The URL can be used to link to this page

10-22-2012 ` OCTOBER NOVEMBER MEMBERS S M T W T F S S M T W T F S NAEF KUZNIA ^ 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 FISHER DATTA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ALLARD FIRTH 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 KERSSEN ANDERSON 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 AGENDA ZONING & PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, October 22, 2012 6:30 P.M. IN RASPBERRY ROOM WITH PARK BOARD FOR COTTAGEVILLE CONCEPTS SPECIAL MEETING 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS � --------- -------------------------------------------- ITEM: Approve and sign minutes of the August 28, 2012, regular meeting. COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / CASE NO. ZCR12-5 MAINSTREET SCHOOL FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS Concept to consider addition to The l�Zainstreet School for the Performing Arts at 1320 Mainstreet CASE NO. SUBD12-4 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT - 525 BLAKE ROAD Public Public Hearing to consider the preliminary/final plat for 525 Blake Road � Hearing and 1301 Cambridge COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / �� \ r • - - -y A�ENDA ZONING & PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 �-.. CASE NO. ZN12-5 REZONING - PARCELS NORTH OF 525 BLAKE ROAD Public Public Hearing to consider a rezoning the north of 525 Blake Road from Hearing B-3 to B-4 and part of 1301 Cambridge Street from B-4 to B-3 COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / CASE NO. SPR12-4 SITE PLAN APPROVAL - 525 BLAKE ROAD Public Public Heaiing to consider a site plan approval to construct a 12,000 squaie Hearing foot retail building at 525 Blake Road COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / .._-.. CASE NO. ZN12-6 PUD OVERLAY- 525 �LAKE ROAD Public Public Hearing to consider placing an overlay PUD zoning on 525 Blake Hearing Road COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / CASE NO. ZN12-7 PARCEL DECERTIFICATION FROM DISTRICT NO. 2-11 Consideration of a parcel decertification to determine if it is in compliance with the City's comprehensive plan COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / ^ ITEM: REPRESENTATIVE TO UPDATE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNMENT — ZONING AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 28, 2012 A regular meeting of the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, August 28, 2012, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Hopkins City Hall. Present were Commission members Doug Datta, Andrea Naef, Jennifer Allard, Scott Kerssen, Aaron Kuznia, Andrew Fisher and Charles Firth. Also present was staff inember Nancy Anderson. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Kuznia called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Kerssen moved and Mr. Fisher seconded the motion to approve the minutes of the July 31, 2012, regular meeting. The inotion was approved unanimously. �-. CASE NO. CUP12-3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-FENCE �VIs. Anderson reviewed the proposed fence. David Mundie, the applicant, appeared before the Commission. Mr. Mundie stated that he wanted to replace the existing chain link fence with a six-foot wood fence. Mr. Mundie also stated that he has a dog and a hot tub. Ms. Anderson stated that a four-foot fence is the minimum height required for an in-ground swimming pool. The Commission had considerable discussion, concluding that there is no special purpose for the fence and if they granted the conditional use pennit it would set a precedent. The public hearing was opened at 6:50 p.m. No one appeared at the public hearing. Mr. Firth moved and Ms. Naef seconded a motion to close the public hearing. The motion was approved unanimously. The public hearing was closed at 6:51 p.m. Ms. Naef moved and Mr. Kerssen seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ12-12, recommending denial of a conditional use permit for a special purpose fence at 501 Drillane. The motion was approved unanimously. CASE NO. SUBD 12-3 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT-20T" AVENUE NORTH Ms. Anderson stated that there are two lots that will be combined into one, and the new lot will meet the zoning requirements. Troy Mathwig, the applicant, appeared before the Commission. ^The public hearing was opened at 7:00 p.m. No one appeared at the public hearing. Ms. Allard moved nd Mr. Datta seconded a motion to close the public hearing. The motion was approved unanimously. MINUTES OF THE ZONING AND PLANNING MEETING, August 28, 2012 Page 2 ..� The public hearing was closed at 7:01 p.m. Mr. Kerssen moved and Mr. Firth seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ12-13, recommending a preliminary/final plat for 230 20�" Avneue North. The motion was approved unanimously. CASE NO. CUP12-4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT—DAYCARE Ms. Anderson asked that the Commission continue this item. Mr. Kuznia moved and Mr. Fisher seconded a motion to continue CUP 12-4 to the September meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. CASE NO. ZCR12-4 CONCEPT REVIEW—525 BLAKE ROAD Ms. Anderson reviewed the proposed redevelopment of 525 Blake Road. Steve Johnson, the applicant, appeared before the Commission. Mr. Johnson stated that they are proposing to construct two 6000 square-foot buildings. Mr. Johnson also stated that he has three leases, but at this time he is not at liberty to name the tenants. It is proposed that construction will start this fa1L The Commission looked favorably on this development. ADJOURN Mr. Firth moved and Mr. Kerssen seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion was ��-' approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 7:37 p.m. MEMBERS ATTEST: � Aaron Kuznia, Chair .--� , October 16, 2012 � Planning Report ZCR12-� CONCEPT REVIEW-MAINSTREET SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS Pronosed Action This is a concept review that requires no action. Any comments regarding the developinent would be helpful to the applicant for future applications. 0�-ervie��v Mainstreet School for the Arts is proposing to construct an 8000 square feet addition to the south side of the existing building. This new space will be used for classrooins. The issue with the addition is that the new building addition is proposed to be constructed to the lot line. The ordinance requires a 50 feet setback. Although there are no residents to the south, the�roperty to the south is Central Park. � Primary Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • What are the preliminary specifics of the redevelopment proposal? • What are the staff's concerns? • What is the applicant's timeline? • What will have to occur for this development to proceed? Supportin� Documents • Analysis of issues • Preliminary site plan I 1 Nancy Anderson, AICP City Pl uier Financial Impact: $ I�1/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: �-� Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: ZCR12-5 Page 2 --� Primarv Issues to Consider. • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the school is R-5, High Density Multiple Family. The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as high density Residential. The proposed development complies with both documents. • What are the preliminary specifics of the redevelopment proposal? Addition The proposal is to construct an 8000 square feet addition to the south of the existing building for additional classrooms. Parking Parking may become an issue in the future. The school is not to capacity at this time, but in the future they hope to attract additional students. Now the students park wherever they can find ^ parking. Surrounding Uses The site is sun•ounded by cominercial to the east and «�est, Central Park to the south and residential to the north. • What are the staff s concerns? The setback to the park is the concern for the staf£ It will be a large, tall addition with a zero lot line. • What is the applicant's timeline? If the variance will be supported, the applicant��-ould like to start as soon as possible. • What will have to occur for this development to proceed? The following are the actions that will have to occur for this development to proceed as proposed: • Site plan approval for the construction of the building ^ • Variance for the setback abutting Central Park � October 16, 2012 Planning Report SUBD 12-4 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT—525 BLAKE ROAD Proposed Action Staff recommends the following motion: Move to ado�t Resolution RZ12-16, recommendin� a�proval of a preliminary/final plat for 525 Blake Road and 1301 Cambrid�e. Overview Hopkins Blake Retail, LLC, is proposing to redevelop the fornler BP gas station site located at 525 Blake Road into a retail building. It is proposed that the existing building will be razed and two buildings will be constructed. The new development will also include two lots to the north. One lot is owned by the apartments to the east and the second owned by MnDOT. The development also has a small area in St. Louis Park. The three lots will be replatted into one lot for the construction of the two retail buildings. 1301 Carnbridge will also be replatted with the east 20 feet of the three lots. The east 20 feet � of the site is the square footage of the area currently owned by the apartments to the east. Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • Does the lot meet the zoning requirements? • What are the specifics of the plat? • Does the proposed plat meet the subdivision requirements? • Will park dedication fees be required? SupAorting Documents • Analysis of Issues • Preliminary/Final Plat • Resolution RZ12-16 � - � ,.� � � G. ;, , , Nancy'�. Anderson,'AIC,P� City Pl er Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: '� Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: SUBD 12-4 .--, Page 2 Primary Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property is B-3 and B-4; the whole retail site will be rezoned to B-4 for the proposed commercial area. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this site as Commercial. The zoning and the Comprehensive Plan of 525 Blake will be consistent. 1301 Cambridge will have the same square footage of Residential and Commercial. • Does the lot meet the zoning requirements? 525 Blake Road will meet the requirements for the B-4 zoning district. 1301 will remain the same except the B-3 area will be reconfigured. • What are the specifics of the plat? When the property is replatted there will be one lot for the new retail buildings and 1301 will be reconfigured. '� • Does the proposed plat meet the subdivision requirements? The plat, as proposed, meets the subdivision requirements. • Will park dedication fees be required? Park dedication fees will be required for the new retail lot. The Park dedication fee will be determined by the County Assessor. Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the preliminary plat/final plat. By recommending approval of the preliminary/final plat, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the preliminary/final plat. By recommending denial of the preliminary/final plat, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the Planning Commission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. � CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota `� RESOLUTION NO: RZ12-16 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT FOR 525 BLAKE ROAD AND THE TWO LOTS NORTH OF 525 BLAKE ROAD WHEREAS, an application for a preliminary/final plat SUBD 12-4 has been submitted by Hopkins Blake Retail, LLC; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: l. That an application for preliminary/final plat was submitted by Hopkins Blake Retail, LLC, on October 2, 2012; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on October 22, 2012: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and � 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. 4. Legal description of the parcel is as follows: Parcel 1: That part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Lot 68 distant 122.41 feet South from the Northwest corner of said Lot 68; thence South along said West line 12.56 feet, more or less, to a point 225 feet North from the Southwest corner of said Lot 68; thence East, at a right angle 208 feet; thence South, at a right angle 173.72 feet, more or less, to the North line of the South 55 feet of said Lot 68; thence East along said North line to the West line of the East 140 feet of said Lot 68; thence North along the last mentioned West line to the North line of said Lot 68; thence West along the North line of said Lot 68 to a point 204 feet East from the Northwest corner of said Lot 68; thence South, deflecting to the left 91 degrees 59 minutes 00 seconds, a distance of 76.65 feet; thence Westerly a distance of 209.58 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning; Except that part of the above described land designated as Parcel 33A on Hennepin County Right-of-Way Map No. 2 recorded in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 435187. Hennepin County, Minnesota � Torrens Property Torrens Certificate No. 582632 Parcel 2: All that part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of Tract DD, Registered Land Survey No. 1058, files of the Registrar of Deeds, County of Hennepin, which point is also the Northwest corner of said Lot 68; thence East 204 feet along the South line of Tract DD; thence South for a distance of 76.65 feet along a line which is the South extension of a line distant 204 feet East, parallel with and measured at right angles to the West line of said Tract DD; thence Southwesterly along a line drawn parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Tract DD to the West line of said Lot 68; thence North along the West line of said Lot 68 to the point of beginning, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Deeds in and for Hennepin County. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property Parcel 3: � Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1805, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Tonens Property, Torrens Certificate No. 1341953 That part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision Number 239, Hennepin County, Minnesota, located in the North 1/2 of Section 19, Township 117 North, Range 21 West of the Sth Principal Meridian, and described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the center lines of Monk Avenue and Cambridge Street; thence Northerly along the center line of Monk Avenue a distance of 195 feet; thence Easterly at right angles to said center line of Monk Avenue a distance of 208 feet; thence Southerly at right angles to last described line approximately 195 feet to the center line of Cambridge Street; thence Westerly at a right angle along the center line of Cambridge Street to the point of beginning, excepting therefrom the part thereof conveyed to the City of Hopkins by Document No. 3040482 and further excepting therefrom the part conveyed to Hennepin County by Document No. 4713173. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for a preliminary/final plat SUBD 12-4 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed preliminary/final plat. � 2. That the preliminary/final plat meets the subdivision requirements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for preliminary/final plat SUBD12-4 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following conditions: �- 1. That the applicant must provide current evidence of title, in the form of a commitment for title insurance, to the City Attorney. 2. That the applicant pay the Attorney's fee for title review. Adopted this 22nd day of October 2012. ATTEST: Aaron Kuznia, Chair � �� I 11j _-__4...._--------___J M�� 48 I . AT '2 - - - - - -_ - - - - - - - 4 - - - - - - - - - - "M MT N00 -25'48'E 162.59 1 ;Y C-r— SLAKE ROAD Ia GA F 1 SOO-25'48"W 109.95 HEIIIIIIIIEFI;I'll Colull"Ol R`W-�Ij OF 11.1-P 2 120'34 146.78NOO. Ij 11 ---------- - i HOO-25-48-E 10590 . tIN I A iA r -I i 'z O I1�2 1A — 2L Sol 'O 29B -w 304.91 1 . . . . .................. . ....... ....... ....... ,I I I I � ul CL ,--� October 16 2012 � Plannin Re ort ZN12-� � g p REZONING—525 BLAKE ROAD Proposed Action Staff reconunends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution RZ12-15. reconunending approval of Ordinance 12-10�5, rezoning the property north of 525 Blake Road and the east 20 feet of 525 Blake Road from B-3 to B-4 and from B-4 to B-3. respectivel� Overview Hopkins Blake Retail, LLC, is proposing to redevelop the former BP gas station site located at 525 Blake Road into a retail building. It is proposed that the existing building will be razed and two buildings will be constructed. The new development will also include two lots to the north. One lot is owned by the apartments to the east and the second owned by MnDOT. The development also has a sniall area in St. Louis Park. The buildings as proposed will have approximately 12,000 square feet of retail. Access to the new buildings will be from Cambridge Street and a new access will be from Division Street in St. Louis Park. � The fonner BP site is zoned B-4, but the ri�o parcels to the north that will be replatted with this property are zoned B-3; these will be rezoned to B-4. The east 20 feet of�2� Blake will be rezoned from be rezoned from B-4 to B-3. Primary Issues to Consider • What is the Comprehensive Plan designation? • What is the existing zoning of the subject site? • What does the B-4 zoning allow? • Should the site be rezoned from B-3 to B-4? Supportin� Documents • Analysis of Issues • Resolution RZ12-15 • Ordinance 12-1055 G Nanc . Anderson, AICP City iner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): ^ Notes: �� r � ZN12-5 Page 2 --� Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the Comprehensive Plan designation? The Coinprehensive Plan has designated the site as Commercial. • What is the existing zoning of the subject site? 525 Blake Road is zoned B-4, Neighborhood Business. The MnDOT property and the area owned by 1301 Cambridge is zoned B-3, General Business. • What does the B-4 zoning district allow? The B-4 zoning district allows retail and restaurants. These are the uses proposed by the applicant. Any use that the applicant proposes must meet the allo��ved uses in the B-4 zoning district. • Should the site be rezoned from B-3 to B-4 and B-4 to B-3? 525 Blake Road is currently zoned B-4, and the rezoning of the MnDOT site and part of 1301 � Cambridge to B-4 will make the whole site except for 20 feet to the east B-4. 1301 Cambridge currently is a triangle area to the north of 525 Blake Road and is zoned B-3. The owner of 1301 Catnbridge will retain a small a portion of the property and he wants it to remain B-3. The east 20 feet of 525 Blake Road will be rezoned to B-3. Alternatives 1. Reconunend approval of the rezoning. By recommending approval of the rezoning, the City Council will consider a reconunei�dation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the rezoning. By recoininending denial of the rezoning, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the Planning Commission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further infoi7nation. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. �� CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ12-15 RESOLUTION MAKING F1NDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE REZONING 525 BLAKE ROAD AND THE TWO LOTS NORTH OF 525 BLAKE ROAD FROM B-3 TO B-4 AND THE EAST 20 FEET OF 525 BLAKE ROAD FROM B-4 TO B-3 WHEREAS, an application for Zoning Amendment ZN 12-5 has been made by Hopkins Blake Retail, LLC; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for zoning amendment was made on October 2, 2012, by Hopkins Blake Retail, LLC; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on October 22, 2012: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. 4. The legal description of the property to be rezoned is as follows: � That part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which is described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 68; thence South 88 degrees 33 minutes 54 seconds East, assumed bearing along the north line of said Lot 68 a distance of 204.00 feet to a point hereinafter known as Point "A"; thence return North 88 degrees 33 minutes 54 seconds West, along said north line a distance of 204.00 feet to the point of commencement; thence South 00 degrees 25 minutes 48 seconds West, assumed bearing along the west line of said Lot 68, a distance of 122.41 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing southerly along said west line of Lot 68 to a point 225.00 feet north from the southwest corner of said Lot 68; thence at right angles South 89 degrees 34 minutes 12 second East, a distance of 208.00 feet; thence North 02 degrees 24 minutes 28 seconds West, a distance of 54.86 feet to a point that bears South 00 degrees 32 minutes 54 seconds East, a distance of 76.65 feet from the aforementioned Point "A"; thence southwesterly a distance of 209.58 feet more or less, to the point of beginning, EXCEPTING therefrom that part lying westerly of the easterly right of way line of Hennepin County Right of Way Map No. 2, recorded in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 435187. All that part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: � All that part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, described as follows; Beginning at the Southwest corner of Tract DD, Registered Land Survey No. � 1058, files of the Registrar of Deeds, County of Hennepin, which point is also the Northv��est corner of said Lot 68; thence East 204 feet along the South line of Tract DD; thence South for a distance of 76.65 feet along a line which is the South extension of a line distant 204 feet East, parallel with and measured at right angles to the West line of said Tract DD; thence South��vesterly along a line drawn parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Tract DD to the West line of said Lot 68; thence North along the West line of said Lot 68 to the point of beginning, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Deeds in and for Heruiepin County. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the West 74.00 feet of said Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239. That part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision I�To. 239, Hemlepin County, Minnesota, described as follo«�s: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 68; thence South 00 degrees 25 minutes 48 seconds West, assumed bearing along the west line of said Lot 68, a distance of 135.01 feet to a point 225 feet north from the southwest corner of said Lot 68; thence at right angles South 89 degrees 34 minutes 12 second East, a distance of 208.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 00 degrees 25 minutes 48 seconds West, a distance of 173.63 feet to the north line of the South �5 feet of said Lot 68; thence I�Torth 88 degrees 34 minutes 04 seconds West, along said north line, a distance of 20.05 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 49 seconds East, a distance of 304.99 feet to the north ^ line of said Lot 68; thence South 88 degrees 33 minutes 58 seconds East, along said north line, a distance of 16.12 feet to a point 204 feet East from said Northwest corner of Lot 68; thence South 00 degrees 32 minutes 54 seconds East, a distance of 76.65 feet; thence South 02 degrees 24 minutes 28 seconds East, a distance of 54.86 feet to the point of beginniiig. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Zoning Amendinent ZN12-5 is hereby recoirullended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Commercial. 2. That the proposed uses comply with the permitted use of the B-4 zoning. 3. That the zoning and the Comprehensive Plan designation will be consistent. Adopted this 22nd day of October 2012. ATTEST: Aaron Kuznia, Chair � CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 12-1055 .� AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE TWO LOTS NORTH OF 525 BLAKE ROAD FROM B-3 TO B-4 AND THE EAST 20 FEET OF 525 BLAKE ROAD FROM B-4 TO B-3 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: That the present zoning classification of B-3, General Business, upon the following described premises is hereby repealed, and in lieu thereof, the said premises are hereby zoned as B-4, Neighborhood Business. That part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which is described as follows: Conunencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 68; thence South 88 degrees 33 minutes 54 seconds East, assutned bearing along the north line of said Lot 68 a distance of 204.00 feet to a point hereinafter known as Point "A"; thence return North 88 deb ees 33 minutes �4 seconds West, along said north line a distance of 204.00 feet to the point of commencement; thence South 00 degrees 25 ininutes 48 seconds West, assumed bearing along the west line of said Lot 68, a distance of 122.41 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing southerly along said west line of Lot 68 to a point 225.00 feet north from the southwest corner of said Lot 68; thence at right angles South 89 degrees 34 minutes 12 second East, a distance of 208.00 feet; thence North 02 degrees 24 minutes 28 seconds West, a distance of 54.86 feet to a point that bears South 00 `'" degrees 32 minutes 54 seconds East, a distance of 76.65 feet from the aforementioned Point "A"; thence southwesterly a distance of 209.58 feet more or less, to the point of beginning, EXCEPTING therefrom that part lying westerly of the easterly right of way line of Hennepin County Right of Way Map No. 2, recorded in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 435187. All that part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: All that part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, described as follows; Beginning at the Southwest corner of Tract DD, Registered Land Survey No. 1058, files of the Registrar of Deeds, County of Hennepin, which point is also the Northwest corner of said Lot 68; thence East 204 feet along the South line of Tract DD; thence South for a distance of 76.65 feet along a line which is the South extension of a line distant 204 feet East, parallel with and measured at right angles to the West line of said Tract DD; thence Southwesterly along a line drawn parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Tract DD to the West line of said Lot 68; thence North along the West line of said Lot 68 to the point of beginning, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Deeds in and for Hennepin County. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the West 74.00 feet of said Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision I�To. 239. That the present zoning classification of B-4, Neighborhood Business, upon the following described premises is hereby repealed, and in lieu thereof, the said premises are hereby zoned as B-3, General Business � That part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision I�1o. 239, Heniiepin County, Minnesota, described as � follows: Conunencing at the north«�est corner of said Lot 68; thence South 00 degrees 25 ininutes 48 seconds West, assumed bearing along the «�est line of said Lot 68, a distance of 135.01 feet to a point 22� feet north from the southwest corner of said Lot 68; thence at right angles South 89 degrees 34 minutes 12 second East, a distance of 208.00 feet to the point of begiiuung; thence South 00 degrees 25 minutes 48 seconds West, a distance of 173.63 feet to the north line of the South 55 feet of said Lot 68; thence North 88 degrees 34 minutes 04 seconds West, along said north line, a distance of 20.05 feet; thence l�Torth 00 degrees 24 minutes 49 seconds East, a distance of 304.99 feet to the north line of said Lot 68; thence South 88 degrees 33 minutes 58 seconds East, along said north line, a distance of 16.12 feet to a point 204 feet East from said Northwest corner of Lot 68; thence South 00 degrees 32 minutes 54 seconds East, a distance of 76.65 feet; thence South 02 degrees 24 minutes 28 seconds East, a distance of 54.86 feet to the point of beginning. First Reading: October 23, 2012 Second Reading: November 7, 2012 Date of Publication: November 15, 2012 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: November 15, 2012 � Eugene J. M��ell, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Signature Date � i o�o�z.,..,.e�P,o..,,;�a�.�.,., _ �� o _ N � f , � HIGHWAY _ � STATE � � � I — � �� TRacr oo. 1 � � L� NW. LIN 05 1 e I � � R.�.s. 1 � � / � �,r,%�� i � / 1� "� `1`' _ I / � 1 Parcel Description: I I / ��J � AU that part o/Cat 68,�Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, Hennepin �� f� County, Minnesato, descri6ed os lollows: I ��t! UNE TRACT rn � � � DD, R.L.S. 1058 / I ,. U I � _ � All thot port af Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, described os �/ � � �� 1 /ollows; Beginning ot the Southwesf corner o/ rract DD. Registered \ I ��✓ -r-�n i•T r�n � Lond Survey Na. 1058, files af fhe Registror o/Deeds, Caunty of POINT OF BfG1NNlNG, I � i i�ri"� UV 1 I Hennepin, which paint is a/sa fhe Northwest comer o/soid Lot 68: \NW. CORNER LOT 68� I thence East 704 7eef o/ong the South line of rroct DD; thence AND SW. CORNER I � I South fo� a distonce o1 76.65 /eet olong a line which is the South TRACT OD, R.LS. NO.� -5. LINE TRACT � exlension o/a line disfont 204 leel Eos(, porollel wilh ond Y058 �I I I �\ OD, R.LS. 1058 � I meosured ot right ongles to the West line of soid Tracf DD; thence � �— � 704.00 � _ Southwesterly along o line drawn porallel wi�h the Northweste�ly line � _ _ - ` , — o(soid 7ract DD to (he Wesf line of soid Lof 68; thence No�th 74.01 �� olong the Wesf /ine of soid Lot 68 to the point of beginning, f / r2,g.gg — according to the plat thereof on /ile and of record in the o//ice af 74.00 — 1 ��- the Registror o(Deeds in and Ior Hennepin Gounty. I ` � I — ' �I NORTH LINE c� I / LINE PARALLfL w/7H AND �.�� J �LOr 68 EXCEP7ING THEREFROM lhe West 74.00 leef ol said Lo1 68, Audilor's 74.00 FEET EAST OF 1Nf I� �I�� I � WEST LINE OF LOT 68 ('�� ✓ Subdivision No. 239. I C� Q I � �,i ��t�IIV � I Q ✓� 1 I <` I �� O I /' b C� Al��`� � o �I�)✓ � , ^ . I � C� �(�vtI I o i ��I��I \ / ^T 11 LINE PARALLEL W17N I ry \�- ��I� I � I �^�lJ� C.V� �:: 1 �THE W LINE OF TRACT DD, R.LS. IOSB I F_ I � ' I <' Q I PApALLEL \ . WIT I I C� I � I I� iNE Nw�DD NR��5' 1058 � / � . TRA�T �( �) � I �—`�---- �a.00 --�— �3n.OJ �' � �✓ � W. UNE OFI L O T 68, I �� AUDITOR'S SUHDIVISION� � Zp9$8 n I� I NO. 2J� � ��' � �� : � a ,� ., �ote 10/09/12 sneet 1 oF 1 Hopkins Z��Z��SkF04 dw ��. Wertwood Rofmlonoi SaMcm,Inc. ssea,.a..mo��. �� Prepered for. Parcel Sketch Etl�n Prrri�,MN 553N PHONE 8 51-9 3131 5 0 � �� Solomon Real Estate Group AI11000 lte FAM 95]J3]-SB]] �nwv: HIN' lALF1� 1�BBB-93]-fi160 x.�a rn...w b./a.m Minnetonka.Minneaota 55305 Hopldne.MinnesoG Y�IeStVY00d www.w.s�woodv�m � \ ( \ � � � � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � � W.LINf OF COf 68 AL50 KNONN AS THf 1 � C � -_ W LINE 0£7NE NF I/4 OF THE NE 1/< j -` � NW COR Of lOT 68--` C Q�SEC 19. 1NA. Ill.RCf Y1; m `1 S N^0025'sE'E 77500 � / � — 1 � - ��— _ _ T` _ � � 500°IS_Ie'W f12.s1_ �. _ � � ' T 9 ��, ,� ,�,�� ' �,,, �,,, 4 — — �X� i vV. lJ,� I �= � -�- - - - - - � -a � . �,�,�-��,� ..�,, T:=� �--�--�„-,,,- -- - - - - � � :� �,� � _ � mF , i i _,�_,.�_, ,,._.._�;.-, . � z ,,,��,r �� .��;� �,��,�. ,.�. � � �+�=_ � �- �ry O �9� n I � "' m � � � I 15 25 %-"' _ — _ � \ \1 � bum �Q_ o I I o=h w _' u _ Ym e i �:g� m I �A u �I \U1 3 & �m�` � � ' ``'I 1 _ ' � �� ' >z� N �� Y I I sa� a ��x g . � �x�' m r_ I 1 I NgY �� I �. I � 1 -'"� Q 1 I �a �6 : I c` bGo > I ,.li � o� r I I� ��l � 11 � ,`I I / I ` _ ' _ � ' � I �� ' — � �� 31.96 76.65 � � I " N07°Tl78�iV 500^JI'SI E � I I I I (.1 l> / � � �� U � - r" U n� R � . I I -i -�� ' ;�� C� ;� I I � �� ;� � � � Uly 4 � I I � - C'1 : I � U� � C_ F � � i � 1 _ m ^R Cf:� N `,: Q a2 I ` N q� �7 cr � � A� I � <� _ Q �^ m ;� �m I I � � N �� I I I C�- _1 � � , p� F+ II ' r � �_»rsr utie oF rHe C� , C� __ I15 IS I EA57 I�0�cT Q�LOi 68 -1 � � I I 1 � �> � rt I S01°29'08"W JO<.93 `J JJ �' �I � '«, I c, ,, c� � � "o I � � I `'' b �I ' I �� i I � � � ��1 i - - - - O O ?N O 3 O �Q�n F �.O (n 4 4 O O In C� j O �.I "`�1 tD� ]��j�O �C U�i � j C ��O� j C � �� QD � 2�.G7� C �n N 'S^b� �j N ��O j-� o O �.j. J � (A� N � � F �� n � -�,. N O ^ O � O N �n � � <D � T'j.O N � ?�A' b� x �"-o � rn.'_c„�o c.��.`D m o c„�m �n � C2; ro `�' � aT� v�, � ��o o�� `�r~v�`,-° o `4°�O �o � � Q � no�o a� 03'� o �.,.m o�'a �m ° a�.. n � °c �o r�o �.°� � �� v`Di o�.�,. m y'� � O � � ^ � oam o» > o� � �y �- .�`� o �ab� m °��.`Drv '^ �mc.,`0 ma N A�`�•�T"i° � rvo °'° o�+��o °�o � ? � � � o�`°y ati'T" y a° ?o ��...�n � �+ �� m� �' � a o � j.N n o o � a�� o Q T E 4 y. � m '^� p a� o {'j �-.]��1 r oi S j � r v�i � � � Q o�Sn a�'j a�^�-n o am 40�cn� �,o- �`��rn �o o� c o ' ti o a�W� � i o 0 4 0 o rn � • . o o°o o � � �-'�-.�'u'_'•�m �,� "cb m � F y� �c m o� o T�o n ` 3' o c �a �'^�o o ti° � �g� ° ' � ° �' ' Cl� ►TJ � � o� om ��do �`ocn'4� > j-ono 0 y y p O rt� � Z�o�o � a�� O c m H �� y 4 N � o � � `��' � m�o'� s � o m �.� � � � ao`c � o cn m y o T�'`�°�°o � 4� °Q o K'' S �� 4��a^"-� � j ,`` � m o �n rn rn vi � S �n r,c0 �N� O Q �C � 1 j O C� J � �4Tk� ° �- �m� � �� ?�- i'3 m ; W � O m� � rG O �� j�� v 4•. j O O 4 j � �„� _ �� a 4 0� p m Q?� S m P n c� N � �➢� ��<D Iti tp C Q^O� j O �p 0 � p 'a Z �� ? l n ��1 j. �� T p��N �^wJ� W 5 �' cl W �O O b � � � b I � � i — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — � a W.LJNE OF LOT 69 AL50 KNOWN AS TH£ 1 { � w LiNE OF THE NE I/4 OF 7HE NE!/i j Nw COR OF LOT 6B__` �p - __ Q�Sc'C 19� iNA. I/J,RCF.11 / —` (SW COR 7RAC�DOf K I - N°0075'ee'f 775.00 — � , —\\ — — �� _ � . SCO^ISYB'W�J5.01 � , �-- �, — — — —� � �,.,,,,,,,-,, , � , r..vv,� ,`�'vr;ri "rv. �ii� I r ' �r ---� - - - - - -� - � --� ; — � A � ninii� i — — — — — I II � Nc��,. _�`'�,"d ;'�vP.`�� 'i��liT v,� ,�.,� ,��;,=' ,"d�^.. � 1 � � �x= m� � �- - - _ _ _ ° m� �� -fi-- � �"'m io� o I 25 25 I n _ _ _ — \ 1 a \ 3 "a,a g`m m I I � � �� \1y o Y� ' I I I ' N �n- I �-�y 1 o � I I 8 � o= S I I �� , __,,.I � 1 II �> I � `1 64a6' I —m 1 I `a , P� �{j I m I— N00^7t'19'E �6/ J6�.99 � N^� —`\ � � I ` �o / 0 — _ ' � ,� r I +U � I a I �� , �7 �;� �� F 500°75'1B"W 1725J 54.B6 �500°!?'Si�£76.65' � / . I ;',i \501°71"1B'E 1 �� I / I �) '�' ' � �� r � �7 m � - �;; _ cr, � � � . I I i �� C� ;J II m �� C;l �� 4 \ \ � I : - �� ; I m' U m � �' g ,--,I1 � �� "'; p o s'� `` o �m c� � i„ � ,, �� I � �; � - O mm �I � �1> m � � a� I I � C� _-I '� � - F+ I I _� �t � >> _MfST LwE OF 1HE r �� M I 75 15 I EAST 140�T Q�LOT 6H \� �.� v� � � ]� : � � I � soi^zs'oa'w saa.93 C J �J N ^ I I I `«� I <� p �I I � � �; � � I � �s I I � I `; � �� I � `.' _ _ � � �1 i ��o o �,� o a� ��,�,so o�� ' `�'v, y o"'c �� 4 °'a�n °.`° g'3 0° �. ' � o"-^�m m ' ac" o `° � rn o"- � ° � °j� � ' �n � ' m o o ao� � � �TUO ��n 4^�� On o fi Q O.. �^� � T� T, �F �� ` O O ? � I'l�?� cn 3 �Z�+�p �j?�rt`� i o . A y �°n�v� ° n ��-`° ° ° m � � m ° P .�, , rn�� m c o �.5� � o ^��•y `D � y O � �1 0 4 p cD (D o ] ] � S 4, e: ° cn��, -,�+ g w� ro A`�o �v`° o a g �' v4i'�� rvo° ��a°3�y ��° 0 4 �/� � � N• (n � �po?4`N° �° m ?cpCoaC � o0 n 0`� p n � j � F �' /� � rn 4�«O � �� `n m?� p fn .H._ y U1 {V o�i0 I��4p�O ni�� 40 2 �� y o � O�� ?N o �N �y ' `. O v� �'fn ��.N fp �O � ry <D �� C-.�l Q 7 ,��C V7 O }� [ � � 1 j. �?N� o m � :°rn C � � y f 4� �, � � .. cn Q� ro �n'4 2 Cn �'d � .``rr�� y acna a�� c.,�o" o ° [�D O �o ac ° � o m;'�"m"�n n m a �v �� N 4 J?] � N UI�n O � O ID y C.i �,� � j-� y 2� m N � c➢T�'� � O' �, �O � � � � Q � o �o �T� �o .,. 2 � a. �55 � y '�'�-4 Q�o a 4`0 � o G,i v�i� j H o N y F cn'm �,�.�^ �y� '�cn� � 3'1a�p ce �O p? � u� � m R " �-� c�n +� moj ��'o �rn �- � � N �j•¢o tnp y �0�.2�� m 4m Qn j. p c `^ j a c�-., p �o �o o`.°.rn `° o ti cn�� .cNco o��,� � ° c _ W a �' � � � � � 4�o`a� `c . � � � I � October 16, 2012 Planning Report SPR12-4 SITE PLAN REVIEW—�25 BLAKE ROAD Proposed Action Staffrecomnlends the following motion: Adopt Resolution RZ12-17. reconunending approval of a site plan to construct two 6000 square feet buildin�s at 525 Blake Road. Overview Hopkins Retail, LLC, is proposing to redevelop the foizner BP gas station site located at 525 Blake Road into a retail building. It is proposed that the existing building will be razed and two buildings will be constructed. The new development will also include two lots to the north. One lot is owned by the apartinents to the east and the second owned by MnDOT. The development also has a small area in St. Louis Park. In addition to the site plan approval, the new development«�ill include a replat, rezoning, and an overlay zoning of Planned Unit Development (PUD). '� The buildings as proposed will have approximately 12,000 square feet of retail. Access to the new buildings will be from Catnbridge Street and a new access ��ill be from Division Street in St. Louis Park. At this time no tenants have been identified. Primary Issues to Consider � What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • What are the specifics of the redevelopment? • What is the applicant's time line? • What are the items that will have to occur for this development to proceed? Supportin�Documents • Analysis of issues • Resolution RZ 12-17 • Site plans � Nancy . Anderson, AICP City Pla er � Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: �� ., �� i � , �,. ' � SPR12-4 Page 2 --� Primarv Issues to Consider. • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property will be B-4, Neighborhood Business. The Comprehensive Plan has designated tlus site as Commercial. The north part of the site will be rezoned B-4 so the whole site is B-4 except for a small strip to the east, the zoning and Comprehensive Plan will be consistent. • What are the specifics of the redevelopment? Building The development will consist of two 6,000 square feet, one story buildings connected by a inechanical room. There will be two patio areas designated, one on the north side of the building by Blake Road and the second on the east side of the building between the buildings. Parking/Access � The parking area will be located on the east side of the site. The site requires 60 parking spaces for 12,000 square feet of retail. The site plan shows 78 parking spaces, with 18 being compact spaces. If there is a restaurant, this will increase the required parking. Access to the site will be from Cainbridge Street and from a new access point from Division Street in St. Louis Park. The two access points to the site from Blake Road and one on Cambridge will be eliminated. Exterior The exterior of the building will be primarily brick. The exterior along Blake Road will be primarily brick and inetal panels. There is glass shown on the plans on the ends along Blake and on either side of inechanical room. The east exterior will be brick and glass. There will be metal fascia on the end caps. ' Staff does have a concern about the exterior along Blake and the metal panels with glass only on the ends and on the sides of the mechanical room. Staff inet with Mr. Johnson regarding the appearance of the elevation along Blake Road. The two glass areas on either side of the mechanical room will be glass, but one will be glass that is not transparent. Staff asked that the metal panels be broken up so they appear less like the back of a building. There are six metal panels along Blake Road, three on each side of the glass next to the mechanical area. Mr. Johnson has agreed that the two middle metal panels will be changed to appear different than the other inetal panels, breaking up the exterior. � SPR12-4 Page 3 Landscaping � The site requires 21 plantings. The site plan indicated 18 plantings in Hopkins and nine additional plantings in St. Louis Park. In addition, in St. Louis Park there will be additional plantings around the city monument. The landscaping will be along the perimeter of the site. There will also be a variety of pereiulials planted. Lighting The building will have some wall sconces on the ends of the building and on the east side. Any other site lighting has not been detailed on the plans. Any lightin� will have to comply with the ordinance. Engineering/Public Works The City Engineer has reviewed the prelirninary plans and noted the following: • Will need watershed pennit • Will need to provide stonn water calculations showing control for 2, 10 and 100 year discharges off site • Will need letter from St. Louis Park pennitting entrance from cul-de-sac on north end • Will need to remove retaining wall in Blake Road right-of-way or obtain pennit from Hemiepin County for said retaining wall • Will need parking lot permit from Hopkins � • Will need to confornl to Hopkins Std specifications Fire Marshal The fire marshal has reviewed the preliminary plans and found them acceptable. Trash The trash enclosure will be on the east side of the parking area and it will be enclosed with brick and a wood gate. The ordinance requires trash areas to be enclosed. Sidewalk There will be sidewalk along Blake Road and Cambridge Street. In addition to the sidewalk along Blake, the building will have a sidewalk in front of the building with a retaining wall on the north side. The retaining wall and part of the sidewalk on the north side of the building is in the right-of-way. Fencing Fencing is required along parking areas. The site plan indicates a decorative fence along the east side of the site. The ordinance requires fencing to capture the headlights of cars. The details of � SPR12-4 Page 4 �` the fence are not indicated on the site plans. If the abutting property ov�ner agrees to a decorative fence that would be one item for the PUD agreement. The abutting property is residential; however, the area that abuts the site is a drive��ay. Bike Racks The site plan does not indicate any bike racks. Staff would recoinrnend adding bike racks to the site. Signage The site plan indicates signage on the building and a monument sign. The pylon sign is in St. Louis Park. The site is allowed three square feet per front foot of lot. The front of the lot is Cambridge. The frontage along Cambridge is 128 feet. The site is allowed 384 square feet. If the applicant is planning for more signage than permitted by ordinance, this can be an item for the PUD agreement. Setbacks The following are the B-4 and the proposed setbacks: B-4 Proposed � fi•ont yard 1 foot 16.9 feet west side yard 10 feet 0 feet east side yard 15 feet 53 feet rear yard 10 feet 67 feet Watershed District This development will have to be approved by the Watershed District. Any City approvals will be contingent on their approval. Surrounding Uses The site is sunounded by multi-fainily housing to the east and south, Hwy 7 to the north and Walgreens to the west. • What is the applicant's time line? The applicant is planning to start construction as soon as possible. • What are the items that will have to occur for this development to proceed? � • PUD agreement SPR12-4 � Page 5 • Rezoning the property • MnDOT transferring the property to the City � • City of Hopkins transfei7ing the MnDOT property to the applicant • Filing the plat Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the site plan to construct two 6,000 square foot retail buildings at 525 Blake Road. By recoininending approval of the site plan, the City Council will consider a recoinmendation of approval. 2. Recoirunend denial of the site plan to construct two 6,000 square foot retail building at 525 Blake Road. By recommending denial of the site plan, the City Council will consider a recommendation of deniaL If the Planning Corninission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further infornlation. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. � �� CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ12-17 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN TO CONSTRUCT TWO, 6000 SQUARE FEET BUILDINGS AT 525 BLAKE ROAD WHEREAS, an application for Site Plan Review SPR12-4 has been made by Hopkins Blake Retail, LLC ; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a Site Plan approval was made by Hopkins Blake Retail, LLC, on October 2, 2012; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Con�unission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on October 22, 2012: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; � 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and, 4. A legal description of the subject property is as follows: That part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision I�To. 239, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Lot 68 distant 122.41 feet South from the Northwest corner of said Lot 68; thence South along said West line 12.56 feet, more or less, to a point 225 feet North from the Southwest corner of said Lot 68; thence East, at a right angle 208 feet; thence South, at a right angle 173.72 feet, more or less, to the North line of the South 55 feet of said Lot 68; thence East along said North line to the West line of the East 140 feet of said Lot 68; thence North along the last mentioned West line to the North line of said Lot 68; thence West along the North line of said Lot 68 to a point 204 feet East froin the Northwest corner of said Lot 68; thence South, deflecting to the left 91 degrees 59 minutes 00 seconds, a distance of 76.65 feet; thence Westerly a distance of 209.58 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning; Except that part of the above described land designated as Parcel 33A on Hennepin County Right-of-Way Map No. 2 recorded in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 435187. AND ^ That part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision Number 239, Hennepin County, Minnesota, located in the North 1/2 of Section 19, Township 117 North, Range 21 West of the Sth Principal Meridian, and described as follows: t . Beguining at the intersection of the center lines of Monk Avenue and Cambridge Street; thence Northerly along the center line of Monk Avenue a distance of 195 feet; thence Easterly at right angles to said center line of `� Monk Avenue a distance of 208 feet; thence Southerly at right angles to last described line approximately 195 feet to the center line of Cambridge Street; thence Westerly at a right angle along the center line of Cambridge Street to the point of beginning, excepting therefrom the part thereof conveyed to the City of Hopkins by Document No. 3040482 and further excepting therefrom the part conveyed to Hennepin CoLulty by Document No. 4713173. AND All that part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: All that part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, described as follows; Begiruling at the Southwest corner of Tract DD, Registered Land Survey No. 1058, files of the Registrar of Deeds, County of Hennepin, which point is also the Northwest corner of said Lot 68; thence East 204 feet along the South line of Tract DD; thence South for a distance of 76.65 feet along a line which is the South extension of a line distant 204 feet East, parallel with and measured at right angles to the West line of said Tract DD; thence Southwesterly along a line drawn parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Tract DD to the West line of said Lot 68; thence North along the West line of said Lot 68 to the point of beginning, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Deeds in and � for Hennepin County. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the West 74.00 feet of said Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Site Plan Review SPR12-4 is hereby recommended for approved based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed redevelopment. 2. That the proposed use meets the requirements for site plan review. 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Site Plan Review SPR12-4 is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. That the new 525 Blake Road be site be rezoned to B-4. 2. That the east 20 feet of 525 be rezoned to B-3. 3. That the City Engineer approves the final plans. 4. That the PUD overlay zoning for the replatted 525 Blake Road is approved. 5. That the site be replatted. 6. That the watershed district approves the proposed development. �-- �--� Adopted this 22nd day of October 2012. ATTEST: Aaron Kuznia, Chair �\ i� �� i� �� _ .+ � Iffoaff OQ@00002 Oo U1 P. (A N� — —.— 51,— . I ... ... F i >y < ugg 1 40, z z z > ;2r 0 > 7<0 m -0 z All z > 0 z 2s 6 0a a m (m 2s I� r4, ' �� s w�44 1"41,501,9 11 1 t � �§ass s � AN 'R qip iftH x$g ql!sa 11RN Hliq � n= � � Via= IRWIN 912�gljj, "I Sig gig fg �H 2 I' m s N9 4 1.18,h e MR 9 q �;g a€ SAI MJF P RM SH .4 g nisi I 54$ q jjjNR All B gig � $ s 1` N -i `5'kFig 9 x NS w 4 � 8 e ' �� s w�44 1"41,501,9 11 1 t � �§ass s � AN 'R qip iftH x$g ql!sa 11RN Hliq � n= � � Via= IRWIN 912�gljj, "I Sig gig fg �H 2 I' m s N9 4 1.18,h e MR 9 q �;g a€ SAI MJF P RM SH .4 g nisi I 54$ q jjjNR All B gig � $ I \ \ / / § .� ( / I no all IMM � I 1011 OIL -- JIM -4- IF �ImJ Zn , 14 2E I m g: I afia'I� Fib i R IM 11 M. III -RPN 02 �$$ � Ni 'a I � -,$ � £ �INII 5 o f a � >a � o Iii Na 1, !^€ 91 $ F�$ °a� 4 n 1!4 I $ . l N P f Y N �m C wN3PupvmuwYN gg = g N N Cg> fY N 8 fi$ W W go' W W °oW W �F $ mp6 Wan 1 18 q A � � � U, 1 NP . � $ �� Q I, - _gad I'M pag$_ aNa "4g U � � � �m � i'AT g ° �9 21 5 fil Mot jig's I I I I Hi Yp q ji� p A i m . III, u Ri E! HIM ge- li6 "Oil 'PIP uh goll;; HUI I hllqljil IN. 1 120s 1 -flj ospi H �p, H IM 4, 411 NM_AN 1H gig §01 in a I ---� � Plaiinin Re ort ZN12-6 October 16, 2012 g p PUD OVERLAY REZONING —�25 BLAKE ROAD Pronosed Action Staff recommends the follo��ing motion: Move to adopt Resolution RZ12-18. recominendin� approval of Ordinance 12-10�6 placing an o��erlav zonin� of Planned Unit Development (PUD) at 525 Blake Road. Overview Hopkins Blake Retail, LLC, has purchased the fornler BP gas station at 525 Blake Road. They are proposing to redevelop the former BP gas station site located at 525 Blake Road into a retail building. It is proposed that the existing building will be raze.d and two buildings will be constructed. The new development «�ill also include ri��o lots to the north. One lot is owned by the apartments to the east and the second owned by MnDOT. The development also has a small area in St. Louis Park. At this time Five Guys Burger and Fries, Bruegger's Bagel, Sprint and Fantastic Sam's are the tenants. Two additional tenants can be added. The buildings as proposed will have approximately 12,000 square feet of retail. Access to the new buildings will be from Cambridge Street and a new access will be from Division Street in � St. Louis Park. The site will be rezoned with an overlay zoning of Planned Unit Development (PUD). The PUD zoning allows flexibility with the underlying zoning of B-4. Along with the overlay zorung to PUD, there will be an agreement with specific parameters on how the site will be developed. Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the underlying zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? � • Why place an overlay zone of PUD on this property? • What are the areas that would be included in the overlay zone? • What would staff recommend for the PUD agreement? Supporting Documents • Analysis of issues • Resolution RZ12-18 • Ordinance 12-1056 Nancy S. Anderson, AICP City Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: � Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: �� I � 1 -i I ZN 12-6 Page 2 Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the underlying zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property is B-4, Neighborhood Business. For this development to occur as proposed, the property would have to be rezoned to a PUD overlay; this would allow flexibility in site development. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this site as Coirunercial. The base zoning and Comprehensive Plan desi�nation will remain. • Why place an overlay zone of PUD on this property? The Planned Unit Developinent allows a site-specific decelopment with the underlying zoning remaining. This type of development allows for a departure from the strict application of the zoning standards. The applicant and the City enter into an agreement defining the specific allov��ed uses and perfonnance standards for each PUD; and these are delineated in the agreeinent. In this case the underlying zoning of business will remain. In the proposed development the signage may exceed the allowed square footage and size, the setback along Blake Road will be reduced, the fencing along the east side of the side not screening the apartments. ^ Staff is also concerned about the appearance along Blake Road. The agreement will detail the elevatioil exterior along Blake Road. • What are the areas that would be included in the overlay zone? The entire site of the new 525 Blake will be included in the overlay zone. • What��ould staff recommend for the PUD agreement? The following is the staff's recommendations • Bike parking • Fencing on east side • Signage • Side yard setback along Blake • Exterior elevation along Blake Road Alternatives � 1. Recommend approval of the overlay zoning of PUD. By reconunending approval, the City Council will consider a recormnendation of approval. ZN 12-6 � Page 3 2. Recon-unend denial of the overlay zonin� of PUD. By recommending denial, the City Council will consider a recorrunendation of denial. If the overlay zoning is not appro��ed, the existing zoning will reinain and any redevelopment of these sites will have to be �" consistent with the existing zoning. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. � �� y � � CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ12-18 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE REZONING 525 BLAKE ROAD AND THE TWO LOTS TO THE NORTH OF 525 BLAKE ROAD WITH AN OVERLAY PLAI�TNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) WHEREAS, an application for Zoning Amendment ZN12-6 has been made by Hopkins Blake Retail, LLC; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for zoning amendment was made by Hopkins Blake Retail, LLC; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Conunission published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on --� October 22, 2012: all persons present v�ere given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. 4. The legal description of the property is as follows: That part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision I�To. 239, Hennepin County; Minnesota, described as follows: Be�innin� at a point on the West line of said Lot 68 distant 122.41 feet South from the Northwest corner of said Lot 68; thence South along said West line 12.56 feet, more or less, to a point 225 feet North from the Southwest corner of said Lot 68; thence East, at a right angle 208 feet; thence South, at a right angle 173.72 feet, more or less, to the North line of the South �5 feet of said Lot 68; thence East along said I�Torth line to the West line of the East 140 feet of said Lot 68; thence North along the last mentioned West line to the North line of said Lot 68; thence West along the North line of said Lot 68 to a point 204 feet East from the Northwest corner of said Lot 68; thence South, deflecting to the left 91 degrees 59 ininutes 00 seconds, a distance of 76.65 feet; thence Westerly a distance of 209.58 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning; Except that part of the above described land designated as Parcel 33A on Hennepin County Right-of-Way Map No. 2 � recorded in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 435187. AND That part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision Nuinber 239, Hennepin County, Minnesota, located in the North 1/2 of Section 19, Township 117 North, Range 21 West of the Sth Principal Meridian, and described as follows: � Beginning at the intersection of the center lines of Monk Avenue and Cambridge Street; thence Northerly along the center line of Monk Avenue a distance of 195 feet; thence Easterly at right angles to sai.d center line of Monk Avenue a distance of 208 feet; thence Southerly at right angles to last described line approximately 195 feet to the center line of Cambridge Street; thence Westerly at a right angle along the center line of Cambridge Street to the point of begiruiing, excepting therefrom the part thereof conveyed to the City of Hopkins by Document No. 3040482 and further excepting therefrom the part conveyed to Hennepin County by Document No. 4713173. AND All that part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: All that part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, described as follows; Beginning at the Southwest corner of Tract DD, Registered Land Survey No. 1058, files of the Registrar of Deeds, County of Hennepin, which point is also the Northwest corner of said Lot 68; thence East 204 feet along the South line of Tract DD; thence South for a distance of 76.65 feet along a line which is the South extension of a line distant 204 feet East, parallel with and measured at right angles to the West line of said Tract DD; thence Southwesterly along a line drawn parallel «�ith the Northwesterly line of � said Tract DD to the West line of said Lot 68; thence North along the West line of said Lot 68 to the point of beginning, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Deeds in and for Hennepin County. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the West 74.00 feet of said Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Zoning Amendment ZN12-6 is hereby recorrunended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the Planning Conunission reviewed the proposed development. 2. That the proposed development use is consistent with the B-4 zoning. 3. That the overlay district is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. That the underlying zoning of B-4 use remains. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Zoning Amendinent ZN12-6 is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Applicant and the City enter into an agreement that satisfies all the conditions and requirements for this PUD development. � ^ 2. That the Applicant reimburses the City for Attorney's fees associated with the PUD agreement. Adopted this 22nd day of October 2012. ATTEST: Aaron Kuznia, Chair �"� �� CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 12-1056 � AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: All of the land described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein is hereby established and zoned as a Plaruied Unit Development (PUD) Overlay District. The existing B-4 zoning classification for the land included in the PUD Overlay District shall remain in effect as the underlying zoning classification with an overlay zoning classification of Planned Unit Development or PUD. The design standards permitted in the PUD overlay district shall be those described in Exhibit B as well as the requirements governing or applicable within the PUD Overlay District as set forth in the PUD agreement. First Reading: October 23, 2012 Second Reading: November 7, 2012 Date of Publication: November 15, 2012 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: November 15, 2012 �- Eugene J. M�well, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine Luedke, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Signature Date � �J � �� Exhibit A That part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision I�To. 239, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Lot 68 distant 122.41 feet South from the North��vest corner of said Lot 68; thence South along said West line 12.56 feet, more or less, to a point 225 feet North from the Southwest corner of said Lot 68; thence East, at a right angle 208 feet; thence South, at a right angle 173.72 feet, more or less, to the North line of the South 55 feet of said Lot 68; thence East along said 1�Torth line to the West line of the East 140 feet of said Lot 68; thence North along the last mentioned West line to the North line of said Lot 68; thence West along the North line of said Lot 68 to a point 204 feet East from the I�Torth��est corner of said Lot 68; thence South, deflecting to the left 91 degrees 59 minutes 00 seconds, a distance of 76.65 feet; thence Westerly a distance of 209.58 feet, more or less, to the point of begiiuiing; Except that part of the abo��e described land designated as Parcel 33A on Hennepin County Right-of-Way Map No. 2 recorded in the office of the County Recorder as Document I�To. 435187. AND That part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision Number 239, Hennepin County, Mirulesota, located in the I�Torth 1/2 of Section 19, Township 117 North, Range 21 West of the Sth Principal Meridian, ^ and described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the center lines of Monk Avenue and Cambridge Street; thence Northerly along the center line of Monk Avenue a distance of 195 feet; thence Easterly at right angles to said center line of Monk Avenue a distance of 208 feet; thence Southerly at right angles to last described line approxiinately 195 feet to the center line of Cambridge Street; thence Westerly at a right angle along the center line of Cambridge Street to the point of beginning, excepting therefrom the part thereof conveyed to the City of Hopkins by Document No. 3040482 and further exceptin� therefrom the part conveyed to Hennepin County by Document No. 4713173. AND All that part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, Hennepin County, Miruiesota, described as follows: All that part of Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239, described as follows; Beginning at the Southwest corner of Tract DD, Registered Land Survey No. 1058, files of the Registrar of Deeds, County of Hennepin, which point is also the Northwest corner of said Lot 68; thence East 204 feet along the South line of Tract DD; thence South for a distance of 76.65 feet along a line which is the South extension of a line distant 204 feet East, parallel with and measured at right angles to the West line of said Tract DD; thence Southwesterly along a line drawn parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Tract DD to the West line of said Lot 68; thence North along the West line of said Lot 68 to the point of beginning, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Deeds in and for Hermepin County. ^ EXCEPTING THEREFROM the West 74.00 feet of said Lot 68, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239. /� �� i� r � .r,-r --,, October 16, 2012 Planning Report ZN 12-7 MODIFICATION TO TIF DISTRICT NO 2-11 (SUPERVALi� Proposed Action Staff recommends the following inotion: Move to ad�t Resolution RZ10-19, findina tl�at the modification to the tax increment financina plan for Tax Increment Finance District No. 2-11 confonns to the �eneral �lan for the development and redevelopment of the Citv. Overview The City is completing a modification to the above referenced TIF district to complete the following: 1. Decertify parcel 19-117-21-33-0027 (e�isting Supervalu Warehouse) since: a. No redevelopment commenced within the nine (9) year time frame required under the special legislation for the district (would have to have commenced redevelopment by 2009); b. The market value today for tax puiposes is less than when the district was certified (base value), therefore it is a negative dra� on the TIF district (meaning it is taking dollars away because it generates negative increment); 2. Update TIF plan to incorporate special legislation approved in 2003 and 2008, which extended the � term of the district by 4 years (2003) and clarified«-hat TIF dollars could be spent on outside of the boundaries of the TIF district (2008); 3. Update budget to reflect actual increment to date and expected through the extended tenn of the district; and 4. Update the TIF plan to be in conformance ��ith Office of State Auditor (OSA) reporting requirements. It should be noted that the City is not expanding the boundaries of the TIF district. The above actions require the City to go throu�h the entire public hearing process for the district, just as if it were creating a ne��v TIF district. As part of that process, the Planning Commission needs to make the detertnination that the development plan (the new Cargill and Supervalu Office complex) conforms to the general development and redevelopment of the City as described in the Coinprehensive Plan for the City. By approval of the resolution, the Planning Commission is reaffirming its original findings that the redevelopment is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan (prior resolutions passed on September 29; 1998, when the district was originally created and then on August 28, 2001, with the 2001 inodification). Supportin� Documents • Resolution RZ12-19 • TIF 2-11 map � � � i . Nancy . Anderson, AICP City Pl Zer i� �--�. i� , ., .+ �. ... � CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ12-19 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS PLAl\'NING COMMISSION FIl�-DIl�'G THAT THE MODIFICATION TO THE TAX Il\TCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINAI�TCII�G DISTRICT NO.2-11 CONFORMS TO THE GENERAL PLANS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY. WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority U� and For the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, (the "HRA")has proposed to adopt a Modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for T�Increment Financing District I`To. 2-11 (the "Modification"), a redevelopment district located within Redevelopment Project No. 1, and has submitted the Modification to the City of Hopkins Pla�ming Commission (the "Commission")}�ursuant to.'11r�z�7esota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3, a��d WHEREAS, the Commission has revie��ed the Modification to detennine its conforniity with the general plans for the development and redevelopment of the City of Hopkins as described in the Comprehensive Plan for the City. � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission that the Modification conforms to the general plans for tl�e development and redevelopment of the City of Hopkins as a whole. Adopted this 22nd day of October 2012 ATTEST: Aaron Kuznia, Chair �� --1 - ` . � �� I—I �L�1 � — — .. —t ?tC� t•► ._ :tt l� , .� t ' � p ._ _1�7• :)]� ll ' :TT 1� �- iTT 1' k' ,_._, . .. . .. . . . . � �� I � - `► ?_ ,�y � . tt.�� 1.L�Q-£E'T�-LiT-6 i � � � � �� x — `�'1� �� _ �'� _�i ��-~ B�� _ �-�, �-,�r� � � �Y �� r� � � �� 4 `.,f . . i "�� . � � il � i }?��-?c-TZ L T�E ' LtOi'L£-Tt•bii-6i ,�;,YY ; r Y� �f �ti -I..YI�I'• � � . � � ' j TSILO'C' � } liz-Li'['S?;, f � f� I 'r �� .-� 1 l;. ( ► - r� � , �� . � � � �.�� -� � � ��.