Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Memo- Comp plans with the Z & P Commission
AGENDA DRAFT COMP PLAN UPDATE A. Overview — Land Use Discussion /questions on Land Use section B. Overview — Downtown Discussion /questions on Downtown section C Overview — Housing Discussion /questions on Housing section he Cit of Hopkins, Minnesota a community vested in threads of history, character, growth and progress Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ©© gill Chapter 1 - Land Use and Development Introduction Overall Pattern The land use pattern of Hopkins has evolved over the last century and is well established (See Existing Land Use Map). In the years ahead, the focus for Hopkins will no longer be on new development, but on redevelopment or underdeveloped sites. Recent redevelopment initiatives have included preliminary planning for the Blake Road Corridor, initial planning for the redevelopment of the Shady Oak Road corridor and long -range planning for the Southwest Light Rail Transit (LRT). These projects and others may impact the existing land use pattern and are discussed further in this section of the Comprehensive Plan. Redevelopment projects that have recently been completed include the Marketplace Lofts in downtown and the Excelsior Crossings located in the northeast quadrant of TH 169 and Excelsior Boulevard. Both projects have proven to fit the overall character and cohesiveness of Hopkins and can serve as a model for other redevelopment initiatives. Only a few undeveloped parcels ofland remain. Underutilized sites and more particularly, inappropriate uses ofland are the major issues now confronting the community. Downtown Hopkins Perhaps one of Hopkins' greatest assets is its Downtown. The Downtown has changed over the years from an important and vibrant retail center to one that serves local convenience needs and certain specialty market niches. The dynamics of consumer preferences and the transportation network have caused such shifts in many older central shopping areas. Downtown Hopkins still, however, possesses a special character. The character ofthe area can be used to help reposition it to respond to contemporary market challenges and opportunities but not without the combination of private and public efforts. CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE Hopkins Downtown Antique Shops Regency Townhomes uu 11Op nc comprehensive plan page 1 -1 1 A.A'++ R1 Minnetonka ti t a i 1 ` 1. n . I f s♦ !w4 a j .. � t o � OM ■••• L ` 4 He , f } S 11 i �Wr + �9 Edina 1 ADO Vol. a Existing Land Use land Use Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Commercial Business Park Industrial Public / Institutional Open Space Golf Course Park Trail Railroad Wetland ROW f � • 1 Low Density Residential Open Space Med um Density Residential Golf Course rip High Density Residential eh Park Commercial Railroad Business Park Trail dr Industrial Wetland Institutional O 500 1,000 2.000 Feet M� a FT" Acres Percent 633.12 25.09% 194.73 7.48% 143.38 5.51% 113.10 4.34% 68.52 2.63% 280.40 10.77% yM 109.48 4.21% 42.52 1.63% 214.19 8.23°o 96.77 3.72% Par 46.86 1.80% ..., 23.41 0.90% 139.18 5.35% 477.89 18. Grand Total: 260 3. 56 100.00% 1 ra r..■•••• wu K opkin comprehensive plan page 1-2 Existing Land Use Map There has been considerable public investment and interest in Downtown in the past, and that trend is continuing. Without question, Downtown Hopkins is one of a limited number of recognizable central community shopping areas in the Metropolitan Area. It is an asset worth protecting. The community recognizes the importance of the Downtown and has a strong positive emotional response to the location. Residential Neighborhoods Another one of Hopkins' greatest assets is its neighborhoods of single- family homes, which accommodate residents of all ages. These neighborhoods give Hopkins its character and cohesiveness. However, acceptance of some of the smaller, post -war homes may wane as time goes by and long -time residents move out. Protecting these neighborhoods from inappropriate development and the effects of aging as well as preserving a strong social fabric will continue to be major challenges for the community. In the future, redevelopment may threaten existing single- family homes. The City needs to consider means to restrict the loss of single- family housing. Industrial and Commercial Areas Hopkins has long been an important center of employment and commerce in the western suburbs as a result of its streetcar, highway, and railroad service. Industrial development and redevelopment continue to be important to the community for purposes of tax base and employment. The City has invested stafftime and financial resources to leverage private investment and is committed to an ongoing effort of business recruitment and development. Excelsior Boulevard, Shady Oak Road, TH 7 and Blake Road have always been important roadways in Hopkins because they serve as a local access for commercial, industrial and residential neighborhood areas. Over the past few years, the City has worked with Hennepin County and other agencies to improve these corridors. The City CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE Single Family Homes SAM's Enterprise 1 - 1opkin8 comprehensive plan page 1 -3 il opkin8 comprehensive plan pays 1-4 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE has recently reconstructed Excelsior Boulevard to improve both its function and aesthetics. The recent enhancement of the corridor gives Hopkins a recognizable gateway into the community. The City should continue to aggressively pursue reconstruction and aesthetic improvements eastward to the St. Louis Park border. Natural Protection Areas There are two locations of special natural significance in Hopkins: Nine -Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek. Each is protected by the rules and regulations of a Watershed District and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. In addition, the City of Hopkins has approved zoning regulations to complement the efforts of those non - municipal agencies. The Nine -Mile Creek basin in southeast Hopkins is being protected for purposes of flood protection, wildlife protection, agriculture, natural beauty, and passive recreation. The Minnehaha Creek basin does not include agriculture but does include active recreation such as canoeing. Other natural areas include a park and trail system that is further discussed in the Park, Open Space, and Trail chapter. Goals A set of overall goals provides a framework for land use initiatives in Hopkins. Pertaining to land use, the City of Hopkins seeks to: CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE • Maintain a viable downtown commercial core. Downtown Hopkins has a unique commercial business core. Maintaining the viability of downtown is dependent on the success of its businesses. Redevelopment in and around downtown Hopkins will occur over the next 30 years. Additional commercial development is likely to occur along Excelsior Boulevard, Shady Oak Road and possibly Blake Road. The City will need to carefully guide additional commercial development in a manner that is supportive of downtown. • Maintain a strong employment base. Much of Hopkins job base is dependent on the success of industrial uses located in the southern portion of the community. It is important for the City to maintain industrial uses that will provide job opportunities. The City will work to ensure these sites are utilized to their full potential as redevelopment occurs and will encourage private reinvestment. • Continue to emphasize compatible land uses between adjacent jurisdictions. Hopkins is adjacent to the Cities of Minnetonka, Edina and St. Louis Park with similar land use patterns occurring along most common borders. The City will continue to work with adjacent jurisdictions to ensure seamless land use patterns along the respective borders, particularly along Excelsior Boulevard. • Maintain appropriate transitions between land uses. Hopkins is a fully developed community and will likely see new development through redevelopment initiatives. The City will work to ensure appropriate transitional uses and buffering between new and existing land uses. • Take advantage ofredevelopment opportunities to capture future Light Rail Transit (LRT) initiatives. The Southwest LRT line passes directly through Hopkins creating redevelopment opportunities at and around three potential station locations. These redevelopment opportunities may occur prior to any LRT improvements. Therefore, the City will work to ensure that new redevelopment in and around future station areas is appropriate and consistent with future transit improvements. • Continue to coordinate land use and transportation needs. An effective transportation network is vital to the future of Hopkins and its redevelopment efforts. Over the next 20 years, traffic volumes on local roadways will continue to increase and added congestion will occur. The City will continue to assess the relationships between land use and transportation in two ways: by assessing the impacts of redevelopment on the existing transportation systems and in some cases and locations, assessing the impacts that new transportation improvements will have on land use. 1-iopkln comprehensive plan Page 1 -5 page 1-6 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE ['opium comprehensive plan Land Use and Development Plan Land Use Plan Categories In addition to the standard residential, commercial and industrial land use categories, of the future land plan uses a mixed land use category (See Land Use Plan). The purpose of the mixed -use category is to accommodate a variety ofplanning initiatives and land uses that may occur around the proposed LRT stations. The following is a review of all of the land use patterns used in the plan Low Density Residential: The majority of Hopkins existing housing stock falls within the low density residential land use category at 1 - units per acre. This category accommodates the existing single - family detached housing that contributes to Hopkins' character and cohesiveness. Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential uses include attached residential units, predominantly townhomes or condominiums ranging from 8 - 16 units per acre. Medium density residential also includes manufactured housing. High Density Residential High Density Residential includes multi -unit and multi - building developments. The high density category accommodates more intense housing, such as apartments and condominium developments. The density range for this category establishes a minimum threshold of 17+ units per acre ultimately resulting in multistoried structures. CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE Owoltx w• Minnetonka i 6 r • } t 1 t I om t t „, q E i wHpn4 L ■ S Edina 69 � Mwy Land Use Plan Land Use Acres Pcrtrnt Low Density Residential 687.42 26.40% Medium Density Residential 163.94 6.30% High Density Residential 141.48 5.43% Commercial 97.96 3.76% Business Park 98.15 3.77% Industrial 178.32 6.85% Mixed Use 90.98 3.49% Public / Institutional 129.40 4.97% Park 94.25 3.62% Open Space 16.49 0.63% Golf Course 214.19 8.23 °ro Trail 50.45 1.94% Railroad 23.47 0.90% Wetland 139.18 5.35% ROW 477.89 18.36% Grand Total: 2601.56 100.00% d x S i z ti 1I Parcels Goff Course Low Density Residential Open Space Medium Density Residential Park le High Density Residential Trail Commercial Ai Public/ Institutional 4. Mixed Use de Railroad Business Park Wetland 4 Industrial N 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Land Use Plan 1 - 1 opUn comprehensive plan page 1 -7 page 1-8 Cusp, WwRs a City r. .. ,�+ w • olth Plolinpor Kepler Group ir Aro 1047 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE DRAFT a' Final Report City of Hopkins, MN Hopkins Station Area Plan I : Iopkinc comprehensive plan Commercial Commercial land uses offer a wide variety of goods and services. Hopkins commercial uses are primarily located along major transportation corridors (Excelsior Blvd & Highway 7), which serve both regional and community needs. Commercial uses located downtown largely serve local needs and specialty market niches. Overall, these goods and services range from grocery stores, salons, dry cleaners, retailers and coffee shops. Mixed Use The Mixed Land Use category is intended to capture anticipated redevelopment initiatives associated with the proposed LRT stations. Each station area is likely to redevelop in a mixed -use type fashion. However, the density ranges and uses may vary between stations. The Hopkins Station Area Plan completed in 2008 addresses preferred density ranges and uses at each LRT station. Additional planning efforts have also addressed station locations. The East Hopkins Land Use and Market Study provides a framework for future land uses near the Blake Station Area. The Hopkins Station Area Plan and East Hopkins Land Use and Market study both support mixed use development and are reflected in the land use plan. Land guided for mixed -uses is located in three areas of the community: 1) Shady Oak Station Area, 2) Hopkins Downtown Station Area and the 3) Blake Station Area. Each station area, as previously noted will vary in density and use. Based on the Hopkins Station Area Plan, the following density ranges and uses are suggested: Shady Oak Station Area The proposed Shady Oak Station would consist of a 280 car Park- and-Ride structure on 17th Avenue. Redevelopment is anticipated to occur in a mixed -use fashion and develop around the park-and- ride sites. Mixed uses would support the function ofa park- and -ride facility and create a live /work environment. Type Shady Oak Station (sq. ft) Main Floor Commerical 102,406 Main Floor Live /Work 23,664 Upper Floor Commercial 58,082 Residential Units (177 Units at 1,000 sq. ft. /unit 177,000 Total Est. Built Area (sq. ft) 361,152 Type Downtown Station (sq. ft) Main Floor Commerical 39,200 Main Floor Live /Work 30,580 Upper Floor Commercial - Residential Units (177 @ 1,000 sq. ft. /unity) 200,00 Total Est. Built Area (sq. ft.) 269,780 The Hopkins Station Area Plan calls for redevelopment to occur in the following manner: Downtown Station Area The mixed -use category is intended to serve the proposed downtown LRT station at 8th Avenue. In this area, the City envisions higher density residential with offices to create a live /work environment. Retail development associatedwith redevelopment should be limited to 8th Avenue, with the majority of retail located along Mainstreet. The Hopkins Station Area Plan calls for redevelopment to occur in the following manner: CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE H o p ki n Somprehensive plan page 1 -9 Type Blake Station (sq. ft) Main Floor Commerical 64,000 Second Floor Office 32,000 Residential Units (194 @ 1,000 sq. ft. /unity) 194,000 Total Est. Built Area (sq. ft.) 290,000 page 1-10 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE H o p k i n Somprehensive plan The Blake Station Area The primary focus of this area is to provide higher density uses near and around the proposed LRT station. Desired uses include a mix of high density housing with retail commercial and offices. The Hopkins Station Area Plan calls for redevelopment to occur in the following manner: Business Park The business park category accommodates stand -alone office and office service uses. Business park areas may include such uses as office- showrooms, research and development facilities, real estate offices or banks. Industrial Industrial uses are largely located near the rail lines that run through Hopkins. In most cases, these areas are fully developed. Uses include manufacturing, warehousing or distribution centers. Open Space The open space category is intended for areas to be preserved for natural resources or future park opportunities. Park These are areas that have been developed for recreational opportunities or amenities /facilities that offer active living opportunities. Wetland The wetlands depicted in the land use plan are derived from the Hennepin County Wetland Inventory. The inventory provides three classes of wetlands: ( 1) Wetlands with little or no drainage apparent (2) Wetlands in most cases, partially drained basins and (3) Wetlands that could potentially be wetlands but need to be field verified. The wetlands that are shown on the planned land use map have been field verified. The wetlands depicted are for reference purposes only. Planning Districts As part of the comprehensive planning update process, eight planning districts have been established (See Planning District Maps). Each district was defined based on geographical boundaries, transportation corridors and known planning initiatives. The intent of the district approach is to allow the establishment of a specific framework for each geographic area. Each planning district embraces the land use goals set forth in this document. Each district has been analyzed and plans have been fomulated based on the specific uses and opportunities within the boundaries of the district as well as assessing its relatioship to adjacent planning districts. Planning District #1 — North Hopkins North Hopkins land use patterns are well established and not likely to change over the next 20 to 30 years. The majority of this area is comprised of larger single- family residential lots and the Oak Ridge County Club (Golf Course). Commercial and high density housing is located along Highway 7 as is the Hopkins School District administrative offices and Eisenhower Elementary School. Residential lots in Planning District # 1 are the largest in Hopkins. The Bellgrove neighborhood is located just north ofthe golf course. This CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE 11 oplin comprehensive plan page 1 -11 page 1 -12 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE 11 opkin8 comprehensive plan neighborhood offers larger homes and provides opportunities for move -up buyers. In addition, Bellgrove is adjacent to the Minnehaha Creek Preserve which offers recreational uses. There are no anticipated land use changes in Planning District #1. If redevelopment were to occur, it would most likely happen through redevelopment initiatives along the Highway 7 corridor. Low - density residential uses will remain unchanged. The Minnehaha Creek Preserve will remain as Open Space and continue to provide passive recreational uses. Summary of Planned Land Use Changes: No changes are being proposed at this time. 1 r s= war 1 ! ! 1 rar 1 1 j ! _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Awn to 0 230 000 1.o00 ha A 11 I St. Louis Park t 1 1 J w rr Planning District #1 Planning District #2 — Central Hopkins A bulk of Hopkins single family homes can be found in the Central Hopkins Planning District. A significant portion ofthese homes were constructed in the 1900's and contribute to the unique character of Hopkins' housing stock. However, housing constructed during this era is reaching a point where maintenance issues are becoming a concern. The Housing Plan addresses this issue calling for ongoing maintenance and private reinvestment. In the future, Planning District #2 needs to be protected from outside intrusions that might threaten the integrity of the existing low density neighborhoods. Potential intrusions are most likely to occur on the common boundary between Planning District #8 and Planning District #2. Shady Oak Road forms the western boundary of Planning District #2. The City has been collaborating with the City of Minnetonka and Hennepin County to address numerous safety, mobility and access issues associated with the corridor. Out ofthose discussions a preferred alignment has been recommended and the reconstruction of the roadway is scheduled for 2013. Corridor improvements and land use changes identified in corridor planning efforts to date are not expected to negatively impact the single family homes located in Planning District #2. Summary of Planned Land Use Changes: No changes are being proposed at this time. CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE il opkin8 comprehensive plan page 1 -13 page 1-14 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE H opkins comprehensive plan Planning District #3 - East of US Highway 169 Planning District #3 is bounded by three major transportation corridors: US Highway 169, Highway 7 and Excelsior Boulevard. Geographically, the district is one of the smallest, but contains a mix of uses including business park, industrial, low density residential, medium density residential and high density residential. Although this district is compact, the existing uses are largely compatible since appropriate transitional uses and buffering exist. Challenges facing Planning District #3 include a narrow strip of land along Jackson Street, just north of Excelsior Boulevard. This land, guided as business park, may see enhanced redevelopment potential due to the recent development of the Cargill office complex immediately to the west. However, the size and width of the site present development challenges. This site continues to be designated as business park. Located just east of Jackson Street is property guided for industrial. It is anticipated that this site will continue as an industrial use. In the unlikely event that this site is proposed for redevelopment in the future, attention should be given to ensure that appropriate buffering can enhance the integrity ofthe residential neighborhoods to the north. Long -term, the presence of LRT may enhance the redevelopment potential of this property. Summary of Planned Land Use Changes: • Reguide the ABM site from Industrial to Low Density Residential 1 � Farmdale Rd Gt i e Hopkins ; ¢; 1 i1�aUKe M St co Q z Shadys,de Gir Sunnyside La 1213 750 Oak Park, La Z N (1) q Q cC • Q U • n .43 Penns, Dose. e1 xwueulr Cny Boundary Gulf coon. Puceh Open Spec Lye Densky Reedvni el + Pert Mnlwrn DeneAy Re,dweul Del • Kkjh Density Re,denba. 4P Pubfn:: instenrrorvrl Commercial * Reboad * Muted u.o Wbkrw &ekes, Park 600 Feb N Planning District: #3 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE 1 lopkin8 comprehensive plan page 1 -15 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE l oplun6 comprehensive plan page 1 - 16 Planning District #4 - Blake Road Corridor Blake Road is a major north -south arterial on the eastern edge of Hopkins. It provides connectivity between Highway 7 and Excelsior Boulevard. The intersection at Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard serves as a "gateway" into the community. Recent initiatives have examined the future of the corridor considering land use, transportation, safety and design. The City has begun to address several of these concerns through various plans. Planning documents addressing this area include: • • • Blake Road Corridor Community Assessment Blake Road Streetscape Concept East Hopkins Land Use and Market Study Hopkins Station Area Plan Blake Road currently contains a mix of uses similar to those found in Planning District #3. Challenges facing this district today include a collection of structures that were built between the 1950's and 1970's that need improvements and a corridor that is facing safety, mobility and access issues. In turn, there is a unique opportunity to revitalize the corridor by implementing the recommendations found in the planning documents referenced above. The most significant planning opportunity from a land use perspective is the proposed LRT station. The station is proposed to be located south of 2nd St NE and west of Blake Road. LRT is a catalyst for redevelopment and is scheduled for 2015. Current land uses near the LRT site consist ofindustrial and commercial uses. Some of the current industrial buildings are no longer operating and are for sale or vacant. Sites located north of Excelsior Boulevard are guided for Mixed -Use and land located to the south is guided for Business Park. Land located west of Blake Road and north of Excelsior Boulevard has been addressed in the East Hopkins Land Use and Market Study, adopted by the City Council in July of 2003. The study suggests that portions of this area are to be redeveloped. This redevelopment is reflected in the future land use plan as mixed -use. However, the East Hopkins Land Use and Market Study should continue to be used to determine future land use patterns in this area. New residential uses located in the planning district would be associated with mixed -use developments. Aviable mixed -use option may typically include high - density housing above retail uses or uses maybe separated in a horizontal configuration. Single family housing located within the planning district is suggested to remain in place consistent with the housing goals defined in this plan. However, it should be noted that the Cottageville Neighborhood located east of the northern portion of Blake Road faces a number of challenges. The neighborhood contains pockets of deteriorating housing. There might also be an opportunity to provide better connectivity with Minnehaha Creek and provide additional recreational opportunities for residents. Removal of some existing structures in this area would increase the visibility and viability of Cottageville Park which is presently underutilized. Planning efforts for the Cottageville Park area will need to continue as the City continues its focus on improvements along the Blake Road Corridor. Summary of Planned Land Use Changes: • Reguide the Baker Square, McCoy's and 43 Hoops sites from Industrial and Commercial to Mixed -Use. • Reguide the Atlas site from Industrial to Mixed -Use. • Reguide the Rainbow /Kunz Oil site from Industrial to Business Park. • Reguide land located west of Blake Road, north of Excelsior Boulevard and south of the railroad tracks from Industrial and Commercial to Mixed -Use. CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE 11 0 h n comprehensive plan page 1 -17 page 1 -18 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE H opkins comprehensive plan 5 t z z 8 1 Hopkins 1 she c" Sunnyside Le z * 1 st S 2nd St S Y < Y 1 i t Edina 1 I40bney Ave yy v1h Si St. Louis Park Selmpv Le C ay 1 3 2 C Q 2 2 0 < C t Goodrich St op a i Spruce Rd g gii Plurrvnq osM N Mtsbul C4, Boundary Go, Goers. Poe.. Open were Loft DarNy R.vMrr t Pe. M.P., Den, F..dr.. [- Tr. • Der-u e R4.Eprbr * Pet. tiweweer C.Teeeeeal ♦ Ns+oae • M.ael use yv�awra • Berne. Pe. 0 250 S00 1.000 Feet .. Y Ornsron SI BoKe Sf Preston LA Planning District: #4 Planning District #5 — East Hopkins The majority of the district consists oflow- density residential along with the presence of significant institutional uses. One of the focal points of the district is Blake School. To the east of the school is the Interlachen neighborhood and to the west, the Presidents neighborhood. Each is a neighborhood of strong single family residential units and existing uses will continue to be supported in the land use plan. It is highly unlikely that the land use pattern in Planning District #5 will change over the next 20 - 30 years. It is expected that property owners will continue their efforts to address ongoing maintenance needs along with more substantial renovations and additions. Summary of Planned Land Use Changes: No changes are being proposed at this time. .6.411, 1 „e, 11 iii„I: .sl11IteleletI Edina �Se 6 1 we er P F we.cece tY d Not. WOODS La We,wvnan Ave 4, a Planning Day.:t K Ind.PW Cey Bo mazy cull CeursO PacW Open Spare. LOW Deny Nw,bx,oal p Pak Medium Demey ReaiaxmuN '! TrW .cle Dena;Y Feedent. t Put. M,daulon.l Wed Use Wetb.,d Busine. Park , 715 190 940 Fool 0 � L�L1_1 A Planning District: #5 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE H opkin8 comprehensive plan page 1 -19 K opkinc comprehensive plan page 1 -20 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE Planning District #6 — South Hopkins The southern portion of Hopkins consists of mainly residential uses. A concentration of medium density housing borders both sides of 1 lth Avenue South. There is a significant stock of single family homes located in the Peaceful Valley and Park Valley neighborhoods. These neighborhoods are well established and have been developed in the 1950s. This planning district has a strong residential core; however, it also includes some commercial, office and industrial uses. In some respects, these uses have spilled over from the industrial core that makes up Planning District #7. The impact ofthese uses on residential properties has not been an issue due to the scale of the buildings and buffering between uses. The residential neighborhoods in District #6 will continue to be an important assets to the community. District #6 is the home of the largest "vacant" parcel of land in Hopkins. The landfill site may have future development potential, but it is highly constrained by a number of environmental issues. At the present time the site has not been cleared by State agencies for any type of use. As a result, the property is fully fenced and it contains a methane collection system. Because of the magnitude of environmental issues on the landfill site, it is not expected to develop within the timeframe of this comprehensive plan without financial assistance from other partners. The future land use plan presents no changes in this district with the exception of the landfill site. When the site is ever developed, it will require a significant public investment that would warrant a public purpose for its future use. The current land use plan designates the site as open space. As part of the comprehensive plan update, it is recommended that this designation be changed to institutional. Summary of Proposed Land Use Changes: • Reguide the Landfill site from Open Space to Institutional. CO LT £� t 6M StS Hopkins Minnetonka 11 ` �en 31h St S Stn St S O 230 600 1.000 feel • t Ttlr SRS 169 CD Mame, Duakd iIB IndualtiW Coy Boundary Gdt Coo. parr.Ma Open Spare L. Denny Reed.. r Pant ka.tlwrn Darsity R..M..NN .R? Trai • Hruln Denaay Rcvden. * P.. f haifuaond Cpmmercul + Rafted ♦ .red UM Wetland Ikeiroeea Pan n N ry Planning District: #6 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE 1-1opkln comprehensive plan page 1-21 page 1 -22 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE 11 opkin comprehensive plan Planning District #7 - Industrial The industrial uses located in Planning District #7 make up a significant portion of the employment base in Hopkins. SuperValu which is Hopkins' largest employer has facilities scattered across this district. It is important to maintain the industrial land use pattern in this area to maintain a wide -range of jobs. It is not anticipated that any of these uses will change over the next 20 to 30 years. The long -range continuation of these uses is encouraged as is public and private reinvestments needed to keep the area viable. Proposed Land Use Changes: No changes are being proposed at this time. 1r 9 I Minnetonka .* t a 1 Edina IN S Planning District: #7 Planning District #8 - Downtown Hopkins The foundation of Downtown Hopkins has been well established for many years. The core of downtown is primarily focused along Mainstreet between 7th Avenue North and 12th Avenue North. The downtown district also extends west of 7th Avenue North and is comprised of a mixture of commercial and residential uses. The downtown core is also comprised of commercial and residential uses with a strong presence of civic uses (City Hall, Post Office & Hopkins Center for the Arts). In addition, a variety of restaurants, a movie theater and specialty stores are located throughout the downtown. At this time, there is no land use changes proposed for downtown. However, redevelopment may present mixed -use opportunities. In recent years, downtown Hopkins has seen a number of significant mixed -use redevelopments. Marketplace Lofts on the east end of Mainstreet provides commercial uses on the street level with residential units above. Future redevelopment within the core of downtown will be encouraged to continue this pattern. Mixed -use redevelopment may also be prompted by the proposed Downtown Station Area located just south of downtown. When LRT becomes available, there will be a desire to redevelop within the vicinity of the station. The station area plan calls for redevelopment along Excelsior Boulevard, at the intersection of 8th Avenue and up 8th Avenue to Mainstreet. At this location, the intent is to create a live /work environment and provide limited retail development, in response to the desire to manage competition with Mainstreet retail. In Planning District #8, there is also an opportunity to capitalize on underutilized properties. The EBCO site located at the intersection ofExcelsior Boulevard and TH 169 could redevelop in a manner that is compatible with the existing business park to the northeast while taking advantage of the proximity to the downtown LRT station. CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE 1 opkin8 comprehensive plan page 1 -23 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE 1I opktn6 coinprehensive plan page 1-24 Areas around all of Hopkins' proposed LRT stations are expected to develop in a mixed -use fashion. However, the form and function of the various mixed -use areas varies between stations. As noted in the land use plan, the mixed -use category has been established to reflect the land use patterns intended for each station. The mixed -use located at the Shady Oak Station has also been included in the planning district. The idea of including both stations within one planning district is to help facilitate coordinated land use patterns. It is important to understand their role and proximity to one another. The purpose of the Shady Oak station is to serve as a live /work environment, but on a different scale then the downtown. Redevelopment in this area would likely occur in a more business park form with the inclusion of residential uses. The mixed -use development may also include some commercial uses. Commercial uses would be sized to serve only the needs of the business park and park-and-ride facility. Overall, Planning District #8 is expected to see the most significant change over the next 20 to 30 years as a result of redevelopment and the implementation of light rail transit. The comprehensive plan supports and recognizes these potential land use changes. Changes in this area, however, will need to continue to be compatible with the character and function ofdowntown. The following chapter provides additional guidance on how to maintain and enhance the character and identity of downtown Hopkins. Summary of Proposed Land Use Changes: Reguide the EBCO site from Industrial to Business Park Reguide the Tech Center and Napco site from Industrial to Neighborhood Mixed Use. Reguide portions ofland north at the intersection ofExcelsior Boulevard and 8th Avenue S to Downtown Mixed -Use. a 1 169 e i nano, oattid eB Wooled City Boundary (1011 course Panes ♦ 00er Soece lo. Deos.ty Res/Owed * hA Meeker, Density lWlsrrd • Ter 4 Fpn 0enaey Reaideltw dir Ruolc r lnsler,te,n+o caeettrrill * Rwbnad ewe Vat wetland �trileu look 0 250 500 1,000 Feel Planning District: #8 C i i.1 1 1• R: 1 - LAND Usk. 11 opkln comprehensive plan page 1 -25 K opktn8 comprehensive plan page 1 -26 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE Summit Condominiums Hopkins' Land Use plan identifies strategies and approaches to help meet the identified land use goals which include: • • • Land Use Implementation Actions Maintain a viable downtown commercial core. Maintain a strong employment base. Continue to emphasize compatible land uses between adjacent jurisdictions. • Maintain appropriate transitions between land uses. • Take advantage of redevelopment opportunities to capture future Light Rail Transit (LRT) initiatives. • Continue to coordinate land use and transportation needs. The goals listed above and the implementation actions that follow are intended to ensure long -term land use patterns, maintain a viable downtown, provide opportunities for new employment, capture redevelopment opportunities and provide a mix of uses that keeps the community viable and competitive. Residential Land Use Patterns The City regards the preservation and protection of its existing residential neighborhoods as one of its most important priorities. The City will work to protect land use patterns that continue to support single family homes. A balanced supply of housing is important to Hopkins efforts to serve the needs of a broad range of residents. The land use plan identifies land use patterns that will support a variety of residential uses including medium to high density uses such as condos, townhomes and apartments. In order to address residential land use patterns, Hopkins will: • • Work to protect the integrity and long -term viability of its low-density residential neighborhoods and strive to reduce the potential negative effects of nearby commercial or industrial land through zoning, site plan reviews, and code enforcement. The infilling ofvacant parcels and the rehabilitation ofexisting developed land will be in accordance with uses specified in the Comprehensive Plan. Incompatible land uses will be improved or removed where possible and the land reused in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. • Work to assure strong and well - maintained neighborhoods. • Work to enhance a variety of residential land uses in the City. • Work to balance the supply of multiple fancily residential uses within the City. Downtown Land Use Patterns Hopkins identity and character is largely defined by the downtown district. It provides a sense of place for residents and is a center for commerce and government. The land use plan takes the adjacent land use patterns into consideration to protect the integrity and long -term viability of downtown. The City will work to ensure that land use patterns do not develop in a manner that would jeopardize downtown's economic viability or character. CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE ll opkin8 comprehensive plan page 1 -27 CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE page I-28 Excelsior Crossings K opklns comprehensive plan In order to address downtown land uses, Hopkins will: • • Work with Downtown landowners and merchants to improve parking, access, and appearance. The City will continue to leverage private investment in the redevelopment of the Downtown through judicious use of tax increment financing revenues and local capital improvement funds. Maintain its compact form in order to concentrate business activities and to protect adjacent residential areas. Expansion of the commercial area will generally be limited to areas that do not displace single family housing. Industry and Business Land Use Patterns Hopkins has established a diversified base of employment including a number of major employers supplemented by a diverse mix of smaller businesses and industries. Today, the only opportunity that industries and businesses have to build or relocate is through redevelopment initiatives. Accordingly, the future land use plan has focused on current land uses that are not being utilized to their fullest potential. In some cases, these properties have been reguided to advocate a more appropriate land use pattern. In order to address industry and business land uses, Hopkins will: Continue to actively promote the development and redevelopment of its industrial areas through marketing and public relations efforts, land use planning, and careful financial incentives, including tax increment financing. • Strive to leverage its valuable locational assets and create industrial areas which have attractive building and grounds, concealed outdoor storage, high floor -area ratios, and high levels of employment, especially employment in the professional and technical job areas. Carefully study the implications for commercial redevelopment of the pending reconstruction, widening, and realignment of Shady Oak Road. Redevelopment efforts for the area seek to create new commercial sites that appeal to the local market, have safe and convenient access and parking, and that have a high level of landscaping and site improvements. Participate in the redevelopment of deteriorated and /or obsolescent industrial and commercial areas when public financing is determined to be feasible and necessary. Expansion of industrial zoning will only be considered in cases where it can clearly be demonstrated that changes will not have a detrimental effect on nearby residential properties. Set and enforce high standards for all non - residential design. Site plans for commercial and industrial facilities will be carefully reviewed for proper building orientation, parking placement, access, traffic impacts, pedestrian improvements, landscaping, screening of storage, and general architectural appearance. When commercial property abuts residential property (especially across a street), extensive landscaping, fencing and /or berms should be used to mitigate impacts on the housing. CHAPTER 1 - LAND USE I-1Opkin comprehensive plan page 1 -29 Introduction Downtown Hopkins has changed substantially over the past 20 years. Noteworthy improvements include construction of the Hopkins Center for the Arts and the Hopkins 6 movie theater complex. These two developments have dramatically changed the visual appearance of the downtown core and they bring substantial numbers ofvisitors into the community. Additionally, the east end of Main Street is seeing significant mixed -use development involving retail uses and housing. The Marketplace Lofts project was significant since it was the first to establish contemporary urban -form housing in downtown Hopkins. Other similar projects are expected in the future. Analysis of Downtown Hopkins Future improvements in downtown Hopkins will seek to capitalize on the assets of the area while working to address identified liabilities. The following is an overview of each: Assets • Downtown serves as a significant shopping destination. • Downtown Hopkins Downtown Hopkins presents a strong sense ofplace. It is the quintessential downtown that many suburban communities are trying to duplicate today. There is a strong base of existing establishments including special purpose retailers and auto dealers who draw people from outside of the immediate Hopkins area. CHAPTER 2 - DOWNTOWN HOPKINS Movie Theater and Restaurant Development Completed in 1997 1 lopkine5 comprehensive plan page 2 -1 K opktnc comprehensive plan page 2-2 CHAPTER 2 - DOWNTOWN IIOPKINS • There is a strong local employment base that draws people to the city. • There is strong community support for the continued improvement of downtown. • 'The business community is service oriented. • Downtown Hopkins "cuts across" a broad range of lifestyle and income groups. Local residents are supportive of local business establishments. • The City government is active in community development. Liabilities • The district lacks a `critical mass" of store types and sizes. • Downtown Hopkins does not operate as a unified business district. Shopping activity is not always continuous along Main Street and therefore, can be perceived as lacking the continuity to support a strong pedestrian environment. • Downtown faces significant retail competition in surrounding communities. Recent public and private projects in downtown Hopkins have strengthened the area's assets and improved issues that have been identified as past liabilities. The strong employment base in Hopkins has always served as means to attract people into the downtown area. The private and public theater developments bring substantial numbers of visitors into the central business district expanding the base of customers for local businesses. In recent years, other improvements have also served to help further unify the business district. New retail construction on the east end of Mainstreet and renovations of old buildings have allowed business expansions as well as opportunities for new retail and service businesses. 'The success of recent developments in downtown Hopkins has caused an increase in the need for additional parking. With events in the Hopkins Center for the Arts and Friday and Saturday evening crowds at the movie theaters, parking is in short supply. Overflow parking from these events could impact the surrounding neighborhood areas. Monitoring and Assessing Based on past marketing studies, current conditions, and ongoing strategic planning initiatives, the followinggeneral recommendations are offered for downtown Hopkins: • • Development efforts should be targeted toward encouraging growth and expansion of commercial establishments that address two market orientations: ( 1) the destination specialty market, and (2) the local convenience and specialty market. Hopkins Center for the Arts helps make Hopkins a true destination. Specialty commercial uses can capitalize on the draw and the success of the arts and entertainment components of downtown Hopkins. Assess the market's perception of downtown Hopkins. Determine types of businesses needed and identify sites for appropriate new businesses. CHAPTER 2 - DOWNTOWN HOPKINS Hopkins Center for the Arts 1 opkin8 comprehensive plan page 2 -3 page 2-4 CHAPTER 2 - DOWNTOWN HOPKINS I1 opkin8 comprehensive plan • Expand the Hopkins Leasing Guide and utilize it as an inventory tool to promote business expansion and the leasing of vacant business spaces. Foster communication between the City, Hopkins Business and Civic Association (HBCA), and owners and managers of commercial properties. Attract specialty retail and destination uses including arts, entertainment, recreation, antiques, hobbies and crafts, gifts and family- oriented uses. • Encourage the adoption of uniform downtown store hours and consistent management to improve customer service. Encourage commercial development to be clustered close to the central core of the business district where it reinforces and is consistent with existing establishment types. • As funding is available, offer financial incentives to retain and attract commercial businesses. Initiate a comprehensive review of long -term parking needs and formulate a plan to address those needs. Attempt alternative solutions to employee parking problems. • Build upon the area's strong sense of place, and improve the surrounding market area's awareness of the community. • Expand joint advertising and promotions for the businesses in the district. Promote Mainstreet via special events. Physica Plan Downtown Hopkins is planned to continue its tight -knit pattern of commercial development along either side of Mainstreet. Commercial activity is targeted in the vicinity of but not limited to the five-block-long core area from 7th to 12th Avenues. The Comprehensive Plan envisions that the present pattern of commercial, residential, and public land uses will be largely continued. If St. Joseph's Church and School determines that all or part of its parking and playground between 12th and 13th Avenues is not needed, the City will consider other options for this property including parking. Longer term, the construction of the Southwest LRT line through Hopkins will create new opportunities and could eventually change the dynamics of downtown. Long -term changes to land uses along 8th Avenue could better connect Main Street to the LRT. Additional information on the potential impacts ofLRT is found in the land use chapter of this plan. Urban Design Guidelines The following guidelines will be used by the City in reviewing new development and redevelopment. The overall intention is to maintain the appearance and character of the historic buildings throughout the commercial area, both in the historic core and in the supportive nearby areas. CHAPTER 2 - DOWNTOWN HOPKINS l ltpk:in comprehensive plan page 2 -S page 2 -6 CHAPTER 2 - DOWNTOWN HOPKINS K opkinc comprehensive plan 1st St N 6th digoiam City Boundary Industrial Parcels Golf Course Low Density Residential Open Space Medium Density Residential ' Park dr High Density Residential Trail Commercial dr Public ! Institutio dr Mixed Use dr Railroad Business Park Wetland O 125 250 500 Feet Q Downtown Area Land Use Plan Buildings • Buildings should be constructed at a scale consistent with the historic downtown. Building heights in the historic should match those of adjacent structures, with two or three stories being the desired height in that area. Maintain as much building line along Mainstreet as practical. Where buildings must be setback, a strongly landscaped edge should be established to maintain some visual line along the street. A window line should be maintained in the building facades along Mainstreet. All commercial buildings along Mainstreet should have rear entries designed to be attractive, functional, and identifiable. All building entries, front and rear should make provision for the protection of users from the elements by overhangs, recessed doorways, and /or awnings. New buildings along Mainstreet should attempt to imitate the window proportions and placement established in the Downtown Overlay District. Exterior building colors along Mainstreet should be in the red -brown spectrum so as to be consistent with those of the historic core. CHAPTER 2 - DOWNTOWN HOPKINS 1 - 1 opkin comprehensive plan page 2 -7 ti opkln8 comprehensive plan page 2 -8 CHAPTER 2 - DOWNTOWN HOPKINS Future Parking Needs May Require Construction of an Additional Parking Ramp Parking • • • • The City should continue to monitor and assess the Downtown Parking Plan. The Parking Plan should be utilized whenever development of redevelopment occurs and its recommendations should be continuously pursued. Parking lots should be kept small and close to the businesses served. Larger parking lots should have visual breaks of four - season landscaping treatments. Parking areas directly abutting the rear of commercial buildings should be paved and landscaped. These spaces should be reserved for customers and not occupied by employees. Emphasis should be placed on easy and pleasant customer use in all seasons. All parking lots should have perimeter landscaping consisting of trees and shrubs selected to withstand the harsh conditions. • All parking lots must be paved with asphalt or concrete and properly maintained, striped, and landscaped. Wherever possible, east -west rear alleys should align with one another so that circulation parallel to Mainstreet is promoted. The exterior design of any new parking ramps should be supportive of the appearance of the Downtown Design Overlay District. No parking ramp should be allowed to abut Mainstreet. Identity Downtown Hopkins will continue to be identified through entry monuments, street lighting, and street landscaping. Continue to emphasize the link between the eastern and western portions of Mainstreet. The focus in the western area should be on the expansion of traditional downtown businesses and on improving the appearance of existing automotive repair service businesses. CHAPTER 2 - DOWNTOWN HOPKINS O comprehensive plan page 2 -9 Chapter 3 - Housing Introduction Overview Hopkins is awell established, complete communitywith a traditional downtown area and neighborhoods containing a variety of housing types. Although many people think of downtown Hopkins when they think of the City, the residential neighborhoods are a strong contributor to the overall character of the community. Hopkins' neighborhoods contain housing that ranges from traditional single- family homes on smaller, narrowlots to larger, more expansive homes on heavily wooded lots in excess of one acre. Multi- family housing consists of a variety of forms from townhouses to apartments to more contemporary loft units. In recent years, Hopkins has seen significant construction in downtown housing with the east end of Mainstreet becoming a strong residential node. Although Hopkins is classified as a fully developed community, its housing stock will continue to evolve and change. Over the next 10 years (2020), the City of Hopkins is projected to add an additional 300 households with 200 more households expected by 2030. Most of this growth will occur as a result of redevelopment, both in and around the downtown area and on sites along some of the major roadways like Excelsior Boulevard, Shady Oak Road and Blake Road. Market Response to Housing in Hopkins Despite the aging of much of Hopkins' housing stock and the shortage in older units of some contemporary conveniences, houses historically have sold relatively quickly in Hopkins. In 2000 the Census reported a vacancy rate of approximately 2% for the entire community. However, the City is keenly aware that the size and design of many Post-War houses combined with the physical deterioration that can occur in such units over time can produce a downward spiral of conditions, values and market response. CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING Historian Structure l lOpkin8 comprehensive plan page 3 -1 CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING H opkins comprehensive plan page 3-2 Hopkins has a number of positive attributes that contribute to the desire to maintain properties and to expand and modify existing homes to meet more contemporary marketplace needs. The City's convenient location that has convenient accessibility to major roads, transit routes and ofd road bicycle trails numerous job opportunities in the City and surrounding area; excellent schools and abundant social and cultural amenities contribute to keeping the housing market strong. Past comprehensive plans have emphasized the need to keep Hopkins' housing marketable. This plan will continue to emphasize and expand upon this directive. Residential Rehabilitation Loan and Grant Program Hopkins has a long history of using loan and grant programs to further housing goals. In response to the need to promote private reinvestment in the aging housing stock, the City has been administering a program of grants and loans to owner - occupants with lower incomes. For the past 35 years, this program has assisted in the improvement of over 300 housing units in all parts of the City. The program is funded by the City's share of County administered Community Development Block Grant funds. Hopkins has also fostered housing innovation. It pioneered housing improvement districts which required special legislation. Setting up the State's first housing improvement district allowed the city to implement major improvements to a townhome development and two condominium developments in the Westbrook area, reversing a decline in housing quality and stabilizing the neighborhood as a desirable residential area. Development Standards are Supportive of Housing Choices The Hopkins Zoning Ordinance has been continually modified over the years to support and implement the housing initiatives identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The current Zoning Ordinance includes five districts that allow detached housing on parcels ranging in size from 6,000 to 40,000 square feet. Five other districts allow attached housing including duplexes, four -unit buildings, townhouses, and apartments at densities ranging from 3,500 to 1,000 square feet of lot area per unit (12 to 43 dwelling units per net acre). The R -4 and R-5 districts allow for very urban uses with minimal amounts of open area. This type of development has proven popular in many communities throughout the Twin City Metropolitan Area. Housing Construction Although the City is considered "fully developed', over 400 new housing units have been built in Hopkins since 1990. Many of the newunits have been created through redevelopment efforts including projects such as the Oaks ofMainstreet, Marketplace Lofts, Oakridge Place and the Summit. Other project such as Marketplace and Main are poised to begin construction as soon as market conditions improve. The impact of these projects on the image of the City has been profound. Hopkins now offers the attraction of urban style housing choices within a compact, historical downtown area. This is exactly the type of environment that many suburban communities today are trying to emulate. In Hopkins, the fit of housing, jobs and the availability of goods and services occurs in a very genuine way. The community has a rich character that cannot be duplicated by new communities that are constructed at one point in time. Accordingly, Hopkins will remain a desirable location for the private marketplace to continue to seek opportunities for redevelopment that fits into the existing fabric of the community. A Guide for Future Housing Initiatives The housing section of the Hopkins Comprehensive Plan is intended to help guide the changes that lie ahead. It contains overall goals, an analysis of past trends, the identification of current issues, a plan for future housing, and strategies and implementation methods to guide future decisions. At its core, the housing plan focuses on two primary themes: 1) ongoing maintenance of existing housing and 2) opportunities to add new housing as a part of future redevelopment efforts. CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING Marketplace Lofts 1-iopkin6 comprehensive plan page 3 -3 CIUAPTER 3 - HOUSING Goals Retain and enhance detached single - family homes. Hopkins has a high percentage of multi- family housing. Most of the housing constructed in the future will also be multi- family due to locational and economic considerations. 'Therefore, the city will generally continue to protect existing single - family neighborhoods from redevelopment and undue encroachments to maintain a variety of housing types. Continue to emphasize housing maintenance. Much of Hopkins single family and multi - familyhousing is at least 40 years old. Due to the age ofthe structures, emphasizing ongoingmaintenance will be critical to maintaining and enhancing real estate values and keeping neighborhoods desirable in the eyes of future home buyers. Take advantage of redevelopment opportunities to provide new housing choices for the community. Redevelopment has created exciting new housing opportunities in recent years and future projects will offer even more choices. Of particular note is the current plan to expand light rail transit to serve southwestern Twin City suburban communities. The Southwest LRT line passes directly through Hopkins creating redevelopment opportunities at and around three potential station locations. Encourage the development of owner - occupied housing. Hopkins has a high percentage of rental housing. In order to maintain overall housing diversity, the city encourages new housing to be owner - occupied where feasible. Continue to strive for a mix of housing that accommodates a balance of all housing needs. The current supply of housing in Hopkins provides opportunities for people in all stages of the housing life- cycle. Hopkins' current housing stock also addresses a wide range of income levels. Entry level opportunities exist in the supply of rental housing; more affordable units are also available for first time home buyers. Existing neighborhoods offer opportunities for move -up housing and the needs of seniors are addressed in a number of subsidized and market rate housing choices. Support services for seniors in the form of assisted living and long -term care opportunities also exist in the community. 1I opkinc comprehensive plan page 3-4 A set of overall goals provides a framework for housing initiatives in Hopkins. Pertaining to housing, the City of Hopkins seeks to: Analysis of Housing Stock Household Characteristics The housing stock in the City of Hopkins is described by the following data from the 2000 U.S. Census Bureau. A household in Hopkins includes all the people who occupy a housing unit as their usual place of residence. Household characteristics offer another perspective on the characteristics ofpeople living in Hopkins: • 45% of Hopkins' households are family households (see Table 1). This compares with 58% for Hennepin County and 65% for the region. • The decrease in married couple homes may not be a true depiction of Hopkins since this decrease may be closely associated with the current housing stock. Single- family homes have not significantly decreased over the years. Instead there has been an increase in more contemporary loft style units. These units typically consist of non - family households and would influence the decrease in married couple homes. • Householders living alone increased by nearly 500 residents between 1990 and 2000. • 23% of all households include children under the age of 18 (See Table 2) compared to the region that has 34% of such households. • 55% of Hopkins households are non - family households. This is significantly higher than Hennepin County (41 %) and the region (35 %) CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING Regency Townhomes Single Family Home 1 - lopkin8 comprehensive pl Page 3 -S page 3 -6 9,000 - 8,000 - 7,000 - 6,000 - 5,000 - 4,000 - 3,000 - 2,000 - 1,000 - 0 60% - 50% - 40% - 30% - 20% - 10% 0% - CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING 7,973 8 Total households Family households Married - couple Nonfamily Married - children <18 ll opknc comprehensive plain 3,827 3,739 (families) Table 1 - Household Type (1990 and 2000) Married - other 2,773 2,583 ❑ 1990 • 2000 CA co Other family - children <18 family households 0 im u • Hopkins ❑ Hennepin County • Twin Cities SMSA 3,526 Householder living alone Table 2 - Household Type - City /County /Region (2000) Other family - other Nonfamily Housing Implications • The increase in householders living alone may be indicative of a longer term pattern. If so, it will continue to support a market for multi - family, smaller unit housing. • The proliferation of households containing a smaller percentage of children under the age of 18 will have an impact on enrollment at local schools and it may have an impact on the future sales of traditional single - family homes. Demographics Communities are continually evolving over time as resident's age or move to other communities. Understanding Hopkins' demographics can provide a telling story about future market needs. The 2000 Census shows a small increase in population since 1990 ofabout 4% (See Table 3). By 2030 Hopkins is projected to add an additional 1,000 residents. Table 3 - Age CIRPTI:R 3 - HousING 9,000 - 8,000 - 7,000 - 6,000 - 5,000 - 4,000 - 3,000 - 2,000 - 1,000 - 0 1,037 989 2,446 2 © 1990 • 2000 2,239 3,085 Under 5 years 5 to 19/20 years 19/20 years to 44 45 to 64 2,526 2,483 Over 65 years 1 - 1 opkin comprehensive plan page 3 -7 page 3 -8 CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING Table 4 - Age (2) 100% - 90% - 80% - 70% - 60% - 50% - 40% - 30% - 20% - 10% - 0% Hopkins Hennepin County Twin Cities SMSA • 65 and older II] 35 to 64 • 20 to 34 © 5 to 19 • Under 5 H opkins comprehensive plan Table 4 provides a breakdown of age groups in Hopkins. A typical trend for the region and the state is the aging "Baby Boom" generation. This age group, typically between 45 and 64 currently makes up 18% of Hopkins' population. As this age group continues to grow in size, it may pose several important questions for the community. Is there a diverse housing stock to accommodate an aging population and are there the necessary services (health services, medical facilities and assisted living) to support the aging population? Providing a diverse housing not only gives residents a community to age in place, but options for all income levels. Demographic Implications • Changing demographics will impact the existing housing stock. One level homes will continue to be popular since they better accommodate the needs of an aging population. • Existing and new housing will continue to need to offer choices for residents to age in place. • Hopkins and other agencies will continue to see a need for support services for the senior population. • Since Hopkins is a fully developed community, redevelopment initiatives will be needed to accommodate the projected 1,000 additional residents by 2030. Housing Stock Between 1999 and March 2000, 40 new housing units were been built in Hopkins (See Table 5). A significant number of new units have been created through land redevelopment over the last 5 years, including projects such as the Oakridge Place, Marketplace Lofts and the Summit. The focus of the community is now on housing maintenance and redevelopment of blighted and /or obsolete properties. Any new construction will likely occur on infill lots and through redevelopment. Table 5 - Year Structure Built 2,500 - 2,000 500 - 0 • Own ID Rent u1 tn 1999 to 1995 to 1990 to March 2000 1998 1994 1980 to 1970 to 1960 to 1940 to 1939 or 1989 1979 Year Built 1969 1959 earlier Overall, the single- family housing stock in Hopkins is in good condition. In some cases, small concentrations of deteriorated multi- family housing exists. Although the older units located between Downtown and Highway 7 and in South Hopkins need more ongoing maintenance due to age, there is apparent pride in ownership of these single- family structures and they are generally well maintained. CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING l lophm comprehensive plan page 3 -9 page 3 -10 CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING; 2,500 - 2,000 - 500 0 N ▪ � O� n Vy O N Year Built o ■ Own © Rent N 0 VO O 1 1999 to 1995 to 1990 to 1980 to 1970 to 1960 to 1940 to 1939 or March 2000 1998 1994 1989 1979 1969 1959 earlier K opkin6 comprehensive plan A large portion of Hopkins multifamily units were built in the 1970's (Table 6) and lead to concerns about deterioration and deferred maintenance issues. Proper maintenance of these units is a strong interest ofthe City. The City does have standards for the maintenance of rental housing that go beyond the Building Code. The provisions of the code require periodic inspections of rental units and repair of identified deficiencies. Table 6 - Year Built /Tenure (2000) Housing Stock Implications • Efforts will need to focus on programs and initiatives that encourage the maintenance of the existing aging housing stock. • Generally single- family and multifamily units constructed 40+ years ago begin to approach an age were continual maintenance improvements are needed. The City may need to find creative ways to encourage homeowners and landlords to conduct maintenance improvements. • The City will need to continue seek outside programs that assist in the maintenance and enhancement of the existing housing stock. Tenure One of the unusual facts about the Hopkins housing stock is the high proportion of renter - occupied units compared to owner - occupied units. According to data from the 2000 Census Bureau, 62% of the housing in Hopkins was renter - occupied and 38% of the units were owner - occupied (See Table 7). Table 7 — Housing Type and Tenure (2000) The Census also reports the population living in various types of housing. This data can be used to calculate the average number of people living in different housing types. Table 8 compares average population by housing type and tenure (own or rent). This data provides some interesting observations about housing in Hopkins: CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING O O O N c 0 ers 0. 0 a 7,000 - 6,000 - 5,000 - 4,000 - 3,000 - 2,000 - 1,000 - 0 op N O In m 0' O■ M In m 1, 1, 2 3or4 5to9 detached attached • Own ID Rent N m O O O O r i 10 to 19 20 to 49 50 or Mobile Boat, RV, more home van, etc. ti opkin comprehensive plan page 3 -II Page 3 -12 CHAPTER 3 - HousINi; • There is a large rental population however, there is also a significant amount of single- family homes that are owner occupied. Hopkins offers a diverse housing stock that allows residents to own single family -homes or rent multifamily units. • Structures with 3 to 49 units are primarily occupied by one and two person households. Table 8 - Population Per Housing Type and Tenure (2000) 3.00 250 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 rn `° ✓ `^ • fV N 1, 1, attached 2 detached m 0 fV • Rent 13 Own M N 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 or 4 5 to 9 10 to 19 20 to 49 50 or more Mobile home K opklnc comprehensive plan Tenure Implications • Hopkins will continue to have a large number of rental units making turnover a potential issue. Household Income Income influences many aspects of a community. Income provides consumers the ability to acquire housing (own or rent) and purchase goods from local businesses. According to the 2000 Census, 27% of Hopkins' homeowners were spending more than 30% of their household income on housing costs (See Table 9). This is 9% more than the Twin Cities average of 18 %. 36% of Hopkins' renters were also spending more than 30% of their household income on housing costs. (See Table 10). Table 9 - Selected Housing Costs as % of Household Income (2000) 60% - 50% 40% - 30% 20% - 10% - 0% 40% - 35% - 30% - 25% - 20% - 15% - 10% - 5% - 0% Less than 20% 37% 56% 55% Less than 20% 25% 27% 20% to 29% • Hopkins Li Hennepin County • Twin Cities SMSA Table 10 - Gross Rent as % of Household Income (2000) 27% 28% 28 °'% 20% to 29% • Hopkins ® Hennepin County • Twin Cities SMSA Regardless ofincome spent on housing, the City ofHopkins has been relatively successful in retaining and attracting new residents. 42% of the population (age 5 and older) lived in the same house in 1995 (See Table 11). This compares with 52% for all of Hennepin County and 54% for the region. The census does not report the portion ofthe population that moved to a different house within Hopkins during this period. People moving to Hopkins from a different location CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING 27% 30% or more 38% 37% 36% M---- —1 30% or more l op n8 comprehensive plan page 3 -13 H opkins comprehensive plan page 3 -14 CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING in Hennepin County made up 28% of the 2000 population. This portion of the population is higher than the comparable segments ofthe County (22%) and regional (25 %) populations. Hopkins' success in retaining residents is partially attributable to the supply of existing single- family homes. Rental units; however, have been a challenge for the City. There has been a high turnover rate of tenants in some rental units compared to the rest of the housing stock. This issue is a concern for the City, because it can influence a community on several levels. Fluctuations in school enrollment creates educational challenges for the Hopkins School District. High turnover rates also influence the overall well being of the community. Retaining residents creates a stronger sense of community and stronger cohesiveness. Table 11 - Residence in 1995 - City /County /State 60% 50% - 3096 - 20% - 10% - O% N f o 0 i ,_ .- o t Mt Same house in 1995 Same county Different MN county Other state Other location • Hopkins © Hennepin County • Twin Cities SMSA Housing Income Implications • Based on current household incomes, portions of Hopkins' housing is affordable. • Hopkins will need to consider ways to accommodate future affordable housing units to meet Metropolitan Council requirements. • The City will need to work with other governmental and non- profit entities to help reduce the turnover rate of rental housing. • The City of Hopkins will need to continue collaborating with the Hopkins School District to assess the social, economic and educational implications of the overall housing supply. Home Buyers /Renters The opportunity for purchases by first -time homebuyers in Hopkins is enhanced by the supply of smaller, older homes in Central Hopkins and in other neighborhoods. Parts of the Presidential neighborhoods, Park Valley and Peaceful Valley are also more affordable (See Neighborhood District Map). Campbell, Hobby Acres and Interlachen Park neighborhoods offer opportunities for move -up buyers. More expensive homes are available in the Bellgrove and Knollwood neighborhoods. The relatively large number of rental apartments and townhouses also offer choices for households who do not wish to or cannot afford to purchase homes. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) owns and maintains 76 dwelling units rented to low - income households. All of the units are located in one building near Downtown. Other subsidized rental units are operated by coops and non -profit agencies not directly affiliated with the City. Overall, 12% of the total rental units in Hopkins are subsidized and 7% of the Cities total housing stock is subsidized (exclusive of group homes). A small percentage of low income individuals (12% Rental & 7% Housing — This does not include senior housing) in Hopkins receive rent assistance through the Federal Section 8 Rent CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING Town Terrace Apartments Hopkins Arches 1 - 1 llopkin8 comprehensive plan page 3 -15 CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING Minnetonka ' ".. IV SP { 11 ' i � f E 1 f ebb I rJ f 1 r' Edina J ! I wlyule 7 1 1 !1 1 . ( 1 ! S 1 / 1 4 ii i ii i i 1 1 1 St. Louis Par s i i a 1 r Nelghborhood Di strict 1 Bellgrove ip 2. Knollwood 4p 3. Hobby Acres 4. Campbell 4 5. Parkridge 4p 6 Cottageville if 7. Oaks 8. Presidents 9. Interlachen 10. Peaceful Valley 11. Park Valley r Seri N • 0 500 1.000 2.000 Feet A r • 1 \ �Iop1�n� LOmpreheusive plan page 3 -16 Assistance Program administered by the Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The City of Hopkins currently has 350 households receiving rent subsidies through the Section 8 Housing Program. This program, however, does not fully meet the need for housing affordability in Hopkins or elsewhere as levels of funding have been reduced annually throughout the past two decades. Home Buyer /Renter Implications • Changing market trends will continue to influence the Hopkins housing market. • The City will need to continue offering and promoting housing assistance programs to facilitate both home ownership and affordable rents. Housing Affordability Housing is considered affordable when it consumes no more than 30% of gross household income. Families spending more than 30% of their income on housing may have difficulty affording basic needs like food or clothing, or be able to handle unanticipated medical or financial expenses. Affordability in the City of Hopkins is defined by the Metropolitan Council and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Based on the thresholds of these agencies, Hopkins and other metro area communities should focus on providing housing that is affordable to families earning 60% of the Twin Cities median family income. Under HUD definitions this translates to a home priced at or below $152,000. At that price, a family of four who earns $47,100, which is 60% of the Twin Cities median family income of $78,500 is spending 30% or less of its gross income on home ownership. CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING I-1opkin comprehensive plan page 3 -17 CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING (11111 lii1lllllllll1llllllllliliiiiim!II' 1 - topkin8 comprehensive plan page 3 -18 Rental housing is defined differently than home ownership. The threshold for rental hosing is considered affordable to families earning 50% of the Twin Cities median family income. The rental threshold for affordable housing for a family of four is $39,250. 'This results in the following affordable rental rates: Efficiency Unit - $687 a month 1 Bedroom Unit - $736 a month 2 Bedroom Unit - $883 a month 3 Bedroom Unit - $1,020 a month In response to affordable housing needs, the Hopkins Comprehensive Plan is required to acknowledge the community's share of the region's need for low and moderate income housing. In January of 2006, the Metropolitan Council released a summary report entitled "Determining the Affordable Housing Need in the Twin Cities 2011 2020." This report not only forecasted the regional need for newly- constructed, affordable housing (2020), but also allocated each community's share of the regional need for the comprehensive planning process. The total need for newly - constructed affordable housing units in the Twin Cities is estimated to be 51,000 between 2011 and 2020. Based on this report, the Metropolitan Council has forecasted a need of 143 new affordable units between 2011 and 2020 for the City of Hopkins. This number is determined based on a variety of factors such as low -wage job proximity, existing housing stock and transit services. The following is a summary of these factors and the formula used by Metropolitan Council: 72 Base allocation of the amount of the 300 new housing units which should be affordable (same across the region with minor adjustments). +66 Low -Wage Job Proximity: Communities, such as Hopkins, with more low -wage jobs than local low -wage working residents have their share increased by a proportional amount (1.93 ratio) -9 Housing Stock: 43% ofHopkins' housing stock is considered affordable at 60% ofmedian income. Since 30% is seen as desirable, the community's hare decreased by a proportional amount. +14 Transit Service — Level 2 transit service available results in an increase of 20% to the community's share. 143 Total New Affordable Units Needed It is important to note that the study was only concerned with newly- constructed affordable housing or development actions that consumes land. The study recognizes that a portion of low income households will find housing in older, market -rate units that have depreciated in price to maintain occupancy. However, these housing units are not included in determining the number of units needed. Since Hopkins is a fully developed community, it is assumed the 143 additional units will be achieved through redevelopment initiatives. These initiatives are discussed further in the Land Use chapter. Housing Plan Hopkins' Housing Plan identifies strategies and approaches to help meet the identified housing goals which include: • Retain and enhance detached single-family homes. • Continue to emphasize housing maintenance. • Take advantage of redevelopment opportunities to provide new housing choices for the community. • Maintain a housing supply that responds to changing demographics. CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING tl opkin8 comprehensive plan page 3 -19 page 3 -20 CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING 11 opkin3 comprehensive plan • Encourage the development of owner - occupied housing • Continue to strive for a mix of housing that accommodates a balance of all housing needs. The goals listed above and the implementation actions that follow are intended to ensure long -term housing quality, meet Hopkins' share of the regional need for low and moderate income housing, preserve the integrity of existing neighborhoods, promote housing redevelopment in appropriate areas and continue to provide a mix of housing types that keeps the community viable and competitive. Neighborhood Preservation The City regards the preservation and protection of its existing residential neighborhoods as one of its most important actions. 'Therefore, the City will work to protect the integrity and long -term viability of its neighborhoods and strive to reduce the potential negative impacts ofnearbycommercial orindustrial land development through zoning, site plan reviews, and code enforcement. Long -term stability and growth of neighborhoods are key elements in Hopkins efforts to remain as a desirable place to live and to achieve long -term sustainability. Neighborhoods are more than attractive places to live. The residential sectors of Hopkins provide employees for businesses, a market for the goods and services, and they create an image of the community. Neighborhoods are also a reflection on the community's social and economic standards ofliving and overall quality of life. In order to address neighborhood preservation, Hopkins will: • Strictly enforce its municipal regulations pertaining to housing and yard maintenance to protect the value and integrity of residential neighborhoods. • Support housingmaintenance through continued administration of applicable programs. • Continue to enforce its maintenance code for multiple - family housing and rental housing. • Protect residential areas adjacent to downtown Hopkins from the undue encroachment ofnon- residential uses. • Promote the infilling of vacant parcels in and near residential neighborhoods. The redevelopment of existing developed land will be in accordance with uses specified in the Comprehensive Plan. • Pursue efforts to remove land uses that are inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and incompatible with existing residential neighborhoods. • Enforce high standards for all multiple- family residential development. Factors to be considered in reviewing new housing proposals will include but not be limited to the aspects of building massing, parking locations, access, traffic impacts, landscaping, exterior architectural design, fencing, trash handing, and parking ratios. Housing Redevelopment Most of Hopkins new growth in housing will be attributable to redevelopment. Today, there are limited locations in the community where it may be appropriate to allow and encourage housing redevelopment. In these locations, the City has indicated its land use intentions through the Land Use Plan and the zoning regulations. In the future, however, the opportunities for additional housing may be expanded. The planned Southwest LRT line has the potential for significant change including creating additional potential locations for more housing or mixed -use development. Future improvements to Shady Oak Road and possibly Blake Road also have the potential to expand housing opportunities. CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING H opkin comprehensive plan page 3 -21 page 3-22 CHAPTER 3 - Hous[NG 1I opkincS comprehensive plan In most cases, future housing construction is expected to be the outcome ofprivate market actions. On a case -by -case basis, Hopkins will consider financial participation in housing redevelopment projects when projects provide demonstrable public benefits consistent with this Comprehensive Plan and city redevelopment policies. In order to address future redevelopment, Hopkins will: Focus on the implementation ofshort and long -term redevelopment recommendations contained in the land use section of this plan. • Remain open to the consideration of new housing types and designs that meet the broad spectrum of existing and future resident's needs. • Work closely with Hennepin County and other agencies on the implementation of the Southwest LRT line. • Collaborate with non - profits and other entities to provide special needs housing. Housing Assistance The City of Hopkins has a long history of providing housing assistance for low income, elderly and special needs residents. Due to the age of the City's housing stock, a significant number of rental and owner - occupied units are affordable. Accordingly, Hopkins will continue to provide housing assistance in a targeted manner. In order to provide housing assistance, the City will: • Participate in the rent assistance programs of Hennepin County and the Twin Cities Metropolitan Housing Authority and serve as a local clearinghouse for information pertaining to rental assistance. • Consider using a variety of means to upgrade existing housing to provide its fair share of rental housing for low and moderate income households. Tools may include revenue bonds, tax increment financing, tax abatement and Community Development Block Grants along with other public funding sources as they may be become available. The City will also consider partnerships with private and non -profit entities to improve the quality of existing housing and /or ensure that rents remain affordable. Housing Initiatives The City of Hopkins has will pursue a series of action steps related to the maintenance of strong neighborhoods and the creation of new housing through appropriate redevelopment efforts. The following initiatives will be pursued: • Continue and /or expand existing housing programs. • Examine and improve housing maintenance codes and actively enforce these codes. • Facilitate development that will help meet "special housing needs" such as handicapped units, three - bedroom units, housing for empty- nesters and high market value housing. • Maintain and improve public infrastructure in neighborhoods. • Monitor the effectiveness of the Truth in Housing Program to ensure that it is helping to maintain and upgrade residential housing stock. • Encourage the use of rental rehabilitation and single- family housing loan programs offered by various private and public sources. CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING 11ophn8 comprehensive plan page 3 -23 CHAPTER 3 - HOUSING Kopkin8 comprehensive plan page 3 -24 • Continue to promote first -time home buyer programs offered by outside agencies. • Continue to promote and offer the Residential Rehabilitation Loan /Grant Program. • Continually monitor the condition of existing housing units and identify properties that have deteriorated to the point that they may need to be removed and replaced with new housing. • Aggressively enforce the Nuisance Abatement Ordinance/ Housing Code in regard to dilapidated housing units. • Continue communication and outreach efforts with residents of multi - family housing including working with the Hopkins Apartment Management Association (HAMA) to ensure that multi- family housing residents are welcomed to the community. • Discourage the construction ofadditional assisted living facilities and long -term care facilities. Hopkins has an extensive supply of such uses which place significant pressure on existing police and emergency medical response services. Additional information on housing programs and actions is included in the Implementation Section of the Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 4 - Parks, Open Space and Trails Introduction Hopkins is a fully developed community with an established park and open space system. From small parks like the Park Valley Playground to community parks like Central Park, public facilities offer diverse activities for residents of all ages. Since there is very little vacant land left in Hopkins, any existing park expansions or new park sites will result from redevelopment activities. It is not likely that redevelopment activities will result in any significant expansion of the existing park system. Since park expansion and new park construction is not the focus of Hopkins' future park planning efforts, the emphasis will be placed on maintaining and enhancing the existing system. Part of the enhancement of the existing system will focus on expanding existing trail connections. Hopkins is a regional hub of recreational trails. In the future, it may be possible to expand local trails to provide better links to regional trails as well as to connect local park facilities and local points of interest. Park, Open Space and Trail Goals 1. Continue to provide a park and recreation system that satisfies the needs of a diverse population. 2. Provide a park and recreation system that supports community identity and serves as a gathering space for community and neighborhood events. 3. Provide local links to the regional trail system. 4. Establish a trail system that interconnects the city and offers an alternative means of transportation. 5. Emphasize maintenance and enhancement of existing parks. CHAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS Burnes Park ll Opkiflc comprehensive plan page 4 -1 CHAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS H opkins comprehensive plan page 4-2 6. Continue to collaborate with the City of Minnetonka, the Hopkins School District, Three Rivers Park District and other agencies to provide recreational opportunities for Hopkins residents. 7. Utilize the park system to protect natural resources. 8. Promote active living and a healthier community through parks and recreational opportunities. Classification System Hopkins has a variety of parks that are components of the overall park system. In order to examine existing parks and to project future park needs, a uniform classification system is used in this plan. The following categories have been established: Classification: Neighborhood Park Description: Neighborhood parks are the basic unit of the park system and serve as the recreational focus of neighborhoods. Neighborhood parks emphasize informal active and passive recreation. Location Criteria: 'A to'/ mile distance and uninterrupted by non- residential roads and other physical barriers. Size Criteria: Usually between 5 and 10 acres. Classification: School - Park Description: Combining parks with school sites can fulfill the space requirements for other classes of parks such as neighborhood, community, sports complex and special use. Location Criteria: Determined by location of school district property. Size Criteria: Variable Classification: Community Park Description: Serves a broader purpose than neighborhood parks. Focus is on meeting community -based recreational needs as well as preserving unique open space. Location Criteria: 1 /2, mile to 3 mile distance and typically uninterrupted by non - residential roads and other physical barriers. Determined by the quantity and usability of the site. Size Criteria: Usually between 20 and 50 acres. Classification: Special Use Park and Recreation Facilities Description: Special Use park and recreation facilities may be privately or publicly owned. Private facilities can offer either indoor or outdoor recreation opportunities, usually on a membership or fee basis. Location Criteria: Variable, depends on specific use. Size Criteria: Variable Classification: Natural Resource Areas Description: Lands set aside for preservation of significant natural resources, remnant landscapes, open space and visual aesthetics. Location Criteria: Depends on resource availability and opportunity. Size Criteria: Variable Parks and recreational facilities are typically utilized based on the distance residents are willing to travel to access amenities. The location criteria set above provides general guidelines on the intended service areas a park should serve. Using these guidelines can provide a useful tool when analyzing the existing park system and determining areas that are underserved. Figure 3.1 provides a visual assessment of Hopkins park system and its service areas. Service areas have been mapped for neighborhood and community parks. Overall the service area analysis shows the City of Hopkins to be well served by its existing system. There are areas for improvement; however, these areas are not likely to see new park construction, unless they are through redevelopment initiatives. CHAPTER ER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS tl opkin8 comprehensive plan page 4 -3 N '''''s•._ Table One: Park Systeru `` ,cr Inventory - i. 1.� �` "0 �. ' c� a v c` ♦ «` . .F ♦ ��� ■� v ,, +" o • •` � ,.. c a" .F • Size Name cc c . � r: �e � � ♦. mo t`' ♦ c . . r• ♦. �' c c' , � k r` F 6 c N• � c ` 0 4 t Park Name (Acres) Park Type .•' �ti` O •e 1 " �`` ■ .•' .♦;° 4 .`• d ,s` ♦ e• ;. -..<` `, ,,. h is ,v r Denotes a park that is currently undeveloped 1 • .. • .. • .. • .• • , • • I. • ■ .. • • N • • N • • N • • • M • • • • • • • • 4 • • • • • Id • • • 1 • • N • • • • I • in • • • • • • 'O • • • • • • sD • • • • • IN • • • • 1∎ • • I • • • • of • • • • • • Izi • • • • • • • • r £L )1nd .red •100tpS Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park 1 Community Park Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park 4 d °YfS Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park YQIV 4_1Roca'd rLinitml Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park Community Park J Altinrd arp reDads acn !wads Neighborhood Park 1 Neighborhood Park Special Use Facility_ - Community Park [�zinZ3 acn /toads t aonoca'i 711144N Community Park Z8 6 46 L4 6£Z Z£ 9 ZE Z1 LZ• I 94'0 L6 4Z 46 0 68Z £8' I 19 Z 91 Z 01 01 4I SE ZO ES I64 £0•9 44 S I 990 4£££ E6'ZE I £7"84£ Alice Smith Elementary School Io afilg I i ;lied lailng I fired eau.mg I 4xtd Ie.nuaD I 4 Iva alltsa8tnoD l 'Downtown Park Insenhower Elementary School /Community Center r I flmo Park !Harley Hopkins Park I D{ep *tlltnn'- H I 4 do;il'H I .4Xtd ua�t11a1uII Plaid PlozlaiyVI 1 ,a►1acald Meal) vtleifauulyql IOak Ridge Golf Course 1 >Ired "4 puno 18L21d La ll!A )1- d to Iv a m;tH >Ito LPtIS I !Shady Oak Beach l end Pig a ;BSI I asracald :lied lauta ;s I II'Yd La1reAI . V101 CHAPTER 4 — PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND 1 RAIi.� n oplu oinprchcnsivc plan page 4 - Facility Inventory Local recreational facilities are provided by a number of sources. Public parks are perhaps the most obvious of these sources, however, parks and recreational opportunities provided by other entities need to be considered in assessing the total park and recreation system. Other entities providing park and recreational opportunities in the Hopkins area include adjacent communities, schools and private facilities (See Table 1). Park System Needs A tool for analyzing a local park system is the application of a population ratio standard. This standard is expressed as a number of acres of park land per one thousand people and is used to provide a general guideline for the assessment of existing and future park needs. For the Hopkins Comprehensive Plan, a standard of7 acres of municipal park land per 1000 people has been used as a benchmark for planning purposes. This standard is consistent with a range of standards offered by the National Park and Recreation Association. Additionally, the overall standard has been broken down into the following components: Neighborhood Park — 2 acres per 1000 people Community Park /Sports Complex —5 acres per 1000 people Standards have not been directly applied to the other classifications used in this plan including school - parks, natural resource areas, trails, or private park and recreation facilities. Neighborhood and community park needs can be satisfied in combination with the development of school facilities provided that facilities are available to both groups. Trail corridors are very site specific and are not included in overall acreage calculations because they serve as links between various components ofthe park system. Private facilities are also not included in the overall standard because in many cases, they do not have the same longevity enjoyed by public park uses. CHAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS 11Opkin8 comprehensive plan page 4 -5 Component Existing acres Standard Acres Per Population Std. Applied to 2010 pop. Net 2010 Park System 119.22 7 1000 125.3 -6.08 Neighborhood Park 25.09 2 1000 35.8 -10.71 Community Park 94 13 5 1000 89 5 4 83 School Park - - - - - Natural Resource Area - - - - - Private Park - - - - - Assessment of Future Need - 2020 (Population 18,600) Component Existing acres Standard Acres Per Population Std. Applied to 2020 pop. Net 2020 Park Systern 119.22 7 1000 130.2 -10.98 Neighborhood Park 25.09 2 1000 37.2 -12.11 Community Park 94.13 5 1000 93 1.13 School Park - - - - - Natural Resource Area - - - - - Private Park - - - - - Assessment of Future Need -2030 (Population 18,900) Component Existing Acres Standard Acres Per Population Std. Applied to 2030 pop. Net 2030 Park System 119.22 7 100-► 132.3 - 13.07 Neighborhood Park 25.09 2 1000 37.8 -12.71 Community Park 94.13 6 1000 94.6 -0.37 School Park - - - - - Natural Resource Area - - - - - Private Park - - - - - CHAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS H opkins comprehensive plan page 4 -6 Application of these standards yields the following results: Assessment of Future Need - 2010 (Population 17,900) Neighborhood Parks Standard: 2 acres per 1000 people Comments: Neighborhood parks are recreational facilities that are intended to serve populations residing within a 1 /4 - 1 /2 mile radius of the site. These facilities typically contain open space areas, which accommodate uses such as field games, court games, play equipment and other uses. Although five acres is generally recognized as a minimum size for neighborhood parks, smaller tracts of land can be used due to natural conditions or in areas where larger land parcels are not available. Existing Supply /Need: Hopkins currently has ten sites that are categorized as neighborhood parks ranging in size from .5 acres to 6 acres. Application of the recommended standard for neighborhood parks results in a deficiency of 12.11 and 12.71 acres in 2020 and 2030 respectively. The standards indicate the need for additional neighborhood park areas, however, closer examination of Hopkins reveals that the City probably does not need to add park areas to serve existing and future needs. Hopkins contains three public school sites that accommodate neighborhood park needs. These sites along with Alder Park in Edina provide convenient access for all residents. As shown in the service area analysis, almost every home in Hopkins is located within 1 / mile of an existing neighborhood park. The only exception is the extreme northern portion of the community lying north of the Oak Ridge Golf Course. This area is completely developed precluding the potential of adding an additional neighborhood park. If the golf course is ever redeveloped in the future, an additional park site could be acquired at that time. Residents in this area do have the opportunity to access bike routes and local trails via Minnetonka Blvd. that provide access to other local facilities within the City of Minnetonka. CHAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS 1 lopkin s comprehensive plan page 4 -7 CIIAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS l lOpkin6 comprehensive plan pagc 4 -8 Shady Oak Beach Community Parks Standard: 5 acres per 1000 people Comments: Community parks are recreational facilities that serve as focal points of community recreational systems. As such, they typically provide facilities that appeal to a broad spectrum of users. Activities may include athletic complexes, archery, fishing, nature study, hiking, picnicking and other uses. Community parks commonly contain facilities that are designed to appeal to both active and passive users within one park site. The location of community parks is usually established based on topography and other natural features and on accessibility via the local road network. Existing Supply /Need: Hopkins currently has five sites that are classified as community parks. They include Central Park, Maetzold Field, Shady Oak Beach, Steiner Park Preserve* and Valley Park. Central Park and Maetzold Field consist predominately of athletic field areas. Both of these sites are used intensively for adult and youth sports programs. Additionally, Central Park is the home of the Hopkins Pavilion that accommodates indoor ice hockey and indoor soccer. Steiner Park Preserve and Valley Park contains passive and natural areas in addition to active pursuits such as volleyball, basketball and archery. Shady Oak Beach, a facility run jointly with the City of Minnetonka, is an area that accommodates swimming, fishing, water oriented play areas and picnicking. Application of the standard for community parks shows the city meeting needs through the year 2020. A small increase in community park land may be needed by 2030 of an additional 0.37 acres. Because of the developed nature of the community, adding community park land will be difficult. However, two future opportunities exist. The southern portion of Hopkins contains a landfill site that has been closed for a long period of time. At the present time the site has not been cleared by State agencies for any * Steiner Park Preserve has not been formally named. The property was donated by the Steiner Family to the City of Hopkins. type of use. As a result, the property is fully fenced and it contains a methane collection system. At some point in the future, the property may become available for public use. When this occurs, the site could be developed as a community park. The second future opportunity involves the Minnehaha Creek Preserve Area that is owned by the City of Hopkins. If it becomes unnecessary to continue to use this property as a public works site, it could be incorporated as a new community park. At this time, the City has no plans to move the public works site. Overall the city is well served by community parks and should continue to meet future needs. Trails and Sidewalks Hopkins has a traditional pattern of development that many suburban communities across the country today are trying to emulate. Established "main street" businesses, high quality neighborhoods, and an excellent park system are all linked by an efficient roadway network. The City also has a strong interest in making all of these areas accessible by non - vehicular means. Accordingly, the Parks, Open Space and Trails section of the plan outlines appropriate locations for trails and sidewalks that accommodate pedestrians, bicycles and in -line skating activities. The purpose of the system is to accommodate recreational pursuits but also to allow people to have access to employment and retail centers without having to use motorized vehicles. Hopkins is a hub for the regional trail network. At the present time, the City is the location of the junction of two legs of the Southwest Hennepin LRT Trail. These trail segments follow 27 miles of abandoned railroad beds stretching from Hopkins to Victoria and from Hopkins to Chanhassen. A portion of the trail, west of 1 lth Ave is surfaced with compacted crushed limestone. East of 11 th Ave CHAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS Bike Trail on Excelsior Boulevard H op k n8 comprehensive plan page 4 -9 CEIAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS page 4 -10 The Depot Coffee House K opkin6 comprehensive plan Excelsior Boulevard the trail is ten feet wide and paved asphalt. Grades along the trail are generally 5% or less which makes them ideal for biking, walking and running. Hennepin Parks operates the trail for spring, summer and fall usage. Currently, the park and ride lot along Excelsior Boulevard at 8th Avenues and the Depot Coffee House is used as a trailhead. In 2006 both trailheads were improved and expanded. The Southwest LRT Trail forms a spine that passes through Hopkins affording easy access to adjacent communities and more distant points of interest. Connectivity Opportunities The City has identified a trail plan that accommodates movement throughout the community providing numerous links to the regional trail spine. The system includes a network of sidewalks and ofd road bike /hike trails. The system is shown on the map entitled Trail Plan. Other local trails will also be added as road reconstruction projects occur in the future or through other trail improvement initiatives. Some of these major corridor initiatives have been currently discussed in plans. The following summary is intended to help frame anticipated connectivity opportunities and serve as a guide to making trail connection decisions. Re o.nv rte S MAW A i ■ .se • J+Y. M aw +Rc *er 1 '_. Existing Trail Proposed Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail Extension • "\,.i Proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Extension City Boundary Parcel Neighborhood Park di Community Park Other Park Facilities Open Water Y Rby 1 i � - a _.1__ .� _._[ CHAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS a 1 1 L t 1 Alice Smith Elementary 2 Blake School 3 Buffer Park 4 Burnes Park 5 Central Park 6 Cottageville Park 7 Downtown Park 8 Eisenhower Elementary 9 Elmo Park 10 Harley Hopkins Park 11 Hiawatha Oaks 12 Hilltop 13 Interlachen Park 14 Maetzoid Field 15 Minnehaha Creek Preserve 16 Oak Ridge Country Club 17 Oakes Park 18 Overpass Skate Park 19 Park Valley Playground 20 Shady Oak Beach 21 Shady Oak Nature Area 22 Steiner Park Preserve 23 Valley Park 0 370 740 1,480 Feet L i i _J- 1 • 1 eJ • 11Opkln8 comprehensive plan page 4-11 CHAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS n opkin6 comprehensive plan page 4 - 1? Blake Road Corridor Blake Road serves as a major north south route on the east end of town. In the past decade, traffic volumes have increased and have posed pedestrian safety issues for the high concentrated neighborhoods to the north and the Blake School to the south. At this time there are no scheduled improvements to address safety, access or mobility issues. The City will continue to coordinate with Hennepin County to address these issues. Connectivity opportunities may present themselves as redevelopment occurs in light of the proposed LRT station and other redevelopment initiatives. These redevelopment initiatives are discussed further in the Land Use Chapter. As a result of needed transportation improvements and possible redevelopment opportunities, numerous planning studies have been completed along the Blake Road corridor. Each study has taken into account at some level pedestrian and bicycle movement. The following planning documents can be used; in addition to the comprehensive plan, to evaluate connectivity opportunities and serve as a guide to planning decisions: • • • • Blake Road Corridor Community Assessment Blake Road Streetscape Concept East Hopkins Land Use and Market Study Hopkins Station Area Plan The Blake Road corridor will continue to be evaluated as pedestrian and bicycle connections present themselves. In addition to evaluating the corridors needs, the City will continue to explore funding opportunities to assist with pedestrian and bicycle improvements. For instance, in 2008 the City applied for a Hennepin County TOD grant to construct pedestrian -ways along Blake Road north of Excelsior Boulevard. Shady Oak Road Hopkins has been collaborating with the City ofMinnetonka and Hennepin County to address safety, mobility and access issues along the corridor. As part of these efforts a preferred roadway alignment has been proposed, along with a pedestrian and bicycle component. Roadway improvements may also provide the opportunity for redevelopment, which is discussed further in the Land Use chapter. Timing for roadway improvements are still being determined at this time. If and when roadway improvements occur and redevelopment opportunities present themselves the appropriate pedestrian and bicycle components should be integrated. Excelsior Boulevard Hopkins has made significant reinvestments to the Excelsior Boulevard corridor. These investments have included boulevards, sidewalks, addressing pedestrian safety issues, city beatification improvements and way finding signs. Improvements to the corridor can serve as a model for other pedestrian and bicycle improvements throughout the community. Hopkins Station Area Plan The Hopkins Station Area Plan by the IBI Group was completed in October of 2007. The purpose of the study was to develop station area plans for the Shady Oak, Downtown and Blake Light Rail Transit (LRT) stations that provide the first elements of a "road map" to guide future integrated transportation and land use planning initiatives with the city. In addition, this report provides connectivity elements to each station plan. Connectivity improvements to the area will need to continue to coordinate with LRT initiatives. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail The proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, which would travel east through Edina and Richfield, would connect with the Southwest Hennepin LRT Regional Trail in Hopkins. Although a preferred regional trail alignment has not been master planned at this point, Three Rivers Park District has worked with the city and others to identify potential corridors in Hopkins. CHAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS 1 lOpk1ne5 comprehensive plan page 4-13 CHAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS K opkin8 comprehensive plan page 4 -14 Recently the City has been facilitating improvements to the creeks corridor that will address erosion issues, failing culverts and potential realignment of the creek. Efforts to improve the creek have been jointly discussed with the Three Rivers Park District. Improvements to the creek will also incorporate segments of the proposed regional trail. Infrastructure improvements to the creek are anticipated to occur in the fall of 2008, with trail work to follow in 2009. Collaboration efforts will continue between the appropriate agencies to incorporate the proposed regional trail and creek corridor improvements. Lake Minnetonka LRT Extension The proposed Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail extension is intended to provide better connectivity to the northern portion of the Southwest Hennepin LRT Regional Trail. A current connection can be made by using existing sidewalks, but is not conducive to bikers. The proposed alignment would follow Main Street, Washington Avenue North and connect up with the South Hennepin LRT trail via 2nd Street NE. Accommodation of bicycle movement along the route would require on- street bike lanes. The City has no plans at this time to integrate bicycle lanes along this route, but will continue to coordinate with Three Rivers Park District to address future regional connections in this part of the community. Connecting the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail with the South Hennepin Regional LRT trail may also present itself along 8th Avenue South. Improvements to 8th Avenue South would likely occur in conjunction with redevelopment initiatives associated with the proposed Downtown LRT station. This connection may not be as direct as the proposed extension, but would provide a link between the two regional trails. Emerging Trends Hopkins demographics are changing with an aging baby boom population and growing ethnic populations. Regardless of age or ethnicities, there is a stronger desire today to be active. However, with changing demographics, recreational needs and the perception of recreational uses have changed as well. In light of these changes, recent studies have begun to highlight future desires for recreational needs. One study in particular done by the University ofMinnesota's Design Center for American Urban Landscape, titled "People and Urban Green Areas: Perception and Use (June 2003)" begins to highlight some of these emerging trends. Emerging Trends • Green space that provides activity for teenagers. • Seniors are more conscious of a healthier lifestyle and are seeking recreational amenities. • Large gathering areas for cultural celebrations. • More flexibility with fields to allow for diverse range of games (lacrosse, soccer, rugby, ultimate frisbee, cricket, etc ... ). • Community Gardens • The need for ball fields are declining. • Desire for more corridor oriented amenities, such as paths and trails. In addition to these emerging trends, there has been a stronger need to promote active and healthier communities. These initiatives are associated with numerous health concerns and have attracted national attention. One in particular has been the rise in obesity, which has been associated with heart disease and diabetes. Providing recreational opportunities and amenities can help promote a healthier and more active community. This park plan has identified many of the assets Hopkins has to offer for its residents to live an active lifestyle. In Hopkins case, the system is well built and residents are well served by its local parks and its trail CHAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS Overpass Skate Park (Highway 169 and Excelsior Boulevard) I1 opknc comprehensive plan page 4-15 CHAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS K opkn8 comprehensive plan page 4 -16 Downtown Park access to the regional system. As improvements are made and park recommendations are considered, there needs to be an ongoing emphasis on providing an active and healthier community. Park and Trail Plan Based on the analysis information presented above, input from the public and the Hopkins Park Board and considering the directions provided by the goals that are contained in the plan, the following recommendations are offered: 1. Develop the landfill site and /or the Minnehaha Creek Preserve area as community parks if the opportunity presents itself Both of these sites have the potential to serve as community park areas. If the landfill becomes available for public use, it could accommodate needed soccer fields and other active facilities. Should the Preserve area become available, it could be used for a combination of both passive and active pursuits. The area adjacent to the creek could be used passively for trails and natural habitat. Other areas of the site could accommodate active facilities such as soccer fields. The City should prepare master plans for both of these potential park sites in order to identify appropriate uses. 2. Work to establish a series of local trails that connect to the regional trails. Incorporate trails as part of all major road improvement projects such as Shady Oak Road, Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard. Examine higher volume local roadways for potential off-street trail installation. 3. Upgrade and improve all park buildings to ensure ADA accessibility. 4. Coordinate improvements for the Shady Oak Nature Area in conjunction with the pending roadway improvements. Examine the feasibility of installing a trail around all or portions of the pond area. 5. Evaluate the use of open fields, ball fields and outdoor hockey rinks to determine opportunities for flexible uses, such as soccer and lacrosse. 6. Improving lighting and sidewalks to make areas more pedestrian friendly. 7 Continue to coordinate with the Three Rivers Park District to provide regional trail connections via Nine Mile Creek and the Lake Minnetonka LRT Extension. CHAPTER 4 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS l ophn8 comprehensive plan page 4-17