Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
VII. 1. Order Public Hearing – 2017 Street and Utility Improvements, City Project 2016-10; Stanley (CR2016-078)
August 16, 2016 Council Report 2016-078 ORDER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT HEARING 2017 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT 2016-10 Proposed Action Staff recommends the following motion: adopt Resolution 2016-055, Resolution Ordering Public Improvement Hearing, 2017 Street and Utility Improvements. This action continues an assessable project for street and utility improvements. Overview At its June 7, 2016 meeting, the Hopkins City Council authorized Bolton & Menk, Inc. to prepare a feasibility report concerning street and utility improvements along West Park Valley Drive, East Park Valley Drive, 5th Avenue South, 6th Avenue South, 9th Avenue South, 10st Avenue South, 6th Street South, 7th Street South, and the alley south of 6th Street South and west of 10th Avenue South. The report is complete and is now submitted to Council for review and further action. A summary of the issues is provided here, and staff will provide a detailed summary of the report at the Council meeting. Primary Issues to Consider Scope of Improvements Public Input Assessments Project Budget and Costs Project Schedule Staff Recommendation Supporting Information Feasibility Report Project Location Map Resolution 2016-055 _________________________________ Nate Stanley, P.E., City Engineer Financial Impact: $7,833,700 Budgeted: Y/N _Y_ Source: _PIR, SA, Water, Sanitary, Storm Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): CIP _ Notes: _________________________________________ Council Report 2016-078 Page 2 ANALYSIS OF ISSUES Scope of Improvements This project includes reconstruction of the following streets: West Park Valley Drive East Park Valley Drive ththth 5 Avenue South from 5 Street South to 7 Street South ththth 6 Avenue South from 5 Street South to 8 Street South thth 9 Avenue South from 7 Street South to Westbrook Way ththth 10 Avenue South from 6 Street South to 7 Street South thth 6 Street South from 10 Avenue South to West Park Valley Drive thth 7 Street South from 11 Avenue to east of East Park Valley Drive thth Alley south of 6 Street South west of 10 Avenue South The pavement condition index for most of the project area is below 40, which indicates failed pavement and warrants reconstruction. Proposed street improvements include full reconstruction of streets and new curb and gutter throughout the project area. Street width improvements were also considered with this project. Water main is proposed to be replaced throughout the project area. Most of the existing main is in excess of 60 years old and made from cast iron. New main will be ductile iron, which has better reliability and when properly installed a longer lifecycle than cast iron. All water services will be replaced from the main to the property line unless they are copper and less than 10 years old. Sanitary sewer improvements include the removal and replacement of the main, manholes and service lines to the property line. Proposed storm sewer improvements include removal and replacement of the storm sewer main, addition of storm sewer inlets to reduce water ponding in the street and improvements to reduce sediment accumulation. thth Pedestrian facilities include extension of a multi-use trail along 9 Avenue South and 7 Street South. This trail will fill a “missing link” in the system and will provide continuity between Valley Park and the Minnesota River Bluffs Regional Trail. The construction of this new trail will be funded by the Three Rivers Park District. Additional sidewalks were considered for the neighborhood, however the vast majority of resident respondents indicated they did not want new sidewalks added. During the scoping for this project, it was determined that there was some other work that should be included in the project, due not only to proximity, but to capitalize on pricing. This additional work will be funded by separate items in the CIP and Budget and includes the following: ththth Mill/overlay of 7 Avenue South from 5 Street South to 8 Street South thth Mill/overlay of 8 Avenue South from 6thy Street South to 8 Street South ththth Mill/overlay of 8 Street South from 8 Avenue South to 6 Avenue South th Sanitary sewer lining along 17 Avenue North from TH 7 to Mainstreet thth Alley connecting 6 Avenue South to 8 Street South Citywide spot alley and sidewalk repairs Council Report 2016-078 Page 3 Public Input A public informational meeting regarding the improvements is scheduled for September 6, 2016. The meeting format will consist of a presentation of the overall project scope, and also focus detailed discussion on assessments. A questionnaire was sent to all properties in the project area in advance of the neighborhood meeting, a total of 67 responses were received. Drainage concerns and a desire for improved street surface were the most notable comment in the responses. Bolton & Menk and City staff has met with individual property owners in person to discuss concerns and look at options to minimize issues; it is anticipated meetings will continue as design progresses. Assessments The proposed street assessments are based on the City’s assessment policy, whereby 70% of the street reconstruction cost and 50% of the water and sewer service replacement are assessed to benefiting properties. The policy also allows for assessments to be capped should assessments exceed previous year assessments by 20%; the costs for this project will trigger the assessment cap. A preliminary assessment roll has been calculated and can be found in the appendix of the attached Feasibility Report. The assessment cap for residential properties is $86.30 per front foot based on adding 3% to the 2016 cap. Without the cap assessments could be double the capped rate. Project Budget and Costs The estimate for this project, which includes 10% contingency and 21% for legal, administrative, and engineering costs for all the work totals to $7,833,700. Project costs and funding sources are as follows: Funding Source CIP Budget Base Project Additional Work PI-PIR/General Obligation Bonds $2,000,000 $3,053,500 $433,500 Assessments 2,000,000 1,420,000 Storm Sewer Fund 600,000 600,000 Sanitary Sewer Fund 500,000 609,100 282,800 Water Fund 1,500,000 1,207,800 Three Rivers Park District 227,000 Total $6,600,000 $6,890,400 $943,300 In the above table, the CIP Budget column represents funding for the Base Project, which includes the original reconstruction project scope. The Additional Work column itemizes costs for the previously noted additions to the project scope and has been budgeted for with separate funding. Council Report 2016-078 Page 4 It should be noted that the current estimate exceeds the CIP budgeted amount for some items. The significant factors contributing to the overage at this time are the percentages applied for contingencies and design costs, these costs will be reduced as the project progresses. Public Works staff will be working with the Finance Director to amend the CIP as necessary to assure the project as proposed can be funded. Staff will return to council with an update on costs prior to contract award. Project Schedule Accept feasibility report/order public hearing August 16, 2016 Public Informational Neighborhood Meeting September 6, 2016 Public hearing/order final design September 20, 2016 Approve final plans/order bids December 20, 2016 Order Assessment Hearing January, 2017 Conduct Public Assessment Hearing/ February, 2017 Adopt Assessment Roll/Award Contract Begin Construction April, 2017 Complete Construction October, 2017 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends accepting the feasibility report and ordering a public hearing for September 20, 2016. Preliminary Engineering Report 2017 Street & Utility Improvements City of Hopkins City Project No. 2016-10 BMI Project No. T19.112021 August, 2016 Submitted by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. 12224 Nicollet Avenue Burnsville, MN 55337 P: 952-890-0509 F: 952-890-8065 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Project Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Background ...................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Existing Conditions .......................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Streets ..................................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Storm Sewer ........................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Sanitary Sewer ....................................................................................................................... 8 3.4 Water Main ............................................................................................................................ 8 4. Proposed Improvements................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Streets ..................................................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Storm Sewer ......................................................................................................................... 10 4.3 Sanitary Sewer ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.4 Water Main .......................................................................................................................... 10 4.5 Pedestrian Facilities ............................................................................................................ 11 4.6 Driveways ............................................................................................................................. 12 4.7 Lawn Sprinkler Systems ....................................................................................................... 12 4.8 Street Signing and Striping .................................................................................................. 12 4.9 Turf Restoration ................................................................................................................... 12 4.10 Boulevard Trees ................................................................................................................... 12 4.11 Water Tower Access Road ................................................................................................... 13 5. Neighborhood Meeting .................................................................................................................. 13 6. Estimated Costs .............................................................................................................................. 14 7. Assessment Rates ........................................................................................................................... 14 8. Right-of-Way / Easements / Permits .............................................................................................. 15 9. Project Schedule ............................................................................................................................ 16 10. Feasibility and Recommendation ................................................................................................... 16 APPENDIX Appendix A – Preliminary Cost Estimates Appendix B – Figures Appendix C – Preliminary Assessment Roll Appendix D – Neighborhood Meeting & Resident Questionnaire Appendix E – Geotechnical Evaluation PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 1 August 2016 1. PROJECT INTRODUCTION This report examines the proposed street and utility improvements including storm sewer, water main, sanitary sewer, and street reconstruction along the following streets as shown on Figure 1 in Appendix B: 6th Street S from 5th Street S to West Park Valley Dr 7th Street S from 11th Avenue S to approx. 100’ east of East Park Valley Dr East/West Park Valley Drive north of 7th Street S 5th Avenue S from 5th Street S to 7th Street S 6th Avenue S from 5th Street S to 9th Street S 9th Avenue from 7th Street S to Westbrook Way 10th Avenue from 6th Street S to 7th Street S Alley south of 5th Street S between 10th and 11th Avenues S Alley between the easterly limit of 8th Street S and 6th Avenue S This report also examines the following related improvements which are proposed to be designed/bid and constructed in the same project, but without involvement of special assessments: Mill/overlay of 7th Avenue S, from 5th Street S to 8th Street S Mill/overlay of 8th Avenue S, from 6th Street S to 8th Street S Mill/overlay of 8th Street S, from 8th Avenue S to 6th Avenue S Sanitary Sewer lining along 17th Avenue N, from Hwy 7 to Mainstreet Citywide spot alley/sidewalk repairs (annual project) Specifically the project as a whole involves: Addition/replacement of storm sewer Water main replacement Water service replacement Sanitary sewer replacement and rehabilitation Sanitary sewer service replacement Concrete curb & gutter replacement Bituminous street removal and reconstruction PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 2 August 2016 2. BACKGROUND The 2017 Street & Utility Improvements project was initiated following its presence for several years in the City’s Capital Improvements Plan. Hopkins City Council ordered the preparation of this feasibility report at its June 7, 2016 council meeting. The feasibility study and report has been completed to better identify the infrastructure improvements needed in the proposed project area and to better define costs associated with the improvements. This report will be used as the basis for final design and is also a required step in the State’s Chapter 429 process for special assessments. The project area consists of single family high density zoning (residential neighborhood), park, institutional, and commercial. 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 STREETS The bituminous streets within the project areas are aged and exhibit various levels of wear and distress. This is evident on the surface by transverse, block, and alligator cracking. The majority of the project area streets have concrete curb and gutter, though a few blocks have no curbing. In many areas, the curb height is only a few inches, indicating the presence of patching or overlaying of the existing pavement and gutter. There is evidence of previous additional street repairs and maintenance throughout the project area including numerous street patches. Existing Pavement Conditions PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 3 August 2016 Consistent with observations of the existing pavements made during preparation of this report, the City’s Pavement Management System also indicates that the “Pavement Condition Index” (PCI) for many of the street segments in the neighborhood is below the threshold where rehabilitation is cost effective. As such, street reconstruction is appropriate in these areas. Subgrade soil sampling was completed throughout the entire project area by Braun Intertec in the summer of 2016. A copy of Braun’s Geotechnical Evaluation Report is included in Appendix F of this report. Twenty-four soil borings were taken throughout the project area. Ground penetrating radar was also used to better delineate and identify discernable bituminous and aggregate base thicknesses present. In 1 of the 24 borings a slight petroleum odor was observed indicating the potential for contaminated soils. The report and previous experience indicates the source of the odor is likely a petroleum based stabilization agent used at the surface when the streets were constructed; however, contingencies have been included in the engineer’s estimate to account for mitigating contaminated soils. Additional testing was not recommended by Braun Intertec as a part of the preliminary evaluation. During construction, if odor is present, additional testing will be required to determine the appropriate actions to take for handling the material. The existing soils just beneath pavements in the project area most commonly included fill soils and the majority were classified as silty sand but also included clayey sand, poorly graded sand with silt, sandy lean clay and lean clay with sand. Glacial outwash and glacial till were also encountered. A few of the borings in the project area found buried topsoil and swamp deposits of organic lean clay, lean clay and peat. The resistance of the soils to deformation under repeated loadings is indicated by an R value estimated by the geotechnical engineer for the various boring locations. Laboratory tests to determine an R-value were not performed but the geotechnical engineer recommends using an R-value of 30 for pavement thickness design of the overall project. Loadings from traffic on the natural soils under a pavement are reduced by using layers of stronger materials at the surface to spread wheel weight to a larger “footprint” on the underlying soils. Engineers typically use a lower cost, moderate strength material consisting of a blend of rock, sand, and fine “filler” particles for the lowest level in the pavement. This layer is referred to as aggregate base and is an important element of the pavement in residential areas. The aggregate base is capped with layers of higher cost asphaltic concrete, often referred to as “bituminous surfacing” for additional strength, a smoother ride, and dust and mud control. The thicknesses used will vary within practical limits, but are typically held to a minimum in residential areas. Designers try to seek a section that balances cost with strength and durability needs and constructability constraints. This usually means a heavy reliance on the aggregate base layer in low traffic areas like residential neighborhoods. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 4 August 2016 The existing aggregate base layer beneath the existing pavement ranged from none present to 10-inches. For the entire project area the average thickness was around 5- inches. The thickness of the bituminous surfacing ranged from 2 to 8-inches, with the average being approximately 4-inches. The streets within the neighborhood vary in width from 31.3 feet to 44 feet, as measured from curb face to curb face. Parking is typically allowed on both sides of the streets throughout the neighborhood. The existing grades range from less than 0.50% (very flat) to 5.5% (moderate). Minimal sidewalk exists in the area. Two short segments of walk, immediately at back of curb, exist at the west ends of both 6th and 7th Streets. Large, mature trees are located in the boulevards, near the back of curb, throughout the project area. Table 3.1 identifies the existing street width, existing curb type, existing street grade, existing right-of-way (ROW) width, and sidewalk/trail location on each street within the project area. Table 3.1 Street Existing Street Width Existing Curb Type Existing Longitudinal Grade [%] Existing ROW Width Existing Sidewalk Side 6th Street S 32.5 feet Concrete B618 C&G 0.50 – 3.75 60 feet South side: 5th Street S for approx. 75’ 7th Street S 36-44 feet Concrete B618 C&G 0.50 – 1.25 66 feet South side: 11th Avenue east for approx. 200’ West Park Valley Dr 31 feet Concrete B618 C&G 2.49 – 3.15 60 feet None East Park Valley Dr 31 feet Concrete B618 C&G 1.68 – 4.16 60 feet None 5th Avenue S 32.5 feet Concrete B618 C&G 0.60 – 3.15 60 feet None 6th Avenue S 35 feet Concrete B618 C&G 0.75 – 5.50 66 feet None 9th Avenue S 31-36 ft feet Concrete B618 C&G, no curb 0.50 – 2.15 60 feet None 10th Avenue S 30 feet No curb 0.50 – 3.92 66 feet None PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 5 August 2016 The soil borings revealed existing pavement thicknesses ranging from 2 – 8 inches, with most streets between 3 to 4 inches. The subgrade materials varied throughout the neighborhood but were most commonly found to be silty sand and sandy lean clay fill. A summary of the existing soils conditions and bituminous thicknesses are listed in Table 3.2. Soil boring logs are included in the geotechnical report in Appendix F. Table 3.2 Street Bituminous Thickness Subgrade Material 6th Street S 3” – 8” Mixture of silty sand, poorly graded sand and clayey sand with some gravel. Odor detected in 1 of 4 borings. 7th Street S 3” – 8” Mixture of silty sand and clayey sand with some gravel and organic clay. West Park Valley Dr 3.5” – 4” Mixture of poorly graded san with silt and lean clay with sand, with some gravel. East Park Valley Dr 2” – 3” Mixture of silty sand and lean clay with sand with trace gravel. 5th Avenue S 4” Mixture of sandy lean clay and poorly graded sand. 6th Avenue S 4.5” – 5” Mixture of silty sand and clayey sand with trace gravel. 9th Avenue S 6”-8” Mixture of silty sand with gravel and peat (swamp desposit) 10th Avenue S 3” Mixture of silty sand with gravel and clayey sand PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 6 August 2016 Alleys An existing gravel alley of varying width is south of 5th Street S, between 10th and 11th Avenues, serves single-family residential properties along 10th Avenue, a multi-family apartment building on 11th Avenue and a commercial property on 5th Street. The alley is in close proximity to Nine Mile Creek and is delineated by overhead utility poles and residential parking areas/garages. It dead-ends at the driveway of a single family home. A bituminous alley serving properties along the east side of 6th Avenue S is in poor condition. Public works staff has patched the alley several times, however the patching efforts have reached a point where they are no longer cost effective. 3.2 STORM SEWER The existing storm sewer system materials were inventoried through a field survey completed in June, 2016, from available record drawings, and through discussions with City Staff. The existing storm sewer systems serving the neighborhood are comprised primarily of reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). Figures in Appendix B illustrate the existing storm sewer layout. There are multiple storm sewer systems serving the project area. Portions of the project area flow to catch basins that drain directly to Nine Mile Creek, which crosses the project area on 7th Street S and 9th Avenue S. A large trunk line (66” RCP) runs along 6th Avenue S continuing south of 8th Street S in Valley Park, eventually making its way to Nine Mile Creek. Another system collects drainage along 7th Street S and continues southeast in a 48” diameter RC pipe from the cul-de-sac at the east end of 7th Street S. A few drainage issues have been identified throughout the project area through evaluation of site grades/elevations, feedback from the neighborhood, and discussions with City Staff. Due to the flat grades of some of the streets and long stretches of streets with no catch basins, localized drainage problems are prevalent. Many drainage structures were also found to be in very poor condition during the field survey. Such structures are often comprised of block or brick, and appear to have been patched with mortar in previous decades. Over time, the mortar has deteriorated from freeze thaw, leaving several structures subject to leakage or potential drastic failure. Recommendations to alleviate these drainage problems are included in section 4.2 of this report and shown in the Appendix B figures. 3.3 SANITARY SEWER The existing condition of the sanitary sewer system was determined through discussions with City staff and televising reports. Manhole structures were evaluated during a field PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 7 August 2016 survey completed by Bolton & Menk. The existing sanitary sewer system is illustrated in the Appendix B Figures. The existing sanitary sewer system consists of 8-18-inch pipe varying in materials from CIP, VCP, RCP and PVC. The majority of the manholes are precast with some block manholes constructed in the early 1950’s. VCP is susceptible to infiltration and root intrusion over time due to the large number of joints and the deterioration of the gasket material originally used to seal the joints. Block manholes are also susceptible to infiltration over time due to cracks and deterioration of the mortared joints. Record drawings obtained from the City illustrate a small portion of the sanitary sewer system supported by pilings due to poor soils. Service lines in the neighborhood are typically 4-inch or 6-inch and their material may be clay, orangeburg, or PVC. Proposed sanitary sewer improvements are discussed later in this report. 3.4 WATER MAIN The existing layout and condition of the water main was determined from record drawings and discussions with City staff. Water main runs along a portion of all the streets within the project area, there are isolated blocks throughout the area that do not have any watermain. The water main is primarily 6-inch cast iron pipe (CIP). CIP is susceptible to rusting and breakage. Service lines in the neighborhood are typically ¾- inch or 1-inch and their material may be copper, galvanized steel, or lead. The layout of the existing water main is illustrated in the Appendix B Figures. 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 4.1 STREETS The majority of streets within the 2017 project limits are scheduled for full reconstruction. This is based on the City of Hopkins’ Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), observed pavement conditions, and pavement and soil sampling. These streets have reached a point where maintenance procedures such as seal coating or milling and overlaying are no longer cost effective strategies to improve ride and delay deterioration: 6th Street S from 5th Street S to West Park Valley Dr 7th Street S from 11th Avenue S to approx. 100’ east of East Park Valley Dr East/West Park Valley Drive north of 7th Street S 5th Avenue S from 5th Street S to 7th Street S 9th Avenue from 7th Street S to Westbrook Way 10th Avenue from 6th Street S to 7th Street S PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 8 August 2016 Due to utility needs – primarily watermain and services - along 6th Avenue S, from 5th Street S to 8th Street S, that roadway is also proposed to be reconstructed. Proposed reconstruction improvements include replacing the concrete curb and gutter and complete pavement section. In areas where there isn’t curb, concrete curb and gutter will be added. The horizontal and vertical alignments will approximate the existing alignments with attempts at lowering the road to facilitate drainage from the front yards to the street where beneficial and practical. A consistent street width of 32 feet from face of curb to face of curb will be utilized throughout the majority of the project area. In general, this is closely matching existing conditions. A few exceptions to the 32’ width are proposed: 7th Street S is proposed be reconstructed at a width of 36-feet-wide. This narrows the roadway between 11th Ave S and 9th Ave S, creating space for the proposed regional trail connection, and also makes the full street width consistent within the project area. 10th Avenue S is proposed to be reconstructed at 28-feet-wide. This narrows the roadway by approximately three feet. 28-foot-width is comparable to other local residential streets in Hopkins and narrowing of the roadway should help address the vehicle “short cut” volume and speed observed by multiple residents. East and West Park Valley Drive is proposed to be 31 feet wide, more closely matching the 31.3’ – 31.5’ width. Widening to 32’ width was considered, however it is more likely this widening would result in additional tree impacts and benefits of the additional one-foot-width would be relatively minimal. The minimum proposed street grade is 0.5%. Street grades flatter than 0.50% are undesirable as acceptable drainage is typically not achieved. Drainage problems can create safety issues in freezing weather and accelerate the degradation of the pavement. Overall drainage patterns throughout the project area are not anticipated to change significantly. Low-points may need to be created on streets with flat grades to help facilitate drainage and maintain the minimum street grades. These locations will be confirmed during the final design process. The recommended typical section for all the streets consists of 3.5 inches of bituminous pavement over 8 inches of aggregate base class 5, in addition 12-24” of granular base will be included throughout the majority of the project area. Due to poor soils, a geotextile fabric is also proposed on 7th Street S and 9th Avenue S. The recommended amounts of subgrade correction, with select granular borrow, will be determined by a roll test during construction. Subgrade corrections usually range from 12 to 24 inches when needed. 4.2 STORM SEWER PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 9 August 2016 The majority of the existing storm sewer systems will be replaced as a part of the project due age, size, and changes in street widths. The existing systems will also be in conflict with the replacement of the sanitary sewer and water main in many locations. Full replacement of the existing storm sewer systems is recommended as a part of this project. Additional storm structures are proposed in areas to help improve drainage and assist in removing water from flowing in the streets. Catch basins will be relocated away from driveways and pedestrian ramps. The 66” RCP trunk line along 6th Avenue S is not proposed for replacement as a part of this project. A 15-inch outlet pipe along 7th Street S appears to discharge excess runoff into the park open space to the north between 9th and 10th Avenues S. It is proposed to perpetuate this function as it is good stormwater management practice and is the most economical alternative. 4.3 SANITARY SEWER The information used to evaluate the existing condition of the sanitary sewer includes televised recordings of the sewers, record drawings, manhole reports, and discussions with City staff. Due to the age of the sanitary sewer system and the City policy to replace VCP and CIP sewers during street projects, the majority of the sanitary sewer is recommended to be completely replaced with PVC pipe. New service wyes will be provided to each home. Per City policy, sanitary services which are not PVC are proposed to be replaced with PVC pipe to the right-of-way (ROW) line. New precast concrete manholes will be installed and incorporate the City standard 27-inch diameter cover with concealed pick-holes. The existing sanitary along 6th Avenue S from 5th Street S to 7th Street S consists of 8” PVC pipe and was installed in 1989. It is in good condition, no improvements are proposed in that area. The existing sanitary sewer from 7th to 8th Street S is 12” RCP, it is proposed to line this segment. The sanitary sewer along 7th Street S from 9th Avenue S to 11th Avenue S and 9th Avenue S from Westbrooke Way to 7th Street S consists of 15-18” RCP and due to the age (constructed in the 70’s-80’s), and existing (poor) soils along these blocks it is proposed to line the existing sanitary sewer to avoid disturbing the existing soils in the area. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 10 August 2016 Table 4-1 summarize the proposed sanitary sewer improvements: ROADWAY FROM / TO EXISTING PIPE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS DIA. MATL AGE 5th Ave S 7th to 5th St S 8 CLAY 53 Reconstruct 6th Ave S 8th to 7th St S 12 RCP 46 Lining 6th Ave S 7th to 5th St S 8 PVC 27 None 6th Ave S 8th to 5th St S 14 DIP 27 None 6th St S 10th Ave to W Park Valley None None 7th St S 11th to 9th Ave S 18 RCP 46 Lining 7th St S 9th to 6th Ave S 8 CIP 64 Reconstruct 7th St S 6th Ave to W Park Valley 10 CIP 62 Reconstruct 7th St S W Park Valley Dr to 2nd Ave S 8 CLAY 63 Reconstruct 9th Ave S Westbrooke Way to 8th St S 15 RCP 46 Lining 9th Ave S 8th to 7th St S 18 RCP 46 Lining 10th Ave S 7th to 6th St S 8 CLAY 63 Reconstruct Park Valley Dr All 8 CLAY 62 Reconstruct 4.4 WATER MAIN Watermain varies in both age and material throughout the project area, though the majority is comprised of cast iron material of over 50 years in age. It is proposed to replace the cast-iron water system with ductile iron pipe (DIP) as a part of this project. 8- inch pipe is a typical recommended minimum main size because the cost differential is relatively low, but the capacity for supplying water, especially fire flows, is much greater. Per City policy all water service lines are proposed to be replaced to the ROW line with 1-inch copper unless the existing service material is copper. A new curb stop and box will be provided on each service. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 11 August 2016 Table 4-2 summarizes the proposed watermain improvements: ROADWAY FROM / TO EXISTING PIPE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS DIA. MATL AGE 5th Ave S 7th to 5th St S 6 Cast 53 Reconstruct with 8" DIP 6th Ave S 8th to 5th St S 6 Cast 51 Reconstruct with 8" DIP 6th St S 10th to 8th Ave S - - Add New 8" DIP 6th St S 8th to 6th Ave S 6 Ductile 52 Reconstruct with 8" DIP 6th St S 6th to W Park Valley - - Add New 8" DIP 7th St S 11th to 10th Ave S 12 Cast 55 Reconstruct with 12" DIP 7th St S 10th to 9th Ave S 12 Ductile 28 Reconstruct with 12" DIP 7th St S 9th to 8th Ave S 6 Cast 63 Reconstruct with 8" DIP or Fused HDPE 7th St S 8th to 7th Ave S 8 Ductile 28 Reconstruct with 8" DIP or Fused HDPE 7th St S 7th to 2nd Ave S 6 Cast 51 Reconstruct with 8" DIP 9th Ave S Westbrooke Way to 7th St S 8 Ductile 46 Reconstruct with 8" DIP or Fused HDPE 10th Ave S 7th to 6th St S 6 Cast 63 Reconstruct with 8" DIP E & W Park Valley Dr All 6 Cast Reconstruct with 8" DIP Watermain segments along both 9th Ave S and 7th St S are located on existing pilings in areas of poor soil conditions. In areas where no services are connected to these mains, it is recommended that watermain on piling be replaced with fused HDPE or PVC and directionally drilled off the existing pilings. In areas where services are connected to watermain on piling, it is recommended adequate piling spacing be verified during final design and restrained joint ductile iron be used atop the existing (or added) piling. 4.5 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES The City and Three Rivers Park District are in discussions to complete a trail connection between the Nine Mile Creek regional trail (along Westbrooke Way at 9th Ave S) and the existing trail along 11th Ave S at 7th St S. Consistent with Three Rivers Trail guidelines, a 10 foot wide bituminous trail is proposed along the west side of 9th Avenue S and the south side of 7th Street S from 9th to 11th Avenues S. A three to five foot boulevard will be constructed between back of curb and the proposed trail edge. To accommodate the trail PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 12 August 2016 and boulevard being constructed within City right-of-way along the west side of 9th Avenue S, the roadway is proposed to be shifted approximately 2 feet to the east. The segment of 7th Street, where the trail is proposed, is being narrowed from 44-feet to 36- feet, to be a consistent width of the rest of 7th Street S to the east of 9th Avenue S. To accommodate the trail construction along its south side, 7th Street S will be narrowed from the south side leaving the northerly curb line in approximately the existing location. The proposed trail connection crosses Nine Mile Creek along both streets, the existing box culvert crossing along 7th Street S can accommodate the trail construction based on the proposed reconfiguration of that street width. Improvements will also be needed along 9th Avenue S to accommodate the trail construction over Nine Mile Creek. A pedestrian bridge similar to the CONTECH bridge just downstream in Valley Park is proposed to cross the Creek along 9th Avenue S. Figures 3.06, 3.18, and 3.19 illustrate the proposed trail improvements. 4.6 DRIVEWAYS All existing driveways within the project areas receiving new concrete curb and gutter will receive a new 5-foot concrete apron to match the proposed concrete curb. Where trail is being placed the apron will extend to the trail. The new concrete aprons will be constructed according to City standards. In addition to the 5-foot driveway apron, additional driveway pavement disturbed as a part of the project will be replaced in-kind to match the existing driveway with the street improvements. 4.7 LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEMS There may be existing sprinkler systems in the residential neighborhood. Adjacent property owners will need to assist in locating and identifying the type of sprinkler systems that are in place prior to and during construction. The contractor will be required to make every effort to preserve the in place systems during construction. Where this is found to be unfeasible, the contractor will be required to remove and replace or salvage and reinstall the existing sprinkler system. 4.8 STREET SIGNING AND STRIPING The existing street name signs will be salvaged and reinstalled by the contractor as necessary to facilitate construction. Regulatory signs such as STOP signs will be replaced in order to conform to new retroreflectivity requirements. Existing zebra crosswalk striping will be repainted upon completion of the paving. 4.9 TURF RESTORATION Boulevards will be graded as necessary to facilitate drainage from the existing yards to the streets. Turf areas disturbed by construction, either due to boulevard grading or utility PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 13 August 2016 service construction, will be graded to match the new street and sidewalk grades and restored with lawn type sod in residential yards. In park or other areas maintained by the City, areas will be restored with seed and mulch (hydroseed). 4.10 BOULEVARD TREES As with all projects being considered by the City of Hopkins, it is a goal of this project to protect healthy boulevard trees and/or make improvements to the urban tree canopy where feasible. Residents echoed the desire to protect healthy trees in questionnaire responses. Design and construction of improvements, including appropriate selection of street widths and utility main placement, are proposed to be completed in a manner to achieve the City’s goals to save healthy trees. An evaluation of boulevard tree species and condition was completed in consideration of the adjacent street and utility improvements to facilitate design and construction and meet this criteria. Due to their susceptibility to the Emerald Ash Borer, green ash trees are generally considered undesirable trees. Similarly, Silver Maple trees are more susceptible to storm damage than other species, create a lot of litter because of their soft wood and weak, brittle branches, and thus are not desirable trees to Public Works staff and local residents. Silver maples are also known to have an intrusive root system that can damage sidewalks and curbs and penetrate sewer joints. Finally, American Elm also exist in the project area and are still susceptible to Dutch Elm disease. These three undesirable species, as well as other trees that are either dead or in poor health, should either be removed or otherwise not protected through the design/construction process. An inventory of the trees located in the right of way was performed in August 2016 by City Public Works Staff. Consistent with the recent 2016 Street & Utility Improvements project, trees that are dead or in very poor condition, and “undesirable” species in fair or poor condition, are proposed to be removed and replaced. Approximately 50 boulevard tree species within the project area, similar to the amount in the 2016 project area, are considered undesirable due to condition/species. Specific tree removals will be identified in the final construction plans for the project. Properties located adjacent to boulevard tree removals will be contacted and allowed to provide input on proposed tree replacements. Tree replacements Certain trees may be identified during design or construction to be removed. This may be due to the street reconstruction, grading, utility replacement, sidewalk replacement, water service replacement, sewer service replacement, or other factors. Options to preserve highly desirable trees in harm’s way include small retaining walls or moving service lines around trees. The City will work with the homeowners to replace these trees as part of the project in the event tree removal is necessary. This project provides an opportunity to increase the health of the neighborhood forest by replacing some of the undesirable species with trees better suited for boulevard areas. Up to two trees are proposed to be installed per each tree removed. The City has usually planted new 2-inch balled and burlapped (B &B) trees. A list of species to be planted PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 14 August 2016 will be formulated during final design in cooperation with the City’s Public Works department. 5.NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A neighborhood meeting is scheduled for September 6, 2016 with residents and property owners that are affected by and being assessed for the improvements. This section will be amended, along with other sections of the preliminary engineering report, based on input received at the meeting. The City Engineer and Bolton & Menk, Inc. representatives will present the scope of the project with a discussion of existing and proposed street and utility conditions, project costs, projected assessments and schedule. Details related to assessment computation and payment options will be provided. Feedback from the residents will be documented in the amended version of this report. Residents within the project area were also mailed questionnaires. Sixty seven questionnaires were returned with comments. The most common questionnaire responses related to: a.Specific drainage problems b.Opposition to any sidewalk improvements c.Cars routinely bottoming out when accessing driveways due to steep roadway crowns d.A desire to minimize traffic volumes/speed on 10th Ave S e.Traffic flow/detours during the 2017 work by MnDOT on Highway 169 f.Questions or concerns about assessments and project costs g.Individual sewer and water service problems, history of backups/root blockages h.Other unique issues specific to individual properties (individual tree conditions, water service line, driveways, landscaping, etc.) 6.ESTIMATED COSTS Estimated construction costs presented in this report include a 10 percent contingency factor. Overhead costs, estimated at 21 percent, include legal, engineering, administrative and fiscal costs. Final costs and assessments will be determined by using low-bid construction costs of the proposed work. Proposed construction costs for the 2017 Street and Utility Improvements (including curb and gutter, bituminous street, pedestrian facilities, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water main, and turf restoration) are itemized in Appendix A and are summarized in Table 6.1 below. These cost estimates are based upon public construction cost information. Since the consultant has no control over the cost of labor, materials, competitive bidding process, weather conditions and other factors affecting the cost of construction, all cost estimates are opinions for general information of the client and no warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy of construction cost estimates is PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 15 August 2016 made. It is recommended that costs for project financing should be based upon actual, competitive bid prices with reasonable contingencies. Table 6.1 SUBTOTAL OF PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS $3,258,500.00 SUBTOTAL OF PROPOSED STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $ 517,400.00 SUBTOTAL OF PROPOSED W ATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS $ 1,207,800.00 SUBTOTAL OF PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $ 901,900.00 STREET & UTILITY SUBTOTAL $5,885,600.00 CONTINGENCIES (10%) $ 588,560.00 ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION (21%) $ 1,359,574.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $7,833,734.00 7. ASSESSMENT RATES Street improvements throughout the project area will be assessed to adjacent and benefitting properties according to the City’s assessment policy. Street improvement work includes pavement and sidewalk removals, grading, subgrade correction, aggregate base, curbing, sidewalks, driveways and pavements construction, and restoration. According to the City’s assessment policy, residential street improvement costs are assessed to the benefitting properties. In summary, assessments to benefitting properties are determined based on the following criteria: Properties are assessed based on 70% of the actual street improvement costs. This is referred to as a “Street Assessment”. o North/South Avenue improvements are typically assessed to properties with direct frontage based on a front foot basis (length) along the Avenue o East/West Street improvements are typically assessed to properties located within one block north/south of the Street on a unit basis (per each property) o In some cases where properties front Streets rather than Avenues (or where no properties front Avenues), City Staff reviews and considers the intent of the policy as it applies to each unique situation. For example along 7th Street S, between 6th Avenue and E Park Valley Dr, properties front the roadway in a fashion similar to typical layouts along North/South avenues as contemplated in the policy. Therefore, assessments for this half of the 7th St S were treated in similar fashion to north/south Avenues. “Street Assessments” to any individual property are capped at front foot rate increase annually by 3% over the prior year’s amount. An assessment cap for residential properties of $86.30 per front foot has been established by adding 3% to the 2016 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 16 August 2016 assessment cap according to City policy. This cap is applied only to residential properties in the project area and is not applicable to non-residential properties. Utility (sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water) main improvements are 100% paid by the respective utility funds. No assessment for utility mains is proposed and there costs do not contribute to either the “Street Assessments”or “Utility Assessments”. Utility service lines are owned by the individual property per City Code. As a result, the City assesses for the cost of the individual service line replacements. This is referred to as a “Utility Assessment”. The City participates in a share of these costs because the replacement is mandatory where mains are reconstructed, and therefore properties are assessed for only 50% of the cost of the service replacement. The estimated cost of the water service replacement from the main to property line is $1,600. With the proposed 50/50 “Utility Assessment” split, $800 will be assessed to each property where water services are replaced. The estimated cost of the sewer service replacement from the main to the property line is $1,500. With the proposed 50/50 “Utility Assessment” split, $750 will be assessed to each property where sewer services are replaced. Thus, a property proposed to receive both a new water service and sewer service would have a proposed “Utility Assessment”of $1,550. In the case that sanitary sewer services are made of Orangeburg or Transite, or are in disrepair, replacement or lining of the entire line will also be required from the property line to the house. On past projects, the property owner has been given one year to affect the necessary repairs. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix C of this report. Total estimated assessments are $1,420,512.83. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2017 Street & Utility Improvements Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc. City of Hopkins, MN Page 17 August 2016 RIGHT-OF-WAY / EASEMENTS / PERMITS The majority of the proposed improvements will be limited to the existing street ROW along all corridors. Temporary construction easements may be needed for work outside the street ROW such as driveway apron replacement, grading and turf restoration. Permits will be required from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for grading (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit), Minnesota Department of Health for Water Main Replacement, and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. 8.PROJECT SCHEDULE If this Preliminary Engineering Report is accepted by the City Council, the following schedule is proposed: Order Public Improvement Hearing.........................................................................August 16, 2016 Conduct Public Improvement Hearing ..............................................................September 20, 2016 Order Final Plans & Specifications....................................................................September 20, 2016 Final Design..............................................................................September 21 – December 20, 2016 Present Final Plans / Authorize Ad for Bids.......................................................December 20, 2016 Open Bids ...............................................................................................................January 18, 2017 Accept Bids / Order Public Assessment Hearing....................................................January 24, 2017 Conduct Public Assessment Hearing / Adopt Assessment Roll / Award Project.......................................................................................................February 21, 2017 Construction.........................................................................................April/May – November 2017 9.FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION From an engineering standpoint, this project is feasible, cost effective, and necessary and can best be accomplished by letting competitive bids for the work. It is recommended that the work be done under one contract in order to complete the work in an orderly and efficient manner. The City, its financial consultant, and the persons assessed will have to determine the economic feasibility of the proposed improvements. Appendix A: Preliminary Cost Estimate ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO. T19.112021 STREET TOTAL SANITARY SEWER WATER STORM SEWER 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 200,000.00 $ 0.59 0.15 0.17 0.09 2 CLEARING AND GRUBBING (TREE)EACH 400.00 $ 54 3 TREE TRIMMING LUMP SUM 5,000.00 $ 0.59 0.15 0.17 0.09 4 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (TRAILS AND DRIVEWAYS)SQ YD 4.00 $ 1964 5 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT (WALKS, DRIVEWAYS, AND ALLEYS)SQ YD 6.00 $ 3937 6 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT 3.00 $ 20089 7 REMOVE CONCRETE STEP EACH 100.00 $ 19 8 REMOVE CONCRETE PARKING STOP LIN FT 20.00 $ 50 9 REMOVE RETAINING WALL SQ FT 20.00 $ 60 10 REMOVE FENCE LIN FT 10.00 $ 0 11 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL-DEPTH)LIN FT 5.00 $ 1260 12 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL-DEPTH)LIN FT 4.00 $ 1894 13 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 13.00 $ 29277 14 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 13.00 $ 2189 15 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CU YD 15.00 $ 16458 16 TOPSOIL BORROW (SPECIAL)CU YD 25.00 $ 2609 17 EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION HOUR 450.00 $ 10 18 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE TON 14.00 $ 23564 19 CLASS 2 AGGREGATE SURFACING (GRAVEL DRIVEWAY)TON 29.00 $ 76 20 MILL OR RECLAIM BITUMINOUS SURFACE SQ YD 2.50 $ 59902 21 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240C)TON 70.00 $ 6767 22 BITUMINOUS NON-WEARING COURSE (SPNWB230C)TON 65.00 $ 4954 23 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 4.00 $ 3293 24 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY & PAVEMENT (SPWEA240B)SQ YD 20.00 $ 3742 25 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SQ FT 45.00 $ 0 26 CONTECH PREFABRICATED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LUMP SUM 50,000.00 $ 1 27 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ABUTMENT EACH 25,000.00 $ 2 28 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 3.70 $ 5513 29 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 42.00 $ 108 30 CONCRETE STEP EACH 225.00 $ 14 31 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT 13.00 $ 22427 32 SPOT CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REPLACEMENT LIN FT 27.00 $ 0 33 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SQ YD 60.00 $ 3354 34 6" CONCRETE ALLEY SQ YD 60.00 $ 1358 35 ALLEY CONCRETE TIE-BARS EACH 22.00 $ 509 36 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 25,000.00 $ 0.59 0.15 0.17 0.09 37 ZEBRA CROSSWALK BLOCK - WHITE EPOXY SQ FT 7.00 $ 648 38 TRAFFIC SIGN POST EACH 193.00 $ 26 39 SIGN PANELS (TYPE C)SQ FT 59.00 $ 24 40 SIGN PANELS (TYPE D)SQ FT 63.00 $ 21 41 LANDSCAPE ALLOWANCE LUMP SUM 30,000.00 $ 0.59 0.15 0.17 0.09 42 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B EACH 350.00 $ 11 43 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (WHITE OAK)EACH 350.00 $ 11 44 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (PARKWAY NORWAY MAPLE)EACH 350.00 $ 11 45 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (RED OAK)EACH 350.00 $ 11 46 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (GREENSPIRE LINDEN)EACH 350.00 $ 11 47 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (CATHEDRAL ELM - DISEASE RESISTANT)EACH 350.00 $ 11 48 INLET PROTECTION EACH 150.00 $ 57 49 SILT FENCE LIN FT 2.30 $ 1000 50 STREET SWEEPER WITH OPERATOR HOUR 150.00 $ 36 51 TURF RESTORATION SQ YD 4.00 $ 29341 52 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 4.00 $ 6452 53 REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLE EACH 500.00 $ 29 54 SANITARY MANHOLE CASTING EACH 650.00 $ 29 55 8" PVC SDR 35 SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 38.00 $ 5762 56 10" PVC SDR 35 SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 45.00 $ 690 57 LINE 8" SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 50.00 $ 4400 57 LINE 18" RCP SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 90.00 $ 675 58 6" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 25.00 $ 5115 59 8" x 6" SDR 26 PVC SERVICE WYE EACH 200.00 $ 155 60 SANITARY MANHOLE EACH 2,500.00 $ 29 61 RECONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH 175.00 $ 155 62 CONNECT TO EXISTIING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 2,500.00 $ 1 63 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE EACH 1,500.00 $ 8 64 REMOVE WATERMAIN LIN FT 5.00 $ 7255 65 ABANDON WATERMAIN LIN FT 8.00 $ 960 66 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 300.00 $ 13 67 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 1,326.00 $ 17 68 HYDRANT EACH 3,832.00 $ 17 69 18" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX EACH 6,000.00 $ 1 70 8" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 2,000.00 $ 45 71 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 1,400.00 $ 17 72 8" DIP WATER MAIN LIN FT 45.00 $ 7911 73 6" DIP WATER MAIN LIN FT 42.00 $ 340 74 8" DIP RJ WATER MAIN LIN FT 85.00 $ 800 75 DIRECTIONAL DRILL 8" WATERMAIN LIN FT 135.00 $ 300 76 DIRECTIONAL DRILL 12" WATERMAIN LIN FT 160.00 $ 660 77 1" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 28.00 $ 5346 78 1" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 350.00 $ 162 79 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH 250.00 $ 162 80 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EACH 200.00 $ 162 81 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE EACH 275.00 $ 162 82 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 7.00 $ 1570 83 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 300.00 $ 33 84 STORM SEWER CASTING EACH 650.00 $ 91 85 12" RC PIPE SEWER CL V DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 33.00 $ 0 86 15" RC PIPE SEWER CL V DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 34.00 $ 2674 87 18" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 37.00 $ 1020 88 21" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 40.00 $ 680 89 24" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 44.00 $ 550 90 27" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 55.00 $ 0 91 42" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 33.00 $ 600 92 48" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 55.00 $ 130 93 STORM MANHOLE EACH 2,500.00 $ 19 94 STORM MANHOLE - 60"EACH 3,500.00 $ 8 95 STORM MANHOLE - 72"EACH 5,000.00 $ 4 96 STORM MANHOLE - 90"EACH 8,000.00 $ 1 97 STORM CATCH BASIN EACH 1,500.00 $ 59 98 SAFL BAFFLE W/SUMP IN MANHOLE EACH 7,500.00 $ 1 99 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM PIPE EACH 750.00 $ 10 100 CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 1,000.00$0 ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE STREET UTILITIES ESTIMATED QUANTITIES SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCIES (10%) ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION (21%) TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO. T19.112021 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 200,000.00 $ 2 CLEARING AND GRUBBING (TREE)EACH 400.00 $ 3 TREE TRIMMING LUMP SUM 5,000.00 $ 4 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (TRAILS AND DRIVEWAYS)SQ YD 4.00 $ 5 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT (WALKS, DRIVEWAYS, AND ALLEYS)SQ YD 6.00 $ 6 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT 3.00 $ 7 REMOVE CONCRETE STEP EACH 100.00 $ 8 REMOVE CONCRETE PARKING STOP LIN FT 20.00 $ 9 REMOVE RETAINING WALL SQ FT 20.00 $ 10 REMOVE FENCE LIN FT 10.00 $ 11 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL-DEPTH)LIN FT 5.00 $ 12 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL-DEPTH)LIN FT 4.00 $ 13 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 13.00 $ 14 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 13.00 $ 15 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CU YD 15.00 $ 16 TOPSOIL BORROW (SPECIAL)CU YD 25.00 $ 17 EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION HOUR 450.00 $ 18 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE TON 14.00 $ 19 CLASS 2 AGGREGATE SURFACING (GRAVEL DRIVEWAY)TON 29.00 $ 20 MILL OR RECLAIM BITUMINOUS SURFACE SQ YD 2.50 $ 21 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240C)TON 70.00 $ 22 BITUMINOUS NON-WEARING COURSE (SPNWB230C)TON 65.00 $ 23 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 4.00 $ 24 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY & PAVEMENT (SPWEA240B)SQ YD 20.00 $ 25 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SQ FT 45.00 $ 26 CONTECH PREFABRICATED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LUMP SUM 50,000.00 $ 27 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ABUTMENT EACH 25,000.00 $ 28 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 3.70 $ 29 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 42.00 $ 30 CONCRETE STEP EACH 225.00 $ 31 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT 13.00 $ 32 SPOT CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REPLACEMENT LIN FT 27.00 $ 33 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SQ YD 60.00 $ 34 6" CONCRETE ALLEY SQ YD 60.00 $ 35 ALLEY CONCRETE TIE-BARS EACH 22.00 $ 36 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 25,000.00 $ 37 ZEBRA CROSSWALK BLOCK - WHITE EPOXY SQ FT 7.00 $ 38 TRAFFIC SIGN POST EACH 193.00 $ 39 SIGN PANELS (TYPE C)SQ FT 59.00 $ 40 SIGN PANELS (TYPE D)SQ FT 63.00 $ 41 LANDSCAPE ALLOWANCE LUMP SUM 30,000.00 $ 42 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B EACH 350.00 $ 43 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (WHITE OAK)EACH 350.00 $ 44 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (PARKWAY NORWAY MAPLE)EACH 350.00 $ 45 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (RED OAK)EACH 350.00 $ 46 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (GREENSPIRE LINDEN)EACH 350.00 $ 47 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (CATHEDRAL ELM - DISEASE RESISTANT)EACH 350.00 $ 48 INLET PROTECTION EACH 150.00 $ 49 SILT FENCE LIN FT 2.30 $ 50 STREET SWEEPER WITH OPERATOR HOUR 150.00 $ 51 TURF RESTORATION SQ YD 4.00 $ 52 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 4.00 $ 53 REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLE EACH 500.00 $ 54 SANITARY MANHOLE CASTING EACH 650.00 $ 55 8" PVC SDR 35 SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 38.00 $ 56 10" PVC SDR 35 SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 45.00 $ 57 LINE 8" SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 50.00 $ 57 LINE 18" RCP SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 90.00 $ 58 6" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 25.00 $ 59 8" x 6" SDR 26 PVC SERVICE WYE EACH 200.00 $ 60 SANITARY MANHOLE EACH 2,500.00 $ 61 RECONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH 175.00 $ 62 CONNECT TO EXISTIING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 2,500.00 $ 63 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE EACH 1,500.00 $ 64 REMOVE WATERMAIN LIN FT 5.00 $ 65 ABANDON WATERMAIN LIN FT 8.00 $ 66 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 300.00 $ 67 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 1,326.00 $ 68 HYDRANT EACH 3,832.00 $ 69 18" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX EACH 6,000.00 $ 70 8" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 2,000.00 $ 71 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 1,400.00 $ 72 8" DIP WATER MAIN LIN FT 45.00 $ 73 6" DIP WATER MAIN LIN FT 42.00 $ 74 8" DIP RJ WATER MAIN LIN FT 85.00 $ 75 DIRECTIONAL DRILL 8" WATERMAIN LIN FT 135.00 $ 76 DIRECTIONAL DRILL 12" WATERMAIN LIN FT 160.00 $ 77 1" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 28.00 $ 78 1" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 350.00 $ 79 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH 250.00 $ 80 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EACH 200.00 $ 81 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE EACH 275.00 $ 82 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 7.00 $ 83 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 300.00 $ 84 STORM SEWER CASTING EACH 650.00 $ 85 12" RC PIPE SEWER CL V DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 33.00 $ 86 15" RC PIPE SEWER CL V DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 34.00 $ 87 18" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 37.00 $ 88 21" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 40.00 $ 89 24" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 44.00 $ 90 27" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 55.00 $ 91 42" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 33.00 $ 92 48" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 55.00 $ 93 STORM MANHOLE EACH 2,500.00 $ 94 STORM MANHOLE - 60"EACH 3,500.00 $ 95 STORM MANHOLE - 72"EACH 5,000.00 $ 96 STORM MANHOLE - 90"EACH 8,000.00 $ 97 STORM CATCH BASIN EACH 1,500.00 $ 98 SAFL BAFFLE W/SUMP IN MANHOLE EACH 7,500.00 $ 99 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM PIPE EACH 750.00 $ 100 CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 1,000.00$ ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCIES (10%) ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION (21%) TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST 10TH AVE S 9TH AVE S 8TH AVE S 7TH AVE S 6TH AVE S 5TH AVE S E & W PARK VALLEY 6TH ST S 7TH ST S 8TH ST S NINE MILE TRAIL ALLEY: 5TH ST S ALLEY: 8TH ST S 4,000 $ 10,000 $ 2,000 $ 4,000 $ 16,000 $ 10,000 $ 18,000 $ 14,000 $ 28,000 $ 2,000 $ 6,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 1,600 $ 2,400 $ - $ - $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 1,600 $ 4,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100 $ 250 $ 50 $ 100 $ 400 $ 250 $ 450 $ 350 $ 700 $ 50 $ 150 $ 50 $ 50 $ 260 $ 356 $ - $ - $ 1,376 $ 712 $ 1,264 $ 364 $ 3,436 $ 88 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,422 $ 2,694 $ 264 $ 264 $ 3,498 $ 1,884 $ 4,392 $ 2,004 $ 4,506 $ 666 $ - $ 1,014 $ 1,014 $ 150 $ 2,160 $ 210 $ - $ 10,947 $ 7,254 $ 12,408 $ 10,230 $ 16,488 $ - $ - $ 210 $ 210 $ 500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,400 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 470 $ 280 $ 190 $ 190 $ 2,815 $ 470 $ 375 $ 565 $ 375 $ 190 $ - $ 190 $ 190 $ 224 $ 300 $ - $ - $ 1,576 $ 1,500 $ 2,324 $ 376 $ 1,124 $ 152 $ - $ - $ - $ 17,979 $ 48,321 $ 494 $ 494 $ 54,444 $ 40,235 $ 70,148 $ 31,525 $ 108,225 $ 689 $ 4,095 $ 1,976 $ 1,976 $ 897 $ 1,625 $ - $ - $ 3,107 $ 2,054 $ 3,575 $ 8,697 $ 8,502 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,385 $ 39,375 $ - $ - $ 39,375 $ 26,130 $ 45,360 $ 10,035 $ 75,210 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,650 $ 5,875 $ 625 $ 625 $ 1,125 $ 7,475 $ 12,775 $ 11,600 $ 15,900 $ 625 $ - $ 2,475 $ 2,475 $ - $ - $ 900 $ 900 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900 $ - $ 900 $ 900 $ 13,958 $ 25,214 $ 140 $ 140 $ 48,076 $ 31,444 $ 55,202 $ 51,604 $ 87,976 $ 448 $ 8,666 $ 3,276 $ 3,752 $ 493 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 116 $ 145 $ - $ - $ 725 $ 725 $ 5,245 $ 9,460 $ 10,673 $ 16,110 $ 18,060 $ 10,940 $ 18,425 $ 18,783 $ 33,008 $ 9,053 $ - $ - $ - $ 14,630 $ 27,300 $ 37,800 $ 57,050 $ 52,220 $ 34,510 $ 59,920 $ 59,570 $ 98,630 $ 32,060 $ - $ - $ - $ 13,585 $ 25,350 $ - $ - $ 48,490 $ 32,045 $ 55,640 $ 55,315 $ 91,585 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 460 $ 832 $ 940 $ 1,416 $ 1,588 $ 964 $ 1,620 $ 1,652 $ 2,904 $ 796 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,300 $ 1,780 $ - $ - $ 6,880 $ 3,560 $ 6,320 $ 1,820 $ 17,180 $ 440 $ 35,560 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 2,601 $ 429 $ 1,480 $ 1,480 $ 6,497 $ 899 $ 474 $ 803 $ 555 $ 2,220 $ - $ 1,480 $ 1,480 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,512 $ 3,024 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,150 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,392 $ 24,765 $ 910 $ - $ 47,541 $ 31,473 $ 53,820 $ 48,828 $ 67,002 $ - $ - $ 910 $ 910 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,540 $ 26,160 $ - $ - $ 23,280 $ 17,220 $ 43,080 $ 15,480 $ 42,300 $ 2,640 $ 6,660 $ 7,440 $ 7,440 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,060 $ 1,740 $ - $ - $ 35,340 $ 41,340 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 418 $ 242 $ - $ - $ 4,862 $ 5,676 $ 500 $ 1,250 $ 250 $ 500 $ 2,000 $ 1,250 $ 2,250 $ 1,750 $ 3,500 $ 250 $ 750 $ 250 $ 250 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,536 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 772 $ 772 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,930 $ - $ 772 $ 772 $ - $ - $ 236 $ 236 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 472 $ - $ 236 $ 236 $ - $ - $ 189 $ 189 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 567 $ - $ 189 $ 189 $ 600 $ 1,500 $ 300 $ 600 $ 2,400 $ 1,500 $ 2,700 $ 2,100 $ 4,200 $ 300 $ 900 $ 300 $ 300 $ 350 $ 350 $ - $ - $ 700 $ 700 $ 700 $ 350 $ 700 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350 $ 350 $ - $ - $ 700 $ 700 $ 700 $ 350 $ 700 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350 $ 350 $ - $ - $ 700 $ 700 $ 700 $ 350 $ 700 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350 $ 350 $ - $ - $ 700 $ 700 $ 700 $ 350 $ 700 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350 $ 350 $ - $ - $ 700 $ 700 $ 700 $ 350 $ 700 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350 $ 350 $ - $ - $ 700 $ 700 $ 700 $ 350 $ 700 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,050 $ 900 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900 $ 1,650 $ 4,050 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,300 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600 $ 600 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600 $ 2,400 $ 600 $ 600 $ 6,576 $ 10,584 $ 1,112 $ 1,112 $ 2,032 $ 13,448 $ 23,000 $ 20,868 $ 28,632 $ 1,112 $ - $ 4,444 $ 4,444 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$-$-$-$-$-$-$-$-$-$-$-$-$ 132,900 $ 271,300 $ 60,100 $ 86,800 $ 401,900 $ 285,400 $ 502,600 $ 377,300 $ 758,900 $ 64,300 $ 170,500 $ 69,600 $ 76,900 $ 13,300 $ 27,100 $ 6,000 $ 8,700 $ 40,200 $ 28,500 $ 50,300 $ 37,700 $ 75,900 $ 6,400 $ 17,100 $ 7,000 $ 7,700 $ 30,700 $ 62,700 $ 13,900 $ 20,100 $ 92,800 $ 65,900 $ 116,100 $ 87,200 $ 175,300 $ 14,800 $ 39,400 $ 16,100 $ 17,800 $ 176,900$361,100$80,000$115,600$534,900$379,800$669,000$502,200$1,010,100$85,500$227,000$92,700$102,400$ ESTIMATED STREET COSTS BY CORRIDOR STREET ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO. T19.112021 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 200,000.00 $ 2 CLEARING AND GRUBBING (TREE)EACH 400.00 $ 3 TREE TRIMMING LUMP SUM 5,000.00 $ 4 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (TRAILS AND DRIVEWAYS)SQ YD 4.00 $ 5 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT (WALKS, DRIVEWAYS, AND ALLEYS)SQ YD 6.00 $ 6 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT 3.00 $ 7 REMOVE CONCRETE STEP EACH 100.00 $ 8 REMOVE CONCRETE PARKING STOP LIN FT 20.00 $ 9 REMOVE RETAINING WALL SQ FT 20.00 $ 10 REMOVE FENCE LIN FT 10.00 $ 11 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL-DEPTH)LIN FT 5.00 $ 12 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL-DEPTH)LIN FT 4.00 $ 13 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 13.00 $ 14 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 13.00 $ 15 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CU YD 15.00 $ 16 TOPSOIL BORROW (SPECIAL)CU YD 25.00 $ 17 EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION HOUR 450.00 $ 18 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE TON 14.00 $ 19 CLASS 2 AGGREGATE SURFACING (GRAVEL DRIVEWAY)TON 29.00 $ 20 MILL OR RECLAIM BITUMINOUS SURFACE SQ YD 2.50 $ 21 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240C)TON 70.00 $ 22 BITUMINOUS NON-WEARING COURSE (SPNWB230C)TON 65.00 $ 23 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 4.00 $ 24 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY & PAVEMENT (SPWEA240B)SQ YD 20.00 $ 25 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SQ FT 45.00 $ 26 CONTECH PREFABRICATED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LUMP SUM 50,000.00 $ 27 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ABUTMENT EACH 25,000.00 $ 28 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 3.70 $ 29 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 42.00 $ 30 CONCRETE STEP EACH 225.00 $ 31 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT 13.00 $ 32 SPOT CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REPLACEMENT LIN FT 27.00 $ 33 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SQ YD 60.00 $ 34 6" CONCRETE ALLEY SQ YD 60.00 $ 35 ALLEY CONCRETE TIE-BARS EACH 22.00 $ 36 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 25,000.00 $ 37 ZEBRA CROSSWALK BLOCK - WHITE EPOXY SQ FT 7.00 $ 38 TRAFFIC SIGN POST EACH 193.00 $ 39 SIGN PANELS (TYPE C)SQ FT 59.00 $ 40 SIGN PANELS (TYPE D)SQ FT 63.00 $ 41 LANDSCAPE ALLOWANCE LUMP SUM 30,000.00 $ 42 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B EACH 350.00 $ 43 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (WHITE OAK)EACH 350.00 $ 44 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (PARKWAY NORWAY MAPLE)EACH 350.00 $ 45 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (RED OAK)EACH 350.00 $ 46 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (GREENSPIRE LINDEN)EACH 350.00 $ 47 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2-INCH DIAMETER B&B (CATHEDRAL ELM - DISEASE RESISTANT)EACH 350.00 $ 48 INLET PROTECTION EACH 150.00 $ 49 SILT FENCE LIN FT 2.30 $ 50 STREET SWEEPER WITH OPERATOR HOUR 150.00 $ 51 TURF RESTORATION SQ YD 4.00 $ 52 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 4.00 $ 53 REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLE EACH 500.00 $ 54 SANITARY MANHOLE CASTING EACH 650.00 $ 55 8" PVC SDR 35 SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 38.00 $ 56 10" PVC SDR 35 SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 45.00 $ 57 LINE 8" SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 50.00 $ 57 LINE 18" RCP SANITARY SEWER PIPE LIN FT 90.00 $ 58 6" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 25.00 $ 59 8" x 6" SDR 26 PVC SERVICE WYE EACH 200.00 $ 60 SANITARY MANHOLE EACH 2,500.00 $ 61 RECONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH 175.00 $ 62 CONNECT TO EXISTIING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 2,500.00 $ 63 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE EACH 1,500.00 $ 64 REMOVE WATERMAIN LIN FT 5.00 $ 65 ABANDON WATERMAIN LIN FT 8.00 $ 66 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 300.00 $ 67 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 1,326.00 $ 68 HYDRANT EACH 3,832.00 $ 69 18" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX EACH 6,000.00 $ 70 8" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 2,000.00 $ 71 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 1,400.00 $ 72 8" DIP WATER MAIN LIN FT 45.00 $ 73 6" DIP WATER MAIN LIN FT 42.00 $ 74 8" DIP RJ WATER MAIN LIN FT 85.00 $ 75 DIRECTIONAL DRILL 8" WATERMAIN LIN FT 135.00 $ 76 DIRECTIONAL DRILL 12" WATERMAIN LIN FT 160.00 $ 77 1" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 28.00 $ 78 1" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 350.00 $ 79 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH 250.00 $ 80 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EACH 200.00 $ 81 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE EACH 275.00 $ 82 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE LIN FT 7.00 $ 83 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 300.00 $ 84 STORM SEWER CASTING EACH 650.00 $ 85 12" RC PIPE SEWER CL V DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 33.00 $ 86 15" RC PIPE SEWER CL V DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 34.00 $ 87 18" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 37.00 $ 88 21" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 40.00 $ 89 24" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 44.00 $ 90 27" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 55.00 $ 91 42" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 33.00 $ 92 48" RC PIPE SEWER CL III DESIGN 3006 (STORM)LIN FT 55.00 $ 93 STORM MANHOLE EACH 2,500.00 $ 94 STORM MANHOLE - 60"EACH 3,500.00 $ 95 STORM MANHOLE - 72"EACH 5,000.00 $ 96 STORM MANHOLE - 90"EACH 8,000.00 $ 97 STORM CATCH BASIN EACH 1,500.00 $ 98 SAFL BAFFLE W/SUMP IN MANHOLE EACH 7,500.00 $ 99 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM PIPE EACH 750.00 $ 100 CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 1,000.00$ ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCIES (10%) ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION (21%) TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST SANITARY SEWER WATER STORM SEWER TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL COST 118,000 $ 30,000 $ 34,000 $ 18,000 $ 1.00 200,000 $ 21,600 $ - $ - $ - $ 54 21,600 $ 2,950 $ 750 $ 850 $ 450 $ 1.00 5,000 $ 7,856 $ - $ - $ - $ 1964 7,900 $ 23,622 $ - $ - $ - $ 3937 23,600 $ 60,267 $ - $ - $ - $ 20089 60,300 $ 1,900 $ - $ - $ - $ 19 1,900 $ 1,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50 1,000 $ 1,200 $ - $ - $ - $ 60 1,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 0 - $ 6,300 $ - $ - $ - $ 1260 6,300 $ 7,576 $ - $ - $ - $ 1894 7,600 $ 380,601 $ - $ - $ - $ 29277 380,600 $ 28,457 $ - $ - $ - $ 2189 28,500 $ 246,870 $ - $ - $ - $ 16458 246,900 $ 65,225 $ - $ - $ - $ 2609 65,200 $ 4,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 10 4,500 $ 329,896 $ - $ - $ - $ 23564 329,900 $ 2,204 $ - $ - $ - $ 76 2,200 $ 149,755 $ - $ - $ - $ 59902 149,800 $ 473,690 $ - $ - $ - $ 6767 473,700 $ 322,010 $ - $ - $ - $ 4954 322,000 $ 13,172 $ - $ - $ - $ 3293 13,200 $ 74,840 $ - $ - $ - $ 3742 74,800 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 0 - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1.00 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2 50,000 $ 20,398 $ - $ - $ - $ 5513 20,400 $ 4,536 $ - $ - $ - $ 108 4,500 $ 3,150 $ - $ - $ - $ 14 3,200 $ 291,551 $ - $ - $ - $ 22427 291,600 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 0 - $ 201,240 $ - $ - $ - $ 3354 201,200 $ 81,480 $ - $ - $ - $ 1358 81,500 $ 11,198 $ - $ - $ - $ 509 11,200 $ 14,750 $ 3,750 $ 4,250 $ 2,250 $ 1.00 25,000 $ 4,536 $ - $ - $ - $ 648 4,500 $ 5,018 $ - $ - $ - $ 26 5,000 $ 1,416 $ - $ - $ - $ 24 1,400 $ 1,323 $ - $ - $ - $ 21 1,300 $ 17,700 $ 4,500 $ 5,100 $ 2,700 $ 1.00 30,000 $ 3,850 $ - $ - $ - $ 11 3,900 $ 3,850 $ - $ - $ - $ 11 3,900 $ 3,850 $ - $ - $ - $ 11 3,900 $ 3,850 $ - $ - $ - $ 11 3,900 $ 3,850 $ - $ - $ - $ 11 3,900 $ 3,850 $ - $ - $ - $ 11 3,900 $ 8,550 $ - $ - $ - $ 57 8,600 $ 2,300 $ - $ - $ - $ 1000 2,300 $ 5,400 $ - $ - $ - $ 36 5,400 $ 117,364 $ - $ - $ - $ 29341 117,400 $ - $ 25,808 $ - $ - $ 6452 25,800 $ - $ 14,500 $ - $ - $ 29 14,500 $ - $ 18,850 $ - $ - $ 29 18,900 $ - $ 218,956 $ - $ - $ 5762 219,000 $ - $ 31,050 $ - $ - $ 690 31,100 $ - $ 220,000 $ - $ - $ 4400 220,000 $ - $ 60,750 $ - $ - $ 675 60,800 $ - $ 127,875 $ - $ - $ 5115 127,900 $ - $ 31,000 $ - $ - $ 155 31,000 $ - $ 72,500 $ - $ - $ 29 72,500 $ - $ 27,125 $ - $ - $ 155 27,100 $ - $ 2,500 $ - $ - $ 1 2,500 $ - $ 12,000 $ - $ - $ 8 12,000 $ - $ - $ 36,275 $ - $ 7255 36,300 $ - $ - $ 7,680 $ - $ 960 7,700 $ - $ - $ 3,900 $ - $ 13 3,900 $ - $ - $ 22,542 $ - $ 17 22,500 $ - $ - $ 65,144 $ - $ 17 65,100 $ - $ - $ 6,000 $ - $ 1 6,000 $ - $ - $ 90,000 $ - $ 45 90,000 $ - $ - $ 23,800 $ - $ 17 23,800 $ - $ - $ 355,995 $ - $ 7911 356,000 $ - $ - $ 14,280 $ - $ 340 14,300 $ - $ - $ 68,000 $ - $ 800 68,000 $ - $ - $ 40,500 $ - $ 300 40,500 $ - $ - $ 105,600 $ - $ 660 105,600 $ - $ - $ 149,688 $ - $ 5346 149,700 $ - $ - $ 56,700 $ - $ 162 56,700 $ - $ - $ 40,500 $ - $ 162 40,500 $ - $ - $ 32,400 $ - $ 162 32,400 $ - $ - $ 44,550 $ - $ 162 44,600 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,990 $ 1570 11,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 9,900 $ 33 9,900 $ - $ - $ - $ 59,150 $ 91 59,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ 90,916 $ 2674 90,900 $ - $ - $ - $ 37,740 $ 1020 37,700 $ - $ - $ - $ 27,200 $ 680 27,200 $ - $ - $ - $ 24,200 $ 550 24,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ 19,800 $ 600 19,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 7,150 $ 130 7,200 $ - $ - $ - $ 47,500 $ 19 47,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 28,000 $ 8 28,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ 4 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,000 $ 1 8,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 88,500 $ 59 88,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500 $ 1 7,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500 $ 10 7,500 $ -$-$-$-$0 -$ 3,258,500 $ 901,900 $ 1,207,800 $ 517,400 $ 5,886,000 $ 325,900 $ 90,200 $ 120,800 $ 51,700 $ - $ 588,600 $ 752,700 $ 208,300 $ 279,000 $ 119,500 $ - $ 1,359,700 $ 4,337,100$1,200,400$1,607,600$688,600$7,834,300$ TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS STREET UTILITIES Appendix B: Figures 1 0 T H A V E N U E S 9 T H A V E N U E S 8 T H A V E N U E S 7 T H A V E N U E S 6 T H A V E N U E S 5 T H A V E N U E S 8TH STREET S 7TH STREET S 6TH STREET S 5TH STREET S A L L E Y 1 1 T H A V E N U E S W P A R K V A L L E Y D R E P A R K V A L L E Y D R 2 N D A V E N U E S 5TH STREET S PROJECT LOCATION MAP 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1AUGUST, 2016©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\1 LOCATION.dwg 8/10/2016 9:25 AM FEETSCALE HORZ. 300 6000 PROPOSED STREET/ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION MILL/OVERLAY 1 0 T H A V E N U E S 9 T H A V E N U E S 8 T H A V E N U E S 7 T H A V E N U E S 6 T H A V E N U E S 5 T H A V E N U E S 8TH STREET S 7TH STREET S 6TH STREET S 5TH STREET S A L L E Y 1 1 T H A V E N U E S W P A R K V A L L E Y D R E P A R K V A L L E Y D R 2 N D A V E N U E S 5TH STREET S 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.11 3 .2 1 3 .2 2 3 .1 8 3 .1 9 3 .1 5 3 .1 6 3 .1 7 3 .1 3 3 .1 2 3 .1 0 3 .1 4 SHEET INDEX MAP 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA FIGURE 3.01AUGUST, 2016©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-01 FIGURE INDEX MAP.dwg 8/10/2016 6:52 AM FEETSCALE HORZ. 300 6000 CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN HYDRANT & VALVE TREE REMOVALX SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM SEWER GATE VALVE WATERMAIN CONCRETE DRIVEWAY EXISTING BACKGROUND SANITARY SEWER SANITARY MANHOLE STORM SEWER STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN WATERMAIN BITUMINOUS CONCRETE CONCRETE CURB HYDRANT GATE VALVE RIGHT-OF-WAY GRAVEL PROPOSED FIGURESEXISTING FIGURES EXISTING S S SANITARY SEWER SANITARY MANHOLE STORM SEWER STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN WATERMAIN BITUMINOUS EDGE CONCRETE EDGE CONCRETE CURB HYDRANT GATE VALVE RIGHT-OF-WAY GRAVEL EDGE SANITARY SEWER GRAVEL DRIVEWAY LEGEND 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS FIGURE 3.02 CONCRETE SIDEWALK ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-02 LEGEND.dwg 8/10/2016 6:56 AM EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 6TH STREET S FIGURE 3.03 5 T H S T S FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-03 FEAS 6TH ST S.dwg 8/10/2016 12:54 PM 8 T H S T R E E T S 5 T H S T S 8 T H S T R E E T S 6TH ST S 6TH ST S 6 0 ' R15'R 1 5 ' 3 2 ' 6 0 ' 3 1 .3 ' EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 6TH STREET S FIGURE 3.04 FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 6 0 ' ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-03 FEAS 6TH ST S.dwg 8/10/2016 12:54 PM 6 T H A V E S 6 T H A V E S 7 T H A V E S 7 T H A V E S 6 0 '6 0 ' 6 0 ' 3 2 ' 3 2 .6 ' 6TH ST S 6TH ST S R 1 5 'R15' R 1 5 'R 1 5' R 1 5 'R15' R 1 5 'R15' EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 6TH STREET S FIGURE 3.05 FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-03 FEAS 6TH ST S.dwg 8/10/2016 12:54 PM W P A R K V A L L E Y D R W P A R K V A L L E Y D R 5 T H A V E S 5 T H A V E S 6 0 ' 3 2 .7 ' 3 2 ' 6 0 ' R15'R 1 5 ' R 1 5 'R 15'R15' R 1 5 ' 6TH ST S 6TH ST S EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 7TH STREET S FIGURE 3.06 FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-06 FEAS 7TH ST S.dwg 8/10/2016 12:56 PM 1 0 T H A V E N U E S 9 T H A V E N U E S 1 0 T H A V E N U E S 9 T H A V E N U E S 1 1 T H A V E N U E S 1 1 T H A V E N U E S 7TH ST S 7TH ST S 4 4 .5 ' 6 6 ' 3 6 ' 6 6 ' R 1 5 'R 1 5' EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 7TH STREET S FIGURE 3.07 FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-06 FEAS 7TH ST S.dwg 8/10/2016 12:56 PM 7 T H A V E N U E S 8 T H A V E N U E S 7 T H A V E N U E S 8 T H A V E N U E S 7TH ST S 7TH ST S R 1 5 'R15' R 1 5 'R 1 5' R 1 5 'R15' R 1 5 'R 1 5' 3 6 ' 6 6 ' 4 3 .7 ' 6 6 ' 3 5 .8 ' EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 7TH STREET S FIGURE 3.08 FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-06 FEAS 7TH ST S.dwg 8/10/2016 12:56 PM 5 T H A V E N U E S 6 T H A V E N U E S R 1 5 'R 1 5 'R15' R 1 5 'R 15' R 15' 3 6 ' 3 6 ' 6 6 '6 6 ' 7TH ST S 7TH ST S 5 T H A V E N U E S 6 T H A V E N U E S EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 7TH STREET S FIGURE 3.09 FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-06 FEAS 7TH ST S.dwg 8/10/2016 12:56 PM R 3 0' R 3 0 ' R 1 5 'R 15'R 1 5 'R 1 5' E P A R K V A L L E Y D RW P A R K V A L L E Y D R E P A R K V A L L E Y D RW P A R K V A L L E Y D R 6 6 ' 3 6 ' 6 6 ' 3 6 ' 7TH ST S 7TH ST S EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS EAST PARK VALLEY DRIVE FIGURE 3.10 7 T H S T R E E T S FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 7 T H S T R E E T S ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-10 FEAS PARK VALLEY DR.dwg 8/10/2016 1:00 PM EAST PARK VALLEY DR EAST PARK VALLEY DR R 1 5 ' R15' 3 1 ' 6 0 ' 3 1 . 5 ' 6 0 ' EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS EAST/WEST PARK VALLEY DRIVE FIGURE 3.11 WEST PARK VALLEY DR FEETSCALE 50 1000 PROPOSED CONDITIONS 6 T H S T R E E T S EXISTING CONDITIONS EAST PARK VALLEY DR WEST PARK VALLEY DR 6 T H S T R E E T S EAST PARK VALLEY DR ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-10 FEAS PARK VALLEY DR.dwg 8/10/2016 1:00 PM EAST/WEST PARK VALLEY DR EAST/WEST PARK VALLEY DR 6 0 ' 3 1 . 6 ' 31.4' 3 1 . 5 ' 6 0 ' 6 0 ' 3 1 ' 3 1 ' 6 0 ' 31' EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS EAST/WEST PARK VALLEY DRIVE FIGURE 3.12 7 T H S T R E E T S FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 6 T H S T R E E T S 7 T H S T R E E T S 6 T H S T R E E T S 6 0 ' 6 0 ' 3 1 ' 3 1 . 3 ' R 1 5 ' R 1 5' R15'R 1 5 ' ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-10 FEAS PARK VALLEY DR.dwg 8/10/2016 1:00 PM WEST PARK VALLEY DR WEST PARK VALLEY DR EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 5TH AVENUE S FIGURE 3.13 7 T H S T R E E T S FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 6 T H S T R E E T S 7 T H S T R E E T S 6 T H S T R E E T S 6 0 ' 6 0 ' 3 2 ' 3 2 . 7 ' R 1 5 ' ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-13 FEAS 5TH AVE S.dwg 8/10/2016 1:02 PM 5TH AVE S 5TH AVE S EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 5TH AVENUE S FIGURE 3.14 5 T H S T R E E T S FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 6 T H S T R E E T S 5 T H S T R E E T S 6 T H S T R E E T S 6 0 ' 6 0 ' 3 2 ' 3 2 . 5 ' ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-13 FEAS 5TH AVE S.dwg 8/10/2016 1:02 PM 5TH AVE S 5TH AVE S R 1 5' R 1 5 ' EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 6TH AVENUE S FIGURE 3.15 8 T H S T R E E T S FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 7 T H S T R E E T S 8 T H S T R E E T S 7 T H S T R E E T S 6 6 ' 6 6 ' 3 2 ' 3 5 . 2 ' ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-15 FEAS 6TH AVE S.dwg 8/10/2016 1:04 PM 6TH AVE S 6TH AVE S EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 6TH AVENUE S FIGURE 3.16 FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 6 T H S T R E E T S 6 T H S T R E E T S 6 6 ' 3 2 ' 3 5 .4 ' ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-15 FEAS 6TH AVE S.dwg 8/10/2016 1:04 PM 6TH AVE S 6TH AVE S 6 6 ' R 1 5 ' R 1 5' EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 6TH AVENUE S FIGURE 3.17 5 T H S T R E E T S FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 5 T H S T R E E T S 6 6 ' 6 6 ' 3 2 ' 3 5 . 6 ' ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-15 FEAS 6TH AVE S.dwg 8/10/2016 1:04 PM 6TH AVE S 6TH AVE S EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 9TH AVENUE S FIGURE 3.18 W E S T B R O O K W A Y FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS W E S T B R O O K W A Y 6 0 ' 6 0 ' 3 2 ' 3 6 . 1 ' ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-18 FEAS 9TH AVE S.dwg 8/10/2016 1:06 PM 9TH AVE S 9TH AVE S R 1 5 ' R750' EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 9TH AVENUE S FIGURE 3.19 7 T H S T R E E T S FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 7 T H S T R E E T S 6 0 ' 3 1 . 1 ' ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-18 FEAS 9TH AVE S.dwg 8/10/2016 1:06 PM 9TH AVE S 9TH AVE S R 1 5 ' R 1 5' EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 10TH AVENUE S FIGURE 3.20 7 T H S T R E E T S FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 7 T H S T R E E T S 6 6 ' 6 6 ' 2 8 ' 3 0 . 8 ' ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-20 FEAS 10TH AVE S.dwg 8/10/2016 1:08 PM 5 T H S T R E E T S 5 T H S T R E E T S R15' R 1 5 ' 10TH AVE S 10TH AVE S EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS ALLEY FIGURE 3.21 7 T H S T R E E T S FEETSCALE 50 1000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 7 T H S T R E E T S ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\3-21 FEAS ALLEY.dwg 8/10/2016 1:09 PM 5 T H S T R E E T S 5 T H S T R E E T S ALLEY ALLEY 1 2 ' Appendix C: Preliminary Assessment Roll PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO. T19.112021 8/10/2016 A B FRONT FOOTAGE ADJUSTED FRONT FOOTAGE PARK VALLEY DR 5TH AVE S 7TH ST S 9TH AVE S 10TH AVE S SUBTOTAL FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT 6TH ST S 7TH ST S ALLEY 5TH ST S ALLEY 8TH ST S SUBTOTAL UNIT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT RATE CAP PER FRONT FOOT STREET ASSESSMENT PER CAP 2511722240046 600 10TH AVE S THOMAS T WALDACK B 46.21 -$-$-$-$103.94$4,802.76$-$2,085.75$5,407.50$-$7,493.25$12,296.01$$ 86.30 $ 3,987.67 3,987.67$750.00$800.00$5,537.67$ 2511722240047 606 10TH AVE S NICK CHAN DO & TONU NGUON B 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.63$-$2,085.75$5,407.50$-$7,493.25$12,684.88$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.54 4,310.54$750.00$800.00$5,860.54$ 2511722240048 610 10TH AVE S JOAN M RIEGER B 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.63$-$2,085.75$5,407.50$-$7,493.25$12,684.88$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.54 4,310.54$750.00$800.00$5,860.54$ 2511722240049 614 10TH AVE S PAUL JOPPA & BRIDGET JOPPA B 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.63$-$2,085.75$5,407.50$-$7,493.25$12,684.88$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.54 4,310.54$750.00$800.00$5,860.54$ 2511722240051 628 10TH AVE S JACQUELINE F LEWIS B 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.63$-$2,085.75$5,407.50$-$7,493.25$12,684.88$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.54 4,310.54$750.00$800.00$5,860.54$ 2511722240052 630 10TH AVE S BRIAN E JENSEN B 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.63$-$2,085.75$5,407.50$-$7,493.25$12,684.88$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.54 4,310.54$750.00$800.00$5,860.54$ 2511722240053 634 10TH AVE S JEFFREY C GRAFF C 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.63$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$7,277.38$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.54 4,310.54$-$-$4,310.54$ 2511722240068 645 10TH AVE S BEVERLY J HOERNEMANN CRAIG R BERTELSON C 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.80$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$7,277.55$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.69 4,310.69$-$-$4,310.69$ 2511722240069 641 10TH AVE S NICHOLAS P ZUMBUSCH C 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.59$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$7,277.34$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.51 4,310.51$-$-$4,310.51$ 2511722240071 623 10TH AVE S JOHN W STEEN C 99.90 -$-$-$-$103.94$10,383.26$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$12,469.01$$ 86.30 $ 8,621.08 8,621.08$-$-$8,621.08$ 2511722240072 621 10TH AVE S ROBERT J COTTER C 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.63$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$7,277.38$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.54 4,310.54$-$-$4,310.54$ 2511722240073 617 10TH AVE S JOHN F UNDERDAHL C 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.63$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$7,277.38$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.54 4,310.54$-$-$4,310.54$ 2511722240074 613 10TH AVE S BRADLEY J TUTTLE C 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.59$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$7,277.34$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.51 4,310.51$-$-$4,310.51$ 2511722240075 609 10TH AVE S TERESA L HILL C 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.63$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$7,277.38$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.54 4,310.54$-$-$4,310.54$ 2511722240076 601 10TH AVE S ROBERT & JUDITH HUTCHINS C 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.66$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$7,277.41$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.57 4,310.57$-$-$4,310.57$ 2511722240127 633 10TH AVE S MICHAEL E & SHE LY A WILES C 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.70$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$7,277.45$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.60 4,310.60$-$-$4,310.60$ 2511722240128 629 10TH AVE S AMANDA M MORE TIMOTHY D EVANS C 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.73$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$7,277.48$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.63 4,310.63$-$-$4,310.63$ 2511722240133 644 10TH AVE S DAVID A DUSOSKI C 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.77$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$7,277.52$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.65 4,310.65$-$-$4,310.65$ 2511722240136 620 10TH AVE S JAMES WARDEN CHRISTA B MELAND B 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.63$-$2,085.75$5,407.50$-$7,493.25$12,684.88$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.54 4,310.54$750.00$800.00$5,860.54$ 2511722240137 624 10TH AVE S FRANZ P PETRUSKA B 49.95 -$-$-$-$103.94$5,191.63$-$2,085.75$5,407.50$-$7,493.25$12,684.88$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.54 4,310.54$750.00$800.00$5,860.54$ 2511722310484 707 11TH AVE S PHILLIP V TATEOSIAN S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310485 707 11TH AVE S JERRY J TALBERT HELEN L THOMAS S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310487 707 11TH AVE S J P & B L GASTERLAND S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310488 707 11TH AVE S CHERYL & MARK HATHAWAY S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310489 707 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310491 707 11TH AVE S J P & B L GASTERLAND S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310492 709 11TH AVE S WILLIAM L/VIRGINIA J HUTTNER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310493 709 11TH AVE S SABRINA A CROW S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310494 709 11TH AVE S REBECCA R DALTON S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310495 709 11TH AVE S KIMBERLY J KUHLMAN S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310496 709 11TH AVE S PALLADIUM HOLDINGS LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310497 709 11TH AVE S PAUL HOFRENNING S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310498 709 11TH AVE S SABRINA A CROW S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310499 709 11TH AVE S TIMOTHY & PAULA LEAHY S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310500 711 11TH AVE S HOPKINS 4 LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310502 711 11TH AVE S WILLIAM & SUSAN BRODY S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310503 711 11TH AVE S ANN M HANKE S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310505 711 11TH AVE S PAUL HAGA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310506 711 11TH AVE S JOSEPH P HAEGELE S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310508 739 11TH AVE S PISETH BUNTHA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310511 739 11TH AVE S TIM & CHRIS CANNON S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310513 739 11TH AVE S FRED V KERBER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310515 739 11TH AVE S WAYNE B WENKER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310516 741 11TH AVE S NEW CONCEPTS MGMT GROUP INC ATTN: DAVID SCHULTZ S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310518 741 11TH AVE S WAYNE WENKER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310519 741 11TH AVE S GLENGARRY PROPERTIES LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310520 741 11TH AVE S WAYNE B WENKER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310521 741 11TH AVE S JANEA MASHEK MITCHELTREE S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310522 741 11TH AVE S WAYNE WENKER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310523 741 11TH AVE S GLENGARRY PROPERTIES LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310524 743 11TH AVE S ANNETTE HUTTER/KEITH HUTTER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310525 743 11TH AVE S VALLI J SHANOR S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310526 743 11TH AVE S JOHN D TIMMONS S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310527 743 11TH AVE S DARRELL L ALEXANDER FRANCES L ALEXANDER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310528 743 11TH AVE S GREGORY T OOTHOUDT LISA A OOTHOUDT S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310529 743 11TH AVE S TAIWO IDOWU S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310530 743 11TH AVE S SPARTAN LLC ATTN: SPARTAN PROP MGMT LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310531 743 11TH AVE S WAYNE B WENKER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310534 745 11TH AVE S EVAN FOLLESE' PARTRIDGE S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310535 745 11TH AVE S J P & B L GASTERLAND S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310536 745 11TH AVE S KRISTIAN SCHMIDT S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310537 745 11TH AVE S YEVGENIY M ONCHANU S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310538 745 11TH AVE S SPARTAN LLC ATTN: SPARTAN PROP MGMT LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310539 745 11TH AVE S HOPKINS 4 LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310541 747 11TH AVE S LEO O ESGET EILEEN J ESGET S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310542 747 11TH AVE S ALLISON A SCHEIBE S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310543 747 11TH AVE S DAVID WIEBELHAUS CAROLINE WIEBELHAUS S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310544 747 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310545 747 11TH AVE S WICKLOW PROPERTIES LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310546 747 11TH AVE S 747 11TH AVE LLC C/O DAN FORT S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310547 747 11TH AVE S CROWS NEST CAPITAL LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310548 749 11TH AVE S FLORENCE OPARAOCHA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310549 749 11TH AVE S YONE OROZCO JORGE LUIS OROZCO S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310550 749 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ PROPOSED STREET ASSESSMENT (Lesser of Column A or B) PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED WATER SERVICE ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT WITHOUT CAP CONSIDERED UNIT ASSESSMENTS FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENTS TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT CAP PID OWNER NAME OWNER NAME 2 ADDRESS GROUP PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO. T19.112021 8/10/2016 A B FRONT FOOTAGE ADJUSTED FRONT FOOTAGE PARK VALLEY DR 5TH AVE S 7TH ST S 9TH AVE S 10TH AVE S SUBTOTAL FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT 6TH ST S 7TH ST S ALLEY 5TH ST S ALLEY 8TH ST S SUBTOTAL UNIT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT RATE CAP PER FRONT FOOT STREET ASSESSMENT PER CAP PROPOSED STREET ASSESSMENT (Lesser of Column A or B) PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED WATER SERVICE ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT WITHOUT CAP CONSIDERED UNIT ASSESSMENTS FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENTS TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT CAP PID OWNER NAME OWNER NAME 2 ADDRESS GROUP 2511722310551 749 11TH AVE S CRAIG E & JERILYN J BRENNER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310552 749 11TH AVE S REBECCA HAUPTMAN S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310553 749 11TH AVE S WESTBROOKE PARK CONDO ASSN C/O NEW CONCEPTS GROUP S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310554 749 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310555 749 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310556 805 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310557 805 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310559 805 11TH AVE S GEM CITY LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310560 805 11TH AVE S DOUGLAS M MAY S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310561 805 11TH AVE S MILLER ENTERPRISES LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310563 805 11TH AVE S JASON C DROMETER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310564 807 11TH AVE S AARON D KATZNER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310565 807 11TH AVE S MARY L FIKE S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310566 807 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310567 807 11TH AVE S RONALD HILK S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310568 807 11TH AVE S AMY L SOKOLOSKI S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310569 807 11TH AVE S DAVID KUENNEN S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310570 807 11TH AVE S TODD D & FERN M PETERSON S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310571 807 11TH AVE S MARILYN GRAHAM S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310572 809 11TH AVE S ALMA RENTALS INC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310573 809 11TH AVE S MARIA KOEGEL S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310575 809 11TH AVE S KEITH A NIEMI S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310576 809 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310577 809 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310578 809 11TH AVE S PHILIP & TERESA TATEOSIAN S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310579 809 11TH AVE S MICHAEL DRIES S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310580 811 11TH AVE S WAYNE B WENKER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310581 811 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310582 811 11TH AVE S DREVLOW PROPERTIES LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310583 811 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310584 811 11TH AVE S J P & B L GASTERLAND S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310585 811 11TH AVE S LYLE GUHL & YVONNE GUHL S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310586 811 11TH AVE S MARY JANE MAJOR S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310587 811 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310604 813 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310605 813 11TH AVE S DOC CHICKEN LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310607 813 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310608 813 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310609 813 11TH AVE S J P & B L GASTERLAND S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310610 813 11TH AVE S TOM T NGUYEN S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310611 813 11TH AVE S KEITH A NIEMI S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310612 815 11TH AVE S STEVEN M SMITH S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310614 815 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310615 815 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310616 815 11TH AVE S DANIEL KROC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310617 815 11TH AVE S HOUSKE REAL ESTATE LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310619 815 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310636 817 11TH AVE S HOANG NGUYEN S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310637 817 11TH AVE S PHILLIP & TERESA TATEOSIAN S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310638 817 11TH AVE S MARILYN ROUSE S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310640 817 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310641 817 11TH AVE S CL BURON LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310642 817 11TH AVE S ROCK CITY LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310643 817 11TH AVE S ERIC E BEYER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310645 819 11TH AVE S KEITH NIEMI S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310646 819 11TH AVE S PATRICK M IRWIN S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310647 819 11TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310648 819 11TH AVE S NAOMI DEWEY S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310649 819 11TH AVE S ROY MOULD & DARYL HORAK S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310650 819 11TH AVE S MARIA SAULSBURY JOHN FRANCIS DHAMER SR S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310651 819 11TH AVE S ROSS DEHARPPORTE S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310688 707 11TH AVE S TERRY L & BARBARA LEHMAN S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310689 739 11TH AVE S HOPKINS 4 LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310690 745 11TH AVE S MATTHEW AIKO HAMADA S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310691 745 11TH AVE S CLAIRE A RABUS S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310692 805 11TH AVE S ART NEEN LAU S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310693 809 11TH AVE S GLENGARRY PROPERTIES LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310694 815 11TH AVE S GLENGARRY PROPERTIES LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310695 711 11TH AVE S PHILLIP V TATEOSIAN S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310696 741 11TH AVE S BRYAN P BJORNSON S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310697 747 11TH AVE S JOHN H WARD S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310701 707 11TH AVE S MELBA LETICIA CARDENAS ARDON S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310715 711 11TH AVE S MOHAMMED ALI TAJBAKHSH S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310716 739 11TH AVE S TRONG Q PHAM S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO. T19.112021 8/10/2016 A B FRONT FOOTAGE ADJUSTED FRONT FOOTAGE PARK VALLEY DR 5TH AVE S 7TH ST S 9TH AVE S 10TH AVE S SUBTOTAL FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT 6TH ST S 7TH ST S ALLEY 5TH ST S ALLEY 8TH ST S SUBTOTAL UNIT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT RATE CAP PER FRONT FOOT STREET ASSESSMENT PER CAP PROPOSED STREET ASSESSMENT (Lesser of Column A or B) PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED WATER SERVICE ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT WITHOUT CAP CONSIDERED UNIT ASSESSMENTS FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENTS TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT CAP PID OWNER NAME OWNER NAME 2 ADDRESS GROUP 2511722310717 805 11TH AVE S THE BERKLEY GROUP INC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310719 813 11TH AVE S JEANNE L BAILEY S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310720 815 11TH AVE S PETER M ANDERSON S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310722 817 11TH AVE S GLENGARRY PROPERTIES LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310723 819 11TH AVE S ROGER WAYNE MILLER BARBARA ANN MILLER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310758 711 11TH AVE S TMG REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310761 739 11TH AVE S JEANENE L SCHMID S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722310764 739 11TH AVE S WAYNE WENKER S 1.22 -$-$147.74$-$-$180.11$-$-$-$-$-$180.11$$ 86.30 $ 105.21 105.21$-$-$105.21$ 2511722130001 500 5TH AVE S NOREEN FAY RALSTON G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.93$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.45$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.04 5,172.04$750.00$800.00$6,722.04$ 2511722130002 504 5TH AVE S STEPHEN T GEORGE G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.96$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.48$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.07 5,172.07$750.00$800.00$6,722.07$ 2511722130003 508 5TH AVE S ALICE L SCHULZ G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,659.00$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.52$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.10 5,172.10$750.00$800.00$6,722.10$ 2511722130004 512 5TH AVE S WILLIAM H OVERHOLT G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.92$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.44$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.04 5,172.04$750.00$800.00$6,722.04$ 2511722130005 516 5TH AVE S J D HOLMAN & N G HOLMAN G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.96$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.48$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.07 5,172.07$750.00$800.00$6,722.07$ 2511722130006 520 5TH AVE S MATTHEW A MCNEIL JEANA LANGER-MCNEIL G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.96$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.48$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.07 5,172.07$750.00$800.00$6,722.07$ 2511722130007 524 5TH AVE S WILLIAM C MADISON G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.96$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.48$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.07 5,172.07$750.00$800.00$6,722.07$ 2511722130008 528 5TH AVE S MICHAEL JUBERT G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.96$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.48$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.07 5,172.07$750.00$800.00$6,722.07$ 2511722130009 532 5TH AVE S DARRELL J HAAR JUDITH A HAAR G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.96$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.48$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.07 5,172.07$750.00$800.00$6,722.07$ 2511722130010 536 5TH AVE S SUSAN K BOLDEN G 60.11 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,678.76$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,709.28$$ 86.30 $ 5,187.44 5,187.44$750.00$800.00$6,737.44$ 2511722130021 600 5TH AVE S MARK PANGER L 58.08 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,452.86$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,569.13$$ 86.30 $ 5,011.98 5,011.98$750.00$800.00$6,561.98$ 2511722130022 604 5TH AVE S JORGE VILLANUEVA CASTILLO L 58.08 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,452.85$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,569.12$$ 86.30 $ 5,011.98 5,011.98$750.00$800.00$6,561.98$ 2511722130023 608 5TH AVE S THOMAS MIKELSON L 58.08 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,452.85$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,569.12$$ 86.30 $ 5,011.98 5,011.98$750.00$800.00$6,561.98$ 2511722130024 612 5TH AVE S GREGORY C HAZLETT L 58.08 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,452.85$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,569.12$$ 86.30 $ 5,011.98 5,011.98$750.00$800.00$6,561.98$ 2511722130025 616 5TH AVE S JORDAN WILLIAM STANS ABBY LEIGH STANS L 58.08 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,452.85$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,569.12$$ 86.30 $ 5,011.98 5,011.98$750.00$800.00$6,561.98$ 2511722130026 620 5TH AVE S BRANDON HARRIS JUSTINE JACKSON L 58.08 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,452.85$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,569.12$$ 86.30 $ 5,011.98 5,011.98$750.00$800.00$6,561.98$ 2511722130027 624 5TH AVE S VICTORIA HANNIGAN L 58.03 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,447.60$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,563.87$$ 86.30 $ 5,007.90 5,007.90$750.00$800.00$6,557.90$ 2511722140009 501 5TH AVE S RICHARD J KAKACH G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.81$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.33$$ 86.30 $ 5,171.95 5,171.95$750.00$800.00$6,721.95$ 2511722140010 505 5TH AVE S ARTHUR W ZWACK G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.85$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.37$$ 86.30 $ 5,171.98 5,171.98$750.00$800.00$6,721.98$ 2511722140011 509 5TH AVE S TRAVIS J GAU G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.85$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.37$$ 86.30 $ 5,171.98 5,171.98$750.00$800.00$6,721.98$ 2511722140012 513 5TH AVE S TIMOTHY A ASP G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.82$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.34$$ 86.30 $ 5,171.95 5,171.95$750.00$800.00$6,721.95$ 2511722140013 517 5TH AVE S LUKE J RICE & CAROLYN P RICE G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.81$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.33$$ 86.30 $ 5,171.95 5,171.95$750.00$800.00$6,721.95$ 2511722140014 521 5TH AVE S JENNIFER LIA EASTWOLD CHO JUN HO CHO G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.85$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.37$$ 86.30 $ 5,171.98 5,171.98$750.00$800.00$6,721.98$ 2511722140015 525 5TH AVE S LORI & JOHN SCHLATTER G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.85$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.37$$ 86.30 $ 5,171.98 5,171.98$750.00$800.00$6,721.98$ 2511722140016 529 5TH AVE S DONALD POLLARD G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.85$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.37$$ 86.30 $ 5,171.98 5,171.98$750.00$800.00$6,721.98$ 2511722140017 533 5TH AVE S MICHAEL & DEBRA REINITZ G 59.93 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,658.82$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,689.34$$ 86.30 $ 5,171.95 5,171.95$750.00$800.00$6,721.95$ 2511722140018 537 5TH AVE S DOREEN BORGMANN G 60.13 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,681.17$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,711.69$$ 86.30 $ 5,189.31 5,189.31$750.00$800.00$6,739.31$ 2511722140019 601 5TH AVE S LARRY BRAKKEN & LYNN DAHL L 58.08 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,452.85$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,569.12$$ 86.30 $ 5,011.98 5,011.98$750.00$800.00$6,561.98$ 2511722140020 605 5TH AVE S SAU Y LEE L 58.08 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,452.85$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,569.12$$ 86.30 $ 5,011.98 5,011.98$750.00$800.00$6,561.98$ 2511722140021 609 5TH AVE S TAYLOR S LOFTSGAARDEN L 58.08 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,452.85$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,569.12$$ 86.30 $ 5,011.98 5,011.98$750.00$800.00$6,561.98$ 2511722140022 613 5TH AVE S KATHERINE R DAHLQUIST L 58.08 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,452.85$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,569.12$$ 86.30 $ 5,011.98 5,011.98$750.00$800.00$6,561.98$ 2511722140023 617 5TH AVE S KATHRYN SATZER L 58.08 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,452.85$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,569.12$$ 86.30 $ 5,011.98 5,011.98$750.00$800.00$6,561.98$ 2511722140024 621 5TH AVE S MARK L & PEI FEN Y SMITH L 58.08 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,452.85$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,569.12$$ 86.30 $ 5,011.98 5,011.98$750.00$800.00$6,561.98$ 2511722140025 625 5TH AVE S O J OLSON L 56.23 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,247.95$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,364.22$$ 86.30 $ 4,852.83 4,852.83$750.00$800.00$6,402.83$ 2511722140096 637 5TH AVE S DOLORIS G ZIPOY L 58.08 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,453.27$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,569.54$$ 86.30 $ 5,012.30 5,012.30$750.00$800.00$6,562.30$ 2511722140097 633 5TH AVE S ALISON & BRIAN SWIGGUM L 57.97 -$111.11$-$-$-$6,441.37$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$11,557.64$$ 86.30 $ 5,003.06 5,003.06$750.00$800.00$6,553.06$ 2511722140098 629 5TH AVE S SANDRA A LIEN L 64.97 -$111.11$-$-$-$7,218.85$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$12,335.12$$ 86.30 $ 5,606.94 5,606.94$750.00$800.00$7,156.94$ 2511722130118 800 5TH ST S WESTSIDE PROPERTY OWNER LLC C/O GREENFIELD PARTNERS LLC E 857.61 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 74,011.65 3,030.52$-$-$3,030.52$ 2511722130011 537 6TH AVE S LOUISE E FERCH F 60.00 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 5,177.75 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130012 533 6TH AVE S ROBERT & KATHLEEN OAKES F 59.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.45 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130013 529 6TH AVE S BARBARA A ANSTETT F 59.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.45 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130014 525 6TH AVE S DONALD W CARLSON F 59.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.40 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130015 521 6TH AVE S GEORGE C HERMANN F 59.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.45 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130016 517 6TH AVE S KAREN L PULTZ F 59.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.45 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130017 513 6TH AVE S TWYLA D HOBBS F 59.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.45 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130018 509 6TH AVE S THOMAS M BAUMAN F 59.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.42 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130019 505 6TH AVE S SHELLI PIETZ F 59.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.45 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130020 501 6TH AVE S DENNIS E DAEHN F 59.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.45 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130028 625 6TH AVE S BETTY LOU QUIST D 57.43 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 4,956.62 4,956.62$-$-$4,956.62$ 2511722130029 621 6TH AVE S DANE A & STEPHANIE J JOHNSON D 58.04 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 5,008.69 5,008.69$-$-$5,008.69$ 2511722130030 617 6TH AVE S JOHN R CHELIKOWSKY TONI L CHELIKOWSKY D 58.04 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 5,008.71 5,008.71$-$-$5,008.71$ 2511722130031 613 6TH AVE S HOLLY J HORNBERG D 58.04 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 5,008.69 5,008.69$-$-$5,008.69$ 2511722130032 609 6TH AVE S STETSON NOLD & ANDRIA NOLD D 58.04 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 5,008.69 5,008.69$-$-$5,008.69$ 2511722130033 605 6TH AVE S KARI FORD JOHNSON D 58.04 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 5,008.71 5,008.71$-$-$5,008.71$ 2511722130034 601 6TH AVE S WILLIAM H HATFIELD D 58.04 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 5,008.69 5,008.69$-$-$5,008.69$ 2511722130035 500 6TH AVE S ROSEMARY LURK F 46.99 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 4,055.17 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130036 506 6TH AVE S WHITNEY R VOLKER F 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.44 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130037 510 6TH AVE S CHRISTOPHER CLOVER KATHRYN CARLSON F 49.95 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,030.52 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,030.52 $ 3,030.52 $$ 86.30 $ 4,310.41 3,030.52 $ 750.00 $ 800.00 $$ 4,580.52 2511722130038 514 6TH AVE S DANIEL A TAYLOR F 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.41 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130039 518 6TH AVE S TODD V KRAFT F 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.41 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130040 520 6TH AVE S THOMAS G STEPANEK F 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.41 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130041 526 6TH AVE S DIANNE & THOMAS DEJOLSVAY F 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.44 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130042 530 6TH AVE S LEE A TSCHETTER F 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.41 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130043 534 6TH AVE S M W SMITH & A G SMITH F 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.41 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130044 538 6TH AVE S T MARIE CLAFLIN F 47.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 4,137.87 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130045 542 6TH AVE S MARY JENSEN F 51.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 4,482.96 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO. T19.112021 8/10/2016 A B FRONT FOOTAGE ADJUSTED FRONT FOOTAGE PARK VALLEY DR 5TH AVE S 7TH ST S 9TH AVE S 10TH AVE S SUBTOTAL FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT 6TH ST S 7TH ST S ALLEY 5TH ST S ALLEY 8TH ST S SUBTOTAL UNIT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT RATE CAP PER FRONT FOOT STREET ASSESSMENT PER CAP PROPOSED STREET ASSESSMENT (Lesser of Column A or B) PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED WATER SERVICE ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT WITHOUT CAP CONSIDERED UNIT ASSESSMENTS FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENTS TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT CAP PID OWNER NAME OWNER NAME 2 ADDRESS GROUP 2511722130046 546 6TH AVE S DEAN E MATSON F 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.41 3,030.52$750.00$800.00$4,580.52$ 2511722130081 602 6TH AVE S CAROL B HOLY D 46.99 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 4,055.20 4,055.20$-$-$4,055.20$ 2511722130082 606 6TH AVE S JOSEPH CHARLES MARSO D 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.41 4,310.41$-$-$4,310.41$ 2511722130083 610 6TH AVE S M ELIZABETH LEE & JOHN T LEE D 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.41 4,310.41$-$-$4,310.41$ 2511722130084 614 6TH AVE S NEIL J & KATHRYN J OLSON D 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.41 4,310.41$-$-$4,310.41$ 2511722130085 618 6TH AVE S E G SIDLA & E A AUSTIN D 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.41 4,310.41$-$-$4,310.41$ 2511722130086 622 6TH AVE S SCOTT M KIEFFER NICHOLE A WALTER D 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.44 4,310.44$-$-$4,310.44$ 2511722130087 626 6TH AVE S PHYLLIS A LAVIGNE D 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.41 4,310.41$-$-$4,310.41$ 2511722130090 636 6TH AVE S MARCIE HILL D 39.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 3,447.64 3,447.64$-$-$3,447.64$ 2511722130091 640 6TH AVE S RUTH SLETTEN ERDAHL D 59.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 5,173.19 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722130092 646 6TH AVE S STEPHEN T & JANET A GUENTHER D 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.69 4,310.69$-$-$4,310.69$ 2511722130161 630 6TH AVE S EYORUSALEM T DANIELS BENNIE DANIELS D 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.41 4,310.41$-$-$4,310.41$ 2511722130162 634 6TH AVE S SHANNA GASRUD D 49.95 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.41 4,310.41$-$-$4,310.41$ 2511722420001 701 6TH AVE S JASON M GEYEN M 106.93 -$-$147.74$-$-$15,798.10$-$-$-$-$-$15,798.10$$ 86.30 $ 9,228.21 9,228.21$750.00$800.00$10,778.21$ 2511722420002 700 6TH AVE S MARK A KLUN M 111.95 -$-$147.74$-$-$16,539.75$-$-$-$-$-$16,539.75$$ 86.30 $ 9,661.44 9,661.44$750.00$800.00$11,211.44$ 2511722420026 705 6TH AVE S HELEN CANNING N 59.97 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$#########12,325.75$12,325.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,175.77 5,175.77$750.00$800.00$6,725.77$ 2511722420027 708 6TH AVE S CECELIA J THOMPSON P 77.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$2,085.75$$ 86.30 $ 6,726.12 2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$ 2511722420028 712 6TH AVE S JAY & KAREN STRACHOTA P 61.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$2,085.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,345.61 2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$ 2511722420029 716 6TH AVE S RICHARD D GARTON P 61.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$2,085.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,345.61 2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$ 2511722420030 720 6TH AVE S BRENDA L SCHWICKERATH P 61.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$2,085.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,345.47 2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$ 2511722420031 724 6TH AVE S STEVEN & ERIN TESCH P 61.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$2,085.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,345.61 2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$ 2511722420032 728 6TH AVE S KRISTIN S CARLSON P 61.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$2,085.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,345.61 2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$ 2511722420033 732 6TH AVE S BRADLEY A FERGUSON P 61.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$2,085.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,345.61 2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$ 2511722420034 736 6TH AVE S MICHAEL H CRAEMER P 70.61 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$2,085.75$$ 86.30 $ 6,093.64 2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$ 2511722420035 709 6TH AVE S STEPHEN J & SHARON M ROEDEL N 59.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$#########12,325.75$12,325.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.96 5,172.96$750.00$800.00$6,722.96$ 2511722420036 717 6TH AVE S HOPKINS 6TH AVE S LLC N 59.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$#########12,325.75$12,325.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.96 5,172.96$750.00$800.00$6,722.96$ 2511722420037 723 6TH AVE S GRANTE MORROW CARNES N 59.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$#########12,325.75$12,325.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.94 5,172.94$750.00$800.00$6,722.94$ 2511722420038 727 6TH AVE S THOMAS R BRIX N 59.94 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$#########12,325.75$12,325.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,172.96 5,172.96$750.00$800.00$6,722.96$ 2511722420080 731 6TH AVE S STANISLAV FAYNGOLD N 67.93 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$#########12,325.75$12,325.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,862.67 5,862.67$750.00$800.00$7,412.67$ 2511722420081 735 6TH AVE S STANISLAV M FAYNGOLD N 67.93 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$#########12,325.75$12,325.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,862.70 5,862.70$750.00$800.00$7,412.70$ 2511722420082 739 6TH AVE S SOHAN UPPAL N 68.51 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$#########12,325.75$12,325.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,912.17 5,912.17$750.00$800.00$7,462.17$ 2511722130120 900 6TH ST S HALIFAX PROPERTIES LLC D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130121 900 6TH ST S JASON C DROMETER D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130122 910 6TH ST S ISRAEL VOGEL D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130123 910 6TH ST S HALIFAX PROPERTIES LLC D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130124 910 6TH ST S JEFFREY C TARMAN D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130125 910 6TH ST S LEO ESGET & EILEEN ESGET D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130126 900 6TH ST S ANHDAO H HOANG D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130127 900 6TH ST S TERRI LARAE D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130128 900 6TH ST S KYLE NEIL PATRICK RICKE HOLLY R RICKE D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130129 900 6TH ST S LINDA L HALCON D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130130 910 6TH ST S JPC LLC D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130131 910 6TH ST S STEPHEN & JUDITH CLARK D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130132 910 6TH ST S HOPKINS 4H PROPERTIES LLC D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130133 910 6TH ST S MICHELLE M-M RICKE YOUNG D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130134 900 6TH ST S MICHAEL BERHANE D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130135 900 6TH ST S JPC LLC D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130136 810 6TH ST S MICHAEL PATRICK MCNAMEE D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130137 810 6TH ST S JEFFREY LAMBUS D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130138 820 6TH ST S JAMISON J DORSEY D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130139 820 6TH ST S STEPHEN & JUDITH CLARK D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130140 820 6TH ST S WILLIAM PLIER & LYNDA PLIER D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130141 820 6TH ST S JPC LLC D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130142 810 6TH ST S FLORENCE PROPERTIES LLC D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130143 810 6TH ST S NUR A YUSUF D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130144 810 6TH ST S W L HUTTNER & V J HUTTNER D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130145 810 6TH ST S JOHN M & SOOK C LAIRD D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130146 820 6TH ST S ANNETTE BALDER D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130147 820 6TH ST S HOPKINS 4H PROPERTIES LLC D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130148 820 6TH ST S KYLE NEIL PATRICK RICKE HOLLY R RICKE D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130149 820 6TH ST S DREVLOW PROPERTIES LLC D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130150 810 6TH ST S DUNLYN 1 LLC D2 170.80 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 54.12 $ 37.25 $ - $ - $ 91.36 $ 91.36 $$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36 $ - $ - $91.36 $ 2511722130151 810 6TH ST S KYLE NEIL PATRICK RICKE HOLLY R RICKE D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130152 800 6TH ST S HOPKINS 4H PROPERTIES LLC D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130153 800 6TH ST S SPARTAN LLC D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130154 800 6TH ST S KYLE NEIL PATRICK RICKE HOLLY R RICKE D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130155 800 6TH ST S STEPHANIE R CHRISTENSEN D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130156 800 6TH ST S RENT-TO-OWN LLC D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130157 800 6TH ST S STEPHANIE M BALFANZ D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130158 800 6TH ST S BOBBIE JO COOK D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722130159 800 6TH ST S JASON SPILLER D2 170.80 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,739.71 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240111 920 6TH ST S SHAWN O'NEILL KRISTA O'NEILL D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240112 920 6TH ST S ROGER C LARSON D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240113 930 6TH ST S ROGER C LARSON D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO. T19.112021 8/10/2016 A B FRONT FOOTAGE ADJUSTED FRONT FOOTAGE PARK VALLEY DR 5TH AVE S 7TH ST S 9TH AVE S 10TH AVE S SUBTOTAL FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT 6TH ST S 7TH ST S ALLEY 5TH ST S ALLEY 8TH ST S SUBTOTAL UNIT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT RATE CAP PER FRONT FOOT STREET ASSESSMENT PER CAP PROPOSED STREET ASSESSMENT (Lesser of Column A or B) PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED WATER SERVICE ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT WITHOUT CAP CONSIDERED UNIT ASSESSMENTS FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENTS TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT CAP PID OWNER NAME OWNER NAME 2 ADDRESS GROUP 2511722240114 930 6TH ST S STEPHEN & JUDITH CLARK D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240115 930 6TH ST S ROGER C LARSON D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240116 930 6TH ST S JOHN M & SOOK C LAIRD D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240117 920 6TH ST S LISA GERTEN D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240118 920 6TH ST S JPC LLC D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240119 920 6TH ST S RAVONA B PETERSON D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240120 920 6TH ST S STEPHEN & JUDITH CLARK D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240121 930 6TH ST S MCCLURE PROPERTIES LLC D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240122 930 6TH ST S SHAWN O'NEILL/KRISTA O'NEILL D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240123 930 6TH ST S S ANDREW BARRETT-BETTCHER D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240124 930 6TH ST S WESTBROOKE-NORTH CONDO ASSN C/O SHARPER MANAGEMENT LLC D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240125 920 6TH ST S STEPHEN & JUDITH CLARK D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240126 920 6TH ST S PHILLIP V/TERESA L TATEOSIAN D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240129 1040 6TH ST S BRITTMAN LLC A 145.89 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$-$5,407.50$-$5,407.50$5,407.50$$ 86.30 $ 12,590.29 5,407.50$-$-$5,407.50$ 2511722130047 545 7TH AVE S GARY C KENDRICK E 129.31 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$3,030.52$$ 86.30 $ 11,159.34 3,030.52$-$-$3,030.52$ 2511722130071 646 7TH AVE S ROBERT WASEM ALEJANDRA MATOS D 129.86 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,206.72 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722130093 643 7TH AVE S STEPHEN & SUSAN KLAPPA D 130.81 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,288.70 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722130106 601 7TH AVE S SHAWN STRATHE & ZOE C LISTON D 129.47 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,172.93 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722130160 602 7TH AVE S MAUREEN E CARRIVEAU D 129.85 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,206.30 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722420011 701 7TH AVE S EMILY M KOPPELMAN P 162.69 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$2,085.75$$ 86.30 $ 14,040.04 2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$ 2511722420045 702 7TH AVE S METOK METOK LOBSANG DOLMA P 130.32 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$2,085.75$$ 86.30 $ 11,246.84 2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$ 2511722240079 901 7TH ST S MARLYS B ROSENGREN D2 162.91 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 54.12 $ 37.25 $ - $ - $ 91.36 $ 91.36 $$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36 $ - $ - $91.36 $ 2511722240080 901 7TH ST S STEPHEN & JUDITH CLARK D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240081 911 7TH ST S LIEN KIM NGUYEN D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240082 911 7TH ST S STEVEN A SCHMIDT D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240083 911 7TH ST S LIEN KIM NGUYEN D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240084 911 7TH ST S JOHN H AHL D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240085 901 7TH ST S ALEMLAS WEST L L C D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240086 901 7TH ST S PHILLIP V TATEOSIAN D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240087 901 7TH ST S KYLE NEIL PATRICK RICKE HOLLY R RICKE D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240088 901 7TH ST S HOPKINS 4H PROPERTIES LLC D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240089 911 7TH ST S RAVONA B PETERSON D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240090 911 7TH ST S PHIL & TERESA TATEOSIAN D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240091 911 7TH ST S STEPHEN & JUDITH CLARK D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240092 911 7TH ST S PHILLIP & TERESA TATEOSIAN D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240093 901 7TH ST S WALLY CISEWSKI D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240094 901 7TH ST S RAVONA B PETERSON D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240095 921 7TH ST S ROGER C LARSON D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240096 921 7TH ST S TRACY L SIMMONS D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240097 931 7TH ST S BCI INVESTMENTS LLP D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240098 931 7TH ST S BCI INVESTMENTS LLP D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240099 931 7TH ST S BCI INVESTMENTS LLP D2 162.91 63.83 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240100 931 7TH ST S BCI INVESTMENTS LLP D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240101 921 7TH ST S WAYNE H ZBYTOVSKY D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240102 921 7TH ST S MEGHAN R O'BRIEN D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240103 921 7TH ST S STEPHEN & JUDITH CLARK D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240104 921 7TH ST S STEPHEN & JUDITH CLARK D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240105 931 7TH ST S BCI INVESTMENTS LLP D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240106 931 7TH ST S BCI INVESTMENTS LLP D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240107 931 7TH ST S BCI INVESTMENTS LLP D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240108 931 7TH ST S BCI INVESTMENTS LLP D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240109 921 7TH ST S SPARTAN LLC D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722240110 921 7TH ST S PHILLIP V TATEOSIAN D2 162.91 -$-$-$-$-$-$54.12$37.25$-$-$91.36$91.36$$ 86.30 $ 14,059.13 91.36$-$-$91.36$ 2511722310744 902 7TH ST S JOHN D FRID & LISE B SILK Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310745 904 7TH ST S MIROSLAV MANDIC JELENA MANDIC Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310746 906 7TH ST S HANNAH LANE Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310747 908 7TH ST S THERESA A BAUER Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310748 910 7TH ST S CHANTHOURA SEANG Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310749 912 7TH ST S CAROLYN CHARLES Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310750 916 7TH ST S SHEILA F PEASE EMBRY Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310751 918 7TH ST S RYAN CODE & GARY CODE Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310752 920 7TH ST S JASON J DEMARS AND AMY G DEMARS Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310753 922 7TH ST S ROSS E DOWNING Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310754 926 7TH ST S MARTHA FILLION Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310755 928 7TH ST S CHANTHEARA HORN Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310756 930 7TH ST S PEACE VALLEY HOWNERS ASSN C/O ASK PROPERTY MGMT Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310757 932 7TH ST S SAMANTHA BOOS Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722410005 416 7TH ST S CHRISTOPHER A NELSON CATHERINE A NELSON M 61.96 -$-$147.74$-$-$9,154.01$-$-$-$-$-$9,154.01$$ 86.30 $ 5,347.17 5,347.17$750.00$800.00$6,897.17$ 2511722410006 420 7TH ST S ROKSOLANA ANTONYUK M 61.96 -$-$147.74$-$-$9,154.11$-$-$-$-$-$9,154.11$$ 86.30 $ 5,347.23 5,347.23$750.00$800.00$6,897.23$ 2511722410007 412 7TH ST S LINDA RUTH M 79.89 -$-$147.74$-$-$11,803.21$-$-$-$-$-$11,803.21$$ 86.30 $ 6,894.66 6,894.66$750.00$800.00$8,444.66$ 2511722410008 408 7TH ST S JOHN M HERKENRATT M 79.89 -$-$147.74$-$-$11,803.16$-$-$-$-$-$11,803.16$$ 86.30 $ 6,894.63 6,894.63$750.00$800.00$8,444.63$ 2511722410009 404 7TH ST S WILLIAM J & BARBARA J DEFORE M 79.89 -$-$147.74$-$-$11,803.16$-$-$-$-$-$11,803.16$$ 86.30 $ 6,894.63 6,894.63$750.00$800.00$8,444.63$ 2511722410010 316 7TH ST S RICHARD J GOCKEL M 79.89 -$-$147.74$-$-$11,803.21$-$-$-$-$-$11,803.21$$ 86.30 $ 6,894.66 6,894.66$750.00$800.00$8,444.66$ 2511722410011 312 7TH ST S STEPHEN & VIKKI JOSEPH JR M 62.91 -$-$147.74$-$-$9,294.98$-$-$-$-$-$9,294.98$$ 86.30 $ 5,429.52 5,429.52$750.00$800.00$6,979.52$ PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO. T19.112021 8/10/2016 A B FRONT FOOTAGE ADJUSTED FRONT FOOTAGE PARK VALLEY DR 5TH AVE S 7TH ST S 9TH AVE S 10TH AVE S SUBTOTAL FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT 6TH ST S 7TH ST S ALLEY 5TH ST S ALLEY 8TH ST S SUBTOTAL UNIT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT RATE CAP PER FRONT FOOT STREET ASSESSMENT PER CAP PROPOSED STREET ASSESSMENT (Lesser of Column A or B) PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED WATER SERVICE ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT WITHOUT CAP CONSIDERED UNIT ASSESSMENTS FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENTS TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT CAP PID OWNER NAME OWNER NAME 2 ADDRESS GROUP 2511722410013 308 7TH ST S ROBERT M & ROSEMARY S MADER M 62.91 -$-$147.74$-$-$9,294.98$-$-$-$-$-$9,294.98$$ 86.30 $ 5,429.52 5,429.52$750.00$800.00$6,979.52$ 2511722410016 220 7TH ST S JOHN T ABEL KEMPER M 62.16 -$-$147.74$-$-$9,183.97$-$-$-$-$-$9,183.97$$ 86.30 $ 5,364.67 5,364.67$750.00$800.00$6,914.67$ 2511722410035 306 7TH ST S J BERNARD VAN LIEROP CHRISTINE VAN LIEROP M 62.91 -$-$147.74$-$-$9,295.03$-$-$-$-$-$9,295.03$$ 86.30 $ 5,429.55 5,429.55$750.00$800.00$6,979.55$ 2511722410036 302 7TH ST S LARRY J HISCOCK M 62.91 -$-$147.74$-$-$9,294.98$-$-$-$-$-$9,294.98$$ 86.30 $ 5,429.52 5,429.52$750.00$800.00$6,979.52$ 2511722420023 500 7TH ST S BRETT K & COLLEEN T JOHNSON M 61.96 -$-$147.74$-$-$9,154.01$-$-$-$-$-$9,154.01$$ 86.30 $ 5,347.17 5,347.17$750.00$800.00$6,897.17$ 2511722420024 504 7TH ST S WILLIAM C & DIANE M GAMBLE M 61.96 -$-$147.74$-$-$9,154.06$-$-$-$-$-$9,154.06$$ 86.30 $ 5,347.20 5,347.20$750.00$800.00$6,897.20$ 2511722420025 508 7TH ST S ROBERT M & KATHLEEN L GROVER M 62.80 -$-$147.74$-$-$9,278.36$-$-$-$-$-$9,278.36$$ 86.30 $ 5,419.81 5,419.81$750.00$800.00$6,969.81$ 2511722420042 822 7TH ST S TIMOTHY & MEREDITH SOKOLOSKI Q 138.87 -$-$-$130.57$-$18,132.73$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$20,218.48$$ 86.30 $ 11,984.79 11,984.79$-$-$11,984.79$ 2511722130059 646 8TH AVE S LEON ROY CLARK D 136.86 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,810.67 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722130072 645 8TH AVE S L R BRAUER & V R LACHNER D 130.81 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,288.84 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722130108 601 8TH AVE S 6224 EQUITIES L L C D 129.49 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,030.52 $ 2,085.75 $ - $ - $ 5,116.27 $ 5,116.27 $$ 86.30 $ 11,175.17 5,116.27 $ - $ - $5,116.27 $ 2511722130109 603 8TH AVE S 6224 EQUITIES L L C D 129.49 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,175.17 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722130110 605 8TH AVE S 6224 EQUITIES L L C D 129.49 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,175.17 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722130111 607 8TH AVE S 6224 EQUITIES L L C D 129.49 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,175.17 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722130112 609 8TH AVE S 6224 EQUITIES L L C D 129.49 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,175.17 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722130113 611 8TH AVE S 6224 EQUITIES L L C D 129.49 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,175.17 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722130114 613 8TH AVE S 6224 EQUITIES L L C D 129.49 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,175.17 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722130115 615 8TH AVE S 6224 EQUITIES L L C D 129.49 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,175.17 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722130116 617 8TH AVE S 6224 EQUITIES L L C D 129.49 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,175.17 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722130117 619 8TH AVE S 6224 EQUITIES L L C D 129.49 -$-$-$-$-$-$3,030.52$2,085.75$-$-$5,116.27$5,116.27$$ 86.30 $ 11,175.17 5,116.27$-$-$5,116.27$ 2511722420076 701 8TH AVE S ANTHONY PUCKETT BRITTANY E PUCKETT P 130.32 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$2,085.75$$ 86.30 $ 11,246.87 2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$ 2511722420077 700 8TH AVE S KAREL T HOOGENRAAD P 138.76 -$-$-$-$-$-$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$2,085.75$$ 86.30 $ 11,975.28 2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$ 2511722310588 810 9TH AVE S ANDREI PETRUSEVICH VIKTORYIA PETRUSEVICH R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310589 810 9TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310590 810 9TH AVE S JOHN W LARSEN R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310591 810 9TH AVE S WESTBROOKE-PARK CONDO ASSOC ATTN: DAVID SCHULTZ R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310592 810 9TH AVE S KATHERINE TOUTIN CACERES R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310593 810 9TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310594 810 9TH AVE S ROCK CITY LLC R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310595 810 9TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310596 812 9TH AVE S CROSSROAD ENTERPRISE LLC R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310597 812 9TH AVE S GLENGARRY PROPERTIES LLC R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310598 812 9TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310600 812 9TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310602 812 9TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310603 812 9TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310620 814 9TH AVE S DOREEN FAYE LUND R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310621 814 9TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310622 814 9TH AVE S GLENGARRY PROPERTIES LLC R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310623 814 9TH AVE S WILLIAM BRODY R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310624 814 9TH AVE S DAVID JOHANSON R 2.21 - $ - $ - $ 130.57 $ - $ 288.65 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 288.65 $$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78 $ - $ - $$ 190.78 2511722310625 814 9TH AVE S ERIC NGUYEN R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310626 814 9TH AVE S MCCLURE PROPERTIES LLC R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310627 814 9TH AVE S ELIZABETH HENDRON R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310628 816 9TH AVE S RICHARD R MAU R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310629 816 9TH AVE S GAYLE T THOMAS R 2.21 - $ - $ - $ 130.57 $ - $ 288.65 $$ - $ - $ -- $ - $$ 288.65 $ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78 $ - $ - $$ 190.78 2511722310630 816 9TH AVE S CODY OVERCASHIER TANA OVERCASHIER R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310631 816 9TH AVE S BROCK W OLSON R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310632 816 9TH AVE S R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310633 816 9TH AVE S J P & B L GASTERLAND R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310635 816 9TH AVE S ZIRCON HOLDINGS LLC R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310698 812 9TH AVE S MCCLURE PROPERTIES LLC R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310718 812 9TH AVE S THE BERKLEY GROUP INC R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310721 816 9TH AVE S MARTEE A ROWE R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310726 706 9TH AVE S SOKHA SEAN Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310727 708 9TH AVE S BRITTNEY D MUSSELL Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310728 710 9TH AVE S CHELSEY SWANSON Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310729 714 9TH AVE S ROSEMARY CARPENTER Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310730 716 9TH AVE S IBRAHIM A GABOW Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310731 718 9TH AVE S PEACE VALLEY HOWNERS ASSN C/O ASK PROPERTY MGMT Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310732 720 9TH AVE S CRYSTAL JOHNSON Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310733 722 9TH AVE S DANA SPRINGER Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310734 726 9TH AVE S DMYTRO KRYKUN NATALIYA PERETYATKO Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310735 728 9TH AVE S LORI D ROWEN Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310736 730 9TH AVE S TERRY JOHNSON Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310737 732 9TH AVE S PETER FITZGERALD Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310738 734 9TH AVE S CHRISTINA HILLAN Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310739 738 9TH AVE S STEPHEN L FARROW Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310740 740 9TH AVE S ABIGAIL CEYNAR Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310741 742 9TH AVE S PETER J SNOW AND CHARITY J SNOW Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310742 744 9TH AVE S TANJA M KAISER Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$-$-$1,233.87$ 2511722310743 746 9TH AVE S GERADA E LOUKS Q 14.30 -$-$-$130.57$-$1,866.82$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$3,952.57$$ 86.30 $ 1,233.87 1,233.87$750.00$800.00$2,783.87$ 2511722420043 717 9TH AVE S ESSO PROPERTIES Q 99.97 -$-$-$130.57$-$13,052.93$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$15,138.68$$ 86.30 $ 8,627.31 8,627.31$750.00$800.00$10,177.31$ 2511722420088 719 9TH AVE S SOHAN & VIJAY UPPAL Q 91.97 -$-$-$130.57$-$12,008.15$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$14,093.90$$ 86.30 $ 7,936.76 7,936.76$750.00$800.00$9,486.76$ PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO. T19.112021 8/10/2016 A B FRONT FOOTAGE ADJUSTED FRONT FOOTAGE PARK VALLEY DR 5TH AVE S 7TH ST S 9TH AVE S 10TH AVE S SUBTOTAL FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT 6TH ST S 7TH ST S ALLEY 5TH ST S ALLEY 8TH ST S SUBTOTAL UNIT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT RATE CAP PER FRONT FOOT STREET ASSESSMENT PER CAP PROPOSED STREET ASSESSMENT (Lesser of Column A or B) PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED WATER SERVICE ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT WITHOUT CAP CONSIDERED UNIT ASSESSMENTS FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENTS TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT CAP PID OWNER NAME OWNER NAME 2 ADDRESS GROUP 2511722420089 727 9TH AVE S SOHAN UPPAL Q 95.97 -$-$-$130.57$-$12,530.26$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$14,616.01$$ 86.30 $ 8,281.85 8,281.85$750.00$800.00$9,831.85$ 2511722420096 731 9TH AVE S SOHAN UPPAL Q 135.95 125 -$-$-$130.57$-$16,321.25$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$18,407.00$$ 86.30 $ 11,732.58 11,732.58$750.00$800.00$13,282.58$ 2511722420097 739 9TH AVE S SOHAN UPPAL Q 136.51 125 -$-$-$130.57$-$16,321.25$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$18,407.00$$ 86.30 $ 11,781.00 11,781.00$750.00$800.00$13,331.00$ 2511722130103 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF HOPKINS Q 260.66 -$-$-$130.57$-$34,034.34$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$36,120.09$$ 86.30 $ 22,494.93 22,494.93$-$-$ 2511722240055 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF HOPKINS Q 133.25 -$-$-$130.57$-$17,398.26$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$19,484.01$$ 86.30 $ 11,499.35 11,499.35$-$-$ 2511722240060 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF HOPKINS Q 49.95 -$-$-$130.57$-$6,522.01$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,607.76$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.71 4,310.71$-$-$ 2511722240061 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF HOPKINS Q 49.95 -$-$-$130.57$-$6,521.97$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,607.72$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.68 4,310.68$-$-$ 2511722240062 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF HOPKINS Q 49.95 -$-$-$130.57$-$6,522.01$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,607.76$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.71 4,310.71$-$-$ 2511722240063 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF HOPKINS Q 49.95 -$-$-$130.57$-$6,521.97$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,607.72$$ 86.30 $ 4,310.68 4,310.68$-$-$ 2511722310652 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JERRY J TALBERT HELEN L THOMAS R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310663 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED WESTBROOKE-PARK CONDO ASSOC ATTN: DAVID SCHULTZ R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310664 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED WESTBROOKE-PARK CONDO ASSOC ATTN: DAVID SCHULTZ R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310670 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED R NESLUND CO C/O PARK AVENUE OF WAYZATA R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310671 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PHILLIP & TERESA TATEOSIAN R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310674 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PHILLIP & TERESA TATEOSIAN R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310680 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DAVID JOHANSON R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310681 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED JOHN H WARD R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310682 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED WILLIAM L/VIRGINIA J HUTTNER R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310683 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED WESTBROOKE-PARK CONDO ASSOC ATTN: DAVID SCHULTZ R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310684 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED WILLIAM L/VIRINIA J HUTTNER R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722310685 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED WESTBROOKE-PARK CONDO ASSOC ATTN: DAVID SCHULTZ R 2.21 -$-$-$130.57$-$288.65$-$-$-$-$-$288.65$$ 86.30 $ 190.78 190.78$-$-$190.78$ 2511722420019 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF HOPKINS R 84.83 -$-$-$130.57$-$11,076.87$-$-$-$-$-$11,076.87$$ 86.30 $ 7,321.24 7,321.24$-$-$ 2511722420022 30 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF HOPKINS R 228.82 -$-$-$130.57$-$29,876.45$-$-$-$-$-$29,876.45$$ 86.30 $ 19,746.79 19,746.79$-$-$ 2511722140034 509 EAST PARK VALLEY DR KEVIN & AMBER CORCORAN I 59.90 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,779.32$-$-$-$-$-$6,779.32$$ 86.30 $ 5,169.70 5,169.70$750.00$800.00$6,719.70$ 2511722140035 513 EAST PARK VALLEY DR FRANK & JOY PETERS I 52.07 113.17$-$-$-$-$5,892.86$-$-$-$-$-$5,892.86$$ 86.30 $ 4,493.71 4,493.71$750.00$800.00$6,043.71$ 2511722140036 517 EAST PARK VALLEY DR ROBERT TRIDEN I 52.54 113.17$-$-$-$-$5,946.24$-$-$-$-$-$5,946.24$$ 86.30 $ 4,534.42 4,534.42$750.00$800.00$6,084.42$ 2511722140037 521 EAST PARK VALLEY DR ANN BOWIE BIRTCIL I 51.59 113.17$-$-$-$-$5,838.08$-$-$-$-$-$5,838.08$$ 86.30 $ 4,451.95 4,451.95$750.00$800.00$6,001.95$ 2511722140038 525 EAST PARK VALLEY DR CHRISTINE E DOCHERTY I 51.41 113.17$-$-$-$-$5,818.54$-$-$-$-$-$5,818.54$$ 86.30 $ 4,437.04 4,437.04$750.00$800.00$5,987.04$ 2511722140039 529 EAST PARK VALLEY DR JOHN T HUTCHISON I 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.11$-$-$-$-$-$6,793.11$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.22 5,180.22$750.00$800.00$6,730.22$ 2511722140040 533 EAST PARK VALLEY DR STEVEN J & BONNIE E HUIRAS I 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.15$-$-$-$-$-$6,793.15$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.25 5,180.25$750.00$800.00$6,730.25$ 2511722140041 537 EAST PARK VALLEY DR GEORGE E MOGUSH I 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.11$-$-$-$-$-$6,793.11$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.22 5,180.22$750.00$800.00$6,730.22$ 2511722140042 541 EAST PARK VALLEY DR GLORINE RASINSKI I 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.15$-$-$-$-$-$6,793.15$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.25 5,180.25$750.00$800.00$6,730.25$ 2511722140043 601 EAST PARK VALLEY DR DAVID BREITENBUCHER J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.11$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,878.86$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.22 5,180.22$750.00$800.00$6,730.22$ 2511722140044 605 EAST PARK VALLEY DR CHARLES G RILEY J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.15$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,878.90$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.25 5,180.25$750.00$800.00$6,730.25$ 2511722140045 609 EAST PARK VALLEY DR ANDREW L FOREMAN J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.11$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,878.86$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.22 5,180.22$750.00$800.00$6,730.22$ 2511722140046 613 EAST PARK VALLEY DR DANIEL DORSEY J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.15$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,878.90$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.25 5,180.25$750.00$800.00$6,730.25$ 2511722140047 617 EAST PARK VALLEY DR REBECCA J LARSON J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.15$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,878.90$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.25 5,180.25$750.00$800.00$6,730.25$ 2511722140048 621 EAST PARK VALLEY DR CRAIG L & MARILYN E HINRICHS J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.11$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,878.86$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.22 5,180.22$750.00$800.00$6,730.22$ 2511722140049 625 EAST PARK VALLEY DR DANIEL L JACKSON J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.11$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,878.86$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.22 5,180.22$750.00$800.00$6,730.22$ 2511722140050 629 EAST PARK VALLEY DR CRAIG A & NANCY J ANDERSON J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.15$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,878.90$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.25 5,180.25$750.00$800.00$6,730.25$ 2511722140051 633 EAST PARK VALLEY DR DONALD B MICHEL J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.15$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,878.90$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.25 5,180.25$750.00$800.00$6,730.25$ 2511722140052 637 EAST PARK VALLEY DR K D BAKEY & T A TRUDEAU J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.60$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,879.35$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.59 5,180.59$750.00$800.00$6,730.59$ 2511722140056 526 EAST PARK VALLEY DR SUSAN J LUNDEN I 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.60$-$-$-$-$-$6,793.60$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.59 5,180.59$750.00$800.00$6,730.59$ 2511722140057 530 EAST PARK VALLEY DR DOMINICK L ROSARIO I 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.75$-$-$-$-$-$6,793.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.70 5,180.70$750.00$800.00$6,730.70$ 2511722140058 534 EAST PARK VALLEY DR JOHN J & AUDREY M NOVAK I 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.67$-$-$-$-$-$6,793.67$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.65 5,180.65$750.00$800.00$6,730.65$ 2511722140059 538 EAST PARK VALLEY DR JOSHUA E BORKEN I 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.75$-$-$-$-$-$6,793.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.70 5,180.70$750.00$800.00$6,730.70$ 2511722140060 542 EAST PARK VALLEY DR IAIN W & AVRIL E FERGUSON I 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.75$-$-$-$-$-$6,793.75$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.70 5,180.70$750.00$800.00$6,730.70$ 2511722140061 602 EAST PARK VALLEY DR ELROY BARRY WEGENER J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.71$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,879.46$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.68 5,180.68$750.00$800.00$6,730.68$ 2511722140062 606 EAST PARK VALLEY DR RICHARD T TANAKA J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.75$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,879.50$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.70 5,180.70$750.00$800.00$6,730.70$ 2511722140063 610 EAST PARK VALLEY DR MICHAEL SCOTT LANNING DONALD L LANNING J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.71$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,879.46$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.68 5,180.68$750.00$800.00$6,730.68$ 2511722140064 614 EAST PARK VALLEY DR GRANT G BREKKE J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.75$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,879.50$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.70 5,180.70$750.00$800.00$6,730.70$ 2511722140065 618 EAST PARK VALLEY DR KIM SCHUSTER J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.71$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,879.46$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.68 5,180.68$750.00$800.00$6,730.68$ 2511722140066 622 EAST PARK VALLEY DR CARLTON A RUNNING J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.75$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,879.50$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.70 5,180.70$750.00$800.00$6,730.70$ 2511722140067 626 EAST PARK VALLEY DR JOEY L TAUER & RACHEL TAUER J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.71$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,879.46$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.68 5,180.68$750.00$800.00$6,730.68$ 2511722140068 630 EAST PARK VALLEY DR ROOPNARAINE RATANSINGH J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.71$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,879.46$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.68 5,180.68$750.00$800.00$6,730.68$ 2511722140069 634 EAST PARK VALLEY DR ALLEN L & KARI J DORSHER J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.75$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,879.50$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.70 5,180.70$750.00$800.00$6,730.70$ 2511722140070 638 EAST PARK VALLEY DR MICHAEL S BARTOW J 60.03 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,793.60$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,879.35$$ 86.30 $ 5,180.59 5,180.59$750.00$800.00$6,730.59$ 2511722140026 538 WEST PARK VALLEY DR CHESTER & EVELYN VERVILLE H 60.18 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,810.31$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,840.83$$ 86.30 $ 5,193.33 5,193.33$750.00$800.00$6,743.33$ 2511722140027 534 WEST PARK VALLEY DR JOELLEN KUMPULA/RANDY GONCZY H 59.88 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,776.52$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,807.04$$ 86.30 $ 5,167.57 5,167.57$750.00$800.00$6,717.57$ 2511722140028 530 WEST PARK VALLEY DR MARCIA A O'KEEFE H 59.88 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,776.59$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,807.11$$ 86.30 $ 5,167.62 5,167.62$750.00$800.00$6,717.62$ 2511722140029 526 WEST PARK VALLEY DR JOHN J VESOVICH H 50.50 113.17$-$-$-$-$5,715.23$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$8,745.75$$ 86.30 $ 4,358.26 4,358.26$750.00$800.00$5,908.26$ 2511722140030 522 WEST PARK VALLEY DR KATHERINE M POWELL H 51.06 113.17$-$-$-$-$5,778.51$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$8,809.03$$ 86.30 $ 4,406.52 4,406.52$750.00$800.00$5,956.52$ 2511722140031 518 WEST PARK VALLEY DR ELVERA & LOANNE BORGMANN H 51.82 113.17$-$-$-$-$5,864.69$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$8,895.21$$ 86.30 $ 4,472.23 4,472.23$750.00$800.00$6,022.23$ 2511722140032 514 WEST PARK VALLEY DR TERRY D & MARY JO KELLY I 49.67 113.17$-$-$-$-$5,620.64$-$-$-$-$-$5,620.64$$ 86.30 $ 4,286.13 4,286.13$750.00$800.00$5,836.13$ 2511722140033 510 WEST PARK VALLEY DR JAMES R CUNNINGHAM I 59.98 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,787.72$-$-$-$-$-$6,787.72$$ 86.30 $ 5,176.11 5,176.11$750.00$800.00$6,726.11$ 2511722140071 637 WEST PARK VALLEY DR ROBERT W GIFFT J 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,794.73$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,880.48$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.45 5,181.45$750.00$800.00$6,731.45$ 2511722140072 633 WEST PARK VALLEY DR RYAN C FOWLER J 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,795.23$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,880.98$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.84 5,181.84$750.00$800.00$6,731.84$ 2511722140073 629 WEST PARK VALLEY DR ALISHA D RISAN PATIRCK T MURRAY J 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,795.19$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,880.94$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.81 5,181.81$750.00$800.00$6,731.81$ 2511722140074 625 WEST PARK VALLEY DR LILLIAN JONES J 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,795.27$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,881.02$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.86 5,181.86$750.00$800.00$6,731.86$ 2511722140075 621 WEST PARK VALLEY DR BRIEANN M HARRIS DANIEL D REMIGER J 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,795.23$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,880.98$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.84 5,181.84$750.00$800.00$6,731.84$ 2511722140076 617 WEST PARK VALLEY DR JAMES E & JODIE L ROBINSON J 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,795.27$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,881.02$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.86 5,181.86$750.00$800.00$6,731.86$ 2511722140077 613 WEST PARK VALLEY DR PATRICIA A RONAYNE J 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,795.19$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,880.94$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.81 5,181.81$750.00$800.00$6,731.81$ 2511722140078 609 WEST PARK VALLEY DR MICHAEL D KJOS J 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,795.27$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,881.02$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.86 5,181.86$750.00$800.00$6,731.86$ 2511722140079 605 WEST PARK VALLEY DR ROBERTA A WELLUMSON J 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,795.23$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,880.98$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.84 5,181.84$750.00$800.00$6,731.84$ PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO. T19.112021 8/10/2016 A B FRONT FOOTAGE ADJUSTED FRONT FOOTAGE PARK VALLEY DR 5TH AVE S 7TH ST S 9TH AVE S 10TH AVE S SUBTOTAL FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT 6TH ST S 7TH ST S ALLEY 5TH ST S ALLEY 8TH ST S SUBTOTAL UNIT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT RATE CAP PER FRONT FOOT STREET ASSESSMENT PER CAP PROPOSED STREET ASSESSMENT (Lesser of Column A or B) PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED WATER SERVICE ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT WITHOUT CAP CONSIDERED UNIT ASSESSMENTS FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENTS TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT STREET ASSESSMENT CAP PID OWNER NAME OWNER NAME 2 ADDRESS GROUP 2511722140080 601 WEST PARK VALLEY DR JAMES A VESCERA SR J 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,795.23$-$2,085.75$-$-$2,085.75$8,880.98$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.84 5,181.84$750.00$800.00$6,731.84$ 2511722140081 541 WEST PARK VALLEY DR NOLAN & FEONA HASSELBALCH I 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,795.23$-$-$-$-$-$6,795.23$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.84 5,181.84$750.00$800.00$6,731.84$ 2511722140082 537 WEST PARK VALLEY DR REBECCA L REITHEL CLIFFORD T REITHEL I 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,795.23$-$-$-$-$-$6,795.23$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.84 5,181.84$750.00$800.00$6,731.84$ 2511722140083 533 WEST PARK VALLEY DR AIMEE M PEDERSON I 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,795.23$-$-$-$-$-$6,795.23$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.84 5,181.84$750.00$800.00$6,731.84$ 2511722140084 529 WEST PARK VALLEY DR R H BRUER I 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,795.23$-$-$-$-$-$6,795.23$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.84 5,181.84$750.00$800.00$6,731.84$ 2511722140085 525 WEST PARK VALLEY DR BROOKE A BASSETT I 60.04 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,794.73$-$-$-$-$-$6,794.73$$ 86.30 $ 5,181.45 5,181.45$750.00$800.00$6,731.45$ 2511722140086 602 WEST PARK VALLEY DR AARON BARKER & BRENDA BARKER K 60.08 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,799.72$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,830.24$$ 86.30 $ 5,185.26 5,185.26$750.00$800.00$6,735.26$ 2511722140087 606 WEST PARK VALLEY DR JULIE K HOLTHUS K 60.08 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,799.69$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,830.21$$ 86.30 $ 5,185.23 5,185.23$750.00$800.00$6,735.23$ 2511722140088 610 WEST PARK VALLEY DR RYAN F FOUDRAY/MARRIAH DAVIS K 60.08 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,799.72$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,830.24$$ 86.30 $ 5,185.26 5,185.26$750.00$800.00$6,735.26$ 2511722140089 614 WEST PARK VALLEY DR LUCILLE A LUND K 60.08 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,799.65$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,830.17$$ 86.30 $ 5,185.21 5,185.21$750.00$800.00$6,735.21$ 2511722140090 618 WEST PARK VALLEY DR DONALD D ROESNER K 60.08 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,799.69$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,830.21$$ 86.30 $ 5,185.23 5,185.23$750.00$800.00$6,735.23$ 2511722140091 622 WEST PARK VALLEY DR NICOLE M SAILER K 60.08 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,799.72$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,830.24$$ 86.30 $ 5,185.26 5,185.26$750.00$800.00$6,735.26$ 2511722140092 626 WEST PARK VALLEY DR BENJAMYN M ANDERSON K 60.08 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,799.69$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,830.21$$ 86.30 $ 5,185.23 5,185.23$750.00$800.00$6,735.23$ 2511722140093 630 WEST PARK VALLEY DR WENDELL L KETTNER STACEY A KETTNER K 60.08 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,799.72$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,830.24$$ 86.30 $ 5,185.26 5,185.26$750.00$800.00$6,735.26$ 2511722140094 634 WEST PARK VALLEY DR JUAN RAMON ORTEGON JR AMANDA JO ORTEGON K 60.08 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,799.69$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,830.21$$ 86.30 $ 5,185.23 5,185.23$750.00$800.00$6,735.23$ 2511722140095 638 WEST PARK VALLEY DR JOSEPH R LEVERNIER JR K 60.08 113.17$-$-$-$-$6,799.25$3,030.52$-$-$-$3,030.52$9,829.77$$ 86.30 $ 5,184.90 5,184.90$750.00$800.00$6,734.90$ PRELIMINARY TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED 1,420,512.83 $ Appendix D: Neighborhood Meeting & Resident Questionnaire CITY OF HOPKINS PUBLIC WORKS-ENGINEERING DIVISION 2017 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE PLEASE RETURN TO CITY HALL (1010 1ST ST S,HOPKINS MN 55343)BY:JULY 8,2016 Street and utility improvements are proposed for your street in 2017. This questionnaire is a valuable resource for the City in identifying issues to receive attention. Your comments and concerns are greatly appreciated. 1.DRAINAGE _____ I have observed standing water in the street or my front yard after a significant rain. It is located at: _____________________________________________________________________________________ 2.SANITARY SEWER _____ We have experienced no problems with our sanitary sewer service. _____ We have experienced problems or replaced our sewer service. Please describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________ 3.WATERMAIN _____ We have experienced no problems with our water service. _____ We have experienced problems or replaced our water service. Please describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________ 4.SIDEWALKS Do you have interest in seeing additional sidewalks within your neighborhood? If so, where? _____________________________________________________________________________________ 5.IRRIGATION SYSTEM / INVISIBLE FENCE _____ Yes, we have an irrigation system. _____ Yes, we have an invisible pet fence. 6.TREES / LANDSCAPING Do you have concerns about trees or landscaping in your front yard? If so, describe. _____________________________________________________________________________________ 7.GENERAL COMMENTS / QUESTIONS Please describe any issues you suggest be considered as part of this project: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ The following information is optional but is useful if we have a question about your responses: Name:________________________________________________ Phone No.:______________________ Address:_______________________________________________ THANK YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSE! Should you have any questions please contact Nate Stanley, City Engineer, at 952-548-6356 or nstanley@hopkinsmn.com or Mike Waltman at 612-221-6946 or mikewa@bolton-menk.com Appendix E: Geotechnical Evaluation Geotechnical Evaluation Report 2017 Street and Utility Improvement Project Hopkins, Minnesota Prepared for Bolton & Menk, Inc. Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Neil G. Lund, PE Senior Engineer License Number: 46212 August 3, 2016 Project B1605339 Braun Intertec Corporation AA/EOE Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com August 3, 2016 Project B1605339 Mr. Mike Waltman, PE Bolton & Menk, Inc. 12224 Nicollet Avenue Burnsville, MN 55337-1649 Re: Geotechnical Evaluation 2017 Street and Utility Improvement Project Hopkins, Minnesota Dear Mr. Waltman: We are pleased to present this Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the 2017 Street Improvement Project in Hopkins, Minnesota. Our results and recommendations in light of the geotechnical issues influencing design and construction are presented in the attached report, which we request that you read in its entirety. Remarks Thank you for making Braun Intertec Corporation your geotechnical consultant for this project. If you have questions about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of our work to date, please call Neil Lund at 952.995.2284. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Neil G. Lund, PE Senior Engineer Matthew S. Oman, PE Principal Engineer Table of Contents Description Page A. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 A.1. Project Description .............................................................................................................. 1 A.2. Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 1 A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents .......................................................... 1 A.4. Project Area Conditions ....................................................................................................... 1 A.5. Scope of Services ................................................................................................................. 2 B. Results .............................................................................................................................................. 3 B.1. GPR Results .......................................................................................................................... 3 B.2. Exploration Logs .................................................................................................................. 4 B.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets ............................................................................................... 4 B.2.b. Geologic Origins ..................................................................................................... 4 B.3. Geologic Profile ................................................................................................................... 4 B.3.a. Pavement Materials ............................................................................................... 4 B.3.b. Geologic Materials ................................................................................................. 5 B.3.c. Groundwater .......................................................................................................... 7 B.4. Laboratory Test Results ....................................................................................................... 8 C. Basis for Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 9 C.1. Design Details ...................................................................................................................... 9 C.1.a. Traffic Loads ........................................................................................................... 9 C.1.b. Anticipated Grade Changes .................................................................................... 9 C.1.c. Utility Depths .......................................................................................................... 9 C.1.d. Precautions Regarding Changed Information ........................................................ 9 C.2. Design and Construction Considerations ............................................................................ 9 C.2.a. Pavement Surface Condition (Potential Mill and Overlay Areas) .......................... 9 C.2.b. Pavement Subgrades and Drainage ..................................................................... 10 C.2.c. Reuse of Materials ................................................................................................ 11 C.2.d. Utility Support and Impact of Groundwater ........................................................ 11 D. Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 12 D.1. Pavements ......................................................................................................................... 12 D.1.a. Subgrade Preparation and Proofrolls ................................................................... 12 D.1.b. Backfill and Material Compaction ........................................................................ 12 D.1.c. Design Sections .................................................................................................... 13 D.1.d. Materials and Compaction ................................................................................... 14 D.2. Utilities .............................................................................................................................. 14 D.2.a. Subgrades ............................................................................................................. 14 D.2.b. Excavation Side Slopes ......................................................................................... 14 D.2.c. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill ................................................ 15 D.2.d. Excavation Dewatering ......................................................................................... 15 Table of Contents (continued) Description Page D.2.e. Corrosion Potential .............................................................................................. 15 D.3. Construction Quality Control ............................................................................................ 15 D.3.a. Excavation Observations ...................................................................................... 15 D.3.b. Materials Testing .................................................................................................. 15 D.3.c. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll .............................................................................. 16 D.3.d. Cold Weather Precautions ................................................................................... 16 E. Procedures...................................................................................................................................... 16 E.1.a. GPR Data Collection ............................................................................................. 16 E.1.b. GPR Analysis ........................................................................................................ 16 E.2. Penetration Test Borings ................................................................................................... 17 E.3. Material Classification and Testing ................................................................................... 17 E.3.a. Visual and Manual Classification .......................................................................... 17 E.3.b. Laboratory Testing ............................................................................................... 17 E.4. Groundwater Measurements ............................................................................................ 17 F. Qualifications .................................................................................................................................. 17 F.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions .................................................................................. 17 F.1.a. Material Strata ..................................................................................................... 17 F.1.b. Groundwater Levels ............................................................................................. 18 F.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility .......................................................................... 18 F.2.a. Plan Review .......................................................................................................... 18 F.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing ............................................................... 18 F.3. Use of Report..................................................................................................................... 18 F.4. Standard of Care ................................................................................................................ 18 Appendix Boring Location Sketch GPR Figures Log of Boring Sheets (ST-01 through ST-24) Descriptive Terminology A. Introduction A.1. Project Description This Geotechnical Evaluation Report addresses the proposed 2017 Street and Utility Improvement Project in Hopkins, Minnesota. The total length of street reconstruction proposed for the project is about 12,000 linear feet and includes the following: 6th Street South, from 5th Street South to West Park Valley Drive. 7th Street South, from 11th Avenue South to 2nd Avenue South. Alley, from 5th Street to one-half block south. 9th Avenue South, from Westbrooke Way to 7th Street South. 6th Avenue South, from 8th Street South to 5th Street South. 5th Avenue South, from 7th Street South to 5th Street South. West and East Park Valley Drive, from 7th Street South to 7th Street South. The City will most likely replace utilities on the above streets, though some may receive only pavement rehabilitation (such mill and overlay or reclamation) if utility replacements are not required. A.2. Purpose The purpose of this geotechnical evaluation was to characterize subsurface geologic conditions at selected exploration locations and provide geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of the Hopkins 2017 Street and Utility Improvement Project. A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents To facilitate our evaluation, we were provided with or reviewed the following information or documents: A base map of the project area provided by Bolton & Menk, Inc., Inc. Geologic Atlas of Hennepin County available from the Minnesota Geological Survey. A.4. Project Area Conditions Based on our referenced documents and past experience, the native soils underlying the project area Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 2 include a mix of glacial till, glacial outwash and organic/swamp deposits. The streets in the 2017 Street and Utility Improvement Project area are residential, with bituminous pavement and concrete curb and gutter. The topography is rolling; surface elevations generally decrease from north to south and east to west. A.5. Scope of Services Our scope of services for this project was originally submitted as a Proposal to Mr. Mike Waltman of Bolton & Menk, Inc., for which we received e-mail authorization to proceed on June 8, 2016. Tasks performed in accordance with our authorized scope of services included: Clearing exploration locations of underground utilities. Performing penetration test borings (labeled ST-1 through ST-24) to between 15 feet below the existing street surfaces. Some borings, including ST-12 and ST-13, were extended to penetrate poor or weak soils. Boring ST-17 was drilled to 6 feet prior to meeting refusal on an unmarked utility. Performing laboratory moisture content tests and mechanical analyses (#200 sieve only) on selected penetration test samples. At the City’s option, performing a ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey and analysis to evaluate pavement thickness on each street. Preparing this report containing a CAD sketch, exploration logs, a summary of the geologic materials encountered, results of laboratory tests, and recommendations for subgrade preparation, pavement thickness design and utility placement. Exploration locations and surface elevations at the exploration locations were determined using GPS technology that utilizes the Minnesota Department of Transportation's (MnDOT’s) permanent GPS Virtual Reference Network (VRN). Our scope of services was performed under the terms of our September 1, 2013, General Conditions. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 3 B. Results B.1. GPR Results GPR was used to determine approximate pavement layer thicknesses along the streets. GPR data was collected at a nominal one-foot interval in both directions of travel. Where “ground-truth” data (borings) were performed, the interpreted layers from the GPR scan were compared directly to the measured thicknesses from the pavement cores and hand auger borings to validate the accuracy of the GPR analysis. Table 1 provides the average bituminous thickness, average aggregate base thickness (where present), and average total pavement thickness for each street in each direction based on our analysis using the RADAN software program. The Appendix shows the interpreted layer depth by foot along each street in the stated direction; we recommend consulting these figures for areas of anomalous thickness. Table 1. Average GPR Thickness Results Street Scan Direction Average Layer Thickness (inches) Bituminous Aggregate Base Total 6th Street S EB 4.4 4.1 8.5 7th Street S EB 5.1 -- -- Alley SB No discernable layers in scan 10th Ave S NB 4.0 -- -- 9th Ave S SB 6.1 6.7 12.9 6th Ave S SB 3.8 -- -- 5th Ave S NB 3.2 -- -- Park Valley Dr W SB 3.0 -- -- Park Valley Dr E NB 3.4 -- -- A distinct aggregate base was encountered only on portions of 5th and 9th Avenues South. Materials that are close in composition (such as a silty aggregate base overlying a silty sand fill) will often fail to produce a visible reflection in the GPR scan; this is consistent with the noted similarity of these materials by the drillers, as well as experience with past projects in the area. Further discussion follows in our boring results summary and construction considerations below. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 4 B.2. Exploration Logs B.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings are included in the Appendix. The logs identify and describe the geologic materials that were penetrated, and present the results of penetration resistance tests, laboratory tests performed on penetration test samples retrieved from them and groundwater measurements. Strata boundaries were inferred from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings. Because sampling was not performed continuously, the strata boundary depths are only approximate. The boundary depths likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may also occur as gradual rather than abrupt transitions. B.2.b. Geologic Origins Geologic origins assigned to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report were based on: (1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2) visual classification of the various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface exploration, (3) penetration resistance testing performed for the project, (4) laboratory test results and (5) available common knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the site and surrounding area in the past. B.3. Geologic Profile B.3.a. Pavement Materials The borings first encountered an average bituminous pavement thickness of 4.5 inches as shown in Table 2. The aggregate base averaged 6.8 inches where it was noted; however, this aggregate was often similar to the underlying fill (silty sand and poorly graded sand with silt) and could not always be easily distinguished from those layers. Table 2. Pavement Thickness Summary Street # of borings Average Pavement Thickness (in.) Bituminous Aggregate Base All 24 4.5 6.8 6th Street S 4 4.8 6.0 Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 5 Street # of borings Average Pavement Thickness (in.) Bituminous Aggregate Base 7th Street S 6 4.7 6.8 Alley 1 N/A N/A 10th Ave S 1 3.0 10.0 9th Ave S 2 7.0 5.0 6th Ave S 4 5.0 6.3 5th Ave S 2 4.0 7.8 Park Valley Dr W 2 3.8 5.3 Park Valley Dr E 2 2.5 8.3 The thicknesses measured in the borings generally compare well to those estimated via GPR, both at select locations and on average. Note that borings can often underestimate thickness in older pavements, particularly given the possibility that bituminous pavements have experienced stripping and material loss may be further damaged by the augering process. The limited sample size of the boring thickness data can also factor into discrepancies between GPR and boring data. B.3.b. Geologic Materials Beneath the pavement layers, the general geologic profile of site (from the top down) most commonly included: Fill or possible fill soils: The majority of soils were classified as silty sand but also included clayey sand, poorly graded sand with silt, sandy lean clay and lean clay with sand. Where encountered, the fill soils extended to between 5 feet below the surface to boring termination depth. Glacial outwash: Poorly graded sand, poorly graded sand with silt and silty sand soils that were usually fine- to medium-grained and brown to gray. Glacial till: The glacial till soils ranged from silty sand to clayey sand, sandy lean clay and lean clay with sand. More limited deposits of the following were also present: Buried topsoil, consisting of black, brown or dark brown sandy lean clay with traces of roots, was encountered in ST-3, ST-9, ST-19 and ST-24. The buried topsoil was present at depth with the exception of in ST-19, where it appeared to be directly below the pavement section. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 6 Swamp deposits of organic lean clay, lean clay with sand and peat were present in ST-10 (5 to 10 feet deep) and ST-13 (7 to 24 feet deep). A complete summary of pavement material thicknesses and the classifications of underlying soils are presented in Table 3. The soils are listed in the order in which they were encountered in the soil column, separated by the subgrade zone (upper 5 feet) and the underlying strata (utility zone). ST-6 and ST-17 were drilled adjacent to the paved surface or did not have field measurements for the pavement section thickness; ST-11 was drilled in the unpaved alley. Table 3. Pavement Thickness and Subgrade Soil Type Summary Boring Street Pavement Thicknesses (in.) Subsurface Soil Classification(s) Bituminous Aggregate Base 0 -5 feet (pavement subgrade) 5 – 16 feet (utility zone) ST-1 6th Street S 8 * SM SM, SC ST-2 6th Street S 3 1/2 7 1/2 SM SM, SP-SM, CL ST-3 6th Street S 4 1/2 4 SM SM, CL, SP-SM ST-4 6th Street S 3 6 1/2 SP-SM, SM SM, SP-SM, CL ST-5 7th Street S 8 8 SM, SP-SM SP-SM, SM, SP ST-6 7th Street S N/A N/A SM SM, SC ST-7 7th Street S 5 1/2 * SM, SP-SM SP-SM, SM, CL ST-8 7th Street S 3 4 SM SM, CL ST-9 7th Street S 4 7 SM, CL CL, SP-SM ST-10 7th Street S 3 8 SM OL, CL, SP-SM ST-11 Alley N/A N/A SM SM, SP ST-12 10th Ave S 3 10 SM SM, SP, SC ST-13 9th Ave S 8 * SM SM, PT, OL, SM ST-14 9th Ave S 6 5 SM SM, SP-SM ST-15 6th Ave S 5 6 SM SM, SP-SM ST-16 6th Ave S 5 1/2 6 1/2 SM SM, SC ST-17 6th Ave S N/A N/A SM N/A ST-18 6th Ave S 4 1/2 6 1/2 SM SM, CL ST-19 5th Ave S 4 7 1/2 CL CL, SP-SM ST-20 5th Ave S 4 8 SP-SM SP-SM, CL, SC ST-21 Park Valley Dr W 4 5 CL, SM SM, SP-SM ST-22 Park Valley Dr W 3 1/2 5 1/2 SP-SM SP-SM, SM ST-23 Park Valley Dr E 3 10 SM SM, SP-SM ST-24 Park Valley Dr E 2 6 1/2 SM SM, CL *A distinct aggregate base layer was either not noted by the drillers or was noted as being difficult to distinguish from underlying materials. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 7 Penetration resistance data is summarized in Table 4, with comments to qualify the significance of penetration test results. Table 4. Penetration Resistance Data Geologic Material Soil Classification(s) Represented Range of Penetration Resistances (BPF)* Comments Fill (granular and non- granular) SP-SM, SM, SC, CL 2 to 40 Mostly SM – variable, mostly loosely compacted Glacial Till (clayey) SC, CL 4 to 28 Rather soft to very stiff; generally medium Glacial Till (silty sand) SM 5 to 24 Loose to medium dense Glacial Outwash (granular) SP, SP-SM, SM 5 to 50/6” Lose to hard; generally loose Swamp deposits OL, PT, CL 0 to 15 -- *BPF – blows per foot. In several borings, the drillers noted instances where blow counts may have been influenced by possible cobbles or coarse gravel at the tip of the sampler. The depth of these occurrences is noted in the comments section of the boring logs. B.3.c. Groundwater Groundwater was observed during our drilling operations as shown in Table 5. Table 5. Groundwater Observation Summary Boring Surface Elevation (feet)* Observed Groundwater Depth (feet) Corresponding Groundwater Elevation (feet) ST-4 903 1/2 12 1/2 891 ST-5 890 1/2 12 1/2 878 ST-6 888 12 1/2 875 1/2 ST-7 892 14 1/2 877 1/2 ST-9 888 1/2 12 1/2 876 ST-10 885 1/2 10 875 1/2 ST-11 892 8 884 ST-12 896 9 887 ST-13 882 13 1/2 868 1/2 ST-14 887 12 875 ST-15 888 12 1/2 875 1/2 ST-19 895 1/2 12 1/2 883 ST-20 892 1/2 15 877 1/2 ST-24 891 10 881 *Rounded to nearest 1/2 foot Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 8 The most common groundwater elevation was approximately between 875 and 880 feet. Due to the layered nature of the soils in borings with higher measured groundwater elevations (ST-4; ST-12), it is possible these represent perched conditions. In Boring ST-13, the reported groundwater level was below the peat layer, whose surface likely corresponds to the true static groundwater condition (elevation of approximately 875 feet). Seasonal and annual fluctuations of groundwater should be anticipated. B.4. Laboratory Test Results Laboratory test results, including moisture content, organic content and mechanical analysis (#200 sieve only) tests, are summarized in Table 6. The moisture contents of the sandy fill soils (above the apparent water table) were around 2 to 14 percent, indicating the materials were likely below to slightly above their optimum moisture contents for compaction. The higher moisture contents of noted clayey soils are likely above their optimum moisture contents for compaction. Table 6. Laboratory Testing Results Borehole Soil Classification Depth %<#200 Sieve Water Content (%) Organic Content (%) ST-02 SM 2 1/2 -- 5 -- ST-03 CL 7 1/2 -- 19 -- ST-04 SP-SM 7 1/2 9 5 -- ST-05 SP-SM 5 -- 7 -- ST-06 SM 5 -- 4 -- ST-07 SP-SM 7 1/2 -- 5 -- ST-08 SM 7 1/2 -- 10 -- ST-09 CL 7 1/2 -- 24 2 ST-10 SM 2 1/2 -- 8 -- ST-11 SM 5 -- 12 -- ST-12 SM 2 1/2 -- 8 -- ST-13 SM 2 1/2 46 14 -- ST-16 SM 2 1/2 -- 8 -- ST-18 SM 5 27 8 -- ST-19 CL 5 -- 19 -- ST-20 SP-SM 5 -- 4 -- ST-21 CL 2 1/2 -- 19 -- ST-22 SP-SM 5 -- 2 -- ST-23 SM 2 1/2 -- 7 -- Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 9 ST-24 CL 7 1/2 -- 26 3 C. Basis for Recommendations C.1. Design Details C.1.a. Traffic Loads The majority of streets of the 2017 Street Improvement Project are residential and no traffic count data was available. We assume that these streets will experience a maximum of 50,000 Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESALs) over a 20-year design period. C.1.b. Anticipated Grade Changes Based on the nature of construction, we anticipate grade changes will be minimal. C.1.c. Utility Depths Design utility depths were not provided to us. Based on the maximum requested boring depths, we assume sanitary sewer depths will be 15 feet or less below grade, and water main will generally be less than 10 feet below grade. We assume storm sewer improvements will be approximately 5 feet below grade. C.1.d. Precautions Regarding Changed Information We have attempted to describe our understanding of the proposed construction to the extent it was reported to us by others. Depending on the extent of available information, assumptions may have been made based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the project details, we should be notified. New or changed information could require additional evaluation, analyses and/or recommendations. C.2. Design and Construction Considerations C.2.a. Pavement Surface Condition (Potential Mill and Overlay Areas) We understand some mill and overlay may take place in the 2017 Improvements Project area if there will be no or only limited utility installations. Pavement surface condition data was not available for our review and a survey of pavement condition was outside our scope of work. Based on the pavement thickness from soil borings and GPR, it appears milling will generally be feasible if Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 10 the mill depth is limited to 1 1/2 or 2 inches, depending on the street. However, several areas showed relatively thin pavements that may not be able to support a milling operation. We recommend reviewing the attached GPR data for areas with less than 2 1/2 inches of bituminous pavement prior to selecting partial-depth mill as a preservation strategy. A minimum intact pavement thickness of 1 inch is good practice to support construction loads. The suitability of a mill and overlay approach should also be evaluated against the existing surface condition of each street. The following conditions, in general, will complicate the mill and overlay process and result in a reduced service life if not addressed: High-severity transverse cracking: Any crack running transverse to the centerline of the street with significant adjacent random cracking (12 inches or more apart), large areas of spalling, missing material and/or potholes. High-severity longitudinal cracking: Any crack running parallel to the centerline of the street with significant adjacent random cracking (12 inches or more apart), large areas of spalling, missing material and/or potholes. Alligator cracking: A series of interconnected cracks forming many-sided, sharp-angled pieces, six inches or less in size typically located in the wheelpaths or where traffic loads are concentrated. We recommend an experienced engineer walk the milled surface to delineate areas where further repair may be warranted based on conditions exposed by the milling process. C.2.b. Pavement Subgrades and Drainage The pavement subgrades (top 5 feet below the pavement surface) will consist of predominantly silty sand or poorly graded sand with silt fill. Based on the borings there may also be clayey pockets, including possible buried topsoil of minor organic content. We anticipate the majority of the subgrade soils present beneath the existing roads will generally be suitable for pavement support in their current condition or with minor rework such as surface compaction. The noted clayey soils (ST-9; ST-19; ST-21) may be wet upon exposure given their measured moisture contents, and these soils in particular may require additional work, such as drying or moisture conditioning. To improve pavement drainage and uniformity, we recommend considering the installation of a subbase, consisting of MnDOT select granular borrow, beneath the aggregate base section. We further recommend placing drain tile about catch basins and at low points behind curb in order Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 11 to facilitate drainage of the roadways. The drain tile should be trenched at least 8 inches below the aggregate base or subbase, wrapped in filter fabric and backfilled with highly permeable aggregate. C.2.c. Reuse of Materials Our borings encountered a bituminous layer averaging slightly less than 5 inches thick, though relatively variable. The agregate base, in the majority of borings but only in limited GPR data, was between around 4 and 7 inches thick. Visually, the limited materials identified as “aggregate base” in the field during drilling were often similar to those described as fill (usually dark brown silty sand (SM) with gravel) and a consistent, readily identifiable support layer did not always appear to be present. This is corroborated by GPR data, which only had a clear secondary (aggregate base) layer on a limited number of the scanned streets, suggesting limited contrast between the properties any aggregate layer present and the underlying soil. Based on the available information, it is our opinion that full-depth reclamation (FDR) will be difficult to perform in a way that will provide a consistent, quality product for reuse in new pavements as aggregate base. Coupled with the need to remove or stockpile these materials in order to maintain grades in areas requiring utility excavations, FDR may also prove to be relatively costly. If the bituminous millings can be stockpiled near the site for direct reuse on the project then some cost savings may be realized. To meet the recommend pavement section thickness, the millings will have to be combined (blended) or supplemented with additional imported materials. C.2.d. Utility Support and Impact of Groundwater The reuse of the utility trench backfill soils will have potential impacts on the pavement subgrades. If the backfill is not properly compacted, there is the potential for subgrade instability and settlement (and premature deterioration) of the driving surface. We anticipate the trench soils will consist of a mix of granular outwash soils (poorly graded sand and poorly graded sand with silt, silty sand), along with clayey glacial till. Numerous borings encountered clayey soils at depth; consult Table 3 and the Logs of Boring for the location of such soils. Depending on the conditions at the time of excavation, drying of the clayey and silty soils may be necessary to achieve the levels of compaction recommended for utility support. Clayey and particularly silt-rich trench soils that are exposed to moisture will be more susceptible to strength loss and may also become unstable, which will require moisture conditioning or removal and replacement with suitable soils. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 12 D. Recommendations D.1. Pavements D.1.a. Subgrade Preparation and Proofrolls For preparation of any exposed subgrades prior to placement of new pavement sections or reclaimed aggregate (see below), we recommend the subgrade soils be proofrolled with a loaded tandem-axle truck and observed by a geotechnical engineer and City personnel. This will assist in identifying any soft or weak areas that will require additional soil correction work. Areas that yield or rut more than 2 inches due to wheel traffic should be corrected. Failed areas should be compacted, or if too wet, we recommend that the upper 1 to 2 feet of the resulting subgrade be scarified, dried to a moisture content not more than 1 percentage point above optimum, and compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). If there are areas that still cannot be compacted, we recommend subexcavating the unstable materials to a minimum depth of 1 to 2 feet (depending on the replacement material), replacing them with suitable materials, and compacting them to 100 percent of their standard Proctor maximum densities. Depending on the depth of subcut and underlying material, suitable subcut backfill material may consist of MnDOT Select Granular Borrow, aggregate base or larger diameter crushed aggregate (“3-inch minus”). We should be consulted regarding subcut depths and backfill material. D.1.b. Backfill and Material Compaction We recommend compacting soils used as backfill for subcuts or material replacement be compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of standard Proctor density within 3 feet of the top of the subgrade. For fills more than 3 feet below final subgrades, 95 percent compaction is sufficient. The moisture content of the fill and backfill should be as shown in the table below depending on the classification of the backfill soils. Our compaction requirements are summarized in Table 7. Table 7. Compaction Recommendations Summary Reference Relative Compaction, percent (ASTM D 698 – Standard Proctor) Moisture Content Variance from Optimum, percentage Points Below pavements, within 3 feet of subgrade elevations 100 -3/+3 (sandy soils) -2/+1 (clayey soils) Below pavements, more than 3 feet below subgrade elevations Below utilities 95 -3/+3 (sandy soils) -2/+3 (clayey soils) Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 13 D.1.c. Design Sections Laboratory tests to determine an R-value for pavement design were not included in the scope of this project. Given the most common soils in the top 5 feet of pavement sections, which include mostly silty sand with various other soils, we recommend using an R-value of 30 for pavement thickness design of the overall project. In our opinion, due to the variability of the subgrade soils, this R-value is a reasonable value to apply on a block-by-block basis. Further testing or refinement of the R-value used for design is possible and can be provided upon request. Based upon the assumed traffic loads and an R-value of 30, we recommend a new pavement section for the streets in the 2017 Street Reconstruction meet the minimum thicknesses presented in Table 8. Table 8. Recommended Bituminous Pavement Thickness Design for Residential Streets Layer Thickness (in.) MnDOT Specification/Designation Bituminous Wear 1 1/2 (1 lift) SPWEB240C Bituminous Non-wear 2 (1 lift) SPNWB230C Aggregate Base (Class 5 or 6) or Reclaim 8 3138 3135 (OPTIONAL) Select Granular Subbase 12 3149.2B2 *The aggregate base thickness can be reduced to 6 inches if the subbase is utilized. If a paved surface with a tighter and smoother look is desired, we recommend using a smaller maximum aggregate size in the wear course (SPWEA240C). Differences in performance will generally be minor, though the smaller aggregate size may be more prone to dimpling or distortion under concentrated loads. The above pavement designs are based upon a 20-year performance life. This is the amount of time before major reconstruction is anticipated. This performance life assumes maintenance such as seal coating and crack sealing is routinely performed. The actual pavement life will vary depending on variations in weather, traffic conditions and maintenance. A minor reduction in life-cycle maintenance costs is likely with the inclusion of the select granular subbase, which will stiffen the subgrade zone against traffic loading, improve drainage and reduce the damaging effects of frost heave. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 14 D.1.d. Materials and Compaction We recommend specifying pavement materials as recommended in Table 8. We recommend compacting the aggregate base to meet the requirements of MnDOT specification 2211.3.D.2.c. (Penetration Index Method). We recommend compacting bituminous pavements to at least 92 percent of the maximum theoretical Rice density per the Maximum Density Method (specification 2360.3.D.1), with bituminous materials and placement practices meeting the requirements of MnDOT Specification 2360. D.2. Utilities D.2.a. Subgrades The native and fill soils encountered at likely utility elevations generally appear suitable for pipe and utility structure support and we anticipate that utilities can be installed per manufacturer bedding requirements. However, we encountered somewhat wet, clayey or silty soils at likely utility depths in several borings, as well as significant depths of wet, organic soils (ST-10; ST-13) that have very limited stability and are not suitable for backfill or support of utilities. These soils should be removed and replaced with suitable grading materials where encountered during excavation. At pipe elevations, we recommend a minimum subcut and replacement with crushed-faced rock that is free of material 1 inch in diameter or smaller. Due in part to the likelihood of wet, clayey soils being present, we also recommend providing a contingency for further subcutting and soil replacement of utility backfill and foundation soils. A geotechnical engineer should observe all utility trench excavations and subcuts. D.2.b. Excavation Side Slopes The project area soils appear to meet OSHA Type A, B and C requirements. We then recommend constructing excavation side slopes to lie back at a horizontal to vertical slope of 1 1/2 to 1 or flatter. In significant depths of organic soils these side slopes may be need to made flatter, or supplemental support may be necessary. All excavations must comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, “Excavations and Trenches.” This document states that excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. Reference to these OSHA requirements should be included in the project specifications. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 15 D.2.c. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill We recommend compacting backfill placed above and below utilities to a minimum of 95 percent of standard Proctor density. The exception is within 3 feet vertically of pavement subgrades, where the minimum compaction level should be increased to 100 percent. The fill should be within 3 percentage points of its optimum moisture content for sands; clays should only exceed their optimum moisture contents by 2 percent. To achieve compaction over wet or waterbearing subgrades, we recommend the use of sands or gravel with less than 5 percent by weight passing the number 200 sieve and less than 50 percent passing the number 40 sieve. D.2.d. Excavation Dewatering We recommend removing groundwater from the utility excavations if encountered, and removing any water that seeps into excavations from sidewalls or the adjacent sitework. Sumps and pumps will generally be suitable for short-term water removal under the soil conditions likely to be encountered for this project. Alternative approaches should be considered for long-term or large-scale groundwater removal. D.2.e. Corrosion Potential If founded in sandy soils, corrosion protection should not be required for ductile iron pipe. Type I cement may also be specified for concrete utilities. Some clayey soils were present at likely utility depths, which are considered at least moderately corrosive to ductile iron pipe. We recommend corrosion protection or the use of corrosion-resistant pipe material if utilities will be bedded within such soils, particular if in close proximity to static groundwater. D.3. Construction Quality Control D.3.a. Excavation Observations We recommend having a geotechnical engineer observe all excavations related to subgrade preparation, utility placement and pavement construction. The purpose of the observations is to evaluate the competence of the geologic materials exposed in the excavations and the adequacy of required excavation oversizing. D.3.b. Materials Testing Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 16 We recommend density tests be taken in excavation backfill and additional required fill placed below pavements and utilities. We recommend Gyratory tests on bituminous mixes to evaluate strength and air voids and density tests to evaluate compaction. D.3.c. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll We recommend that proofrolling of the pavement subgrades be observed by a geotechnical engineer to determine if the results of the procedure meet project specifications and to delineate the extent of additional pavement subgrade preparation work that may be necessary. D.3.d. Cold Weather Precautions If site grading and construction is anticipated during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading. No fill should be placed on frozen subgrades. No frozen soils should be used as fill. Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM C 94. Concrete should not be placed on frozen subgrades. Concrete should be protected from freezing until the necessary strength is attained. E. Procedures E.1.a. GPR Data Collection GPR data collection occurred at posted speed limits according to GSSI, Inc. (manufacturer) SIR-20 processor settings at a specified interval of approximately one scan per lineal foot a single travel direction. A calibration file, required for data post-processing, was collected at the onset of testing. E.1.b. GPR Analysis Data collected by the GPR unit was analyzed to estimate the pavement thickness using RADAN 7.0, a software package included with the GSSI RoadScan system. The software includes tools to aid in delineating pavement layer transitions and automatically calculates their depths from the pavement surface using the calibration file(s) collected prior to or following testing. Where “ground-truth” data was collected, the interpreted layers from the GPR scan were compared directly to the measured thicknesses from the cores to validate the accuracy of the GPR analysis. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 17 E.2. Penetration Test Borings The penetration test borings were drilled with a truck-mounted core and auger drill equipped with hollow-stem auger. The borings were performed in accordance with ASTM D 1586. Penetration test samples were taken at 2 1/2- or 5-foot intervals. Actual sample intervals and corresponding depths are shown on the boring logs. E.3. Material Classification and Testing E.3.a. Visual and Manual Classification The geologic materials encountered were visually and manually classified in accordance with ASTM Standard Practice D 2488. A chart explaining the classification system is attached. Samples were placed in jars or bags and returned to our facility for review and storage. E.3.b. Laboratory Testing The results of the laboratory tests performed on geologic material samples are noted on or follow the appropriate attached exploration logs. The tests were performed in accordance with ASTM or AASHTO procedures. E.4. Groundwater Measurements The drillers checked for groundwater as the penetration test borings were advanced, and again after auger withdrawal. The boreholes were then backfilled as noted on the boring logs. F. Qualifications F.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions F.1.a. Material Strata Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations were developed from a limited amount of site and subsurface information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from exploration locations continuously with depth, and therefore strata boundaries and thicknesses must be inferred to some extent. Strata boundaries may also be gradual transitions, and can be expected to vary Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 18 in depth, elevation and thickness away from the exploration locations. Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until additional exploration work is completed, or construction commences. If any such variations are revealed, our recommendations should be re-evaluated. Such variations could increase construction costs, and a contingency should be provided to accommodate them. F.1.b. Groundwater Levels Groundwater measurements were made under the conditions reported herein and shown on the exploration logs, and interpreted in the text of this report. It should be noted that the observation periods were relatively short, and groundwater can be expected to fluctuate in response to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications and other seasonal and annual factors. F.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility F.2.a. Plan Review This report is based on a limited amount of information, and a number of assumptions were necessary to help us develop our recommendations. It is recommended that our firm review the geotechnical aspects of the designs and specifications, and evaluate whether the design is as expected, if any design changes have affected the validity of our recommendations, and if our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the designs and specifications. F.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing It is recommended that we be retained to perform observations and tests during construction. This will allow correlation of the subsurface conditions encountered during construction with those encountered by the borings, and provide continuity of professional responsibility. F.3. Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of the parties to which it has been addressed. Without written approval, we assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations may not be appropriate for other parties or projects. F.4. Standard of Care Bolton & Menk, Inc. Project B1605339 August 3, 2016 Page 19 In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Appendix From 5th St S To W Valley Park Length (feet)1,992 6th St S : 5th St S to W Valley Park Project Name Hopkins 2017 Imprv Project No.B1605339 Roadway 6th St S 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2,000 2,100 2,200 2,300 2,400 2,500 2,600 2,700 2,800 2,900 3,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) From 11th Ave S To 2nd Ave S Length (feet)2,818 7th St S : 11th Ave S to 2nd Ave S Project Name Hopkins 2017 Imprv Project No.B1605339 Roadway 7th St S 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 2,000 2,100 2,200 2,300 2,400 2,500 2,600 2,700 2,800 2,900 3,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) From 7th St S To 5th St S Length (feet)698 10th Ave S : 7th St S to 5th St S Project Name Hopkins 2017 Imprv Project No.B1605339 Roadway 10th Ave S 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) From 7th St S To Westbrooke Way Length (feet)1,070 9th Ave S : 7th St S to Westbrooke Way Project Name Hopkins 2017 Imprv Project No.B1605339 Roadway 9th Ave S 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft) Bit Depth (in.) Agg Depth (in.) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft) Bit Depth (in.) Agg Depth (in.) From 5th St S To 8th St S Length (feet)2,084 6th Ave S : 5th St S to 8th St S Project Name Hopkins 2017 Imprv Project No.B1605339 Roadway 6th Ave S 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) Agg Depth (in.) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) Agg Depth (in.) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 2,000 2,100 2,200 2,300 2,400 2,500 2,600 2,700 2,800 2,900 3,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) Agg Depth (in.) From 7th St S To 5th St S Length (feet)1,376 5th Ave S : 7th St S to 5th St S Project Name Hopkins 2017 Imprv Project No.B1605339 Roadway 5th Ave S 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) From E Park Valley Dr To 7th St S Length (feet)1,065 W Park Valley Dr : E Park Valley Dr to 7th St S Project Name Hopkins 2017 Imprv Project No.B1605339 Roadway W Park Valley Dr 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) From 7th St S To W Park Valley Dr Length (feet)1,129 E Park Valley Dr : 7th St S to W Park Valley Dr Project Name Hopkins 2017 Imprv Project No.B1605339 Roadway E Park Valley Dr 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 De p t h ( i n . ) Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.) 20 21 13 9 7 4 Odor from 1 to 4 feet. PAV FILL SC 8 inches of bituminous. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist. CLAYEY SAND, with Gravel, brown, moist to wet, rather soft to rather stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed while drilling. Boring then backfilled. 895.1 886.8 879.8 0.7 9.0 16.0 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-01 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerR. Hansen L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 145273: E: 492659. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-01 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 6 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota Symbol Elev. feet 895.8 Depth feet 0.0 21 12 8 10 9 10 5 PAV FILL FILL SM CL 3 1/2 inches of bituminous over 7 1/2 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown to dark brown, moist. FILL: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist. SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, Lean Clay Seam, brown, wet, loose. (Glacial Till) LEAN CLAY with SAND, gray, wet, rather stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed while drilling. Boring then backfilled. 899.4 891.3 888.3 886.3 884.3 0.9 9.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-02 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 145263: E: 493234. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-02 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 6 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 900.3 Depth feet 0.0 10 7 9 5 5 9 19 PAV FILL CL SP- SM CL 4 1/2 inches of bituminous over 4 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist. LEAN CLAY with SAND, trace roots, brown, wet, rather stiff. (Buried Topsoil) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, loose. (Glacial Outwash) LEAN CLAY with SAND, brown, wet, rather soft to rather stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed while drilling. Boring then backfilled. 907.7 901.4 899.4 896.4 892.4 0.7 7.0 9.0 12.0 16.0 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-03 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 145247: E: 493747. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-03 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 6 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 908.4 Depth feet 0.0 25 7 19 12 17 17 9 An open triangle in the water level (WL) column indicates the depth at which groundwater was observed while drilling. Groundwater levels fluctuate. 5 PAV FILL FILL SP- SM CL 3 inches of bituminous over 6 1/2 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist to waterbearing, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist to waterbearing, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) Lean Clay seam at 10 feet. LEAN CLAY with SAND, gray, wet, very stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water observed at 12 1/2 feet while drilling. Boring then backfilled. 902.8 899.5 896.5 889.5 887.5 0.8 4.0 7.0 14.0 16.0 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-04 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 145244; E: 494152. Offset 3' N of stake. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-04 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 6 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota P200 % MC %Symbol Elev. feet 903.5 Depth feet 0.0 22 16 13 8 9 11 7 PAV FILL FILL FILL SP 8 inches of bituminous. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist. FILL: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown to dark brown, moist. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, dark brown, moist. POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist to waterbearing, loose to medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) END OF BORING. Water observed at a depth of 12 feet with 12 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water observed at a depth of 12 1/2 feet with 14 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Boring then backfilled. 889.6 888.3 883.3 881.3 874.3 0.7 2.0 7.0 9.0 16.0 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-05 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerR. Hansen L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 144631; E: 492115. Offset 10' S of stake. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-05 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 890.3 Depth feet 0.0 38 19 9 7 2 5 4 FILL FILL FILL FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist. FILL: Clayey Sand, Lean Clay seam, brown, wet. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, trace wood, brown to gray, waterbearing. END OF BORING. Groundwater at a depth of 12 1/2 feet with 12 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Boring then backfilled. 879.0 876.0 872.0 9.0 12.0 16.0 6/22/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-06 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 144619; E: 492595. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-06 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 888.0 Depth feet 0.0 10 3 5 5 12 6 5 PAV FILL FILL SP CL 5 1/2 inches of bituminous. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist. FILL: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist. Dark brown seam at 10 feet. POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist to wet, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) LEAN CLAY with SAND, brown, wet, medium. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water observed at a depth of 14 1/2 feet with 14 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Boring then backfilled. 891.7 890.2 880.2 877.2 876.2 0.5 2.0 12.0 15.0 16.0 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-07 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerR. Hansen L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 144594; E: 493094. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-07 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 892.2 Depth feet 0.0 10 8 6 12 9 8 10 PAV FILL CL 3 inches of bituminous over 4 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist. LEAN CLAY with SAND, gray, wet, medium to rather stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed while drilling. Boring then backfilled. 892.5 881.1 877.1 0.6 12.0 16.0 6/22/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-08 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 144606; E: 493631. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-08 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 893.1 Depth feet 0.0 9 11 8 13 11 17 OC=2%24 PAV FILL FILL CL SP- SM 4 inches of bituminous over 7 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, Lean Clay seam, trace Gravel, brown, moist. FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown to gray, wet. LEAN CLAY with SAND, trace roots, dark gray, wet. (Possible Buried Topsoil) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) Lean Clay seams at 15 feet. END OF BORING. Groundwater at a depth of 12 1/2 feet with 12 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Boring then backfilled. 887.7 884.6 881.6 879.6 872.6 0.9 4.0 7.0 9.0 16.0 6/22/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-09 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 144601; E: 494105. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-09 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 888.6 Depth feet 0.0 40 8 4 15 11 7 8 PAV FILL OL CL SP- SM 3 inches of bituminous over 8 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist. ORGANIC CLAY, with roots and fibers, black, wet, rather soft to medium. (Swamp Deposit) LEAN CLAY with SAND, slight Gravel, black to gray, waterbearing. (Swamp Deposit) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, trace Gravel, brown, waterbearing, loose to medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) END OF BORING. Groundwater at a depth of 10 feet with 10 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Boring then backfilled. 884.5 880.4 876.4 873.4 869.4 0.9 5.0 9.0 12.0 16.0 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-10 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 144593; E: 494556. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-10 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 885.4 Depth feet 0.0 4 8 9 10 3 6 12 SM SM SP SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, dark brown, moist. (Topsoil) SILTY SAND, fine-grained, gray, moist, loose. (Glacial Outwash) POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist to waterbearing, very loose to loose. (Glacial Outwash) END OF BORING. Water observed at a depth of 10 feet with 9 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water observed at a depth of 8 feet with 14 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Boring then backfilled. 887.9 884.9 875.9 4.0 7.0 16.0 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-11 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerR. Hansen L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 145140; E: 492158. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-11 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 891.9 Depth feet 0.0 5 12 7 8 4 WOH 6 8 PAV FILL FILL SP 3 inches of bituminous over 10 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist. FILL: Clayey Sand, trace Gravel, brown, moist. POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium-grained, brown, moist to waterbearing, very loose to loose. (Glacial Outwash) No recovery at 20 feet. END OF BORING. Water observed at a depth of 6 1/2 feet with 19 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water observed at a depth of 9 feet with 14 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Boring then backfilled. 894.8 888.9 886.9 874.9 1.1 7.0 9.0 21.0 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-12 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerR. Hansen L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 144879; E: 492315. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-12 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 895.9 Depth feet 0.0 7 15 3 2 3 WOH WOH 6 4614 PAV FILL PT OL SM 8 inches of bituminous. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown to gray, moist to wet. PEAT, trace shells, black, wet. (Swamp Deposit) ORGANIC CLAY, with shells and fibers, gray, wet, very soft. (Swamp Deposit) SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, Lean Clay seam, gray, wet, medium. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water observed at a depth of 13 1/2 feet with 24 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 8 feet. Boring then backfilled. 881.1 874.8 867.8 857.8 855.8 0.7 7.0 14.0 24.0 26.0 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-13 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerR. Hansen L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 144010: E: 492674. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-13 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota P200 % MC %Symbol Elev. feet 881.8 Depth feet 0.0 6 11 6 6 7 4 PAV FILL FILL SP- SM 6 inches of bituminous over 5 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, dark brown, moist. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, gray, moist. POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, gray to dark gray, moist to waterbearing, loose. (Glacial Outwash) END OF BORING. Water observed at a depth of 12 feet with 12 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 feet. Boring then backfilled. 886.1 883.0 880.0 871.0 0.9 4.0 7.0 16.0 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-14 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerR. Hansen L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 144429: E: 492652. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-14 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota Symbol Elev. feet 887.0 Depth feet 0.0 7 7 6 11 15 12 PAV FILL SP- SM 5 inches of bituminous over 6 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist. POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist to waterbearing, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) END OF BORING. Groundwater at a depth of 12 1/2 feet with 12 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Boring then backfilled. 886.9 878.8 871.8 0.9 9.0 16.0 6/22/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-15 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 144312; E: 493673. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-15 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota Symbol Elev. feet 887.8 Depth feet 0.0 16 16 13 15 10 10 8 PAV FILL SC CL 5 1/2 inches of bituminous over 6 1/2 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist. CLAYEY SAND, gray to brown, moist, stiff. (Glacial Till) LEAN CLAY with SAND, gray, wet, rather stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed while drilling. Boring then backfilled. 893.6 885.6 882.6 878.6 1.0 9.0 12.0 16.0 6/22/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-16 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 144740; E: 493676. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-16 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 894.6 Depth feet 0.0 12 10 FILL FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist. Lean Clay seam at 5 feet. END OF BORING. Water not observed while drilling. Boring then backfilled. 897.7 6.0 6/22/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-17 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 145143; E: 493689. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-17 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota Symbol Elev. feet 903.7 Depth feet 0.0 9 15 4 7 24 24 279 PAV FILL CL SM 4 1/2 inches of bituminous over 6 1/2 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist. LEAN CLAY with SAND, gray, wet, medium. (Glacial Till) SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed while drilling. Boring then backfilled. 913.3 905.2 902.2 898.2 0.9 9.0 12.0 16.0 6/22/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-18 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 145757; E: 493678. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-18 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota P200 % MC %Symbol Elev. feet 914.2 Depth feet 0.0 5 4 13 9 10 12 19 PAV CL CL SP- SM CL 4 inches of bituminous over 7 1/2 inches of aggregate base. SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace roots, dark brown, wet. (Buried Topsoil) SANDY LEAN CLAY, brown, wet, rather soft. (Glacial Till) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, waterbearing, loose to medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) SANDY LEAN CLAY, gray, wet, rather stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water observed at 7 1/2 feet with 7 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water observed at 12 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. 894.6 891.5 888.5 881.5 879.5 0.9 4.0 7.0 14.0 16.0 6/22/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-19 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 144952; E: 494031. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-19 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 895.5 Depth feet 0.0 10 15 18 12 9 18 4 PAV FILL SP- SM CL SC 4 inches of bituminous over 8 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist. POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) LEAN CLAY with SAND, gray, wet, rather stiff. (Glacial Till) CLAYEY SAND, brown, wet, very stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed while drilling. Boring then backfilled. 949.1 946.0 941.0 936.0 934.0 0.9 4.0 9.0 14.0 16.0 6/22/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-20 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 145479; E: 494027. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-20 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 950.0 Depth feet 0.0 5 10 11 13 25 22 19 PAV FILL FILL SP- SM 4 inches of bituminous over 5 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Lean Clay with Sand, brown, wet. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, Lean Clay seams, brown, moist. POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium-grained, brown, moist to waterbearing, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) Lean Clay seam with roots at 10 feet. END OF BORING. Water observed at a depth of 15 feet with 15 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Boring then backfilled. 891.8 888.5 885.5 876.5 0.8 4.0 7.0 16.0 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-21 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 144856; E: 494358. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-21 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 892.5 Depth feet 0.0 15 18 32 17 17 13 2 PAV FILL FILL 3 1/2 inches of bituminous over 5 1/2 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist. END OF BORING. Water not observed while drilling. Boring then backfilled. 908.9 902.7 893.7 0.8 7.0 16.0 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-22 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 145367; E: 494367. Offset 3' N of stake. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-22 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 909.7 Depth feet 0.0 5 12 18 20 25 50/6" 7 PAV FILL SP- SM SM SP- SM 3 inches of bituminous over 10 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist. Lean Clay seam at 4 feet. POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine-grained, with Gravel, black to gray, moist, very dense. (Glacial Outwash) END OF BORING. Water not observed while drilling. Boring then backfilled. 912.3 905.4 901.4 899.4 897.9 1.1 8.0 12.0 14.0 15.5 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-23 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 145399; E: 494655. Offset 4' E of stake. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-23 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota MC %Symbol Elev. feet 913.4 Depth feet 0.0 24 11 4 8 6 7 326 PAV FILL CL SM SP- SM 2 inches of bituminous over 6 1/2 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown to gray, moist. LEAN CLAY with SAND, trace organics, dark brown, wet. (Possible Buried Topsoil) SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, gray to brown, waterbearing, loose. (Glacial Outwash) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium-grained, brown, waterbearing, loose. (Glacial Outwash) END OF BORING. Groundwater at a depth of 10 feet with 10 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Boring then backfilled. 890.1 883.8 881.8 878.8 874.8 0.7 7.0 9.0 12.0 16.0 6/21/16 1" = 4'DATE:SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL ST-24 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerC. McClain L O G O F B O R I N G (S e e D e s c r i p t i v e T e r m i n o l o g y s h e e t f o r e x p l a n a t i o n o f a b b r e v i a t i o n s ) LOCATION: N: 144698; E: 494671. Offset 7' W of stake. See attached sketch. (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) Description of Materials ST-24 METHOD: BORING: BPF Braun Intertec CorporationB1605339LO G O F B O R I N G N : \ G I N T \ P R O J E C T S \ A X P R O J E C T S \ 2 0 1 6 \ 0 5 3 3 9 . G P J B R A U N _ V 8 _ C U R R E N T . G D T 7 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 : 1 7 Braun Project B1605339 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 2017 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvements Hopkins, Minnesota P200 % MC %Symbol Elev. feet 890.8 Depth feet 0.0 Descriptive Terminology of Soil Standard D 2487 - 00 Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) Rev. 7/07 DD Dry density, pcf WD Wet density, pcf MC Natural moisture content, % LL Liqiuid limit, % PL Plastic limit, % PI Plasticity index, % P200 % passing 200 sieve OC Organic content, % S Percent of saturation, % SG Specific gravity C Cohesion, psf Angle of internal friction qu Unconfined compressive strength, psf qp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf Liquid Limit (LL) Laboratory Tests Pl a s t i c i t y I n d e x ( P I ) Drilling Notes Standard penetration test borings were advanced by 3 1/4” or 6 1/4” ID hollow-stem augers unless noted otherwise, Jetting water was used to clean out auger prior to sampling only where indicated on logs. Standard penetration test borings are designated by the prefix “ST” (Split Tube). All samples were taken with the standard 2” OD split-tube sampler, except where noted. Power auger borings were advanced by 4” or 6” diameter continuous- flight, solid-stem augers. Soil classifications and strata depths were in- ferred from disturbed samples augered to the surface and are, therefore, somewhat approximate. Power auger borings are designated by the prefix “B.” Hand auger borings were advanced manually with a 1 1/2” or 3 1/4” diameter auger and were limited to the depth from which the auger could be manually withdrawn. Hand auger borings are indicated by the prefix “H.” BPF: Numbers indicate blows per foot recorded in standard penetration test, also known as “N” value. The sampler was set 6” into undisturbed soil below the hollow-stem auger. Driving resistances were then counted for second and third 6” increments and added to get BPF. Where they differed significantly, they are reported in the following form: 2/12 for the second and third 6” increments, respectively. WH: WH indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of hammer and rods alone; driving not required. WR: WR indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rods alone; hammer weight and driving not required. TW indicates thin-walled (undisturbed) tube sample. Note: All tests were run in general accordance with applicable ASTM standards. Particle Size Identification Boulders ............................... over 12” Cobbles ............................... 3” to 12” Gravel Coarse ............................ 3/4” to 3” Fine ................................. No. 4 to 3/4” Sand Coarse ............................ No. 4 to No. 10 Medium ........................... No. 10 to No. 40 Fine ................................. No. 40 to No. 200 Silt ....................................... No. 200, PI 4 or below “A” line Clay ..................................... No. 200, PI 4 and on or above “A” line Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils Very loose ................................ 0 to 4 BPF Loose ....................................... 5 to 10 BPF Medium dense ......................... 11 to 30 BPF Dense ...................................... 31 to 50 BPF Very dense ............................... over 50 BPF Consistency of Cohesive Soils Very soft ................................... 0 to 1 BPF Soft ....................................... 2 to 3 BPF Rather soft ............................... 4 to 5 BPF Medium .................................... 6 to 8 BPF Rather stiff ............................... 9 to 12 BPF Stiff ....................................... 13 to 16 BPF Very stiff ................................... 17 to 30 BPF Hard ....................................... over 30 BPF a. Based on the material passing the 3-in (75mm) sieve. b. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add “with cobbles or boulders or both” to group name. c. Cu = D60 / D10 Cc = (D30)2 D10 x D60 d. If soil contains 15% sand, add “with sand” to group name. e. Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay f. If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM or SC-SM. g. If fines are organic, add “with organic fines” to group name. h. If soil contains 15% gravel, add “with gravel” to group name. i. Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded sand with silt SW-SC well-graded sand with clay SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay j. If Atterberg limits plot in hatched area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay. k. If soil contains 10 to 29% plus No. 200, add “with sand” or “with gravel” whichever is predominant. l. If soil contains 30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name. m. If soil contains 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name. n. PI 4 and plots on or above “A” line. o. PI 4 or plots below “A” line. p. PI plots on or above “A” line. q. PI plots below “A” line. Poorly graded sand h Peat Well-graded gravel d PI plots on or above “A” line PI 7 and plots on or above “A” line j PI 4 or plots below “A” line j Fi n e - g r a i n e d S o i l s 50 % o r m o r e p a s s e d t h e No . 2 0 0 s i e v e Co a r s e - g r a i n e d S o i l s mo r e t h a n 5 0 % r e t a i n e d o n No . 2 0 0 s i e v e Soils Classification Gravels More than 50% of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve Sands 50% or more of coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve Silts and Clays Liquid limit less than 50 Highly Organic Soils Silts and clays Liquid limit 50 or more Primarily organic matter, dark in color and organic odor Group Symbol Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests a Group Name b GW GP GM GC SW SP SM CL ML OL OL SC Poorly graded gravel d Silty gravel d f g Clean Gravels 5% or less fines e Gravels with Fines More than 12% fines e Clean Sands 5% or less fines i Sands with Fines More than 12% i Fines classify as ML or MH Fines classify as CL or CH Clayey gravel d f g Well-graded sand h Fines classify as CL or CH Fines classify as ML or MH Silty sand f g h Clayey sand f g h Inorganic Organic Liquid limit - oven dried Liquid limit - not dried 0.75 Inorganic Organic PI plots below “A” line Lean clay k l m Liquid limit - oven dried Liquid limit - not dried 0.75 CH MH OH OH Fat clay k l m Elastic silt k l m Organic clay k l m n Organic silt k l m o Organic clay k l m p Organic silt k l m q Cu 6 and 1 Cc 3 C PT Cu 4 and 1 Cc 3 C Cu 4 and/or 1 Cc 3 C Cu 6 and/or 1 CC 3 C 0 10 16 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 7 “U” L i n e “A” L i n e 10 20 30 40 50 60 4 0 ML or OL MH or OHCL o r O L CH o r O H CL - ML Silt k l m Services Provided: Civil and Municipal Engineering Water and Wastewater Engineering Traffic and TransportationEngineering Aviation Planningand Engineering Water Resources Engineering Coatings Inspection Services Landscape Architecture Services Surveyingand Mapping Geographic Information System Services FundingAssistance www.bolton-menk.com 1 0 T H A V E N U E S 9 T H A V E N U E S 8 T H A V E N U E S 7 T H A V E N U E S 6 T H A V E N U E S 5 T H A V E N U E S 8TH STREET S 7TH STREET S 6TH STREET S 5TH STREET S A L L E Y 1 1 T H A V E N U E S W P A R K V A L L E Y D R E P A R K V A L L E Y D R 2 N D A V E N U E S 5TH STREET S PROJECT LOCATION MAP 2017 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1AUGUST, 2016©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2016, All Rights Reserved H:\HOPK\T19112021\CAD\C3D\FEAS\1 LOCATION.dwg 8/10/2016 9:25 AM FEETSCALE HORZ. 300 6000 PROPOSED STREET/ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION MILL/OVERLAY CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2016-055 RESOLUTION ORDERING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT HEARING FOR 2017 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT 2016-10 WHEREAS , the City Council authorized and directed the City Engineer to prepare a report with reference to the aforesaid improvement, and WHEREAS , the City Engineer has caused to be prepared the aforesaid report for improvements thththththththth on 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 Avenues South; 6 and 7 Streets South; East Park Valley Drive thth and West Park Valley Drive; the alley south of 6 Street South west of 10 Avenue South; and thth the alley connecting 6 Avenue South to 8 Street South, and this report was received by the City Council on August 16, 2016, and WHEREAS , the report provides information regarding whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connec- tion with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Hopkins, Minnesota: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets and utilities in accordance with the report and the assessment of benefitting properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statues Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of $7,833,700. th 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on Tuesday, the 20 day of September, 2016 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1010 First Street South at 7:30 P.M. and the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvements as required by law. th Adopted by the City Council this 16 day of August, 2016. _________________________ Molly Cummings, Mayor __________________________ Amy Domeier, City Clerk