Loading...
WVR 90-01 CITY OF HOPKINS ^ ZONING APPLICATION SUMMARY FORM Application Number wV� �CYj J�l-ii7-,�.� �3 �c�s3 P .I .D .�: "`' `'=`� CiC?�� Applican ' s Name (Last , First) Owner (if other than applicant) '�i`��r �x �-C��z�1Tr4 �/,/-1- i/'�/si E� .'fi�A �c� ��c�� ,��� �i.�l, �'�� Cv�,f-�� . Mailing Address (Street , City, State , Zip Code) �7`��;��,�`-�,c_ ff"r� -L�'f3����/�`� /�� /-'7�'///t�-'=r�t�,a�`�� / �'�.��'/�i��' //u '`�>� . , � � � y, �I,c.J�1�LZ Sc�+r1-rz Phone Number: (Day) y�(� -3c�l�- (Evening) 933 i,3�a.� Property Address �XX /7� �r��� �t�, 1.7- . . � r " - ,•�, ` , l� ;�_�-c� /'`_� �i.�d�c . � �- APPLICABLE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT(S) TYPE OF ZONING REQUEST �Q R-1-A [ ] R-2 [ ] B-1 [ ] Concept Review [ ] R-1-B [ ] R-3 [ ] B-2 [ ] Conditional Use Permit [ ] R-1 -C [ ] R-4 [ ] B-3 L ] Variance [ 7-�R-1 -D [ ] R-5 L ] I-1 [ ] Zoning District Change [ -1 -E [ ] R-6 ( ] I-2 [ ] Subdivision Approval [ ] Ordinance Amendment � �1 Other (�giVr� vF �CftT- I hereby certify with my signature that all data contained herein as well as all supporting data ���`�`'�5-` ��N � �����t��CC are true and correct to the best of my knowledge: � b�,F�� App icants Signa�ture Date `:-��'� Owners Signature Date ADMINISTRATIVE DATA SIJMMARY [ ] Proper addendum to application Application received: �//— 9� [ ] Detailed plans submitted [ ] Written pro�ect description submitted Fee Paid : �-�'Q,� � Referred to City PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Engineer: Approved: X without modifications Referred to City [ ] with modifications Attorney Denied [ ] Referred to Watershed District Date: May 29, 1990 Date of Public ---� Hearing Notice � - /y- �a COUNCIL ACTION Date of Publie A�. ved: X without modifications Hearing .�- ol j- j4 [ ] with modifications Denied: [ ] Date: June 5, 1990 RESOLUTION N0: 90-63 , � j Y O . G ,�' �i� --� y 9 May 30, 1990 � P K ` � Council Report: 90-120 WAIVER OF PLAT - 17TH AVENUE & 3RD STREET Proposed Action. Staff recommends approval of the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution No: 90-63 approving a waiver of plat to allow the division , of Lot 23 to combine with lots 24 and 22 . � ; � Approval of this motion will create two conforming lots. overview. The subject properties are 3 parcels on the southeast corner of 17th Avenue and 3rd Street. The three parcels are vacant. The applicant is proposing to divide the middle lot and combine the divided lot with the lot on either side. The existing parcels are 38.92, 40 and 50 feet wide. The new parcels will be 61.89 and 66.73 feet wide. Staff is recommending approval because the new parcels will conform with the R-1-A minimum requirements. Mike Schatz representing the owner of the property appeared before the � Commission. Mr. Schatz stated that there would probably be a two family home constructed on each lot. A few surrounding neighbors were concerned with the additional traffic in the alley and where the access to the garages would be. There was little discussion on this item. The Commission unanimously approved Resolution No: Z90-10 approving the waiver of the plat to divide Lot 23 and combine with Lots 22 and 24 to create two lots. Primary Issues to Consider. o Do the lots meet the minimum requirements for an R-1-A lot? o What can be constructed on the new lots? o If the lots are not divided, what can be constructed on the lots? o Why is a waiver of the platting process being proposed? SupportinQ Documents. o Location Map o Survey o Analysis of Issues o Alternatives o Resolution No. 90-63 � � � � � + � , Nanc S. Anderson Plann r -� . CR: 90-120 Page 2 Detailed Backqround. Primarv Issues to Consider. o Do the new lots meet the requirements for the R-1-A district? � , � The minimum lot size for a lot in the R-1-A district is 6000 square feet and the minimum width is 50 feet. Both lots will exceed the minimum requirements. o What can be constructed on the new lots? The R-1-A district allows both single family and two family homes. With the division of the lots two doubles or two singles can be constructed on the lots. o If the lots are not divided, what can be constructed on the lots? If the lots are not divided, a single family home can be built on each � lot. A single family home can be built on each lot even though the lots do not meet the minimum requirements because the ordinance has a grandfather clause that would allow the construction of single a family home. o Why is a waiver of the platting process being proposed? In the past the City has allowed a waiver of the platting requirements instead of a subdivision because a waiver of plat costs less to the applicant. Hennepin County has accepted the waiver of plat if it is a simple division. Alternatives. - l. Approve the request for a waiver of the plat. By approving the request the applicant will have two lots that meet the minimum requirements. 2 . Deny the request for a waiver of the plat. By denying the wavier of plat, three lots will remain with the ability to construct 3 single family homes. 3 . Continue for further information. If the Commission feels � further information is needed, the item should be continued. ' - - - - - , (19) I v � 12(37) (26) I � 16(65) (52) 3 � �. 15(51) (38)2 � � 14 I I � r� i � IS(64) �53)4 N � 44(5q.�39) 3 N � 13(' ^ �20y 2 v- a .I. (36) ( 7� 2 � v- v- a. I 0 a r� � 14(63) (54)5 � � 13( (40)4 � ~ (21) 3 � 12(2 a. O � lOaS) i28) 3 `r P v� �- o "� �13(621 (�)6 � � 12( (41) 5 � p I I(2t . i 9 (22) 4 O \ � g(34) (29) ` � � C � 4 v O� 12(61) �56)7 � 0 1 1�4� �42)6 � . O 10(2 ' � 8 (25) (23) 5 O O 8{33) (30) 5 � 11(g0 a' v- _ �r �- �r � (57)8 o O c 10(4 (43) 7 0� O � 9(2E 7 (24) 6 0 0 7(32) (31) 6 p 1015 58)o � 0 9(45) (44}8 0 � p �r o- a. a, 8(25 � 4�f � --� I _18 (21) 1 _ � 21(20 (2) 1 � � 24 _ (100)I d' 24 U4� 122)�_ h_24,, . �_I7� (22)2 e 20(19 (3) 2 ^ 23(!21 (101)2� ^ 23(I4?� 2 "� _ "� 23(106. L�- ` I g 3 � � 22(120 (102)3 M � 22(141) 123)3 a' M 22U05) I ,`�_ 15 � -- (4)4 � �_21U19 (103� � � 21U40) 124)4 `r � 21U04) (24)5 �1 � T7) o (104?5 rr� c°v' 20(138 125)5 0 °j ' 14(3 5) 5 M - M � 20G03)' (26� � j � U6) (6) 6 N �J V _ (IIS) (105� � � 19 (,38 6)6 N � ch 19(IOti 7 2 W , --- � - ���� ���6n N � � �8��3�� �27�7 M � � �8 U��� � 151i�) �7) 7 `� � r� 11 "� N � m � h 13� � Q . 14�j� (8)8 � � � U0T)8 � � \ u(�3Q .128?8 � � � 17U00) M �31) (9) 9 a � � 16(II (108A � � `'� U29)9 � � "� o� 12(30) �3 � � Q - -- i � ;�_ I�(99) �- - - 8 (II) 10 a. � IS(II (10910 � � ,�� 15U36) �30)10 �� Q o 15(9� II (28) � � 14(II , (I10)11 0 � 14(134) (131)II o 0 14(9� � ,� 10(29) 9 o I - _ `O 13(n (Itl)12 0 0 13(133) 132A2 p . 0 13(96) � . � 3R0 _ , 2�� C�4) I � � 23(7�; �� �— - — ' ����1 - - - - (56r C(i f I �. �2C1(8� (76)I . � • <r 2$8S� _�,c� ,� (35)S_� �_2��� I--- i d7J 2 v-_19(85) 777 2 "' a 2�8� , �,.,;<2 I`�52 (36) _ � � - - 2 � MS 3 b--- (78) 3 � N 20( � (37) - ,ar �'- �'ti ��{8)-N ti `, N 17 � � 19�� � 20 (38r _ `�`�' . �_197 � �� °�.i�18(98) � 16�:8� (79)5 � N 1F� _• ( 19� (39)6_� N �8 �5 N � 17(977 (88)4 80} 6 N T ' 17. 3 ! � �8U4 � ti i Z N �, (40?7 . � � �-- - (60Jg N °j 16(96 � . (:•� cv (89)5 (�1) � 16(80) (41) 8 � � ^ N I7�5� N � � 16(69 (6Q 7 � � \ 15(�4 6 �, � �5 7 N � N--- ` �� � 16(49 � � 1�68 d. � (; N (42)9 �q, �, (52)8 � � I 19 (90)7 v --- -� ,,�---- O �5(4 (43)10 N N 14�6 . o, � ` N 13(94 -- -\ � -14--) I <v 14{791 �; �O (91) 8 m 13 � � 8 �' -N 14(4 (44)II o � 13 (63)�� � ` 12(93 '- - -N -12--1 f—9- Io 13(46 0-- -- - II _ -- N (45)12 � 0 12�� (64)II o N I I (9?�IO � O I I � � 10 13 . - - - � � --- - � � �� 2 � suR� pR: HAC.� ER P(ZOPEtZT1E"S � Pre ared B ; ��542 2i3�� P y SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. Engineers • Surveyors . Planners . Solls Testing NORTH 10bb0 Wayzata Boulevard 1'Q30� �2 (� � �.T- � /• Minnetonka, Mn, 66343 J rc 1. �I � Tel. 646-7801 P 1 a�= 12�.4-0 .'�ti , .� ... _ Meos I2�.35—�.. .. .o e . � j . N '. , \ �� DESCRIPTION: i . ' � ! c� .a � � l�: '� cr1 '4�',, Lots 22, 23 and 24, Block 3, "Gibbs' First Addition to Nest , . i m �, (i V� : • , Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Minnesota" according to the recorded I v i� /: m o• � plat thereof. ` m 0.. � /�� � d � 71 � / � l �"\ > .i' � � � �. � i/ � �, . � � _ � Q' GENERAL NOTES: � � '� ProPosed � � � ' 1) • - Denotes iron monument found. ; 0 2) o - Denotes iron monument set. � • �0 � ��� � �IYiSIOfI Ll�le O , . �7 Q �j 3) Areas: Gross 16,253 square feet P /�, � ° C Parcel A 7,801 square feet �. � � ��� .i 0! , Q Parcel B - 8,452 square feet ^ � r .—' � ,t — � QUe `�• �•�' ..,• ... i26.��••N� •- • . :. y,. i2.00 �2.00-�� . ._ ;�� , P ; . � � . , , ' �• , ; PROPOSED DESCRIPT10Ns N � ; '� �E� ., � � � o� �. CO � � I Q C `� �i `� � � � � 'N N �ot 22 and the south 12.00 feet of Lot 23, Block 3, "Gibbs' First N N � g �� � � , o -� -, Addition to Nest Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Minnesota" � 0 �• . . � il according to the recorded plat thereof. � (ri � N � �,. , , O �� � � � � � �. � � ,1 v� Parcel B i � ' I 8 � �- ? d Q Lot 2�1- and that part of Lot 23 lying north of the south 12.00 feet ,.•7 80 � l of Lot 23, Block 3, "G1bbs' First Addition to West Minneapolis, •ti., � ' " Hennepin County, Minnesota" according to the recorded plat . : � . . , .p�. d :a• thereof. I .... • •— ME?4S.= �2�0.�0 ... _ I .''J/ i P I o.-}- = I 2�.0 7 G4� ° • 's I � G�4ve 1 O�;vewa ( � I hereby certify that this survey xas prepared under my supervision and that I am a Licensed Land Surveyor under the ws of the State of Minnesota. N Oate: April 19, 1990 � " Theo ore . Kemna land Sur.veyor MN Lic. No. 17006 CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota � RESOLUTION NO: 90-63 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF PLAT WVR: 90-1 WHEREAS, an application by Haller Properties for a Waiver of the Platting Requirements WVR:90-1 to divide Lot 23 thus creating Parcels 'A' and 'B' as described below is hereby approved. , � Parcel 'A' : Lot 22 and the south 12 feet of Lot 23 , Block 3 , Gibbs First Addition to West Minneaplis, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. Parcel 'B' : Lot 24 and that part of Lot 23 lying north of the south 12 feet of Lot 23 , Block 3 , Gibbs First Addition to West Minneaplis, Hennepin County, Minnesota according to the recorded plat thereof. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the amendment is as follows: 1. That the application for Waiver of the Platting Requirements was filed with the City of Hopkins on May 11, 1990. 2 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such -1 application on May 29, 1990. 3 . That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed notices, held a public hearing on May 29 , 1990; all persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. 4 . That the written comments and analysis of the City Staff and the Planning Commission were considered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that application for Waiver of the Platting Requirements is hereby approved subject to the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the new lots meet the minimum requirements for the R-1-A District. 2 . That a single family home or a two family home can be constructed on each lot. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for Waiver of the Platting Requirements is hereby approved subject to the following Conditions: 1. That the Hennepin County Recorder accepts the Waiver of Plat. Adopted this 5 day of June, 1990. � Nelson W. Berg, Mayor ATTEST: James A. Genellie, City Clerk � S Y O G '� <� 4 ,��� ti � May 18, 1990 � ° K � N Planning Report: WVR90-1 WAIVER OF PLAT - 17TH AVENUE & 3RD STREET Proposed Action. Staff recommends approval of the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution Z90-10 recommendina approval of a waiver of plat to allow � the division of Lot 23 to combine with lots 24 and 22 . t Approval of this motion will create two conforming lots. overview. The subject properties are 3 parcels on the southeast corner of 17th Avenue and 3rd Street. The three parcels are vacant. The applicant is proposing to divide the middle lot and combine the divided lot with the lot on either side. The existing parcels are 38.92, 40 and 50 feet wide. The new parcels will be 61.89 and 66.73 feet wide. Staff is recommending approval because the new parcels will conform with the R-1-A minimum requirements. ^ Primary Issues to Consider. o Do the lots meet the minimum requirements for an R-1-A lot? o What can be constructed on the new lots? o If the lots are not divided, what can be constructed on the lots? � o Why is a waiver of the platting process being proposed? supportinq Documents. o Location Map o Survey o Analysis of Issues o Alternatives o Resolution No. 90-10 � anc S. Anderson Plan r � WVR: 90-1 Page 2 Detailed Backqround. Primary Issues to Consider. o Do the new lots meet the requirements for the R-1-A district? � . � The minimum lot size for a lot in the R-1-A district is 6000 square feet and the minimum width is 50 feet. Both lots will exceed the minimum requirements. o What can be constructed on the new lots? The R-1-A district allows both single family and two family homes. With the division of the lots two doubles or two singles can be constructed on the lots. o If the lots are not divided, what can be constructed on the lots? If the lots are not divided, a single family home can be built on each � lot. A single family home can be built on each lot even though. the lots do not meet the minimum requirements because the ordinance has a grandfather clause that would allow the construction of single a family home. o Why is a waiver of the platting process being proposed? In the past the City has allowed a waiver of the platting requirements instead of a subdivision because a waiver of plat costs less to the applicant. Hennepin County has accepted the waiver of plat if it is a simple division. Alternatives. l. Approve the request for a waiver of the plat. By approving the request the applicant will have two lots that meet the minimum requirements. 2 . Deny the request for a waiver of the plat. By denying the wavier of plat, three lots will remain with the ability to construct 3 single family homes. 3. Continue for further information. If the Commission feels � further information is needed, the item should be continued. � _ . . . . — (19) I � � 12{3� (26) I � 16(65) f52) 3 �v �. 15(51) (38)2 � ,� 14 I I � r� � � 15(64) �53)4 N � V4(5Q.(39) 3 N `�' 13(30 (2�!2 v v .I, (36) ( � 2 �. �t o- a. --� - - a, p � 14(63) (54)5 � � 13( (40)4 m � 12(29 10 (21) 3 � � 10(35) i28) 3 � `r P d' � O . o � �13(6� (55)6 � � 12(4 (41) 5 � � I I(28) � 9 (22) 4 O \ O 9(34) (29) � �-- d' � C � 4 r O� 12(61) (56)7 � 0 11�4� �42)6 � O 10(27) . 8 (25) (23) 5 O O 8(33) (30) 5 � I1�6� � � Q � _ a v �r � (57)8 o c 10(4 (43) 7 0 0 9�26) 7 (24) 6 o p 7(32) (31) 6 � 10(5 58)o � 0 9(45) (44)8 0 � U g(25) �r v� v r � 4-� � --- I _18 (21) I _n. 21(20 (2) i � �_24 _ (100)I a' 24U4� 122)I_ �o h_24t- , � 17� (22)2 co 20(19 �3) 2 � 23(!21 (IOp 2� e' 23(147� 2 `� � '� 23(106 -- - --- -- --� � 22(120 (102)3 M � 22(141) 123]3 � � 22(105) LL�_ � 8 3 I `� 15 _ -- 4 d' �_21(I19 (I03� M � 21(140) �24)4 � `� 21 U04) '�__ ( 11 n, _ (4� `� � 14(3 �24)5 `� � �7) 5) 5 r� � _ (104� r� � 20(139 (125)5 � ,N��. 20(10� (26)6 � j � (16) � � (118) (105)6 � � 19 (,38 (126)6 N I , . N 19(IOv ; � ` (6) 6 cV \ � -(117 N \ N �'V 7 2 W , --- � _ (106rT N J 18(137) 127)7 cy � °t 18U01) � \ � IS/i�) �7) 7 `� r� '7'II � � N M i � . ..�� � � � �7 ���T?� � I , , �,j� 3�1 ��28�8 � � M �7�►00� b 13 � Q 14 14 (8)8 i� ` � � 12�3I0) 13 �9) 9 v � � 16(U (IOSA � � � - -- U29)9 � � M IG(99) •( � \ � (109�0 � � (130)10 � �� - Oi) lo a �5(n ° � isU35) � Q o �5(9� (28) 8 -� � � 14(�I , (110)I I o � 14(13� (131)II �O � 14(9� ( f� ,� 10(29) 9 0 � - M � 13(n (ill)12 0 o I3(133) 132A2 - o . 0 13(96) I L 3R0 _ �::.:�:: c�a�� � . - — `;;:.::_ .�:n..:.. :. — � z�c�� I�s6r «� ' �.�. !�as� c7s�� . � . �* Zaa� o ;:� (35)2 0- � ?2� � d'l) 2 � �.::.�"�;.,.,, .. _r,a. v_ � '.�` --- i ._ _ �r 19(85) 7�2 `�' tl' 21(841 . `:. � (36)3 � 2 �, <v--- � rq 21(52 (37) - � � -.y �3 � � � 19\��i 3 m_17 (78)3 � N 29 (�. - 'ar - -S- . �-(1s�8)_ � __� M (8?� (E 20 (38�-Zr N 19 � -=-- r.� � 7 ��.9�: �i18(98) N 16,�8� (79)5 N N I (7 19(� (39)6_� N 18 � N N 17(97) (88)4 ��.-3 ` so) s � T ' i 7.. . �� 18U4 � N 17T N °' '` ��' (40)7 N � �-_- (60� N N 16(96 (89)5 N (t31) 7 � � 16tg0) (7 ^ (n -- � 17�50 (41) 8 � � 16(69 � � N � �'-- A N c V ` (61)7 N � \ 15(14 g N 1 5 n+ \ ,\ N 16(49 (42?9 •�, � 15Z68 (5Z)8 `r '^ � ----a --— �: `� N ` o� I_� (90)7_a � 14 � i �v 14(79) (7 N �5(4 �43)10 N o 1416 . 9 � N+t3(94 � ----I � 8 �7, �o �-- -- . (91) 8_� 13 I I -N 14(4 (44)II � N 13 (63)�� . `�' 12(93 �, -�2-_i ('--- IO 13l46 O 12(65 e'-- -- -� � _ 9_ N (45)12 N o (64)I I o N I I 9?�10' o I I � � 10 13 . - - - -11 -� _ _ e_ / V!1 - \ _ . 2 3 �. r suRv, �oR: HALIER PROP�R.T1E'S ` (01542 t 2�3�� , 1� Prepared By: SCHOELL 8� MADSON, INC. " Engineers • Surveyors . Planners . Soils Testing ' 10b50 Wayzata Boulevard NO 3pH Minnetonka, Mn. 6b343 3 l�.D 5T N. Tel. 546-7601 P�G'�= I'uc.� .7\�� , ...— Meos =12�.35—... .. •o , • � /' '� i. , +\ .� DESCRIPTION: N \ � "Gibbs' First Addition to West �� �`. /': �y m '� ' Lots 22, 23 and 24, Block 3, m �, (� � • • ° .�• Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Minnesota" according to the recorded • m � � I �� r: ' o• . plat thereof. 0.. � �.. ` 0. � 71 � � � � �..\/, .i� � ► �q 4J" • Q � _ � � Q' GENERAL NOTES• I • Pro o s e d ' � a ' 1) • - Denotes iron monument found. � • ,0 �� piv�sion Line °o : � 2) ° - Denotes iron monument set. � n 3) Areas: Gross : 16,253 square feet � � P'f-'� � � a � Parcel A - 7,801 square feet � , � r�� j � , � Parcel B 8,452 square feet ,�.. �� � � •U � 0. ��� d • .j 7"�1 �, ... ... , �z.00�•'' : ._ ����� •.� ... i26.n Ni P . , �..>- 12.00 � � • o: � PROPOSED DESCRIPTIONS N : ' cL n • . � � ar e �� � � Q P�G C/ �� '� � I C • 'N N �o t 2 2 an d t he south 12,00 feet of Lot 23, 81ock 3, "6ibbs' first -N N pp � �� � � � ,' o —�� Addition to West Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Minnesota" • N � N i. , , � i� according to the recorded plat thereof. �� Q v., � � r^ 4 � Q Y� o a� � n i'� � '�� � � a� Q parcel B o.. ,� � . �-� �� : � � �-- � a lot 2�i- and that part of Lot 23 lying north of the south 12.00 feet ,7$•� gp � � � �� l of Lot 23, Block 3, "Gibbs' First Addition to West Minneapolis, „� • � Hennepin County, Minnesota" according to the recorded plat , • • . . Ro�,, Q �a' thereof. . •,i' . . I .... • • Meas.- 126.oo--.... -. I •'�� P 10.-�- = I 2�o.0 7 G�' ° 's I .� � I • G ave I O�;veway J I hereby certify that this survey was prepared under my supervision and that I am a Licensed Land Surveyor under the ws of the State of Minnesota. o Date: April 19, 1990 � � „ Theodore . Kemna z Land Surveyor MN Lic. No. 17006 � CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: Z90-10 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF �PLAT WVR:90-1 WHEREAS, an application for a Waiver of the Platting � Requirements WVR:90-1, made by Haller Properties is recommended for approval. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for Waiver of the Platting Requirements WVRR:90-1 was filed with the City of Hopkins on May 11, 1990. 2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such application on May 29, 1990. 3. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed notices, held a public hearing on May 29, 1990: all persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. � . 4 . That the written comments and analysis of the City Staff and the Planning Commission were considered. _ NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that application for Waiver of Platting Requirements WVR:90-1 is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following Findings of Fact: l. That the new lots meet the minimum requirements for the R-1-A disrict. 2 . That a single family home or a two family home can be constructed on each lot. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for WVR:90-1 is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following Conditions: 1. That the Hennepin County Recorder accepts the Waiver of Plat. Adopted this 29 day of May, 1990. ^ . Toni Richardson, Chair