The URL can be used to link to this page

CUP 90-03 J � " CITY OF HOPKINS ---� SUPPLEMENTAL DATA FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Application No .�j��p__:z P . I .D . No . A. GENERAL DATA 1 A M E 0 F A P P L I C A N T: /L'l�4�t2�t5 G�Y�'OY��h T/C.�t/ �he above named individual , firm or corporation hereby respectfully submits the 'ollowing data in support of the preliminary information provided on the .ceompanying Zoning Application Summary Form dated i D for the purpose of -ecuring a Conditional Use Permit . S� Al n� �b�K— ��l 3 -/1 �7 �7 `� ` �7 S6 Contact Person Last Name , First Day Phone No. Evening Phone No. B. PROJECT INFORMATION 1 . Specify the section of the ordinance which applied to this project: ? . Brief narrative description of this request:�t,�.�s l 'ta .P£��of .P-� D C,v�vrT�z�cc? f`�P�-aX/�f�9T6�)� 6 coa u,sr4b� ��(,c�sz� i-�ET o '� ✓�-£Tn��.. Sc�iK� c�� "7�i � Gc_D C!T% �-,1�c.� .s i T� C�o� /.3��4 K-� JZ� � ` 3 • �ten justification for request including discussion of hoW any potential conflicts with existing nearby land uses will be minimized: `'�oT�m /��ts �Sif�J O£S�G.�✓�� 7d /�/CL�cDF jG�E-£N/'�G �o'�" ,9�c%�F.�T �/�'10EL.T �.✓ (�l�T/F•r�i�v �s�s . 4 . Check all additional supporting documents and data whieh are being submitted to help explain this project proposal: [M] sketch plan , [ ] topographic map , [ ] detailed narrative , [ ] operation plans , [ ] engineering plans , [ ] flood plain hydraulic analysis , [ ] flood proofing plans and specifications , [ ] other (specify) : hereby certify with my signature that all data �n my application forms , plans and specifications ire true and correct to the best of my knowledge: 6 � 6 Signature of Applicant ate CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT � :n accordanee with 525. 13 of _ Zoning Code , the (Seetion of Ordinance) (Ordinance No . ) 'ity of Hopkins hereby [ X] approves , [ ] denies the foregoing Application for �onditional Use Permit. If approved , said approval is sub�ect to the following �eneral and Special Provisions : . ^ �� Pl anni ng & Economi c �Y:. �� = � � Development Director 8/30/90 ,e�uthorized Signature) (Title) (Date) SEE REVERSE FOR GENERAL AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS - � PAGE 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT GENERAL PROVISIONS `� 1 . This permit is not valid until it has been recorded at the Office of the County Recorder . A true and correct copy of the full legal description of the affected property must be attached to this document . 2 . This permit does not constitute a building permit , sewage system permit , grading permit , land alteration permit , well permit or the like . Separate permits may have to be applied for and obtained in order to aceomplish all the goals of the projeet authorized herein . 3 • The issuance of this permit does not negate the need to secure other permits from other local units of government , state agencies or federal ageneies who may also have jurisdiction over portions of your project . SPECIAL PROVISIONS l. That the fence on the north side of the �uilding is extended with a height of at least 32 feet in wood. 2. That the applicant adds 2 or 3 trees to the site. 3. Receive the proper permits from Hennepin County for drainage. 4. That the fence between the residential area a�d the site is a wood fence. 5. That the area behind the building is designated "one way". �. 6. That the existing sidewalk is retained or replaced by the applicant. 7. That the trash container is enclosed on four sides. E%PIRATION. A Conditional Use Permit expires one year after it has been issued unless the use for which the permit has been granted is in effect . Extensions may be 3ranted provided the applicant submits a letter to the Zoning Administrator requesting an extension 30 days before the expiration of said approval . The letter shall state the facts of the request , showing a good-faith attempt to �tilize the Permit , and it shall also state the additional time being requested to begin the proposed construetion . The City Council may grant extensions not to exceed one year. U CITY OF HOPKINS �--� ZONING APPLICATION S� RY FORM Application Number ��90 � � P .I .D .#: Applicant ' s Name (Last , First) Owner (if other than applicant) ft� s ca�Po2r4Tro�1 GiTr of rto�r��tis Mailing Address (Street , City, State , Zip Code) 1 Ooo i ��+yz�T�r 6 �J.O_ 5c,c_ t�. i 00 �y ►N N��JK71 SS3�3 Phone Number: (Day)__ S�j3 " /� ?� (Evening) �7� - 775� Property Address .3��- gL<tK-�- ��. APPLICABLE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT(S) TYPE OF ZONING REQUEST [ ] R-1-A [ ] R-2 [ ] B-1 [ ] Concept Review [ ] R-1-B [ ] R-3 [ ] B-2 [ ] Conditional Use Permit [ ] R-1 -C [ ] R-4 [7C1 B-3 [ ] Variance [ ] R-1 -D [ ] R-5 [ ] I-1 [ ] Zoning District Change [ ] R-1 -E [ ] R-6 [ ] I-2 [ ] Subdivision Approval [ ] Ordinance Amendment [ ] Other I hereby certify with my signature that all data contained herein as well as all supporting . data are true and correet to the best of my knowledge: � � yo ' Applieants Signature ate Owners Signature Date ADMINISTRATIVE DATA SUMMARY [ ] Proper addendum to application Application received: � - i- 9 D � 7 Detailed plans submitted [ ] Written pro�ect description submitted Fee Paid : �S� Referred to City PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Engineer: Approved: without modifications Referred to City �] with modifications Attorney Denied [ ] Referred to Watershed District Date: '7- 3/- 9D Date of Publie , Hearing Notice � - � �-�� ^ COUNCIL ACTION Date of Public A �ved: without modifications Hearing �- �/- q� �X7 with modifications Denied: [ ] Date: - �c - �/-�/> RESOLUTION N0: qCJ - I� � S Y O G � � ti 5 � August l, 1990 � P K � � Council Report: 90-166 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MARCUS CORPORATION Proposed Action. Staff recommends approval of the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution No: 90-68 approvinq the Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a 6600 square foot buildinct at 302 Blake Road. Approval of this motion will allow the construction of a 6000 square foot building at 302 Blake Road. overview. On January 9, 1990, the City Council designated the subject site as surplus property. The City Council also directed staff to solicit proposals. Requests for Proposals were mailed to 5 developers. Two proposals were received by the City at the end of March. The proposal from Marcus Corporation was selected. On February 27, 1990 the rezoning of the site from R-4 residential to B-3 business became effective. The applicant, Marcus Corporation, is in the process of purchasing the well site on Second Street and Blake Road from the City. The applicant is proposing to construct a 6600 square foot building for .--� retail. Staff is recommending approval because the applicant meets the ordinance requirements. Mark Senn appeared before the Commission. The Commission had reviewed the proposal at the previous meeting. Mr. Senn showed the Commission samples of the exterior material for the proposed structure. The Commission discussed the landscaping, fencing, heating and air conditioning units, and the access to the property. The Commission unanimously approved Resolution No. Z90-il approving the Conditional Use Permit with conditions. Primary Issues to Consider. o Is the proposed use allowed in the B-3 district? o How is the applicant proposing to buffer the residential area? o Does the proposed development meet the ordinance requirements? Supportinq Documents. o Detailed Background o Analysis of Issues o Alternatives o Location Map o Site Plan � o Resolution 90-68 Nancy S. Anderson � • ♦ �` CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - MARCUS CORPORATION CR: 90-166 Page 2 Detailed Backqroun8. Parkina. The site plan shows 31 parking spaces. The site will require 30 spaces for retail. 7 spaces are designated as compact. The site is allowed to have 25% of the spaces as compact. Staff is recommending that the one parking space near the entrance on Second Street be eliminated. Access. Access to the site is proposed from Blake Road and Second Street. The access from Blake Road will have to be approved by Hennepin County. If access is not granted by the County on Blake Road, the site will have only one access point which is acceptable to staff. The access point from Second Street is lined up with the access point to Fina. Staff has reviewed the access point on Second Street with Mitch Wonson of Benshoof and Associates. The plan reflects the design from Mitch Wonson. One concern of the staff's is the traffic flow behind the building. ^ There maybe a problem with traffic coming from both sides since the road will be narrow. Staff is recommending that the applicant work with staf f to determine which traf f ic f low wi 11 work the best and to designate the road 'ONE WAY' . The following are the B-3 requirements and the proposed site plan: B-3 Proposed front yard 20 feet 74 feet rear yard 25 feet 25 feet side yard south 10 feet 45 feet north 15 feet 25 feet height 45 feet 16 feet Landscaping. The site plan shows a variety of plantings. The site is required to have 15 trees. The site plan shows 4 trees of the required size plus additional shrubs throughout the site. The applicant has stated that he will add additional trees on the site. However, the applicant will not be able to add 11 trees to the site. Probably only two or three additional trees will be added to the site. The Commission can grant a waiver where compliance restricts off-street parking. The applicant does provide an overall landscape design throughout the site with smaller plantings. —� . • . � CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - MARCUS CORPORATION CR: 90-166 Page 3 Drainage. The Engineering Supervisor has reviewed the plans and found them acceptable. The site will drain to a catch basin on the southeast corner of the site. The applicant will have to receive permission from Hennepin County to connect to the existing catch basin. Fire Marshal. The Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans and found them acceptable. If the access from Blake Road is not granted from the County the plan is still acceptable. FencinQ. The plans have detailed a 6 foot chain link fence/vinyl slat. The applicant will bring a picture of the fence. However, if the Commission indicates that a wood fence would buffer the residential area better, the applicant will construct a wood fence. The staff is recommending a wood fence. The fence along the north side of the site will be extended. The ordinance requires a 3 1/2 foot fence between the residential ^ districts and parking lots. The applicant has agreed to extend the f ence. Exterior Materials. The proposed building will have a variety of materials. The building will have a band around the top with a mixture of inetal and cement plaster. Rockface material will be on the back of the building and in a few areas on the front. The building will have earth tone colors. The applicant will bring samples of the materials to the meeting. Trash. The trash container is located on the northwest corner of the site. The container is enclosed on three sides with a six foot fence. Access to the trash container will be from the rear of the site. Staff is recommending enclosing the container on four sides. Primary Issues to Consider. o Is the proposed use allowed in the B-3 district? The applicant is proposing retail uses. The B-3 district is a general business district which allows most retail uses. If a use is � proposed for an area in this building and requires a conditional use permit, approval will be required from the Zoning and Planning Commission and City Council. . , . - � CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - MARCUS CORPORATION CR: 90-166 Page 4 o How is the applicant proposing to buffer the residential area from the business area? The ordinance requires the fence to be a type that captures vehicle lights. The applicant is proposing a 6 foot chain link/vinyl slat fence on the west and north sides of the property. This type of fence is being proposed because the fence does not look as bulky. However, the applicant will erect a wood fence if the Commission indicates a wood fence is preferred. The staff would recommend a wood fence. The fence on the north side of the property will have to be extended which the applicant has indicated he will do. Most of the activity on the site occurs away from the residential areas. The apartments to the west are buffered by the building and a fence. The nearest apartment building to the west is oriented to the north and south not in the direction of the site. The residential area to the north also does not have any apartments looking into the site. The fence along the north lot line will block .�. any activity on the site. Alternatives. 1. Approve the Conditional Use Permit with the conditions as recommended by the staff. By approving the Conditional Use Permit, the applicant can construct a 6600 square foot retail building. 2. Deny the Conditional Use Permit. By denying the Conditional Use Permit the applicant will not be able to construct the building as proposed. Findings should be outlined which supports the denial of the Conditional Use Permit. 3. Continue for further information. If the Commission feels further information is needed, the item should be continued. "� / A;19) _1 I I I I I I I 5•\ `2' � Gj ��• � ; �6 P �77) � �75) ` �41) � B (3) C34 � . (78) . � (119) f4�� (20 $�. R � � �-. � � � �, , _ — - .�` � F ,� � �8� �45) . / ' `vO < q �84 �83) - 325 �\g yqT � �O� 2 c�s � ca�) � ss � � ��s �S'q Uo) . M�4 �� . c86)� � ,32 \ 7 /045 //05 /15 //25 � 3�3 �3� (I i) ` g�2 AVE. (80) 3� �30 1 I �14 /050 ///O ! — �g � � ' �6 (9)8 (18) (3�) (28) (4o h ` �3 1,C �13�2 136 15 ' ,q� �c7s) p►� i7 � (3 12�� 18 0 104 03 02 O /O/O ! / E � �—� �r- � - � i I i / ' i .) �10) �� / Q / / \ . . // / F5, I � � - ("ER ED ' , � �N D � � . , � � , � , Q — , 74 � � ' (1') �2) / / _ . �� / � / / � � . � , / i �' � � �•' � � . � '�� / (s) >€T� �, � � / ' " " ;� 4` � J � � � � / � -.6;`..�{.'}i':`h." I O � � / � v � ,-'� � I �- `'� - � , � ; � ' - 5UR ��' ,.� � 02 : � � W J � � �; . � �� c�� N � Q� - � .•� �� , N E. , J � cs) 5 2 � � 1�� ' �.� -- � ..�, � (4) � � �\ M_ N - _ p _ � -C� ��• � � � �\ � �14� �17) N � /N�� \ ��9� , , P�� . ��`� � � u ) � � � � ��-�. , I�a. � 561 � "5' � , . � PGp - . c2o� � G,�`��' O — - - - �— - - - - - - - -� ----- -- -- - �- - � � � � G� • (36) . 13 �� - , . , : _ _ . � - � - ;� �� :--- ,, �� ;; -....� �� I ° " � 5 � x € � � i � a� �._ ' `� a� �� - - " � : 9 i 6 : � I <a� > I � ' 6 s � � F E ! a � p �� II �� i d� . � � � I I � I ^ � � � � � � � i I � c � � � j • iC> ;i� � - -- �� II��' . ; , � , __ , �. ► , �,� � - -o �� _ _ II I - d� � -- - -d '- c I I � ' ' � � I•�'•---- , ---�� ' � ,� i� � I� . - � I _ : i � � i� - �+- � i i I ; �.I _ P i —-- - �i I� i i \ � t _.__ . ,.�.�..=,..�.�..�, ----- a �� : � � � � � �� ---- - � -�-- i � � i a� ; 7 � � i a � \�\\ .��• � t--'--"='-' � —� rs I 'l i : � � 4 z �� . �., . . . �} � �= : s - �,}. \ `. � � g �'; � t � y � , . ':1 "-� t� '�( y .� � r I g..� , �- � � '`� �' N, !.�,- a� � �••.• } �' �, \�\ \�\�� - - �_ � �� .{ � I - - - � � _ _' < \�, Y-''�� - 4'" i�;�';\`•• `J • . � .b , �� . . . .=_xt. � � . � ? r- i ■ .1`�.�lr:, � � `\ ___'� ��p� P -� •( � . e r . I � q,� ` � � ' � � I i � � � V � i ��` � ` �r'� £' � ^ ' f �1 1 \�� \� 1 q � e�� \ ` � -_ 1 K ' �' --�- —— �. _ I � � � I 1 �, ��'`�� ,J 5� �� i ''' '�� ?� � \ � '� `,�e - --- -- � -- ^, ��:" �� ✓ __..___ N. ..� _ _ . . c.snx r�o. 20 ��)' RETAIL BUILDING MARCUS CORPORATION _..—�-r�f-.�' BLAKE ROAD FIOR<N9.(vN -MINNETONKA,Iu1N.55343 �� S�'�� ' �A� ov sr � � ....r.r.c..or--�smr -- �� _-._. _ - ---- '�'�= - ----- �!�w.e' •}_. . '_ �.e - __w.• . __._._ �� _.+'f. '�.�__—_' ' l —_�- � 1-_ i _-- j � � � ; � t, . : . � ; r ; � • ;i - �s.°� �� ;..: �j I ; �, , � i. I I�� ' i ij , r. ---- - -- .._ _ . "--- - - -----' '. --'._- '. - "' ----- .� 1. � !�� 1 � i i __1^t 1 �-------------C�_�-------------- =�------------- '+ -- -- ,�` � I I � I }, � fi i iI I � { ' I � � i�' � � , : � �� , ; a .�:�� d � � � „ _ .ma . —------ z RETAIL BUILDING MARCIiS CORPORATION :��-- -----------�M. �ry�(_��/��+�y� �.�:�v.%�ccr.�ow.�wr I`Vll�l-�IGVIJII`N.•�unsw��w� m�o41.A BLAKE ROAD FIOF'FCAVS,MV MINNETONKA,MN. 55343 ��N� �� eixex��ee ,4.,.r�.wm��µ�-. CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota '� RESOLUTION NO: 90-68 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP90-3 WHEREAS, an application by Marcus Corporation for a Conditional Use Permit CUP:90-3 to construct a 6, 000 square foot retail building at 302 Blake Road North is approved. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That the application for CUP90-3 was filed with the City of Hopkins on June 1, 1900. 2 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such application on June 26, 1990. 3 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing on June 26, 1990 and continued on July 31, 1990; all persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. 4. That the written comments and analysis of the City Staff and the Planning Commission were considered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that application for CUP90-3 is hereby approved subject to .the following Findings of /"`� Fact: 1. That the proposed building meets the requirements for the B-3 district. 2 . That retail uses are allowed in the B-3 district. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for CUP90-3 is hereby approved subject to the following Conditions: 1. That the fence on the north side of the building is extended with a height of at least 3 1/2 feet in wood. 2 . That the applicant adds 2 or 3 trees to the site. 3 . Receive the proper permits from Hennepin County for drainage. 4 . That the fence between the residential area and the site is a wood fence. 5. That the area behind the building is designated 'One Way' . 6. That the existing sidewalk is retained or replaced by the applicant. 7. That the trash container is enclosed on four sides. Adopted this 7 day of August, 1990. --� Nelson W. Berg, Mayor ATTEST: James A. Genellie, City Clerk � t Y O G � ti 5 � July 23 , 1990 � p K ` � Planning Report: CUP90-3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MARCUS CORPORATION Proposed Action. Staff recommends approval of the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution No: Z90-11 recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a 6000 square foot building at 302 Blake Road. Approval of this motion will allow the construction of a 6000 square foot building at 302 Blake Road. overview. On January 9, 1990, the City Council designated the subject site as surplus property. The City Council also directed staff to solicit proposals. Requests for Proposals were mailed to 5 developers. Two proposals were received by the City at the end of March. The proposal from Marcus Corporation was selected. On February 27 , 1990 the rezoning of the site from R-4 residential to B-3 business became effective. The applicant, Marcus Corporation, is in the process of purchasing the well site on Second Street and Blake Road from the City. The l applicant is proposing to construct a 6000 square foot building for retail. Staff is recommending approval because the applicant meets the ordinance requirements. Primary Issues to Consider. o Is the proposed use allowed in the B-3 district? o How is the applicant proposing to buffer the residential area? o Does the proposed development meet the ordinance requirements? supportinq Documents. o Detailed Background o Analysis of Issues o Alternatives o Location Map o Site Plan o Resolution Z90-11 , � �; ti�11 Nanc S. An erson Plan er � ^ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - MARCUS CORPORATION CUP: 90-3 Page 2 Detailed Background. Parkina. The site plan shows 31 parking spaces. The site will require 30 spaces for retail. 7 spaces are designated as compact. The site is allowed to have 25% of the spaces as compact. Staff is recommending that the one parking space near the entrance on Second Street be eliminated. Access. Access to the site is proposed from Blake Road and Second Street. The access from Blake Road will have to be approved by Hennepin County. If access is not granted by the County on Blake Road, the site will have only one access point which is acceptable to staff. The access point from Second Street is lined up with the access point to Fina. Staff has reviewed the access point on Second Street with Mitch Wonson of Benshoof and Associates. The plan reflects the design from Mitch Wonson. One concern of the staff's is the traffic flow behind the building. There maybe a problem with traffic coming from both sides since the � road will be narrow. Staff is recommending that the applicant work with staff to determine which traffic flow will work the best and to designate the roady 'ONE WAY' . The following are the B-3 requirements and the proposed site plan: B-3 Proposed front yard 20 feet 74 feet rear yard 25 feet 25 feet side yard south 10 feet 45 feet north 15 feet 25 feet height 45 feet 16 feet Landscaping. The site plan shows a variety of plantings. The site is required to have 15 trees. The site plan shows 4 trees of the required size plus additional shrubs throughout the site. The applicant has stated that he will add additional trees on the site. However, the applicant will not be able to add 11 trees to the site. Probably only two or three additional trees will be added to the site. The Commission can grant a waiver where compliance restricts off-street parking. The applicant does provide an overall landscape design throughout the site with smaller plantings. --� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - MARCUS CORPORATION CUP: 90-3 Page 3 Drainage. The Engineering Supervisor has reviewed the plans and found them acceptable. The site will drain to a catch basin on the southeast corner of the site. The applicant will have to receive permission from Hennepin County to connect to the existing catch basin. Fire Marshal. The Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans and found them acceptable. If the access from Blake Road is not granted from the County the plan is still acceptable. Fencinq. The plans have detailed a 6 foot chain link fence/vinyl slat. The applicant will bring a picture of the fence. However, if the Commission indicates that a wood fence would buffer the residential area better, the applicant will construct a wood fence. The staff is recommending a wood fence. The fence along the north side of the site will be extended. The ordinance requires a 3 1/2 foot fence between the residential districts and parking lots. The applicant has agreed to extend the '� fence. Exterior Materials. The proposed building will have a variety of materials. The building will have a band around the top with a mixture of inetal and cement plaster. Rockface material will be on the back of the building and in a few areas on the front. The building will have earth tone colors. The applicant will bring samples of the materials to the meeting. Trash. The trash container is located on the northwest corner of the site. The container is enclosed on three sides with a six foot fence. Access to the trash container will be from the rear of the site. Staff is recommending enclosing the container on four sides. Primary Issues to Consider. o Is the proposed use allowed in the B-3 district? The applicant is proposing retail uses. The B-3 district is a general business district which allows most retail uses. If a use is proposed for an area in this building and requires a conditional use _ permit, approval will be required from the Zoning and Planning Commission and City Council. � CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - MARCUS CORPORATION CR: 90-3 Page 4 o How is the applicant proposing to buffer the residential area from the business area? The ordinance requires the fence to be a type that captures vehicle lights. The applicant is proposing a 6 foot chain link/vinyl slat fence on the west and north sides of the property. This type of fence is being proposed because the fence does not look as bulky. However, the applicant will erect a wood fence if the Commission indicates a wood fence is preferred. The staff would recommend a wood fence. The fence on the north side of the property will have to be extended which the applicant has indicated he will do. Most of the activity on the site occurs away from the residential areas. The apartments to the west are buffered by the building and a fence. The nearest apartment building to the west is oriented to the north and south not in the direction of the site. The residential area to the north also does not have any apartments looking into the site. The fence along the north lot line will block any activity on the site. � Alternatives. 1. Approve the Conditional Use Permit with the conditions as recommended by the staff. By approving the Conditional Use Permit, the applicant can construct a 6000 square foot retail building. 2 . Deny the Conditional Use Permit. By denying the Conditional Use Permit the applicant will not be able to construct the building as proposed. Findings should be outlined which supports the denial of the Conditional Use Permit. 3 . Continue for further information. If the Commission feels further information is needed, the item should be continued. --� A��9) _I I I I I ��_ . , � � ��. �2) � � �77) �41)4E �• d' , (76 0� (75) `� � B (3) C34 � . (78) � (119) �42)47 (20 $?i /Q ) � � 4f \ � � — �I; `�^ao9 A`� C� FL N (81) �83) �82) �45) 4i �� j �� 2 (36 v � � ,0 (84 325 g��Ty.Q (10? ��Q �� 86)�85 � 132� 1 ��7 \ / 045 //05 //5 //25 � � 3 �3� (I I) R�\ A VE. I (80) �I�30 �3� �32 ' 1050 ///O ll — �3 13 . 3F6 I� 14 /3 (9) 8 U8) (37) �32) (40 h \ �3 K� 13�2 116 '. - q� �c79> . L�► „ � Q (3 l2�� $ 05104 03 02 � 0 /O/O � E I � �---_ �� / . / � I i / � � (10) � ��/ Q � � - �/ / �5� I Q N � // F' rn , � NDNW � ` rERED , � � � , � _ i , Q -r� i , , ---- - - - I � (2) � � _ � , � � � � , / � I � � / � � �� (a) H � i � ,, . � � o �. .- ,' � �C� , , , I ` . '� � 5�J R �1� ;� � W J� � �. % � . t �►�Z c i> a �C �` � ..� ��c . � NE. Q � _ J � cs) �� 2 � ' 0� � / �.r. — -- � � (4) / '_ "'• �\ M N _ o _ . � � 5�• � � . � � �14) (17) N � �N�� ►9� P�� , . ,'I�D � � c i ) � � � � �\�-� , ` U5) I��. � 56 ! �, �o � . c2o� � �Gp' / - -- ----- -- -- - � _C,' \ �G� — — — — — — — — — — — .--_ GN • ' (3s) . , 13 lq . , . A A . . a � ' - � _ �� I=--- - +� �� . I —' � �7 I� � � � � € � � � � a� �� '�� i a� � � 9 � � � > I ``' �� I. �� E 9 8 � I� �� ' I I �J � as � � 5 ° '� I �I � � � � � � I'�� , , � �' � � /^ I� � s � I� � • io I, il l � ' ! I � !� -- --; �� I'I� I �ii1��!I� I ,'� ��i�� -- �. � � � �� I , ,� � � - - --o �� '�� _- �� ► ; .� � _{__ _I._� §� � • C� i � I , P I I I I II .1�-- i--� ' ' _ -,N� � ,i �; ,; jl � �� . ,� i ,+ � � � I� �� i� '' �I ', , o, �� -- " �� - C� !� � I ^ �� i . � � � f - ,„m.�.,..�,,.,,��,,.�,�„� � � � � � � � � �`;:� _ _-- � ___�' � I I R� � '� � r � ,.. �I � � � 6 � � '�� -�-� —--_"�'-�- � -- "s ; Rj � A I � i� i L � ��' � �o � � � �,- j 3P� . C I. : _ _ `� r�" 9 . o ,� x' � y � � � �� , ` f,\� � •_� � �'.:, � �c , �` V '�� - "� � . � \ \— �- .-�TI, t 'I .r.r=a�� _ _ � '�' � 1 I g �� f�`�7� . - =-' a�b �.• • +b' �b o q� ��-��,�; `�� b � _�J J °� "^_�. �.T � a ; -1 �,1� - � \ ___'� � � � , a �� • I � ` � � � � II�/ 1 ^e ' ✓ ` ,� t�ia n I a I ��, \�w \ , = , " ' a� \ � \�i�� •i �+� � A\ � - --� - -- � ---� i I Y y t .,� \ � \ 3� � b. j'Y+,( ,b \ 1 � t-� � � R�4� � �� 1 E-�� I� \,'Q -' -- �! -- E �-.....�� ' \ — . N—. +, • � l�� C.S.A1-1 NO. 20 tB�.A1cE ROAD) RETAIL BUILDING MARCUS CORPORATION :-��-��=,=,—' BLAKE ROAD HOPI<N9.MJ MINNETONKA,MN. 55343 �C S NC.��-�—�� .:. . sr ...r...,o+-irn,r , �� , ___ - ---- �.00 -- --- -- ,w.e er.o ad y'.e' �__._. ..—_`:eT .so 'ao}—"'_.____' __' _."_ '_.�" " -__- I � I I I II I I �.�-._ .. .._. • • -__--_�'.__ _._._ .__ � —.. i� i \ i � \ � � Y ilI S_ '° I �t � �� I I II I � il I I, ' �r��":� ' ----- =- -- .. _..--- _ -- -' --. . -. - ------ -- _ . a_a .�, I � � � ; Ii � i � — x�--'---- -------�=�L1. --------------J�_�--------------� o — � I � � I I I � I i i i i I � ,�_i_ -- � �� i � , � , � � ------ � , , � � � � ��r � � � Q ��a ---- �— .--� �d � RETAIL BUILDING MARCUS CORPORATION �:v-� :°M �� w a.RwncT cwr BLAKE ROAD HOPKRVS,N�1 MINNETONKA,MN. 55343 ARCF'#TECT5INC.�,�--�M�� n+.n BW M4N ST NOPKN9 MJ A t2 833 73BB ��'µ CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota � RESOLUTION NO: Z90-11 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP90-3 WHEREAS, an application for a Conditional Use Permit entitled CUP90-3 made by the Marcus Corporation for a 6, 000 square foot retail building at 302 Blake Road North is recommended for approval. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for Conditional Use Permit CUP90-3 was filed with the City of Hopkins on June 1, 1990. 2 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such application on June 26. 3 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing on June 26 and continued to July 31, 1990: all persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. 4 . That the written comments and analysis of the City Staff and the Planning Commission were considered. ^ NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that application for Conditional Use Permit CUP90-3 is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the proposed building meets the requirements for the B-3 district. 2 . That retail uses are allowed in the B-3 district. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for CUP90-3 is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following Conditions: 1. That the fence on the north side of the building is extended with a height of at least 3 1/2 feet in wood. 2 . That the applicant adds 2 or 3 trees to the site. 3 . Receive the proper permits from Hennepin County for drainage. 4 . That the fence between the residential area and the site is a wood fence. 5. That the area behind the building is designated 'One Way� . 6. That the existing sidewalk is retained or replaced by the applicant. 7. That the trash container is enclosed on four sides. ^ Adopted this 31 day of July, 1990. Eugene Maxwell, Chairman � t Y O G '�' ti 5 ^ June 18, 1990 � P K � � Planning Report:CUP90-3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MARCUS CORPORATION Proposed Action. Staff recommends the following motion: Move that the conditional use permit for Marcus Corporation be continued to the July 31, 1990 meetina. The applicant will be asking for final approval next month. The site plan is for the Commission's preliminary review and comments. Approval of this action will allow the applicant to return to the July meeting for final action. Overview. The applicant, Marcus Corporation, had wanted to get all the information required for the June meeting, but was unable to do so. However, the applicant has submitted a site plan and would appreciate the comments of the Planning Commission. He has stated that all required documentation will be submitted for the July meeting. The applicant is in the process of purchasing the well site on Second Street N.E. and Blake Road from the City. The applicant is proposing to construct a 6, 000 square foot building. The proposed building will be orientated to Blake Road with most of the parking in the front, � toward Blake Road. Primary Issues to Consider. o Is the proposed use allowed in the B-3 district? o How is the applicant proposing to buffer the residential area? Supnortinq Documents. o Detailed Background o Analysis of Issues o Location Map o Site Plan J � '� � ;'�`, Nancy, . Anderson Planr�e ---� ^ CUP:90-3 Page 2 Detailed Backqround. Not all of the details have been worked out. The following are some of the items the site plan shows: Parkinq. The site plan shows 31 parking spaces. The site will require 30 spaces for retail. Access. Access to the site is proposed from Blake Road and Second Street. The access from Blake Road will have to be approved by the County. The following are the B-3 requirements and the proposed site plan: B-3 Proposed front yard 20 feet 110 feet rear yard 25 feet 25 feet side yard south 10 feet 45 feet north 15 feet 25 feet ^ Primary Issues to Consider. o Is the proposed use allowed in the B-3 district? The applicant is proposing retail uses. Most retail uses are allowed in the B-3 district. o How is the applicant proposing to buffer the residential area from the business area? The applicant is proposing a fence on the west and north sides of the property. The applicant is required to screen the parking area from the residential area. The ordinance requires the fence to be a type that captures vehicle lights. � i � -- -- - - - - � S3'7HdS �� NMO}i5 �N1�21'dd j�I(9 L I'bZb 'V'JO� S��d�s o� hN171�1bd a��nb�y �?ly i�I�N1,L(�lOd -4d1SCli-1 '1�'d's �� bZZtY '7Q"1g 55GRf9 �,58]!�b'bL:)'ld'DS �D5��C �d�?�'d �1�5 'N��W �d�IN019NNIW �i�.b�od�o� sn��dw Nti"ld 1d�7fv0� „o ;oZ = ,,i ;�s v �d-,d �its __. / � � j ` I � i /� - �°� � '� , ..� i � �� ,, � .o� , - �. . o i� ° 0 0 � - --o � � ' i° 0 � o � �/ � io /' / '° / �o % ;,�__ _ i o �i . � - - ' 'o� / / . _ __ i ;o; r � � ' ' . - • ❑ % � . ' _._. �°I i �o / ' -�❑ � � �� a � _.. ! ' ,o N '�� i . . . -{ ❑ , �� ❑ r / j� �_ I N . Ir � � � I �- �� p'. —�— .� ' ❑'I, . I'.r . - : '� j o I � ,'��— .._ ' I �_�I ❑ J —� �Q �� I � ❑I �3 -d ❑I . ,.o. .A i D ❑i In i _ ,� � �� • �t� � �o� Iv _` o ❑ --•- � ;,� I io ' m !❑ . !❑ ; � i °' ❑� __ � , ��o! , � o � 0 �� o 0 � 0 -------... _ -----------�— -----------ntraonaQ , --q ° --_. _ _ . � �..� I ' sa�bds �f r+rnQ++s �N��d ��i(3 L i'bZb'WO,� Sa�vrs o� hN��bd a��,��b�y ��ld l�r�NI1NOd -odlsnH d'cb� ctd�l ba�av •�Q�$ ssaa� �58']!�b'bl:)'ld'bS Co5 f��C • `d�2!'d �1�5 'N��Vr ��d�IN019NNIW �11bro��o� sn�bdw „p �oZ =_ ;,i :�s N'�"l d 1 d�7N 0� �-- tvb��d :_:_ �i1S..._ / � � // � , / / °' , � � - �� ./ ° 0 � o ;-� �� ; = �. 0 /i/ ° 0 . o / � �o / � ; �o 0 0 / �% `o / o . �o 0 , �� - �o j� ; ;^— � � 'o � � �- . �___ -- � � ��o ,o; ; . _ � ;o' �/ __ ._ . . _._.._ �. o � � �I i ' �o� � ' '°I �o /' ;� - , _ _ �I o� , � ��o�� , ,� �o 0 ' r '❑I ..t.^ N _,r :ol � � �1 p', � � �� .r • '�' °� ..-- ❑ iD , � ❑ , I n I __;_'o J ' �' �0 jc� ,� I o, � �� -q ❑'. . ,a: H � I n I ��I iI� �oi � I ° � � 0 ' � m '"� �o I I 'a , _ ��o' � t �I 0 � ❑ � o ❑ _ ❑ ❑� ---- ❑ --------. -----_._..—__._�--------------Atra o n o 0 4 n0 -- - - - ' i �� I s[-rrz A? -EFA 54, E -,OZ) SQ, FT, (-l'q Ar-VGS) &Pco �(P, Fn f'AjZKtN(r.p 15ROWN 38 5F"'Zes CONCEPT FLAN VA ?lCj 5 Mll,�WSTOWKA, WINN', COMA, 4SI , 11