Loading...
CUP 86-07 � CITY OF HOPKINS Appl i cati on for: Amendment of Zoni ng Ordi nance Date: 7- ,;�- �r'�/_ Concept Review Conditional Use Permit �_ Case No: "�� - - - Subdivision Approval Variance Fee: �5.00 Waiver of Platting Requirements Date Paid: �- 31- �(� 1. Street Location of Property:_ � �G���i� S c7 2. Legal Descri pti on of Property: ,.��,`�- ,�,�� _ -_ : _ �-����' 3. Owner: Name � ' m �E5' -'"Rd�dre s s 3o L�J���.t��S1�2_ ����Phone 3S-` � 4. Appl icants Name: � /F� Address Yr�-�E Phone J 3� --1J1c 5. Description of Request: �j���`l G�� ��n� � 7� Cp� oG�r� . � ^ � G��� - C'O�� �i-1^ �cn�� �j� ��� mo c� Zoning District Use 6. Present Proposed 7. Present Proposed �—� 8. Reason for Request � Q>c � / 9. What error, if any, in the existing Ordinance would be corrected by the proposed amendment? (for Zoning Ordinance amendment only) 10. If request is for a variance, what hardship would justify approval (see 427.04(108) of the Zoning Ordinance) . 11. Exhibits submitted: �4ap or plat showing the lands proposed to be changed Other -�. Acknowledgement and Signature: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the pen- � alties of law, for the purpose of inducing the City of Hopkins to take the action herein requested, that all statements herein are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in accordance with the Ordi ances of the City of Hopkins and the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature of Applicant: l� �.� Signature of Owner: RECORD OF ACTION TAKEfJ BY PLANNING & ZONING COf�1MISSIOPd --` Application for Conditional Use Permit Date: 8/26/86 CASE N0: 86-CUP PIANNING COMMISSION RECOP1MENDATIONS On the 26 day of _ Au_ ust 19 86 , the action requested in the foregoing petition was approved (X) disapproved subject to the following conditions: Recommend approval based on the Findings of Fact that the structure is the ame building as previously proposed. Chairman: CITY COUNCIL ACTION Approved X Denied by the Council this 2nd day of September 19 86 Approved with following amendment: Adopted Resolution No. 86-51 Granting Conditional Use - Permit. --�. Clerk: � . �Z '� lI C Following to be filled in by City Action of City Officials Chronolo Date 6 Rec'd by Bldg Dept. `� Published by Bldg Dept. On Pl . Comn. Agenda 8 26 86 JK . P1 . Comm. Postponement Pl . Comm. Action 8/26/86 JK Recommend approval On Council Agenda 9 2 86 JK Council Postponement � . i � -L uncil Action 9/2/g6 � JK Approved Resolution No. 86-51 Granting Conditional Use Permit � ' NOTE: A Conditional Use Permit shall expire one year after it has been issued unless ' the use for which the permit has beeo granted is in effect, except that, upon y written application of the owner of the effected land for which the permit was , granted prior to the end of said year may request and the Council may grant an , extension not to exceed one year. � CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0: 86- 51 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROUING TNE APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP86-7 WHEREAS, an application for a Conditional Use Permit entitled CUP86-7 has been made by W. Pitt Rolfe, to construct an office building in excess of $75,000.00 on Second Avenue South & 7th Street. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: l. That an application for CUP86-7 was filed with the City of Hopkins on July 31, 1986. 2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such application on August 26, 1986. 3. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed notices, held a public hearing on August 26, 1986; all persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. 4. That the written comments and analysis of the City Staff and the Planning Commission were cansidered. —� NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hopkins City Council makes the following Findings of Fact in respect to CUP86-7 : 1. That the structure is the same building as previously proposed in August 1984. Adopted this 2nd day of September, 1986. Ellen Lavin, Mayor � , . r--� Pla nnin� Commission Report August 11, 1986 T0: Zoning & Planning Commission FROM: Nancy Anderson SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit for Rolfe Office Building The applicant was approved for a Conditional Use Permit in September 1984 and received a year extension in September 1985. 427.26(5) states a Conditional Use Permit shall expire one year after it has been issued unless the use for which the permit has been granted is in effect, except that upon written application of the owner of the effected land for which the permit was granted prior to the end of said year may request and the Council may grant an extension not to exceed one year. The proposed building remains the same as the building proposed in 1984. The applicant has not constructed the building because he has �., had a problem securing tenants. r� � -; , � � Nancy . Anderson, Analyst Commu ty Development N o. CUP86-7 � August 23, 1984 Case No: 84-27 Applicant: W. Pitt Rolfe Location: Second Avenue South & 7th Street South Request: Conditional Use Permit for Construction of an Office Building STAFF FINDINGS & COMMENTS: 1. Applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct an office building. 427.26(c) requires a Conditional Use Permit for new construction over $75,000. 2. The subject site is located North of 7th Street South and between Second Avenue South and County Road 18. The site is zoned B-1 , Limited Business. 3. The proposed office building is to be 14,268 square feet. The building is three stories high with a mean building height of 25 feet. The first floor of the building will be below street level with an elevation of 893.0 feet, the average street elevation is 900 feet. The exterior of the building is to be constructed of brick, with the windows being constructed of bronze ^ insulated glass. 4. The proposed use for the office building is a dentist office occupying the first floor, an accounting firm on the second and the occupancy for the third floor is unknown at this time. 5. The structure as presented would have a 38 foot front yard setback along Second Avenue South, a 68 foot rear yard setback along County Road 18, a 80 foot sideyard setback to the North and a Southerly side yard setback of 20 feet along 7th Street South. Ordinance 427.35 requires setbacks of 20 feet for the front yard, 10 feet for the rear and 10 feet for the side yards. 6. An office building is located to the North of the subject site, single family homes to the West, buf,fered by trees, construction of a medical clinic to the South and Highway 18 to the east. 7. 58 parking stalls are to be provided with an entrance/exit from the Northwest. 14 compact stalls are provided along with two handicap stalls. The number of parking stalls are in compliance with ordinance 427.45(20) which requires at least one parking space for each two hundred and fifty square feet of gross floor area for office. The ordinance requires 57 parking stalls based on these requirements. 8. The perimeter of the parking lot is to be landscaped with sod and a variety of over and understory trees. The landscaping would conform to the requirements — of the proposed landscaping ordinance. 9. The drainage plan has been reviewed by the City Engineer and has been found acceptable. Drainage will flow in a Northwesterly direction on the site. � . : ' � Case No: 84-27 Page 2 10. Ordinance 427.35 requires a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 1.0. The proposed building has a F.A.R. of .39 which meets the requirements of the ordinance. 11. Trash storage is to be located at the Northeast corner of the site and en- closed with a 5 foot high redwood fence. 12. Access to the proposed site will be from the Northwest corner from Second Avenue South. 13. The Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans and noted that the building must be sprinkled, any other Fire Code requirements will have to be complied with at the building permit stage. � i�