CR2002-165 Hopkins crossroads/mtka blvd prelim layout
~
CITY OF
. October 10, 2002 ~ Council Report 2002-165
HOPK1NS
APPROVE PRELIMINARY PLANS, LAYOUT 1F
HOPKINS CROSSROADS/MINNETONKA BOULEVARD INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS (HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJECT 8111)
Proposed Action.
Staff recommends the following motion: Move that Council adopt Resolution
2002-95, Resolution approvinq roadway construction preliminary plans, layout
1 F, for the construction of a new intersection at Hopkins Crossroads and
Minnetonka Boulevard (Hennepin County Project 8111).
This action authorizes the City and Hennepin County to proceed to final design
and acquire necessary right-of-way, permits and easements.
Overview.
In December, 1999 City Council adopted a resolution in support of intersection
improvements provided that several conditions were met. Since that time, staff
from the cities of Hopkins and Minnetonka, Hennepin County staff, consultants
and a Hopkins Task Force have been working to reach agreement on many
design elements, including: signal system component design, street signage
design, driveway access, pedestrian safety design, landscaping, median design
. and lane widths. In April 2002 the Task Force reached agreement on a
preliminary intersection design and on May 16 staff held a public informational
meeting. There is still work to be done with Hennepin County on defining
corridor enhancements east of the proposed new intersection. Staff feels that
there is sufficient agreement on the preliminary design to proceed. Hennepin
County personnel will be present at the Council Meeting to help explain the
project and answer questions.
Primary Issues to Consider.
. Project Design Specifics
. Property Impacts
. Project Cost and Schedule
Supportina Documents.
. Analysis of Issues
. Proposed Resolution 2002-95
. Proposed preliminary layout plan, signal design, landscape plan
. Preliminary cost estimate
. Ci y Council es lution 99-116
Steven J. Stadler, Public Works Director
.
---- -- - - --
. Council Report 2002-165
Page 2
Analvsis of Issues
. Project Design Specifics
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC SIGNALS
. Signal pole/mast arm design will be similar to Mainstreetl1 ih Avenue
intersection design (Visco products), not a standard Hennepin County
design (Millerberndt products)
0 City of Hopkins will pay increased cost of materials
0 City will stock replacement pole/s, Hennepin County will fully
maintain the traffic signals
. There will be six signal poles total, one at each corner with mast arms and
a pedestal signal pole in each of the two CSAH 73 medians
0 CSAH 73 mast arm will be 35' long and support one signal face
0 CSAH 5 mast arm will be 40' long and support two signal faces
0 The intersection will include a total of 16 signal faces
0 Street name signage will be included on the signal poles, not hung
. from the mast arms
ROADWAY GEOMETRICS
. Approach lanes will be the minimum State Aid width, i.e., 11' wide plus
2' curb and gutter
. Pedestrian areas provided at each corner of the intersection
. Median widths are the minimum - 5' back to back of curb
. East approach median longer than required to help slow approach
traffic
STREETSCAPE/LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS
. Each corner area will have common elements including: pedestrian
area paving, seat wall, evergreen plantings behind wall
. Medians have special paving and bollards
. Colored and score-patterned concrete at crosswalks and center area
. Existing landscaping at southeast corner to be relocated and/or
replaced to the extent pOSSible
PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS
. . Staff proposes to provide a continuous 6' wide asphalt sidewalk along the
south side of the road. Accordingly, the road section would include two
. Council Report 2002-165
Page 3
12' travel lanes, two 6' asphalt shoulders and the 6' sidewalk on the south side.
This results in a 42' wide pavement and sidewalk section. The existing
pavement width varies from 38' to 44'.
. Property impacts
0 The proposed plan will require permanent property takings from
several Minnetonka properties and four Hopkins properties. The
Hopkins properties are: 18 Loring Road, 11115, 11100 and 11118
Minnetonka Boulevard. Temporary construction easements will be
required from four other Hopkins properties. There will be some trees
lost at both corner properties. The road alignment has been adjusted
to minimize tree loss and every effort will be made to protect trees,
wherever possible, rather than removing them. As design continues,
staff will work with the owners at each corner regarding the expected
construction impacts and ways to mitigate them. Owners will be
compensated for loss of trees, shrubs and, of course, for the
easements.
. . Project Cost and Schedule
COST: The current construction cost estimate is $2,413,972. The estimated
Hopkins share is $498,268. The 2003-2007 CIP has a city budget of $500,000
for this project. A preliminary cost estimate is attached.
SCHEDULE: Hennepin County would complete design by Jan 31,2003.
Construction on utility and road improvements would begin in August, 2003 and
be completed in 2004.
.
. CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION 2002-95
APPROVAL OF ROAD CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS, LAYOUT 1 F,
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW INTERSECTION AT HOPKINS
CROSSROADS - MINNETONKA BOULEVARD (HENNEPIN COUNTY
PROJECT 8111)
WHEREAS, Layout NO.1 F, Hennepin County project 8111 showing proposed
improvements to Hopkins Crossroads (County State Aid Highway 73) and
Minnetonka Boulevard (County State Aid Highway 5), within the limits of the city
have been prepared and presented to the city.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Hopkins, that said Layout 1 F be in all things approved, that the City and
Hennepin County are hereby authorized to acquire all rights-of-way, permits
and/or easements required for said improvements in accordance with Layout 1 F,
. and that the city agrees to ban the parking of motor vehicles at all times and to
provide enforcement for the prohibition of on-street parking on Hopkins
. Crossroads and Minnetonka Boulevard within its corporate limits.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 15th Day of October, 2002.
Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor
ATTEST:
Terry Obermaier, City Clerk
.
~
~
(
.
\
I .
, ,
I ,
I \ _ .
I _
I
I
I
I
.
I
- -----~~-----
/~
{jJ
CP
:P'
(Fl
fTl
.-
-
. ~
-_...:..~"",--- -
....
......
~M,-~lf-...'IIl..._ct'~
Q'!;t;~~::: --. '.
- c=--=-=--- ~~=-='- ~<~ ~f ~ . _ _ _ g " ~ "" _ / /~
- ') ~ elf-
~:~ : r,
t" . /(
~ 1. r - ~ '1
c:E. \' I , ___
fTl '~ '.1 -w
-I , GL I ~
.- ~ I ~ 1/'
:P' 1 I CI 'I
:Z o I,! /. J
~ () · 10' /,1 E
\ '10 / I / ,~ l
I .. , ---- V"\
,./" ./~~. --....
' ' oF ,/ _ ""'"'
~\~' ~r
.1" f !t
7' ~
\' s.
~ I ~
.b I :, ~
- I .
r~ I _
g~ I ~
fTll
6~ I
c:: -I }
. ~';\ I so
~ ::0 - 1_
'-, I
- - I "
DETAIL E
CS.AH. NO. 5
VISCO
. SIXTEEN SIDED, FLUTE~ TAPERED
MAST ARM SIGNAL POLE WITH LUMINAIRE
CITY OF HOPKINS MAINT AINED
(NO SCALE)
I 40'
e
~ 8
.
" 11 " " I' "
1~--.JkL~~ r~~~~
. ~_11' LANE 11' LAN~
2' CURB AND GUTTER
RAISED MEDIAN
SHEET 5 OF 9
DETAIL C
CS.AH. NO. 73
VISCO
. SIXTEEN SIDE~ FLUTEft TAPERED
MAST ARM SIGNAL POLE WITH LUMINAIRE
AND SIGNAL PEDESTAL
CITY OF HOPKINS MAINTAINED
(NO SCALE)
\ 35/
8
.
/' I I "" /' I I " ,..- ~ I ""
~~~~~ r~~~~ f~ ~~~
. 11/ LANE 11 / LANE 11 / LANE
2/ CURB AND GUTTER
RAISED MEDIAN SHEET 3 OF 9
~CHEDULE OF MATERIALS
paving materials
_ ~dnve concrete -
~or wa.lk concrete ~
-----.J plain drive concrete Or .-~._. . "" ~'"." . . ~~ ..A>
:::l plain walk concrete -
TIn special median paving -
._~~ ._,~,~.~ ~~~.~c;.=~ ~-~.:::::.'--'
, ~~
special features \~_... I." .......-
I -"" > ',,'-- " "',,
cast concrete bo\1arcls - ' . . "}'" . ~ Oc_'-" ,-~~ ,'.
. " .' c- ""ly",=-k.-}
- cast concrete walls
," ~ i>c~" -.--'."
," ( . ~~~W~
'" . .". ',". . ~ .,'. ~
: ' t'., '",' ",i!1/.,,' ,;;"- ".". . ,.,
. '-~ . ~~\~ .~:!:~d~d"~!l .
landscape materials f'::"-";~; - I....::_I~'.€~-"~':.-+., ! ---=
o upi'fght evergreens SEAT WALL BOLLARD 42" RA1UNq @ OVERLOOK
o medium deciduous shrubs Concept Sketches for special features
<l) small deciduouS shrubs
. perennials
- ~ .-
~
~
l
~
"
Belgrave neighborhood
stone entry columns &
asphalt split rall ten
drive I." ,'. ",""
~
" \
" ~:,: "O,\T~@j
asphalt ~ \.1 \ [
drive \ -"--'
· '0""" 1"
_____- ~ __ =----.J
,Iarged intersection plan
CSAH 73 & 5 intersection Schematic plan
Hennepin Co. ,City of Hopkins" City of Minnetonka
....~._~
..0 Q) --~-''''--''''
t' j..U .)
t Z ?.- m ~-
ro .__h"'__,\
I~' Z', Q) '. ,
\'- , . I.- '.-
;; ',:E en 0- CD
~,CI) c
l- ~ 0 c.~~)
--.......+,;;
"l''''';;'.::::t:. I.- ' Q r---~~"7~
:'\,l co 0' '=,' . "
J
~:~~++---
. 0 4- L-
-- "l
"'-'..~..;
-0 U) .,,_~i
"",(1) Q) C
.",' > '
=: J Cl;f:!: 0 \--
,-
r:! :<, ,j::) (.) LL.J
-t u)""
I" < I en 0
ci. '. _J C ;~-;:.~i
~ \ U)7 0 :: ::;:;;;?
ro: . 't. ..:~i> ,r- t) 0 \ /
r " ""'. 0 Q) ,-
.~ f' ~~. s.... \ /
/ :z .00- ,/
ci. : ./I r;-''''''<l 1/
~, /
'& ~I\ /
(ij :.;\'1> ~;;""_~~0.'.-'>'" ~) r. n. I )
3l: , .-
.. '--7 2' /
Q) '0 "~I ! l.~,~ -
-0 C "! c ' I
:::l E J
13 ,
0- (1) '\ ,(.l' (
C >> .D "
-
~ cIJ .. J~l ./- /
(ij OJ
(1) c: i
E 3: 'ZJ i
1ii c j
8 ro I
II> a. .9 J
s: cIJ ,
ti ~ i
(/) --5 !
C ro ' .
rJ) ui 8 ~ ~ wi.
Q) (j) g 10 ,':r -g
tl) -
.... j--""". rJ)
- .w ro 8 0. ~ .5
..:.:: '\~IZ l.) o ,. E
(l1 ,.'€. . ~ s;.. '.
0 I uJ - ~ .
Ol \";l ,I I- If) :: m.
.~ I;. O~8Q)
:t2 I Z.D \"0
.'~ ( ~-,.' \.
\..__ __-. ~cc _.-- -~
(
~I; . cIJ .~
"'\","- ~ (\10>
~:~"'t' .- c:
0.-
"'5 w ~
.0 g-o..
~.J~lj_;-:'~-::!:j .'f. :li.-j :t} 'fT
i j:.-: .f ;, ~-,~. ~ ~ :-~rr','=-"E~~~':-1_'l, -',":; :.\ ~..."
(/)
c ....- ~ -~ --- --- ---- ........- .....-- - ---., -_. --:-..
m
G
Q)
E I
(I
I
.'~ . .~:
..... 'y 'YX){ 'j{' ~*\, .
---~"1:-J()r.::~;. ' , .::.~,,, ,,'...:. :.
~~ , ... .
/ I
~
.....- 1 . ~; .
/ 0> .~
/' &i - -" . ~J:-) t
.~ '0 .....~ ',(0/'
------.._-~ ~- -~ c: .', (.1. I I
-- :.2 \' .\ _c~ \1
3= 1 (.l'
.:.;:: (j) .. "_-,r,
. .n \:":/1
., 0 , (~) ~
II) 0 If)
(!) 'i: 0> /
'0 (l) c::
::l > +=i
- 0 c: ~E ___" ,..___--------
g = ~ l ~."'~~. 'I
. .- (l1 0. \, ------ 1
Q) ~ c:: II) "----.. r------- --'- ~ ,
E t:l (!) C .~-- -- I
o 8 ~",$; ro ...._.~..'-________..--r-"...- ,
:a.
U _ E> (,) m. ~"")---
3: CJ) W ~/ '(Y E, Ex:
z ~ -1; -:-.0 c:'
-- ,- .
...... -- Ol _....~
.----~ C'
-- '5
.-"
e --
/
c-'
."; -1
~'. '.. ,J
_. ~.
Q) '\.....-...-
~
C
/ +-"
Q) C
> ill
0 Q)
!.-
0) C
- 0
Q) +-" Z
. CO (/)
I
- ........L....\
- r -
--'c'r - CO
5
u
c -
c 0
.-
w 0
- U
0-
"
0 +-'
C co
0 Q)
(,) ..c
0- >
C (/) 'C
-- co "0
W
-
0..
, , , i Ii...' .)a.--rf
' I . , i ",j,.-.: I I ! J....-
J-j-t'r ~tl~':[ LJ ~_I. -,-.
0 -- -
-- - -
c .- -.
0 -
u
c
.-
m
0-
.C
.-
CO -
-
0- m
5:
~
. "
;
--........
"-
oS !'1 i
1'1' '
.- ro -
3: !.- '
. 1
PRELIMINARY COST SHARING ESTIMATE
C.S.A.H. NO. S & 73 / PROJECT 8111 /
ITEM TOTAL UNIT ESTIMATED HENNEPIN MINNETONKA HOPKINS
COST QTY COST COST COST
MOBILIZATION $120,000.00 LS 1.00 $96,000 $12,000 $12,000
TRAF-FIC CONTROL $80,000.00 LS 1.00 $64,000 $8,000 $8,000
REMOVALS $122,000.00 LS 1.00 $122,000
GRADING $340,000.00 LS 1.00 $340,000
BITUMINOUS SURFACING $347,000.00 LS 1.00 $352,000
(1 ) STANDARD CONCRETE PAVT $114,695.00 SF 16385 $32,770 $81,925
(1) COLORED CONCRETE PAVT $126,500.00 SF 11000 $22,000 $104,500
CURB & GUTTER $100,000.00 LS 100 $50,000 $25,000 $25,000
(1 ) STANDARD CONCRETE WALK $2.475.00 SF 550 $2.475
(1) COLORED CONCRETE WALK $3,850.00 SF 550 $2,475 $1,375
. COLORED CONCRETE MEDIAN $12.000.00 SF 2000 $9,000 $3,000
BITUMINOUS WALK $16.000.00 LS 1.00 $8,000 $4,000 $4,000
PAVEMENT MARKING $61,000.00 LS 1.00 $61,000
DRAINAGE $80,000.00 LS 1.00 $40,000 $20,000 $20,000
(2) UTILITIES $400,000.00 LS 1.00 $300,000 $100,000
TURF ESTABLISHMENT $37,000.00 LS 1.00 $37,000
(3) LANDSCAPING $20,57500 LS 1.00 $6,858 $13,717
(3) PRECAST CONCRETE BOLLARDS $19,200.00 EA 12.00 $6.400 $12,800
(3) CONCRETE SEAT WALLS $21,677. 00 LS 1.00 $7,226 $14.451
SIGNAL SYSTEM $150,000.00 EA 1.00 $75,000 $37,500 $37.500
RIGHT OF WAY $240,000.00 EA 1.00 $120,000 $60,000 $60,000
SUBTOTAL 1 $1,454,2041 $466,5001 $498,268 I
TOTAL I $2,413,9721
(1) COUNTY COST PAID AS BIT. SURFACE
(2) SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT
(3) ROADSIDe ENHANCEMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM (UPTO 33%).
(4) ESTIMATE FOR FUTURE NB RIGHT TURN LANE IS $300.000 WILL INCLUDE
. REVISED SIGNAL SYSTEM, RIGHT TURN LANE, RETAINING WALL AND RIGHT-OF-WAY COSTS.
prelim_cost_ split xis 5/16/2002
CITY OF HOPKINS
. Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 99R116
COUNTY ROAD 73 AND MINNETONKA BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Hopkins recognizes the need for improvements to the intersection and
surrounding areas County Road 73 (Hopkins Crossroads) and County Road 5 (Minnetonka
Boulevard) by improving the conditions for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists; and
WHEREAS, the needed improvements must reflect the concerns of both the travelljng public
and the surrounding neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, The City of Hopkins has been working with a task force to develop an acceptable
response and solution to the various concerns and goals; and
WHEREAS, the result of these efforts from all parties has identified a potential solution to the
concerns of all parties and the Hopkins City Council wishes to present a position statement reflecting
it's position and desire to continue toward improvements; and
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Hopkins believes that the proposed improvements
are generally in line with the goals and expectations of the City of Minnetonka and Hennep1n Co.
.. NOW~ THEREFO~EJ BE IT RESOLVED, by the City ~ouncil ~fthe City of Hopkins that the
City of HopkinS supports Improvements to the area near the IntersectIon of Co. Rd 73 and Co. Rd 5
under the following conditions:
1. That the intersection design closely follows the design elements as depicted on the Biko Assoc.
"Hennepin County Discussion Plan" which includes the following design elements:
a. Concrete Pavement with contrasting color and texture elements in the crosswalk and center
areas.
b. Intersection geometries will include the configurations as shown with the understanding that a
future right turn lane in the west-bound Co. Rd 5 approach will be accepted if the overall
intersection level of service reaches a service level D.
c. Intersection lane widths and raised center medians are constructed to the minimum State Aid
standards (11 '). Raised medians will include landscaping as shown.
d. Non-standard decorative traffic control devices are utilized which are acceptable to the Cities
of Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Hennepin Co.
e. Street identification signage, which is placed prior to the intersection rather than attached to
the poles and/or mast arms. Attempts will be made to keep allsignage off of tDe poles and
mast arms. if signage must be attached, it shall be minimal in size.
f. Landscape design elements that reflect the intended effect of improving the aesthetics of the
area.
g. Maintenance of the intersection will be the responsibility of Hennepin Co.
.
2. That Hennepin Co., City of Minnetonka and City of Hopkins agree to diligently pursue
enhancements to Co. Rd. 5 including:
-------
. a, Roadway improvements such as streetscape amenities, trails, landscaping, and defined
h driving surface edges with the expectation of improving aesthetics and reducing speed
. through Hopkins (35 mph preferred).
b. Creating a uniform, consistent speed along the Co. Rd. 5 corridor from Hwy 169 to Hwy 494.
c. An understanding that there will be no roadway lane additions or expansions for at least 10
years.
d. The improvements outlined in this section are to be considered an integral part of the approval
process from the City of Hopkins.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEDI
1. That the Hopkins staff is directed to develop an agreement with Hennepin Co. and the City of
Minnetonka which will lead to the construction of the improvements.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 21 st day of December, 1999.
Charles D. Redepenning, Mayor
ATTEST:
~i6i:~~)
errY Obemaier, City Clerk .
Res98-116
.