CUP 89-05 ��-•� CITY OF HOPKINS
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA
FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Application No . ��� �.
P. I .D . No13-117-22 330005
A. GENERAL DATA
E OF APPLICANT: The Pemtom Company
above named individual , firm or corporation hereby respectfully submits the
_lowing data in support of the preliminary information provided on the
ompanyi�g Zoning Application Summary Form dated S_S_gq for the purpose of
:uring a Conditional Use Permit .
3erbst Daniel J 888-9561
'ontact Person Last Name , First Day Phone No. Evening Phone No .
B. PROJECT INFORMATION
. Specify the section of the ordinance which applied to this project:
. Brief narrative description of this request: P�oposal to build fiVe townhomes
�
�-:����� ii�a�� isii Of a p�:ivate C31_"i VP � nakl-c�n Ri C7i3_Q whl_C,_}Z�.ul.l-1 hP i-hA
� d Addition of the W�st Oaks Townhomes. There
Written justification for request including discussion of how any potential
conflicts With existing nearby land uses xill be minimized: There does not apoea _.
to be any existing conflicts.
Check all additional supporting documents and data xhich are being submitted
to help explain this project proposal: [X ] sketch plan, [X � topographie map,
[X] detailed narrative , [ ] operation plans , [X ] engineering plans , [ ] flood
plain hydraulic analysis , [ ] flood proofing plans and specifications , [ ]
other (specify)
hereby certify With my signature that all data
my application forms , plans and specifications
e true and correct to the best of my knoWledge: - -
Signat of Applicant Date
Daniel J. Herbst, President
CONDITIONAL IISE PERMIT The Pemtom Company
: accordance with Sub�ivisio�� 1 of 565.02 , the
(Section of Ordinance) (Ordinance No. )
.ty of Hopkins hereby [X] approves , [ ] denies the foregoing Application for
nditional II e Permit. If approved , said approval is subject to the following
ne.� and p�'cial Provisions:
� � Planning & Economic
Development Director 6/12/89
(Aut oriz d Sign ture) (Title) (Date)
SEE REVERSE FOR GENERAL AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS
, :-���
PAGE 2 ^ �
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
�
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1 . This permit is not valid until it has been recorded at the Office of the
County Recorder . A true and correct copy of the full legal description of
the affected property must be attached to this document .
2 . This permit does not constitute a building permit , sewage system permit ,
grading permit , land alteration permit , well permit or the like . Separate
permits may have to be applied for and obtained in order to accomplish all
the goals of the project authorized herein .
3 . The issuance of this permit does not negate the need to secure other permits
from other local units of government , state agencies or federal agencies Kho
may also have jurisdiction over portions of your project .
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
1. That the preliminary plat is approved.
2. That Hennepin County approves the access point into the site. ���
3. That all utilities are obtained from Hopkins if possible.
4. That the walking path on the south side of the property remains.
5. That the Minnehaha Watershed District approves the proposed development
6. That the Traffic Engineer reports to the City Council on potential traffic problems �
on County Road #73.
E%PIRATION.
A Conditional Use Permit expires one year after it has been issued unless the
use for which the permit has been granted is in effect . Extensions may be
granted provided the applicant submits a letter to the Zoning Administrator
requesting an extension 30 days before the expiration of said approval. The
letter shall state the facts of the request , shoWing a good-faith attempt to
utilize the Permit , and it shall also state the additional time being requested
to begin the proposed construction . The City Council may grant extensions not
to exceed one year. �.p��
��
^ CITY OF HOPKINS .
ZONING APPLICATION
SUMMARY FORM
Application Number����-S
P .I .D .�: 13-117-22 33 0005
Applicant ' s Name ( Last , First) Owner (if other than applicant)
The Pemtom Company
Kailing Address (Street , City , State , Zip Code)
8200 Humboldt Avenue South , Bloomington, Minnesota 55431
°hone Number: (Day) 888-9561 (Evening)
�roperty Address
�PPLICABLE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT(S) TYPE OF ZONING REQUEST
_ ] R-1-A [ ] R-2 [ ] B-1 [ ] Concept Review
: ]_R-1-B [ ] R-3 [ ] B-2 [ g] Conditional Use Permit
_ ' 1 -C [ ] R-� [ ] B-3 [ ] Variance
_ 1-D [ ] R-5 � � I-1 ( ] Zoning District Change
_ ] x-1-E [ ] R-6 [ ] I-2 [ g] Subdivision Approval
[ ] Ordinance Amendment
[ J Other
: hereby certify With my signature that all data .
:ontained herein as well as all supporting data
ire true and correct to the best of my knowledge: 5-5-89
Applic s Signature Date
Daniel J. Herbst
5-5-89
Owners Signature Date •
ADMINISTRATIVE DATA SUMMARY
. ] Proper addendum to application Application received: .S�� �'j�
_ ] Detailed plans submitted '
. ] Written pro�ect description submitted Fee Paid: 7��G
Referred to City
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Engineer:
.pproved: X without modifications Referred to City
[ ] With modifications Attorney
�enied [ ] Referred to Watershed
District
►at� May 30, 1989 Date of Public
Hearing Notice �/,�fJ9
COUNCIL ACTION Date of Public
.pproved: X without modifications Hearing S_�f�-�9
[ ] with modifications � �
�enied: [ ]
�ate: June 6, 1989 RESOLUTION N0: 89-33
\ t Y O
G �
i
^ C-��
ti 5
� P K , t�
May 31, 1989 Council Report: 89-133
PEMTOM COMPANY - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
County Road #73 - North of Robinwood Lane
Proposed Action.
Staff recommends approval of the following motion: "Move approval of
Resolution No: 89-33 to construct five townhouses within a PUD" .
Approval of this motion will allow construction of five townhomes.
The Commission unanimously approved the Conditional Use Permit to
construct five townhomes with a P.U.D.
overview.
The applicant is proposing to extend the West Oaks Townhomes into
Hopkins. Currently all the townhomes are in Minnetonka. When this
development was first approved, the Hopkins land was to be used as a
holding pond for water.
Since this project was approved by Minnetonka, the applicant has made
changes in the drainage so the Hopkins land is no longer needed
totally for a holding pond. We have talked to the Minnetonka staff
^ about this site and they have no objection to the construction of the
townhomes. Most of the west end of the site will remain as a holding
pond for water.
Staff is recommending approval because the project conforms to the
ordinance and will also provide a quality development in Hopkins.
At the Zoning & Planning meeting a Minnetonka resident was concerned
about the traffic on North Oakvale Road turning onto County Road #73.
He stated that this intersection has had many accidents. The proposed
road to the townhomes will be opposite North Oakvale Road. Staff was
instructed to have the Director of Engineering review the situation
and report to the City Council. Staff will update the Council at the
meeting.
Primary Issues to Consider.
o Will the development affect drainage on the surrounding
parcels?
o Will the development have an affect on the surrounding area?
Supportinq Information.
o Detailed Background o Site Plan
o Location Map o Resolution Z89-2
'� Nancy S. Anderson, Planner
�� �
PEMTOM COMPANY
CR89-133
Page 2
Detailed Background.
site Characteristics
The existing site is vacant land which is surrounded by homes to the
south, north, west, and Oakridge Golf Course to the east. The west
part of the site is lower than the east and is and will continue to be
used as a water holding pond. The walking path to the south will
remain.
Access
Access to the site will be from County Road #73. The applicant will
have to receive permission from the County for this access. The
internal road will also continue north into the Minnetonka Townhomes.
Gradinq/Drainaqe
The Director of Engineering has reviewed the grading/drainage plan and
found them acceptable. Drainage will flow toward the west.
�
The applicant has talked with the Minnehaha Watershed District but has
not yet received approval. Any approval should be contingent on
watershed approval.
IItilities �
The utility plan has been reviewed by the Director of Engineering. He
has recommended that, if possible, all utilities be supplied by
Hopkins. The proposed plan shows sanitary sewer from Minnetonka.
Service is available from Hopkins on County Road #73. The applicant
will see if it is possible to get the sanitary sewer from Hopkins.
Current ZoninqlGuide Plan
The current zoning is R-3. The R-3 district allows townhomes.
The current guide plan designates this site as R-4 and the new guide
plan as mediwn density multiple family. Both of these plans are
consistent with the proposed plan.
Fire Marshal
The Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans and found them acceptable.
Landscapin.g
The site is required to have five trees. The landscaping plan
"` reflects landscaping throughout the site. The walking path will be
separated from the townhomes by a green area with trees. Trees will
surround the holding pond. The proposed landscaping is consistent
with the landscaping of the Minnetonka townhomes.
! �
�
PEMTOM COMPANY
CR:89-133
Page 3
Exterior Materials
The exterior materials will be the same as the townhomes in
Minnetonka. The siding is brown in color and the trim is white. The
townhomes will also have cedar shingles.
Primarv Issues to Consider.
o Will the development affect drainage on the surrounding area?
When the West Oaks development was proposed, the Hopkins site was to
be used as a holding pond for water. During construction other things
were done so the Hopkins site was not totally needed for a holding
area. The proposed development will still allow for a holding pond on
the west side of the site.
The Minnetonka staff has no objection to the Hopkins site being
^ developed.
o Will the development have an affect on the surrounding area?
The proposed development should not affect any of the surrounding
area. The traffic from the townhomes will be minimal and will not
have access to the residential area to the south. If there were to be
an impact on an area, it would be the residential area to the south.
This area will be separated from this development by a great deal of
landscaping.
The density of the development is so minimal and the development
really is self contained that there should be no affect to any of the
surrounding areas.
�
CITY OF HOPKINS
� Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO: 89-33
RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP89-5
WHEREAS, an application for a Conditional Use Permit entitled
CUP89-5 made by The Pemtom Company,
to construct five townhomes on the east side of County
Road 73 just north of Robinwood Lane is approved.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as
follows:
1. That an application for Conditional Use Permit
CUP89-5 was filed with the City of Hopkins on May
8, 1989.
2 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such
application on May 30, 1989.
3 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to
published and mailed notices, held� a public
hearing on May 30, 1989: all persons present at
the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard.
4. That the written comments and analysis of the City
�
Staff and the Planning Commission were considered.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that application for Conditional
Use Permit CUP89-5 is hereby approved subject to the
following Findings of Fact:
1. That townhomes are a permitted use within an R-3
District.
2. That the proposed townhomes meet the requirement
for an R-3 District.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for CUP 89-5 is hereby
approved subject to the following Conditions:
1. That the preliminary plat is approved.
2. That Hennepin County approves the access point into the
site.
3. That all utilities are obtained from Hopkins if
possible.
4. That the walking path on the south side of the property
remains.
5. That the Minnehaha Watershed District approves the
proposed development.
6. That the Traffic Engineer reports to the City Council
on potential traffic problems on County Road #73 .
� Adopted this 6 day of June, 1989.
Donald J. Milbert, Mayor
. . � � T Y p
G .c
� r"�
��
ti 5
� P K 1 C�
May 15, 1989 Planning Report: CUP89-5
PEMTOM COMPANY - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
County Road #73 - North of Robinwood Lane
Proposed Action.
Staff recommends approval of the following motion: "Move approval of
Resolution No: Z89-2 request to construct five townhouses within a
PUD" .
Approval of this motion will allow construction of five townhomes.
overview.
The applicant is proposing to extend the West Oaks Townhomes into
Hopkins. Currently all the townhomes are in Minnetonka. When this
development was first approved, the Hopkins land was to be used as a
holding pond for water.
Since this project was approved by Minnetonka, the applicant has made
changes in the drainage so the Hopkins land is no longer needed
totally for a holding pond. We have talked to the Minnetonka staff
about this site and they have no objection to the construction of the
townhomes. Most of the west end of the site will remain as a holding
� pond for water.
Staff is recommending approval because the project conforms to the
ordinance and will also provide a quality development in Hopkins.
Primary Issues to Consider.
o Will the development affect drainage on the surrounding
parcels?
o Will the development have an affect on the surrounding area?
Supportinq Information.
o Detailed Background o Site Plan
o Location Map o Resolution Z89-2
��(1C, � r
Nanc S. Anderson, Planner
��
i
. .
��
PEMTOM COMPANY
CUP89-5
Page 2
Detailed Background.
Site Characteristics
The existing site is vacant land which is surrounded by homes to the
south, north, west, and Oakridge Golf Course to the east. The west
part of the site is lower than the east and is and will continue to be
used as a water holding pond. The walking path to the south will
remain.
Access
Access to the site will be from County Road #73. The applicant will
have to receive permission from the County for this access. The
internal road will also continue north into the Minnetonka Townhomes.
Gradinq/Drainage
The Director of Engineering has reviewed the grading/drainage plan and
found them acceptable. Drainage will flow toward the west.
� The applicant has talked with the Minnehaha Watershed District but has
not yet received approval. Any approval should be contingent on
watershed approval.
Utilities
The utility plan has been reviewed by the Director of Engineering. He
has recommended that, if possible, all utilities be supplied by
Hopkins. The proposed plan shows sanitary sewer from Minnetonka.
Service is available from Hopkins on County Road #73 . The applicant
will see if it is possible to get the sanitary sewer from Hopkins.
Current Zoninq/Guide Plan
The current zoning is R-3. The R-3 district allows townhomes.
The current guide plan designates this site as R-4 and the new guide
plan as medium density multiple family. Both of these plans are
consistent with the proposed plan.
Fire Marshal
The Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans and found them acceptable.
Landscapinq
The site is required to have five trees. The landscaping plan
—� reflects landscaping throughout the site. The walking path will be
separated from the townhomes by a green area with trees. Trees will
surround the holding pond. The proposed landscaping is consistent
with the landscaping of the Minnetonka townhomes.
r�
PEMTOM COMPANY
CUP89-5
Page 3
Exterior Materials
The exterior materials will be the same as the townhomes in
Minnetonka. The siding is brown in color and the trim is white. The
townhomes will also have cedar shingles.
Primary Issues to Consider.
o Will the development affect drainage on the surrounding area?
When the West Oaks development was proposed, the Hopkins site was to
be used as a holding pond for water. During construction other things
were done so the Hopkins site was not totally needed for a holding
area. The proposed development will still allow for a holding pond on
the west side of the site.
The Minnetonka staff has no objection to the Hopkins site being
.^
developed.
o Will the development have an affect on the surrounding area?
The proposed development should not affect any of the surrounding
area. The traffic from the townhomes will be minimal and will not
have access to the residential area to the south. If there were to be
an impact on an area, it would be the residential area to the south.
This area will be separated from this development by a great deal of
landscaping.
The density of the development is so minimal and the development
really is self contained that there should be no affect to any of the
surrounding areas.
'�
I,
:1 II .� .:u � -- .ni��i� � ��. ' ' � I�
_ � ,r�r� •���..��i � n�n Nmni m� ■ r��� �a
. _� .. _ , _ _ :� �����Q. ■_:: .
� �//1�� I' : ==��-' .-- a_� _� �_ ��'�p .
,� .►,.,� . �.I.. •�- � . _ �'� ��� � -
� �� �ii � N' � ► � � �� �i� �,'� �� ��
��"' ,\ �� �� �� �� �'� � �
'/..�� � 1 �� - �� �i� �_
�� �` � � � '
,,`�� �� �� �= � �' � � I, �� �� �
i•� ��'�� �= �� '�\ � � �i�
N.�� � � � � � � �
�,/=��,�� �� � I-
��,N � �� � �i � =
� �� ��
���'��' �� �� � . ., � �� � _�� �
�� �� ��� � � �� � :
:�� � �,� '►� �� � � i .
� �
� ;�� �� � ,� ' '� �■� �=�
�� �� � _ _.�•_=• -■
�� �� �
�� �� � � �� �����
� �Z CC � �
,,�== = ��.�� � `� - � �� , �
� N I ��• \ . �= � ■
.� � � - , --_
��:_ + : � _ � ��:--
��
N: � =� � � :
�. . � ��
�i� �
-
.... .��
,�__ T
:
' � �- _ :i1
� • �
.... �, a
� �
� .;. .�ii�
�.�;. ,� ..� a�
,� ��n::.��.
�.�. ��. � Iiq�"�'R'.
�,:��:.�.:.
,����a
,,. �
�...... � .�I1�
�H' , ■.�■.-
w���.�.ar �
=:�..�i+, �
1�' ■ 'If�': -
1'�IRIYI - -
i� :�■ :�� � ��, �.
�,.�.,, �r ► :■ � .11
n��n■� � ��%I�:�11��� ''
i■�i � :���:
■■��. �'� �� :��j
, ���� �� ��r���
- -- ...,
_�=i� , v�� _
� w
� ��i1� � � C _;� .
� � .
a == � � � ^ �• ;. � �
- =_ =- - • •,., �
� �� =� T ��i '� c�•�nrtr
� � �: _� Ii�iii ilqNl NHIII ��� � �i� ��
_ �� ��n� � � -�� ,� ��
����������� ��� ini�:iiii��� � �.,�, .
���� �, � �--�- � -
� , � II: � �� k�
�������!� �� �1��:== � ���A���° �
, � �� • �' � �� � �
. ����� __ � __ �__. G ���,� .,r■���
� �� �� �� �'� �� •1 ` �
-- -- , � r � � , ,�/