CR 85-34 Hopkins Bowl Beer License
~_~'______~~__._~~~~_'~~_,,_~~_,_~~~.~~____~ ~T~~__' ____, _ _._C ~ __~'_~___'___.~~~_,________n~~__'__n______ I
Vl-
g
,
..' .0 .,~~-;~'~~""'~ CI1-Y OF HOPKINS
-... . - ....c:-r;~ _...~.;,..
, -~~~~> .:--~
HOPKINS BOWL
-.-_-~......---.._~ 107 SHADY OAK ROAD ----------~'~
ON SALE 3.2X BEER lICENSE 1
Pi.~; The pUY'p05~ of this report is to recomnend Council action en a I
request for a one day temporary or.-sale 3.2% Beer License.
BACKGROUND:
---App l'i cant: Edward Joseph Hatten. Pre~ident
I
Date Requested: ,Ju ly 21. 1985 I
location: Hopkins Bow! I
107 Sh~dy Oak Road
Reason: Outside Pig Roast
Record check indicates licnese (On-Sale Liquor) suspended
by City Council June 18. 1985 for sales to minor.
RECOMMENDATION: Based on inforn~tion provided a~d records check. Police
6~parWlent sees no reason to withhold approvai
:' 1 / · I
i. ~ J
'. 0'- /~..
It.ke- Z ( ,c/l:&'-<':/{, I
JACK C. PRATT COMMAN01R !
HOPKINS POLICE DEPARTMENT
I
I
I
,
i
I
~
I
I
i
,
.
f
Pep! Q::: '1 .- ,
r-I 1* . -- --.-.../
'~~---------~. ('----' c'u n Ci ----.-.-.... ---_..~~~
-'~---'--- ~ ____.__.__".~_c_.~ ~~~'._. __'_-_'~._. P'....___'lI'r1I'11'1'11--.;r ..--.~_~ ~
" '"
VI - n
CI-r\; OF HOPKINS
(: f' f ~:; i r' f' ~" t r' " r'!-: i rip; 'J i1 r' j a nee - 1 ')~) S h il d Y () a k R (l ad
r; V 11! ;;, f' 1 r, n e ;-; 5 C e n t. e "
~u r~:~-~-~-v-a ~-i a 0:0 f :om or f-" i ree l pa r ki ng "eq ,; \ rP.~en is for the 11
b u i 1 d i r ~ g 1 0 C d t. e (j :-:l t ,! j ",', S n ad 'i ,~) a !', H0 ad. I
I
8a:'k''"I'O--''od - "e"" ~t''''';'-'I'~' "ta(.... rp'pcrr ",,, 7~t"rlro- 7 PJ"n"'l'ng I
'"...., ~ VI.. ..) __ ;.:1.' 1_ d L I , _. '..... ....'1 ,-' . t '.. .' '-' ~ <;... '...I I .1. 5 cr _ <-:1. ,.. ~ ,~
p, p p IT c a fiT' :3 ~. ,eo t. e d t h 1::' j r' h ;} r d s hip a s r 0 1 ], 0 W S :
I 1 ). de c 3 U S Eo ,:j f the p t e s e 1"1 \", p3 f- kin g , the rea (' eve:" y
few iJ.ses that e'"ju.ld be undert.-iken "in ,-.!'"le bujlding.
I
.,1 2). The pad:ing requirements for such a u....,e is not
I ;3 pee i f i, calI y d eta i 1 e din the Z 0 n j, r. g (, r din;:; n c '9 . I n
] essen~e, the ordi~ance places this~~5e ~n a category
that 1S felc requIres more spaces ~nan IS needed.
.,' The applicant stat~d that d similar facility in the City of
..',' Roseville operated adequately with approxlma~ely the same number of
: par k i 11 g spa c e s . A] e t t e r was sub m i t t e d f C' 0 m t. he C i t Y s tat i n g t hat
" t.hey have not experienced a p!'oblem to date.
I 11 e C C) ill !~e n cl a ~ 1. 0 11 - .4 P P r' 0 'J':; d h y thE.' ,. P L'it"ln 1. 1'J g (l. n d Z 0 fA i n g Com m i s ~. ion
with a 6 -1 vote, with the fOllowing conditions:
I
1). ~ayout of configuration of the parking be worked out
by staff with minimum of 31 spaces to be provided.
-=' ) '! a r' "0 Il C "" 1-) '" 1 1. m l' ~ ,-' ri f- " c' D '" r i "; C 'J ." p 0 f' go " m '" ,- " I
I ~_. IJ - 1:::.l. .. ,,- L, \:" .~ . I I '_..... J '-" .... ~. .~- \. _! -A. ~ ........ \ A- C' ~... c~ : 1 ..... .
}-t e 0. 2 t ~ f a c i : i t Y ~
I
I ,
II ,. I
~ _., \~ ..t.-1:,. :-."
- ~_-----.:._--+._--_._-~...............~
1,- .
I.; 1 ;-!"i '\~: r r J iT.;:1 r.
I
I i
I I
I I I
i I I
I I
, ,
I I I
~--------counCil Rept " --------~ I
__~___...........~~ ~_ ........... ____ _. _~.J
"II___~.w!I - ------_..--...-'-'-----~~- -~~"-'---
.
June 11, 1985
Case No; 85-34
Appl icant: .John Goodman
location: 135 Shady Oak Road
Request: Varianc~ for off-street parki ng
STAFF FINDINGS & COMMENTS: An<iet4san
1, The a,piicant is proposing to loc~te a Gym and Fitness Cente~ at 135 Shady Oak
Road, the former site of the Minnesota State Employment Office. Tile subject
site is zon~j B-3.
2. Ordinance 427.45(25) Skating, Dance Hall>> Miniature Golf, Private Clubs, Ice
Arena re(uires ten parking spaces pius one (1) additional spac~ for each two
hundred 200) square feet of floor area devoted to the princ'ipal lJse. The
subject site would require 62 parking spaces. The site has 31 parking spaces.
3. 427.04(108) states that a varianc~ shall be granted to a specific parcel of
property because of undue t~rdship due to circWlstanCp.s peculiar and unique
upon such parcel,
4. The size of the parking ~paces are 9 x 16. Ordinance 427.43(7) requires spaces
shall not be less than 9 feet in width and 20 fee~ in length, however, that in
any parking area established pursuant to this Ordinance~ which provid~s for
contiguous parking for r!"lOrE than twenty-five (25) vehicles. d portion of suc.h
area not exceeding twenty-five p~rcent thereof may be designated" delineated.
marked and ul:>ed in dimensions of not 'less than 8 feet by 16 feet provided sllch
parking spaces are clearly marked as !ICompact Cal's.1l
5. The applicant has stated that there is adequate open s?~':\ce on the prCJgert}' to
provide the amount of parking t€chnical1y required by tbe Zoning Code for virtu-
ally any conmer'dal use, also cata,gorizing the proposed use under Section 421.45
(25) of the Zoning Code as a "private club" is inequitable becat:~e the uses under
that section contemplate a greater flow of traffic than they feel their use will
generate.
6. The parking situation has been a problemir. this area for a number of years.
The subject structure was or~ginany constructed as a roller skating rink by
the owner of the adjacent bo\o!iing alley. As part of the oppraval it was stated 1
that the owner of the bowling alley would have to provide additional parking
should a demand over and above what was being provided be act!..lally needed.
However', sometime after this the subject bui ldillg was s€par'ated off from the
bowling alley parcel and sold to a different owner. In recent years. the struc- I
tUT'e has been used as office space by ~1innesot>'\ M~npower. This use was fairly
compatible with the dred as the'l, major' parking demand was during the day~ with
the bowling alley heing ~t ~!ght. Also it came closer to meeting the ordinance
a as an office use would only require 40 SpaC€i. The applicant has stated that
they have been unable to fi1d 3 new office use tenant as the builci;~; and its
location are unsuited for such d use.
1. The appl1c~nt has contacted thE surrounding n~ighhors.
-,~_. ~1l'SI~J}i1Jlllt"'i,"ril:" _________~ -11~~ i.III,.*~~. I
L\jj
"II .011 IfI - ..- I ~~IT YII!!['CBIL __~ll =n~--'I~:~.
. \ , ..
.
I
.
I FOR VARIANCE APPLICATION ONLY
HOTE: The purpose of a vGriance is to provide ~elief to a property owner when
the strict enfor'ecmcnt of the Zoning Ordinance would cause a.n undue hard-
ship" to the property owner or deny reasonable use c # the property. .-
Hdrd$~ip to the applicant is the cruciai test. Variances will be granted
only 1n unusual situations \'-rrdch were not foreseen when the Zoning Or--din-
ance was adopted, Economic situations are seldom ul1ique and are ra~ly
considered a v~lid hardship.
Hardship A.
Explain why strict eoforce~ent of the Zoning Ordinance would cause undue
ha.rdship:
---Iher..e.is inat1~llate open s.pa.ce-an thp pl':"!lp(*'r'ty till prnvirle- tt,e aD1nUr't~
of pa~m,; ,technicat!Lr-eQu![ed by the ZoQioo Cod~" for H'i"tuaUy an}' {;~
merdal use. i
~ - I'
~-
Condi t'ion$ 8.
What are the special conditions (shape of lot, exceptional topographfc
conditions, etc.) of this request that are unique to this property and
do not apply generally to other properties in the district?
1 .. Th.e property, indudi"g the htJildlng~-"WJ~eY..e.d...ll~LAhe..~ I
and adjacent landowner in such a way as to leave inadequate space on this
Earcel fOI" the ~uired parkin9..=- - ~ I
_~':;a.tagorjzing the ..eroQ..osed use l,md~t:~Section !i27 .~(25) qf the ZQD.irlg
Codt;- as a "private dub" is inequitable beca....se the uses .,mdel"" that section
contemplate a greater flow of tr-affic than would be anticip3ted,.
Ust of Homeowner's
Contacted by Applicant C.
Submit a 11 st of names and addr"esses of neighbors contacted.
See attached
I
I
I
I
. ._,___..__,___~,,"_____""""'.'---"'_. .__......__~"'-~_....,_.._............-__...-.....~~:!";'~~:JODI -. -,- -_._.,--~~-~".._.,,-----~-j
---- -'---~)n-~~~'~'=~~:~ -::~~.,. ~ .t:".f~~- ,
- '-on .,,n....,.. ".,,!v..!"'~ I 1.:,,", ".I.........~ ," '0 1,:""1(;,:)6
110 - 2 I ~ ~ ~~~z_... ':-..,.~,,>_,-"
i" ..' -=;:~ :-.... ......~ "" ,'Ii
I .A-"_~. ...{,; .....'._.
~._~ , .%1
rl " t,~"
' .-;...,:;
,
cO',;
~
I
':';1 Pl"" ~:;II"!/ /. ~/~~ ,
.
".,.,..- ().~.J"'.I~")il-'l v'.1:'€1 I ia
.. .." .. -......
' ,f"~ ......... i
r"? .... J............1
-f .._~~ _ .~
. oi r"U'~~"""~ -"... - n' " ..~~~;; ~.~~
t.' i .\
. · I 11/'" \ J
I I I ' ::\ I
/ ~ . "4 r.
"r. I ./ "\ ~ I~
I 1 ...~1, \' .~.
,r I . ... :',
. , :S r--fl, ~,',,' '_,.,,',:!,
I .' ~ / '-.t , I .t':,;:'
I 91 '\ ~ I'!- J :+: I .' 'Ii
: "..J' · . t\. I ' ! ''\.I''i'~
. , ~ I .'
I,.t.l . ~,,<
If " · .. 1 1 '1l f.':,!.;,
~ ~ 1~!t . I 4; \t9:iI
I ' j~'!t
" . ~ ',- ,--.'.- "Z'i
: ' - - - -. .- - - -- ~ _. ~ t '- ~ ~,'~1Ji
:"'\ ;' . . .,. \ l' "'. ~ t :.;;;,jj-~
V- " - - . 0 ell __ , \J: .... ;;~
d ! r" "'. .~~~"" .( . . ... , o{.... . ~. t.~.~~r....."":"'......,,,,,..... .~ \'\ ~. "", ,21. ;;l,'~,'
. I I I' Co\ ,.. ~-'IS~
!) . -I'. I ... .'." '._'.',
' .. ....... ~ ~ .".
~ I 'l rl ' r ..i,'~';
. , , ~ ~ "l~'~;
,; ! ~~ '1J
"'~ --------.- ---, -- """'- -) "
. --, -- . --.-- rl<..' ._~
~. I '~.!Co .. ,'"
...-.. -~. -~ -',' ,.. -. ....'. """'w_ ..."..,., '. "_.... -~.,... :..~" ..-....-:.. A. . ...... ,~. .~..... !all"'''' 4 ~"a~ ~.'"....~_;,'.,,'..:..'
. , j r[ '\Q.. ~ --
'. ~ " ~ c..,',.,
\ ,\1 If ,J, . Q\.. ~;,'+
-e~ I~ '1 I I ~. .\,.,}
, I ;'" 1.1 ~ ....
\, L I ~ 1 II N)J
. , I f I V
' .
\ ' I / I
\ - -~-- J.' I
'.') : (( I
'~ I .
w, r /? I
,~ .
~ 1
",' -b ~. I"
. I
:~. 0 I
. "j ~
~ ~ I
~ ~ \
~..~-~
_~~c~~'__~.. . - --~~,.._-~J.UUl~~_ 11III
. I .
OrdBn 8
LIST Of NEIGHBORS CONTACTED
---------- -~---------..--_- ------..
HEN.THKIT ELECTRONICS CENTER
101 Shady O~k Road
Hopkins, Minnesota
938-6.311
Jeff P-orr j t t
SUBURBAN DRY CLEANERS
4540 Shady Oak Read
Mtnnetonka, Minnesota
;35-4833
(}~n Johnson, Owner
HOPKINS BOWL
107 Sh~dy Oak Road
HopktnsJ M~nn~sot~
938-4090
Gladys Restorf, General Manager
LEMAN'S LIQUORS
120 Shady Oak Road
Hopkins. Minnesota
935-2656
Jim Masoo. Son of Owner
SHADY OAK LIQUORS
11524 County Road 3
MinnetonkaJ Minnesota
938-7060
Paul Kenyon, Owner
NELSON'S BAKERY AND MEATS
116 Shady Oak Road
Hopkins, Minne~ota
935-9092
Rick Nelson, Owner
SANDY'S APPLIANCE AND TV I
4 - SUbprpdr1 Square - Shady Oak Road
Hopkins~ Minnesota
935-3361
Dale Amolins
VETERANS OF FORELGN WARS
100 Shady Oak Road
Hopkins, Minnesota
938-9916
Doug wellman
KOKESH ATHLETIC STORE I
11525 County Road 3
Minnetonka, Minnesota
935-7006
Tim and Frank Kokesh
D
~~-"'~-:::=-=--~~~_w_____~._.._..._.
&..' t. .
OORHOLT. INC.
22 Shady Oak Road
Hopkins, Minnesota
933-3591
Jim Dorholt. Owner
BRUOA COLLECTABLES
6 Suburban Square
Hopkins, Minnesota
935-3348
George Dodds, Marion Dennis, Owners
GLEN LAKE BODY SHOP
106 Shady Oak Road
Hopkins~ Minnesota
938-8565
On ill e Kemper' .
COA T COM!> Afff
14 Suburban Square
Hopkins, Minnesota
933-43:5
Mad 1yn Emerson
J M OFFICE PRODUCTS
20 Shady Oak Road
Hopkinsj Minnesota
938-8377
Jerry Mandel, ~~ner
MARIl YN JOHNSON
140 20th Avenue S~~th
Hopkins, Minnesota
935-3588
Neighboring H~~eowner
ANN ~ARIE WOODWARD PARKER
128 20th Avenue South
Hopkins. Minnesota
932..5977
Neighboring H~neo~r.er
','
"'""
--~--~--~~--~. ----"'- --. ""'11---- - ~~- -"r' ~'UB _~iJJi>ll!V'"- ~ ".-",."
,t . VI - i
---
CITY OF HOPKINS
Conditional USE' Pc' rn) 1. t
9th Avenue South -. .......- -~ I
r ~-
I ':;ohan Uppal
!
,I ?~rpose - Recommend act.:i.an a Condit;i0nal Use Permit to allow
on
c~ruc tion of a ten ~l(1 i t townhouse development on 9th Avenue
South~ just north of Nine Mile Cr~ex.
Background - see att3ched Staff report to Planning and Zoning.
The applicant stated he Has contacted by W8stbrook Association
I who staed they were infavor 0f the pro,] ec t. provided tht: trees
to the south of the pr'oj ec t area were net removed. tvlr. Kerrigan
I stated that any a.pprova.l should be contingent upon the applic~nt
accompl ish:tng the following~
1 ) . Aletter of approval from the Watershed District. I
2) . Meet with Dick Wilson of Parks and Recreation
~. , to work out grade changes l:iet;.;een subject lot and the park.
Recomrnend~tio(J - The Commis3ion approved on a 4 - 1 vote ~i.i th
the following conditions. I
1 ' Approva.l of the Watershed District I
-~ ,
2) . No signif.icant grade changes on souther::'y boundary. I
i
3 j . Approval by the Fire Marshal
4 ) . Elevations approved by Watershed District
5) . Lot.s to be combined,
dJ:llJf\O~-C1'rdo,~ _. I
Nanc:.; Anderson I
Community Development Analyst
I
I I
I
I I i
I
I j I
l --Council Rept # ;:;,::,-q ---' I
_.~-- -~ --~----- i
'.... . J
I
,
~~i!illllfllW.~""'~~liiI!liIiQl~m2Z!I1llI11IBlllM''-~~,~Mb_",'_,,----J