Loading...
CUP 87-07 � CITY OF HOPKINS APPLICATION FOR: AMENDMENT OF ZONING ORDINANCE DATE: March 6, 1987 CONCEPT REVIEW CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT x CASE N0: t��/� `��i'- �'� SUBOIVISION APPROUAL VARIANCE FEE: '•%- " WAIVER OF PLATTING REQUIREMENTS DATE PAID: � - �- - 4 �� 1. Street Locatton of Property: 101 Jefferson Ave South, Hopkins, MN 55440 2. Legal Description of Property: Parcels l, 2 & 3 - See Attached 3. Owner: Name Super Valu Stores, Inc Address 11840 Valley View R@lhone 828-4000 E en Prairie, Mrd 55344 4. Applicant's Name: PLANMARK Address Same As Above Phone 828-4500 5. DesCription of Request: For 9 , 000 SF Building Addition & Remodelinq oning District Use � Present Proposed 7. Present Proposed I-2 I-2 Distribution Center Distribution , Cente� 8. Reason for Request: Need Expansion Space - NOTE: If request is for variance, please also complete attached page. 9. What error, if any, in the existing Ordinance would be corrected by the proposed amendm�nt? (for Zoning Ordinance amendment only) 10. Exhibits submitted: Map or plat showing the lands proposed to be changed OtherArea Site Plan, Site Plan & Addition Floor P] a �f Ar3�7� i-i nn � Fi A��a�io: 11. Acknowledgement and Signature: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the City of Hopkins to take the action herein requested, that all statements herein a e tru and that all work herein mentioned will be done. in ac- cordance with the Ordinance� of t Ci of Hopkins and the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature of Applicant: �L � � Signature of Owner: RECORD OF ACTION TAKEtJ BY PLANNING & ZONING COf�IMISSIOfd Date: 3/31/87 -- Application for Conditional Use Permit CASE N0: CUP87-7 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOP1MENDATIONS On the 31 day of ;�arch 19 87 , the action requested in the foregoing petition was approved ( xj disapproved subject to the following conditions: Recommend approval with i=indings: 1. Proposed addition meets the r s f an I-2 Dist. 2. Addition meets r•equirements of a Conditional Use Permit; an �th nd' ' s: . Approval by Fire Marshal ; 2. Applicant secure an easement for the relo ter . 3.Special Purpose Fence 22' -25' be constructed Chairman: along southerly property line. CITY COUNCIL ACTION Approved X Denied by the Council this 5 day of Ma.y 19 87 Approved with folloa�ing amendment: � C1erk: �, � ��-v'�� � �. `�� �- Following to be filled in by City Action of City Officials Chronolo Date B Rec'd by Bldg Dept. Published by Bldg Dept. On Pl . Corrm. Agenda 3/31/87 JK Pl . Comm. Postponement P1 . Corrm. Action 3/31/87 JK Recommend to Council approval of Conditional Us Permit with Findings and Conditions stated abov On Council Agenda 4 7 87 JK Council Postponement ' 4/21/87 , JK � � � � � Council Action 5/5/87 � JK Approved as stated in Resolution No: 87-28 � �� RESOLUTION N0: 87-28 � CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COONTY, MINNESOTA RESOLIITION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL= USE PERMIT CUP87-7 WHEREAS , an application for Conditional Qse Permit CUP87-7 has been made by Super Valu Stores , Inc . , 101 Jefferson Avenue South , to construct an addition to the present facility. WHEREAS , the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1 . That an application for Conditional Use Permit CUP87-7 Was filed on March 6 , 1987 • 2 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission revieWed suah application on Maroh 31 , 1987 • 3 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission , pursuant to published and mailed notices , held a public hearing on March 31 , 1987 ; all persons present at the hearing Were given an opportunity to be heard . 4 . That the Written comments and analysis of the City '� Staff and the Planning Commission were considered . NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED , that the Hopkins City Council makes the folloWing Findings of Fact in respect to CUP87-7 : 1 . That the proposed addition meets the requirements of an I-2 District . 2 . That the proposed addition meets the requirements of a Conditional Use Permit . BE IT FURTHER RESOLYED , that application for Conditional iJse Permit CUP87-7 is hereby approved sub�ect to the folloWing conditions: 1 . That the Fire Marshal approve the plans . 2 . That the applicant secure an easement for the relocated watermain . 3 . ConstruQtion of a Speeial IIse Fence (sound barrier �rall) 22 ' -25 ' in height along the southerly property line . ^ Adopted this 5th day of May, 1987 • Ellen Lavin , Mayor � MEMORANDUM DATE: April 28 , 1987 T0: City Council FROM: Nancy S. Anderson �SA SUBJECT: Conditional IIse Permit for Super Valu - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - At the last City Council meeting , several surrounding neighbors to the Super Valu property complained about the noise generated at the site . On April 22 , 1987 , Super Valu ^ met with the surrounding neighbors and presented them a plan which provides a sound Wall and landseaping along the southern property line . The sound aall starts approximately at the new addition and continues West to the end of the Super Valu property. The wall Kill be 20-25 feet in height and made of treated Wood . Landscaping rrill be provided along the wall . The surrounding residents at the meeting Were in favor of the sound wall . � Citv Counci [ Repor � April 1 , 1987 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - SUPER VALU 101 Jefferaon Avenue South PURPOSE: To review and recommend action on an application for a Conditional Use Permit to construct an addition to the existing facility. BACKGROUND: See staff report to Zoning and Planning Commission . Dave Linner , representing Super Valu � revieWed the proposed addition . Mr. Linner noted there is a 12 foot grade change between the Super Valu property and the abutting residential district at the south side of the site . Super Valu did meet r+ith the ^ surrounding neighbors . Mr. Paul Janke of Monroe Avenue spoke in favor of the project . The Commission was concerned r+ith landscaping around the site . Mr. Linner stated that the south and east sides of the property that abutt residential distriets are landscaped . RECOMMENDATION: The Commission approved the Conditional Use Permit unanimously with the folloxing Findings of Faet and Conditions : 1 . That the proposed addition meets the requirements of an I-2 District . 2 . That the proposed addition meets the • I requirements of a Conditional Use Permit i Conditions: 1 . That the Fire Marshal approve the plans . 2 . That the applicant secure an easement for the relocated watermain . I Respeetfully submitted � � I i � � �_ I Nancy . Anderson Community Development Analyst N Q. 87-66 � �� Plannin� Commission Report CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - SOPER VALU PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT N0: CUP87-7 MARCH 24 , 1987 PURPOSE: To review and recommend action on an application for a Conditional Use Permit to construct an addition to the existing Super Valu Building . BACRGROUND• Name of Applicant: Super Valu Stores Inc . Address of Property: 101 Jefferson Avenue South Present Zoning: I-2 � Reason for Request: Needed expansion space Nature of Request : Ordinance requires — eonstruetion over $75 ,000 to obtain a Conditional Use Permit . The applicant is proposing to construct a 9000 square foot addition with six loading docks to the south side of the existing dry goods loading area ad�acent to Third Street South. Ordinance 525 • 13 requires a Conditional Use Permit whenever a building permit requested is for new construction or for the enlargement , remodeling repair of the exterior of any existing building including structures aecessory thereto , at a eost of at least $75 ,000 , except one through four family structures . ANALYSIS: The sub�ect property abutts a residential distriet along Monroe Avenue and Third Street South. Because of this situation the ordinance requires a u0 foot rear yard setbaek and loading docks to have a 50 foot setback . The proposed addition is not parallel to the lot line . The loading dock area will have approximately a 52 foot setback , Which then tapers to . approximately 43 feet at the easterly end . The plan as proposed Will have a 15 foot concrete block wall screening the loading area Prom the residential � N 0. cuPs�-� CUP87-7 Page 2 — district along Third Street South. The Wall will be painted to match the existing building. The addition is at a loWer elevation than the abutting residential distriet . With the Wall , differenae in elevation and the existing fenee � noise and visual impact should be minimal to the homes along Third Street South. A 20 foot Wide aecess road Will be maintained between the proposed building and the lot line . This road will provide access to the parking lot east of the addition . The Floor Area Ratio is .55 • The maximum requirement for an I-2 District is .60 . The site is close to maximum development . A 12" watermain Will have to be relocated because of the proposed building. The applicant �ill move the watermain to the south side of the addition for which the City will require a 15 ' easement . The City Engineer has reviewed these plans and found them acceptable . The applicant will have to petition to vacate the existing utility easement on Second Street South. The exterior of the building Will be painted concrete block to mateh the existing building . The addition will also have a canopy to match the existing building . The addition will require five more parking spaces , which the applicant will provide . Any future additions will require the applicant provide additional spaees . The applicant may seek a parking varianee for future additions . The Fire Marshal has revieWed the preliminary plans , but was out of town during the writing of this report. Any approval should be contingent upon his approval . The Director of Engineering has reviewed the plans and found them aeeeptable . The applicant requires additional space for their business . The proposed addition complies with the requirements for an I-2 distriet and a conditional use � CUP87-7 Pdge 3 � permit . The addition should have a minimum impact on the abutting residential distriet the the south beeause of the wall screening the loading area and the elevation difference. ALTERNATIVES• 1 . Approve the Conditional Use Permit . 2 . Deny the Conditional Use Permit . 3 . Continue for additional information . RECOMMENDATION: I recommend Alternative #1 . The folloWing are Findings of Facts and Conditions should the Commission recommend approval . 1 . That the proposed addition meets the requirements of an I-2 Distriet . 2 . That the proposed addition meets the requirements of a Conditional Use Permit . Conditions: 1 . That the Fire Marshal approve the plans . .--� 2 . That the applicant secure a easement for the relocated watermain . Respeetfully submitted , _ I �,��(1JC �,,rnP�'�Q: � Nanc S . Anderson Community Development Analyst ��