The URL can be used to link to this page

VI.1. Accept Blake Road Corridor Study Final Report; Stanley (CR 2015-066)��. � ,��; c �m�m ��r��' • •� May 19, 2015 Council Report 2015-066 ACCEPT BLAKE ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL REPORT CITY PROJECT 2013-06 Proposed Action Staff recommends the following motion: adopt Resolution 2015-045, Resolution accepting the Blake Road Corridor Study and the recommendations of the final report. Overview Over the last year, staff has been working with agencies and stakeholders who have an interest in the reconstruction of Blake Road to come to a consensus on recommendations that will serve as a basis for future improvements in the corridor. The study has been completed and the results are now submitted to Council for review and further action. A brief summary of the recommendations and issues is provided in this report, and an Executive Summary of the final report is attached. The project consultant, WSB & Associates, will be accompanying staff to present the report in detail to the City Council. Primarv Issues to Consider ■ Study Summary and Recommendations ■ Public Input ■ Estimated Project Costs and Funding ■ Project Schedule ■ Staff Recommendation Supportin� Information ■ Blake Road Corridor Study ■ Blake Road Final Preferred Layout ■ Resolution 2015-045 �,., � �� r �.� wW � �� ., ,.. ��.��.��,�� Nate Stanley, P.E., City Engineer Financial Impact: Budgeted: Y/N _Y_ Source: _ _Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): CIP _ Notes: Council Report 2015-066 Page 2 ANALYSIS OF ISSUES Study Summary and Recommendations Several different factors and goals served as both the basis for determining options and also in the scoring of the various options in the evaluation process. Considerations for traffic operations, safety, pedestrian and bicycle comfort, access, construction impacts, economic development potential, environmental impacts, cost, and long term maintenance all played a role. Between Interlachen Boulevard and Excelsior Boulevard the road section is recommended to remain a two-lane section with on-road bike lanes. A sidewallc is recommended to be added on the west side of the roadway from Maloney Avenue to Excelsior Boulevard. Between Excelsior Boulevard and Trunk Highway 7(TH 7) the recommended cross-section for the road is a four-lane divided roadway with a multi-use trail on both sides of Blake Road. An additional left turn lane is proposed at Excelsior Boulevard to shorten peak traffic queues and allow for full access to remain at Westside Village. An additional left turn lane is proposed at TH 7 to mitigate existing queuing issues. Left and right turn lanes are provided as needed along the length of the corridor. Signalized intersection control is recommended to remain where it currently exists. Marked pedestrian crossings away from fully controlled intersections are proposed at high pedestrian traffic locations. It is recommended that at these crossings, rapid rectangular flashing beacons be installed, which have been found to have a very high compliance rate and positive affect for pedestrians. North of TH 7 the recommended cross-section is a four-lane divided roadway with a multi-use trail on both sides of Aquila Avenue. The southbound Aquila Avenue to westbound TH 7 ramp is recommended for removal, which would require traffic to make a right at the controlled intersection of Aquila Avenue and TH 7. Traffic lanes through the corridor are recommended to be narrowed to 10.8-feet in width, which is considered the minimum able to accommodate a bus or truck Boulevard space to accommodate landscape and hardscape treatments was considered to enhance separation of vehicular traffic from the trail and create a more pedestrian and bicycle friendly environment. Public Input Three public open houses were held over the last year, each at a different stage of the study process. The most recent open house was held Apri120, 2015 at the Blake School. The final recommendations of the study were presented to those in attendance. Comments on the proposed layout and road section were generally positive. A couple residents did have questions on whether the number of traffic lanes could be reduced. Staff discussed the reasons for the recommendation of the 4-lane section versus another alternative with those who had questions. The item that generated the most controversy was the sidewallc extension along the west side of Blake Road into Edina. Over the course of the study, the project team also participated in other public events to engage residents and property owners. Last fall, project team members attended an outdoor movie event in Cottageville Park, held a separate meeting at Westside Village for residents and management, attended a Blake Road Corridor Collaborative meeting, and met with Blake School staff. Council Report 2015-066 Page 3 Estimated Project Costs and Funding The total estimated project cost, including construction, engineering, administration, and contingency is $18,446,300. The budget amounts and funding sources for the project are shown in the following table. Budget Proposed Amount Fundin Estimated Project Cost $18,446,300 Hennepin County 10,182,200 City of Hopkins Roadway 2,235,200 City of Hopkins Utilities 1,750,000 City of Hopkins Right-of-Way 1,000,000 City of Hopkins Utility Burial 375,000 City of St. Louis Park 2,706,400 City of Edina 197,500 Total $18,446,300 $18,446,300 The total cost to the City of Hopkins is currently estimated to be $5,360,200. Costs are itemized in the table above for roadway, utility replacement, right-of-way, and overhead utility burial. The city funds will be included in the 2016-2020 Capital Improvements Program. The City is in the process of applying for outside funding sources. This summer applications for Federal funding will be submitted, which if secured would work against the project total. Staff will provide an update later this year on the outcome of the grant applications. Project Schedule Council accepts Blake Road Corridor Study City enters into County cooperative agreement Select project design consultant Environmental Process Property Acquisition Private Utility Relocation Complete Construction Plans Begin Construction Complete Construction Staff Recommendation May 19, 2015 Summer 2015 Summer 2015 Fall 2015 — Spring 2016 Spring 2016 — Fall 2017 Spring 2017 — Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Spring 2018 Fall 2019 Staff recommends accepting the Blake Road Corridor Study Final Report. CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2015-045 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BLAKE ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FINAL REPORT WHEREAS, the City of Hopkins, City of Edina, City of St. Louis Park, and Hennepin County have partnered to analyze the current and future needs of Blake Road and, WHEREAS, the study area along Blake Road extends from Interlachen Boulevard in Edina to north of State Trunk Highway 7 into St. Louis Park, WHEREAS, Blake Road is County State Aid Highway No. 20 between Excelsior Boulevard (County State Aid Highway No. 3) and State Trunk Highway 7, WHEREAS, recommendations for the improvement of Blake Road have been made and are contained in the Blake Road Corridor Study Final Report, WHEREAS, the recommendations of the Blake Road Corridor Study will be used as the basis of design for future improvement and reconstruction of Blake Road, WHEREAS, Hennepin County has also requested that the City of Hopkins participate in the right-of-way costs associated with this project and that the city agree to enter into a Right-of- Way Agreement and a Construction Cooperative Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota that: 1. The Blake Road Corridor Study Final Report is hereby accepted. 2. The City of Hopkins agrees to enter into a Right-of-Way Agreement and a Construction Cooperative Agreement which will define financial responsibilities for the construction items, right-of-way, design, construction management and other related items associated with said project. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 19�h day of May 2015. : ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor 5/13/2oi5 Blake Road Corridor Stud y Final Report �:�� ' �'��' S�. Louis Park �iLy of` IIapkin� �� I N N E s o r n Blake Road Corridor Study Final Report Blake Road Corridor Study Final Report Executive Summary Purpose of study The Blake Road corridor is expected to experience significant change over the next 2o years. A major catalyst for this change will be the opening of the Green Line Extension (Southwest LRT) and construction of a station at Blake Road. The LRT line is expected to open in 2oi9. In recognition of this change, the City of Hopkins and its partners initiated the Blake Road Corridor Study to address opportunities to: • Provide better transportation opportunities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and bus transit users • Provide better connections and access to the planned light rail station at Blake Road for all modes • Provide better connections and access to adjacent neighborhoods, commercial nodes, schools, and recreational facilities • Provide transportation infrastructure to support redevelopment in and near the corridor that will enhance economic growth, community connectivity, and residential diversity. As part of the study, the project team analyzed existing and future conditions, developed alternatives to improve conditions in the corridor, evaluated alternatives, and recommended a design concept for transportation improvements in the corridor. The public and affected agencies were involved throughout the study process. Study area The project study area includes Blake Road between Interlachen Boulevard to Trunk Highway (TH) � and Aquila Avenue between TH � and 36th Street. Figure ii shows the location of the study area. The study corridor spans three cities: Edina (Interlachen Boulevard to Spruce Road), Hopkins (Spruce Road to TH �), and St. Louis Park (TH � to 36th Street). While the name of the street changes at TH �, the study area is referred to as the Blake Road Corridor for the purpose of this study. Study participants The study was led by the City of Hopkins and guided by a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) with representatives from the following agencies: • City of Hopkins • City of Edina • City of St. Louis Park • Hennepin County • SWLRT Project Office • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) • Three Rivers Park District • Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) i• �. S? r - -° � �' � � "� � 'w' ia`� V € : � t ar^r ., s � ...#- � . a � � - J . - �'" I w 7- .r F� �y q,. � yd ,y .,_ r+f'�.^"� 'a� . " *dM.��" f{��°X re ! }�j,. �,� �.-�t r � � ! } i . � s -�.- y•;� ��.#�} r� 4 3 t�„�F�4 �:�'�r1 rt ..�'� t. �� . 'ffi'& � �F i �c;.- r `S� ( t�.`�'tt' Fn" � - � 1 , � �., ±� � 6 S �.�- I" � �� ^, � � y p i ` � � �i F^,°� � � � x�. '�� + S •y'�, ` 4 * e� d �I .FF Tr+ F$r ti.�- ' y i � � I 4 �il� (� .,�. � ,.., � 9:��Cn7 — ,'"• ti 'x.,," Y = '� j � ,� r ' M �•��, ' �� "..a � - �- i�� . r�..M '�y� � ; � � � ' � r-n � { �. �l � a -�^ -� : � ' �"'�r' � � � r �,�' R . '. � , �, ' � ' . KNOLLWOOD � Y r � •, �" i � 1 � �r,IR�'� p . , ' :� .:�,. �- � ?yf J � �:, . 0• '. . . MALL � r�. !" I y.•.� � . � . . . . - t " . , . �P pz ;r ,, � _ � . � I. _ �� . .��{ �� • Y .... �� ..s. r , � d} � �t � � �T�.^�+--, �.��^� � ��" `ES�i� � k ,,rr. fi ./`cl' i ;� �-„'2 �� p� t� ... ,� r .d I �'� �-s r�M`� ,t � s3'�, [rq ''�"`1 '',E { � .`, �s�yr' ' �,-''�: �> : �� ,- � �E r-�„" �` :, , '"' - . � � ,.. ,r.�. r " � ; f �� f. �-� �`^ �ro ` ^f' ,�` �-�'.. r%'� �' . 1'` r rr . * .j � +" i . �! ;� .,�. � $�� '''-`°'< C�LCZ °�° �� y��11 � „'r� `r �� t � w., , � �ex rr `� �x �(�V�� f ..� �� C°i4��3 �x ��`:,�,P' �d' �' �� . . � � r ;�- ��§E °F+� �'�x'�.a,` ".. ., i r : I �t `�x �i^'F ��'�w�E_,�1� �r � ,r „+ �� -r� �`� 3 -.. . , i�� , �.r��'^��,� �;s^y ,�� , L'�F��`c':ii�GiC-- � �,�j � E `[� � � p �' ,� s �,,._ �a' �G� r' ' r i fif ��' y � � ��, !,� ��f �� 8 �.��.� � � : ��-•� ��,;,��t� -� ; ,��," �=: �` r; ,� f' F';�"�^1 xc:1,. ;' ��..�.�. � FrkT �t_t7"' . , , . ,�ra`,� � r', �� •� �1?Y� �.ttt'et1' ,...._ . • �'r ,�,e�e� � �., r ttr '. r �,:P fx�"A � � � �� ' °" p �� ?T {R�r��`� �� . `�� e�� 13im;; �'�,*.7^'T".� i,f i � �� tai�on .. j/ , . (` -� ,� / ,�';� �` �RT 5 �� G'� � �G � `">�` � � �°�-�a ��..., .� � �_, _ � ' � �� .�,F � _ _� _ p � ,;: I f � � / �•" ��"Y ! +�I� � � �� i �f� � � r� � w,'�v �— �� a � a e � �' } �� T�'u'n �� t °r t,..,_ y,� `t-oyr^,� r� �'L;,� E o'�/ �4 F�� L�c Tf�� r i'�i b r ', � i � : �'� T � ' : �� r�� r. � e . �} � p• �`�r {f' •f .�' � 4 � . � r ^'I - ..�. , g Y f�:�,-�., . �TM" y +Tr+�'�5 �T�...y� p ` 1 r �^�i.F-� `.�° ,f' � � ' � a wv,a ��, � � �� .� � . R'F _ "+ < <• �`' j ,/ ! � . r e?: y � � d ''r .L r � '�'i ,� �] r ,lcT-� � .a-a .� � ♦ L"S s i,11"� .+si`t '�` „�'r� r y�.'i` sA� M'. a � Q1�� .a .� ' ; r ,:.: � a rr ..�.rt � r � , �{ � � ';'F� ,. p� �. .�. -�_ �A � o• a �-_._��- ..r.n � � � R - yy �' "�V ° '-�il � � 'T�1'• � �r_ .. w4 r" � f ' g��. l 1 aloney Avenue, LEGEND w �- ., �r�,� _ p �n �,r .. } IF,� f p' �. a � a" r �.�-Y� �I'� �'�F 'fY+� ��- , � � � q.,;s�.��. � r � .. t %, � r � _ ��. ,� .�, + � �°� � � h` � 7 . - i� � � � , r::' �: '�� 4tF x ��^ � �` �:"' g- w'� - � v ��; - __ � r ; a' ;� , ,a r�, �,,, �` t y 'a , ,a� P �"' r ; *`°r",�;�r � :*{ ^•,. ;�p �r�._� ,��: �( 3 � g'� ��' " ,,}� ."` 4 '� �i�.a' .�+ �:`;j � -`.'".��__ � w,.: �f'� �� .. ' y� �" ��:� � y �..t, � , ,� . � ,�: �> ��aL�xa � ' �"'.,`, - � :�'•:�; ;� e � . ? - .t a ' � � . p+F"'7� w �i ,1E_a �.�:1 >. }� t Y.:_Jy • i'P �' � �P r � �� r ' ra '� � �r='�T A '��, � g�; �' . t'�� . �4; p 1�, � ., . �y. 4 . ' `� �� e . . "^ _ '� g�.�� '� i,;d .j} p. « t�.. . s. ..� _ _. � . - . a. � � t � — Bituminous Path — Existing Regional Trail — On Street Bike Lane .—� Railroad Project Study Area Existing Sidewalks --- Proposed Trail �Municipal Boundary — SWLRT Blake Road Corridor Study Figure i I: StudyArea Blake Road Corridor Study Final Report Study goals Early in the study process, the TAC developed study goals to guide the development and evaluation of alternatives for the Blake Road Corridor. The goals of the study included the following: • Facilitate access to the future Southwest LRT Blake Road station • Create a roadway that is comfortable, safe, and functional for all transportation modes: pedestrian, bicycle, motor vehicle, freight, and transit • Support redevelopment and make the roadway a place that is comfortable and active • Protect and enhance natural resources near the roadway including Minnehaha Creek • Improve connections between the roadway and nearby neighborhoods, parks, and trails • Improve connections to Minnehaha Creek and nearby trails Public involvement The public involvement process included open houses, neighborhood meetings, a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), and meetings with elected officials. Three open house meetings were held as part of the planning process. Notice of each open house was posted on city websites and mailed to residents and property owners along the corridor. Input from each meeting was documented and provided to the TAC. The project team reached out to neighborhood residents and property owners through additional meetings and attendance at events. Project staff attended an event in Cottageville Park, met with Westside Village Apartments management and residents, and met with representatives from the Blake Road Corridor Collaborative and the Blake School. Throughout the project, the City of Hopkins maintained a project webpage for the Blake Road Corridor Study. The webpage listed meeting announcements and materials from each open house. Edina and St. Louis Park also posted meeting announcements on their city websites. A TAC was convened at the beginning of the project to ensure that all interested agency stakeholders were involved in the study process. The TAC was composed of staff from the agency partners listed under Study Participants. The TAC met monthly to guide the study process, review and discuss technical analyses, provide direction on alternatives development and evaluation, and work together to determine the preferred alternative. The project team presented study progress to elected officials at several stages during the project. Staff provided updates at Edina, St. Louis Park, and Hopkins City Council Work Sessions in August and September 2oi4. Staff also presented the preferred alternative at an April i4, 2oi5 Hopkins City Council Work Session. Evaluation Process The project team developed several alternatives to address the goals of the project. These alternatives addressed roadway width and number of lanes, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, pedestrian crossings, and intersection design. The alternatives were evaluated based on the following criteria: Blake Road Corridor Study Final Report • Traffic operations: Ability to provide sufficient capacity for the existing and forecast volumes on Blake Road and cross streets. • Safety and conflict points: Ability to reduce crashes on Blake Road and minimize conflict points between corridor users. • Pedestrian and bicycle crossings - delay, safety, and directness: Measure of the distance of pedestrian and bicycle crossings, safety of crossings, and ability to directly link pedestrians and bicyclists to destinations in the corridor. • Bicycle facility safety and comfort for likely users: Ability for the bicycle facility to be comfortable and safe for a wide range of bicyclists. • Pedestrian safety and comfort: Measure of the amount of separation the facility provides between pedestrians, vehicles, and bicyclists. • Business/Residential Access: Measure of how many vehicle movements are preserved to and from businesses and residences on Blake Road. • Right of way impacts — Roadway cross-section width: Measure of how much right of way impacts are anticipated. • Economic development: Related to right of way impacts, access, traffic operations, and bicycle and pedestrian enhancements. • Construction cost: Estimated construction cost based on width of roadway. • Maintenance costs and ease of maintenance: Measure of how easily the bicycle and pedestrian facilities can be maintained. • Environmental: Ability to minimize and enhance environmental impacts adjacent to the roadway. Recommendations The evaluation of alternatives led to the following recommendations for the corridor. These recommendations are broken out by segment. Interlachen to Excelsior Boulevard Figure ia shows the preferred alternative for Interlachen to Excelsior Boulevard. The recommended cross-section in this segment has two lanes with on-road bike lanes and sidewalk on the west side. The primary improvement in this section is the addition of a sidewalk on the west side of Blake Road. The sidewalk would provide a facility for pedestrians from the residential areas south of Excelsior Boulevard, and provide connection to Excelsior Boulevard, the future Blake Road LRT station and other areas on Blake Road north of Excelsior Boulevard. It is recommended to maintain the existing bike lanes on Blake Road south of Excelsior Boulevard. Existing and projected traffic volumes are low enough that the bike lane will continue to be a comfortable facility for many bicyclists. Excelsior Boulevard to TH 7 Figure i3 shows the preferred alternative for Blake Road between Excelsior Boulevard and TH �. The recommended cross-section in this segment is a four lane divided roadway with multi-use iv • EXIST --------------------------------------- —f� �----_�;�� I � i ; _ -- �. _ �I ` Spruce Rd r � - � �� ;S". �.'$: -, .. ' - ' ` � � t�:�. � �~ I a • 'I ` d `. � � Belmore Ln �, 7 - 7 :: �r `' I I,.. . � � � F � � Y m a. ..� i• � ' . '+�.. Maloney Ave n �� { � U � -�,�R - .R � � n : r �;; , �. � � ' r' - ° '' _ � � . < �+• � -�` 4 � 'T_ �. �k^ , - 4 _ . � � y �'. ` "� "� �a,:`?� � ' � . K / � , � �_' �� ,,,�" � v . .8,� ra 'A.�, . � . y*�'- �+,. �. `"_ ,. .� f � r` . �� 4 � . �" : ,�� $ , �,. Waterman Ave r � `,�� . F — T�- . � __\ �J� .. : �� /a � � ` ' �; � �h�� g� d `. � ' i .. r — , I 66' , i It �� i�4� iF. �� _ � r. ��! �� ,, liri �' � ��n-..4� �-�"��" _�-'�",. �- � r A�„� � �, � - F � Blake School Entr _ �� i �� :,� f--=.t �i ��.I I '� If: � rj�� , �- - � I !'I � ' �''' , . "�s. � >. � ��.� �� r � � � �!� � �� . � �� . I, ,; �,i,' � �)� , '�' I � .�� — k ' `u -- ` i \ �1' I i il M �. . �' � —1 !:\� — " �=�� I t o4,ti, EXIST 3 11 I 6' I 6' I 6' I 12' I 12' I 6' � 15' I r5idewalk � Blvd r Exist Thru Lane f Thru Lane f Exist Boulevard Bike Lane Bike Lane LEGEND O Proposed Greenspace I� Proposed Roadway � Proposed Walls / Medians / Curb � Proposed Multiuse Trail O Proposed Bike Lane � Proposed Walk O Proposed Bridge � 1r Proposed Traffic Directional Arrows _ Proposed Crosswalk �� Proposed Signal xxxx Access Closed Figure i2: Preferred Alternative between Blake Road Corridor Study Interlachen and Excelsior Boulevards � _ k � � �' � �,� _ � �`�. _ - � __ �- _. �� J.__ _ ��_.. __ - � ` 1 �` . . _ r_ �` �. 1�'�r f'^��"� .j_f' 4 !`. C�� Tfl'. 1 ��—I � �� .. _ I � I . _ — � . � � � �.I_� _._ I I � 1 - -�— � � " ' Cambridge Street �-� � � �—� � - 6 ' �4 I ' I ? d " � - /: . 's. ;�... .. _ I... _ -�.�_ �,� §S, �' - � I � . � I � � s— ___' sI — ' o . � , II i I I '.— � .. . . . _ — l . I -- `.. _�. . . � ._ I' xf rd St .. �, _ J ��- —.._... .. �I .e .., I � I`{ I I '," �— ` � .__� 6I —r� -. ;,�� ,� . � --- � � � � 4 � � � � ''� ' - . I � I I � � � � �� ` . � � � -� ;�.r � J�� --�'^ ' �f I�I�j� �. �� , ._ � � _ _ , , � :. Pb, r � I I ..�-.�3�� _ HiawathaAve ul A � w�^^ SJ'� I� � �j��M � � # ,�.. �,� K— I — �3 -_ � � . { II � � I I . . — � i -�� _ _ _ r��' , ' � ., ^ �',, � �, .� _� _- ` ;� �— `�� "� � �� '� -�� J'�. � - �� \ � 23.33" � z� � �_� 10' � 11.33, I 2� Multipurpose Buffer �� Trail �-- r -- ,�y_ �.� �; r�'ab r � �e .-'� - • �i:�.r.r � �`�Ke�"�� - � x_. �?C,�� /� ,4" -� ��. �l . �:f � . - � , ��_, -'� . �: � �- � •r� �. � r`,F � `4 -� I,�'!" `�a. � ' . i � . - 4. �` __. � �r' ,.t�� .s �� 1 '- �,, _ " �s��S� - - �� - --- - -- - - j j Excelsior BI d -j` � ! i_.�� __. i'� I � �� r ! - '�i'1, � . I . _.+wr`�.i I 05.86' 59.20' LEGEND O Proposed Greenspace O Proposed Roadway � Proposed Walls / Medians / Curb � Proposed Multiuse Trail O Proposed Bike Lane � Proposed Walk O Proposed Bridge � i r Proposed Traffic Directional Arrows _ Proposed Crosswalk 1�� Proposed Signal zzzz Access Closed -��- -��, , �. , . : � �--�•- 1U.8' I I{1.$' I lZ' I 14.8' � lp.fi I 2' I 11.33' Thf4/ Lane ~�� Thru LanP �� Tum Lane „rn Thru 3.ane Thri; Lane� �y�� Buffer Existin� Right-of-Way Varies SS' ta 95' 23.33' lp` Multipur�ose Trail �--"1 2' Figure i3: Preferred Alternative between Blake Road Corridor Study Excelsior Boulevard and Highway 7 Blake Road Corridor Study Final Report trail on both sides of Blake Road. The io foot multi-use path on both sides of Blake Road will be a combined facility for bikes and pedestrians. Landscape and hardscape treatments were considered in this section during the evaluation phase to make sure that adequate space was provided to accommodate the urban design treatments that will create a friendly environment for pedestrians and bicyclists. Design and treatments along the boulevard and the multi-use trail will be developed further during the final design phase of this project. It is also recommended that the City of Hopkins consider zoning requirements for a green buffer strip between the multi-use trail and the adjacent properties to enhance the bicycle and pedestrian corridor and separate it from adjacent parking lots and buildings. It is also recommended that the overhead power lines in the corridor be put underground to further enhance the pedestrian and bicycle corridor. Detailed consideration was given to pedestrian crossings and intersections in the corridor. Intersection and crossing recommendations are summarized below: • Excelsior Boulevard intersection: Recommendation to provide two southbound left turn lanes to provide adequate storage between the median opening at the West Side Village access and Excelsior Boulevard. Combined through and right-turn lanes on southbound Blake Road and northbound Blake Road are recommended in order to minimize crossing distance on Blake Road at the intersection. • Median Opening at West Side Village Access: Full access recommended at this location to support existing development and future redevelopment. • Pedestrian Crossing between Excelsior Boulevard and Railroad Tracks: A marked pedestrian crossing with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) is recommended north of the West Side Village Access where there is a full width median. • Cedar Lake Trail Crossing: Three Rivers Park District is proposing a grade separation at the Cedar Lake Trail crossing of Blake Road. It is recommended that no marked at grade crossing be provided where the Cedar Lake trail intersects with the Blake Road multi-use trail. • ana Street Intersection: A signalized intersection is recommended. The 2nd Street signal will be interconnected with the railroad signal to avoid trapping vehicles on the LRT/railroad tracks. • Lake Street Intersection: Side-street stop control is recommended. A marked pedestrian crossing with RRFB is recommended on the north side of the intersection. • Minnehaha Creek Bridge: It is recommended that the Minnehaha Creek Bridge be retained. • Oxford Street: It is recommended that the median extend through the intersection of Oxford Street and Blake Road. Oxford Street would have right in and right out access on Blake Road. Businesses on the west side of Blake Road would also have right in and right out access. • Cambridge Street: No change in the lane configuration or traffic control is proposed at this intersection. The intersection of Cambridge Street and Blake Road will be signalized. vii • Blake Road Corridor Study Final Report • TH �: The intersection of Blake Road/Aquila Avenue and TH � is recommended to be modified to add a second left turn lane for northbound left turns on Blake Road and southbound left turns on Aquila Avenue. In addition the southbound free right on Aquila Avenue will be modified so that right-turns are made closer to TH �. Modification of the southbound free right will be completed as part of a separate MnDOT project. A right-turn lane will be added for southbound right turns. It is recommended that the radius on all corners of the intersection be reduced to reduce right turn speeds and minimize pedestrian crossing distances. TH 7 to 36th Street Figure i4 shows the preferred alternative for Aquila Avenue between TH � and 36th Street. The recommended cross-section in this segment is a four-lane divided roadway with multi-use trail on both sides of Aquila Avenue. The roadway section in this segment will have a minimum 4 median at left turn lanes, io.8 foot through lanes, a 4 foot median, a � foot boulevard and a 8 foot trail. This section will require acquisition of some right of way. No specific recommendations have been made regarding landscape or hardscape in this section The 36th Street intersection is recommended to be signalized and will have the same lane configuration as the current intersection. The 37th Street intersection is currently signalized. A roundabout was considered as an alternative at this intersection. The City of St. Louis Park will continue to evaluate both alternatives for this intersection. Cost Estimate The estimated construction costs for the improvements are approximately $ii.� million in current dollars (2oi5). A 20% contingency is included in the construction costs. The estimate includes approximately $2.3 million for engineering and administration costs. The estimate does not currently include any costs for city utilities, undergrounding the overhead power lines or for right-of-way. The estimated construction costs are based on conceptual design and will change as more detail design is completed. Next Steps The recommendations in this study represent a concept design for the corridor that addresses the goals of the various stakeholders. There is significant additional design that is required before final costs and right of way can be determined. Additional study is needed of the utilities in the corridor to determine what should be replaced and the location for the utilities. As indicated earlier more detail also needs to be developed for the urban design elements of the corridor. The next step in the engineering process is to complete final design for the corridor which will help establish final construction limits and right of way needs. Environmental Review This project is subject to state environmental regulations and potentially subject to federal environmental regulations depending on the funding sources. Either a Project Memo or Environmental Assessment would be required if the project receives federal funding. It is recommended that a state EAW be completed for the project. viii • — — I — I I ____ —�. " ; �� ,;,�� :, �— •t � . �l � •�,: -� _�: � �. ;`� � - ._ ---...---=,--,.� _ . �. •• 36th St W 4 ,�,�,, ' 6; — - - - - - - ��' n �-��--�,. �"-�{��_ ,. r. _�� \ b+' ' ,� '� , ,��'.5 � �. - , �tim ,�ia.::. � �l�r i! .l�f�3 �,l * � U , � '�` ` � ". 4��f l4 . ''�' `�k:# • k f , �-,� f r � �' + � � � � ' �r � r .-v- � ` �M1� i �'� 1 ' , ,r r � �'_ f e r � � ,� R �� r,: ; fi'�.' i, , '� � r�� Q"� � #S x , �' �� , � (� � R �f�' (y� ' � � �p, . � \. � �3^ ; ..°; Y:� A /�. r K . �. ' , ` � .. r � � T1. ._ { f P f �. . � . �, � . . . . .� ,. .,.�'.� Ir. — . . . -. .: � i-� � . .. �_�. � . � f: a3 � f '��` � �, . � � k 4_� �� ,��` �. � .I?� �1'�r fi �:: . ,� � ��` . �'�Y,, �`�' �•'�• . .�% �!'�, �y. E�\,. �/ � �f� t� ��!� �'�''� �'-'.• .. , ':�. , � � i r�,, '��P � f t� � fr 6 i� � ~.�'4 � � p' N � . . r�*��t��„� �¢1� � . � Ir;t s�=� �� _ � ' .� a `11 ` •�?; ,i . , _ ,;e ` � --- tW ��_,4 g 'r _ g7th 5 _ .�-�'4��' . h .,.� �,..'k. �:-� h _ \ � � �f �� L TI ./� _ �;,yp.. '"'�� a4�� . ;i�`•'�y-'�'��'. e,s: � Y�t � � , '� � � �� _ � - sY F � ,p �, � _.--- � . ��`�- . - ---� _ _ ------ � -- .. �~ t �� r._ 'r .. _ �— . .� � : �,.,�, , _ �, � � ..� - �.�, � '" —' � . F t t. � — ---- ,T � : _ _ -- � � � -- - . ��Y�ti � ` 1 - - 4. , � ��yti}.• 1 �' . _- = �� f � '! n_ � ' ,� \ ♦ c1� / _ a ewns. � , � �� r - � � - �,� ', � 'ir ."�� I � � ef � �- _ - -- �o t�. - ��_ _ � _ ._— � ' a ��_,o .:��.� � � • � . — m � rr r � I 1. -- � � ��` � 1 � 4- -- �. .� ---.,_� --w � ', �r 97.2' 17' 63.2' LEGENC7 � Propased Greenspace �] Proposed Rv2dway � Proposed Walls F Medians 1 Cur6 Ir Propnsed Mulliuse Trai1 � Propased Bike Lane � Propnsed Walk � Propased Brldge ti j � Propused Traffic 6irectional Arrnws � � Proposed Crasswalk � ��r Propased Signal ,�= Accrss ClasEd 17' v��,� �ip �,�►Y � � ��w..�. �+�� l� — '� � � 4' 8' 7' I 2' I 10.8' 10.8' I 10' 1�1 � 4' 1 Il I 10.8' I 10.8' I 2' I 7' I 8' Multipurpose I Buffer Thru/7um Lane I Thru Lane Tum Lane Median �� Thru Lane Thru/Tum Lane Buffer Multipurpose Trail Trail I Existing Right-of-Way Varies 75' to 129' I I I �--�I Blake Road Corridor Study Figure i4: Preferred Alternative between Highway 7 and 36th Street Blake Road Corridor Study Final Report Funding Sources A variety of funding sources will be utilized to construct this project. Local funding sources could include: • City of Hopkins: Local utilities and undergrounding of overhead utilities on Blake Road between Excelsior Boulevard and TH � • City of St. Louis Park: Aquila Avenue Improvements • City of Edina: Sidewalk improvements in Edina • Hennepin County: Blake Road between Excelsior Boulevard and TH � • MnDOT: TH � intersection — Potentially Cooperative Agreement Funds In addition, federal funding sources will be pursued and could include: TIGER Grant: Federal funding for multi-modal transportation projects that generate economic development and improve access to reliable, safe, and affordable transportation. The minimum federal funding per project is $io million. Transportation Alternatives Program: Federal funds administered through the Metropolitan Council that could be used for multi-use trail and aesthetic enhancements. Coordination with other projects The design of this project needs to be coordinated with several other projects that will be designed and potentially constructed in the same time frame. This includes: • Southwest LRT and Blake Road Station Area • Cedar Lake Regional Trail grade separation • Cold Storage Site Development Plans • Highway � intersection improvements • City of Hopkins local street reconstruction x• Clt� of Hopl<lr�� H�r�r��plr� Cour�t�g Mlr�r��o�� RpprOved b� ROJEGT LOGATION OUNTYo HENNEPIN ISTRICTm METRO , �,9 Ni i i i v,�9 N 29 N ,�„N e za w PROJECT '�'" �ocaTloN RzzW Rz4W HENNEP]N COUNTY coso�oHo Noo XXX ��YouT Noo PRo�ECT Noo XX VRCINITY OF �OPKINS & ST �OUIS P�RK FROM EXCE�SIOR B�VD TO TRUNK HIG WRY 7 DQTEe 1ID/14/11 SCQLEe 1"= 1IDID' STQFF QPPROVQL REVISIONS DESIGN SPEED 40 mph THE TRAFFIC VOLUMES SHO _ � ARE:ADT (2023) _ THE ALIGNMENTS AND GRAD SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE TENTATIVE ANO SUBJECT T CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE �EGEND Proposed Roadway B��lt Over Inplac Proposed Roadway Proposed Isl�nds / Medi�ns Proposed Shoulder Proposed Bituminous Path Proposed Concrete W�lk Proposed Retdining W�lls Proposed Driveways Existing Right of Way Proposed Right of W�y Proposed Temporary Easement --- Rpproximate Construction Limits Proposed Totdl R/W Rcquisition �! Driveway Remnant Rrea (To Become P Partial Taking XXXX Rccess Closed �RYOUT HISTORYo e Roadway s November, 2�14o Submitted �ayout #1 to Hennepin Co �X CONCEPT ON�Y SUBJECT TO CHQNGE WITHOUT NOTICE QPRIL 9,2�15 Exlsting /�orc�sted Tr�f f ic Uolumes Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Peak Hour Traffic Volumes xxx -mtavoi�mes � �� X xxx -za�avoi�mes �� A' xxx -mtavoi�mes �� 1� (xxx�-zossvommes aa aa a` � (xxx�-sossvommes a` ¢` ¢a � �xxx)-saasvoi�mes ¢a a' aa � �� so �aa� AM � �� as �sa� AM Q ��'� N� � zs �zs� AM � � 35 (85� PM � � 195 429 PM � L 20 (207 PM � � �� 792 (97fi) PM � � ~ 539 (682) PM � � ~ 0 (0) PM % 46 (192) AM )I 15 (15) AM y� 54 (156) AM )I 51 (56) AM Y 100 `I01 PM � I� 15 (15) PM Q 33 (1111 PM I� 5 (5) PM � 164 (2371 PM I� 74 (110) PM (6 ( Ufi42 (78fi) AM 551 (732) AM 0 (0) AM 1059 (1186) PM� m 839 (939) PM �� m o �o� PM � � �5 �5I PM � � Q 40 �23) PM � � 1 r N 183 (190 PM � � 1 r � 1 � a I I N I a� Qa a� = aa aa aa = aa aa Qa a a - - U - - U - � ao �.y o � am u' Excelsior Blvd Excelsior Blvd Hill Street Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Peak Hour Traffic Volumes xxx -zo�avowmes �� X xxx -za�avaiumes �� X xxx -zo�avawme: �� N (XXX)-2o35Volumes ¢a ¢a Qa � (XXX�-2u35Volumes aa aa aa 1 (XXX)-2o35Volumes ¢a aa ¢a � V � � � Q�` Ma Mo I� 2 (108) AM Q �� ^ `� I` 12 (6) AM Q � �� c� IL 23 (23) AM � � 0 (52) PM �f L 7 15 PM � L 1b (1b) PM 1 (3) AM 8 (8) AM � �— 0 (20) PM � ~ 4 (5) PM � ~ 14 (14) PM � 31 (1327) PM � I� 1 (40) PM (6 39 (9)) PM � I� 45 (57) PM (6 214 (274) PM � I� 20 (50) PM 1 (3) AM 1 (5) AM 9 (9) AM m 3 (43) PM � m 6 (8) PM —� m 22 (22) PM � v 59 (125) AM �"� 20 (54) AM �� 59 (59) AM N 142 170 PM � R 1 � N 19 33 PM � R 1 � N 117 177 PM � � 1 � 1 I 1 I I � ¢ aa aa aa ¢ aa an ¢a ¢ aa ¢a au � � — .� � ,-.a �i"' U - U - - U - - na m 2nd Street�NE Lake Street Cambridge Street Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Peak Hour Traffic Volumes xxx .sotavoi�mes �s s s X xxx .sa�avai�mes �s X xxx -zotavai�mes X �xxx�-zossvowmes aa aa aa � (XXX�-2035Volumes aa ¢a ¢a � (XXX)-2035Volumes aa ¢a aa � � ia � °1� n� na mm Qam ^� �� I� 67 (67) AM c� ` IL 17 (17) AM N I� 12 (12) AM N � � 191 (191) PM � L 25 25 PM � L 21 (21) PM LL 1156 (1284) AM 5 (5) AM 67 (67) AM �-1070 (1188) PM � ~ 30 ~ (171) PM Y 141 (141) AM )I 288 261 AM � 8 (8) AM )I 41 (45) AM � 9 (9) AM 772 � 260 (2601 PM I� 336 �394) PM Q 78 (781 PM I� 1fi9 (182) PM Q 43 (431 PM � I� 99 (105) PM 1577 (1751) AM 4 (4) AM 104 (144) AM m 1371 (1522) PM� � 31 (31) PM —� � 241 (240) PM � v 744 (i76) AM �� 65 (72) AM �� 86 (96) AM Q 183 268 PM � R 1 � S 392 407 PM � R 1 � 107 172 PM � R 1 � 1 I 1 I � 1 I �� Q �� Q �� _ ¢a aa ¢a ¢a ¢a ¢a ¢a aa aa U _ _ _ __ _� m� aH Trunk Highway 7 37th Street� 36th Street� CS�H �Bl��e Ro�d) Maloney MU�TIPURPOSE �K Improvements Ave to 37th St W �IN��PRE�ERRED Count� ��YOUT