Loading...
09-24-2013 SE2TEMBER OCTOBER MEMBERS S M T W T F S S M T W T F S "t,�I,�AEF ��KUZNIA � 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 1�FISHER �) I�ATTA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 � ALLARD � IRTH 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 �/KERSSEN �ANDERSON 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 AGENDA ZONING & PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, September 24, 2013 REGULAR MEETING 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS ----------------------------------------------------- ITEM: Approve and sign minutes of the August 27, 2013, regular meeting. � COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / CASE NO. SPR13-2 SITE PLAN REVIEW- SHADY OAK ROAD Public Public hearing to consider site plan approval to construct a building at 108, Hearing 116 and 120 Shady Oak Road COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / CASE NO. ZN13-3 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OVERLAY- SHADY OAK ROAD Public Public hearing to consider a PUD overlay zoning for the new building Hearing at 108, 116 and 120 Shady Oak Road ^ COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / AGENDA ZONING & PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 � CASE NO. ZCR13-1 CONCEPT FOR PPL Concept for the construction of a 51-unit apartment complex at 1202-1304 Oxford Street ADJOURNMENT ,.-� � '�i���F���e�,6� �. ZONING AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 27, 2013 A regular meeting of the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, August 27, 2013, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Hopkins City Hall. Present were Commission Members Charles Firth, Andrew Fisher, Andrea Naef, Scott Kerssen, Jennifer Allard and Doug Datta. Aaron Kuznia was absent. Also present was staff inember Nancy Anderson. CALL TO ORDER Ms. Naef called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Firth moved and Mr. Kerssen seconded the motion to approve the minutes of the July 30, 2013, regular meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. ITEM: SUBD13-1 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT—SHADY OAK ROAD � Ms. Anderson reviewed the proposed plat. Dan Dorholt, the applicant, appeared before the Commission. Mr. Dorholt stated that he would be a tenant and the other tenants are unknown at this time. The public hearing was opened at 6:37 p.m. No one appeared at the public hearing. Ms. Naef moved and Mr. Datta seconded a motion to close the public hearing. The motion was approved unanimously. The public hearing was closed at 6:38 p.m. Mr. Kerssen moved and Mr. Fisher seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ13-10, recommending approval of the preliminary/final plat. The motion was approved unanimously. ITEM: SPR13-2 SITE PLAN REVIEW— SHADY OAK ROAD Ms. Anderson asked that this item be continued to the September meeting. Mr. Fisher moved and Ms. Allard seconded a motion to continue SPR13-2 to the September meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. ITEM: ZN13-3 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OVERLAY—SHADY OAK ROAD Ms. Anderson asked that this item be continued to the September meeting. ^ Mr. Kerssen moved and Mr. Firth seconded a motion to continue ZN13-3 to the September meeting. I'he motion was approved unanimously. MiNUTES OF THE ZONING AND PLANNING MEETING, August 27, 2013 Page 2 ITEM: SUBD13-2 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT—SHADY OAK ROAD ,.— Ms. Anderson reviewed the proposed plat. Ms. Anderson stated that Lot 2 is the building that Syndicate Sales will be moving into. The public hearing was opened at 6:45 p.m. No one appeared at the public hearing. Mr. Firth moved and Mr. Kerssen seconded a motion to close the public hearing. The motion was approved unanimously. The public hearing was closed at 6:46 p.m. Mr. Kerssen moved and Mr. Firth seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ13-13, recommending approval of various zoning amendments. The motion was approved unanimously. ADJOURN Ms. Allard moved and Mr. Kerssen seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 6:47 p.m. MEMBERS � ATTEST: Andrea Kloehn Naef, Vice Chair � �--� Se tember 16 2013 � Plamiin Re ort SPR13-2 P , g P SITE PLAN REVIEW—SHADY OAK ROAD Pronosed Action Staff reconunends the following motion: Adopt Resolution RZ13-11, recomrnending approval of a site plan to construct a new building at 108, 116 and 120 Shady Oak Road. Overview With the reconstruction of Shady Oak Road, Dan Dorholt is proposing to construct a new building on the corner of Bradford and Shady Oak Roads. Currently, Leaman's Liquor,Nelson's Meats, Bakery and Deli and Syndicate Sales are the businesses in this location. Leaman's Liquor is closing,Nelson's Meats, Bakery and Deli and Syndicate Sales are moving. The new building will be constructed in an L-shape. The building will be constructed along the alley and Bradford Road with the parking on the east and north sides of the site. Snap Print will occupy the south side of the new building with an additional 4600 square feet available for retail -� tenants. The new building will be approximately 10,400 square feet. Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • What are the specifics of the redevelopment? • What is the applicant's tiine line? Supportin�Documents • Analysis of issues • Resolution RZ13-11 • Site plans � �' � Nancy Anderson,AICP City Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: � Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: SPR13-2 Page 2 � PrimarY Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property is B-3, General Business. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this site as Commercial. The zoning and Comprehensive Plan are consistent. • What are the specifics of the redevelopment? Exterior The exterior will consist of rock face CMU, precast stone, and brick EPS finished at cornice with decorative inserts and reveals. The majority of the building will be a brick veneer. The west side of the building abutting the residential area will be primarily concrete block Parking/Access The access to the parking area will be from Shady Oak Road and the alley. There are 28 parking spaces on site. The site is required to have 32 parking spaces. Eight parking spaces on the east side of the site will be for compact vehicles. Access to the building will be from Shady Oak Road and the parking lot. The number of parking spaces will be addressed the PUD agreement. � Landscaping The site is required to have 13 plantings. The site has four plantings of the required size and two not of the required size. In addition to the required plantings, the Shady Oak Road side of the building will be planted with feather reed grass and a black wrought iron fence with five foot high brick piers. The plantings will have a base of either crushed limestone mulch or sod. The seven additional plantings will be addressed in the PUD agreement. Lighting The building will have exterior light fixtures, and the parking area will have four lights. A lighting plan was submitted and is acceptable. Engineering/Public Works The City Engineer has reviewed the preliminary plans and found them acceptable. Sidewalk A concrete sidewalk along Shady Oak Road will be added with the reconstruction of Shady Oak Road. � SPR13-2 Page 3 Signage There are areas on the building for signage; any signage will require permitting. � Fire Marshal The fire marshal has reviewed the plans and found them acceptable. Loading dock There will be a loading dock on the west side of the building. Setbacks The following are the required and actual setbacks and height requirements: B-3 Actual Front yard 1 foot 1.5 feet West side yard 8 feet 0 feet East side yard 10 feet 3.5 feet Rear yard 15 feet 47 feet Maximum building height 60 feet 19 feet � Although the west side yard setback does not meet the setback requirements because the building abuts a residential area, there will be very limited activity to the west because that is the rear of the building. Trash The trash enclosure will be located on the northwest side of the site. The enclosure meets the requirements of the ordinance. Surrounding Uses The site is surrounded by residential to the west and commercial to the north, south and east. • What is the applicant's time line? The applicant is planning to start construction as soon as possible. Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the site plan to construct a new building. By recommending approval of the site plan, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. � SPR13-2 Page 4 � 2. Recommend denial of the site plan to construct a new building. By recommending denial of the site plan, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the Planning Commission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. --� i� CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota �-- RESOLUTION NO: RZ13-11 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A BUILDING AT 108, 116, AND 120 SHADY OAK ROAD WHEREAS, an application for site plan approval SPR13-2 has been made by Dan Dorholt; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a site plan approval was made by Dan Dorholt on July 26, 2013; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on August 27, 2013: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and, � 4. A legal description of the subject property is as follows: Lots 9, 10 and 11, Block 1, Oak Ridge 2na Addition NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for site plan approval SPR13-2 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: , 1. That the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed redevelopment. I 2. That the proposed use meets the requirements for site plan approval. ' 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. ; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Site Plan Review SPR13-2 is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following conditions: ; 1. That the property be rezoned to a PUD overlay district. � 2. That a PUD agreement be approved and executed. � 3. That the watershed district approves the proposed development. � 4. That the site be replatted � ; i i 'i i � Adopted this 24th day of September 2013. ATTEST: Aaron Kuznia, Chair --� �\ t & t /§\ qloll rbi E __ _ _ _ _._._......_... .._.... _............ _._ ..... ............... _......_._..__._..__._..__.. ____.___._...._._ _.._.__. ......._ O C SHIP �� or Nall Rn 0 0 z I m m> m AS I, 4 z 114 5011 CD O X 0 a PAVED L homaml F� ------ . . . ....... am I I :u C: z M I pit I i z IRV m z z��i� z I z 0 m 0 I A 1, 1 1 �a fall e l� 0 p N P p p V P P., Ml U191 9 A 1 111 1! a''" n v N "I f 4 1 q ff I F I H'i U 2.11, 11 U 1'. i� t, ".4 4 9-i R, T 1 iii 4. zi 9 t I w, t fid 'T Aw, U I I a a:at qi L I a RN Ng Aq 14 41 i I I m To Rk n tl WO IT R!" B �jh] Rh 10.,5 't kilo j$ti F ER ka �aH i qi, Till 9yxA —W W'. PH 1 CO. T4 hR t PH So 1a, 9, TZ! 3.4 I -F T if ak 1 '3 R H 9 3-H a kl. 'El it G ,CF '0 , 1 0 1 > 0 Ao­ I;z :7r-* 'M L lip, gp IF , '0 , 1 0 1 > 0 Ao­ I;z :7r-* 'M � September 16, 2013 Planning Report ZN13-3 PUD OVERLAY REZONING—SNAP PRINT— SHADY OAK ROAD Pronosed Action Staff recominends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution RZ13-12, recoinmending approval of Ordinance 13-1067, placin� an overla z�ning of Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the redevelopment of the northwest corner of Shady Oak Road and Bradford Road. Overview With the reconstruction of Shady Oak Road, Dan Dorholt is proposing to construct a new building on the corner of Bradford and Shady Oak Roads. Currently, Leaman's Liquor,Nelson's Meats, Bakery and Deli and Syndicate Sales are the businesses in this location. Leaman's Liquor is closing,Nelson's Meats, Bakery and Deli and Syndicate Sales are inoving. The site will be rezoned with an overlay zoning of Planned Unit Development (PUD). The PUD � zoning allows flexibility with the underlying zoning of inixed use. Along with the overlay zoiung to PUD, there will be an agreement with specific parameters on how the site will be developed. Primary Issues to Consider • What is the underlying zoning of the property, and how has the Coinprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • Why place an overlay zone of PUD on this property? • What are the areas that would be included in the overlay zone? Supportin�Documents • Analysis of issues • Resolution RZ13-12 • Ordinance 13-1067 `°�I� � Nancy . derson,AICP City Pla ler Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: ^ Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: ZN13-3 Page 2 � Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the underlying zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The property is rezoned B-3, General Business. For this development to occur as proposed the property will have a PUD overlay; this would allow flexibility in site development. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this site as Commercial. • Why place an overlay zone of PUD on this property? The Planned Unit Development allows a site-specific development with the underlying zoning remaining. This type of development allows for a departure from the strict application of the zoning standards. The applicant and the City enter into an agreement defining the specific allowed uses and performance standards for each PUD, and these are delineated in the agreement. In this case the underlying zoning of B-3, General Business, will remain. In the proposed development, the side yards setbacks are less than the required, there are fewer parking spaces than required and the required landscaping is not present. • What are the areas that would be included in the overlay zone? � The entire site will be included in the overlay zone. Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the overlay zoning of PUD. By recommending approval, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the overlay zoning of PUD. By recommending denial, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the overlay zoning is not approved, the existing zoning will remain and any redevelopment of these sites will have to be consistent with the existing zoning. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. /'\ CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota � RESOLUTION NO: RZ13-12 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE FOR AN OVERLAY PUD ZONING AT 108, 116 AND 120 SHADY OAK ROAD W,�IEREAS, an application for a Planned Unit Development overlay district ZN13-3 has been made by Dan Dorholt; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a Planned Unit Development overlay district ZN13-3 was made by Dan Dorholt; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on August 27, 2013: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for a Planned Unit Development overly district ZN13-3 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: `� 1. That the overlay district is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. That the underlying zoning of B-3 remains. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for a Planned Unit Development District ZN13-3 is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Applicant and the City enter into an agreement that satisfies all the conditions and requirements for this PUD development. 2. That the Applicant reimburse the City for Attorney's fees associated with the PUD agreement. Adopted this 24th day of September 2013. Aaron Kuznia, Chair � CITY OF HOPKINS � Hennepin County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 13-1067 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: All of the land described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein is hereby established and zoned as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay District. The existing B-3 zoning classification for the land included in the PUD Overlay District shall remain in effect as the underlying zoning classification with an overlay zoning classification of Planned Unit Development or PUD. The design standards permitted in the PUD overlay district shall be those described in Exhibit B as well as the requirements governing or applicable within the PUD Overlay District as set forth in the PUD agreement. First Reading: October 1, 2013 Second Reading: October 15, 2013 Date of Publication: October 24, 2013 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: October 24, 2013 Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine Luedke, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Signature Date � EXHIBIT A Lots 9, 10 and 11, Block 1, Oak Ridge 2nd Addition � � �� � September 16, 2013 Planning Report ZCR13-1 CONCEPT REVIEW—PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING APARTMENTS Proposed Action This is a concept review that requires no action. Any comments regarding the development would be helpful to the applicant for future applications. Overview Project for Pride in Living (PPL) is proposing to construct a 51-unit affordable apartment complex on the southeast corner of Oxford Street and Blake Road. The property addresses are 1202-1304 Oxford Street. There are currently six duplexes on this property. PPL has purchase agreements with the current owners. The six duplexes will be razed and the new apartment complex constructed. This new apartment building will abut the expanded Cottageville Park to the south. The building will be four stories on Blake and stepped down to three on Oxford. There will be � 10 one bedroom, 2� two-bedroom and 13 three-bedroom apartments. All units will be affordable. The monthly rent will be around $670.00, for a one bedroom, $730.00 for a two- bedroom, and $935 for a three-bedroom. Primary Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • What are the preliminary specifics of the redevelopment proposal? • What is the applicant's timeline? • What was the discussion at the neighborhood meeting? • What will have to occur for this development to proceed? Supportin�Documents • Analysis of issues • Preliminary site plan 1� f ,�.. V ^1Z. 1 I Nancy &. Anderson, AICP City Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: ^ Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: ZCR13-1 Page 2 � Primary Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the existing property is R-2, low density multiple family. The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as low density residential. A rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendment will have to be completed in order for this development to proceed. • What are the preliminary specifics of the redevelopment proposal? Building The proposed building will be located on the southeast corner of Blake Road and Oxford Street. The building will be four stories on the part of the building closest to Blake and then scale down to three stories as the building moves to the east. Five first floor apartments on Oxford will have front doors on Oxford. Parking/Access There will be 43 underground and eight above ground parking spaces. This is one parking space '� for each unit. Access to the parking area will be from the alley to the south of the building. There is also additional parking on Oxford Street. Exterior The exterior is a contemporary design. The materials of the exterior have not been detailed at the concept level. Engineering/Public Works The engineering department has reviewed the preliminary plans and found them acceptable. Fire Marshal The fire marshal has reviewed the preliminary plans and found them acceptable. Trash The trash area will be located in the underground parking area. Sidewalk � The concept plan indicates sidewalks on Oxford and Blake. There will be a sidewalk on the south side of the property to connect Oxford and Cottageville Park. This sidewalk area on the ZCR13-1 Page 3 east side of the site will be landscaped. � Watershed District The applicant will need watershed district approvals. Surrounding Uses The site is surrounded by residential to the north and east, Cottageville Park to the south and Blake Road to the west. • What is the applicant's timeline? The applicant is proposing to submit applications for approvals this year and start construction the spring of 2014. The applicant and the City are seeking funding through the Met Council for $1.6 million. • What was the discussion at the neighborhood meeting? The main topic at the neighborhood meeting was the parking and the traffic. • What will have to occur for this development to proceed? The following are the actions that will have to occur for this development to proceed as � proposed: • Site plan approval for the construction of the building • Rezoning • Comprehensive Plan amendment • Replatting � 0 BLAKE ROAD AKE ROAD BLAKE ROAD IF mollill A IS "Am ca"/ii// % "'A/," 16/9, m .I 107 sip i x (D;o 3 . M C: M Z m A m M m M.