The URL can be used to link to this page

CUP 88-12 �� CITY OF HOPKINS ZONING APPLICATION SUMMARY FORM Application Number /i�� k�c�� ,_, /— P .I .D .�: 19-117-21 13 0014 Appl cant ' s Name ( Last , First ) Owner ( if other than applicant ) L'/��L�%�/ _�/�!�U � //Z/ � C� � � � �� c'�- L�f7�%'L.�J/�/f / �'tl'//� f7� /�L�'�d/ Mailir_o A��re�s �St:�et , City, S�ata , Zip �,O�E j ' / / �-- i; �'/'�,/ i� �/� L�(J � i ,(�" / ,� C��'/ Phone Number: (Day) ��- �� (Evening) ��%/1--�J.� Property Address ��/� �`� j�_,�� V. � APPLICABLE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT(S) TYPE OF ZONING REQUEST [ ] R-1-A [ ] R-2 [ ] B-1 [ ] Concept Review [ 1�R-1-B [ ] R-3 L 7 B-2 [� Conditional Use Permit [ Z-1 -C [ ] R-4 [ ] B-3 [ ] Variance [ t-1-D [ ] R-5 ['C] I-1 ( ] Zoning District Change [ J R-1-E [ ] R-6 [ ] I-2 [ ] Subdivision Approval [ ] Ordinance Amendment [ ] Other I hereby certify with my signature that all data contained herein as well as all supporting data , - -- are true and correct to the best of my knowledgg • —7�--�-��`--� J � � Appli nts 'gn ure ate �' �? \ � '� � �� Own�rs Signat re Date ADMINISTRATIVE DATA SUMMARY [ ] Proper addendum to application Application received: R�SfR� [ ] Detailed plans submitted [ ] Written pro�ect description submitted Fee Paid : ��5�� Referred to City PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Engineer: Approved: without modifications Referred to City [ ] with modifications Attorney ; Denied [ ] Referred to Counci 1 without Referred to Watershed recommendation. District : D�'~ : 8/30/88 Date of Publie Hearing Notice; g/12/gg COUNCIL ACTION Date of Public Approved: X without modifications Hearing: 8/30/38 [ ] with modifications Denied: [ ] Date: September 6, 1988 RESOLUTION NO• ga-�� CITY OF HOPKINS SUPPLEMENTAL DATA FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Application No . CUP88-12 P . I .D . No . 19-117-21 13 0014 A. GENERAL DATA ��lE OF APPLICANT: / � U'��`�S/ �4� � s above named individual , firm or corporation hereby respectfully submits the llowing data in support of the preliminary info at ' on provided on the :companying Zoning Application Summary Form dated or the purpose of .curing a Conditio 1 Use Permit . /�Z z � G ��/ ��-/�3 Contact Person ast Name , First Day Phone No . Evening Phone No . B . PROJECT INFORMATION . Specify the section of the ordinance which applied to this project : . �rief narrative descrip�ion of this request: ' �--��/C�%c.%,V J � /' -�z�� So �l�"" 7N� �cC' ,�r�,� � ,�) ! S ti� 1JN - j �C7 (JS � Written justification for request including discussion of how any potential conflicts with existing nearby land uses will be minimized : Check all additional supporting documents and data which are being submitted to help explain this project proposal: [� sketch plan , [ J topographic map , [ ] detailed narrative , [ ] operation plans , [ ] engineering plans , [ ] flood plain hydraulic analysis , [ ] flood proofing plans and specifications , [ ] otuer (specifyj hereby certify with my signature that all data � my application forms , plans and specifications �—__— . e true and correct to the best of my knowledge: � � � Signature of Ap icant Date CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT � accordance with of , the (Section of Ordinance) (Ordinance No . ) ity of Hopkins hereby [ X] approves , [ ] denies the foregoing Application for onditional s Permit . If approved , said approval is subject to the folloWing �►"�al an S ec ' al Provisions : y: �-- Sept. 9, 1988 (A thorize Sign ture) (Title) (Date) SEE REVERSE FOR GENERAL AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS , � PAGE 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT �� GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 . This permit is not valid until it has been recorded at the Office of the County Recorder . A true and correct copy of the full legal description of the affected property must be attached to this document . 2 . This permit does not constitute a building permit , sewage system permit , grading permit , land alteration permit , well permit or the like . Separate permits may have to be applied f'or and obtained in order to SC�GwY11Sr ail the goals of the project authorized herein . 3 . The issuance of this permit does not negate the need to secure other permits from other local units of government , state agencies or federal agencies who may also have jurisdiction over portions of your project . , SPECIAL PROVISIONS �� I i E%PIRATION. A Conditional IIse Permit expires one year after it has been issued unless the use for which the permit has been granted is in effect . Extensions may be granted provided the applicant submits a letter to the Zoning Administrator requesting an extension 30 days before the expiration of said approval . The letter shall state the facts of the request , showing a good-faith attempt to utilize the Permit , and it shall also state the additional time being requested to begin the proposed construction . The City Council may grant extensions not to exceed one year. �� s • �'`� CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County , Minnesota RESOLUTION N0: 88-74 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING � APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP88-12 WHEREAS , an application for a Conditional. Use Permit entitled CUP88-12 , made by William H . MeCoy , 1102 Second Street N .E . , to allow a 10 foot front yard setback for a 69 square foot pylon sign is approved . WHEREAS , the procedural history of the application is as follows : 1 . That an application for Conditional Use Permit CUP88-12 was filed with the City of Hopkins on July 26 , 1988 . 2 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such application on August 30 , 1988 • 3 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission , pursuant to published and mailed notices , held a public hearing on August 30 , 1988 ; all persons present ^ at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard . �1 . That the written comments and analysis of the City Staff and the Planning Commission were considered . NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED , that the Hopkins City Council makes the following Findings of Fact in respect to CUP88-12: 1 . That the proposed sign will be an identification sign . 2 . That the proposed sign presents no traffic visibility problem . 3 . That the proposed sign does not have an adverse affect on the surrounding parcels . � . That the applicant plans to renovate and upgrade the existing sign . Adopted this 6th day of September 1988 . Donald J . Milbert , Mayor � . � � U G �\ �� August 30 , 1988 ti 5 Counoil Report: 88-180 O P N , N CONDITIONAL IISE PERMIT - i1ILLIAH HeCOY 1102 Seoond Street Northeast Proposed Aotion. Staff reeommends approval oP Resolution No: 88-74 Approving the Conditional IIse Permit to locate a sign with a 10 foot front vard setback . - ' , Approval of this motion kill a11oW McCoy Petroleum to erect a sign with the removal of the old price sign . The Commission did not make a recommendation to a11oW MeCoy Petroleum to have a 10 foot setback . The vote Was 2-2 With Mr. Anderson abstaining . OvervieW. McCoy Petroleum, loeated at 1102 Second Street Northeast , �ants to erect a sign xith a 10 Poot front yard setback . Currently MeCoy Petroleum has no business sign on the site . The applieant is requesting the proposed sign Will be placed above the e$isting non- conforming ��gas price sign . This sign has appr�oximately an 8 foot setback. The ordinance requires a 20 foot setbaek . ^ The staff is recommending that the existing price sign be removed and a new price sign incorporated With the new business sign. Steve Hurtz of Nordquist Signs and William McCoy appeared before the Commission . Mr. Hurtz eYplained that eurrently McCoy Petroleum has no identification sign . The Commission had considerable diseussion on the removal of the old price sign and ineorporating a new price sign with the new identification sign . Mr. MeCoy stated that the old price sign Would be painted to match the new sign . Mr. Hurtz did state that a new priee sign Would cost approximately $1500 additional . . Issues to Consider. o Is a lesser setback needed? o Will the new sign improve the property? Supporting Documents . o Background o Site Plan o Location Map o Resolution � � . . - - Nancy . Anderson Commun y Development Analqst �� ' CUP88-12 Page 2 Detailed Background _ Ordinance 570.47 states "application for other proposed sign permits involving only by and under a conditional use permit and under the applicable provisions and regulations of conditional use requirements set forth in the zoning code. The conditional use permit may require periodic reviews and may be canceled for cause. " The proposed sign will be 4 '4" x 16 ' and 21'5" in height. A 250 square foot sign is allowed in an I-1 district. The sign will be internally lit. There is no other signage on the site except for the gas price sign. The gas price sign is a legal non-conforming sign. There is no record of when the sign was erecte�. The proposed sign will have a red background with white letters. � The subject sign is surrounded by Medalist to the west, a City well and the Hopkins Arches to the north, Fina Gas station to the east and the applicants gas station to the south. Analysis. - Is a lesser setback needed? The sign setback in this district is 20 feet. Every business owner wants to place their sign to be visible to the public. The building setback is also 20 feet in this district. This 20 foot setback has been a problem in the past since visibility of a sign is so important to a business. The staff is recommending at this meeting to change many of the sign setbacks to a more realistic setback. A 10 foot setback is recommended for a front yard setback in industrial districts. There will not be a traffic visibility problem with the proposed sign. - Will the new sign improve the property? The proposal as requested in the staffs' opinion will not improve the property. The existing gas price signs are old and putting a new sign over the old gas price sign will not improve the property. The two � signs will appear disjointed. The new sign does not l.ine up with the .r� ► CUP88-12 Page 3 existing sign, will hang out two feet more to the north than the new sign. The gas price sign is a legal non-conforming signs because of the 8 foot setback. It seems logical that if the applicant is erecting a new sign that a new price sign could also be incorporated for one overall sign. Alternatives. 1. Approve the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed sign. By approving this sign the applicant will be able to erect the sign with a 10 foot setback. 2 . Deny the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed sign. By denying the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed 1_ sign the applicant will have to move the sign to the south 10 feet. 3 . Continue for further information. If the Commission feels that further information is needed, the item should be continued. �--� � w v , . , .�-� ,J � � .... u2, , •'��q�y N° �o �2 N o , ��,o qT � � !�s a ,� nI i `�s 7 'S'-4 U o) tii,q 3tip � W. � Q /O 4 5 //OS //5 O //25 � ,�8� `n c�� ? AVE. r io5o ,,,o , • I - // �9)8 (IS) �3�) �28) (40 � ST �� ,Qoo �(: — — — — ---7 (3 � NE. - � � � ; soo ioio M I I h ,� � . � � E ��jl , , '� . . i p �•r � � r � / �. Grt.�� , � I '\b�� _ � " (11) (lo) i/ .'/ Q 0 � � _ � /� / / `5, I � N �K �At�k �.._r—� � / F M (33) 9 � � R EG I S T E R E D - � .N p M �, � � , �, � ,� , aq ; c32� � �� ,' . --- -- - � � C3o) � , � - I � —. I � � � � i (? ' o K. - � �/ ' ^� � � / G .`� � (9) / / (8) (7) � I ~ � � / H � i l� . 6 M Q � � � I � N � i � ' (103) � �� 1 � I� - ��04� - -- � ,' . - 5 U R E 1� ,,v o � W � � ,� . , #� �� ` �s, 4 � � , . . N E. Q N � - J � _ �.��. � �p02 - � � i ('�. i ` � l `� � � � �� 3 a� N � �• � �. M <::;;`i�1'::;<;�:';:;' p - � N ,� 5 \ • �� n::::��*��:'«`:' (17�� 191 ``»:�:<::>::: �8) 2 � �� i � �� p ` � > i � - - - -- - - � \. �I � i O i � pN � � � E� Na. 561 � . S , �o 1 ��► , ,�P . — — -- - - --- ------ -- - — --�'� �� _ , _ G�� . � (36) . � � . � 13 , . � _ ._ �, . . . . _. . . r �� ._. 5 . • ,ri r- � i � r � i J � J E v `—�—� � �`' � < � g ` � 3 y -- . I y� � i � 11j � J 1_ iJ a. '�. � �^_ 0 T � � N � � li�L n u , a Z t _ � _ � � � , � J � � �. — '� � � � � < T d �y L �v i — � �� , . J 1 � ��. O � l � � � � � � , �� i.t I , � v ,.�5 � 0' -0 � � � � � 3 � ► � h I � I �^ ► j o ; • i , � - �► 1111=I�� : � . � . � ° � oo J . � � �� -'- 1111= :�_,� _ . � �T - ��. � v I ~ 0 � I u1 ;n I 3 1 � I y J 1 \ 'J r - . n� �` � `, q,�u .�� I b ,z� �-L) � I ,i � I g b_ � i �� t � ' � u 0 � �� S- 9 O � K ` t� August 22 , 1988 Planning Report: CUP88-12 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - WILLIAM McCOY 1102 Second Street Northeast Proposed Action. Staff recommends abproval of the Conditional Use Permit to locate a slctn with a 10 foot front yard setback Approval of this motion will allow McCoy Petroleum to erect a sign with the removal of the old price sign. Overview. McCoy Petroleum, located at 1102 Second Street Northeast, wants to erect a sign with a 10 foot front yard setback. Currently McCoy Petroleum has no business sign on the site. The applicant is requesting the proposed sign will be placed above the existing non- conforming gas price sign. This sign has approximately an 8 foot setback. The ordinance requires a 20 foot setback. ---� The staff is recommending that the existing price sign be removed and a new price sign incorporated with the new business sign. Issues to Consider. o Is a_ lesser setback needed? o Will the new sign improve the property? Sut�porting Documents o Background o Site Plan o Location Map o Resolution , ,,�, Nancy S. Anderson Commu ity Development Analyst � � , �� CUP88-12 Page 2 Detailed Background. Ordinance 570.47 states ��application for other proposed sign permits involving only by and under a conditional use permit and under the applicable provisions and regulations of conditional use requirements set forth in the zoning code. The conditional use permit may require periodic reviews and may be canceled for cause. " The proposed sign will be 4 ' 4" x 16 ' and 21 ' 5" in height. A 250 square foot sign is allowed in an I-1 district. The sign will be internally lit. There is no other signage on the site except for the gas price sign. The gas price sign is a legal non-conforming sign. There is no record of when the sign was erected. � The proposed sign will have a red background with white letters. The subject sign is surrounded by Medalist to the west, a City well and the Hopkins Arches to the north, Fina Gas station to the east and the applicants gas station to the south. Analysis. - Is a lesser setback needed? The sign setback in this district is 20 feet. Every business owner wants to place their sign to be visible to the public. The building setback is also 20 feet in this district. This 20 foot setback has been a problem in the past since visibility of a sign is so important to a business. The staff is recommending at this meeting to change many of the sign setbacks to a more realistic setback. A 10 foot setback is recommended for a front yard setback in industrial districts. There will not be a traffic visibility problem with the proposed sign. - Will the new sign improve the property? The proposal as requested in the staffs' opinion will not improve the property. The existing gas price signs are old and putting a new sign over the old gas price sign will not improve the property. The two ^ signs will appear disjointed. The new sign does not line up with the , ,, � • �� CUP88-12 Page 3 existing sign, will hang out two feet more to the north than the new sign. The gas price sign is a legal non-conforming signs because of the 8 foot setback. It seems logical that if the applicant is erecting a new sign that a new price sign could also be incorporated for one overall sign. Alternatives. 1. Approve the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed sign. By approving this sign the applicant will be able to erect the sign with a 10 foot setback. 2 . Deny the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed sign. By denying the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed ^ sign the applicant will have to move the sign to the south 10 feet. 3 . Continue for further information. If the Commission feels that further information is needed, the item should be continued. � � - - , , , �� _ . � � • (9£) � `N� . — ��d ��-- — , - -- -- ---- --- - - -- _:._ _ — . O9d'�� 1 roa� ( � � I95 � �o� 0��5 � , ::: :: � 0 N i - c i) � 0 � I -- -- - - - � � ` � � d \ � . '::;:; � y z � �6��` � � � �� ce ti _c��i :;'�:��:;:�;:' � • � , ,� a ::::;: , �,5 - N � «_:>=::.H:>;::<:;<> w �� i � -_�`, £ c� � _ �p� `- � � �.� � - � , Z / � r - i ro � ti .� N � _ . � � , � �9: � -� c�� I o '::`:>;::2:�;::: �\, 1 � � � I �-- - - - - - - � �� 1 �� / / � (�o�) ; � I f I � i ro c�oi) / i� .� � / i-� / � o�"i 9 (SZ) � / ' � - y I q (L) H {8) /� / / (6) � J / � o .� r , / , N �, l�� / � � I . � I � ^ (!) - � ,� c► tOFJ i U� � - - - --- /� /� I N (Z�) I y � i � ^� o a N� , � a� �J�1 S I J� - � s �££� w ,' � � � � I c5) � , r-�--� �2�d� �� i � O ' ' � W ° � � � �� co�� n�� . � �� q� I w `3 � � �,�'� / � � � I t �, f l \' I3 � � I � � `� I O/O/ 006 � "� � - '�N ' E, � �__ _ L,U ��°�eZ � _ �� 15. — � ( £) �L£) (81) 8 �6� // � ` � �� OSO/ � � 9 .�/�d z �I I) �, (8� / � � Sz// S// SO// Sb0/ �'s L�\ / £ O � � � o ti 9� b W �o _c o�� b-,y�b9o�\ �� b I � � >� '� � •oN �d�'S' � � cz�� s�� ( � w � �� t�) �Z$�.°Z� / " � � cE�� .. , �� i J � F �, s � N � s � 1- � 3 �i �_-- � _ T L � S J � 'J ` �� a 3 v � N � � � � J � -`— L. , - --�. �'J � � � � �� —� �y LL � � , j � ori �' , 0 j ' i� � ; � v i ��a o �� F- J ; � � � �L � . Y� i J � � - � Q F � � �J � � � 1U W r _ , u.1Q � � 3F_ � � J ) Ov Q = - � Q pN � a 0 I � J3 � � 3 ;'�.< "i _� ; �,• i � � i N � • _ � I 0 +``� _ � ' I �\ - \� - � 1��= �� .9_� _..,_ � ' I ' �o : --- - - -� O � . � � - c� �o�. ' ��I- � ws � �n ~ o 2 � 31 _�J N � \� °4G ,li „°� 6 „z� � ,� ��g/rb-,b � ��I -iLl -�-L � � l6ZtRR-Zl9 t -I aIA?45 80-VSS NW 'SlPd—U!W aji?G ILAoxk-JV iawcnsn:) Ad o,2 d -,i In laa% @Nel 4saA'v ZIE -q ';J.IHM -)salt's o mm� )< IrDNI OrLD NaMS" KN Ail U-picl t�pl � jo fijadoKJ X44 SI StJ!M-eJp S!Ll I ITSUOIS.1/om ei I -L,:",! jaujolSf'O I S4 1,4 V Q's, d'VO-I 'IyC)7ljjv — I -- i- I n ')-rf 17 1,4 'Y 02 (1 ) A -A 11111111 i 1111111 Ad o,2 d -,i -LI-4'V,4 II -q ';J.IHM o mm� ww t�pl