Loading...
CR 04-55 Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Condos G \ T Y OF ~ HOPKINS . March 31, 2004 Council Report 04-55 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - CONDOS Proposed Action. Staff recolllmends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution 04-26, approving a Comprehensive Plan amendment from Institutional to High Density Multiple Family [or the site north of the United Methodist Church. At the Zoning and Planning meeting, Mr. Halverson moved and Mr. Paul seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ04-6, recommending approval o[ a Comprehensive Plan amendment from Institutional to High Density Multiple Family for the site north of the United Methodist Church. The motion was approved unanimously. Overview, The applicant, Halley's Custom Homes, Inc., is proposing to construct 18 for-sale, one and two-bedroom condos north of the United Methodist Church located on Highway 7, The subject lot cUlTently has the church located on the south side and a parking lot on the north side of the site. The church docs not need the additional parking, and it appears that their parking can be accommodated on the south side of the site. . The proposed building would be three stories and have underground and surface parking. The condo price range will be from $350,000 to $500,000. The building will be marketed [or residents 55 years of age nnd older. Primary Issues to Consider. . How has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject area? . What is the difference between the Institutional and R-4 zonings? . Should the site north of the United Methodist Cllurch Comprehensive Plan designation be changed? . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Supporting Documents. . Analysis o[ Issues . Comprehensive Plan . Resolution U4-26 . Site Map N ane y , Anderson, AICP Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: - . Related Documents (eTP, ERP, etc.): Notes: r ,"-:1; CR04-55 Page 2 . ' Primarv Issues to Consider. . How has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Institutional. There is a requirement that the Comprehensive Plan and zoning be consistent. With the proposed zoning change, the zoning and the Comprehensive Plan d~signation will be consistent. . What is the difference between the Institutional and High Density Residential designation? ' An Institutional zoning allows single;-family homes,and two-family homes as permitted uses, Schools and religious institutions ~are allowed as conditional uses, The High Density Residential designation is a high density multiple family building, . Should the site north of the United Methodist Church Comprehensive Plan designation be changed? In looking at the area, the only logical change would be to amend the, Comprehensive Plan to a multiple family designation. The, site. would not be a commercial, industrial or a single- family area. There is an area owned 'by the golf course on the east side and then farther east . is anapartment complex. To the north is the golf course, to the south the church, and to the west the property is owned by the School District. . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Ms. Anderson stated that the Comprehensive Plan ,and zoning have to be consistent, so the Plan will have to be amended from Institutional to High Density Residential. No one appeared at the public hearing regarding this issue. " Alternatives, 1, Approve the Comprehensive Plan amendment. By approving the Comprehensive Plan amendment, the zoning and qomprehensive Plan will be consistent. 2, Deny the Comprehensive Plan amendment. By denying the Comprehensive Plan amendment, the zoning and. Comprehensive Plan will not be consistent. If the City Council considers this altemdtive, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative, 3. Continue for further information, If the City Council indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. , ' i i .'! , l' T -, . , City of :J-{opRjns C0111,prenensive' ,CEEa1J '.. . "Land Use Plan Land Use Categories, ~~j;~'~:~:;j Low DensHy Residential _ Medium Density Residential _ High Density Residential ' _ Oomrnerciat _ Business Park; ,. _ Industrial .. PubliC/Institutional _ 9pen SpacelTrail _ Park "1 I, ' . i Cl> .), r , 1 IlIIB Hoish1gtOn Ko~.. Group, me. , 500' 0 1000 2000' 3000 4000 ,i 5000 , Feet (gO 123 North Third Street, Suite 100' ~ I ' MilIneapolis, MN 55<!?1 1'; November S, 1999 Scale: 1" = ' 2000' ! . W.E. 941.0 Il I ~ N152.000 // 953,6 F ____- 000 ,~// I A-Cr~ ~535 / ~It:: / ' - ,) '-t - - --- -~---. " ~.~' -~1. \ CITY OF HOPKINS . Hennepi* County, Minnesota i RESOLUTION NO: 04-26 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE SITE NORTH qF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ! WHEREAS, an application for Zoning Amendment ZN04-5 has been made by Mike Halley; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: , ' , , 1. That an application ~for a comprehensive plan ,amendment was made by Mike, Halley on March 1,2.004; 2, That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on March: 30, 2004: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; .1 I . 3, That the written comrhents and analysis of City staff were considered; and A legal description ofthe subject property is as follows: 4, . Lot I, Block 1, Oak Ridge Place NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment ZN04-5 is hereby approved bas,ed on the following Findings of Fact: , , " L That the amendmeht to the Comprehensive Plan will make the zoning and the land use plan consistent. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that.application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment ZN04-5 is hereby approved based on the following conditions: I i 1. That the Metropolitan' Council approves the proposed amendment, Adopted this 6th day of April 2004. . Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk -,:1.