Loading...
1988 -1992 CIP I 1 City of Hopkins, Minnesota 1 mu 01,1,101.1 Capital 11 e Improvement Program - • • 1988 — 1992 o® IIIIIIIIIIII == O4 \' 111 #41.39- 111 I O 7 1 iIIII 11 ON pia eves ICITY O F HOPKINS I IIDate: January 1988 To: The Mayor and City Council IIFrom: Craig R. Rapp, City Manager 11 Subject: 1988-92 Capital Improvement Plan Enclosed is the 1988-92 Capital Improvement Plan. The 1 document is the first of its kind to be formally adopted by the City Council and it represents the culmination of a preparation and review process that involved staff, advisory II commission, citizens and the City Council. The Capital Improvement Plan is a 5-year forecast of project 11 and equipment needs in the City of Hopkins. It is intended to alert the Council and citizens to the major capital needs on the horizon. The first year of the plan becomes an adopted capital budget and relates almost completely to the 1 operating budget approval that is given on a yearly basis. The remaining four years are the Council and staff's best estimate of project needs and funding capabilities. 11 The Capital Improvement Plan is intended to serve as a planning tool and is therefore structured to present a meaningful long-range perspective of the City's capital I programming needs. At the same time sufficient project detail is provided to enable those who review the information to make informed decisions on the programming of IIprojects over the next several years. Please use the information provided to formulate plans, 1 projects, or questions. The Capital Improvement Plan can serve the community best by provoking thoughts and actions. This document was developed over the past year with the 11 assistance of all of our City departments, however a great deal of credit goes to Jim Genellie, Assistant City Manager and Jean Kaeding, Senior Secretary, for their hard work and Idedication. II I 1010 First Street South,Hopkins,Minnesota 55343 612/935-8474 An Equal Opportunity Employer 1 I INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 1 1 The Capital Improvement Program is a flexible plan based upon long-range physical planning and financial projections, which schedules the major public improvements and equipment purchases that may occur within the City over the next five years. Flexibility of the Capital Improvement Program is established through annual review, and revision if necessary. The annual review assures that the program will become a continuing part of the budgetary process and that it will be consistent with changing demands as well as changing patterns in cost and financial resources. Funds are appropriated only for the first year of the program, which is then included in the annual budget. The Capital Improvement Program serves as a tool for implementing I/ certain aspects of the City's comprehensive plan, therefore, the program describes the overall objectives of City development, the relationship between projects with respect to timing and need, and the City's fiscal capabilities. The Capital Improvement Program can help assure: Ii. A systematic approach to planning and initiating capital projects affording the opportunity to plan the location, timing an financing of needed public improvements; 2. The development of a realistic program of capital spending within the City's projected fiscal capability to finance such projects, avoiding sharp change in the tax levy or bonded indebtedness; 3 . The coordination of public and private improvement projects permitting adequate time for design and engineering to eliminate duplication of effort and expense; 4. The expenditure of public funds that are compatible with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; 5. That the public is kept informed of proposed future projects 11 and expenditures; 6. That private investors are aware of the City's long-range 11 development program so that they may guide their development in a way that is compatible with the City's program; 7. Aid in achieving federal and/or state participation by 11 providing the necessary planning and lead time necessary for a successful application in addition to meeting prerequisites needed for certain federal and state grants. 1 • r I li B. Objectives: 1 1. Provide sewer lines of adequate size and grade to collect and transmit all discharged sewage. I 2. Prevent sewage from overflowing into the natural environment. 11 3. Prevent sewage back-ups. 4. Encourage or promote connection of all generators of sewage to the Municipal system. I5. Meet the effluent and infiltration standards of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. 11 III. Storm Sewer Sub-Program A. Sub-Program Goal: Manage and control surface and ground II waters in order to protect the man-made and natural environment in a safe and efficient manner. IIB. Objectives: 1. Prevent flooding. 1 2. Prevent damage to property due to erosion. 3 . Meet water quality standards established by the 11 controlling regulatory law or authority. II TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM li Program Description: This program includes streets, walkways, traffic signs and signals, vehicular parking facilities, and street lighting. ilProgram Goal: The goal of the Transportation Program is to provide for the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City. ISub-Programs: Streets, Walkways/Sidewalks, Signs/Signals, Parking Facilities, and Street Lights. ilI. Streets Sub-Program A. Sub-Program Goal: The goal of the Streets Sub-Program is Ito provide safe, convenient and economic public streets to best facilitate the movement of vehicular traffic. 1 II I I B. Objectives: 1 1. To provide lighting at each street intersection within the City. 2. To provide midblock street lighting in conformance with the City's street lighting policy, in order to provide equitable, cost efficient service. 3. To continually update the system so as to provide energy and cost efficient lighting. PARK AND RECREATION PROGRAM Program Description: This program includes community parks, neighborhood parks, open spaces, recreational structures and facilities. Program Goal: The goal of the Park and Recreation Program is to provide facilities for safe, stimulating, and comprehensive II • leisure time activities of Hopkins citizens. Sub-Programs: Neighborhood Facilities, Community Facilities. 11 I. Neighborhood Facilities Sub-Program A. Sub-Program Goals: The goal of the Neighborhood Facilities Sub-Program is to acquire ownership or use rights of park sites located to provide convenient walking access to all 11 Hopkins citizens and to develop such sites to provide optimum recreational serviceability consistent with the preservation and enhancement of pleasing aesthetic qualities. B. Objectives: 11 1. Acquire property or use rights on those neighborhoods that do not have convenient walking access to neighborhood park facility. 2. Develop neighborhood park facilities to meet the needs of various user groups. 3 . Preserve and maintain existing structures and facilities in order to retain current service and safety levels. 4. Preserve and enhance the aesthetic qualities of neighborhood parks. 1 I I II. Maintenance Facilities Sub-Program 11 A. Sub-Program Goal: The goal of the Maintenance Facilities Sub-Program is to provide facilities for the efficient and safe conduct of City Maintenance functions. B. Objectives: 1. Maintain current facilities in a state of good repair so as to maximize cost effectiveness and avoid costly repair. 2. Upgrade facilities as necessary to provide for the efficient, safe, and effective provision of City services. III. Fire Facilities Sub-Program A. Sub-Program Goal: To provide a fire station, or stations, for storage of Fire Department equipment and for the training and meetings of volunteer firefighters located to provide prompt and efficient protection to life and property. B. Objectives: 1. Provide a maximum 4-minutedaytime and 3-minute nighttime response to all points within the City. 2. Meet objective (1) through use of volunteers. IV. COMMUNITY CENTER SUB-PROGRAM A. Sub-Program Goal: To provide a community facility, or facilities that meet the social, recreational and cultural needs of all citizens, particularly senior citizens. 11 B. Objectives: 1. Maintain current facilities in a state of good repair so as to maximize cost effectiveness andavoid costly repair. 2. Construct or acquire structures and facilities necessary to meet the changing needs of the community. 3 . Upgrade facilities as necessary to provide for efficient, safe, and effective provision of City services. I 11 CIP SOURCES OF FUNDING In order to fund the anticipated capital improvements, the City must draw upon a variety of sources. Many of these sources have a specific or "dedicated" purpose (i.e. , the water utility fund would finance water main installation but not a street overlay) . Therefore, it is important to identify the uses and limitations of the various revenue sources. Utility Revenues: 11 Utility revenues consist of the income generated from the sale of water, or charges made for sewage disposal and refuse collection. The cost of operations plus system (capital) improvements determine the ultimate charge levied for the service provided. Factored into this is the use of surplus funds to purchase materials or forestall rate increases. I/ Current Revenues - General Fund This represents funding via current year revenue collections of the General Fund which support operations and capital outlay expenditures. Revenue sources include property tax levies, state aid payments, and various permit and license fees. This source 11 of funding is generally used only for operations and small capital purchases. General Obligation Bonds: Improvements with a life of several years may be financed through the proceeds of a General Obligation Bond Issue. The total debt that can be incurred under this method of financing is limited by law, but can be repaid via a tax levy that is outside the State levy limitation. General Obligation bonds are generally subject to a referendum process, and as such, are not advisable unless the project is absolutely necessary and/or another financing mechanism is available as a backup. Revenue Bonds : 11 These are bonds issued for improvements made for a specific revenue producing facility or operation. The debt incurred is repaid from the revenue generated by the facility. If the 11 revenue generated is insufficient then the difference becomes an annual obligation of the taxpayers and becomes an additional tax levy. These are generally not subject to referendum. Service Charge: These are charges made by the City or utility to cover the cost 1 of an improvement. I I I/ Tax Increment Funds This funding source results from tax value from new development that is "incremently" greater than the existing tax value. Typically, bonds are sold based on the assumption that the higher tax receipts will retire the bonds. This type of funding can be used for public improvements within a redevelopment district to support the goals of redevelopment, specifically elimination of blighted conditions. Approval of the Hopkins HRA should be anticipated prior to commitment of these funds. The use of these funds are strictly regulated by State law. Parking 11 'This funding source consists primarily of revenues generated by parking permit fees and parking fines. The fund is limited to expenditures related to the parking system. Cable Television I This funding source consists of franchise fees received from Rogers Cablesystems, in excess of the amounts earmarked for the access programming and commission budgets. Expenditures are limited to cable-related facilities, or must have a cable-related purpose. State- Aid Streets This funding source represents funds received from the State of Minnesota to support construction and maintenance of State-Aid classified municipal streets. State law defines the types and limits of State-Aid streets expenditures. Storm Sewer Fund Historically, the City of Hopkins has contributed general tax dollars, or other excess fund to the Storm Sewer Fund, to assure that projects could be built without the need for assessment. Currently, the City budgets and transfers $65,000 from the General Fund to the Storm Sewer Fund. Expenditures are limited to drainage-related facilities. Equipment Replacement Fund Supported by an annual 1.5 mill levy, the Equipment Replacement Fund is used to provide for the purchase of vehicles and equipment on an identified 20-year schedule. I I I 1 i 1 1 1 I BUILDING INVENTORY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BUILDING INVENTORY 11 LOC . BUILDING LOCATION WORTH 27 . Concessions Shady Oak Beach $ 28 , 500 II28 . Park Building Oakes Park 24 , 600 I29 . Park Shelter - . 801 7th Ave . S . 27 , 200 30 . Hopkins Community Center 33 14th Avenue North 686 , 000 II31 . Recreation Building 117-121 17th Avenue South 74 , 500 32 . Garage 117 - 121 17th Avenue South 94 , 300 II33 . Public Works Garage 1601 2nd Street S . 775 , 000 34 . Storage - 117- 121 17th Avenue South 85 , 000 11 35 . Storage 117-121 17th Avenue South 31 , 100 II36 . Landfill Building 7th St . S . & 14th Ave . S . 26 , 000 TOTAL $6 , 449 , 700 1 1 I I I/ i 1 I 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 I PROJECT SUMMARIES i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 11 FIVE YEAR EXPENDITURE SUMMARY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PROGRAM I PROG FUNDING CAT. PROJECT TITLE SOURCE 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 CE-1 City Manager Vehicle (414) E.R. 9,000 CE-2 Main Copier E.R. • 17,100 CE-3 Minicomputer - Finance E.R. 73,000 CE-4 Fire Marshal's Car (3695) B.R. 14,600 II CE-5 Aerial Tower (Tower 9) E.R. 425,800 CE-6 Four Wheel Drive Truck (90) E.R. 17,500 CE-7 Police Computer E.R. 85,000 I CE-8 City-Wide Radio System E.R. 339,000 CE-9 Police 4 WD Wagon S.R. 20,200 CE-10 Marked squad car E.R. 15,900 17,200 CE-10 Marked squad car E.R. 15,300 16,500 17,900 I CE-10 Marked squad car S.R. 15,900 17,200 CE-10 Marked squad car E.R. 15,300 16,500 17,900 CE-10 Marked squad car E.R. 15,300 16,500 17,900 I CE-10 Marked squad car S.R. 15,900 17,200 CE-11 Prkg. Enforce. Veh. E.R. 6,000 CE-12 Unmarked Admin Car E.R. 10,300 11,500 CE-12 Unmarked Admin Car E.R. 9,900 11,100 I CE-12 Unmarked Admin Car E.R. 10,700 CE-12 Unmarked Admin Car E.R. 9,900 11,100 CE-13 Chev 1 ton dump (806) E.R. 20,800 I CE-13 1 ton dump truck (342) E.R. 21,600 CE-13 1 ton dump truck (315) E.R. 18,000 CE-14 Street sweeper (318) E.R. 93,600 I CE-15 Tandem dump truck (330) E.R. 54,100 CE-15 Sgl. axel dump trk. (331) E.R. 58,600 CE-16 3/4 ton (816) E.R. 15,600 CE-16 3/4 ton p.u. (1006) E.R. 15,600 I CE-16 3/4 ton with box (403) E.R. 16,800 CE-16 3/4 ton dump truck (605) E.R. 11,600 CE-16 3/4 ton with box (507) E.R. 18,200 I CE-17 Compact Pickup (1001) E.R. 7,800 CE-17 Compact Pickup (501) E.R. 8,100 CE-17 Compact Pickup (504) E.R. 8,400 I CE-17 Compact Pickup (801) E.R. 8,700 CE-18 Tractor/gang mower (807) E.R. 37,900 CE-19 Ram riding mower (811) ' E.R. _ 9,700 CE-20 3-wheel Truckster (822) E.R. 8,900 I CE-21 Refuse Truck (901) E.R. 105,200 CE-21 Refuse Truck (903) E.R. 80,000 CE-22 Micro Network Server E.R. 16,200 III CE-23 Thermal Imaging Camera C.R. 10,000 CE-24 Engine 6 E.R. 162,200 CE-25 Log Truck w/Clam (305) S.R. 83,100 CE-26 Front end loader (319) E.R. 90,000 I CE-27 Sign Applicator E.R. 10,000 CE-28 Flail Mower E.R. 11,000 CE-29 Optical Scanner Ballot Mach. C.R. 50,000 I CE-30 Optical Scanner for PCs C.R. 10,800 CE-31 Overseeder C.R. 5,000 CE-32 Ultimap C.R. 41,100 ICE-33 Computer Meter Reading System U.R. 19,000 TOTAL OF CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 644,500 409,200 327,900 461,100 615,000 1 1988 CAPITAL PROJECT BUDGET I FROG. PROJECT FUNDING CAT. NUMBER PROJECT TITLE SOURCE 1988 I Trans. ST-1 11th Avenue Railroad Bridge M.S. 1,200,000 Trans. ST-2 Rebuild/Redesign 11th Avenue S.A./G.O. 450,000 I Ttans. ST-3 Hobby Acres - St. & Sever S.A./G.O./S.S. 600,000 Trans. ST-8 Concrete Alleys C.R. 10,000 Trans. ST-9 Reconstruction of 17th Avenue M.S. 160,000 I Trans. SG-2 Signals-11th Ave. & 5th St. M.S. 50,000 Trans. PR-1 Parking Ramp T.P. 1,900,000 Parks NF-1 Interlachen play equipment C.R. 10,000 Parks CP-3 Golf Course R.B. 50,000 I Parks CF-11 Valley Park Sun Shelter C.R. 10,000 Bldgs. AO-1 Council Chamber Renovation C.T. 80,000 Bldgs. AO-2 Pistol Range Ventilation R.E. 16,000 I Bldgs. AO-4 City Hall Renovation R.E./G.R.S. 135,000 Bldgs. CC-1 Comm. Ctr. air exchange G.A./C.R. 50,000 Bldgs. CC-2 Comm. Ctr. Asbestos removal C.R. 10,000 Bldgs. CC-5 Comm. Ctr. Kitchen G.A./C.R. 5,000 IBldgs. CC-8 Comm. Ctr. Boiler Drain G.A./C.R. 10,000 4,746,000 I III 1988 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT BUDGET 111 PROG FUNDING CAT. PROJECT TITLE SOURCE 1988 CE-7 Police Computer E.R. 85,000 CE-8 City-Wide Radio System E.R. 339,000 ICE-la Marked squad car E.R. 15,300 CE-10 Marked squad car E.R. 15,300 CE-10 Marked squad car E.R. 15,300 CE-12 Unmarked Admin Car E.R. 9,900 I CE-12 Unmarked Admin Car E.R. 9,900 CE-13 Chev 1 ton dump (806) E.R. 20,800 CE-16 3/4 ton (816) E.R. 15,600 III CE-16 3/4 ton p.u. (1006) E.R. 15,600 CE-17 Compact Pickup (1001) E.R. 7,800 CE-27 Sign Applicator E.R. 10,000 CE-28 Flail Mover E.R. 11,000 I CE-29 Optical Scanner Ballot Mach. C.R. 50,000 CE-31 Overseeder C.R. 5,000 CE-33 Computer Meter Reading System U.R. 19,000 1 TOTAL OF CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 644,500 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � UTILITIES 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 I `' • "" r'= CITY OF HOPKINS f f- Y I QTS. • z —.rDi ,o_,___-i _. R WI if --1.--,°•=4.. y- 77 4 WJi_ 0.46 l' f _ k_ A ft 1 -.1 4-----1 _ \ -.: _ iii,„ N t 7, ''' I i C' ---- -' inn"0 0 I k- h - 1111 .- -.----' ' -ti"- -.- --'' -.- -.-- 1111111.141 ___.-.... _rm., rilliril..----A SA I si—= , .' . i Err/ '@ .-7,—,------ lilt L I . 11111.1q-im%a- : . . ruk o o I* o 1.- • 1070:111:1,77111 11;111 �I/.1Hi ! "_ ' © I caw• . ilir I • WA r 1 f .1 .. s, , _Allilin ' :'_.... sr s i 6. t 4., Gil I -4=''':' , ___. 'W 1 CITY WIDE I I I I UTILITIES PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER I - Utilities Emergency Prower for # 4 well WA - 2 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD I - $150 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING III SOURCE R.B. 150 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: IDebt Service . . . . Well #4 Maint. Costs . . . . 500 1401 Elmo Park Service Drive Operating Costs . 250 ITOTAL T50 Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: I Emergency power for the well and treatment plant that are the major source of water for the City. IJUSTIFICATION: The well and treatment plant are in an area that is prone Ito NSP power outages and with the emergency power , either by generator or a NSP power grid crossover , it would protect the City against not having a reliable source of water supply during any kind of emergency whether natural or man made . I With emergency power , our fire protection would be more secure because we would always be able to pump water at any time . I 1 1 IPROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Bid & construction - 1990 I RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: IPlans completed for installation of emergency power generator at this location. I . 1 2/1/88 PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER ' - Utilities Replace B16 Meadowbrook Lift Station SA - 1 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD - $105 , 060 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING ISOURCE U.R. 5 , 000 100 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: IDebt Service . . . . 15 , 000 Meadowbrook lift station Maint . Costs . . . . 10 , 000 6601 Excelsior Blvd Operating Costs . 3 , 000 St . Louis Park TOTAL 28 , 000 Cost Savings . . 2 , 000 IDESCRIPTION: Reconstruction of the Meadowbrook Sanitary Sewer Lift Station that was built in 1952 . IJUSTIFICATION: The present lift station and pumps are obsolete and repair parts are becoming very difficult to locate or are not available . Replacement could be made with new style lift station that is much easier to maintain. I S 1 I IPROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Plans & specifications - 1990 Bid & construction - 1991 Construct - May - July 1991 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: iConsistent with upgrade of sewer system. Investigation of MWCC participation in cost will be undertaken. 111 1/4/88 i i 1 TRANSPORTATION 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ,l "I CITY OF HOPKINS I .„------ --:-.-- __:. ` ►0 __ , 1. r 0 I ,__,..7-\______B4 1 0 F. 1 11 MINNETONKA '..,:.. ` fririlli)T \ E, ff ST I 0 f 10 1 ,_. C A.,_,, ,----,K,soitemm. , " ,,,, , , *---ik-----;--71 V„,( N cx:,10111 - ___. .4----------------- it i r r,__ ,,Ii-i-- i. , �� I °'t 71‘11\ _,____.. 1. '‘ _.,113111111,1111141*---,„,1*$ /I Ai'A 2' -1 er. . 1 , gitevii iiiitiettri -4* / di'fil ---- ! ' - • �= ,� 4 ,' ` eke,- _ a 1111411 /4I ,,., , , ,,, TIC111 __T"----2 � 1 � l _.... , 'k • i ,► I 1 1,r7-111!141- �}•� . , . , . ,-.,. moo; � �Eil � I,,�1O `-, / � �, I10- 444(1) Ur _,_E� , + , : s 1'1 i" In. r a E'f , ., .. ,, .: ST Al* ESN. ;pi10 1 t K I • _ _ - ,--", ii 0 1 ,. 41, 1 `-- . il — I , ,'''I 0 , .._ Ih......,.._ , , -___, , , , ,_ i ,.". ot ; it-r ---40-110111-1 ,1 ii SD o 1 0 v , 8 0 0 - p` ...c+oNK. - • .._._ 10 CITY WIDE N II I I - I TRANSPORTATION i _ PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER I - Transportation Rebuild/Redesign 11th at Co . Rd. 3 ST - 2 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD ' - $450 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING SA 270 , 000 ISOURCE SA/GO GO 180 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: IDebt Service . . . . 11th St . from 1st St So . to 5th Ave . So . • Maint. Costs . . . . Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . DESCRIPTION: Rebuild/Redesign of roadway. Widen and add turning lanes and signals . IIJUSTIFICATION: To accommodate increased traffic due to the R. L. Johnson 13A site development and normal increase in traffic . Current design is reaching the point of not functioning safely . Additional development will necessitate the redesign and reconstruction of the roadway. The City will experience some cost savings due to lower street maintenance costs . 1 1 PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Design - 1987 Plans & specifications - 1988 Bid & construction - 1988 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: ' Consistent with the R. L. Johnson redevelopment agreement . r ' 2/1/88 PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER - Transportation Street Reconstruction ST - 4 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD ' $475 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 240 , 000-SA FUNDING .SA/ 160 , 000-GO IISOURCE GO/SS 75 , 000-SS ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: Debt Service . . . . 58 , 240 Maint . Costs . . . . 4 , 000 Knollwood addition Operating Costs . TOTAL 62 , 240 Cost Savings . . 10 , 000 -DESCRIPTION: ' Program to reconstruct streets and provide storm sewer improvements in areas designated as poor on the street condition survey. IIJUSTIFICATION: Recent policy discussions on street reconstruction and ' storm sewer have indicated a need for a planned program of street reconstruction. The numbers indicated in the year box above assume the street indicated was rated poor on the street condition survey and should be ' reconstructed in the next 5 years . The numbers also assume a 60% assessed and 40% general City share of street reconstruction costs and the City funding 100% ' of major storm sewer construction and reconstruction. The City will experience some cost savings due to lower street maintenance costs . IPROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Public Hearing - 1990 ' Plans & specifications - 1990/91 Bid & construction - 1991 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with the City Council adopted Roadway Improvement Policy and street ratings . 1/4/88 PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER Transportation Street Reconstruction ST - 6 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD ' - $400 , 000 - 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 210 , 000- SA FUNDING SA/ 140 , 000-GO i -SOURCE G0/SS 50 , 000-SS ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: II Debt Service . . . . 50 , 960 Maint . Costs . . . . 3 , 000 Campbell addition Operating Costs . TOTAL 53 , 960 Cost Savings . . 8 , 000 DESCRIPTION: Program to reconstruct streets and provide storm sewer ' improvements in areas designated as poor on the street condition survey. JUSTIFICATION: Recent policy discussions on street reconstruction and storm sewer have indicated a need for a planned program ' of street reconstruction. The numbers indicated in the year box above assume the street indicated was rated poor on the street condition survey and should be reconstructed in the next 5 years . The numbers also assume a 60% assessed and 40% general City share of street reconstruction costs and the City funding 100% of major storm sewer construction and reconstruction. The City will experience some cost savings due to lower street maintenance costs . PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: ' Public Hearing - 1991 Plans & Specifications - 1991/92 ' Bid & Construction - 1992 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with the City Council adopted Roadway Improvement Policy and street ratings . 1 _ 1/4/88 PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER Transportation Concrete Alleys ST - 8 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD $50 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING ISOURCE C.R. 10 , 000 10 , 000 10 , 000 10 , 000 10 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: Debt Service . . . . City Wide Maint . Costs . . . . ' Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . 2 , 000 IDESCRIPTION: ' Annual contribution for the City' s portion of concrete alley construction costs . IJUSTIFICATION: The City has had a policy of constructing concrete alleys for ' a number of years . This policy has proved to be sound by the concrete alleys durability and low maintenance costs . The street and alley condition survey indicates that there is approximately 8 , 500 feet of alley in poor condition. The estimated cost to rebuild these alleys is between $300 , 000 and $350 , 000 . Current policy has the city share at 20 percent of the cost in residential areas . The amount recommended would 1 allow reconstruction for a 5 year period. The City would experience some cost savings due to lower maintenance costs . PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: ' 1 , 700 feet per year for 5 years (approximately 3 to 4 blocks) Public Hearing - year prior to project ' Plans/Specs/Bid/Construction - year of project RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with the City Council adopted Roadway Improvement Policy and street ratings . 1/4/88 PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER I - Transportation Reconstruct Mainstreet ST - 10 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD - $600 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING SA 150 , 000 SA 210 , 000 ISOURCE SA/GO GO 100 , 000 GO 140 , 000 • ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: Debt Service . . . . 87 , 360 Mainstreet : Washington to 5th Ave . Maint . Costs . . . . 4 , 000 13th to 21st Ave . Operating Costs . TOTAL 93 , 360 Cost Savings . . 10 , 000 IDESCRIPTION: Reconstruction of Mainstreet from Washington to Shady Oak with the exception of the Welcomall . Two seperate projects proposed, in years shown. JUSTIFICATION: Roadway currently deteriorating. The road also has an excessive crown which limits the ability to overlay the road. By I reconstructing we will upgrade the current roadway and lower our maintenance costs . The City will experience some cost savings due to lower street maintenance costs . I f I IPROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Plans and specifications - 1988/89 Construction - 1989/90 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with City Council adopted Roadway Improvement Policy . I 1/4/88 I PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER Transportation Light Rail Transit Station ST - 12 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD - $20 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING SOURCE T.F. 20 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . 100 Block, 9th Avenue South Maint. Costs . . . . 1 , 000 Operating Costs . TOTAL 1 , 000 Cost Savings . . DESCRIPTION: Construction of a Light Rail Transit (LRT) station in the 11 downtown area. 11 JUSTIFICATION: Should Light Rail Transit be routed through downtown Hopkins , g g a station will need to be constructed. Stations will vary in design and may be built by the City . I I I I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: 111 Planning - 1988 - 1990 Plans and specifications - 1990 11 Construction - 1991 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: 1 Consistent with plans for downtown LRT stop in Hopkins by Hennepin County task force . I - 1/4/88 I PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER Transportation Replace Traffic Controllers SG - 1 ITOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD 1 - $32 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING CR 8 , 000 SOURCE CR/MS MS 8 , 000 MS 8 , 000 MS 8 , 000 IANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . City Signalized Intersections Maint . Costs . . . . 2 , 000 Operating Costs . 2 , 000 ITOTAL 4 , 000 Cost Savings . . 1 , 500 DESCRIPTION: Replace existing electro-mechanical control systems with electronic systems , throughout the City . i JUSTIFICATION: The existing electro-mechanical control systems are rapidly becoming obsolete and maintenance intensive . All new systems being installed I are electronic . These systems are smaller , more reliable , easier to maintain and service . A planned replacement over a reasonable period would appea-r to be the responsible approach. 1 1 I I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: - IThree intersections per year for 4 years Traffic study to determine signal requirements - 1988 Plans/Specs/Bid/Construction - each year of project RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: I I - 1/4/88 I PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER I - Transportation Parking Ramp PK - 1 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED MID SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD. I - $1 , 900 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING ISOURCE T.F. 1 , 900 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: IDebt Service . . . . Lot 400 and Norwest Lot Maint . Costs . . . . • Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . DESCRIPTION: Parking Ramp for 200 additional cars . IJUSTIFICATION: Current parking demand exceeds available spaces . Future needs require additional parking spaces . Landowner currently interested in private financing of part of the ramp . 1 I I 1 PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Plans & specifications - 1988 Bid & construction - 1988 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: IConsistent with Benshoof Parking System Plan. I - 2/1/88 I 1 1 1 1 PARKS & RECREATION 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 `' "" CITY OF HOPKINS II I , CFL, ____ Ijr;------ . . iQ!)-----=------N— -A- --------;rf-- �` C w.KTON.c. .w JI 1111 V _ soir,e_vm.....„ .... _pilI CF J 'MINI 7-g J � � v A I CF 0. E1 . — . i1ilk. :A.-,,4% ,' _.,-717 . pr N .\ ALIKE Egginus -.• 1 .i,..r _ ---- '.: -- 1 I \----- - Num muitimit)-_,,---,.Nip," ,_, ,..... -, . , @,,- i _ _ . _ _ .. _ . _... ._. .._ .1 r / 0 • __ - . 1 ‘9 1 lingiiiiiiiii4A „... ... _ _, I 1 1,-.4\t, Is , kik ' -111111 • 1 fp, . re', -,\ mi.* ,i i . 0 .,___ , i ., , .! , 1I �I •. ., . I • 04 _111_111 ---- = f I .1- - • - ii I ' ri, `` CF 0 1 'I 11,12 CF 1 ..7 � - -_L ft �L a r\, _,_Ai i- 1, 1I .:'it . leatiLidli , - . .--_- - 7 triPP-- _-". 11 `` It CF I ' `�;\yampi _' AD.0.t . I I I PARKS & RECREATION • PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER II Park & Rec . Golf Course CF - 3 TOTAL COST T RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER Park & Rec . Oakes Park Sun Shelter CF - 1 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD $10 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING SOURCE C.R. 10 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Oakes Park Maint . Costs . . . . 200 Operating Costs . 200 I TOTAL Cost Savings . . IIIDESCRIPTION: Sun Shelter construction to allow picnics and other function to have a covered shelter in Oakes Park. IJUSTIFICATION: At the present time , Oakes Park has no covered shelters to accommodate picnics etc . The Park Board has listed a sun shelter at Oakes Park as one of its high priorities . Oakes Park is increasing in use . This shelter would allow better utilization of the park and be consistent with its development . I I I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: I Bid & Construction - early Spring 1989 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with Park Board Five Year Plan. I - 1/4/88 I ! - - PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER j - Park & Rec . Golf Course CF - 3 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD 1 - $750 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING 50 , 000 700 , 000 IISOURCE R.B. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: 1 Debt Service . . . . Seventh St . South at 14th Ave . Maint . Costs . . . . (former landfill) Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . DESCRIPTION: 9 or 18 hole golf course IIJUSTIFICATION: The City Council has indicated a desire to reuse the former landfill site on 7th Street South. Preliminary soils testing indicate that the area is suitable for recreational use . The City Council has directed that II . a feasibility study be conducted to determine the viability of a golf course on the site . 11 I 1 PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Soils testing - 1987 Feasibilty study - underway - 1987 Plans & specifications - 1988 Construction - 1988-89 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Non-ranked on Park Board priority list I 2/i/as PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER Park & Rec . Shady Oak Concession Renovation CF - 5 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD - • $20 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING I -SOURCE R.E. -20 ,000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Shady Oak Beach Maint . Costs . . . . Operating Costs . TOTAL • Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Various improvements to the concession building to meet health requirements . Improvements would include tile installation and new machinery . IJUSTIFICATION: The environmental health inspectors of the Minnetonka Community Development Department., have on past occasions served notice to the Recreation Department of several health and safety violations . The buildings which are in violation include the concession building and the restrooms . I I I I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: I IRELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: I 1/4/88 II PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER IPark & Rec . Central Park - Play Equipment CF - 7 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD I - $30 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING ISOURCE C.R. 30 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: . IDebt Service . . . . Central Park Maint . Costs . . . . 200 Operating Costs . 200 . I TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Construct large unit type playground equipment in Central Park IJUSTIFICATION: Since the removal of the "LIONS" hill , Central Park has no large I play area . The proposed type of unit has been well recieved at Burnes Park. Central Park is a large and popular park that can handle additional (large numbers) of people attracted to this type of equipment . This type of development creates a focal point in a park Isystem. I I I IPROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Bid & construction - 1991 I RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: I I 1/4/88 I IPROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER Parks & Rec . Handicap Play Equipment CF - 9 ITOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD I - $10 , 000 1988 1989 . 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING -SOURCE C.R. 10 , 000 I ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Central Park Maint . Costs . . . . 100 . 00 " Operating Costs . ITOTAL 100 . 00 Cost Savings . . 111 DESCRIPTION: Construct special handicap play equipment at Central Park. 1 1 JUSTIFICATION: As a community service , one centralized park should be designated to have equipment for the handicapped. Handicapped children are many times I left out of the experiences provided for the non-handicapped. This equipment would provide a means to use Central Park by the handicapped. I I I _ I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: 1 Plan/Bid/Construction - 1989 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: IConsistent with Park Board 5 Year plan. I - 1/4/88 I PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER Park & Rec . Valley Park Sun Shelter CF - 11 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR. FIVE YEAR PERIOD - $10 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING - ' ISOURCE C.R. 10 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: IDebt Service . . . . Valley Park Maint . Costs . . . . 200 Operating Costs . 200 TOTAL 400 Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Sun shelter construction to allow picnics and other functions to have a covered shelter in Valley Park. 1 JUSTIFICATION: At the present time Valley Park has no covered shelters to accommodate I picnics etc . The Parks Board prioritized a sun shelter as its number one need on its current prioritizing list . Valley Park has doubled in size since originally purchased and has many community functions now. This shelter would be consistent with other proposed development to Iincrease the community use of Valley Park. I L I IPROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Construction - 1988 I RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: IConsistent with Park Board Five Year Plan. r - _ 1/4/88 t 1 1 1 1 1 I GENERAL PUBLIC BUILDINGS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ., ,�.. '',1 ••" ,L CITY OF HOPKINS wn�a ,.._,-, 1-13 Inl NOME TOM. -- r MFAI . 4 - = I 4 o \ n _ . .,___. �. . _,_ ,�. �, --....--. ,,,- ,_,. ._ ___, i,...,.. , i. , -,..,---1=, :, . ...„_ . .. _ / .,, „..,_ ,,,,,,. _ _ _ . ........,_ , ,..„. _.. __,,..„ , , ,__,..,... h.,,,..I.E.p.,_ 1. iii N i ,c'h-----1' 1r _ ,i_PitilAi_i_illb_,_-.-_,,,,, 1 Jjk, i/ ,) /4"..-_,!.. 1-,' ....-.. ,,. i -- -----•-- Ilefill ®1,7-T-_-„ 1._, -,.._1____: _ _ illitrill 1 1,--) --/ ' fl __ , 1-• :„ -N--- -- - igoft----- tit 1 • _, u , i. I 11‘ 0 -- .' ' , .r I I ,-.H...-....-.. - --- -70,01-_ irk iutiitiniØij 1 .J . ° 1 .,•0#1,r1. Sill ' lit 7: r. COMA fl,. .,. t— _, 1P \ 1A _ _____ v. i , I . •,__,_ _rn lig ., \-.. AO 0 v CITY WIDE I i I GENERAL PUBLIC BUILDINGS PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER Gen. Pub . Bldg . Pistol Range Ventilation Improvement AO - 2 . TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD $16 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING • SOURCE R.E. 16 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Maint . Costs . . . . City Administrative Office/ Police Operating Costs . Pistol Range TOTAL • Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: IIDuct work/ventilation improvements to the pistol range . JUSTIFICATION: The present system does not adequately remove the powder residue discharged during pistol practice . This smoke and residue contains Ihigh levels of lead that are a health hazard. 1 I I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: 11 Install in 1988 as part of HVAC improvements . RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: This plan is a component of the City Hall Improvement project and included in the H. V. A. C . study . 1 - 2/1l88 PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER Gen. Pub . Bldg. City Hall Renovation AO - 4 IITOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD I $450 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING RE/ RE 55 , 000 RE 315 , 000 I . -SOURCE GRS GRS 80 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Maint . Costs . . . . City Hall Operating Costs . I TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Renovation of office space ; installation of an elevator ; I renovation of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems . I JUSTIFICATION: The City Hall was built in 1964 . Since that time , no major improvements have been made to either the offices or the HVAC I systems . Current department needs are not adequately by the original floor plan. The proposed renovation will open up the building so that any rearrangement in the future will be easily I accomplished. The proposed changes should improve customer service and make the building more energy efficient . The addition of an elevator will make the upper level handicap Iaccessible . I I in PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: 111 Study - 1987 Plans - Spring/summer , 1988 IConstruction - Late 1988 , early 1989 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: IMaking the building handicap accessible is mandated by the Federal Government . 1 - 1/4/88 I PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER Gen. Pub . Bldg . Fuel Dispensing System MF - 2 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD I - $55 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING IISOURCE C.R. 55 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: Debt Service . . . . Public Works Facilities Maint . Costs . . . . 200 1601 - 2nd Street South Operating Costs . 200 TOTAL 400 Cost Savings . . 500 IIDESCRIPTION: Replacement of existing fuel storage tank (gasoline) , fuel pumps , and ' card type dispensing control systems . I JUSTIFICATION: The existing gasoline fuel tank, all pumps and key dispensing system are reaching the end of useful life . EPA and PCA regulations are being proposed that would require immediate repalacement of the gasoline tanks . The proposed replacement would update all equipment to current standards . The card dispensing system would allow each vehicle and I employee to be monitored automatically . More accurate and timely record and reports would be generated for use by finance. and other departments . I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Plans/Specs/Bids/Construction - 1989 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: ' Consistent with overall upgrade of Public Works facilities . 1 _ 1/4/88 1 1 - PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER Gen. Pub . Bldg . Fire Dept . - Overhead Doors FF-1 I TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD 1 - 12 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING I -SOURCE C.R. 12 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . City Hall Maint . Costs . . . . Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Replacement of existing main doors (4) for the fire station. IJUSTIFICATION: The existing doors are the original doors installed when the building was constructed in 1962 . They are becoming worn and are not energy efficient . Replacement is necessary to insure reliable operation and to improve energy conservation. i 1 1 I IPROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Plan/Bid/Construction - 1989 1 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: • 114)88 PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER IGen. Pub . Bldg. Community Center - Air Exchange CC - 1 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD _ $50 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING GA 42 , 000 111 SOURCE GA/CR CR 8 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: IDebt Service . . . . Hopkins Community Center Maint . Costs . . . . 33 - 14th Avenue North Operating Costs . ' TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Installation of an adequate air handling system for the entire I Community Center IJUSTIFICATION: The current air handling system at the Community Center is inadequate I and unsafe . The amount of air that can be handled for air changes and combustion make-up does not meet current standards for health and safety. Plans at the time of Community Center start up called for upgrading modifications which have not been done . The system can be designed for Ifuture addition of air conditioning. • 1 IPROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: IConsistent with overall Community Center improvement plans . 1 1/4/88 PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER Gen. Pub . Bldg. Community Center - Game Room Renovation CC - 3 ' TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD ' - $150 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING GA 127 , 000 ISOURCE GA/CR CR 23 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: II Debt Service . . . . Hopkins Community Center Maint . Costs . . . . Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . IIDESCRIPTION: The present wall separating the game room - lounge with the locker room would be eliminated. The existing shower area would be divided into two rooms , one as the maintenance room and the other a small private meeting room. ' JUSTIFICATION: If the Center is going to function as a facility to serve many ages and many activities and meet the needs of the community , we must prepare the Center to do so . We need adequate meeting and recreation areas , proper space for the IImaintenance department . 1 1 1 PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Bid & construction 1990 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: This project is part of the Hopkins Community Center Renovation Plan that has been in existence since the spring of 1986 . 1/4/88 PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER I Gen. Pub . Bldg. Community Center - Kitchen Renovation CC - 5 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD $5 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING GA 4 , 000 I -SOURCE GA/CR CR 1 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: Debt Service. . . . Hopkins Community Center Maint . Costs . . . . Operating Costs . ' TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Repair exhaust hood system, install 3 compartment sink, provide ' make-up air system, update Vulcan ovens , update warming table , purchase additional shelving & stainless steel equipment . IJUSTIFICATION: The Hopkins Health Department has notified the Center that these items need to be taken care of to make the Center ' s kitchen ' available for commercial use . I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Bid & installation 1988 i RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: This project is part of the Hopkins Community Center Renovation Plan that has been developed. 1/4/88 PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER Gen. Pub . Bldg. Community Center - Office & Entrance CC - 7 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD $83 , 000 - 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 GA 62 , 000 FUNDING GA/ CR 11 , 000 IISOURCE CR/PF PF 10 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT . LOCATION: Debt Service . . . . Hopkins Community Center Maint . Costs . . . . 33 - 14th Avenue .North Operating Costs . ' TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: A window will be placed on the west wall of the office . A lockable window opening would be placed between the two existing office doors . Replace one existing door and part of the wall adjoining it with a glass panel wall . Replace the other door with a glass panel door . JUSTIFICATION: If staff is to market the Center for all ages to use , they must provide a marketable product . The renovations will open our entryway and give a more open, bright and welcoming feeling It would also eliminate the congestion problem that has plagued this area. Staff needs to monitor who is coming and going for their own safety . At times there is a very insecure feeling of sitting in an office with no windows . I I I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Bid & construction - 1989 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: This project is part of the Hopkins Community Center Renovation Plan. 1/4/88 1 (� CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER Capital Equipment City Manager ' s Vehicle CE - 1 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD $9 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING SOURCE E.R. 9 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Maint . Costs . . . . Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Administrative vehicle for use by the City Manager I I JUSTIFICATION: Vehicles included on the adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule have been scheduled to maximize service life and minimize operating cost . I I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Schedule conforms with 20-year plan RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Expenditures proposed conform with Council-adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule . 1 _ 1/4/88 I I - PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER 1 Capital Equipment Minicomputer-Finance CE - 3 - TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD - $73 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING ISOURCE E.R. 73 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: IDebt Service . . . . City Hall Maint. Costs . . . . Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Replace minicomputer purchased in 1984 . • IJUSTIFICATION: Projected life for this type of hardware is 8 years . During this time the technology is expected to have changed so much that replacement is imperative to keep the accounting/billing/payroll systems compatible with current operating software . I I 1 I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Schedule conforms with 20 year plan. Study will be conducted in 1991 to determine the feasibility of alternatives . RFPs will precede purchase in 1992 . RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Expenditure proposed conforms with Council adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule . - T 1/4/88 I - PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER ICapital Equipment Aerial Tower CE - 5 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD - $425 , 800 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING IIISOURCE E.R. 425 , 800 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: IDebt Service . . . . N/A Maint . Costs . . . . I Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: An aerial ladder truck with enclused cab and pump . This unit is assigned on all structural fires . The function of the unit is to transport people and equipment to the scene . IJUSTIFICATION: Vehicle is included on the adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule which is designed to maximize service life and minimize operating cost . I I I I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Schedule conforms with 20 year plan. RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Expenditures proposed conform with council-adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule . 1/4/88 I PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER Capital Equipment Police Computer CE - 7 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR. PERIOD - $85 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING I -SOURCE E.R. 85 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Maint . Costs . . . . 12 , 900 City Hall/Police Department Operating Costs . 2 , 500 TOTAL 15 , 400 Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Computer System for Police Department used for records management information processing, word processing, management analysis . IJUSTIFICATION: The existing word processing/micro data base system provides extremely marginal police records management . The existing system has been filled to capacity . No further expansion is available , and the equipment has outlived its useful life . . I I I IPROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Installation - 1988 I RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: This is a priority project identified in the 1987 Police Study . I 1/4/88 I Am I _ PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER Captial Equipment Police 4 WD Wagon CE - 9 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD - $20 , 200 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING ISOURCE E.R. 20 , 200 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Maint . Costs . . . . Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Police 4 Wheel Drive wagon used for animal control , general patrol and service provision during heavy snow conditions . IJUSTIFICATION: .1 Vehicles included on the adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule have been scheduled to maximize service life and minimize operating cost . I I I I IPROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Schedule conforms with 20-year plan. I RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Expenditures proposed conform with Council-adopted equipment replacement schedule . ! 1/4/88 I mt PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NBER Capital Equipment Parking Enforcement Vehicle CE UM- 11 • TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD $6 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING SOURCE E.R. 6 , 000 1 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Maint . Costs . . . . Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Replacement of Parking Enforcement Vehicle I JUSTIFICATION: Vehicles included on the adopted Equipment Replacement schedule have been scheduled to maximize service life and minimize operating cost . I I I 1 PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Schedule conforms with 20-year plan. I RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Expenditures proposed conform with Council-adopted equipment replacement schedule . I - 1/4/88 1 PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER Capital Equipment 1 Ton Dump Trucks (806 , 342 , 315) I CE - 13 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD $60 , 400 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING 20 , 800 21 , 600 18 , 000 SOURCE E.R. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Maint . Costs . . . . Operating Costs . I TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Three one-ton trucks used in the Streets and Parks Divisions of Public Works . One of the streets trucks and the Parks truck are 4 x 4 vehicles . JUSTIFICATION: Vehicles included on the adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule have been scheduled to maximize service life and minimize operating cost . • I • I I I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Schedule conforms with 20-year plan RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Expenditures proposed conform with Council-adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule . I - 1/4/88 I • PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER I Capital Equipment Dump Trucks (.330 & 331) CE - 15 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD - $112 , 700 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING 54 , 100 58 , 600 I -SOURCE E.R. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Maint . Costs . . . . Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Dump Trucks used in Streets Division of Public Works . Truck replaced in 1989 is a single axle , in 1991 is a tandem axle . IJUSTIFICATION: Vehicles included on the adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule have been scheduled to maximize service life and minimize operating cost . • I I I i PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: 111 Schedule conforms with 20-year plan I RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: ( Expenditures proposed conform with Council-adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule . 1/4/88 I - PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER Capital Equipment Compact Pickups (1001 , 501 , 504 , 801) CE - 17 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD - $33 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING SOURCE E.R. 7 , 800 8 , 100 8 , 400 8 , 700 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Maint . Costs . . . . Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Compact pick-ups to be used by Vehicle/Equipment Mainten- ance , Parks , and Water/Sewer divisions of Public Works . IJUSTIFICATION: Current vehicles are used by supervisors and division personnel for a variety of tasks . Proposed vehicles are a downgrade to compact pick-ups to save fuel/repair costs . Current vehicles are 1/2 ton pick-ups . I 1 I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Schedule conforms with 20-year plan. I RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Expenditures proposed are less than the Council-adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule , due to downgrade in size of vehicles . 1/4/88 i • PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER CapLtal Equipment' Riding Mower I CE - 19 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD - $9 , 700 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING I -SOURCE E.R. 9 , 700 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Maint . Costs . . . . Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . DESCRIPTION: Riding Mower used by Parks Maintenance Department of Public Works . IJUSTIFICATION: Equipment included on the adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule have been scheduled to maximize service life and minimize operating cost . • 1 •1 I in PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Schedule conforms with 20-year plan. 1 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Expenditures proposed conform with council-adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule . 1 - 1/4/88 111 PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER mi Capital Equipment Refuse Trucks (901 & 903) CE - 21 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD - $185 , 200 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING I -SOURCE E.R. 80 , 000 105 , 200 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Maint . Costs . . . . Operating Costs . TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Refuse trucks used by Refuse Utility Division of Public Works . Rear loading vehicle (903) proposed for 1990 is used for as a garbage collection backup and as primary vehicle for special collections . Vehicle scheduled for 1991 , (901) , is an ' automated garbage collection vehicle . JUSTIFICATION: Vehicles included on the adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule have been scheduled to maximize service life and minimize operating cost . ' Vehicle 903 is currently a used rear loader . We propose an upgrade when a replacement vehicle is purchased. Additional work load requires the purchase of a more reliable vehicle . in 1 PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: 111 Schedule conforms with 20-year plan RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: iExpenditures proposed conform with Council-adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule . 1/4/88 1 I PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER I -Capital Equipment Miniature Thermal Imaging Camera I CE - 23 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD I - $10 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING ISOURCE C.R. 10 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: 111 Debt Service . . . . Maint . Costs . . . . N/A Operating Costs . I TOTAL Cost Savings . . • IDESCRIPTION: ' Electronic sensor to locate victims in zero visibility IJUSTIFICATION: • Rescuing downed or trapped victims in a fire is the top priority I of the fire department when operating at a fire scene . Our present technology requires us to search large areas with virtually no visibility. We search each room by "feel" . This is time consuming process . If a victim is trapped in a contaminated environment , each I minute they continue to breath toxic gas lessens their chance of survival . I A British firm has developed a thermal imaging camera that literally sees through smoke . This camera is widely used throughout the United Kingdom. Every pumper in the London Fire Brigade has been Iassigned one of these amazing devices . The infra-red sensitive camera converts radiation into a video signal , giving the camera operator an image outline of the heat generating 1 object . PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Scheduled for inclusion in the 1989 budget . I RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: I I 2/1/88 I . 1 - PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER I -Capital Equipment Log Truck w/Clam I CE - 25 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD - $83 , 100 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING I -SOURCE E.R. 83 , 100 • ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Maint. Costs . . . . Operating Costs . ' TOTAL Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Log truck with clam boom used by Tree Service Division of Public Works . IJUSTIFICATION: This vehicle is an integral part of City-wide brush removal program. It is also used for loading and hauling logs to the Hennepin County tree disposal site . Current vehicle was purchased used. Proposed replacement is a new vehicle . The safety and efficiency of the brush removal program have ' improved markedly and justify the purchase of a new vehicle . Equipment included on the adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule has been scheduled for replacement to maximize service life and minimize operating cost . I I PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Schedule conforms with 20-year plan. RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Expenditures proposed conform with Council-adopted Equipment Replacement Schedule . 2/1/88 PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER ' -Capital Equipment Sign Applicator I CE - 27 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD I - $10 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING 1 SOURCE E.R. 10 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: IIDebt Service . . . . Public Works Garage Maint . Costs . . . . 100 Operating Costs . 400 TOTAL 500 Cost Savings . . 2 , 0.00 IDESCRIPTION: ' Replace obsolete existing 24" x 30" sign applicator with a 48" x 72" machine . II JUSTIFICATION: The existing applicator was purchased used and does not ' meet the size requirements of the current manual on Uniform Traffic Control devices . This machine would allow Traffic Services to make new signs as needed on a much more timely basis and allow replacement when needed. Traffic Services ' feels they could save $1 , 000 to $2 , 000 yearly on sign materials and utilize sign making as a winter project . Estimate a life of at least 20 years . 11 11 1 PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Approved in the 1988 budget . RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: I 1/4/88 — PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER Capital Equipment Optical Ballot Counters I CE - 29 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD $50 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 ' FUNDING SOURCE C.R. 50 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Maint . Costs . . . . City Wide Operating Costs . TOTAL ' Cost Savings IDESCRIPTION: Optical ballot counters allow for the automatic tallying of votes . JUSTIFICATION: ' All jurisdictions in Hennepin County are obtaining optical scanning equipment . Hopkins has committed to buying one ' unit per precinct and one unit for the Counting Center . This will make election administration easier , more accurate , and in the long run, less costly . $18 , 000 was budgeted for ' a ballot counting computer in 1986 but not expended as this new county-wide system was adopted. 11 PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: ' Approved for the 1988 budget . RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: 1/4/88 PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER Capital Equipment Overseeder CE - 31 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD $5 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 FUNDING 11 SOURCE C.R. 5 , 000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: II Debt Service . . . . Maint . Costs . . . . 100 Operating Costs . 200 TOTAL 300 Cost Savings . . IDESCRIPTION: Equipment to overseed existing turf areas in parks , etc . ' To improve and repair the condition of the grass areas . IJUSTIFICATION: This unit is five feet wide and attaches to a three-point ' hitch of a Ford tractor . It slices the existing grass and and soil , places grass seed and covers the seed. Proper turf maintenance requires that overseeding be done on a continuing basis . This method is the best means to accom- plish this maintenance and repair . Savings could result from a decrease in the amount of areas that require re- sodding. 1 ' PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: Accepted for inclusion the 1988 budget . 1 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: 1 1/4/88 PROGRAM CATEGORY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT NUMBER Capital Equipment Hand held computer meter reading system CE - 33 TOTAL COST RECOMMENDED AND SCHEDULED FOR FIVE YEAR PERIOD $19 , 000 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 • FUNDING SOURCE U.R. 19 , 000 ' ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION: I Debt Service . . . . Maint. Costs . . . . Operating Costs . City wide TOTAL Cost Savings . . 10 , 000 IDESCRIPTION: Meter reading system to improve efficiency of reading and recording II reads for billing. JUSTIFICATION: I The present method of reading meters is a manual system of books and pen. This system is slow and very difficult to change routes to allow more I efficiency . The proposed system would allow routes to be modified for more efficient reading and would speed up the processing of the readings in the office . The system would allow the utilization of less I experienced personnel for reading. We feel time could be saved in the field and in the office to pay for the system within 3 years . This system could be used as an effective interim until other electronic read systems are perfected and we realize a good use of our recently I changed water meters with outside readers . 1 PROJECTED SCHEDULE/CURRENT STATUS: IIAdopted for inclusion in the 1988 budget . RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: I - 1/4/88