SUBD 92-03 \ S � �
G ,c
�
^ June 22, 1992 tio �, � Planning Report SUBD92-3
P K �
PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT - SUPER VALII
ProDosed Action.
Staff recommends the following motion: Move to approve
Resolution RZ92-17 reco�r�nendin a roval of the
preliminary/final plat to divide the lot at 333 2nd Street
N.E.
overview.
The applicant, Super Valu is proposing to divide the
property at 333 Second Street N.E. This site accommodated
the meat packing building for Red Owl. Currently this
building is vacant. Super Valu has had the building for
sale, but does not want to sell the vacant land to the west
of the building. The building will probably be more
sellable with the vacant land not part of the sale. The
vacant land to west of the building is used to store snow in
the winter for Super Valu. -
The building on the site is located on the east part of the
site. The west part of the site that will be retained by
� Super Valu was never part of the meat processing facility.
To the west of the proposed plat is the abandoned railroad,
this area will not be changed.
Primarv Issues to Consider.
o What is the property zoned?
o Do the new lots meet the minimum lot requirements?
o Will the access to the lots be affected by the lot
split?
o What are the surrounding uses?
o What are the staff's recommendations?
Suanortinq Documents.
o Analysis of Issues
o Plat
o Resolution RZ92-17
� ,� !;� , n r
Nancy� . Anderson
Plann
��
SUBD92-3
Page 2
�
Primary Issues to Consider.
o what is the property zoned?
The property is zoned I-2 and R-2. The north 175 feet is
zoned R-2. The zoning for the new lots will remain the
same.
o Do the new lots meet the minimum lot requirements?
I-2 Lot 1 Lot 2
minimum
lot size 12,000 sq. ft. 3. 050 acres 4.484 acres
The building will have the minimum setbacks required for the
I-2 district. A park dedication fee will be required for
the new lot.
o Will the access to the lots be affected by the lot
split?
Both lots have access from 2nd Street N.E. The access to
the lots will not be affected by the lot split.
o What are the surrounding uses? �
The site is surrounded by the following uses:
west - abandoned railroads tracks and State Highway 169
east - Honeywell parking and residential
north - residential
south - Super Valu
o What are the staff's recommendations?
The staff is recommending that there is a 25 foot drainage
and utility easement on the east and north sides of Lot 1.
This drainage and utility easement will allow this site to
be connected with City's storm water system.
Alternatives.
l. Recommend approval of the plat. By recommending
approval of the plat, the City Council will consider a
recommendation of approval of the plat.
2 . Recommend denial of the plat. By recommending denial
of the plat the City Council will consider a
recommendation of denial of the plato
�
suan9a-3
Page 3
--�
3. Continue for further information. If the Commission
indicates that further information is needed, the item
should be continued.
��
� "
�
Qi - rVH J J� .� - 10� �,,,,
_1 . ��
a � I� { 8 -- .
N � � 8
I(22) (29) v _ f 13) _ _. / �
:�
_ �` � � Location M�a ��V" ,�
� p
�I �;�� o .
n' 2(23) (28) d' � sr�� (14) '�`• � I �_
`� ��y / r.�e�
p/ I
O
3 (2� �Qo 35)
(24) ,, ,
�i/ / 5�' ,.. • :,, .
`. 4(25) (26) p � O 4 I
I I2
� /05 � ' � (3TJ (3 4)
c3oi ;�o FA RMDA L E Rp 425 I
o /04 /OB //2 //6 204 20B
� o� �� c�� R. S. o. 95 �� i csq (sa) (ss) '
(88) (89) (90) 10 II Q
TUR `GR N
�o�v � a B c U2) isJ �� i ' Q �' ' �2 css)
.�* Q�� °�'l F° � (72) � � � 2(s2) qD . � —9
d`jl � (6) (7) (8) (9) U I) (15) n� 40/
"'S�( 4 5 6 7 9 �3 =' (74) (7 M 3(63) MONROE f
�9 345 ,3 � 3 2
5 I 3 g/ `'T3� 8 � � 225 229 , M 4(64) 402 40 9.
6 7�so 342 33 - �"'.s� �P� G �,C/RCLE N.� � I 5�s� ; �;� R ��
I s -
(58k� (34) 2 �' �� 99 C P 226 30 34 Q � (g Q -
g � (35) � 200 � /6 3 2 I � o,
3 N /7 � �� < �77) (76) (75) � 7(67� � (72) s
f36) �
5 9, D� �`� � 2� 4 `� ,(81) (80) (79) (78) � -
( O n�� 57) (37) ►n • V 7 6 5 4 O �i 8(68) ,h (1
� (38) (�, Q� (^
� �O � 24�56) 5 \0 V : � 2/9 23 227 3� \ rp 9(69) O_ (106) _(
L/M � (3S) � v •_
��� 23�5� s a Q, : C/RCLE S. O o �ocro�
h . ,:..�: � o c77� e
2 I "�O (22 (40� "� Q. �..;; 2/6 220 224 228 232 Q ►o _
t : ' �
�O ' Y.-... 5 4 3 ' 2 � � 0 11�71) � -�.
13 ,h0\(521 � �8 � �� : : ' (86) � (85) (84) (83) (82) c`• (80)
^ /` r`� c� 19 (�
(42) ^�� o�
�
� . -
9
� 2 _
0
I
4 - -
� -
�L . –
I
ti
M
5 �f;.
2)
81 -
O (
�
4 .
N
�
f
I
�5
I
) O
(
3
)
M
b
5
19
10
0
8
5
M
M
( )
(� � (
> ti
M
� V 4
4
N
6 `�
ti
(
1
�
i
D� .
� .
L`
18
O
�
/
N
(5
) �h
�
(
8
6
)
21
45 •
'\
(
)
ti
12 7A q
�
(87
)
V :`?�;;?�."1:7��������`1���??�``?i:>;i.�"::`"``_:`:<;?"?":::;:?:c�;`>;';i;?: c
�::::::::::::::>:�»>:�»>:�::�:�:�>:
�T O '�F..:...::. :::.:•.�::::>::;:•::>::::::.. ::::::::: ..
.;.;;;>;:�;;;:;:: ::>;:�;:�;>;;:�;;
� (49) c�, (8
/
M
\•
46 �
Q (� �
( ) �L
16
I
3
�o
V
(48 ..
)
I �
/
47
ti
�
91
c
( (
)
. �
) .
ti .
(
. �
Q� N
.
15
I
4
�C/
I -
. �'
Z
I
8
C�
2 .
3
UO
>:::::+::>:::::�:::::::::::::::::>:::
�
<<::� -- - - - - --
� ::::: :�:':`:»:::::�::::»:::::��`:::>::>:<::::`:::::::::::::�::::>:::::::::�:::::�::�:::: <:;<::>::>::::::>:
..................
;:>::>::>::>::>::>:<:»::>:«:>::>::>::>::::
�:�:�:�:::�;<:>:�:<:�:::::::;::;::::::::::>:�>:..... .,�.::::......,...........:::::.><.;::�>:.;;:;:.;::;:;.;:+:;:<.:;:�::::<:;: �4
I
— _' — — — — — — — — .-- — �►r
. 23
�-R sit
till
NINVO d.
Ell
OL
LA
I top!
A 12
4
Bit
oL os
LLJ
J2d
JS\
.1
ww. aver sem
■
�� CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO: RZ92-17
RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT
WHEREAS, an application for a preliminary/final plat entitled
SUBD 92-3 made by Super Valu is recommended for
approval.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as
follows:
1. That an application for a preliminary/final plat
SUBD 92-3 was filed with the City of Hopkins on
June 15, 1992 . •
2 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such
application on June 30, 1992 .
3 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to
published and mailed notice, held a public hearing
on June 30, 1992 ; all persons present at the
-- hearing were given an opportunity to be heard.
4. That the written comments and analysis of the City
Staff and the Planning Commission were considered.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that application for SUBD 92-3 is
hereby recommended for approval based on the following
Findings of Fact:
1. That the new lots meet the minumum lot size for the
zoning district.
2 . That the plat meets the platting requirements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for SUBD 92-3 is hereby
recommended for approval based on the following
conditions:
1. That there is a 25 foot drainage and utility easement
on the north and east sides of Lot l.
Adopted this 30th day of June, 1992 .
--�
Richard Pavelka, Chairman
� T Y
G �
�
�
.-.. y
July 1, 1992 ° P K , N y
Council Report 92-142
PRELIMINARY�FINAL PLAT - SUPER VALU
Pro�osed Action.
Staff recommends the following motion: Move to abprove Resolution 92
55 a rovin the reliminar final lat to divide the lot at 333 2nd
Street N.E.
Mr. Hutchison moved and Mr. Winship seconded the motion to approve
Resolution RZ92-17 recommending approval of the preliminary/final plat
at 333 Second Street NE. The motion carried unanimously.
Overview.
The applicant, Super Valu is proposing to divide the property at 333
Second Street N.E. This site accommodated the meat packing building
for Red Owl. Currently this building is vacant. Super Valu has had
the building for sale, but does not want to sell the vacant land to
the west of the building. The building will probably be more sellable
with the vacant land not part of the sale. The vacant land to west of
the building is used to store snow in the winter for Super Valu.
The building on the site is located on the east part of the site. The
west part of the site that will be retained by Super Valu was never
_ part of the meat processing facility.
To the west of the proposed plat is the abandoned railroad, this area
will not be changed.
Staff reviewed the plat with the Commission. Ryan Johnson
representing Super Valu appeared before the Commission. Mr. Johnson
stated that Super Valu has no intention of selling the vacant parcel.
Steve Shaw, an abutting property owner, appeared and was concerned
with the appearance of the property. The Commission discussed the
appearance of the site. Mr. Johnson will provide a letter to the City
regarding the clean-up of the vacant parcel before the City Council
meeting.
Primarv Issues to Consider.
o What is the property zoned?
o Do the new lots meet the minimum lot requirements?
o Will the access to the lots be affected by the lot split?
o What are the surrounding uses?
o What are the staff�s recommendations?
su000rtinq Documents.
o Analysis of Issues
o Plat
o Resolution 92-55
U'��..(��� .
.danc . Anderson -
Planner
� "�� � � '
��., �
,. . . . � -
i�
I /
i
; ,
: :
� �. . .
,1 ,
i
I � � � �
�
i
'� . .
.� ��
��
CR92-142
.-.
Page 2
Primary Issues to Consider.
o What is the property zoned?
The property is zoned I-2 and R-2. The north 175 feet is zoned R-2.
The zoning for the new lots will remain the same.
o Do the new lots meet the minimum lot requirements?
I'2 Lot 1 Lot 2
Minimum
Lot size 12 , 000 sq. ft. 3 . 050 acres 4. 484 acres
The building will have the minimum setbacks required for the I-2
district. A park dedication fee will be required for the new lot.
o Will the access to the lots be affected by the lot split?
Both lots have access from 2nd Street N.E. The access to the lots
will not be affected by the lot split.
o What are the surroundinq uses?
� The site is surrounded by the following uses:
west - abandoned railroads tracks and State Highway 169
east - Honeywell parking and residential
north - residential
south - Super Valu
c What are the staff's recommendations?
The staff is recommending that there is a 25 foot drainage and utility
easement on the east and north sides of Lot 1. This drainage and
utility easement will allow this site to be connected with City's
storm water system. The City Engineer has also recommended that a 30
foot maintenance easement is added abutting the drainage area.
Alternatives.
1. Approve the plat. By approving the plat, the applicant will be
able to divide the lot.
2. Deny the plat. By denying the plat the applicant will not be
able to divide the lot.
3. Continue for further information. If the City Council indicates
that further information is needed, the item should be continued.
�
�
Q '� Yl�i�ll J�•� - j02 �vv /
J I - �
W
Q � � ( I 8
(22) 829) v (13) :.., //
= I �� • ■ � I .
L� � Location Map
,�y I^'I 2(23) (28) a� O�- u�� (14)
-� ��y / r3 e�
�,o I3 (2'� �4'o U5)
(24) _; :
��� ' .,. , . •
� � 4 5� �• 4
(25) (26) p � O I
' I 2 � /05 P ' � (3Tl (34)
c3°; � FA RMD�I L E RD 425 I
I��� /04 /OB //2 //6 204 20B ' �
i o ti �� c I, R. S. o. 95 �-= i csi) �94) (95)
�ea� ce9> cso� io �i � , M TUR `GR N
IO�v o'` A e C (12) /3) !
� � 4� � � �2 (96)
� A1 ., l� c�2) � � � 2 ts2) AD . � -��
3sj) �� (6) (7) (8) (9) (II) (15) � rr� 40/
3s� 4 5 g 7 �9 13 � (74) (7 � 3(63) MONROE f
�' 3 a 9 345 3g� 3 (I 0 �• � 225 229 . M 4(64) 402 40 4
5 I `�'� 6
6 �-'�'sp 342 33 . "��''� P� �,C/RCLE N.� � I 5css� ; M� � �3
�,n (19) �
7 � s ��R t v' � J 2 2 6 3 0 3 4 Q � 1 6 - -
--� ( f58Ao (34) (3 5) N� 2 0 0 \ 99 ° Q 3 2 I "� e o,
8 tn 3 /7 �/6 � ` �77) (76) (75) �
7(6� � CT2) 6
C36) � L7 ►o
59) (�, � 2g N =(81) (80) (79) (78) � M '�
9 b' av � (57) (37)4 ,� � � 8�68) ;� (105) 7
� ' Q, 7 6 5 4 (�, �
( 0 O ��� ` \ 24(56) (38)5 �\0 � I 2/9 23 227 3/ \ r0 9�69) rp_ �106) _I
�� h 23css� c3s�6 � QV . C/RCLE S. � � io o c77� 8
Cra� �
M� i�� �� 2/6 220 224 22B 232 Q ''�
2 I �O (22 (40L O �� ;•-•.; 5 4 3' 2 � � � 11�71) � -�
r
4 � �.t.:;;�
13 ^��\l 21 � (6 �o ,(.V .'�:. (86) � (85) (84) (83? (82) N �80) 19 (
O �� �
� 'h -
42
( )
♦
n� - - -- --
�
20
9
'„:: �.
M
I
4
� .
�L I •
(
8
ti )
I
5 O
i
N
��
ti
43 •
h
�
I
�
( ) ^�
�
i
15 0
8
5
19 0
�
( )
1
[�� �
�':''»: M
) ti
>:�i:>:i: N
44
•6
. V
ti
(
11
�
� .
L�
18
4� �
N
(
8
6
)
21
O
M
�
: �
(5 )
45 •
'`
( )
ti
(
87
<
12 ":'>';F9�1`:; ":??`'"'``'`�>:::;::;�``'::::`:;<:'>;::::;;:'.:?>: .
;:.;:.;:.;:.;.:.;:.;>; .;:..;::;::.;.
::»::>::>:>:: :>:::::::::::::;::>::>::>::
;.;:.::.;:.;:.>::.;:.;:.;:.;;::.»;:.;:
v
�7
O
c�,' (8
49
/
�
� )
M
�
46
ti
\•
� [� �
( )
13
�o
V
I ..
6
(48
)
�
� �
�L (
91
)
� C
�
4
�
�
( ) .
N .
N
�
. Q'
15 4
I ,
f
I
_ �C/ :
� �'
Z
I
8
C�
2 '
3
uo
;,::::>::::>::::>::>::::::::>::>:::
— �
.,.a -- - - - - -
. `>:«<�:::'::>:»:�:::::>::>::>:�:::::�;�:::>::::::::`:::::::::>:::::::<::::>::>::>::`<<:>::::�::<�:�::�::<::
:::::::..�:::::::::::::::::::
,::.;:.::.;;:.:;.;:.::::.;;:.;:.;:.;:.;;;
::�:�>::;'>`�:�>��>��:�>:�:�:::�s:�:�:>:�>:>::::;:: ,3�...............................:..:::. :.:�:::::.+:::::. ::.::•:• �4
.... ..,....
I . ........ .. ... _
�_�7
SA
\\\\ ��\
\\
�/
jig 1
go,
19 -
gm
Q 1
2
&I Mal.
1H
ge
HO w
till a
TZ
on UZI
IN
is
1 i 11
I U
!;!|{|;! }\ /}
\
till i
M
Est;
.wh
-,-
109:01
91 -OW! 2
In 12SION
*0
HIEN 3nN3Av 9OYNOPV
z 2 y y �� {� � � \�
z of
nm 1
Alf
ilOWN! 9 A IG E
H Pulps U unSa dis 8
lei I
A W"
is
it HOW ga
4h 1 1
YKA S
1 lit
imam
rg-- .11 1
wQ 2121 gall lit i 1P 1 Ill 1
I n M 3A V Vgg;-:!j
00 DLrl
VZ
LA I I
a
!Af--YA V
.::i3gp�Nlj I �F '•'I
I J
lit
X 2§
OL of