Loading...
V.1. Public Hearing for Municipal Consent Trunk Highway 169 Improvements, State Project (S.P.) 2772-113; Stanley (CR2015-136) November 2, 2015 Council Report 2015-136 PUBLIC HEARING FOR MUNICIPAL CONSENT TRUNK HIGHWAY 169 IMPROVEMENTS STATE PROJECT (S.P.) 2772-113 Proposed Action Staff recommends the following motion: adopt Resolution 2015-088, Resolution for Layout Approval, Trunk Highway 169 Improvements after public hearing. Overview Earlier this year staff from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) notified the City of Hopkins that plans were being developed to rehabilitate Trunk Highway 169 from Golden Valley to Edina. The proposed project has many components, the largest being reconstruction of the bridge over Nine Mile th Creek, which will cause a full closure of the highway between Bren Road in Minnetonka and 7 Street South in Hopkins during bridge construction. MNDOT has been working with cities that will be affected by the project, and begun public outreach. MNDOT is seeking municipal consent from Hopkins to advance the project. MNDOT is proposing to acquire permanent right-of-way in Hopkins to create a storm water treatment pond for the highway; right-of- way acquisition is a trigger for municipal consent. If MNDOT was not seeking the right-of-way, municipal consent would not be required for the bridge or highway work. Notice of the hearing was advertised publicly per state statute. Staff recommends approval of the layout for S.P. 2772-113, which allows MNDOT to begin right-of-way acquisition activities. MNDOT staff will be at the public hearing to present and answer questions. Supporting Information Municipal Consent Letter and Layout Affidavit of Publication Resolution 2015-088 _________________________________ Nate Stanley, P.E., City Engineer Financial Impact: Budgeted: Y/N _ Source: _ Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): _ Notes: _________________________________________ HPDP / Scoping / Subject Guidance Minnesota Department of Transportation Municipal Consent Contact Steve Ryan, P. E. steve.ryan@state.mn.us Project and Process Guidance Engineer Office of Technical Support 395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 676 St. Paul, MN 55155 (651) 366-4675 Forms For a generic layout-approval resolution for use by a municipality, see Sample Resolution in the Appendix. Threshold Criteria Municipal consent should only be requested from a city if it is required. When Required Municipal approval is required for any trunk highway project that results in any of the following within a municipality: Alters access, Increases or reduces traffic capacity, or Requires acquisition of permanent right-of-way. (Changing capacity means adding or reducing the number of through lanes. For example, adding auxiliary lanes is not a change in capacity). Exceptions Municipal consent is NOT required (regardless of impacts to access, capacity, or R/W) for projects needed for any of the following: Regulate traffic, or Install traffic control devices, or Other safety measures The term “other safety measures” refers to traffic safety measures. For example, the addition of a turn lane is a traffic safety measure; the replacement of a structurally-deficient or fracture-critical bridge is not. 1 of 5 Municipal Consent HPDP / Scoping / Subject Guidance Mn/DOT Also, maintenance activities do not trigger the need for municipal consent. Examples Permanent Easements require (such as Drainage Easements) municipal consent (because they take permanent right-of-way). Roundabouts are used for traffic regulation and as a safety measure, and thus are exceptions that do not require Municipal Consent even if they involve permanent right-of-way taking. Roles and Procedures Municipal consent should only be requested from a city if it is required. (See Threshold Criteria above). Sometimes a city may choose to waive municipal consent on a specific project. In that case the city council must pass a resolution clearly identifying the project and waiving its right to municipal consent for that project. However, the typical municipal consent process is as outlined below. Procedure (for obtaining municipal consent) 1. Mn/DOT (District) submits to the city the final layout with a letter requesting city approval. The letter includes a good faith cost estimate of the city’s share of the project’s cost and the following (either in the letter or in an attached report): project purpose route location short description of the proposed design of the highway any additional supporting data 2. City schedules and holds public hearing (within 60 days of submittal). City must schedule within 15 days of receiving Mn/DOT’s request for approval and must give 30 days public notice. 3. City passes resolution approving / disapproving (within 90 days of public hearing). After 90 from the date of the public hearing, if the city has not passed a resolution disapproving the layout, the layout is deemed approved. 2 of 5 Municipal Consent HPDP / Scoping / Subject Guidance Mn/DOT 4. If city disapproves, Mn/DOT decides whether to: a. Meet city’s condition(s), assuming city approved with conditions: Mn/DOT writes city a letter indicating this and attaches revised layout with change(s). This ends the MC process. b. Go to the appeal process. c. Stop the project (do not build the project, or scale project down so that municipal consent is no longer required). 5. If in the final plan Mn/DOT alters access, capacity or R/W, Mn/DOT must re-submit changed portion of plan for city’s approval. (The city is not required to hold another public hearing and has 60 days to approve or disapprove). City Approval The city can approve either by a formal approval resolution (see generic resolution in Appendix), or by not passing a resolution disapproving the layout within 90 days of the public hearing. The city’s review – with regards to layout approval – is limited to the project elements in the final layout that are within the boundaries of that city. A city cannot impose a condition on its approval that is outside of the city’s boundaries. The process allows the city one opportunity to exercise approval or disapproval of the final layout (unless Mn/DOT alters the plan with regards to access, capacity, or right-of-way). Once a city approves the layout, it cannot rescind its approval later. If a city disapproves with conditions, and if Mn/DOT agrees to meet those conditions – and notifies the city in writing (including copy of revised layout) – then municipal consent has been obtained. The municipal consent statute applies to changes on “any route on the trunk highway system lying within any municipality.” If a T.H. borders a city and no section of the T.H. is completely within the city limits, municipal consent is still required for any of the designated changes (access, capacity, or right-of-way) that do occur within that city. However, if the changes triggering the municipal consent process are on the other side of the T.H. – and thus outside the city’s limits – then municipal consent is not required from that city and is not requested from that city. 3 of 5 Municipal Consent HPDP / Scoping / Subject Guidance Mn/DOT City Disapproval If a city disapproves the final layout, Mn/DOT can stop the project (or scale it back so that municipal consent is no longer required), or Mn/DOT can take the project to the appeal process. If the city disapproves – but includes condition(s) for approval, Mn/DOT has the above options plus the option of meeting the city’s condition(s), and thus obtaining the city’s approval. To do this, Mn/DOT sends the city a letter to that effect with the layout attached (revised to show the change(s)). This completes the municipal consent process; Mn/DOT then has the city’s approval. (Sending the letter and revised layout is NOT a resubmittal for further consideration by the city). Appeal Process The appeal process is the same for interstate and non-interstate projects. However, the Mn/DOT Commissioner is not bound by the recommendations of the appeal board with respect to interstate highways. If Mn/DOT decides to go to the appeal process, the first step is to establish an Appeal Board of three members: one member appointed by the Commissioner, one member appointed by the City Council, and a third member agreed upon by both the Commissioner and the City Council. (If a third member cannot be agreed upon, the Commissioner refers the selection to the chief justice of the Supreme Court, who then has 14 days to appoint the third member). After the appeal board is established, the Commissioner refers the final layout to the Appeal Board. The Appeal Board then has 30 days to hold a hearing at which the Commissioner and the City Council may present their cases for or against approval of the layout. Within 60 days after the hearing, the Appeal Board must make its recommendation regarding the final layout. The recommendation can be: for approval, or for approval with modifications, or for disapproval. The board can also make additional recommendations consistent with state and federal requirements as it deems appropriate. The board must submit a written report with its findings and recommendations to the Commissioner and the City Council. 4 of 5 Municipal Consent HPDP / Scoping / Subject Guidance Mn/DOT Legal Basis The Minnesota municipal consent statutes (see links below) were revised in the 2001 legislative session. State Municipal Consent Statutes DefinitionsMN Statute 161.162 Highway Project ReviewMN Statute 161.163 Final Layout Approval ProcessMN Statute 161.164 Commissioner Action; Interstate HighwaysMN Statute 161.165 Commissioner Action; Other HighwaysMN Statute 161.166 Reimbursement of Expenses MN Statute 161.167 (for Appeal Board Members) Helpful Links Mn/DOT Public Involvement Glossary Municipality: A statutory or home rule charter city. Municipal Consent: A municipality’s approval of Mn/DOT’s final layout for a project on a Trunk Highway when such approval is required by State Statute – see Threshold Criteria below. (Approval is by a resolution passed by the elected council of the municipality – the City Council). Appendix Municipal Consent Process Sample City Resolution 5 of 5 Municipal Consent Process Mn/DOT – HPDP/Scoping Basic Process 1. Mn/DOT submits the final layout to the City with a letter requesting City approval of the layout. 60 days 2. The City holds public hearing within 60 days of Mn/DOT’s submittal and gives a 30-day (minimum) public notice of the hearing. Mn/DOT presents the layout at the public hearing 3. The City Council passes a resolution approving / disapproving the layout (within 90 days of public hearing). 90 days If after 90 days from the public hearing the City has not passed a resolution disapproving the layout, the layout is deemed approved 4. If the City approves, Mn/DOT can proceed with the project. 5. If the City disapproves, Mn/DOT’s options are: Make the changes requested by the City (if any) o Refer the layout to an Appeal Board o Stop the project o Modify the project so municipal consent is not required o Prepare a new final layout and start the MC process over from beginning o Before Appeal: Total Maximum time = 150 days Appeal Process 1. Mn/DOT notifies the City that it is appealing. 2. An Appeal Board of three persons is established: Undefined time to Mn/DOT appoints a member o establish appeal board The City appoints a member o Third member selected by mutual agreement between the City & Mn/DOT. o If they cannot agree, Mn/DOT requests the MN Chief Justice to select. 14 days The Chief Justice appoints third member within 14 days of Mn/DOT’s request. Undefined time 3. Mn/DOT refers the final layout to the Appeal Board. 4. The Appeal Board holds a hearing (within 30 days of receiving final layout from Mn/DOT). 30 days The City and Mn/DOT each present their case 60 days 5. The Appeal Board makes its recommendation (within 60 days of the hearing): Approval, or o Approval with modifications, or o Maximum for Appeal Process = 104 days + Disapproval of the final layout o (plus time to establish appeal board, etc.) 6. If the Board approves, Mn/DOT can proceed with the project. 7. If the Board disapproves, or approves with modifications, Mn/DOT’s options are: Make recommended modifications (if any), and proceed with the project o Stop the project o Modify the project so municipal consent is not required o Prepare a new final layout and start the MC process over from beginning o If it is an Interstate Highway project, Mn/DOT may proceed with the project using o the layout that was not approved (and sends a report to the City and the Appeal Board stating the reasons for doing so). TOTAL Possible Time = 254 days + NOTE: If final construction plans contain changes to access, capacity, or right-of-way from the layout approved by the City, Mn/DOT resubmits the changed portion of the plans to the City for approval. (City has 60 days to approve). This holds whether municipal consent was obtained through the basic MC process or through the appeal process. Sample City Resolution RESOLUTION NO. _____ RESOLUTION FORLAYOUT APPROVAL At a Meeting of the City Council of the City of ___________________, held on the __ day of _______, 200_, the following Resolution was offered by ____________________and seconded by ________________ to wit: WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation has prepared a final layout for the improvement of _____________________________________________________________________________ within the City of __________________________ from ________________________ to _________________; and seeks the approval thereof: and WHEREAS, said final layouts are on file in the Minnesota Department of Transportation office, ______, Minnesota, being marked, labeled and identified as Layout No. ___ S.P. __________ from R.P. __________ to __________; and WHEREAS, improvements to city streets and appurtenances have been included in the said final layouts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said final layouts for the improvement of said Trunk Highway within the corporate limits be and is hereby approved”. Upon the call of the roll the following Council Members voted in favor of the Resolution: The following Council Members voted against its adoption: ___________________________________________________________________________________ ATTEST: Mayor _________________________________ Dated ________________, 200________ STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ________________ CITY OF ____________________ I do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of ___________________________, Minnesota at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the ______ day of _________________, 200_____, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. (SEAL)_______________________________ City Clerk CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2015-088 RESOLUTION FOR LAYOUT APPOVAL TRUNK HIGHWAY 169 IMPROVEMENTS STATE PROJECT (S.P.) 2772-113 WHEREAS , the Commissioner of Transportation has prepared a final layout for the improve- ment of Trunk Highway 169 within the City of Hopkins, and WHEREAS , the proposed improvements require the acquisition of right-of-way for storm water treatment purposes, and WHEREAS , the acquisition of right-of-way requires the Commissioner of Transportation to seek layout approval from the City of Hopkins, and WHEREAS , the final layout has been submitted to the City of Hopkins, and WHEREAS , a public hearing on said improvements was advertised according to State statute and held on November 2, 2015, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Hopkins, Minnesota: The final layout for the improvement of Trunk Highway 169, identified as S.P. 2772-113, within the corporate limits of Hopkins is hereby approved. nd Adopted by the City Council this 2 day of November, 2015. _________________________ Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor __________________________ Amy Domeier, City Clerk