The URL can be used to link to this page

07-29-2014 (2) JULY AUGUST MEMBERS ,�-, S M T W T F S S M T W T F S MCNEIL HUNKE 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 FISHER TAIT 6 7 8 9 1011 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ALLARD FIRTH 13 1415 16 1718 19 1011 12 13 141516 KERSSEN ANDERSON 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 AGENDA ZONING & PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, July 29, 2014 REGULAR MEETING 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS ----------------------------------------------------- ITEM: Approve and sign minutes of the June 24, 2014, regular meeting. ---� COMMISSION ACTION: �LI �'r� �<;�ti�C`'�� / / / / CASE NO. ZN14-2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT— PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING (PPL) Public Public Hearing to consider a comprehensive plan amendment to change Hearing the land use plan from low density residential to mixed use 1202-1304 Oxford Street COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / CASE NO. ZN14-3 REZONING - PPL Public Public Hearing to consider rezoning of the property at 1202-1304 Oxford Hearing Street from R-2 to Mixed Use. � COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / AGENDA ZONING & PLANNING COMMISSION �� PAGE 2 CASE NO. ZN14-4 REZONING PUD - 1202-1304 OXFORD STREET Public Public Hearing to consider a Planned Unit Development overlay for the Hearing redevelopment of 1202-1304 Oxford Street COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / CASE NO. SUBD14-1 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT - PPL Public Public Hearing to consider combining the lots at 1202-1304 Oxford Street Hearing into one lot COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / CASE NO. SPR14-1 SITE PLAN APPROVAL - PPL --� Public Public Hearing to consider constructing a 51-unit apartment building at Hearing 1202-1304 Oxford Street COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / CASE NO. VN14-1 VARIANCE - PARKING SPACE SIZE ALICE SMITH ELEMENTARY COMMISSION ACTION: / / / / CASE NO. ZCR14-2 CONCEPT FOR A NEW BUILDING AT 1609 MAINSTREET � ADJOURNMENT �� l`� , , � � �!�l�FF�� ZONING AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 24, 2014 A regular meeting of the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, June 24, 2014, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chainbers of Hopkins City Hall. Present were Commission Meinbers Andrea Naef, Scott Kerssen, Aaron Kuznia, Doug Datta, Andrew Fisher and Jennifer Allard. Charles Firth was absent. Also present was staff inember Nancy Anderson. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Kuznia called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ms. Naef moved and Mr. Kerssen seconded the motion to approve the minutes of the May 27, 2014, regular meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. ITEM: CONCEPT FOR PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING (PPL) ---. Ms. Anderson reviewed the concept for the apartments on Oxford. Cluis Wilson, Matt Soucek, and Mary Tering appeared before the Commission representing PPL. Mr. Wilson discussed the surface parking spaces that were added and a traffic study that was completed. The Commission discussed the schedule, parking, security, parking on Oxford, and the practice of current residents crossing Blake at uncontrolled areas. The Commission looked positively on the proposed development. No one appeared before the Commission regarding this item. ADJOURN Mr. Kerssen moved and Ms. Naef seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS �--� MINUTES OF THE ZONING AND PLANNING MEETING, June 24, 2014 ��t�� Page 2 ATTEST: �. Aaron Kuznia, Chair � �i � July 21, 2014 Planning Report ZN14-2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT— OXFORD VILLAGE Proposed Action Move to adopt Resolution RZ14-2 recommending approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment from Low Densitv Residential to Mixed Use at 1202-1304 Oxford Street Overview Project for Pride in Living (PPL) is proposing to construct a 51-unit affordable apartment coinplex on the southeast corner of Oxford Street and Blake Road. The property addresses are 1202-1304 Oxford Street. There are currently six duplexes on this property. PPL has purchased the duplexes. The six duplexes will be razed and the new apartment complex constructed. This new apartment building will abut the expanded Cottageville Park to the south. The building will be four stories on Blake and stepped down to three on Oxford. There will ^ be 10 one bedroom, 28 two-bedroom and 13 three-bedroom apartments. All units will be affordable. The monthly rent will be around $670.00 for a one bedroom, $730.00 for a two- bedroom, and $935 for a three-bedroom. Primary Issues to Consider • How has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • What is the difference between the Low Density Residential and Mixed Use designation? Supportin�Documents • Analysis of Issues • Comprehensive Plan • Resolution RZ14-2 ''1`��." .U�� ` '`.,� Nancy, . Anderson, AICP City Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: '� Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: ZN 14-2 Page 2 Primary Issues to Consider. � • How has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Low Density Residential. There is a requirement that the Comprehensive Plan and zoning be consistent. With the proposed zoning change, the zoning and the Comprehensive Plan designation will be consistent. • What is the difference between the Low Density Residential and Mixed Use designation? A low density residential is used for single family housing. Mixed Use zoning allows a variety of uses both residential and commercial. Much of the area around the light rail station is designated for mixed use and will be rezoned in the future. Alternatives. l. Recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. By recommending approval, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. By recommending denial, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the zoning is changed and the Comprehensive Plan amendment is not approved, the zoning and � Comprehensive Plan will not be consistent. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. � i ,I"� Lnd Ilee P�au � Cmd(Ise 9ae. Paon.t Lotc Gcy�z�h-Residn�tul 654.�}�i _'G._4".. , \Sednuu Lleu=ih-Rcsidrntul IG3 i' 6_'4"., ' .... � i Hia6 Deus�ry-f.es�deudal If4.53 S 6-"o _ �- . ��--'� ' ' i'ouunet cul 91.17 3 3 5�:� � �/_� ' ! EiLn�es:��Pa-k . I 11 -- �'_-`•. �;;�1�—"��-�� I ludu�uul 14i.'0 G.30°,� .41 . ! \fizedUse 9-.il(1 3'1^,. i_ . . ��"-' Yublir lu-:tihmou�l I1_' �� 430"0 � ��Y�' Puk Q+I1 3 GO°.. -� C ,eu:' ace iS.Sb 1"4°:. GolfCom_t '_1#1° S 19`,. T,ai SO i5 1 93°; r.`` � Ra��o�d ;�__.�-�_,: _'i�" fr 9[I°;, - i 1Cedmd t>� 1S 5 d_`o ` . - � RU\l' i�-S9 1�_'-°:. - . � '� �1 i �169.� Graud TotaL _�14_'S 100 UO"o :� f,�, �� _ . „� - _- '- - ------" � - . - , \, , �- ------ - . i - 7 /-�.` � ` /� . `\,\-��'E � , I / � I ! ��. � � j ! i� � ��. - � , ,. '{ . - _\ I-�--7- � *� i /1 i� I �' ' r- -�-� � � ; -7 . � � � , , � � � � � -I " ; '� ,�; �� _ � , , ---, � , � ; � - � � �/�, � � � � ; � � ��-,- ., i 1 � I � �_' } +� _ +� � � � . _` /"�r �169j � . j- . . � � �; �.- ��. ; . - -- p� --------' � �' i � , � �-- _ ; �� . � � � -- �=-�; -�-�-1�- - � ' E d i n � , �.'..r�' �� . . _ ',i- w'4 - -�169� '�' = Proposed LRT Station - _ -��I.. I'o...+` I � .- .i_ �_� �r� CdyBoundary _ Industnal �� i. {� Parcels Golt Course " -- - - --�-- -- �� Low Density Residential Open Space Medium Density Residential � Park I i� High Density Rasidential Treil � � n I� G E � �"'! k `� I Commerdal � Public/Institutional I� Mixed Use � Railroad i Business Park Wetland I Figure 4.2-Land Use Plan �� Ko�k�. . _' n�_-� ,,.=«' � � ;,,�; � ��y�a_� CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota �. RESOLUTION NO: RZ14-2 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR OXFORD VILLAGE WHEREAS, an application for Zoning Amendment ZN14-2 has been made by Project for Pride in Living(PPL); WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment was made by PPL on June 30, 2014; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on July 29, 2014: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and 4. A legal description of the subject property is as follows: �-- That part of South 40 feet of Lot 69 and of the north 98 feet of Lot 701ying west of east 495 feet thereof and east of west 33 feet thereof, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 495 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 495 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70,Auditor's Subdivision No 239 West 55 feet of east 440 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 440 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 385 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 385 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 330 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 330 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 275 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 275 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment ZN14-2 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan will make the zoning and the land use plan consistent. � � BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment ZN14-2 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following conditions: 1. That the Metropolitan Council approves the proposed amendment. Adopted this 29th day of July 2014 Scott Kerssen, chair � i� � �� i� � July 21, 2014 Planning Report ZN14-3 REZONING - OXFORD VILLAGE Proposed Action Staff recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution RZ14-3, recommending approval of Ordinance 14-1075, rezoning the property at 1202-1304 Oxford from R-2 to Mixed Use. Overview Project for Pride in Living (PPL) is proposing to construct a 51-unit affordable apartment complex on the southeast corner of Oxford Street and Blake Road. The property addresses are 1202-1304 Oxford Street. There are currently six duplexes on this property. PPL has purchased the duplexes. The six duplexes will be razed and the new apartment complex constructed. This new apartment building will abut the expanded Cottageville Park to the south. The building will be four stories on Blake and stepped down to three on Oxford. There will ^ be 10 one bedroom, 28 two-bedroom and 13 three-bedroom apartments. All units ��ill be affordable. The monthly rent will be around $670.00 for a one bedroom, $730.00 for a two- bedroom, and $935 for a three-bedroom. Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the Comprehensive Plan designation, and what is the zoning of the subject site? • What does the Mixed Use zoning allow? • Should the site be rezoned froin R-2 to Mixed Use? Supportin� Documents • Analysis of Issues • Resolution RZ14-3 • Ordinance 14-1075 � 'i� � .� ancy . Anderson, AICP City Planrier ^ Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: ZN 14-3 Page 2 Primarv Issues to Consider. � • What is the Comprehensive Plan designation, and what is the zoning of the subject site? The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Low Density Residential. The site is zoned R-2, Low Density Multiple Family. The Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning will have to be changed for this development to proceed. • What does the Mixed Use zoning allow? The Mixed Use zoning allows residential as a perinitted use. • Should the site be rezoned from R-2 to Mixed Use? The building as proposed is not allowed in the R-2 zoning district, which does not allow multiple family dwellings. The option is to rezone to R-5, High Density Multiple Family or Mixed Use. In looking at the ordinances, the proposed building is more in conformance with the Mixed Use zoning. Alternatives. 1. Recoinmend approval of the rezoning. By recommending approval of the rezoning, the � City Council will consider a recoinmendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the rezoning. By recommending denial of the rezoning, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the Planning Commission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. � �� _ -__--=___= --��---- City of Hopkins Zoning Map �� -_=__- -- _ _ __ _ .. _ _.. R.t-0 _ .___,_ .,.. __-_-.� -/L`_�'E-.` `�_-.. � �. --��_.., �. - - -----,-_- -- N '_ _ �.L.. I I _�_��_ - �i - _ R1D _-iir�.-_� '_ � 1--t _-- T�^ _ -,,. - �� -^ ! - — f =��*� �_; - _ __ __ ^ g��,� -- �� - �....-Z� t1N� �� RI' C�� - µ ' �j/�;. __t � � � / ��...l( '� � ;_� � � � �-...___ - �_ _ % r {� — — r t t .� .`�,�� '�� i.- i C �L._.-�} .� ^ � .�� _ ._�� e. .� � r�-5-.F�--�, Z�� .�r -, .� " � ��7 �-- _ � . � _ -�.�'3..�`� 3�" i-is = � � ��•- �:� �-- -` l y t•_ � E-�i�^ # c � = nt� � r-� .�*- rf� �'^ r ��-�i � :...— \ ~ l �_+L-� q�� : ��„- JR , �� = ��S�-�`'��_ n,.c� '``��r � - 'r �„� 'r'^'�`.t�� A��.=t , �..`ct E.�_ - w = y._ L� , . _-- � ,- .s I �� '�x-�',� - � _.�-�i � - �j�I a � �� \� C�� -r�-.�-.�-C�� = r��`r'�c_ ,...�L_� , }��"�i+'�:�' .� � �/Ra -.. �� ._� �_ -� � �� 'B�SIa�S . - �-Z��yi �, �� .� r�'- - " � � � 7- JJ' � 11��UD � I � �� _ .-;-..f` N : � -_� _ � • � `� � - / �� '�� ' . �.� _. �-_ ...- � � � • - ��: I :� 7 `,� - .. .�'tE.�� ,..1� ....�1�i �� . _� �3_ � � t��"�C_- � � L'�' I r� � �� " NliliUipr.K -1.1-�r+- • I ��_.,"; i a _._....� �-� ��:� ' - ��_ . _—�.-t_��-��-'�� ..�ii#—C-�y RJ s I��! C'� � - ��' �""_'C.�. .'.. � �`.= �,- � � � �� A � ��`c�� _ � :. �"' �, : �a �� • TI��-�� _ _ .-� ,._ -f -� --_ _ � I ' --�� ._ _ �-_a:�...,�..3..,.0,��;-.-,t-7__��- -.,-�?-�._.^_ �"� =� ZONING DISTRICTS i` i-z , ' ,��.p ,. %'-, . _._�__.._.., ^I R-7-A SWGLE AND TWO FAMILY HIGH DENSITY 1 -/.� � R-1-B SWGLE FAMILY HIGH DENSIN � r �._- .- _" ___ ��}�ra Mi _��.,�� —�� — R-1-C SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY � -_!� � �� R-1-D SINGLE FAMILY LOW DENSITV / �_ �� i'�� -- ��-=�� R-LESINGLEFAMILYLOWDENSIN ! ` 1- ;. � .��.�-,�l— , � �_ � R-2 LOW DENSITV MULTIPLE FAMILY � y �� R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY . � � r — �� q�.;�� ._.�r'�_ �_ � s•t R�MEDIUM HIGH DENSIN MULTIPLE FAMILY Y..T::c�..�? . ,y._��'c_.—__'. . . �R-5 HIGH DENSIN MULTIPLE FAMILY � ..._._�-�E'c- ' �-7,./_.__"""" ' -- - -i; ---- .--. -._.�'��Y.-,-��" -;R�6 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY _ E' x-�� Rd _'��=�j, __B-1 LIMITED BUSNIESS e� , _____- -._.._ __ _L �-_ �B-2CENTRALBUSINESS � �—' �B-3 GENERAL BUSINESS � .00 . I �=�1:._.-__._.__� _ _ _ _ _B�NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS I-1 INDUSTRIAL � ��I-2 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL �BUSINESS PARK 9�INSTITUTIONAL '� �J MIXED USE �.,.._. 0 B50 1 J00 3,400 5,100 6,800 Feet CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota � RESOLUTION NO: RZ14-3 RESOLUTION MAKING F1NDiNGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE REZONING OXFORD VILLAGE FROM R-2, LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY, TO MIXED USE WHEREAS, an application for Zoning Amendment ZN14-3 has been initiated by Project for Pride in Living (PPL); WHEREAS, the procedural history of the applicatioil is as follows: 1. That an application for zoning amendment was received from Project for Pride in Living; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on July 29, 2014: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. 4. The legal description of the property is as follows: That part of South 40 feet of Lot 69 and of the north 98 feet of Lot 701ying west � of east 495 feet thereof and east of west 33 feet thereof, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 495 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 495 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No 239 West 55 feet of east 440 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 440 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 385 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 385 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 330 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 330 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 275 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 275 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application far Zoning Amendment ZN14-3 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the rezoning is necessary for future redevelopment of the site. 2. That the zoning and Comprehensive Plan will be consistent. Adopted this 29th day of July 2014 � Scott Kerssen, Chair CITY OF HOPKINS '� Hennepin County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 14-1075 AN ORDINANCE REZONING 1202-1304 OXFORD STREET FROM R-2 TO MIXED USE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: That the present zoning classification of R-2, Low Density Multiple Family, upon the following described premises is hereby repealed, and in lieu thereof, the said preinises are hereby zoned as Mixed Use. That part of South 40 feet of Lot 69 and of the north 98 feet of Lot 701ying west of east 495 feet thereof and east of west 33 feet thereof, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 495 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 495 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No 239 West 55 feet of east 440 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 440 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 385 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 385 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 � West 55 feet of east 330 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and w�est 55 feet of east 330 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 275 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 a�Id west 55 feet of east 275 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 First Reading: August 4, 2014 Second Reading: August 19, 2014 Date of Publication: August 28, 2014 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: August 28, 2014 Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Amy Domeier , City Clerk � APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Signature Date � July 21, 2014 Plaruling Report ZN14-4 PUD OVERLAY REZONING —OXFORD VILLAGE Proposed Action Staff recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution RZ14-6. recommendin� approval of Ordinance 14-1076, placing an overla zoning of Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the Oxford Village apartments. Overview Project for Pride in Living (PPL) is proposing to construct a 51-unit affordable apartment complex on the southeast corner of Oxford Street and Blake Road. The property addresses are 1202-1304 Oxford Street. There are currently six duplexes on this property. PPL has purchased the duplexes. The six duplexes will be razed and the new apartment complex constructed. This new apartment building will abut the expanded Cottageville Park to the south. The site will be rezoned with an overlay zoning of Planned Unit Development (PUD). The PUD zoning allows flexibility with the underlying zoning of Mixed Use. Along with the overlay ^ zoning to PUD, there will be an agreement with specific parameters on how the site will be developed. Primary Issues to Consider • What is the underlying zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • Why place an overlay zone of PUD on this property? • What are the areas that would be included in the overlay zone? • What would the recommend for the PUD agreement? 5upporting Documents • Analysis of issues • Resolution RZ14-4 • Ordinance 14-1076 ��.1� ��"��ll��;�,Y'�', Nancy �. Anderson, AICP City Planner � Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: ZN 14-4 Page 2 Primarv Issues to Consider � • What is the underlying zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The property will be rezoned to mixed use. For this development to occur as proposed the property will need a PUD overlay; this would allow flexibility in site development. The Comprehensive Plan will be changed to Mixed Use. With the rezoning to Mixed Use, the Comprehensive Plan designation will be consistent with the zoning. • Why place an overlay zone of PUD on this property? The Planned Unit Development allows a site-specific development with the underlying zoning remaining. This type of development allows for a departure from the strict application of the zoning standards. The applicant and the City enter into an agreement defining the specific allowed uses and performance standards for each PUD, and these are delineated in the agreement. In this case the underlying zoning of Mixed Use will remain. In the proposed development the FAR is less than the required, the canopy will be in the front yard setback, the rear setback is larger than allowed and the landscaping is not the required 1 percent. • What are the areas that would be included in the overlay zone? The entire site will be included in the overlay zone. � • What would the staff recommend for the PUD agreement? The staff would recommend that the alley be reconstructed to the applicant's lot line and to City standards. Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the overlay zoning of PUD. By recommending approval, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the overlay zoning of PUD. By recommending denial, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the overlay zoning is not approved, the existing zoning will remain and any redevelopment of these sites will have to be consistent with the existing zoning. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. � � CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ14-6 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE 1202-1304 OXFORD STREET SITES WITH AN OVERLAY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) WHEREAS, an application for Zoning Amendment ZN14-4 has been made by Project for Pride in Living(PPL); WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for zoning amendment was made by PPL; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on July 29, 2014: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; � 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. 4. The legal description of the property is as follows: That part of South 40 feet of Lot 69 and of the north 98 feet of Lot 70 lying west of east 495 feet thereof and east of west 33 feet thereof, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 495 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 495 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No 239 West 55 feet of east 440 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 440 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 385 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 385 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 330 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 330 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 275 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 275 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Zoning Amendment ZN 14-4 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: ^ 1. That the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed development. 2. That the proposed development use is consistent with Mixed Use zoning 3. That the overlay district is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. That the underlying zoning of Mixed Use remains. � BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Zoning Amendment ZN14-4 is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Applicant and the City enter into an agreement that satisfies all the conditions and requirements for this PUD development. 2. That the Applicant reimburse the City for Attorney's fees associated with the PUD agreement. 3. That the applicant reconstruct the alley to the lot line with a minimum width of 24 feet and be constructed to City of Hopkins standards. Adopted this 29th day of July 2014 ATTEST: Scott Kerssen, Chair � �i CITY OF HOPKINS '� Hennepin County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 14-1076 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHiNG A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR THE OXFORD VILLAGE APARTMENTS THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: All of the land described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein is hereby established and zoned as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay District. The Mixed Use zoning classification for the land included in the PUD Overlay District shall remain in effect as the underlying zoning classification with an overlay zoning classification of Planned Unit Development or PUD. The design standards permitted in the PUD overlay district shall be those described in Exhibit B as well as the requirements governing or applicable within the PUD Overlay District as set forth in the PUD agreement. First Reading: August 4, 2014 Second Reading: August 19, 2014 .--. Date of Publication: August 28, 2014 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: August 28, 2014 Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: � City Attorney Signature Date t, ^ EXHIBIT A That part of South 40 feet of Lot 69 and of the north 98 feet of Lot 70 lying west of east 495 feet thereof and east of west 33 feet thereof, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 `-- West 55 feet of east 495 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 495 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No 239 West 55 feet of east 440 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 440 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 385 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 385 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 330 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 330 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 275 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 275 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 � �� . . � � July 21, 2014 � Planning Report SUBD 14-1 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT—OXFORD VILLAGE Proposed Action Staff recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution RZ14-4, recommending approval of a preliminarv/final plat to combine 1202-1304 Oxford Street into one lot. Overview The proposed development, Oxford Village, is currently six lots. The replatting of the area will combine the six lots into one. Project for Pride in Living (PPL) is proposing to construct a 51-unit affordable apartment complex on the southeast corner of Oxford Street and Blake Road. The property addresses are 1202-1304 Oxford Street There are currently six duplexes on this properly. PPL has purchased the duplexes. The six duplexes will be razed and the new apartment complex constructed. This new apartment building will abut the expanded Cottageville Park to the south. The building will be four stories on Blake and stepped down to three on Oxford. There will be 10 one bedroom, 28 two-bedroom and 13 three-bedroom apartments. All units will be affordable. The monthly rent will be around $670.00 for a one bedroom, $730.00 for a two- --� bedroom, and $935 for a three-bedroom. Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • Does the lot meet the minimum lot requirements? • What are the specifics of the plat? • Does the proposed plat meet the subdivision requirements? • Will park dedication fees be required? Supportin�Documents • Analysis of Issues • Preliminary/Final Plat • Resolution RZ14-4 �l - �� Nancy S Anderson, AICP City Pla er Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): —� Notes: «..._._ . SUBD 14-1 Page 2 Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and ho�� has the Comprehensive Plan `� designated the subject site? The zoning of the property is R-2, Low Density Multiple Family. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this site as Low Density Residential. The zoning and the Comprehensive Plan will be changed to Mixed Use. • Does the lot meet the minimum lot requirements? The mixed use zoning does not have minimum lot sizes. • What are the specifics of the plat? When the property is replatted there will be one lot for the 51-unit apartment development. • Does the proposed plat meet the subdivision requirements? The plat, as proposed, meets the subdivision requirements. • Will park dedication fees be required? Park dedication fees will be required for the new lot. The park dedication fee will be $800.00 per unit. � Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the preliminary plat/final plat. By recommending approval of the preliminary/final plat, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the preliminary/final plat. By recommending denial of the preliminary/final plat, the City Council will consider a recommendation of deniaL If the Planning Commission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. `_._•/ CITY OF HOPKINS -- Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ14-4 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY/F1NAL PLAT FOR 1202-1304 OXFORD STREET WHEREAS, an application for a preliminary/final plat SUBD14-1 has been submitted by Project for Pride in Living (PPL); WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for preliminary/final plat was submitted by PPL on June 27, 2014; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on July 29, 2014: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. 4. Legal description of the parcel is as follows: � That part of South 40 feet of Lot 69 and of the north 98 feet of Lot 701ying west of east 495 feet thereof and east of west 33 feet thereof, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 495 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 495 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No 239 West 55 feet of east 440 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 440 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 385 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 385 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 330 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 330 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 275 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 275 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for a preliminary/final plat SUBD14-1 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the preliminary/final plat meets the subdivision requirements. .� BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for preliminary/final plat SUBD 14-1 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following condition: L That the applicant must provide current evidence of title, in the form of a commitment for title insurance, to the City Attorney. 2. That the applicant pay the attorney's fee for title review. Adopted this 29th day of July 2014 4-' Scott Kerssen, Chair � �/ a�d �ubd 2}9 . %� ------ - PRELIMINARY PLAT -- \ I� i I I i I 1I ; ! ; � ' OXFORD VILLAGE ; , , �:�r.�.,-��.....�,,:,_I �, - — ' � � i i � I i �� `� CITY OF HOPKINS,HENNEPIN COUNTY � � � _ � � I ° � � 1------- � ° � � � � �`°`, .3._ � I � " ` �. � _. i —_1-�_�"-r-— � ��—��-4�-i--�--�—+--6--T---,I � Legal Descriptions i ' I G-�—._.—,—a.--1•--��,�,-3=;--,I , , .._�5, � I , 1 N�� .._�1 � ; �.,.No.b]90:�,]Ob,]OZD.b,eS�R��) I ' q /t� ypj �' ��.r,+e+a� TIieW�at55he�olt��East2]SkeloltheSouM�0leetolLot69�ntlMeWe9551e�tolt�eEastPSNet II I I � ��""� ��r --''I of ihe Nortn 9E het ot Lat]0�uEilols SUEtlrvrcron No.Zi9 Nen�pin CauMy,MNn�wla. ! � 7'�'._„_.. `•e•' „m- i � � � � •s[,�e�==j�o .� ''. Cax No.A039W(1202-13(la C�bra Shee[) _ I y r T � "_ I Tlial p�rt al llro SaN�90�eet ol Lol fi9 Niry VJeY ol Me East 1951eet Il�ereolsntl I��t pa�of tl�e NON�98 het ol Lot'/O ly�nq Watl ol Ne Esa1 l95leet IMr�al,EXLEPT Me VJeN 3]hel tlienol,m�uE�o(s SuEElvision � I ��1 •�.�-gJ',� NumEer]I9.MenMqn CouMy.Minnesot�aha e�cePt�1 IPs�Pa�tlefi9na�eC arN Oe4r�ealM as Parcel JOE, � I I �C �.�,�� a ___ Menrieqn County R�igh�olWay Map No.I,Henriepin Courdy,Mlnnewta. I t �'^ I �?>01 - -_ _ aw r�o.�o3sm�i zi a omm sv..c� I I 5�,.,,k„rr � "'''` Tl�e Wesl 55 hat of Me E+Y lA0 Mat ot tM So�IP CO kel of Lot 89�M tlie We�i 55 het ol tlie E+et 4W ket I —'•-'-"—"r• �.{ ' af M�No�n 9!M1el of Lot]0.AWilo/i SUDErviwn No.239,Hann�qn Gounry.Mirmewb. � J.b----�� , _.. � e �.~'~,�>^T"'�'I`: � • •I�� Cau No.10]909I13I0-121E OvbrE Sireet) I . TTeWest55M1�1o1NeE�+t]]OhetolU�5aNM140feetolLot89�natMN4q55b�toltMEaatJlflk�t _ I ; I 33 j I I-� -,,,�I� I alMe NOR�9�het of Lot]0.AWhor'a SUEEmwn No.Zl9.Henriaqn Gounry.Mimewb. - Ir I� � C�x Na.e019121�Me O�tora Sbe�l) � �<i � , --- ��t' TlieWeY55helolMaE+�1195k�toIlM1aSouM90hetolLo169�MUeNhYSSle�tolt�aEaYi95h�[ I I; O � I �- �� '^I ot Me Nonn 98 ket of Lol]0.Autlitols SuOtlrvivan Na.279,Hanriepin Gounry,Minnewla. I ' Q � � ? J�� ' ,r.I G�e No.<OJ91J(121b121<Ovbrtl Street) I I I� � N J I 4 I •. p� 3'� Tne Weu 55 hat of ine E�st JES 4et o�ma Soiln e0leet oi Lot 69�na Me West 55 Mt of tM EsY 785 het ' �* I i z:�,-T Q -� .��I- 3 #� e� �� olt�e Nonn 98 het o/Lat'!0 AUCllofs SuOCrvnqn No.239.Menr�e pin Cou M y,MlnriemW. 'I —" I o.M � 2 I ,1_ C� �� I I I 7�'I� Q Q L � `�,2 �.; I j ,��C•":�e O O v. I J $ u� �F' � N � � 3I � � � m � '� i� ��°�� I MISCELLANEOUS NOTES �k 'J, ti 2 L_—_._-. . —_—_— _- � � �, c � �1 � '� �� I � S 3'39'E . � I i � �� Q � ' i Y ;Ilj, ��' � �'I ��,; i�oei aes��000�.�a aan�me�a d any,per Etle cammihnent from First American TNe � I W = � �, iro�ra�«eomw�r comm�unem N�mee,smaoe au daced��e s,zoia. �i I �.>'� � � ��_;�'� �� 0. I t`_;�� i N89°34't6'W�6.0 I v ' � I ,..� � "y �w ^�w z Proverry Aedress � e s� Z S . �y .. - 3 _ �S q�I 1702-t204 OAortl Sheel Hopbns.Minnesola 55343 I .Q W _ �5.. PID Na.�19-117-21-11-0074 � i � N�¢ �.� ', o_ 1302-730A Ozlord Sheet.MoOb�s�Minnesota 55343 — � I ' 33 t� ' 1�� o i I PID Na.-19-117-2t-11-0069 � N, 12t00�cforE Sbeet.HopWne.Minnesota 553a7 /� I o�s: o t ___ II 1 � ______ __, '�' I I � ^ ?�� — I PIDNa.'1}tt72 tt-0072 I 7 �� - I � -�'�II 1�18-1220 O#or0 Street.Hoptine,MinnKOta 55743 � ' PID Na.�.19-117-2t-11-00�0 I � i �� ; I —,�� __,'.�� . 1208 OxtwE Street Hopkns.Minnesata 55343 I I ' 9J._ i I Ma^�Y .. �I P�DNo. 19-117-11-11-007] �. __. � I� i � A I �}'� "I 1214-1716 Oaford Street,HopWns,Minnesala 55343 I I W� 'r i� � PIDNa.'.18-117-2t-11-0071 � S = � I � � y� I '��I .O Area of aY Parceh=445�0 sytl(�02 acres) 1 3� �� I =I i� uN� Properry is in FbaC 2one'X"(area o(miMmal 1laating)per FEMP.panel map �I �I 'II number27053C0342E.dated5eptemCer2.2004. � � �� tiw 5 Bmchmark Top nut of hydrant at&ake 8 Hiawat�a.Elevation=9�1.861eet I ! Y� �� I � ?I A'N 6 Mov�OrouM upYly bn0om luw Ga�n 11�k bral�tl aa s�avm.M uMaryreunE u1JRy�ervk�a I I },I MicN urve iM Woprty Nve�tl�nqf�E io M(W bat�tl Mrauq�Vh»rvice�eI Goplur SbY i Qw GI p�r t�cth rwmGr 133]40]O5.Hewwr vrry o1 W wity mrrqrw>hiYtl fo Mq ba4 I � I �I wM�.po�M uOMry bomm.In tlwa�au�.wiMf�>fnovn�•.nam av��Ytl��u�nY�w. I I L_______ � FuiawriMer�eenwi4c�Gapn.rSYYMG11�3t-IS�LpOSorBtt) I i �i � � , � � � � � � Legend of Symbols 8 Abbreviations LfGfND I a �Ke�^o_: � o ��.��h w�,�M�T,.��. � ' � Certification � . x,��„,��,�,m,��P,�� — — � �,., �� _ P,�..� � aK P�� ! � a � �"�''""r' I The ony easemenb a�own are from pats of recard or in(ormatlon c ��=� � P�o��ded�,d�e�� ,._„_„_ �„�,�,„.., e...ac..��y.a,..�.�.a i certry ma<<�vs qm,speaacaean,o�report was oreparea ey me or I ��,�, under my brect supervin�on anE t�at I am a duly Licenaed land � �� Surveyor untler Ne le�.s ol t�e State ot Mlnnesota. I —�—•—•— 5��.r z�..:. -_-_-_- �N«.T„� SCa�E IN F=E- I DatedJune25,2014. _�—�—�_ Grs�:.: �-�--�� PreOaretlby�. e�.��,-_ J �'- �a^ ^ The Greyory Group.Inc.a.�a. Lot Surveys Company QOew�.+c:y�•o;w.��a,�,.:�».xc��q.o�..� 760173rGAvenueN. Brookyn Park MN 55428 Signed�. 1 phone 76}560.3093 Greyory R.Prasch Repisvaoon No.24992 �ar 76}550-3522 / _ Benc�mark Top nut o��ydrant bphtl al tne Oxford Sheet and Blake Road � ElevaOon=913.68 tee[ F+.w, v.e.No.toa�-n nv.exm .E...�.��::,. .c.;.,;..,-,�.�._.e.._�- - .�.-�.--- � �.,� ._._:-._ .. ...,...-<.,::, .r.�....>....,.. OTE �.�a� ertcn��bO�rson �e v�m2.9.69-C�m�oro apartmenta-nennevn\wiad�nl�aqe P�e�imirory pl .��a� .:e „N�,�y.w„„��a��,ia 7��i��vow �_ yj�x��o �e-0:' �u:ep �ry�aayosry�mpap�owsce3`.>tlllL�4NO3\OJ"�caw"I�wayii^iiywaa:9�++41 rnnauu�y�'.vuno�u H'N3(INOJ3UA.LNf1OJ riB �n.�ungUuno�mdavuaH. —�� o.�ep—snp Pano�ddv uo�q svry�ep zM�1G961�S45 9C8C�as'�a�um5 nusa�u�y u��wnuiy n��m�y'�nn��utl>vn>H'N(�ISIAIQ A3AN(15 tiNndad ..g io�ryntl 4wo�maauua}{v�dr4J�A�"W (IZ' 1��'�+—zry��a�v�tc�J�iyiuo�aquxap�ve�i�l��uaaqauyur.an��udpia airyqr�Mca>n��aNNo+a�.:qva41 � m�wm�y'.uuno�ubwuaH'��JIAN35 31tl]S3 ltl3N ONtl 1N341S3ll r�=i�a�� .,B ,�..�W� �<e v�osawmw'�a�a s�no�c�ls e�^�:��ra�s to�sos��uus�+�Nms mK.w�w nq pap�nmA m suriiepaawwavz pn s�mwwr�yans In�dihv inoyux pavla�a my pnuxd.:ep OE P�9uxvd ay�in,yu ay�.:q pauav maq anry uam3u3.:emy3�N Nmq�a�p�we unnsuodsw�y io umiaiwwn� ay�lo suoqvpuawwu�a pw s�uawma.uauux ayi a�yn��ddv�I' Oi' Jo`T—x!4�I'I'4Jovayi 3vn+aa�e�nlv e m aio�+uu��y suqdo�{lo.v��•y�lo�iauno�.��l•N W P�W»�1""�'Pa.�add�xsm 37tl1'l1A aNOiX01�`�vld+^Il MlOS3NN114'SI�UJId(1H o ,w i�` _- 9L1eZl t ___. ."_'_'_'__"_�__"'____"'__"'____'_____" %od.PG,66 5 ✓o �� c --�.::.,�,.�'��3 '�r•,s�- �v�� 133� Ni 3�V�5 1s3M.BI5L.oa Mlnos - NV38 01 43Wf1SStl SI�tL'tl'6l I-dM1'6L'�3S i0 P'l 3N 3H1 i0 bll 3N 3H1 j0 3NIl M1ilON � _ � 3N11V1d SIHl i0 S3SOdMnd 3H1 tl0! -��'�� u� � �t � �� 2 �Sf1H1 NMOHS 3W S1N3W35V3 ,unun arrv�vNroaa � T � _ ______————_O — � _fZ� $ e(Z 2/3N�'O.�MN d0 7/V�O : ' � 8 `+`��'�a .� ,�`'��.,. Op. i m �.�`d. — �_'_____. ^ici.oi..,�r':•, ' '�' ozfr„oz�n.rm,��.:��r._�su�a�c�n.eaNnauo.��aa�,�_ �-^os6.,�,oa,,,,wyon ezFc,. _— .. . ., . ,H._� £H'SLE -'� "- '°<`-- 3.LZ,6Z.BB S �I o y inaivn.voiv m2 ln]rv�v+a9��vCJ)�.SVJ c3tonJc (f�.v�� . z u. ..n�0 N JH�� O:IOn 3S✓'nd3i:1�S5J>�v/' -��v.'��^•M1 �� _,�]w.��O:v:d:e r�Ou�uJn:Z'r Orv/;O�S]I�NaO � �M,��"'�y_'; � � ' OilON3s�1fy]u_JS53tN.� '-"'"�"� f " v�M3BIN�'N3in'3�/l.Jd�J2VYJONYl3c J i...vr/v..i1:d.a rvvY'a�ti,t:,:6 u.�N�Z;r 5'�_'JA3C v��;�vp i 6l"��S�z�o�3M i }___'__'_'__'_'b�-'9Z/_ // '__'_"_'____"'_'__'___"_'_'. d.tc EEeJ2 S �� ti �oa a � �� V �� I/ \ �--� July 21, 2014 � Planning Report SPR14-1 SITE PLAN APPROVAL—PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING APARTMENTS Proposed Action Staff recommends the following motion: Adopt Resolution RZ14-5, recommendin�Lapproval of a site�lan to construct a 51-unit apartment buildin� at 1202-1304 Oxford Street. Overview Project for Pride in Living (PPL) is proposing to construct a 51-unit affordable apartment complex on the southeast corner of Oxford Street and Blake Road. The property addresses are 1202-1304 Oxford Street. There are currently six duplexes on this property. PPL has purchased the duplexes. The six duplexes will be razed and the new apartment complex constructed. This new apartment building will abut the expanded Cottageville Park to the south. The building will be four stories on Blake and stepped down to three on Oxford. There will be 10 one bedroom, 28 two-bedroom and 13 three-bedroom apartments. All units will be affordable. The monthly rent will be around $670.00 for a one bedroom, $730.00 for a two- --� bedroom, and $935 for a three-bedroom. Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • What are the preliminary specifics of the redevelopment proposal? • What is the applicant's timeline? • What was the result of the traffic and parking study? • What was the discussion at the neighborhood meeting? • What other approvals will be required? Supportin� Documents • Analysis of issues • Site plans • Resolution RZ14-5 • Traffic and parking study ��. �' , 'I C s�'�i 4:k-(�� ;,'��;�,:;).�.;� Nancy� S. Anderson, AICP City �lanner ^ Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: SPR14-1 Page 2 Primarv Issues to Consider �— • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the existing property is R-2, low density multiple family. The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as low density residential. A rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendment will have to be completed for this development to proceed. • What are the preliminary specifics of the redevelopment proposal? Building The proposed building will be located on the southeast corner of Blake Road and Oxford Street. The building will be four stories on the part of the building closest to Blake and then scale down to three stories as the building moves to the east. Five first floor apartments on Oxford will have front doors on Oxford. Setbacks The following are the required and proposed setbacks for the building: Mixed Use Pro osed � Front yard 15'-25' 18.5 feet with the expansion of Blake Road Side yard south 10 feet 10.8 feet Side yard north 10 feet 10.6 feet Rear yard 10 feet 32 feet Parking/Access There will be 45 underground and 16 above ground parking spaces, for a total of 61 spaces. This is one parking space for each unit and 10 for visitors. Access to the parking area will be from the alley to the south of the building. There is also additional parking on Oxford Street. The parking study concluded that the parking was sufficient. Exterior The exterior is a contemporary design. The majority of the exterior materials will be fiber cement panels and brick masonry. The balconies will be aluminum. Landscaping There will be a rock maintenance strip around the entire building. Almost the entire building will be bordered with a variety of landscaping. In addition, the walkway from Oxford Street to � SPR14-1 �. Page 3 the alley will be heavily landscaped with honeysuckle, sumac, dogwood and chokeberry. Lighting The front of the building will be lit with dow�n lights in the canopy. The south side of the building will be lit with wall-mounted lighting on the south side of the building. The walkway froin Oxford Street to the alley will be lit with pedestrian scale lighting. All the site lighting will be LED. Bike Racks Details of the bike racks have not been supplied. This will be a condition of approval. Signage At this time the signage has not be detailed. Any signage will have to conform to the sign ordinance. Engineering/Public Works Engineering staff offered the following comments on the subject project: � • The applicant should dedicate additional 6 feet of right-of-way along Blake Road to eliminate the "jog' in the right-of-way line currently shown. In order to do this without having the proposed steps into the building within the right-of-way, the stairs should be rotated counterclockwise 90-degrees so they approach from the south. • The applicant must furnish and install "No Parking or Stopping' signs along Blake Road. Sign placement shall be per City of Hopkins standards. • All existing water service lines serving buildings to be demolished must be removed to the corporation at the main and the corporation must be turned off. • All existing sanitary sewer service lines must be removed to the right-of-way, cut, and capped. • There are six water service lines within Oxford Street that need to be removed; this will result in a street patch at each location. Since the water main is located on the north half of the street,the street patch must extend across the full street width. The patch must be constructed to City of Hopkins standards. • The applicant will be responsible for the reconstruction and widening of the alley that extends from Blake Road along the south line of the property. This work includes construction of a new entrance to the alley at Blake Road. The new alley width must be a minimum of 24 feet and be constructed to City of Hopkins standards. • Reconstruction of the alley will impact the existing aerial utilities adjacent to the south side of the alley; these lines must be relocated and buried. �— • There will be a fee charged to the applicant for connection to the new regional storm water facility that will be constructed in Cottageville Park. The fee will be determined based on the site's contribution to the facility. SPR14-1 Page 4 • The catch basin in the alley will need to be removed and replaced at the centerline of the new widened alley. � • The two storm sewer lines from the site proposed to connect to the catch basin in the alley appear to be at an angle which will be too abrupt to allow for construction. The lines should be consolidated within the site so there is only one new line connecting to the catch basin. The new pipe from the site into the catch basin must be reinforced concrete. Fire Marshal The fire marshal has reviewed the preliminary plans and found them acceptable. Trash The trash area will be located in the underground parking area. Sidewalk The concept plan indicates sidewalks on Oxford and Blake. There will be a sidewalk on the south side of the property to connect Oxford and Cottageville Park. The sidewalk area on the east side of the site will be landscaped. Watershed District The applicant will need watershed district approvals. � Surrounding Uses The site is surrounded by residential to the north and east, Cottageville Park to the south and Blake Road to the west. • What is the applicant's timeline? The applicant is proposing to submit applications for approvals this year and start construction approximately summer 2015. The applicant secured funding through the Met Council for $1.6 million. Additional funding is being sought from MHFA. • What was the result of the traffic and parking study? The result of the traffic and parking study was positive. Attached is the traffic and parking study. • What was the discussion at the neighborhood meeting? At the first neighborhood meeting the main discussion was on the parking and the traffic. The second neighborhood meeting was held June 18; the main discussion was again on parking and traffic. ,._.. SPR14-1 � Page 5 • What other approvals will be required? In addition to the site plan approval, the development will need a rezoning to Mixed Use, amendment of the Comprehensive Plan to Mixed Use, replatting and an overlay zoning of planned unit development. Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the site plan to construct a new apartment building. By recommending approval of the site plan, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the site plan to construct a new apartment building. By recommending denial of the site plan, the City Council will consider a recommendation of deniaL If the Planning Commission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. --� � m c t m. WAKE I w m (COUHTYRC � I t3 -._......_ _ . _«s°rwwn•ur � p aerx �" an, 5 2544 E3] 9' �4y o A a � I q - � s g 3 I I I V i » z — SLI m M m 0 a�m 0 z x —1 z y –n a 1D a �D � m � o A # 'M cF 6m 6 %�^Zgi fin>a x gia$ e >N 5 5 5s $s lis kgs �a s� S!S 3S S - �s5 #; eb" aS' BC e6' cq8 i M m 0 a�m 0 z x —1 z y –n a 1D a �D � m � o A # 9 8 BtANE ROAD z � 9 � v 6 ■ I A w m � ll � g gg �i� a � U 3 R 'F .2 QH 10 m H MIm� S� 3 flI SRI HR x '' d r f 9 Planting Plan Oxford Village dei CERNNK RHOADES ARCRREGTS d^ s 4 9$ s euxExcao � s � ! R a { r� J. x nz q �.iI)�"r.+ a r rk7 a y 0, i j � k• a oy ;�aoy'r'�,t"Sa,,A ts, / r tpo aY i $ f1k 3 R 'F .2 QH 10 m H MIm� S� 3 flI SRI HR x '' d r f 9 Planting Plan Oxford Village dei CERNNK RHOADES ARCRREGTS d^ s 4 9$ ag, R R , INi A46 0 L ou -1 380 IA li C. 9/ r M, 7� T—, PRELIA41NARY GRADING PLAN OXFORD VRI -AGE is ,11-10-010MIDSC — Z W, MR , INi A46 0 L ou -1 9/ r j <Zz oAa_ BlAri_AYY,.., F.'ORC7 NC3. (COUNPYROAD No. VO) 71�Q zr{C ' w to ii fr. Noy[ 4a^E tp5 `� �m .0^::.rtuv rn rwm, crJ. nx:a.0 -. 2544 48 .. 2-4a ,,W o i u ki zmL Y Z z z dl ry 1 � y I C A yy z lll. y i of ( i A p 4 �u — Fs` s 0 r y N 0 Vf vl V VI rt - n - n vu L:.i ti �z — cio L _ _ zC ,.. <�Gm� ya`-so" gni niy � " I' >r � ?9 a s —io PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN : OXFORD VILLAGE WS6'b ��:nRm•. Mm G EFONT W OXWO GT. IKIP W, MN WJ B FOR PgWF IF.N UING 5 � wn4mgcnuE euro n»xm oa�nx ammo i4 J � .. �.,?oi.n'a;,te:: � a 0 w mw I m gOfg M M I a 61 I z w I . . . �--� � ' �� , . �; �� ,.,�,�,� �; i � i i � i � � !' --, , � LT_7 ■�I ? ■.I 1 [�7 [�.1 � ,I I —� �� - --� i - -- ---� -� --- � �� l � ( � � �.�� J �;��___I k_, � � il �I I - � �� ! � � �� % I ,�I_ __ ,i _ ` � l J _ _:'' �`""t�` i i — � — — � � � �I I I��...,._......�- '-T.�-__-..-'__�.._ '� � I� ____ _I� __ -._�� f.._; . '_�� a\ I I .�� f •� �� y`� y'_._._ ____ ;�i i ,�\ I � �` . :-� � �� . �� .__ , �::� 21 june 727 AM 22 december 9:48 AM � � .I I �� , � i � ;I ----_.________ �, ^ 'I i —l-^ I _._ ._ -_...._ _ '..�, I � "r"" ^'�,^ . m � oJ � � '!�� ,�� i ��I ,�, (��' � � � � � I �� , � � ; �; �? � I � � ,l L:;.. � � _� _...1 (� �� :� _� � ��! � i - � �' - _ i � � � �, ,� il � �l � � y � i l i i � I f �I � i �� i � lY ! Ij _ _ �� _� .J L'�� i .,.. �--�. L� _�� _._ %f#� -1--- � 1 i/ ' � ��_ ... , i1 — � —�� —\ ,___ � _ �� , �� > . �.�4 ,._..:.�;. -- ------- � y ' I --r �...�. ��--_�.� ,1 i ,��, �'' � s �" � � ``•,• )— i t�' / � i ' ' `w% �>.. ��, A; � � . _ -� �I- � . .� � � � ��;. . . � ��. I:- .. 21 june 12:00 PM 22 december 12:00 PM , =----� I - � � _ �`� { .,., :- • - : ; - �� - --- .I - � ------- , I� si - � T,:�: C.�] =7 Cl� i� '� � .,r. i a�i�gr '��S�.:a. `'*',•.KYk ''"�S �I ,�� l: _; Ci j "'�'J � �� '�I � �� _ � ;'� ,� � ' � ll_l I �� --- � `�,'�� ,� ��' �� : � -. ` �` � -:F= �j _� - 'i.; _--.�_-�� - _,� � i� , _- �;� '�:_.__ = s ,;` �� =�=�� , _ _ _._ -_ �L � ,� �� '.•, � . .�;. ��'J ._ `. • :I . _ �,,�� 21 june 7:03 PM 22 december 234 PM �'^� C��c�c�rc� Vi![aye � CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS i r � Oxford Village A proposed 51-unit apartment development by Project for Pride in Living, Inc. Project Description ' �'�� :}, - � � � �e� . ,� �� ._, r ��`� �;;� �� Y �, y �i�'w., 9." -, � � ►.� � �� . Y I�' } ' � �1j. �� p . - ^ �1�� I ._ �'�:��{y�� F�.�t �',�' . � �� '� fy.:,V ;. .F' , � � , �� ^t �K, p� �� . � A . . „�'�'t .� - � �a�;y � ,.� �'� i �.Ey: �,. . ._} ^.'� f"7'T r,_ !1C � �� _,� ^ ('� + t .,r�ry_ �1: � ,a `� �� ` • 7 ' r .. _. ..,... .._.. �.: _-:s�.�i�r�i�.,��y ��` � :. I�+�...`",.;.:y ��`�-= �:::+�.;- �.� � � .:-. ` �. ,.. _ �G ;�".'��a..., �ia� ,� Project for Pride in Living, Inc. (PPL), a Minneapolis-based provider of affordable housing and social service programs since 1972, proposes to develop and construct a 51-unit apartment building at the intersection of Blake Road and Oxford Street in the City of Hopkins. The development will be built on a 1.04 acre site that is currently comprised of six residential properties containing a total of 12 housing u nits. The building will contain up to 4 stories of residential space, a community room, property management and service coordinator offices, and an elevator. There will be 45 underground and 16 surface parking spaces. Construction will be wood frame over precast concrete, with brick and cement board panels as the predominant exterior materials. Of the 51 total housing units, 10 will be 1-bedroom, 28 will be 2- bedroom, and 13 will be 3-bedroom. Five of the Z-bedrrom units will be dual entry with walk-in entrances on Oxford Street as well as internal entrances. Rents for units in the development will be affordabie to households earning 50% or less of the area median income, or approximately $42,000 for a family of four. The building will include a large Page 1 Oxford Viliage Apartments Project Description � lune 26,2014 � community room to accommodate programming for adults and children that PPL's Self Sufficiency and Youth Development Programs make available to all residents. The development is adjacent Cottageville Park, which the city is enlarging and improving to inciude and abundance of open space and play areas for children, and within a third of a mile of the Blake Road Station of the soon to be constructed Southwest Corridor Light Rail Line. The development will include 4 units of permanent supportive housing serving individuals who meet the state's definition for Long Term Homelessness (LTH). These single adults will be 18 years of age or older; be disabled (dignosed with a mental illness, and/or chemically dependent, or have a physical disability); and be financially eligible for the State's Group Residential Housing (GRH) Program (must be receiving GA or SSI). The four units will be 1-bedroom and will be designated to serve LTH individuals. The project will meet the sustainability benchmarks of Enterprise Community Investment's "Green Communities" Standards, and the overlay to these standards from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. The project location is exceptionally transit rich and walkable. Metro Transit busses stop next to the development, and the planned Blake Road Station of the Southwest LRT is approximately one third of a mile away. There are many other amenities within easy walking distance as well. There is easy access to retail at Knollwood Mall and the Super Target. Restaurants, drug stores, banks and a day care are also all within half a mile. Libraries, schools, movie theatres, downtown Hopkins, and Methodist Hospital are all within a mile and a half. Additionally, the site's east-west orientation and unobstructed southern exposure make it ideal for passive solar heat gain, as well as a solar thermal hot water system. ^ PPL envisions a very green development, with storm water management elements designed in conjunction with the city's renovation of adjacent Cottageville Park, which is designed to be a regional storm water holding and infiltration facility. Trees, shrubs and other landscaping will form a feature directly connecting the park with surrounding neighborhood and separating the development from neighboring single-family properties to the east. This feature will provide evergreen protection for the north side of the building and shade in the summer along the southern exposure of the building, thus reducing energy usage in two ways while providing other environmental and aesthetic benefits. The building itself will also promote a green and healthy lifestyle. In addition to taking advantage of the passive solar potentials of the site, the building will also be tightly constructed per Green Communities using relatively little carpet, low VOC paints and sealants, and durable materials. To further enhance residents' health, smoking will not be allowed in the building. An auto-free lifestyle will also be encouraged by minimizing parking and providing secure bike storage space in the underground parking area and outside the building. PPL believes that the site represents an excellent opportunity for development of moderate density housing geared toward working families and individuals of low and moderate incomes. The central location of the site and its proximity to employment, services and public transportation make it an excellent location for workforce housing geared toward a variety of household make-ups, including singles and small families as well as moderate-sized families. The Oxford Village proposal is consistent with the Blake Road Small Area Plan and Blake Road Station Area Plans, as well as the state's affordable housing goals and objective of ending long-term homelessness. --� Page 2 Oxford Village Apartments Project Description June 26,2014 r t , CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota �-�- RESOLUTION NO: RZ14-5 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN TO CONSTRUCT 51 APARTMENTS AT 1202-1304 OXFORD STREET WHEREAS, an application for Site Plan Review SPR14-1 has been made by Project for Pride in Living(PPL); WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for Site Plan approval was made by PPL on June 27, 2014; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on July 29, 2014: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and, 4. A legal description of the subject property is as follows: � That part of South 40 feet of Lot 69 and of the north 98 feet of Lot 70 lying west of east 495 feet thereof and east of west 33 feet thereof, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 495 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 495 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No 239 West 55 feet of east 440 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 440 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 385 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 385 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 330 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 330 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 West 55 feet of east 275 feet of south 40 feet of Lot 69 and west 55 feet of east 275 feet of north 98 feet of Lot 70, Auditor's Subdivision No. 239 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Site Plan Review SPR14-1 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the Planning Commission reviewed the site plan for the proposed redevelopment. 2. That the proposed use meets the requirements for site plan review. � , • , , . � 3. That the proposed use is a permitted use within the Mixed Use zoning. 4. That the proposed use conforms to the vision for the Blake station area. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Site Plan Review SPR14-1 is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. That the site be rezoned to Mixed Use. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designation be changed to Mixed Use. 3. That the City Engineer approves the final plans. 4. That the bike plan is detailed and meets the ordinance requirements in the final plans. 5. That the site have an overlay PUD zoning. 6. That the site be replatted. 7. That the watershed district approves the proposed development. 8. That the police department reviews the security camera placement and the lighting plan. Adopted this 29st day of July 2014 ATTEST: --� Scott Kerssen, Chair � �� E �<;i�� res P L 4 V 1 F R> D rsic,�.Fes Can�ulLn�Gmup,Inc February 11, 2014 � Meg Beekman, Community Development Coordinator CITY OF HOPKINS 1010 l st Street S Hopkins, MN 55343 SUBIECT: PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR: PPL APARTMENTS TRAFFIC STUDY Dear Ms. Beelanan, We are pleased to submit this proposal to provide a traffic study for the proposed Project for Pride in Living (PPL) Apartments development in the City of Hopkins. The proposed development is located in the southeast quadrant of the Blake Road and Oxford Street intersection. The main objectives of this study are to evaluate the traffic impacts to the adjacent roadway network and residential neighborhood; review the site plan circulation and parking; and recommend any necessary improvements to accommodate the proposed development. SCOPE OF SERVICES � The scope of services, as we understand, is to perfonn the following tasks: 1. Collect a.m. and p.m. peak period entering and exiting traffic volumes at the existing duplex home access alley. 2. Estimate the number of trips that are generated by the proposed development for the a.m. and p.m. peak periods and on a daily basis using the current ITE trip generation rates. Provide a trip generation comparison between the existing and proposed land uses. 3. Review the proposed site access and parking supply, as well as any other celated internal or site specific issues. 4. Qualitatively assess the traffic impacts from the proposed development to the adjacent neighborhood. 5. Determine what improvements, if any, are needed to accommodate the proposed development with safe and efficient operations. 6. Prepare a draft memorandum documenting the findings and recommendations. Make revisions as appropriate based on City review and prepare a final memorandum. � www.srfconsulting.com One Carlson Park�vay North,Suite 150 � Alinneapolis, 11N SS�i�37-4443 � 763.475.0010 Fax:763.475.2429 4n Eq»ai Oppo�t�utity E�rryluyrr Meg Beekman - 2 - February l 1, 2014 ^ City of Hopkins PPL Apartments TS 7. Provide day-to-day project management, administration, and quality control, as well as project coordination with City staff. 8. Optional Task—Prepare for and attend one meeting at the request of City staff(i.e. planning commission, city council, or other). This meeting will be billed for actual time expended. For scoping purposes, the meeting was assumed to cost $500. SCHEDULE We are prepared to begin immediately upon notification to proceed and will complete this work within a mutually agreed-upon schedule. BASIS OF PAYMENTBUDGET We propose to be reimbursed for our services on an hourly basis at the approved City rates for actual time expended. Other direct project expenses, such as printing, supplies, reproduction, etc., will be billed at cost, and mileage will be billed at the current allowable IRS rate for business miles. Invoices are submitted on a monthly basis for work performed during the previous month. Payment is due within 30 days. '� Based on our understanding of the project and scope of services, the cost of our services is not to exceed $4,000.00 ($4,500.00 ivith optional task), which includes both time and expenses. CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF SERVICES It is understood that if the scope or extent of work changes, the cost will be adjusted accordingly. Before any out-of-scope work is initiated, however, we will submit a budget request for the new work and will not begin work until we receive authorization from you. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS The attached Standard Terms and Conditions (Attachment A) together with this proposal for professional services constitute the entire agreement between the Client and SRF Consulting Group, Inc. and supersede all prior written or oral understandings. This agreement may only be amended, supplemented, modified or canceled by a duly executed written instrument. �� Meg Beekman - 3 - February 11, 2014 City of Hopkins PPL Apartments TS ACCEPTANCE/NOTICE TO PROCEED �-- A signed copy of this proposal, either mailed or emailed to our office, will serve as acceptance of this proposal and our notice to proceed. The email address is mpacyna@srfconsulting.com. We sincerely appreciate your consideration of this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, SRF CoNsuLrrNG GxouP, I�1c. .r--;-;�,!-- ,_4 �� 1+ ' - � �r L... - . . Matt Pacyna, P.E. (MN,ND) Patrick Corkle, P.E. (MN, WI,NE), PTOE Senior Associate Principal APPROVED: (signature) Name Title .� Date This cost proposal is valid for a period of 90 days. SRF reserves the right to adjust its cost estimate after 90 days from the date of this proposal. SRF P14152 K:ITra�clProposalsVordanSU4innesotalP1A152_PPLApartmentsTS 140211.docx �.. A � • � i ' • /� ATTACHMENT A ST.ANDARD TER14iS AND CONDITIONS The Standazd Terms and Conditions together with the attached Proposal for Pr�fessional Services conctitute the entire Agreement beriveen the CLIENT and SRF Consulting Group,Inc. ("SRF")and supzrsede all prior written or oral undzrstandings. TMs Agreement may only be amendzd,supplemznted;modified,or canceled by a duly ea:ecuted written instnanent. 1. STANDARD OF C,�.RE a. The standard of caze for all profzszonal senices perfotmzd or fumished by SRF undzr this Agreement will be thz care and sl:ill ordinarily used by members of SRF's profession practicing under similaz circumstances at the same time and in the same locality. SRF inakes no w�azranties,eapressed or unplied,under the Agreement er othervcise,in connection�ith 5RF's service. b. 'I1ie CLIENT shall be res��isiblz for, and SRF inay rely upon,the accuracy and completeness of all requirements,progranls, instructions,reports,data,and other infonnatien furmshed by CLIE?�IT to SRF pursuant to this Agreement. SRF inay use such requirements,reports,data,and information in perfomrir�or fumishing sen�iczs under flus Agreement. 2. II�'DEPENDENT CONTRACTOR All dubes and responabilities undertaken piusuant to this Agreement w�ill be for the sole and exclusive bznefit of the CLIEN"I'and SRF and not for the benefit of any other party. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a ccmtractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against zither the CLIENT or SRF. SRF's sernices under this Agreement are being p;rformed solely for the CLIENT's benefit,and no other entity shall have arry�clauns against 5RF because of this Agreemerrt er the perfonnance or ncmperformancz of szrvices hereunder. 3. PAYMENT'TO SRF Invoices will be prepazed in accordance with SRF's standard im�oicing pracrices and wtill be submitted to the CLIENT by SRF monthly,uriless otheradse agreed. Invoices are due and payable within thirty(30)days of receipt. If the CLIENT fails to make any payment duz SRF for senlces and expenczs vcrithin fcnty-fi��e(45)days aftzr receipt of SRF's invoice thereafter,the amounts due SRF r��ll be increased at the rate of 1-1i2%per month(or the ma�imum rate ef interest penmtted by law,if less). In addition,SRF inay, � aRer giving seven days written notice to the CLIENT, suspend sennices imdzr this Agrezment until SRF has been paid in fiill of amounts due for services,e�enses,and other rzlated charges. 4. OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST Any opirdons ef costs prepazed by SRF represent its judgment as a design profzssional and aze futnished for dle general guidance of the CLIENT. Since SRF has no control over the cost of labor,materials,mazket condition, or comperitive bidding, SRF does not gi�rantee the accuracy of such cost opinions as campared to contractor or supplier bids or actual cost to the CLIENT. 5. INSURANCE SRF will maintain insurance coceragz for Workers'Compensatian,e7eneral Liability,Atuomobile Liability and Professicmal Liability and K711 proF2de cerrificates of insurunce to the CLIENT upon request. ti. INDEMNIFICATION AND ALLOCATION OF RISK a. To the fullest e�ent permitted by law, SRF agrees to indemrufy and hold hazmless the CLIENT, their officers. directers and employees against all damages,liabilities or costs(including reasonable attomeys'fees and defense costs)to ihe extent caused by SRF's negligent acts under Uus Agreement and thaY of its subconsultants or anyone for whom SRF is legally liable. b. To the fullest extent pernutted by law,the CLIE'_�1T agrees to indenmify and hold hannless SRF,their o�cers, directors and employees agairist all damages,liabilities er costs(including reasonable attomeys'fees and defense costsj to the extent caused by the CLIENT's negligent acts under this Agreement and that of its subconsultants or anyone for a3�om the CLIENT is legally liable. TERMINATI�N OF AGREEMENT Either party may at any time, upon seven da}•s prior wzitten netice to the ether party, temunate this Agreement. Upon such temunatior�the CLIENT shall pay to SRF all amounts oR-ing to SRF under this Agreemeru,for all work performed up to the eff ctive date of tenturtati�n 8. OWNERSHIP AND REUSE OF DOCUT4ENTS All documents przpazed or fumished by SRF pursuant to this Agreement aze instruments of service,and SRF shall retain an ownership �.� and property interest therein. Rzusz of any such documents by the CLIENT shall be at CLIENT's solz risk;and the CLIENT agrees to Page 1 of 2 (Standard Terms and Conditionsj Rev:Aligust 18,^_Ol l , . • . w � T : indemnify, and hold SRF hannless from all claims, damages, and expences including attomey's fees arisvig out of such reuse of documents by the CLIENT or by others acting through the CLIENT. `-� 9. USE OF ELECTRONIC T�EDIA a. Copies of Documents that may be relied upon by the CLIENT are limited to the printed a�pies(also kno�c�n as hazd copies)tY�at aze signed or sealed by SRF. Files in electronic media fomzat of text,data,graphics,or of other t}�s that aze fiunished by SRF to the CLIENT aze only for com�enience of the CLIENT. Any conclusion or information obtained or derived from such electronic files H�ill be at the user's sole risk. b. \�Jhen transfemng documents in electronic media forma�SRF inakes no representations as to long-term compatibility,usability, or readability of documents resulting&om the use of software application packages,operatir� systems, or crnnputer hazdwaze differing from those used by SRF at the begvuung of this Assignment. c. If there is a discrepancy between the electronic files and the hazd copies,the hard copies govem. d. Because data stored in electronic media format can deteriorate er be modified inadvertenfly or otherv��ise without authorization of this data's creator,the party receiving electrcmic files agrees that it will perfonn acceptance tests or procedures vc�ithin sixty(60) days,after which the receiving party shall be deemed to have accepted the data thus transfeired. Any errars detected within the six�ty(60)day acceptance period will be coneeted by the party deliveric�the electronic files. SRF shall not be responsible to maintain doctunents stored in elecLronic media fortnat after acceptance by ihe CLIENT. ]0. FORCE r4AJEURE SRF shall not be liable for any loss or damage due to failure ar delay in rendzring any service called for under this Agreemznt resulting from any cause beyond SRF's reasonable control. 11. ASSIGNMENT Neither party shall assign its rights,interests or obligations under this Agreement k�thout the ekpress written consent ef the other P�Y ]2. BINDING EFFECT T'his Agreement shall bind,and the benefits thereof shall inure to the rzspective parties hereto,their legal representatives,executors, administrators,successors,and assigns. �► ]3. SEV�RABILITY�'D WAIVER OF PROV'ISIONS Any provisions or part of the Agreement held to be void or unenforceable under any laws or regulations shall be deemed stricken,and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon flie CLIENT and SRF,who agree that the Agreement shall be reformed to replace such stricken pro�Zsion or part thereof with a valid and enforceable pro�zsion that comes as close as possible to e�ressing the intention of the stricken provision Non-enforcement of any provisian by either party shall not constitute a waiver of that pro��ision,nor shal]it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement. 14. SURVIVAL All provisions of this Agreement regarding Uvnership of Documents and Reuse of Documents, Electronic Media pro�zsions, Indemrrification and Allocation of Risk,and Dispute Resolution shall remain in effect. 15. DISPUTE RESOLUTION If negotiation in good faith fails to resolve a dispute within the ttrirty(30)days of notice of the dispute,or time period specified by applicable law, then the parties agree that each dispute, claim or controvzrsy arising from or related to tttis A�eement or the relationships which result from this Agreement shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to initiating legal or equitablz actions by either party. Unless the parties agree othetwise,the mediation shall be in accordance with the Commercial Mediation Procedures of the American ArMtration Association then currenUy ut effect. A request for mediation shall be filed in writing R�ith the American Arbitration Association and the other party. No legal or eqiritable action may be instituted for a period ofninety(90)days from the filing of the request for mediation unless a longer period of time is provided by agreement of the parties. Cost of inediation shall be shazed equally between the parties. Mediation shall be hzld in a location mutually agreed upon by the parties. T'he parties shall memorialize any agreement resulting from the mediation in a mediated settlement agreement, v�fiich agreement shall be znforceable as a settlement in any court having jurisdiction ihereof. 16. CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement is to be govemed by the law of the principal place of business of SRF. Page 2 of 2 `� (Siandard Tertns and Conditions) Rev:August 18,2011 . • � July 22, 2014 Planning Report VN 14-1 PARKING SPACE SIZE VARIANCE—ALICE SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Proposed Action � Staff recommends the following motion: adopt Resolution RZ14-7 recommendin�ap roval of a parkin� space size variance on the fonner Minnetonka Mills Road to the south of Alice Smith Elementarv School. Overview A few summers ago the intersection of Minnetonka Mills/ Ninth Avenue and Fourth Street was reconstructed. At this time a portion of Minnetonka Mills Road was abandoned as a through street. The School District would like to expand the parking area of Alice Smith onto the former Minnetonka Mills Road. 43 more parking spaces will be added with the new parking area. The plan as proposed has 9' x 18' parking spaces; the ordinance requires 9' x 20'. The City will have an agreement with the School District for the use of the road. There are mature trees on the south side of the former Minnetonka Mills Road. If the parking lot is inoved south, to meet the ordinance requirement for parking spaces size the trees will need to be removed and the parking area will be closer to the residential home on the south. By granting a variance for the parking space size, the trees can remain and the parking area will be farther from the residential area. The sidewalk will be removed along the former Minnetonka Mills Road at this time, but is scheduled to be rerouted and completed in the summer of 2015. Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? � What does the ordinance require? • What are the specifics of the applicant's request? • What practical difficulties does the property have? Supportin�Documents • Analysis of Issues • Site plans • Resolution RZ14-7 �l`� �► -. 11�Y. Nancy Anderson, AICP City Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: � Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: VN14-1 Page 2 Primarv Issues to Consider .�,, • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The subject property is zoned R-1-A, Single and Two-Family High Density. The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Low Density Residential. • What does the ordinance require? The required size of a parking space is 9' x 20'; the School District is proposing 9' x 18'. • What are the specifics of the applicant's request? The applicant is requesting a two-foot variance to the length of the parking spaces. The applicant will construct a six-foot fence as required on the south side of the new parking area and will add landscaping on the south side of the fence. The landscaping will be a combination of lilacs, dogwoods and junipers. • What practical difficulties does the property have? The new state statute requires three standards for the granting of a variance. The three requirements are: � l. That practical difficulties cited in connection with the granting of a variance means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by an official control; 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property, not created by the landowner; and 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The applicant meets the three requirements to grant a variance. The applicant is trying to save trees and keep the parking area as far away from the abutting residential property as possible. Surrounding uses The site is surrounded by residential on the west, and south and Chapel View to the east. Alice Smith Elementary School is to the north. Alternatives l. Recommend approval of the parking space size variance. By reconunending approval of the parking space size variance, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. � VN 14-1 ^ Page 3 2. Recommend denial of the parking space size variance. By recommending denial of the parking space size variance, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the Planning Commission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. .� �� CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ14-7 � RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PARKING SPACE VARIANCE ON THE FORMER MINNETONKA MILLS ROAD ADJACENT TO 801 MINNETONKA MILLS ROAD WHEREAS, an application for Variance VN14-1 has been made by Neil Tessier on behalf of School District#270, and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for Variance VN14-1 was made by Neil Tessier on behalf of the Hopkins School District #270 on July 8,2014; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed notice, held a meeting on the application and reviewed such application on July 29, 2014: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of the City staff were considered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ZONING AND PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA, that application for Variance VN14-1 to reduce the parking space size from 9' x 20' to 9 x 18' for the proposed parking lot is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the applicant does have a circumstance peculiar and unique to the parcel � because of the placement of the existing trees. 2. There exists a practical difficulty because if the proposed parking space size was required, the parking area would move closer to the abutting residential home. 3. That the variance will not alter the essential character of the surrounding area. BASED ON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the Zoning and Planning Commission of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, hereby determines that the literal enforcement of the 9' x 20' parking space size would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the subject property, that granting of the requested variance to the extent necessary to compensate for such practical difficulties is in keeping with the intent of the Hopkins City Code, and that the variance of two feet is reasonable. Adopted this 29th day of July 2014 Scott Kerssen, Chair � m �. N 9TH iA 'ate ST. e w �^ wp +li LA oemym"p..v.�: b'in RR up'o'n £ Sys a m ez b Y� L4 n r, I m A o e' Z O z u a m I a .! o Za m r A V. Z ' O ;11 �3 "� 9 Z m 0 „nom C z in , /'" —' 1.1 Z r�T 11 s� s K :j '�9 a8 C) oemym"p..v.�: b'in RR up'o'n £ Sys a m ez r, I m A o e' Z O z u a m I a .! o Za m r A V. Z ' O ;11 �3 "� 9 Z m m K C z in , /'" —' 1.1 Z r�T lJ f, s� s K :j '�9 a8 C) p U: ; s�Ln of Z p O < VI %„3�w � � �, n E3 � m n ass -m>a; n es^s A -HE N a NHl a mQ= a oS 0 0 z 0 >a u n�R �dg L�p MEM 16,15 'M f R H- vL;�a'B'o Cg$ 92' o� 8 4mp4 $&o 6H s Ulm soy=g� a�V' oma m s`NTE�� I I I I HOR IM14 IM Mg AN.;. Km;uo; ;-H zffl A TR SSE oxM 5 §1 M 1 sn IIT;� - MIMen . O 11 1 1 r4 11 1 �V0�� 1l � M, I I @ Hi r—n co p A I I I I HOR IM14 IM Mg AN.;. Km;uo; ;-H zffl A TR SSE oxM 5 §1 M 1 sn IIT;� - MIMen . O 11 1 1 r4 11 1 �V0�� 1l � M, I I am U 11 HIM MH H H I SH SIN i P, M-01 I. Hi H H_ ,, q� q 9m oma SEMI 92 gu PH H Ma HU oIIS AHM A jj\� �.��. ©- ` � `� \ � � C, 0 un � July 21, 2014 � Planning Report ZCR14-2 CONCEPT REVIEW— 1609 MAINSTREET Proposed Action This is a concept review that requires no action. Any comments regarding the development would be helpful to the applicant for future applications. Overview The applicant is proposing to construct a building that will be commercial on the first floor and residential on the second floor at 1609 Mainstreet. The existing site has a small building on the east side of the side and the remaining site is vacant. The property is zoned B-3, General Business. Residential is allowed on the second floor of commercial buildings with a conditional use permit. The owners of the property are planning to live on one side of the residential area and rent the second apartment. The owners will also have their business on half of the commercial area on the first floor. � Primarv Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • What are the preliminary specifics of the redevelopment proposal? • What is the applicant's timeline? • What will have to occur for this development to proceed? Supportin� Documents • Analysis of issues • Preliminary site plan �i �u r u�� ` �l �`l' Nancy � Anderson,AICP City Pl er Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): � Notes: ZCR14-2 Page 2 Primarv Issues to Consider � • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the existing property is B-3, general business. The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as commercial. The proposed use complies with both docuinents. • What are the preliminary specifics of the redevelopment proposal? Building The building as proposed will be a two-story building with commercial uses on the first floor and two residential units on the second floor. Parking/Access The parking will be in the rear of the building as will the access. There will be two garages for the apartments with additional parking for the cormnercial uses. Exterior At this time the exterior has not been detailed. � Engineering/Public Works The engineering department has reviewed the preliminary plans and found them acceptable. Fire Marshal The fire marshal has reviewed the preliminary plans and found them acceptable. Sidewalk There is existing sidewalk on Mainstreet that will remain. Watershed District The applicant will need watershed district approvals. Surrounding Uses The site is sounded by residential to the north and commercial uses to the west, east and south. � ZCR 14-2 _ Page 3 • What is the applicant's timeline? The applicant is planning on applying for final approval in August. • What will have to occur for this development to proceed? The following are the actions that will have to occur for this development to proceed as proposed: • Site plan approval for the construction of the building • Replatting � • Conditional use permit for the residential units --� i� 0 simll 0 Job IF IN C/7 �--�, ""� M C-' cr W., ti S 0357a5" W Existing Building flip 1 W"Jk Existing Building T.% Ch --1,30.00-- 3 8' Existing Building 7 12 N 12