1998 - 2002 CIP \ T Y
0
O T
ti 5
O K ` r1
CITY OF HOPKINS
1998-2002
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PLAN
September 1997
f
/
City of Yfopkjns
1010'First Street South • .7fopkins, 1MW 55343-7573 • Phone: 612-935-8474 • Ta.x 612-935-1834
DATE : September 1997
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Steven C. Mielke, City Manager
SUBJECT: 1998-2002 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
With this letter, I respectfully submit the 1998-2002 Capital
Improvement Plan. This five-year planning document represents the
combined efforts of city staff, advisory commissions, citizens,
and the City Council .
The Capital Improvement Plan is a five-year forecast of project
needs in the City of Hopkins . It is intended to alert the Council
and citizens to the major capital needs on the horizon. The first
year of the plan becomes an adopted capital budget and relates
almost completely to the operating budget which is approved on a
yearly basis . The remaining four years represent an estimate of
project needs and funding capabilities of the city. In previous
plans an explanation of five-year equipment needs was also
included. This year' s plan does not include proposed equipment
purchases . A document relating specifically to equipment
replacement needs has been developed into a separate document.
The Capital Improvement Plan is intended to serve as a planning
tool and is therefore structured to present a meaningful, long-
range perspective of the city' s capital programming needs . At the
same time, sufficient project detail is provided to enable those
who review the information to make informed decisions on the
programming of projects over the next several years .
Please use the information provided to formulate plans, projects,
and questions . The Capital Improvement Plan can serve the
community best by provoking thoughts and actions .
This document was developed by the City Manager' s Office with the
assistance of all city departments .
I wish to thank all those involved in the development of the
Capital Improvement Plan, and especially Steve Stadler, Public
Works Director; Jim Gessele, Engineering Supervisor; Jim Kerrigan,
Planning and Economic Development Director; John Schedler, Finance
Director; Nancy Anderson, Planner; and Bish Johnson,
Administrative Assistant, for their hard work and dedication.
fin Equal Opportunity Employer
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1997-2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
City Manager ' s Message 1
Introduction and Purpose 1
Program Descriptions/Goals and Objectives 2
Utilities Program 2
Transportation Program 4
Park and Recreation Program 5
General Public Buildings Program 7
CIP Sources of Funding 9
Five Year Project Summaries 13
Total Expenditures by Funding Source 17
Capital Improvement Projects 18
Proposed Projects By Funding Source 19
Proposed Expenditures for Unscheduled Projects . . . 21
Revenue Projections to
Show Impact of Projects on Funding Source 27
Summary 29
General Fund 31
Municipal. State Aid Fund 32
Economic Development Fund 32
Tax Increment Financing - 1 . 1 Fund 33
Tax Increment Financing - 2 .X Fund 33
Water Fund - Cash Flow 34
Sanitary Sewer Fund - Cash Flow 34
Refuse Fund - Cash Flow 35
Storm Sewer Fund - Cash Flow 35
Project Descriptions 37
Utilities 3
Transportation 47
Parks & Recreation 65
General Public Buildings 71
Proposed Expenditures/Unscheduled Projects 81
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
The Capital Improvement Plan is a flexible plan based upon long-
range physical planning and financial projections, which schedules
the major public improvements that may be incurred by the City
over the next five years . Flexibility of the Capital Improvement
Plan is established through annual review, and revision if
necessary. The annual review assures that the program will become
a continuing part of the budgetary process and that it will be
consistent with changing demands as well as changing patterns in
cost and financial resources . Funds are appropriated only for the
first year of the program, which is then included in the annual
budget .
The Capital Improvement Plan serves as a tool for implementing
certain aspects of the City' s comprehensive plan, therefore, the
program describes the overall objectives of City development, the
relationship between projects with respect to timing and need, and
the City' s fiscal capabilities .
The Capital Improvement Plan can help assure :
1 . A systematic approach to planning and initiating capital
projects affording the opportunity to plan the location,
timing, and financing of needed public improvements;
2 . The development of a realistic program of capital spending
within the City' s projected fiscal capability to finance such
projects, avoiding sharp change in the tax levy or bonded
indebtedness;
3 . The coordination of public and private improvement projects
permitting adequate time for design and engineering to
eliminate duplication of effort and expense;
4 . The expenditure of public funds that are compatible with the
City' s adopted Comprehensive Plan;
5 . That the public is kept informed of the proposed future
projects and expenditures;
6 . That private investors are aware of the City' s long-range
development program so that they may guide their development
in a way that is compatible with the City' s program;
7 . Aid in achieving federal and/or state participation by
providing the necessary planning and lead time necessary for a
successful application in addition to meeting prerequisites
needed for certain federal and state grants .
1
PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS
-In order to effectively plan for and manage the projects contained
in a Capital Improvement Plan, it is necessary to group similar
activities into "Program Categories" . The City of Hopkins '
activities are divided into four program categories which are 1)
Utilities, 2) Transportation, 3) Parks, Forestry and Pavilion, and
4) General Public Buildings . The City also includes an outline of
proposed expenditures for udscheduled projects . Program
categories are explained in the following sections .
UTILITIES PROGRAM
Program Description: The Utilities Program includes the municipal
water, municipal sanitary sewer, storm sewer and refuse systems .
Program Goal : Provide reliable, efficient, and safe utility
service to all parts of the City with a minimum of adverse effects
on the environment .
Subprograms : Water, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, and Refuse
Service.
I . Municipal Water System Subprogram
A. Subprogram Goal : The goal of the Municipal Water System
subprogram is to provide water in sufficient quantities
at sufficient pressure, with a high degree of reliability
and safety to all parts of the City so as to satisfy the
normal demands of the general public for water while at
the same time providing sufficient reserves in case of \:
fire emergency or power outages .
B. Objectives :
1 . Water quality shall meet the purity standards of the
Minnesota Department of Health.
2 . Any hydrant on the system shall, under maximum
condition, deliver no less than 500 gallons per minute
with a residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch.-
3 . The system shall be looped to provide maximum
reliability.
4 . The supply and storage system shall be designed and
maintained to have maximum reliability.
2
II . Municipal Sanitary Sewer Subprogram
A. Subprogram Goal : The goal of the Municipal Sanitary
Sewer subprogram is to promote a healthful environment by
collecting all sewage from existing and projected
development in a sanitary and economic manner .
B. Objectives :
1 . Provide sewer lines of adequate size and grade to
collect and transmit all discharge sewage .
2 . Prevent sewage from overflowing into the natural
environment .
3 . Prevent sewage back-ups .
4 . Encourage or promote connection of all generators of
sewage to the Municipal system.
5 . Meet the effluent and infiltration standards of the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.
III . Storm Sewer Subprogram
A. Subprogram Goal : Manage and control surface and ground
waters in order to protect the man-made and natural
environment in a safe and efficient manner .
B. Objectives :
1 . Prevent flooding.
2 . Prevent damage to property due to erosion.
3 . Meet water quality standards established by the
controlling regulatory law or authority.
IV. Refuse Subprogram
A. Subprogram Goal : To promote a healthful environment by
collecting all residential solid waste in a sanitary and
economic manner .
B. Objectives :
1 . Provide efficient refuse collection in a timely
manner to minimize disruption to residents .
2 . Provide residential recycling programs that
3
minimize the amount of refuse that needs to be
landfilled.
3 . Provide yard waste collection that meets state
statutes and is also convenient for the residents .
4 . Provide bulk pick up/drop off and brush pick up
alternatives for the residents to eliminate these
items from being put in the refuse cans .
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
Program Description: This program includes streets, walkways,
traffic signs and signals, vehicular parking facilities, and
street lighting.
Program Goal : Provide for the safe and efficient movement of
people and goods throughout the city.
Subprograms : Streets, Walkways/Sidewalks, Signs/Signals, Parking
Facilities, and Street Lights .
I . Streets Subprogram
A. Subprogram Goal : The goal of the Streets Subprogram is to
provide safe, convenient, economic public streets to best
facilitate the movement of vehicular traffic .
B. Objectives :
1 . Streets should be constructed with permanent surfaces,
concrete curb and gutter, and with ancillary storm
drainage, to standards established by the City.
2 . Streets should be of a size and load capacity
consistent with their functional classifications .
3 . Timely major repair to preserve the basic capital
investment in streets .
II . Walkways/Sidewalks Subprogram
A. Subprogram Goal : To provide a safe and convenient
pedestrian system with incidental recreational benefits .
III . Signs/Signals Subprogram
4
A. Subprogram Goal : The goal of the Signs/Signals subprogram
is to provide an efficient and orderly system of street
and traffic signing so as to promote safe, convenient
travel throughout the City.
B . Objectives :
1 . Signs and Signals should be installed in conformity
with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices .
2 . Periodic surveys and studies should be made to document
the effectiveness of City signing patterns .
IV. Parking Facilities Subprogram
A. Subprogram Goal : To provide such supporting facilities as
will promote maximum use of public parking spaces by
employers, employees, customers, and visitors .
B. Objectives :
1 . Provide parking facilities for present and anticipated
needs of the City of Hopkins .
V. Street Lights Subprogram
A. Subprogram Goal : To provide a system of street lighting
within the City that will promote safe and convenient
vehicular and pedestrian travel on City Streets .
B. Objectives :
1 . To provide lighting at each street intersection within
the City.
2 . To provide mid-block street lighting in conformance
with the City' s street lighting policy, in order to
provide equitable, cost efficient lighting.
3 . To continually update the system so as to provide
energy and cost efficient lighting.
PARKS, FORESTRY AND PAVILION PROGRAM
Program Description: This program includes community parks,
neighborhood parks, open spaces, recreational structures and
facilities .
5
Program Goal : The goal of the Park and Recreation Program is to
provide facilities for safe, stimulating, and comprehensive
leisure time activities of Hopkins citizens .
Subprograms : Neighborhood Facilities, Community Facilities
I . Neighborhood Facilities Subprogram
A. Subprogram Goals : To acquire ownership or use rights of
park sites located to provide convenient walking access to
all Hopkins citizens and to develop such sites to provide
optimum recreational serviceability consistent with the
preservation and enhancement of pleasing aesthetic
qualities .
B. Objectives :
1 . Acquire property or use rights on those neighborhoods
that do not have convenient walking access to
neighborhood park facilities .
2 . Develop neighborhood park facilities to meet the needs
of various user groups .
3 . Preserve and maintain existing structures and
facilities in order to retain current service and
safety levels .
4 . Preserve and enhance the aesthetic qualities of
neighborhood parks .
II . Community Facilities Subprogram
A. Subprograi“ Goals : The goal of the Community Facilities
Subprogram is to develop, or acquire ownership or use
rights of sites which serve the entire City and to provide
facilities that serve community-wide needs .
B. Objectives :
1 . Acquire sites which have valuable and unique natural
characteristics to preserve irreplaceable community
resources .
2 . Preserve by acquisition, gift, or other arrangement
properties which have valuable historic-cultural
qualities .
6
3 . Preserve and maintain existing structures and
facilities in order to retain current service and
safety levels .
4 . Construct or acquire structures and facilities
necessary to meet the changing needs of the community.
GENERAL PUBLIC BUILDINGS PROGRAM
Program Description: The General Public Buildings Program
includes all municipal buildings except those provided for in the
Utility and Park Facilities Program.
Program Goal : Provide buildings which are adequate and convenient
for the efficient accommodation of City functions .
Subprograms : Administrative Offices, Maintenance Facilities,
Fire Facilities, Community Center .
I . Administrative Offices Subprogram
A. Subprogram Goal : The goal of the Administrative Offices
Subprogram is to provide facilities for the efficient and
safe conduct of legislative and administrative functions
of the City.
B. Objectives :
1 . Maintain current facilities in a state of good repair
so as to maximize cost effectiveness and avoid costly
repair.
2 . Upgrade facilities as necessary to provide for the
efficient, safe, and effective provision of the city
services .
II . Maintenance Facilities Subprogram
A. Subprogram Goal : The goal of the Maintenance Facilities
Subprogram is to provide facilities for the efficient and
safe conduct of City maintenance functions .
B. Objectives :
1 . Maintain current facilities in a state of good repair
so as to maximize cost effectiveness and avoid costly
repair .
7
2 . Upgrade facilities as necessary to provide for the
efficient, safe, and effective provision of City
services .
III . Fire Facilities Subprogram
A. Subprogram Goal : To provide a fire station, or stations,
for storage of Fire Department equipment and for the
training and meetings of volunteer fire fighters to
provide prompt and efficient protection to life and
property.
B. Objectives :
1 . Provide a maximum four minute daytime and three minute
nighttime response to all points within the City.
2 . Meet objective 1 through the use of volunteers .
IV: Community Center Subprogram
A. Subprogram Goal : To provide a community facility, or
facilities, which meet the social, recreational, and
cultural needs of all citizens, particularly senior
citizens .
B. Objectives :
1 . Maintain current facilities in a state of good repair
so as to maximize cost effectiveness and avoid costly
repairs .
2 . Construct or acquire structures and facilities
necessary to meet the changing needs of the City.
3 . Upgrade facilities as necessary to provide for
efficient, safe, and effective provision of City
services .
8
CIP SOURCES OF FUNDING
In order to fund the anticipated Capital Improvements, the City
must draw upon a variety of sources . Many of these sources have a
specific or "dedicated" purpose (i . e . , the water utility fund will
finance water main installation but not a street overlay) .
Therefore, it is important to identify the uses and limitations of
the various revenue sources .
CURRENT REVENUES - GENERAL FUND (C .R. )
This represents funding from current year revenue collections in
the General Fund which support operations and capital outlay
expenditures . Revenue sources include property tax levies, state
aid payments, and various permit and license fees . This source of
funding is generally used only for operations and small capital
purchases .
GENERAL FUND RESERVES (G.R. )
Reserves of the general fund are the funds remaining after
subtracting cash flow and emergency amounts from the City' s cash
balance, sometimes referred to as "fund balance" . The use of
General Fund Reserves is not recommended for Capital Improvements
without significant staff and Council review.
CABLE TELEVISION FUND (C. T . )
This funding source consists of franchise fees received from
Paragon Cable TV, in excess of the amounts earmarked for the
access programming and commission budgets . Expenditures are
limited to cable-related facilities, or must have a cable related
purpose .
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND (E . D. )
This funding source was established by the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the City of Hopkins, to provide
funding for the purpose of promoting development and redevelopment
within the City. The Economic Development fund is a revolving
fund administered by the HRA, intended to provide an ongoing
funding source used to reduce or extend the long term debt
involved with development and redevelopment activities . The HRA
reviews all proposed uses of this fund on an individual basis .
9
GRANT-IN-AID (G.A. )
This is aid received from either the Federal or State government .
In many cases, grants are made on matching basis, which means the
City shares a portion of the costs of the project being funded.
MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS (M. S . )
This funding source represents funds received from the State of
Minnesota to support construction and maintenance of State Aid
classified municipal streets . State law defines the types and
limits of State Aid Streets expenditures .
PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING/GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (P. I . )
Improvements with a life of several years may be financed from the
proceeds of a General Obligation Bond Issue. The ' total debt that
can be incurred under this method of financing is limited by law.
With some exception, General Obligation Bonds are generally
subject to a referendum process . Examples of projects which may
not require a referendum are those financed through the use of
special assessments where at least 20 percent of the project cost
is assessed to the benefiting property owners . The remaining
portion not assessed can be financed through general obligation
bonds repaid by a tax levy.
PRIVATE SECTOR FUNDING (P. F. )
This funding source consists primarily of payments made by
developers for the purchase of land, the installation of water,
sewer, or streets or other related expenditures . It can also
refer to donations made to the City by individuals or groups .
REVENUE BONDS (R.B. )
These are bonds issued for improvements made for a specific
revenue producing facility or operation. The debt incurred is
repaid from the revenue generated by the facility. If the revenue
generated is insufficient then the difference becomes an annual
obligation of the taxpayers and becomes an additional tax levy.
These are generally not subject to referendum.
10
REAL ESTATE SALES FUND (R.E . )
This funding source consists primarily of funds built up from the
sale of city owned property. To date, the fund has been used for
building improvements . Because the sal_e of both general City
property and park/recreation property are accumulated into this
fund, earmarking a portion for recreational purposes may be
justified.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT (S .A. )
A number of projects may be realistically financed using Special
Assessment to pay the ultimate cost . Almost any project can
potentially be financed using the assessment process . In each
case it is necessary to make a determination that the assessed
property will benefit by the amount of the assessment .
The cost of street reconstruction is shared 70 by the property
owner and 30% by the City. Concurrent improvement ' costs to the
utility systems are assumed by the respective utility funds .
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (T . F. )
This funding source results from the tax value of new development
that is "incrementally" greater than the existing tax value .
Typically, bonds are sold based on the assumption that the higher
tax receipts will retire the bonds . However, the use of TIF funds
through a "pay as you go" method has become more common. This
type of funding can be used for public improvements within a
redevelopment district to support the goals of redevelopment,
specifically the elimination of blighted conditions . Approval of
the Hopkins HRA should be anticipated prior to the commitment of
these funds . The use of these funds are strictly recculated by
State law.
SANITARY SEWER FUNDS (S . F. )
Sanitary sewer funds consist of revenue generated from charges
made for sewage disposal . The cost of operations plus system
(capital) improvements determine the ultimate charge levied for
the service provided.
WATER FUNDS (W. F. )
Water funds consist of revenue generated from the sale of water .
The cost of operations plus system (capital) improvements
determine the ultimate charge levied for the service provided.
11
STORM SEWER UTILITY REVENUES (S .U. )
Storm sewer funds consist of revenue generated by charging storm
water drainage fee to parcels of land for the availability and use
of municipal storm sewer facilities . Expenditures from this
funding source are related to drainage facilities .
OTHER GOVERNMENTAL UNITS (G.U. )
These are funds received from Hennepin County, adjacent
communities, etc . for projects which also benefit a jurisdiction
other than the City of Hopkins .
REFUSE FUND (R. F. )
Refuse funds consist of revenues generated from collection fees,
(bulk pickup and weekly collections) recycling fees, and recycling
and composting grants from Hennepin County. Revenues are used to
support the City' s refuse collection services as well as its
recycling program. The cost of operations plus system (capital)
improvements determines the charge for the services provided.
PAVILION FUND (P.A. )
Pavilion Funds consist of revenues generated from rental fees
collected from users of the Pavilion. These funds are utilized to
pay for operating, and capital expenditures .
12
FIVE YEAR
PROJECT SUMMARIES
FUNDING SOURCES
Current Revenues - General Fund C.R.
General Fund Reserves G.R.
Cable Television Fund C. T .
Economic Development Fund E . D.
Grant-In-Aid G.A.
Municipal State-Aid Streets M. S .
Permanent Improvement Revolving/
General Obligation Bonds P. I .
Private Sector Funds P. F.
Revenue Bonds R.B .
Real Estate Sales Fund R.E .
Special Assessment S .A.
Tax Increment Financing T . F.
Sewer Fund S . F.
Equipment Replacement Fund E .R.
Storm Sewer Utility S .U.
Water Fund W . F.
Refuse Fund R. F.
Pavilion Fund P .A.
Other Governmental Units G.U.
15
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Total Expenditures by Funding Source
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
G.R. 51,000 24,000 200,000
C.R. 257,150 227,000 170,000 168,000 30,000 103,000
P.F. 1,000,000
T.F. 2,300,000 204,700
M.S. 1,055,408 1,379,221 422,000 1,273,578 300,000
S.A. 194,110 577,480 220,000 198,000 150,000
W.F. 970,000 575,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 960,000
S.F. 95,000 185,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 500,000
S.U. 335,000 126,000 47,000 47,000 35,000 100,000
E.D. 100,000
P.I. 195,790 262,920 1,790,000 120,000 120,000 21,000
G.U. 1,034,058 2,104,219 1,365,000 3,378,937
G.A. 50,000
TOTAL 6,487,516 6,460,840 4,414,000 5,335,515 485,000 2,288,700
Total for 5 year period (does not include future projects) 23,182,871
KEY
General Fund Reserves G.R.
Current Revenues,General Fund C.R.
Grant-In-Aid G.A.
P.I.R/G.O. Bonds P.I.
Municipal State-Aid Streets M.S.
Private Sector Funds P.F.
Revenue Bonds R.B.
Real Estate Sales Fund R.E.
Special Assessment S.A.
Tax Increment Financing T.F.
Sewer Fund S.F.
Economic Development Fund E.D.
Storm Sewer Utility S.U.
Water Fund W.F.
Refuse Fund R.F.
Pavilion Fund P.A.
Other Governmental Units G.U.
17
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
PROG PROJECT FUND
CAT. NUMBER PROJECT TITLE SRC 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Util SA-1 Lift Station Reconst SF 20,000 110,000
Util SS-1 Storm Drainage System Maint SU 250,000 79,000
Util SS-2 Storm Water Management Plan SU 20,000
Util WA-1 Repaint Water Towers WF 500,000 500,000
Util WA-2 Water Treatment,Elmo Park WF 395,000
Trans ST-1 Residential Street Improvements SA 194,110 263,480 150,000 150,000 150,000
Trans PI 195,790 112,920 120,000 120,000 120,000
Trans ST-2 Residential Street Improvements SU 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
Trans WF 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000
Trans SF 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000
Trans ST-3 Citywide Concrete Ally SA 48,000 48,000 48,000
Trans SU 30,000 12,000 12,000 12,000
Trans ST-4 County Road 3 GU 1,034,058 2,104,219 2,178,937
Trans TF 2,300,000
Trans MS 1,034,058 1,035,221 1,073,578
Trans ST-5 Fifth Avenue South SA 207,000
Trans PI 89,000
Trans MS 158,000
Trans ST-6 Digital&Ortho Mapping of City CR 50,000
Trans ST-7 County Road 61 (Shady Oak) GU 1,200,000 1,200,000
Trans MS 400,000 200,000
Trans ST-9 Redesign/rebuild 11th Ave So SA 59,000 22,000
Trans MS 186,000 22,000
Trans ST-10 City-Wide Sidewalk Repair CR 40,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 30,000
Trans ST-11 Second Street NE PI 35,000
Trans ST-12 Second Avenue South PF 1,000,000
Trans ST-13 Stop light pre-emption system MS 21,350
Trans CR 20,150
Trans ST-14 Third Street South PI 60,000
Trans ST-15 Lake Street Bridge Replacement GU 165,000
Trans PI 75,000
Trans ST-16 City Parking Lot Improvements PI 61,000
Parks CF-1 Downtown Park Stage GR 32,000 24,000
Parks CF-2 Valley Park Improv CR 25,000 20,000
Parks CF-3 S Oak Beach Redevel CR 100,000 100,000 100,000 50,000
Parks CF-4 Pavilion Carpet GR 19,000
Bldgs MF-1 Pavilion Mezzanine GR 200,000
GA 50,000
Bldgs MF-2 Fire Station Roof Maintenance CR 50,000
Bldgs MF-3 Fire St Concrete Apron Replace CR 15,000
Bldgs MF-4 Public Works Storage Facility PI 1,500,000
Bldgs MF-6 Fire dept storage bldg CR 40,000 40,000
Bldgs MF-7 Fire station wheelchair lift CR 28,000
Bldgs MF-8 Fire Station Murphy Beds CR 12,000
Bldgs MF-9 Fire Sta Vehicle Exhaust CR 32,000
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 6,487,516 6,460,840 4,414,000 5,335,515 485,000
TOTAL FOR 5 YEAR PERIOD 23,182,871
18
61
o 0 0 0 0 0 1V101
' S0NO8 311N3A321
O 0 0 0 000'000'1 0 1V1O1
000'000'L d d U10OS anuany p1-1000S Z1-.1.8 suel-
SOMA ZJO103S 31VARId
000'00£ 0 8L5'ELZ'L OOOZZC LZZ'6L£'1. 901'990'1 1V1O1
000'00£ ell ('os any U12L of 111L 1)'05 laaJ1S 41xIS C-dd soak,
09C'LZ SIN walsAS uolldwa-aid 14611 dols £L-IS sues,
000'ZZ 000'981 SIN os anuany t411,L u6lsapa8/plinga8 6-IS sueu
000'002 000'001 SIN PCO )1e0 APeUS- 1.9 P21 00 L-IS sueJj
000'891 SIN UlnoS anuany Ugld 5-19 soak'
8L9'ELO'L LZZ'9£O'L 950'1£0'L S IN E Peoa Aluno0 1-IS suer
S133211S OIV•31V.S 1VdIOINf1W
000'12 000'0Z1. 000021. 000'061'1. OZ6'Z9Z 061'961 1V101
000'LZ 000'1.9 Id sluawanoidwl 101 6ualled All0 91.-IS sum.'
000'9/ .I'd luawaoeldaa a6pus laai1S a>lei 5L-Is sued
000'09 'I'd woos laa4S P.N.L. 11.-19 sued
000'55 .1'd 3N 1aallS puooaS 11-1S SueJ1
000'68 'I'd 1-11nos anuany U14Id s-Is sued
000'021 000'0Z L 000'021. OZ6'Z 1.1 06L'961 I'd sluawanoidwl laaqs Ie1;uaplsa8 L-IS sue11
000'009'1. l d A11Hoed a6e)olS S>uoM ollgnd 1-dI11 s61)19
SONO8'O'O/'M'I'd
O 0 0 000'09 0 0 1V101
000'05 VO auluezzayy uo111ned 1.-dlN 6P18
OIV-NI-INV2I0
000'001. 0 0 0 0 0 1V101
000'001 0.3 (os any U1Z L of(-111 L)05 1s 41xIS C-dd sued
0Nf1d 1N31,VdO13A30 011NONO03
O 0 0 0 0 0 1V101
ONfld NOISIA3131 318V0
O 0 0 000'00Z 000'1Z 000'1.9 -1V101
000'00Z -8.0 auluezzaw owned 1.-dIN s6pls
000'61. '8.0 ladhe0 uomAed P-d0 seed
000'12 000'25 8.0 a6e1S Ted uMoluMoO 1.-d0 seed
S3AtI3S2LI 1VL13N3O
000'£01. 000'05 000'891. 000'011 000'/ZZ 091.'L52 1V101
000'2£ 8•0 walsAS isneUx3 ap1UaA uolls1S and 6-dIN s6P18
000'21. '8.0 spas AUd)nIN uogelS sand 8-dIN s6p18
000'9Z 28'0 11!1 ne4olaaUM uopelS and 1-dIN S6PI8
000'09 000'01 000'01 '210 6PI8 a6eJolS 1de0 and 9-JW S6pls
000'51. 8'0 luawaoeldaa uoidy alal3uo'O uo!le1S and £-dIN S6PI8
000'05 8.0 aoueualulew loon uol1e45 and Z-diN s6Pie
000'59 '8'0 101 6uNied>IJed l2Jlua0 9-dd S)IJed
000'09 000'001. 000'001. 000'001 8 0 luawdolanapaa 4oeas>ISO APSUS £-d0 suued
000'0Z 000'9Z 8 0 sluawann)dwl)lied ASIISA Z-d0 Wed
091.'0Z 2f0 walsAS uol;dwa-aid 146!1 do2S £L-1S sued
000'05 000'05 000'05 000'01 000'01 8.0 neda8>11eMapISaPIM-I40 01.-IS sueil
000'09 '8.0 A110 Jo 6ulddew oloUdogpO V IelI61O 9-IS sm.!.
0Nnd 1V113N3O-S311N3A321 1N321al0
3afllfld ZOOZ 1002 0002 6661 8661.
3O21fOS sNIONf1d AS S1O31'O21d O3SOdO21d
y
OZ
00L'88Z`Z 000`9817 919`9E9`9 000'1>14,37 0178'097'9 9L9'L81'9 1V101 ONV21O
o 0 L£6'8L£'£ 000'99E'L 6L7,'COL'Z 840'17£0'l. 1V101
000'991. p10 luawaoeldaa a6pu8 laaJlS ajel g1.-±g saeJj
000.00Z'L 000'00Z'L 'rip NeO Apeus) L9 peoa Aluno0 L-IS sued
L£6'8LCZ 6LZ'P0L'Z 990'17£0'L n o c peoa AlunoO V-lg sued
SIINn 1V1N3WN213AOD H3H1O
O 0 0 0 0 0 1V101
aNnd NOI11AVd
000'096 000'9L 000'9L 000'SL 000'9L9 000'0L6 1V101
000'0SZ 'd M Jopw00161 anuanV LIIWN Z-dd sued
O 000'9L 000'4L 000'9L 000'4L 000'SL d M I!in-sluawanoidwl 1S Ieguap!sael Z-19 suejl
000'0 LL 000'96£ d M )IJed owe'sagg!oed luawleaJl JaleM Z-VM 19n
000'009 000'009 .d.M SJaMol JaleM luieda8 1.-VM 1911
ONfld 2131VM
000'001- 000'4£ 000'LP 000'Lb 000'9ZL 000'99£ 1V101
000'001. 'fl 5 Jopwo0la1 anuan'41u!N Z-dd sued
0 0 000'Z I. 000'Z1 000'zL 000'0£ 'ris sAallV alaJouo0 ap!M40 E-19 sued
0 000'S£ 000'9£ 000'9£ 000'4£ 000'9£ ns ;In-sluawanadwl 1S Ieguap!sail Z-l8 sued
000'0Z ns veld luawa6euelry JaleM WJolS Z-SS or
000'6L 000'04Z TIS aoueualu!elry walsAg a6eu!eia WJol5 L-SS vin
A11lIln 213M3S INHOIS
000'009 000'9L 000'4L 000'4L 000'981. 000'96 1V101
000'09£ 'd'S Jopuuo0187 anuany LOON Z-dd sued
O 000'4L 000'4L 000'4L 000'4L 000'4L 'd S IM-sluawanoJdwl 15 Ieguap!sa21 Z-IS sued
000'091- uogonJlsuooaa uogeIS 8!1 Z-VS I!If
000'01.1. 000'0Z .d.9 uo!loruisuooaa uogelS II!1 1-VS I!I1
A1111lfl I3M3S AHVIINVS
00L'40Z 0 0 0 0 000'00£'Z 1V101
000'091 J 1 (Z)suogelS 1!sueJl pea 146!1 L-dd sued
001.'179 d.1 uogellelsul walsAS AlunoaS 9-dd 96P18
000'00£'Z d1 £peoa AlunoO trig sued
ONIONVNId IN3W321ONI XVI
0 000'091. 000'861. 000'0ZZ 087 LLS 01.1.'1761- it
000'ZZ 000'69 V'S 4lnoS anuanv 1411.L p1!ngaa/u6!sapael 6-IS sued
000'L0Z V S yl-1o9 anuanV yll!d 9-IS sued
000'917 000'97 000'87 V S sAally alaJouo0 ap!MAI!0 £-IS sued
000'041. 000'041. 000'0SL 0817'£9Z 011.'1761. V S sluawanadwl 1aa11S Ieguap!saH L-15 sued
1N3WSS3SSV 1VIO3dS
danlnd zo0z Looz o0oz 6661. 9661-
30Z:MOS ONIONfli AS S133f02Jd O3SOd0Zid
I
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES FOR FUTURE PROJECTS
PROG PROJECT • FUND
CAT. NUMBER PROJECT TITLE SRC 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 FUTURE
Util SA-2 Lift Station Reconstruction SF 150,000
Trans PP-1 Lt Rail Transit Stations (2) TF 150,000
Trans PP-2 9th Ave LRT Corridor WF 250,000
SF 350,000
SU 100,000
Trans PP-3 6th St S(11th-12th Ave S) ED 100,000
MS 300,000
Trans ST-16 City Parking Lot Improvements PI 21,000
Parks PP-5 Central Park Parking Lot CR 53,000
GP Bldg PP-6 Security System Installation TF 54,700
GP Bldg WA-2 Elmo Park Treatment Facility WF 710,000
GP Bldg MF-6 Fire Dept Storage Bldg CR50,000
TOTAL FUTURE PROJECTS 2,288,700
21
1998-2002 Capital Improvement Plan
Expenditures by Program for 1998
Parks Buildings
Utilities $151,000 $47,000
$1,185 000 r is '';s"1.N 3311
s ss ,.,.ors's'sss is , ✓r'Y,x"H;}:,»»»
,:3133:1 t ! // 3:0..1; ':gz.•li"1;1:,:,.
.i..1�.,..::. / }%J..:.S.f...::'/'i...... ...."'^:'5.; ;:.::,
31f1..Y.11111'3,5 /
.' • .. .::�; �. :.::�::::.;,. :<31'•:;131 '311;1::3131::111"1;11131'L»1111113✓'311.3133113333333333331'111113'.,:«<»,
....11fiY.�J�:3;i33....:,,i..33 x.....,.,.1'3;:::3:333..
::: :::'1' :% 111113,»Sll.:•• .11:!;1:.J,,,:.,:,.:,, "3,»:,:,,
"'t 313y :i», :::,G:3313533311.....3.
. x33»15�:"1'1':•1
,13;131,»,»:»:,133,333
N
:3333:<; :;:,<::13«333<;13;:3,�
,,:Y31.':..%73'•3311:»:::.:.,::,,:.:
111:;,::%,1::':•.�3,'::�:��;131111:13::11311,;1 :1
3113t3 ,.33773 ...i,::::,1,11;,;;,,;,,;,,,,,:.»:::»»,
%
,.: ,.G ;3�'t3.....333,.3'.33f33333313Yf3f333.J3f3...'
31;'1.'!.,..,:,:3.,::.::::333•.'..::.,..,: .::::,:,..:,»..:.,:::...:...:::,.•...::,:„
,», , ,::J.,»,».,:»,/:„»»».33 »
.::+.1>.::.3: r::s: , .tY•331::3+1;:;•;:3::.'3:,...:11:1;;3'-:>fl.;;3:: ::33':11,J1:
1331 1311113"•'1111,3133/1 131111:3.'•,.'•31311<,11,1t'''.''+':<`:.+3313::;33333;3'33
.. ..sem..:;• ;:•,,.....:'.::...::;::..::.,..::.:..>. :•,:.: >,:-:•::.:,::•:,:..:::•»,:
1;1'!,5{13:::,:,.:
...7•;:: • •
--••.•••••:::.1:..••••••.••••••.:.;:. ::..3'.:....1..1...::,::,,,
:1:13 ,331:'.•33..,��,,,...737;;.313337
.:% ......7. ... 111:.;i.. � 1 .'•;...%.��.'•.•:;....`,,1.1111:,
• :.>:..�• :'::3`3"''3 '111::'•;1t3331.;1:�:3':1•,3111':v..•rt::1'•::1t33':i3331'3
i
33111„»»:»»:»» ,:»»,
'•�... 1331':::3x...:...;.:;:;.:.1...1:;:.•.:1.. ;..: ...'' ,:,,,,,:,,
11.1:,;;13::?:13<':,;:,;3331331;1,E33:;1:::1331:333::..: 331Y331�11,1t.'•153„3,t1';.: ...<33" , `:`'
i :::: :; 4 ;,i:f2;::f;:::::"` :?' :';'>%.........:..:..:1'',..•"%.:::::::;::••:g.: ;'.::.::..;9••:; :::: :
1998-2002 CapitalImprovement Plan
Expenditures by Program for 5 Years
Utilities Parks
$1,874,000 $470,000
Buildings , ,:: :
$1,967,000 ''1?,;;; ;:k s wz,...#t##tt„„,..:•t
::: :
t##3## <###ttrt3t33 :»:>ttt# ttttt#tttttt##tt #3 »»
ttt3t'3•;Nass.s:t»:»»»»,.•>t�::��:»:,;# #,3##t tt
:»:»:::
»�:: g...-'''';- El:tt }t» 333»»s,:
s3txt G::»s'3ss:.»:»:»::sststr»:: :
'3333331
tx�
: t»
�:»»:!r:: s3,stsstI
N
3:####
3t3': .#ttt
tYf33•"l'l!l:3333 333333'!.1::tt3#t33';33r :-
s
#amiss#:•1,s:t:�: :�%'
33�::: ::t:ttt3.'•t :.st�t3tss#if##>#i#%#:::::»:».: :» »:»:». 1» ,;:sr:::.11'�»3r•».:»» #::::::t tttt » 33ttt:»»:.:. ::,ttt 3333`;3t : :::::: , : , :: : :;: . tt»':: ..::.:::-...g a:1:":: s3 :::::..: ::: :::::::.:::t:::::.:: ::..P :::..•:.:. •::�.».:.:::::.. :»: ::..: : ::»::.:»..»„•: .: »:»::»::::»»»:sem•»::::»»:»::�:��rr�tt:»»:»»»::»»:::» :::
.»��sin fists .,ss33st3::t✓:»»»:» :
s#.#sssssssit#'sH#i'�ss •sts s ;is ss #######st3t3:
33;!3s3tstwst333333»»» :»»:
»as:s
{:.•:.:,:sssi .:g.»t3::g •33;;r:3333sst z4:.•stst33333i3:
>x�ttts3;33:>33333ssttssssts3t :3 ;>:»:»» .»:::»:»: ts..:».:.
tttt<tt:::::0 3 3s<.:st33;::::.—; »:s;::: :,.:»:»:3:.x3t:»33:»:»: :»3:»:.»:»:,:::
• .:<:<z<.;<33s3:333•:*s::•::33< t3 2333<3:
'v#s##;#1;3'1/1 :
i#itis s}s�;;i##>isssss
''sss's>s%%%>s>i`'s';`ss#ss`s�>is%s: s%>•s#%i>s% "`s<s '#s%%zis»
y .::•
:::3i3%`3:'.2 i:i;i>ic` >:i ,;1111%
##t;;tom#.•#t3t1t3333333i3y :�� :: �:
.::.::::::...
31'/::•1.1:':•"•�•'
<•..... :.:�::�:::::: ::,::.:::.�.........:.: %�a::1333;;;.;..;r;:::::::.�:.::,:::............ .:•::;:�.`!3:::: :. • ;
•
:err::i:: :•••••••••
......................� ::::3:::;::
Transportation
$18,871,871
Total Expenditures for 5 Year Period
$23, 182,871
1998-2002 Capital ! mprovement Plan
Expenditures by Source 1998
l
GA
RB
ED
P F
$51,000
GR
SF ..:a,
$95,000
SA $194,110
.................
....Ni]i $195,790
P.I.
CR $257,150
`
$335 000
SU
$970,000
WF .::.
.:. $1,034,058
GU i
$1,055,408
MS �•
�•'......::::::::..
$2,300,TF
$0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000
Total Expenditures for 1998 $6,487,516
LEGEND
TF Tax Increment 2,300,000
MS Municipal State Aid 1,055,408
GU Other Governmental Units 1 .034.058
WF Water Fund 970,000
SU Storm Sewer Utility 335,000
CR Current Revenue 257,150
P.I. P.I.R./G.O. Bonds 195,790
SA Special Assessment 194,110
SF Sewer Fund 95,000
GR General Fund Reserves 51 ,000
PF Private Sector Funds
ED Economic Development Fund
RB Revenue Bonds
GA Grant-In-Aid
$6,487,516
25
1998-2002 Capital improvement Plan
Expenditures by Source for 5 Years
GA
ill: $50,000
GRV $275,000
SF imp, $505,000
SU , $590,000
CR $852,150
.111111111.1110
PF �� $1,000,000
SA 00 $1,339,590
WFO $1,770,000
TF $2,300,000
0O
PI $2,488,710
MS cr.., $4,130,207
GU .•` 1 $7,882,214
L $0 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000
Total Expenditures for 5 Year Period $23, 182,871
LEGEND
GU Other Governmental Units $7,882,214
MS Municipal State Aid $4,130,207
PI P.I.R./G.O. Bonds $2,488,710
TF Tax Increment $2,300,000
WF Water Fund $1 ,770,000
SA Special Assessment $1 ,339,590
PF Private Sector Funds $1 ,000,000
CR Current Revenue $852,150
SU Storm Sewer Utility $590,000
SF Sewer Fund $505,000
GR General Fund Reserves $275,000
GA Grant-In-Aid $50,000
$23,182,871
26
REVENUE PROJECTIONS
SHOWING
IMPACT OF PROJECTS
ON FUNDING SOURCE
•
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES
CURRENT REVENUES/GENERAL FUND RESERVES
Funding all of the proposed 1998-2002 projects would not be possible and also maintain the
necessary General Fund reserve balance for working capital. No grant monies have been
included as a source of funding. Funding all the projects presented would lower the fund
balance below the targeted cash flow of$2,600,000 in the years 1998 through 2001.
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
Funding from bonds is used up front to pay for construction that will eventually be paid by
special assessment collections, over a 15-20 year span, and the City's share (levy) of
construction projects. The P.I.R. cash position remains very tight. The reduced level of
anticipated projects, the potential of recouping landfill work costs from the PCA and rising
repayments of special assessments will allow continued funding without a bond issue in the
near future. However, bonds of approximately $1,500,000 will be needed to fund the public
works storage facility proposed in the year 2000.
MUNICIPAL STATE AID
Funding is sufficient for the projects listed in the CIP document through 1998 , then the
unencumbered allotment will be in a deficit mode until the year 2005. It would be necessary
to sell MSA bonds in order to maintain the construction schedule.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
Considering all tax increment districts as a whole, cash on hand, increments above debt
service, and loan repayments are sufficient to cover these projects.
WATER FUND
Several large facility upgrades scheduled from 1996 through 1999 will require rate increases
periodically. In prior years an ample cash balance had been nurtured in anticipation of the
several needed projects. Now into the upgrade stage, a rate increase in 1997 was approved
and an additional $.05 is proposed in each of years 1999 and 2001 These modest rate
increases would be necessary to maintain the planned projects to avoid issuance of bonds.
The fund will be in a negative cash flow by mid 1997 with anticipated additional projects
beyond the year 2000 exceeding $1.7 million dollars. Temporary inter fund loans would be
available through 2003 when the Water Fund is projected to recover its cash flow.
29
SANITARY SEWER FUND
The relatively low magnitude of capital needs over the next 5-year period should not
necessitate a rate change during the 5-year period. This fund's operating costs are determined
mostly by charges from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission which appear to have
stabilized for the present.
REFUSE FUND
The volume base rate change in 1995 and the loss of the County yard waste grant in 1994,
continues to reduce the healthy cash balance of past years. A rate change is not proposed at
this time.
STORM SEWER FUND
The heavy construction over the past several years necessitates a variable temporary interfund
loan each year. A rate increase in 1993 was approved to repay the loan, the bonds of 1989,
and continue to fund projects as the need arose. The CIP anticipates a reduction in the pace
of construction after 1999. Even with a funding amount of$230,000 from the Nine Mile
Creek Authority, the continued need for projects each year is not allowing the fund to attain a
positive cash flow. It is recommended that the storm sewer rates be increased in 1998 from
$9.00 to $9.60. This is an increase of twenty cents per household per month for a total
monthly cost of$3.20.
30
GENERAL FUND
(000's Omitted)
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Working Capital Begin 2,844 2,801 2,801 2,601 2,601
Year
Reserve Fund Balance Cash 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600
Flow(Target)
CIP - General Reserves 43 - 200 -Use
Reserved in Prior Years 355 455 445 50 -
Unspent at year end
Uncommitted/(Over (154) (254) (444) (49) 1
Committed) Reserves
Working Capital Balance 12/31/02 2,601
Uncommitted Reserves 1
Assumes a balanced budget each year, which includes all CIP current revenue projects in levy.
31
MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUND
(000'S Omitted)
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Unencumbered Allotment 1,011 369 (597) (606) (1,467)
Balance Begin Year
Annual Allotment 413 413 413 413 413
CIP 1,055 1,379 422 1,274 -
Balance 12/31/2002 (1,054)
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND
(000'S Omitted)
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Fund Balance Begin Year (148) (170) (135) (85) (35)
Revenue 130 180 190 190 200
Other Expenses 142 145 140 140 140
Balance 12/31/2002 25
32
TAX INCREMENT 1.1 AND 1.2 FUND
(000's Omitted)
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Fund Balance Begin Year 739 1,140 1,641 2,107 2,682
Issue Bonds
Taxes Received 1,200 1,300 1,300 1,400 1,400
Debt Service 699 699 714 70.5 701
Administrative Expense 100 100 120 120 130
Balance 12/31/2002 3,251
TAX INCREMENT 2.X FUND
(000's Omitted)
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Fund Balance Begin Year (451) (322) (249) (125) (10)
Taxes Received 370 400 450 450 450
Debt Service 216 297 296 295 300
Administrative Expense 25 30 30 40 40
Balance 12/31/2002 100
33
WATER FUND - CASH FLOW
(000's Omitted)
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Cash Balance Begin Year (17) (742) (1,017) (832) (567)
Add From Operations 275 320 320 360 355
Rate Increase ($.05 1999
and 2001 each)
CIP 970 575 75 75 75
Capital Outlay 30 20 60 20 50
Balance 12/31/2002 (337)
Rate History
1984 $0.85
1993 $1.05
1997 $1.10
SANITARY SEWER FUND - CASH FLOW
(000'S Omitted)
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Cash Balance Begin Year 817 932 937 952 1,037
Add From Operations 220 210 190 180 175
CIP 95 185 75 75 75
Capital Outlay 10 20 100 20 10
Balance 12/31/2002 1,127
Rate History
1983 $1.50
1989 $1.75
1991 $2.00
1993 $2.50
34
REFUSE FUND - CASH FLOW
(000's Omitted)
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Cash Balance Begin Year 480 480 367 376 381
Add From Operations 20 15 15 10 10
Capital Outlay 20 128 6 5 10
Balance 12/31/2002 381
Rate History
1989 $15.10
1991 $17.25
1995 $11.00 - 14.45
STORM SEWER FUND - CASH FLOW
(000's Omitted)
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 •
Cash Balance Begin Year* (184) (354) (349) (279) (217)
Add From Operations 405 400 390 380 370
Debt Service: '89 Bonds 240 239 243 246 238
Interest on Interfund Loan: 20 30 30 25 25
$400,000 to $600,000
CIP 315 126 47 47 35
Balance 12/31/2002 (145)
*Outstanding receivable from Watershed District 30
Rate History
1989 $4.75
1991 $6.00
1992 $7.50
1993 $9.00
1998 $9.60
35
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
6E
S aLLI ua
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Utilities Lift Station Reconstruction SA-1 $130,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Sewer Fund SF 20,000 110,000
Location:
Lift Station 6 - 8456 Excelsior Boulevard
DESCRIPTION:
Reconstruction and repair of Lift Station #6 ($130,000) - 1999
Work is scheduled to coincide with the proposed Excelsior Boulevard improvements.
JUSTIFICATION:
Certain lift stations have been identified in need of reconstruction or repair. Various
reasons such as safety concerns, pumping capacity, condition and obsolete parts
contributed to this need.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Lift Station 6:
Plans and Specifications 1998
Bid & Construction 1999
•
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with Water and Sewer Master Plan approved in 1990.
41
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Utilities Storm Drainage System Maintenance SS-1 $329,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Storm Sewer SU 250,000 79,000
LOCATION:
1998 - Sixth Avenue North between First and Third Streets North
1999 - South Park Pond
DESCRIPTION:
1998 - Install 36 inch trunk storm sewer
1999 - Dredging and maintenance of pond east of Nine Mile Cove development.
JUSTIFICATION:
Severe localized flooding can occur at Third Street Not th/Sixth Avenue North causing
property damage. A trunk sewer connection to the giant trunk main terminating at
Sixth Avenue and First Street North would alleviate the potential for flooding.
The siltation pond in the Nine Mile Creek flood plain east of the Nine Mile Cove development
was last dredged in 1989. It is time again for maintenance to be done.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
1998 Project 1999 Project
Plans and specifications 1997 Plans and specifications 1998
Bid and construct 1998 Bid and construct 1999
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the Storm Water Management Plan and Pavement Management Plan.
42
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Utilities Storm Water Managemer.t Plan ss-2 $20,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Storm Sewer SU 20,000
LOCATION:
City-wide
DESCRIPTION:
Update City's current storm water management plan.
JUSTIFICATION:
The City's storm water management plan, developed in 1990, does not meet the requirements
set down by Minnehaha Creek and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District regulations.
The City will contract with a consultant to completely revamp the report.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Revision and report by end of 1998.
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with evolving regulation is promulgated by the Board of Water and Soil
Resources and the Watershed District.
43
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Utilities Repaint Water Towers WA-1 1 $1,000,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Water Fund WF 500,000 500,000
LOCATION:
Moline Tower, 10421 Excelsior Boulevard - 1998
Blake Tower, 151 Tyler Avenue South - 1999
DESCRIPTION:
Repaint water tower (Moline site) 1998
Repaint water tower (Blake) 1999
JUSTIFICATION:
The Moline tower is showing signs of rusting under the exterior paint.
The Blake tower should be ready to repaint in 1999.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Plans and Specifications 1997 (Moline) 1998 (Blake)
Bid and Construct 1998 (Moline) 1999 (Blake)
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Schedule moved up to 1998 due to rusting exterior on Moline tower.
Normal repaint for Blake tower in 1999.
44
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Utilities Water Treatment Facilities, Elmo Park WA-2 $395,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Water Fund WF 395,000
LOCATION:
1401 Elmo Park Service Drive
DESCRIPTION:
Reconstruction/repair of the water treatment facilities at the Elmo Park site.
JUSTIFICATION:
The present facility is in need of repair and upgrading to improve utilization and
efficiency. Several safety related items need attention. Improvements include new
filter media and backwash retention tank.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Plans and Specifications 1997
Bid and Construct 1998
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with water and sewer master plan approved in 1990.
I
45
TRANSPORTATION
47
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Residential Street Improvements ST-1 $1,576,300
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Sp Assess SA 194,110 263,480 150,000 150,000 150,000
Perm Improve PI 195,790 112,920 120,000 120,000 120,000
LOCATION:
1998: Reconstruction--Ashley Road from Preston Lane to Boyce Street, Preston Lane from Ashley Road to
Homedale Road, Holly road from Spruce Street to Goodrich Street.
Mill/Overlay--11th Avenue from First Street North to First Street South, First Street South from Eighth Avenue South
to 11th Avenue South, Eighth Avenue South from First Street South to Mainstreet, Tenth Avenue North
from Mainstreet to First Street North.
DESCRIPTION:
Program to improve streets needing repair or reconstruction as indicated by street condition
survey, or as part of an area street improvement.
Proposed 1999 reconstruction includes: 12th and 13th Avenues from Second Street South to
Mainstreet and First Street South from 11th Avenue to 13th Avenue.
Justification:
Pavement Management analysis shows a minimum $300,000 street improvement
commitment (sealcoating, mill/overlays, reconstruction) to maintain current overall street
conditions and backlog. The numbers assume a 70% assessed and 30% general city
share of costs for reconstruction projects and 100% city costs for sealcoat and mill/overlay
projects.
Sealcoat project costs budgeted in street maintenance budget. Costs for sanitary sewer
and water main reconstruction are not shown.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Public Hearing - year prior to planned construction
Plans and Specifications - year prior to planned construction
Bid and Assessment - year of planned construction
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the City Council adopted Roadway Improvement Policy, street ratings,
and Pavement Management Program.
49
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Residential Street Improvements- Utilities ST-2 $925,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Storm Sewer SU 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
Water Fund WF 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000
Sewer Fund SF 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000
LOCATION:
Locations to be determined as they are consistent with the street reconstruction program.
DESCRIPTION:
Program to reconstruct deteriorated water main and sanitary sewer and to provide
storm sewer improvements in areas where streets have been designated as in poor condition.
1998: Install storm sewer- Preston Lane, Ashley Road to Homedale Road
Sanitary sewer improvements - Preston Lane, Ashley Road to Homedale Road
JUSTIFICATION:
In most cases where street reconstruction takes place, storm sewer facilities either need
upgrading or need to be installed new. In some cases, water main and sanitary sewer
need to be rehabilitated in conjunction with street reconstruction. The numbers assume
the City funding 100% of major storm sewer, water main, and sanitary sewer construction/
reconstruction. These costs are to be used in conjunction with street reconstruction
costs shown on ST-1.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Public Hearing - year prior to planned construction
Plans and Specifications - year prior to planned construction
Bid - year of planned construction
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the Storm Water Management Plan, Water and Sewer Utility Master Plan,
and television inspections.
50
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Citywide Concrete Alleys _ ST-3 $210,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Sp Assessment SA 48,000 48,000 48,000
Storm Sewer SU 30,000 12,000 12,000 12,000
LOCATION:
1998: Alley north of Mainstreet between arts center and US West Central office
1999: Alley between Fifth and Sixth Avenues North and Second and Third Streets North
Alley between 12th and 13th Avenues North and Third and Fourth Streets North
DESCRIPTION:
Program to construct concrete alleys in areas designated as poor on the Alley Condition
Survey.
JUSTIFICATION:
The City has had a policy of constructing concrete alleys for a number of years. This
policy has proved to be sound by the concrete alleys' durability and low maintnenance
costs. The Alley Condition Survey indicates there are approximately 8,000 feet of
alley in poor condition. The estimated cost to rebuild these alleys is $350,000 over
six years. Current policy has the City share at 20% of the cost in residential areas. The
amount recommended would allow the City to complete reconstruction of the alleys
(currently rated as poor) by the year 2001.
The City will experience cost savings due to lower maintenance costs.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDU.E:
Approximately 1250 feet per year for four years.
Public Hearing - year prior to project
Plans, Specifications, Bid, Construction - year of project.
(RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the City Council adopted Roadway Improvement Policy and Alley ratings.
51
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation County Road 3 ST-4 $10,760,071
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Other iGvmnt GU 1,034,058 2,104,219 2,178,937
Tax Increment TF 2,300,000
Muni St Aid MS 1,034,058 1,035,221 1,073,578
Note: GO bond payments to be financed by a combination of existing TIF revenue, Municipal State Aid road funds,
additional TIF revenue created by economic development, grant funds and, as a last resort, general City revenue.
LOCATION:
County Road 3 from Shady Oak Road to Meadowbrook Road.
DESCRIPTION:
Lighting, landscaping, street, etc. improvements along Excelsior Boulevard from the east
to west city limits.
JUSTIFICATION:
Deficiencies in terms of roadway condition, traffic/pedestrian movement, safety and
aesthetics appear in all four segments of County Road 3:
o Segment 1 from Shady Oak Road to 11th Avenue South
Upgrade existing undivided roadway, upgrade 11th Avenue intersection to meet
future needs, implement beautification program.
o Segment 2 from 11th Avenue South to Hwy 169
Upgrade roadway, implement beautification program.
o Segment 3 from Hwy 169 to Blake Road
Upgrade existing narrow undivided roadway, resolve safet." issues at railroad
crossing, improve north-south access, account for future LRT access, address
redevelopment needs.
o Segment 4 from Blake Road to Meadowbrook Road
Upgrade roadway, implement beautification program.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Segment 1 Segment 3
Planing and Acquisition 1996-97 Planning and Acquisition 1998
Bidding and Construction 1997-99 Bidding/Construction 1999/2000
Segment 2 Segment 4
Planning 2000 Planning and Acquisition 2000
Bidding and Construction 2001 Bidding and Construction 2001
(Landscaping work included in Segment 1)
•
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with Hennepin County CIP and Council action requesting improvements by
year 2000.
52
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Fifth Avenue South ST-5 $454,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Sp Assess SA 207,000
Perm Improve PI 89,000
Mncpl State Ad MS 158,000
LOCATION:
Fifth Avenue South from Mainstreet to County Road 3
DESCRIPTION:
Regrading and resurfacing of .15 miles of street between Mainstreet and County Road 3,
including lighting and landscaping improvements.
JUSTIFICATION:
Fifth Avenue was last graded and surfaced to its 44 foot width in 1964. The roadway is showing extreme
wear and stress and its age alone indicates its condition on the downward side of the pavement
deterioration curve.
Fifth Avenue is a major access route to Mainstreet from County Road 3. As such it should
be afforded the same amenities or theme treatment as those recently installed on Mainstreet.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Design 1998
Plans and Specifications 1998
Bid and Construction 1999
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the City Roadway Imrovement Policy, street condition ratings,
State Aid CIP.
53
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Digital & Orthophoto Mapping of City ST-6 $50,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Current CR 50,000
Revenues
LOCATION:
City-wide
DESCRIPTION:
Aerial photography of City and preparation of 1/2 secton topo maps in electronic form
and on mylar sheets.
JUSTIFICATION:
With considerable street reconstruction and site redevelopment done in the past eight years,
the City's current topo maps are obsolete. New photography and updated maps
stored electronically greatly enhance planning and engineering functions and provide a
logical step in the direction of a central G.I.S. system.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Aerial photography and map preparation in 1998.
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with a planned staged introduction of a G.I.S. program in city government.
5-t
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation County Road 61 (Shady Oak Road) ST-7 $3,000,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Other Units GU 1,200,000 1,200,000
General Oblg MS 400,000 200,000
Note: GO bond payments to be financed by a combination of existing TIF revenue, Municipal State Aid road funds,
additional TIF revenue created by economic development, gran,funds and, as a last resort, general City revenue.
LOCATION:
Shady Oak Road from County Road 3 to T.H. 7
DESCRIPTION:
Lighting, landscaping, street, etc., improvements from County Road 3 to T.H. 7
JUSTIFICATION:
Deficiencies appear in terms of roadway conditions, traffic/pedestrian movement, safety,
and aesthetics. Upgrade an undivided roadway, resolve safety issues with number of
driveway access points and intersection at Mainstreet. Lighting needs upgrading
and provide beautification program.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Planning and Acquisition 2000
Bidding and Construction 2001
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with Hennepin County CIP and City's desire to upgrade the roadway.
55
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Rebuild/Redesign 11th Avenue South ST-9 $289,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Sp Assess SA 59,000 22,000
Mncpl State Ad MS 186,000 22,000
LOCATION:
Segments:
1. HCRRA right-of-way to Fifth Street South
2. Fifth Street South to Westbrooke Way
3. Westbrooke Way to Smetana
DESCRIPTION:
Rebuild and redesign roadway, widen and add turning lanes and signals.
Segment 1 was reconstructed in 1997.
Segments 2 and 3: Improve pavement condition, curbing and drainage, incorporate
sidewalk/trail improvements.
JUSTIFICATION:
To extend pavement life and accommodate increased traffic due to Cornerstone Business Center
and Diamond Laboratory developments and normal increase in traffic. Costs for sanitary
sewer and water main replacement not shown.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Design 1998
Bid and construction 1999
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS: •
•
Consistent with City Roadway Improvement Policy.
56
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation City-Wide Sidewalk Repair ST-10 $170,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Current CR 40,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 30,000
Revenues
LOCATION:
City-Wide
DESCRIPTION:
Perform sidewalk maintenance on all public sidewalks and construct ADA improvements.
Zone 3 1998
Zone 4 1999
Zone 1 2000
Zone 2 2001
Zone 3 2002
JUSTIFICATION:
Routine sidewalk maintenance is necessary to ensure sidewalks are safe for pedestrian
use. Maintenance is also necessary to remove hazards that may cause an injury and
result in the City being held liable for the injury. Yearly projects will call for replacement
of intersection pedestrian ramps that fall below accessibility standards as set down
by the Americans With Disabilities Act.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Plan/Bid/Contract - Each Year
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with overall maintenance of general public infrastructure.
57
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Second Street N.E. ST-11 $35,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Perm Improve Pi 35,000
LOCATION:
Second Street N.E. between Blake Road and Tyler Street
DESCRIPTION:
Improvements to Second Street N.E. between Blake Road and Tyler Street involving
the installation of landscaping and lighting.
JUSTIFICATION:
Concerns have been expressed by the adjacent residential neighborhood regarding
the appearance and condition of this street. This street is abutted by major industrial
users as well as residential units that utilize Second Street for vehicular access or
pedestrian access.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Future project
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with sidewalk plan.
58
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Second Avenue South (3rd to 5th Street South) ST-12 $1,000,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
PM Sectr Fnds PF 1,000,000
LOCATION:
Second Avenue South, From Third Street South to Fifth Street South
DESCRIPTION:
Roadway extension through the current Hennepin County site.
JUSTIFICATION:
- Provides better access to Highway 169 ramps
- Frontage road to future development site at Hennepin County site.
- Logical location for internal roadway
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULL:
Planning/Discussion 1998
Plans and Specifications 1998/1999
Bidding and Construction 1997
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with recommendations of Hopkins/Minnetonka Roadway System
Study of 1989.
59
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Stop Light Pre-emption System ST-13 $41,500
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Mncpl State Aid MS 21,350
Current CR 20,150
Revenues
LOCATION:
Quantity/Type Cost Each
1998: Mainstreet and 14th Avenue 3 Channel $ 10,000
Mainstreet and 12th Avenue 4 Channel $ 10,500
Mainstreet and 10th Avenue 4 Channel $ 10,500
Mainstreet and 9th Avenue 4 Channel $ 10,500
1998 Total Cost $ 41,500
DESCRIPTION:
Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption system to allow police and fire vehicles to change
stop light to green during an emergency.
JUSTIFICATION:
Recent state legislation requires all new stop lights to be wired for emergency vehicle
pre-emption when installed. Hopkins traffic has grown to the point where police and fire vehicles
are often slowed down or stopped at intersections. This system will help prevent accidents and
speed up response time. It is also compatible with our neighbors who already have such a
system.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Upgrade as many intersections as possible each year starting with the most critical. Cost per
intersection can vary because of the type and age of stoplight equipment.
Plan/Bid contract each year
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Shady Oak Road, County Road 3 to 11th Avenue, will be done as part of a
larger 1997-2000 projects. The Highway 7 corridor was completed in 1995.
60
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Third Street South ST-14 $60,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Perm Improve PI 60,000
LOCATION:
Third Street South from Fifth Avenue South to Washington Avenue.
DESCRIPTION:
Asphalt surface milling and pavement section repair. New asphalt wear course overlay
to restore pavement surface condition and extend pavement section life.
JUSTIFICATION:
Street has extensive high severity block cracking, pavement condition warrants
mill and overlay improvement.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Design 1999
Construction 2000
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Pavement improvement project would be subsequent to Hennepin County
public works site redevelopment.
61
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Lake Street Bridge Replacement ST-15 $240,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Other Govt Units GU 165,000
Perm Improve PI 75,000
LOCATION:
Lake Street NE at Minnehaha Creek
DESCRIPTION:
Replace existing deteriorated bridge with new concrete girder span bridge including
concrete approach panels, sidewalks, and railings.
JUSTIFICATION:
Existing bridge is 92 years old with a sufficiency rating of 34. A rating of less than 50
is required to be eligible for federal bridge replacement funds. The west concrete abutment
is severely deteriorated and the concrete railings have heavy spalling of concrete.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Design 1999
Construction 2000
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Replace when state transportation funds are available
CATEGORY PROJECT TITL= NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation City Parking Lot Improvements ST-16 $61,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Perm Improve PI 61,000 21,000
LOCATION:
1999: West City Hall Parking Lot $36,000
Lot 500 25,000
2003: Lot 600 21,000
Total $82,000
DESCRIPTION:
Reconstruct City Hall parking lot off 11th Avenue South. Excavate lot, install storm sewer,
curb and gutter, and bituminous surface.
Resurface City Lots 500 and 600 north of Mainstreet between 5th and 11th Avenues North.
JUSTIFICATION:
11th Avenue South upgrades will impact City Hall parking lot. This factor as well as age
of lot and deteriorating condition warrant replacement.
Lots 500 and 600 are on or approaching a critical point on a deterioration curve. Seal coats
and crack sealing will not redeem them. Mill and overlay are a minimum improvement needed.
Project costs noted above are for total replacement of the bituminous pavement.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
City Hall Lot Plan/bid 1999
Lot 500 Plan/bid 1999
Lot 600 Plan/bid 2003
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
City Hall lot and Lot 500 can be done as part of larger 1999 City street projects.
63
PARKS & RECREATION
65
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Park & Rec Downtown Park Stage CF-1 $56,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
General GR 32,000 24,000
Reserves
LOCATION:
Downtown Park
DESCRIPTION:
Stage with metal standing seam roof with ornamentation similar to the clock tower plaza. Roof
structure to be added in 1999.
JUSTIFICATION:
Portable stage has created problems with A.D.A. accessibility, is getting old, has created
employee safety concerns.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Design 1997
Construction 1998-1999
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Previously discussed and studied in November 1994.
67
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Park & Rec Valley Park Improvements CF-2 $45,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 I FUTURE
Current CR 25,000 20,000
Revenues
LOCATION:
Valley Park
DESCRIPTION:
Tennis Court (25,000) -1999
Parking Addition (20,000) -2001
JUSTIFICATION:
Tennis Courts addition to meet standards
Parking Addition addition to meet standards
Basketball Court maintenance
Valley Park is getting more use each year as a community park; as these uses grow,
the demand for additional parking is created.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with Park Board adopted Park Guidelines and CIP Priority List of 4/20/90.
68
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Park & Rec Shady Oak Beach Redevelopment CF-3 $350,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
General Fund CR 100,000 100,000 100,000 50,000
Reserves
LOCATION:
Shady Oak Beach
DESCRIPTION:
The 1994 Shady Oak Beach study identified structural and ADA problems. A Shady Oak Beach
master plan was developed and associated improvements approved by the cities of Minnetonka
and Hopkins. Phase I work to be completed in 1996 includes demolition of deep water docks,
purchase of new, removable deep water dock system and construction of a fishing pier and
canoe launch area. Phase II work will begin in 1997 and includes a reconfigured entrance drive
and 175 space parking lot, new changing/restroom/entry control buildings, new concession/life
guard station building, upgraded picnic shelter, canoe/paddle boat rental area, sanitary sewer
system upgrade and other beach improvements.
JUSTIFICATION:
All beach improvements will be agreed upon with the City of Minnetonka. CIP funding
must be identified to allow Hopkins to participate in the joint redevelopment of Shady Oak
Beach. Based on the traditional 2/3 Minnetonka, 1/3 Hopkins participation, a $1,500,000
project would cost Hopkins $500,000, budgeted over five years at $100,000 per year.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
1996: Phase I work completed
Phase 2 design
1997: Phase II work begins in September
1998: Phase II work completed by July
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with Park Board adopted resolution regarding a joint study.
69
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Park & Rec Pavilion Carpet CF-4 $19,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
General Fund GR 19,000
Reserves
LOCATION:
1505 Second Street South
DESCRIPTION:
Installation of soccer carpet.
1996 cost was $50,000 with velcro seams, delivered, with installation assistance.
JUSTIFICATION:
Replacement of existing indoor soccer surface which was purchased used
in 1990. The carpet is now 8-10 years old and is wearing out.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
7u
GENERAL PUBLIC
BUILDINGS
71
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Gen Pub Bldg Pavilion Mezzanine MF-1 $250,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Gen Fund Res GR 200,000
Grant in Aid GA 50,000
LOCATION:
Pavilion, 1515 Second Street South
DESCRIPTION:
Install elevator to mezzanine, and install the floor, ceiling, partitions, sprinkler system
and other items in this area.
JUSTIFICATION:
The original construction of the Pavilion provided the rough-in features for the mezzanine
area. The plan is to finally finish off this area so it could be used for City and athletic
functions.
I
(CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
I
Non-ranked on Park Board priority list.
73
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Gen Pub Bldg Fire Station Roof Maintenance MF-2 $50,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Current CR 50,000
Revenues
LOCATION:
Hopkins City Hall
1010 First Street South
DESCRIPTION:
Roof maintenance on the Fire Station in 1999.
JUSTIFICATION:
Periodic roof maintenance necessary to retain integrity of building. This is a
flat roof of built up pitch tar type construction.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Plan/Bid/Contract - 1999 (Fire Station)
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with overall maintenance of general public buildings.
74
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Gen Pub Bldg Fire Station Concrete Apron Replacement MF-3 $15,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Current CR 15,000
Revenues
LOCATION:
Hopkins City Hall
1010 First Street South
DESCRIPTION:
Fire station concrete apron
JUSTIFICATION:
Existing concrete pad is in poor condition. A portion of the pad along 11th Avenue
will be replaced as part of the Excelsior Boulevard project.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Eleventh Avenue is tentatively scheduled for replacement in 1998
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Excelsior Boulevard reconstruction
75
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Gen Pub Bldg Public Works Storage Facility MF-4 $1,500,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Perm Improve PI 1,500,000
LOCATION:
1601 Second Street South
DESCRIPTION:
Public Works vehicle storage building
JUSTIFICATION:
Scope of project is to remove building number 2 and construct a new 200 X 106 heated
storage building. Utilize building number 3, the current street equipment storage building,
for salt and sand storage. Current buildings are over 50 years old and will be in need of
major renovations in the near future.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Plans and specifications: Year prior to construction
Bid: Year of construction
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
•
76
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Gen Pub Bldg Fire Department Storage Building MF-6 $80,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Current CR 40,000 40,000 50,000
Revenues
LOCATION:
To be arranged.
DESCRIPTION:
Fire Department storage building.
JUSTIFICATION:
The Fire Department currently has an agreement with the technical college for
off-site storage. The lease on their property is up in the year 2000.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Set aside funds 2000-2002
Plan/Bid/Contract 2002
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Temporary arrangements have been made with Hennepin County Technical College for
storage space through the year 2000.
77
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Pub Bldg Fire Station Wheelchair Lift MF-7 $28,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Current CR 28,000
Revenues
LOCATION:
Fire Station
DESCRIPTION:
Fire Station wheelchair lift.
JUSTIFICATION:
Wheelchair access is required to the 2nd floor per the Americans with Disabilities Act.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Plan/Bid/Contract in 2001
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the Fires Station remodeling project.
78
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER s YEAR COST
Gen Pub Bldg Fire Station Murphy Beds MF-8 $12,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Current CR 12,000
Revenues
LOCATION:
Fire Station
DESCRIPTION:
Provide and install five pull-down beds:
- Three in the classroom
- Two in the lounge
JUSTIFICATION:
Provide sleeping accommodations for up to five fire fighters on standby for rescue, storms, or
special circumstances.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Contract in 1999
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the Fire Station remodeling project.
79
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Gen Pub Bldg Fire Station Vehicle Exhaust System MF-9 $32,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Current CR 32,000
Revenues
LOCATION:
Fire Station
DESCRIPTION:
Fire Station vehicle exhaust system.
JUSTIFICATION:
OSHA is requiring an upgrade of existing occupancies where vehicles may omit fumes and
carbon monoxide within a building. Since upgrading most of the trucks to diesel fuel, this problem
has become more apparent. An exhaust system would also help keep the station cleaner and
avoid health problems with Fire and City Hall personnel.
This will also keep the recently painted fire station cleaner.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
This project should be done prior to our next OSHA inspection to avoid any citations or fines.
•
•
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with the Fire Station remodel plan.
PROPOSED
EXPENDITURES
FOR
FUTURE
PROJECTS
81
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Utilities Lift Station Reconstruction SA-2 $0
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 I FUTURE
Sewer Fund SF 150,000
LOCATION:
Sanitary Sewer Lift Station #1
DESCRIPTION:
Reconstruct existing wet well/dry well with wet well design for ease of maintenance
and standardization with other lift stations.
JUSTIFICATION:
Eliminates a confined space, simplifies future maintenance/repairs.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDUL .:
Future project
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
None
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Light Rail Transit Stations (2) PP-1 $0
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Tax Increment TF 150,000
LOCATION:
1) Intersection of Third Street South and Fifth Avenue South
2) Second Street Northeast
DESCRIPTION:
Supplemental improvements to two Light Rail Transit (LRT) stations in the
proposed HCRRA locations.
JUSTIFICATION:
The HCRRA proposes to construct two stations along the Southwest Corridor.
The proposed expenditures would be in addition to the funds expended by the HCRRA.
The additional funds would be used to ensure the stations are high quality in appearance.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Dependent on HCRRA plans.
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with plans for LRT stops in Hopkins by Hennepin County.
84
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Ninth Avenue LRT Corridor PP-2 $0
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 FUTURE
Water Fund WF 250,000
Sewer Fund SF 350,000
Storm Sewer SU 100,000
LOCATION:
Ninth Avenue From County Road 3 to First Street North
DESCRIPTION:
Relocation of utilities and reconstruction of street to accommodate light rail transit
line from County Road 3 to First Street North.
JUSTIFICATION:
In 1984 the City hired J.J. Bakker to analyze the proposed light rail transit corridors in
Hopkins. The study recommended that the northwest route of the Southwest Corridor
not cross County Road 3 at TH 169. Rather, the study recommended that the northwest
route be extended north on Ninth Avenue to First Street North and then continue
northwestward on the proposed corridor.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Dependent on HCRRA plans.
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with recommendations made in 1984 Bakker study.
85
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Transportation Sixth Street South (11th to 12th Avenue South) PP-3 $0
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 FUTURE
Econ Dev ED 100,000
Mncpl State Ad MS 300,000
LOCATION:
Sixth Street South from 11th Avenue South to 12th Avenue South.
DESCRIPTION:
Extension of roadway and box culvert crossing at Nine Mile Creek.
JUSTIFICATION:
1. Offer a second access to the industrial area (fire access).
2. Direct some of the existing industrial traffic north, away from the residential
intersection at Seventh Street and 11th Avenue.
3. Connect a current dead-end alley, west of 11th Avenue.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Planning/Discussion 1995 - 1998
Plans and Specifications 1998 - 2000
Bidding and Construction 1998 - 2000
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Currently on MSA Plans.
86
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Park & Rec Central Park Parking Lot PP-5 $0
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Current CR 53,000
Revenues
LOCATION:
North side of Central Park, west of volleyball courts.
DESCRIPTION:
Number of parking stalls - 31
Handicap/van access stalls - 2
JUSTIFICATION:
Current parking lot is 20-25 years old and has deteriorated quickly in the last several years. Poor::rainage
(no storm sewer) and no permanent curbing has accelerated this deterioration.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Nonscheduled in 1996-2000 CIP Plan
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with Park Board maintenance standards.
87
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Gen Pub Bldg Security System Installation PP-6 $0
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 FUTURE
Tax Increment TF 54,700
LOCATION:
Parking ramp
DESCRIPTION:
Installation of video security system in parking ramp.
JUSTIFICATION:
The use of the parking ramp will likely increase from its current 25%, to approximately 80%
upon completion of the theater/restaurant project on the former Suburban Chevrolet site.
Its use will increase even more upon completion of the arts facility on the north side of this property.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Planning and discussion Future
Bid and construction Future
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
88
CATEGORY PROJECT TITLE NUMBER 5 YEAR COST
Utilities Water Treatment Facilities, Elmo Park WA-2 $395,000
FUNDING SCHEDULED PROJECT ACTIVITY
SOURCE 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 FUTURE
Water Fund WF 395,000
LOCATION:
1401 Elmo Park Service Drive
DESCRIPTION:
Reconstruction/repair of the water treatment facilities at the Elmo Park site.
JUSTIFICATION:
The present facility is in need of repair and upgrading to improve utilization and
efficiency. Several safety related items need attention. Improvements include new
filter media and backwash retention tank.
CURRENT STATUS/PROJECTED SCHEDULE:
Plans and Specifications 1997
Bid and Construct 1998
RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING PLANS AND OTHER PROGRAMS:
Consistent with water and sewer master plan approved in 1990.
89