Loading...
CR 2014-079 Parking Space Size Variance - Alice Smith Elementary SchoolJuly 30, 2014 Council Report 14-79 PARKING SPACE SIZE VARIANCE — ALICE SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Proposed Action Staff recommends the following motion: adopt Resolution 14-39, approving a parking space size variance on the former Minnetonka Mills Road to the south of Alice Smith Elementary School. At the Zoning and Planning meeting, Mr. McNeil moved and Mr. Firth seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ14-7, recommending approval of a parking space size variance on the former Minnetonka Mills Road to the south of Alice Smith Elementary School. The ]notion was approved unanimously. Overview A few summers ago the intersection of Minnetonka Mills/ Ninth Avenue and Fourth Street was reconstructed. At this time a portion of Minnetonka Mills Road was abandoned as a through street. The School District would like to expand the parking area of Alice Smith onto the I-ormer Minnetonka Mills Road. 43 more parking spaces will be added with tile new parking area. The plan as proposed has 9' x 18' parking spaces; the ordinance requires 9' x 20'. The City "Till have all agreement with the School District for the use of the road. There are mature trees on the south side of the former Minnetonka Mills Road. If the parking lot is moved south, to meet the ordinance requirement for parking spaces size the trees will need to be removed and the parking area will be closer to the residential home on the south. By granting a variance for the parking space size, the trees can remain and the parking area will be farther from the residential area. The sidewalk will be removed along the former Minnetonka Mills Road at this time, but is scheduled to be rerouted and completed in the summer of 2015. Primary Issues to Consider 0 What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? 0 What does the ordinance require? 0 What are the specifics of the applicant's request? 0 What practical difficulties does the property have? 0 What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? !Su ortin, D�oeunieuts Analysis of Issues Site plans Resolution 14-39 Nancy Anderson, AICD City Manner Financial Impact: $ —N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: CR 14-79 Page 2 Primary Issues to Consider What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The subject property is zoned R -1-A, Single and Two -Family High Density. The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Low Density Residential, 0 What does the ordinance require? The required size of a parking space is 9' x 20'; the School District is proposing 9' x 18'. 0 What are the specifics of the applicant's request? The applicant is requesting a two -foot variance to the length of the parking spaces. The applicant will construct a six-foot fence as required on the south side of the new parking area and will add landscaping on the south side of the fence. The landscaping will be a combination of lilacs, dogwoods and junipers. 0 What practical difficulties does the property have? The new state statute requires three standards for the granting of a variance. The three requirements are: I That practical difficulties cited in connection with the granting of a variance means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by an official control; 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property, not created by the landowner; and 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The applicant meets the three requirements to grant a variance. The applicant is trying to save trees and keep the parking area as far away from the abutting residential property as possible. Surrounding uses The site is Surrounded by residential on the west, and South and Chapel View to the east. Alice Smith Elementary School is to the north. 0 What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Ms. Anderson reviewed the proposed pal -king lot and the reasons for the variance. The Commission was concerned about the removal of the sidewalk and that it might not be constructed in 2015. No one appeared on this item. CRL 4-79 Page 3 Alternatives 1. Approve the parking space size variance. By approving the variance applicant will be able to construct the parking lot as proposed. 2. Deny the parking space size variance. By denying the parking space size variance, the applicant will not be able to construct the parking lot as proposed. If the City Council considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further in -formation. If the City Council indicates that further information is needed, the itern should be continued. RESOLUTION NO: 14-39 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING A PARKING SPACE VARIANCE ON THE FORMER MINNETONKA MILLS ROAD ADJACENT TO 801 MINNETONKA MILLS ROAD WHEREAS, an application for Variance VN14-1 has been made by Neil Tessier on behalf of School District #270, and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: I That an application for Variance VN14-1 was made by Neil Tessier on behalf of the Hopkins School District #270 on July 8, 2014; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed notice, held a meeting on the application and reviewed such application on July 29, 2014: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of the City staff were considered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKIN S, MINNESOTA, that application for Variance VN 14-1 to reduce the parking space size from 9' x 20' to 9 x 18' for the proposed parking lot is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the applicant does have a circumstance peculiar and unique to the parcel because of the placement of the existing trees. 2. There exists a practical difficulty because if the proposed parking space size was required, the parking area would move closer to the abutting residential home. 3. That the variance will not alter the essential character of the Surrounding area. BASED ON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the City Council of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, hereby determines that the literal enforcement of the 9' x 20' parking space Size Would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the subject property, that granting of the requested variance to the extent necessary to compensate for such practical difficulties is in keeping with the intent of the Hopkins City Code, and that the variance of two feet is reasonable. Adopted this 4th day of August 2014 Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor offlog&W Amy Domeier, City Clerk CONSTRUCTION DOCU ISD 270 PARKING LOT CON la,ICE SMITH EL EMENTA R Y SCPm,, 00L---,, GENERAL NOTES: PLAN INDEX: ALICESMITH ^ ' ELEMENTARY SCHOO/ �� Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE Engineering Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS ANNEFS SURVEYORS LANO�S AP AEH�ICHI CIS • E NftONMENTAI SCIENFSTS SIO (6511 a52-0909 Jar/ .5I2o ( al uHJ-J39/ Arkansas * California * Georgia * Louisiana * Minnesota * Pennsylvania * Texas LEGAL DESCRIPTION. EASEMENTINFO UTILITYINPORMATION N—MAT ON AND 1� IT NG D-1— —1 1 T IUR— T"T 'TT .. .......... T, T11 11111111111 111 I'RTIS� 11— 111 1� T11 IIIIT —All— IN111,11 11 � sl IIIAI "' ly — A" A, DOC NO RT"I,—�TTI III I I 111-1 11A, �TNAI�Cl" niol IAIII N 1� 'I'll 11— .111111 �R . -IT 1, N 'NITII.—T—Al ISI �'D —,T.1 T��, IL �Tll, ��,�TA,�Tl, N. TITI 111 C �O 4:1 s Ro ki . ....... I, ,�4 -A/ , u. .0 LEGEND CATII��A,11,1'1-1 11. ...... S� 11C.. 11 ATI 0 S NORTH I ADDI,,�'lAIP",,"'V.A"",INl�,xA"AVNAGIL�C'�LL"A�,A�,�IN —_ N. 41H STREET =ITIIILLI�ll � , A�,�TL. "I N. 4TH ST. Y'xo,r NOTII IIILIC ITIIII I—C ITIIITI IIN S—M SI -All S11111 -1 pENCHMARK INFO: IE— D I'll nvT 'A' 1-1 nil11 T 11 N� 1-11 -1—virnTs, avty"TE I I -T I -T— IT—IL oerverv�r enesiaw warEs cervr_w,� Er+osio>J mores c�mro Engineering Associates, Inc. EROSION CONTROL PLAN -SCAPE NDTES -ff-P-ETAIL, 6618 CON'RETE fEMPOHAFV—Si LT L[NCf "'❑ SA—gil—llg, PLLC Cng n g A ' tes, Inc Ali- Smith Elementa, Schovl m7" Rld DETAILS - a�