Loading...
08-27-2013 � AUGUST SEPTEMBER / MEMBERS S M T W T F S S M T W T F S `/�AEF � UZNIA ^ 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 '-�F SHER � TTA 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 LARD ���' RTH 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 • KERSSEN ✓ANDERSON 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 AGENDA ZONING & PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, August 27, 2013 REGULAR MEETING 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS ----------------------------------------------------- � ITEM: Approve and sign minutes of the July 30, 2013, regular meeting. COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / CASE NO. SUBD13-1 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT - SHADY OAK ROAD Public Public hearing to consider the preliminary/final plat for property at 108, 116 Hearing and 120 Shady Oak Road to combine into one lot COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / CASE NO. SPR13-2 SITE PLAN REVIEW- SHADY OAK ROAD Public Public hearing to consider site plan approval to construct a building at 108, ^ Hearing 116 and 120 Shady Oak Road COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / �� �� �� . � s � � AGENDA LONING & PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 � CASE NO. ZN13-3 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OVERLAY- SHADY OAK ROAD Public Public hearing to consider a PUD overlay zoning for the new building Hearing at 108, 116 and 120 Shady Oak Road COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / CASE NO. SUBD 13-2 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT - SHADY OAK ROAD Public Public hearing to consider the preliminary/final plat for 20 and 24 Shady Hearing Oak Road COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / n ADJOURNMENT � ZONING AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 30, 2013 A regular meeting of the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, July 30, 2013, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Hopkins City Hall. Present were Commission Members Aaron Kuznia, Charles Firth, Andrew Fisher, Andrea Naef, and Scott Kerssen. Jennifer Allard and Doug Datta were absent. Also present was staff inember Nancy Anderson. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Kuznia called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Firth moved and Mr. Kerssen seconded the motion to approve the minutes of the June 25, 2013, regular meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. ---� ITEM: ZN13-2 ZONING AMENDMENTS Ms. Anderson reviewed the proposed amendments. Ms. Anderson noted that massage therapists would be allowed as an accessory use and brew pubs would now be allowed in the B-2 and B-3 zoning districts. The public hearing was opened at 6:37 p.m. No one appeared at the public hearing. Mr. Kuznia moved and Mr. Firth seconded a motion to close the public hearing. The motion was approved unanimously. The public hearing was closed at 6:38 p.m. Mr. Kerssen moved and Mr. Kuznia seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ13-7, recommending approval of various zoning amendments. The motion was approved unanimously. ITEM: VAC13-2 ALLEY VACATION Ms. Anderson reviewed the proposed vacation with the Commission. Ms. Anderson noted that Comcast and Excel Energy have requested easements. Ed Stiele, the applicant, appeared before the Commission. The public hearing was opened at 6:45 p.m. No one appeared at the public hearing. Mr. Kuznia moved and Ms. Naef seconded a motion to close the public hearing. The motion was approved unanimously. The public hearing was closed at 6:46 p.m. Mr. Kuznia moved and Mr. Firth seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ13-8, recommending � approval of an alley vacation west of 612-1 l�h Avenue South. The motion was approved unanimously. MINUTES OF THE ZONING AND PLANNING MEETING, July 30, 2013 Page 2 ITEM: VN13-3 SIGN SETBACK VARIANCE—THE DEPOT � Ms. Anderson reviewed the practical difficulties for the variance. Bo Carlson from Three Rivers Park District appeared before the Commission. No one appeared regarding this item. Mr. Kuznia moved and Mr. Kerssen seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ13-9, recommending approval of a sign setback variance for The Depot Coffee House. The motion was approved unanimously. ADJOURN Mr. Kuznia moved and Mr. Firth seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m. MEMBERS � ATTEST: Aaron Kuznia, Chair .`�... � August 19, 2013 � Planning Report SUBD13-1 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT—SHADY OAK ROAD Proposed Action Staff reconunends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution RZ13-10, recommending a�proval of a preliininarv/final plat for 108, 116, 120 Shady Oak Road. Overview With the reconstruction of Shady Oak Road, Dan Dorholt is proposing to construct a new retail building on what is now Leaman's Liquor, Nelson's Meats, Bakery and Deli and the Syndicate Sales buildings. The buildings will be razed and a new retail building will be constructed. With this replatting the three lots will be combined in one lot and a new building will be constructed. ---� Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • Does the lot meet the zoning requirements? • What are the specifics of the plat? • Does the proposed plat meet the subdivision requirements? • Will park dedication fees be required? Supportin�Documents • Analysis of Issues • Preliminary/Final Plat • Resolution RZ13-10 �J Nanc S. Anderson, AICP City P anner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: �--- Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: SUBD13-1 Page 2 Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property is B-3, General Business. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this site as Commercial. The zoning and the Comprehensive Plan are consistent. • Does the lot meet the zoning requirements? The property is zoned B-3, General Business. The minimum lot size is 3000 square feet. The proposed lot is over 3000 square feet. • What are the specifics of the plat? When the property is replatted there will be one lot for the new retail building. • Does the proposed plat meet the subdivision requirements? The plat, as proposed,meets the subdivision requirements. ,--� • Will park dedication fees be required? Park dedication fee will be required for the new retail lot; however, staff is recommending that the fee be waived. Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the preliminary/final plat. By recommending approval of the preliminary/final plat, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the preliminary/final plat. By recommending denial of the preliminary/final plat, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the Planning Commission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. i� CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ13-10 � RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT FOR 108, 116 AND 120 SHADY OAK ROAD WHEREAS, an application for a preliminary/final plat SUBD13-1 has been submitted by Dan Dorholt; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for preliminary/final plat was submitted by Dan Dorholt on July 26, 2013; � 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on August 27, 2013: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. 4. Legal description of the parcel is as follows: Lots 9, 10 and 11, Block 1, Oak Ridge 2"d Addition NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for a preliminary/final plat SUBD13-1 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the preliminary/final plat meets the subdivision requirements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for preliminary/final plat SUBD13-1 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following conditions: 1. That the applicant must provide current evidence of title, in the form of a commitment for title insurance, to the City Attorney. 2. That the applicant pay the Attorney's fee for title review. 3. That Hennepin County approves the plat. Adopted this 27th day of August 2013. � Aaron Kuznia, Chair Im GVHS Owe Af. Lr me av )y YVO PI • --7— Tzl--� O.,V V. — — — — — — — — — — $3� IC--------- ii mV/ m'ASee Oj° ry — — — — — — — — — — $3� IC--------- ii mV/ m'ASee Oj° � Au ust 20 2013 � Plaimin Re ort SPR13-2 g � g P SITE PLAN REVIEW—SHADY OAK ROAD Proposed Action Staff reconunends the following motion: Adopt Resolution RZ13-1 l, recommendin�approval of a site plan to construct a new buildin� at 108, 116 and 120 Shadv Oak Road. Overview With the reconstruction of Shady Oak Road, Dan Dorholt is proposing to construct a new building on the corner of Bradford and Shady Oak Roads. Currently, Leaman's Liquor,Nelson's Meats, Bakery and Deli and Syndicate Sales are the businesses in this location. Leainan's Liquor is closing,Nelson's Meats, Bakery and Deli and Syndicate Sales are moving. The new building will be consiructed in an L shape. The building will be constructed along Shady Oak and Bradford Roads with the parking on the west and north sides of the site. Snap Print will occupy the south side of the new building with an additiona14600 square feet available � for retail tenants. The new building will be approximately 10,400 square feet. Primary Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • What are the specifics of the redevelopment? • What is the applicant's time line? Supportin�Documents • Analysis of issues • Resolution RZ13-11 • Site plans � ��� Nancy . Anderson, AICP City Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: � Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: SPR13-2 Page 2 � Primary Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property is B-3, General Business. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this site as Commercial. The zoning and Comprehensive Plan are consistent. • What are the speci�cs of the redevelopment? Exterior The exterior will consist of rock face CMU, precast stone, and brick EPS finished at cornice with decorative inserts and reveals. The majority of the building will be a brick veneer. Parking/Access The access to the parking area will be from Shady Oak Road and the alley. There are 28 parking spaces on site. The site is required to have 32 parking spaces. Nine parking spaces on the west side of the site will be for compact vehicles. Access to the building will be from Shady Oak Road and the parking lot. The parking area on the north side of the site has a zero lot line and is � required to have a two-foot setback. The parking setback and parking spaces are items for the PUD agreement. Landscaping The site is required to have 13 plantings. The site has four plantings of the required size and six not of the required size. In addition to the required plantings, the Shady Oak Road side of the building will be planted with a variety of shrubs. The plantings will have a base of either crushed limestone mulch or sod. The three additional plantings are items for the PUD agreement. Lighting The building will have exterior light fixtures, and the parking area will have four lights. A lighting plan was submitted and is acceptable. Engineering/Public Works The City Engineer has reviewed the preliminary plans and found them acceptable. Sidewalk A concrete sidewalk along Shady Oak Road will be added with the reconstruction of Shady Oak � Road. SPR13-2 Page 3 Signage � There are areas on the building for signage; any signage will require permitting. Fire Marshal The fire marshal has reviewed the plans and found them acceptable. Loading dock There will be a loading dock on the west side of the building. Setbacks The following are the required and actual setbacks: B-3 Actual Front yaxd 1 foot 4 feet West side yard 8 feet 8 feet East side yard 10 feet 1 foot Rear yard 15 feet 34' 6" Building height 60 feet 19 feet � Trash The trash enclosure will be located on the northwest side of the site. The enclosure meets the requirements of the ordinance. Surrounding Uses The site is surrounded residential to the west and commercial to the north, south and east. • What is the applicant's time line? The applicant is planning to start construction as soon as possible. Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the site plan to construct a new building. By recommending approval of the site plan, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the site plan to construct a new building. By recommending denial of the site plan, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the Planning Commission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this � i I � I SPR13-2 Page 4 �` alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. �� i"� CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota _- RESOLUTION NO: RZ13-11 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A BUILDING AT 108,116, AND 120, SHADY OAK ROAD WHEREAS, an application for site plan approval SPR13-2 has been made by Dan Dorholt; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a site plan approval was made by Dan Dorholt, on July 26, 2013; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on August 27, 2013: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and, �— 4. A legal description of the subject property is as follows: Lots 9, 10 and 11, Block 1, Oak Ridge 2nd Addition NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for site plan approval SPR13-2 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed redevelopment. 2. That the proposed use meets the requirements for site plan approval. 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Site Plan Review SPR13-2 is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. That the property be rezoned to a PUD overlay district. 2. That a PUD agreement be approved and executed. 3. That the watershed district approves the proposed development. 4. That the site be replatted � Adopted this 27'h day of August 2013. ATTEST: Aaron Kuznia, Chair �'\ �� �� �� i� lilt to o cis ro b g9 3 �8 Ws a g i �d W _-m_, _..._- EI II 1 �I y to o cis ro b g9 3 �8 Ws a g .. ........... ---------- ------- ...... .... . . ------ - ---- - ---- - -------- ---- - ----- - --------- --- if.1 hmh zil H z 015 + + + + ............ . . . . . ........... . ... . .......... pig ...... ....... . . .. ... .......... . - --------- . ......... ... ........ .. ----------- R� SMN 3 Rp$ iR" .mom FL . __ _._ _- _.. °'~•'`. a,a., Sia a� LJ tv !{����x" ua� — — _ _ 1 Ilir0 m -,.._ � 'P�J�, l � -�� 4 /f � � � � ���\\ Y "\��""4\\ ,�\".`w t, °,A"•y,. If 1 r w. "' Y" ., T a art � w" '" � y; \ "\'\ ti • �, a ', r a a HAO�D 81 _. JJU m .�- -�am ,..ate •.-..., _ � j o yya S loll 11 MUMyPIRV % §l aye , fes. .. \ r 1 711 VMS vvynq - f i e � / x1k ✓ l� /p j ( "T Aarurmi fb h pp R�1 Von 1 gf, oil a IS, Cr ros 4 it �^ -.6, u .._.<m"..-.... .�. . /� •, f" �� 9Vf nxa i Tyj(�n a�.W �'u �•. �(� ��.. Ni j{pg - r- �q 01 x m N p p p p p p a s$ m wce aP �.ut; g 'agce P. Sp � a F p � �g 4 q � 1n U1. �`- � id 'x a qy H, i BFd Ina H ttp WI a v w ce 4 "q poen # p nr aaa i n Asa h aw w aw g a p 4 Tv oil fill a tw g� pp�a w$1 a a Y esw =a aw4 IH � Ill g 1iT4M1 wW. ll l�� a of 3w °&�gal P a EPAION allq E1111" Jill ;?;�Ij p1#11 P11 nji a ing 1 11 j!� , I I I ! i IJII ia a alit 2 411 Jill Jet 1.114 . t!nn 'lw 01 � i q 61 it 3 nFillip"Rillig , gx t IF HI Nill 1 ;RI lllr 1gopV , TV , IP 3 P IM; Nil R 1 1 qlAil Pi i i Lill P115, IF it I` dI t1i lip I FUR 2r q m Jill[ 1 110 il it I IP Ilk U lip, q; gig !,;I . Rill A to fill A", R I al AN 1 A It ilia Re N flif 41111 1 tg� gaga pPx ill if I, I -, . all gP 2 all 11) lit Ii h ill} !l I ill[ ml a 1:- 1 pil- Till 'N it a tPR' 1-1 1 fill I lit g1l;' OR 111,F '11 Fill' 5 A I P j- 8 - il g Nis 15 4 T pig 31 ca oil — I 1.411 119 all lit P I ulroj iv it 1? N' Fit f 3 j I 11PI All l 11 Y01345+ ara Nil IF 15 1 A", R ir It ilia Re N flif 41111 1 tg� gaga pPx ill if I, I -, . all gP 2 all 11) lit Ii h ill} !l I ill[ ml a 1:- 1 pil- Till 'N it a tPR' 1-1 1 fill I lit g1l;' OR 111,F '11 Fill' 5 A I P j- 8 - il g Nis 15 4 T pig 31 ca oil — I 1.411 119 all lit P I ulroj iv it 1? N' Fit f 3 j I 11PI All l 11 Y01345+ ara Nil m rm fill I 0 ;m 2 3: u A", R m rm fill I 0 ;m 2 3: u MUFMI 11- 6 1 T ill u 91 .0 - — ------- - . . . . . ................... . . . .. ......... . qg IMI M IIII fl, I1, Ill I III m m Z 0 z 19 is8e 6 1 T ill u 91 .0 - — ------- - . . . . . ................... . . . .. ......... . --� August 19, 2013 � Planning Report ZN13-3 PUD OVERLAY REZONING—SNAP PRINT—SHADY OAK ROAD Proposed Action Staff reconunends the following tnotion: Move to adopt Resolution RZ13-12, recommending a�proval of Ordinance 13-1067, placing an overla z�ning of Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the redevelopment of the north«�est corner of Shady Oak Road and Bradford Road. Overview With the reconstruction of Shady Oak Road, Dan Dorholt is proposing to construct a riew building on the corner of Bradford and Shady Oak Roads. Currently, Leainan's Liquor, Nelson's Meats, Bakery and Deli and Syndicate Sales are the businesses in this location. Leaman's Liquor is closing,Nelson's Meats, Bakery and Deli and Syndicate Sales are moving. The site will be rezoned with an.overlay zoning of Planned Unit Development (PUD). The PUD � zoniug allows flexibility with the underlying zoning of mixed use. Along with the overlay zoning to PUD, there will be an agreement with specific paranleters on how the site will be developed. Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the underlying zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • Why place an overlay zone of PUD on this property? • What are the areas that would be included in the overlay zone? Supporting Documents • Analysis of issues • Resolution RZ13-12 • Ordinance 13-1067 � ,� Nancy �. Anderson, AICP City Pl er Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: ^ Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: i� �� �\ . ZN 13-3 Page 2 -� Primary Issues to Consider • What is the underlying zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The property is rezoned B-3, General Business. For this development to occur as proposed the property will have a PUD overlay; this would allow flexibility in site development. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this site as Commercial. • Why place an overlay zone of PUD on this property? The Planned Unit Development allows a site-specific development with the underlying zoning remaining. This type of development allows for a departure from the strict application of the zoning standards. The applicant and the City enter into an agreement defining the specific allowed uses and performance standards for each PUD, and these are delineated in the agreement. In this case the underlying zoning of B-3, General Business, will remain. In the proposed development, the side yard setback is less than the required, the parking setback is less than required, there are fewer parking spaces than required and the required landscaping is not present. �—. • What are the areas that would be included in the overlay zone? The entire site will be included in the overlay zone. Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the overlay zoning of PUD. By recommending approval, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the overlay zoning of PUD. By recommending denial, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the overlay zoning is not approved, the existing zoning will remain and any redevelopment of these sites will have to be consistent with the existing zoning. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. ^ CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota � RESOLUTION NO: RZ13-12 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE FOR AN OVERLAY PUD ZONING AT 108, 116 AND 120 SHADY OAK ROAD WHEREAS, an application for a Planned Unit Development overlay district ZN13-3 has been made by Dan Dorholt; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a Planned Unit Development overlay districtt ZN13-3 was made by Dan Dorholt; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on August 27, 2013: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for a Planned Unit Deveopment �. overly district ZN13-3 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the overlay district is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. � 2. That the underlying zoning of B-3 remains. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for a Planned Unit Development District ZN13-3 is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Applicant and the City enter into an agreement that satisfies all the conditions and requirements for this PUD development. 2. That the Applicant reimburse the City for Attorney's fees associated with the PUD agreement. Adopted this 27th day of August 2013. Aaron Kuznia, Chair ��, � ' i EXHIBIT A � Lots 9, 10 and 11, Block l, Oak Ridge 2nd Addition �� �\ CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 13-1067 � AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: All of the land described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein is hereby established and zoned as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay District. The existing B-3 zoning classification for the land included in the PUD Overlay District shall remain in effect as the underlying zoning classification with an overlay zoning classification of Planned Unit Development or PUD. The design standards permitted in the PUD overlay district shall be those described in Exhibit B as well as the requirements governing or applicable within the PUD Overlay District as set forth in the PUD agreement. First Reading: September 3, 2013 Second Reading: September 17, 2013 Date of Publication: September 26, 2013 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: September 26, 2013 ,� Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine Luedke, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Signature Date � � August 19, 2013 � Planning Report SUBD13-2 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT–SHADY OAK ROAD Pronosed Action Staff recoirunends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution RZ13-13, reconunendin� �proval of a preliminarv/final plat for 20 and 24 Shady Oak Road. Overvie��v With the reconstruction of Shady Oak Road, 20 and 24 Shady Oak Road need to be re- platted. Syndicate Sales will move from their existing location to the building on Lot 2. With the replat, Lot 2 will consist of the lot with the building and the vacate land to the west of Lot 1. The building on Lot 1 will be razed and become a parking lot. There will be a retaining wall constructed between the new Syndicate Sales lot and the new parking lot. Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • Do the lots meet the zoning requirements? • What are the specifics of the plat? • Does the proposed plat meet the subdivision requirements? • Will park dedication fees be required? Supporting Documents • Analysis of Issues • Preliminary/Final Plat • Resolution RZ13-13 Nanc . Anderson, AICP City Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: — Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: r� �\ �� SUBD 13-2 Page 2 --� Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property is B-3, General Business. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this site as Commercial. The zoning and the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with the proposed use. • Do the lots meet the zoning requirements? The property is zoned B-3, General Business. The minimum lot size is 3000 square feet. Both lots are over 3000 square feet. • What are the specifics of the plat? When the property is re-platted there will be two lots. The rear of Lot 1 will be combined with Lot 2. � Does the proposed plat meet the subdivision requirements? —' The plat, as proposed,meets the subdivision requirements. • Will park dedication fees be required? A park dedication fee will not be required, since no new buildable lots will be created. Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the preliminary plat/final plat. By recommending approval of the preliminary/final plat, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the preliminary/final plat. By recommending denial of the preliminary/final plat, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the Planning Commission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Cominission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. � � CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ13-13 � RESOLUTION MAKING F1NDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY/F1NAL PLAT FOR 20 AND 24 SHADY OAK ROAD WHEREAS, an application for a preliminary/final plat SUBD13-2 has been indicated by the City of Hopkins; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for preliminary/final plat was initiated by the City of Hopkins; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on August 27, 2013: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. 4. Legal description of the parcel is as follows: Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, Oak Ridge 2nd Addition �.., NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for a preliminary/final plat SUBD13-2 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the preliminary/final plat meets the subdivision requirements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for preliminary/final plat SUBD13-2 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following condition: 1. That Hennepin County approves the plat. Adopted this 27th day of August 2013. Aaron Kuznia, Chair I I ____ __". OWNER: MAN D. CARLSON OWNER JOHN V. ms OWNER: 9) qpeN.J. qnl JOHNSON LTD PARTNERSHIP A J �U IN- 1,Salve z ZIA G > - Aim K --------------- "Xx ------------------ , x - --- ----------------- wa____I-- S91 12 3 RIP �4- x. "N i. c, ja (A 40 IWS m A—M. Al— �13 \-COUNTYROAD 61 '(SHADY OAK R OAD, aaa -I ) Zi i 8 : i3 -N .Zp 40 n $ 9. g. -3 - A �U IN- 1,Salve z ZIA G > - Aim I 0. . 49 19 3 3, I CL 13 EP 1- 91- ^=s r CL