Loading...
CR 05-104 Rezone Oakridge Condos CiTY OF m July 27,2005 HOPKINS Council Report 05-104 REZONING- CONDOS Proposed Action. Staff recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution 05-68, recommending approval of Ordinance 05-952, rezoning the area north of the Eisenhower Community Center from Institutional to R-5 for first reading. At the Zoning and Planning meeting, \.1r. Paul moved and Ms. Halverson seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ04-21, recommending approval of Ordinance 05-952, rezoning the area north of the Eisenhower Community Center from Institutional to R-5. The motion was approved unanimously. Overview. Mike Halley, the applicant, is proposing to construct a 14-16 unit condo building on the property just west of the condo building Mr. Halley is constructing north of the United Methodist Church. The proposed building will be located on property that was owned by the School District on the northeast side of the Eisenhower Community Site. The proposed building would be four stories and have underground and surface parking The current zoning of the site is Institutional and the applicant is proposing a rezoning to R- 5. The school property will remain Institutional. Primary Issues to Consider. . What is the Comprehensive Plan designation, and what is the zoning of the subject site? . What does the R-5 zoning allow? . Should the site be rezoned to R-5? . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Supporting Documents. . Analysis of issues . Site plan . Uses allowed in R-5 and Institutional zoning districts . Resolution 05-68 . Ordinance 05-952 ~ Nancy . Anderson, AICP Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: Y/N Source: CR05- 104 Page 2 Primarv Issues to Consider. . What is the Comprehensive Plan designation? The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Institutional. The applicant has applied for a Comprehensive Plan amendment. The new designation, if approved, would be High Density Residential. . What does the R-5 zoning allow? The R-5 zoning allows multiple family buildings with a density of one unit for every 1000 square feet of area. The site could have 5 I units. The applicant is proposing approximately 14-16 units. . Should the site be rezoned to R-5? In looking at the area, the only logical zoning change would be to a multi-family zoning. Othcr than an Institutional zoning, the site would not be a commercial, industrial or a single- family area. To the north is the golf course, to the east condos, and to the west and east Hopkins Community Center. . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Ms. Anderson stated that the property will have to rezoned from Institutional to R-5 for the condo development to proceed. No one appeared at the public hearing regarding this item. Alternatives. 1. Approve the rezoning. By approving the rezoning, the applicant will be able to construct the condos as proposed. 2. Dcny the rezoning. By denying the rezoning, the applicant will not be able to construct the condos as proposed. If the City Council considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for fmiher infonnation. If the City Council indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: R05-68 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE AREA NORTHEAST OF THE EISENHOWER COMMUNITY CENTER FROM INSTITUTIONAL TO R-5 WHEREAS, an application for Zoning Amendment ZN05-7 has been made by Mike Halley; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for zoning amendment was made by Mike Halley on June 24, 2005; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on July 26,2005: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Zoning Amendment ZN05-7 is hereby approved based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the rezoning is necessary to develop the property to a multi-family building. 2. That the area to be rezoned is compatible for a multi-family building. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Zoning Amendment ZN05-7 IS hereby approved based on the following conditions: 1. That the Comprehensive Plan designation is changed from Institutional to High Density Residential. 2. That the site plan is granted for the construction of the proposed development. 3. That the site is replatted. Adopted this 3rd day of August, 2005. ATTEST: Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor TelTY Obermaier, City Clerk CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 05-952 AN ORDINANCE REZONING FROM INSTITUTIONAL TO R-5, HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE F AMIL Y THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: That the present zoning classification of [nstitutional, upon the following described premises is hereby repealed, and in lieu thereof the said premises is hereby zoned as R-5 High Density Multiple Family. All of the following described tract lines north of the centerline of Highway No 7: That par of the west 247.5 feet of the west y, of the northeast quarter and that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 117, Range 22 lying north of the centerline of Minnetonka Mills Avenue as shown on the plat of "West Minneapolis Second Division". The north 40 feet of the east 85 feet of the westerly 247.5 feet of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township, 117 Range 22 ( said distance being measured along the north line of said Northeast Quarter). Together with an easement for ingress and egress purposed over, across and upon that part of the east 33 feet of the west 247.5 feet of said Northeast Quarter of the said Section 24 lying north of State Highway No.7. First Reading: August 3, 2005 Second Reading: August 16,2005 Date of Publication: August 25, 2005 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: August 25, 2005 Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Signature Date Hopkins city Code (Zoning) 542.01 section 542 - Zonina, Institutional District 542.01. one-family detached dwellings and two-family detached dwellings are permitted uses in the Institutional district, but subject to all provisions of Section 530 applicable thereto, which provisions are incorporated in this section. 542.02. Conditional uses within the Institutional districts. Subdivision 1. The following are conditional uses in Institutional zoning districts and certain of . the standards, restrictions and requirements applicable to such conditional uses, ( . Schools and all structures, facilities and physical improvements incident or accessory thereto. . Religious Institutions and all structures, facilities and physical improvements incident or accessory thereto. 542.03 Any expansion, enlargement or modification of an Institutional use that will result in the demolition or removal of a dwelling unit shall be a conditional use requiring a Conditional Use Permit. All conditional uses shall be allowed only upon compliance with and fulfillment of all the standards, conditions and requirements stated in Sections 525.13 and 542 of the Hopkins Zoning Ordinance. 542.04 Area and Yard Limitations Conditional Uses permitted in any Institutional district are subject to the following minimum floor and lot area, minimum lot width, yard and setback, requirements, and maximum building heights. Front yard Side yard Rear yard 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet Minimum Lot Size Lot width % Building Coverage 20,000 square feet 100 feet 35% of lot area Maximum building height 35 feet 542.05 Subdivision. 1. In addition to the standards, conditions. and requirements stated elsewhere in Section 525.13 and this Section 542, no Conditional Use Permit shall be granted for a conditional use within an Institutional district unless the applicant has demonstrated compliance with the following standards, conditions and requirements. 1. The removal of a dwelling unit, whether attached or detached, shall not change the character of the neighborhood. Wherever such a dwelling is removed it shall be replaced by a use that to the street, and is compatible in size, scale, orientation I R-6 530.05 (Revised 4-6-99) R-5 R-4 R-3 R-2 sts pennitted uses and minimum standards in R Districts. R-I-E R-I-D R-I-C The table below R-I-B tticts. 530.05. p P P 16,000 20,000 2,600 150 35 35 IS' or 1/2 the height whichever is greater 25' or 112 the height, whichever is greater p p 24,000 20,000 1,000 150 30 30 p p 20,000 20,000 1,600 Is!L" 30 30 25' or 112 the height, whichever is greater IS' or 112 the height, whichever is greater p P P P 16,000 20,000 2,600 150 35 35 p p P P 12,000 20,000 3,500 100 35 35 \0 12 14 35 p p 40,000 40,000 40,000 100 35 35 \0 12 14 40 p p 20,000 20,000 20,000 \00 35 35 \0 12 14 P P 12,000 20,000 12,000 80 35 30 10 12 14 The side yatd for additions to any existing dwelling shall be the same or greatet than the existing structure, except that nO side yard shall be less than five feet. p p 8,000 20,000 8,000 60 35 30 8 8 10 TIlE FOLLOWING ARE MINIMUMS REQUIRED: 6,000 20,000 3,500 50 35 25 8 8 10 R-I-A p Lot AIea (Sq. Ft.) Non Residential Use Lot AIea I Family (Sq. Ft.) Lot Width (Ft.) % Building Co-verage Front Yard (Ft.) Side Yard (Ft.) see footnote (2) I Story 2 Story 3 Story I. Family Detached Dwelling P 2 Family DweJling P 2-4 Family Dwelling Townhouse Multiple Dwelling Hopkins Owned Park &Rec PERMI'ITED USES: (2) 520 600 720 4 story 520 600 720 4 story 520 520 600 600 720 720 120 for each Bedroom) 45 800 520 600 720 (700 + 1,200 40 1,200 35 1,000 30 800 25 700 700 Rear Yatd Dwelling Floor Area (Sq. Ft.) I Family 2 Family More than 2 Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom Over 2 bedroom 35 35 \:\.25 1:1:75 35 ....,......__.....,.._....re._..'n- ".__,_re"'-O'-- ",""'''''''''''' 1:\ zoning districts. (Added Ord. 99-823) 1:2.5 1:\.5 35 35 35 35 Building Height R-I existing dwelling on a comer lot abutting a right-of-way has a minimum setback of five feet in ar Open Space Ratio (3) The side yard to an (Added Old. 99-823) front porches are allowed to be constructed in the front yard setback with a minimum setback of 20 feet Section 530 Page 2 (4) (5) In all R-I districts, ~ ~ 1 ~ " ~ ~ fi ~. s " . ~ ~ ~ ! I ~ ~ % w ~ "\l 0 " so 90 ~ ~ ;. I s FEET DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY TOTIL srtt AAEA _ 60,048 SO. FT. OR ,.,BAC. LOT 1 ., 51,896 SQ. FT. OR 1.19 AC. O\mOT' _ 4.740 sa. FT. OR O. t 1 AC. OUTLOiB _ 3,412 SQ. F.T. OR 0.08 AC. PARKING SUMMARY f" _-4EGENO- -- -.-------- -------- ,. ,\ ".0 ~~~ c:;::::::;:::::; c--- oR1t\ SER\ -- .. J-.-j oENOm> eoUN~ UN!:: DENOTES PROPOSED RET,t.JN!NG 'M.i..L DENOTES PROPOSED B 612 CURB de: GUilDl OEHOTtS EXISTING" BUILDING DENOTES PROPOSl:Xl aUILDlNG >>,PROXlMA'Tt lOCATION .or l.lINWUt.( 20' \\'lOE ROAD EASEMENT TO BE DEDICATED TO ~ ClT1. WARWIWG THO: cotJiAACTOR SHALL CONTACT AU. PUBt,.lC UOUT1ES FOR LOCATIONS OF AU. UNOERGROUND WIRES, CA9\..ES. COWWIlS. PIPES, IMNHOLES. VAlVES. OR O11iER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE orCGING. HE SHAl.L REPAIR OR REPLACE THE AWJE W'rIEN ~ OUR,(tolG CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. eo PARKING SfAL.LS 16 UNDER GROUND PARKING STIlUS TOTAL PARKING STAllS PRCMOED SETBACKS: BUILDING' FMt<<: 1:S.0' REAR: 15.0' SIDE: 20.0' [ J t I t/ff&///,0 so " ~ JT I~ t J( fE P T \ ;~I~cW~EMM ~ J ~- \0 0 0 --- --' -----, _~..sEIa6ct::_~___. -..-:" ,I , \' \ ' 1\ \ \ ......,- '-" I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \'11: ____ - ~ ~ I c~..ss . ~ ' , ---------- ...... -= I' - - \ ._<,0>1 - \ n .\ ~I '\ \.1 ~ ~I 1/ ~ .Ii PI1 11 I' I" }/ / Ii I / II ''-......... ./ )11/ ...... / ~'/ .............. / /~ ''-..... //// ~../ >'....... / ./ /) ;" !/'a........ __ "f__ ~. cr- .- - ,.-' ,--:' \ ' \J POND NW\.._940.3 DiI'Il!:~ 6/204105 ~ ~ Project NameJLo:;:ation: Oak Ridge Place \I Ho~"IIIn:n.'Dt. Sh8etTrtle:: SIte Pian Inc. '" Halley's Custom Homes, '''21 E. w.,._tt. 8\'111., Su\t. :t30 Weyz.ab., MN 55391 Chont: Schoell & !\J!~.'. . ~ 0 S\Ir'Y8YIfIg 0 PIanhln; SOl Testing 0 EnvIronmentlll Services --- 10!1S0W~~ _~,~~,sa phono,(I52l546-1I01.!n:IVS2)S4609065 -.- ---~-_.---:. Oplgned ey' ORlwnBy. Checke.d6y; ------ --- --- --- ------~---- - - -' - - ~ " - ~ ::::::: ....... '\ E: ~ ~ " - " > - " ~ "- - , ~ . / - / ? >\ / / / ? I / / / ), ~ ~ f ~ , ~ - . - ~ < ;>- " , - ~ "" EISENHOWER SCHOOL & "-........ COMMUNITY ~ CENTER LOT 1 f ~ / ~ / ~ '-....: / ,! :- '/ 0 ~ ~ / '. I ~ " ~~~~COMO . , OFEJSENHCIWERc.DlENT./IR'(SIlHOOL~ I toIl.UN~C9ITER. 0 llIIaiSl.51 (tte.V.D. 111z/1) ~ RevIsions - - - lterebyc;elUy1hal_planWUP/8Plonrdbymee>rundllf !)ate: 08scri~tion: e, trrjlifec:l~andlhllllWaUcer\Sell~ E~o.n\6rtrle~ollho!S1ateofWlnes<lla. - Reg. No ReyIsMld~ _.