The URL can be used to link to this page

CUP 88-09 ��, ��.'. � -�-� CITY OF HOPKINS APPLICATION FOR: AMENDMENT OF ZONING ORDINANCE DATE: � � 9- f�� CONCEPT REVIEW CONDITIONAL USE PERh1IT _� CASE N0: � - - SUBDIVISION APPROVAL VARIANCE - FEE: �j5.� � WAIVER OF PLATTING REQUIREMENTS DATE PAID: � �_ 1. Street Location of Property: g�,�, 11�'='`� �'�"� �� r�-� 15= sT�-�- so��+ 2. Legal Description of Property: L�-s 11 ►� �3 r4 �S 1(� 18 15 ao ZI �2 �� -r '—+—.--+ T— --�c.� sow� �/L �- � �� .o �3 a��. -� `��St ��:S� --- 3. Owner: Name C.;�.,� {-4,Dk;Ns ,ea� �A��.► �oR-p• Address Phone -7 �J�'G'� 4. Applicant's Name: $�-ToN �Z�o��-�or► Address 33� Su-o�o AaeN. .MPIs. Phone 3�►-�88co 5. Description of Request: �Ke►.�o oi��N�� C-'N��:o.�� sE +��"`�'r oning District Use � 6. Present Proposed 7. Present Proposed 8e Reason for Request: �4�' �,.sr Deu�lo ,Ne-�.-� I�•.. -40 �e-�lt�� srRoN De��, -� __ �►.�Do�N.�p+iv�w�S , NUTt: If request is for variance, please also completE attached pag�. 9. What error, if any, in the existing Ordinance would be corrected by the proposed amendment? (for Zoning Ordinance amendment only) 10. Exhibits submitted: Map or plat showing the lands proposed to be changed �u��;u �.�e,,,,��►�,.��lS�-�-��'�-►J Other 11. Acknowledgement and Signature: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the City of Hopkins to take the action herein requested that all statements herein are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in ac- cordance with the Ordinances of the City of Ho ins and the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature of Applicant: �'�''�O'' ��A�'� � Signature of Owner: ' � ._:_:._..s- RECORD OF ACTION TAKEN BY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Application for: Conditional Use Permit Case No: CUP88-9 On the 31 day of P4a 19 88 , the action requested in the foregoing petition was approved X disapproved �) subject to the following conditions : 1. That the applicant and the Citv execute a revised redevelopment �]an 2. Approval by HRA of revised plan CITY COUNCIL ACTION Approved �_ Denied by the Council this _� day of June 19$�• Resolution No: R88-44 Special Conditions: l. That the applicant and the Citv execute a revised redevelopment plan. � 2. Approval by HRA of revised plan � � � James D. Kerr gan Planning & Economic Dev lopment Qirector If you have any further questions as relates to this matter, please call Nancy Anderson, 935-8474, extension 146. � Note: A Conditional Use Permit shall expire one year after it has been issued ,� unless the use for which the permit has been granted is in effect, except that, upon written application of the owner of the effected land for which the permit was granted prior to the end of said year may request and the Council may grant an extension not to exceed one year. i , . � . ` u G �� l� ti 5 June 1 , 1988 � ° " � a Couneil Report: 88-107 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - BATON CORPORATION 11th Avenue South & First Street Proposed Action . Staff recommends the following motion: That the request to revise the ori inal Conditional Use Permit to construct more condominiums is approved by Resolution No: R88-44 . Approval of this motion will allow the applicant to construct more condominiums . Overview. Baton Corporation is proposing to revise their original plans which received Conditional Use Approval on June 2 , 1987 • They are now proposing �9 condominiums and 14 townhomes . The original proposal was for 32 townhomes and 26 condos . The townhomes currently under construction will be the only toWnhomes built . The condos will be built in t�►o phases , the first along 11th Avenue and the second along ^ the Suburban Chev side . The condos will be both one and two bedrooms . Baton is making this request because of the market demand for the condos in this area compared to the toWnhomes . The sub3ect site is on HRA Redevelopment Project area. Steve Embretsen , representing Baton Corporation � appeared before the Commission . He stated that they are requesting this change because of the demand for condos . It was noted that the access to the condos was ehanged from 11th Avenue to 12th Avenue . Mr. Embretsen also stated that all units will be oWner occupied . No one appeared regarding this item. � Issues to Consider. o Is the construetion of more condominiums a better use for the site? � o Will the surrounding parcels be affected by the change? Supporting Documents . � o Location Map o Site Proposal _ o Site Plan o Resolution � � . 4 � Nancy . Anderson � Community Development Analyst CIIP88-9 ^ Page 2 Site Proposal. When the original Conditional IIse Permit Was granted , five variances Were also granted . The variances are as folloWs: 20 ' variance of required 30 ' front yard setback 5' variance oP required 15 ' side yard setback 19 ' variance of required 25 ' rear yard setback 26 ' varianee of required 36 ' distance betWeen buildings 2x variance oP maximum building coverage of 30� for Alternate 'A' (toWnhomes) for 15x variance of maximum building coverage of 30x Alternate ' B' (toWnhomes/condos) With this new proposal many of the granted variances Will be decreased : - the rear yard setback variance will not be needed. The proposed neW building xill be setback 25 feet - the neW building coverage Will be decreased by 8x - the variance for distance between buildings Will not be ��^�� needed . There noW Will be 44 ' betWeen the townhomes and .--� the condos . The south end of the site Will remain as proposed. The folloWing is a list of the proposed development and ordinance requirements: R-5 Proposed Lot area 2�1 ,000 sq . ft . 85 ,860 sq. ft . Lot area per family 700 sq. ft . f 1 ,3b2 s4. ft . Lot Width 150 ft . 268 ft . Front yard 30 ft . 10 ft . Side yard 15 ft . E 11 ft . W 11 ft . Rear yard 25 ft . 25 ft. Bldg . height 4 story TWnhm 2 story Condo 3 story Bldg. coverage 3� � 39 s aces or 1 .25 Parking 1 .2 per unit Approx 79 P Dwelling Floor Area 2 bedroom 720 sq. ft . TWnhm 1 ,200 sq . ft . Condo 1 , 100 sq . ft . 1 bedroom 600 sq . ft . TWnhm 1 ,200 sq . ft . Condo 1 , 100 sq. ft . * with credits � a CUP88-9 _ Page 3 Exterior Features. The exterior look of the condos Will be similar to the to�nhomes. The exterior is proposed to be oP brick, hardboard siding and asphalt shingles . Sidewalk Will be provided along 11th and 12th Avenues and First Street South. LandscaninR. The site is required to have 28 trees . The landscape plan shoWs over double of that requirement. The plantings Wiil remain essentially the same as before , only the placement Will change. Sod will be laid throughout the site. There �ill be more green space on the north and West sides of the site �ith the new proposal. A fence is proposed between the condo parking lot and the toWnhomes driveWay. TrafPic F1oW. The traffic flow throughout the� site Will be changed . TWelfth Avenue South Will noW have the only ingress/egress points. The to�nhomes now xill have their oWn drive �hich �ill be separated from the condo parking. The condos �ill also have a separate ingress/egress point . Access to the underground parking Will be on the xest side oP the .��. condo parking lot . The parking lot is designed for a drop-ofP area ---� along �ith an area on 11th Avenue. The old plan had a drop-oPf area on 11th Avenue along With the entrance to the underground parking area. DrainaQe. The Director of Engineering has reviewed the plans and found them acceptable . The ne� plan Will provide 6x more green space than the previous plan . This added green space should help alleviate the run- off on the site . The site will get xater and storm drainage from 12th Avenue and sanitary sewer from 11th Avenue . Fire . The Fire Marshal has revieWed the plans and found them acceptable . - Is the construction of more condominiums a better use for the site? The neW site plan as presented is a better use for the site . The to�nhomes and condos will be separated by landscaping and a fence . This Will provide more privacy for both the residents of the townhomes and condos . The neW plan also provides more green space throughout the site . This additional green space Will be a nice feature for both the residents and the surrounding neighbors . The new plan will also minimize or eliminate many of the variances that_ �ere granted . This '— neW plan Hill benefit both the City and the applicant . CUP88-9 ^ Page 4 - Will the surrounding parcels be affected by the proposed change? There should be less impact on the surrounding parcels xith this proposed plan than the first proposal . Al1 traffic in and out of the site Will be on the less traveled 12th �venue. The old proposal had aecess to the underground parking off 11th Avenue. The new proposed plan xill have a larger green area betWeen Suburban Chevrolet and the condos . The other setbacks along the outside perimeter will remain the same as the old plan or greater. The neW proposal ofPers a site plan Which seems to have less impact on the area. Alternatives . 1 . Approve the Conditional Ose Permit to revise the original plan for CitiGables. By approving the Conditional Use Permit Baton Will be able to eonstruct more condos. 2 . Deny the Conditional IIse Permit to revise the original plan for CitiGables. By denying th_e Conditional Use --� Permit the applicant Will still be able to construct the original approved plans . 3 . Continue for Purther information. If the Commission Peels that further information is needed , the item should be continued . .--� � � , �, � ; � . . � - � _ . . P�A�1T� SCHEDUL� CODE � QT1(, COMMON NAME/LATIN NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS q , � � �s�a-� ti/�.� �� P-�l�T. �N T�Z �k` � G�cl•. �n� �. - g i � �� 1 _ L1N��f��__... _ ?' u �� . �1 �_.. .,'Cl��h �� ' ��N�� „h�, '� C ' N��` - - '_ __.--- : ..- --�� .v 6H .� . . . ��8 -7�GE�. p � G��: .��.��.E p ii � _� �� — . .-!_ _ 2� �� i� T . � �_ ��z � .� � _r�_.�t.. -�I._�_�_.� � �_. ._._ -z" _ ��x� y b�-�+= �z�� -.�.� F � . - - _ __ - . _ -.�� -.��-�_: .. . . - . _ _. __ .-- - ---- � - - _ . . _ . __ _ ._. _-.---=-- . . .__ _._ .�. _. .. . ; - -- - G 2 = .- � -- =- .. =--- . - - - ' _ . �. .-_ .-�L_�..�_-- �N. - - -- _�----- -- - � - -�:.--- - . ._ ._ ._ ..-�---. . --- .: � � - ----- H ; 5 . _ , _. . � �__� � �- -. w---- -.- J� --- � � �-t �- :. � - - - � _�8.:��N.�--�oP . _.__ . , . � _ • . ' � , � � � , , . . itiGables Towrihomes and Condominiums �� Pia�c s neduie� iton Corporation� ,_ Lindbera Pierce. Inc. Ar�hitPrt� --� CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0: 88-u4 RESOLUTION MARING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL IISE PERMIT CUP88-9 WHEREAS, an application for a Conditional IIse Permit entitled CDP88-9 has been made by Baton Corporation to allow more condominiums in place of toWnhouses at 11th Avenue South � First Street is approved. 1 . That an application for Conditional Use Permit CIIP88-9 Was filed with the City of Hopkins on May 9 , 1988 • 2 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission revieWed such application on May 31 , 1988 . 3 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices , held a public hearing on May 31 , 1988; all persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard . ^ 4 . That the written comments and analysis of the City staff and the Planning Commission Were _ considered . NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hopkins City Council makes the folloWing Findings of Fact in respect to Conditional Use Permit CIIP88-9 � 1 . That the revised plans minimize the granted variances . 2 . That the density of the added units conforms with the distriet requirements . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that application for Conditional Use Permit CUP88-9 is hereby approved sub�ect to the following Conditions : 1 . That the applicant and the City execute a revised redevelopment agreement . 2 . Approval by HRA of revised plan . Adopted this 7th day of June , 1988 • ---� • Donald J. Milbert , Mayor l ' � V G t /� �;4�•`\ . �� 'L S O c� �' K � May 23 , 1988 Planning Report : CUP88-9 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - BATON CORPORATION 11th Avenue South & First Street Proposed Action. Staff recommends the folloWing motion: That the request to revise the original Conditional Use Permit to construct more condominiums is approved by Resolution No: R88-4� . Approval of this motion will allow the applicant to construct more condominiums . Overview. Baton Corporation is proposing to revise their original plans which received Conditional IIse Approval on June 2 , 1987 . They are now proposing 49 condominiums and 14 townhomes . The original proposal Was for 32 townhomes and 26 condos . The toWnhomes currently under construction will be the only townhomes built . The condos will be built in two phases , the first along 11th Avenue and the second along ' the Suburban Chev side . The condos will be both one and two bedrooms . Baton is making this request because of the market demand for the condos in this area compared to the townhomes . The subject site is on HRA Redevelopment Pro�ect area. Issues to Consider. o Is the construction of more condominiums a better use for the site? o Will the surrounding parcels be affected by the change? Supporting Documents. o Location Map o Site Proposal o Site Plan o Resolution Nancy . Anderson � Community Development Analyst � ^ CUP88-9 Page 2 Site Proposal. When the original Conditional Use Permit was granted , five variances were also granted . The variances are as follows: 20 ' variance of required 30 ' front yard setback 5 ' variance of required 15 ' side yard setbaek 19 ' variance of required 25 ' rear yard setback 26 ' variance of required 36 ' distance betWeen buildings 2� variance of maximum building coverage of 30% for Alternate 'A' ( townhomes) 15� variance of maximum building coverage of 30� for Alternate ' B' ( toWnhomes/condos) With this new proposal many of the granted variances will be decreased : - the rear yard setback varianee will not be needed . The proposed new building Will be setback 25 feet - the new building coverage Will be decreased by 8� - the variance for distance between buildings will not be --� needed . There now will be u4 ' between the toWnhomes and the condos . The south end of the site will remain as proposed . The following is a list of the proposed development and ordinance requirements: R-5 Proposed Lot area 24 ,000 sq. ft . 85 ,860 sq. ft . Lot area per family 700 sq . ft . � 1 ,362 sq.ft . Lot width 150 ft . 268 ft . Front yard 30 ft . 10 ft . Side yard 15 ft . E 11 ft . W 11 ft. Rear yard 25 ft . 25 ft. Bldg . height 4 story TWnhm 2 story Condo 3 story Bldg. coverage 30 K 39 x Parking 1 .2 per unit Approx 79 spaces or 1 .25 Dwelling Floor Area 2 bedroom 720 sq. ft . Twnhm 1 ,200 sq. ft . Condo 1 , 100 sq. ft . 1 bedroom 600 sq . ft . Twnhm 1 ,200 sq. ft . Condo 1 , 100 sq. ft . --� * with credits . --� CUP88-9 Page 3 Exterior Features . The exterior look of the condos Will be similar to the townhomes. The exterior is proposed to be of brick , hardboard siding and asphalt shingles . Sidewalk Will be provided along 11th and 12th Avenues and First Street South. Landscaping. The site is required to have 28 trees . The landscape plan shows over double of that requirement . The plantings will remain essentially the same as before , only the placement will change . Sod will be laid throughout the site . There Will be more green space on the north and west sides of the site With the neW proposal . A fence is proposed between the condo parking lot and the townhomes driveway. Traffic Flow. The traffic flow throughout the site will be changed . TwelFth Avenue South Will now have the only ingress/egress points . The townhomes now will have their oWn drive which will be separated from the condo parking. The condos will also have a separate ingress/egress point . Access to the underground parking will be on the west side of the ---� condo parking lot. The parking lot is designed for a drop-off area along with an area on 11th Avenue . The old plan had a drop-off area on 11th Avenue along With the entrance to the underground parking area . Drainage . The Director of Engineering has reviewed the plans and found them acceptable . The new plan will provide 6$ more green space than the previous plan . This added green space should help alleviate the run- off on the site . The site will get water and storm drainage from 12th Avenue and sanitary sewer from 11th Avenue . Fire . The Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans and found them acceptable . - Is the construction of more condominiums a better use for the site? The new site plan as presented is a better use for the site . The townhomes and condos will be separated by landscaping and a fence . This will provide more privacy for both the residents of the townhomes and condos . The new plan also provides more green space throughout the site . This additional green space will be a nice feature for both the residents and the surrounding neighbors . The new plan will also '� minimize or eliminate many of the variances that were granteda This new plan will benefit both the City and the applicant . --� CUP88-9 Page 4 - Will the surrounding parcels be affected by the proposed change? There should be less impact on the surrounding parcels with this proposed plan than the first proposal . All traffic in and out of the site will be on the less traveled 12th Avenue . The old proposal had access to the underground parking off 11th Avenue . The new proposed plan will have a larger green area between Suburban Chevrolet and the condos . The other setbacks along the outside perimeter will remain the same as the old plan or greater. The neW proposal offers a site plan which seems to have less impact on the area. Alternatives . 1 . Approve the Conditional Use Permit to revise the original plan for CitiGables . By approving the Conditional Use Permit Baton will be able to construct more condos . 2 . Deny the Conditional Use Permit to revise the original '� plan for CitiGables . By denying the Conditional Use Permit the applicant Will still be able to construct the original approved plans . 3 . Continue for further information . If the Commission feels that further information is needed , the item should be continued . ---�