1994 -1998 CIP 6
City of Hopkins, Minnesota
� o10
•
�- Capital
,111.,
- 4 c) Il
Improvement
I
Plan
1994 - 199
I
111111111111 s=
04 \o
i rC-\,
• o �
e
1
iie�
e
..oil"
ease
CITY O F HOPKINS
DATE: October 1993
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Steven C. Mielke, City Manager
SUBJECT: 1994-1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
' With this letter, I respectfully submit the 1994-1998 Capital
Improvement Plan. This five year planning document represents the
combined efforts of city staff, advisory commissions, citizens,
and the City Council.
' The Capital Improvement Plan is a five year forecast of project
needs in the City of Hopkins. It is intended to alert the Council
1 and citizens to the major capital needs on the horizon. The first
year of the plan becomes an adopted capital budget and relates
almost completely to the operating .budget which is approved on a
yearly basis. The remaining four years represent an estimate of
project needs and funding capabilities of the City. In previous
plans an explanation of five year equipment needs was also
included. This year's plan does not include proposed equipment
' purchases. A document relating specifically to equipment
replacement needs has been developed into a separate document.
The Capital Improvement Plan is intended to serve as a planning
tool and is therefore structured to present a meaningful,
long-range perspective of the City's capital programing needs. At
the same time, sufficient project detail is provided to enable
II those who review the information to make informed decisions on the
programming of projects over the next several years.
Please use the information provided to formulate plans, projects,
and questions. The Capital Improvement Plan can serve the
community best by provoking thoughts and actions.
This document was developed by the Community Development
Department with the assistance of all City departments.
I wish to thank all those involved in the development of the
Capital Improvement Plan, and especially to Tom Harmening,
Community Development Director, Lee Gustafson, Public Works
Director, Jim Gessele, Engineering Supervisor, John Schedler,
Finance Director, Nancy Anderson, Planner, and Bish Johnson,
Secretary, for their hard work and dedication.
1
' 1010 First Street South,Hopkins,Minnesota 55343 612/935-8474
An Equal Opportunity Employer
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1994-1998
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S PAGE
1
City Manager's Message 1
IIIntroduction and Purpose 3
IIProgram Descriptions/Goals and Objectives 4
Utilities Program 4
Transportation Program 6
II Park and Recreation Program 7
General Public Buildings Program 9
IICIP Sources of Funding 11
Five Year Project Summaries 15
IITotal Expenditures by Funding Source 17
Capital Improvement Projects 18
Proposed Expenditures for Unscheduled Projects 19
11 Proposed Projects By Funding Source 20
Revenue Projections to
1 Show Impact of Projects on Funding Source 22
Summary 23
II . General Fund 25
Municipal State Aid Fund 26
Economic Development Fund 26
Tax Increment Financing - 1. 1 Fund 27
II Tax Increment Financing - 2.X Fund 27
Water Fund - Cash Flow 28
Sanitary Sewer Fund - Cash Flow 28
I
Refuse Fund - Cash Flow 29
Storm Sewer Fund - Cash Flow 29
1 Project Descriptions
Utilities 31
Transportation 40
II Parks & Recreation 57
General Public Buildings 65
Proposed Expenditures/Unscheduled Projects 72
II
I 2
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
•
The Capital Improvement Plan is a flexible plan based upon
' long-range physical planning and financial projections, which
schedules the major public improvements that may be incurred by
the City over the next five years. Flexibility of the Capital
Improvement Plan is established through annual review, and
11 revision if necessary. The annual review assures that the program
will become a continuing part of the budgetary process and that it
' will be consistent with changing demands as well as changing
patterns in cost and financial resources. Funds are appropriated
only for the first year of the program, which is then included in
the annual budget.
' The Capital Improvement Plan serves as a tool for implementing
certain aspects of the City's comprehensive plan, therefore, the
program describes the overall objectives of City development, the
relationship between projects with respect to timing and need, and
the City's fiscals capabilities.
The Capital Improvement Plan can help assure:
1. A systematic approach to planning and initiating capital
' projects affording the opportunity to plan the location,
timing, and financing of needed public improvements;
I
2. The development of a realistic program of capital spending
within the City's projected fiscal capability to finance such
projects, avoiding sharp change in the tax levy or bonded
indebtedness;
3. The coordination of public and private
improvement projects
P
permitting adequate time for design and engineering to
' eliminate duplication of effort and expense;
4. The expenditure of public funds that are compatible with the
' City's adopted Comprehensive Plan;
5. That the public is kept informed of the proposed future
projects and expenditures;
11 6. That private investors are aware of the City's long-range
development program so that they may guide their development
in a way that is compatible with the City's program;
7. Aid in achieving federal and/or state participation by
' providing the necessary planning and lead time necessary for a
successful application in addition to meeting prerequisites
needed for certain federal and state grants.
3
I
II. Municipal Sanitary Sewer Sub-Program
A. Sub-Program Goal: The goal of the Municipal Sanitary
Sewer sub-program is to promote a healthful environment
by collecting all sewage from existing and projected
development in a sanitary and economic manner.
B. Objectives:
1. Provide sewer lines of adequate size and grade to
collect and transmit all discharge sewage.
2 . Prevent sewage from overflowing into the natural
environment.
3 . Prevent sewage back-ups.
4. Encourage or promote connection of all generators of
' sewage to the Municipal system.
5. Meet the effluent and infiltration standards of the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.
III. Storm Sewer Sub-Program
A. Sub-Program Goal: Manage and control surface and ground
waters in order to protect the man-made and natural
environment in a safe and efficient manner.
fB. Objectives:
1. Prevent flooding.
2. Prevent damage to property due to erosion.
3 . Meet water quality standards established by the
controlling regulatory law or authority.
IV. Refuse Sub-Program
11
A. Sub-Program Goal: To promote a healthful environment by
collecting all residential solid waste in a sanitary and
economic manner.
B. Objectives:
1. Provide efficient refuse collection in a timely manner
to minimize disruption to residents.
2. Provide residential recycling programs that minimize
the amount of refuse that needs to be landfilled.
5
11
B. Objectives:
1. Signs and Signals should be installed in conformity
with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices.
2 . Periodic surveys and studies should be made to document
the effectiveness of City signing patterns.
IV. Parking Facilities Sub-Program
A. Sub-Program Goal: To provide such supporting facilities
• as will promote maximum use of public parking spaces by
employers, employees, customers, and visitors.
11 B. Objectives:
1. Provide parking facilities for present and anticipated
' needs of the City of Hopkins.
V. Street Lights Sub-Program
A. Sub-Program Goal: To provide a system of street lighting
within the City that will promote safe and convenient
vehicular and pedestrian travel on City Streets.
B. Objectives:
11 1. To provide lighting at each street intersection within
the City.
2. To provide mid-block street lighting in conformance
with the City's street lighting policy, in order to
provide equitable, cost efficient lighting.
3 . To continually update the system so as to provide
energy and cost efficient lighting.
PARKS, FORESTRY AND PAVILION PROGRAM
Program Description: This program includes community parks,
11 neighborhood parks, open spaces, recreational structures and
facilities.
1 Program Goal: The goal of the Park and Recreation Program is to
provide facilities for safe, stimulating, and comprehensive
leisure time activities of Hopkins citizens.
1
7
t
GENERAL PUBLIC BUILDINGS PROGRAM
Program Description: The General Public Buildings Program
includes all municipal buildings except those provided for in the
Utility and Park Facilities Program.
Program Goal: Provide buildings which are adequate and convenient
-- for the efficient accommodation of City functions.
11 Sub-Programs: Administrative Offices, Maintenance Facilities,
Fire Facilities, Community Center.
I. Administrative Offices Sub-Program
A. Sub-Program Goal: The goal of the Administrative Offices
Sub-Program is to provide facilities for the efficient and
safe conduct of legislative and administrative functions
of the City.
B. Objectives:
1. Maintain current facilities in a state of good repair
so as to maximize cost effectiveness and avoid costly
repair.
1 2. Upgrade facilities as necessary to provide for the
efficient, safe, and effective provision of the city
services.
II. Maintenance Facilities Sub-Program
A. Sub-Program Goal: The goal of the Maintenance Facilities
Sub-Program is to provide facilities for the efficient and
safe conduct of City maintenance functions.
B. Objectives:
1. Maintain current facilities in a state of good repair
' so as to maximize cost effectiveness and avoid costly
repair.
2 . Upgrade facilities as necessary to provide for the
11 efficient, safe, and effective provision of City
services.
11 III. Fire Facilities Sub-Program
A. Sub-Program Goal: To provide a fire station, or stations,
11 for storage of Fire Department equipment and for the
training and meetings of volunteer fire fighters to
provide prompt and efficient protection to life and
property.
9
11
I
CIP SOURCES OF FUNDING
In order to fund the anticipated Capital Improvements, the City
must draw upon a variety of sources. Many of these sources have a
specific or "dedicated" purpose (i.e. , the water utility fund will
finance water main installation but not a street overlay) .
Therefore, it is important to identify the uses and limitations of
the various revenue sources.
CURRENT REVENUES - GENERAL FUND (C.R. )
This represents funding from current year revenue collections in
the General Fund which support operations and capital outlay
expenditures. Revenue sources include property tax levies, state
aid payments, and various permit and license fees. This source of
funding is generally used only for operations and small capital
purchases.
GENERAL FUND RESERVES (G.R. )
1 Reserves of theeneral fund are the funds remaining ning after
subtracting cash flow and emergency amounts from the City's cash
balance, sometimes referred to as "fund balance" . The use of
General Fund Reserves is not recommended for Capital Improvements
without significant staff and Council review.
CABLE TELEVISION FUND (C.T. )
This funding source consists of franchise fees received from
Paragon Cable TV, in excess of the amounts earmarked for the
access programming and commission budgets. Expenditures are
limited to cable-related facilities, or must have a cable-related
purpose.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND (E.D. )
This funding source was established by the Housing and
' Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the City of Hopkins, to provide
funding for the purpose of promoting development and redevelopment
within the City. The Economic Development fund is a revolving
fund administered by the HRA, intended to provide an on-going
funding source used to reduce or extend the long term debt
involved with development and redevelopment activities. The HRA
11 reviews all proposed uses of this fund on an individual basis.
11 11
1
I
REAL ESTATE SALES FUND (R.E. )
This funding source consists primarily of funds built up from the
sale of City-owned property. To date, the fund has been used for
building improvements. Because the sale of both general City
property and park/recreation property are accumulated into this
1 fund, earmarking a portion for recreational purposes may be
justified.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT (S.A. )
A number of projects may be realistically financed using Special
' Assessment to pay the ultimate cost. Almost any project can
potentially be financed using the assessment process. In each
case it is necessary to make a determination that the assessed
property will benefit by the amount of the assessment.
The cost of street reconstruction is shared 70% by the property
1 owner and 30% by the City. Concurrent improvement costs to the
utility systems are assumed by the respective utility funds.
1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (T.F. )
This funding source results from the tax value of new development
1 that is "incrementally" greater than the existing tax value.
Typically, bonds are sold based on the assumption that the higher
tax receipts will retire the bonds. However, the use of TIF funds
through a "pay as you go" method has become more common. This
type of funding can be used for public improvements within a
redevelopment district to support the goals of redevelopment,
specifically the elimination of blighted conditions. Approval of
the Hopkins HRA should be anticipated prior to the commitment of
these funds. The use of these funds are strictly regulated by
State law.
SANITARY SEWER FUNDS (S.F. )
Sanitary sewer funds consist of revenue generated from charges
made for sewage disposal. The cost of operations plus system
(capital) improvements determine the ultimate charge levied for
1 the service provided.
11 WATER FUNDS (W.F. )
Water funds consist of revenue generated from the sale of water.
The cost of operations plus system (capital) improvements
1 determine the ultimate charge levied for the service provided.
13
I
� FIVE YEAR
1
� PROJECT SUMMARIES
1
15
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
FUNDING SOURCES
Current Revenues - General Fund C.R.
General Fund Reserves G.R.
Cable Television Fund C.T.
Economic Development Fund E.D._
Grant-In-Aid G.A.
General Obligation Bonds G.O.
Municipal State-Aid Streets M.S.
Private Sector Funds P.F.
Revenue Bonds R.B.
Real Estate Sales Fund R.E.
Special Assessment S.A.
Tax Increment Financing T.F.
Sewer Fund S.F.
Equipment Replacement Fund E.R.
Storm Sewer Utility S.U.
Water Fund W.F.
Refuse Fund R.F
Pavilion Fund P.A.
Other Governmental Units G.0
1
I
I
11
1 16
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR EXPEDITURE SUMMARY
PROD PROJECT FUNDING
CAT. NUMBER PROJECT TITLE SOURCE 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
4941:11Ini
Util WA-2 Elmo Park Treatment FacilW.F. 315790 710,090 119,000,,
•
Util WA-4 Well Rehabilitation W.F. 54,000
:"1.04%'-:g:f.:41:;7A:::liT,EP;" -'17?:;11140EE-17406AINII'`..,-
Util SA-1 Lift Station Reconstruction S.F. 20,000 110,000 20,000 250,000
Util SS-2 Nine Mile Creek Improvements G.U. 1,800,000
_233'
od,tint;iRff"%'IWriiV4144,,,ligitkeIlAiiIV"i''2i";
Trans ST-2 Citywide Street Reconstr.-Utilities S.U. 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
Citywide Street Reconstr.-Utilities W.F. 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000
, fyconstr:; 72,pp975,000v
-.- ""! on351ivk:A.°=. ,t!
in Trans ST-4 County Road 3 G.A. 233,000 1,580,000 1,712,000
County Road 3
County Road 3 T.F.
100,000 39,000 273,000 246,000
G.U.
92,000 652,000 747,000
County Road 3 S.A. 111,000 10,000 811.000 772,000
I Trans ST-6 Util Reconstruction-Hopkins House Neighborhood W.F. 75,000
Util Reconstruction-Hopkins House Neighborhood S.F. 75,000
Util.Reconstruction-Hopkins House Neighborhood S.U. 35,000
•5 • • r401.74'.! 1.7?;
15141:
•
5the i%8
ITrans ST-8 Mainstreet-5th Avenue to Washingon Avenue G.O. 85,000
Mainstreet-5th Avenue to Washington Avenue S.A. 139,000,
Mainstreet-5th Avenue to Washington Avenue T.F. 60,000
Mainstreet-5th Avenue to Washin•ton Avenue S.F. 50,000
ltf.:1:,4.,::;:fi 0010;ii • •
Trans ST-10 T.H.7 Frontage Road at 12th Avenue G.O. 120,000
T.H.7 Frontage Road at 12th Avenue, S.A. 180,000
I 1:':f0-4
k, TWO40,1;1102 M • :At'i.4,111***
':',;-f4V-z-luigi-,:amievitaf(;',:(41:tnitiati, zgt" !!g:C.
:i4"711kil :41v.,-.;• 2:,0,903-*AligiVW.,"4
; • • A••,-
Trans ST-12 Reconstruction of 1st Street North M.S. 437,000
Reconstruction of 1st Street North S.A. 173,000,
S'ria Ii
42:
. • RAO-
'7,7257:15' hotiOrdille44460*.W.44446-00 ,- . IMI:K`A;:f?tgr •36 0
ITrans ST-14 City Wide Sidew,alk RepaiL C.R. 59,000 50,099 0,000 30,000 30,000
TranS ' ST 15 SecONAtfikkitrr,. O 500O 35 00
Trans SG-1 Signals 11th Ave&5th Ave M.S. 75,000
• , 4a1oo,00r; oo,obci0.•*:',-4,1•:::•
IParks CF-2 Valley Park Improvements C.R. 45,000
Parks' F 3 Shay c$X ci rnproverint CR OCI(Vt' ISW:t1Clit
Parks CF-4 Maetzold Field P.F. 50,000
Maetzold Field G.R. 130,000 124,000 60,000
I - 'OF:t5 PvhoAccoustics''-',- -• 40 600AAWifiakt:'
Parks CF-6 Replace Deep Water Dock C.R. 30,000
Parke „
Bldgs MF-1 City Hall Parking Lot Improvement _ 35,000
ItyaIYEWeSOft QR 6800
Bldgs MF-3 Salt&Sand Storage Building C.R. 35,000 35,000
8Idg top:,41 Fire$ja1n Remodel
Bldgs MF-5 ADA Modifications-Activity Center
Bldgs8dé MF6p4biliWOrk*t.011060j0011.6:inqe
TOTAL OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 4,601,100 2,427,400 1,979,500 5,384,000 5,073,000
18I
I
I
PROPOSED PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE
I
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 UNSCHEDULED
I Bldgs MF-2 CURRENT REVENUES-GENERAL FUND
City HatFire Station Roof Maint C.R. 68,000
Bldgs MF-3 Salta Strad Storage Building C.R. 35,000 35.000
Parks CF-2 Valey Park Improvements C.R. 45,000
Parks CF-3 Shady Oak Beach Improvements C.R. 25.000
I Perks CF-6 Replace Deep Water Dodc C.R. 30.000
Trans ST-14 City VNde Sidewalk Repair 50,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000
TOTAL 140,000 153,000 30,000 75.000 30,000 0
GENERAL RESERVES
I Parks CF-1 ADA Compliance G.R. 100,000 100,000
Perks CF 4 Maetzold Field G.R. 130,000 124,000 60,000
Parks CF-5 PavilonAccoustics G.R. 40,000
Bldgs MF-1 City Hal Parldng Lot Improvement G.R. 35,000
Bldgs MF-4 Fire Station Remodel G.R.. 38.500
I Bldgs MF-5 ADA Modification-Activity Carder G.R. 6.900
TOTAL 310,400 264,000 60,000 0 0 0
CABLE TELEVISION FUND C.T.
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0
I
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND
I Trans PP-6 6th Street So.(11th to 12th Ave So) E.D. 100,000
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 100.000
GRANT-IN-AID
I Trans ST-4 County Road 3 GA
GA
GA
233,000 1,580,000 1,712,000
Trans ST-11 County Road 61(Shady Oak Road) 264.000
1161 PP 4 Erosion Repair of Nine Mile Creek 330,000
TOTAL 0 0
233.000 1,580,000 1,976,000 330.000
1 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
Trans ST-1 Citywide Street Reconstruction G.O. 35,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Trans ST-5 Street ReconsWctoniHopldns House Neighborhood G.O. 252,000
Trans ST-7 5th Avenue South G.O. 89,000
Trans ST-8 Mainstreet-5th Ave to Washington Ave G.O. 85,000
Trans ST-10 T.H.Frontage Road at 12th Avenue G.O. 120.000
I
Tans ST-15 Second Street N.E. G.O. 5,000 35,000
TOTAL 377,000 255,000 189,000 100,000 100,000 0
MUNICIPAL STATE-AID STREETS
ITrans ST-7 51h Avenue South M.S. 158,000
Trans ST-12 Reconstruction of 1st Street North M.S. 437,000
Trans ST-13 RebuildRedesign11thAvenue Souh M.S. 220,400
Trans PP-6 61h Street S.(11th to 12th Ave S) M.S. 300.000
Trans PP-1 2nd Avenue South(3rd to 5th St.S.) M.S. 300.000
Trans PP-2 11th Avenue/2nd Avenue Comector M.S. 300,000
Trans SG-1 11th
Ave&5th St So. M.S. 75,000
TOTAL 0 295,400 158,000 437,000 0 900,000
PRIVATE SECTOR FUNDS
I Bldgs CF-4 Maetzold Field P.F. 50,000
Bldgs PP-8 Pavilon Mezzanine P.F. 250,000
TOTAL 0 50,000 0 0 0 250,000
IREVENUE BONDS
Parks PP-7 Golf Course R.B. 2,000,000
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000
I
I
i 20
I
I
1
I
1994-1998 Capital Improvement Plan
Expenditures by Program for 5 Years
1
I
Buildings ($478,400 )
Parks ($734,000 )
= jUtilities ($4,455,200 )
j
Transportation ($13,797,400 )
I Total Expenditures for 5 Year Period - $19,465,000
I
I
I
21A
I
I
1994-1998 Capital Improvement Plan
Expenditures by Source for 5 Years
I
SA \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ $4,323,010
GA \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\• '$3,789,000
IGU \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\O\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\0"$3,479,000
WF \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\` $2,370,200
GO \\\\\\\\\\\V"$1,021,000
II TF \\\`\\\\\\ $900,000
MS \ \\\\\\ $890,400
SF \\\\\ • $885,000
IS634,400
GR
\\\\\\\\\V�'
SU \\\\\\\\� $435,000
CR \\\\\\; $428,000
I r
RF \• ''$260,000
PF '' "'
$0 $5
I (Millions)
I
Total Expenditures for 5 Year Period - $ 19,465,000
I LEGEND
SA Special Assessment $4,323,000
I GA Grant-In-Aid $3,789,000
GU Other Governmental Units $3,479,000
I WF Water Fund $2,370,200
GO General Obligation Bonds $1,021,000
TF Tax Increment $900,000
I MS Municipal State Aid $890,400
SF Sewer Fund $885,000
IGR General Fund Reserves $634,400
SU Storm Sewer Utility $435,000
CR Current Revenue $428,000
I
RF Refuse Fund $260,000
PF Private Sector Funds $50,000
I
21C
1
� REVENUE PROJECTIONS
1
1 SHOWING
1
� IMPACT OF PROJECTS
1 ON FUNDING SOURCE
1
1
1
A
i
i
� 22
•
II SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES
ICURRENT REVENUE GENERAL RESERVES
Funding all of the proposed 1994-1998 projects would be possible
I/ while maintaining the necessary General Fund reserve balance for
working capital. No grant monies have been included as a source
of funding.
II
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
IFunding from bonds is used up front to pay for construction that
will eventually be paid by special assessment collections, over a
15-20 year span, and the City's share (levy) of construction
projects.
II
The Hopkins House neighborhood and the Mainstreet/Fifth Avenue to
II Washington projects being added to 1994 would require a bond issue
in excess of $1,200,000 in 1994. The City's levy share would run
an average of $32, 000 per year over 15 years.
IIBonds of approximately $8,000,000 will also be needed to fund
initial payments for the County Road 3 and 61 projects. The
timing of the issue(s) will depend on repayments from grants and
I/ other Governmental units. There is also the possibility to use
some idle funds for short periods of time depending on activities
in other City functions.
II
MUNICIPAL STATE AID
II The large projects in 1991 and 1992 caused a two-year moratorium
on projects funded by this source. The CIP takes this situation
into account, and funding is sufficient for the projects listed.
11
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
ICash on hand, increments above debt service and loan repayments
are sufficient to cover these projects.
IIWATER FUND
II Several large facility upgrades scheduled from 1993 through 1997
will require rate increases periodically. In prior years an ample
cash balance had been nurtured in anticipation of the several
needed projects. Now into the upgrade stage, a rate increase in
I 1993 was approved (the first increase since 1984) . A modest rate
increase in the next two odd numbered years would be necessary to
maintain the planned projects to avoid issuance of bonds.
I
I 23
I
IGENERAL FUND
(000 omitted)
I
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
ICash Balance Begin Year 3,601 3,291 3,027 2,967 2,967 .
ICIP - General Reserves 310 264 60
Reserved Fund Balance
Cash Flow 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600
I
Reserved Balance 691 427 367 367 367
I
Note: Cash flow target$2,600,000.
IAssumes a balanced budget each year, which includes all CIP current revenues in levy.
I Council now has the authority to levy without state restriction.
Application for grants has not been included.
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1 25
I
TAX INCREMENT 1.1 FUND
(000 omitted)
I
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
IFund Balance Begin Year 1,726 1,456 1,262 1,202 919
ITaxes Received 1,100 1,150 1,200 1,200 1,250
Debt Service 700 700 750 700 700
IAdministrative Expense 100 105 110 110 110
Other Expenses 300 500 400 400 300
ICIP 270 39 273 246
r
Balance 12/31/1998 813
I
I
ITAX INCREMENT 2.X FUND
I (000 omitted)
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
I Fund Balance Begin Year 634 679 733 823 888
ITaxes Received 150 200 200 200 200
Debt Service 70 70 70 70 70
IAdministrative Expense 35 40 40 40 40
CIP 36 25 11
IBalance 12/31/1998 967
I
i 27
I
IREFUSE FUND-CASH FLOW
(000 omitted)
1
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
ICash Balance Begin Year 746 612 712 637 703
IAdd from Operations 126 100 87 66 45
Capital Outlay 260 162
I
Balance 12/31/1998 748
IThe above scenario is based on no changes in operations. Changes in equipment,grants and/or
rebates are anticipated, but when and the magnitude of change is presently unknown.
I
I
ISTORM SEWER FUND- CASH FLOW .
(000 omitted)
$
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
ICash Balance Begin Year (64) 88 236 328 415
IAdd from Operations 474 470 464 459 423
Rate Increase($1.50 1993)
IDebt Service: '89 Bonds 250 250 250 250 250
Interfund Loan$500,000(1992) 25 25 25 25 25
ICIP 47 47 97 97 147
I
Balance 12/31/1998 416
I
I
1 29
1
1
� PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
� 30
1
1
1
1
1
� UTILITIES
1
31
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Utilities Moline Treatment Facility WA - 1
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
' $ 596,500 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
FUNDING
SOURCE W.F. 501, 000 95,500
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
II Debt Service. . . . 916 County Road #3
Maint. Costs. . . .
Operating Costs.
TOTAL
Cost Savings. . 5,000
IDESCRIPTION:
Rehabilitation of the water treatment facilities at the Moline site.
JUSTIFICATION:
The present facility is in need of repair and upgrading to improve
utilization. Internal modifications are necessary to change the
general use of this structure to fill its new role in the water
system. In addition, the redevelopment anticipated in the surrounding
area will increase aesthetic concerns.
IThe 1996 improvements will basically complete the renovation of this
facility.
• CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Plans & specifications - 1994
Bid & construction - 1995, 96
1
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
' Consistent with water and sewer master plan approved in 1990.
1
32 6/10/93
' SA-1
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Utilities Telemetering Controls WA - 3
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
$141,500 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
FUNDING S.F. SF 60,000
SOURCE W.F. WF 25,000 WF 56,500
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
I
Debt Service. . . . Public Works Building - 1993/96
Maint. Costs. . . . 2,000 Wells & treatment plants - 1994/95/96
Operating Costs. 2, 000
TOTAL 4, 000 Sewer Lift Stations - 1996
Cost Savings. . 2, 000
1 DESCRIPTION:
Replacement of existing water well and treatment plant, and lift
station monitoring equipment of different manufacturers.
JUSTIFICATION:
The system relies on phone company lines for transmission
which have reliability problems, and high rental costs. The
service of the system is becoming difficult, due to the
hybrid design and combination of manufacturer's equipment.
' An upgrade to newer electronic and radio transmitted system
would allow more reliable monitoring, easier service, more
control of functions in response to changing conditions
' and especially allow us faster response to sewer station
problems.
The cost to implement this improvement in the wells and plants
is included in projects WA-1 and WA-2 throughout the construction
costs listed in 1994/95/96.
11
' CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Computer study and purchase - 1994
Plans & specifications - 1994
Bid & construction - 1994/95/96/97
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
1 Consistent with water and sewer master plan approved in 1990.
1
34 6/10/93
SA-3
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Utilities Blake Water Tower Improvements WA - 5
1 TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
' $ 96,500 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
FUNDING
SOURCE W.F. 96,500
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
1 Debt Service. . . . 151 Tyler Avenue South
Maint. Costs. . . .
Operating Costs.
' TOTAL
Cost Savings. .
IDESCRIPTION:
Install new valve vault
Install new 18" valve
Install P.L.C. to transmit data to Public Works Building
IJUSTIFICATION:
The existing 18" valve is in need of repair and is of a vintage that
makes parts not readily accessible. In addition, the layout of the
II vault makes operation of the existing 18" valve highly inefficient.
I
1
' CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Plans and Specifications - 1995
Bid and Construction - 1996
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
IConsistent with water and sewer master plan approved in 1990
36 6/10/93
11 WA-5
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Utilities Storm Drainage System Maintenance SS - 1
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
' $ 200,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
FUNDING
ISOURCE S.U. 0 0 50,000 50, 000 100, 000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
I
1996 - Meadowbrook I (Meadowbrook Rd to
Debt Service. . . . Golf Course
Maint. Costs. . . . 1997 Meadowbrook II (Hawthorne to
Operating Costs. Meadowbrook)
' TOTAL 1998 - Meadowbrook III (Homedale to
Hawthorne)
Cost Savings. .
' DESCRIPTION:
Program to construct/reconstruct storm sewer improvements in areas
' designated in the Implementation Program of the Storm Water Management
Plan. Reconstruction of deteriorated storm sewer system.
JUSTIFICATION:
Flooding in park at end of Homedale Road and at end of Meadowbrook
I
Road occurs from excess runoff. Storm sewer pipe from Homedale to
the golf course is undersized and deteriorated.
I
1
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Feasibility Study - year prior to project
Plans, Specifications, Bid, Construction - year of project.
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
IIConsistent with the Storm Water Management Plan and its list of
priorities.
'
6/21/93
38 ss-1
1
� TRANSPORTATION
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 40
1
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
I
Transportation Citywide Street Reconstruction ST - 1
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
II $1,367,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
SA-233,000 SA-233,000 SA-233, 000 SA-233,000
FUNDING SA/GO GO-35,000 GO-100,000 GO-100,000 GO-100,000 GO-100,000
I
SOURCE
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
II
Debt Service. . . . Locations to be determined as they may
Maint. Costs. . . . be consistent with public works
I
Operating Costs.
TOTAL maintenance districts and Pavement
Management Program.
ICost Savings. .
DESCRIPTION:
1 Program to reconstruct streets designated as poor on the street
condition survey and falling within the Public Works Pavement
Management Programs.
1 JUSTIFICATION:
1 Approx. 9 miles of City streets are in need of reconstruction and
have received priority designation in a planned reconstruction
program. The numbers indicated in the year box above assume the
streets were rated poor on the street condition survey and
IIshould be reconstructed in the next 5 years. The numbers assume
a 70% assessed and 30% general city share of construction costs.
Costs for sanitary sewer and water main reconstruction are not
I
shown.
II 1994 expenditures are designated for implementation of a Pavement
Management Program and purchase of computer soft/hardward.
The City will experience cost savings due to lower street
1 maintenance costs.
IICURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
IIPublic Hearing - year prior to planned construction
Plans & Specifications - year prior to planned construction
Bid & Assessment - year of planned construction
IIRELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the City Council adopted Roadway Improvement
IIPolicy, street ratings, and Pavement Management Program.
' 6/21/93
41 ST-1
II
_PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Transportation City Wide Concrete Alleys ST - 3II _
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
I $300,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
FUNDING SA/SU SA-48,000 SA-48, 000 SA-48, 000 SA-48, 000 SA-48,000
IISOURCE SU-12,000 SU-12, 000 SU-12,000 SU-12,000 SU-12,000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
1994 9th Ave N/10th Ave N/lst St N/2nd St N
II Debt Service. . . . 1994 12th/13th Ave N/4th St N/TH7 Frontage R
Maint. Costs. . . .
Operating Costs.
II TOTAL
Cost Savings. . 3, 000
IIDESCRIPTION:
Program to construct concrete alleys in areas designated as poor
on the alley condition survey.
II
IJUSTIFICATION:
The City has had a policy of constructing concrete alleys for
Ia number of years. This policy has proved to be sound by the
concrete alleys' durability and low maintenance costs. The
alley condition survey indicates there are approximately 8, 000 ft of
alley in poor condition. The estimated cost to rebuild these
I alleys is $350, 000 over 6 years. Current policy has the City share
at 20% of the cost in residential areas. The amount recommended
would allow reconstruction for a five year period.
IThe City will experience cost savings due to lower
maintenance- costs.
1 .
t
IICURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Approximately 1250 feet per year for 5 years •
Public Hearing - year prior to project
IPlans, Specifications, Bid, Construction - year of project
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the City Council adopted Roadway Improvement
Policy and alley ratings. .
6/21/93
43 sr-8.
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Transportation Street Reconstruct-Hopkins House Neighbrhd ST - 5
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
$ 840,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
FUNDING SA/GO SA-588, 000
SOURCE GO-252,000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
' Robinwood Lane, Fifth Street North,
Debt Service. . . . Elmo Road, and Elmo Service Road
Maint. Costs. . . .
I Operating Costs.
TOTAL
' Cost Savings. .
DESCRIPTION:
' Program to reconstruct 0.8 miles of street designated as poor on
the street condition survey and falling within the Public Works
Pavement Management Program.
IJUSTIFICATION:
The streets in the above-referenced neighborhood are in need of
reconstruction and have received priority designation in a planned
reconstruction program. The numbers indicated in the year box
above assume the street indicated was rated poor on the street
II condition survey and should be reconstructed in the next 5 years.
The numbers assume a 70% assessed and 30% general City share of
construction costs.
' The City will experience cost savings due to lower street
maintenance costs.
I
I
IICURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Public Hearing - 1993
I Plans & Specifications - 1994
Bid & Construction - 1994
IRELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the City Council adopted Roadway Improvement
Policy, street ratings, and Pavement Management Program.
6/24/93
45 ST-2
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Transportation Fifth Avenue South ST - 7
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
$454,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
SA 207,000
FUNDING SA/GO GO 89,000
11 SOURCE MS MS 158,000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
Debt Service. . . . Fifth Avenue South from Mainstreet to
Maint. Costs. . . . County Road 3
Operating Costs.
TOTAL
Cost Savings. .
DESCRIPTION:
Regrading and resurfacing of . 15 miles of street between Mainstreet
and County Road 3, including lighting and landscaping improvements.
IIJUSTIFICATION:
The present roadway is deficient in cross section and structure and
11 should be widened to more closely meet its designation as a collector
street. Fifth Avenue was last graded and surfaced to its 44 foot
width in 1964. The roadway is showing extreme wear and stress and its
age alone indicates its condition on the downward side of the pavement
deterioration curve.
Fifth Avenue is a major access route to Mainstreet from County Road 3 .
As such it should be afforded the same amenities or theme treatment
as those recently installed on Mainstreet.
1
1
11 CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Design - 1995
Plans and Specifications - 1995
Bid and Construction - 1996
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
1 Consistent with the City Roadway Improvement Policy, street
condition ratings, State Aid CIP.
1
' 6/24/93
47 ST-11
1
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
' Transportation CBD Alley Improvement ST - 9
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
1 $ 130,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
FUNDING S.A. 20, 000
SOURCE T.F. 110,000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
IIDebt Service. . . . East-west alley from Eighth to Eleventh
Maint. Costs. . . . Avenue, north and south of Mainstreet.
Operating Costs.
TOTAL Lot 700, west of Eighth Avenue North
and north of Mainstreet.
Cost Savings. .
DESCRIPTION:
Improvement of this stretch of alley by improving traffic flow,
1 organization of parking spaces, additional lighting, sidewalk and
landscaping.
IJUSTIFICATION:
Improvements to this alley area are needed to improve the image of
the alley and the unorganized impression left on downtown shoppers.
I/ Improvements to the public areas may also cause building owners to
upgrade their rear facades as well.
Improvements will increase the value of the abutting properties.
I
1
ICURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Public Hearing - 1994
Council Decision - 1994
IBidding and Construction - 1994
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Project is consistent with City's goals of improvement to the CBD
area by construction of adequate facilities.
1
6/24/93
49 ST-16
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
' Transportation County Road 61 (Shady Oak Road) ST - 11
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
$ 553, 000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
GA 264,000
FUNDING GA/GU GU 158,000
I SOURCE TF/SA TF 25, 000 TF 11,000
SA 95,000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
Debt Service. . . . Shady Oak Road from County Road 3 to
Maint. Costs. . . . T.H. 7.
II Operating Costs.
TOTAL
' Cost Savings. .
DESCRIPTION:
' Lighting, landscaping, street, etc. , improvements from County Road 3
to T.H. 7.
IIJUSTIFICATION:
Deficiencies appear in terms of roadway conditions, traffic/pedestrian
movement, safety and aesthetics. Upgrade an undivided roadway, resolve
safety issues with number of driveway access points and intersection
at Mainstreet. Lighting needs upgrading and provide beautification
program.
Additional costs of $2,995,000 anticipated in 1999.
i
r
II
I
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Planning and Acquisition - 1994-95
II Bidding and Construction - 1996-99
U
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with Hennepin County CIP and City's desire to upgrade
11 the roadway by year 2000.
I/ 7/30/93
51 ST-17
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Transportation Rebuild/Redesign 11th Avenue South ST - 13
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
$ 301,400 1994 1995 1996 1997. 1998
SA- 45,000
• FUNDING SA/ MS-220,400
SOURCE MS/TF TF- 36,000
■
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
I Debt Service. . . . Alternatives *
Maint. Costs. . . . 1. 1st St. N. to Co. Rd. 3
Operating Costs. 2. Co. Rd. 3 to 5th St. S.
' TOTAL 3. 5th St. S. to Westbrooke Way
Cost Savings. . 4. Westbrooke Way to Smetana
IDESCRIPTION:
Rebuild and redesign roadway, widen and add turning lanes and signals.
JUSTIFICATION:
To accommodate increased traffic due to the R. L. Johnson site
development and normal increase in traffic. Current design is
' reaching the point of not functioning safely. Additional development
will necessitate redesign and reconstruction. Costs for sanitary
sewer and water main reconstruction are not shown.
t * Alternatives and cost breakdown:
1. SA-$45, 000; MS-$220,400; TF-$36,000 TOTAL $301,400
2. SA-$37,800; MS-$212,700; TF-$36,000 TOTAL $286,500
' 3 . SA-$53, 300; MS-$169,500 TOTAL $222,800
4. SA-$19,800; MS-$19,800 TOTAL $39, 600
The City will experience cost savings due to lower street maintenance
costs.
1
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
IDesign - 1994
Plans and Specifications - 1994
Bid and Construction - 1995
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
t Consistent with R.L. Johnson development schedule, State Aid CIP, and
City Roadway Improvement Policy.
6/23/93
' 53 sr-13
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
' Transportation Second Street N.E. ST-15
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
$ 40,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
FUNDING
IISOURCE G.O. 5, 000 CR 35, 000 CR
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
Debt Service. . . . Second Street N.E. between Blake Road
Maint. Costs. . . . and Tyler Street
Operating Costs.
' TOTAL
Cost Savings. .
IDESCRIPTION:
' Improvements to Second Street N.E. between Blake Road and Tyler Street
involving the installation of landscaping and lighting.
JUSTIFICATION:
Concerns have been expressed by the adjacent residential neighborhood
' regarding the appearance and condition of this street. This street is
abutted by major industrial users as well as residential units that
utilize Second Street for vehicular access or pedestrian access.
o 1993 improvements consisted of installing concrete sidewalk along
the north side of Second Street NE from Blake Road to T.H. 169. It
also involved constructing a bituminous path along the east side of
' Washington Avenue from Second Street NE.
o 1994 improvements consist of tree plantings
' 0 1995 improvements consist of minor lighting improvements
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Planning and Discussion - 1993-1994
Construction - 1994-1995
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with sidewalk plan.
I
' 6/23/93
55 sr-23
1
� PARKS & RECREATION
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
57
1
1
II PROGRAM CATEGORY
PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Park & Rec. • ADA Compliance CF - 1
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
' $200,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
FUNDING
SOURCE G.R. 100,000 100,000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
Debt Service. . . . 14 City Parks
Maint. Costs. . . .
Operating Costs.
' TOTAL
Cost Savings. .
' DESCRIPTION:
Accessible accomodations to include restroom modifications, trails,
drinking fountains, miscellaneous beach changes.
• JUSTIFICATION:
111
The Americans with Disabilities Act requires all structural and
miscellaneous changes to be completed by January 26, 1995.
1
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
I
1993 - Survey, plan, begin trail and structural changes
11 1994 —Plan and complete structural
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
6/10/93
' 58 CF-11
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
1 Park & Rec. Shady Oak Beach Fishing Pier CF - 3
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
' $ 25,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
FUNDING G.R. $ 5,000
SOURCE G.A. $20, 000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
Debt Service. . . .
int. Costs. . . . Shady Oak Beach
Operating Costs.
TOTAL
Cost Savings. .
II DESCRIPTION:
Fishing Pier (25, 000)
IJUSTIFICATION:
Fishing Pier - Increase access for fishing - Application
1
made for
1993 grant
1
1
i
1
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
1
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
1 Consistent with Park Board adopted Park Guidelines and CIP
Priority List of 4/20/90.
1
' 6/10/93
60 CF-3
11
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
' Park & Rec. Pavilion Accoustics CF - 5
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
$ 40,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
FUNDING
SOURCE G.R. 40,000
II ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
Debt Service. . . . 1505 Second Street South
Maint. Costs. . . .
Operating Costs.
TOTAL
Cost Savings. .
DESCRIPTION:
Installation of accoustical ceiling and wall tiles.
' JUSTIFICATION:
Accoustical panels are needed in the pavilion to improve the sound
quality. Groups are presently hesitant to rent the pavilion due
to this problem.
I
11
I
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Construction - 1994
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
' Non-ranked on Park Board priority list
I
62 6/10/93
CF-8
I
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Park & Rec Trail Systems TS-1
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
$30,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
FUNDING
SOURCE G.U. 30, 000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
Debt Service. . . .
Maint. Costs. . . . 1,000
Operating Costs.
TOTAL
Cost Savings. .
jDESCRIPTION: 1994 1994
Central Hopkins South Hopkins
Trail Regional Trail
11 JUSTIFICATION:
Central Hopkins Trail - Trail link to Minnetonka regional trail
Icompleted several years ago.
South Hopkins Trail - Trail link to regional trails to be developed
by cities of Minnetonka, Eden Prairie, Chanhassen and Chaska in 1992-3.
11I
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
I
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
IIConsistent with Park Board adopted Park Guidelines and CIP Priority
List updated 8-19-91.
6/10/93
64 CF-7
1
1
1
1
1
1
I GENERAL PUBLIC BUILDINGS
1
65
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PROGRAM CATEGORY
PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Gen. Pub. Bldg. City Hall Parking Lot Improvement MF - 1
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
' $ 35,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1997
FUNDING 35, 000
' SOURCE G.R.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
Debt Service. . . .
Maint. Costs. . . . City Hall East Parking Lot
Operating Costs.
TOTAL
Cost Savings. .
1 DESCRIPTION:
Improvement/Expansion of East Parking Lot by addition of retaining
wall, increased asphalt surface and landscaping.
1
JUSTIFICATION:
Parking for City staff and vehicles is extremely tight and is
exacerbated during fire calls. This improvement will add parking
spaces to the lot allowing for more efficient use of the area and
less disruption to firefighters on fire calls.
1
1
1
1
• CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
1995 Construction documents and construction
1
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
1 Included in 1989 site improvements plan by David A. Kirscht
I
6/10/93
1 66 MF-1
PROGRAM
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
1 Gen. Pub. Bldg Salt & Sand Storage Building MF - 3
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
$70, 000 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
FUNDING
1 SOURCE C.R. 35, 000 35,000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
Debt Service. . . .
Maint. Costs. . . . 500 Public Works Facilities
Operating Costs. 1601 - 2nd Street South
TOTAL 500
Cost Savings. . 500
IIDESCRIPTION:
Construction of a storage building for salt/sand mix at the Public
Works facility.
' JUSTIFICATION:
Storage of salt/sand is presently accomplished by an open pile
at the Public Works yard. Regulations are being considered at the
I
present time by the State to require closed storage to protect the
environment. This requirement is a law in Wisconsin now. Open
storage also allows loss of a certain percentage (up to 5 percent) which
IIof course can be related to a direct cost.
The allocation of funds as noted above is intended to build up the
1 necessary funds to construct the facility in 1995.
1
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Plans/Specs/Bid/Construction - 1995
1
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
IConsistent with overall upgrade of Public Works facilities and may
become a requirement of EPA regulations.
1
6/10/93
11 68 MF-3
11
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Gen. Pub. Bldg. ADA Modifications - Activity Center MF - 5
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
$ 6,900 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
FUNDING
I
SOURCE G.R. 6,900
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
1 Debt Service. . . .
Maint. Costs. . . . Hopkins Activity Center
Operating Costs. 33 - 14th Avenue North
TOTAL
Cost Savings. .
1 DESCRIPTION:
Automatic Front Entrance Doors $5,500
Drinking Fountain
Modify Men's & Women's Bathroom Stalls $ 750
Lower Urinal in Men's Bathroom $ 250
Required Signage $ 200
1 JUSTIFICATION: TDD Phone $ 200
The above expenditures are needed to bring the Activity Center into
compliance with the American Disabilities Act. These modifications
I are mandated by Title II of the Act and need to be completed by June
of 1995.
1
1
1
1
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Bid and Construct -
1994
1
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with overall maintenance of general public buildings.
I
6/24/93
11 70 MF-6
1
� PROPOSED
1
1 EXPENDITURES
1
FOR
UNSCHEUDLED
� PROJECTS
1
1
1
72
1
1
" PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Transportation 2nd Avenue South (3rd to 5th St. So. ) PP - 1
IITOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
$ 1,000,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 UNSCHED
TF 400,000
FUNDING TF/ MS 300,000
SOURCE MS/SA SA 300,000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
Debt Service. . . . 2nd Avenue South, from 3rd St. So.
Maint. Costs. . . . to 5th St. So.
Operating Costs.
TOTAL
Cost Savings. .
DESCRIPTION:
Roadway extension through the current Hennepin County site.
JUSTIFICATION:
- Provides better access to Hwy 169 ramps
- Frontage road to future development site at Hennepin Co. site
- Logical location for internal roadway
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Planning/Discussion - 1993-1996
Plans and Specifications - 1996-2000
Bidding and Construction - 1996-2000
LATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
II
Consistent with recommendations of Hopkins/Minnetonka Roadway
System Study of 1989.
6/23/93
73 PP-1
I
i
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Transportation Light Rail Transit Stations (2) pp - 3
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
$ 150, 000 1994 1995 1996 1997 UNSCHED
FUNDING
SOURCE T.F. 150,000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
Debt Service. . . . 1) Intersection of 3rd Street South
Maint. Costs. . . . and 5th Avenue South
Operating Costs.
11 TOTAL 2) Second Street Northeast
Cost Savings. .
IDESCRIPTION:
Supplemental improvements to two Light Rail Transit (LRT) stations
in the proposed HCRRA locations.
JUSTIFICATION:
The HCRRA proposes to construct two stations along the Southwest
Corridor. The proposed expenditures would be in addition to the
funds expended by the HCRRA. The additional funds would be used
to ensure the stations are high quality in appearance.
I
I
I
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
I
Planning - 1994-1997
Plans and Specifications - 1997-2000
Construction - 1997-2000
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
'' Consistent with plans for LRT stops in Hopkins by
Hennepin County.
I
6/23/93
75 ST-18
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Transportation 9th Avenue LRT Corridor PP-5
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
11 $ 700,000 1994 1995 1996 1997 UNSCHED
WF 250,000
FUNDING WF SF 350,000
11 SOURCE SF/SU SU 100,000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
II Debt Service. . . . 9th Avenue from CR3 to First
Maint. Costs. . . . Street N.
Operating Costs.
TOTAL
Cost Savings. .
IIDESCRIPTION:
Relocation of utilities and reconstruction of street to accommodate
light rail transit line from CR3 to 1st Street N.
JUSTIFICATION:
In 1984 the City hired J.J. Bakker to analyze the proposed light
rail transit corridors in Hopkins. The study recommended that the
northwest route of the Southwest Corridor not cross CR3 at TH169.
Rather, the study recommended that the northwest route be extended
north on 9th Avenue to 1st Street N. and then continue northwestward
on the proposed corridor.
I
I
I
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Planning/Discussion 1994-1996
Plans and Specs 2000-2010
Bidding and Construction 2000-2010
I
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
11 Consistent with recommendations made in 1984 Bakker study.
I
6/23/93
77 PP-7
PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER
Park & Rec. Golf Course PP - 7
TOTAL COST SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
$ 2,000, 000 1994 1995 1996 1997 UNSCHED
FUNDING
ISOURCE R.B. 2,000,000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT LOCATION:
I Debt Service. . . . 208,400 Seventh Street (South) at 14th Avenue
Maint. Costs. . . . (former landfill)
Operating Costs.
TOTAL
Cost Savings. .
IIDESCRIPTION:
Design, construction and financing of 9 hole golf course.
JUSTIFICATION:
The City Council commissioned a feasibility study to determine
the viability of a golf course on the site. The feasibility
study indicated a strong market for a 9 hole par 3 golf course.
The study also indicated that the course may not generate revenues
adequate to offset expenses of construction due to difficult soil
problems. The course should generate excess revenues to operating
expenses in five years.
1
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
I
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Non-ranked on Park Board priority list
I
6/23/93
11 79 CF-1
I
I •
I
1
•
•
•
•
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1