Loading...
WVR 86-01 --�-� CITY OF HOPKINS Application for: Amendment of Zoning Ordinance Oate: f�- �( -�� Concept Review Conditional Use Permit Case No: �" � Subdivision Approval Variance Fee: �,n , �� Waiver of Platting Requirements �_ " Date Paid:/� d�- �J 1. Street Location of Property: 92�Main Street 2. Legal Description of Property: to be divided: 3. Owner: Name Perkl-Mason Contract Pur- Address Phone chaser 4. Applicants Name: Perkl-Mason Address 14201 Excelsior Blvd. Phone 935-3486 Minnetonka, MN 55345 5. Description of Request: Waiver of plat to divade lot to build building attached to ^ adiacent lot. Zoning District Use 6. Present Proposed 7. Present Proposed B-2 B-2 B-2 B-2 8. Reason for Request to build a building as part of adjacent lot in conjunction with purchase of land. 9. What error, if any, in the existing Ordinance would be corrected by the proposed amendment? (for Zoning Ordinance amendment only) none 10. If request is for a variance, what hardship would justify approval (see 427.04(108) of the Zoning Ordinance) . none 11. Exhibits submitted: f�ap or plat showing the lands proposed to be changed Other ?. Acknowledgement and Signature: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the pen- alties of law, for the purpose of inducing the City of Hopkins to take the action herein requested, that all statements herein are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Hopkins and the laws of the State of Minnesota. � ,,, � y—��`/ ,.��;,;��• �� �.. Signature of Applicant: �- -_ - � Signature of Owner: ��--�� . �`- - �:i��,r___ . � RECORD OF ACTION TAKEN BY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSIOPJ Date: 1/28/86 Application for Waiver of Platting Requirements CASE N0: WVR86-1 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOP1MENDATIONS On the 1g_ day of Januar�r 19�_, the action requested in the foregoing petition was approved (X) disapproved subject to the following conditions: Recommend approval based on Findings of Fact: 1. That the Waiver of the Platting Re ire- ments will form two conforming lots, that the building as propo d may be bui on proposed lot, said lots conform to al] requirements of ordinance on t t said Waiver be approved subject to approval of Chairman: CITY COUNCIL ACTION Approved X Denied by the Council this 4 day of February 1986 Approved with following amendment:. qPProved as recommended by Zoning & Planning Commission � �� � Clerk: � , -�.� Following to be filled in by City Action of City Officials Chronolo Date B Rec'd by Bldg Dept. � Published by Bldg Dept. On Pl . Comm. Agenda 1 28/86 t JK � Pl . Comm. Postponement ; � , � � � i I ' , �P1 . Corrm. Action ; 1/28/86 � JK Recanmend approval as stated above. I i ; ' I �On Council Agenda ` 2 4 86 JK � � ' I j 1 ;Council Postponement ; ; ! � ' I � � � ` i , Council Action j 2/4/86 � JK � Approved as recommended by Zoning & Planning � i Resolution No. 86-1 i � NOTE: A Conditional Use Permit shall expire one year after it has been issued unless the use for which the permit has been 9ranted is in effect, except that, upon written applica[ion of the owner of the effected land for which the permit was granteA prior to the end of said year may request and the Council may grant an extension not to exceed one year. T _ _.. _ _-�-- --____--._. �--.^ - ---- -- -- ----_._- _ —_ —..__ , --- -----�_ .,–� CITY OF HOPKINS Nennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION N0. 86-12 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF PLATTING REQUIREMENTS WVR86-1 WNEREAS, an application for a Waiver of the Platting Requirements has been made by Perkl/Mason, 921 Mainstreet, to divide said lot for addition to building attached to adjacent lot. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows : 1. That an application for Waiver of Platting Requirements WVR86-1 was filed with the City of Hopkins on December 26, 1985. 2. That the Hopkins Planning Comnission reviewed such application on January 28, 1986. 3. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed notices , held a public hearing on January 28, 1986; all persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. ^ 4. That the written comments and analysis of the City Staff and the Planning Corm�ission were considered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hopkins City Council makes the following Findings of Fact in respect to WUR86-1 : 1. That the Waiver of the Platting Requirements will form two conforming lots. 2. That the building as proposed may be built on the proposed lot. 3. That the proposed lots conform to all requirements of the City' s zoning ordinance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for Waiver of Platting Require- ments is hereby approved subject to the following condition: � 1. Said Waiver be approved subject to approval of the Hennepin County Recorder. — Adopted this 4th day of February 1986. E en Lavin,• Mayor � .,,� -,�,x;: .,. , _ . ,,,,�. �-- . -,�..::, _ �► ` �' I �� ;,ty .^ - _ � , �' - __� CITY OF HOPKIIVS . ��: A .. . . �n".:�`��"(:5)l.._�...... . . ^ WAIVER OF PLATTING REQUIREMENTS 921 MAINSTREET PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT N0. WVR86-1 JANUARY 16, 1986 PURPOSE: To review and recommend action on a waiver of the platting requirements to divide the lot at 921 Mainstreet. BACKGROUND: Nature of Request: To divide a single lot of approximately 3640 square feet into two separate lots of approximately 1782 and 1858 square feet. Name of Applicant: Bob Mason Address of Property: 921 hlainstreet Present Zoning: B-2 Reason for Request: To build a building as part of adjacent lot in conjunction with purchase of land. � The applicant is proposing to divide a single parcel of land into two separate parcels at the current site of Preferred Travel . The applicant was approved for a Conditional Use Permit for construction on this site and the adjoining property and a variance to locate the building one foot from the lot line at the trash dumpster. A B-2 district does not have a minimum lot area, however, there is a minimum lot width of 20 feet, which both lots will have. The applicant will have access to the subject property from the alley. It has been usual policy for the Commission to grant a waiver of the plat on a single division provided the lots created are legal and with approval contingent upon acceptance by Hennepin County Recorder of the division. ANALYSIS: The applicant has requested a waiver of the plat to construct a building in conjunction with the building on the adjacent lot. The proposed lots will com- ply with the minimum lot requirements for a B-2 district. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend approval of the waiver of the platting requirements based on the fact that two conforming lots will be created. The following findings of fact are suggested should the commission recommend approval : Resol�ation recommending approval 1. That the waiver of the plat will form two conforming lots 2. That the building as proposed may be built on the proposed lot 3. That the proposed lots conform to all requirements of the City' s --� ,� zoning ordinance. , � � � �!I►lt��!I�L�YI Nancy S. Anderson � Community Development Analyst