The URL can be used to link to this page

SUBD 86-02 (2) ^ CITY OF HOPKINS Application for: Amendment of Zoning Ordinance Date: 2�28�b6 Concept Review Condi ti onal Use Permi t Case No: ��',P �— �J Subdivision Approval X Variance Fee: $150.00 Waiver of Platting Requirements Date Paid: 2/28/86 1. Street Location of Property: Smetana Road and Feltl Court 2. Legal Description of Property: SW4 Sw'4 Sec. 25 Twp 117�J R 22W (See attached drawing) e ar ve. . - or 3. Owner: Name Oakwood Development Co. Address Bloomington , P1N 55420 Phone 333-2577 1415 N. Lilac Dr. 4. Applicants Name: 4Jehrman Bergly Assoc. ,_ Address M�ls. , (�PJ 55422 Phone 546-4303 nc. 5. Description of Request: Divide above described property into two lots ,--. Zoning District Use o. Present Proposed 7. Present Proposed R-6 R-6 Undeveloped Multiple Residential 8. Reason for Request To meet HUD requirements rec�arding separate lots and mortgages for each building. 9. What error, if any, in the existing Ordinance would be corrected by the proposed amendment? (for Zoning Ordinance amendment only) N/A 10. If request is for a variance, what hardship would justify approval (see 427.04(108) of the Zoning Ordinance) . N/A 11. Exhibits submitted: Oakwood Flills--Preliminary Plat f�ap or plat showing the lands proposed to be changed Sheet S5 Other Drawing and description of lots ^. Acknowledgement and Signature: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the pen- alties of law, for the purpose of inducing the City of Hopkins to take the action herein requested, that all statements herein are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Nopkins and the laws of the State of Minnesota. - , . � � � � Si gnature of Appl icant: � l� /`�/f'I`IE Signature of Owner: RECORD OF ACTION TAKE�d BY PLANNING & ZONING C0�4MISSIOPd .--� Da te: 3/25/86 Application for Plat approval CASE N0: SUBD86-2 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS On the 25 day of Plarch 19 86 , the action requested in the foregoing petition was approved (X) disapproved subject to the following conditions : Recommend approval based on the Findings of Fact: l. subdivision conforms with the requirement of an R-6 District. 2.Conditional Use Permit was granted for c qnstruction of 324 u it apt. complex. 3. no variances are required; with the following condi't_i`�h"�'� f�vQ bl � utcome of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet.2. Chairman: •� � Securin a drivewa easement.3. parcels having two, or as requir y e � , access points for emergency ve ic es. . necessary easemen s are r cor e . CITY COUNCIL ACTION Approved �_ Denied by the Council this lst day of April 19 86 Approved with following amendment: Approved as recommended by Zoning and Planning Comnission. � C 1 e r k: --��- ��--olT Following to be filled in by City Action of City Officials Chronol o Date B Rec 'd by Bldg Dept. � Published by Bldg Dept.� 3f10/86 ; JK ; On P1 . Comn. Agenda � K � ; Pl . Comm. Postponement ' ' I � � ' IPI . Comm. Action ! JK I Recommend a roval as stated above. , � 3/25/86 Pp � ( i0n Council Agenda ( 4/1/86 JK i , � � I ' � � i ! ;Council Postponement ; � � � ---� � � ,ouncil Action ' 4/1/86 � JK � Approved as recommended. ' � I � ' 1 tJOTE: A Conditional Use Permit shall expire one year after it has been issued unless the use for which the permit has been 9ranted is in effect, except that, upon written application of the owner of the effec[ed land for which the permit was granted prior to the end of said year may request anA the Council may grant an extension not to exceed one year. CITY OF HOPKINS '� Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 86-17 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SUBD86-2 WHEREAS, an application for Subdivision Approval entitled SUBD86-2 has been made by Oakwood Development Company, to divide the property at Smetana Road and Feltl Court into two separate lots. WNEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for Subdivision Approval SUBD86-2 was filed with the City of Hopkins on February 28, 1986. 2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such application on hlarch 25, 1986. 3. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing on March 25, 1986; all persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. 4. That the written comments and analysis of the City Staff and the ^ Planning Commission were considered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hopkins City Council makes the following Findings of Fact in respect to SUBD36-2: 1. That the subdivision conforms with the requirements of an R-6 District. 2. That a Conditional Use Permit was granted for construction of a 324 unit apartment complex. 3. No variances are required. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for Subdivision SUBD86-2 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. A favorable outcome of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet. 2. Securing a driveway easement 3. The parcels having two, or as required by the Fire Marshal , access points for emergency vehicles. 4. The necessary easements are recorded. Adopted this lst day of April , 1�86. � Ellen Lavin, Mayor . 16:`r• . y, , a�� ' � '�•• � .� ___—._ _��" i __ '_ .._.._ ' � � �` � CITY OF HOPKI (VS �.. .� _ - _ _ �;� _ - _ i __ PLAT APPROVAL-FELTL COURT b SMETANA ROAD PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 14, 1986 REPORT N0. SU6086-2 PURPOSE: To review and recommend action on a subdivision at Smetana Road and Feltl Court. BACKGROUND: Name of Applicant: Wehrman-Bergly Assoc. Inc. Address of Property: Smetana Road & Feltl Court Present Zoning: R-6 Nature of Request: To divide property in two lots of 507 ,655 square feet and 375,853 square feet. Reason for Request: To meet HUD requirements regarding separate lots and mortgages for each building. The applicant is proposing to build a 324 unit apartment complex at this � site. The Conditional Use Permit to build this complex was approved last month. Parcel 'A' will be developed first, consisting of 174 units, fol- lowed by Parcel 'B' with 150 units. The proposed development complies with the following R-6 requirements. Parcel 'A' Ordinance • Proposed Front yard 35 64 North side ya rd 20 63 South side yard 20 60 Rear Yard 25 200 Minimum Lot Area 16,000 507,665 Lot Area per unit(with credits) 2,150 2,917.61 Parking - 313 Building Coverage 35% lOq approx. Open Space Ratio 1: 1.25 4.59 approx. Height 4 story 3 story Dwelling Floor Area 1 Bedroom 600 741-726 2 Bedroom 720 996-869 Over 2 bedrooms 840 - �� REPORT N0. SUBD86-2 "'� Page 2 Parcel 'B' Ordinance Proposed Front yard 35 50 East side yard 20 50 West side yard 20 120 Rear yard 25 30 Minimum Lot area 16,000 375,853 Lot Area per unit(with credits) 2,150 2,505.69 Parking - 270 Building Coverage 35% 14� approx Open Space ratio 1:2.25 3.40 Height 4 story 3 story Dwelling Floor Area 1 Bedroom 600 741-726 2 Bedroom 720 996-869 Over 2 bedrooms 840 - The Fire Marshal noted that because Parcel 'A' is being developed first, there must be two access points to the building. It also should be noted tha t Feltl is spelled wrong on the preliminary plat, it should be changed prior to the final plat. ^ The Assistant City Engineer has noted there should be sewer easanent in the southwest corner of the site also if it is the desire of the appli- cants to have the City maintain the water and sewer on the site, ease- ments will have to be shown on the plat. ANALYSIS: The applicant has requested a subdivision to meet the HUD requirements. Both lots will comply with the minimum requirements for an R-6 district. RECOMMENDATION: I recomnend approval of the subdivision with the following conditions: 1. A favorable outcome of the Environme�tal Assessment Worksheet. 2. Securing a driveway easement 3. The parcels having two access points for emergency vehicles. 4. The necessary easements are recorded. The following Findings of Fact are suggested should the Commission recommend approval : 1. The subdivision conforms with the requirements of an R-6 District. 2. A Conditional Use Permit was granted for construction of a 324 unit apartment complex. 3. No variances are required. �,,� � �--� �� I'rl"C'�4 1 �r i^��iy�f �� %��' 1 Nancy SG Anderson, Analyst Communi�y Development _ -- � -- — r ` � �� d.y9— V/V V1�f'VS� — - ____ - -•- I q o ; ',r�. �C �.�.�� I — �_ _� __ 4 � �� i. • ��n��)uu��•, � -- -- -- --- -- ___ ,`-�-i�P�Gui .�1,�!� I� -- -- — iF:) IP�;�J(�JJfI � ly � •�p�` I ,�,�. .lti7 I��n^ �^` ` .(� `I I� �1�� .�.1 l�1 i ' J \Y� n, !i�l'�lU�n�� O - (�V �. �J �;l:)� I C � 'll ... ��; '1.11�.1V Q � , �"..lv S��U(,�� I � \ � � .�':'. '�•��.��)'�+] � ;r :��uluuliJG I :� ,,��,��F q N r �•.�^'�Znn, �9 8 � � a��1 i,��p�p I SaJ�� j��SL�`/ � ��c e �,;�o�� ` as �' � ► � � 'U: '-��:.ien�� I �J --1 "� � iJ =' }�eH 1S�M �f � ,J •� e nu i�uaiu��o� I rJ aui � paqi��sap 0 ��F� •e;osauu<<� I 'L ', � +'IUSUMO� 'y� Q � �U� JO JJ"JJPIIr / Q \ 11 10 7aPr1 Ze41 � � � � � / o� � � \ i � � i-�. o � / -�\o� 8£/ � � �`;s�\ 092/9 5 � � �T '��•.,-.. �Z\ �� o / ., /�� .. < \ / E �i � � I � � o � � � ti � �, �� o � � � J �, o , :� �. ° I �' � ? °w `^ n �l ��.l�i JJ��1] . D �1� � v I�V \ �� iSaMUZf1�S • � 0 "� (\i1 V �l \i �4� Ol :�J� .. � `, Q i .,� u Dz S�a.�6ap � � � I � � :saM, spuo�as � � ul�o�� a�uaU� �, � :o Euiuui�aQ �'A-: � ;0 d7ur�7Slp . � 0 � �^ �s�MuZnoS � � c% ai�1 5uo�e � a'�3P 0 47�oN . � � �4: 1aJ�.+Pn�i � � � 1� 1lpH 1saN ; � Sa./�p i s9/�OS ,� � f,Ul�UIiIUJOI 4 V -�:;� � p�G�axap .-� � /� as -�99' 1 �� V ��' �y � � �-� � —� '' � t' ; 'P;OSJUUI�y . \ ✓ . � cii�.isi�Mol 'S7, . �y� ;o aa7�an(; .. ' 0� 1 :o l.acrl �ryl � � � � ti , � :� � ..�.. : . -- _ ' �� -- asCC9— . C '`�,s�,z�,�ey 0� '�15 .Lo j�>c' !o c'�/S�iy�c lti. • � yf��