Loading...
2000 - 2004 CIP t m - Fa55 � y 1 ym ';'.',1'.'''711'.',".0.('-,,,,, / TY O, \ f%'J N_ \ .,,,c ,,,k,,,, ` Rt *, �� / -- ._______,/ '''`'-�HOPKI$S ,r. 2000-2004 k CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ow PLANr. . T ,,, lioillIlIlliij. C . $l rip1,1 ,,,,,. ..' , , . ,. . .,, ...„.. .,... . •t•ei... ,,,, Fahf Map P, d Ill za 1 tsF / ti++. r', i1 `t 0 . _ ...„., bFd i � x µ�� z�''. r ....42wp3 t. City of.7-fopkins 1010¶First Street South • 7fopkins, 9101 55343-7573 • Phone: 612-935-8474 • Fax 612-935-1834 DATE: October 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Steven C. Mielke, City Manager SUBJECT: 2000-2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN With this letter, I respectfully submit the 2000-2004 Capital Improvement Plan. This five- year planning document represents the combined efforts of city staff, advisory commissions, citizens, and the City Council. The Capital Improvement Plan is a five-year forecast of project needs in the City of Hopkins. It is intended to alert the Council and citizens to the major capital needs on the horizon. The first year of the plan becomes an adopted capital budget and relates almost completely to the operating budget that is approved on a yearly basis. The remaining four years represent an estimate of project needs and funding capabilities of the city. In previous plans an explanation of five-year equipment needs was also included. This year's plan does not include proposed equipment purchases. A document relating specifically to equipment replacement needs has been developed into a separate document. The Capital Improvement Plan is intended to serve as a planning tool and is therefore structured to present a meaningful, long-range perspective of the city's capital programming needs. At the same time, sufficient project detail is provided to enable those who review the information to make informed decisions on the programming of projects over the next several years. Please use the information provided to formulate plans, projects, and questions. The Capital Improvement Plan can serve the community best by provoking thoughts and actions. This document was developed by the City Manager's Office with the assistance of all city departments. I wish to thank all those involved in the development of the Capital Improvement Plan, and especially Steve Stadler, Public Works Director; Jim Gessele, Engineering Supervisor; Jim Kerrigan, Planning and Economic Development Director; Lori Yager, Finance Director; and Bish Johnson, Administrative Assistant, for their hard work and dedication. i fon EqualOpportunity Employer CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2000-2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE City Managers Message Table of Contents iii Introduction and Purpose 1 Program Descriptions/Goals and Objectives 2 Utilities Program 2 Transportation Program 4 Park and Recreation Program 6 General Public Buildings Program 7 CIP Sources of Funding 10 Five Year Project Summaries 15 Total Expenditures by Funding Source 18 Five Year Expenditure Summary 19 Proposed Projects By Funding Source 20 Proposed Expenditures for Unscheduled Projects 22 Revenue Projections to Show Impact of Projects on Funding Source 31 Summary 33 General Fund 35 Municipal State Aid Fund 36 P.I.R. Fund 36 Water Utility Fund - Cash Flow 37 Sanitary Sewer Fund - Cash Flow 38 Refuse Fund - Cash Flow 38 Storm Sewer Fund - Cash Flow 39 Project Descriptions 41 Utilities 43 Transportation 53 Parks & Recreation 71 General Public Buildings 81 Proposed Expenditures/Unscheduled Projects 89 iii INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The Capital Improvement Plan is a flexible plan based upon long- range physical planning and financial projections, which schedules the major public improvements that may be incurred by the City over the next five years . Flexibility of the Capital Improvement Plan is established through annual review, and revision if necessary. The annual review assures that the program will become a continuing part of the budgetary process and that it will be consistent with changing demands as well as changing patterns in cost and financial resources . Funds are appropriated only for the first year of the program, which is then included in the annual budget . The Capital Improvement Plan serves as a tool for implementing certain aspects of the City' s comprehensive plan, therefore, the program describes the overall objectives of City development, the relationship between projects with respect to timing and need, and the City' s fiscal capabilities . The Capital Improvement Plan can help assure : 1 . A systematic approach to planning and initiating capital projects affording the opportunity to plan the location, timing, and financing of needed public improvements; 2 . The development of a realistic program of capital spending within the City' s projected fiscal capability to finance such projects, avoiding sharp change in the tax levy or bonded indebtedness; 3 . The coordination of public and private improvement projects permitting adequate time for design and engineering to eliminate duplication of effort and expense; 4 . The expenditure of public funds that are compatible with the City' s adopted Comprehensive Plan; 5 . That the public is kept informed of the proposed future projects and expenditures; 6 . That private investors are aware of the City' s long-range development program so that they may guide their development in a way that is compatible with the City' s program; 7 . Aid in achieving federal and/or state participation by providing the necessary planning and lead time necessary for a successful application in addition to meeting prerequisites needed for certain federal and state grants . 1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS In order to effectively plan for and manage the projects contained in a Capital Improvement Plan, it is necessary to group similar activities into "Program Categories" . The City of Hopkins ' activities are divided into four program categories which are 1) Utilities, 2) Transportation, 3) Parks, Forestry and Pavilion, and 4) General Public Buildings. The City also includes an outline of proposed expenditures for unscheduled projects . Program categories are explained in the following sections . UTILITIES PROGRAM Program Description: The Utilities Program includes the municipal water, municipal sanitary sewer, storm sewer and refuse systems . Program Goal : Provide reliable, efficient, and safe utility service to all parts of the City with a minimum of adverse effects on the environment . Subprograms : Water, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, and Refuse Service. I . Municipal Water System Subprogram (WA) A. Subprogram Goal : The goal of the Municipal Water System subprogram is to provide water in sufficient quantities at sufficient pressure, with a high degree of reliability and safety to all parts of the City so as to satisfy the normal demands of the general public for water while at the same time providing sufficient reserves in case of fire emergency or power outages . B. Objectives : 1 . Water quality shall meet the purity standards of the Minnesota Department of Health. 2 . Any hydrant on the system shall , under maximum condition, deliver no less than 500 gallons per minute with a residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. 3 . The system shall be looped to provide maximum reliability. 2 4 . The supply and storage system shall be designed and maintained to have maximum reliability. II . Municipal Sanitary Sewer Subprogram (SA) A. Subprogram Goal : The goal of the Municipal Sanitary Sewer subprogram is to promote a healthful environment by collecting all sewage from existing and projected development in a sanitary and economic manner. B. Objectives : 1 . Provide sewer lines of adequate size and grade to collect and transmit all discharge sewage . 2 . Prevent sewage from overflowing into the natural environment . 3 . Preventsewage back-ups . 4 . Encourage or promote connection of all generators of sewage to the Municipal system. 5 . Meet the effluent and infiltration standards of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. III . Storm Sewer Subprogram (SS) A. Subprogram Goal : Manage and control surface and ground waters in order to protect the man-made and natural environment in a safe and efficient manner. B. Objectives : 1 . Prevent flooding. 2 . Prevent damage to property due to erosion. 3 . Meet water quality standards established by the controlling regulatory law or authority. IV. Refuse Subprogram (RF) A. Subprogram Goal : To promote a healthful environment by 3 collecting all residential solid waste in a sanitary and economic manner. B. Objectives : 1 . Provide efficient refuse collection in a timely manner to minimize disruption to residents . 2 . Provide residential recycling programs that minimize the amount of refuse that needs to be landfilled. 3 . Provide yard waste collection that meets state statutes and is also convenient for the residents . 4 . Provide bulk pick up/drop off and brush pick up alternatives for the residents to eliminate these items from being put in the refuse cans . TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Program Description: This program includes streets, walkways, traffic signs and signals, vehicular parking facilities, and street lighting. Program Goal : Provide for the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the city. Subprograms : Streets, Walkways/Sidewalks, Signs/Signals, Parking Facilities, and Street Lights. I . Streets Subprogram (ST) A. Subprogram Goal : The goal of the Streets Subprogram is to provide safe, convenient, economic public streets to best facilitate the movement of vehicular traffic . B. Objectives : 1 . Streets should be constructed with permanent surfaces, concrete curb and gutter, and with ancillary storm drainage, to standards established by the City. 2 . Streets should be of a size and load capacity 4 consistent with their functional classifications . 3 . Timely major repair to preserve the basic capital investment in streets . II . Walkways/Sidewalks Subprogram (WS) A. Subprogram Goal : To provide a safe and convenient pedestrian system with incidental recreational benefits . III . Signs/Signals Subprogram (SI) A. Subprogram Goal : The goal of the Signs/Signals subprogram is to provide an efficient and orderly system of street and traffic signing so as to promote safe, convenient travel throughout the City. B. Objectives : 1 . Signs and Signals should be installed in conformity with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices . 2 . Periodic surveys and studies should be made to document the effectiveness of City signing patterns . IV. Parking Facilities Subprogram (PA) A. Subprogram Goal : To provide such supporting facilities as will promote maximum use of public parking spaces by employers, employees, customers, and visitors . B. Objectives : 1 . Provide parking facilities for present and anticipated needs of the City of Hopkins . V. Street Lights Subprogram (SL) A. Subprogram Goal : To provide a system of street lighting within the City that will promote safe and convenient vehicular and pedestrian travel on City Streets . 5 B. Objectives : 1 . To provide lighting at each street intersection within the City. 2 . To provide mid-block street lighting in conformance with the City' s street lighting policy, in order to provide equitable, cost efficient lighting. 3 . To continually update the system so as to provide energy and cost efficient lighting. PARKS, FORESTRY AND PAVILION PROGRAM Program Description: This program includes community parks, neighborhood parks, open spaces, recreational structures and facilities. Program Goal : The goal of the Park and Recreation Program is to provide facilities for safe, stimulating, and comprehensive leisure time activities of Hopkins citizens . Subprograms : Neighborhood Facilities, Community Facilities I . Neighborhood Facilities Subprogram (NF) A. Subprogram Goals : To acquire ownership or use rights of park sites located to provide convenient walking access to all Hopkins citizens and to develop such sites to provide optimum recreational serviceability consistent with the preservation and enhancement of pleasing aesthetic qualities . B. Objectives : 1 . Acquire property or use rights on those neighborhoods that do not have convenient walking access to neighborhood park facilities . 2 . Develop neighborhood park facilities to meet the needs of various user groups . 3 . Preserve and maintain existing structures and 6 facilities in order to retain current service and safety levels . 4 . Preserve and enhance the aesthetic qualities of neighborhood parks . II . Community Facilities Subprogram (CF) A. Subprogram Goals : The goal of the Community Facilities Subprogram is to develop, or acquire ownership or use rights of sites which serve the entire City and to provide facilities that serve community-wide needs . B. Objectives : 1 . Acquire sites which have valuable and unique natural characteristics to preserve irreplaceable community resources . 2 . Preserve by acquisition, gift, or other arrangement properties which have valuable historic-cultural qualities . 3 . Preserve and maintain existing structures and facilities in order to retain current service and safety levels . 4 . Construct or acquire structures and facilities necessary to meet the changing needs of the community. GENERAL PUBLIC BUILDINGS PROGRAM Program Description: The General Public Buildings Program includes all municipal buildings except those provided for in the Utility and Park Facilities Program. Program Goal : Provide buildings which are adequate and convenient for the efficient accommodation of City functions . Subprograms : Administrative Offices, Maintenance Facilities, Fire Facilities, Community Center. 7 I . Administrative Offices Subprogram (AO) A. Subprogram Goal : The goal of the Administrative Offices Subprogram is to provide facilities for the efficient and safe conduct of legislative and administrative functions of the City. B. Objectives : 1 . Maintain current facilities in a state of good repair so as to maximize cost effectiveness and avoid costly repair. 2 . Upgrade facilities as necessary to provide for the efficient, safe, and effective provision of the city services . II . Maintenance Facilities Subprogram (MF) A. Subprogram Goal : The goal of the Maintenance Facilities Subprogram is to provide facilities for the efficient and safe conduct of City maintenance functions . B. Objectives : 1 . Maintain current facilities in a state of good repair so as to maximize cost effectiveness and avoid costly repair. 2 . Upgrade facilities as necessary to provide for the efficient, safe, and effective provision of City services . III . Fire Facilities Subprogram (FF) A. Subprogram Goal : To provide a fire station, or stations, for storage of Fire Department equipment and for the training and meetings of volunteer fire fighters to provide prompt and efficient protection to life and property. B. Objectives : 1 . Provide a maximum four minute daytime and three minute nighttime response to all points within the City. 8 2 . Meet objective 1 through the use of volunteers . IV, Community Center Subprogram (CC) A. Subprogram Goal : To provide a community facility, or facilities, which meet the social, recreational, and cultural needs of all citizens, particularly senior citizens . B. Objectives : 1 . Maintain current facilities in a state of good repair so as to maximize cost effectiveness and avoid costly repairs . 2 . Construct or acquire structures and facilities necessary to meet the changing needs of the City. 3 . Upgrade facilities as necessary to provide for efficient, safe, and effective provision of City services. 9 CIP SOURCES OF FUNDING In order to fund the anticipated Capital Improvements, the City must draw upon a variety of sources . Many of these sources have a specific or "dedicated" purpose (i .e. , the water utility fund will finance water main installation but not a street overlay) . Therefore, it is important to identify the uses and limitations of the various revenue sources. CURRENT REVENUES - GENERAL FUND (C.R. ) This represents funding from current year revenue collections in the General Fund which support operations and capital outlay expenditures . Revenue sources include property tax levies, state aid payments, and various permit and license fees . This source of funding is generally used only for operations and small capital purchases . GENERAL FUND RESERVES (G.R. ) Reserves of the general fund are the funds remaining after subtracting cash flow and emergency amounts from the City' s cash balance, sometimes referred to as "fund balance" . The use of General Fund Reserves is not recommended for Capital Improvements without significant staff and Council review. CABLE TELEVISION FUND (C.T. ) This funding source consists of franchise fees received from Paragon Cable TV, in excess of the amounts earmarked for the access programming and commission budgets . Expenditures are limited to cable-related facilities, or must have a cable related purpose. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND (E,D. ) This funding source was established by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the City of Hopkins, to provide funding for the purpose of promoting development and redevelopment within the City. The Economic Development fund is a revolving 10 fund administered by the HRA, intended to provide an ongoing funding source used to reduce or extend the long term debt involved with development and redevelopment activities . The HRA reviews all proposed uses of this fund on an individual basis . GRANT-IN-AID (G.A. ) This is aid received from either the Federal or State government . In many cases, grants are made on matching basis, which means the City shares a portion of the costs of the project being funded. MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS (M. S . ) This funding source represents funds received from the State of Minnesota to support construction and maintenance of State Aid classified municipal streets . State law defines the types and limits of State Aid Streets expenditures . PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING/GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (P. I . ) Improvements with a life of several years may be financed from the proceeds of a General Obligation Bond Issue. The total debt that can be incurred under this method of financing is limited by law. With some exception, General Obligation Bonds are generally subject to a referendum process . Examples of projects which may not require a referendum are those financed through the use of special assessments where at least 20 percent of the project cost is assessed to the benefiting property owners . The remaining portion not assessed can be financed through general obligation bonds repaid by a tax levy. PRIVATE SECTOR FUNDING (P.F. ) This funding source consists primarily of payments made by developers for the purchase of land, the installation of water, sewer, or streets or other related expenditures . It can also refer to donations made to the City by individuals or groups . 11 REVENUE BONDS (R.B. ) These are bonds issued for improvements made for a specific revenue producing facility or operation. The debt incurred is repaid from the revenue generated by the facility. If the revenue generated is insufficient then the difference becomes an annual obligation of the taxpayers and becomes an additional tax levy. These are generally not subject to referendum. REAL ESTATE SALES FUND (R.E. ) This funding source consists primarily of funds built up from the sale of city owned property. To date, the fund has been used for building improvements . Because the sale of both general City property and park/recreation property are accumulated into this fund, earmarking a portion for recreational purposes may be justified. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT (S .A. ) A number of projects may be realistically financed using Special Assessment to pay the ultimate cost . Almost any project can potentially be financed using the assessment process . In each case it is necessary to make a determination that the assessed property will benefit by the amount of the assessment . The cost of street reconstruction is shared 70% by the property owner and 30% by the City. Concurrent improvement costs to the utility systems are assumed by the respective utility funds . TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (T. F. ) This funding source results from the tax value of new development that is "incrementally" greater than the existing tax value . Typically, bonds are sold based on the assumption that the higher tax receipts will retire the bonds . However, the use of TIF funds through a "pay as you go" method has become more common. This type of funding can be used for public improvements within a redevelopment district to support the goals of redevelopment, specifically the elimination of blighted conditions . Approval of the Hopkins HRA should be anticipated prior to the commitment of these funds . State law strictly regulates the use of these funds . 12 SANITARY SEWER FUNDS (S .F. ) Sanitary sewer funds consist of revenue generated from charges made for sewage disposal . The cost of operations plus system (capital) improvements determines the ultimate charge levied for the service provided. WATER FUNDS (W. F. ) Water funds consist of revenue generated from the sale of water. The cost of operations plus system (capital) improvements determines the ultimate charge levied for the service provided. STORM SEWER UTILITY REVENUES (S .U. ) Storm sewer funds consist of revenue generated by charging storm water drainage fee to parcels of land for the availability and use of municipal storm sewer facilities . Expenditures from this funding source are related to drainage facilities . OTHER GOVERNMENTAL UNITS (G.U. ) These are funds received from Hennepin County, adjacent communities, etc . for projects that also benefit a jurisdiction other than the City of Hopkins . REFUSE FUND (R. FJ Refuse funds consist of revenues generated from collection fees, (bulk pickup and weekly collections) recycling fees, and recycling and composting grants from Hennepin County. Revenues are used to support the City' s refuse collection services as well as its recycling program. The cost of operations plus system (capital) improvements determines the charge for the services provided. PAVILION FUND (P.A. ) Pavilion Funds consist of revenues generated from rental fees collected from users of the Pavilion. These funds are utilized to pay for operating, and capital expenditures . 13 14 FIVE YEAR PROJECT SUMMARIES 15 Funding Sources Current Revenues - General Fund C . R . General Fund Reserves G . R . Cable Television Fund C . T . Economic Development Fund E . D . Grant-In-Aid G.A. Municipal State-Aid Streets M. S . Permanent Improvement Revolving/ General Obligation Bonds P . I . Private Sector Funds P . F . Revenue Bonds R . B . Real Estate Sales Fund R . E . Special Assessment S .A. Tax Increment Financing T . F . Sewer Fund S . F . Equipment Replacement Fund E . R . Storm Sewer Utility S .U. Water Fund W. F . Refuse Fund R . F . Pavilion Fund P .A. 16 Utilities Program Subprogram Categories Municipal Water System Subprogram W.A. Municipal Sanitary Sewer Subprogram S.A. Storm Sewer Subprogram S . S . Refuse Subprogram R.F. Transportation Program Streets Subprogram S .T. Walkways/Sidewalks Subprogram W.S . Signs/Signals Subprogram S . I . Parking Facilities Subprogram P.A. Street Lights Subprogram S .L. Parks, Forestry and Pavilion Program Neighborhood Facilities Subprogram N.F. Community Facilities Subprogram C.F. General Public Buildings Program Administrative Offices Subprogram A.O. Maintenance Facilities Subprogram M. F. Fire Facilities Subprogram F.F. Community Center Subprogram C.C. 17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Total Expenditures by Funding Source 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE G.R. 80,000 C.R. 162,000 175,000 88,000 85,000 85,000 P.F. 142,000 2 50,000 T.F. 51,800 204,700 M.S. 2,222,279 591,800 1,759,328 209,700 300,000 S.A. 56,000 372,100 342,100 362,100 150,000 W.F. 1,180,000 775,000 275,000 75,000 75,000 250,000 S.F. 295,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 500,000 S.U. 489,000 271,500 69,500 50,000 50,000 100,000 E.D. 100,000 P.I. 340,000 770,000 300,000 199,800 120,000 G.U. 3,604,219 1,550,000 2,478,937 H.R.A. 100,000 1,400,000 G.A. R.B. TOTAL 8,590,498 5,980,400 5,689,665 1,056,600 555,000 1,534,700 Total for 5 year period (does not include future projects) 21,872,163 KEY General Fund Reserves G.R. Current Revenues,General Fund C.R. Grant-In-Aid G.A. P.I.R/G.O.Bonds P.I. Municipal State-Aid Streets M.S. Private Sector Funds P.F. Revenue Bonds R.B. Real Estate Sales Fund R.E. Special Assessment S.A. Tax Increment Financing T.F. Sewer Fund S.F. Economic Development Fund E.D. Storm Sewer Utility S.U. Water Fund W.F. Refuse Fund R.F. Pavilion Fund P.A. Other Governmental Units G.U. Housing and Redevelopment Authority H.R.A. 18 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FIVE YEAR EXPENDITURE SUMMARY PROG PROJECT FUND CAT. NUMBER PROJECT TITLE SRC 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Util SA-1 Lift Station Reconst SF 130,000 lari arwat, ,'f,w.a,; - „',s guli . „,, » SA-3 Sanitary Sewer Rehab SF 70,000 00Q :.; 12,500 12,500 , :.g t.. .. d 4 -� ' Util SS-1 Storm Drainage , � ``�!� ;, SU �x� .,.,. ., u,.u;-�.� Util SS-2 Storm Water Management Proje SU 125,000 165,000 Util WA-1 e aint Water Towers ' ' ' F l o �.Q �0 O QQO ' , k,- 2'r 14F, Util WA-2 Water Treatment, Elmo Park WF 395,000 Util WA-3 Watermeter Radio i¢ ®e. e y.2�e 200,000 R, yet VVF �� _ �.,», �Y.„� Trans ST-1 Residential Street Improve SA 100,000 66,000 150,000 150,000 Trans 1 3 .71�-4,6-71.> vl ,' ��5,000 2 il.°„»,,,., . 115,000 120,000 120,000 Trans ST-2 Residential Street Improvements SU 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Transr> i 3,' i;<' `` 5'z. 75 000 3. 1, x'5,000 75,000 75,000 Trans SF 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Trans ST-3 Citywide Concrete Ally SA 0 S, 28;000 . e Trans SU 14,000 14,000 7,000 Trans ST7,4 County Rga' mow: r l 1 GU ', 1i ,1 ',n.;9 ,e ,i,,,, z., .k ... ` "; 2 ri ,2,178 937 :_ , � �'� � Trans MS 2,069,279 1,073,578 Trans 1 .: .. k t ,r,k ` , M 15 .44 "'.0 I3'''.l,:,.at',, ter. Y , ... Trans ST-5 Fifth Avenue South SA 50,600 212,100 Trans 0.& liVatPlnllPglfffVrtr!YVTP.:%;MlliligPeltdiilliilVetfiaIPttlfM!' .. 79,800 .'t. ,.4 ISFA Trans MS 78,000 73,600 209,700 Trans � -,? ;� � ��� �' � r _. r� _.._ _w?��.,.->I: .r„ lug:.:_ .:,��4��.��a..�.�.... ,.. _,.�'a?',.;:...r_��r��a.. _� ,. ,�: Trans ST-6 County Road 61 (Shady Oak) GU 1,200 000 1,200,000 321,000 Trans a 4.e' .«�: �,�t.R ,aY �.�, A ff'=.- �,�o��ts!;€. ,,, . 11 »» Trans SA 48,700 Trans ST-..7 � s _7m .t r€ � w s � ", » .. iet. » � V • 197,50Q i M , Trans MS 71,800 85,150 Trans 4 _,iig, l3 - .a?tr3o` _.! ilz, ': Trans ST-8 Streetseape Improv-11th Ay S PI 30,000 135,000 Trans ST-9 Pedestrian CrOS404$ 4,� ,.. »a s '�` 1 !.- ..f g e ;�.. : e`.+ � / �r°r».. la.. :, ,.. Trans ST 10 Second Street NE PI 35,000 Trans . ;$«-, f:4 ... 'z,,!R .,;i, :...; 4fi ,..33 ,n .....^,a Trans ST-11 Lake Street Bridge Replacement GU 300,000 : s °� 3 ' `' , Trans v�?, „,�.,�� ,�,,,,. a,, ,», w' t «.,. <�» , �n» , �� » » i ,�1�.. a., Trans �WF 10,000 Trans _.. $ °V1104;thlaingliirifr, ani, r i °r � .v . VEZiitiliel Trans S1 12 Traffic Signal Upgrade MS 75,000 Trans ST-13 CSAH 73/5 inti ` " Trans GU 350,000 Trans WS-1 Olty Wed,, Y. ,,epair SCR ' r, fit `., l .97* I t,:'J ,. '; 20,00Qy 20,000 Trans PA-1 City Parking Lot Improve PI 250,000 Parks CF-2 Valley Parke v CR .:rzs7 gi""'a »"' ra .,20,000 ° . ,4 ° Parks CF 3 S Oak Beach Redeye! CR 50,000 50,000 Parks CF-4 Central Par) ftli ',U R u 'W. i _ .., ;65,000 Parks CF-5 Skateboard Park PF 125,000 Parks CF-6 Pavilion MezxanO e - ' 7:7-C*--';''; ` 4 Ofi: r Parks CF-7 Downtown Park Improve CR 20,000 Parks CF-8 Regional Trail Conn tons CFc i i f' .Rog i„•,»,'3ltt, -ypi ,A.- i° .3 m Parks CF-9 Excelsior Pedestrian Bridge PI 150,000 150,000 Parks GU 300,000 Bldgs FF-1 Fire Station Roof Maintenance CR 60,000 .:4.A.$1,::',It:;, ,ia;_ >' . g , riii., 3. Bldgs FF-2 Fire station wheelchair lift CR 28,000 Bldgs FF-3 Firesdapt storaggb GR 32,000 r.. � , i ` -.. .. ...., ,,.,, ,,..u,.e..,,. c,-C,._ 3�av§aa�'.�1,�...3az•.9w,...amBY,. 's�.�.s g Bldgs FF-4 City Hall HVAC Control Upgrd CR a70,000 Bldgs MF-1 Public Works"Storage Fcil�; ;11RA ` �fti 'Ris, % t i''„°°0 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 8,590,498 5,980,400 5,689,665 1,056,600 555,000 TOTAL FOR 5 YEAR PERIOD 21,872,163 19 PROPOSED PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE CURRENT REVENUES-GENERAL FUND Trans WS-1 City-Wide Sidewalk Repair C.R. 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Parks CF-2 Valley Park Improvements C.R. 20,000 45,000 Parks CF-3 Shady Oak Beach Redevelopment C.R. 50,000 50,000 Parks CF-4 Central Park Parking Lot C.R. 65,000 CF-7 Downtown Park Improvements C.R. 20,000 CF-B Regional Trail Connections C.R. 15,000 20,000 20,000 Bldgs FF-1 Fire Station Roof Maintenance C.R. 60,000 Bldgs FF-2 Fire Station Wheelchair Lift C.R. 28,000 Bldgs FF-3 Fire Dept Storage Building C.R. 32,000 Bldgs FF-4 City Hall HVAC Control Upgrade C.R. 70,000 TOTAL 162,000 175,000 88,000 85,000 85,000 0 GENERAL RESERVES Parks CF-1 Park Stage G.R. 80,000 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 CABLE TELEVISION FUND TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND Trans PP-3 Sixth St So(11th to 12th Ave So) E.D. 100,000 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 GRANT-IN-AID TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 P.I.R./G.O. BONDS Parks CF-9 Excelsior Pedestrian Bridge P.I. 150,000 150,000 Trans PA-1 City Parking Lot Improvements P.I. 250,000 Trans ST-1 Residential Street Improvements P.I. 135,000 235,000 115,000 120,000 120,000 Trans ST-4 County Road 3 P.I. 100,000 Trans ST-5 Fifth Avenue South P.I. 79,800 Trans ST-8 Streetscape Improve-11th Ave So P.I. 30,000 135,000 Trans ST-10 Second Street NE P.I. 35,000 Trans ST-11 Lake Street Bridge Replacement P.I. 75,000 TOTAL 340,000 770,000 300,000 199,800 120,000 0 MUNICIPAL STATE-AID STREETS Trans ST-4 County Road 3 M.S. 2,069,279 1,073,578 Trans ST-5 Fifth Avenue South M.S. 78,000 73,600 209,700 Trans ST-6 Co Rd 61 -Shady Oak Road M.S. 400,000 321,000 Trans ST-7 Rebuild/Redesign 11th Avenue So. M.S. 71,800 85,150 Trans ST-10 Second Street NE M.S. 206,000 Trans ST-12 Traffic Signal Upgrade M.S. 75,000 ST-13 CSAH 73/5 Intersection M.S. 120,000 Trans PP-3 Sixth St So-11th to 12th Ave So M.S. 300,000 TOTAL 2,222,279 591,800 1,759,328 209,700 0 300,000 PRIVATE SECTOR FUNDS Trans ST-9 Ped Crossing, Second St NE P.F. 17,000 Park CF-5 Skateboard Park P.F. 125,000 Bldgs CF-6 Pavilion Mezzanine P.F. 250,000 TOTAL 142,000 0 250,000 0 0 0 REVENUE BONDS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 I:: 20 1011111111111111111111111111111.11111.1111 PROPOSED PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE 2004 FUTURE 2000 2001 2002 2003 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Trans ST-1 Residential Street Improvements S.A. 100,000 66,000 150,000 150,000 56,000000 S.A. 28,000 212,100 Trans ST-6 County Road 61-Shady Oak Rd Trans ST-3 Citywide Alleys S.A. 56,000 28, Trans ST-5 Fifth Avenueue South h S.A. 48,700 167,400 197,500 150,000 0 Trans ST-7 Redesign/Rebuild 11th AveTOTAL nue South S.A. 56,000 372,100 197,500 362,100 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 51,800 150,000 T.F. Trans ST-5 Fifth Avenue South T.F. 54,700 Trans PP-1 Light Rail Transit Stations(2) T.F. 51,800 0 0 204000 Trans PP-4 Security System Installation 0 0 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER UTILITY S.F. 130,000 150,000 Util SA-1 Lift Station Reconstruction S.F. Util SA-2 Lift Station Reconstruction S.F. 70,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Util SA-3 Sanitary Sewer Rehab75,000 75,000 Trans ST-2 Residential St Improvements-Util S.F. 20,000 350,000 Trans ST-11 Lake Street Bridge Replacement S F 75,000 75,000 500,000 Trans PP-2 Ninth Avenue LRT Corridor S.F. 350,000 TOTAL 295,000 75,000 75,000 STORM SEWER UTILITY 300,000 12,500 12,500 Util SS-1 Storm Drainage System Maintenance S.U. 300,000 165,00015 50,000 50,000 50,0005 6 ,000 50,000 Util SS-2 Storm Water Management Pen S U 7,000 Trans ST-2 Residential Street Improvements S U 14,000 14,000 Trans ST-3 Citywide Concrete Alley S.U. U 30,000 100,000 ST-7 Rebuild/Redesign 11th Ave So S.U. 50,000 50,000 100,000 Trans PP-2 Ninth Avenue LRT Corridor 489,000 271,500 69,500 WATER FUND W F 500,000 500,000 Util WA-1 Repaint Water Towers 395,000 200,000 Util WA-2 Water Treatment Facilities, Elmo Park W.F. 200,0005 200,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Util WA-32Residential Radio Read System W.F. F Trans ST-2 Street Improvements W.F. F 10,000 250,000 ST-11 Lake Street Bridge Replacement W F 75,000 75,000 250,000 Trans PP-2 Ninth Avenue LRT Corridor W.F. 250,000 TOTAL 1,180,000 775,000 275,000 PAVILION FUND 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL OTHER GOVERNMENTAL UNITS G.U. 300,000 CF-9 Excelsior Pedestrian Bridge G U 2,104,219 2,178,930 7 Trans ST-4 County Road 3 G U 1,200,000 1,200,000 ' Trans ST-6 County Road 61 (Shady Oak) G.U. 300,000 Trans ST-11 Lake Street Bridge Replacement350,000 0 0 tG.U. Trans ST 13 CSAR 73/5 Intersection TOTAL 3,604,219 1,550,000 2,478,937 0 C C MF 1 HOUSING&REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 100,000 1,400,000 C Bldgs Public Works Storage FacilityTAL H.R.A. 100,000 1,400,000 TO N 5,689,665 1,056,600 555,000 1,534,700 GRAND TOTAL 8,590,498 5,980,400 21,87 2,163 21 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PROPOSED EXpr'•- PROG PROJECT CAT. NUMBER O co C ' D C CV O N Q O O C CO a Cl) � � 0 _ cl) 0_ E "1 co a) W 0 >- O E Lo co L ITN L- T- O CO cn M CD h a03 � C Y 1,1i = %_. ..... )4 °. y C MS W a) X 44- _+ w O 'S cO c' o co N a m �CD 5 F- O X O W O N O O N O N ER ER 25 26 2000-2004 Capital Improvement Plan Expenditures by Source for 2000 GA $- GR $- TF $- ED O $- RB $- $56,000 SA $100,000 HRA PF 0 $142,000 $162,000 CR €/ SF $295,000 P' $340,000 isimmr SU $489,000 �/ WF $1,180,000 $2,222,279 MS $3,604,219 GU i r i f $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,000,000 Total Expenditures for 2000 $8,590,498 LEGEND GU Other Governmental Units $3,604,219 MS Municipal State-Aid Streets $2,222,279 WF Water Fund $1 ,180,000 SU Storm Sewer $489,000 PI PIR/GO Bonds $340,000 SF Sewer Fund $295,000 CR Current Revenues $162,000 PF Private Sector Funds $142,000 HRA Housing and Redevelopment Authority $100,000 SA Special Assessments $56,000 RB Revenue Bonds $0 ED Economic Development Fund $0 TF Tax Increment $0 GR General Fund Reserves $0 GA Grant-In-Aid $0 $8,590,498 27 28 2000-2004 Capital Improvement Plan Expenditures by Source for 5 Years RB-PE $0 GA $0 GR $0 ED $0 TF 10 $51,800 PF =/ $392,000 SF $595,000 CR 1111P $595,000 SU $930,000 SA 01111_ $1,282,300 HRA-1_,- $1,500,000 PI $1,729,800 $2,380,000 MS $4,783,107 GU $7,633,156 - $0 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 Total Expenditures for 5 Year Period $21 ,872, 163 LEGEND GU Other Governmental Units $7,633,156 MS Municipal State Aid $4,783,107 WF Water Fund $2,380,000 PI P.I.R./G.O. Bonds $1 ,729,800 HRA Housing & Redevelopment Authority $1 ,500,000 SA Special Assessment $1 ,282,300 SU Storm Sewer Utility $930,000 CR Current Revenue $595,000 SF Sewer Fund $595,000 PF Private Sector Funds $392,000 TF Tax Increment $51 ,800 ED Economic Development Fund $0 GR General Fund Reserves $0 GA Grant-In-Aid $0 RB Revenue Bonds $0 $21 ,872,163 29 30 REVENUE PROJECTIONS SHOWING IMPACT OF PROJECTS ON FUNDING SOURCE 31 32 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES CURRENT REVENUES/GENERAL FUND RESERVES Funding of the Fire Station roof maintenance and the vehicle exhaust system in 2000 will increase general fund expenditures by $92,000 or 1.3 %. That would imply that a levy increase will be needed to sustain the general funds current status in order to fund 2000 operating and capital improvement projects. Once the increase is implemented, finance recommends not lowering the levy amount but maintaining this new rate to build the fund balance in the general fund in order to cover future projects without levy increases. GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS—P.I.R FUND Funding from bonds is used up front to pay for construction that will eventually be paid by special assessment collections, over a 10-20 year span,and the City's share (levy) of construction projects. The P.I.R. working capital will decrease substantially over the next few years with the construction of County Rd. 3 and all the other projects that have been planned. The potential of recouping landfill work costs from the PCA and rising repayments of special assessments will help its' funding level. The city has not issued P.I.R bonds since 1992. We will issue $850,000 in P.I.R bonds in the fall of 1999. In addition to these bonds, we will need to issue approximately $1,000,000 and $850,000 of P.I.R. bonds in 2001 and 2003 respectively. The bonds will be paid from special assessments' and property tax levies for projects started between 1999 through 2004. Finance does not anticipate a need to increase the current debt service levy of$330,000 a year. MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUND Funding is sufficient for the projects listed in the CIP document through 2001, and then the unencumbered allotment will be at a deficit until the year 2005. It may be necessary to sell MSA bonds in order to maintain the construction schedule or request an advance on future allotments from the state. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FUNDS Considering all tax increment districts as a whole, cash on hand, increments above debt service, and loan repayments are sufficient to cover these projects. 33 WATER FUND Several large facility upgrades scheduled from 1999 through 2001 will require rate increases periodically. In prior years an ample cash balance had been nurtured in anticipation of the several needed projects. Now into the upgrade stage, a rate increase in 1997 was approved and an additional $.10 is proposed in the year 2000. This modest rate increase will be necessary to maintain the planned projects and to pay off bonds that will be necessary to provide funding for these projected C.I.P. projects. Without issuing revenue bonds, this fund will have a negative working capital balance from the year 2000 and beyond. SANITARY SEWER FUND The low magnitude of capital needs over the next 5-year period will facilitate this fund in building its' working capital balance to offset any unforeseen changes of charges from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Those charges appear to have stabilized for the present. Further analysis of projected sewer projects and the associated rates has prompted a rate decrease in 1999 from $2.50 per 1,000 gallons to $2.25 per 1,000 gallons. The new rate is reflected in the projected operating income. REFUSE FUND This fund continues to increase its working capital balance each year. The planned purchase of a new refuse truck in 1999 will slightly decrease the working capital balance in 1999. This should be recouped in the following years as long as we continue to receive the $30,000 grant each year from Hennepin County. The volume base rate change in 1995 continues to reduce the operating profits of past years. A rate change is not proposed at this time. STORM SEWER FUND The heavy construction over the past several years necessitates a variable temporary interfund loan each year. The CIP anticipates the continued pace of construction through 2001. The continued need for projects each year is not allowing the fund to attain a positive cash flow. The city implemented a storm sewer rate increase in 1998 of$.40 per residential equivalency factor, (REF). It became apparent that this was not going to be enough to cover the past projects and the future projects. The city implemented a rate swap between the Sanitary Sewer fund and the Storm Sewer fund thereby increasing the storm sewer rate to $12.00 per ref up from $9.60. This rate adjustment had minimal affect on residents and businesses in the city. The rate change will bring needed cash flow to the Storm Sewer fund and allow the city to issue revenue bonds in 1999 to make this fund positive. The rate increase changes the total monthly charge for households to$4 per month up from $3.20. No future rate changes are perceived at this time. 34 o t O O ,:3 N O O N 00 t` �D --- v) N 0. M V1 ON 0000 O CT a, - N .N-i 0000 N N 6 9 N kr) N r- t- N N O 0 U N 01 MN N O O N Vl l� N wa) 00 N r- O N OT d' in v1 N k0 N a) �O O 00 N M Nr N. 0000 N 000 N 00 00 00 l p N• �h N N N N N N �en re) 2-4 - 00 O\ O\ O O N �O vD Cr N ..N oN 'p '.0 O O O M '.0 v] .O M(0 qO N v) 00 00 O O �O p 0 - Z. O O N �n '.D ¢ N OHO oo O V�1 M -M-" OHOoo kr) M O W w N C N N t� N N a) -1.+ 0 VI O >>C.) Ci) O N 00 M •-+ ..... O O N re) OM c� cd' O �n 00 d O O O t` N a) �; Q. N �p [ - o� O O 00 t� .N-. \ ++ O W O N en �O 0. M M N — O y M yat S N 00 N O en en d N N v w t7 y .� 00 O •-• 00 a o N en t-- t- N N a) 0 O a N 0. V1 in O O O O O N t--- Y 69 ,_., ' ed N OT N N O O VO •-- cO O .4▪ O� crN d- Op . ' kr) kr) .4- 0000 U a) A O N N 00 O en 00 M et 5 1-+ 5 00 00A N d M N N N N U 0C eto N N MMO O N V O M O O O O '.0 M N ) •z a) 0 O N O M V N N N Cl y1 N O N 00 M O en N - d' 00 en 'I N ti j, f1 N 1 M N N N N Q c� Q . V) a) W a) N U = U > W a) • 4 el 14 0 V a O h LL i...1 ^' �Oal W `" ami O p W [s. O E- z o U < W W y U 00 4-al 00 a) a> ° b 0 o • o a o co H ¢ U 3 CI 35 • kr) CO co co 0 �O 0 M co O O 000 co 0000 0 0 oo .1- O —. O co O tri (5 O kr) V) vl -: O M 00 N v N �O M NN 00N N M Co O O O O - 0 N 0 0 0 00 CT 0 CT N 0 N 0 O 00 co 00 cr O 0 0 M 0 0 f N N N N M N• - N - 't N M N d © 0 © c© 00 O O O — ,t O V) 0 0 O N 00 O 0 N 00 00 M Cr) O Oo C\ O O 0 t co oo N 0 N 'n 0 ' vi o0 - O oo en o0 M co M N N 0 N `� N M M 00 N N .--, CTO N 00 CTO OOMN O N - 0 0 ,.,., O CT 0 N M �O O N .� 0 M st N M N - � 0000 O N• N - st M tet' N C O' en '.D en en N 00 O M 0 N 0 sr) kr) 0 r--, O 0 0 '.p _O 0? C CA O N. 00 CA en .-- oo 0 C1 O O 0 vo M N en en en cu N C\ r-- - 0000 O0 - tr.) M N CA N 5 74CD ti) RS CO Fi oo E ... 0. OO NO O - O — O 0 NQ O N N 0 0 00 0 en NN N N r, 4 p v5 N en 0 M N N N D, eq r:4 .-� N kr)0. U en p oo en O kel 00 ON 0 VD N N 0 00 0 0 0 kr) -M, O M '.° O O O •ch N M O N M 'I- 00 N N 00 N M k •-••1 N 00 00 .--i O ca) rn Iii a) a) CO = Q -0 bA > Q W i. al W ami aa) C ••,:,, W C >* v cd U g as 0 U Ucn °� E U 00 Q W to to Q o 0 C CD o. bin 3 acn o 0 0 a = U 3 �' ° S v) S Li oa Q 3 36 kr) 00 0 0 0` I in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NO N O O. 4 N N 2 In 0 0 00 0 in O0 O O O O O O M O O. N N .-. .6� .-. �n O 0 O O In In O O 0 O O O O kr)Z o00 M O O d' VD N FSI F co) acn N 0 0 © © 0 kr) a [7] On d en M l� en 'r CO K7. CC l en N N �-, pF� U d U F 0 , OO 0 0 WI N O O O O 0 0 M z0 l— — vi O © M O N � d' r— —. O, O ,-1 O N l- en N 0 CO E .__0 '.o O O 0 0 0 0 0 © © 0 0 >i.... W 0 enenv © 000 NN N F 0. N vl N in O - © .--i — .-. F va Wtr, OO O k F q O O O O O 3 N In 0 M N — N en d' .-� .--i V1 a) 5 H a.) o a w cZ a) 45 U N o O. .U o 0 00 O - 41 O o a F = -" t" c" c" ds w --- 0 -0 0 o. 4 0 'Cl- en 0 0 ¢ CCI C.,)v v A 3 a` � -. N 37 cn N ., O 0 0 O v, o\O,^ O 0 CT O Vtri N' r---tri O vo O N o N v) .--, v? N VD d 01 0 0 O 01 O 0 0\ VD � 01 O O C^ O vi vi vi O vi O r O O R NO -1' N -- O © N N ., d' 0 O O gt rY N O 0 N N O 0 0 0 CT CT MO CT 0 0 CT CN 000• - N O 1- O co Ti: ,M_, O N N N CN 0 0 0 0 0 VD N CT O O O CT Qn o O o, z 0 O vi O N 00 vO O d' ON vl N .---' 00 .-r .-' ,_., N i..0 M .--' VI N cd z o O .1. O 0 H Oo a N 0 (U N N 0 0 CTO M.-O- O0 0 O OT M --, O\ 0 0 Oa\^ ri O O O O ooO O 00 cl �"N ? a) 00 .0 '.p a) t:C1 Eno as CT 0 0 0 0 0 i O CT o O o CN U o o\ O o CN o� vi o a; o O O M ' N N NO 0 N N O O 1 3 , . . . ..i. a N 00 0 N W C O N Q\ q M• ( 0 O 0'4M w N OM W ^" W • `� oA C) O a) 0 0 0 a) °co CC w at al Ti I. 7t1 O N O Ual 0 U o N U U 0 �bA ° c� csNn � sN9 •to cts ° cn c� � sR o la a o ooc000rna � c b g 0 00 ch < r) U xa, � o, a, a, ¢ � U 3 x ° � C 38 en oo 0 k 0 0 en 0.3 o r o - o o r M q& — - N 0 - 00 0 0 en N - \ / / •— 0 / - 0 en 0 0 N 7 en r- 0 o e 0 0 en en o ® en en en 3 0 1- % M r N — — 00 0 3 � 0 0 - 0 I 0 0 0 $ 05' en 2 — 0 r f M r M - U � % N O m 0 ' 0 0 0 0 00 N 0 - 0 2 k « « i s o - 2 ^ - / 'Zr - N S - c) Q d U oo 0N N el 0 0 N 0 5 < c r- o 0\ ' / / / / $ N 0 / N4.1 0 0 en 0 't Cg CC - W .-M. 00 kr2 0 / W 2 ,:d . . » • A. / § $ J %% • ) 2 2 00 c .50 c c /{ / / L4 R $ 0 R * 'A 0 ) ( § 2 `R 0 07 r o c o c o ƒ ( ( / \ / \ - • 0.0 / a \ / G. m ƒƒ � @R •& $ $a o ON ? ON 7 / / a a a a a / U U 39 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS 41 42 UTILITIES 43 44 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Utilities Lift Station Reconstruction SA-1 $130,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Sewer Fund SF 130,000 Location: Lift Station 6 - 8456 Excelsior Boulevard DESCRIPTION: Reconstruction and repair of Lift Station #6 ($130,000) - 2000 Work is scheduled to coincide with or precede the proposed Excelsior Boulevard improvements. JUSTIFICATION: Certain lift stations have been identified in need of reconstruction or repair. Various reasons such as safety concerns, pumping capacity, condition and obsolete parts contributed to this need. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Lift Station 6: Plans and Specifications 1999 Bid & Construction 2000 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with Water and Sewer Master Plan approved in 1990. 45 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Utilities Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation SA-3 $70,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Sewer Fund SF 70,000 LOCATION: 3rd Street North between 11th-14th Avenues. DESCRIPTION: Replace existing 8" diameter clay pipe sanitary main with 12" diameter plastic pipe. Pipe will be replaced by using "Pipe Bursting" technique. No street excavation will be done. JUSTIFICATION: The current pipe is in poor condition with much root prenetration. The pipe is at or near capacity in flow and may account for some sewage backups. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Plans and specifications 1999 Bid and construction 2000 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with water and sewer master plan approved in 1990. 46 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Utilities Storm Drainage System Maintenance SS-1 $325,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Storm Sewer SU 300,000 12,500 12,500 LOCATION: 2000 - Thermotech site 2001 - Nine Mile Creek DESCRIPTION: 2000 - Install new pipe between Nine Mile Creek and Thermotech ponds ($300,000). 2001/2002 - Stabilize creek banks of Nine Mile Creek headwaters and provide maintenance access to Creek ($25,000). JUSTIFICATION: The Thermotech project replaces a deteriorated and collapsing pipe between Nine Mile Creek and a series of storm detention ponds. This project completes a larger scale storm improvement begun in 1992. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: 2000 Project Plans and specifications 1999 Bid and construct 2000 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with the Storm Water Management Plan. 47 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Utilities Storm Water Management Projects SS-2 $290,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Storm Sewer SU 125,000 165,000 LOCATION: 2000 - Monroe Avenue/Second Street NE 2001 - Shady Oak pond and First Street North (18th Avenue North to Shady Oak pond) DESCRIPTION: 2000 - Enhance ditch system capacity from Monroe Avenue North intersection to Auborn Townhomes. Create new detention pond facility. 2001 - Provide outlet pipe to Shady Oak Pond into Minnetonka, lower 18th Avenue/First Street North intersection, install new pipe in First Street North from 18th Avenue to Shady Oak pond. JUSTIFICATION: The Monroe Avenue/Second Street NE intersection is prone to localized flooding and there is threat to homes in the neighborhood. Shady Oak pond has no outlet and floods streets and residential property if not pumped. Intersection lowering and new pipe to Shady Oak pond will alleviate flooding in alley and private property in the #10 block between 17th/18th Avenues North. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: 2000 Projects 2001 Projects Plans and specifications 1999 Plans and specifications 2000 Bid and construction 2000 Bid and construction 2001 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with City Council approved Action Plan of October 21, 1997, the City's Storm Management Plan, and Shady Oak Road reconstruction timetable. 48 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Utilities Repaint Water Towers WA-1 $1,000,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 FUTURE Water Fund WF 500,000 500,000 LOCATION: Moline Tower, 10421 Excelsior Boulevard Blake Tower, 151 Tyler Avenue South DESCRIPTION: Repaint Moline water tower 2000 Repaint Blake water tower 2001 JUSTIFICATION: The Moline and Blake towers are showing signs of rusting under the exterior paint, and should be repainted. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Bid and repaint 2000 (Moline) Bid and repaint 2001 (Blake) RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Normal repaint for Moline tower in 2000. Normal repaint for Blake tower in 2001. 49 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Utilities Water Treatment Facilities, Elmo Park WA-2 $395,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Water Fund WF 395,000 LOCATION: 1401 Elmo Park Service Drive DESCRIPTION: Reconstruction/repair of the water treatment facilities at the Elmo Park site. JUSTIFICATION: The present facility is in need of repair and upgrading to improve utilization and efficiency. Several safety related items need attention. Improvements include new filter media and backwash retention tank. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Plans and Specifications 1999 Bid and Construct 2000 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with water and sewer master plan approved in 1990. Project moved back to 1999/2000 due to 1998 SCADA implementation, storage tank paint projects. 50 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Utilities Watermeter Radio Read System WA-3 $600,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Water Fund WF 200,000 200,000 200,000 LOCATION: City wide DESCRIPTION: Install a radio read system on the watermeters JUSTIFICATION: The system will allow the Finance Department to move from a quarterly billing system to a monthly utility bill. The monthly billing system has benefits for both the City and the customers. It will provide a better cash flow for the City, and smaller monthly bills for the customer. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: 1999: Phase I installation in Bel!grove, Knollwood, and Drillane neighborhoods RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: 51 52 TRANSPORTATION 53 54 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation Residential Street Improvements ST-1 $1,191,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Sp Assess SA 100,000 66,000 150,000 150,000 Perm Improve PI 135,000 235,000 115,000 120,000 120,000 LOCATION: 2000 Mill/Overlay 11th Avenue North from Mainstreet to 1st Street North 9th Avenue South from Mainstreet to Co Rd 3 2001 Reconstruction 2nd Street North from Shady Oak Road to 21st Avenue North 16th Avenue from 1st Street North to 2nd Street North Partial Reconstruction 14th Avenue North from 4th Street North to South Service Drive Mill/Overlay 8th Avenue from 1st Street North to Co Rd 3 2002 Partial Reconstruction 1st Street North from 17th Avenue to Shady Oak Road DESCRIPTION: Program to improve streets needing repair or reconstruction as indicated by street condition survey, or as part of an area street improvement. Justification: Pavement Management analysis shows a minimum $300,000 street improvement commitment (sealcoating, mill/overlays, reconstruction) to maintain current overall street conditions and backlog. The numbers assume a 70% assessed and 30% general city share of costs for reconstruction projects and 100% city costs for sealcoat and mill/overlay projects. Sealcoat project costs budgeted in street maintenance budget. Costs for sanitary sewer and water main reconstruction are not shown. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Public Hearing - year prior to planned construction Plans and Specifications - year prior to planned construction Bid and Assessment - year of planned construction RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with the City Council adopted Roadway Improvement Policy, street ratings, and Pavement Management Program. 55 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation Residential Street Improvements - Utilities ST-2 $1,000,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Storm Sewer SU 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Water Fund WF 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Sewer Fund SF 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 LOCATION: Locations to be determined as they are consistent with the street reconstruction program. DESCRIPTION: Program to reconstruct deteriorated water main and sanitary sewer and to provide storm sewer improvements in conjunction with street improvement projects. JUSTIFICATION: In most cases where street reconstruction takes place, storm sewer facilities either need upgrading or need to be installed new. In some cases, water main and sanitary sewer need to be rehabilitated in conjunction with street reconstruction. The numbers assume the City funding 100% of major storm sewer, water main, and sanitary sewer construction/ reconstruction. These costs are to be used in conjunction with street reconstruction costs shown on ST-1. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Public Hearing - year prior to planned construction Plans and Specifications - year prior to planned construction Bid - year of planned construction RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with the Storm Water Management Plan, Water and Sewer Utility Master Plan, and television inspections. 56 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation Citywide Concrete Alleys ST-3 $175,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Sp Assessment SA 56,000 56,000 28,000 Storm Sewer SU 14,000 14,000 7,000 LOCATION: 2000: Alley between 17th/18th Avenues North, 1st/2nd Streets North Alley between 7th/8th Avenues North, 1st Street/Mainstreet 2001: Alley between 5th/6th Avenues North, 2nd/3rd Streets North Alley between Shady Oak Road and City limits, north of Bradford Road 2002: Alley west of 19th Avenue North, north of 3rd Street North DESCRIPTION: Program to construct concrete alleys in areas designated as poor on the Alley Condition Survey. JUSTIFICATION: The City has had a policy of constructing concrete alleys for a number of years. This policy has proved to be sound by the concrete alleys' durability and low maintnenance costs. The Alley Condition Survey indicates there are approximately 8,000 feet of alley in poor condition. The estimated cost to rebuild these alleys is $350,000 over six years. Current policy has the City share at 20% of the cost in residential areas. The amount recommended would allow the City to complete reconstruction of the alleys (currently rated as poor) by the year 2002. The City will experience cost savings due to lower maintenance costs. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Approximately 1250 feet per year for four years. Public Hearing - year prior to project Plans, Specifications, Bid, Construction - year of project. RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with the City Council adopted Roadway Improvement Policy and Alley ratings. 57 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation County Road 3 ST-4 57,526,013 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Other Gvmnt GU 2,104,219 2,178,937 Muni St Aid MS 2,069,279 1,073,578 Perm Improve PI 100,000 Note: GO bond payments to be financed by a combination of existing TIF revenue, Municipal State Aid road funds, additional TIF revenue created by economic development, grant funds and, as a last resort, general City revenue. LOCATION: County Road 3 from Shady Oak Road to Meadowbrook Road. DESCRIPTION: Lighting, landscaping, street, etc. improvements along Excelsior Boulevard from the east to west city limits. JUSTIFICATION: Deficiencies in terms of roadway condition, traffic/pedestrian movement, safety and aesthetics appear in all four segments of County Road 3: o Segment 1 from Shady Oak Road to 11th Avenue South Upgrade existing undivided roadway, upgrade 11th Avenue intersection to meet future needs, implement beautification program. o Segment 2 from 11th Avenue South to Hwy 169 Upgrade roadway, implement beautification program. o Segment 3 from Hwy 169 to Blake Road Upgrade existing narrow undivided roadway, resolve safety issues at railroad crossing, improve north-south access, account for future LRT access, address redevelopment needs. o Segment 4 from Blake Road to Meadowbrook Road Upgrade roadway, implement beautification program. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Segment 1 Segment 3 Construction 1998/1999 Planning and Acquisition 1998/1999 Bidding/Construction 1999/2000/2001 Segment 2 Segment 4 Planning 1999 Planning and Acquisition 2001 Bidding and Construction 2000 Bidding and Construction 2002 (Median upgrades only) RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with Hennepin County CIP and Council action. 58 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation Fifth Avenue South ST-5 $755,600 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Sp Assess SA 50,600 212,100 Perm Improve PI 79,800 Mncpl State Ad MS 78,000 73,600 209,700 TIF TF 51,800 LOCATION: 2000 - Fifth Avenue from County Road 3 to Third Street South 2002 - Fifth Avenue from Mainstreet to County Road 3 2003 - Fifth Avenue from T.H. 7 to Mainstreet DESCRIPTION: 2000 - Upgrade Fifth Avenue from County Road 3 to Third Street South to serve needs of redeveloped Hennepin County Public Works site and Metro Transit Park/Ride. 2002 - Resurfacing and partial reconstruction of Fifth Avenue from Mainstreet to County Road 3. Includes lighting and landscaping requirements. 2003 - Resurfacing and partial reconstruction of Fifth Avenue from T.H. 7 to Mainstreet. Includes sidewalk north of Minnetonka Mills Road. JUSTIFICATION: Fifth Avenue was last graded and surfaced to its 44 foot width in 1964. The roadway is showing extreme wear and stress and its age alone indicates its condition on the downward side of the pavement deterioration curve. Fifth Avenue is a major access route to Mainstreet from County Road 3. As such it should be afforded the same amenities or theme treatment as those installed on Mainstreet. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: 2000 Projects Plans and specifications 1999 Bid and construction 2000 2002 Projects Plans and specifications 2001 Bid and construction 2002 2003 Projects Plans and specifications 2002 Bid and construction 2003 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with the City Roadway lmrovement Policy, street condition ratings, State Aid CIP, and County Road 3 reconstruction timetable. 59 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation County Road 61 (Shady Oak Road) ST-6 $3,169,700 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Other Units GU 1,200,000 1,200,000 Mncpl State Aid MS 400,000 321,000 Sp Assess SA 48,700 Note: GO bond payments to be financed by a combination of existing TIF revenue, Municipal State Aid road funds, additional TIF revenue created by economic development, grant funds and, as a last resort, general City revenue. LOCATION: Shady Oak Road from County Road 3 to T.H. 7, Mainstreet from 20th Avenue to Shady Oak Road DESCRIPTION: Lighting, landscaping, street, etc., improvements from County Road 3 to T.H. 7 Reconstruction and amenities on Mainstreet from 20th Avenue to Shady Oak Road. JUSTIFICATION: Deficiencies appear on Shady Oak Road in terms of roadway conditions, traffic/pedestrian movement, safety, and aesthetics. Upgrade an undivided roadway, resolve safety issues with number of driveway access points and intersection at Mainstreet. Lighting needs upgrading and provide beautification program. Reconstruction of Mainstreet for 1 block section needs to be done to conclude the upgrading of all of Mainstreet. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Planning and Acquisition 2000 Bidding and Construction 2001/2002 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with Hennepin County CIP, City's desire to upgrade the roadway, and reconstruction program for all of Mainstreet. 60 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation Rebuild/Redesign 11th Avenue South ST-7 $551,850 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Sp Assess SA 167,400 197,500 Mun State Aid MS 71,800 85,150 Storm Sewer SU 30,000 LOCATION: Segments: 2001 - Westbrooke Way to Smetana 2002 - Soo Line Bridge to Westbrooke Way DESCRIPTION: Segments 1 and 2: Improve pavement condition, curbing and drainage, incorporate sidewalk/trail improvements. Connect storm sewer to Westbrooke Patio Homes proposed system in Segment 1. JUSTIFICATION: Partial reconstruction is necessary to replace section of tipped curb to improve drainage. Section of storm sewer may need to be upgraded because of neighborhood flooding issues south of Westbrooke Way. Surface condition can be upgraded with milling and overlay procedure. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: 2001 Project 2002 Project Plans and specifications 2000 Plans and specifications 2001 Bids and construction 2001 Bids and construction 2002 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with City roadway improvement policy. 61 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation Streetscape Improvements-11th Avenue South ST-8 $165,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Perm Improve PI 30,000 135,000 LOCATION: 11th Avenue South, First Street South to Mainstreet DESCRIPTION: Streetscape improvements to visually tie Mainstreet to upgraded Excelsior Boulevard. Work includes lighting, sidewalk, and landscaping. Mill and overlay street surface JUSTIFICATION: An improved 11th Avenue corridor is needed to provide an enhanced connection between Excelsior Boulevard and the central business district. Street surface shows distress and degradation due to many utility patches. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Planning/Design: 2000 Construction: 2001 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Provides consistent transition between Mainstreet and Excelsior Boulevard streetscape themes. 62 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation Pedestrian Crossing, Second Street N.E. ST-9 $17,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Private Funding PF 17,000 LOCATION: Second Street N.E., between Jackson Avenue and Tyler Avenue North DESCRIPTION: Install upgraded pedestrian crossing, including pedestrian signs, poles, flashers, cabinet, and power. JUSTIFICATION: Pedestrian crossing flashers are needed for the crosswalk at the main entrance to Alliant-Tech Systems. There have been numerous vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at this heavily-used crosswalk. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Construction: 2000 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: 63 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation Second Street N.E. ST-10 $241,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Perm Improve PI 35,000 Mncpl State Aid MS 206,000 LOCATION: Second Street N.E. between Blake Road and T.H. 169 DESCRIPTION: Improvements to Second Street N.E. between Blake Road and Tyler Street involving the installation of landscaping and lighting. Mill and overlay and partial reconstruction, if necessary, of Second Street N.E. between Blake Road and T.H. 169. JUSTIFICATION: Concerns have been expressed by the adjacent residential neighborhood regarding the appearance and condition of this street. This street is abutted by major industrial users as well as residential units that utilize Second Street for vehicular access or pedestrian access. The current roadway condition index indicates moderate decline that can be reversed with bituminous milling and overlay. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: 2001 - Plans and specifications 2002 - Bids and construction RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with sidewalk plan and City's pavement management program. 64 1 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation Lake Street Bridge Replacement ST-11 $405,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Other Govt Units GU 300,000 Perm Improve PI 75,000 Water Fund WF 10,000 Sewer Fund SF 20,000 LOCATION: Lake Street NE at Minnehaha Creek DESCRIPTION: Replace existing deteriorated bridge with new concrete girder span bridge including concrete approach panels, sidewalks, and railings. JUSTIFICATION: Existing bridge is 92 years old with a sufficiency rating of 34. A rating of less than 50 is required to be eligible for federal bridge replacement funds. The west concrete abutment is severely deteriorated and the concrete railings have heavy spalling of concrete. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Design 1999 Construction 2000 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Replace when state transportation funds are available 65 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation Traffic Signal Upgrade ST-12 $75,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Muni State Aid MS 75,000 LOCATION: Mainstreet and 17th Avenue DESCRIPTION: Upgrade of current signalized intersection with mast-arm traffic light. Enhance visibility of traffic lights. JUSTIFICATION: Current traffic light installation is perceived to be confusing and a safety hazard because lights are not visible. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Design 1999 Construction 2000 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Response to residents repeated requests. 66 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation CSAH 73/CSAH 5 Intersection ST-13 $470,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Muni State Aid MS 120,000 Other Gov Units GU 350,000 LOCATION: CSAH 73/CSAH 5 intersection DESCRIPTION: Construct intersection improvements including traffic signals, modified geometrics, pedestrian ways, and landscaping to: o Improve pedestrian safety o Improve vehicular and traffic flow and eliminate confusion at the intersection o Improve intersection aesthetics JUSTIFICATION: The existing 4-way stop and poor geometrics have contributed to long-standing problems, including safety concerns for pedestrians, local and regional traffice and the adjoining residential properties and neighborhood area. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Preliminary planning 1999 Design 1999/2000 Construction 2001 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Constructs citizen task force recommended, City Council approved intersection improvements. 67 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation City Parking Lot Improvements PA-1 $250,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Perm Improve PI 250,000 LOCATION: 2001: Lots 500 and 600 DESCRIPTION: Redesign and reconstruct City Lots 500 and 600 north of Mainstreet between 9th and 11th Avenues North. JUSTIFICATION: Lots 500 and 600 are on or approaching a critical point on a deterioration curve. Seal coats and crack sealing will not redeem them. Mill and overlay are a minimum improvement needed. Project costs noted above are for total replacement of the bituminous pavement and curb installation. To address downtown parking issues an analysis is recommended for 2000, a feasibility report in 2000, and possible construction beyond what is here recommended in 2001. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Lots 500 and 600 Plan - 1999/2000 Bid and Construction - 2001 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Lots 500 and 600 improvements based on comprehensive parking analysis. 68 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation City-Wide Sidewalk Repair WS-1 $100,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Current CR 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Revenues LOCATION: City-Wide DESCRIPTION: Perform sidewalk maintenance on all public sidewalks and construct ADA improvements. Zone 4 1999 Zone 1 2000 Zone 2 2001 Zone 3 2002 Zone 4 2003 JUSTIFICATION: Routine sidewalk maintenance is necessary to ensure sidewalks are safe for pedestrian use. Maintenance is also necessary to remove hazards that may cause an injury and result in the City being held liable for the injury. Yearly projects will call for replacement of intersection pedestrian ramps that fall below accessibility standards as set down by the Americans With Disabilities Act. URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Plan/Bid/Contract - Each Year •ELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with overall maintenance of general public infrastructure. 69 70 PARKS & RECREATION d 71 7 2 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Park & Rec Valley Park Improvements CF-2 $65,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Current CR 20,000 45,000 Revenues LOCATION: Valley Park DESCRIPTION: Parking Addition (20,000) 2002 Hockey Rink Upgrade (45,000) 2003 USTIFICATION: Parking Addition Valley Park is getting more use each year as a community park; as these uses grow, the demand for additional parking is created. URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: •ELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with Park Board adopted Park Guidelines and CIP Priority List of 4/20/90. 73 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Park & Rec Shady Oak Beach Redevelopment CF-3 $100,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE General Fund CR 50,000 50,000 Reserves LOCATION: Shady Oak Beach DESCRIPTION: The 1994 Shady Oak Beach study identified structural and ADA problems. A Shady Oak Beach master plan was developed and associated improvements approved by the cities of Minnetonka and Hopkins. Phase I work, completed in 1996, included demolition of deep water docks, purchase of new, removable deep water dock system and construction of a fishing pier and canoe launch area. Phase II work began in September of 1997 and includes a reconfigured entrance drive and 175 space parking lot, new changing/restroom/entry control buildings, new concession/life guard station building, upgraded picnic shelter, canoe/paddle boat rental area, sanitary sewer system upgrade and other beach improvements. JUSTIFICATION: All beach improvements will be agreed upon with the City of Minnetonka. CIP funding must be identified to allow Hopkins to participate in the joint redevelopment of Shady Oak Beach. Based on the traditional 2/3 Minnetonka, 1/3 Hopkins participation, the $1,685,000 project will cost Hopkins $561,000, budgeted over five years from 1997-2001 . CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: 1996: Phase I work completed Phase II design 1997: Phase II work began in September 1998: Phase II work completed by August 1 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with Park Board adopted resolution regarding a joint study. 74 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Park & Rec Central Park Parking Lot CF-4 $65,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Current CR 65,000 Revenues LOCATION: North side of Central Park, west of volleyball courts. DESCRIPTION: Number of parking stalls - 31 Handicap/van access stalls - 2 USTIFICATION: Current parking lot is 25 years old and has deteriorated quickly in the last several years. Poor drainage (no storm sewer) and no permanent curbing has accelerated this deterioration. URRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Design: 2003 Construction: 2004 ELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with Park Board maintenance standards. 75 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Park & Rec Skateboard Park CF-5 $125,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Private Funding PF 125,000 LOCATION: Highway 169 overpass at 3rd Street South DESCRIPTION: Recreational facility for skateboarding and in-line skating. JUSTIFICATION: Community need identified by Hopkins Jaycees. Proposed grant to city to pay for construction. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Design: 1999 Construction: 2000 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: 76 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE Park & Rec NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Pavilion Mezzanine CF-6 FUNDING S250,000 SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Private Funds PF 250,000 LOCATION: Pavilion, 11000 Excelsior Boulevard DESCRIPTION: Install elevator to mezzanine, and install the floor, ceiling, partitions, sprinkler system and other items in this area. !JUSTIFICATION: The original construction of the Pavilion provided the rough-in features for the mezzanine area. The plan is to finish off this area so it could be used for City and athletic functions. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Non-ranked on Park Board priority list. 77 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Park & Rec Downtown Park Improvements CF-7 $20,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Current CR 20,000 Revenues LOCATION: Downtown Park Pavers DESCRIPTION: Remove and replace center red concrete area of Downtown Park with pavers and new benches. JUSTIFICATION: Existing concrete is cracked, posing tripping hazards. Benches in need of replacement. Existing benches are 20 years old. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Unscheduled RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: 78 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Park & Rec Regional Trail Connections CF-8 $55,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Current CR 15,000 20,000 20,000 Revenues LOCATION: Develop various intra-city connections to existing regional trails DESCRIPTION: Park Board is currently identifying trail connections that could be developed beginning in the year 2001 . JUSTIFICATION: Safe intra-city connections to the expanding use patterns on the regional trails is necessary. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Unscheduled RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Regional trail plan under review 79 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Park & Rec Excelsior Pedestrian Bridge CF-9 $600,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Perm Improv PI 150,000 150,000 Other Govt Units GU 300,000 LOCATION: 5th Avenue at Excelsior Boulevard DESCRIPTION: Park Board endorsed, feasibility study underway. JUSTIFICATION: Feasibility study should help determine if these funds will be necessary. Matching funds with Hennepin Parks, Metro Transit, and possibly Hennepin County or MnDOT will be required. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Complete feasibility study: 1999 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Plans shown as a part of proposed Metro Transit Park and Ride. Feasibility study under way. 80 GENERAL PUBLIC BUILDINGS 81 82 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Gen Pub Bldg Fire Station Roof Maintenance FF-1 $60,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Current CR 60,000 Revenues LOCATION: Hopkins City Hall 1010 First Street South DESCRIPTION: Roof maintenance on the Fire Station in 2000. JUSTIFICATION: Repair/replace this 35 year old roof. Periodic roof maintenance necessary to retain integrity of building. This is a flat roof of built up pitch tar type construction. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Plan/Bid/Contract - 2000 (Fire Station) RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with overall maintenance of general public buildings. 83 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Pub Bldg Fire Station Wheelchair Lift FF-2 $28,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Current CR 28,000 Revenues LOCATION: Fire Station DESCRIPTION: Fire Station wheelchair lift. JUSTIFICATION: Wheelchair access is required to the 2nd floor per the Americans with Disabilities Act. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Plan/Bid/Contract in 2002 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with the Fires Station remodeling project. 84 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Gen Pub Bldg Fire Station Vehicle Exhaust System FF-3 $32,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Current CR 32,000 Revenues LOCATION: Fire Station DESCRIPTION: Fire Station vehicle exhaust system. JUSTIFICATION: OSHA is requiring an upgrade of existing occupancies where vehicles may omit fumes and carbon monoxide within a building. Since upgrading most of the trucks to diesel fuel, this problem has become more apparent. An exhaust system would also help keep the station cleaner and avoid health problems with Fire and City Hall personnel. This will also keep the recently painted fire station cleaner. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: This project should be done prior to our next OSHA inspection to avoid any citations or fines. RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with the Fire Station remodel plan. 85 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Gen Pub Bldg City Hall HVAC Control Upgrade FF-4 $70,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Current CR 70,000 Revenues LOCATION: Hopkins City Hall 1010 First Street South DESCRIPTION: Upgrade of current pneumatic heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system at City Hall. JUSTIFICATION: The current HVAC system for City Hall and the police station needs to be upgraded. Our present system is a very complicated air operated system that needs constant monitoring in order to heat and cool City hall. By upgrading the controls, we could adjust the system for better efficiency and comfort with a potential for savings in heating and cooling costs. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Specifications - 2000 Installation - 2001 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: 86 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Gen Pub Bldg Public Works Storage Facility MF-1 $1,500,000 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Housing/ HRA 100,000 1,400,000 Redevelop Auth LOCATION: 1 1 100 Excelsior Boulevard DESCRIPTION: Public Works vehicle storage building JUSTIFICATION: Scope of project is to remove building number 2 and construct a new 200 X 106 heated storage building. Utilize building number 3, the current street equipment storage building, for salt and sand storage. Current buildings are over 50 years old and will be in need of major renovations in the near future. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Plans and specifications: Year prior to construction Bid: Year of construction RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: 87 88 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES FOR FUTURE PROJECTS 89 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Utilities Lift Station Reconstruction SA-2 $0 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Sewer Fund SF 150,000 LOCATION: Sanitary Sewer Lift Station #1 DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct existing wet well/dry well with wet well design for ease of maintenance and standardization with other lift stations. JUSTIFICATION: Eliminates a confined space, simplifies future maintenance/repairs. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Future project RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: None 91 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation Light Rail Transit Stations (2) PP-1 $0 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Tax Increment TF 150,000 LOCATION: 1) Intersection of Third Street South and Fifth Avenue South 2) Second Street Northeast DESCRIPTION: Supplemental improvements to two Light Rail Transit (LRT) stations in the proposed HCRRA locations. JUSTIFICATION: The HCRRA proposes to construct two stations along the Southwest Corridor. The proposed expenditures would be in addition to the funds expended by the HCRRA. The additional funds would be used to ensure the stations are high quality in appearance. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Dependent on HCRRA plans. RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with plans for LRT stops in Hopkins by Hennepin County. 92 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation Ninth Avenue LRT Corridor PP-2 $0 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Water Fund WF 250;000 Sewer Fund SF 350,000 Storm Sewer SU 100,000 LOCATION: Ninth Avenue From County Road 3 to First Street North DESCRIPTION: Relocation of utilities and reconstruction of street to accommodate light rail transit line from County Road 3 to First Street North. JUSTIFICATION: In 1984 the City hired J.J. Bakker to analyze the proposed light rail transit corridors in Hopkins. The study recommended that the northwest route of the Southwest Corridor not cross County Road 3 at TH 169. Rather, the study recommended that the northwest route be extended north on Ninth Avenue to First Street North and then continue northwestward on the proposed corridor. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Dependent on HCRRA plans. RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Consistent with recommendations made in 1984 Bakker study. 93 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Transportation Sixth Street South (11th to 12th Avenue South) PP-3 $0 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Econ Dev ED 100,000 Mncpl State Ad MS 300,000 LOCATION: Sixth Street South from 11th Avenue South to 12th Avenue South. DESCRIPTION: Extension of roadway and box culvert crossing at Nine Mile Creek. JUSTIFICATION: 1. Offer a second access to the industrial area (fire access). 2. Direct some of the existing industrial traffic north, away from the residential intersection at Seventh Street and 11th Avenue. 3. Connect a current dead-end alley, west of 11th Avenue. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Planning/Discussion 1995 - 1998 Plans and Specifications 1998 - 2000 Bidding and Construction 1998 - 2000 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Currently on MSA Plans. 94 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Gen Pub Bldg Security System Installation PP-4 $0 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE Tax Increment TF 54,700 LOCATION: Parking ramp DESCRIPTION: Installation of video security system in parking ramp. JUSTIFICATION: The use of the parking ramp will likely increase from its current 25%, to approximately 80% upon completion of the theater/restaurant project on the former Suburban Chevrolet site. Its use will increase even more upon completion of the arts facility on the north side of this property. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Planning and discussion Future Bid and construction Future RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: 95 CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST Park & Rec Park Stage CF-1 $0 FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY SOURCE 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FUTURE General GR 80,000 Reserves LOCATION: Downtown Park DESCRIPTION: Stage for park/recreation purposes. JUSTIFICATION: Portable stage has created problems with A.D.A. accessibility, is getting old, has created employee safety concerns. CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE: Design: 1999 RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: Previously discussed and studied in November 1994. 96