Loading...
ZN 95-07 CITY OF HOPKINS ^ ZONING APPLICATION S _ARY FORM — Application Number Z��'�� _� P .I .D .�`: Applicant ' s Name (Last , First ) Owner (if other than applicant) C�,`�T'�1 ��c`��� al '� Mailing Address (Street , City, State , Zip Code) I c ���> ��`r��t���t-r N G�`�}�� Phone Number: (Day) (Evening) Property Address APPLICABLE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT( S) TYPE OF ZONING REQIIEST [ J R-1-A [ ] R-2 [ 1 B-1 [ ] Concept Review [ ] R-1-B [ ] R-3 [ ] B-2 [ ] Conditional IIse Permit [ ] R-1 -C [ ] R-u [ ] B-3 [ ] Variance [ ] R-1 -D [ ] R-5 [ � I-1 [ 1 Zoning District Change [� R-1 -E [ ] R-6 [ ] I-2 [ ] Subdivision Approval J [�] Ordinance AmendmentZ��Ir1�'~Ty���- 1 ��� [ ] Other I hereby certify with my signature that all data contained herein as well as all supporting data are true and correct to the best oP my knowledge : Applicants Signature Date Owners Signature Date ADMINISTRATIVE DATA �SIIMMARY c �:'C [ ] Proper addendum to application Application received : �- �,�- �-� [ ] Detailed plans submitted [ ] Written pro�ect description submitted Fee Paid : Referred to City PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Engineer: Approved : X without modifications Referred to City [ ] with modifications Attorney Denied [ ] Referred to Watershed District Date • � �� � �� Date of Public Hearing Notice � �� � �51� COUNCIL ACTION Date of Public ?� t, �' ��oved : � without modifications Hearing �J 7l, �S [ J with modifications Deuied : [ ] Date : l�� U �IS RESOLUTION N0: ��j �`t� � T Y O G .c� _ ti 5 May 22, 1995 ° p K � � Planning Report ZN95-7 REZONING-AREA BETWEEN TYLER AND 169 Proposed Action. Staff recommends the following motion. Move to ap�rove Resolution RZ95-13 recommendin�approval of Ordinance 95-768 that will rezone the area between Hi�hway 169 and Tvler Avenue. Overview. In an effort to reduce the number of potential multi-family units within the City, the Planning Commission has previously undertaken a process of amending the Comprehensive Plan to reflect new goals for the City regarding multi-family sites. One of the goals in the Strategic Plan for Economic Development specifies for Staff to review the potential multi-family sites and recommend changes. In conjunction with this process, the Planning Commission has also reviewed several sites in the City that are either zoned or guided for multi-family to determine if a change is appropriate. One of the areas identified previously by the Staff and the Zoning and Planning Commission to be changed is the residential area between Tyler and Highway 169. This property is currently zoned R-2, Low Density Multiple Family. The majority of the uses are single and two family ^ homes. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Low Density Residential. Staff is proposing amending the zoning for this property to R-1-A, Single and Two-Family High Density and R-1-C, Single Family Medium Density. This change will allow the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance to be in agreement for the future reuse of this property. Primarv Issues to Consider. o How is the area currently zoned? o What has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject area? o What types of uses are in this area? o What notification has the neighborhood received? o What has the Planning Commission previously recommended for the site? o Why is the Staff recommending a change? o What is the impact of this change? Supporting Documents. o Analysis of Issues o Resolution RZ95-13 o Ordinance 95-768 Nancy . derson, AICP ... Planner ZN 95-7 -- Page 2 Primarv Issues to Consider. o How is the area currently zoned? The zoning of the area is R-2, Low Density Multiple Family. This zoning would allow two-family dwellings, two to four family dwellings, and townhomes. Approximately 435 units could be added with the existing zoning. o What has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Low Density Residential, which basically corresponds to the existing land uses in the area. o What types of uses are in this area? This area consists of single and two-family homes. o What notification has the neighborhood received? The parcels to be rezoned and all parcels within 350 feet of the parcels to be rezoned were notified of the proposed rezoning and of the public hearing at the May 30, 1995, Zoning and ^ Planning meeting. A public hearing notice was also published in the paper. o What has the Planning Commission previously recommended for the site? In a previous discussion of the area, the Planning Commission recommended that the areas be rezoned to R-1-A and R-1-C. o Why is the Staff recommending a change? The Staff is recommending a rezoning to R-1-A and R-1-C. The Staff is recommending amending the Zoning Ordinance in order to maintain the single and two-family homes in the area. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this area as low density residential. The Strategic Plan has also recommended that various multi-family sites be reviewed within the City and that amendments be made to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance to preserve the single-family homes within Hopkins. o What is the impact of this change? The areas that will be zoned R-1-C are all single family homes, and now they will become conforming uses in this area. The area that will be rezoned to R-1-A is single family and two- family homes and will also become conforming uses. � ZN 95-7 -- Page 3 Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the zoning amendment. By recommending approval of the zoning amendment, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the zoning amendment. By recommending denial of the zoning amendment, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the Planning Commission considers this option, findings of fact will have to be stated that support the alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. � � � �` CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ95-13 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECONIMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, an application for a rezoning, ZN95-7, has been made by the City of Hopkins; and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows. 1. That an application for Ordinance Amendment ZN95-7 was made by the City of Hopkins on Apri128, 1995. 2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on May 30, 1995; all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard. 3. That the written comments and analysis of the City Staffwere considered. ^ NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Ordinance Amendment ZN95-7 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact. 1. That a goal in the City of Hopkins Strategic Plan for Economic Development is to review the multi-family zoned and guided property. 2. That the City has undertaken a detailed analysis of multi-family zoned and/or guided sites in Hopkins, including the subject site. 3. That the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance is consistent with the goals/policies in the Comprehensive Plan including: o The City will work to provide an overall mixture of residential land use in the City. o The City will work to correct the disproportional amount of multiple family land uses within the City. o The City will work to provide a balance of land uses within the City. o The City will seek to provide housing opportunities for people in all segments of the life cycle. 4. That the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance is consistent with the future land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan for the property in question. Adopted this 30th day of May, 1995. ,-. Dan Johnson, Chairperson � CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 95-768 AN ORDINANCE REZOI�TING THE AREA BETWEEN TYLER AND HIGHWAY 169 BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Hopkins as follows. That the present zoning classification of R-2, Low Density Multiple Family, upon the following described premises is hereby repealed, and in lieu thereof the said premises is hereby zoned as R-1-C, Single Family Medium Density. Lots 1-11 Block 1 Campbell Third Addition Lots 1-3 Block 2 Campbell Third Addition Lots 1-7 Block 3 Campbell Third Addition Lots 1-5 Block 4 Campbell Third Addition Outlot No. 1 Campbell Third Addition, beginning at a point on south line of north 1/2 of northwest 1/4 distance 1214.03 feet west from southeast corner thereof thence north at right angles 200 feet thence west at right angles to east line of ^ Great Northern Railroad right-of-way thence southwesterly along said right-of-way line to south line of north 1/2 of northwesterly 1/4 thence east to beginning excluding road 18-24 Block 1 Stevens Oakwood Park Lots 1-9 Block 1 Stevens Oakwood Park That the present zoning classification of R-2, Low Density Multiple Family, upon the following described premises is hereby repealed, and in lieu thereof the said premises is hereby zoned as R-1-A, Single Family High Density. The south 72 feet of west 133 feet Lot 17 Block 1 Stevens Oakwood Park The south 36 feet of west 133 feet of lot 16 and the north 36 feet of west 133 feet of Lot 17 Block 1 Stevens Oakwood Park The north 72 feet of west 133 feet Lot 16 Block 1 Stevens Oakwood Park Lots 1-3 Turngren's Addition Lots 1-6 Monroe Place Addition Outlot 1 including adjacent vacated street Turngren's Addition Lots 1-6 Block 1 Meath's Addition Lots 1-5 Block 1 Lenher Terrace Lots 1-4 Block 2 Meath's Addition Lots 9 & 10 Block 1 Meath's Addition Lots 1-7 Block 2 Stevens Oakwood Park .—. Lots 16-24 Block 2 Stevens Oakwood Park ^ That the presently existing Hopkins Zoning Map adopted as part of Hopkins Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended and changed in accordance with the above provision. First Reading: June 6, 1995 Second Reading: June 20, 1995 Date of Publication: June 28, 1995 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: July 18, 1995 Charles D. Redepenning, Mayor ATTEST: James A. Genellie, City Clerk ^ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Signature Date ---. .h�' � � �'� � / '8� �.�- � , (37I (34) I ' 725 � / = RD 425 � L�4 KE ST � —� . � 2oe � �� � icsu �UR �GR N 9M A3 '�S s — — — — -- i NE. �� � /3J � I � O � � f 2 (9613 (22� 4 QS- 509-I /3-15 /07-/50 �� c�2� � � � zcs2� qD . � -9 _ 6 � 50/3 HADYSIDE , . � 15) �� ►� 3(63) O/- 4/ � 5D2- 5 /0-l� l4-/ (,� ,� '? , b 13 = (74} Cr ^� MONROE Qi� 5 s sos �2 � � 2 ' h � 225 229 . M 4(64) 402 40 4/4 �0) � (I) � � � I 1, . 6 � , �+ � 5(65) . U8) 2a �3 4 �,() g (3) �N � C/RCLE N., � I M� c19� czo tz�� c�2) �13) 5 . 22s so 34 Q , �s s io �4� _ OA.K PAf,�K L N. " � ��72� 6 �7�� o,� �oo 09 4 M N �40� � R EG \ (33) � , ; � � � ' � SUNNYS/�DE LA. ^ 16 9 "' 1 PROPOSED � � ---�gz,_ .. N 502-506- 5/O- 5/4- ., I �'7 ; (105) 17 (T3) o � .�4 3B 2/2 Il6 . ���I N (106) �o � (17) (16� -(15? (14) o �7 (31) i (30) 2, �° ' 2/9 �� � �C 9169) �--- -- -fI51 .�. ►o �43 CIRCLC J, v o IOCTO) I 2/6 220 224 228 232 Q � � �� P�O P O S E D ►) � M 18�' (44) �29� 7 � 5 4 3 ` 2 1 � ►� I 1�71) � -,--.��v�'�� h�`�'__ � - _ - � N �80� R_ 1 A �65� N N pF�OPOSED � Q (86) � l85) (84) (83) (82) � �g � . � (66) �r ` N � 1- - ----• I � (81). wv v� - - - - - �Yal- - � (83)►o• (63) N (103) M N (85) (84)N�O N(62) 64 (57) � N 20 R� 1 —C 1041 N — —c� - -� . � `88�) 21 � � (60) (5F) N N � 21 (48� (26) 4 � / /� (93) c�, (89) N cV (59) cv � N N � N ��o�� W � --� ----- � (91) (90) N � N � 22 (25? � � / � ` 3 I 2 _ M N Q ` --- � �l - - - - -I . / / . . 23 (100) �� (99) 2 O h (50) 23 I (98) 2 • � � � ( � N I I / -- - - - - --- - V - - N - - - - - -- - - - - -� - - - - - -- - - � ' EG333 �24 � I �. 24 I � � - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — /--- ' -- — — -- � ( . � ( � �_ `.