The URL can be used to link to this page

05-29-2012 MAY JUNE MEMBERS S M T W T F S S M T W T F S u� EF � ZNIA �� 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 �F SHER �TTA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LARD ,�IRTH 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 KERSSEN ?NDERSON 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 27 28 2� 30 31 24 25 �6 27 28 29 30 AGENDA ZONING & PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, May 29, 2012 REGULAR MEETING 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS ----------------------------------------------------- � ITEM: Approve and sign minutes of the April 24, 2012, regular meeting. �� COMMISSION ACTION: r7� \f1 �G'`vp� _/ / / / CASE NO. SUBD12-1 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT FOR 249 INTERLACHEN ROAD Public Public Hearing to consider a preliminary/final plat at 249 Inteilachen Road Hearing �`I � COMMISSION ACTION: OCt� M �� CASE NO. CUP12-1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 643 13TH AVENUE SOUTH Public Public Hearing to consider a conditional use permit to operate a storage lot at Hearing 643 13th Avenue South � COMMISSION ACTION: G�I �n�� / / / / '�� :�1 �� . :, � AGENDA �� ZONING & PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 CASE NO. SPR12-1 SITE PLAN REVIEW- 415 17TH AVENUE NORTH Public Public Heariilg to considei the iedevelopment of the former Mayon Hearing Building at 415 17th Avenue North COMMISSION ACTION: � � � � CASE NO. ZN12-1 REZONING PUD - 415 17TH AVENUE NORTH Public Public Heaiing to consider a Planned Unit Development overlay for the Hearing redevelopment of the former Mayon Building at 415 17th Avenue North COMMISSION ACTION: � � � � � CASE NO. ZCR12-3 CONCEPT REVIEW- THE BLAKE SCHOOL Consideration of a concept for the area west of Blake School on Harrison Ave ITEM: ELECTION OF OFFICERS ITEM: REPRESENTATIVE TO UPDATE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNMENT --� i� ZONING AND PLANNING COPZn1ISSION MINUTES April 24, 2012 A regular meeting of the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, April 24, 2012, at 6:30 p.m. in the Counci] Chainbers of Hopkins City Hall. Present were Coininission inembers Doug Datta, Andrew Fisher, Andrea Naef, Jennifer Allard, Scott Kerssen and Charles Firth. Coinmission member Aaron Kuznia was absent. Also present was staff inember Nancy Anderson. CALL TO ORDER Ms. Naef called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Firth moved and Mr. Fisher seconded the motion to approve the minutes of the March 27, 2012, regular meeting. The inotion was approved unanimously. �-. ITEM: PLANNING EXERCISE—COTTAGEVILLE PARK The Coininission worked on the various exercises for designing Cottageville Park. ADJOURN Mr. Kerssen moved and Mr. Datta seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. MEMBERS � ATTEST: Andrea Naef, Vice Chair � GITY Q� �� NOPKINS May 22, 2012 Planning Report SUBD12-1 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT—249 INTERLACHEN ROAD Proposed Action Staff recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution RZ12-1, recommending ��roval of a preliininarv/final plat at 249 Interlachen Road. Overview Paul Swanson, the applicant, owns 249 Interlachen Road and the vacant lots to the south. Mr. Swanson is proposing to coinbine the southerly lots and divide the vacant lots fi•om the lot with his hoine and create a buildable lot. Mr. Swanson owns Lots 12 through 15, part of Lot 16 and part of the vacated Interurban Street. The area that abuts Maple Hill Road will be an outlot and unbuildable. At tlus ti�ne there are no building plans. Any new house that is constructed will have to comply with requirements of the R-1-C zoning district. Utilities are available from Interlachen Road. � Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has tlie Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • Do the lots meet the zoning requirements? • What are the specifics of the plat? • Does the proposed plat meet the subdivision requirements? • Will a park dedication fee be required? SuAnortin�Documents • Analysis of Issues • Preliminary/Final Plat • Resolution RZ 12-1 � } ,s� � °�� Nancy . Anderson, AICP City Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: �--� Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: �� i� �� i ti . � SUBD12-1 Page 2 Primarv Issues to Consider • VVhat is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property is R-1-C, Single Family Medium Density. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this site as Residential. The proposed use will coinply with both documents. • Do the lots meet the zoning requirements? A lot in the R-1-C zoning district is required to have a minimum size of 12,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 80 feet. The proposed Lot 1 will be 142.50 feet in width and 18,778 square feet. The proposed Lot 2 will be approxiinately 123 feet in width and 21,849 square feet. • What are the speci�cs of the plat? When the property is replatted there will be three lots. The northerly lot, Lot 1, will have the existing house and the southerly lot, Lot 2, will be a vacant lot with the ability to construct a ^ new house. The area abutting Maple Hill Road will be the third lot, Outlot A, and will be unbuildable. • Does the proposed plat meet the subdivision requirements? The plat, as proposed, meets the subdivision requirements. • Will a park dedication fee be required? A park dedication fee will be required because an additional lot will be created. Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the preliminary plat/final plat. By recommending a�proval of the preliminary/final plat, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Recoimnend denial of the preliininary/final plat. By recominending denial of the preliminary/final plat, the City Council will consider a reconunendation of denial. If the Plaruling Coinmission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further infoi7nation. If the Planning Conunission indicates that further � infonnation is needed, the itein should be continued. CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota � RESOLUTION NO: RZ12-1 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT FOR 249 1NTERLACHEN ROAD WHEREAS, an application for a preliminary/final plat SUBD12-1 has been submitted by Paul Swanson; WHEREAS, tl�e procedural liistory of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for preliminary/final plat was submitted by Paul Swanson on April 26, 2012; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on May 29, 2012: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and 3. That the written coinments and analysis of City staff were considered. � 4. Legal description of the parcel is as follows: Parcel 1: Lots 12 to 15 inclusive and; That part of Lot 16 lying North of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the East boundary line of said Lot 16, 45 feet South of the Northeast coi-ner thereof; thence West to a point in the West line of said Lot 16, 45 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof; that part of vacated Interurban Street adjoining said Lot 15 lying between the Southerly extensions of the East And West lines of said Lot 15; Block 12 "F. A. Savage's Interlachen Park." Parcel 2: Outlot D, The Blake School. Parcel 3: That part of the abandoned right-of-way of the Minneapolis and St. Paul Suburban Railroad in the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29, Tov,�nship 117, Range 21, lying between the Easterly and Westerly boundary lines, extended Southerly across said Right-of-way, of Lot 15, Block 12, F. A. Savage's Interlachen Park. Parcel 4: That part of the Abandoned Minneapolis St. Paul Suburban Railroad Right-of-Way � located in the Northwest Quarter of Section 29, Township 117 N, Range 21 W, lying West of the West line of Block 12, F.A. Savage's lnterlachen Park, extended South across said Right-of-Way. r� NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for a preliininary/final plat SUBD12-1 is hereby recoirunended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: l. That the preliininary/final plat ineets the subdivision requirements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for preliminary/final plat SUBD12-1 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following condition: 1. That the a}�plicant must provide current evidence of title, in the fonll of a commitment for title insurance, to the City Attorney. 2. That the applicant pay the Attorney's fee for title review. Adopted this 29th day of May 2012. ^ Aaron Kuznia, Chair /� a!0 H- w . A A ma OF SATHREMERGMISTINIC i i Rpm !PION HUM 1. all 1 1 Sol wg oil bin lug Hen 2 111.1-1-"" 1111111111111-11 111-1--l-111 ........... .......... ma OF SATHREMERGMISTINIC i i Rpm 1 ,IPA -14 i x 00 -11' 411--. WAYZATA, MN55391 (9 52) 476-600 160 SOUTH BROADWAY 01 Q�l 16 1z ti- .. . . . . . . AN is d r !PION HUM 1. all 1 1 Sol wg oil bin lug Hen 2 111.1-1-"" 1111111111111-11 111-1--l-111 ........... .......... ma OF SATHREMERGMISTINIC i i Rpm 1 ,IPA x WAYZATA, MN55391 (9 52) 476-600 160 SOUTH BROADWAY 01 Q�l 1z .. . . . . . . . . . . ..... .. EA. 1 119 Hug ;Rug H 1 Hoge! 1 too; le OR M IN O no h I ilH 11 al; Ell jai 1 y� 11-0 SEE "I ... ............. _', ........ 111-1--, 111.1-1-"" 1111111111111-11 111-1--l-111 ........... .......... ma OF SATHREMERGMISTINIC i i Rpm 1 ,IPA x WAYZATA, MN55391 (9 52) 476-600 160 SOUTH BROADWAY 01 1z .. . . . . . . G1T �' Or �� HOPKINS May 21, 2012 Planning Report CUP12-1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — CONTRACTOR'S YARD Proposed Action Staff recominends the follo��ing inotion: Move to adopt Resolution RZ12-2. recoimnendin� approval of a conditional use�ernlit to operate a contractor's yard at 643-13th Avenue South. Overview Blue Hat Properties, a landscaping coinpany, owns 643-13t'' Avenue South and the adjoining vacant site. They are proposing to use the vacant site to store the landscaping inaterials. The landscaping materials will be items such as wood, stone, clay, glass products, building and landscaping supplies. The access to the site will be from 13th Avenue. The site is zoning I-1, Industrial, and requires a conditional use pennit for a contractor's yard. The site is sun-ounded Uy industrial uses. � Primary Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Coinprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • What are the conditions for a open sales lots and open storage? • How does the proposed lot comply with the above requirements? Supportin�Documents • Analysis of Issues • Site Plans • Resolution RZ12-2 � ' � Nanc . Anderson, AICP City Planner Financial Iinpact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): '� Notes: �� i� �� i , . � . � CUP 12-l Page 2 Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The subject property is zoned I-1, Industrial. The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Industrial. The proposed use complies with both documents. • What are the conditions for a open sales lots and open storage? 540.03. Conditional uses: I district. The following uses are pennitted conditional uses in I districts: g) Open sales lots and open storage provided: 1. the lot is graded and surfaced according to a plan submitted and approved by the city engineer that will adequately provide for drainage and dust control; 2. that the storage on such lot be so organized that a space of 15 feet of vehicular accessible open space remain between storage area with such areas not to exceed 40 feet in width; ^ 3. that the height of such open storage shall not exceed 15 feet; 4. that the storage area shall be fenced in such a way as to screen from the street right-of- way. 5. that the storage area shall be landscaped and maintained according to a plan submitted and approved; and 6. that a side yard setback is required for fences that abut a right-of-way 50 feet or inore in width. The setback shall be the required setback for a building in said Industrial district. • How does the proposed lot comply with the above requirements? The following comply with the requirements: 1. The surface of the lot is an assortment of asphalt, gravel and concrete. The grade of the lot will not change. 2. The storage will be organized so that it will be around the side of the site. 3. The applicant has stated that the stored material will not be higher than 15 feet. 4. The applicant will construct a fence at least six feet in height around the entire site. 5. The applicant has submitted a plan that is attached regarding the storage of the inaterials. 6. The site does not abut a side yard. --� Alternatives l. Recoininend approval of the conditional use pernlit to operate a contractor's yard. By recommending approval of the conditional use penllit, the City Council will consider a � CUP 12-1 �� Page 3 recoimnendation of approvaL � 2. Recoimnend denial of the conditional use pennit. By recoininending denial of the conditional use pennit, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the Planning Cotninission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further infonnation. If the Planning Coinmission indicates that further infonnation is needed, the itein should be continued. � �� ^ CITY OF HOPHINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ12-2 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CONTRACTORS YARD AT 643 13T" AVENUESOUTH WHEREAS, an ap�lication for a Conditional Use Pernzit CUP12-1 has been made by Blue Hat Properties; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for zoning amendment was made by Blue Hat Properties on April 27, 2012. 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Cormnission published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on May 29, 2012: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard. � 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. 4. Legal description of the parcel is as follows: Lot 14 and 15, Block, 56, West Minneapolis NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Conditional Use Pennit CUP12-1 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the proposed contractor's lot meets the requirements for a conditional use pennit. 2. That the contractor's yard is constructed as proposed. Adopted this 29th day of May 2012. �� Aaron Kuznia, Chair 'JE 5__ .. � .. �� ...-..,.___. - _ ._ _ �, - - iA�_ .''"�f��_. `s.'.�T �'� �. _ _ .. � - � �� . n.. . - = -= � = ".° ` � -� �; - r - = �- � = - - - , - ,� , _ � � - _r � - -, _ - _ ,� = - � - _ -- - , . -, ;,, _. �n t' �' =. `=; � � � � , i•. � _ _ • � � �� . L �� _ I� �� r Tf�� r�? �i� - — �� _ r> > — � '�: � - - l - j� �� J „ ''� � / — --------- ----------------i J-- - - ---- -- ---- -- --�- — - �= - - i /,, i I �:�� _�°�� , � 1 � .. i -� I � _ �, II, _ _ _ � � � '� = � I��'�� -- � - __ _ � � � � � ��,. j = � �� ,�:. — ' _ - , �`� �` �` ,� - �' � _ - � i _. — � - . _ ,1; , � - � _ _ � _ �� . . .� _ � � �� _ , _ — � - I--t { , F � ` H, - = f — , — � - - - - � � � -- = = � �� Y � — _ _ � . � __ � � � � — 1 _ I. � - , � �� `� _ _ _ � �� , _ — �; � � ' y= � �� ' �� `� � - '� - - ��,.' , - �; �� _ -- �� _ .. � �� ; - �V �� - .� � � � _ _ '� _ � - _ _ � � - � � - � � �n � �'` � � _ _ � � , �n = j _ _ n_ �� i� � �. . � . ' � . � - � - il — _ - � J � i � � ��.. _ �� ... . � �� i — 'i � � _ -� :I _ I � � ' � i __ �I �� ' _ �� . / - j' � , �'� ' �� ' � - � � � �� ;;� �� <�� / - ' � � �� ' � � � � �I �� I;�. - �, y � �� _� � --� ��f �-------- � � � � li y u r i � i, �I � i i � �� , - � — i� '� - I, �- . - � - � $ - ,— - - - -- - - --- ------- - - - --- .� �.- -_�' _ - ��, — _ .�, a�_I_ - _ i I _ = -- . i - � i - I - ' � �� ,, �� ^ h'OPKiNs May 21, 2012 Planning Report CUP12-1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT—CONTRACTOR'S YARD Proposed Action Staff recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution RZ12-2, recoirunendinQ approval of a conditional use�ennit to operate a contractor's yard at 643-13th Avenue South. Overview Blue Hat Properties, a landscaping company, owns 643-13`h Avenue South and the adjoining vacant site. They are proposing to use the vacant site to store the landscaping materials. The landscaping inaterials will be items such as wood, stone, clay, glass products, building and landscaping supplies. The access to the site will be froin 13`h Avenue. The site is zoning I-1, Industrial, and requires a conditional use pernlit for a contractor's yard. The site is surrounded by industrial uses. � Primary Issues to Considei• • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Coinprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • What are the conditions for a open sales lots and open starage? • How does the proposed lot comply with the above requirements? Supporting Documents • Analysis of Issues • Site Plans • Resolution RZ12-2 �, Nanc� `. Anderson, AICP City Plamzer Financial Iinpact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): --� Notes: ^ CUP 12-1 Page 2 Primar`� Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the propert,y, and ho«� has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The subject property is zoned I-1, IndustriaL The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Industrial. The proposed use complies with both documents. • What are the conditions for a open sales lots and open storage? 540.03. Conditional uses: I district. The following uses are pennitted conditional uses in I districts: g) Open sales lots and open storage provided: 1. the lot is graded and surfaced according to a plan submitted and approved by the city engineer that will adequately provide for drainage and dust control; 2. that the storage on such lot be so organized that a space of 15 feet of vehicular accessible open space remain between storage area with such areas not to exceed 40 feet in width; � 3. that the height of such open storage shall not exceed 15 feet; 4. that the storage area shall be fenced in such a way as to screen froin the street right-of- way. 5. that the storage area shall be landscaped and inaintained according to a plan subinitted and a�proved; and 6. that a side yard setback is required for fences that abut a right-of-way 50 feet or inore in width. The setback shall be the required setback for a building in said Industrial district. • How does the proposed lot comply with the above requirements? The following coinply with the requirements: 1. The surface of the lot is an assortment of asphalt, gravel and concrete. The grade of the lot will not change. 2. Tl1e storage will be organized so that it will be around the side of the site. 3. The applicant has stated that the stored material will not be higher than 15 feet. 4. The applicant will construct a fence at least six feet in height around the entire site. 5. The applicant has subinitted a plan that is attached regarding the storage of the inaterials. 6. The site does not abut a side yard. �-^� Alternatives l. Recominend approval of the conditional use pennit to operate a contractor's yard. By recommending approval of the conditional use pennit, the City Council will consider a f CUP 12-1 Page 3 recommendation of approval. � 2. Recommend denial of the conditional use pennit. By recommending denial of the conditional use pennit, the City Council will consider a reconunendation of denial. If the Planning Commission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further infonnation. If the Planning Conunission indicates that further infonnation is needed, the item should be continued. � � � CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ12-? . RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CONTRACTORS YARD AT 643 1;TH AVENUESOUTH WHEREAS, an application for a Conditional Use Pennit CUP12-] has Ueen made by Blue Hat Properties; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: l. That an application for zoning amendment was made by Blue Hat Properties on April 27, 2012. 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission published notice, held a puUlic hearing on the application and reviewed such application on May 29, 2012: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard. r 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. 4. Legal description of the parcel is as follows: Lot 14 and 15, Block, 56, West Minneapolis NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Conditional Use Pennit CUP12-1 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the proposed contractor's lot meets the requireinents for a conditional use pennit. 2. That the contractor's yard is constructed as proposed. Adopted this 29th day of May 2012. �� Aaron Kuznia, Chair _ _...�._ _.._ �, . _::,. ._ , _,, �E s = I�.�-,._�'. #�"_-_ = = - _ -�l�� t" __ = _ ` = = .,�,F � �; _ _ _ - _ � _ _ _ = - � _ r _ _ - _ = _ _ _ _� ce€ - I�J ' - _ - ' �- �- . . - i� � r_ I _ --1-1� i;; r; - - i � fl = r� i' _ t: - . r 1 . 'j r ` _ , � �� ._- _— ___ .. — � . ' `�� ___'_—______ '—'_ —_T_'_____ '_ ___—_�:_ _ . -� ',. ,�-_'_ . . .. I ,. y�.. • . .�, ' , . . ��t ?_�;i.i�M�7 � � 1i � � � I � � � � � ��, ��II �_ _ i �� I _ —-+ _ _ ,I _ '! _ - i h. �\ I� - I�'il ' ' - .� �� V � � - � � _ - � � . � � � = i � � .�� ..— � � i, � � � � � , � _ — �� .r - �I � . . � � �� — �� . . - �. �� — _ - = r. _ _ _ ', , � V ' �'- �\ - _ _ _ �'—_.� - � I �. A �� — — - � I — i — i — ��. � . �• I — i � - - - � ;�,�� — �� '� - � � � — � _- � . _- � �� - - �� ,s _ . � � . _ _ . . - I \ \ - I - � � _ — �. � �� \ \\\ . III C \ \�\ .. \ ,� ' , � . 1 — - _ \_ I P- I - _ � �. . I .TI` \� \ �n �II �* . � I �,� � � � � ' - � I� � � ��.� . _ � � ., _ � ' � �� _ /� � � _ ' �- ' _ � � � - ' I / - � �i � , - ' � I = i �.I f , i, � II _ � � �� - � � � L i �, ., � � �. �' `� _�� - �I `- - � �� _ � � � � � � ��'' � �, � � � , � � ; ,= ,'- ,� � ;-- �,_ _ . i , � �� , -__ - _ _ � - ----- - ----J ; - -- - , �L II:: _ I I_ T - . i �`',- � __ � � - 1' I I � � � ,: . , _.- _�..�.__,._._e.�.T�__. . __._—. '__�' + GIT �' OF � May23, 2012 �� PK � N� Pla�uling Report SPRI?-1 SITE PLAN REVIEW—FORMER MAYON PLASTICS BUILDING Proposed Action Staff recommends the following motion: Adopt Resolution RZ12-3, recommendin� approval of a site �lan to remodel the foinler Mayon Plastics buildin� into a retail buildin� at 415 - 17tb Avenue North. Overvie�� Swervo Development Corporation has a purchase agreement for the fornler Mayon Plastics building located at 415 - 17th Avenue North. It is proposed that the west side of the building will be reinoved and the east side reinodeled to pennit a retail area of approxiinately 10,800 square feet of retail. There could be up to seven retailers in the reinodeled building. At this ti�ne there are no retailers that have been indentified. The parking area will be located on the west and south sides of the building. The staff is recoininending a 1'UD overlay zoning because of the tightness of the site ^ relative to parking. Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Conlprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • What are the specifics of the addition? • What is the schedule for construction? Supportin� Documents • Analysis of issues • Resolution RZ 12-3 • Site plans J - � i � � . Nancy . Anderson, AIC City P aimer � Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Docu�nents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: � SPR12-1 Page 2 Pi-imarv Issues to Consider. • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property is B-4, Neighborhood Business. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this site as Cominercial. Any proposed use will have to comply with the pennitted uses in the B-4 zoning district. • What are the specifics of the addition? Building The west side of the existing building will be reinoved, and the east side will remain. The remaining building will have windows added on the west side. Parking ^ A parking area will be added on the west side of the site. Based on a net square footage of 10, 800, the site is required to have 54 parking spaces; the site plan indicates 57 parking spaces. The parking spaces are 18' x 9' with a two-foot overhang on all the spaces except for the west side. The parking spaces on the west side ��vill only be 1' 4 inches fi-om the lot line. There are nine coinpact spaces on the south side of the site. Access The access froin Fourth Avenue will remain in approxiinately the saine location. Tl�ere will be no access from the site to the alley. Exterior The majority of the exterior of the building will be glass with a stone and brick veneer. The Urick will be above the windows and the stone below the windows. There will also be a metal awning below the brick. The site plans shows the east side of the building being repainted. There will be no access to the building from the east side. The columns on the building will be lit. Setbacks There are no building setback ]ines that are affected. The setbacks on the reinaining building are � grandfathered. SPR12-1 Page 3 � Parl:ing setbacks The ordirlance requires parking spaces to Ue two feet from the lot line most of the parking spaces will be two feet from the lot line. Some of the parking spaces on the west side of the site that will be 1' 4 inches from the lot line. This is unavoidable because of the width of the site. The ordinance also requires that there is Ue parking in the front yard setback. The front yard is Fourth Street, and the site plan indicates parking in this setback. Landscaping The applicant is required to plant 18 trees of the required size. The landscape plan indicates 18 trees of the required size. The majority of landscaping is located along the ends of the site. Additional scrubs and peremiials are located throughout the site. The site plan does not detail a fence on the east side, Uut a fence will be required of at least four feet on the north and south sides of the building. Public Works Before the construction of the LA Fitness building, a traffic study was completed for the LA Fitness site and the Mayon site. It was recommended that additional right-of-way be taken from the Mayon site for an additional lane to be constructed in the future. The site plan reflects the �' additional right-of-��ay needed for an additional lane northUound and a six-foot sidewalk. Surrounding Uses The site is surrounded by Highway 7 to the north, LA Fitness to the west, residential to the east and south. Fire Marshal The fire inarshal has reviewed the preliminary plans and found them acceptable. Trash The trash area will be located on the south side of the site. The trash area will be screened with composite wood and a inetal steel fi-ame. Screening is required by the ordinance. Height The building will remain the same, with a slight elevation increase on the north end with the new fascia on the building. � Watershed District This development will have to be approved by the Watershed District. Any City approvals will � SPR12-1 Page 4 be contingent on their approval. • «'hat is the schedule for construction? The applicant v��ould like to start construction as soon as possible. Alternatives. 1. Recominend approval of the site plan to remodel the fonner Mayon Plastics building. By recoirunending approval of the site plan, the City Council will consider a recoinmendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the site plan to remodel the fonner Mayon Plastics building. By recoinmending denial of the site plan, the City Council will consider a recoinmendation of deniaL If the Planning Coininission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further infonnation. If the Planning Commission indicates that further � information is needed, the item should be continued. —� CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ12-3 � RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN TO REMODEL THE BUILDING AT 415-17TH AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, an application for Site Plan Review SPRl2-1 has been made Uy Swervo Development; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a Site Plan was made by Swervo Development, on April 27, 2012; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and puUlished notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on May 29, 2012: all persons present were given an opportunity to Ue heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and, 4. A legal description of the subject property is as follows: Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, and 1 l, Block 1 Souba Addition. � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Site Plan Review SPR12- 1 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: L That the Planning Cominission reviewed the proposed redevelopment. 2. That the proposed use meets the requirements for site plan review. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Site Plan Review SPR12-1 is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. That there is no vehicle access from the site to the alley. 2. That there be no deliveries froin the alley. 3. That a fence of minimuin height of four feet be constructed on the north and south sides of the building. 4. That the property be rezoned to a PUD overlay district. 5. That a PUD agreeinent be approved and executed. 6. That the watershed district approves the proposed development. Adopted this 29st day of May 2012. ATTEST: � Aaron Kuznia, Chair z -TT7 --FTT oq NO I. (3 A Y ----- . .. . ..... 16TH AVE. N. PLAINUM PROPERinES "LlI'u'll L AND H T L E SURVE. T ! .. .. .. .. .. .. . 1�4 allXV, 41111 1, SOUSA, ADVATICH "I 1W I', MAYON aPLM TO MPIMNS, SM04 2C T117N, R22W, ENNEPW CGUNFY, MfNNLSCI'A, H.W"Is, 77 77 mm "a 41, 11 — k1V 01Rag 1 0NN 0 �M U q� YiV M m all M 14�6 T "RI PLAINUM PROPERinES "LlI'u'll L AND H T L E SURVE. T ! .. .. .. .. .. .. . 1�4 allXV, 41111 1, SOUSA, ADVATICH "I 1W I', MAYON aPLM TO MPIMNS, SM04 2C T117N, R22W, ENNEPW CGUNFY, MfNNLSCI'A, H.W"Is, 77 77 mm "a 41, 3E T "U" K� z ."S H R A W Yf PLAINUM PROPERinES "LlI'u'll L AND H T L E SURVE. T ! .. .. .. .. .. .. . 1�4 allXV, 41111 1, SOUSA, ADVATICH "I 1W I', MAYON aPLM TO MPIMNS, SM04 2C T117N, R22W, ENNEPW CGUNFY, MfNNLSCI'A, H.W"Is, 77 77 mm "a 5, PLAINUM PROPERinES "LlI'u'll L AND H T L E SURVE. T ! .. .. .. .. .. .. . 1�4 allXV, 41111 1, SOUSA, ADVATICH "I 1W I', MAYON aPLM TO MPIMNS, SM04 2C T117N, R22W, ENNEPW CGUNFY, MfNNLSCI'A, H.W"Is, 77 77 mm L- - - - - - - - - - - - - cn I I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — cn Ila 0 ®R zl ®R zl i ,� 11M1 I ; , N` I $$ P R o G am >r r oi� Rp � o a aoA.� a=tea�€r �o = ism; ry �_ oe T o�q Ngo-g�= M ;N o� o oms� p o N� gFoF bh - RQg z �Qm om zm m��m 4'4 eA ��m oa 9m m� ode pR-z aim gigs s� 1.g gb .Zso�m� "moo os>� � ms � �� yo �g U omm oN �a�c _ _ g8 =g F oMH NN anF§ m ? G > oZQ �a yg E mds m mmo �g yR9RE m,A ,N� pq mem V ®j¢ TA agA"woomgco €gs mg � p �rnA qi Ki q u pig W ; L m N-, 4i ��m m � b I i i agA"woomgco €gs mg � p �rnA qi Ki q PEE > za��z m�q�N�o Sig pig W ; �. ��o�� b� m�� yAr z" d m z F " kq n gm �<r FA N m W 5i�ag g my" o " N, mc`" MOO mawm a7 p F �A�g� '�� w="2 ' F �omrQ�gm kx�q�. m b mN-tY iym Z5 mY 'PE9x rggi ani AA L� � tlo SCI P 43 m§ ten s"' yv $mgo m ��gmW $ �w�o,A-, '30 �� V mz 0 $msz az�z `"� €ou Kris or '�� fy g�-� ob�� ry.�! 'enemas mmg :",o nBF pgp " x x g HEN eO S m oma g�gyp�� R 6$og aba A �o 4 M�� d "� 7m � K QygF � 'B b � �Q mem en �s� 5 z a�ffl.m2z o��dogy �2 "� z " �m _ 7 F �°� m 64 �p � go 2 �� m � F I I I Fill] ITI Cy i EI 2 I I I 11 m RetailMayon Plastics - DJR ,r �J „%,%% ;y%,i, r%, , ,„iG i,,✓ %%!�//i;; 1r%rJ, 1% iiiA5CHITECTURE. INC v Mayon Plastics Retail Conversion__ p . i F i jusmum ..,,� o o.. I �Ih ofh F1. g Imp { kik lSk'l n o �. I I I II'd I ,I LU I I i I .I� gg r i t 40 D a II w Z z Mayon Plastics Retail Conversion__ p . I IMP CA }l �" Iga„ m gikG 1 !�� VgeidF:',rVY' §J f I Fv s� m x Mg t3 si 4vr'" "pay m m Ex $n wa r s $ m,2, y a � �'� ��osso�, r a 4E „Q Up R �" $<+ iA �F o EF pp PH, o m' 2a ` gm oma!m AN; P� Ga m G4� A9 M1l m8 �' Ps 36 Fs CA }l �" Iga„ m gikG 1 !�� VgeidF:',rVY' §J f I Fv s� m x Mg t3 si 4vr'" "pay m m Ex $n wa r s $ m,2, y a � �'� ��osso�, r a 4E „Q � � GITY OF �� NOPKINS May 21, 2012 Planning Report ZN12-1 PUD OVERLAY REZONING—415 - 17t�' AVENUE NORTH ProAosed Action Staff recommends the follo��ing inotion: Move to adopt Resolution RZ12-4. recommendin� approval of Ordinance 12-1049, placing an overlav zonin� of Planned Unit Development (PUD� at 415 - 17`" Avenue North. Overview Swervo Development Corporation has a purchase agreement for the fonner Mayon Plastics building located at 415 - 17ti' Avenue North. It is proposed that the west side of the building will be removed and the east side remodeled to pennit a retail area of approximately 10,800 square feet. This site is difficult to develop because of the width. All redevelopinent proposals on the site have kept the east half of the existing building because of the setback on the east side. The remaining area on the west side would be the parking area. The last time Swervo Development was approved, soine of the parking was at the LA Fitness site. At this time LA Fitness is using �� all of their parking, so the Mayon site needs to have all of their parking on the site. The width of the site inakes parking stalls and aisles very tight. The site will be rezoned with an overlay zoning of Planned Unit Development (PUD). The PUD zoning allows flexibility with the underlying zoning of B-4. Along with the overlay zoning to PUD, there will be an agreeinent with specific parameters on how the site will be developed. Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the underlying zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan desigllated the subject site? • Why place an overlay zone of PUD on this property? • What are the areas that would be included in the overlay zone? Supporting Documents • Analysis of issues • Development Plan • Resolution RZ12-4 • Ordinance 12-1049 f1 '� � �� Nancy . Anderson, AICP � City Planner Financial Iinpact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Docu�nents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: �� i� Y �\ ZN 12-1 Page 2 Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the underlying zoning of the properh�, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property is B-4, Neighborhood Business. For this development to occur as proposed, the property would have to be rezoned to a PUD overlay; this would allow flexibility in site development. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this site as Commercial. The base zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation will remain. • Why place an overla��zone of PUD on this property? The Planned Unit Development allows a site-specific development with the underlying zoning remauling. This type of developinent allows for a departure from the strict application of the zoning standards. The applicant and the City enter into an agreement defining the specific allowed uses and perfonnance standards for each PUD, and these are delineated in the agreement. In this case the underlying zoning of business will remain. In the proposed development parking spaces will be in the front yard setback and some of the parking spaces will � not be the required two feet from the lot line. The flexibility needed is in the parking area. When LA Fitness was constructed, a traffic study was conducted. The traffic study recommended additional land be reserved on the east side of 17t" Avenue for future intersection improvements. The site plan reflects this additional land needed, which nan-ows the site for parking. • What are the areas that would be included in the overlay zone? The entire site will be included in the overlay zone. • What would staff recommend for the PUD agreement? The following is the staff's recommendations: • No backlit canned signs • Bike parking • Art dedication fee Alternatives �� 1. Recoinmend approval of the overlay zoning of PUD. By recommending approval, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Reconunend denial of the overlay zoning of PUD. By recominending denial, the City Y ZN l 2-1 Page 3 � Council will consider a recoininendation of denial. If the overlay zoning is not approved, the existing zoning will remain and any redevelopment of these sites will have to be consistent with the existing zoning. 3. Continue for further infornlation. If the Planning Coininission indicates that further inforn�ation is needed, the item should be continued. �� r �\ ' CITY OF HOPHINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ12-4 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE FOR AN OVERLAY PUD ZONING AT 415 - 17T" AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, an application for Zoning Ainendinent ZN12-1 has been inade by Swervo Development; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for zoning ainendinent ZN12-1 was made by Swervo Development; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Cominission puUlished notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on May 29, 2012: ^ all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Zoning Ainendinent ZN12-1 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the overlay district is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. That the underlying zoning of B-4 reinains. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Zoning Amendment ZN12-1 is hereby recoirunended for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Applicant and the City enter into an agreeinent that satisfies all the conditions and requirements for this PUD developinent. Adopted this 29th day of May 2012. /� Aaron Kuznia, Chair CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 12-1049 �.�- AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: All of the land described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein is hereby established and zoned as a Planned Unit Developinent (PUD) Overlay District. The existing B-4 zoning classification for the land included in the PUD Overlay District shall remain in effect as the underlying zoning classification with an overlay zoning classification of Planned Unit Development or PUD. The requirements governing or applicable within PUD Overlay District shall be as set forth in the PUD agreement. First Reading: June 5, 2012 Second Reading: June 19, 2012 Date of Publication: June 28, 2012 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: June 28, 2012 � Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine Luedke, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Signature Date �i EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE I�O. 12-1049 � Legal Description of Land Included in PUD Overlay District Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, and l 1, Block 1 Souba Addition. � �� G�TY �F HOPKINS � May 21, 2012 Planning Report�CR12-3 CONCEPT REVIEW—THE BLAKE SCHOOL Proposed Action This is a concept review that requires no action. Any com�nents regarding tlie development would be helpflil to the applicant for further applications. Ovei'VICW In 2008-9 The Blake School did a long range campus improvement plan for their Hopkins site. Many of these improveinents will not be canstructed for soine ti�ne; however, any change will require water retention capacity on the prope��ty. Because of the need for additional water retention capacity, The Blake School has purchased eight properties on the east side of Harrison Avenue. The proposal is to have a retention pond on the corner of Han-ison Avenue and Excelsior Boulevard and to keep the remaining five homes. The retention pond area would consist of an outlot owned by the City, 13 and 15 Hai7ison, which are vacate parcels, and the hoine on 17 Harrison would be razed. A zoning change for 13-17 Harrison and the outlot would be requested � from R-1-A to institutional. The Blake School is proposing to have a day care in 33 Han-ison foi- the faculty of the school. lt is anticipated there will be 10 children. Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • What is the concept for the Han-ison Avenue properties? � What is the applicant's tiine line? • What are the concei7is of the neighborhood? • What are the items that will have to occur for this developinent to proceed? SuAporting Documevts • Analysis of issues • Preli�ninary site plan '1�1� ,.�- I , �u d.i�'i �J ` , �-,,�^��.T,,�f . Nancy� . Anderson, AICP Planner � Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Docuinents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: �� /� i� . � .. ^ ZCRl2-1 Page 2 . Primarv Issues to Consider. � What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the main campus is Institutional. The properties along Harrison Avenue are R-1-A, Single and Two-family High Density. The Co�nprehensive Plan has designated the Hai77son Avenue properties residentiaL If this proposal were to proceed and the property along Harrison is rezoned, tlle Comprehensive Plan will have to be amended. • What is the concept for the Harrison Avenue propei-ties? The proposal is to construct a water retention pond on the corner of Harrison and Excelsior Baulevard. The pond would be screened from Hat-rison Avenue with a wall and landscaping. The remaining five homes would have landscaping improvements and some would have home impravements also. A day care for the faculty of Blake School is proposed at 33 Harrison. The capacity wauld be for approximately 10 children. � Surrounding Uses The site is surrounded by commercial to the north, residential to the west and south and The Blake School to the east. • What�s the applicant's time line? The actual time that this will take place is unknown. Funds have to be raised for this proposal to ha�pen. Before construction can take place, a public hearing inust be held for City a�provals. • What are tl�e eoncerns of the neighbarhood? A neighborhood �ileeting was 11e1d and this proposal was presented to tl�em. The concen�s were the following: • Stadium light on • Day care traffic � A wall buffer between the remaining homes on Hairison and Blake School � Better gate contral for the road on the west side of Blake School • Canstruction of a loop road on the west side of Blake—traff c concerns r� Several of these cancerns are operational issues with Blake School, and we will work with 131ake School. The other items will be addressed when Blake Schoo] seeks approvals. � ZCR12-1 Page 3 � • V�That are the items that w�ifl have to occur for this concept to proceed? r The following are tl�e items that will have to occur for this concept to proceed: • Rezone 13-17 Harrison and the outlot to Institutional • Amend Coinprehensive Plan to Institutional • Sell Blake School the City's outlot abutting Excelsior Boulevard • Reinove tlle building covenants froml3 and l 5 Han-ison Avenue • Approval by Minnehaha Creek Watershed District • Vacate part of north/sout]Z alley • Relocate wateiznain in tl�e north/south alley � �� , .,- ____ __ _. i , �NIldV'�SdN'C'"I Z13ddf18 ;�..;:: O Nd"ld 311S ' ' • .��,d le�d� k� 8 �� 1 la3�ls Is� XIW 4335 13fT1 � �� x�w a�as dwda � XIW ?13f110�d allRl aNv sassvx+� aib�dad � - -� _ � sanaHs °� ----� A - 33z11 JIT�OlS-a34NT1 9f10f1a1734 � N z 33?Jl .�.21016-213/�O D �J'v'a37 dN'v' Sr10f141734 � � , � m , Jl3�l 3db'JSCINb'l S�NIlND'ld F �� ' � Z13�df18 .. � . I I i �---� � S1N3W3�OZldWI � ' � 3dV7SQNty� aN'v' ( 3WOH 31V�ON3?� l lO�f 'Lfq � S1N31�t3�0?JdWI � , � '� �dV7SQNb'� ---- '{ I Z lOZ �£Ep � � � I ,t � � S1N3W3�t 3d'v'�� . £ 10� 1� S1N�W3�OZ�dWI 3d'v'�SaNty� � tr 10� 'SL# � t` -- -- -- t � � 61N�W3/�Oz1dWl � � 3d5'7SQNty� dND' - SC10H 31tr/�ON3ZI r-- "" 5 10'1 �IZp �ti. � k.l � --_ ••�•• ��„ - - 3St10H NS('lOW3Q �3llV' 31'v'7V'/� � � 1 ` 'i�' 9 10"1 ►----T i t �_ �: / I ( ( �' . l, _� --- I ` � .: �, , , . � , � , 3�N33 �lNfl NI'v'M� / ' /;; i/ �, t ' / � �ildCy�SaN'D'� dNV � � f �� i � � ' � � � �„tT.139 �833ZI1 fT13N 3�J43 3�Nf10G Zf31b'fi1 N�IH � ,�,,:%�� i � . � . : ;: .. , � -ndm rn� �saldnl�m�� ' %-',` ; ' . i .� ; i i �zis ariod lr+��r�m � , , � _ '- -"-'- ( cs�lenl�mj� � ' _._;, �-�� `�r ' QNOd NOI1N3132� 2l31<Jff1 lb'W210N � � � " -"�J . -" l-� ``� �---�`` - - �---, W�39 3d�'7SQNV1 , 1;�=%"-'r� — � �- i •,... ' � � 1 r: � �erm N�3a�s ��riosdw L__,.- � 0061 � z�oz�o-_H�H�,�w • 5��v;� •��i�:iq ; ��---�"�— �S 13�X3 "I O O H�S d1053NNlW'SNIYdOH ^-tig 2�A �?I�i'-1� No.��,�r,iic�>:,�o� �nr��n�,�rvosi��dh a' �F� � �40H�S 3�Id18 3H1 .. ��- - . /� � �� . I `�r. .