ZN 95-08 CITY OF HOPKINS
^ ZONING APPLICATION
S �RY FORM
— � Application Number ���1� .C�
P .I .D .�k:
Applicant ' s Name (Last , First ) Owner (if other than applicant)
"t\i (`� ��t�l���
Mailing Address (Street , City, State , Zip Code)
Il��l`�� �-��t��� `�t�r�� �����'1
Phone Number: (Day) (Evening)
Property Address
APPLICABLE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT(S) TYPE OF ZONING REQIIEST
[ ] R-1-A [ 7 R-2 [ ] B-1 [ ] Concept Review
[ ] R-1-B [ ] R-3 [ ] B-2 [ ] Conditional IIse Permit
j ] R-1 -C [ ] R-� [ ] B-3 [ ] Variance
[ ] R-1 -D [ ] R-5 C l I-1 L ] Zoning District Change
[�..]� R-1 -E [ 1 R-6 C � I-Z [ ] Subdivision Approval � � y��j^
[X] Ordinance Amendment � 'Z-�--�f��� ` �u'
[ ] Other ��
I hereby certiPy with my signature that all data
contained herein as well as all supporting data
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge :
Applicants Signature Date
Owners Signature Date
ADMINISTRATIVE DATA �SUMMARY
�(� J
[ ] Proper addendum to application Application received : ����v� '�I�J
[ ] Detailed plans submitted
[ ] Written pro�ect description submitted Fee Paid :
Referred to City
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Engineer:
Approved : Y without modifications Referred to City
[ ] with modifications Attorney
Denied [ ] Referred to Watershed
District
Date : �=� � �� - t �� Date of Public f�
Hearing Notice �� '��"�V
COUNCIL ACTION Date of Public
P '��oved : without modifications Hearing J J�����
[ ] with modifications
Dt.,ied : [ ]
Date : `t� l4 �1�1 RESOLUTION N0: C�Cj "�"I
\ t Y O
G �`
-�
y 5
May 22, 1995 ° P K � � Planning Report ZN95-8
REZONING/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE
Pronosed Action.
Staff recommends the following motion. Move to approve Resolution RZ95-14
recommendin�approval of Ordinance 95-767 that will rezone the part of the bowling a11eX
parkin� lot from R-2, Low Density Multiple Familv to R-1-B, Single Family Hi�h DensitX
and amend the Comprehensive Plan from Commercial to Low Densitv Residential for the west
side of 20th Avenue.
Overview.
In an effort to reduce the number of potential multi-family units within the City, the Planning
Commission has previously undertaken a process of amending the Comprehensive Plan to
reflect new goals for the City regarding multi-family sites. One of the goals in the Strategic
Plan for Economic Development details for Staffto review the potential multi-family sites and
recommend changes. In conjunction with this process, the Planning Commission has also
reviewed several sites in the City that are either zoned or guided for multi-family to determine
if a change is appropriate.
One of the areas identified previously by the Staff and the Zoning and Planning Commission to
^ be changed is the residential area between 17th Avenue and 20th Avenue, south of Mainstreet.
This property is in the process of being rezoned to R-1-B. There is a small part of the
bowling alley parking lot that was not included in the rezoning of the area that is zoned R-2,
Low Density Multiple Family, this small area is the area to be rezoned
The Comprehensive Plan designates the area on the west side of 20th Avenue as commercial.
Staff is proposing to change the property along 20th Avenue to Low Density Residential in
the Comprehensive Plan. This change will allow the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning
Ordinance to be in agreement as relates to the future reuse of this property. The residential
area to the east is designated as Low Density Residential.
Primarv Issues to Consider.
o How is the area currently zoned?
o What has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject area?
o What types of uses are in this area?
o What notification has the neighborhood received?
o What has the Planning Commission previously recommended for the site?
o Why is the Staff recommending a change?
o What is the impact of this change?
Supporting Documents.
o Analysis of Issues
^ o Resolution RZ95-14
o Ordinance 95-767
�` � � f
Nancy S. derson, AICP
Planner
ZN 95-8
--_ Page 2
Primarv Issues to Consider.
o How is the site currently zoned?
The zoning of the property is R-2, Medium Density Multiple Family. This zoning would
allow two-family dwellings, two-four family dwellings, and townhomes.
o What has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site?
The Comprehensive Plan has designated the area on the west side of 20th Avenue as
Commercial, which does not correspond to the existing land uses in the area.
o What types of uses are in this area?
This area consists of mostly single family homes and the bowling alley parking lot.
o What notification has the neighborhood received?
The owners of the properties and all the owners of the parcels within 350 feet of the area to
be rezoned and the Comprehensive Plan amended were notified of the proposed changes and
of the public hearing at the May 30 Zoning and Planning meeting. A public hearing notice
� was also published in the paper.
o What has the Planning Commission previously recommended for the site?
In a previous discussion of the area, the Planning Commission recommended that the site be
rezoned to R-1-A, Single and Two-Family High Density and that the Comprehensive Plan is
amended from Commercial to Low Density Residential. The Planning Commission has since
recommended that the abutting area is rezoned to R-1-B.
o Why is the Staff recommending a change?
The Staff is recommending a rezoning to R-1-B. This zoning is the same as the proposed
rezoning for the area between 17th and 20th. The Comprehensive Plan change will make the
area consistent with the zoning.
The Staff is recommending amending the Zoning Ordinance in order to maintain the single and
two-family homes in the area. The Strategic Plan has also recommended that various
multi-family sites be reviewed within the City and that amendments be made to the
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance to preserve the single-family homes within
Hopkins.
o What is the impact of this change?
' The bowling alley parking lot will remain a parking lot. If in the future this use is
discontinued, the parking lot will be zoned for single family homes. The Comprehensive Plan
change will make the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning consistent.
ZN 95-8
,...� Page 3
Alternatives
1. Recommend approval of the zoning amendment. By recommending approval of the zoning
amendment, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval.
2. Recommend denial of the zoning amendment. By recommending denial of the zoning
amendment, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the Planning
Commission considers this option, findings of fact will have to be stated that support the
alternative.
3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further
information is needed, the item should be continued.
�
��
' 2 _' ' � 14b1 AI rU �
� ! � � � 17 I- -�= 8 17 O O` 16�45) (I72�15 �
- � -- - - (g7)- _'O I 6�66� (65) 15 � � � - - - �
� � 1 16 �ST STREET _
� a, �. 3104� � �
` \\ , `JIO) (89) �_ � � -3-N2-� - - - � 30(14 &`� - -
1 i � A(q � 30 103)2 � _ - - �
1 ---_ (9(�-aror � 2g02Q 3 � 29 Q24) 3 M
1 i � 6 (2) �IT- � �- -- ft84'�4 ,- � 28(142) 12� 4 �
4 -
� �r � ��� � � 27� (105) 5 27(141) _ •
\ � (92) 5 „� v� � o� 26(I (126) 6 �
1 � i ,� � (4)I (93) fi .� h 26019) (106)6 ti � �
",` - --
1 1 � � E(5) � 7 _ _ (107) 7 � ��� 25(139) _ _7 � C
� h F (6)I I(94)_8 N � � 2�18) �108)8 � � _ _ _ _ 12� 8 N �
, 1 � N g_ � � 2 3 (1 0 9) 9 � c� 23(!38 028) 9 O
. I N G �) O � 2 2(1 1 7)� 1 0 `� 22(13 (129)10
. ,� ) h H(S) �95) 10 - - - -
(9 6) I I � � h 21 I I �b • o> 21 (130) I I �
OI (97) 12 � (175)2 0 � ��12 _ 20�I36 (131) 12 �
i � �
�� 2� I I (I�;•1I � 114) �I I�I12� III)� �35# 13
19�18 I 16�15 � 14�13 19 18I 17 16 15I 14I13 19i 18I17 16 15I �13��3
� � � � � � B2 B/ l�0/
(56) �� I L�OJI/ I /9 I90 � _
/Y/H!/VJ���
" 2oi2 B� 4� '2 �
� I II2I3 4I5I 7
I i(20 �21)I 2
(69) g � � �
^ � 17(33) �24) 8 �
�16 R POSED "�QW h �6�32� 25 9
� ) �
�� � S TY RESIDENTIAL ' . .� N 15(31) (zg) 10 � ( � ��
(18) 3 � _� N �V
� � �
(19) 4 Q N 1 4(30) �27)�I Q �
�
5
(15� 86) F � A (2) p � 13�29) �8) 12 m n
�20) 6 - - - "�
- - 7 0 �85) E p B (83) (3) �
I s t S TREET -
- 8 � (84) D p ` � - (4) O O �4(75) (62) � p �
� �
O
�) 9 � ; o (14) (5) � O 13�4� (63) 2 o p
ED ,�, '� , ,
,�o c� , _
Q ` � h A(76) (6) � � h .12(73) (64)3 N � �
(23) II � � � l �
(,� - � � _B(77) (87) � � r,� \ ^ -
���
(79) A � -�� � � N I 1�72) (65) 4 m (� \
� N- D�78) (7) N \ -
�80) N � N 10(71) �66) 5 ti N
. (17) C � M (13) (8) N � � �
� \ N ,� 9(70) (67) 6 � i
_ � \ (18) (81) E �' O '`� �12) (9) \ � - -
� �V
h 8(69) �68) 7 � h
h (II) (10) n�j � M �
PROPQSED P \ \
DENSITY RESID ROA D No 3
ENTIAL
-- CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO: RZ95-14
RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOA�IlVIENDING
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, an application for a rezoning and Comprehensive Plan change, ZN95-8, has been
made by the City of Hopkins; and
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows.
1. That an application for Ordinance Amendment and Comprehensive Plan change ZN95-8
was made by the City of Hopkins on April 28, 1995.
2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a
public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on May 30, 1995; all
persons present were given an opportunity to be heard.
—� 3. That the written comments and analysis of the City Staff were considered.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Ordinance Amendment and
Comprehensive Plan change ZN95-8 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following
Findings of Fact.
1. That a goal in the City of Hopkins Strategic Plan for Economic Development is to review
the multi-family zoned and guided property.
2. That the City has undertaken a detailed analysis of multi-family zoned and/or
guided sites in Hopkins, including the subject site.
3. That the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan
change is consistent with the goals/policies in the Comprehensive Plan including:
o The City will work to provide an overall mixture of residential land use in the City.
o The City will work to correct the disproportional amount of multiple family land
uses within the City.
o The City will work to provide a balance of land uses within the City.
o The City will seek to provide housing opportunities for people in all segments of
the life cycle.
4. That the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive
Plan will be consistent with the future land use for the property in question.
^ Adopted this 30th day of May, 1995.
Dan Johnson, Chairperson
,, CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 95-767
AN ORDINANCE REZOI�TING THE EAST SIDE OF THE BOWLING
ALLEY PARKING LOT
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Hopkins as follows.
That the present zoning classification of R-2, Low Density Multiple Family, upon the
following described premises is hereby repealed, and in lieu thereof the said premises is hereby
zoned as R-1-B, Single Family High Density.
Except for the most westerly 220 feet thereof, as measured from the center line of Shady Oak
Road, the following described parcel: That part of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter
of Section 23, Township 117, Range 22 described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner
of Tract A Registered Land Survey Number 610; thence west along the north line to the
northwest corner thereof; thence south along the west line thereof 113 feet; thence west parallel
with the westerly extension of the south line of said Tract A to the west line of the southeast
quarter of the southeast quarter of said section 23; thence north along the west line thereof a
distance of 388 feet; thence east 168 feet; thence south 90 feet; thence east to the west line of
20th Avenue South; thence south along the west line thereof to the point of beginning except
^ road.
That the presently existing Hopkins Zoning Map adopted as part of Hopkins Zoning
Ordinance is hereby amended and changed in accordance with the above provision.
First Reading: June 6, 1995
Second Reading: June 20, 1995
Date of Publication: June 28, 1995
Date Ordinance Takes Effect: July 18, 1995
Charles D. Redepenning, Mayor
ATTEST:
James A. Genellie, City Clerk
� APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney Signature Date