Loading...
IV.4. Resolution Establishing Legislative Policy 3-G – Electronic Signature Policy; Domeier March 20, 2018 Council Report 2018-038 Resolution Establishing Legislative Policy 3-G Electronic Signature Policy Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Motion that the Hopkins City Council adopt Resolution 2018-026 Establishing Legislative Policy 3-G Electronic Signature Policy. Approval of this motion will establish language in the Legislative Policy Manual Chapter 3 on the City’s policy on electronic signature. Overview The City of Hopkins continues to pursue a number of efforts to increase efficiency, decrease costs, and improve customer service through online forms. To further these efforts, staff is requesting the implementation of an Electronic Signature Policy. The goals of the policy are to provide guidance on when the electronic signatures are considered accepted means of validating the identity of a signer on electronic documents and correspondence, and therefore substitute for traditional “wet” signatures within the organization. Documents where electronic signatures cannot be used include: resolutions, ordinances, contract or documents governed by the UCC, and documents related to employee disputes, union negotiations, and real estate transactions. Supporting Information:  Legislative Policy 3-G Electronic Signature Policy  Resolution 2018-026 Amy Domeier, City Clerk Financial Impact: $__________Budgeted: Y/N _______ Source: ________________ Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): _______________________________________ Notes: _______________________________________________________________ CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2018-026 ESTABLISHING LEGISLATIVE POLICY 3-G – ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE POLICY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hopkins has approved a document entitled the Legislative Policy Manual to provide uniform guidelines on City policies so that actions taken are consistent and fair; and WHEREAS, the City Council has created Legislative Policy 3-G in order to set forth procedures to be followed for the use of electronic signatures. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hopkins hereby adopts the establishment to Legislative Policy 3-G Electronic Signature Policy as proposed in Council Report 2018-038. th Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 20 day of March, 2018. By:___________________________ Molly Cummings, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Amy Domeier, City Clerk POLICY 3-G ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE POLICY 1. PURPOSE 1.01 The City of Hopkins wishes to implement paperless processes to increase efficiencies within the organization. The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance on when electronic signatures are considered accepted means of validating the identity of a signer in the City of Hopkins electronic documents and correspondence, and thus substitute for traditional “wet” signatures, within the organization. 2. POLICY 2.01 This policy hereby adopts by reference the Definitions of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (MS 325L.02). Of note, "Electronic signature" means an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with a record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record. 2.02 An electronic signature may be accepted in all situations where requirement of a signature or approval is stated or implied. This policy does not supersede situations where laws specifically require a written signature, or the specific electronic signature policies of other government agencies. 2.03 Examples of documents, while not all inclusive, where electronic signatures are appropriate include: purchasing and accounting transactions such as purchase orders, inventory, receiving, accounting entries, payment records, timesheets, expense reports, credit card logs, time off, requests, and permitting/licensing applications. Other documents may be deemed appropriate by the City Manager. 2.04 The electronic signatures/approvals are protected by reasonable security measures as applicable to established computer functions of the City of Hopkins and outlined in the Procedures below. 2.05 The City Manager his/her designee will maintain an organization-wide list of the types of documents and correspondence that are not covered by this policy, which shall be listed in and Appendix to this policy. Electronic signatures must apply to individuals only. Electronic signatures for roles, positions, or titles are not considered valid. 2.06 The use of electronic signatures is subject to criminal laws pertaining to fraud and computer crimes. 3. PROCEDURES 3.01 Laserfiche Forms – • Internal signatures by employees may utilize the signature field in Laserfiche Forms. In Forms where a login is required, the authentication process may be considered sufficient authentication and no signature is required. The authentication shall be saved to Laserfiche using the “Include Action History” setting in the Save to Repository tool. • Internal approval processes, such as those that normally may require a supervisor signature, may utilize Laserfiche Forms without the use of a signature field. The electronic approval shall be saved to Laserfiche during the Forms process using the “Include Action History” setting in the Save to Repository tool. In Forms where action history does not track the user, a combination of employee name and ID or user name and passcode shall be implemented to verify the identity of submitter and safeguard the process. • Signatures for external applicants may be obtained via Laserfiche Forms Signature field, except where a "wet" signature is required by other agencies or to meet any legal or contractual requirements. 3.02 Electronic signatures may be utilized on PDFs utilizing key pair signatures, or through products such as Adobe Sign, DocuSign, or other similar products, provided staff follow appropriate signature validation and authentication procedures for the key pair. 3.03 In all cases, procedures shall be implemented that sufficiently address the issue of authentication, depending on the type of form, necessity for authenticating the user, likelihood of misuse, and risk for liability. 3.04 In all cases, forms shall include notifications of the statutes addressing fraudulent use of electronic signatures and the potential penalties for these acts. 3.05 In all cases, documentation of the Form inputs and supporting actions, shall be saved to Laserfiche and retained as required by the City’s Document Retention Policy. Established: 3/20/2018 City of Hopkins APPENDIX Documents on which Electronic Signatures are not allowed (Updated March 20, 2018) • Resolutions • Ordinances • Contracts or Documents governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) • Documents related to o Employee Disputes o Union Negotiations o Real Estate Transactions