CUP 85-22 .._---�--
. ,
�
� CITY OF HOPKINS
; ��.r--�-
��'NLICATID�� FOR: AMENDMEPJT OF ZONING ORDINANCE DATE: �}' �1 V
CONCEPT REVIEW
CONDITIONAL USE PERh1IT � CASE N0: ,:._`�- ` -
SUBDIVISION APPROVAL
CC
VARIANCE �` FEE: =� c" •'
WAIVER OF PLATTING REQUIREMENTS
DATE PAID: � - � � �-
1. Street Location of Property: � j �� � �� l�L !S ; "; '-`�-� _ -
2. Legal Description of Property:
. ��- ;
3. Owner: Name �" �; �, �-',�_ "��,C f�'i�,:'�� Address `� s ` I � ,�; , � ! �;�- Phone
�����a_ ���n.r�-1 ���; ��� �- �
4. Applicant's Name: �;-c�cr's, 1�.�. Address %��:� �L �� � � is;�,: Phone `j ;�'-/1��)
. .. - - _ _ ,�_ __.._�.- , .�_ _ -
5. Descripti on of Request: , . �;� _�- , �t��==�--�5- `<. � �*---�-
- -_�>-- L _x ��• G� _ �"�". ', t-�'
Zoni ng Di s ri ct Use ' G�'�+
6. Pr(esent Proposed 7. Present Pro os�d (
"'� !� —� (`.. - ` �' " � �•l�' F\{. �'�- � ��`�c �[ r :i. - c< u C�\("`� t
_�_._... � �_ �1
.c c: r �
. . Reaso� for Request: " �-{-�-��-��T----
r
NOTE: If request is for variance, please also complete attached page.
9. What error, if any, in the existing Ordinance would be corrected by the proposed amendment?
(for Zoning Ordinance amendment only)
10. Exhibits submitted:
Map or plat showing the lands proposed to be changed
Other
11. Acknowledgement and Signature: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties
of law, for the purpose of inducing�the City of Hopkfins to take the action herein requested,
that all statements herein are true �nd/that all wo,rk,, h r,ein mentioned will be done in ac-
cordance with the Ordinances of �he %Ci�y of Hopkin , n �the laws of the State of Minnesota.
;� ,
� ; � ,i , ��� _
Signature of Applicant: � '
�.�_ �� ,�� �i ,ti��L
, �,:
�
1.
,�
,
^ � RECORD OF ACTION TAKE�J BY PLANNING & ZOrvIroG COMMiSStOra �
Da te : 4/30/85
Application for Conditional Use for Siqn
CASE N0: g5-22
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
On the 30 day of A ril 19 85 , the action requested in the foregoing petition
was approved ( ) disapproved subject to the following conditions :
Tabled
4/29/86 Recommend approval of a corner sign with a 10 feet �eback fro walk
Recommend approval of a pole sign at east property i it 1 fe s �.
Chairman: ��4���
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Approved X Denied by the Council this 6 day of Ma.y 19 86
Approved with following amendment: Approved CUP for west corner sign with a 10 foot setback
Sign with 1' setback-East end continued. Resolution 86-20
6/3/86 Approval of CUP to place sign with one foot setback Resolution 85-,-2�
-�. � C 1 e r k: •-� , ��,�, ��;'t�.t.--t
Following to be filled in by City Action of City Officials
Chronolo Date B
Rec'd by Bldg Dept.
Published by Bldg Dept.
On P1 . Corrm. Agenda 4
P1 . Comm. Postponement
Pl . Comn. Action � 4/30/85 JK � Tabled
4/29/86 JK Recommend approval of CUP as stated above.
On Council Agenda
I
I !
�Council Postponement ( ,
-1 j
• 5/6/86 Adopt Res. 86-20
_�unci � Action 6/3/86 i JK Adopt Res. 86-28
- i
��
.�,
e
f
�:., CITY OF HOPKINS
� �� Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION N0. 86-20
RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP85-22
WHEREAS, an application for a Conditional Use Permit entitled CUP85-22
has been made by Rudy Luthers Hopkins Honda, 459 Mainstreet, to place a
sign at less than the minimum frontyard setback.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows:
1. That an application for Conditional Use Permit CUP85-22 was filed
with the City of Hopkins on May 11, 1985.
2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such application on
April 30, 1985 and on April 29, 1986.
3. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed notices,
held a public hearing on April 30, 1985 and April 29, 1986; all
� persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be
heard.
4. That the written comments and analysis of the City Staff and the
---�
Planning Corr�nission were considered.
—�_
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hopkins City Council makes the
following Findings of Fact in respect to CUP85-22:
1. That the Design Committee found the setback acceptable.
2. That all other businesses along Mainstreet have a one foot
setback.
Adopted this 6th day of May, 1986.
Ellen Lavin, Mayor
�,."y,
��
. �, .
CITY OF HOPKINS
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION N0. 86-28
RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
APPROVING APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CUP85-22
WHEREAS, an application for a Conditional Use Permit entitled CUP85-22
has been made by Rudy Luthers Hopkins Honda, 459 Mainstreet, to place a
sign at less than the minimum frontyard setback.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows :
1. That an application for Conditional Use Permit CUP85-22 was filed
with the City of Hopkins on April 11, 1985.
2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such application on
April 30, 1985 and on April 29, 1986.
3. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed notices,
held a public hearing on April 30, 1985 and April 29, 1986; all
persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be
heard.
--�_ 4. That the written comments and analysis of the City Staff and the
�� Planning Commission were considered.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hopkins City Council makes the
following Findings of Fact in respect to CUP85-22:
1. A closer setback to Mainstreet will allow the sign to be farther
away from the residential district.
2. A one foot setback will allow the sign to be visible from Mainstreet.
3. Other signs in the area have a one foot setback.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for Conditional Use Permit
CUP85-22 is hereby approved subject to the following condition:
l. That the sign be erected in conformance with the site plan submitted
to the City of Hopkins.
Adopted this 3rd day of June, 1986.
Ellen Lavin, Mayor
---�
-.�...
,