The URL can be used to link to this page

CR2002-072 2002 Alley Reconstruction Project C\lY Of: . . , , . ~ May 2, 2002 Council Report 2002-72 HOPKINS . PUBLIC HEARING 2002 ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT PROJECT 00-12 Proposed Action Staff recommends the following motion: "Move that Council adopt Resolution 2002-38, Resolution Ordering Improvement After Public Hearing, 2002 Alley Reconstmction Proiect, City Project 00-12, and companion Resolution 2002-39, stating City's intent to sell revenue bonds to fund this project. This action continues an assessable project for alley upgrading, Overview At the November 8, 2000, meeting, the Hopkins City Council authorized the City Engineer to prepare a feasibility study concerning alley improvements in the 200/300 Block between 19th Avenue North and 20th A venue North. The report was presented to Council at its April 2, 2002, meeting, and a public hearing was ordered for May 7, 2002. Hearing notices have been mailed to all affected property owners of record. Two neighborhood information meetings were hclcl on November 14, 2000, and March 2 L 2002, to discuss and share general project information and the information in the repOlt with the affected property owners. In accordance with state statutes, Council needs to conduct the public hearing and determine authorization of the project. Following the public hearing and potential authorization of the project, Council is then asked to state the City's intent to sell revenue bonds 10 fund the project through resolution adoption. . Primary Issues to Consider. . Scope of Improvements . Project Funding . Public Input and Project Schedule Supporting Information. . Public Hearing Notice, Affidavit of Mailing, and Proposed Pending Assessment Roll . Feasibility Report . Resolutions 2002-38 and 2002-39 Jk;:zU - Steven G. Bot Assistant City Engineer - ... Financiallmpact: $ 34.750 Budgeted: Y IN Yes Source: _ Special Assessments, PIR. Storm Sewer Utility Fund Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): eIP Notes: . . Council Report 2002-72 Page 2 .AnalysiS of Issues . Scope of Improvements: This project provides for the construction of a concrete pavement surface 10 to 18 ['eet wide and 6 inches thick, in accordance with the City of Hopkins' concrete alley construction standard. The additional width, up to 1 8 feet. is needed tor the east-\:vest alley segment for City maintenance and refuse pickup purposes. Existing grade and erosion issues are proposed to be improved by using a new alley rrofile. 8 inch integral curb in some areas, riprap. and erosion control blanket on steep slopes. A utility pole that has caused obstruction problems {or both the n:sidents and the City refuse collectors vvill be moved along \\lith the project. City staff investigated the possibility' of burying of the Lltility lines in the area and determined this was not feasible with this project mainly because of cost and conflict issues. The project IS necessary to correct maintenance problems caused by inadequate alley surfacing. Maintenance problems include high maintenance costs for adding graveL maintailllng a gravel surt~lce, controlling erosion. and other problems associated with overall poor drainage. . Project Funding: It is proposed that the comTete pavement project be assessed in accordance ,vith the City of Hopkins' current assessment policy. wllerein 8U% of the cost is assessed to abutting properties and 20% is funded as a City cost. It is further proposed that the City's portion of the costs be paid entirely from the storm sewer utility fund. in accordance with City policy. Additional drainage improvements at Hilltop Park at the n011h . end of the alley dead end \VOldd also be paid ham the storm sewer utility fund. Because there are such unique circumstances surrounding this project site, including the unusual "L ,- shaped functional nature of this alley, staff feel s that the fairest method to assess this project is on a per-unit basis rather than on an abutting linear footage basis as is usually done with alley assessments, and that each abutting property be assessed the same. as they all have equal eligibility to use the alleyway. This assessment method is consistent v./ith past assessments tor Hopkins alley projects hy assessing each abutting property in the same manner even though every property doesn't currently use the alleyway for their primary driveway access. As mentioned above, each property has the same eligibility to lIse the alley and the potential for future redevelopment or changes to each of the propeliies means each property should be assessed in the same manlier. The City stalTis also ofthe opinion tllat the computation for the costs eligible for assessment should be based otT a I O-foot-vvide alley section for the entire length of the functional alleyway because the additinnal R-lont width for the east \vest portion is needed to benefit the City for maintenance and refuse pickup purposes. Preliminary estimated amnunts ror assessments CLlI11putcd in accordance \vith the per-unit I O-loot alley method outlined above have indicated assessments in the range of approximately $ 1,993 per unit. This amount is consistent witl] assessment amounts for other recent alley projects in the City of Hopkins. The costs associated with this additional width would come out of the PIR Fund. The eIP budget for the proposed project is $50,000. Estimated Cost and Funding Breakdown Estimated Alley Construction Costs $32.629 .. Engineering and Administration (([i 6.510; $ 2,1:21 ..... Total Project Costs $34,750 Council Report 2002-72 Page 3 . Assessments: 80% of alley costs per City policy $13,05] (Based on standard] O-foot-wide residential alley) Assessment Period 1 0 years Interest Rate 7.U% Est. Assessment per abLltting lot unit (7 lots) $ L 091 Storm Sewer Fund: 20% of alley costs per City policy $3,4R8 (Based on standard] O-foot-\.vide residential alley) Drainage Improvements at Hi lltop Park $:1.06~ (North end of al ley dead end) PIR Fund: A]ley costs for wider east-west alleyv.<i:ty $] 4,~49 Necessary for City maintenance and rcfuse pickup (Based on standard lO-foot-wide residential alky) I Public Input and Project Schedule: . A public information meeting was held for all of the affected property owners on November 14, :2000 and . March 21. 2002. and a residenl survey questionnaire was sent in the mail. Responses and feedback gathered at both the public information meeting and through the returned questionnaires have generally been both constructive and positive. The input received from the meeting and the questionnaires \vil! continue to be used and addressed throughout the final design process should the project be approved. Many of the issLles brought up by tbe residents were addressed and planned fin' \vith the feasibility study and the preliminary project design. These issues included side yarlt drive\vay, and alley drainage, utility pole obstruction. and erosion concerns. During the informational meetings, it was brought up that perhaps the residents who have garages that directly use the alley and are dependant on lhe alley for access should pay more than those who are nol as dependant on the alley for access. It was discLlssed at the meeting that in accordance with the Hopkins assessment policy and keeping consistent with other alley assessments in Hopkins, parcels abutting the alleyways are looked at as having equal rights (either on a linear footage or a per unit basis) and ability to use the alleyway both now and with potential future development of the parcels. The project schedule is outlined below: City Council orders preparation of Feasibility Report November 8, 2000 Public Information Meetings November 14_ 2000 & March ~], 2002 City Council receives the Feasibility Report and orders the Public Hearing April 2. 2002 Public Improvement Hearing May 7, 2002 City Council orders plans and specs May 7,2002 . City Council accepts plans and specs and orders bids May ~1. 2002 Adveltisc for bids May 31 & June 7, 2002 Receive bids June 12. 2002 Council Report 2002-72 Page 4 . Accept bids and award contract June 18. 2002 Begin construclion July. 2002 Construction ends August. 2002 Assessment Hearing October. 2002 . - .., . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) 88 _ COUNCIL OF HOPKINS ) Terry Obermaier, being first duly sworn, deposed and says: I am a United States citizen, over 21 years of age, and the City Clerk of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota. On April 19, 2002 acting on behalf of the said city, I caused to be deposited in the United States Post Office at the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of public hearing for 2002 Alley Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 00-12, enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses appearing on the attached copy of the mailing list. . There is delivery service by United States mail between the place of mailing and the places so addressed. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of April, 2002. ~ I1lD ()J CT\.{.+V\ Ar, ) Notary Publfc DARLA CRONN NOTARY PUBUC-MlNNESOTA My CDmmissio.1 Expires Jan. 31, 2005 .J(:~...;.. ~"':';":',..:.-f'~ - - --- --- -- CITY OF HOPIUNS Hermepin County, Minnesota . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT 2002 ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CITY PROJECT 00-]2 "PID~) <<N AME I >> <<NAME2>> <<NAME3>> <<NAME4>> RE: PID #<<PID>>, <<PROPERTY _ADDRESS)> TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota will meet at the City Council Chambers, Hopkins City Hall, 1010 1 st Street South, at 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, May 7, 2002 to consider the improvement of the existing alley located along the 200/300 block between 19th Avenue Nand 201h Avenue N. This improvement would include the reconstruction of the alleyway including concrete pavement, concrete curb, miscellaneous drainage improvements, and all necessary appurtenances pursuant to Mimlesota Statutes Chapter 429. . The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is as follows: Plat Name See Twp Rug QLQ Suffix West Milmeapolis Third Division 23 117 22 14 0036 through 0037 23 117 22 14 0039 through 0040 23 117 22 14 0073 23 117 22 14 0137 through 0138 The total estimated cost of such improvement is $34,750. The total estimated amount to be assessed for such improvements is $13,951. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above-proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. DATED: April 19, 2002 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL ~_tkn.uev Terry Obennaier, City Clerk City of Hopkins, Mimlesota ... Publisll: Hopkins Sun Sailor April 17 , 2002 & May 1, 2002 ,.,. YOUR ESTIMATED PEND lNG ASSESSMENT IS: <<PENDING>> (Please Note: This estimated pending assessment is not payable at this time. If you have questions regarding this assessment, please call the Special Assessment Clerk at 952-939-1346.) ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 ~ (9<'"i <'"i<'"i<'"i<'"i <'"i<'"i :;:; :z:(l) (l)(l)(l)01 (l)(l) _01 (l)01(l)01 01(l) OC a T"""~~~~T"""""':--- '" zwV}V}V}wV}b9- ~ W . 0.. ,.,., ,.,., "T "T ,.,., ,.,., 'TO on 'TO 'TO :z: :z: 2 2 ch u5 '<t ~ Z w ~ ;2 ~ 0-. 0-. <:( 0 0 z :I: ::c ,.,., I""'l rr') l"""") rr'l "T -r:t-..::J-"='t"='t ,.,., M I""'j t""I M 'TO I.t'l In tn Lr} VlZlnLrltnlnz Z~ZZZZLlJ 2>;::;:2:2::>;> ~-<..-~-< UJ:I:VlVlUJVl:I: "'~E-<~ZZ~f- w:><:C">~;2;2:><:o :2O-.~O-.O-.O-.O-.N <:(oSOOOOC; z:I:,.,.,:I::I::I:::C,.,., Z ~ Ll.J ~ 0 . Z~ZZZZO Ll.JillUJLlJLl.JLl.JZ >~>>>>-< -<<-<-<-<<> :I:~:I:::C:I::I:< NE-<:Z:f-f-E-<E-<:><: ~~GF;;?,~~cr: <cOOe<:r-C">"TN< z~>~~~g:E :z: cr:[iJSS ",g: LlJUJE-< LlJO-.e<: 9[U:<<:q:~Ll.J :z:ill;$:...J2Vlj VlLl.J:I:DLl.J::>;- ...J:I:",Vi:I: 2 >->-Ll.JE-<E-<~.....l ~Ll.J~c2iX"""E-< WLJ Ll.J;>-U-l~ :2 <[t < c::Ie<:NZ <C!-IJ-I::CO<:(~O Z",.....,Wcr:OVl'" ()) (}) W gsZZ:Z:ZZ:Z:Z DIJ-IL1JL1JLlJL1JUJU-l <t>>>>;;->> >--<-<<:(<:(<:(<:(<:( E.:::I::I:::C:I:::C::C:I: wE-<E-<f-E-<E-<E-<E-< (L~~g~;?:.~g :iOOOr-O>""'N~ _.......OOlnOO D... M t""I or"") f"""", N (") M . 1.0'--"0-.01"')1:-00 r-rJ(rlr""1"'Tr-~t""') 000.00............ 0000000 -+-+..+~.J-~~ -..........-.................- ...... ~ I I I . I I r~ -r--t .r4 (,""l f"">1 .('.1 N .-1 (""I r-l ("oJ N N N I I I I I I I r--r----r-t-r---r-r-- .................... ---'.................. D-~~~~~~ I I I I I I I -MI""if""'ll""""'ltrlN')!""'1 a.NNNNN~N . FEASIBILITY REPORT 2002 ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT ALLEY LOCATED WEST OF 19TH AVE. N. INCLUDING AND NORTH OF 3nJ ST. N. HOPKINS, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 00-12 March 2002 . I hereby certify that this repOli was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the Jaws of the State of Minnesota. k:z;/gk-~ REG. NO. ~ / ~ 0'3 DATE: S) "2..3/ 0 7- REVIEWED BY: .. - - . FEASIBILITY REPORT CONCRETE ALLEY PAVING ALLEY LOCATED WEST OF 19th AVENUE NORTH INCLUDING AND NORTH OF 3rd STREET NORTH CITY OF HOPKINS PROJECT NO. 00-12 Conclusions and Recommendation Summary: Conclusions drawn from studies and investigations are: l. The proposed alley and drainage improvements Gre feasihle, necessary, and cost effective. ") If the recommended alley is not reconstructed at this time, significant maintenance work "-. will be required. 3. The existing right-of-way 1S adequate to construct most of the proposed street improvements. Temporary construction easements will be needed in some areas. 4. The existing alley does not meet the current City of Hopkins standards. Based on these conclusions we recommend: . 1. The proposed alley improvements be constructed at an estimated project cost of $34,750. 2. A public infoTIllation meeting be held prior to the public improvement hearing. Notice of this meeting should be provided to affected property owners. 3. The project be assessed in accordance with the City's Assessment Policy. Introduction For a number of years the City of Hopkins has identified concrete alley paving projects to improve the function, drainage, and maintenance of many problematic City alleyways. The 2000-2004 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) first identified an alley paving project for the alley west of 19lh A venuc North, north of 3 rd Street North for the year 2002. Subsequent Capital Improvement Plans (2001-2005 and 2002~2006) have continued the identification of this alley for reconstruction in 2002 due to its designation as poor on the alley condition survey. On November 8, 2000, the Hopkins City Council adopted a resolution ordering the preparation of a feasibility report for this project. At the time, consideration was being made to possibly construct the project in 2001 rather than 2002. It was determined that the alley required upgrades with concrete paving due to the poor drainage ancl deteriorated condition of the alley. When one of the properties on the alley decided to remove and replace their garage in 2001, it ...... was detcrmined by staff that reconstruction of the alley should not take place until 2002 as originally planned in the CJP. ...... Background . The alley under consideration is the only roadway access to two properties located between Hilltop Park and 19th Avenue North in the #300 block. The alley connects with a short improved section of 3rd Street North and thence to 19 A venue North. The existing alley is constructed with a gravel! bituminous millings surface that is considerably deteriorated. Maintenance is an on- going issue because of an increasing need for filling in and patching various areas due to erosion, sluffing, and rutting. Issues of drainage arise in att<:mpting to channel storm runoff into 3rd Street or to an established low area adjacent to Hilltop Park. There are also issues of vehicle maneuvers for trash collection and snow removal. The combination of a poor surface section and inherent drainage problems has led to the increased rate of deterioration of the alley. The result is that levels of maintenance have grown larger. Proposed Improvements The proposed alley improvement projects are presented on the attached plan sheet The project provides for the construction of a concrete pavement surface 10 to 18 feet wide and 6 inches thick, in accordance with the City of Hopkins' concrete alley construction standard. The additional width, up to J 8 feet, is needed for the east-west alley segment for City maintenance and refuse pickup purposes. Existing grade and erosion issues are proposed to be improved by using a new alley profile and 8 inch integral curb in some areas. . The existing bituminous driveways will be sawcut and restored with bituminous driveway pavement upon completion of the concrete alley paving. Existing gravel driveways will be replaced with similar gravel materials of equal or greater depth than existed previous to the alley reconstruction. There will be no sod restoration within the limits of this project. Any turf restoration required by the project win be accomplished with black dirt and seed. An erosion control blanket will be used to help establish vegetation on existing steep slopes while preventing eroSIOn. The concrete alley paving will consist 0 f an inverted crown section, which is slightly depressed in the center to allow storm runoff within the alley sectiun versus ponding in the adjacent properties. The pavement grade wi II be establ ishcd to direct the runoff to the respective Hilltop Park and 19th Avenue North. A utility pole, located withiil the north~south right of way is proposed to be relocated in conjunction with the project to allow for bettcr access to driveways off the alley and remove a potential obstruction. It is anticipated that all new alley construction will be limited to the existing 12 foot north-south and 60 foot east-west respective right-of-ways; however, driveway restoration will extend up to five feet beyond the limits of the existing public right of way where it is only 12 feet wide (north-south). Temporary construction easements may be needed to help better facilitate construction activities. The 60 foot east-west right-of-way segment is an extension of the 3nJ . Street N011h right-of-way but functions as and will remain an alley segment due to grade and right-of-way issues. As mentioned above, an 18 foot alley segment will be installed in this section for City maintenance and refuse collection purposes. The construction will also require a concrete apron at the intersection with 191h A venue North. . Estimated Project Schedule City Council ordcrs prcparation of Feasibility November 8, 2000 Rep0l1 Public Information Meetings November 14, 2000 & March 21, 2002 City Council receives the Feasibility Report ancl April 2, 2002 orders the Public Hearing Public Improvement Hearing May 7, 2002 City Council orders plans and specs May 7,2002 City Council accepts plans and specs and orders May 21,2002 bids Advcltise for bids May 31 & June 7, 2002 Receive bids June 12, 2002 Accept Bids and Award Contract June 18, 2002 Begin Construction July, 2002 . Construction ends August, 2002 Assessment Hearing October, 2002 Proposed Fundine It is proposed that the concrete pavement project be assessed in accordance with the City of Hopkins' current assessment policy, wherein 80% of the cost is assessed to abutting properties and 20% is funded as a City cost. It is further proposed that the City's portion of the costs be paid entirely from the storm sewer utility fund, in accordance with City policy. Additional drainage improvements at Hilltop Park at the north end of the alley dead end would also be paid from the storm sewer utility fund. Because there are such unique circumstances sUlTounding this project site, including the unusual "L" shaped functional nature of this alley, staff feels that the fairest method to assess this project is on a per unit basis rather than on an abutting linear footage basis as is usually done with alley assessments, and that each abutting prope11y be assessed the same as they all have equal eligibility to use the alleyway. This assessment method is consistent with past assessments for Hopkins alley projects by assessing each abutting property in the same manner even though every property doesn't currently use the alleyway for their primary driveway access. As mentioned above, each property has the same eligibility to use the alley and the potential for . future redevelopment or changes to each of the properties means each property should be assessed in the same manner. The City staff is also of the opinion that the computation for the costs eligible for assessment should be based ofT a 10 foot wide alley section for the entire length of the functional alleyway because the additional 8 foot width for the east west portion is needed . to benefit the City for maintenance and refuse pickup purposes. Preliminary estimated amounts for assessments computed in accordance with the per unit 10 foot alley method outlined above have indicated assessments in the range of approximately $1,993 per unit. This amount is consistent with assessment amounts for other recent alley projects in the City of Hopkins. The custs associated with this additional width would come out of the PIR Fund. Project Costs Estimated Alley Construction Costs $32,629 Engineering and Administration @ 6.5% $ 2,121 Total Project Costs $34,750 Proposed Funding Assessments: 80% of alley costs per City policy $13,951 (Based on standard 10' wide residential alley) Assessment Period 10 years Interest Rate 7.0% Est. Assessment per abutting lot uni t (7 lots) $ L 993 . Storm Sewer Fund: 20% of alley costs per City policy $3,488 (Based on standard 10' wide residential alley) Drainage Improvements at Hilltop Park $3,062 (North end of alley dead end) PIR Fund: Alley costs for wider east-west alleyway $]4,249 Necessary for City maintenance and refuse pickup (Based on standard 10' wide residential alley) Recommendations and Conclusions The project is necessary to con-ect maintenance problems caused by inadequate alley surfacing. Maintenance problems include high maintenance costs for adding gravel, maintaining a gravel surface, controlling erosion, and other problems associated with overall poor drainage. The project is feasible, cost effective, necessary, and it is part of the City's annual alley paving program. The City plans for necessary capital improvements annually to coordinate other work ancI ensure that necessary improvements are provided in a timely and cost-effective mamler. The concrete alley paving project is teclmically feasible from an engineering standpoint and it is reC0I1U11ended that the City Council accept the project engineer's feasibility report as outlined . herein, and order the improvement made, subsequent to holding a public hearing. Addended to the end of this report is a summary of the estimated construction costs and a preliminary project schedule for the City Council's consideration. ENGINEERS ESTIMATE .ROJECT NO. 00-12 lIey Reconstruction >J~imiN~r . .'. Item.. . <A.-Po/OX. . Unrt .Vnrt AQlQWhf'" . :9U~r1~ty PriCES 1 Remove bituminous pavement 32 8.Y. $ 2.00 $ 64.00 2 Remove concrete curb and gutter 10 L.F. $ 4.00 $ 40.00 3 Saw cut bituminous pavement 82 LF $ 3.00 $ 246.00 4 F& I Type 41 A wear course mixture 32 8.Y $ 9.00 $ 288.00 5 Install 1 0' - 18' wide concrete alley pavement 674 8Y $ 30.00 $ 20,220.00 6 F & I class V aggregate base 78 TON $ 14.00 $ 1,092.00 7 F & 1 select granular borrow 117 TON $ 12.00 $ 1,404.00 8 Common excavating (plan quantities) 295 CY $ 10.00 $ 2,950.00 9 Subgrade correction 80 Cy $ 12.00 $ 960.00 10 Install concrete cross gutter 46 L.F. $ 20.00 $ 920.00 . 11 Install 8" integral concrete curb section 147 L.F. $ 10.00 $ 1,470.00 12 High Velocity Erosion Control Blanket 175 S.Y. $ 5.00 $ 875.00 13 F & I class III Rip Rap 20 TON $ 80,00 $ 1,600.00 14 Restoration 1 LUMP SUM $ 500.00 $ 500,00 Total of estimated bid amount Dollars = $ 32,629.00 Add 6.5% Eng. & Admin 34,749.89 . Project 00 12 Quanities rvh/NT 450 3f27f2002 ASSESSI'1ENT E~c,T lf01\TE B1-\SE f) ON ~~ T ANDAPD llJr WIDE ReSIDENTIAL ALLI:<:Y fjj.ROJECT NO. 00-12 ley Reconstruction Item No, Itf)nl Approx. Unit . .' Wriit . · Amoull\ Quanity .Prioe 1 Remove bituminous pavement 10 SY. $ 2.00 $ 20.00 2 Remove concrete curb and gutter 10 LF $ 4.00 $ 40.00 3 Saw cut bituminous pavement 25 LF $ 3.00 $ 75.00 4 F& I Type 41 A wear course mixture 10 S.Y. $ 9.00 $ 90.00 5 I nstall1 0' - 18' wide concrete alley pavement 444 SY $ 30.00 $ 13,320.00 6 F & I class V aggregate base 0 TON $ 14.00 $ 0.00 7 F & I select granular borrow 0 TON $ 12.00 $ 0.00 8 Common excavating (plan quantities) 178 C.Y $ 10.00 $ 1,7BO.00 9 Subgrade correction 0 C.Y. $ 12.00 $ 0.00 10 Install concrete cross gutter 20 L.F $ 20.00 $ 400.00 . 11 Install B" tntegral concrete curb section 55 LF $ 10.00 $ 550.00 12 High Velocity Erosion Control Blanket 0 SY. $ 5.00 $ 0.00 13 F & I class III Rip Rap 0 TON $ 80.00 $ 0.00 14 Restoration 0.2 LUMP SUM $ 500.00 $ 100.00 Total of estimated bid amount Dollars = $ 16,375.00 Add 6.5% Eng. & Admin 17,439.38 Subtract 20% to Storm Sewer Fund 13,951.50 Total Assmts 13,951.50 Estimated Assmt. For 7 Parcels 1,993.07 ~ .. Project 00-12 Quanities rvhl N T 450 3/27/2002 -- m_ co m 0)"'6 '<1"1- 1'-_ "'<i1iJ (T) , e ,. D- n g o "' ;:: " . ID _ '" 'C 0 ~ OJ ~ E '" f! - "' Z (T) In " ~ OJ In <: In <:( '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "" ""'0 C a 0. 0 0 0 c:> 0 0 0 0 0. c:> <D ({) c :J ~ 0. r:: co 0 N 0 c:> 0 ro c ci ui co ~ C :J l(J 0 ~ r-- OJ :J l!- I'- 0. 0 r-- 8 '<tLL ~ ro CD '<t co_ ~, lD, ~ OJ ~ N ("i ({) OJ ~ (T) ~ OJ OJ Cf) (J) E E 6 .8 en (J) c Vl "' 'E "' III 0 0 '0 0 <:( I- oCl E 6 Vl OJ C <:( l1J OJ # :;s If) ~ <0 '(J W '(J - <:( 0 '-"! 0 0. N a a a 0 0. 0 0 a 0. 0 0 0. a 0 a a a a 0 0 0 0. a a 0 a 0. 0. c:> a i:il ~ a r:: ro ci N -1 0' . H p:; t. :~ ~ U) fI> fI> .... '" .... .... fI> '" fI> <n- w <n- p 2, 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ tJ 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ii-l N '<t r') m ci Y> <I) .... fI> ... fI> fI> fI> fI> '" ;:2' :J - ~ LL ~ >-: z z >- ~ LL. LL ~ Z U) ..E LL 0 0 0 ::: ...J ...J ui 0 ---' ...J ui [L U) IJ) l- e- U e- ;:2' :J --' . ;' ..>:. N 0 r-- 01 0 co t~ r-- 0 lD ~~ ID 0 co l~: N ID 01 (T) t- ~ ~ ro 01 m t'- 01 0 01 ~ ~ ~ <(0 c OJ E OJ c > m 00 g iV OJ "- OJ -0 -"" ~ ::; >- "" ill C OJ ~ "-E "' m :t:: x ro ..0 rn c :J - E III OJ c OJ OJ :J ::; 0 OJ ill OJ iV III ~ 0- <ii 0 E '(J E lIJ C E c on t ..0 0 c :t:: QJ C QJ OJ QJ ::; ~ lIJ :J - 0 llJ > > c <ll 0 OJ ill U :J - lIJ ..0 lIJ 0 0 ro ..0 -30 t D- o D- ::; 0- U 0 Vl c C lIJ E ~ Ol ro Ol c III 0 '" 0 '" '" <ll [l! C 0 0 0 <n 0:: (1J :J :J ill '(J -S ~ - t 0 ~ 0 OJ 0 ~ '~ OJ C 0 ~ 0 ,Q- u " ..... ,~ OJ c OJ (1J > OJ <11 W 0:: :0 :~ E t 'E <:( fo (1J 0, III ~ OJ OJ " 0 ~ .c u c ~ ~ > 0 III - <lJ " .., ~~ ;:! :J X t 0 0 OJ n <lJ 0 C '(} OJ c iii '15 0 :.0 <lJ ill OJ <ll C ,- 0 ill a " <ll OJ :; 0- b '" Qj c '(J a fo Qj lIJ .~ E ;; o u >- ~ a '" 0 ti o ::I > > u I- 13 ill E 0, > 13 0 n ... 0 0 ro - ro ro - OJ u E E - E r: "' citi ~ "' oCl oCl ..0 Iii Iii OJ 0/:1 0 " QJ QJ lIJ 0/:1 0 :J <ll 0' Z C 0::: 0::: (J) LL C LL LL 0 (J) E E I lL 0::: n: I- 8 ro U 11> 6 i5 wo:: Z I- ""'l >- I, ~ 01 (') '<t L(J (0 t~ CO m 0 ~ 01 (') "" o OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0::= a.c:( ------ _----- ~----- __ _ ___ _- ___----"'-,uc='-"-- ~....""'.twUl'""~1-I~ , ~ _------ _ ,.'Y U<9U'1.'l ......t 00t _d to ..., III ..\II'U"'l" ,.lIIjj~1oiIl ~1$f'JI'I.'I'P"!!"'.''''' _"..,~,.,,~_.'''_ \,~ ,."'.............I...It!....fII"~ ..WIlJ.~"'oIlnn _.. ""1 '""' .,,~.... ....J(1IlI \ ' ,. , '1 . -, t\\ \~ \\\ \\\t 'i\ \\ ,\ \\ \\ ~ I , b ~ ~t f;i.! '''' \1 l' ~i. \~ I . ~ ,. ~j 'l"i \!!~' it" h~ t" I!l:" i' ~1 \. t. ~i lel~ ; .i; .l~li ~i! ~li ,,1 .. .1 '" : ~ ~ \ .1 ,. " 1 ., II!' I.", ,I . V " ' I: ii\ i;t \l~t ,I.' ,t. 11\ tot ,i II '~ ~ .' ~ c,' ill" yl~\ i.t l!:l 'ill, \'11 n \ i \~:; .ll~t..i ,~",1 i!'. ,e!O 1.1 ill tl '''l B x ..c: 1 ,1- i ~ ,~l:' t'; u! ..i ,& ..J I . 1.\1 .. I I !pl .! l~ · i ~\ ~1" ~\ ~.~. . 1\ ~ll '!' ~\\ ~I ~l' t ~ \ ., ) j~ ~"\ ,_,) 1':":':~' $) ,~ 0 J- .._ /' .c .--- - (! ;\) 11J~ l~;::::~-::. +- /: \~,,' .n \..J' ._ (" l>- [~___ (0 0 ~ ~ .-~-ilrL': ~----'~<:. =? o I,l J 0 ~ -... t~~ l~CA' ( j __ \.-_ ilL-I _ (\) ----~ - "'""\ 1-'O).J -- :--. ~ l]J If >(10\ .n ~\h:::-F' 4.".J c;~ -------- ~~. - '" ! ..- < ... I ~ r 3 ~~ . l o,.tj eo. ,.J - . ' .., . ~ ' ' 1 · (j) <]) . h]}'OJ r,; N .. .... ", _~_'.. CO -0 o " ' ,., .' ,-;:;\ -" ~---,,\ --' .. I g..\ -. · 0 .!,\., '" ~. !. --..-'" \ <II ~ --i ~ In.,,,,, ~ _. "'" Y~,. ,___,c_~t, ~7;J1.CS~';; '\ r'J-:~~ u 0 ") I{} -~-~--~ ~l .~ ~ . (Ie>.' .~ . (_,' ( I ~ ,"<l"\ f4iC,' r- Jrl ." \"' :\- Q \ ,? ( , ('0 r'l "'( ,,\ . , .... _ l" ~_.( , . f )_\ ,~ \, 0 ,1' , r o "' J" , ;r () '>l (' -1~~- ~..-----'- \,-~""h ("i r~t('-') I > j \ 0 . ,,) ~)- ---~. \''''j .__- ~ fc ~ "" -- - -' - '(< 1 (_{~r',-.1 N -' ~ ...... '\ ~ ..~_ i ,r'o , . r _.~ ..-~ [ <::-> I . ~~ 0::;;;';-: .. ( )"~ JO,) __ ( ,-~J ( ~ --:::.:::' ,~ ) ( . __J (, ) ._.-J( n \ I ." .-r"'" '-" \ ::::: .__.~._ D- J ri' ' <. ; . CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2002-38 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING 2002 ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY PROJECT 00-12 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 2nd day of April 2002 fixed a date for a Council Hearing on the proposed improvement of alley reconstruction in the 300 Block between 19th Avenue North and Hilltop Park, including concrete pavement and curb installation, drainage and erosion control improvements, and all necessary appurtenances, and WHEREAS, the Council deems it appropriate and expedient to make such improvements, and WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon the 7th day of May 2002, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution adopted the 2nd day of April 2002. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this ih day of May 2002. By Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk ..... ~ . CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2002-39 DECLARING THE OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FROM GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BOND PROCEEDS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY OF HOPKINS WHEREAS, the Internal Revenue Service has issued Treas. Reg. #1.150-2 providing that proceeds of tax-exempt bonds used to reimburse prior expenditures shall not be deemed spent unless certain requirements are met; and I WHEREAS, the City expects to incur certain expenditures, which may be financed temporarily from sources other than bonds and reimbursed from the bond proceeds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY . OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA (THE CITY) AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City intends to incur expenditures for the project described in Council Report 2002-72, for City Project 00-12 (the "Project") and intends to reimburse itself for such expenditures from the bond proceeds to be issued by the City in the maximum principal amount described in the "project". 2. The City Manager is authorized to designate additions to Project 00-12 in circumstances where time is of the essence, and any such designation shall be reported to the Council at the earliest practicable date and shall be filed with the official books and records of the City. 3. This resolution is intended to constitute a declaration of official intent for the purpose of Treas. Reg. #1.150-2 and any successor law, regulation, ruling or amendment pertaining thereto. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, this ih day of May 2002. By Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor - ATTEST: - Terry Obermaier, City Clerk