Loading...
CUP 86-08 ^ CITY OF HOPKINS Application for: Amendment of Zoning Ordinance Date: `f�- /�- �� Concept Review ����L � Conditional Use Permit ✓ Case No: ,, - � Subdivision Approval � Variance Fee: - Waiver of Platting Requirements Date Paid: $- /S- �� 1. Street Loca ti on of Property: �� K �,�u(� � ���� ��,�� 2. Legal Description of Property: �G !1 � w 3. Owner: Name Address ( °��'�''' PhoneJ� . - 4. Applicants Name: ���p �9��,61_.Q Address " °` Phone `` '"` 5. Description of Request: � ,� � � �.,n o � ,��� �� � -�y l�,,J�,��rv. �--�.�'-"�•�—r . � c — ---� Zoning District Use 6. Present Proposed 7. Present Proposed �~2 s�' /1tiOKQ Df r'C��c 8. Reason for Request 9. What error, if any, in the existing Ordinance would be corrected by the proposed amendment? (for Zoning Ordinance amendment only) 10. If request is for a variance, what hardship would justify approval (see 427.04(108) of the Zoning Ordinance) . 11. Exhibits submitted: f4ap or plat showing the lands proposed to be changed . ' Other ,12. Acknowledgement and Signature: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the pen- alties of law, for the purpose of inducing the City of Hopkins to take the action herein requested, that all statements herein are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Hopkins and the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature of Applicant: �� Signature of Owner: � _ RECORD OF ACTION TAKEfd BY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION � Date: 8/26/86 Application for Conditional Use Permit CASE N0: CUP86-8 PLANNING COh�1ISSI0N RECOMMENDATIONS On the 26 day of Au ust 19 86 , the action requested in the foregoing petition was approved (X) disapproved subject to the following conditions: Recommend approval of CUP86-8 with the Findings of Fact: l.the development meets the re- quirements for a CUP; 2. the development meets the minimum I-1 req ' ements• d with the Conditions : l.approval by Watershed Dist. ;2.approval by Fire Ma al ; ' ge approve by Director of Engeering; 4.60'of evergreen Chairman: lantin s be added to lan•5.10 ever r building be added; 6. irrigation system be added. CITY COUNCIL ACTION Approved x Denied by the Council this 2nd day of September 19 �� Approved with following amendment: Adopt Resolution No. 86-53 Granting Conditional Use ' Permi t. ---� C1erk:��. JCot� ��-�-Y����-C Following to be filled in by City Action of City Officials Chronolo Date B - Rec'd by Bldg Dept. Published by Bldg Dept. � On P1 . Comm. Agenda 8 26 86 J � Pl . Comm. Postponement Pl . Corrm. Action 8/26/86 JK Approved as stated above. On Council Agenda Council Postponement � ^ Council Action 9/2/86 JK Adopted Resolution No 86-53 Granting Conditional Use Permit. NOTE: A Conditional Use Permit shall expire one year after it has been issued unless the use for which the permit has been granted is in effect, except that, upon written application of the owner of the effected land for which the permit was granted prior to the end of said year may request and [he Council may grant an extension not to exceed one year. CITY OF HOPKINS �-- Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 86- 53 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP86-8 WHEREAS, an application for a Conditional Use Permit entitled CUP86-8 has been made by R. L. Johnson Investment Company, to construct an office/warehouse facility as Fifth Street South & Seventh Avenue. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for Conditional Use Permit CUP86-8 was filed with the City of Hopkins on August 15, 1986. 2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such application on August 26, 1986. 3. That the Nopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing on August 26, 1986; all persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. 4. That the written comments and analysis of the City staff and the Planning Commission were considered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hopkins City Council makes the following ^ Findings of Fact in respect to CUP86-8: 1- The development meets the minimum I-1 requirements. 2. The development meets the requirements for a Conditional Use Permit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for Conditional Use Permit CUP86-8 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval by the Watershed District. 2. Approval by the Fire Marshal . 3. That the drainage plan be approved by the Director of Engineering. 4. Sixty feet of evergreen plantings be added on each side of the plan of the north-south plantings on the Seventh Avenue perimeter. 5. Plan to incorporate low evergreens against the building. 6. Site to have an irrigation system. Adopted this 2nd day of September, 1986. Ellen Lavin, Mayor ---� � �Plannin� Commission Report - August 20, 1986 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - A & J PROPOSAL PURPOSE: To review and recommend action on a Conditional Use Permit request to construct an office/warehouse. BACKGROUND: fJame of Applicant: R. L. Johnson Investment Company Address of Property: Fifth Street South & 7th Avenue Present Zoning: I-1 Nature of Request: To construct a 109,200 square foot office/warehouse Reason for Request: Ordinance requires a Conditional Use Permit for construction over $75,000 This proposed construction is the first of four proposed by the ap- plicant. This proposed development will consit of a 109,200 square foot office/warehouse building located at Fifth Street South and Seventh Avenue. The building consists of 80% office and 20% ware- � house. I-1 District Proposed Front Yard 75 110 Side Yard N 20 N 50 S 40 S 100 Rear Yard 20 50 Lot Area 10,000 sq.ft. 397 ,555 sq.ft. F.A.R. . 60 .27 Height 35 approx. 17 Parking 344 395 The proposed development complies with the I-1 minimum requirements except the proposed plan shows parking in the front yard setback. The applicant has applied for a variance. The applicant has revised the parking plan since the agenda was de- livered. A few spaces were removed on the inside of the building in the loading dock area, however, the plan still meets the parking re- quirements. Access to the site has been eliminated along 6th Street and there is now proposed three access points along 5th Street. Five loading docks are located on the inside of the proposed build- ing. The proposed plan shows 145 plantings, this exceed the minimum re- --� quirements. N O. CUP86-8 PLANNING REPORT CUP86-8 Page 2 � No drainage plan has been submitted, the applicant believes it should be ready by the meeting. The applicant has stated that the trash containers will be located in the load- ing dock area. A traffic study has been done for the entire project, which has been enclosed. Basically it was concluded that the current roadway system can handle the traffic for this development. The exterior of the building will be Alucabond fascia with 1" insulated glass. The applicant has contacted the Watershed District, however as of the date of this report has not received approval . The Fire Marshal was out of town at the time of this report, any approval should be contingent on approval by him. The applicant has not detailed any lighting system for the parking lot, however, all lighting of the parking area will have to conform with the ordinance require- ments. ANALYSIS: The proposed development meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance � for the I-1 District and also the requirements for a Conditional Use Permit. The applicant has designed the building to buffer the residential area by placing the access to the building along 5th Street South. Landscaping will also buffer the residential area from the proposed building. The proposed building will provide Hopkins with space to attract new business opportunities. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The following are suggested Findings of Fact should the Commission recommend approval : 1. The development meets the minimum I-1 requirements. 2. The development meets the requirements for a Conditional Use Permit. Conditions: 1. Approval by the Watershed District 2. Approval by the Fire Marshal 3. That the drainage plan be approved by the Director of Engineering. Nancy Anderson, Analyst Communi y Development ��