CR2002-125 Payment to Henn Cty for property parcels
CITY Or::
.. ~
HOPK1NS
. July 16, 2002 Council Report 2002-125
Approve Payment to Hennepin County for Property Parcels
Construction Cooperative Agreement
Excelsior Boulevard Reconstruction, Phase II
Proposed Action. Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move that
Council approve a settlement with Hennepin County in the amount of $167,874 for city
purchase of remnant property parcels alonq south side of Excelsior Boulevard between
Monroe Avenue and Harrison Avenues.
Overview.
At the July 2, 2002 City Council meeting, Council approved a proposed construction
cooperative agreement between the City of Hopkins and Hennepin County for
construction and maintenance related to Excelsior Boulevard Improvements, Phase II.
However, there was one area of the agreement where the City and County could not
reach agreement.
This was in regards to the value and city payment for remnant property parcels that the
County wanted to deed over to the City. The remnant parcels are in excess what the
County needs for public right of way. City staff has negotiated a settlement and
requests City Council approval.
. Primary Issues to Consider.
. Explanation of proposed settlement
Supportinq Information.
. Hennepin County email memo
. Parcel valu tables
Steven J. Stadler
Public Works Director
.
.
Council Report 2002-125
Page 2
Analysis of Issues
. Explanation of proposed settlement
Under the terms of the proposed agreement, the County would deed over to the City the
remnant portions of the total-take commercial properties along the south side of
Excelsior Boulevard between Monroe Ave and the Blake School property. The City will
pay % of the cost of those total-take property acquisitions, some of which have been
purchased for some time now. However, the County has proposed that, in addition, the
City pay % of the land value of the portions of those parcels not needed for public (road)
right of way. The County has estimated this additional city cost at approximately
$213,000. As a counter offer, City staff proposed that property restrictions be recorded
against these properties such that if the City were to ever sell them that the County
would then receive % of the fair market value of the property at the time of sale.
. Hennepin County will not accept this counter offer.
Since the July 2 City Council meeting, staff has been negotiating the purchase amount.
The originally proposed purchase price of $213,000 has been reduced to 167,874. City
staff is comfortable that this price more accurately reflects the actual commercial land
value of these reduced-sized parcels and recommends agreeing to this amount.
.
Steve Stadler
.rom: Brad. Moe@co.hennepin.mn.us
ent: Friday, July 12, 2002 14:24
To: Steve Stadler; James. Grube@co.hennepin.mn.us; Bruce.M. Polaczyk@co.hennepin.mn.us;
Craig. m. Twinem@co.hennepin.mn.us; Guy. K. Nowlan@co.hennepin.mn.us
Subject: RE: 3-9227
i? i?
!...
pic03336.pcx picOS783.pcx
Stf:Ove,
Please resolve the R!W isslle on 3-9;::27 A~~l\P . I \"ill be c.,]t. I-l t the office
un vacation ne~;t week. It is H,:onrlf:OVln C'UU[ll~ y 1 S undprstanding that you
previously LlgreeJ tu reimburse the rnllnty :, (1 '" for the rdodiniflq pc)rt ion oj:
the totc:.ll dcquisitinns. Ba5ed on thi,] a'JreemL~llt He fl1J!:epi n COllnty has
purchased Fm d reJ.ocat,,,d business",,, d] UJltj Lhe prof'I's,~cJ '::orr idol'. AfteL tlle
fa']t you are now requesti!llJ a lower prir:c fc,r your payment te, Ule county.
The County's pOOiition is tnrlt we have be8n more thdT' faiL in estimAting
thiOi paym,cmt.
1 ) Hennepin Cuunty is only cn Flr'Ji n'j the City 5 iJ ':t e)f tllf:O relllain.ing value
for the properties we provide to you f':JL tht' L'ity ot Hopkins use. Under
the proposed settlement He nr ,t:pin County will ['OJ y :;;;::59,000, to allow the
City of Hopkins to own ,lOd dlrr'el't devele'pmc!nt of laeld tl!at the C01mty
.UIC!laOicct.
) Hennepin County is only ,.:hd I '; iJlq Lf)(-! C.it:y of Hopkins for the
rpmainln'J land oULside tht: bcrmin'~J Clno .c: idpwCl~. k; the true cost .c;hould be
based upon tllt: F/W line.
3 ) Hennepin COllnl:y IS only chcu-9in9 residential land vallles for ['arcel
10 and 11 \\'hen they are actually zoned c(lmmpr,~ial ; this a~ounts to a
$27,000 credit for the City of Ho[,kins.
4 ) Hennepin County h3S reducc.cJ t)le valuation ot pilrud.s G and 7 to $2
per square foot, this amounts to rl $lCJ,UI.IU ':' redi t. for the Ci t:y of Hupkins.
5 ) Hennepin l~oun 1- y has spent o \Te r ') and d lid!. f million dollilrs tDr
-'
advancp CJ ":g\li si t i cJn ~~.I f pr,:'pcrt i8s d l_ Ulie_ "cqueOiL ot t.hl" City of Hc'pkins.
Thl" rity of Hopkins has neJt meld", a paYIll':cnt 1': :-)I.'Ie, rris thpse a'.:qui sit ion costs.
A consorvative estiruate at t~le jurl']eml"nt rate for interest CL'S L 011 this
amount is $3;~:8, 000. Ca] r.lllA I' Rei {=is follO',,8 :
(Embedded imct'J'" muved t 1:""1 fil,? : pi c:n.c'3..,6. [".7)
As you dre dWdr(~ Hpnnppln r:"UTlt y staff and T'ly~e 1 f aLlf:Ol1ut:u d 1_'iLy CCHlnl~il
mep.t.in'] wiLh you on ,July ,.., :200~ . At L11dt timt' you iP. ,-:ommenrk, d to the
~ ,
council that they cJPfJlLJVt: tll[:! a I,] rp.p.mp n t e;':l~erl- for the right of way
portioll. At the meptiw] the County "vas offering to Settle the matter tnr
$213,U(JO. The following day I provideJ yc,u with A :::0 thousand-dollar
reduction La reflect an amount of $ 1 Ii 4 , 110 (] . On LTuly 7, you cou'1tered with
$143,000. In t.hp. interest of settling Lhis i5sue and movifl4 on with t.he
aqrl"p.ment Hpnnppin County offers tD split I~ f.P. di.fference in op.ini.on Flnc!
settle the issu'" at $lG8,OiJCI d~) detd i led bl~lDv'i.
(Embedded irna,y:; rrw,v",d t(-:-I fJ.~~F?~ fi i :.: [) 5 7 F; 3 . r' c :'C )
e BLdJ S. ~k"=,
HEU['ILL'.L ['J '::Cifll,lT ','
Gi'JhL \-~ 1 ~1'i1:rr-1 V ;, i vis i lJ n t~j.3.r1clqer
1 h 1)(1 Prn.ir-ip Dr.L lJe, [vj,:edin.'l, ~1N 5S340-J4~~1
1
Otu6.lflA1- f!..1i'64Vesr-
.
P arc el Reulainiflq Area $/SF Est. Value
3 '1 '1 :391 $8,00 $95 ,928
4 5,546 $8.00 $44 ,368
5 13 602 $8,00 $1 08 .81 6
6 6 ,48 "1 $8,00 $51.848
7 3.149 $8.00 $25.192
8 2 .34 7 $8,00 $18,776
9 4.892 $8,00 $39.136
10 5,922 $3,50 $20,727
1 1 6.089 $3,50 $21 .312
60 ):119 Tot al $426,103
8 throuQ h 11 19 ;2 50
C rry Sha re 50 0/0 $213,051
.
-- --. -- -" - -.. -- - --.. - - -
1~,-'f 3 oPP5L
.
P arc el Remainina Area jlSF Est. Value Citv 50%
.-, '1'1 .991 $'=: no $C1 h q"10 $4.... QF'4
":1 I 1_ ._ . "_a ,--' 1,-",,::,,1_1 . I I'....:J
4 5.54b $8.0U $44 ,368 $221184
.- '1:3 602 $8 {lO $108,816 $54 .408
~ .
6 ~3 .48 '1 $2.oU $'1? Q6'; $6 .48'1
......{._. L
7 3,'149 $2 .CIIJ $f' 'J go $':' '14Q
. :j "::"'_ U I ..J '..1
3 to 7 Total $268,372 $134,186
8 ') ':147 $13 .0 0 $ '1'-' TOOT' $'-~ .-, H:'
-'- ,'..1 . . D.. I:J ..:. ~_u
9 4 ':'y? $8 DO $':.q '1 ~r $'19.568
1..1_ ..... J ...1 '-' ...1 :)
10 5 q:"") $'-' hn $'-1 n T)i $1 I] 1364
,.-''-~ . ":J .__1_ L_lfL.l~
1 1 G Ol=: 9 $'-' .- I] $':1 1 ~'1 ':1 $1 I] ,656
I ":1.:1 '...... ...:..I......
8 to 11 Total $99,951 $49,975
Grand Total $368,323 $184,161
.
-. -..
C? 4Z{)p()~e;o S~w1
.
Parce 1 Re m.ainiltg Area $lSF Fs t. "1'" alue City 50~'O
3 11 ~991 $8 .00 1'0 J; 9--' 9 $47~964
. I.. _J., l,......
4 .I) .r 46 $8.00 $44~36 8 $22~184
...~.)
.r 1'-' ell) $8 .00 $1 08~816 $54~408
.) j~U_.....
6 6~481 $2 .00 $1"J l~nJ $6~431
....,,- -......
... 3~ 1 49 $2.00 $ ,- "90 $3) 49
j ,f-. . --
-~..:., ~
3 to 7 Total $268,372 $134,186
. r, ~I ~ 41[ 1'':' J;O $'xo '11 .I) $4) 07
() ..:.,~- ) .1_1 __,I . I_I:-~ __
9 4 ({OJ i--:;' J; 0 i'1'11';1; $'-) .r r 1
:-1'_1 _" ....... .1_I.j . 1 ,I ~ ......... ' ,:::.~J~)
10 5,922 $'-' .rO $--10 '1"1 'I $1 0)64
j ._) .l. "I..:.,)
11 6~0 89 f:;' J; 0 $') 1 '~H 'J $10.656
I_I .__1 ...... ,,_ .&...I
8 to 11 Total $67,375 $33,688
Grand Total $'~'~~ .....4..... $167 ,874
' ... ... .... , .1 .1
.
-~--~
\~ <;t Itr ~
,_ Q1 LC
~-<;r'ON
~ ~ ~ ; ~~ N
~ :.t.... .CJ III
r ~ ~ ': -,
~\r ~ ~,~ .
__--~~ - l' h
- I~ \! . ~
. ~ ~?~
~ ~Il\ t ~ 0'
~ ~i\l\ 1111\\\\\\\\ en \1 .. i; ~~ ~ ~ 0 ';'
" -=-_~~ , --:~ I;, ~ffi U '"
~;' ; ~ 0
"'
: ~ II, ~ a" " !-
a ..: ~ t '15 .
;) _ __ '.<11 ~ :E~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ '" '"
--. ~)~_~I (I -'~ - - . 7
'" " a
'" . N
r:', --' .. a
"- . I
if> N
~. ~l:J~~::::;-~ l;~ t ,.. 0;::
;;; ~- " "- II ~ . - '" I .0<
. ... _.,--,~ yo '" ..-
~ - --- - ,- ~~ is ~ g
~. .1 fl: 'iiI ~'
S~~~o~~~~~,.~~~~~~~~..~~ .. \ ~ ~ ' . J- .
..[~t": <Ii '" . "
". ~ ~ ~
w ~~~ ~,~~
~r-:: . <II
~ " ~ ~
:17. ". ~...<i
. ;;t [}~~r~ "-
...!~a ~"~ ~~~ 0
, :;:;! ~ u
~:"" !iEi ~ ~ !i~~:;}0&I~
~h~ ~ .;l~~~~~ .z
< z
..;.g~ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ h~ w
'"
~
yo
~:;
~;t
~~
" y ~...
~ ~ ,~
- " ~t:~
~~~ g I
~;:..... t' ~i~~
.~~: s ..~~@~
~" l.\ n~~.~~;
~... - ~ ~ ~i.:""~r~
clh- ~ cll~H~
~w "'~ ~ ~EI,,~~~
... ~:&:~ ~
-::;.:-....C" ' -
"
~
~~
. ~ -
. ~ ,
; ~ ti ~~
~=~ ~~t..i
tI~ ~ 1!~~
~~tH :~H~~
.~.~ e '" .~5~
tl",q."" ,j~~ii~""
.~"~ ~ ~t:'i'~~~
C~J
--1-~ .
I - I 1
:~ ffi
;J-~~i : ~
____,__ --c- t ~
~ a
~ ~
~~ ~ ~
~~ .
':: ... i
.r: g~ ti a~ :i -
"''i''''''' .o~:i ~
~ ~~ ~ ~....'" ... -
...~~~.:~ ~ ~~~~.~ ~
. ;.i ~ ? ~!i:o. ~
~. w> " ~ .. ~ -
5h~~ ~ i ., ~ S
" ~ ~ ~ <
~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~J ~ J ::
~i\11l~ l~lll~i ,,\~ [I
. ~1;~\1~ ~il~~l~ lil~
~ ~g~~~~~f~~~~~ ~~~~
.
~~~.._~_~_~.~:~~:~~~~f
~\' 9Flll.l t i".Cl-J6Q/ljC
utlp 'ZtJfll d,'f,.J~ a/iP\.I\Ll.J\~U["l1 d\ I L~Q2 t I -4- \..o::ll;/q\ .Ij
apar..Eqs
"~ '"
~ln '~ N
.. 3...- N
~ ~ ~~~~
. '0 ~
"3AV 3J~3[d f
I __ -$ t-
~ N ~
, . ,
'" z n.. 0
Ii" -c;:( . N
S ---.J .0;( 0
.., n.. . I
~ >- V1 ~
~ : r- -
L..L.. N 0
IL 0 ~ ::z
~ I-
~ Ii; ~g~
i ~ r-'" .... 1'1 ~ cr:
\ ~~ ~'" ::: ~~ ~ a ~
\ D W ... ^ _m --!i '" ;>
. u _ 0_ ~::I "-
" ~~ f1~~ ~ ~ 0
I ~f ~~ i Cr' ~ ~ . 1i u
~~ ~~ ~ J:t:t:i ;;::;!J ~ z
r Z
-w W
~ --' "- ~ I
f-, ...... IL
~. .-
~ .
5~ ~~~~~=:~ ~
g:. ~ i:
~~ ~..,.~ ~~.:
g w ~?::
H ,,-q , :~~~ ~
." ... ~~g; ~
I" -- '<iJ ~~~~ ~
.~., - ' ~
E~~~~--- \
illlll!ill!!l!l!ll!!l !,~-
. .""."".^.^......."..."'~ '9~'
i;:::::::;:;~,:,::::, i;!l! :i.
_ _ ~ "- IL "-... '" .... 'L L
~;~~g~~~:~~~~;E~~~;~:
1;!!!l~!1!!111~11!11! v ~,~:V ,,,;; I,L j, 11:
~i---:::~~ "~'" ;;,_ .... _ ~ ~ _ _ i;:1 \ i;l l -
'i'1 "i! I '"-.... IL "- q 11-" "-
II' 'i:' .... ~
~c ~~ _ ~~ L '
€*~~ ~g ~g:a i~
IS - n .<:1 'i' :J: '1' oL'I ... ...-
~BP~ ~H oJH~o~H 0
~::J. .h ~ .:, Ii;j Ii! ~
~t H ~ ~ ~ ; a ~ UJ H; ~
~~ ~ fI
. ~ ~~
S 5 ~~t .
~ ! ~~~ ~ !
" ~ ~ i ~H~~ ~! :1"
T r 'i" ~.., ~ I . '1;'
. . .. _ ., ~ u ~ ( ~
D _ ~ 011: ~w.... ':.I ~ M
: ; : ~~ H ~J: -- " 1
~w 1'='i.lllr ?U/b~U~D
LJ[}p. ~Ur:ll dJill..J12~(jD\/I\O.l\::.LJLoj <.J\ I J I;;UZ II ~ \1l:::1i'oL/;, I Y
ap<l^U ~S'
.- .'
. July 16, 2002
2001 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT AND A UDIT PRESENTED
BY LORI YAGER AND KPMG
Overview
Staff has prepared a presentation of a consolidated version of the 2001 Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report. Staff has requested our auditors to present the results of the 2001 audit to the City
Council and public.
Supportim! Information
. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
.
d'I~~~
Lori Yager
Finance Director
.
-- --.--
.
~ City of Hopkins
The City of Hopkins . Economic Condition
Financial Report presents its' ., Major Initiatives
Comprehensive Annual . Revenues by fund
City of Hopkins Financial Report types
An Overview of the 2001 This presentation provides . Expenditures by
a broad oveNiew of our fund types
Comprehensive Annual financial performance and .. Balance sheet
Financial Report position. . Cash Management
All information is public, ., Changes in Fund
balance
Economic Condition Significant Projects in 2001
'+New construction valued at $17.1 "Plantation Apartments $3.5 million
million in 2001. +Nine Mile Cove $2.5 million
. "Strong economic development market ""SuperValu addition $1.8 million
within the City of Hopkins.
. Successful redevelopment activities by "Walser addition $1.3 million
the city. +Excelsior Blvd. const. $ .7 million
+An additional $49 million of construction +Parkside Residential $ .4 million
projected for 2002/2003. +Mason Property $ .3 million
"Water Tower Painting $ .3 million
Future Projects Major Municipal Initiatives
+Regency Residential $17 million .. Street repair and
+Fire & Public Works Facility improvements -
$2,446,000.
and Police addition $13 million +Sump pump
.Market Place Lofts $11 million inspection program
"Nine Mile Cove $10 million continued in 2001.
., Storm Sewer
"Eastside redevelopment $10 million reconstruction
"Excelsior Blvd. const. $ 7 million projects - $83,000.
,*Walgreens $ 2 million .. Blake Water Tower
Painting - $285,000
.
1
.
Definitions Revenues and Other Financing Sources
by Fund Type
.. General Fund - accounts for basic services Including /:~~
administration, public safety, public works, planning, and parks
and recreiltion. , / \ '.
.. Special Revenue Funds account For specific activity including / I I
Economic Development, llF, Housing Rehab., Cable, Parking / S4,743,1I7lI \, I ! ~-) General
and Depot Coffee House.
. capital Funds - account For assets of a permanent nature \ $7,15S,491 n Special
,- -- - \
including Par~ Improvements and Street improvements. I . . [J Capital
.' Debt Service Funds - account for payment of interest and J Debt
principal on general obi igation debt. l Entel'prise
.. Enterprise Funds account For selF supporting activibes of \ ss,~9(I ~
government including Water, Sewer, ReFuse, Storm Sewer, . Jntemal
S3,!11s,m ;
Pavilion, Art Center, Skate Park and Housing Authority. /
... [nternal Service funds - account for financing of goods or
serivces provided by one department to other departments.
Revenue Comparisons Expenditures and other financing uses
by Fund Type
... Operating revenues in all governmental fund \i~r
types are up 1.4%. The majority of the
. increase is in property tax revenues with a /~
decrease in intergovernmental revenues. ' I I ! General
" 'I, : S7,6&l.A13
+Operating revenues in proprietary fund types 'I I I i Special
, - [J Capital
are down 1% or $41,000. This is primarily a ~137'~ /'" I Debt
fluctuation in water usage in the city. " . ._o;:,~;,_i'" ! U EntftflJrise
;\4'i~'!!f}/ " . IntemaJ
' 'I
.I $S,Q2.f,3It7 /
/
n
Expenditure Comparisons Balance Sheet
(in thousands} 2001 2000
Assets
.. Operating expenditures in all governmental .Cash and short-term irl\lE!slmenls $22,614 S20,392
fund types are up 23.6%. The majority of .Tall;BS & special assessments receivablE! n,415 13.782
the increase is in capital outlay (land & .Olher receivables 4,921 5.034
.Olher assets and debJls 71.661 68,054
improvements) and debt service payments.
'f> Operating expenditures in proprietary fund Totol Ass_ $112,611 $107.262
,. .-
types stayed the same as last year. The Uabililies
.Accounts payabls $1,065 $1.195
types of expenditures varied slightly. -Accrued compensalton 732 701
.Other liabilitjE!s 17,780 18,675
_Long term debl 25,063 22,669
~
Total Uabilflil!$ $4.t,6A 543,240
I;quity and Other Credits $67.951 SlW,022
.
2
.
.
Cash Management Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures
and Changes in Fund Balance
Governmental Fund Types. (in ltKMJsandsl 2001 211IIII
The City'S investments .. U.s Govern me nt Revenues
are held by the City Agency Securities .Property taxes arid ~pedal assessments $9,071 $7.998
.lnlerg(l\/elT1menlal revenues 3,097 3.719
or its agent in the . $8,476,634 .Licenses permits, fines & forfeitures 544 577
City's name. ~ Commercial Paper .Charges for servIces 472 676
This form of .Olner na-\lE!lllJl;!S 5.164 1,919
. $13,552,301
investment security T~ Revenues and Other- Sources $18,_ $14,11II9
Cash/deposits EzpenditulllS
holding posses the . $585,290 .SalariE!S Blld employee Benefil5- $6,301 $5,926
least risk for loss. .Maleriajs, supplies and services 1,677 1,633
.Capital Outlay 5.061 <,665
.Other e)(pendillires 3.635 2.661
TotI' El<penditures iIIld Olher Uses $16,174 $12.907
E:l<cess Revenues over E>:pendilures $1,494 $1,9lI2
Comparisons of Revenue for Comparisons of Expenditures for
Governmental Fund Types, [in millions) Governmental Fund Types, (in millions)
$10,llOll' , $1,llO11 1
$9,l1011i $6,000 . ;
. $11,IIOO I
$1,llO11 , $5,000 i
$6,lIOlI . : l..i2001! $4,llOII ! '12001
$5,000' 1 C 2000 $3,000: . ; D 2000
$4,llO11 i 1:'1 1999 $2,IIlIO' I IJ 1999
$3,llO11
$2,IIlIO 'I
$:t,OlIlI $l,OOlI :1
$0 $0
Taxes lntI!rgow't ChaIgl!5 OIlIer Salllril!s "*rials Cilpilal 0118
Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenses and ComparIsons of Revenue for
Changes in Retained Earnings
Pmpriebuy Fund Types. (in_, 2001 211IIII Proprietary Fund Types, (in millions)
Revenues
.Charges for services $4.831 $4,896 $5,llO11 , .
.Intergovernmental relJenues 61 173 $4,5llII .
.lnveslmenl eamif1gs 273 356 $4,llOII . ..
.Other revenues 215 158 $3,soo .
T...... Reven""" and Other Sources $5,3811 $5,513 $3,llO11 :
, 12001
ExpendibllllS $1,500! 1.'2000
.Safaries a.nd employee Benefits $1.241 $1.140 =t cll!J9!l
.Malerials, supplies and servrces 1.470 1,660
_Disposal CofilS 923 B36 $l,OOlI'
.Other expenditures 456 22B $500'
.Deprecialiorl 1,174 1,062 $0' ~
T~ Ezpendilures ~nd Olher Uses $5,264 $4,92& 0Ia.ges ~ 0tIIer
--
Excess Rev.................. E>:pen~ $116 $6S7
.
3
.
Comparisons of Expenditures for
Proprietary Fund Types, (in millions)
$1,800 1
$l,liOO : '
$1,4OlI1
$1,2GlI i ~}: .
$1,000 . ;:~~ ! i;S
$8OD' I
$liOO ,.1 "
~t ,.,
, ' .J;:
$2GlI , '" .. ..
$II' . ~
Salaries Materials Dispals;;JI Olha
.
.
4