1995 -1999 CIP 1:
I
I
City of Hopkins, Minnesota
I
I
.•
I °._OM
Capital
1 'i''
Improvement
proveme
o I� - nt
1
I Plan
.*.
1 •
1995 - 1999
I
IMI
�
°111111111111
1
UI..,
ellen
MUM
soo`
•
UCITY OF HOPKINS
IDATE: March 1995
II TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Steven C. Mielke, City Manager
U
SUBJECT: 1995-1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
With this letter, I respectfully submit the 1995-1999 Capital
IIImprovement Plan. This five-year planning document represents the
combined efforts of city staff, advisory commissions, citizens,
and the City Council.
U The Capital Improvement Plan is a five-year forecast of project
needs in the City of Hopkins. It is intended to alert the Council
and citizens to the major capital needs on the horizon. The first
I
year of the plan becomes an adopted capital budget and relates
almost completely to the operating budget which is approved on a
yearly basis. The remaining four years represent an estimate of
project needs and funding capabilities of the city. In previous
Uplans an explanation of five-year equipment needs was also
included. This year's plan does not include proposed equipment
purchases. A document relating specifically to equipment
I
replacement needs has been developed into a separate document.
The Capital Improvement Plan is intended to serve as a planning
tool and is therefore structured to present a meaningful ,
long-range perspective of the city's capital programing needs. At
the same time, sufficient project detail is provided to enable
those who review the information to make informed decisions on the
Uprogramming of projects over the next several years.
Please use the information provided to formulate plans, projects,
Il and questions. The Capital Improvement Plan can serve the
community best by provoking thoughts and actions.
I This document was developed by the Community Development
Department with the assistance of all city departments.
I wish to thank all those involved in the development of the
Capital Improvement Plan, and especially to Tom Harmening,
Community Development Director, Lee Gustafson, Public Works
I Director, Jim Gessele, Engineering Supervisor, John Schedler,
Finance Director, Nancy Anderson, Planner, and Bish Johnson and
Shannon Smith, Secretaries, for their hard work and dedication.
1
U
1010 First Street South,Hopkins,Minnesota 55343 612/935-8474
An Equal Opportunity Employer
I
I
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1995-1999
ITABLE OF CONTENTS
IPAGE
City Manager's Message 1
IIntroduction and Purpose 3
Program Descriptions/Goals and Objectives 4
I Utilities Program 4
g
Transportation Program 6
I Park and Recreation Program 7
General Public Buildings Program 9
ICIP Sources of Funding 11
Five Year Project Summaries 15
ITotal Expenditures by Funding Source 18
Capital Improvement Projects 19
Proposed Expenditures for Unscheduled Projects 20
IProposed Projects By Funding Source 22
Revenue Projections to
IShow Impact of Projects on Funding Source 23
Summary 25
II General Fund 27
Municipal State Aid Fund 28
Economic Development Fund 28
Tax Increment Financing - 1. 1 Fund 29
I Tax Increment Financing - 2.X Fund 29
Water Fund - Cash Flow 30
Sanitary Sewer Fund - Cash Flow 30
I Refuse Fund - Cash Flow 31
Storm Sewer Fund - Cash Flow 31
Project Descriptions 33
IUtilities 35
Transportation 45
II Parks & Recreation 61
General Public Buildings 71
Proposed Expenditures/Unscheduled Projects 81
II
I 2
I
I
II
I
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
II The Capital Improvement Plan is a flexible plan based upon
long-range physical planning and financial projections, which
schedules the major public improvements that may be incurred by
II the City over the next five years. Flexibility of the Capital
Improvement Plan is established through annual review, and
revision if necessary. The annual review assures that the program
will become a continuing part of the budgetary process and that it
11 will be consistent with changing demands as well as changing
patterns in cost and financial resources. Funds are appropriated
only for the first year of the program, which is then included in
1 the annual budget.
The Capital Improvement Plan serves as a tool for implementing
1 certain aspects of the City's comprehensive plan, therefore, the
program describes the overall objectives of City development, the
relationship between projects with respect to timing and need, and
IIthe City's fiscals capabilities.
The Capital Improvement Plan can help assure:
p P
i 1. A systematic approach to planning and initiating capital
projects affording the opportunity to plan the location,
timing, and financing of needed public improvements;
II2 . The development of a realistic program of capital spending
within the City's projected fiscal capability to finance such
II projects, avoiding sharp change in the tax levy or bonded
indebtedness;
I 3 . The coordination of public and private improvement projects
permitting adequate time for design and engineering to
eliminate duplication of effort and expense;
11 4. The expenditure of public funds that are compatible with the
City's adopted Comprehensive Plan;
II 5. That the public is kept informed of the proposed future
projects and expenditures;
il 6. That private investors are aware of the City' s long-range
development program so that they may guide their development
in a way that is compatible with the City's program;
II 7 . Aid in achieving federal and/or state participation by
providing the necessary planning and lead time necessary for a
successful application in addition to meeting prerequisites
1 needed for certain federal and state grants.
3
I
t
t
Ii. Municipal Sanitary Sewer Sub-Program
A. Sub-Program Goal: The goal of the Municipal
eSanitary
nt
Sewer sub-program is to promote a healthful
by collecting all sewage from existing and projected
' development in a sanitary and economic manner.
B. Objectives:
i. Provide sewer lines of adequate size and grade to
collect and transmit all discharge sewage.
' 2. Prevent sewage from overflowing into the natural
environment.
' 3 . Prevent sewage back-ups.
4. Encourage or promote connection of all generators of
sewage to the Municipal system.
5. Meet the effluent and infiltration standards of the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.
III. Storm Sewer Sub-Program
' A. Sub-Program Goal: Manage and control surface and ground
waters in order to protect the man-made and natural
environment in a safe and efficient manner.
B. Objectives:
1. Prevent flooding.
2. Prevent damage to property due to erosion.
1 3 . Meet water quality standards established by the
controlling regulatory law or authority.
11 IV. Refuse Sub-Program
A. Sub-Program Goal: To promote a healthful environment by
collecting all residential solid waste in a sanitary and
economic manner.
1 B. Obiectives:
i. Provide efficient refuse collection in a timely manner
to minimize disruption to residents.
2 . Provide residential recycling programs that minimize
the amount of refuse that needs to be landfilled.
5
11
B. Objectives:
1. Signs and Signals should be installed in conformity
with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices.
2. Periodic surveys and studies should be made to document
the effectiveness of City signing patterns.
IV. Parking Facilities Sub-Program
A. Sub-Program Goal: To provide such supporting facilities
as will promote maximum use of public parking spaces by
employers, employees, customers, and visitors.
B. Obl ectives:
11 1. Provide parking facilities for present and anticipated
needs of the City of Hopkins.
' V. Street Lights Sub-Program
11 A. Sub-Program Goal: To provide a system of street lighting
within the City that will promote safe and convenient
vehicular and pedestrian travel on City Streets.
IB. Objectives:
1. To provide lighting at each street intersection within
' the City.
2. To provide mid-block street lighting in conformance
with the City's street lighting policy, in order to
provide equitable, cost efficient lighting.
3 . To continually update the system so as to provide
energy and cost efficient lighting.
PARRS, FORESTRY AND PAVILION PROGRAM
Program Description: This program includes community parks,
neighborhood parks, open spaces, recreational structures and
facilities.
Program Goal: The goal of the Park and Recreation Program is to
' provide facilities for safe, stimulating, and comprehensive
leisure time activities of Hopkins citizens.
7
I
II
IIGENERAL PUBLIC BUILDINGS PROGRAM
II Program Description: The General Public Buildings Program
includes all municipal buildings except those provided for in the
Utility and Park Facilities Program.
II Program Goal: Provide buildings which are adequate and convenient
for the efficient accommodation of City functions.
Sub-Programs: Administrative Offices, Maintenance Facilities,
IFire Facilities, Community Center.
III. Administrative Offices Sub-Program
A. Sub-Program Goal: The goal of the Administrative Offices
II Sub-Program is to provide facilities for the efficient and
safe conduct of legislative and administrative functions
of the City.
IB. Objectives:
Maintain current facilities in a state of good repair
Ii.
so as to maximize cost effectiveness and avoid costly
repair.
I
2. Upgrade facilities as necessary to provide for the
efficient, safe, and effective provision of the city
services.
IIi. Maintenance Facilities Sub-Program
A. Sub-Program Goal: The goal of the Maintenance Facilities
Sub-Program is to provide facilities for the efficient and
safe conduct of City maintenance functions.
IIB. Objectives:
1. Maintain current facilities in a state of good repair
IIso as to maximize cost effectiveness and avoid costly
repair.
2 . Upgrade facilities as necessary to provide for the
IIefficient, safe, and effective provision of City
services.
IIII. Fire Facilities Sub-Program
A. Sub-Program Goal: To provide a fire station, or stations,
I for storage of Fire Department equipment and for the
training and meetings of volunteer fire fighters to
provide prompt and efficient protection to life and
I
property.
9
I
I
CIP SOURCES OF FUNDING
IIn order to fund the anticipated Capital Improvements, the City
must draw upon a variety of sources. Many of these sources have a
I
specific or "dedicated" purpose (i.e. , the water utility fund will
finance water main installation but not a street overlay) .
Therefore, it is important to identify the uses and limitations of
II
the various revenue sources. •
CURRENT REVENUES - GENERAL FUND (C.R. )
I This represents funding from current year revenue collections in
p
I
the General Fund which support operations and capital outlay
expenditures. Revenue sources include property tax levies, state
aid payments, and various permit and license fees. This source of
funding is generally used only for operations and small capital
I
purchases.
I GENERAL FUND RESERVES (G.R. )
Reserves of the general fund are the funds remaining after
subtracting cash flow and emergency amounts from the City's cash
I
balance, sometimes referred to as "fund balance" . The use of
General Fund Reserves is not recommended for Capital Improvements
without significant staff and Council review.
I
CABLE TELEVISION FUND (C.T.)
IThis funding source consists of franchise fees received from
Paragon Cable TV, in excess of the amounts earmarked for the
I access programming and commission budgets. Expenditures are
limited to cable-related facilities, or must have a cable-related
purpose.
IECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND (E.D. )
This funding source was established by the Housing and
IRedevelopment Authority (HRA) and the City of Hopkins, to provide
funding for the purpose of promoting development and redevelopment
11within the City. The Economic Development fund is a revolving
fund administered by the HRA, intended to provide an on-going
funding source used to reduce or extend the long term debt
involved with development and redevelopment activities. The HRA
IIreviews all proposed uses of this fund on an individual basis.
I 11
I
IREAL ESTATE SALES FUND (R.E. )
I This funding source consists primarily of funds built up from the
sale of City-owned property. To date, the fund has been used for
building improvements. Because the sale of both general City
property and park/recreation property are accumulated into this
I
fund, earmarking a portion for recreational purposes may be
justified.
ISPECIAL ASSESSMENT (S.A. )
number of projects may be realistically financed using Special
IA
Assessment to pay the ultimate cost. Almost any project can
potentially be financed using the assessment process. In each
case it is necessary to make a determination that the assessed
Iproperty will benefit by the amount of the assessment.
The cost of street reconstruction is shared 70% by the property
I owner and 30% by the City. Concurrent improvement costs to the
utility systems are assumed by the respective utility funds.
ITAX INCREMENT FINANCING (T.F. )
This funding source results from the tax value of new development
I
that is "incrementally" greater than the existing tax value.
Typically, bonds are sold based on the assumption that the higher
tax receipts will retire the bonds. However, the use of TIF funds
I through a "pay as you go" method has become more common. This
type of funding can be used for public improvements within a
redevelopment district to support the goals of redevelopment,
I specifically the elimination of blighted conditions. Approval of
the Hopkins HRA should be anticipated prior to the commitment of
these funds. The use of these funds are strictly regulated by
i
State law.
SANITARY SEWER FUNDS (S.F. )
ISanitary sewer funds consist of revenue generated from charges
made for sewage disposal. The cost of operations plus system
(capital) improvements determine the ultimate charge levied for
Ithe service provided.
IIWATER FUNDS (W.F. )
Water funds consist of revenue generated from the sale of water.
The cost of operations plus system (capital) improvements
determine the ultimate charge levied for the service provided.
I 13
1
� FIVE YEAR
1
� PROJECT SUMMARIES
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 15
1
1
1
1
I
II
IFUNDING SOURCES
ICurrent Revenues - General Fund C.R.
IGeneral Fund Reserves G.R.
Cable Television Fund C.T.
IEconomic Development Fund E.D.
• Grant-In-Aid G.A.
IGeneral Obligation Bonds G.O.
IMunicipal State-Aid Streets M.S.
Private Sector Funds P.F.
IRevenue Bonds R.B.
Real Estate Sales Fund R.E.
' Special Assessment S.A.
I
Tax Increment Financing T.F.
Sewer Fund S.F.
IEquipment Replacement Fund E.R.
Storm Sewer Utility S.U.
IWater Fund W.F.
IRefuse Fund R.F.
Pavilion Fund P.A.
IOther Governmental Units G.U.
I
I
I
1 17
I
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
I FROG PROJECT
FIVE YEAR EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
FUND
CAT. NUMBER PROJECT TITLE SRC 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
I Util SA-1 Lift Station Reconst SF 20,000 130,000 250,000
Util SS-1 Storm Drain S s Maint SU 50,000 50,000 100,000
Util WA-1 Moline Treatmnt Facity WF 581,000 95,500
I
Util WA-2 Elmo Park Treat Fad WF 395,000
WF 25,000 56,500
I Util WA-4 Well Rehabilitation WF 54,000
Util WA-5 Blake Water Tower WF 96,500
Trans SG-1 Signals/11Ave/5St So MS 75,000
Trans ST 1 Residential Street Recon SA 233,000 233,000 233,000 233,000
I .l. -i ..... ».e;...� :iii;Fi.w_..__;.. r. , AW ..T". ,.:1'i '..._. �.,ti 9 ®,0 ® �.c�-_:z 9® 0 .i.".. -3 3'0®
iii
Trans ST-2 Residential St Recon/Util SU 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
WF 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000
Trans ST-3 Citywide Concrete Ally SA 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 48;000
SU 12,000 1122;,000 12,000 12,000 12,000
S.1w: mac
". . .. .. e.. '113, 4..._>.: 2...: 6 ..::....i'l .. l:r -,;;,-e a �g '"g - ^?...a •' c L --
TF 311,778 117,635 517,320 213,620
' 3'3a' SA 311,778 517,320213,620
_a,..W x- "- .J a z Vi...... .... ,4w
GO 374,133 141,160 620,785 256,340
ITrans ST-5 Fifth Avenue South SA 207,000
MS 158,000
I Trans ST-6 TH7 Fronta•e Road MS 350,000 ��y.
.>'....ii.s�.....:: .--.. .- ..... L9 .
' ' ii-. .:�. 1:-§ fin: ' ": .......:... ... :.:......... .. .::..._.. ......::tet 'i.. 4,F. •' B q........ 11:>,
GU 158,000
TF 25,00011,000
Trans ST-8 Reconst First St No MS 437,000
;--„: �i ate'-ii- .. SA 173,000
... ........r~ 4 " q�P
itssi
.,
MS 220,400
TF 36,000
Trans ST-11 Second Street NE CR 35,000
Trans ST-12 Second Avenue South TF 400,000
MS 300,000
ISA
300,000
Trans ST-13 Stop light pre-emption syst MS 35,000 35,000 35,000
Parks CF-1 ADA Com'Hance GR 10,000 10,000
KIK' r? � .ssim t�' ": I4, : . ..
1ie..4Iit'-tillitkl...ARiiiitZiii=i..11•,.Z.'
Parks CF-3 S Oak Beach Redevel GR 50,000 50,000 50,000
Parks CF-4 Maetzold Field PF 50,000
-fix ��� s :�;,. . - �-':
„. f" �... +� .....^f�*A-�r!.i.°.2.� r`r_ i..? i'a G;i; ...;W.. ... .:si, -.:,: ie:a 1 0 . - .�,_
I Parks CF-7 Tennis Court Replace GR 31,500
Parks CF-8 Outdoor Hocke Rinks GR 22,500 � -
!.,.�5,.. ....... . �: . ... 50,000
Bldgs MF-2 City Hall/Fire St Roof CR 50,000
I
Bld•s MF-3 Salt/Sand Store.e Bld CR 35,000 _
Bides MF-6 Fire dept stora•e bld• CR 100,000
�
Bldgs MF-8 Surface fire station floors CR 19,000
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 1,587,000 6,758,759 2,108,137 8,887,555 3,711,808
ITOTAL FOR 5 YEAR PERIOD 23,053,259
19
IPROPOSED PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE
I1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
Trans ST-i Residential Street Reconstruction S.A. 0 233,000 233,000 233,000 233,000 0
rans ST-3 Citywide Concrete Alleys S.A. 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 0
Trans ST-4 County Road 3 S.A. 0 311,778 0 517,320 213,620 0
rans ST-5 Fifth Avenue South S.A. 0 0 0 207,000 0 0
rans ST-7 County Road 61 (Shady Oak) S.A. 0 0 0 95,000 0 0
rans ST-8 Reconstruction of 1st Street North S.A. 0 0 0 0 173,000 0
Trans ST-9 Rebuild/Redesign 11th Avenue South S.A. 0 45,000 0 0 0 0
ST-12 Second Avenue So.(3rd to 5th St.So.) SA. 0 0 0 300,000 0
Irns
0
rans PP-2 Eleventh AveJSecond Ave.Connector SA. 0 0 0 0 0 300,000
TOTAL 48,000 637,778 281,000 1,400,320 667,620 300,000
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
rans ST-4 County Road 3 T.F. 0 311,778 117,635 517,320 213,620 0
Trans ST-7 County Road 61 (Shady Oak) T.F. 0 0 25,000 11,000 0 0
Iraps ST-9 Rebuild/Redesign 11th Avenue South T.F. 0 36,000 0 0 0 0
rans ST-12 Second Avenue So.(3rd to 5th St.So.) T.F. 0 0 0 400,000 0 0
Trans PP-2 Eleventh AveJSecond Ave.Connector T.F. 0 0 0 0 0 400,000
rens PP-3 Light Rail Transit Stations(2) T.F. 0 0 0 0 0 150,000
TOTAL 0 347,778 142,635 928,320 213,620 550,000
SANITARY SEWER UTILITY
Itil SA-1 Lift Station Reconstruction S.F. 0 20,000 130,000 250,000 0 0
rans PP-4 Ninth Avenue LRT Corridor S.F. 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 .
Util WA-3 Telemetering Controls S.F. 0 60,000 0 0 0 0
rens ST-2 Residential St.Reconstr:Utii. S.F. 0 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 0
TOTAL 0 155,000 205,000 325,000 75,000 350,000
STORM SEWER UTILITY
liktil SS-1 Storm Drainage System Maintenance S.U. 0 50,000 50,000 100,000 0 0
rans PP-4 Ninth Avenue LRT Corridor S.U. 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
rans ST-2 Residential St.Reconstr:Util. S.U. 0 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 0
Trans ST-3 Citywide Concrete Alleys S.U. 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 0
II
TOTAL 12,000 97,000 97,000 147,000 47,000 100,000
WATER FUND
Itil WA-1 Moline Treatment Facility W.F. 581,000 95,500 0 0 0 0
bl WA-2 Elmo Park Treatment Facility W.F. 0 0 0 395,000 0 710,000
til WA-3 Telemetering Controls W.F. 25,000 56,500 0 0 0 0
UItil WA-4 Well Rehabilitation W.F. 0 54,000 0 0 0 0
Ul WA-5 Blake Water Tower Improvements W.F. 0 96,500 0 0 0 0
rans PP-4 Ninth Avenue LRT Corridor W.F. 0 0 0 0 0 250,000
Trans ST-2 Residential St.Reconstr:Util. W.F. 0 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 0
TOTAL 606,000 377,500 75,000 470,000 75,000 960,000
IPAVILION FUND
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER GOVERNMENTAL UNITS
til SS-2 Nine Mile Creek Improvements G.U. 300,000 0 0 0 0 0
Trans ST-4 County Road 3 G.U. 0 3,869,747 549,602 3,138,277 1,629,335 0
irans ST-7 County Road 61 (Shady Oak) G.U. 0 0 0 158,000 0 0
TOTAL 300,000 3,869,747 549,602 3,296,277 1,629,335 0
GRAND TOTAL 1,587,000 6,758,759 2,108,137 8,887,555 3,711,808 5,590,000
I
21
I
I
1 o O
CZ rn
...,
0 44
Ct
I " 0. OO
. ..,
to ...........
41.1 in
1 C 6) 0 c0 Nt cd
cu
•,..,
= p cn te E.-
I .........
4m o OC3•N L., 0
..,• :. r.,,
• .,_.
.........„:.
,,,t). ....., 1-4
t E c:, ........ ak fi{t` r'o ..„,....,..
� 'tc„^:»
-0*,„,,,wh,
,,,,,,,,i,.,:,:,,,,,A.,..,.,,,, -
I 0
E2 ,,,,y/ia ,,,,,...,,,„,„,'Mt.' -;.x.%.:47" ,
1 -- o.. .,-' cc
MIME >41
0
L.
CC
IOt
a) v o
c) ,,,
I x o• •�
O •
I ILO to
a) o CD
1
1 22A
I'
1995-1999 Capital Improvement Plan
Expenditures by Source for 1995
1
F
W
f r i �x
Ev'I606,000
� :,
350,000
uv
.300,000
C ,.107,000
GRA 114,000
1pF T: 50,000
SA ; •;: ,48,000
1 SU (. 12,000
0
$350,000
$700,000
1
1
Total Expenditures for 1995 $1 ,587,000
1
LEGEND
WF Water Fund $606,000
MS Municipal State Aid $350,000
GU Other Governmental Unit: $300,000
1 CR Current Revenue $107,000
GR General Fund Reserves $114,000
PF Private Sector Funds $50,000
' SA Special Assessment $48,000
SU Storm Sewer Utility $12,000
1
22C
t
� REVENUE PROJECTIONS
1
� SHOWING
� IMPACT OF PROJECTS
1
� ON FUNDING SOURCE
1
23
1
1
1
1
1
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES
11 CURRENT REVENUES/GENERAL RESERVES
Funding all of the proposed 1994-1998 projects would be possible
while maintaining the necessary General Fund reserve balance for
working capital. No grant monies have been included as a source
of funding.
I
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
Funding from bonds is used up front to pay for construction that
will eventually be paid by special assessment collections, over a
15-20 year span, and the City's share (levy) of construction
projects.
The Hopkins House neighborhood and the Mainstreet/Fifth Avenue to
Washington projects being added to 1994 would require a bond issue
in excess of $1,200, 000 in 1994. The City's levy share would run
an average of $32, 000 per year over 15 years.
Bonds of approximately $8,000,000 will also be needed to fund
initial payments for the County Road 3 and 61 projects. The
timing of the issue(s) will depend on repayments from grants and
other Governmental units. There is also the possibility to use
some idle funds for short periods of time depending on activities
in other City functions.
11
MUNICIPAL STATE AID
The large projects in 1991 and 1992 caused a two-year moratorium
on projects funded by this source. The CIP takes this situation
11 into account, and funding is sufficient for the projects listed.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
Cash on hand, increments above debt service and loan repayments
are sufficient to cover these projects.
WATER FUND
I/ Several large facility upgrades scheduled from 1993 through 1997
will require rate increases periodically. In prior years an ample
cash balance had been nurtured in anticipation of the several
needed projects. Now into the upgrade stage, a rate increase in
1993 was approved (the first increase since 1984) . A modest rate
increase in the next two odd numbered years would be necessary to
maintain the planned projects to avoid issuance of bonds.
25
GENERAL FUND
1 (000 omitted)
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Cash Balance Begin Year 3,250 3,136 3,010 2,960 2,710
CI? - General Reserves 114 126 50 250
Reserved Fund Balance
Cash Flow 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600
Reserved Balance 536 410 360 110 110
Note: Cash flow target$2,600,000.
Assumes a balanced budget each year, which includes all CIP current revenues in levy.
Council now has the authority to levy without state restriction.
Application for grants has not been included.
I
1
t
I
1
I
I
I
27
I
I
TAX INCREMENT 1.1 FUND
I (000 omitted)
1 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Fund Balance Begin Year 1,460 1,565 1,780 1,995 2,260
Taxes Received 1,250 1,300 1,400 1,450 1,500
1 Debt Service
740 775 775 775 750
Administrative Expense 105 110 110 110 120
IOther Expenses 300 200 300 • 300 350
IBalance 12/31/1999 2,540
I
I
1 TAX INCREMENT 2.X FUND
I (000 omitted)
1 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Fund Balance Begin Year
632 732 474 531 (207)
ITaxes Received 200 200 300 300 500
I Debt Service
70 70 70 70 70
Administrative Expense
30 40 30 40 30
I CIP
348 143 928 214
1 Balance 12/31/1999 (21)
I
1 29
I
IREFUSE FUND- CASH FLOW
1 (000 omitted)
I1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Cash Balance Begin Year 511 561 545
575 605
I Add from Operations
50 40 30 30 25
I Capital Outlay
56 128
iBalance 12/31/1999 502
Rate History
1988 $10.90
I 1989 $15.50 •
1990 $18.00
I
I
STORM SEWER FUND- CASH FLOW
1 (000 omitted)
I1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Cash Balance Begin Year
35 180 228 275 265
IAdd from Operations •
416 408 400 392 384
I
Debt Service: '89 Bonds
234 238 236 240 237
Interfund Loan$500,000 (1992) 25
25 20 15 15
IReduced to $300,000 (1998)
CIP
12 97 97 147 47
I
Balance 12/31/1999 350
IRate History
1989 $4.75
I 1991 $6.00
1992 $7.50
1993 $9.00
1 31
1
t
1
1
� PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 33
1
1
UTILITIES
1
1 35
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Utilities Storm Drainage System Maintenance SS-1 $200,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
Storm Sewer SU 50,000 50,000 100,000
OCATION:
1996 - Meadowbrook I (Meadowbrook Road to Golf Course)
1997 - Meadowbrook II (Hawthorne to Meadowbrook)
1998 - Meadowbrook III (Homedale to Hawthorne)
ESCRIPTION:
Program to construct/reconstruct storm sewer improvements in areas designated
in the Implementation Program of the Storm Water Management Plan. Reconstruction
of deteriorated storm sewer system.
USTIFICATION:
Flooding in park at end of Homedale Road and at end of Meadowbrook Road occurs
from excess runoff. Storm sewer pipe from Homedale to the golf course is undersized
and deteriorated.
URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Feasibility Study - year prior to project
Plans, specifications, bid, construction -year of project.
-ELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the Storm Water Management Plan and its list of priorities.
37
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Utilities Moline Treatment Facility WA-1 $676,500
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
ater Fund WF 581,000 95,500
OCATION:
916 County Road 3
ESCRIPTION:
Rehabilitation of the water treatment facilities at the Moline site.
USTIFICATION:
The present facility is in need of repair and upgrading to improve utilization. Internal
modifications are necessary to change the general use of this structure to fill its new
role in the water system as a water pumping station instead of a filtration plant. In
j addition, the redevelopment anticipated in the surrounding area will increase aesthetic
concerns, and as such, aesthetic improvements are planned for the building.
The 1996 improvements will basically complete the renovation of this facility.
I
I
URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Plans and Specifications 1994
Bid and Construct 1995, 1996
l
I
ELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
:R
Consistent with water and sewer master plan approved in 1990.
I
I1
r 39
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Utilities Telemetering Controls WA-3 $141,500
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
ISewer Fund SF 60,000
-Water Fund WF 25,000 56,500
1
ILOCATION:
Public Works Building 1995-1996
Wells and Treatment Plants 1995-1996
Sewer Lift Stations 1996
111 DESCRIPTION:
Replacement of existing water well and treatment plant, and lift station monitoring
Iequipment of different manufacturers.
'JUSTIFICATION:
The system relies on phone company lines for transmission which have reliability
problems, and high rental costs. The service of the system is becoming difficult, due
to the hybrid design and combination of manufacturer's equipment. An upgrade to
newer electronic and radio transmitted system would allow more reliable monitoring,
easier service, more control of functions in response to changing conditions and
especially allow us faster response to sewer station problems.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Computer study and purchase 1995
1 Plans and specifications 1995
Bid and construction 1995/96/97
ELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with water and sewer master plan approved in 1990.
41
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Utilities Blake Water Tower Improvements WA-5 _ $96,500
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
ater Fund WF 96,500
LOCATION:
151 Tyler Avenue South
DESCRIPTION:
Install new valve vault
Install new 18" valve
Install P.L.C. to transmit data to Public Works Building
UST1FICATION:
The existing 18" valve is in need of repair and is of a vintage that makes parts not
readily accessible. In addition, the layout of the vault makes operation of the existing
18" valve highly inefficient.
Installation of the P.L.C. will coincide with the other metering improvements that are
being made throughout the entire water system.
URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Plans and Specifications 1995
Bid and Construction 1996
•ELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with Water and Sewer Master Plan approved in 1990.
43
1
1
1
1
TRANSPORTATION
45
1
0
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE
NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
' Transportation Signals - 11th Avenue and Fifth Street South SG-1 $75,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
11Mncpl State Ad MS 75,000
0
'LOCATION:
11th Avenue South and Fifth Street South
DESCRIPTION:
Traffic signals
USTIFICATION:
Control increase in traffic expected from R.L. Johnson project. Generally difficult
to enter 11th from Fifth Street at current levels. Additional traffic may make
intersection unsafe.
URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
il!, Study/Plan 1995
Construct 1996
ELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Coordinate with 11th Avenue reconstruction.
47
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Residential Street Reconstruction - Utilities ST-2 _ $740,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
torm Sewer SU 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
ater Fund WF 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000
-ewer Fund SF 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000
OCATION:
Locations to be determined as they are consistent with the street reconstruction program.
ESCRIPTION:
Program to reconstruct deteriorated water main and sanitary sewer and to provide
storm sewer improvements in areas where streets have been designated as in poor condition.
USTIFICATION:
In most cases where street reconstruction takes place, storm sewer facilities either need
upgrading or need to be installed new. In some cases, water main and sanitary sewer
need to be rehabilitated in conjunction with street reconstruction. The numbers assume
the City funding 100% of major storm sewer, water main, and sanitary sewer construction/
reconstruction. These costs are to be used in conjunction with street reconstruction
costs shown on ST-1.
URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Public Hearing - year prior to planned construction
Plans and Specifications - year prior to planned construction
Bid -year of planned construction
ELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the Storm Water Management Plan, Water and Sewer Utility Master Plan,
and television inspections.
49
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation County Road 3 ST-4 $13,828,359
FUNDING
SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
1 SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
0Other Gvmnt GU 3,869,747 549,602 3,138,277 1,629,335
Tax Increment TF 311,778 117,635 517,320 213,620
Sp Assesment SA 311,778 517,320 213,620
Mncpl State Ai MS 249,423 211,740 413,853 170,893
General Obig GO 374,133 141,160 620,785 256,340 _
LOCATION:
County Road 3 from Shady Oak Road to Meadowbrook Road.
DESCRIPTION:
Lighting, landscaping, street, etc. improvements along Excelsior Avenue from the east
to west city limits.
USTIFICATION:
Deficiencies in terms of roadway condition, traffic/pedestrian movement, safety and
aesthetics appear in all four segments of County Road 3:
o Segment 1 from Shady Oak Road to 11th Avenue South
Upgrade existing undivided roadway, upgrade 11th Avenue intersection to meet
future needs, implement beautification program.
o Segment 2 from 11th Avenue South to Fifth Avenue South •
i Upgrade roadway, implement beautification program.
o Segment 3 from Fifth Avenue South to Blake Road
Upgrade existing narrow undivided roadway, resolve safety issues at railroad
Icrossing, improve north-south access, account for future LRT access, address
redevelopment needs.
0 o Segment 4 from Blake Road to Meadowbrook Road
Upgrade roadway, implement beautification program.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Segment 1 Segment 3
Planning and Acquisition 1994-95 Planning and Acquisition 1997
Bidding and Construction 1995-96 Bidding/Construction 1998/1999
Segment 2
Planning and Acquisition 1995-96 Segment 4
Bidding and Construction 1996-97 Planning and Acquisition 1997-98
Bidding and Construction 1999
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with Hennepin County CIP and Council action requesting improvements by
year 2000.
51
I
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
ITransportation T.H. 7 Frontage Road at 12th Avenue ST-6 $350,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
ncpl State Ad MS 350,000
OCATION:
Intersection of 12th Avenue with north Frontage Road along T.H. 7
ESCRIPTION:
Redesign and rebuild intersection of T.H. 7 Frontage Road at 12th Avenue North.
USTIFICATION:
The design of the intersection does not meet current standards. Safety and congestion
problems are of great significance in that right turns off T.H. 7 are difficult to execute
and at times conflict with normal westbound through vehicles on the frontage road. There
is very little stacking distance for vehicles attempting to gain access to the highway.
The project is predicated on the School District donating the additional land needed
for the redesigned roadway and providing its own hard surface parking areas if needed.
URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Planning and Discussion 1994
Plans and Specifications 1994
Bid and Construction 1995
ELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
This program needs to be coordinated with other roadway projects in Maintenance
District V and with proposed building construction at Eisenhower School. Consistent
with the City Council adopted Roadway Improvement Policy.
53
I
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
ITransportation Reconstruction of First Street North ST-8 $610,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
ISOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
MncP i State Ad MS 437,000
Sp Assess SA 173,000
LOCATION:
First Street North from Fifth Avenue to 17th Avenue.
IDESCRIPTION:
Reconstruction of roadway and sidewalks on First Street North from Fifth Avenue
to 17th Avenue.
IJUSTIFICATION:
Current roadway has received priority designation in a planned reconstruction program.
Portions of the street rate 'poor' on the Street Condition Survey and should be reconstructed
in the next 5 years. The street may need to be widened to meet traffic and parking needs.
The numbers assume a 50% assessed and 50% MSA share for an average street construction.
The costs in excess of an average street construction and the 50% share are to be paid
for from MSA funds.
This street was orginally scheduled for reconstruction in 1990-92. However, due to the
rMainstreet reconstruction project this project was postponed until 1995. Hennepin County
has tentatively scheduled the reconstruction of Shady Oak Road in 1998 which may also impact
First Street North. The upgrading of First Street North has therefore been delayed until
`i 1999 due to the scheduling of Shady Oak Road. Increased maintenance activities may
be required on First Street North due to the postponement in upgrading.
Ii CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Feasibility Study 1998
Bid and Construction 1999
• RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the City Council adopted Roadway Improvement Policy and street ratings.
55
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation City-Wide Sidewalk Repair ST-10 $210,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
Current CR 50,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
'-evenues
OCATION:
City-Wide
ESCRIPTION:
Perform sidewalk maintenance on all public sidewalks.
In 1995 maintenance work will be completed on all sidewalks in Hopkins. Beginning in
in 1996 ADA improvements will begin.
USTIFICATION:
Routine sidewalk maintenance is necessary to ensure sidewalks are safe for pedestrian
use. Maintenance is also necessary to remove hazards that may cause an injury and
result in the City being held liable for the injury. Yearly projects will call for replacement
of intersection pedestrian ramps that fall below accessibility standards as set down
by the Americans With Disabilities Act.
URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Plan/Bid/Contract - Each Year
1ELAT1ONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with overall maintenance of general public infrastructure.
57
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Second Avenue South (3rd to 5th Street South) ST-12 $1,000,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
ax Increment TF 400,000
ncp State Ad MS 300,000
p Assess SA 300,000
OCATION:
Second Avenue South, From Third Street South to Fifth Street South
ESCRIPTION:
Roadway extension through the current Hennepin County site.
i
USTIFICATION:
- Provides better access to Highway 169 ramps
- Frontage road to future development site at Hennepin County site.
- Logical location for internal roadway
URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Planning/Discussion 1995 - 1997
Plans and Specifications 1996 - 1997
Bidding and Construction 1997-1998
ELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with recommendations of Hopkins/Minnetonka Roadway System
Study of 1989.
59
PARKS & RECREATION
61
1
I CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Park & Rec ADA Compliance CF-1 $20,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
General Fund GR 10,000 10,000
Reserves
LOCATION:
14 City Parks
DESCRIPTION:
A.D.A. accommodations to include restroom modifications, trails, and drinking fountains.
JUSTIFICATION:
The Americans With Disabilites Act requires all structural and miscellaneous changes
to be completed by January 26, 1995. Most parks require minor modifications to meet
compliance.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
1994 Continue to identify trail and structural changes
1995 Plan and complete structural and trail changes
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
11
I 63
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Park & Rec Shady Oak Beach Redevelopment CF-3 $150,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
General Fund GR 50,000 50,000 50,000
eserves
OCATION:
Shady Oak Beach
ESCRIPTION:
The 1994 Shady Oak Beach study will identify structural and ADA problems. It will also
make recommendations for beach improvements and redevelopment.
USTIFICATION:
All beach improvements will be agreed upon with the City of Minnetonka. CIP funding
must be identified to allow Hopkins to participate in the joint redevelopment of Shady Oak
Beach. Based on the traditional 2/3 Minnetonka, 1/3 Hopkins participation, a $450,000
project would cost Hopkins $148,500, budgeted over three years at $50,000 per year.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
1
I RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with Park Board adopted resolution regarding a joint study.
65
I
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Park & Rec Pavilion Accoustics CF-5 _ $40,000_
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
'General Fund GR 40,000
Reserves
II
'LOCATION:
1505 Second Street South
1
DESCRIPTION:
1 Installation of accoustical ceiling and wall tiles.
I
'JUSTIFICATION:
Accoustical panels are needed in the pavilion to improve the sound quality.
IGroups are presently hesitant to rent the pavilion due to this problem.
11
IliCURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Construction 1996
i
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Non-ranked on Park Board priority list.
67
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Parks & Rec
FUNDING
Outdoor Hockey Rinks CF-8 $22,500
SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
eneral Fund GR 22,500
"Reserves
1
i
OCATION:
Oakes Park
I ESCRIPTION:
Replace permanent hockey rink
JUSTIFICATION:
Oakes Park hockey rink is deteriorating rapidly with many boards in need of
replacement. Cost - $22,500.
,
i
URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
I 1995 - Plans, specifications and construction
-ELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Upgrade of existing plans and programs.
1 69
1
t
GENERAL PLBLIC
� BUILDINGS
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Gen Pub Bldg Pavilion Mezzanine MF-1 $250,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
General Fund GR 250,000
Reserves
LOCATION:
Pavilion, 1515 Second Street South
DESCRIPTION:
Install elevator to mezzanine, and install the floor, ceiling, partitions, sprinkler system
and other items in this area.
USTIFICATION:
The original construction of the Pavilion provided the rough-in features for the mezzanine
area. The plan is to finally finish off this area so it could be used for City and athletic
functions.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
I
1
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Non-ranked on Park Board priority list.
i
I
73
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Gen Pub Bldg Salt & Sand Storage Building MF-3 $35,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
urrent CR 35,000
Revenues
LOCATION:
Public Works Facilities
1601 - Second Street South
DESCRIPTION:
Construction of a storage building for salt/sand mix at the Public Works facility.
USTIFICATION:
Storage of salt/sand is presently accomplished by an open pile at the Public
Works yard. Regulations are being considered at the present time by the State
to require closed storage to protect the environment. This requirement is a law
in Wisconsin now. Open storage also allows loss of a certain percentage (up to
5 percent) which of course can be related to a direct cost.
The allocation of funds as noted above is intended to build up the necessary funds
to construct the facility in 1995 or 1996 or when mandated by the State.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Plans/Specs/Bid/Construction - 1996 or when mandated by the State.
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with overall upgrade of Public Works facilities and may become
a requirement of EPA regulations.
75
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE
Gen Pub Bldg Fire Department Storage Building
1996 MF-6 5 YEAR COST
$100,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1997
100,000 NUMBER
1998 1999 FUTURE
Current CR
Revenues
iii
111
LOCATION:
li
To be arranged.
DESCRIPTION:
Fire Department storage building.
JUSTIFICATION:
0 The Fire Department currently has 3 separate areas of off-site storage, none of which are on city
property. A heated building with easy access is needed to consolidate these items along with
1 other items that do not have to be kept in the Fire Station.
II
1
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
{ Plan/Bid/Contract in 1997.
I
f
I
1
II
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
I
Ii
1'
77
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
en Pub Bldg Surface Fire Station Floors MF-8 $19,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
urrent CR 19,000
!Revenues
OCATION:
Fire Station
•ESCRIPTION:
Resurfacing of Fire Station cement floors in apparatus area, ramps and hallway.
USTIFICATION:
The Fire Station cement floors have not been surfaced since the original construction of the
building in 1964. Resurfacing is necessary to protect the concrete, provide anti-slip protection,
and hide stains and wear marks. This project also includes the hallway created by the
remodeling project.
URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Bid/Contract in 1996
ELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the Fire Station remodeling project.
79
1
1
i
� PROPOSED
1
i EXPENDITi1RE5
1
� FOR
� FUTURE
1
� PROJECTS
1
1
1
1
i
1 81
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Eleventh Avenue/Second Avenue Connector PP-2 _ $0
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
ax Increment TF 400,000
Mncpl State Ad MS 300,000
.p Assess SA 300,000
OCATION:
New connector route from 11th Avenue South to Second Avenue South.
Exact location is undefined.
ESCRIPTION:
New collector roadway connecting 11th Avenue (south of Seventh Street) to
Second Avenue (south of Seventh Street).
USTIFICATION:
- To provide direct route to Westbrooke area which is less circuitous than current routes.
- Connector road to future development of Minneapolis Floral property.
URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Planning/Discussion of Routes 1995 - 1998
Plans & Specifications 1998 -2000
Bidding and Construction 1998 -2000
IRELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with Hopkins/Minnetonka Roadway System of 1989.
Consistent with development plans for South Hopkins.
83
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Ninth Avenue LRT Corridor PP-4 _ $0
FUNDING • SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
i SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
0 Water Fund WF 250,000
I Sewer Fund SF 350,000
Storm Sewer SU 100,000
LOCATION:
Ninth Avenue From County Road 3 to First Street North
1 DESCRIPTION:
Relocation of utilities and reconstruction of street to accommodate light rail transit
Iline from County Road 3 to First Street North.
I
JUSTIFICATION:
In 1984 the City hiredanalyzeproposed J.J. Bakker to the light rail transit corridors in
I
Hopkins. The study recommended that the northwest route of the Southwest Corridor
not cross County Road 3 at TH 169. Rather, the study recommended that the northwest
route be extended north on Ninth Avenue to First Street North and then continue
iii
I northwestward on the proposed corridor.
I
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
IPlanning/Discussion 1995 - 1998
111 Plans and Specs 2000 -2010
Bidding and Construction 2000 - 2010
'RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with recommendations made in 1984 Bakker study.
I
1 85
I CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Park & Rec Golf Course PP-6 $0
1 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
(Revenue Bond RB 2,000,000
I
LOCATION:
Seventh Street (South) at 14th Avenue (former landfill)
DESCRIPTION:
Design, construction and financing of 9 hole golf course.
JUSTIFICATION:
The City Council commissioned a feasibility study to determine the viability of a golf
course on the site. The feasibility study indicated a strong market for a 9 hole par 3 golf course.
The study also indicated that the course may not generate revenues adequate to offset
expenses of construction due to difficult soil problems. The course should generate excess
revenues to operating expenses in five years.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Non-ranked on Park Board priority list.
1
87
I
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE
NUMBER I 5 YEAR COST
Gen Pub Bldg Fire Station Vehicle Exhaust System PP-8 $0
' FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 FUTURE
ICurrent CR 30,000
Revenues
LOCATION:
Fire Station
1
DESCRIPTION:
Fire Station vehicle exhaust system.
(JUSTIFICATION:
OSHA is requiring an upgrade of existing occupancies where vehicles may omit fumes and
carbon monoxide within a building. Since upgrading most of the trucks to diesel fuel, this proble
has become more apparent. An exhaust system would also help keep the station cleaner and
avoid health problems with Fire and City Hall personnel.
URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Future project.
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the Fire Station remodel plan.
89