Loading...
VII.1. Zoning Code Text Amendment to Allow Licensed Residential Programs for 7 to 10 Persons as a Conditional Use Permit; Lindahl May 7, 2019 City Council Report 2019-048 Zoning Code Text Amendment to Allow Licensed Residential Programs for 7 to 10 Persons as a Conditional Use in the R-1-D and R-1-E Districts Proposed Action: Move to adopt Resolution 2019-041, denying the zoning code text amendment application from Wilshire Properties, LLC to allow Licensed Residential Programs Serving 7 to 10 Persons as a conditional use in the R-1-D and R-1-E Districts. Overview The applicant, Bruce Lawrence of Wilshire Properties, LLC, requests a zoning code text amendment to allow Licensed Residential Programs Serving 7 to 10 persons as a conditional use in the R-1-D and R-1-E districts. The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this item during their regular April 23, 2019 meeting. During that meeting, the Commission heard a summary presentation from staff that included a recommendation of denial and held a public hearing with most comments in opposition to this request. After some general discussion, the Planning & Zoning Commission voted 4 to 3 to recommend the City Council approve this request. Staff continues to recommend denial of this request based on the findings detailed in this report including that it would establish a use and associated standards that are inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and incompatible with surrounding present and future land use. It is important to note that the applicant applied for this request to alleviate a specific zoning violation existing at the group home they own rather than comply with the zoning standards that apply to all other group homes in the state of Minnesota. Complaints from the surrounding neighborhood led city staff to conduct a series of site inspections that discovered the applicant’s property housed a licensed residential facility with ten (10) residents. Under state law, this type of facility is permitted in any single family residential district provided it has no more than six (6) residents. As a result, staff initiated a code enforcement process to bring the site into compliance. In response, the property owner filed for the above stated application to change the zoning standards rather than comply with limit of six (6) residents. Primary Issues to Consider ● Background ● Zoning Code Text Amendment ● Fire Marshal Comments ● Next Steps ● Alternatives Supporting Documents ● Resolution 2019-041 ● Applicant’s Narrative ● Draft 4/23/19 P&Z Minutes ● Public Comments ● Neighborhood Meeting Information ● Zoning Violation Letter ● Zoning Map ● Zoning Standards in Other Cities ● 4/6/12 City Council Minutes ● 4/6/12 Patch Article _____________________ Jason Lindahl, City Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N ____ Source: _____________ Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): _________________________________________ Notes: City Council Report 2019-048 Page 2 Background The Background section includes information on the applicant’s request, history of this application, action by the Planning & Zoning Commission, neighborhood meeting, Hopkins’ current zoning standards for group homes and zoning standards for Licensed Residential Facilities in other communities. Applicant’s Request. The applicant requests to amend Section 530.09, Conditional Uses within the R Districts to include Licensed Residential Programs Serving 7 to 10 Persons in the R-1-D and R-1-E Districts. The standards requested by the applicant are detailed below. Licensed Residential Programs Serving 7 to 10 Persons in the R-1-D and R-1-E Districts, subject to the following: 1. The property must be with-in 75 feet of an R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5, or R-6 district. 2. The minimum lot size is 35,000 square feet. 3. Modifications that change the exterior size of the dwelling are not allowed. 4. The dwelling living area, excluding the basement, must be at a ratio of 500 square feet per person minimum. 5. Expansion of parking surfaces must not decrease open space ratio by more than 3%. 6. For driveways and parking areas that abut or are across the street from an existing dwelling of the same zoning district, there shall be a landscaped buffer area per Section 542.05 Subd. 1, Item 3. History. According to the applicant’s narrative (attached), the subject property began operating as a Licensed Residential Facility in 2011. City permit records confirm this timing. At that time the facility was owned and operated by Grace Homes. Representatives of Grace Homes attended the March 20, 2012 City Council meeting to announce the startup of their 8-bed facility. There was also an article in the Hopkins Patch on April 6, 2012 highlighting the facility (attached). In May of 2017, the applicant purchased the subject property (and the neighboring property at 414 Wilshire Walk) from Grace Homes. In the summer of 2018, code enforcement complaints from the surrounding neighborhood led city staff to conduct a series of site inspections and contact the property owner regarding these issues. In January 2019, a routine fire inspection and subsequent review of Minnesota Department of Health records found ten (10) residents living at the subject property. This is a violation of Hopkins City Code, section 530.06(b) which limits licensed residential facilities in single family zoning districts to 6 or fewer residents. As a result, staff began the code enforcement process and informed the property owner they must bring the site into compliance with the City’s zoning standards within 30 days (March 4, 2019). In response, on February 21, 2019 the property owner filed for a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning and conditional use permit to allow a Licensed Residential Facility Serving 7 to 16 residents. That application required the applicant to host a neighborhood meeting (see details below). According to the applicant, after talking with the neighbors at that meeting he decided to withdraw his original application stated above and re-file for a zoning code text amendment to allow Licensed Residential Programs for 7 to 10 persons as a conditional use in the R-1-D and R-1-E Districts. Planning & Zoning Commission Action. The Planning & Zoning Commission held a public City Council Report 2019-048 Page 3 hearing to review this item (Planning Application 2019-06-AMD) during its regular meeting on April 23, 2019. During that meeting, the Commission heard a summary presentation from staff and comments from both the applicant and the public. Draft minutes from the meeting are attached for your reference. The applicant, Bruce Lawrence of Wilshire Properties, LLC, was the first to speak. Mr. Lawrence went over the information in his narrative about the ownership history of 601 Oakridge Road and the number of residents at the property. He continued by stating he believed the proposed text amendment was consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and cited 2012 information (City Council minutes, a Hopkins Patch article and building permits) as evidence the City was aware his property had more than 6 residents. It should be noted that State of Minnesota (not cities) review licenses for residential programs. None of the applicant’s examples constitutes city zoning approval. Next the Planning & Zoning Commission heard from 10 residents during the public hearing (see attached draft minutes). Of those that spoke, 8 were opposed to the zoning text amendment citing various concerns including: incompatibility with single family neighborhoods, potential for more group homes with a greater number of residents, the existing zoning violation at the applicant’s property, intensification of people and activity on the site and traffic and parking in residential areas. Those that supported the proposal stated they thought 601 Wilshire Walk was the perfect location for a group home but were concerned that these uses could take over the neighborhood. Another resident shared a quote he attributed to Hubert Humphry, “The measure of a society is how we take care of the most vulnerable among us” but didn’t state any specific comments about the proposal. The City also received several comments from the public on this item prior to the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. All of these expressed opposition to the proposed text amendment. These comments came to the City through both phone calls and e-mails. These comments are attached for your reference and summarized in the table below. Zoning Code Text Amendment Public Comment Summary Commenter Comment Kim Burmeister* Opposed to proposal Randy Engel Opposed to proposal Arthur & Francine Horowitz* Opposed to proposal Charles Horowitz Opposed to proposal DW Johnson Opposed to proposal Susan Kahn Opposed to proposal Ben Rubin* Opposed to proposal John Sheehan Opposed to proposal Ann Steinfeldt* Opposed to proposal *Also spoke during the public hearing After the public hearing, the Planning & Zoning Commissioners had general discussion about the proposal. Commissioners Hanneman, Steile and Wallace-Jackson spoke in opposition to the proposal based on the findings in the staff report. Commissioners Hanneman and Wallace- Jackson added their concern with the existing zoning violation and noted the applicant should know the state requirements and could have chosen to locate their business in compliance with the law on any number of properties in Hopkins already guided and zoned for multiple family City Council Report 2019-048 Page 4 use. Commissioners Balan, Daly, Goeman and Warden spoke in support of the proposal based on the need for these facilities, the history of the property at 601 Oakridge Road and their belief that it will be consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and present and future land uses. Next, Commissioner Daly moved and Commission Goeman seconded a motion to recommend the City Council approve the request. The Commission voted 4-3 to approve this motion with Commissioners Balan, Daly, Goeman and Warden voting in favor and Commissioners Hanneman, Steile and Wallace-Jackson voting against. Neighborhood Meeting. Hopkins neighborhood meeting policy requires applicants for conditional use permit or rezoning applications located adjacent to or within residential zoning district to host an informational meeting for neighbors within 350 feet of the subject property. This requirement applied to the original rezoning and conditional use permit applications but not to the current zoning code text amendment application. As part of his original application, the applicant held a neighborhood meeting at the Hopkins Pavilion on Tuesday, March 19 from 6:30 to 7:30 PM. The applicant mailed an invitation for this meeting to the Knollwood neighborhood, Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council (see attached). Summary minutes from the neighborhood meeting are attached for your reference. According to these minutes, seven (7) members of the neighborhood attended the meeting and one (1) other resident contacted the applicant by phone. While the attendees acknowledged the need for these types of facilities, they did not support the applicant’s proposal to intensify the use of this facility in single family neighborhoods. According to applicant, after talking with the neighbors at that meeting he decided to withdraw his original application and re-file for a zoning code text amendment to allow Licensed Residential Programs Serving 7 to 10 Persons as a conditional use in the R-1-D and R-1-E Districts. Standards for Licensed Residential Facilities in Hopkins. Minnesota Statute 462.357, Subdivision 7, requires all local governments in Minnesota to allow licensed residential facilities in residential zoning districts. The state administers the license for these facilities so local governments have no direct oversight or control over the day to day operation of these facilities. However, the City can regulate group homes the same as it would any other single family dwelling (outdoor storage, condition of the yard, number of vehicles, etc.). Under state law, licensed residential facilities serving 6 or fewer residents must be allowed as a permitted use in any single family residential zoning district. Residential Facilities serving 7 through 16 residents must be allowed as a permitted use in multiple family residential districts. The state law provides cities with an option to require a conditional use permit for these uses in multiple family districts. To comply with these state requirements, the City of Hopkins adopted Ordinance 93-722 which established zoning standards for Licensed Residential Facilities. Hopkins City Code Section 530.06(b) allows Licensed Residential Programs with a Capacity of 6 or Fewer Persons as a permitted use in any single family district. Section 530.09(p) allows Licensed Residential Programs with a Capacity of 7 to 16 persons as a conditional use in the R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5 and R-6 districts, subject to the following conditions: 1. Facilities shall comply with all applicable codes and regulations and shall have, current and in effect, the appropriate State licenses. 2. On-site services and treatment at residential facilities shall be for residents of the facility City Council Report 2019-048 Page 5 only, and shall not be for nonresidents or persons outside the facility. 3. The conditional use permit is only valid as long as a valid State license is held by the operator of the facility where such license is required. 4. Traffic generated by the facility not to exceed the design capacity of the local street system or cause a decrease in service levels of intersection, as defined by the Institute of Traffic Engineers. Adequate sight distance at access points shall be available. 5. No on-street parking to be allowed. Adequate off-street parking shall be required by the City based on the staff and resident needs of each specific facility. 6. No external building improvements undertaken which alter the original character of the home unless approved by the City Council. 7. Additional conditions may be required by the City in order to address the specific impacts of a proposed facility. Standards for Licensed Residential Facilities in Other Communities. Staff researched the standards for Licensed Residential Facilities in other communities through the City Attorney and other metropolitan communities. According to the City Attorney, their client communities follow the standards required by state law and they have not modified their zoning requirements to allow exceptions similar to the applicant’s request. City staff also reached out directly to the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Richfield and St. Louis Park and received response from four of these communities. In summary, like Hopkins the cities of Eden Prairie and Richfield follow state statute. Both Minnetonka and St. Louis Park have modified their zoning standards to allow exceptions for group homes similar to the applicant’s request. The zoning standards for Licensed Residential Care Facilities in Minnetonka and St. Louis Park are attached for your reference. Minnetonka allows these uses with 6 – 12 residents as a conditional use in its R-1 District while St. Louis Park allows these uses with up to 9 residents as a permitted use subject to certain conditions in its R-2 district. It’s important to note, the zoning districts in these communities have different standards than Hopkins (see table below). Of the standards in other communities, Minnetonka’s standards for its R-1 district are most like Hopkins’ R-1-D district. Zoning District Comparison Category Hopkins Minnetonka St. Louis Park R-1-D R-1-E R-1 R-2 Minimum Lot Size 20,000 Sq. Ft. 40,000 Sq. Ft. 22,000 Sq. Ft. 7,200 Sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 100’ 100’ 110’ 60’ Front Setback 35’ 35’ 35’ – 50’ Side Setback 10’ – 14’ 10’ – 14’ 10’ 5’ – 7’ Rear Setback 40’ 40’ 40’ or 20% of Lot Depth 25’ Zoning Code Text Amendment Zoning Code amendments are legislative actions in that the City is creating new standards to regulate the development of certain types of uses and/or structures. Under the law, the City has wide flexibility to create standards that will ensure the type of development it desires; however, City Council Report 2019-048 Page 6 zoning regulations must be reasonable and supported by a rational basis relating to promoting the public health, safety and welfare. The City’s Comprehensive Plan should be the primary source of information for guidance when considering zoning changes. As you may recall, the City is close to completing the process to update the current comprehensive plan. As such, staff considered both documents in our analysis below. Based on a review of the goals and policies of both the current 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan – Cultivate Hopkins, staff recommends denial of this request. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed zoning code text amendment would be inconsistent with both the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed text amendment would allow Licensed Residential Programs Serving 7 to 10 Persons as a conditional use in the R-1-D and R-1-E Districts. These zoning districts are guided as LDR – Low Density Residential on the 2030 Future Land Use Map. According to the narrative for this land use classification, it allows for single family detached residential dwelling at 1 to 7 units per acre. Chapter 4 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan – Land Use and Development details the rationale behind the City’s land use plan. This narrative supports the preservation and protection of the City’s existing residential neighborhoods. As mentioned above, state law requires the City to allow Licensed Residential Facilities serving Six (6) or fewer residents as a permitted use in single family zoning district. However, staff finds that permitting these uses with more than 6 residents in single family districts is not consistent with the goals and policies of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The Land Use and Development chapter states the City regards the preservation and protection of its existing residential neighborhoods as one of its most important priorities. The City will work to protect land use patterns that continue to support single family homes. In order to facilitate this residential land use patterns, Hopkins will: • Work to protect the integrity and long-term viability of its low-density residential neighborhoods and strive to reduce the potential negative effects of nearby commercial or industrial land through zoning, site plan reviews, and code enforcement. • Ensure that the infilling of vacant parcels and the rehabilitation of existing developed land will be in accordance with uses specified in the Comprehensive Plan. • Ensure that incompatible land uses will be improved or removed where possible and the land reused in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. • Work to assure strong and well-maintained neighborhoods. Chapter 6 – Housing also includes goals and policies that support denial of this application. The overall goals provide a framework for housing initiatives in Hopkins. Pertaining to housing, the City of Hopkins seeks to: • Retain and enhance detached single-family homes. Hopkins has a high percentage of multi- family housing. Most of the housing constructed in the future will also be multi-family due to locational and economic considerations. The city will generally continue to protect existing single-family neighborhoods from redevelopment and undue encroachments to maintain a variety of housing types • Encourage the development of owner-occupied housing. Hopkins has a high percentage of City Council Report 2019-048 Page 7 rental housing. To maintain overall housing diversity, the city encourages new housing to be owner-occupied where feasible. Similarly, the Housing Plan within Chapter 6 identifies strategies that also support denial of this request, including: • Retain and enhance detached single-family homes. • Encourage the development of owner-occupied housing. Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan – Cultivate Hopkins. The proposed text amendment would allow Licensed Residential Programs Serving 7 to 10 Persons as a conditional use in the R-1-D and R-1-E Districts. The Draft 2040 Future Land Use Map guide properties in the R-1-D District as Suburban Neighborhood while R-1-E properties are guided as Estate Neighborhood. Properties in the Suburban Neighborhood category are designed around a modified grid street network with good access to the surrounding transportation network. Properties in this category are relatively large for Hopkins, with most having ample private yards and attached garages. The Suburban Neighborhood category plans for low density single family neighborhoods and accessory uses such as parks and neighborhood scaled public and institutional uses. Neighborhood scale public and institutional uses would acknowledge and allow for licensed residential facilities serving six (6) or fewer residents as required by state law but not those facilities with more than six (6) residents. The Estate Neighborhood category is fully contained within the Bellgrove neighborhood along either side of Minnetonka Boulevard. It consists of relatively secluded large lot single family dwellings connected to city sewer and water services. Streets in this area follow a curved and looping design that rarely connects, creating organically shaped blocks to cul-de-sacs that limit pedestrian and bicycle mobility. Properties in this district tend to have larger footprints with attached garages and may include large accessory buildings or amenities. Large lot single family residential should remain the primary use in this category. Densities in this area typically range from 1-2 units per acre on average. The Built Environment section contains goals and policies that support denial of this application. Built Environment Goal 4 states “support and strengthen the city’s residential areas with reinvestment and appropriate infill.” The supporting policy for this goal states the City should “preserve and enhance the community’s detached single family housing stock, especially in the Estate Neighborhood and Suburban Neighborhood future land use categories.” Compatibility with Present and Future Land Uses. Based on the analysis above, a zoning code text amendment introducing Licensed Residential Programs Serving 7 to 10 Persons as a conditional use in the R-1-D and R-1-E Districts would be incompatible with present and future land uses. Properties in the R-1-D and R-1-E district are currently, and intended to remain, primarily large lot single family dwellings (see table below). The future land use plans in both the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan reinforce this land use pattern and would not support introducing group homes with more than six (6) residents, and its related activities, into these single family residential zoning districts. City Council Report 2019-048 Page 8 Surrounding Existing and Future Land Uses Analysis Location Existing Future North Single Family Residential Low Density Residential South Single Family Residential (Hwy. 7) Low Density Residential East Single Family Residential Low Density Residential West High Density Residential High Density Residential Conformance with New Standards. Staff recommendation for denial applies to both the proposed use and the associated standards. Should the City Council choose to agree with the Planning & Zoning Commission’s recommendation to approve the proposed use, staff recommends tabling this item so staff can fully vet the applicant’s proposed conditions and how they fit with the other properties within the R-1-D and R-1-E districts and the rest of the standards in the zoning ordinance. Based on an initial review of the applicant’s proposal, staff offers the following comments: • The City must carefully consider how the proposed use and any associated conditions effect other properties within the community and other existing City regulations not just the applicant’s property. • The use should be limited to the zoning district where there is currently a zoning issue (R-1- D district). • The associated conditions should limit the proposed use to properties better able to accommodate the more intense activity associated with residential facilities that have more than 6 residents. • When considering what conditions to apply to the proposed use, the City should begin with its own standards already in place for Licensed Residential Facilities serving 7 to 16 residents as detailed in Section 530.09(p) and detailed on pages 4 and 5 above, as well as the standards found to be effective by other communities. Fire Marshal Comments Should the City approve the proposed text amendment, the Hopkins Fire Marshal will require a new evaluation of any Licensed Residential Facilities with more than 6 residents. The Fire Department’s initial review of the Fire Code suggests any such facility must be sprinkled. Next Steps Should the City approve the applicant’s request, the next step for the applicant would be to file for review of a conditional use permit. Conditional use permit applications are considered quasi- judicial actions. In such cases, the City would act as a judge to determine if the regulations within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance are being followed. Generally, if a conditional use permit application meets these requirements it should be approved. The City has the ability to add conditions of approval that are directly related to the conditional use permit standards. In evaluating the proposed conditional use permit application, the City must consider and require compliance with the general conditional use permit standards in Section 525.13, Subdivision 15 and any other standards created through this text amendment process. Alternatives 1. Approve the zoning code text amendment application from Wilshire Properties, LLC. By approving the zoning code text amendment, Licensed Residential Programs for 7 to 10 persons will be allowed as a conditional use in the R-1-D and R-1-E Districts. City Council Report 2019-048 Page 9 2. Deny the zoning code text amendment application from Wilshire Properties, LLC. Should the City Council select this option, it should table this item and direct staff to prepare a supporting resolution and ordinance amendment based on specific findings of fact. 3. Continue for further information. The item should be continued if the City Council finds that further information is needed. 1 CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2019-041 A RESOLUTION DENYING THE ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT REQUEST FROM WILSHIRE PROPERTIES, LLC TO ALLOW LICENSED RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMS SERVING 7 TO 10 PERSONS AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE R-1-D AND R-1-E DISTRICTS WHEREAS, the applicant, Wilshire Properties, LLC, initiated zoning code text amendment application to allow licensed residential programs serving 7 to 10 persons as a conditional use in the R-1-D and R-1-E single-family zoning districts; and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. A comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, and conditional use permit application was initiated by the applicant on February 21, 2019; 2. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting at the Hopkins Pavilion on March 19, 2019 in conformance with the City of Hopkins Neighborhood Meeting Policy; 3. The applicant withdrew its application for a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, and conditional use permit on March 22, 2019; 4. A zoning code text amendment to allow licensed residential programs serving 7 to 10 persons as a conditional use in the R-1-D and R-1-E Districts was initiated by the applicant on March 22, 2019; 5. That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notice, held a public hearing and reviewed such application on April 23, 2019 and all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 6. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered that included a recommendation to deny this application; 7. The Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission voted 4-3 to recommend the City Council approve the text amendment, as submitted; 8. On May 7, 2019, the Hopkins City Council reviewed such application and the comments and recommendations from the Planning & Zoning Commission, City staff, the applicant, and all others that have provided input on the matter. WHEREAS, based on a review of the application and the submissions, the Planning and Zoning recommendation, and the written staff report, and after careful consideration of all other written and oral comments concerning the requested zoning code text amendment, the City 2 Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed zoning code text amendment would be incompatible with present and future land uses within the zoning districts in which it is proposed. The R-1-D and R- 1-E districts are single-family districts whereby licensed residential programs are only permitted for six or fewer persons, which is mostly consistent with a single-family designation. To allow licensed residential programs with greater capacities in these districts, through a conditional use permit or otherwise, would from a land-use perspective create an adverse impact on the surrounding properties. The City Code currently designates licensed residential programs with 7-16 persons as a conditional use in the City’s multi-family residential districts due to the impacts created by facilities serving this many persons, and said impacts are inconsistent with the City’s single - family districts. 2. The proposed zoning code text amendment is also inconsistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, which guides the R-1-D and R-1-E districts as low-density residential to support the preservation and protection of the City’s existing residential neighborhoods. Additionally, the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan presently maintains, as the primary purpose of R-1-D and R-1-E district, low-density single-family uses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hopkins that all recitals set forth in this Resolution are incorporated into and made part of this Resolution, and more specifically, constitute the express findings of the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hopkins that based on the findings contained herein, the City Council of the City of Hopkins hereby denies the applicant’s requested zoning code text amendment. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 7th day of May 2019. ATTEST: ______________________ _______________________ Amy Domeier, City Clerk Jason Gadd, Mayor DRAFT Minutes of the Planning & Zoning Commission, April 23, 2019 – Page 1 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES April 23, 2019 A regular meeting of the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission was held on April 23, 2019, at 6:30 p.m. in the Training Room at Hopkins Fire Station. Present were Commission Members James Warden, Samuel Stiele, Elizabeth Goeman, Gerard Balan, Emily Wallace-Jackson, Kristin Hanneman and Laura Daly. Also present was City Planner Jason Lindahl. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Warden called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. ADOPT AGENDA Commissioner Wallace-Jackson moved, Commissioner Hanneman seconded, to adopt the agenda. The motion was approved unanimously. OPEN AGENDA – PUBLIC COMMENTS/CONCERNS – None. CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Goeman moved, Commissioner Balan seconded, to approve the minutes of the March 26, 2019, regular meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Planning Application 2019-06-AMD Wilshire Properties, LLC Zoning Code Text Amendment Mr. Lindahl gave an overview of this item stating that the applicant, Bruce Lawrence of Wilshire Properties, LLC, requests a zoning code text amendment to allow Licensed Residential Programs for 7 to 10 persons as a conditional use in the R-1-D and R-1-E districts. Mr. Lindahl continued that recent complaints from the surrounding neighborhood led city staff to conduct a series of site inspections and contact the property owners regarding these issues. This process found the property housed a licensed residential facility with 10 residents. Under state law, this type of facility is permitted in any single-family residential district provided it has no more than six residents. As a result, staff initiated a code enforcement process to bring the site into compliance. In response, the property owner filed for the stated application to change the zoning standards to allow a Licensed Residential Facility serving 7 to 10 residents as a condition use in the R-1-D and R-1-E districts. Staff recommends denial of this request. Chairperson Warden opened the public hearing. Coming forward to address the Commission was the applicant, Bruce Lawrence. Mr. Lawrence shared some background information on the history of the group home and the services they provide to their residents. Mr. Lawrence also detailed the requested changes to the zoning code for Conditional Uses within the R Districts to include Licensed Residential Programs Service 7 to 10 Persons. DRAFT Minutes of the Planning & Zoning Commission, April 23, 2019 – Page 2 Shannon Schlecht, elected official of the Knollwood Association and resident at 302 Cottage Downs, shared concerns on how allowing the proposed changes to the zoning code could potentially affect the future of the single-family neighborhood in a negative way and the precedent it could set for other group homes to also start allowing more residents. Commissioner Daly followed with a question on how the difference between six or nine residents specifically affects the neighborhood. Mr. Schlecht did not have an example available but replied that the increase in persons contributes to more activity, deliveries, garbage, etc. The Commission asked about the number of cars regularly coming and going from the group home and how that has negatively affected the neighborhood. Mr. Schlecht did not have an average number to provide to the Commission. Marshal Taniguchi, 122 Wilshire Walk, commented that he is very supportive of group homes and the services they provide, but is wondering what the proper number of residents for a group home is. Mr. Taniguchi also referenced a study that discusses how the quality of life starts to decrease starting at four residents living in a group home, and drops significantly after six. Arthur Horowitz, resident of the Knollwood neighborhood, is supportive of the group home within the confines of current state law and City ordinance but is concerned that increasing the number of residents opens the neighborhood up to the possibility of major changes. Ben Rubin, 115 Cottage Downs, is not supportive of the zoning amendment and believes the change, even with the conditions proposed by the applicant, creates the possibility of major changes to the neighborhood. Mr. Rubin is in favor of letting the residents that are currently there stay until they choose to move out or are otherwise no longer living there, after which the property will operate within the current standards. Chairperson Warden questioned whether the City would allow the property to continue to operate under the violation and gradually come into compliance with the standards. Mr. Lindahl replied that he would have to discuss that with the City attorney. Kim Burmeister, 810 Edgemoor Drive, addressed the Commission seeking clarification on who is the owner of the property and who runs the group home. Susan Reader, 417 Cottage Downs, shared concerns about the number of cars in the neighborhood around the group home. Jim Hicks, 815 Park Terrace, commented on the amount of income the group home brings in monthly with each resident. Sharon Steinfeldt, 240 Bridle Lane, is supportive of the group home but is not in favor of changing the current zoning and shares concerns that allowing more residents will alter the feel of the neighborhood. Jed Gurlin, 805 Park Terrace, shared a quote from Hubert Humphrey: “The measure of a society is how we take care of the most vulnerable among us.” DRAFT Minutes of the Planning & Zoning Commission, April 23, 2019 – Page 3 Bruce Lawrence was invited to address the Commission and answer the questions and concerns from the community: • Related to parking and number of cars coming and going from the property, Mr. Lawrence explained that they operate a one to three staff to resident ratio. A maximum of three staff members come and go during shift changes throughout the day. Visitors of residents may also periodically park their cars in the driveway. There could be 9 or 10 cars parked at the property at any given time. In terms of how the traffic affects the Knollwood neighborhood; the applicant does not believe it should, based on the location of the driveway on Oak Ridge Road and not Wilshire Walk. • In response to the comment on how the number of residents affects quality of life, additional staff is added to be sure there is adequate care for each resident. If the application is denied, a current resident in need of special care would need to be moved to another facility. • In response to emergency evacuations, there are plans for safe evacuation of the residents in case of an emergency. • Addressing the concern of how the text amendment could encourage other group homes in the area to expand in a similar way, the applicant reiterated the requested conditions of the text amendment would ensure other group homes would have to go through the same conditional use process in order to make any changes to how they operate. • Regarding the ownership of the property, the applicant owns the care business that operates inside the property but does not own the property itself. • In response to a comment about a large amount of cars at the property for a dying person, it does not happen often and is usually only for a short period of time. • The applicant is willing to make alternations to help conceal the view of cars in the driveway. • If the application is denied, the applicant requests some time to locate another facility for a resident in need of special care. The Commission questioned how much time is reasonable to move the resident; the applicant responded a minimum of 30 days. John and Deb Anderson, 203 Wilshire Walk, commented on how the property at 601 Wilshire Walk is the perfect location for the group home and lists the only concern as group homes taking over the rest of the neighborhood. With no one else wanting to speak, Commissioner Wallace-Jackson moved and Commissioner Balan seconded to close the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. The motion was approved unanimously. Commission discussion after the public hearing included: • There are multi-family residential zones in Hopkins that are zoned to accommodate group home 7-16 residents. • How was this group home previously introduced to the City Council as an 8-bed facility and not recognized as a violation of City Code? Mr. Lindahl responded that he was not a staff member at that time, but believes the prior operators made a good faith effort to introduce themselves to the City Council and because the Council did not have the standards of the City Code in front of them during the meeting, the violation was not immediately DRAFT Minutes of the Planning & Zoning Commission, April 23, 2019 – Page 4 recognized. However, this does not require the City to continue to allow the violation to continue. • What are the next steps in the process if the City approves the applicant’s proposal for the text amendment? Mr. Lindahl responded that applicant would need to come back though the conditional use permit process and meet whatever the City ultimately sets. • Concern over the precedent the zoning amendment could provide to other group homes and the risk of affecting single-family neighborhoods. • Concern for the current residents required to vacate if the zoning amendment is denied. • Commissioner Daly agreed with an earlier comment about 601 Oakridge as an ideal location for the group home. • Confirmation that the applicant cannot split the lot under current zoning, which would not change with approval of the proposed text amendment. • The City can set standards that would limit the number of group homes in a single-family neighborhood with seven or more residents; however, group homes with six or fewer residents cannot be restricted as it is state law. • Support for protecting single-family neighborhoods, but concern about the impact on the vulnerable individuals being cared for by the group home. • Discussion of the option to table the item in order to examine the broader picture against the Comprehensive Plan. With no further discussion by the Commission, Commissioner Daly moved and Commissioner Goeman seconded, recommending the City Council approve the zoning code text amendment request from Wilshire Properties, LLC to allow Licensed Residential Programs serving 7 to 10 Persons as a conditional use in the R-1-D and R-1-E zoning districts. The motion was approved 4-3 with Commissioners Balan, Warden, Daly and Goeman voting for, and Commissioners Wallace- Jackson, Hanneman and Stiele voting against. This application will be presented to the City Council at their May 7, 2019 regular meeting with the Planning Commission’s recommendation for approval. OLD BUSINESS 1. Planning Application 2018-12-AMD 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Mr. Lindahl gave a brief overview of the item before introducing Haila Maze from Bolton & Menk who presented a summary of the comments received during the comment period for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission was instructed to review the comments and draft responses and determine if there should be any changes to how comments are addressed. When Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council reviews are complete (including a public hearing), the plan will be approved by resolution for submittal to the Metropolitan Council for formal review. Once the plan is submitted, the Met Council will have 15 business days to do a completeness review. If any issues are found, they will be brought to the attention of the city via a letter. The City then will have an opportunity to work with the Met Council to resolve any remaining items before final approval by both bodies. DRAFT Minutes of the Planning & Zoning Commission, April 23, 2019 – Page 5 The Commission requested receiving the draft a week in advance of the public hearing to allow more time for review. NEW BUSINESS – None. ANNOUNCEMENTS – None. ADJOURN Commissioner Goeman moved, Commissioner Balan seconded, to adjourn the meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Courtney Pearsall Administrative Assistant From:Charles Horowitz To:Jason Lindahl Cc:Robin Horowitz Subject:[EXTERNAL] Grace Homes Zoning Issue Date:Monday, April 22, 2019 11:22:59 AM Dear Mr. Lindahl - I am a homeowner and resident of the Knollwood neighborhood and City of Hopkins taxpayer. I am writing on behalf of my wife Robin and I to voice our strenuous disapproval of the Grace Homes zoning variance proposal seeking to increase the number of beds from seven to ten. Similar to all (or virtually all) of my neighbors, I am gravely concerned about the precedent the proposed expansion would set. If unchecked, addition of facilities like this will destroy the serenity of our neighborhood, and likely lead us to move out. I am concerned about quality of life issues the existing facility has already created. We moved here almost twenty years ago owing in large part to the peacefulness and seclusion of the neighborhood. The Group Home in its present state, even without the proposed expansion, generates large quantities of rubbish. There is frequently a giant, unsightly dumpster in front of it during the summer months, and lots of vehicles coming and going. Just last week two bags of garbage were in front of the house on the curbside. I attach a picture that I took with my cellphone. Whereas I’m in concept sympathetic that the Twin Cities may have a shortage of “group home” beds (if that be the case), a for-profit home of this sort is more appropriate to an area with a greater population density and public amenities necessary to hand the volume of trash they create. I am urging the zoning commission deny the requested expansion. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to email or call me (612) 203-8328 (cell). Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Charles and Robin Horowitz 102 Bridle Lane PS I learned online that the couple owning Grace Homes are members of the Wayzata Yacht Club and “a regular at Yoga House in Edina.” Which makes me wonder why they chose Hopkins and Burnsville for their group homes over Edina and Wayzata. https://www.yelp.com/biz/grace-homes-hopkins From:Anne Steinfeldt To:Jason Lindahl Cc:Randy L. Engel; Siddhartha Chadda Subject:[EXTERNAL] Zoning 601 Oak Ridge Road Date:Thursday, March 21, 2019 8:29:50 AM Good morning Jason, I regret that I will be unable to attend the public hearing on Tuesday March 26th but I wanted to share my input with you as Hopkins considers rezoning this property to be a Licensed Residential Program for 7 to 16 persons. Grace Homes has been a good neighbor but I am not in favor of changing the current zoning. I am concerned about increased traffic and safety at a very busy intersection. I am concerned about increased traffic/parking when it flows onto Wilshire Walk. This past winter, the amount of snow made Wilshire Walk just passable for a single car where drivers would need to take turns in order to safely pass each outer. I am also concerned about the amount of debris that can overflow onto Oak Ridge Road. Not often, but there have been times when personal property was discarded onto Oak Ridge Road — not in trash bins but on the street. I probably should have reached out to the City when those occurrences happened but I did not. I was just disappointed that a business didn’t dispose of oversize items in a business-required fashion. It felt disrespectful to the integrity of the neighborhood and their consideration of neighbors. Thank you and the Commission for consideration of my concerns. Copied on this email are my husband, Siddhartha Chadda, and Randy Engel, President of the Knollwood Association. Warmest regards, Anne Steinfeldt 710 Edgemoor Drive From:Anne Steinfeldt To:Jason Lindahl Cc:Randy L. Engel; Siddhartha Chadda; Sharron Steinfeldt Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: [EXTERNAL] Zoning 601 Oak Ridge Road Date:Saturday, April 20, 2019 1:24:53 PM Hello Jason, I am reaching out again regarding my position on a proposed zoning change to 601 Oak Ridge Road. I’ve also added my mother, Sharron Steinfeldt, who has lived in Knollwood for 60+ years. I know she shares my concerns. Again, I regret I am unable to attend the meeting on Tuesday April 23rd but I wanted to express my concerns regarding a proposed zoning change for the reasons I stated in an email on 3/21/19. Those concerns are noted below. Since my March email, I’ve come to know that State regulations allow for 6-bed facilities zoned in residential areas. I now further understand that Wilshire Properties as been conducting business outside of their approved zoning. What I don’t understand from the narrative on the Hopkins website is if Wilshire Properties currently continue to operate (and sell services) outside their approved zoning number of beds or if they are required in this period to reduce the number of beds. From the narrative, it appears that the only reason Wilshire Properties requested the zoning change is to alleviate a violation and to move forward in a manner best suited to Wilshire Properties' objectives rather than the integrity of the Knollwood neighborhood, what is defined as single-family, residential dwellings. I reiterate my concerns expressed on 3/21/19 but add the following: A 7-10 bed facility is not compatible with current and future land uses of the Knollwood neighborhood A 7-10 bed facility creates extra taxation on services such as water and sewer A 7-10 bed facility creates extra work for providers of city services such as fire inspectors, building inspectors, city planners, city attorneys, etc (who are paid for by tax payers) A 7-10 bed facility doesn’t support the Built Environment section of the Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan - Cultivate Hopkins I further believe that Wilshire Properties should be retroactively fined for being in violation of zoning codes going back to 2012. Whether or not they knew they were in violation of existing State Zoning Regulations, they were able to sell services and conduct business outside what they were legally allowed to do. Wilshire Properties attempt to change zoning is because they were found to be in violation. I assume they would have continued to operation outside existing zoning regulations for as long as no one inspected them and found them to be in violation. I am able to determine from the Hopkins website if Wilshire Properties was required to notify neighbors of their 2nd attempt to change the zoning. In their first attempt, we received 3 notifications (our home is 3 tax-ids) but I don’t recall getting any notification from them. I could be incorrect in my memory but I don’t recall if Wilshire Properties reached out to us this time around. Jason, thank you for listening to my concerns. I am in agreement with the Hopkins Staff recommendation to deny a proposed text amendment to allow Licensed Residential Programs for 7-10 persons as a conditional use in the R-1-D and R-1-E Districts. Please let me know if you have any follow up questions. Waremest regards, Anne Steinfeldt & Siddhartha Chadda 710 Edgemoor Drive On Mar 21, 2019, at 8:37 AM, Jason Lindahl <jlindahl@HOPKINSmn.com> wrote: Hi Anne – Thanks for your comments. I will include them in the report on this item to the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. Thanks Jason <image001.jpg> Jason Lindahl | City Planner | City of Hopkins 1010 1st St S | Hopkins, MN 55343 | 952-548-6342 | 952-935-1384 Fax www.hopkinsmn.com From: Anne Steinfeldt <annesteinfeldt@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 8:30 AM To: Jason Lindahl <jlindahl@HOPKINSmn.com> Cc: Randy L. Engel <randy.engel@buetow2architects.com>; Siddhartha Chadda <siddhartha.chadda@gmail.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Zoning 601 Oak Ridge Road Good morning Jason, I regret that I will be unable to attend the public hearing on Tuesday March 26th but I wanted to share my input with you as Hopkins considers rezoning this property to be a Licensed Residential Program for 7 to 16 persons. Grace Homes has been a good neighbor but I am not in favor of changing the current zoning. I am concerned about increased traffic and safety at a very busy intersection. I am concerned about increased traffic/parking when it flows onto Wilshire Walk. This past winter, the amount of snow made Wilshire Walk just passable for a single car where drivers would need to take turns in order to safely pass each outer. I am also concerned about the amount of debris that can overflow onto Oak Ridge Road. Not often, but there have been times when personal property was discarded onto Oak Ridge Road — not in trash bins but on the street. I probably should have reached out to the City when those occurrences happened but I did not. I was just disappointed that a business didn’t dispose of oversize items in a business-required fashion. It felt disrespectful to the integrity of the neighborhood and their consideration of neighbors. Thank you and the Commission for consideration of my concerns. Copied on this email are my husband, Siddhartha Chadda, and Randy Engel, President of the Knollwood Association. Warmest regards, Anne Steinfeldt 710 Edgemoor Drive From:Ben Rubin To:Jason Lindahl Cc:"Randy L. Engel"; brubin@deephaveninc.com Subject:[EXTERNAL] GROUP HOME AT 601 OAK RIDGE ROAD Date:Saturday, March 23, 2019 8:39:44 AM Hi Jason: I understand that Grace Homes as decided not to pursue a zoning change to allow them to operate with more than six residents at the above noted address. However, it troubles me that they have been and may continue operating with more than six residents in violation of the zoning ordinance. There a number of reasons this concerns me, from traffic to visitors, but none more than setting a precedent for businesses to operate in what we thought was a residential zoned neighborhood when we purchased our lot in 2013 and built our home. So, to be clear, we are adamantly opposed to any change in the zoning or a waiver allowing Grace, or any other business, to operate outside the current zoning guidelines allowing more than six residents. Please feel free to contact me if you want to discuss further. Sincerely, Ben Rubin 115 Cottage Downs Hopkins MN 55305 Tel: 612.868.4462 ben@benrubin.net Notice: This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is legally privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. If you received this transmission in error, please reply to the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. From:Ben Rubin To:Jason Lindahl Cc:Ben Rubin Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re 4/23/19 Hopkins Planning Committee Meeting/Wilshire Properties Group Home Date:Wednesday, May 1, 2019 3:18:10 PM Dear Jason: My wife and I attended the April 23, 2019, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at the Hopkins Fire Department Facility. I was surprised by the seeming inability of the members of the Commission to confine their discussion and decision to the facts and zoning matter in front of them, their seeming lack of knowledge as to Roberts Rules of Order to running a meeting, how to make a motion, what the actual motion in front of them was, and the resulting outcome. First and foremost, I am troubled that the Commission voted 4 to 3 to recommend to Council, Wilshire Properties LLC, request for a conditional use permit to operate a 7-10 bed group home facility, against the express recommendation of staff to deny the request. Second, staff specifically and, several times throughout the meeting, advised the Commission that it had not studied the text request submitted by Wilshire Properties, because staff is recommending a denial of request. However, should the Commission decide the request by Wilshire has merit, staff would then study the text request and provide an opinion to committee. Third, staff several times throughout the meeting, advised the Commission that Wilshire Properties has been operating with more than 6 beds for years in violation of city ordinance, yet committee member Laura Daily, who made the motion for Commission to recommend to Council the text as written, stated ‘what’s the difference if they operate with 6, 7, or 8, beds, after all, a number is just a number”. If you follow that logic then similarly, Hopkins residents can drive 50 mph on city streets with limit clearly posted as 30 mph without consequence. After all, a number is just a number, right? Wrong, that is equally ridiculous. Fourth, the Commission seemed to focus their discussion on an emotionally charged need to care for aging adults and even mentioned caring for an increasing autistic population. While I agree this is an important societal issue, I do not believe it is an issue for the Zoning Commission. Zoning and its impact to Hopkins neighborhoods and “the health, safety and general welfare of people living and working in Hopkins and implementing the City's Comprehensive Plan” is their mission, according to the City of Hopkins’s website. Fifth, the Commission’s decision to recommend verbatim, Wilshire Properties text request for a conditional use permit to Council, is a recommendation lacking proper study, adequate thought and, in my opinion, one that unfairly targets the dwellings in the Knollwood neighborhood as few, if any, other Hopkins neighborhoods have multiple 35,000 sq. ft lots. Sixth, the Commission voted to recommend the text request, without consideration that it does not specify “within 75’ of a multi-family zoned area within Hopkins”. As recommended, it is possible that some homes along Edgemoor Road may qualify for this conditional use as those homes are within 75’ of the St Louis Park Amhurst multi-family housing development. My wife and I purchased a vacant lot at 115 Cottage Downs in 2012 and constructed our house in 2013. We did so because we liked the feel of the residential, single-family home, Knollwood neighborhood. We never imagined that the group home that operated at the corner of Oak Ridge Road was operating in violation of code and city ordinance, nor that it would expand to two group homes and then a third operator would expand on the group home concentration on Wilshire Walk in the Knollwood neighborhood. At present, group homes comprise 5% of the homes in the Knollwood neighborhood. Given the size of the homes and lots in Knollwood, along with their relatively low- price compared to a commercial building or facility, it is likely that the Knollwood neighborhood is a target of group home operators and the number of group homes in the neighborhood will increase over time. I urge the Council to deny Wilshire Properties request for conditional use permit at the May 7, 2019, City Council Meeting. I also urge the Council to reach out and, work with, the Minnesota legislature on behalf of the Knollwood neighborhood and, all of Hopkins, to impose a radius limit on the concentration/proximity of group homes within neighborhoods zoned single-family to protect the long-term residential quality of life within Hopkins before it is too late. Below is a summary provided to me by my attorney. I urge the Council to review it and consider the merits of his comments as well. City of Hopkins Zoning Code Text Amendment - Licensed Residential Programs for 7 to 10 persons in R-1-D and R-1-E Districts Ben: The request of Wilshire Properties, LLC for a zoning code text amendment to allow Licensed Residential Programs for 7 to 10 persons as a conditional use is contrary to intent and purpose of the existing zoning code. A few relevant stated purposes of the Hopkin’s zoning code are 1) to protect and provide for the public health, safety and welfare, 2) guide future growth and development of the City in accordance with the comprehensive guide plan, 3) divide the city into zones and districts … (controlling the) use of structures and land, and 4) protecting the character and social and economic stability of all areas of the City. The proposed zoning text amendment does not advance any of these policy considerations. This proposed text amendment is being advanced for the singular purpose of trying to rectify an existing violation of Hopkins City Code section 530.06(b). A change to the zoning code should be based on policy considerations consistent with the purpose and intent of the zoning code, not to cure a singular violation. The proposed zoning text amendment is inconsistent with the comprehensive guide plan which the Applicant is also requesting be amended. Per Hopkins existing zoning code, and in compliance with MN Law, Licensed Residential Programs are permitted in R-1-D and R-1-E districts, so long as the number of residents does not exceed 6 persons. The policy purpose for limiting the number to 6 or less is a recognition of the single family residential nature of the R-1-D or R-1-E districts and intended to minimize the impact of the Licensed Residential Programs in that type of residential area. Licensed Residential Programs serving 7 to 16 residents are permitted by the Hopkins zoning code, but only in R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5 and R-6 districts. This recognizes the policy considerations in placing the higher volume, greater density Programs in areas that reflect the City’s plan for concentration of density and services in specific districts of the City. I can think of no compelling policy considerations why the City would want to change the comprehensive plan or the zoning code text to permit this intensified use of single family structures in a R-1-D or R-1-E single family district. Thanks- Ben Rubin 115 Cottge Downs Hopkins MN 55305 Notice: This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is legally privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. If you received this transmission in error, please reply to the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. 1 Jason Lindahl From:Kim Burmeister <kimburm@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, April 17, 2019 4:39 PM To:Jason Lindahl Subject:[EXTERNAL] Grace Homes - zoning change  Dear Mr. Lindahl,    We have lived in Knollwood for over 25 years and strongly oppose the conditional permit to change the residential  group home located at 601 Oak Ridge Road (located next to their other group home on Wilshire  Walk) from a 6‐bed residence to a 7 to 10 bed facility.  Our primary concern is the dramatic negative change that it will  cause our quiet and beautiful neighborhood.  Our neighbors take great pride in our small community and love the “less  travelled” and open landscape of the area.  The changes that have already occurred with the two residential homes (with a third opening on Wilshire Walk) has  already caused hardship on local homeowners due to additional traffic and parking issues.  We have narrow streets (in  need of repair) and tight corners that are not built to take on more traffic.  The current owners of Grace Homes purchased the business knowing the licensing was for six beds and we see no  reason why we, a small, quiet and historic neighborhood should have to pay a price for increasing the volume of  congestion.  People specifically purchase homes in Knollwood because of the charm, stability and quiet streets. We are one of the  very few low‐density neighborhoods of Hopkins, and like us, the City of Hopkins would not benefit from increasing the  density in a residential area for business operations.  Looking forward, one conditional permit change opens doors for more permit changes, that again we do not support for  our neighborhood and other Hopkins neighborhoods.  In conclusion, we strongly oppose the City approving the request for a conditional permit change to increase the number  of clients allowed in a home.    We appreciate your consideration.    Kim and John Burmeister  810 Edgemoor Drive  Hopkins, MN 55305  From:Peg Hicks To:Jason Lindahl Cc:Jim Hicks Subject:[EXTERNAL] Grace Homes request for a conditional use zoning permit Date:Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:38:57 PM My husband and I are writing to express our strong opposition to the Grace Homes’ request for conditional use permit to allow the operation of a licensed group home with 7 to 10 beds at 601 Oak Ridge Road. As residents of the Knollwood neighborhood, we strongly value and want to protect the charm and low-density nature of our quiet residential neighborhood. While we understand that the current zoning laws permit 6-bed group homes in residential neighborhoods, we are not in favor of having a larger commercial business operating in our quiet residential neighborhood. Grace Homes is located at a very busy intersection of Oak Ridge Road and Highway 7. Our neighbors on Wilshire Walk already have experienced increased traffic and cars parking on their quiet residential street from visitors, staff, and deliveries to the the Grace Homes. By approving the Grace Homes’ conditional use permit request for additional beds, the City of Hopkins would further add to our neighborhood’s traffic burden and potentially harm the historic charm of our low-density residential neighborhood. By approving the Grace Homes’ request, the city would be setting a dangerous precedent for both our residential neighborhood and other neighborhoods in Hopkins. As you will note in the attached link, the Grace Homes’ web site includes a photo of the Knollwood neighborhood entrance signs on its web site. Here’s the link: http://gracehomes.info/wilshire-walk-memory-care-home/ This commercial operation already is benefiting greatly at the expense of the rest of our neighborhood. Permitting additional beds at the site is an undue burden to the Knollwood neighborhood. We respectfully request that you reject Grace Homes conditional use permit zoning request. We plan to attend the Hopkins Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on April 23 to express our strong opposition to this proposal. Thank you. Peg & Jim Hicks 815 Park Terrace Hopkins, MN 55305 From:Sharron Steinfeldt To:Jason Lindahl Cc:Anne Steinfeldt; Randy L. Engel Subject:[EXTERNAL] Planning Application 2019 -AMD Wilshire Properties L:LC Zoning Code Text Amendment Date:Monday, April 22, 2019 2:01:17 PM Jason : I am against Zoning Code text Amendment that would increase the number of people who could be housed at the care facilities from a maximum of 6 people to allowing 7 - 10 people . I have lived in the Knollwood Neighnothood at 240 Bridal Lane for 61 years and I plan to stay for many more years because I love Hopkins and my neighbors, Hopkins is a great place to raise a family . I strongly believe that if the City of Hopkins permits this increase it will set a precedent that will be detrimental to not only Knollwood but to many other residential home owners in R1 neighborhoods in Hopkins. I look forward to being at the meeting tomorrow April 23 at 6:30. Sharron Steinfeldt 240 Bridal Lan Hopkins Mn 55305 PS I was surprised to hear that a property on Wilshire Walk may already be inviolation with 10 people being cared for at that facility. Is that true ? How will this be remedied? f 1 Jason Lindahl From:Susan Kahn <susan.kahn@mac.com> Sent:Wednesday, April 17, 2019 4:54 PM To:Jason Lindahl Subject:[EXTERNAL] Grace Homes (Wilshire Properties, LLC) Request We are writing in regard to the upcoming request by Grace Homes to amend the Hopkins City Code to allow a licensed group home with seven to 10 beds as a conditional use in certain R-1 zoning districts … and the potential, if this request is approved, to allow the facility located at 601 Oak Ridge Road to receive a conditional use permit for its current location. We are opposed to a change to the Hopkins City Code and opposed to Grace Homes receiving a conditional use permit for its current location - to operate a group home with up to 10 beds. We have made significant investments in our property and our neighborhood, treasure the nature and density of our residential neighborhood - and therefore, we are not in favor of this request to expand this group home in the Knollwood neighborhood. We are unable to attend the Hopkins Planning and Zoning Commission meeting next week on April 23, so we are sharing our perspective via this email and hope that it will be considered in this process. Sincerely, Susan and Ken Kahn 712 Valley Way Hopkins, MN 55305 From:horow001 To:Jason Lindahl Subject:[EXTERNAL] Grace Homes Condition Use Permit Date:Monday, April 22, 2019 12:22:26 PM Dear Mr. Lindahl, Mrs. Horowitz and I have resided in Hopkins since we moved to Minnesota June 1969, initially owning a home in Hobby Acres, but moving to our present residence at 830 Edgemoor Drive in Knowlwood in 1971. When we moved to Knollwood, we chose not to live in a commercially zoned area, but a fine residential community. Mrs. Horowitz and I would like to express our vehement objection to the zoning changes requested by Grace Homes. The owner of Grace Homes and applicant should certainly have been sufficiently knowledgable to realize that the Hopkins zoning ordinance allowed him to create facility limited to only six beds in an established single family home but six customers was the limit. Granted, he can make more money by expanding the number of his residents, but to the detriment of my neighborhood and ultimately the value of my property. I sympathize with this business owner, but he was the one who made the decision to establish a six bed facility in my neighborhood with the full knowledge of the existing zoning regulation. If he feels that six beds won’t do, he should chalk up his problem to a bad business decision. With regards, Francine B. Horowitz Arthur J. Horowitz, MD March 19, 2019 Neighborhood Meeting Minutes Agenda: 6:30: Gather and Sign-In 6:40: Welcome and Introductions 6:50: Project Description and Background 7:00: Q & A Attendance: 7 people from the neighborhood representing 6 properties as follows: 122, 203, and 216 Wilshire Walk 302 and 417 Cottage Downs 810 Edgemoor Drive 2 people with ties to Hopkins Community Arts one of which is a business partner of the Grace Homes owners. 1 person contacted me by phone earlier in the week as they were not able to attend the meeting. The meeting opened with an introductions and an overview of Matrix Home Health Care Specialists, including when the company was founded, when and why it expanded into home care and when and why residential care came was added. The licensing requirements for care homes was provided including state and county requirements. The background on how we got to this point was presented highlighting the fact that residential care homes were fairly new to the city when Grace Homes opened in 2011 leading to the oversight in zoning restrictions that lasted for the better part of 7 years. We talked about R-1 zoning and 6 residents being protected by the state and that there is a provision to allow more than 6 residents that requires multiple family zoning and a conditional use permit. R-1-A zoning which supports multiple family housing was discussed although it wasn’t a good fit for this situation. The possibility of a text change was also discussed as an option but again not a good fit for this situation. 6900 Shady Oak Road  Suite 216 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952/525-0505 / Fax: 952/525-0506 www.MatrixHomeHealthMN.com www.GraceHomesMN.com The meeting was fairly free flowing with questions and discussion all throughout. In general the attendees agreed that there weren’t issues with Grace Homes and acknowledged that the pushback is primarily due to the new home going in on Wilshire Walk. Many acknowledged the need for this type of housing and were supportive of Grace Homes. The operations at Grace Homes was discussed including the number of bedrooms, how they are allocated, what the staffing ratios by time of day are, and who else works at the house. A question was asked about the number of cars that come and go on a daily basis, not so much as an issue with Grace Homes but a potential issue with the new care home. The Elderly (EW) and CADI waivers were discussed as well as how shared rooms are sometimes necessary for EW residents due to the relatively low reimbursement rate. Also discussed was the ability of Grace Homes to accommodate more EW residents if the total number of residents was more than 6. The person that called in asked why a conditional use permit couldn’t be issued rather than rezoning the property. The answer being that the conditional use permit didn’t pertain to R-1 properties. Thus the property needed to be rezoned in order to apply the conditional use permit. There were several concerns expressed which were shared by all of the neighborhood attendees. They were: 1. Any zoning change is permanent and while they were receptive of what Grace Homes was doing, the property could be used differently in the future which may negatively impact the neighborhood. 2. A precedent gets set if an exception is made for one property that might lead to others wanting to do similar things. “You did it for them, why won’t you do it for me”. 3. There was concern about the ability to have up to 16 residents if rezoned to R-2. This was addressed by limitations placed on the number of residents by the county as well as the practicality of having too many residents in a limited space as shared rooms are generally more difficult to rent than private rooms. 4. Parking and traffic flow was a concern although a stipulation of the conditional use permit in the R-2 district is that all parking must be off-street. The traffic flow was trivial compared to that generated on Hwy 7 and by the neighboring apartment building. Again the real concern was not with Grace Homes but with the new care home on Wilshire Walk. 5. A concern was expressed the opinion that property values were being affected by the presence of the care homes citing 3 properties on Wilshire Walk that sold for less than property value. Not all shared this concern as it’s not clear what the true connection between property value and the care homes is. Summary The meeting was generally positive and had good discussion. The attendees came to better understand the situation, how it came to be, what the limitations are, and were generally supportive of the business recognizing the need for this type of housing. The attendees were not supportive of a zoning change however due to precedent and future development issues. The meeting concluded at 7:30pm as scheduled. The following handout was provided: March 19, 2019 Neighborhood Meeting Agenda 6:30: Gather and Sign-In 6:40: Welcome and Introductions 6:50: Project Description and Background 7:00: Q & A Background: The property at 601 Oak Ridge Road is owned by Wilshire Properties, LLC; Mr. Charles Scott President. The property was operated as a Residential Living facility by Mr. Scott and his spouse Bethany Buchanan, RN beginning in July of 2011. Grace Homes was announced to the Hopkins City Council as an 8-bed senior care home at the March 20, 2012 meeting. Sometime later a 9th resident was added with permission from Christopher Kearney, the Lead Inspector for the City of Hopkins. In May of 2017 Matrix Advocare Network, Inc. d/b/a Matrix Home Health Care Specialists (Matrix) purchased the business operations of Grace Homes with the intent of continuing to operate the care home. This includes the properties at 601 Oak Ridge Road and the adjacent property at 414 Wilshire Walk. The physical properties are still owned by Wilshire Properties, LLC and Matrix has continued to operate the homes under the name Grace Homes. In January of 2019, after a routine fire marshal inspection the City of Hopkins cited Matrix for operating the facility with more than 6 residents due to the way the property was zoned. There haven’t been any neighborhood issues to the knowledge of the former or present owners of Grace Homes. 6900 Shady Oak Road  Suite 216 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952/525-0505 / Fax: 952/525-0506 www.MatrixHomeHealthMN.com www.GraceHomesMN.com Project Description: This project is a request to change the zoning of the property from R-1-D to R-2 and approve a conditional use permit for up to 10 residents. The property in its current form meets all the requirements for R-2 zoning. The project does not call for any physical changes to the property or building nor does it change the way the property has been used since it opened in 2011. The project is merely a request to allow the facility to continue to operate as it has been and meet current zoning and use requirements. Below is a copy of the zoning map showing the subject and surrounding properties. 601 Oak Ridge Road Hwy 7. Hwy 7. Oak Ridge Road 5th Avenue Attendance Sign-In Sheet Zoning Map Subject Property Standards for Licensed Residential Facilities in Other Communities City of Minnetonka. Section 300.16, Subdivision 3.g - Licensed Residential Care Facilities or Community Based Residential Care Facilities: 1. 3,000 square feet of lot area for each overnight resident, based on proposed capacity; 2. 300 square feet of residential building area for each overnight resident, based on proposed capacity; 3. In R-1 and R-2 districts, for new construction including additions, a floor area ratio (FAR) that is no more than 100% of the highest FAR of the homes within 400 feet of the lot lines and within 1,000 feet of the lot along the street where it is located, including both sides of the street. The FAR applies to an existing structure only if it seeks to expand. The city may exclude a property that the city determines is not visually part of the applicant's neighborhood and may add a property that the city determines is visually part of the applicant's neighborhood. The city may waive or modify the floor area requirement where: a. The proposed use would be relatively isolated from the rest of the neighborhood by slopes, trees, wetlands, undevelopable land, or other physical features; or b. The applicant submits a specific building design and site plan, and the city determines that the proposed design would not adversely impact the neighborhood character because of such things as setbacks, building orientation, building height, or building mass. In this case, the approval is contingent upon implementation of the specific site and building plan. 4. No external building improvements undertaken in R-1 and R-2 districts which alter the original character of the home unless approved by the city council. In R-1 and R-2 districts, there must be no exterior evidence of any use or activity that is not customary for typical residential use, including no exterior storage, signs, and garbage and recycling containers; 5. Traffic generation: a detailed documentation of anticipated traffic generation must be provided. In order to avoid unreasonable traffic impacts to a residential neighborhood, traffic limitations are established as follows: a. In R-1 and R-2 districts, the use is not be permitted on properties that gain access by private roads or driveways that are used by more than one lot; b. The use must be located on, and have access only to, a collector or arterial roadway as identified in the comprehensive plan; c. The use must prepare, and abide by, a plan for handling traffic and parking on high traffic days, such as holidays, that has been reviewed and approved by city staff. 6. No on-street parking to be allowed. Adequate off-street parking will be required by the city based on the staff and resident needs of each specific facility. In R-1 and R-2 districts, the parking area must be screened from the view from other R-1 and R-2 residential properties. Private driveways must be of adequate width to accommodate effective vehicle circulation and be equipped with a turnaround area to prevent backing maneuvers onto public streets. Driveways must be maintained in an open manner at all times and be wide enough for emergency vehicle access. Driveway slope must not exceed 8 percent unless the city determines that site characteristics or mitigative measures to ensure safe vehicular circulation are present. Adequate sight distance at the access point must be available; 7. All facilities to conform to the requirements of the Minnesota state building code, fire code, health code, and all other applicable codes and city ordinances; 8. Landscape buffering from surrounding residential uses to be provided consistent with the requirements contained in section 300.27 of this ordinance. A privacy fence of appropriate residential design may be required to limit off-site impacts. Landscape screening from surrounding residential uses may be required by the city depending on the type, location and proximity of residential areas to a specific facility; 9. Submission of detailed program information including goals, policies, activity schedule, staffing patterns and targeted capacity which may result in the imposition of reasonable conditions to limit the off-site impacts; 10. Submission of a formal site and building plan review if a new building is being constructed, an existing building is being modified, or the city otherwise determines that there is a need for such review; and 11. Additional conditions may be required by the city in order to address the specific impacts of a proposed facility. City of St. Louis Park. Sec. 36-163(C) - Uses permitted with conditions. A structure or land in an R-1 district may be used for one or more of the following uses if its use complies with the conditions stated in section 36-162 and those specified for the use in this subsection. 1. Group home/nonstatutory. The conditions are as follows: a. At least 800 square feet of lot area shall be provided for each person housed on the site. b. At least 12% of the lot area shall be developed as designed outdoor recreation area. c. The residence structure shall be occupied by not more than six persons under treatment. d. The residence structure shall provide one bedroom for each two persons accommodated in group living quarters. e. The residence structure shall provide one bathroom for each four persons accommodated in group living quarters. f. The use shall not be located within 1,500 feet of any other group homes. A regular meeting of the Hopkins City Council was held on March 20, 2012, in the Council Chambers of the Hopkins City Hall. Present were Mayor Maxwell, Council Members Cummings, Gadd, Halverson, and Youakim. Also, present were staff members Bradford, Elverum, Genellie, Mornson, Stadler and City Attorney Jeremy Steiner. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Maxwell called the meeting to order at 7:31 p.m. II. OPEN AGENDA - PUBLIC COMMENTS AND CONCERNS There were no comments. III. PRESENTATION The owners of Grace Homes, an 8 -bed senior care home in Hopkins, introduced their business. Mayor Maxwell welcomed them to the City of Hopkins. IV. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Minutes of the Goal Setting Day on February 17, 2012 2. Minutes of the March 6, 2012 Council Meeting 3. Minutes of the March 6, 2012 Work Session following the Council Meeting 4. Minutes of the March 13, 2012 Work Session 5. Approve Overpass Skate Park Operational Agreement with action Sports of Minnesota, Inc., dba, The Third Lair (CR 2012-024) 6. Accept Improvements and Authorize Final Payment on 5th Street South Street and Utility Improvements (CR 2012-025) Mr. Stadler addressed the Council regarding Consent Agenda Item #5. There are no changes to the agreement and Third Lair continues to add new equipment to provide a fresh experience for the skate park users. Mr. Bradford addressed Council regarding Consent Agenda Item #6. The contractor completed all work as specified in the contract. Council Member Cummings moved and Council Member Youakim seconded a motion to approve the Consent Agenda. A poll of the vote was ,as follows: Council Member Cummings, aye; Council Member Gadd, aye; Council Member Halverson, aye; Council Member Youakim, aye; Mayor Maxwell, aye. The motion carried unanimously. 1 IV. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approve Preliminary Plans for Shady Oak Road (CR 2012-027) Mr. Stadler addressed the Council giving an overview of the Shady Oak Road project. Hennepin County representative Craig Twinem reviewed the project location, project history, public meeting input and project schedule. Tony Heppleman, WSB & Associates Consultant, reviewed the purpose & need for the project which includes poor pavement condition, safety issues, capacity improvements, pedestrian & bicycle facility needs, and drainage issues. Mr. Heppleman reviewed the layout changes & comparison from 2006 to 2012. Mr. Stadler reviewed the layout changes, property impacts and project funding. The estimated cost to the City of Hopkins is approximately $2.9 million. Ms. Elverum discussed the process and plan for working with property & business owners affected by the project. Staff will continue to keep the Council updated during the final design process and construction. There was much discussion by Council about the preliminary plan, landscape buffering, keeping the integrity of the neighborhoods, importance of neighborhood input, minimizing property impact and maximizing buffering, Duck Pond viewing area outlet to prevent flooding, Highway 7 intersection changes, impact of the future SWLRT station, pedestrian friendly trails & sidewalks, road elevations and the importance of working with & communicating with impacted businesses & residents. Rick Nelson, owner of Nelson's Meats, addressed the Council. Mr. Nelson's business is impacted and parking is a big concern. Jill & Allen Forrest, 202 West Park Road, Hopkins addressed the Council. The Forrest's home is impacted and the close proximity of the road to their home is a big concern. Council Member Halverson moved and Council Member Gadd seconded a motion to Approve Resolution 2012-015, Resolution approving preliminary plans, layout #2, for the reconstruction of Shady Oak Road from Excelsior Boulevard to north of Highway 7. A poll of the vote was as follows: Council Member Gadd, aye; Council Member Halverson, aye; Council Member Youakim, aye; Mayor Maxwell, aye. The motion carried. 2. Approve Cooperative Agreement between Hopkins and Met Council (CR 2012-026) Mr. Bradford addressed the Council regarding the replacement of the sanitary sewer lift station, why it needs to be replaced, possible site locations, review of the public 06 input meetings, examples of possible lift station design & landscaping and gave an overview of the proposed Oakes Park location. Mr. Bradford explained that there would be additional public input & design meetings as the project moves forward. Mr. Bradford reviewed the Inter -Governmental Agreement with the Metropolitan Council. Adam Gordon, Met Council representative, discussed the lift station design with the Council. Mr. Gordon explained that new Lift Station buildings are built well above noise odor standards from twenty years ago. The following residents addressed the Council about the Lift Station project: Esther Williams, 921 Abbie Lane, Hopkins, & Parkside Homeowners Association Vice - Chairperson, opposes the Lift Station relocation and is concerned that not all the impacted homeowners were kept informed during the process. Gerald Healy, 700 Oak Park Lane, Hopkins, opposes the Lift Station being built on Parkland and prefers rebuilding the Lift Station at the present location. Corinne Braun, 813 Kassie Court, Hopkins, presented Council with a petition from residents opposing the re -location of the Lift Station to Oakes Park and requested community involvement in the site location selection. Jean Sorenson, 808 Cameron Court, Hopkins, & Parkside Homeowners Association Chairperson, opposes the Lift Station location and would like Council to explore other options. There was much discussion by Council regarding the lift station design, entrance to the lift station, building maintenance, size of the building, screening of outside equipment, other possible locations & reasons for choosing the Oakes Park site, reasons for not building at current location, most cost-effective solution, project costs, distance of lift station to nearest home, building appearance, enhanced restroom facilities for the park, odor filter systems, possible hockey rink re -location, additional opportunities for public input into the design process and the importance of resident engagement in the process. Mr. Bradford gave an explanation of the project financials and that staff will continue to engage the Council, community members & Park Board as the process continues. Council Member Cummings moved and Council Member Gadd seconded a motion to Approve Inter -Governmental Agreement with the Metropolitan Council. A poll of the vote was as follows: Council Member Cummings, aye; Council Member Gadd, aye; Council Member Halverson, aye; Council Member Youakim, aye; Mayor Maxwell, aye. The motion carried unanimously. 9 3. 2012 Goals (CR 2012- 016) Mr. Mornson addressed the Council regarding the City of Hopkins 2012 Mission & Goals. Mr. Mornson reviewed the Mission Statement, Vision, accomplishments in 2011 and the goals, strategies & action items. Council Member Youakim moved and Council Member Halverson seconded a motion to Adopt Resolution 2012-008, affirming the City of Hopkins Mission Statement and adopting the 2012-2013 Goals and Strategic Plan for the City of Hopkins. A poll of the vote was as follows: Council Member Cummings, aye; Council Member Gadd, aye; Council Member Halverson, aye; Council Member Youakim, aye; Mayor Maxwell, aye. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Mornson recognized Community Development Coordinator Tara Beard for successfully acquiring and completing requirements for grant monies. V. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Council Member Halverson moved and Council Member Youakim seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 10:19 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Debbie Vold COUN IL MEMBF,RS ATTEST: 0.100 Eugene J. axwell, Mayor Local News Real Estate Events Get Tickets Grace Homes specializes in creating a warm atmosphere for those with memory illnesses. By James Warden | Apr 6, 2012 2:30 pm ET | Updated Apr 6, 2012 5:55 pm ET Walk into 601 Oak Ridge Road home, and you’re immediately struck by the warmth of hard woods. A spacious kitchen, luxurious living room and beautiful backyard with deck all add to the ambience. Then there’s a dog named Daisy, a cat named Angel and two birds, Sunny and Sky, who add a spark of life to the elegance. Hopkins Long-Term Care Facility Makes Residents Feel at Home | Hopk... https://patch.com/minnesota/hopkins/amp/3923186/hopkins-long-term-ca... 1 of 6 4/18/2019, 10:31 AM This isn’t the home of a wealthy suburban family, though. The house is an 8-bed residential care facility specializing in memory care—specifically illnesses such as Alzheimer’s and dementia. Subscribe Grace Homes, as the business is named, is a three-year-old company that started in Hopkins on July 1. A crew of certified nursing assistants—overseen by wife and husband owners Bethany Buchanan and Charles Scott—care for residents in the secure but homelike setting. “I really feel strongly that this is the best model of care for the elderly. It’s small. It’s personal. It’s intimate,” Buchanan said. Buchanan is a registered nurse who spent eight years in hospital settings and four years Hopkins Long-Term Care Facility Makes Residents Feel at Home | Hopk... https://patch.com/minnesota/hopkins/amp/3923186/hopkins-long-term-ca... 2 of 6 4/18/2019, 10:31 AM in long-term care. That background gives her the ability to care for patients with severe health issues beyond the memory-related illnesses that are the business’ specialty. But as the home’s atmosphere suggests, the focus is on quality of life—not just treating illnesses. The food residents eat is mostly local and organic. They exercise every day, including with a physical fitness specialist who comes in three times a week. They get massages once a month. They listen to old, familiar songs while singing and playing hand instruments. There’s also aromatherapy and, during the winter, light box therapy to keep residents’ vitamin D levels up and boost their mood. Buchanan and Scott pride themselves on rarely using psychotropic drugs with patients. They didn’t have any residents on that type of medication when Patch visited a week ago. The team spends as much time engaging the residents as providing for them. The residents feed the pets and water the plants because caring for living beings stimulates memory care patients. They also participate in other light chores, such as getting the mail, that keeps them active—vital because memory care patients can sit for 10 hours at a time if not encouraged. “They want to feel purposeful, and they need to move,” Buchanan said. For Grace Homes, the warm atmosphere, the healthy living and the activities all contribute to one goal: Making residents feel at home. *** Want to learn more about Grace Homes? The home will host an open house from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. May 20 at the facility, located at 601 Oak Ridge Road. The open house is just one way the business is connecting with the community. It has joined it local neighborhood association and will continue taking its residents on outings to local places, such as Dairy Queen and the Farmers’ Market. “We’ve just had a terrific welcome from Hopkins,” Buchanan said. Hopkins Long-Term Care Facility Makes Residents Feel at Home | Hopk... https://patch.com/minnesota/hopkins/amp/3923186/hopkins-long-term-ca... 3 of 6 4/18/2019, 10:31 AM