VII.6. Blake Road Station Rezoning, Planned Unit Development & Site Plan Review for Site A; Lindahl
August 2, 2021 City Council Report 2021-076
Blake Road Station
Rezoning, Planned Unit Development & Site Plan Review for Site A
Proposed Action: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the following motions:
• Move to adopt Resolution 2021-042 approving the first reading of Ordinance 2021-1172
rezoning the subject properties in the northwest quadrant of Excelsior Boulevard and Blake
Road with PID’s 19-117-21-42-0044, 19-117-21-42-0045 & 19-117-21-42-0046 to Mixed Use
with a Planned Unit Development (PUD), subject to conditions.
• Move to adopt Resolution 2021-043 approving the site plan for the Blake Road Station Site
A (PID 19-117-21-42-0045), subject to conditions.
Overview
The applicant, Bryan Farquhar of Trilogy Real Estate Group, requests rezoning and planned unit
development (PUD) approvals for Blake Road Station, a 3 phase mixed use residential and
commercial development proposed for the northwest quadrant of Excelsior Boulevard and
Blake Road just south of the future Blake Road light rail transit station. This project will
redevelop the existing Hopkins Commerce Center strip commercial development into 3 separate
7-story buildings totaling 770 residential units and approximately 11,000 square feet of
commercial space.
The applicant also requests site plan approval for Site A, the first of the 3 phase redevelopment,
which includes a 7-story building with 220 apartment units and approximately 2,100 square feet
of commercial space. This report summarizes the concept proposal, reviews the proposal
against the Mixed Use district development standards and outlines a likely formal review
process. Based on the findings in this report, both the Planning & Zoning Commission and
staff recommend approval of these requests subject to the conditions detailed in the attached
resolutions.
Primary Issues to Consider
• Background
• Community Comment
• Rezoning & PUD Review
• Site Plan Review
• Engineering Review
• Alternatives
Supporting Documents
• Site Location Map
• Resolution 2021-042 & 2021-043
• Ordinance 2021-1172
• Applicant’s Narrative
• Community Comments
• Neighborhood Meeting Comments
• Plans and Building Elevations
• Traffic Impact Analysis
_____________________
Jason Lindahl, AICP
City Planner
City Council Report 2021-076
Page 2
Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N ____ Source: _____________
Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): _________________________________________
Notes:
BACKGROUND
This Background section provides a history of existing site, project summary, and a brief
summary of the review process for this development to date. More information about the
project, it’s phasing, design, streetscape and public realm and retail components can be found in
the applicant’s narrative which is attached for your reference.
Existing Site. The 6.4-acre subject property was re-platted as Lots 1, 2 & 3, Hopkins
Commerce Addition in July of 1992. However, the buildings on each of these lots were built
much earlier. Lot 1 contains a 44,000 square foot building constructed in 1954 (Goodwill and
vacant space). Lot 2 contains a 25,000 square multitenant strip commercial building constructed
in 1957. And Lot 3 contains a 26,000 square foot multitenant strip commercial building
constructed in 1959. In total, the 3 multitenant strip commercial buildings total approximately
95,000 square feet of neighborhood serving retail and service uses.
Project Summary. According to the applicant, the Blake Road Station project will redevelop
6.4 acres of land located at the intersection of Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road South.
Trilogy Real Estate Group is working with the City of Hopkins to develop the site in a three
phase, multi-modal transit-oriented development adjacent to the Southwest Light Rail Transit
(LRT) Blake Road Station. Each phase will build upon the improvements of the previous phase
and will ultimately result in an increasingly connected, pedestrian friendly, and transit focused
community. The project will add to the mix of housing choices for area residents, providing a
new opportunity to live immediately adjacent to the light rail transit station. As detailed in the
table below, overall the site will include 770 residential units and over 11,000 square feet of retail
space.
Blake Road Station Development Summary
Site Start Units Parcel Size Density
A Late Summer 2021 220 1.55 Acres 142 Units/Acre
B 2022-2027 250 2.1 Acres 119 Units/Acre
C 2026-2031 300 2.76 Acres 109 Units/Acre
Total N/A 770 6.4 Acres 120 Units/Acre
Review Process to Date. The review process for this project to date included both a concept
plan review with a neighborhood meeting and Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW).
The City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed the concept plan for this
development in June 2020 and generally supported the concept plan, rezoning to mixed use and
use of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The City Council offered the following comments
during the concept plan review:
• In exchange for the PUD, the applicant must detail how they intend to provide a higher
quality development or meet other City goals. Items the applicant could focus on include
enhanced architecture, pedestrian and bicycle, sustainability, energy conservation, renewable
energy, and public art elements.
• The applicant should add additional commercial space to offset the loss of the existing
commercial space. This space should focus on neighborhood serving uses.
City Council Report 2021-076
Page 3
• The applicant should explore incorporation of affordable residential and commercial space
into the project including larger apartment units with 3-4 bedrooms.
• The applicant should revise their plans to meet the City’s exterior building materials, façade
and building orientation standards.
• All 3 buildings should provide “360-degree architecture” with active street fronts on the
ground level and pedestrian scaled architecture for at least the first 2 levels.
• Given the site’s location adjacent to the Blake Road light rail transit station, pedestrian and
bicycle access to and through this site will be essential. The applicant shall revise their plans
to meet or exceed the City’s landscaping, streetscape, bicycle, sidewalk and trail standards.
• The applicant shall conduct a Travel Demand Management study as required by the Mixed
Use District and Hennepin County.
As a concept plan review, no public hearing was required. However, the City did require the
applicant to hold a virtual neighborhood meeting. The applicant mailed invitations to property
and business owners within 350’ of the subject property (the same notification distance as a
public hearing). A summary of the community comments from the concept plan neighborhood
meeting focused on the following topics:
• Business displacement and a need to incorporate affordable neighborhood serving
commercial uses
• Need for affordable and larger apartment units with 3-4 bedrooms
• The importance of pedestrian scaled architecture
• The importance of pedestrian and bicycle access to and through the site
The City Council reviewed the Environmental Assessment Worksheet in October of 2020 and
made a negative declaration of need regarding the EAW. Based on the review of the project,
reasonably expected environmental impacts, and the findings of fact and conclusions in the
EAW, the City found that the project does not have the potential for significant environmental
effects and that where there may be environmental impacts, they can be addressed through the
permitting process.
COMMUNITY COMMENT
Neighborhood Meeting. The City’s public engagement process for this development goes
above and beyond the typical statutory requirements for a public hearing and review by the
Planning & Zoning Commission and approval by the City Council. It also requires the applicant
to host a neighborhood meeting before the public hearing to explain the project, answer
questions and take any comments. This meeting took place on July 14, 2021 at 1002 – 2nd Street
Northeast (43 Hoops).
The comments from this meeting are attached for your reference. The meeting included Trilogy
staff and 8 community participants. During the meeting, Trilogy staff presented their proposal
and took questions on the following topics:
• Development site selection process & project timeline
• Types of units and potential rents
• Displacement of existing businesses
• Public financial participation in the project
City Council Report 2021-076
Page 4
• Environmental issues
• Potential use of solar panels
Planning & Zoning Commission Action. The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this
item (Planning Application 2021-07) during their July 27, 2021 meeting. Prior to the public
hearing, the City received 19 email comments generally opposed to the proposal but with a few
supporting it. Comments in the emails focused on the need for affordable housing and
commercial space, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, displacement of existing businesses,
environmental concerns and the need for an equitable development review of the proposal.
Email comments were provided from the following individuals and are attached for your
reference.
• Svetlana Traun
• Larry Hiscock
• Andrew Reinhardt
• Jay Graham
• Lee Gilbertson
• Connie Krauth
• Vyonne Howg
• Joe Gardner
• Mary Jane Yue
• Dawn & Chris Conte
• Barb Ricke
• Andrew Marcelino-Schalkwyk
• Hopkins Housing Team
• Stacey Anderson
• Eric Anondson
• April Grande
• Ravi Ramalingam
• John Frid
• Butch Johnson & Billie Kraut
During the meeting, the Commission also heard a presentation from staff and held a public
hearing that produced several public comments opposed to the development. Comments during
the public hearing focused on the need for: additional public engagement, assistance for
displaced businesses, affordable housing and commercial space, and an equitable development
review of the proposal. Those speaking during the public hearing included:
• Abdi Muse
• Janet Omazik
• Brent Kummer
• Lee Gilbertson
• Larry Hiscock
• Andrew Reinhardt
The Commission discussed each of these items and expressed sympathy for the business
owner’s situation and general support for additional City Council attention on the other
concerns that were beyond the zoning regulations. After some additional general discussion of
the proposal, the Planning & Zoning Commission approved motions recommending the City
Council approve both the rezoning and site plan for Site A.
REZONING & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property from B-4, Neighborhood Business
and I-1, Industrial to Mixed Use with a planned unit development (PUD) consistent with the
Activity Center Future Land Use guiding in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The PUD
establishes the Mixed Use district and its development regulations as the base zone and
standards for review. Overall, the PUD entitles lot configuration, access and private road
configuration, and building height for all 3 sites as well as the setback standards for Site A.
These standards will be used for the site plan review for Site A below. Sites B and C will be
City Council Report 2021-076
Page 2
required to receive separate site plan review and approval based on the entitlements established
in the PUD Master Plan detailed above and the specific zoning standards of the Mixed Use
district. Deviations from the Mixed Use standards for Sites B or C other than those noted
above will require either a minor or major amendment to the planned unit development.
It should be noted that applicant’s narrative notes their intent to subdivide the property as part
of future development for Sites B and C. Because this project is along a county road, both the
City of Hopkins and Hennepin County will have plat review authority. With any subdivision,
the City has the ability to collect park dedication in the form of land or a fee-in-lieu. The current
park dedication fee for multiple family residential subdivisions is $3,000 per unit while the
commercial fee is an amount equal to five (5) percent of the fair market value of the commercial
land as estimated by the county assessor. The applicant has requested and the City has agreed to
apply the current park dedication fees to their future subdivision and that fee will apply to the
development on all 3 sites.
Rezoning applications are considered a legislative action. When considering legislative actions,
the City is advancing health, safety, and welfare by making rules that apply throughout the entire
community. By including the PUD in this case, the zoning standards are only specific to the
subject properties. There are three key criteria for the City to weigh when considering a
rezoning request – consistency with the comprehensive plan, compatibility with present and
future land uses and how the proposed development conforms with the new zoning standards.
These criteria and staff's findings for each are detailed below.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Rezoning the subject properties from B-4,
Neighborhood Business and I-1, Industrial to Mixed Use with a planned unit development
(PUD) is consistent with the Activity Center Future Land Use guiding in the 2040
Comprehensive Plan. Activity Centers surrounds and supports the planned Blake Road and
Shady Oak light rail stations along the Southwest LRT Green Line Extension. These areas are
planned to include moderate to high density mixed use development designed to complement
and enhance the existing development pattern in these areas and support the public investment
in transit.
The Activity Center areas are expected to experience significant reinvestment and
redevelopment to absorb a substantial portion of the city’s anticipated future growth.
Development in the Activity Center areas is expected to be medium to larger scale
neighborhood and regional uses with an approximate mix of 75% residential and 25%
commercial. Densities in these areas will typically range from 20-60 units per acre, with 75-150
units per acre within ¼ mile of an LRT station platform. The applicant’s plan illustrates an
overall residential density of 120 units per acre, which is consistent with the Activity Center
category standards; however, it falls short of the commercial space percentage guideline. The
following goals from the comprehensive plan support the proposed development:
• Encourage transit-oriented development (development that emphasizes pedestrian and
bicycle connectivity and a broader mix of uses at densities that support transit) in areas with
high quality transit service, especially within a quarter mile of light rail stations or high-
frequency bus routes.
• Plan for appropriate amenities, high-quality design, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and open
space in high growth areas, particularly in the Neighborhood Center, Activity Center, and
City Council Report 2021-076
Page 3
Downtown Center future land use categories or other areas in close proximity to transit.
• Encourage the transition of selected auto-oriented areas into Activity Centers, as defined and
designated in the comprehensive plan.
• Improve pedestrian and bicycle access throughout the community, particularly in the Centers
future land use categories as defined and designated in the comprehensive plan or other
areas in close proximity to transit.
• Engage the community to explore how to increase the mix of housing types near transit
corridors, parks, and the Centers future land use categories as defined and designated in the
comprehensive plan.
• Encourage all new projects to have a positive relationship to the street by orienting main
entrances to the front of the property, connecting the front door to the sidewalk, and
reducing parking between the building and the street as much as possible.
Compatibility with Present and Future Land Uses. Rezoning the subject properties from B-
4, Neighborhood Business and I-1, Industrial to Mixed Use with a planned unit development
(PUD) is consistent with surrounding present and future land uses. These uses are detailed in
the table below.
Surrounding Existing and Future Land Uses Analysis
Direction Existing 2040 Future Land Use
North Future Southwest LRT Station
and Rail Corridor
Activity Center
South Blake School Campus Activity Center
East Multiple Family Residential Activity Center
West Commercial/Industrial Activity Center
Conformance with New Zoning Standards. Generally, the overall development site meets
the development standards for the Mixed Uses district with the exception of building height,
signage for Goodwill, floor to area ratio (FAR), setbacks, parking stall dimensions, building
façade articulation, and exterior building materials. These deviations are acceptable based on the
overall planned unit development proposal from the applicant which includes transit supportive
densities, ground floor walk-up units, enhanced landscaping, pet exercise area, extra bicycle
facilities and energy efficiency measures.
The zoning regulations for the Mixed Use district include both development and dimensional
regulations and are reviewed in detail for Site A in the Site Plan Review section below. Sites B
and C will require separate future site plan review to insure conformance with the PUD Master
Development plan and zoning standards of the mixed use district.
SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR SITE A
Standards for reviewing site plan applications are detailed in Article IV of the City Code. This
section establishes the site plan review procedure and provides regulations pertaining to the
enforcement of site design standards. These procedures are established to promote high quality
development that ensures long-term stability of residential neighborhoods and enhance the built
and natural environments within the City as new development and redevelopment activities
occur. In this case, site plan review is required to review construction of a new building. Staff
has reviewed the proposed development against the zoning regulations for the Mixed Use
City Council Report 2021-076
Page 4
district. Staff’s review and findings for each of these regulations are detailed below.
Height. The applicant’s plans call for the height of all three buildings to exceed the Mixed Use
district standard which is acceptable under the overall planned unit development. The Mixed
Use district height standards for the Blake Road Station Area allows 3-4 stories for residential
structures and 5-6 stories for mixed use buildings. The 7-story buildings on Sites B and C are
acceptable under the planned unit development but will require separate site plan review prior to
construction.
This site plan application specifically reviews Site A which includes a 7-story mixed use building
with 220 residential units and 2,106 square feet of commercial space. As a mixed use building,
the Mixed Use district would allow building to be up to 6 stories in height. The proposed 7-
story building is acceptable in this case under the overall planned unit development.
Floor to Area Ratio (FAR). As designed, the Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) for site A meets the
standard of the Mixed Use district. Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) is a measurement of density
calculated by dividing the floor area of a building by the lot area of the parcel on which the
building is located. In the Blake Road Station Area, the FAR standard is a minimum of 2 and a
maximum of 3 for residential buildings and a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 5 for mixed use
buildings. The building on Site A is considered a mixed use building because it includes
commercial space. With a proposed FAR of 3.46, the building on Site A conforms to the 3 to 5
FAR Mixed Use district standard for mixed use buildings.
Setbacks. As designed, the building on Site A does not meet the setback standards for the
Mixed Use district. The table below compares the required and proposed setbacks for Site A.
This design results in a pedestrian and transit focused site layout and is acceptable under the
overall planned unit development.
Setback Review for Blake Road Station – Site A
Setback Standard Proposed Status
Front (South) 15’ – 25’ 8’ -7 Non-Conforming
Side (East) 10’ 28’ +18 Non-Conforming
Side (west) 10’ 6’ -4 Non-Conforming
Rear (North) 10’ 0’ -10 Non-Conforming
Off-Street Parking & Travel Demand Management. The applicant’s Traffic Impact Analysis is
attached as a reference. Overall, this study confirmed the City’s off-street parking requirements
were adequate for all 3 buildings. A specific review of Site A finds the proposed off-street
parking meets the requirements of the Mixed Use district. These standards require residential
uses provide a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 1.5 enclosed parking stalls per unit and 1 guest
stall per 15 units. Using these standards, the 220 unit building proposed for Site A is required to
provide at least 235 off-street parking stalls and 256 are proposed. This results in 21 more stalls
than required under the Mixed Use district standards and a parking ratio of 1.16 stalls/unit.
It should be noted that the building on Site A also includes 2,106 square feet of commercial
space. The Traffic Impact Study found the development provided adequate off-street parking
for up to 11,000 square feet of commercial space with this space and its associated 32 parking
stalls in Site B. The applicant will be required to demonstrate how they intend to manage off-
street parking for the commercial space on Site A until completion of Site B and its 32
City Council Report 2021-076
Page 5
commercial off-street parking spaces.
Bicycle Parking. Site A exceeds the short-term and long-term bicycle parking standards for the
Mixed Use district. For multifamily residential, the Mixed Use district requires 1 long-term
space per 2 units and 1 short-term space per 20 units or a total of 121 bicycle parking spaces.
The applicant proposes over 200 bicycle parking spaces in either a centralized bicycle parking
room located at the southwest corner of Building A or at the ends of many of the vehicle
parking stalls within the building. The bicycle parking room will include a fix-it station and there
will also be a bike wash area in the P1 parking level.
For the retail space, the Mixed Use district bicycle parking requirements are 0.5 long-term spaces
per employee and 0.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of net building area. Based on these
standards the applicant estimates 3 required spaces but is planning for 8 spaces directly along
Excelsior Boulevard next to the planned retail space. At least 1 of these spaces must be long-
term and located inside the building.
Shadow Study. The Mixed Use district requires a shadow study for all buildings four stories or
higher and the applicant has included this study with their plans. According to the Mixed Use
district standards, the shadow study must indicate the shadows cast at the shortest and longest
days of the year. Impacts of a shadow on the surrounding property may be a reason to lower
and/or adjust the location or height of buildings. Staff review of the shadow study finds little to
no impact on adjacent properties even with the additional height to 7-stories allowed through
the PUD.
Exterior. The Mixed Use district requires the primary exterior treatment (80%) of walls facing a
public right-of–way or parking lot on a structure shall be brick, cast concrete, stone, marble or
other material similar in appearance and durability. Regular or decorative concrete block, float
finish stucco, EIFS-type stucco, cementitious fiberboard, or wood clapboard may be used on the
front façade as a secondary treatment or trim (up to 20%) but shall not be a primary exterior
treatment of a wall facing a public right-of-way. The proposed exterior materials for the
building on Site A are summarized in the table below.
Site A Exterior Materials
Material North South East West
Glass 29% 32% 30% 27%
Metal Panel Tile Siding 33% 42% 40% 18%
Smooth Tile 5% 9% 7% 7%
Brick Veneer 21% 13% 14% 19%
Fiber Cement
Lap Siding
12% 4% 8% 29%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
Of the proposed exterior materials detailed above, only the brick qualifies as a primary material
and it covers 21% of the north, 13% of the south, 14% of the east and 19% of the west sides of
the building on Site A. While these are significantly less than the requirement, the applicant
notes that the brick material is concentrated on the first two levels of all sides of the building to
enhance the ground level pedestrian experience. This design and mix of materials for the
building on Site A is acceptable under the overall planned unit development.
City Council Report 2021-076
Page 6
The Mixed Use district zoning standards do not specifically call out exterior building material
standards for interior “courtyard” facing elevations. For your reference, the applicants plan also
provides this information which is summarized in the table below.
Site A Courtyard Exterior Materials
Material North South East West
Glass 39% 25% 34% 25%
Metal Panel Tile Siding 0% 71% 15% 51%
Smooth Tile 2% 2% 2% 1%
Fiber Cement
Lap Siding
59% 0% 49% 22%
Wood Accent
Siding
0% 0% 0% 1%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
Building Orientation. The building on Site A conforms to the building orientation standards of
the Mixed Use district. Buildings within the Mixed Use district must be oriented toward the
pedestrian by providing a direct link between each building and the pedestrian walking system,
with emphasis on directing people to a transit station. The applicant’s plans for Site A show the
building will have pedestrian connections to the existing sidewalk along Blake Road and will
eventually connect with the sidewalks and streets planned for Sites B and C and the City’s
sidewalk and trail system. Staff recommends a condition of approval require the applicant to
create a plan to allow residents, visitors and patrons of Site A to access both the City’s sidewalk
and trail system and the Blake Road LRT station until Sites B and C are complete.
Façade. The building on Site A does not meet the façade articulation standards of the Mixed
Use district. These standards require the primary street side façade of a building shall not
consist of an unarticulated blank wall, flat front facades or an unbroken series of garage doors.
The front of a building shall be broken up into individual bays of a minimum of 25 feet and
maximum of 40 feet wide.
The applicant’s plans show two sections of Levels 1 and 2 on all four sides of the building on
Site A with bays larger than 40 feet (see attached plans and narrative). According to the
applicant, this design is a result of the parking design on Level 2. While this design does not
technically meet the Mixed Use district standard, all four sides of the building are articulated
with other architectural elements that help break up these elevations. As a result, this design is
acceptable under the overall planned unit development.
Sidewalks. Site A meets the sidewalk standards of the Mixed Use district. The Mixed Use
district requires a minimum 5-foot wide sidewalk along the frontage of all public streets and
within and along the frontage of all new development or redevelopment. The applicant’s plans
illustrate sidewalks of at least 5 feet along all four sides of Site A.
Pedestrian/Streetscapes. The Mixed Use district requires pedestrian streetscape improvements
along all sidewalks. Pedestrian improvements of at least 25 percent of the landscaping budget
shall be included in the development. These improvements shall create a high quality pedestrian
experience through the provision of benches, planters, drinking fountains, waste containers,
median landscaping and the like. Pedestrian-scale light fixtures that shine downward on the
City Council Report 2021-076
Page 7
sidewalks and walkways shall be no greater than 12 feet in height and must be provided along all
sidewalks and walkways to provide ample lighting during nighttime hours for employees,
residents, and customers. The applicant’s plans appear to meet these standards. Staff
recommends a condition of approval require the applicant to provide more detailed streetscape
information for street furniture and light (see also landscaping and exterior lighting sections
below).
Landscaping. The applicant’s landscape plan for Site A exceeds the landscaping standards for
the Mixed Use district. According to the applicant’s estimates, this project is required to provide
$90,000 in landscape improvements with at least 25% allocated to pedestrian/streetscape
improvements (see section above). In this case, the applicant’s plans include $226,000 of total
landscaping improvements with $163,000 of plantings, fencing and irrigation and $63,000 (or
28%) in pedestrian/streetscape improvements. Staff recommends a condition of approval
require the applicant to provide a landscape and pedestrian/streetscape letter of credit in a form
acceptable to the City Attorney for 125% of the value of all improvements. The City will hold
the letter of credit until the plantings have survived at least one growing season and the applicant
has installed the pedestrian/streetscape improvements.
Signs, Canopies and Awnings. The site plan for Site A does not include a sign plan. All signs
must be approved through a separate administrative permit subject to conformance with the
standards of the Mixed Use district and sign regulations contained in Article XXI - Signs. It
should be noted that the PUD includes a specific approval for a specific sign to be installed on
Site B. This item is addressed in the PUD section above and not part of the site plan review for
Site A.
Trash Enclosure. The applicant plans to store trash containers within the underground parking
garage. The applicant shall designate an on-site location for trash pickup. Trash pick-up shall
not occur within the public right-of-way.
Exterior Lighting. The applicant’s plans for Site A do not include exterior lighting or
photometric plans. Pedestrian-scale light fixtures that shine downward on the sidewalks and
walkways shall be no greater than 12 feet in height and must be provided along all sidewalks and
walkways to provide ample lighting during nighttime hours for employees, residents, and
customers. Staff recommends a condition of approval require the applicant submit and receive
approval of a detailed lighting and photometric plan for Site A prior to action on this item by the
City Council. This plan shall include both pedestrian-scale street lights (no greater than 12’ in
height) as well as all building exterior lighting, light fixture spec sheets and photometric data.
Stormwater Treatment. The applicant’s narrative includes stormwater treatment information that
indicates it exceeds both the City’s and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District’s (MCWD)
standards. For Site A, the majority of the stormwater treatment and attenuation will occur
underground given existing site constraints. In summary, the new landscaping will help with
stormwater abstraction and the underground treatment system will retain and treat stormwater
in excess of MCWD and City standards. The proposed on-site stormwater management system
exceeds MCWD/City standards by providing filtration treatment above the required 2” rainfall
event. The detention system has the volume capacity to treat up to a 2.59” rainfall event. The
proposed Jellyfish Filter system has the capacity to treat a flow rate of 2.92 CFS and the
modelled flow rate is 2.62 CFS, allowing for an additional contributing flow rate of 0.3 CFS.
City Council Report 2021-076
Page 8
ENGINEERING REVIEW
The Engineering Department offers the following comments.
• Conformance with all requirements of the Traffic Impact Study.
• The plan will be subject to Hennepin County review in addition to the City, whereby the
County will have authority regarding access along County Roads, review of traffic impacts,
and potential necessary improvements to maintain safe and acceptable traffic operations.
• The plan will be subject to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) review in
addition to the City, as the MCWD is the permitting authority for storm water.
• West of the site there is a localized low area that is currently not served by gravity storm
sewer, and does take significant runoff from the site. The drainage plan must address this
issue to mitigate the flooding that occurs at 8660 and 8700 Excelsior Boulevard.
• Construction of Pierce Avenue and the SWLRT Park and Ride by the Metropolitan Council
includes extension of new water main from Blake Road. The proposed water main extension
to serve the Blake Road Station site from Excelsior Boulevard must connect to the new
main in Pierce Avenue.
• The City has a sanitary lift station along Excelsior Boulevard, which must remain operational
and accessible.
• Water and sewer infrastructure shall meet City Standards.
• All drive aisles through the site must meet the standards for fire access per the State Fire
Code.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Vote to approve the rezoning, planned unit development & site plan for Site A
applications. By voting to approve these applications, the development will receive
approval of the first reading of the rezoning request and site plan approval for Site A.
2. Vote to deny the rezoning, planned unit development & site plan for Site A
applications. By voting to deny these applications, the development will not receive
approval of the first reading of the rezoning or site plan approval for Site A. Should the
City Council consider this option, it must also identify specific findings that support this
alternative.
3. Continue for further information. If the City Council finds that further information is
needed, the items should be continued.
Site Location Map for Blake Road Station
Subject Property
CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION 2021-042
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 2021-1172
REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES IN THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF
EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD AND BLAKE ROAD WITH PIDS 19-117-21-42-0044, 19-117-21-42-
0045 & 19-117-21-42-0046 TO MIXED USE WITH A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD),
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the applicant, Bryan Farquhar of Trilogy Real Estate Group, initiated an
application requesting to rezone the properties at the northwest corner of Excelsior Boulevard and Blake
Road with PIDs 19-117-21-42-0044, 19-117-21-42-0045 & 19-117-21-42-0046 to Mixed Use with a
Planned Unit Development (PUD), subject to conditions, and
WHEREAS, these properties are legally described as Lots 1, 2 & 3, Hopkins Commerce
Addition; and
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows:
1. That the above stated application was initiated by the applicant on June 25, 2021; and,
2. That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notice,
held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on July 27, 2021: all
persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and,
3. That written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and,
4. That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this application during their July
27, 2021 meeting and recommended approval by the City Council, subject to conditions; and
5. That the Hopkins City Council reviewed this application during their August 2, 2021 meeting
and agreed with the findings of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
WHEREAS, staff recommended approval of the above stated applications based on the findings
outlined in the staff report dated August 2, 2021.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hopkins
hereby approves the first reading of Ordinance 2021-1172 rezoning the properties at the northwest
corner of Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road with PIDs 19-117-21-42-0044, 19-117-21-42-0045 &
19-117-21-42-0046 to Mixed Use with a Planned Unit Development (PUD), subject to the conditions
listed below.
1. Execution of a Planned Unit Development Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
2. Approval of the associated site plan application for Blake Road Station Site A and conformance
with all related conditions.
3. Approval of the development by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and conformance with
all related conditions.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 2nd day of August, 2021.
By:___________________________
Jason Gadd, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION 2021-043
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SITE PLAN FOR BLAKE ROAD STATION SITE A
WITH PID 19-117-21-42-0045, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the applicant, Bryan Farquhar of Trilogy Real Estate Group, initiated an
application for site plan approval for Blake Road Station Site A to allow construction of a 7-story
mixed-use building with 220 residential units and approximately 2,100 square feet of commercial space
on the property located at the northwest corner of Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road with PID 19-
117-21-42-0045; and
WHEREAS, these properties are legally described as Lots 1, 2 & 3, Hopkins Commerce
Addition; and
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows:
1. That the above stated application was initiated by the applicant on June 25, 2021; and,
2. That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notice,
held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on July 27, 2021: all
persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and,
3. That written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and,
4. That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this application during their July
27, 2021 meeting and recommended approval by the City Council, subject to conditions; and
5. That the Hopkins City Council reviewed this application during their August 2, 2021 meeting
and agreed with the findings of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
WHEREAS, staff recommended approval of the above stated applications based on the findings
outlined in the staff report dated August 2, 2021.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hopkins
hereby approves the site plan for Blake Road Station Site A to allow construction of a 7-story mixed-use
building with 220 residential units and approximately 2,100 square feet of commercial space on the
property located at the northwest corner of Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road with PID 19-117-21-
42-0045, subject to the conditions listed below.
1. Conformance with all applicable standards of the Mixed Use District.
2. Approval of the associated rezoning application and execution of a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
3. The applicant will be required to demonstrate how they intend to manage off-street parking
for the commercial space on Site A until completion of Site B and its 32 commercial off-
street parking spaces.
4. At least 1 of the bicycle parking spaces required for the commercial space in Site A shall be a
long-term space located inside the building.
5. The applicant shall create a plan to allow residents, visitors and patrons of Site A to access
both the City’s sidewalk and trail system and the Blake Road LRT station until Sites B and C
are completed prior to issuance of a building permit.
6. The applicant shall provide a streetscape plan detailing the specific improvements planned
for Site A prior to issuance of a building permit.
7. The applicant shall provide more detail as to how and where the trash will be placed for
pickup. This placement must be located on the applicant’s property and shall not interfere
with normal vehicle or pedestrian movement through the site.
8. Submission and approval of exterior lighting and photometric plans prior to issuance of a
building permit. These plans shall cover the entire site and demonstrate downward directed
light fixtures, poles no higher than twenty (20) feet and light levels equal to or less than 1.0
lumens at any non-residential property line or 0.5 lumens at any residential property line.
9. Provision a landscape letter of credit equal to 1.5 times the cost of all plantings and
streetscape improvements in a form acceptable to the City Attorney prior to issuance of a
building permit. The City shall hold this security until all streetscape improvements have
been installed and all plantings have survived at least one full growing season.
10. The applicant shall demonstrate all equipment will be screened in conformance with all
zoning requirements.
11. Conformance with all requirements of Hennepin County and the Metropolitan Council.
12. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer.
13. Approval of all necessary permits from the Building, Engineering and Fire Departments.
14. Approval of the development by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and conforms with
all related conditions.
15. Payment of all applicable development fees including, but not limited to SAC, park
dedication and City Attorney fees.
16. The applicant has indicated their intent to subdivide the properties as part of the future
development of Sites B or C. The applicant has requested and the City has agreed to lock in
the current park dedication fees ($3,000/unit and 5% of the fair market value of the
commercial land as estimated by the county assessor) and apply them to the development on
all 3 sites as part of any future subdivision of any of the 3 parcels.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 2nd day of August, 2021.
By:___________________________
Jason Gadd, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
1
CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-1172
AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES IN THE NORTHWEST
QUADRANT OF EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD AND BLAKE ROAD WITH PIDS 19-117-
21-42-0044, 19-117-21-42-0045 & 19-117-21-42-0046 TO MIXED USE
WITH A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
1. That the present zoning classifications of B-4, Neighborhood Business District or I-1, General
Industrial District, upon the following described premises are hereby repealed, and in lieu
thereof, said premises are hereby rezoned as follows:
• PID 19-117-21-42-0044 from I-1, General Industrial to Mixed Use with a Planned
Unit Development (PUD)
• PID 19-117-21-42-0045 from B-4, Neighborhood Business District to Mixed Use
District with a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
• PID 19-117-21-42-0046 from B-4, Neighborhood Business District to Mixed Use
District with a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
2. The legal description of the properties to be rezoned are as follows:
• Lot 1, Block 1, Hopkins Commerce Center Addition (PID 19-117-21-42-0044)
• Lot 2, Block 1, Hopkins Commerce Center Addition (PID 19-117-21-42-0045)
• Lot 3, Block 1, Hopkins Commerce Center Addition (PID 19-117-21-42-0046)
First Reading: August 2, 2021
Second Reading: August 17, 2021
Date of Publication: August 26, 2021
Date Ordinance Takes Effect: August 26, 2021
________________________
ATTEST: Jason Gadd, Mayor
__________________________
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
Dear Hopkins Planning and Zoning Commission Members,
We are writing with comments in regard to the Blake Road Station development proposed by
Trilogy Real Estate Group, and ask you to encourage development in the city that includes
affordable housing options, that responds to needs expressed by community members such as
housing with 3 or 4 bedrooms, and that provides affordable retail space for
neighborhood-supporting businesses.
In 2013, Hennepin County’s Southwest LRT Community Works program completed a Housing
Inventory, a summary of housing and demographic data for each of the station areas along the
Southwest LRT. This report counts 16 multi-family rental developments (of 12+ units) containing
1,857 units within the Blake Road station area of Hopkins. All sixteen of these properties are
market-rate apartments. None of the properties are income-restricted affordable housing, and
only three of these market-rate buildings accepted some Housing Choice Vouchers, a voluntary
program not required of apartment managers and owners. Except for one 51-unit apartment
building built by Project for Pride in Living in 2017 that provides dedicated affordable housing,
housing in the Blake Road neighborhood remains predominantly market-rate.
Although the Blake Road station area has little legally binding affordable housing, the
market-rate housing that exists in the neighborhood has tended to be more affordable in rental
prices. The Housing Inventory notes that for the 13 (out of 16) market rate properties in the
Blake Road station area in Hopkins for which rents were known at the time of the study, all are
affordable at 60% AMI or less, with most affordable at 50% AMI.
According to the Housing Inventory, “the Blake Road station area had the highest population
with nearly 5,400 persons” within a half-mile radius (an area only slightly larger than the Blake
Road neighborhood, but a close approximation). The report also notes that the Blake Road
station area has one of the highest populations of people of color (52%), the highest percent
(26%) of people 19 years old and younger, and was one of only four that averaged over two
people per household.
Having a clear understanding of the housing within the Blake Road neighborhood is crucial.
While housing in the Blake Road neighborhood has provided a more affordable place to live for
many Hopkins residents, with much of this housing being market rate, there is no guarantee that
the rental prices will remain at more affordable levels into the future. As new market-rate
buildings like the proposed Trilogy development arrive in the neighborhood, nearby properties
will face increasing pressure. Unless a concerted effort is made to ensure affordable housing is
included within new developments, it will not be possible to make up for all that is at risk of
being lost.
The Hopkins Community Housing Team formed in 2017 due to concerns around housing
stability in Hopkins. These concerns included not only the growing pressures within the housing
market, but also this risk to affordable housing that construction of the Southwest LRT poses as
demand to live and own property in the station areas increases.
Since forming in 2017, our housing team has organized listening sessions, compiled surveys of
Hopkins renters, hosted several community meetings including one attended by city staff and a
council member, and coordinated a housing forum with a resource fair and community
discussion. We have so far connected with close to 200 community members. Consistently, in
these conversations on housing in Hopkins, top concerns include increased rents, fear of
displacement, a desire for more affordable housing, a need for units with more bedrooms,
wanting to feel included in the city, among others.
As expressed in these community conversations and in documents such as the Blake Road
Station Area Development Guidelines and the Hopkins 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the desire
for development projects that support an inclusive, connected, healthy, and equitable community
is clear. We ask you to encourage development projects that acknowledge and respond to these
community concerns. We also ask that you require meaningful community engagement to be an
integral part of the development process.
Thank you for your consideration,
The Hopkins Community Housing Team
From:Andrew Schalkwyk
To:Jason Lindahl
Cc:hopkins4equity@gmail.com
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Blake and Excelsior Development
Date:Monday, July 26, 2021 6:29:49 PM
Hi!
I live a few blocks south of the Blake school and am excited to see the possibility of increased
density proposed in the development at Blake and Excelsior.
That area is not a vibrant commercial center and more density would be a boon to everyone.
I would also strongly encourage you to listen to or read the transcript of Ezra Klein’s
NYTimes podcast about the causes of America’s housing crisis, discussing how misguided
“progressive” arguments are used to halt development for local resident’s narrow self interest
at the expense of the community as a whole:
How Blue Cities became so Outrageously Unaffordable.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/23/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-jerusalem-demsas.html
Particularly salient is the point about how housing costs are typically and have historically
been lowered primarily by more expensive “luxury” options being built.
Andrew
--
Andrew Marcelino-Schalkwyk
(617) 642-8816
Page 1 of 1
Advance Medical Equipment
(Formerly CW Healthcare)
8572 Excelsior Blvd
Hopkins, MN 55343
26 July 2021
Subject: Blake Road Station Development – Existing Business Impact
Dear HOPKINS CITY COUNCIL
We appreciate your taking time to allow us to address our concerns as a business, and a
supplier of home medical equipment. Our company has been proudly serving the residents of
Hopkins for over three years as tenants of Hopkins Commerce Center. As business owners,
and contributors to the community, we support progress and are encouraged the city of Hopkins
is proactively partnering with developers who can renovate and develop new living and
commerce areas for the city. In the redevelopment plan there will be well-funded and thriving
entities who benefit economically; subsequently, small and disadvantaged businesses will be
displaced and burdened with additional costs. We are appealing for a solution that benefits all.
Relocating a business is a very time intensive, and costly endeavor. Doing it quickly, so
operations can resume in the shortest time possible, requires the services of costly moving
companies with lots of manpower. Moving without the expense of subcontractors means
sacrificing weeks, possibly months, of revenue while the business is closed for a longer period.
In either scenario, the collective losses in revenue and increased costs are likely to exceed
$30,000 for our business alone. As a small Veteran owned business already recovering from
the 40% drop in revenue that occurred during the COVID pandemic, we are underprepared to
sustain additional costs of this magnitude.
We are not appealing for an individual bail-out or trying to delay the redevelopment plan that will
ultimately make Hopkins a better community. Rather, if the City Council has not already
considered it, we are asking for a relocation stipend for the few businesses who will be
negatively impacted by the redevelopment. If this were not a highly profitable endeavor for
many, it is unlikely this project would be a consideration. As such, a relocation stipend for the
few who are being displaced would be a compassionate, inexpensive, and equitable decision. It
would also affirm the City of Hopkins is committed to working not only with those who are
building a better community in the future, but also to those who have already helped make
Hopkins a community where others want to invest.
We thank you for your consideration of our request and look forward to all the exciting new
developments in the City of Hopkins.
Kind Regards,
Andrew Reinhardt
President
Office: (952) 426-4812
Mobile: (612) 300-7747
From:aprilgrande
To:Jason Lindahl
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Redevelopment
Date:Monday, July 26, 2021 5:39:38 PM
I am very much against the proposal to redevelop the corner of Excelsior and Blake Rd.I am
concerned about the displacement of people employed by the many businesses there. I am a
member of Curves, one of the few left in our area, so this change would displace me, too.I also
don’t like the idea of an apartment building with zero affordable units for low and middle-
income people.
Please vote against this proposal.
Thank you.
April Grande
Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS
From:Barb Ricke
To:Jason Lindahl
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Blake Road Station Development Displacement of Businesses
Date:Monday, July 26, 2021 6:37:53 PM
I am writing regarding the proposed development at Blake and Excelsior. This affects many
businesses in that area which includes the gym that I have gone to for many years. I want my
gym to stay there.
I lived in Hopkins for about 20 years, very close to this area. It does not need a huge
populated apartment building in that area. That corner is currently very busy and you want to
add 770 apartments which adds to more than 1000 people in that small area, leading to a
traffic nightmare. I also understand that none of those apartments will be affordable units.
Shame on you. Every building Hopkins approves now should have a percentage set as
affordable, at least 10% of the building total apartments.
I also understand that you denied a request for the business owners/community members to
talk with the city about this project. You clearly do not care about the businesses in Hopkins,
you just want the tax dollars from these high cost apartments you continue to allow to be
built.
Barb Ricke
From:butch@aabaca.com
To:Jason Lindahl
Cc:Billee Kraut
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Inclusionary / Mixed Rate Housing Trilogy Project
Date:Friday, July 23, 2021 11:54:02 AM
>
Hi Jason,
We're writing to encourage the development of the Trilogy project to
include a portion of affordable housing. We're supporters of
inclusionary/mixed rate housing and do not support building projects
that only allow for a certain economic base (economic silos). It's
important when building housing communities that all economic parties
are allowed to reside in the same building.We believe when building
housing communities it's important to encourage and allow neighbors to
get to know each other.
We do support the Blake 325 and understand this project to include
mixed market and senior housing.
Butch Johnson and Billee Kraut
140 11th Ave. N.Hopkins, MN 55343
612-250-6309 Butch's cell
From:Connie Krauth
To:Jason Lindahl
Cc:hopkins4equity@gmail.com
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Save Hopkins Curves
Date:Tuesday, July 27, 2021 9:41:16 AM
Please consider delaying demolition of the strip mall that includes Curves on Excelsior Blvd. It is a popular
workout spot and one of the few remaining Curves in the twin cities.
Please support this small business that has worked so hard to survive during the COVID virus. Employees and
members of Curves have been steadfast in their support of this health club for many years. The cost of finding and
preparing a new space up against the timeline of demolition is very tight and may result in the end of this franchise.
Please look at other alternatives.
Thank you.
Connie Krauth
Curves member of 20 years.
Sent from my iPhone
From:dawn conte
To:Jason Lindahl
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Hopkins Commerce Center
Date:Monday, July 26, 2021 8:02:48 PM
Dear Mr. Lindahl,
I am writing this email on behalf of the Hopkins Commerce Center business owners,
employees and patrons.
In May 2019, my husband and I moved to Hopkins from Baltimore City. As you can
imagine, it was a big change. Over the past two years, Hopkins has become our home.
I am convinced there is no better city in Minnesota. The reason? The people. This
close knit community is unlike any other. Hopkins residents, especially during the
pandemic, came together to support not only one another, but the small businesses as
well. It breaks my heart to learn that the small businesses of Hopkins Commerce
Center, which fought so hard to successfully survive the pandemic, will now be lost to
"progress".
Many of the businesses cater to Hopkins underserved residents: Goodwill, though not
local, is essential as it provides affordable clothing and household goods, Sambusa
King and Shanghai Market bring comfort, familiarity and support to newly arrived
(and long standing) immigrant populations and Blake Food Market serves those who
cannot afford Target. Mac's Liquor does more than sell adult beverages. Owner Lee,
Joe and all the other wonderful employees are welcoming, greet customers with a
smile, remember your name and never fail to make you feel better walking out than
when you went in.
This proposal will close over 15 businesses, eliminate 65 jobs, drastically deplete
neighborhood resources, isn't consistent with zoning, etc. Behind each closed business
and job lost is a person, many the sole breadwinners with families to support. This
project will only benefit Trilogy Real Estate, not the citizens of Hopkins. I cannot
imagine the 11,000 square feet of retail, down from 70,000, will be an option to many
residents except those who can afford to live in one of 700+ apartments.
Most importantly, this proposal eliminates the strong, supportive and diverse
community that is Hopkins. It is not easy to build a community. It takes time,
patience, tolerance and understanding. Closing Hopkins Commerce Center destroys
the community Hopkins has worked so hard to build.
Please consider these comments when making your decision. Hopkins is a very special
place to those who live here; that is why we chose to call it our home.
Thank you for your time,
Dawn and Chris Conte
--
Dawn Conte
From:Eric Anondson
To:Jason Lindahl
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Feedback for Site A"s site plan review
Date:Monday, July 26, 2021 6:03:08 PM
Hi Jason,
I am really excited that this development is fulfilling some of the visions conceived in
Hopkins’ East End Land Use and Market Study from 2003. I am very supportive of the
rezoning, the PUD, and the site plan for Site A but I have some feedback related to the site
plan for Blake Road Station, and in particular my interest in the public realm experienced by
pedestrians and and people on bicycles, scooters, and wheelchairs.
The new street to be created needs to take inspiration from the excellent design of 8th Ave
near Mainstreet in these ways.
– The new street should have pedestrians and people on bicycles given priority over fast motor vehicle traffic, this
should be visually communicated that it is a pedestrian space primarily, access for drivers secondary.
– There should be no steep traditional curb on this new street.
– If there will be a steep traditional curb, then the T-intersection by the linear park needs to
have the crossings raised to sidewalk level. Even better, the T-intersection should be raised to
a table at sidewalk level similar to the tabled crossing in the middle of 8th Avenue. This will
visually expand the park-like space of the linear park.
– There should be unforgiving bollards between the linear park and the vehicle traffic.
Along Excelsior Blvd.
– I am grateful for the few trees, the shade offered will be well appreciated in the future of
climate change. However, the Excelsior Blvd-face side of Site A should add deep awnings
where there will be no tree canopy to offer shade and rain protection.
– I would rather the vegetation buffer between the building and the sidewalk be moved to be a
buffer between the speeding drivers on Excelsior Blvd, or used to widen the sidewalk to give
safe space for people on bicycles to pass pedestrians more safely.
– Even if the turning radius of the corner at Pierce meets standards by the book, the radius is
so large that is will be a danger for people crossing Pierce because the very large radius is
going to induce very high speed turns. A safer design should be considered.
– In the case the retail space in Site A can be filled by a restaurant or cafe, I want to make
certain there will be enough sidewalk space for tables and chairs for patrons. The sidewalk
along Excelsior in front of the retail should have SUV-stopping bollards to protect the patrons
and building from reckless driving.
I look forward to giving feedback on the later phases, but I wanted to chime in on Site C.
Based on the shadow study, I am concerned that in winter the Cedar Lake Trail will be in
extended periods of shadow preventing sun from melting show, making trail use dangerously
slippery. I know it is too late for Hopkins to get on the ball and come up with winter shadow
requirements for the bike trail, but I wanted to suggest that the city recommend that Site C be
designed in a way to avoid complete shadow during deep winter. One option to consider
would be that Site C use the “Tower in a Village” design that Alatus is proposing for the SW
corner of 325 Blake. That Alatus proposal includes a 14-story tower with a 2-story building at
the base. In the Site C case, placing a narrow tower along the south east corner and a 3- to 4-
story apron to the west and north will help allow sun access the trail to help melt ice and snow
in deep winter.
Thank your for this chance for feedback!
Eric Anondson
53 Jackson Ave S, Hopkins
From:Jay Graham
To:Judith Graham
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Blake Road Station Development
Date:Tuesday, July 27, 2021 12:28:21 PM
Greetings,
My name is Jay Graham. I am 23 years old, I am student at the University of
Minnesota, and I am writing to you because I am also a full-time manager at Mac's
Liquor, one of several businesses who stand to lose a lot in the current proposal for
this site redevelopment. I'd like to take a moment to share some personal concerns
about this situation.
First of all, I have worked for Mac's for 1.5 years now because as a small business
they've been able to accommodate my school schedule in a way that most jobs are
unwilling to do. I also earn enough money to support myself while still working at a job
that doesn't require me to miss classes, a situation that is not as common as one
might think. Additionally, as a person with Autism who has a hard time functioning in
many work environments, I appreciate my job at Mac's because it has given me an
environment where I can perform independently without struggling, which is not so
easy to find. So from a self-concerned perspective, I strongly oppose this plan by
Trilogy group that would involve removing my source of income and potentially
destroying the business completely.
Secondly, I'd like to point out that this plan is at odds with the portion of Hopkins' Vision
Statement which states that Hopkins is “Creating a spirit of community where all people feel
safe and respected, and diversity is celebrated.” On the contrary, this plan would eliminate
several immigrant community hubs and businesses and leave their owners with no place to go.
The Shanghai Asian Market in this mall is the only Asian store in the nearby area, not to
mention that it is one of the better Asian markets outside of the main cities. Not only Asian
people shop here either; if you stop in you will see many other community members shopping
for items that aren't available in standard stores. The Somali community relies heavily on the
Halal market and Sambusa King restaurant, and the owners of these businesses have invested
in trying to improve the appearance of their storefronts and the corner in general. These are
only a few of the businesses in this corner that are either owned by, or primarily staffed by,
immigrants, single families, and small scale entrepreneurs. None of these businesses are likely
to survive if they are forced to spend thousands to move to a new location and away from their
client base to be replaced by a large apartment complex that will not even be affordable for
most residents of Hopkins. Not very celebratory of diversity, I would say, which brings me to
another issue with this development.
The website for the city of Hopkins states that "While Hopkins may be known for our quaint
single-family neighborhoods, the majority of our homes are rental. Because of our great
location, availability of jobs, affordable rents and variety of housing types, Hopkins is often
the first home for people moving to the Twin Cities area." The corner of Blake and Excelsior
is already home to several lower income apartment complexes, and to build a luxury one
nearby is almost certain to raise the rents for surrounding buildings as well.
Merriam-Webster defines gentrification as follows: "a process in which a poor area (as of a
city) experiences an influx of middle-class or wealthy people who renovate and rebuild homes
and businesses and which often results in an increase in property values and the displacement
of earlier, usually poorer residents." An influx of (upper) middle-class and wealthy people is
exactly what this kind of development is seeking to attract, to the detriment of the current
occupants and community. Not to mention that this project is at odds with the "availability of
jobs", since it would eliminate at least 75 jobs from this part of Hopkins.
There are many other issues with this proposed project that I will not elaborate on here, but
which include the fact that it affects walkability of the area, it will require subsidies from the
city that will not come back to the benefit of the surrounding community, it does not provide
affordable housing, it cuts retail for the area in general to 1/7th of its current capacity, and it
does not fit with current zoning regulations in the area. I trust that you are already making
yourselves aware of these and other concerns.
I realize that perhaps it looks more lucrative to you to build expensive new apartments and
leave the small business owners and lower income community to sink or swim, but I have
hopes that this is not what Hopkins is about. I hope that you will not allow this project to go
forward, at least not without requiring major changes to solve these problems. I hope that what
the city website says is more than just lip service and that the leadership of this city really does
value diversity and the little guys.
Thank you for your continued consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
J Graham
Hello,
My name is Joe Gardner. I work at Mac’s Liquor and have all but 2 years since 2007. I am now disabled
and would struggle in finding an employer that would be as understanding as Lee is. I know that doesn’t
mean anything in your grand scheme of things. I get that. It’s about money and lots of it.
Today’s world we are forgetting about community and the little things that make a community what is.
How many of you have been to a small town and talked to the people about why they live there? It isn’t
about having the most of everything but having what is wanted to just be that spot.
I know that Hopkins isn’t a small town. Drive down the main street. Pretty cool?
The area that you want to put up these ugly buildings, I mean the renderings are awful. That area
doesn’t have much for those around there. Look what is being lost.
Jobs and people’s business. A couple of them that will put the owners of those businesses out of making
a living after putting years into building that business and getting a wonderful clientele.
Yes, Mac’s Liquor is a much-needed business there. Mac’s is the closest liquor store to that part of the
community. Talk to Lee about what Mac’s supplies to the community.
There is that convenience store along Blake Road. So many in that area go to that little shop to get little
things and even a nice meal. Curves. I see a lot of older ladies going in and out of there. Great spot for
our seniors to go and work out and meet with others of their same age.
That is just a small amount of what the community would be losing over some apartments.
84 jobs in total will be lost. 84 people that will have to struggle to find jobs that suit their abilities with
employers that have an understanding of those abilities or little struggles. 84 people. May not seem like
a lot to you, but to those 84 people that’s a lot.
For me? That’s a hell of a lot, but what do I know. I’m just a retired paid on call fire fighter – not
Hopkins- and EMT from a Level 1 Trauma Center that has seen enough pain on the faces of people that
have lost a lot.
I would also like to add: By destroying this area and putting up these “apartments” Eliminating
neighborhood resources. Stores etc. Where is the building of the community? None. They are asking for
rezoning, Why is that? (money) Losing 70k sq ft of retail down to 11k sq ft of retail. Building this would
kill 15 businesses in favor of apartments. What a huge loss of community.
Thanks for your time
Joe Gardner
From:jfrid@lakeweb1.com
To:Jason Lindahl
Cc:hopkins4equity@gmail.com
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Excelsior and Blake Project
Date:Monday, July 26, 2021 5:01:21 PM
Hi,
I am a taxpaying homeowner in Hopkins, and I think this is a GREAT use of the land adjacent to a
light rail station. We SHOULD have high density housing at this location.
I support this project 100%!
John Frid
902 7th Street S
952-881-9322
From:Larry Hiscock
To:Jason Lindahl; equity4hopkins@gmail.com
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Comment on Blake Road Station Development
Date:Tuesday, July 27, 2021 2:19:17 PM
July 27th, 2021
Zoning and Planning Commission,
I want to state my opposition to the current development proposal by Chicago based Trilogy
Real Estate Group and the supporting staff recommendation for the Blake Road Station
Development. I also want to raise significant concerns regarding the explicit disregard of
critical components of the Cultivate Hopkin 2040 Comprehensive plan and process failures
that are causing extreme hardship for business owning community members.
I have lived in Hopkins for eight years with my family. We chose to live in Hopkins because
of the affordable housing option on commitment to racial and economic diversity. I was also
part of the Cultivate Hopkins planning process with other community stakeholders. I am
troubled by mishandling of the Cultivate Hopkins plan and the development process. The
Zoning and Planning Commission needs to change course now.
Here are my requests of the Zoning and Planning Commission:
1. Reject the development proposal because it lacks the vision to advance the
Cultivate Hopkins 2040 Comprehensive Plan overall goals while directly
contradicting and/or undermining multiple goals and fails to demonstrate the
public purpose to justify zoning changes at this time or any form of public
subsidy.
2. Restart the public engagement process consistent with the direction provided
in the Cultivate Hopkins Comprehensive Plan. The decision by City Staff, Zoning
and Planning Commission, and Developer to focus on property owners to the
exclusion of business owners leasing their space and people who rent in the
decision-making process invalidates the process. This failure has allowed a lackluster
development concept to move forward in secret but now is causing significant harm
to local businesses. “Facilitate inclusive engagement through the empowerment of all
community members to participate in local decision-making.” Cultivate pg 68 on page
69 “Address and engage renters in public processes.”
3. Direct staff to develop a transition or relocation plan that treats our business
neighbors with respect and fairness. Business owners should have been engaged
by City staff as soon as the LRT line was approved.
4. The Zoning and Planning Committee and City Staff immediately apply an equity
analysis to understand the benefits and burdens of the development.
“Systematically and collaboratively address racial equity in evaluating public and
private investments at multiple decision points, transparently report results, and make
adjustments accordingly” (Cultivate Hopkins 2040 Plan pg 69).
The following are specific standalone reasons to vote no on the Trilogy development and
protect our community.
1. Reason 1 to Reject Application: Large scale developments need to be mixed-
income to avoid a pattern of income-based residential segregation creating an
area of concentrated wealth. This project will have little to no opportunity for
households making 80% AMI or less (roughly $80K). It might be possible for people
at or above 80% AMI to buy up but would be cost burdened. This development could
easily create an Area of Concentrate White Wealth because of its size combined with
documented consequences of overt discrimination and existence of current racial
disparities in wealth in our region. Including 10-20% of affordable housing does
ensure a mixed-income community which helps protect the character of Hopkins,
preserves the economic and racial diversity of the community and is consistent with
the Cultivate Hopkins 2040 Comp Plan.This would still produce 80-90% market rate
and above rental units. This project runs counter community goals.
2. Reason 2 to Reject Application: Failure to take into consideration those most
impacted by the development. The businesses have not been engaged or involved
in the process resulting in incredible hardship. The renters in the area have not been
notified. Over the last few days I have talked to multiple business owners and people
that rent nearby. The consistent message is that they have not been notified, the
sense of exclusion, disrespect and feeling of threat and fear this development poses.
The Zoning and Planning Commission, City staff and Council have failed to engage
community members most impacted. The staff report celebrates attempts to make
acceptable this failure by stating the notification process is above statute
requirement. A failure that exceeds minimum requirements is still a failure.
3. Reason 3 to Reject Application: City of Hopkins community engagement and
public notification process institutionally excludes people leasing their
business space and people renting their homes. The City of Hopkins only
requires developers including Trilogy to send notification to owners with 350 feet. The
consequence is the exclusion of small businesses leasing space and renters in the
area that is over 50% people of color. The lack of public participation at the virtual
meeting, the first neighborhood meeting on July 14th, 2021 and the recent surprise of
impacted members of the community to learn the development was even under
consideration. Additional evidence is the first public neighborhood meeting on this
development was not until July 14th, 2021 (simply absurd). The City’s actions
explicitly violate the Cultivate Hopkins Goals and Policies listed on page 68 to
“Facilitate inclusive engagement through the empowerment of all community
members to participate in local decision-making.” The decision to require
notification to only property owners structurally excludes 60% of the
households.
4. Reason 4 to Reject Application: The disregard of community input and
concerns by both Trilogy Real Estate Group and staff recommendation.
Community input regarding this project has been consistent and largely ignored by
City staff and Trilogy. Community members have consistently raised concerns
regarding the well-being of area renters, preservation of existing affordable units, loss
of existing businesses, and production of new affordable housing. There has been no
effort by the City or Trilogy to engage the long-term business owners in the area to
prepare for transition putting their businesses and families at risk until July 14th,
2021. There has been no effort to explore a mixed-income development through
creative funding mechanism or partnership with local developers familiar with the
community. The developers that responded to 325 Blake have a better understanding
of our Cultivate Hopkins goals and strategy to build an integrated community. It has
been reported the developer has indicated that there has been no request of
affordable housing despite community input and Comp Plan priorities contrary to
documented public input.
5. Reason 5 to Reject Application: The development proposal fails to provide
sufficient public purpose to support changing existing zoning. The
development concept is weak and mundane and is not creating a unique contribution
to the community that justifies changing existing zoning or to approve prior to a
proper updating of the Zoning and Planning Code. The lack of community vision and
alignment should disqualify it from further consideration until the plan is revised or to
open the door for a different developer to submit a concept that matches the vision
and potential of the area.
6. Reason 6 to Reject Application: Because of the narrowly cherry-picked goals to
obscure application shortcomings - it should be denied until the Zoning and
Planning Code has been updated, equity principles incorporated, and reviewed
by the community, then approved by the Council. This project is inconsistent with
several Cultivate Hopkins goals. Considering this, the Zoning and Planning
Commission should deny this application until the Zoning Code update has been
reviewed and approved. This process and development proposal directly contradict
all the goals and policies recommended for Equity and Inclusion listed on page 63
and specifically the following - “Systematically and collaboratively address racial
equity in evaluating public and private investments at multiple decision points,
transparently report results, and make adjustments accordingly” and “Address and
engage renters in public processes.” It also fails to meet the affordable housing focus
of the overall plan and specific affordable housing goals section.
7. Reason 7 to Reject Application: Developer and staff recommendation cherry-
pick Cultivate Hopkins 2040 Plan goals at the detriment of businesses, renters
and long-term goals of the community. Trilogy Real Estate Group and the City
staff report selectively references elements of the Cultivate Hopkins 2040 Comp Plan
obscuring its failures and direct conflicts with the overall focuses of the plan and
commitment to community. This proposal abandons the explicit policy
recommendation connected to affordable housing, development that serves
everyone, commitment to diverse communities, inclusion of renters in decision-
making.
Thank you for your consideration.
Larry Hiscock
302 7th St S
Hopkins, MN 55343
From:Mike Mornson
To:Kersten Elverum; Jason Lindahl
Subject:Fwd: [EXTERNAL] Re: Comment on Blake Road Station Development
Date:Wednesday, July 28, 2021 8:46:05 PM
FYI.
Mike Mornson
Hopkins City Manager
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jason Gadd <jgadd@hopkinsmn.com>
Date: July 28, 2021 at 8:14:02 PM CDT
To: Mike Mornson <mmornson@hopkinsmn.com>
Subject: Fw: [EXTERNAL] Re: Comment on Blake Road Station Development
From: Larry Hiscock <larryhiscock@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 7:35 PM
To: Jason Gadd <jgadd@HOPKINSmn.com>; Kristi Halverson
<khalverson@HOPKINSmn.com>; Brian Hunke <bhunke@HOPKINSmn.com>; Rick Brausen
<rbrausen@HOPKINSmn.com>; Alan Beck <abeck@hopkinsmn.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Comment on Blake Road Station Development
Mayor Gadd and Council Members,
The Public Hearing on Tuesday, July 27th was a truly difficult meeting filled with
pain, fear, loss of family wealths. It also exposed significant deficiencies in City
practices that delivered us to this catastrophic point for these businesses. Catastrophic
is not an overstatement. Several could lose everything by September 30th. This
includes building space, their business, source of income, savings and any retirement
they have. All this could have been avoided if we applied the fullness of the
Cultivate Hopkins 2040 Comprehensive Plan to our decision-making.
Redevelopment is inevitable but it can be done humanely, in a respectful and planned
manner.
Will there be time on the agenda for community members to address the
Council?
The Trilogy development process has exposed the institutional deficiencies in the
City of Hopkins when it comes to public engagement, managing Transit Oriented
Development, including people that are not property owners (renters and business
owners) and implementing our 2040 Plan which calls for the City to analyze our
public and private investment with an equity lens. It was truly disturbing to watch the
Cultivate Hopkins plan selectively used to justify a rezoning for an out of State
developer with $40 Billion of assets yet not apply any of the equity priorities that
would have avoided or mitigate the harm on the businesses and included the
surrounding families that rent which will be directly impacted.
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding my concerns. I am happy to
talk further.
Thank you,
Larry Hiscock
302 7th St S
Hopkins, MN 55343
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 2:32 PM Larry Hiscock <larryhiscock@gmail.com> wrote:
July 27th, 2021
Zoning and Planning Commission,
I want to state my opposition to the current development proposal by Chicago
based Trilogy Real Estate Group and the supporting staff recommendation for
the Blake Road Station Development. I also want to raise significant concerns
regarding the explicit disregard of critical components of the Cultivate Hopkin
2040 Comprehensive plan and process failures that are causing extreme
hardship for business owning community members.
I have lived in Hopkins for eight years with my family. We chose to live in
Hopkins because of the affordable housing option on commitment to racial and
economic diversity. I was also part of the Cultivate Hopkins planning process
with other community stakeholders. I am troubled by mishandling of the Cultivate
Hopkins plan and the development process. The Zoning and Planning
Commission needs to change course now.
Here are my requests of the Zoning and Planning Commission:
1. Reject the development proposal because it lacks the vision to
advance the Cultivate Hopkins 2040 Comprehensive Plan overall
goals while directly contradicting and/or undermining multiple goals
and fails to demonstrate the public purpose to justify zoning changes
at this time or any form of public subsidy.
2. Restart the public engagement process consistent with the direction
provided in the Cultivate Hopkins Comprehensive Plan. The decision
by City Staff, Zoning and Planning Commission, and Developer to focus on
property owners to the exclusion of business owners leasing their space
and people who rent in the decision-making process invalidates the
process. This failure has allowed a lackluster development concept to
move forward in secret but now is causing significant harm to local
businesses. “Facilitate inclusive engagement through the empowerment of
all community members to participate in local decision-making.” Cultivate
pg 68 on page 69 “Address and engage renters in public processes.”
3. Direct staff to develop a transition or relocation plan that treats our
business neighbors with respect and fairness. Business owners should
have been engaged by City staff as soon as the LRT line was approved.
4. The Zoning and Planning Committee and City Staff immediately apply
an equity analysis to understand the benefits and burdens of the
development. “Systematically and collaboratively address racial equity in
evaluating public and private investments at multiple decision points,
transparently report results, and make adjustments accordingly” (Cultivate
Hopkins 2040 Plan pg 69).
The following are specific standalone reasons to vote no on the Trilogy
development and protect our community.
1. Reason 1 to Reject Application: Large scale developments need to be
mixed-income to avoid a pattern of income-based residential
segregation creating an area of concentrated wealth. This project will
have little to no opportunity for households making 80% AMI or less
(roughly $80K). It might be possible for people at or above 80% AMI to
buy up but would be cost burdened. This development could easily create
an Area of Concentrate White Wealth because of its size combined with
documented consequences of overt discrimination and existence of current
racial disparities in wealth in our region. Including 10-20% of affordable
housing does ensure a mixed-income community which helps protect the
character of Hopkins, preserves the economic and racial diversity of the
community and is consistent with the Cultivate Hopkins 2040 Comp
Plan.This would still produce 80-90% market rate and above rental units.
This project runs counter community goals.
2. Reason 2 to Reject Application: Failure to take into consideration
those most impacted by the development. The businesses have not
been engaged or involved in the process resulting in incredible hardship.
The renters in the area have not been notified. Over the last few days I
have talked to multiple business owners and people that rent nearby. The
consistent message is that they have not been notified, the sense of
exclusion, disrespect and feeling of threat and fear this development
poses. The Zoning and Planning Commission, City staff and Council have
failed to engage community members most impacted. The staff report
celebrates attempts to make acceptable this failure by stating the
notification process is above statute requirement. A failure that exceeds
minimum requirements is still a failure.
3. Reason 3 to Reject Application: City of Hopkins community
engagement and public notification process institutionally excludes
people leasing their business space and people renting their homes.
The City of Hopkins only requires developers including Trilogy to send
notification to owners with 350 feet. The consequence is the exclusion of
small businesses leasing space and renters in the area that is over 50%
people of color. The lack of public participation at the virtual meeting, the
first neighborhood meeting on July 14th, 2021 and the recent surprise of
impacted members of the community to learn the development was even
under consideration. Additional evidence is the first public neighborhood
meeting on this development was not until July 14th, 2021 (simply absurd).
The City’s actions explicitly violate the Cultivate Hopkins Goals and
Policies listed on page 68 to “Facilitate inclusive engagement
through the empowerment of all community members to participate
in local decision-making.” The decision to require notification to only
property owners structurally excludes 60% of the households.
4. Reason 4 to Reject Application: The disregard of community input
and concerns by both Trilogy Real Estate Group and staff
recommendation. Community input regarding this project has been
consistent and largely ignored by City staff and Trilogy. Community
members have consistently raised concerns regarding the well-being of
area renters, preservation of existing affordable units, loss of existing
businesses, and production of new affordable housing. There has been no
effort by the City or Trilogy to engage the long-term business owners in the
area to prepare for transition putting their businesses and families at risk
until July 14th, 2021. There has been no effort to explore a mixed-income
development through creative funding mechanism or partnership with local
developers familiar with the community. The developers that responded to
325 Blake have a better understanding of our Cultivate Hopkins goals and
strategy to build an integrated community. It has been reported the
developer has indicated that there has been no request of affordable
housing despite community input and Comp Plan priorities contrary to
documented public input.
5. Reason 5 to Reject Application: The development proposal fails to
provide sufficient public purpose to support changing existing
zoning. The development concept is weak and mundane and is not
creating a unique contribution to the community that justifies changing
existing zoning or to approve prior to a proper updating of the Zoning and
Planning Code. The lack of community vision and alignment should
disqualify it from further consideration until the plan is revised or to open
the door for a different developer to submit a concept that matches the
vision and potential of the area.
6. Reason 6 to Reject Application: Because of the narrowly cherry-
picked goals to obscure application shortcomings - it should be
denied until the Zoning and Planning Code has been updated, equity
principles incorporated, and reviewed by the community, then
approved by the Council. This project is inconsistent with several
Cultivate Hopkins goals. Considering this, the Zoning and Planning
Commission should deny this application until the Zoning Code update has
been reviewed and approved. This process and development proposal
directly contradict all the goals and policies recommended for Equity and
Inclusion listed on page 63 and specifically the following - “Systematically
and collaboratively address racial equity in evaluating public and private
investments at multiple decision points, transparently report results, and
make adjustments accordingly” and “Address and engage renters in public
processes.” It also fails to meet the affordable housing focus of the overall
plan and specific affordable housing goals section.
7. Reason 7 to Reject Application: Developer and staff recommendation
cherry-pick Cultivate Hopkins 2040 Plan goals at the detriment of
businesses, renters and long-term goals of the community. Trilogy
Real Estate Group and the City staff report selectively references elements
of the Cultivate Hopkins 2040 Comp Plan obscuring its failures and direct
conflicts with the overall focuses of the plan and commitment to
community. This proposal abandons the explicit policy recommendation
connected to affordable housing, development that serves everyone,
commitment to diverse communities, inclusion of renters in decision-
making.
Thank you for your consideration.
Larry Hiscock
302 7th St S
Hopkins, MN 55343
--
Larry Hiscock
A Culture of Health Leader
Culture of Health Leaders is a national leadership development program supported
by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. It fosters collaboration between people
from all fields and professions that have an influence on people’s health.
www.cultureofhealth-leaders.org
The opinions expressed here are the author’s own and do not represent the opinions
of the program or the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
--
Larry Hiscock
A Culture of Health Leader
Culture of Health Leaders is a national leadership development program supported by
the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. It fosters collaboration between people from
all fields and professions that have an influence on people’s health.
www.cultureofhealth-leaders.org
The opinions expressed here are the author’s own and do not represent the opinions of
the program or the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Jason Gadd | Mayor | City of Hopkins
1010 1st St S | Hopkins, MN 55343 | 612-839-7030
www.hopkinsmn.com
Like the City on Facebook Visit Think Hopkins
From:Mac"s Liquor
To:Jason Lindahl
Cc:Mike Mornson; Jason Gadd; Alan Beck; Rick Brausen; Kristi Halverson; Brian Hunke; Kersten Elverum
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Hopkins Commerce Center Redevelopment
Date:Tuesday, July 27, 2021 11:38:37 AM
Attachments:Businesses & Jobs Lost to Redevelopment.pdf
Dear Mr. Lindahl, Mr Mornson, Mr Mayor & City Council Members & City Staff,
I am writing out of concern for our business and the businesses that comprise Hopkins
Commerce Center. Currently there are over 15 different businesses that operate at this site.
Some of our businesses have been here 20, 30, 40, even 50 years and are long-time supporters
of the local neighborhoods and good corporate citizens to the city of Hopkins. Attached is a
spreadsheet that provides details about the current businesses affected by this proposed
redevelopment. Collectively we have over 95 employees and each of our small businesses
contribute to the character and hometown feel that makes Hopkins unique.
After all of these years of commitment to the city of Hopkins, the employees and owner-
operators here cannot fathom being forced out of business by the city if they allow this
redevelopment to move forward as currently proposed. To not be offered any sort of transition
plan, relocation help or written promise to be re-established after redevelopment is sad and
disconcerting. Further it is a bitter pill for the employees and business owners to learn that a
developer will receive a total package of over $3 million in grants and loans from the city of
Hopkins and then be able to turn around and use that money to literally demolish our
businesses.
Hopkins Commerce Center is zoned commercial and has over 95,000 square feet of combined
retail space that provides significant resources to the neighboring residents. The proposed
redevelopment is not consistent with zoning and does not provide a commercial corridor to the
city of Hopkins. With the proposed construction of 770 dwelling units it is counter-intuitive
that the developer would be allowed to reduce that commercial/retail space to 11,000 square
feet. The planning commission and council should require the developers to at least maintain
the current amount of commercial/retail space that exists on the site in order to meet the
ongoing needs of the neighborhood and the needs of the new residents that will be residing on
the site. It is evident additional time is needed to look at the long-term impact a 770 unit
apartment building will have on the area when it doesn't have resources to support current and
new residents.
The city of Hopkins can do better and make this a win-win for everyone concerned. There is a
proper and transitional way to proceed with this redevelopment that doesn't eliminate 95 jobs
and destroy 15+ businesses. The city of Hopkins can mandate that the developer provide a
written action plan that meets the needs of the employees and affected business owners before
demolition/construction permits are issued. At this time the zoning commission and council
should not rush a decision but rather postpone action until a thorough plan is put in place to
assist those significantly affected by this redevelopment.
Sincerely,
Lee Gilbertson
Mac's Liquor
8550 Excelsior Blvd
Hopkins, MN 55343
www.MacsLiq.com
store: 952-935-9291
cell: 612-481-3678
Businesses & Jobs Lost (as of 7/26/21)
Site A Owner-Operators Staff Total Jobs Lost
Sea Level Fish Store 1 4 5
Mach 1 Car/Audio 2 4 6
CW Healthcare 2 2
Curves 3 3
Blue Ceiling Design 1 1 2
Mac's Liquor Store 1 5 6
Tracy's Hair Salon 1 9 10
4 Season Nail Salon 2 4 6
Site A =40
Site B
O'Reilly Auto Parts 5 5
Shanghai Market 2 3 5
Blake Dry Cleaners 2 4 6
Blanchard Catering 1 1
3 Chocolatiers 3 3
Blake Grocery & Deli 1 4 5
Site B =25
Site C
Goodwill Industries 30 30
Site C =30
15 Active Businesses Lost Total Jobs Lost:95
From:Mary Jane Yue
To:Jason Lindahl
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Blake Road Station Development
Date:Monday, July 26, 2021 10:38:07 PM
Please reconsider the proposed Trilogy Real Estate group proposal to displace the three
buildings on the NW corner of Excelsior and Blake Roads.
I am a regular customer of three businesses there and am saddened that it will be replaced by
luxury apartments. Do you really need luxury apartments in that location?
Right now, it’s perfect little mall, favored by many customers.
MaryJane Yue
From:Ravi Ramalingam
To:Jason Lindahl
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Public Zoning Hearing (Blake/Excelsior)
Date:Monday, July 26, 2021 3:35:55 PM
Mr. Lindahl,
I’m a resident who lives near the intersection of Excelsior/Blake Road. I understand that the
redevelopment of the northwest corner parcel is under consideration. While this is very exciting for
the neighborhood, I’m very disappointed to hear that the redevelopment only includes a fraction of
the retail space previously afforded to local businesses. In part, I’m concerned for the job losses,
destruction of small businesses, and elimination of retail options in the area. But, my wife and I
always looked forward to modernization of such valuable real estate – we always assumed that it
would involve new shops, restaurants and other resources for the area. We dreamed of walking to a
bakery with our kids, grabbing breakfast at a local spot, or maybe having a cup of coffee within the
community instead of driving elsewhere. I’m actually shocked that such amenities aren’t part of the
redevelopment plan with only 11,000 square feet devoted to retail. Currently, I enjoy frequenting
the convenient store, the Asian grocery market, and the liquor store. I even went to the auto parts
store a few weeks ago. Removing these options from the community, and replacing them with
apartments feels like a giant missed opportunity.
Please be clear that I’m supportive of redevelopment, progress and bringing change about. But, I
had hoped that the project would be more conscious of the neighborhood’s needs. In fact, I hoped
that redevelopment would become an enhancement to our community. I’m sorry to hear that this
isn’t the case under the current proposal. I hope that the zoning decision will take the foregoing into
account. I understand that you have a tough job, and many interests to manage. I hope that there’s
a way to accomplish everyone’s goals in this case.
Thank you for your time,
Ravi
From:Stacey Anderson
To:Jason Lindahl
Cc:hopkins4equity@gmail.com
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Blake Road Station
Date:Monday, July 26, 2021 6:12:29 PM
I not only live in a neighboring community, I work out at Curves. Do not get rid of my work
out space. Curves is my savior , especially with all the changes due to the Covid-19
pandemic.
Please keep my Curves!!
Thank you,
Stacey Anderson
From:Svetlana Traun
To:Jason Lindahl
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Public Hearing Notice
Date:Tuesday, July 27, 2021 3:49:10 PM
(Sorry for the late email I hope this email can be considered during the hearing)
Good Afternoon Jason,
I received the letter regarding the construction project that might possibly happen. I've lived
in Hopkins for now 3 years and have chosen to stay in the area because of neighborhood
resources that are available to me. I use that goodwill a lot and I worked at that liquor store
(Macs Liqour). With all those different businesses there I’ve gotten to know many people and
if this project happens not only do a lot of people lose their jobs but rent will go up in the area
and the relationships that I have created with the businesses will be gone. I don’t agree with
this move to building new apartments.
Regards,
Svetlana Traun
612.619.4731
This message and any attachments contain confidential and potentially legally privileged
information intended only for the named addressees’ use. If you are an addressee, you may
only use the information contained in this message or any attachments in a business-like
manner and you are strictly prohibited from disseminating, forwarding, distributing, copying
or in any other manner sharing its contents, except for the sole purpose of carrying out its
business intent and purpose. If you are NOT an addressee or if you are an unintended
addressee, please notify the sender immediately and then delete this message in its entirety
since you are strictly prohibited from reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, sharing or
using it and/or its contents for any purpose whatsoever. Thank you.
From:VI HOWG
To:Jason Lindahl
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Blake Road Station
Date:Tuesday, July 27, 2021 9:18:18 AM
Please don't replace all of these businesses and means of making a living for these people with
just another fancy apartment building. This does not seem to benefit this neighborhood in
any way. So many hard working, good people count on these companies losing them to just
another living place for the more privileged people just doesn't seem like the right thing to
do. I hope you will give serious consideration to what will really be best for all of Hopkins and
make the choice to save this area ass it is.
We need our CURVES there! I speak for myself and the many other CURVES women who go
there daily. There is no other gym for women to attend which can provide the great workouts
and as a result healthy bodies that CURVES gives us. This would be a loss that cannot be
replaced.
Please do not let this area be demolished. I appreciate very much your help and anything you
can do to save these busisnesses.
Thank you.
Vyonne Howg
952-935-9293
To: Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission, Hopkins City Council, and Hopkins City Staff
From: Hopkins Community Housing Team
The Hopkins Community Housing Team is opposed to Trilogy Real Estate Group’s Blake Road
Station development proposal which conflicts with priorities identified by multiple community
processes. The City of Hopkins and residents have been anticipating development projects in
the LRT station areas, including within the Blake Road Corridor, for many years. In preparation
for these projects and to guide future development projects, the City of Hopkins and community
members have supported numerous planning processes and documents. In each of these
planning documents, the community and City have stressed the importance of development
projects that promote inclusion and support the cultural and economic diversity of the
neighborhood and City. We oppose the proposal by Trilogy for the Blake Road Station
development in its current format because it does not support community-identified goals and
does not help the community or the City fully achieve the vision that has been established.
In seeking proposals for the development of 325 Blake Road, the City engaged with residents to
draft a Development Vision. This document outlines expectations for development around
Inclusion, Housing Mix, and Community Engagement. Specifically, the document states “The
site is located in a very economically and culturally diverse neighborhood with a significant
number of naturally-occurring affordable housing units. It is the goal to embrace that diversity
and develop the site in a way that is equitable, seeks to honor and preserve the existing
community and does not aim to gentrify the neighborhood.” It also states that the development
should “Consider a variety of housing types, including ownership and rental for people at a mix
of income levels and household sizes.”
Located across the road from the 325 Blake Road site, Trilogy’s proposed Blake Road Station
development is located in the same economically and culturally diverse neighborhood and
should have the same expectations of honoring and preserving the existing community without
gentrifying the neighborhood. With 770 proposed housing units, the Blake Road Station
development will be as significant a development as the 325 Blake Road project, and should
also meet the expectations for housing for a mix of income levels and household sizes.
Similarly,Development Guidelines for the Blake Road station area created by the community in
2015 outlines four goals for development in the neighborhood, including Goal 2: Preserve the
neighborhood diversity and Goal 4: Strengthen residential and neighborhood-oriented retail to
enhance vitality and livability. Strategies outlined in the guidelines for achieving these goals
include:
● Provide for a range of housing types and affordability to meet the needs of all people
throughout their life and changing lifestyle needs.
● A mix of housing types, including senior housing, that can accommodate a range of
incomes, ages and family size (both rental and ownership options).
● Redevelopment that works to incorporate existing local businesses into new construction
projects.
● Creative ways to support small cultural businesses that serve the community.
As proposed, Trilogy’s Blake Road Station development does not meet the expectations and
goals outlined in the Development Vision nor in the Development Guidelines - it does not
include affordable units, does not provide a mix of unit types, and displaces 15 long-standing
businesses that provide at least 94 jobs without a plan for incorporating community-serving
businesses.
As we continue to build a coalition of collaboration, how can we consider all of our options to
find new ways to achieve affordable housing goals. There are a combination of tools, from
federal tax credits, to state housing trust fund dollars, as well as city ordinances around zoning.
As a City and a community, we have only one opportunity to carry out development in a way that
serves our entire community. The City and community have been diligent in outlining a vision for
development in preparation for these decisions. The Blake Road Station development site is a
prime location and will set the tone for transit-oriented development in Hopkins in addition to the
Blake Road station area. Let’s be patient and ask developers to join us in striving to reach our
goals.
Sincerely,
Hopkins Community Housing Team
Neighborhood Meeting 7/14/21 Minutes – Blake Rd, Page 1 of 2
Project: Blake Road Station Development
RE: Neighborhood Meeting (July 14, 2021, 6:30-7:30 pm)
Attendees: (see attached Sign-In Sheet for attendees that signed in; approximately 15 people attended)
Development Team Attendees: Josh Peters, Tim Biere, Nicole Midtdahl – Trilogy Real Estate Group;
Gretchen Camp, Heather Whalen, Alyssa Jagdfeld and Teresa Forsberg – ESG
Introductions were made from the development and design team. The general public approvals process
and next steps for this project at the City were discussed. General master plan clarification questions
were asked as well as the location of the future LRT station.
Questions from the group and discussion:
1. What type of apartments and any proposed for ownership? Market-rate; none for ownership.
2. Are you proposing any affordable units? No. The study performed for Hopkins indicated there
is a surplus of affordable units that already exist. Perhaps discuss with surrounding sites about
proposing some affordable housing.
3. What is the general construction timeframe for each phase? It is approximate – Fall 2021 start
construction for Site A; Fall 2022 start construction for Site B; 10 years after approval granted
for Site C
4. Do you own this/these property/properties? Not yet. Due diligence is occurring, and a closing
date would come after approval is granted (approximately Aug. 18).
5. How did you select this property? It is located near the future LRT station. Hopkins has a
certain amount of vacancy, so there is an adequate need for proposing a project like this.
6. Most of us here tonight are business owners:
a. What types of retail are you proposing? We are open to various types but cannot
discuss the specifics of leases without the landlord(s) present. Any questions we’ve
already received have been forwarded onto the landlord(s).
b. What types of retail are in your other projects? We do not have retail in other projects
due to those projects’ locations and market.
7. What about any environmental issues? We have an environmental report that indicates
environmental issues. Any contaminated water that will be properly dealt with in the new
construction efforts, proper vapor mitigation will occur, and, for any existing asbestos, proper
asbestos remediation will occur. We can share a list of sustainable items that are proposed in
the project and site [we shared with an interested attendee via email].
8. What about solar? We have been exploring being solar-ready. Perhaps investigate the solar
payback and electric models. We are enrolled with Xcel Energy for an efficient building
analysis.
Neighborhood Meeting 7/14/21 Minutes – Blake Rd, Page 2 of 2
9. What is the unit rental range? The rental model is based on the neighborhood analysis. We do
not have the rental cost ready to release as that will be concluded further into construction.
10. How much TIF are you asking for? None.
11. How much notice-to-vacate will we receive? We don’t have the lease terms nor can discuss
with you without the landlord(s) being present. None of us have leases. Mac’s Liquor owner
expressed he is most concerned with where he goes when Site A breaks ground (his existing
location).
12. I’d like to see a townhome style proposed for this site.
13. Can you sit down with existing retailers now and work on the top identified needs for retail
you’re proposing? We encourage you to discuss this strategy with the City so that we can work
together, especially on the subsidy part of the financial ask for tenants.
14. Have you expressed interest in the Arby’s site? We have, and we have not received returned
correspondence. Has the City notified you of other possible sites to develop? Yes, and we’ve
investigated as well.
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
6/25/2021 11:35:12 AMT1-1
TITLE SHEET
220503
AJ JM Checker
08/20/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
6/25/2021
No. Description Date
BLAKE STATION, MASTER PLAN & SITE A
325 BLAKE ROAD, HOPKINS, MN 55343
PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT TEAM
BUILDING METRICS
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
ARCHITECT:
CIVIL ENGINEER:
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
Trilogy Real Estate Group, LLC
520 West Erie Street Suite 100
Chicago, IL 60654
Ph: (312) 750-0900 Ext. 125
ESG Architecture & Design
500 Washington Ave. South, Suite 1080
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Ph: 612-339-5508
Sheet
Number Sheet Name
LUA
SUBMITTAL
04/23/2021
LUA
SUBMITTAL
06/25/2021
LAND USE APPLICATION
A1-0 CONTEXT MAP & IMAGES ●
A1-1 MASTER PLAN ● ●
A1-2 DESIGN PERSPECTIVES ●
A1-3 LEVEL P1 PLAN ●
A1-3b INTERIM PARKING PLAN ● ●
A1-4 LEVEL 1 PLAN ●
A1-5 LEVEL 2 PLAN ●
A1-6 LEVEL 3 PLAN ●
A1-7 LEVEL 4-6 PLANS ●
A1-8 LEVEL 7 PLAN ●
A1-9 ROOF PLAN ●
A3-1 NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATIONS ●
A3-2 WEST & EAST ELEVATIONS ●
A3-3 COURTYARD ELEVATIONS ●
A3-4 EXTERIOR MATERIALS ●
A3-5 SHADOW STUDIES ●
GENERAL INFORMATION
T1-1 TITLE SHEET ● ●
CIVIL
C300 EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1
●
C400 OVERALL SITE PLAN ●
C401 SITE PLAN - SITE A ●
C500 OVERALL GRADING PLAN ●
C501 GRADING PLAN - SITE A ●
C502 OVERALL STORM SEWER PLAN ●
C503 STORM SEWER PLAN - SITE A ●
C600 OVERALL UTILITY EXHIBIT ●
C601 UTILITY PLAN - SITE A ●
LANDSCAPE
L010 GENERAL NOTES ●
L011 REFERENCE NOTES & PLANTING
SCHEDULES
●
L100 MASTER PLAN OVERALL SITE
PLAN
●
L111 SITE PLAN - BUILDING A ●
L140 LANDSCAPE PLAN - BUILDING A ●
L500 LANDSCAPE DETAILS ●
L501 LANDSCAPE DETAILS ●
Neighborhood Context Map
Site Location
A
C
B
Damon Farber Landscape Architects
401 North 2nd Avenue, Sutie 410
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Ph: 612-332-7522
Kimley-Horn
767 Eustis Street, Suite 100
St. Paul, MN 55414
Ph: 651-645-4197
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:MBJ
510 S Marquette Ave UNIT 900
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Ph: 612-338-0713
MEP:Emanuelson-Podas
7705 Bush Lake Road
Edina, MN 55439
Ph: 952-930-0050
DRAWING INDEX
** LOT AREA SHOWN HERE IS AMOUNT OF OVERALL PARCEL AREA LESS THE TRAVELLED WAY (EXCELSIOR BLVD AND PIERCE
AVE) AND PEDESTRAIN EASEMENT AREA (ALONG EXCELSIOR BLVD).
BLAKE RD NB L A K E R D S W L R T S T A T IO N
B U S S T O P
E X C E L S I O R B L V DPIERCE AVESITE A
SITE C
SITE B
FUTURE USE
BLAKE SCHOOL
BOYCE STREET ASHLEY ROADPRESTON LANE
2 N D S T R E E T N E
PARKSIDE BOULEVARDS T L O U IS S T R E E T
TYLER AVENUE NP A R K A N D R ID E
C E D A R L A K E L R T R E G IO N A L T R A IL
POLK AVENUEE X C E L S I O R B L V D
OAKES PARK
COTTAGEVILLE PARKMINNEHAHA CREEKLAKE STREET NE
L A K E S T R E E T N E
OXFORD STREET
1/4 MILE
1 .5 M IL E S T O T H E A R T E R Y O N 8 T H A V E
5 M IL E S T O B D E M A K A S K A
1.25 MILES TO SHOPPES AT KNOLLWOODMCWD 325 BLAKE RD
REDEVELOPMENT
PIZZA LUCE
BLAKE RD S2
1
3
INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSEMULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL EDUCATION/RECREATION
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
4/23/2021 3:03:30 PMA1-0
CONTEXT MAP & IMAGES
220503
AJ JM Checker
08/12/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
4/23/2021
No. Description Date
FROM WEST OF EXCELSIOR BLVD, LOOKING NORTHEAST
EXCELSIOR BLVD, LOOKING NORTHWEST
FROM EXCELSIOR BLVD & BLAKE RD, LOOKING NORTHWEST
1.
2.
3.
DWICEREF BLAKE RD NE X C E L S I O R B L V DPIERCE AVE30,724 SF
PARKING
313 SF
MECH / ELEC
EXHAUST
492 SF
TRASH PARKING GARAGE
VENTILATION WELL
443 SF
1 BR - LL
982 SF
2 BR
656 SF
2 BR - LL
567 SF
2 BR - LL
482 SF
1 BR - LL
446 SF
1 BR - LL
448 SF
1 BR - LL
443 SF
1 BR - LL
618 SF
2 BR - LL
737 SF
1 BR
692 SF
1 BR
9'
- 10"9'
-
1"A C T U A L
2 8 ' - 4 "9'
- 3"A C T U A L
2 8 ' - 2 "5' - 0"9' - 8"
12' - 6"
A C T U A L
3 3 ' - 6 "10' - 8"49' - 0"
15' - 1"
14' - 2"16' - 0"18' - 3"5' - 1"ACTUAL76' - 6"1 6 ' - 5 "16'
-
1"51' - 10"
9' - 4"8'
-
1"MARKETING COLOR LEGEND
AMENITY
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
PARKING
RESIDENTIAL
RETAIL
SERVICE6' - 0"RETAIL
2,106 SF
8,534 SF
AMENITY ACTUAL83' - 8"1,369 SF
AMENITY
2,902 SF
RETAIL
8,961 SF
AMENITY
40,757 SF
PARKING
1,477 SF
BIKE STORAGE
1,539 SF
FITNESS
3,104 SF
AMENITY
45,010 SF
PARKING
519 SF
MECH / ELEC
642 SF
TRASH
310 SF
ELEC
3,407 SF
RETAIL
2,703 SF
RETAIL
3,561 SF
AMENITY
3,315 SF
RESIDENTIAL
1,040 SF
RESIDENTIAL 1,217 SF
AMENITY
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
6/29/2021 1:55:46 PMA1-1
MASTER PLAN
220503
AJ Checker
08/12/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
6/25/2021
No. Description Date
1" = 40'-0"A1-1
1 MASTER PLAN
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
4/22/2021 10:32:39 PMA1-2
DESIGN PERSPECTIVES
220503
AJ Checker
08/20/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
4/23/2021
No. Description Date
VIEW WEST ON EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD VIEW OF LINEAR PARK
VIEW NORTHEAST ON EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD AT PIERCE AVENUEWALK UP UNITS OF SITE A
A B E
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
12
11
10
AA
BB
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
HH
II
JJ
KK
9' - 0"18' - 0"UP24' - 6"43' - 10"STORAGE
STORAGE
DC F G H I
10' - 7"21'
-
8"9' - 0"8' - 0"9' - 0"18' - 0"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"16' - 0"
2
A3.124' - 0"22' - 5"
24' - 0"
27' - 6"
5' - 3"
ELEC
WATER
ELEC
MAKEUP
AIR UNIT
9 7 ' - 0 "85' - 2"12' - 1"6' - 11"25' - 5"EXHAUST AIR
AREA WELL
5 ' - 4 "
3 1 ' - 0 "
72' - 6"14' - 0"10' - 4"142' - 5"14' - 2"129' - 7"253' - 6"11' - 11"75' - 6"9' - 2"11' - 4"24' - 0"188' - 1"17' - 10"18' - 7"6' - 8"1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
8 ELEC
LOBBY
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/8/2021 3:18:49 PMA1-3
LEVEL P1 PLAN
220503
AJ Checker
08/12/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
6/25/2021
No. Description Date
1/16" = 1'-0"A1-3
1 SITE A - LOWER LEVEL
BLAKE ROAD NE X C E L S I O R B O U L E V A R DPIERCE AVENUEEXISTING BUILDING
EXISTING
BUILDING
EXISTING
BUILDING
SWLRT PARK AND RIDE
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
SITE A - NEW CONSTRUCTION ADAADAGOODWILL PARKING, SEE CIVIL GOODWILL DONATIONSPARALLEL PARKINGRE-STRIPED
PARKING
RE-STRIPED
PARKING
RE-STRIPED
PARKING
EXISTING BUILDING
EXISTING PARKING
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
6/24/2021 4:34:36 PMA1-3a
INTERIM PARKING PLAN
220503
AJ Checker
06/24/21
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
6/25/2021
No. Description Date
1" = 40'-0"A1-3a
1 SITE A INTERIM PARKING PLAN
BLAKE ROAD NE X C E L S I O R B O U L E V A R DPIERCE AVENUEEX ISTING BUILDING
EXISTING
BUILDING
EXISTING
BUILDING
SWLRT PARK AND RIDE
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
SITE A - NEW CONSTRUCTION ADAADAGOODWILL
MONUMENT SIGN
S I T E B -N E W C O N S T R U C T I O N
30' - 0"3 0 ' - 0 "10'
-
0"GOODWILL PARKING, SEE CIVIL GOODWILL DONATIONSPARALLEL PARKINGRE-STRIPED
PARKING
RE-STRIPED
PARKING
RE-STRIPED
PARKING
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/8/2021 3:18:55 PMA1-3b
INTERIM PARKING PLAN
220503
AJ Checker
09/11/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
6/25/2021
No. Description Date
1" = 40'-0"A1-3b
1 SITE A & B INTERIM PARKING PLAN
A B E
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
12
11
10
AA
BB
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
HH
II
JJ
KK
276 SF
RETAIL TRASH
RAMP UP TO LVL 2
2
A3-2
1
A3-1
2
A3-1
1
A3-2
RAMP DN TO LVL P1
GARAGE
ENTRY
LOADING
MAKEUP
AIR UNIT
UNIT TH-C6 UNIT TH-B3 UNIT TH-C5 UNIT TH-C4 UNIT TH-B3 UNIT TH-B3 UNIT TH-B3 UNIT TH-B3
UNIT B2
UNIT C3
UNIT B1
FITNESS ROOM
B I K E S T O R A G E
LOBBY AND AMENITY
T T
DC F G H I
SETBACK9'
- 10"SETBACK9'
- 1"SETBACK9'
- 3"SETBACK5' - 0"SETBACK
9' - 8"
SETBACK
12' - 6"SETBACK8'
-
1"S E C O N D A R Y
R E S I D E N T
E N T R Y
RESIDENT ENTRY
RETAIL ENTRY
476 SF
RES. TRASH
10' - 9"8' - 0"8' - 0"18' - 0"
8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"86' - 0"68' - 0"9' - 0"
TRAN SFORMERS
GENERATOR
12'
- 0"32'
- 8"38' - 8"24' - 8"10' - 10"9' - 9"50' - 0"7' - 0"26' - 0"15' - 0"22' - 2"7' - 0"39' - 4"7' - 0"75' - 11"
249' - 5"
3 0 ' - 4 "
6 9 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
1 7 ' - 7 "
9 ' - 0 "
3 3 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
9 6 ' - 7 "
1 0 ' - 1 0 "
RETAIL
2,106 SF
A C T U A L
2 8 ' - 4 "
3 1 ' - 1 "
EXHAUST AIR
AREA WELL
188' - 8"2 5 4 ' - 0 "142' - 5"TRANSFORMERS
GARAGE EXHAUST
CONFERENCE
LEASING
MAIL
MULTISPORT STUDIO
MECHANIC AL
BIKE WORKSH OP /
MAKER SPACE
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
8
CONFERENCE
LOBBY
JANITOR
W O M E N
M E N
UNIT LEGEND
"A" PREFIX = STUDIO
"B" PREFIX = 1 BR
"C" PREFIX = 2 BR
"AA" PREFIX = JR 1 BR
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/8/2021 3:19:35 PMA1-4
LEVEL 1 PLAN
220503
AJ Checker
08/12/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
6/25/2021
No. Description Date
1/16" = 1'-0"A1-4
1 SITE A - LEVEL 1
A B E
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
12
11
10
AA
BB
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
HH
II
JJ
KK
MDF
2
A3-2
1
A3-1
2
A3-1
1
A3-2
MAKEUP
AIR UNIT
RAMP DN TO
LEVEL 1
GARAGE EXHAUSTUNIT B2
UNIT C3
UNIT B1
UNIT C2
UNIT C1
UNIT BB1
309 SF
POOL EQUIP.
DC F G H I
16'
- 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"9' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 6"16' - 0"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"16' - 0"
50' - 0"7' - 0"26' - 0"15' - 0"22' - 2"7' - 0"39' - 4"7' - 0"76' - 0"38' - 9"24' - 8"10' - 10"9' - 9"12'
- 4"32'
- 8"9 7 ' - 1 1 "
9 ' - 0 "
1 7 ' - 8 "
9 ' - 0 "
3 2 ' - 1 1 "
9 ' - 0 "
9 6 ' - 6 "
1 1 ' - 0 "39' - 1"7' - 0"109' - 6"2 8 3 ' - 0 "18' - 0"188' - 9"155' - 7"249' - 6"
UNIT TH-C4
(UPPER LEVEL)
UNIT TH-B3
(UPPER LEVEL)
UNIT TH-B3
(UPPER LEVEL)
UNIT TH-B3
(UPPER LEVEL)
UNIT TH-B3
(UPPER LEVEL)
UNIT TH-C5
(UPPER LEVEL)
UNIT TH-B3
(UPPER LEVEL)
UNIT TH-C6
(UPPER LEVEL)
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
8
ELEC
TRASH
SNOW MELT EQUIP STORAGEUNIT LEGEND
"A" PREFIX = STUDIO
"B" PREFIX = 1 BR
"C" PREFIX = 2 BR
"AA" PREFIX = JR 1 BR
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/8/2021 3:19:40 PMA1-5
LEVEL 2 PLAN
220503
AJ Checker
08/12/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
6/25/2021
No. Description Date
1/16" = 1'-0"A1-5
1 SITE A - LEVEL 2
3
A3-3
EXTERIOR
AMENITY DECK
POOL
2
A3-2
1
A3-1
2
A3-1
1
A3-2
2
A3-3
1
A3-3
UNIT C7
UNIT A1 UNIT C8
UNIT B4-A
UNIT B4-A UNIT B4-A UNIT B4-A UNIT B4-A UNIT A1
UNIT D1
UNIT B4-A
UNIT B4-A
UNIT C10
UNIT C12-A
UNIT B4-B
UNIT C9-B
UNIT C13
UNIT AA3
UNIT AA4UNIT AA1-A
908 SF
CLUB ROOMUNIT AA1-AUNIT B4-C
UNIT AA2
UNIT B4-A
UNIT B4-B
UNIT C9-A
UNIT B6
UNIT D2
UNIT B5UNIT C11
UNIT C8
UNIT C9-A
UNIT B4-A
UNIT C9-C
UNIT B4-A
UNIT AA1-B
PLANTER
WALK OUT TERRACESWALK OUT TERRACES
DC F G H I
4
A3-3
AMENITY LAWN
2 7 ' - 2 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
2 4 ' - 0 "
3 7 ' - 8 "14'
- 4"10'
- 0"21'
- 8"12'
- 3"25' - 8"12' - 10"9' - 0"72' - 2"30' - 6"88' - 9"7' - 5"132' - 3"8' - 5"16' - 5"104' - 8"9' - 0"42' - 3"10' - 0"15' - 9"908 SF
CLUB ROOMSPEAKEASY
Room
UNIT C12-B181' - 9"253' - 3"150' - 2"9 8 ' - 1 0 "
7 7 ' - 7 "
1 0 8 ' - 2 "PLANTERSPA
3 3 ' - 2 "
4 5 ' - 9 "
2 9 ' - 2 "
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
8
SPA
UNIT LEGEND
"A" PREFIX = STUDIO
"B" PREFIX = 1 BR
"C" PREFIX = 2 BR
"AA" PREFIX = JR 1 BR
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/8/2021 3:20:09 PMA1-6
LEVEL 3 PLAN
220503
AJ Checker
08/12/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
6/25/2021
No. Description Date
1/16" = 1'-0"A1-6
1 SITE A - LEVEL 3
3
A3-3
A B E
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
11
10
9
AA
BB
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
HH
II
JJ
KK
2
A3-2
1
A3-1
2
A3-1
1
A3-2
2
A3-3
1
A3-3
UNIT C7
UNIT A1 UNIT C8
UNIT B4-A UNIT B4-A UNIT B4-A UNIT B4-A
UNIT B4-A UNIT A1
UNIT D1
UNIT B4-A
UNIT B4-A
UNIT C10
UNIT C12-A
UNIT B4-B
UNIT C9-B
UNIT C13
?
UNIT AA1-AUNIT AA1-AUNIT B4-B
UNIT C9-A
UNIT AA3
UNIT B4-C UNIT AA1-A
UNIT B4-A
UNIT B4-B
UNIT B6
?
UNIT B5
UNIT B4-B
UNIT C11
UNIT C9-A
UNIT B4-A
UNIT C9-C
UNIT B4-A
UNIT AA1-B
UNIT C12-B
DC F G H I
4
A3-3
2 7 ' - 2 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
2 4 ' - 0 "
3 7 ' - 8 "12'
- 4"21'
- 8"10'
- 0"14'
- 4"30' - 6"72' - 2"9' - 0"12' - 10"25' - 8"46' - 1"42' - 9"7' - 5"132' - 3"8' - 5"16' - 5"104' - 8"9' - 0"42' - 3"10' - 0"15' - 9"UNIT C9-A
UNIT D2
UNIT C8
UNIT AA4
UNIT AA2
181' - 7"253' - 3"150' - 2"1 0 8 ' - 2 "
7 7 ' - 7 "
9 8 ' - 1 0 "
3 3 ' - 2 "
4 5 ' - 9 "
2 9 ' - 2 "
UNIT LEGEND
"A" PREFIX = STUDIO
"B" PREFIX = 1 BR
"C" PREFIX = 2 BR
"AA" PREFIX = JR 1 BR
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
4/23/2021 4:43:16 PMA1-7
LEVEL 4-6 PLANS
220503
AJ Checker
08/12/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
4/23/2021
No. Description Date
1/16" = 1'-0"A1-7
1 SITE A - LEVELS 4-6
3
A3-3
A B E
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
11
10
9
AA
BB
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
HH
II
JJ
KK
2
A3-2
1
A3-1
2
A3-1
1
A3-2
2
A3-3
1
A3-3
DC F G H I
4
A3-3
14'
- 4"10'
- 0"21'
- 8"12'
- 4"2 9 ' - 2 "
9 ' - 0 "
7 0 ' - 0 "25' - 7"12' - 11"9' - 0"101' - 7"87' - 3"7' - 5"132' - 3"8' - 5"16' - 8"104' - 8"9' - 0"67' - 11"CIRC
TRASH
UNIT C7
UNIT A1 UNIT C8
UNIT B4-A UNIT B4-A UNIT B4-A UNIT B4-A
UNIT B4-A UNIT A1
UNIT D1
UNIT B4-A
UNIT B4-A
UNIT C10
UNIT C12-A
UNIT B4-B
UNIT C9-B
UNIT C13
UNIT AA4UNIT AA1-AUNIT AA1-AUNIT B4-B
UNIT C9-A
UNIT AA3
UNIT B4-C UNIT AA1-A
UNIT B4-A
UNIT B4-B
UNIT B6
UNIT D2
UNIT B5 UNIT B4-B
UNIT C11
UNIT C9-A
UNIT B4-A
UNIT C9-C
UNIT B4-A
UNIT AA1-B
UNIT C12-B
UNIT C8
UNIT C9-A
UNIT AA2
9 8 ' - 1 0 "
7 7 ' - 7 "
1 0 8 ' - 2 "
3 7 ' - 3 "
2 4 ' - 5 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
2 7 ' - 2 "181' - 7"252' - 0"149' - 1"UNIT LEGEND
"A" PREFIX = STUDIO
"B" PREFIX = 1 BR
"C" PREFIX = 2 BR
"AA" PREFIX = JR 1 BR
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
4/23/2021 4:43:52 PMA1-8
LEVEL 7 PLAN
220503
AJ Checker
08/20/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
4/23/2021
No. Description Date
1/16" = 1'-0"A1-8
1 SITE A - LEVEL 7
3
A3-3
A B E
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
11
10
9
AA
BB
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
HH
II
JJ
KK
2
A3-2
1
A3-1
2
A3-1
1
A3-2
2
A3-3
ELEVATOR OVERRUN
ROOF PARAPET
ROOF PARAPET
ROOF BELOW
EDGE OF AMENTITY TERRACE BELOW
9'
- 5"9'
-
0"DC F G H I
4
A3-3
8'
- 0"ROOF HATCH
DRAINS
DRAINS
DRAINS
DRAINS
DRAINSDRAINSDRAINS
DRAINS
DRAINS
DRAINS
DRAINS
TRASH CHUTE ENCLOSURE
ELEVATOR OVERRUN
MECH UNIT
MECH UNIT
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
4/23/2021 4:44:19 PMA1-9
ROOF PLAN
220503
AJ Checker
08/12/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
4/23/2021
No. Description Date
1/16" = 1'-0"A1-9
1 SITE A - ROOF PLAN
01 -Level 1
0"
02 -Level 2
14' - 4"
03 -Level 3
25' - 4"
04 -Level 4
36' - 4"
05 -Level 5
47' - 0"
06 -Level 6
57' - 8"
07 -Level 7
68' - 4"
08 -Roof
79' - 0"14' - 4"11' - 0"11' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"2' - 0"81' - 0"8' - 0"ELEVATOR OVERRUN
FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING
METAL TILE SIDING
BRICK VENEER
WOOD SLAT PRIVACY RAILING
METAL MESH BALCONY RAILING GLASS BALCONY RAILING
GLASS BALCONY RAILING
SMOOTH METAL PANEL
50' - 0"7' - 0"26' - 0"15' - 0"22' - 2"7' - 0"39' - 4"7' - 0"75' - 11"
37' - 2"8' - 9"20' - 8"9' - 0"13' - 2"7' - 5"4' - 0"9' - 0"21' - 0"9' - 0"7' - 3"9' - 0"13' - 9"9' - 0"21' - 2"9' - 0"6' - 2"9' - 0"4' - 11"8' - 5"16' - 6"
19' - 9"29' - 0"15' - 10"11' - 3"89' - 0"11' - 6"16' - 5"11' - 5"11' - 3"10' - 11"11' - 2"14' - 10"10' - 9"18' - 2"21' - 2"
01 -Level 1
0"
02 -Level 2
14' - 4"
03 -Level 3
25' - 4"
04 -Level 4
36' - 4"
05 -Level 5
47' - 0"
06 -Level 6
57' - 8"
07 -Level 7
68' - 4"
08 -Roof
79' - 0"
FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING
METAL TILE SIDING
BRICK VENEER
METAL MESH BALCONY RAILING
GLASS BALCONY RAILINGSMOOTH METAL PANEL
FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING
METAL MESH BALCONY RAILINGMETAL TILE SIDING
WOOD ACCENT SIDING
9' - 0"87' - 7"9' - 0"33' - 0"9' - 0"17' - 7"9' - 0"57' - 8"40' - 2"
29' - 2"9' - 0"36' - 9"33' - 2"77' - 7"37' - 8"24' - 0"10' - 0"27' - 3"
BUILDING SIGNAGE LOCATIONWOOD ACCENT SIDING 7' - 0"3' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 0"11' - 0"14' - 4"89' - 0"60% GLAZING AT
GROUND FLOOR ALONG
EXCELSIOR BLVD
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
5/14/2021 3:36:58 PMA3-1
NORTH & SOUTH
ELEVATIONS
220503
AJ JM Checker
08/12/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
SD PRICING SET
5/6/2021
No. Description Date
3/32" = 1'-0"A3-1
1 NORTH ELEVATION - LUA
3/32" = 1'-0"A3-1
2 SOUTH ELEVATION - LUA
LUA REVISIONS 5/14/2021
01 -Level 1
0"
02 -Level 2
14' - 4"
03 -Level 3
25' - 4"
04 -Level 4
36' - 4"
05 -Level 5
47' - 0"
06 -Level 6
57' - 8"
07 -Level 7
68' - 4"
08 -Roof
79' - 0"3' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 0"11' - 0"14' - 4"FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING
METAL TILE SIDING
BRICK VENEER
BRICK VENEER
METAL MESH BALCONY RAILINGGLASS BALCONY RAILING
METAL MESH BALCONY RAILING
SMOOTH METAL PANEL 82' - 0"METAL TILE SIDING
38' - 8"24' - 8"10' - 10"9' - 9"117' - 11"30' - 11"12' - 10"
15' - 9"10' - 0"6' - 6"8' - 0"8' - 2"8' - 0"11' - 7"9' - 0"38' - 3"9' - 0"12' - 0"9' - 0"23' - 4"9' - 0"4' - 1"13' - 4"20' - 4"9' - 7"13' - 7"
01 -Level 1
0"
02 -Level 2
14' - 4"
03 -Level 3
25' - 4"
04 -Level 4
36' - 4"
05 -Level 5
47' - 0"
06 -Level 6
57' - 8"
07 -Level 7
68' - 4"
08 -Roof
79' - 0"
FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING
METAL TILE SIDING
BRICK VENEER
WOOD SLAT PRIVACY RAILING
GLASS BALCONY RAILING
MECAHNICAL LOUVERS
SMOOTH METAL PANEL
SMOOTH
METAL PANEL
20' - 0"6' - 0"23' - 8"9' - 0"20' - 5"9' - 0"21' - 8"6' - 9"6' - 11"19' - 0"13' - 2"
30' - 2"23' - 10"7' - 0"9' - 0"7' - 0"25' - 4"9' - 0"12' - 11"25' - 2"2' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 0"11' - 0"14' - 4"81' - 0"METAL MESH BALCONY RAILING
WOOD ACCENT
SIDING
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
5/14/2021 3:37:11 PMA3-2
WEST & EAST ELEVATIONS
220503
AJ Checker
08/12/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
SD PRICING SET
5/6/2021
No. Description Date
3/32" = 1'-0"A3-2
1 WEST ELEVATION - LUA
3/32" = 1'-0"A3-2
2 EAST ELEVATION - LUA
01 -Level 1
0"
02 -Level 2
14' - 4"
03 -Level 3
25' - 4"
04 -Level 4
36' - 4"
05 -Level 5
47' - 0"
06 -Level 6
57' - 8"
07 -Level 7
68' - 4"
08 -Roof
79' - 0"3' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 0"11' - 0"14' - 4"89' - 0"7' - 0"FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING
METAL TILE SIDING
WOOD SLAT PRIVACY RAILING
METAL MESH
BALCONY RAILING
GLASS BALCONY RAILING FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING
ELEVATOR OVERRUN
01 -Level 1
0"
02 -Level 2
14' - 4"
03 -Level 3
25' - 4"
04 -Level 4
36' - 4"
05 -Level 5
47' - 0"
06 -Level 6
57' - 8"
07 -Level 7
68' - 4"
08 -Roof
79' - 0"2' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 0"11' - 0"14' - 4"81' - 0"FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING
PLANTER
METAL MESH BALCONY RAILING GLASS BALCONY RAILING
FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING
ELEVATOR OVERRUN
METAL SILL
01 -Level 1
0"
02 -Level 2
14' - 4"
03 -Level 3
25' - 4"
04 -Level 4
36' - 4"
05 -Level 5
47' - 0"
06 -Level 6
57' - 8"
07 -Level 7
68' - 4"
08 -Roof
79' - 0"
FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING
METAL TILE SIDING
BRICK VENEER
METAL MESH BALCONY RAILING GLASS RAILING
SMOOTH METAL PANEL
PLANTERS 2' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 0"11' - 0"14' - 4"81' - 0"METAL SILL
03 -Level 3
25' - 4"
04 -Level 4
36' - 4"
05 -Level 5
47' - 0"
06 -Level 6
57' - 8"
07 -Level 7
68' - 4"
08 -Roof
79' - 0"
PLANTER
METAL TILE SIDING
METAL MESH BALCONY RAILING
GLASS BALCONY RAILING 11' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"3' - 0"56' - 8"Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
4/22/2021 10:34:35 PMA3-3
COURTYARD ELEVATIONS
220503
AJ Checker
08/20/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
4/23/2021
No. Description Date
3/32" = 1'-0"A3-3
2 WEST COURTYARD ELEVATIONS
3/32" = 1'-0"A3-3
1 NORTH COURTYARD ELEVATION
3/32" = 1'-0"A3-3
3 EAST COURTYARD ELEVATION
3/32" = 1'-0"A3-3
4 SOUTH COURTYARD ELEVATION
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
4/22/2021 10:34:37 PMA3-4
EXTERIOR MATERIALS
220503
Author Checker
09/11/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
4/23/2021
No. Description Date
WOOD ACCENTS - WALNUT METAL TILE - WARM GRAY
BRICK VENEER - MEDIUM IRONSPOT
FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING - LINEN
BLAKE RD NB L A K E R D S W L R T S T A T IO N
B U S S T O P
D R O P O F F B U S S T O P
E X C E L S I O R B L V DPIERCE AVESITE A
SITE C
SITE B
FUTURE USE
BLAKE RD NB L A K E R D S W L R T S T A T IO N
B U S S T O P
D R O P O F F B U S S T O P
E X C E L S I O R B L V DPIERCE AVESITE A
SITE C
SITE BLINEAR PARKFUTURE USE BLAKE RD NB L A K E R D S W L R T S T A T IO N
B U S S T O P
D R O P O F F B U S S T O P
E X C E L S I O R B L V DPIERCE AVESITE A
SITE C
SITE BLINEAR PARKFUTURE USEBLAKE RD NB L A K E R D S W L R T S T A T IO N
B U S S T O P
D R O P O F F B U S S T O P
E X C E L S I O R B L V DPIERCE AVESITE A
SITE C
SITE B
FUTURE USE
BLAKE RD NB L A K E R D S W L R T S T A T IO N
B U S S T O P
D R O P O F F B U S S T O P
E X C E L S I O R B L V DPIERCE AVESITE A
SITE C
SITE BLINEAR PARKFUTURE USE
BLAKE RD NB L A K E R D S W L R T S T A T IO N
B U S S T O P
D R O P O F F B U S S T O P
E X C E L S I O R B L V DPIERCE AVESITE A
SITE C
SITE BLINEAR PARKFUTURE USE BLAKE RD NB L A K E R D S W L R T S T A T IO N
B U S S T O P
D R O P O F F B U S S T O P
E X C E L S I O R B L V DPIERCE AVESITE A
SITE C
SITE BLINEAR PARKFUTURE USE
BLAKE RD NB L A K E R D S W L R T S T A T IO N
B U S S T O P
D R O P O F F B U S S T O P
E X C E L S I O R B L V DPIERCE AVESITE A
SITE C
SITE BLINEAR PARKFUTURE USE
BLAKE RD NB L A K E R D S W L R T S T A T IO N
B U S S T O P
D R O P O F F B U S S T O P
E X C E L S I O R B L V DPIERCE AVESITE A
SITE C
SITE BLINEAR PARKFUTURE USE BLAKE RD NB L A K E R D S W L R T S T A T IO N
B U S S T O P
D R O P O F F B U S S T O P
E X C E L S I O R B L V DPIERCE AVESITE A
SITE C
SITE BLINEAR PARKFUTURE USE
BLAKE RD NB L A K E R D S W L R T S T A T IO N
B U S S T O P
D R O P O F F B U S S T O P
E X C E L S I O R B L V DPIERCE AVESITE A
SITE C
SITE BLINEAR PARKFUTURE USE
BLAKE RD NB L A K E R D S W L R T S T A T IO N
B U S S T O P
D R O P O F F B U S S T O P
E X C E L S I O R B L V DPIERCE AVESITE A
SITE C
SITE BLINEAR PARKFUTURE USE
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
4/23/2021 2:59:37 PMA3-5
SHADOW STUDIES
220503
AJ Checker
08/13/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
4/23/2021
No. Description Date
SHADOW STUDY - JUNE 9 AM
SHADOW STUDY - JUNE 3 PM
SHADOW STUDY - JUNE 12 PM
SHADOW STUDY - MARCH 9 AM
SHADOW STUDY - MARCH 12 PM
SHADOW STUDY - MARCH 3 PM
SHADOW STUDY - SEPTEMBER 9 AM
SHADOW STUDY - SEPTEMBER 12 PM
SHADOW STUDY - SEPTEMBER 3PM
SHADOW STUDY - DECEMBER 9 AM
SHADOW STUDY - DECEMBER 12 PM
SHADOW STUDY - DECEMBER 3 PM
EXCELSIOR
BLVD
PIERCE AVE(BY OTHERS)EXISTING POWER POLETO BE RELOCATEDAAADBBBBBBBBBBBTTTTTTTTTTTTJOXNNNIIIIIIIIIIEXISTING ELECTRICMETER TO BE REMOVEDKHRIUPUQJILELCTEPGKISBUOLJECJCLOUUJBPROTECT EXISTINGLIFT STATIONBGBGPTYYWJYJJBSSJHYBOLFELELMJECCJKJPROTECT IN PLACEEXISTING SANITARYSTRUCTUREFFFFMFREMOVE EXISTINGCONCRETE STAIRSREMOVE EXISTINGCONCRETE STAIRSREMOVE EXISTINGCONCRETE STAIRSPROTECT IN PLACEEXISTING UTILITY POLENIGHGGPROTECT IN PLACEEXISTING WATER VALVEHHKKIIKKJJHKKPROTECT IN PLACEEXISTING SANITARYSTRUCTUREPROTECT IN PLACEEXISTING STORMSTRUCTUREVVVVVVVVVYVPROTECT INPLACE EXISTINGCURB & GUTTERVVVPROTECT IN PLACEEXISTING BUSSTOP SIGNVQAAAPROTECT IN PLACEEXISTING BENCHSCAVBXXASignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed engineerunder the laws of the State of Minnesota7/17/2020
160192000BPGBlake Road StationBlake Road StationHopkins, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL04/23/2021No.Description Date2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMTRISHA D. SIEH49848 04/23/2021TDS1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATIONAPPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS,PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANSCAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL ANDBROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS.2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THEDEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIREDFOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OFDISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES.UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGERAND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY.4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVALAND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANYCONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES ANDANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES.5. THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BESTINFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEERASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHINALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK.6. ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACTLOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS ANDPROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIESREGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PRECEDINGWITH THE WORK.7. ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED ORRELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BEPROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TOPROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TOEXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION.8. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC.(AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTIONMANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH HOPKINS,HENNEPIN COUNTY AND MINNESOTA/DOT.9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, ANDSHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURINGCONSTRUCTION.10. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED.11. CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT ISREQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THESURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR.12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATERDEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION ISCONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OFCONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATERMAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY OF HOPKINS DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITHWATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRACOMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED.13. REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS.14. ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES.15. IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNERIMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALLSTATE OF MINNESOTA REQUIREMENTS.16. IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALLCONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BEDISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS.17. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. NOACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER.DEMOLITION PLAN NOTESNORTHKEYNOTE LEGENDREMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTREMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENTREMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTERREMOVE EXISTING BUILDING AND ASSOCIATEDFOUNDATIONS/FEATURESREMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWERREMOVE EXISTING SANITARY SEWERREMOVE EXISTING WATER MAINREMOVE EXISTING GAS MAINREMOVE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICREMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND POWERREMOVE EXISTING TELEPHONE LINEREMOVE EXISTING STORM STRUCTUREREMOVE EXISTING SANITARY STRUCTUREREMOVE EXISTING UTILITY POLEREMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLEREMOVE EXISTING HYDRANTREMOVE EXISTING WATER VALVEREMOVE EXISTING GAS VALVEREMOVE EXISTING RETAINING WALLREMOVE EXISTING SIGNAGEREMOVE EXISTING BOLLARDSPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING UTILITIESPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING LIGHT POLEPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SIGNAGE OR SALVAGE ANDREINSTALLPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING BOLLARDSABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONREMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACEREMOVE CONCRETE SURFACEREMOVE BUILDINGREMOVE ITEMREMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERREMOVE UTILITY LINESPROPERTY LINEEXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINEEXISTING CHAINLINK FENCEEXISTING RETAINING WALLEXISTING SANITARY SEWEREXISTING STORM SEWEREXISTING WATERMAINEXISTING GAS MAINEXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONEEXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLEEXISTING CONTOUREXISTING SIGNEXISTING FLARED END SECTIONEXISTING STORM MANHOLEEXISTING STORM CATCHBASINEXISTING GAS METEREXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVEEXISTING WELLEXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLEREXISTING ROOF DRAINEXISTING GATE VALVEEXISTING HYDRANTEXISTING METAL COVEREXISTING ELECTRICAL METEREXISTING AIR CONDITIONEREXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLEEXISTING CABLE BOXEXISTING GUY WIREEXISTING POWER POLEEXISTING LIGHT POLECLEARING & GRUBBINGEXISTING CURB & GUTTERLEGENDFULL DEPTH SAWCUTC200DEMO PLAN - SITE ACONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN UTILITY SERVICE TO ADJACENTPROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION, ANDSHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF SERVICES WILL BEINTERRUPTED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION.
50.0'20.0'9
2
0
9
2
0920 916917
917
917
918918918
9
1
8918 919
91
9
919919919919921 915915920920916916916916917917917917918918918918919919919919
915915915920920
916916916916916917917
917917918918918918919919
919EXCELSIOR
BLVD
PIERCE AVE(BY OTHERS)ABBBBCCCCCBDDDDDDDDDDSWPPP SIGNAGEECDDDDDDSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed engineerunder the laws of the State of Minnesota7/17/2020
160192000BPGBlake Road StationBlake Road StationHopkins, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL04/23/2021No. Description Date2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMTRISHA D. SIEH49848 04/23/2021TDSNORTHEROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BEINSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.4. WITHIN TWO WEEKS (14 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BESTABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FORMATERIALS.5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED INACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDINGTHE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THECONSTRUCTION.7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THECONTRACTOR.8. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTOEXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS ASNECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATERFROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS.UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER,PARKING, LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUELAND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC.,IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES INLOCATION AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS.BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER CULVERTS.2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (1), CONCRETE WASHOUTPIT (1) AND INSTALL SILT FENCE.3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA.4. CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS.5. PERFORM CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE SITE. PERFORM MASS GRADING.ROUGH GRADE TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS.6. START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES.7. TEMPORARILY SEED WITH PURE LIVE SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION,DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE OR ASREQUIRED BY NPDES AND/OR CITY OF HOPKINS GRADING PERMIT.SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION:ROCK ENTRANCEINLET PROTECTIONLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEBIOLOGLEGENDKEYNOTE LEGENDCONSTRUCTION ENTRANCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, OFFSET FOR CLARITYBIROLLINLET PROTECTIONBIOLOGABCDEC300OVERALL EROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL PLANBMP QUANTITIESBMPUNITQUANTITYCONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEA.1BIROLLLF2,405INLET PROTECTIONEA.16PROPERTY LINEBIOROLLSURFACE DRAINAGE DIRECTION
BLAKE RD SEXCELSIO
R
B
L
V
DPIERCE AVE(BY OTHERS)PROPOSED BUILDING A
FFE: 918.5 TO 920
P1 FFE: ±908.0
PROPOSED BUILDING B
FFE: 919.25 TO 920.0
P1 FFE: ±909.0
PROPOSED BUILDING C
FFE: 918.0 TO 919.5
P1 FFE: ±908.0
PIERC
E
A
V
E
(BY OT
H
E
R
S)
BLAKE ROAD STATION
PARK & RIDE
(BY OTHERS)
BLAKE ROAD
STATION
(BY OTHERS)PRIVATE DRIVEPRIVATE DRIVE
2570+0
0
2575+0
0
75+00
80+00
9.0'24.0'9.0'19.9'6.7'6.0'22.7'
26.0'24.0'6.7'6.0'6.0'
6.7'
6.7'9.2
'
7.7'
10.9'
24.0'9.0'
6.0'
24.1'
6.7'
6.0'20.3'27.2'9.0'24.0'22.9
'
31.2'
31.0'4.9'5.4'11.2
'
NEW RIGHT-IN, RIGHT-OUT
FOR PIERCE AVE (BY OTHERS)
EXISTING FULL ACCESS
DRIVEWAY ON ADJACENT
PARCEL
RETAINING WALL EASEMENT
TO BE VACATED
EXISTING SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
BUS STOP
GAS EASEMENT TO BE
RELOCATED
PROPOSED RIGHT
TURN LANE
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/17/2020160192000
BPG
Blake Road Station
Blake Road Station
Hopkins, MN 55343
LUA SUBMITTAL
04/23/2021
No. Description Date
2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114
PHONE: 651-645-4197
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
TRISHA D. SIEH
49848 04/23/2021
TDS
PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER
PROPERTY LINE
RETAINING WALL
LEGEND
SITE PLAN NOTES
1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS
AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT
LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT
PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING
UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.
3. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
4. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,
REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE
BID.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,
STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL
WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS
AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL
COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.
6. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A
SURVEY BY SAMBATEK, DATED 02/12/2020.
KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR
OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND
ELECTRICAL PLAN.
8. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND
UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS
SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.
9. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY
BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.
10. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.
11. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.
NORTH
C400OVERALL SITE PLAN
PROPERTY SUMMARY
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 7.39 AC
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 0.00 AC
BUILDING A PARCEL 1.62 AC
BUILDING B PARCEL (FUTURE)2.27 AC
BUILDING C PARCEL (FUTURE)3.50 AC
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS
AREA (BUILDING A PARCEL)66,023 SF (1.52 AC)
PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA
(BUILDING A PARCEL)4,588 SF (0.10 AC)
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA
(INCLUDES OFFSITE
IMPROVEMENTS)
115,597 SF (2.65AC)
ZONING SUMMARY
EXISTING ZONING I-1 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
B-4 BUSINESS DISTRICT
PROPOSED ZONING PUD
EXCELSIO
R
B
L
V
DPIERCE AVE(BY OTHERS)PROPOSED BUILDING A
FFE: 918.5 TO 920
P1 FFE: ±908.0
PRIVATE DRIVE
TRASH
1041 BR
1052 BR
1061 BR
1071 BR - LL1081 BR - LL1091 BR - LL
1101 BR - LL
1111 BR - LL1122 BR - LL1131 BR - LL1142 BR - LL
12.0
'11.0
'11.0
'11.0
'10.7
'20.0'22.0'20.0'6.6'
9.0'
(TYP)5.2'
6.2'8.0'8.0'8.0'24.0'R30.0'9.2
'22.0' (TYP)
9.0'7.7'7.3'6.0'6.0'6.7'
6.0'6.8'
R15.0'
R12.0'
R8.0'
R8.0'
PROPOSED
RIGHT-TURN LANE,
SEE ROADWAY PLANS
RELOCATED LIFT STATION
CONTROL CABINET RECONSTRUCTED
RIGHT-IN, RIGHT-OUT
ACCESS
RECONSTRUCT
EXISTING
RETAINING WALL
BUS STOP
PROPOSED
SAWCUT LINE
PROPOSED TREE GRATES.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN
SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN
FOR HARDSCAPE
DETAILS
PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER
PROPERTY LINE
RETAINING WALL
PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT
PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT
LEGEND
PROPOSED GREENSPACE
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/17/2020160192000
BPG
Blake Road Station
Blake Road Station
Hopkins, MN 55343
LUA SUBMITTAL
04/23/2021
No. Description Date
2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114
PHONE: 651-645-4197
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
TRISHA D. SIEH
49848 04/23/2021
TDS
SITE PLAN NOTES
1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS
AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT
LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT
PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING
UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.
3. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
4. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,
REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE
BID.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,
STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL
WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS
AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL
COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.
6. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A
SURVEY BY SAMBATEK, DATED 02/12/2020.
KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR
OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND
ELECTRICAL PLAN.
8. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND
UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS
SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.
9. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY
BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.
10. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.
11. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.
NORTH
PROPERTY SUMMARY
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 7.39 AC
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 0.00 AC
BUILDING A PARCEL 1.62 AC
BUILDING B PARCEL (FUTURE)2.27 AC
BUILDING C PARCEL (FUTURE)3.50 AC
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS
AREA (BUILDING A PARCEL)66,023 SF (1.52 AC)
PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA
(BUILDING A PARCEL)4,588 SF (0.10 AC)
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA
(INCLUDES OFFSITE
IMPROVEMENTS)
115,597 SF (2.65AC)
ZONING SUMMARY
EXISTING ZONING I-1 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
B-4 BUSINESS DISTRICT
PROPOSED ZONING PUD
C401SITE PLAN - SITE A
DDD
D BLAKE RD SEXCELSIO
R
B
L
V
DPIERCE AVE(BY OTHERS)PROPOSED BUILDING A
FFE: 918.5 TO 920
P1 FFE: ±908.0
PROPOSED BUILDING B
FFE: 919.25 TO 920.0
P1 FFE: ±909.0
PROPOSED BUILDING C
FFE: 918.0 TO 919.5
P1 FFE: ±908.0
PIERC
E
A
V
E
(BY OT
H
E
R
S)
BLAKE ROAD STATION
PARK & RIDE
(BY OTHERS)
(BY OTHERS)PRIVATE DRIVEPRIVATE DRIVE
TRASH
1041 BR
1052 BR
1061 BR1071 BR - LL1081 BR - LL1091 BR - LL
1101 BR - LL
1111 BR - LL1122 BR - LL1131 BR - LL1142 BR - LL
2570+0
0
2575+0
0
75+00
9179189179179
1
8
919
917915914 915
916
917
918919 916917916917
917
919918916915914915915916 916917918919
920
920919918917919919918917
91
6
916
91
5
918
917
916
920915919.4
918.5
918.5
918.5
918.5918.5
916.2
914.5
914.8
914.7
???
915.0
915.1
916.6
919.5
919.4
???
???
915.5
916.1
917.0
918.1
919.2
918.0
918.0
916.4 918.0
919.2
916.8
916.3
918.1
918.8
918.9
919.1
920.0
920.0
919.0
919.2919.0
919.2919.3
919.2
916.6
917.7
917.1
916.1
914.6
919.2
918.1
DDD
D
918.5 916.4
917.9
WALK-UP UNITS
WALK-UP UNITS
919.2
919.9
919.2
919.0
914.8
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/17/2020160192000
BPG
Blake Road Station
Blake Road Station
Hopkins, MN 55343
LUA SUBMITTAL
04/23/2021
No. Description Date
2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114
PHONE: 651-645-4197
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
TRISHA D. SIEH
49848 04/23/2021
TDS
GRADING PLAN NOTES
1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF HOPKINS,
SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.
3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
RCP PER ASTM C-76
HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252
HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306
PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034
STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443
HDPE PER ASTM 3212
PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212
4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING
UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY
DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.
5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO
HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.
WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE
EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING
PAVEMENT.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM
SEWER ALIGNMENTS.
8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO
SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.
9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED
UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF
THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE
LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.
11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND
GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND
CONCRETE SIDEWALKS.
13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL
STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>.
14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING
DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO
CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO
CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL
SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR
AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL
BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY
ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO
PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE
ISSUES.
16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.
17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF
LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN
LANDSCAPE AREAS.
18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX>
OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN
CONNECTION.
19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING
MANHOLE CONNECTIONS.
20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT
PLUMBING CODE.
21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN
CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.
22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"
WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT
DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR925
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00
LEGEND
PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0
PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION
PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION
PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION
PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION
LP:0.0
G:0.00
T:0.00
PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
T/G:0.0
EOF:0.0
0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION
0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE
ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT
PROPOSED RIPRAP
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION
CO
D
NORTH
C500OVERALL GRADING PLAN
DDD
D
EXCELSIO
R
B
L
V
DPIERCE AVE(BY OTHERS)PROPOSED BUILDING A
FFE: 918.5 TO 920
P1 FFE: ±908.0
PRIVATE DRIVE
TRASH
1041 BR
1052 BR
1061 BR
1071 BR - LL1081 BR - LL1091 BR - LL
1101 BR - LL
1111 BR - LL1122 BR - LL1131 BR - LL1142 BR - LL
3 STEPS W/ 6"
RISERS
4 STEPS W/ 6"
RISERS
4 STEPS W/ 6"
RISERS5 STEPS W/ 6"
RISERS
5 STEPS W/ 6"
RISERS915916917
917
919
6 STEPS W/ 6"
RISERS919
915
916
917
9164 STEPS W/ 6"
RISERS 3 STEPS W/ 6"
RISERS
9179189179179
1
8
919
917915914 915
916
917
918919 916917916917
917916916
9179
1
7
9170.
6
7
%
2.22%
1
.
2
2%1.47%2.89%2.68%7.30%2.06%1.86%1.64%1.23%
1.53
%2.12%
4.69%2.64%1.72%
4.15%
2.08%1.40%2.
9
5
%1.40%DDD
D
CBMH-202
CBMH-201
CBMH-200
OCS-1
CBMH-203
STMH-104
CB-106
CBMH-103
RD-1
STMH-300
STMH-105
STMH-302
RD-3
RD-4
ST-2
ST-3
RD-2
ST-301
ST-14
EXSTMH-100
ST-1
ST-16
ST-184.52%1.22%
2.32%
2.44%
2.44%
1.74
%1.33%918.50
920.00
917.00
917.00
915.81
915.07ME:914.53
ME:915.25
918.50 916.34
918.50
918.50
918.50
918.50 918.50
918.50
918.50 918.50
917.50
EOF:916.24
ME:914.27
916.78
918.50
918.49
918.50
918.50
ME:917.40
ME:918.13
ME:918.86
ME:916.28
ME:916.08
ME:916.03
ME:915.97
LP:915.49
917.03
917.37
ME:916.30
ME:916.28
916.07
916.31
ME:918.15
918.98
919.21
918.12
ME:919.16
ME:919.41
ME:917.97
918.93
919.07
915.76
919.02
917.77
ME:914.69
917.21
915.31
ME:916.53
ME:916.60
ME:919.24
ME:918.22
ME:918.55
ME:919.35
917.14
917.51
917.34
916.58
917.23
919.32
918.76
918.47
918.36
ME:917.30
918.13
917.65918.34
918.31
918.12
917.97
917.48
917.24
917.16
916.89916.56916.23915.56
915.53 915.91
916.10
916.41
916.59
916.92
917.09
916.98
916.80 916.63
916.33
915.95
915.81
914.39
ME:916.21
919.77
919.77
ME:917.81
ME:918.28
916.86
CBMH-102
CBMH-101
917.00
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/17/2020160192000
BPG
Blake Road Station
Blake Road Station
Hopkins, MN 55343
LUA SUBMITTAL
04/23/2021
No. Description Date
2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114
PHONE: 651-645-4197
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
TRISHA D. SIEH
49848 04/23/2021
TDS
GRADING PLAN NOTES
1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF HOPKINS,
SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.
3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
RCP PER ASTM C-76
HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252
HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306
PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034
STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443
HDPE PER ASTM 3212
PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212
4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING
UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY
DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.
5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO
HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.
WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE
EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING
PAVEMENT.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM
SEWER ALIGNMENTS.
8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO
SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.
9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED
UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF
THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE
LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.
11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND
GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND
CONCRETE SIDEWALKS.
13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL
STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>.
14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING
DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO
CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO
CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL
SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR
AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL
BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY
ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO
PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE
ISSUES.
16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.
17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF
LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN
LANDSCAPE AREAS.
18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX>
OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN
CONNECTION.
19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING
MANHOLE CONNECTIONS.
20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT
PLUMBING CODE.
21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN
CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.
22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"
WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT
DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR925
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00
LEGEND
PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0
PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION
PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION
PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION
PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION
LP:0.0
G:0.00
T:0.00
PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
T/G:0.0
EOF:0.0
0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION
0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE
ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT
PROPOSED RIPRAP
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION
CO
D
NORTH
C501GRADING PLAN - SITE A
PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTRUBANCE
915
915
916
916
917
917
918
918
919
920
917 917918
9
1
9 9209169179189199
1
5
92
0
91
6
9179
1
8
919917917918918918919 919916
9
1
6 917917
918 918919919
919
915916917914915914916
917
918 BLAKE RD SEXCELSIO
R
B
L
V
DPIERCE AVE(BY OTHERS)PROPOSED BUILDING A
FFE: 918.5 TO 920
P1 FFE: ±908.0
PROPOSED BUILDING B
FFE: 919.25 TO 920.0
P1 FFE: ±909.0
PROPOSED BUILDING C
FFE: 918.0 TO 919.5
P1 FFE: ±908.0
PIERC
E
A
V
E
(BY OT
H
E
R
S)
BLAKE ROAD STATION
PARK & RIDE
(BY OTHERS)
BLAKE ROAD
STATION
(BY OTHERS)PRIVATE DRIVEPRIVATE DRIVE
915
916 916916917917918
919915915
916
9
1
7
9
1
8
919
2570+0
0
2575+0
0
75+00
80+00
DDD
DDDD
D
915916917
918919
916917918919BMP 1
±400 LF - 60" CMP OR APPROVED EQUAL
B/PIPE: 909.50
T/PIPE: 914.50
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 66,023 SF
REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME: 11,004 CF
PROVIDED TREATMENT VOLUME: 11,064 CF
2.00" EVENT DISCHARGE RATE: 2.62 CFS
TREATMENT CAPACITY: 2.94 CFS
BMP 3
±1,000 LF - 48" CMP OR APPROVED EQUAL
B/PIPE: 910.25
T/PIPE: 914.25
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: ±135,000 SF
REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME: ±11,250 CF
PIPE STORAGE VOLUME: ±12,500 CF
BMP 2
±660 LF - 48" CMP OR APPROVED EQUAL
B/PIPE: 910.25
T/PIPE: 914.25
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: ±95,000 SF
REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME: ±7,920 CF
PIPE STORAGE VOLUME: ±8,300 CF
SEE C503 FOR SITE A STORM SEWER PLAN
CBMH-103
NEENAH R-2501
RE: 915.50
IE (N/S/E/W): 910.08
45 LF - 12" STORM SEWER @ 0.37%
32 LF - 12" STORM SEWER @ 0.45%
82 LF - 12" STORM SEWER @ 0.50%
CBMH-500
NEENAH R-3067
RE: ±916.00
IE (N/S): 910.49
215 LF - 12" STORM SEWER @ 0.50%
CBMH-501
NEENAH R-3067
RE: ±918.00
IE (S): 911.57
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/17/2020160192000
BPG
Blake Road Station
Blake Road Station
Hopkins, MN 55343
LUA SUBMITTAL
04/23/2021
No. Description Date
2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114
PHONE: 651-645-4197
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
TRISHA D. SIEH
49848 04/23/2021
TDS
GRADING PLAN NOTES
1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF HOPKINS,
SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.
3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
RCP PER ASTM C-76
HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252
HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306
PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034
STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443
HDPE PER ASTM 3212
PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212
4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING
UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY
DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.
5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO
HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.
WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE
EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING
PAVEMENT.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM
SEWER ALIGNMENTS.
8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO
SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.
9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED
UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF
THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE
LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.
11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND
GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND
CONCRETE SIDEWALKS.
13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL
STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL.
14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING
DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO
CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO
CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL
SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR
AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL
BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY
ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO
PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE
ISSUES.
16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.
17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF
LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN
LANDSCAPE AREAS.
18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX>
OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN
CONNECTION.
19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING
MANHOLE CONNECTIONS.
20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT
PLUMBING CODE.
21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN
CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.
22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"
WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT
DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.
NORTH
C502
OVERALL STORM SEWER
PLAN PLAN
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
CO
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT
PROPOSED RIPRAP
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION
D
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
STORMWATER PIPE DETENTION
PROPOSED FINGER DRAIN - INSTALL AROUND CATCH BASINS, 4 DRAINS,
SPACED AT 90°, EXTENDING 10' FROM CATCH BASIN
915
915
916
916
917
917
918
918
919
920
917 917918
9
1
9 91691791891992
0
9
1
8
919917919
914915914916
917
918 DDD
D
EXCELSIO
R
B
L
V
DPIERCE AVE(BY OTHERS)PROPOSED BUILDING A
FFE: 918.5 TO 920
P1 FFE: ±908.0
PRIVATE DRIVE
DDD
D
915
916
917
918
9
1
6
9179189179189199
1
7
91
8
919915 916BMP 1A
± 400 LF - 60" CMP OR APPROVED EQUAL
PIPE STORAGE: ±8,000 CF
PIPE IE: 909.50
2.00" DISCHARGE RATE: 2.62 CFS
100-YR HWL: 914.37
BMP 1B
8 X 8' JELLYFISH TREATMENT VAULT OR
APPROVED EQUAL
54" DEPTH CARTRIDGE
RE: 917.30
IE (W) 909.46
IE (E): 909.34
TREATMENT CAPACITY: 2.94 CFS
TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA: 1.46 AC
DISTURBED DRAINAGE AREA: 2.65 AC
189 LF - 24" RCP
@ 0.40%
31 LF - 24" RCP
@ 0.40%
39 LF - 24" RCP
@ 0.40%
23 LF - 12" RCP
@ 0.50%
19 LF - 12" RCP
@ 0.50%
8 LF - 24" HDPE
@ 0.00%
8 LF - 12" RCP
@ 0.50%
5 LF - 12" RCP
@ 1.00%
14 LF - 12" RCP
@ 0.50%
7 LF - 12" RCP
@ 1.00%
112 LF - 12" RCP
@ 0.50%
23 LF - 12" PVC
@ 1.00%
14 LF - 10" PVC
@ 2.00%
240 LF - 12" RCP
@ 0.50%
19 LF - 12" PVC
@ 2.00%
CBMH-202
NEENAH R-3067
RE:919.53
IE:916.00 E
IE:915.93 W
CBMH-201
NEENAH R-3067
RE:920.00
IE:915.26 E
CBMH-200
NEENAH R-3067
RE:918.38
IE:914.70 W
IE: 914.67 (S)
IE:914.40 S
OCS-1
NEENAH R-1642
RE:918.07
IE:909.50 N
IE:909.50 E
T/WEIR: 911.00
CONNECT TO EX.
STORM SEWER
IE:915.86 E
IE:915.86 W
STMH-104
NEENAH R-1642
RE:917.16
IE:909.27 N
IE:909.29 W
IE:909.29 S
CB-106
CB 24"X36"
RE:916.57
IE:911.89 E
CBMH-103
CBMH 48" DIA.
RE:916.64
IE:909.16 N
IE:911.82 W
IE:909.16 S
RD-1
ROOF DRAIN
IE:916.23 W
STMH-300
STMH 48" DIA.
RE:916.61
IE:909.59 W
IE:909.59 S
STMH-105
CBMH 48" DIA. (CIR.)
RE:915.49
IE:910.02 S
STMH-302
NEENAH R-3067
RE:914.62
IE:910.91 E
RD-3
ROOF DRAIN
IE:912.00 E
RD-4
ROOF DRAIN
IE:912.00 E
ST-2
CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND SW SYSTEM
IE:911.73 W
RD-2
ROOF DRAIN
IE:911.18 N
ST-301
12"X12" INSERT-A-TEE
IE:910.79 W
IE:910.79 S
IE:910.79 E
EXSTMH-100
STMH 60" DIA.
RE:917.20
IE:908.95 NW
ST-1
CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND SW SYSTEM
IE:909.50 N
ST-3
CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND SW SYSTEM
IE:911.72 W
14 LF - 12" PVC
@ 2.00%
CBMH-102
CBMH 48" DIA.
RE:916.94
IE:909.01 N
IE:909.01 S
7 LF - 24" RCP
@ 0.40%
CBMH-101
CBMH 48" DIA.
RE:916.87
IE:908.98 N
IE:908.98 SE
9 LF - 24" RCP
@ 0.40%
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/17/2020160192000
BPG
Blake Road Station
Blake Road Station
Hopkins, MN 55343
LUA SUBMITTAL
04/23/2021
No. Description Date
2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114
PHONE: 651-645-4197
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
TRISHA D. SIEH
49848 04/23/2021
TDS
NORTH
GRADING PLAN NOTES
1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF HOPKINS,
SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.
3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
RCP PER ASTM C-76
HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252
HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306
PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034
STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443
HDPE PER ASTM 3212
PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212
4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING
UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY
DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.
5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO
HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.
WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE
EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING
PAVEMENT.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM
SEWER ALIGNMENTS.
8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO
SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.
9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED
UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF
THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE
LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.
11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND
GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND
CONCRETE SIDEWALKS.
13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL
STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL.
14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING
DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO
CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO
CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL
SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR
AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL
BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY
ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO
PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE
ISSUES.
16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.
17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF
LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN
LANDSCAPE AREAS.
18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX>
OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN
CONNECTION.
19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING
MANHOLE CONNECTIONS.
20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT
PLUMBING CODE.
21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN
CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.
22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"
WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT
DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
CO
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT
PROPOSED RIPRAP
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION
D
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
STORMWATER PIPE DETENTION
C503
STORM SEWER PLAN -
SITE A
STORMWATER SUMMARY - BUILDING A PARCEL
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR
PROPERTY AREA 70,611 SF (1.62 AC)
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 66,023 SF (1.52 AC)
TRIBUTARY AREA TO BMP 1 63,709 SF (1.26 AC)
DISTURBED AREA 115,597 SF (2.65 AC)
RATE ATTENUATION SUMMARY
1-YEAR
(CFS)
10-YEAR
(CFS)
100-YEAR
(CFS)
PIERCE AVENUE
EXISTING 6.65 12.07 21.55
PROPOSED 0.32 0.75 1.55
EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD
EXISTING 1.68 2.91 5.10
PROPOSED 5.49 9.50 15.58
TOTAL
EXISTING 8.32 14.99 26.65
PROPOSED 5.80 10.25 17.12
RUNOFF VOLUME SUMMARY
REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME:
MCWD REQUIRES A VOLUME ABSTRACTION OF 1"
OVER THE IMPERVIOUS AREA (5,502 CF) OR
TREATMENT OF THE FLOW RATE RESULTING
FROM THE 2" EVENT OVER THE IMPERVIOUS AREA
FOR FILTRATION PRACTICES.
11,004 CF
PROVIDED TREATMENT VOLUME:
TO DEMONSTRATE THE UNDERGROUND
DETENTION AND TREATMENT VAULT HAVE
SUFFICIENT CAPACITY, THE 2" EVENT IS MODELED
WITH A 2.59" RAINFALL DEPTH THAT RESULTS IN
THE PROVIDED TREATMENT VOLUME.
11,064 CF
WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
REQUIRED TSS REMOVAL 70%
SITE CAPTURE 90.2%
BMP 1B TSS REMOVAL RATE 80%
BMP 1B TREATMENT CAPACITY 2.94 CFS
BMP 1A DISCHARGE RATE (2" EVENT)2.62 CFS
PROVIDED TSS REMOVAL 72.16% (90.2% SITE CAPTURE * 80%
REMOVAL)
PROPOSED FINGER DRAIN - INSTALL AROUND CATCH BASINS, 4 DRAINS,
SPACED AT 90°, EXTENDING 10' FROM CATCH BASIN
BLAKE RD SEXCELSIO
R
B
L
V
DPIERCE AVE(BY OTHERS)PROPOSED BUILDING A
FFE: 918.5 TO 920
P1 FFE: ±908.0
PROPOSED BUILDING B
FFE: 919.25 TO 920.0
P1 FFE: ±909.0
PROPOSED BUILDING C
FFE: 918.0 TO 919.5
P1 FFE: ±908.0
PIERC
E
A
V
E
(BY OT
H
E
R
S)
BLAKE ROAD STATION
PARK & RIDE
(BY OTHERS)
BLAKE ROAD
STATION
(BY OTHERS)PRIVATE DRIVEPRIVATE DRIVE
DDD
D
2570+0
0
2575+0
0
75+00
80+00
FILD VERIFY LOCATION AND
ELEVATION OF EXISTING
SANITARY SEWER
SANITARY STUB
CONNECT TO BUILDING PLUMBING,
COORDINATE WITH MEP
FUTURE FIRE HYDRANT
AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY,
PROVIDE 6" LEAD
FUTURE FIRE HYDRANT
AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY,
PROVIDE 6" LEAD
FUTURE 6" WATERMAIN
COMBINED WATER SERVICE,
PROVIDE SPLIT AND BACKFLOW
PREVENTER INSIDE BUILDING
FUTURE 8" WATERMAIN
SANITARY STUB
CONNECT TO BUILDING PLUMBING,
COORDINATE WITH MEP
FUTURE FIRE HYDRANT
AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY,
PROVIDE 6" LEAD
FUTURE FIRE HYDRANT
AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY,
PROVIDE 6" LEAD
R150'
FUTURE HYDRANT COVERAGE, TYP.
SEE C601 FOR SITE A UTILITY PLAN
COMBINED WATER SERVICE,
PROVIDE SPLIT AND BACKFLOW
PREVENTER INSIDE BUILDING
FUTURE 6" COMBINED
BUILDING WATER SERVICE
FUTURE STORM SEWER
FUTURE WATERMAIN CONNECTION
MAINTAIN FRANCHISE
UTILITY SERVICES TO
EXISTING BUILDING
MAINTAIN SANITARY
SEWER AND WATER
SERVICES TO EXISTING
BUILDING
FUTURE FIRE HYDRANT
AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY,
PROVIDE 6" LEAD
SS-03
IE:907.45 E
SS-02
RE:918.32
IE:907.35 W
IE:907.35 SE
SS-05
IE:907.97 SW
SS-01
RE:917.98
IE:906.90 NW
IE:906.90 E
IE:906.80 S
SS-09
IE:909.00 E
EX SS-00
RE:917.60
IE:906.36 N
SS-04
RE:916.89
IE:907.15 NE
IE:907.15 N
IE:907.05 W
SS-06
RE:916.74
IE:907.60 N
IE:907.60 N
IE:907.50 S
SS-08
RE:916.00
IE:908.80 W
IE:908.80 N
IE:908.70 S
5 LF - 6" PVC
@ 2.00%
23 LF - 6" PVC
@ 2.00%
41 LF - 6" PVC
@ 2.00%
29 LF - 8" PVC
@ 0.50%
218 LF - 8" PVC
@ 0.50%
71 LF - 8" PVC
@ 0.50%
10 LF - 6" PVC
@ 2.00%
89 LF - 8" PVC
@ 0.50%
SANITARY STUB
CONNECT TO BUILDING PLUMBING,
COORDINATE WITH MEP
PROTECT EXISTING LIFT
STATION TO REMAINFIRE HYDRANT AND GATE
VALVE ASSEMBLY, PROVIDE
6" LEAD (BY OTHERS)
PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT
AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY,
PROVIDE 6" LEAD
PROPOSED 8" WATERMAIN
PROPOSED 8" WATERMAIN
WETTAP EXISTING 8" WATERMAIN
WITH SADDLE & GATE VALVE
PROPOSED 6" STUB AND PLUG
WETTAP EXISTING 8" WATERMAIN
WITH SADDLE & GATE VALVE
FUTURE WETTAP EXISTING 8"
WATERMAIN WITH SADDLE & GATE
VALVE
FUTURE WETTAP EXISTING 8"
WATERMAIN WITH SADDLE & GATE
VALVE
PROPOSED 8" STUB AND PLUG
DDD
D
EXISTING WATER SERVICE
EXISTING WATER SERVICE
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/17/2020160192000
BPG
Blake Road Station
Blake Road Station
Hopkins, MN 55343
LUA SUBMITTAL
04/23/2021
No. Description Date
2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114
PHONE: 651-645-4197
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
TRISHA D. SIEH
49848 04/23/2021
TDS
NORTH
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
STORM SEWER
SANITARY SEWER
WATERMAIN
GATE VALVE
HYDRANT
TEE
REDUCER
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
TELEPHONE
GAS MAIN
STORM SEWER
LEGEND
CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO
EXISTING PROPOSED
UTILITY PLAN NOTES
1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF
PROPOSED UTILITIES.
2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP
8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP
6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-3034
DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150
3. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241
CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150
4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150
SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER
ANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241.
4. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET.
5. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST
BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE
CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS.
6. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18"
VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR
STRUCTURE).
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES.
8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES,
STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE
SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET
ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE
MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A
MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR
ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50).
9. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE
BACKFILLING.
10. TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED
PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN
GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS.
11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION
STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I.
12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW
LINES.
13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES.
14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY
OF HOPKINS AND/OR STATE OF MINNESOTA WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND
INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES.
15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION
OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE
VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE
FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE
CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS
BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL
BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES
WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES.
17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION
REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND
ELECTRICAL PLAN.
19. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE
INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS.
20. ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND
MAINTAINED.
21. ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION
BLOCKING.
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
STORMWATER PIPE DETENTION
C600OVERALL UTILITY PLAN
DDD
D
EXCELSIO
R
B
L
V
DPIERCE AVE(BY OTHERS)PROPOSED BUILDING A
FFE: 918.5 TO 920
P1 FFE: ±908.0
PROPOSED BUILDING C
FFE: 918.0 TO 919.5
P1 FFE: ±908.0 PRIVATE DRIVEPRIVATE DRIVE
PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN
R150'
PROPOSED HYDRANT COVERAGE
EXISTING GAS MAIN TO REMAIN,
MAINTAIN SERVICE TO ADJACENT BUILDINGS
EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS,
MAINTAIN SERVICE TO ADJACENT BUILDINGS
PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN
PROPOSED 6" WATER SERVICE
EXISTING POWER AND COMMUNICATION SERVICE TO REMAIN.
MAINTAIN SERVICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES
PROTECT EXISTING LIFT STATION
MAINTAIN ELECTRIC SERVICE TO
LIFT STATION AT ALL TIMES
SS-03
STUB
IE:907.45 E CO
SS-02
CLEANOUT
RE:918.32
IE:907.35 W
IE:907.35 SE SS-05
STUB
IE:907.97 SW
SS-01
48" SSWR MH
RE:917.98
IE:906.90 NW
IE:906.90 E
IE:906.80 S
SS-09
STUB
RE:916.10
IE:909.00 E
SS-04
48" SSWR MH
RE:916.89
IE:907.15 NE
IE:907.15 N
IE:907.05 W
SS-06
48" SSWR MH
RE:916.74
IE:907.60 N
IE:907.60 N
IE:907.50 S
EX SS-07
48" SSWR MH
RE:916.29
IE:907.93 S
SS-08
48" SSWR MH
RE:916.00
IE:908.80 W
IE:908.80 N
IE:908.70 S
5 LF - 6" PVC
@ 2.00%
23 LF - 6" PVC
@ 2.00%
41 LF - 6" PVC
@ 2.00%
29 LF - 8" PVC
@ 0.50%
218 LF - 8" PVC
@ 0.50%
71 LF - 8" PVC
@ 0.50%
10 LF - 6" PVC
@ 2.00%
A
D
B
C
A
C
G 8" X 8"
H 8"
H 8"
G 8" X 8"
B
C
G
8" X 6"G8" X 6"
F
C
G 8" X 6"
B
B
G8" X 6"
F
A
G8" X 8"
H8"
H 8"
H8"
H8"
A
E
E
EX SS-00
48" SSWR MH
RE:917.60
IE:906.36 N
89 LF - 8" PVC
@ 0.50%
51 LF - 8" PVC
@ 0.65%
SANITARY SERVICE FOR EXISTING
BUILDING ASSUMED TO CONNECT HERE.
FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND INVERT
SANITARY SERVICE FOR EXISTING
BUILDING ASSUMED TO CONNECT HERE.
FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND INVERT
EXISTING WATERMAIN TO REMAIN
EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO REMAIN
FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION
EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO REMAIN
FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION
EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO REMAIN
FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER SERVICE,
MAINTAIN SERVICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES
EXISTING POWER POLE TO REMAIN
RELOCATED COMMUNICATION
AND POWER
6"
8"
RELOCATE EXISTING
POWER POLE
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER & COMMUNICATION SERVICES,
MAINTAIN SERVICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES
SERVICE FOR
FUTURE BUILDING
DDD
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/17/2020160192000
BPG
Blake Road Station
Blake Road Station
Hopkins, MN 55343
LUA SUBMITTAL
04/23/2021
No. Description Date
2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114
PHONE: 651-645-4197
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
TRISHA D. SIEH
49848 04/23/2021
TDS
CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO
EXISTING PROPOSED
UTILITY PLAN NOTES
1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF
PROPOSED UTILITIES.
2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP
8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP
6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-3034
DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150
3. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241
CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150
4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150
SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER
ANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241.
4. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET.
5. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST
BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE
CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS.
6. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18"
VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR
STRUCTURE).
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES.
8. IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES,
STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE
SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET
ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE
MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A
MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR
ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50).
9. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE
BACKFILLING.
10. TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED
PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN
GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS.
11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION
STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I.
12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW
LINES.
13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES.
14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY
OF HOPKINS AND/OR STATE OF MINNESOTA WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND
INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES.
15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION
OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE
VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE
FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE
CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS
BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL
BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES
WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES.
17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION
REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND
ELECTRICAL PLAN.
19. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE
INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS.
20. ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND
MAINTAINED.
21. ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION
BLOCKING.
NORTH
SANITARY SEWER KEYNOTE LEGEND
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. CONNECT TO BUILDING PLUMBING
COORDINATE W/ MEP PLANS
ADJUST EXISTING CASTING TO NEW RIM ELEVATION
CONSTRUCT MANHOLE OVER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER.
CONNECT TO EXISTING SERVICE PIPE. FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND
ELEVATION.
CORE DRILL AND CONNECT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE. FIELD VERIFY
LOCATION AND ELEVATION
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
STORM SEWER
SANITARY SEWER
WATERMAIN
GATE VALVE
HYDRANT
TEE
REDUCER
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
TELEPHONE
GAS MAIN
STORM SEWER
LEGEND
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
STORMWATER PIPE DETENTION
C601UTILITY PLAN - SITE A
WATERMAIN KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROPOSED 6" COMBINED WATER SERVICE, PROVIDE SPLIT AND
BACKFLOW PREVENTER INSIDE BUILDING
WATER STUB AND PLUG
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN WITH WET TAP SADDLE,
PROVIDE GATE VALVE
CORE DRILL AND CONNECT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE. FIELD VERIFY
LOCATION AND ELEVATION
RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY, PROVIDE
NEW 6" LEAD
PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY, PROVIDE 6"
LEAD
TEE
BEND
GATE VALVE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
NORTH0SCALE:1"=16'16' 32'48'PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLANSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE ROADSTATIONHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL04/23/2021No. Description DateGENERAL NOTESL010SITE AND LANDSCAPE NOTESSITE PREPARATION NOTES1.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIARWITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPEOF WORK.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND BRING TO THEATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DISCREPANCIES WHICHMAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN OR INTENT OF THE LAYOUT.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLECODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK AND MATERIALSSUPPLIED.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS,TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURINGCONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BEREPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.5. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OFUNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THENECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTIONBEGINS (MINIMUM 10' CLEARANCE).6. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTIONAND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORSWORKING ON SITE.7. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT TRENCHESDO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN.8. EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB/GUTTER ANDOTHER ELEMENTS ARE BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TOTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALLVERIFY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME.9. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OF PROPOSED WALKS,TRAILS OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENTREQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONSAND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. CHANGES INALIGNMENT AND GRADES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN SITECONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANTESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLE SITECONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK.11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE OFNEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF SUBSTANTIALCOMPLETION. REPAIR OF ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICHMAY OCCUR PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION SHALL BE THERESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.12. EXISTING TREES OR SIGNIFICANT SHRUB MASSINGS FOUND ON SITESHALL BE PROTECTED AND SAVED UNLESS NOTED TO BE REMOVEDOR ARE LOCATED IN AN AREA TO BE GRADED. QUESTIONSREGARDING EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THEATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL.13. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, UPON DIRECTION OF LANDSCAPEARCHITECT, SHALL BE FERTILIZED AND PRUNED TO REMOVE DEADWOOD, DAMAGED AND RUBBING BRANCHES.14. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUESTFOR THE SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION INSPECTION OF LANDSCAPEAND SITE IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FINAL PAYREQUEST.15. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT REPRODUCIBLEAS-BUILT DRAWING(S) OF LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION, IRRIGATIONAND SITE IMPROVEMENTS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTIONINSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION.16. SYMBOLS ON PLAN DRAWING TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCHEDULESIF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS ANDDETAILS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES.GRADING1. ROUGH GRADING AND FINISHED GRADING TO BE DONE BY OTHERSEXCEPT WHERE NOTED.2. GRADING LIMITS ARE DEFINED AS THE JUNCTURE OF PROPOSEDGRADE WITH EXISTING GRADE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.3. GRADING LIMITS AND LIMITS OF WORK SHOWN ON PLAN ARE ONLYAPPROXIMATE AND MAY BE ADJUSTED IN FIELD BY LANDSCAPEARCHITECT. WORK OUTSIDE OF THESE LIMITS WILL BE DONE ATLANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE UNLESS DIRECTED BYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER IN WRITING.4. FILL/CUT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A 1% MINIMUM GRADE AWAYFROM BUILDINGS WITHIN LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.5. SALVAGE TOPSOIL FROM THE EARTHWORK AREAS AS APPROPRIATEOR AS INDICATED ON PLANS AND STOCKPILE FOR REUSE.6. OBTAIN SOIL SAMPLE FROM SALVAGED TOPSOIL STOCKPILE ANDSUBMIT TO INDEPENDENT TESTING AGENCY FOR ANALYSIS.7. MAINTAIN A UNIFORM GRADE BETWEEN CONTOURS IN AREAS TO BEGRADED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.8. ELEVATIONS, IF SHOWN ARE FINISHED ELEVATIONS. SPOTELEVATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER CONTOURS.9. ADD EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IF GRADES GREATER THAN 3:1OR IF CONDITIONS WARRANT. REFER TO MNDOT SPECIFICATIONSFOR EROSION CONTROL.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATION OFUNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES,VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVEIF DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TOTHE OWNER.11. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROPER EROSION CONTROLMEASURES AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT EROSION IS KEPT TO ANABSOLUTE MINIMUM.12. PROVIDE TEMPORARY COVERING FOR CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES UNTIL FINISHED GRADING IS COMPLETE.13. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS AS NEEDED.14. PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCESSHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REFER TO STATESPECIFICATIONS FOR AGGREGATE BASE AND SILT FENCE.15. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROLMEASURES PER LOCAL POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ANDSPECIFICATIONS.16. WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF FINISHED SITE GRADING, DISTURBED AREASSHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, MULCH OR ROCK BASE.17. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES,INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT IN FRONT OF SILTFENCES AND EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED CATCH BASINS, FORTHE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION.18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURESAFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED AND DISPOSE OF OFF SITE.19. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT SOIL CONDITIONS AND COMPACTION ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGEAROUND THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. UNDESIRABLE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. IT SHALL BE THELANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE PROPERSURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE IN PLANTING AREAS.PLANTING1. SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION IS FROM APRIL 15 TO JUNE15.2. FALL CONIFEROUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 21 TOSEPTEMBER 30.3. FALL DECIDUOUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 UNTILNOVEMBER 15.4. ADJUSTMENTS TO PLANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITINGBY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.5. STAKE PROPOSED PLANTING LOCATIONS PER PLAN FOR REVIEWAND APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALL.6. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OFTHE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSI Z60.1.UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE ATLEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED HEIGHT. ORNAMENTAL TREESSHALL HAVE NO 'V' CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NOLOWER THAN 3' FEET ABOVE THE ROOT BALL. STREET ANDBOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6'ABOVE PAVED SURFACE.7. INSTALL PLANT MATERIAL AFTER FINAL GRADING ANDCONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.8. INSTALL PLANT MATERIALS PER PLANTING DETAILS.9. SUBSTITUTION REQUESTS FOR PLANT MATERIAL TYPE & SIZE SHALLBE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FORCONSIDERATION PRIOR TO BIDDING. SUBSTITUTIONS AFTERBIDDING MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND ARESUBJECT TO CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS.10. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAYBE NEEDED IN FIELD. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIEDPRIOR TO ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTS.11. FERTILIZE PLANT MATERIAL UPON INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONEMEAL AND OTHER APPROVED FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THEPLANTING SOIL (PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS) ORTREAT FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATIONOF GRANULAR 10-0-5 OF 12 OZ. PER 2.5" CALIPER TREE AND 6 OZ.PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 10-0-10 THEFOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER.12. INSTALL 18" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL IN AREAS RECEIVING GROUNDCOVER, PERENNIALS, AND ANNUALS. PLANTING SOIL SHALLCONSIST OF MnDOT 3877-B MODIFIED TO CONTAIN A MAXIMUM OF30% SAND, A PH OF 7.1 MAX, OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THEPROJECT SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL.13. TREE WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE TWO-WALLED PLASTICSHEETING APPLIED FROM TRUNK FLARE TO FIRST BRANCH. WRAPSMOOTH-BARKED DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIORTO DECEMBER 1 AND REMOVE WRAPPING AFTER MAY 1.14. APPLY PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR APPROVED EQUAL) INANNUAL, PERENNIAL, AND SHRUB BEDS FOLLOWED BY SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION REGARDING USE OF HERBICIDES.MULCHING1. INSTALL 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH RINGS AT CONIFEROUS & DECIDUOUS TREES WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK.2. INSTALL 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH RINGS AT SHRUBPLANTING AREAS WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH SHRUB STEMS.3. INSTALL 3" DEEP FINELY SHREDDED MULCH IN PERENNIAL PLANTINGBEDS. REMOVE ALL MULCH FROM STEMS OF PERENNIALS - PLANTSTEMS SHOULD NOT BE IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH MULCH.WATERING1. PLANTED MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED BY TEMPORARY MEANSUNTIL PLANTS ARE ESTABLISHED.2. TEMPORARY WATERING MEANS, METHODS, AND SCHEDULING SHALLBE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. REMOVE TEMPORARYWATERING EQUIPMENT UPON PLANT ESTABLISHMENT.WARRANTY1. WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEARFROM THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. NO PARTIALACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED.TURF NOTES1. SOD AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE.2. WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADEOF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC.3. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVESTAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR INDRAINAGE SWALES, SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY.4. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRINGSEED & SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HASTHAWED TO JUNE 15.5. FALL SODDING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TO NOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TOSEPTEMBER 15. ADJUSTMENTS TO SOD/SEED PLANTING DATESMUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.IRRIGATION NOTES1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION THAT MEETS THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE PROVIDED PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONAS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK. SUBMIT LAYOUT PLAN ANDSPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR CONSTRUCTION. IT SHALL BE THECONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT SODDED/SEEDEDAND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSEAREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY WATER SUPPLY, VOLUME,PRESSURE AND LOCATION FOR SYSTEM TAP PRIOR TO SYSTEMDESIGN.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM COMPLETE LIMITS OF IRRIGATIONWITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUPPLYING SHOPDRAWINGS.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR INSPECTION AND APPROVAL OF AREAS RECEIVING DRIP IRRIGATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MULCH.5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPEARCHITECT WITH AS-BUILT DRAWINGS, DETAILED SYSTEMOPERATION INSTRUCTIONS AND AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULEAPPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND PLANTEDMATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS.
CURBSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYDETAILMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELCOLOR/FINISHCOMMENTSCONCRETE PLANTER CURB468 LF7/L500 CUSTOMCONCRETE CURBINGSTANDARD CONCRETE8" HEIGHT FROM FINISHED GRADE, REFER TOCIVIL FOR ELEVATIONSEDGINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYDETAILMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELCOLOR/FINISHCOMMENTSSTEEL EDGING70 LF5/L500 RYERSON3/16" GALV. STEELBLACK4"X 3/16" WITH 12" STAKES - RYERSON ORAPPROVED EQUALLIGHTINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYDETAILMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELCOLOR/FINISHCOMMENTSSTREET LIGHT5TBDMATCH TO CITY STANDARD MATCH TO CITY STANDARD OWNER PURCHASED, CITY INSTALLEDPEDESTIAN LIGHT10FORMS AND SURFACESLIGHT COLUMN PEDESTRIANLIGHTARGENTO TEXTURE12` HEIGHTMINERAL MULCHSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYDETAILMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELCOLOR/FINISHCOMMENTSCRUSHED STONE100 SF 2/L501 HEDBERG AGGREGATESDRESSER GRAY TRAP ROCK GREY3" DEPTH - 3/16" MINUS OVER 6" CLASS VBASEPAVINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYDETAILMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELCOLOR/FINISHCOMMENTSCONCRETE PAVING9,732 SFN/ASTANDARD CONCRETESTANDARD / BROOM FINISH SEE CIVIL FOR PAVING PROFILECONCRETE UNIT PAVER579 SF 1/L501 BORGERTBULOVAR PAVERGRAPHITERUNNING BOND PATTERNSPECIALTY / PEDESTRIAN PAVING715 SFN/AINTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETEWITH JOINTING PATTERNCHARCOAL / TOPCAST 100 SEE CIVIL FOR PAVING PROFILESITE FURNITURESYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYDETAILMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELCOLOR/FINISHCOMMENTSBIKE RACK43/L501 FORMS+SURFACESTRIO BIKE RACKSLATESURFACE MOUNT PER MANUFACTURER`SDIRECTIONTREE GRATE24/L501 URBAN ACCESSORIESJAMISON TREE GRATEGREY IRON / NATURAL FINISH 5`-0" X 7`-0" RECTANGLESITE BENCH26/L501 LANSCAPE FORMSBANCAL BENCHSTORMCLOUD / IPE168" LENGTH WITH 88" OFFSET BACKREST,SURFACE MOUNT PER MANUFACTURER`SDIRECTIONCB-01ED-01LT-01LT-02MM-02P-01P-02P-03SF-01SF-02SF-03OVERALL REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULEN/AN/ASEE CIVILSEE CIVILDECIDUOUS TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONT. NOTESAC-M5ACER MIYABEI `MORTON` TM / STATE STREET MIYABEI MAPLE2.5" CAL. B&B TRUNK FREE OF BRANCHES 6`-7` FROM BASEAC-P4ACER PLATANOIDES `POND` TM / EMERALD LUSTRE MAPLE3" CAL.B&B NATURAL FORM, SINGLE LEADERAC-R1ACER RUBRUM `ARMSTRONG` / ARMSTRONG RED MAPLE2.5" CAL. B&B TRUNK FREE OF BRANCHES 6`-7` FROM BASEAM-G6AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE` / `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE` SERVICEBERRY10` HT. CLUMP B&B CLUMP FORMGL-I6GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS `SKYCOLE` TM / SKYLINE THORNLESS HONEY LOCUST2.5" CAL. B&B TRUNK FREE OF BRANCHES 6`-7` FROM BASEQU-L5QUERCUS X WAREI `LONG` TM / REGAL PRINCE OAK3" CAL.B&B TRUNK FREE OF BRANCHES 6`-7` FROM BASETI-A 2TILIA AMERICANA `MCKSENTRY` / AMERICAN SENTRY LINDEN2.5" CAL. B&B TRUNK FREE OF BRANCHES 6`-7` FROM BASESHRUBSCODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONT. NOTESAR-M 55ARONIA MELANOCARPA `UCONNAM165` / LOW SCAPE MOUND CHOKEBERRY#2CONT. SPACE 2`-0" O.C.DI-L 80DIERVILLA LONICERA / DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE#5CONT. SPACE 3`-0" O.C.HY-J 19HYDRANGEA PANICULATA `JANE` / LITTLE LIME HYDRANGEA#3CONT. SPACE 4`-0" O.C.PH-O16PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `DONNA MAY` / DONNA MAY NINEBARK#5CONT. SPACE 3`-6" O.C.SO-S82SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA `SEM` / SEM ASH LEAF SPIREA#2CONT. SPACE 3`-0" O.C.SP-E46SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA `TOR` / BIRCHLEAF SPIREA#5CONT. SPACE 3`-0" O.C.EVERGREEN SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONT. NOTESTA-M 21TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTONII` / TAUTON YEW#3CONT. SPACE 3`-0" O.C.GRASSESCODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONT. NOTESCA-A192CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` / FEATHER REED GRASS#3CONT. SPACE 2`-6" O.C.GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONT. NOTESSOD2,120 SFSODSODROLL SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 329200OVERALL PLANT SCHEDULENORTH0SCALE:1"=16'16' 32'48'PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLANSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE ROADSTATIONHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL04/23/2021No. Description DateREFERENCE NOTES &PLANTING SCHEDULESL011
BUS PLAZA
CURBED PLANTING BED
(10'-0" -13'-0" WIDTH / 30" OFFSET
FROM CURB)
CITY STANDARD PAVING /
STREETSCAPE
CITY STANDARD PAVING /
STREETSCAPE
TREE GRATES
CURBED PLANTING BED
(7'-0" -11'-0" WIDTH / 30" OFFSET FROM
BACK OF CURB)
STREET LIGHTING
POCKET
PARK
(4,360 SF)
STREETSCAPE
PLANTINGS
TURF BOULEVARD
(6'-0" WIDTH, TYP.
TURF BOULEVARD
(6'-0" WIDTH, TYP.)
CONCRETE WALKWAY
(9'-0" WIDTH)
CONCRETE WALKWAY
(10'-0" WIDTH)
CONCRETE WALKWAY
(10'-0" WIDTH)
CONCRETE PAVER EDGE
(2'-0" WIDTH)
CONCRETE WALKWAY
(7'-0" WIDTH)
DOG PARK
BUILDING A
BUILDING B
BUILDING C
TREE GRATES
EXISTING LIFT STATION /
RELOCATED CABINET AND
ANTENNA
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
(5'-0" WIDTH)
COLORED CONCRETE AT
ENTRY
CONCRETE PAVER
BOULEVARD
COLORED CONCRETE AT
BUILDING / RETAIL ENTRY
STREET LIGHTING
TREE GRATES
CONCRETE WALKWAY
(7'-0" WIDTH)
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
TBD
COLORED CONCRETE
RETAIL AREA
L140
1
LANDSCAPE / FOUNDATION
PLANTINGS
LANDSCAPE /
FOUNDATION PLANTINGS
PROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L IN E
PROPERTY LINE
P R O P E R T Y L IN E PROPERTY LINECONCRETE WALKWAY
(6'-0" WIDTH, TYP).
CONCRETE WALKWAY
(6'-0" WIDTH)
CONCRETE WALKWAY
(6'-0" WIDTH)
E X C E L S I O R B L V D .BLAKE RD.PIERCE AVE.MASTER PLAN SITE INFORMATION
BUILDING A:
LOT AREA:69,515 sf
BUILDING FOOTPRINT:52,490 sf
HARDSCAPE / IMPERVIOUS AREA:12,689 sf
LANDSCAPE / PERVIOUS AREA:4,336 sf
TREES:25 TREES
SHRUBS:301 SHRUBS
TURF:1,234 SF
BUILDING B:
LOT AREA:92,864 sf
BUILDING FOOTPRINT:64,470 sf
HARDSCAPE / IMPERVIOUS AREA:19,209 sf
LANDSCAPE / PERVIOUS AREA:9,185 sf
TREES: 36 TREES
SHRUBS:600 SHRUBS
TURF:1,1998 SF
BUILDING C:
LOT AREA:152,769 sf
BUILDING FOOTPRINT:66,456 sf
HARDSCAPE / IMPERVIOUS AREA:61,482 sf
LANDSCAPE / PERVIOUS AREA:24,831 sf
TREES:58 TREES
SHRUBS:750 SHRUBS
TURF:3,260 SF
NOTES:
1. REFER TO SHEET "L140: LANDSCAPE PLAN -BUILDING A"
FOR A DETAILED INFORMATION ON PLANT QUANTITIES,
SPECIES, AND SIZES.
2. LANDSCAPE COUNTS FOR BUILDING B AND BUILDING C
ARE APPROXIMATIONS ONLY AND BASED ON OPEN SPACE
AREA SQUARE FOOTAGES.
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
landscape architect under the laws of the
State of Minnesota
310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050
Minneapolis, MN 55415
p: 612.332.7522
4/23/2021 10:13:53 AML100
MASTER PLAN OVERALL
SITE PLAN
20-172
BD JS
07/20/20
BLAKE ROAD STATION
BLAKE ROAD
STATION
HOPKINS, MN 55343
LUA SUBMITTAL
04/232020
No. Description Date
MASTER PLAN LEGEND
CONCRETE PAVING
SPECIALTY PAVING
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER
LANDSCAPE PLANTING BED
TURF GRASS
Xre
f C:\Users\ajagd\OneD
rive
- ESG
A
rch
itects
\Desktop\Blake Road_Mas
ter Plan-220503_B
lake
Rd Hopk
ins
S
ite Mas
te
r Plan-rvt-1-MASTER PLAN
.dwgXre
f C:\Users\ajagd\OneD
rive
- ESG
A
rch
itects
\Desktop\Blake Road_Mas
ter Plan-20-172
- Blake Road Sta
tion_bdouce
tteLSV6S-
rvt-1-MASTER
PLAN.dwgXre
f C:\Users\ajagd\OneD
rive
- ESG
A
rch
itects
\Desktop\Blake Road_Mas
ter Plan-Blake Rd
Hopkins Si
te
A_MEP_2020
-rvt-1-MASTER
PLAN.dwgRETAIL2,106 SFSF-03P-01LT-01LT-01P-02SF-02CB-01CB-01LT-01CB-01LT-01LT-01P-03P-03SF-03P-01P-01P-01P-01MM-02LT-02LT-02LT-02LT-02LT-02P-01P-01SF-01LT-02LT-02LT-02BLAKE STATIONBUILDING AEXCELSIOR
BOULEVARD
PIERCE AVENUE
PROPERTY LIN
E PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY L
INE
7'-0"7'-0"WALK-UP UNIT ENTRY,SEE ARCHITECTUREPLANTING BED,SEE PLANTING PLANPLANTING BED,SEE PLANTING PLANRE-ALIGNEDRETAIL PARKING7'-0"3'-10"GENERATOR AND TRANSFORMERACCESS TOPARKING6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"TURF BOULEVARD,SEE PLANTING PLANWALK-UP UNIT ENTRY,SEE ARCHITECTURELANDSCAPED BOULEVARD - 11'-0" WIDTH,SEE PLANTING PLANWALK-UP UNIT ENTRY,SEE ARCHITECTURE6'-0"
6'-0"4'-0", TYP.9'-0" CLR.VARIES4'-0"RELOCATED LIFT STATIONCABINETEXISTING ACCESS TO LIFT STATION,TO REMAINCURBSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYDETAILMANUFACTURERCONCRETE PLANTER CURB468 LF7/L500 CUSTOMEDGINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYDETAILMANUFACTURERSTEEL EDGING70 LF5/L500 RYERSONLIGHTINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYDETAILMANUFACTURERSTREET LIGHT5TBDPEDESTIAN LIGHT10FORMS AND SURFACESMINERAL MULCHSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYDETAILMANUFACTURERCRUSHED STONE100 SF 2/L501 HEDBERG AGGREGATESPAVINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYDETAILMANUFACTURERCONCRETE PAVING9,732 SFN/ACONCRETE UNIT PAVER579 SF 1/L501 BORGERTSPECIALTY / PEDESTRIAN PAVING715 SFN/ASITE FURNITURESYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYDETAILMANUFACTURERBIKE RACK43/L501 FORMS+SURFACESTREE GRATE24/L501 URBAN ACCESSORIESSITE BENCH26/L501 LANSCAPE FORMSCB-01ED-01LT-01LT-02MM-02P-01P-02P-03SF-01SF-02SF-03REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULEN/AN/ASEE CIVILSEE CIVILSITE INFORMATIONSITE AREA:69,515 SFBUILDING FOOTPRINT:52,490 SF (76%)LANDSCAPE / PERVIOUS AREA: 4,770 SF (7%)HARDSCAPE / IMPERVIOUS AREA: 12,255 SF (17%)PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLANSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE ROADSTATIONHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL04/23/2021No. Description DateSITE PLAN - BUILDING AL111NORTH0SCALE:1" = 16'16' 32'48'
Xref C:\Users\ajagd\OneDrive - ESG Architects\Desktop\Blake Road_Master Plan-220503_Blake Rd Hopkins Site Master Plan-rvt-1-MASTER PLAN.dwgXref C:\Users\ajagd\OneDrive - ESG Architects\Desktop\Blake Road_Master Plan-20-172 - Blake Road Station_bdoucetteLSV6S-rvt-1-MASTER PLAN.dwgXref C:\Users\ajagd\OneDrive - ESG Architects\Desktop\Blake Road_Master Plan-Blake Rd Hopkins Site A_MEP_2020-rvt-1-MASTER PLAN.dwg2 - GL-I2 - GL-I2 - GL-I58 - CA-A56 - CA-A4 - AC-M1 - AC-M16 - DI-L16 - DI-L16 - DI-L16 - DI-L16 - DI-L3 - HY-J19 - AR-M4 - HY-JEXTENT OF STRUCTURAL SOIL,500 CF PER TREE2 - AC-P2 - AC-P2 - TI-A6 - PH-O16 - SP-E8 - CA-A4 - PH-O10 - SP-E8 - CA-A4 - HY-J17 - CA-A3 - HY-JBLAKE STATIONBUILDING AEXCELSIOR
BOULEVARD
PIERCE AVENUE
8 - TA-M3 - HY-J9 - CA-A7 - AR-M2 - HY-J11 - CA-A6 - AM-G29 - AR-M8 - CA-A13 - TA-M1 - AC-R5 - QU-L6 - PH-O20 - SP-E81 - SO-S17 - CA-ADECIDUOUS TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEAC-M5ACER MIYABEI `MORTON` TM / STATE STREET MIYABEI MAPLEAC-P4ACER PLATANOIDES `POND` TM / EMERALD LUSTRE MAPLEAC-R1ACER RUBRUM `ARMSTRONG` / ARMSTRONG RED MAPLEAM-G6AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE` / `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE` SERVICEBERRYGL-I6GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS `SKYCOLE` TM / SKYLINE THORNLESS HONEY LOCUSTQU-L5QUERCUS X WAREI `LONG` TM / REGAL PRINCE OAKTI-A 2TILIA AMERICANA `MCKSENTRY` / AMERICAN SENTRY LINDENSHRUBSCODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEAR-M 55ARONIA MELANOCARPA `UCONNAM165` / LOW SCAPE MOUND CHOKEBERRYDI-L 80DIERVILLA LONICERA / DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLEHY-J19HYDRANGEA PANICULATA `JANE` / LITTLE LIME HYDRANGEAPH-O16PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `DONNA MAY` / DONNA MAY NINEBARKSO-S82SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA `SEM` / SEM ASH LEAF SPIREASP-E46SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA `TOR` / BIRCHLEAF SPIREAEVERGREEN SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMETA-M21TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTONII` / TAUTON YEWGRASSESCODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECA-A192CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` / FEATHER REED GRASSGROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESOD 2,120 SF SODPLANT SCHEDULENORTH0SCALE:1"=16'16' 32'48'PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLANSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE ROADSTATIONHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL04/23/2021No. Description DateLANDSCAPE PLAN -BUILDING AL140NORTH0SCALE:1" = 16'16' 32'48'
PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLANSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE ROADSTATIONHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL04/23/2021No. Description DateLANDSCAPE DETAILSL5001136" RADIUSDIG PLANTING PIT
4" TO 6" DEEPER
THAN ROOT BALL
UNDISTURBED SUBGRADENOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORMAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITIONTHROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. WRAPTREE TRUNKS ONLY UPON APPROVAL BYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SEE SPECIFICATIONSECTION RELATED TO PLANTS AND SOILPREPARATION.EACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THEROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THEROOT BALL. IF THE ROOT FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE,THE SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED IN A LEVELMANNER FROM THE ROOT BALL TO WHERE THEFIRST MAIN ORDER ROOT (12" DIA. OR LARGER)EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. SET MAIN ORDERROOT 1" HIGHER THAN ADJACENT GRADE. DONOT COVER TOP OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL.PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED ORCOMPACTED SOILTAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLYWITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALLDOES NOT SHIFT4" BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OFROOT BALLPLANTING PIT TO BE TWOTO FIVE TIMES THE DIAMETEROF THE ROOT BALL, SLOPEDPREPARED PLANTING SOILPER SPEC6' DIAMETERMULCH RINGREMOVE BURLAP, TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE FROMTOP HALF OF ROOT BALLEDGE CONDITION VARIES;REFER TO PLAN4" ORGANIC MULCH; DO NOT PLACE MULCH INCONTACT WITH TREE TRUNKSCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PITWITH SPADE BY HAND TO BINDWITH PREPARED PLANTING SOILDETAIL - TREE PLANTING3/4" = 1'-0"PROVIDE & INSTALL RODENT PROTECTION.12"HARDWIRE CLOTH MESH CYLINDER, 8" DIA. ORGREATER X 36" HGT; STAKE IN PLACE. PER SPECP-20 172-011PREPARE PLANTING SOIL FORTHE ENTIRE BEDAPPLICATION OF PRE-EMERGENTHERBICIDE3" MULCH; DO NOT PLACE INCONTACT WITH SHRUB STEMPREPARE BED
A MIN. 4" DEEPER
THAN ROOT BALL 12" MIN.SPACINGDETAIL - SHRUB PLANTING1" = 1'-0"EDGE CONDITION VARIES;REFER TO PLANPLANTING SOIL FOR SHRUBSSCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIREBED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BINDWITH PLANTING SOILUNDISTURBED SUBGRADECONTAINER GROWN MATERIALSHALL HAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENEDP-20 172-022TREE - SEE PLAN FORSPECIES. LOWEST BRANCHMUST BE MIN. 6' ABOVESIDEWALK ELEVATION AT THETIME OF PLANTING.TREE GRATE - 4'X6' RECTANGLE2" WOOD CHIP LAYER UNDERTREE GRATEEDGE CONDITION VARIES,REFER TO PLAN AND DETAILSC.U. CERTIFIED STRUCTURALSOIL 3' DEPTH, SEE DRAWINGFOR AREA AND SPEC. FORINSTALLATION PROCEDURES3" IRRIGATION SLEEVEBETWEEN TREE GRATELOCATIONSSUBGRADE4" PERF PVC PIPE W/ SOCK INAUGERED HOLE. FILL PIPEWITH 3/4" DIA. DRAIN ROCK.INSTALL AS NEEDED TOPROVIDE ADEQUATEDRAINAGENOTES:1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR GRADEBEAM AND ATTACHMENT OF TREE GRATE FRAME FORAPPROVAL PRIOR TO PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION.2. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITHMANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.3'-0"TREE GRATE OVER STRUCTURAL SOIL3/4" = 1'-0"PLANTING SOIL PERSPECIFICATIONP-20 172-643PREPARE PLANTING SOIL FORTHE ENTIRE BED1'-6"6"MIN.SPACINGUNDISTURBED SUBGRADESCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIREBED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITHPLANTING SOILPLANTING SOIL FOR PERENNIALSCONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALLHAVE ROOTS AND LOOSENEDEDGE CONDITION VARIES; REFER TO PLAN3" MULCH; DO NOT PLACE IN CONTACTWITH PLANT STEMDETAIL - PERENNIAL PLANTING1 1/2" = 1'-0"4P-20 172-04HOLD FINISHED GRADE 12"BELOW EDGER- SEE PLAN FOREDGE CONDITION316" METAL EDGER W/ STAKEPLANTING AREA- SEE PLANTINGPLANTURF- SEE PLANTING PLANSTEEL EDGING1 1/2" = 1'-0"P-20 172-65P-20 172-656CONCRETE PLANTER CURB1 1/2" = 1'-0"COMPACTED MnDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATEBASEC.I.P. CONCRETE CURB, 1/4" CHAMFER ONEDGES, TYP.EXPANSION JOINT, TYP.(2) #4 BAR, EPOXY COATED, CONTINUOUS.LANDSCAPE BED, 3" MIN DEPTHHARDWOOD MULCH,SEE PLANTING PLANCOMPACTED SUBGRADEPAVING CONDITION VARIES, REFER TO PLAN8"8"10"1'-6"6"7P-20 172-10OMEGA ARCHITECTURALFENCE SYSTEM,INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'SDETAILS AND RECOMMENDATIONSCOLOR: BLACK2"3"6"X6" BASE PLATEC-FLANG3GV12" DIA SONOTUBECONCRETE FOOTINGEQUAL SPACED SEGMENTS -7'-6" O.C. MAX SPACING3'-6" MIN DEPTH1/2" = 1'-0"4'-0"NOTE:ALL GATE HARDWARE SHALL BECOMPLIANT WITH ADA STANDARDS ANDGUIDELINES.PROVIDE 10" HIGH SMOOTH SURFACEAS KICK PLATE ACROSS BASE OF PUSHSIDE OF GATE PER ADA REQUIREMENTS.EXTERIOR FENCE1/2" = 1'-0"5P-20 156-65P-20 156-655
PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLANSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE ROADSTATIONHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL04/23/2021No. Description DateLANDSCAPE DETAILSL5014" CONCRETE UNIT PAVERS W/ POLYMERICSAND SWEPT JOINTS, SET HAND TIGHT1" WASHED SAND LEVELING BASE6" COMPACTED AGGREGATE SUBBASECOMPACTED SUBGRADEPLANTING VARIES- HOLD FINISHED GRADE1" BELOW PAVERS, SEE PLANTING PLAN6"PLASTIC PAVER RESTRAINT SYSTEMCONCRETE UNIT PAVER1" = 1'-0"FLUSHADJACENT PAVING, SEE PLANSNOTE:CONCRETE UNIT PAVERS SHALL BEINSTALLED IN A RANDOM SIZE RUNNINGBOND PATTERN USING THE VARIOUSLENGTHSP-20 172-6623" THK. 316" MINUS TRAPROCK6" THK. CLASS 5 BASE-COMPACT TO 98%PROCTOR DENSITYCOMPACTED SUBBASECRUSHED STONE PAVING1" = 1'-0"3P-20 172-67CONCRETE SIDEWALK,SEE CIVILCOMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE,SEE CIVILPREPARED SUBGRADEFORMS + SURFACES TRIOBIKE RACK - "SLATE",EMBEDDED MOUNT PER MANUFACTURER'SDIRECTIONBIKE RACK, SURFACE MOUNT1" = 1'-0"2'-10"P-20 172-68P-20 172-685TREE GRATE ENLARGE PLAN3/4" = 1'-0"6"7'-0"6"5'-0"6"CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER,SEE CIVILCONCRETE WALKWAY, SEE CIVIL6" CONCRETE BAND WHERETREE GRATE ABUTS PAVERSCONCRETE PAVERJAMISON TREE GRATEP-20 172-694SITE BENCH - INGROUND MOUNT1" = 1'-0"CONCRETE SIDEWALK,SEE CIVILCOMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE,SEE CIVILPREPARED SUBGRADELANDSCAPE FORMS - BANCAL BENCH,INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S DIRECTIONP-20 172-756CONCRETE UNIT PAVER1L501CONCRETE PLANTER CURB7L500CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER,SEE CIVILSTREETSCAPE PLANTING,SEE PLANTING PLANSTREET SECTION3/4" = 1'-0"2'-6"WIDTH VARIES - 4'-0" - 8'-7"9'-0"4'-8"CONCRETE WALKWAYBUILDING FACADELANDSCAPE BUFFERP-20 172-78P-20 172-781P-20 172-782
Blake Road Station
Hopkins, MN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN — SITE AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN
• Transit-oriented development location adjacent to
LRT station
• Native and adaptive plant species selected for
their ability to provide enhanced streetscapes,
additional habitat and stormwater management
strategies
• Removal of more than 45,890 sq ft of existing
surface parking areas and replaced with new
buildings and 38,352 sq ft area of landscape area
consisting of native and adaptive tree and plant
species
• Smart irrigation systems (rain/soil moistures, drip
irrigation, highly efficient controllers/sprayheads)
• Connecting to existing bike trails and providing
internal bike storage rooms
• Porous pavement integrated into streetscape
improvements
Blake Road Station
Hopkins, MN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN — STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
• Dramatic improvements over current site
conditions - currently 100% impervious surfaces
that sheet drain to streets untreated; future
pervious area equal to 12% of the total site area
(38,352 sq ft)
• Future water run-off collected in catch basins
• Sub-surface system in StormTech isolator rows
• Treat 2” of run-off from the site’s impervious
surfaces via a treatment train of above-ground
features, pipe storage system, and JellyFish type
treatment structure.
• Storage capacity designed to hold back storm
events and discharge run-off at rates that are below
those of the existing conditions
Blake Road Station
Hopkins, MN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
ENERGY EFFICIENCY & SAVINGS
• High R-Value building envelope — roof & walls
• High solar reflectance index (SRI) for the roof
• Low-E insulated glazing
• Tightly sealed building envelope to reduce leakage
and inefficiencies
• High-Efficiency HVAC system with individual controls
for residents
• Project is enrolled in the Xcel Energy Efficient
Building Program to evaluate and select efficient
mechanical systems and optimize the building
enclosure
• Water Sense plumbing fixtures
• Energy Star rated appliances
• LED fixtures with occupancy sensors
• Programmable or SMART thermostats
• Electrical vehicle charging stations (Building A will
be constructed with capacity for 20 stations)
• Building structure and electrical system are designed
to be Solar-Ready for future photovoltaic panels
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN — BUILDING DESIGN
Blake Road Station
Hopkins, MN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN — OPERATIONS
HEALTH & WELLNESS
• Designed to encourage physical activity - primary
and secondary pedestrian-oriented entrance, each
with a convenient stairwell to encourage physical
activity; bike racks and storage available with site
improvements that include trail along Excelsior Blvd
• Clean air with at least MERV 8 air filters. MERV 13
air filters in common spaces. Apartments will be
supplied with outside air from individual packaged
heating and cooling units dedicated to each space.
• Access to daylight in units and amenity spaces -
Vertically oriented windows allow daylight to reach
deep into dwellings and common areas
• Low VOC materials and paints
• Convenient common area hand sanitizers and hand
washing locations
• Cleaning procedures, including daily cleaning of
entrances, common areas, corridors, restrooms and
offices
• Operable windows and balcony doors ensure
access to natural ventilation and connection to the
outdoors
• Ceiling Fans in bedrooms = reduced cooling needs
BLAKE ROAD NE X C E L S I O R B O U L E V A R DPIERCE AVENUEEX ISTING BUILDING
EXISTING
BUILDING
EXISTING
BUILDING
SWLRT PARK AND RIDE
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
SITE A - NEW CONSTRUCTION ADAADAGOODWILL
MONUMENT SIGN
S I T E B -N E W C O N S T R U C T I O N
30' - 0"3 0 ' - 0 "10'
-
0"GOODWILL PARKING, SEE CIVIL GOODWILL DONATIONSPARALLEL PARKINGRE-STRIPED
PARKING
RE-STRIPED
PARKING
RE-STRIPED
PARKING
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/8/2021 3:18:55 PMA1-3b
INTERIM PARKING PLAN
220503
AJ Checker
09/11/20
BLAKE STATION, MASTER
PLAN
BLAKE STATION,
MASTER PLAN
Hopkins, Minnesota
LUA SUBMITTAL
6/25/2021
No. Description Date
1" = 40'-0"A1-3b
1 SITE A & B INTERIM PARKING PLAN
kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197
MEMORANDUM
To: Hennepin County
CC: City of Hopkins, Trilogy Real Estate Group
From: Trish Sieh, P.E.
Jacob Rojer, P.E.
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Date:
August 14, 2020
Subject: Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment – Right-In/Right-Out Access on Excelsior Boulevard
Hopkins, MN
Importance of Access
The existing sites (Site A, B, & C) have three accesses, one at Blake Road & Hill Street and two on
Excelsior Boulevard. The final proposed sites will have two accesses upon full build out of the site by
2030. The site accesses will remain the same as the existing site through the first phase to keep service
to the remaining retail. With the development of Site B, the Hill Street right-in/right-out (RIRO) on Blake
Road will be closed. The existing site accesses on Excelsior Boulevard are paramount to
redevelopment viability of the site. The RIRO on Excelsior Boulevard provides access to existing
businesses, provides connectivity throughout the Site, and it helps maintain a grid like roadway network
on site splitting the site into urban blocks, allows for retail/commercial on the corner of Excelsior
Boulevard & Blake Road. Providing successful retail for a mixed-use TOD area has been a key
component of the City of Hopkins and regional vison for the site as outlined in the letter from the from
the City to Hennepin County. The letter is attached.
Trip Comparison at the Right-In/Right-Out Access
Traffic counts were collected at all site access points in February 2020 to determine the existing trip
generation of the site. While, the trip-generating potential of the proposed development was calculated
using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Tenth Edition. Standard
ITE trip rates were used to develop the total trips generated by the site. Table 1 provides a comparison
of the existing site trips at the RIRO and the proposed full build out of sites A, B, C, and the out lot trips
at the RIRO. The full build out of the development is anticipated to increase the trips at the RIRO in the
AM peak hour by 27 trips. In the PM peak hour, it is anticipated that there will be more entering trips
but less exiting trips resulting in no change in trips at the RIRO.
Page 2
kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197
Table 1 – Trip Comparison at the Right-In/Right-Out on Excelsior Boulevard
Land Use Description
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Right
In
Right
Out Total Right
In
Right
Out Total
Existing Site 5 4 9 26 31 57
Proposed Redevelopment
(Sites A, B, C, & Out lot) 15 21 36 44 13 57
NET CHANGE +10 +17 +27 +18 -18 0
The proposed redevelopment is anticipated to generate 4,012 daily trips and 15% of the site traffic
would utilize the RIRO, this results in approximately 600 daily trips. The proposed redevelopment is
not anticipated to generate significantly more daily trips than the existing condition at the RIRO.
Crash History
A review of the crash data from the Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT2) showed that
there were no crashes attributed to the RIRO on Excelsior Boulevard in the last 10 years. While it is
understood that Excelsior Boulevard as a whole has a higher than average crash rate along the corridor,
there is not a history of crashes at the RIRO access point. With the redevelopment of the site, the RIRO
will no longer feed directly into parking lots, it will be an urban roadway connecting the site. Signage
and pavement marking will also be improved. These changes will improve the flow of vehicles entering
and exiting the site access compared to the existing condition.
Conditions for Change in Access
Although operationally a westbound right-turn lane on Excelsior Boulevard at Pierce Avenue is not
shown to be necessary, the developer agrees to install the desired westbound right-turn lane with the
redevelopment of Site A.
In the short term, which includes Site A of the redevelopment, the RIRO on Excelsior Boulevard will
remain in place as it will provide access for the existing retail uses.
When Sites B and C are redeveloped, it is imperative for the site to maintain access along Excelsior
Boulevard. When a signal is warranted at Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue a reduction in access
at the RIRO to right-in only may be necessary if either of the following scenarios occur.
Based on the preliminary design and anticipated volumes it is not anticipated that there will be
crash issue at the access. However, if a crash issue does arise, access may be limited.
It is anticipated that the RIRO will not see a significant increase in daily traffic. As previously
mentioned, approximately 600 vehicles would use the access in full build out. If the RIRO
access becomes more desirable and sees a significant increase in traffic, access may be
reduced to right in only. Kimley-Horn is proposing that the daily volume threshold for the access
be 1,000 vehicles.
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR REDEVELOPMENT
HOPKINS, MINNESOTA
Prepared for:
ESG Architecture & Design and Trilogy Real Estate Group
Prepared By:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
767 N Eustis Street, Suite 100
St. Paul, MN 55114
AUGUST 2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
2
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR REDEVELOPMENT
HOPKINS, MINNESOTA
REPORT CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
__________________________ Date: 8/24/2020
Jacob A. Rojer, P.E.
License No. 56767
3 Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 4
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS ................................................................................................. 4
Existing Roadways .............................................................................................................. 4
Existing Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................................... 5
Roadway Improvements ....................................................................................................... 5
Background Growth ............................................................................................................. 6
PROPOSED D EVELOPMENT ......................................................................................................... 8
Site Trip Generation ............................................................................................................. 8
Site Trip Distribution and Access ............................................................................................ 9
Parking .............................................................................................................................10
Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Infrastructure.........................................................................11
CAPACITY ANALYSIS.................................................................................................................12
Existing Year (2020) Conditions ............................................................................................13
Opening Year No-Build (2022) Conditions ..............................................................................15
Opening Year Build (2022) Conditions ...................................................................................17
Horizon Year No-Build (2030) Conditions ...............................................................................19
Horizon Year Build (2030) Conditions ....................................................................................21
Horizon Year Build + Outlot (2030) Conditions ........................................................................23
Mitigation Analysis ..............................................................................................................26
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................27
APPENDIX ..............................................................................................................................29
APPENDIX
A.Exhibits
B.Site Plan
C.Raw Turning Movement Counts
D.SimTraffic Analysis Results
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
4
INTRODUCTION
ESG Architecture & Design and Trilogy Real Estate Group are proposing a multiphase development that
includes , a 215-unit multifamily housing building, a 250-unit multifamily housing building, a 298-unit
multifamily housing building, and the potential for an additional outlot development. It is anticipated that
there will be a total of 19,000 sq. ft. of retail between the three buildings, however, the exact amount in each
building is not known at this time and will be evaluated as each building is developed. The total development
will include around 763 units of multifamily and 19,000 square feet of retail on the northwest corner of
Excelsior Boulevard (CSAH 3) & Blake Road (CSAH 20) in Hopkins, MN. The exact unit count may vary
slightly since the 250-unit apartment building and the 298-unit apartment building would not be built until
2026 and 2030, respectively. Th e site is currently occupied by various retail developments with five
accesses onto Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road. Exhibit 1 in Appendix A shows the proposed project
location. The proposed site plan is included in Appendix B.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
The proposed d evelopment is located in the northwest corner of Excelsior Boulevard & Blake Road in
Hopkins, MN. The following study intersections are included in the traffic analysis.
•Excelsior Boulevard (CSAH 3) & Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue
•Excelsior Boulevard (CS AH 3) & Pierce Avenue (site access)
•Excelsior Boulevard (CSAH 3) & Right -In/Right-Out (RIRO) (site access)
•Excelsior Boulevard (CSAH 3) & Blake Road (CSAH 20)
•Blake Road (CSAH 20) & Full Site Access (site access)
•Blake Road (CSAH 20) & Pierce Avenue RIRO (site access)
•Blake Road (CSAH 20) & 2nd Street
The study intersections listed above are shown in Exhibit 1 in Appendix A. The Hill Street RIRO site
access on Blake Road was also counted to determine the existing trip generation of the site, but the
access was not included in the analysis as this access will be closed with the redevelopment of the site.
EXISTING ROADWAYS
The red evelopment will have site accesses on Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard . These are the two
major roadways in the study area and the following provides a detailed description.
Excelsior Boulevard (CSAH 3) is a four lane east-west roadway with left turn lanes at accesses.
Excelsior Boulevard is classified as an A-Minor Reliever according to t he City of Hopkins 2040
Comprehensive Plan. The MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application reports the A ADT Excelsior
Boulevard as 19,100 vehicles per day (vpd). The current posted speed limit on Excelsior Boulevard
is 35 miles per hour west of Blake Road and 40 miles per hour east of Blake Road.
Blake Road (CSAH 20) is a four lane north-south roadway with left turn lanes at accesses . Blake
Road was reconstructed in 2018 and 2019 and there is ongoing construction at the Cedar Lake
Trail crossing and future Southwest Light Rail crossing. Blake Road is classified as a Major
Collector according to the City of Hopkins 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The MnDOT Traffic Mapping
5 Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
Application reports the AADT Blake Road as 12,200 vpd. The current posted speed limit on Blake
Road is 30 miles per hour.
EXISTING TRAFFI C VOLUMES
To analyze the traffic operations at the study intersections, weekday peak period turning movement counts
were collected on Wednesday February 26, 2020 and Tuesday March 10, 2020. With the ongoing
construction along Blake Road the counts were compared to 2017 counts provided by Hennepin County
and historical AADT data along Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road. It was determined that the traffic
counts collected were significantly lower than the historic counts, so the volumes were increased by 40-50
percent to better represent a typical weekday.
Exhibit 2 in Appendix A provides a summary of the adjusted weekday AM and PM peak hour turning traffic
volumes used in the analysis. The raw turning movement count data is provided in Appendix C. The
network AM peak hour was determined to be 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM and the network PM peak hour was
determined to be 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM.
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
The Cedar Lake Trail c rossing at Blake Road will be converted to an underpass and the Blake Station will
be constructed as part of the Southwest LRT project. Pierce Avenue on the west side of the site will be
reconstructed and connect to Blake Road near the new transit station and the park and ride lot. Originally,
Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue was intended to be signalized but was not included in the Southwest
LRT project because the intersection did not meet traffic signal warrants. Figure 1 below shows the Metro
Transit plan for the improvements to be completed in conjunction with the S outhwest light rail project
(SWLRT). These improvements were included in the opening year and horizon year analysis.
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
6
Figure 1 – Metro Transit Blake Station SWLRT Improvements
BACKGROUND GROWTH
The first phase of the proposed development is anticipated to be completed and open by 2022 with the
complete buildout of the site completed by 2030. The City of Hopkins Comprehensive plan was reviewed
to identify a background growth rate to develop forecast peak hour volumes at the study intersections for
Opening Year (2022) and Horizon Year (2030). The Horizon year analyzed 2030 and not 2040 because
the proposed development is not anticipated to add significantly more trips to the study area than the
existing s ite.
Table 1 provides a summary of the AADT information and the resultant growth rate. To provide a more
conservative analysis, the 0.6% growth rate was applied to both the Excelsior Boulevard and the Blake
Road corridors for the Existing (2020) traffic volumes to develop the Opening Year No-Build (2022) and
Horizon Year No-Build (2030) turning movement volumes.
Table 1 – Annual Growth Rate Calculation
In addition to the background growth rate, the 89-stall park and ride lot at the LRT station was added to the
2022 background growth. The trip-g eneration was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers
Street Segment
Most Recent AADT Projected 2040 AADT Annual
Growth Rate Year Volume Year Vo lume
Excelsior Boulevard 2018 19,100 2040 22,000 0.6%
Blake Road 2018 12,200 2040 13,400 0.4%
7 Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
(ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Tenth Edition. Standard ITE trip rates were used to develop the total trips
generated.
For the 2030 background growth a 0.6% annual growth rate was applied, traffic associated with the 89-stall
park and ride lot was added, and it was assumed that the 17-acre site east of Blake Road & 2nd Street (325
Blake Road ) would be developed. Based on concept plans from the City of Hopkins, it was assumed that
the 325 Blake Road site would include 643 multifamily housing units, 22,000 square feet of office, and
12,100 square feet of retail. Table 2 shows the trip generation for the 2022 background condition and the
2030 background condition. The trip generat ion was calculated using the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Tenth Edition. Standard ITE trip rates were used to develop the
total trips generated. The background trips were distributed to adjacent roadways based on the current
traffic patterns in the area and a general assessment of the major regional roadways surrounding the study
area.
Table 2 – Background Trip Generation
Exhibit 3 and 4 in Appendix A shows the Opening Year No-Build (2022) & Horizon Year No-Build (2030)
turning movement volumes, respectively.
Land Use Description Size
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
2022 Background Trips
Park & Ride (ITE 90) 89 stalls 29 8 37 10 28 38
Total Generated Trips 29 8 37 10 28 38
2030 Background Trips
Park & Ride (ITE 90) 89 stalls 29 8 37 10 28 38
Multifamily Housing (Mid-Ris e) (ITE 221) 643 units 59 170 229 167 108 275
General Office Building (ITE 710) 22,000 sq. ft. 22 4 26 4 21 25
Shopping Center (ITE 820) 12,100 sq. ft. 6 3 9 13 12 25
Total Generated Trips 116 185 301 194 169 363
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
8
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SITE TRIP GENERATION
Traffic counts were collected at all the site accesses to determine the existing trip generation of the site.
Table 3 provides the AM and PM peak hour trip generation for the existing site.
Table 3 – Existing Site Trip Generation
The trip -generating potential of the proposed development was calculated using the Instit ute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Tenth Edition. Standard ITE trip rates were used
to develop the total trips generated by the site. The average rate for ITE land uses were used to calculate
the trip generation potential of the site. Sites A, B, and C are part of the proposed development but the
o utlot, that currently is a vacated Arbys, is not part of the development plan. Based on conversations with
the City of Hopkins and Hennepin County, this analysis assumed that the 0.7 acres of developable land in
the outlot could be built out at the same density as the rest of the proposed development, which is 110 units
per acre. The exact amount of retail in each building is not known at this time and will be evaluated as each
building is developed it was assumed that the retail would be concentrated in Site B as it is on the corner
of Excelsior Boulevard & Blake Road. With The proposed new land uses for the site are listed below.
• Site A: a 215-unit multifamily housing building
• Site B: a 250-unit multifamily housing building with retail
• Site C: a 298-unit multifamily housing building
• Outlot: a 77-unit multifamily housing building
The studies completed by the Metropolitan Council for the SWLRT project forecasts that Blake Station,
adjacent to the proposed site, will serve 1,300 riders per day in 2040 and that the majority of riders are
expected to walk to the station. Based on its proximity and density, this development will likely create a
significant portion of the projected ridership. However, this analysis did not assume a transit reduction to
provide a worst -case traffic analysis scenario.
Table 4 provides a summary of the number of trips anticipated to be generated during the weekday AM
and PM peak hours for the three analysis scenarios. These scenarios are:
• Site A Buildout with the existing site traffic
• Sites A, B, and C Buildout with the existing site traffic removed
• Sites A, B, C, and Outlot Buildout with the existing site traffic removed
Land Use Description
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Existing Site 53 32 85 145 171 316
9 Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
Table 4 – Site Trip Generation
Comparing the Existing Site trip generation in Table 3 to the proposed site trip generation in Table 4, the
AM peak hour trip generation is anticipated to be significantly higher for the 2030 scenarios than the existing
site. The existing site generates 85 AM peak hour trips and the Horizon Year (2030) scenarios are
anticipated to generate 259 or 287 trips in the AM peak hour. This difference is expected when switching
from a retail focused land use to a residential focused land use. In the PM peak hour, the trip generation is
s imilar with the existing site generating 316 trips and the 2030 scenarios generating 316 or 350 trips.
SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ACCESS
The site trips were distributed to adjacent roadways based on the current traffic patterns in the area and a
general assessment of the major regional roadways surrounding the study area. In general, the following
global trip distribution was assumed for the development:
• 30% north on Blake Road
• 35% east on Excelsior Boulevard
Land Use Description Size Daily Trips
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
2022 Opening Year (Only Site A + Existing Site Traffic)
Site A: Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) (ITE 221) 215 Units 1,170 20 57 77 58 37 95
Total New Site Generated Trips 1,117 20 57 77 58 37 95
Existing Site Trips -- 53 32 85 145 171 316
Total Analysis Site Trips -- 73 89 162 203 208 411
2030 Build Year (Sites A, B, & C)
Site A: Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) (ITE 221) 215 Units 1,170 20 57 77 58 37 95
Site B: Mid-Ris e Residential with 1st Floor
Commercial (ITE 231)
250 Units 860 21 54 75 63 27 90
Site C: Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) (ITE 221) 298 Units 1,622 28 79 107 80 51 131
Total Site Generated Trips 3,652 69 190 259 201 115 316
2030 Build Year + Additional Out Lot Assumption
Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) (ITE 221) 77 Units 420 7 21 28 21 13 34
Total Site Generated Trips (2030 Build Year + Out Lot) 4,072 76 211 287 222 128 350
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
10
• 25% west on Excelsior Boulevard
• 10% south on Blake Road
The trip distribution for the site-generated traffic used the same overall distribution pattern for the 2022 Site
A scenario and the 2030 scenarios, however, the distribution at the site accesses varied between the
scenarios. Exhibits 5 & 6 show the distributions for the two Build years and Exhibits 7, 8, & 9 show the
trip assignment for the three build scenarios. The exhibits can be found in Appendix A.
The existing site area has five site accesses, which are listed below:
• Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue
• Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
• Blake Road & Hill Street RIRO
• Blake Road & Full Site Access
• Blake Road & Pierce Avenue RIRO
The proposed site area has four site accesses. The site accesses will remain the same as the existing site
except the Hill Street RIRO will be closed and the Blake Road RIRO will move approximately 175 feet north
of its existing location which will provide better access spacing. The proposed site plan is included in
Appendix B.
The existing site accesses on Excelsior Boulevard are pivotal to the site. The RIRO on Excelsior Boulevard
provides connectivity, it helps maintain a grid like roadway network on site, and increases the viability of
retail on the corner of Excelsior Boulevard & Blake Road. With the redevelopment of the site, the rem aining
site accesses will no longer feed directly into parking lots, they will be urban roadways connecting
throughout the site. This change will improve the flow of vehicles entering and exiting the site accesses.
PARKING
Per the City of Hopkins code of ordinances sec. 102-365, “A minimum of one and maximum of 1.5 parking
spaces per multifamily unit is permitted; one guest space per 15 units is permitted.” The proposed parking
ratios for the three multifamily buildings are shown in Table 5. The proposed development fits within the
city parking guidelines.
Table 5 – Parking Ratios
Building Units Parking
Stalls
Parking
Ratio
Site A 215 246 1.15
Site B 250 316 1.26
Site C 298 331 1.11
Total 763 893 1.17
11 Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, AND TRANSI T INFRASTRUCTURE
The site is located in a predominately industrial and residential area in the east part of Hopkins . There are
primarily industrial businesses on the north side of Excelsior Boulevard and residential on the south side of
Excelsior Boulevard. The site is bordered by the Cedar Lake Trail and Canadian Pacific (CP) Railroad on
the north side of the site. Excelsior Boulevard provides sidewalks on both sides of the roadway west of
Blake Road and has pedestrian crossings at the signals. Blake Road provides trails on both sides of the
roadway and provides access to the Cedar Lake Trail which will be a grade separated crossing under Blake
Road. Blake Road also has a pedestrian crossing with flashing beacons at the full site access. The
proposed site will have sidewalk s along all the interior roadways and provide connections to the future
SWLRT station and bus stops.
The site is well connected to promote bicycling as a viable mode of transportation as there is access to the
regional trail system along the north side of the site and there are on-street bike lanes on Blake Road south
of Excelsior Boulevard and trails on Blake Road north of Excelsior Boulevard.
This is a transit -oriented development as it will be located immediately adjacent to a SWLRT station. As
previously stated, the adjacent Blake S tation is projected to serve 1,300 riders per day in 2040 and the
majority of riders are expected to walk to the station. Based on its proximity and density, this development
will likely create a significant portion of the projected ridership. With the addition of a b us stop near the
SWLRT station it will provide more options to utilize transit.
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
12
CAPACITY ANALYSIS
A capacity analysis was performed to quantify the delay and level of service at the study intersections during
the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The capacity analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic.
The capacity of an intersection quantifies its ability to accommodate traffic volumes and is measured in
average delay per vehicle. It is expressed in terms of level of service (LOS) which ranges from A to F, with
LOS A as the highest (best traffic flow and least delay), LOS E as saturated or at -capacity conditions, and
LOS F as the lowest (oversaturated conditions). The LOS grades shown below, which are provided in the
Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), quantify and categorize the driver’s
discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and travel times experienced as a result of intersection control
and the resulting traffic queuing. A detailed description of each LOS rating can be found in Table 6. The
range of control delay for each rating (as detailed in the HCM) is also shown in Table 6. Because signalized
intersections are expected to carry a larger volume of vehicles and stopping is required during red time,
higher delays are tolerated for the corresponding LOS ratings. For s ide street stop intersections, the
intersection LOS is reported as the worst side street movement.
Table 6 – Level of Service Information
Level of
Service
Average Control Delay
(seconds/vehicle) Description
A 0-10 (Unsignalized); 0-10 (Signalized) Minimal control delay; traffic operates at primarily free-flow
conditions; unimpeded movement within traffic stream.
B >10-15 (Unsignalized); >10-20 (Signalized)
Minor control delay at signalized intersections; traffic
operates at a fairly unimpeded level with slightly restricted
movement within traffic stream.
C >15-25 (Unsignalized); >20-35 (Signalized)
Moderate control delay; movement within traffic s tream
more restricted than at LOS B; formation of queues
contributes to lower average travel speeds.
D >25-35 (Unsignalized); >35-55 (Signalized)
Considerable control delay that may be substantially
increased by small increases in flow; average travel speeds
continue to decrease.
E >35-50 (Unsignalized); >55-80 (Signalized) High control delay; average travel speed no more than 33 percent of free flow speed.
F >50 (Unsignalized); >80 (Signalized) Extremely high control delay; extensive queuing and high
volumes create exceedingly restricted traffic flow.
Traffic models for each scenario were developed using Synchro /SimTraffic, and the delay and queueing
were evaluated for each scenario. The scenarios that were analyzed are as follows:
• Existing (2020)
• Opening Year No -Build (2022)
• Opening Year Build (2022)
• Horizon Year No -Build (2030)
• Horizon Year Build (2030)
• Horizon Year Build + Outlot (2030)
13 Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
EXISTING YEAR (20 20) CONDITIONS
The traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 2 in Appendix A were used in the Existing Year (2020) analysis. As
previously discussed, these volumes were adjusted based on historic growth rates and traffic counts
provided by Hennepin County. Table 7 & 8 show the LOS and delay for the study intersections under
Existing Year (2020) conditions during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively.
Based on the analysis, the study intersections are currently operating at a LOS D or better during the AM
peak hour. In the PM peak hour, Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue experiences excessive delays for
the nort hbound turning movements from the school access onto Excelsior Boulevard. With the amount of
east /west traffic on Excelsior Boulevard and the side street stop control, this is not unexpected. While the
delays are long, the queues are not excessive. There are minor movements during the AM & PM peak
hours at the signalized intersections that operate at LOS E. All turn lane queues are within their storage
capacity. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D.
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
14
Table 7 – Existing (2020) AM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis
Intersection Control Approach
Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Excelsior Boulevard
& Milwaukee
Street/ Jackson
Avenue
Signal
EB 38.9 D 7.7 A 5.1 A
19.3 B WB 53.8 D 18.0 B 15.6 B
NB 48.8 D 53.6 D 2.2 A
SB 51.5 D 63.9 E 1.9 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue
Side
Street
Stop
EB 9.0 A 3.7 A 3.4 A
29.7 D WB 8.1 A 0.4 A 0.2 A
NB 20.1 C 29.7 D 4.8 A
SB 13.7 B - - 6.6 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& RIRO
Side
Stre et
Stop
EB - - 1.0 A - -
9.3 A WB - - 1.8 A 1.4 A
NB - - - - - -
SB - - - - 9.3 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Blake Road Signal
EB 38.7 D 13.3 B 3.2 A
23.1 C WB 46.2 D 20.0 B 3.7 A
NB 41.6 D 33.7 C 12.5 B
SB 40.4 D 34.5 C 23.6 C
Blake Road & Full
Site Access
Side
Street
Stop
EB 7.4 A - - 3.1 A
7.7 A WB 7.7 A 5.3 A 3.6 A
NB 3.9 A 1.2 A 1.1 A
SB 2.7 A 0.4 A 0.2 A
Blake Road & RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - - - - -
1.4 A WB - - - - - -
NB - - 0.2 A - -
SB - - 1.6 A 1.4 A
Blake Road & 2nd
Street Signal
EB 18.0 B - - 10.7 B
12.5 B WB - - - - - -
NB 23.1 C 6.8 A - -
SB - - 13.4 B 5.1 A
15 Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
Table 8 – Existing (2020) PM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis
Intersection Control Approach
Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Excelsior Boulevard
& Milwaukee
Street/ Jackson
Avenue
Signal
EB 58.8 E 12.2 B 9.7 A
19.6 B WB 69.0 E 27.2 C 26.1 C
NB 49.4 D 58.4 E 2.5 A
SB 51.1 D 56.7 E 2.8 A
Exc elsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue
Side
Street
Stop
EB 14.7 B 7.0 A 7.2 A
69.9 F WB 29.1 D 0.7 A 0.6 A
NB 69.9 F 28.6 D 54.3 F
SB 14.4 B - - 5.8 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - 3.5 A - -
6.8 A WB - - 2.1 A 1.6 A
NB - - - - - -
SB - - - - 6.8 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Blake Road Signal
EB 53.3 D 24.3 C 8.6 A
29.1 C WB 53.1 D 20.2 C 6.8 A
NB 54.7 D 46.6 D 24.5 C
SB 56.6 E 48.1 D 35.7 D
Blake Road & Full
Site Access
Side
Street
Stop
EB 11.6 B 16.2 C 6.1 A
18.8 C WB 18.0 C 18.8 C 8.1 A
NB 5.1 A 1.4 A 1.0 A
SB 5.6 A 0.6 A 0.2 A
Blake Road & RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - - - 4.2 A
4.2 A WB - - - - - -
NB - - 0.3 A - -
SB - - 1.7 A 1.4 A
Blake Road & 2nd
Street Signal
EB 21.8 C - - 15.5 B
14.4 B WB - - - - - -
NB 28.3 C 9.5 A - -
SB - - 16.6 B 8.2 A
OPENING YEAR NO-BUIL D (2022) CONDITIONS
A capacity analysis was performed for Opening Year No -Build (2022) conditions in order to develop
baseline operating conditions for the opening year. The analysis was performed using the existing
intersection geometry except for the southbound Pierce Avenue approach at Excelsior Boulevard which is
currently a single lane approach but with the addition of the Park & Ride and upgrading Pierce Avenue a
southbound right turn lane will be added . The exi s ting signal timing information was used for the study
intersections. The traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 3 in Appendix A.
The results of the analysis are provided in Tab les 9 & 10 for the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Based
on the Opening Year No -Build (2022) capacity analysis, the study intersections are expected to operate at
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
16
a LOS C or better during the AM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, Excelsior Boulevard & Blake Road
has excessive side street delays, similar to the existing conditions. Again, the queues are not excessive,
and it is not uncommon for a side street stop intersection to have longer delays. All turn lane queues are
within their storage capacity. The side street stop delay at Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue is slightly
better than the existing condition in the AM peak hour. This is due to the low volumes (less than 5 peak
hour trips) for the side street movement and the variability in the simulations. in the In the PM peak hour,
eastbound queues on Excelsior Boulevard may extend from Blake Road to Pierce Avenue, Th e SimTraffic
reports are provided in Appendix D.
Table 9 – Opening Year No -Build (2022) AM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis
Intersection Control Approach
Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Excelsior Boulevard
& Milwaukee
Street/ Jackson
Avenue
Signal
EB 39.0 D 7.3 A 4.2 A
19.6 B WB 56.1 E 19.2 B 19.1 B
NB 43.9 D 59.4 E 2.1 A
SB 40.9 D 65.6 E 2.0 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue
Side
Street
Stop
EB 10.9 B 3.5 A 4.0 A
23.0 C WB 7.9 A 0.4 A 0.2 A
NB 18.5 C 23.0 C 6.3 A
SB 19.2 C - - 6.4 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - 0.9 A - -
3.5 A WB - - 1.8 A 1.5 A
NB - - - - - -
SB - - - - 3.5 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Blake Road Signal
EB 41.8 D 14.0 B 3.2 A
23.8 C WB 49.9 D 21.0 C 4.2 A
NB 40.8 D 33.3 C 11.5 B
SB 41.5 D 35.7 D 24.0 C
Blake Road & Full
Site Access
Side
Street
Stop
EB 9.2 A - - 4.0 A
9.5 A WB 9.5 A 7.9 A 3.8 A
NB 3.6 A 1.3 A 1.2 A
SB 3.4 A 0.4 A 0.2 A
Blake Road & RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - - - 3.5 A
3.5 A WB - - - - - -
NB - - 0.2 A - -
SB - - 1.6 A 1.5 A
Blake Road & 2nd
Street Signal
EB 18.4 B - - 11.7 B
13.2 B WB - - - - - -
NB 24.7 C 6.9 A - -
SB - - 14.5 B 6.2 A
17 Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
Table 10 – Opening Year No -Build (2022) PM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis
Intersection Control Approach
Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Excelsior Boulevard
& Milwaukee
Street/ Jackson
Avenue
Signal
EB 53.2 D 14.9 B 8.3 A
20.5 C WB 64.2 E 27.5 C 27.3 C
NB 48.2 D 56.6 E 2.7 A
SB 53.3 D 59.1 E 2.9 A
Exce lsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue
Side
Street
Stop
EB 16.4 C 8.3 A 11.1 B
100+ F WB 31.3 D 0.7 A 0.5 A
NB 100+ F - - 49.4 E
SB 91.5 F - - 8.9 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - 4.8 A - -
7.0 A WB - - 2.1 A 1.4 A
NB - - - - - -
SB - - - - 7.0 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Blake Road Signal
EB 54.8 D 25.7 C 9.4 A
30.1 C WB 57.0 E 21.4 C 6.9 A
NB 56.6 E 42.8 D 26.1 C
SB 57.8 E 48.1 D 35.5 D
Blake Road & Full
Site Access
Side
Street
Stop
EB 14.3 B 22.7 C 6.4 A
22.7 C WB 18.2 C 18.1 C 7.4 A
NB 4.1 A 1.4 A 1.2 A
SB 5.8 A 0.6 A 0.3 A
Blake Road & RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - - - 3.7 A
3.7 A WB - - - - - -
NB - - 0.3 A - -
SB - - 1.7 A 1.4 A
Blake Road & 2nd
Street Signal
EB 19.5 B - - 13.5 B
14.6 B WB - - - - - -
NB 31.3 C 10.6 B - -
SB - - 16.7 B 9.0 A
OPENING YEAR BUILD (2022) CONDITIONS
Opening Year Build (2022) conditions were analyzed to determine any traffic impacts from the addition of
the site traffic. Opening Year Build (2022) turning movement volumes were developed by adding the site
trips to the Opening Year No -Build (2022) turning movement volumes in Exhibit 3 in Appendix A. The
Opening Year Build (2022) turning movement volumes are shown in Exhibi t 10 in Appendix A. It should
be noted that in the Opening Year Build (2022) conditions the Site A traffic was added to the existing site
trips at the accesses, no trips were removed for the analysis.
It was assumed that site access would remain the same as the Opening Year No -Build condition and that
a westbound right turn lane at Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue would be installed with Site A.
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
18
The results of the analysis are provided in Table s 11 &12 for the weekday AM and PM peak hours . Based
on the Opening Year Build (2022) capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at
LOS C or better in the AM & PM peak hours except for Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue which is
anticipated to operate at LOS E in the AM peak hour and LOS F in the PM peak hour. With the excessive
southbound delays at Excelsior Boulevard & Peirce Avenue, vehicles exiting the site may utilize different
site accesses during the peak hours to minimize delay. This intersection should continue to be monitored
as it may require mitigation. All turn lane queues are within their storage capacity. In the PM peak hour,
eastbound queues on Excelsior Boulevard may extend from Blake Road to Pierce Avenue. There are no
additional geometric changes required in the study area as a result of the development. The SimTraffic
reports are provided in Appendix D.
Table 11 – Opening Year Build (2022) AM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis
Intersection Control Approach
Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Excelsior Boulevard
& Milwaukee
Street/ Jackson
Avenue
Signal
EB 40.7 D 7.7 A 4.5 A
20.1 C WB 50.9 D 19.3 B 16.4 B
NB 47.3 D 55.5 E 2.3 A
SB 44.2 D 54.7 D 1.9 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue
Side
Street
Stop
EB 13.7 B 3.7 A 4.4 A
41.3 E WB 10.1 B 0.5 A 0.3 A
NB 32.1 D 41.3 E 9.6 A
SB 30.3 D - - 6.4 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - 1.0 A - -
4.8 A WB - - 1.8 A 1.4 A
NB - - - - - -
SB - - - - 4.8 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Blake Road Signal
EB 37.9 D 15.0 B 3.6 A
23.8 C WB 43.9 D 20.9 C 4.3 A
NB 39.8 D 33.9 C 13.4 B
SB 39.6 D 35.8 D 22.2 C
Blake Road & Full
Site Access
Side
Street
Stop
EB 8.1 A - - 4.4 A
12.6 B WB 10.4 B 12.6 B 4.1 A
NB 4.4 A 1.3 A 1.1 A
SB 3.2 A 0.4 A 0.3 A
Blake Road & RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - - - 3.5 A
3.5 A WB - - - - - -
NB - - 0.2 A - -
SB - - 1.6 A 1.3 A
Blake Road & 2nd
Street Signal
EB 17.8 B - - 11.5 B
12.5 B WB - - - - - -
NB 24.9 C 6.8 A - -
SB - - 13.2 B 5.7 A
19 Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
Table 12 – Opening Year Build (2022) PM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis
Intersection Control Approach
Operations by Movement Overall
Intersection Left Through Right
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Excelsior Boulevard
& Milwaukee Street/
Jackson Avenue
Signal
EB 55.3 E 15.3 B 10.5 B
20.9 C WB 62.6 E 27.9 C 26.7 C
NB 50.1 D 61.0 E 2.8 A
SB 49.6 D 65.9 E 2.9 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue
Side
Street
Stop
EB 18.3 C 8.1 A 7.0 A
100+ F WB 32.9 D 0.8 A 0.7 A
NB 100+ F - - 100+ F
SB 100+ F - - 46.0 E
Excelsior Boulevard
& RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - 5.1 A - -
4.0 A WB - - 2.1 A 1.4 A
NB - - - - - -
SB - - - - 6.3 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Blake Road Signal
EB 54.9 D 26.3 C 9.5 A
30.2 C WB 56.4 E 21.1 C 7.5 A
NB 56.3 E 45.8 D 25.9 C
SB 55.3 E 47.2 D 35.7 D
Blake Road & Full
Site Access
Side
Street
Stop
EB 16.3 C 22.6 C 7.1 A
21.9 C WB 21.5 C 21.9 C 7.6 A
NB 4.6 A 1.5 A 1.3 A
SB 5.2 A 0.6 A 0.3 A
Blake Road & RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - - - 3.0 A
3.0 A WB - - - - - -
NB - - 0.3 A - -
SB - - 1.8 A 1.8 A
Blake Road & 2nd
Street Signal
EB 20.1 C - - 15.2 B
14.3 B WB - - - - - -
NB 31.3 C 9.5 A - -
SB - - 16.9 B 8.8 A
Note: delays in excess of 100 seconds per vehicle are reported as "100+"
HORIZON YEAR NO -BUILD (2030) CONDITIONS
A capacity analysis was p erformed for Horizon Year No -Build (2030) conditions in order to develop baseline
operating conditions for the Horizon year . The analysis was performed using the same geometry assumed
in the 2022 scenarios . In the Horizon year it was assumed that the 17-acre, 325 Blake Road site would be
developed so that development is included in the background traffic as previously discussed. Excelsior
Boulevard is a coordinated signal system so individual intersections could not be optimized without taking
into account downstream intersections outside of the study area, therefore, t he cycle lengths were not
changed, but the splits at the signals were optimized. The traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 4 in
Appendix A.
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
20
The results of the analysis are provided in Tables 13 & 14 for the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Based
on the Horizon Year No -Build (2030) capacity analysis, the study intersections are expected to operate at
a LOS D or better during the AM & PM peak hours except for Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue which
has excessive side street delays, similar to the Opening Year Build conditions. Queues for the southbound
approach at Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue are acceptable but the delays for the vehicles attempting
to make southbound left turns would likely cause vehicles to use a different access. Mitigation at this access
will be required by the Horizon Year (2030), with or without the development. All turn lane queues are within
their storage capacity. In the PM peak hour, eastbound queues on Excelsior Boulevard may extend from
Blake Road to Pierce Avenue. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D.
Table 13 – Horizon Year No Build (2030) AM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis
Intersection Control Approach
Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(se c/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Excelsior Boulevard
& Milwaukee
Street/ Jackson
Avenue
Signal
EB 41.7 D 8.4 A 4.6 A
20.8 C WB 55.7 E 20.3 C 19.5 B
NB 49.1 D 50.5 D 2.2 A
SB 48.3 D 45.8 D 2.1 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue
Side
Street
Stop
EB 13.7 B 4.1 A 4.2 A
31.7 D WB 8.0 A 0.5 A 0.3 A
NB 22.5 C 31.7 D 6.0 A
SB 20.1 C - - 5.5 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - 1.1 A - -
5.3 A WB - - 1.9 A 1.5 A
NB - - - - - -
SB - - - - 5.3 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Blake Road Signal
EB 35.8 D 15.3 B 3.6 A
25.2 C WB 46.6 D 22.7 C 4.3 A
NB 40.9 D 36.2 D 16.7 B
SB 38.8 D 37.8 D 25.3 C
Blake Road & Full
Site Access
Side
Street
Stop
EB 9.4 A - - 4.5 A
10.6 B WB 10.2 B 10.6 B 4.2 A
NB 5.1 A 1.4 A 1.1 A
SB 3.1 A 0.4 A 0.3 A
Blake Road & RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - - - 3.7 A
3.7 A WB - - - - - -
NB - - 0.2 A - -
SB - - 1.6 A 1.3 A
Blake Road & 2nd
Street Signal
EB 20.7 C 20.4 C 14.7 B
16.4 B WB 20.4 C 22.3 C 5.1 A
NB 30.3 C 11.4 B 6.1 A
SB 37.4 D 17.1 B 8.5 A
21 Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
Table 14 – Horizon Year No Build (2030) P M Peak Hour Intersection Analysis
Intersection Control Approach
Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Excelsior Boulevard
& Milwaukee
Street/ Jackson
Avenue
Signal
EB 59.7 E 15.8 B 16.0 B
22.1 C WB 70.1 E 29.6 C 30.9 C
NB 52.4 D 61.6 E 2.9 A
SB 51.6 D 61.3 E 3.1 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue
Side
Street
Stop
EB 18.3 C 8.7 A 9.0 A
100+ F WB 34.9 D 0.8 A 0.3 A
NB 100+ F 100+ F 78.9 F
SB 9.0 A - - 7.6 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - 5.8 A - -
7.4 A WB - - 2.1 A 1.5 A
NB - - - - - -
SB - - - - 7.4 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Blake Road Signal
EB 59.2 E 27.0 C 10.4 B
31.7 C WB 56.0 E 20.8 C 8.7 A
NB 56.9 E 46.2 D 29.3 C
SB 59.2 E 51.0 D 40.8 D
Blake Road & Full
Site Access
Side
Street
Stop
EB 17.2 C 22.2 C 8.5 A
26.8 D WB 26.8 D 23.9 C 12.5 B
NB 4.9 A 1.6 A 1.4 A
SB 6.9 A 0.7 A 0.2 A
Blake Road & RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - - - 4.0 A
0.9 A WB - - - - - -
NB - - 0.4 A - -
SB - - 1.6 A 1.4 A
Blake Road & 2nd
Street Signal
EB 24.3 C 25.1 C 20.4 C
20.4 C WB 26.3 C 28.1 C 7.5 A
NB 41.4 D 17.7 B 14.4 B
SB 42.1 D 19.8 B 10.7 B
HORIZON YEAR BUILD (2030) CONDITIONS
Horizon Year Build (2030) conditions were analyzed to determine any traffic impacts from the addition of
the site traffic. Horizon Year Build (2030) turning movement volumes were developed by adding the site
trips to the Horizon Year No -Build (2030) turning movement volumes in Exhibit 4 in Appendix A. The
Horizon Year Build (2030) turning movement volumes are shown in Exhibit 11 in Appendix A. It should
be noted that in the Horizon Build (2030) conditions the existing site traffic was removed from the site
accesses.
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
22
The results of the analysis are provided in Tables 15 & 16 for the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Based
on the Horizon Year Build (2030) capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at
LOS D o r better in the AM peak hour. In the PM peak hour, the study intersections are expected to operate
at LOS C or better, except for Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue. Queues f or the southbound approach
at Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue are acceptable but the delays for the vehicles attempting to make
southbound left turns would likely cause vehicles to use a different access. Traffic control changes at this
access will likely be required by the 2030 analysis year, with or without the development. All turn lane
queues are within their storage capacity. In the PM peak hour, eastbound queues on Excelsior Boulevard
may extend from Blake Road to Pierce Avenue. There are no geometric changes required in the study area
as a result of the development. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D.
Table 15 – Horizon Year Build (2030) AM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis
Intersection Control Approach
Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Excelsior Boulevard
& Milwaukee
Street/ Jackson
Avenue
Signal
EB 40.6 D 8.6 A 4.6 A
21.1 C WB 55.2 E 22.7 C 23.1 C
NB 42.5 D 50.2 D 2.3 A
SB 42.9 D 57.0 E 2.1 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue
Side
Street
Stop
EB 12.2 B 4.1 A 3.6 A
31.5 D WB 8.8 A 0.5 A 0.3 A
NB 23.4 C 21.0 C 7.2 A
SB 31.5 D - - 7.6 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - 1.2 A - -
5.6 A WB - - 1.9 A 1.4 A
NB - - - - - -
SB - - - - 5.6 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Blake Road Signal
EB 35.6 D 15.4 B 3.9 A
24.7 C WB 46.0 D 23.2 C 4.6 A
NB 40.4 D 32.2 C 14.6 B
SB 38.2 D 34.5 C 27.3 C
Blake Road & Full
Site Access
Side
Street
Stop
EB 12.3 B - - 6.2 A
11.1 B WB 11.1 B 4.0 A 5.2 A
NB 1.3 A 0.8 A 4.0 A
SB 0.5 A 0.3 A 1.8 A
Blake Road & RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - - - 4.5 A
4.5 A WB - - - - - -
NB - - 0.3 A - -
SB - - 1.8 A 1.4 A
Blake Road & 2nd
Street Signal
EB 20.4 C 20.3 C 15.1 B
16.0 B WB 19.8 B 18.6 B 4.9 A
NB 28.4 C 11.0 B 5.9 A
SB 32.2 C 17.1 B 8.7 A
23 Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
Table 16 – Horizon Year Build (2030) PM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis
Intersection Control Approach
Operations by Movement Overall
Intersection Left Through Right
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Excelsior Boulevard
& Milwaukee Street/
Jackson Avenue
Signal
EB 56.6 E 16.3 B 12.0 B
21.6 C WB 59.6 E 28.4 C 26.4 C
NB 52.8 D 56.1 E 2.5 A
SB 53.0 D 66.1 E 3.0 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue
Side
Street
Stop
EB 19.7 C 8.7 A 10.3 B
100+ F WB 28.5 D 0.8 A 0.7 A
NB 100+ F - - 73.6 F
SB 100+ F - - 45.2 E
Excelsior Boulevard
& RIRO
Si de
Street
Stop
EB - - 6.0 A - -
6.8 A WB - - 2.1 A 1.8 A
NB - - - - - -
SB - - - - 6.8 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Blake Road Signal
EB 58.8 E 26.7 C 10.8 B
31.8 C WB 56.7 E 21.5 C 9.4 A
NB 56.4 E 46.0 D 27.5 C
SB 57.5 E 53.5 D 42.5 D
Blake Road & Full
Site Access
Side
Street
Stop
EB 22.7 C - - 9.8 A
30.6 D WB 30.6 D - - 11.1 B
NB 6.4 A 1.5 A 1.3 A
SB 6.9 A 0.7 A 0.4 A
Blake Road & RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - - - 4.3 A
4.3 A WB - - - - - -
NB - - 0.4 A - -
SB - - 1.8 A 1.7 A
Blake Road & 2nd
Street Signal
EB 26.3 C 25.0 C 20.6 C
20.7 C WB 26.7 C 25.1 C 6.9 A
NB 42.0 D 16.9 B 12.2 B
SB 48.3 D 20.9 C 12.8 B
Note: delays in excess of 100 seconds per vehicle are reported as "100+"
HORIZON YEAR BUILD + OUTLOT (2030) CONDITIONS
Horizon Year Build + Outlot (2030) conditions were analyzed to determine any traffic impacts from the
addition of the final Outlot. Horizon Year Build + Outlot (2030) turning movement volumes were developed
by adding the outlot trips to the Horizon Year Build (2030) turning movement volumes in Exhibit 11 in
Appendix A. The Horizon Year Build + Outlot (2030) turning movement volumes are shown in Exhibit 12
in Appendix A. It should be noted that in the Horizon Build (2030) conditions the existing site traffic was
removed from the site accesses.
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
24
The results of the analysis are provided in Tables 17 & 18 for the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Based
on the Horizon Year Build + Outlot (2030) capacity analysis, the study intersections are anticipated to
operate at LOS D or better in the AM & PM peak hours , except for Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue.
In the PM peak hour, Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue will continue to have operational delays similar
to the Horizon Year Build (2030) scenarios. There will be no additional mitigation required as a result of the
outlot being developed. The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix D.
Table 17 – Horizon Year Build + Outlot (2030) AM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis
Intersection Control Approach
Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Excelsior Boulevard
& Milwaukee
Street/ Jackson
Avenue
Signal
EB 40.4 D 8.1 A 4.4 A
21.0 C WB 56.7 E 22.8 C 23.3 C
NB 43.8 D 52.4 D 2.3 A
SB 48.3 D 49.3 D 2.1 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue
Side
Street
Stop
EB 14.9 B 4.0 A 3.3 A
43.3 E WB 7.3 A 0.5 A 0.4 A
NB 25.5 D 43.3 E 8.1 A
SB 30.1 D - - 8.4 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - 1.3 A - -
6.2 A WB - - 2.0 A 1.3 A
NB - - - - - -
SB - - - - 6.2 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Blake Road Signal
EB 36.2 D 15.8 B 4.0 A
25.7 C WB 47.8 D 24.6 C 4.7 A
NB 40.7 D 34.5 C 14.5 B
SB 39.2 D 37.0 D 29.0 C
Blake Road & Full
Site Access
Side
Street
Stop
EB 13.4 B - - 6.6 A
10.1 B WB 10.1 B - - 4.2 A
NB 6.9 A 1.3 A 1.4 A
SB 3.6 A 0.6 A 0.2 A
Blake Road & RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - - - 4.9 A
4.9 A WB - - - - - -
NB - - 0.3 A - -
SB - - 1.7 A 1.5 A
Blake Road & 2nd
Street Signal
EB 20.6 C 19.9 B 15.5 B
16.5 B WB 22.0 C 22.4 C 4.8 A
NB 30.2 C 11.5 B 5.8 A
SB 40.5 D 17.0 B 8.1 A
25 Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
Table 18 – Horizon Year Build + Outlot (2030) PM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis
Intersection Control Approach
Operations by Movement Overall
Intersection Left Through Right
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
Excelsior Boulevard
& Milwaukee Street/
Jackson Avenue
Signal
EB 59.5 E 17.5 B 10.3 B
22.9 C WB 71.9 E 29.5 C 29.4 C
NB 53.7 D 53.1 D 2.7 A
SB 51.1 D 56.0 E 3.0 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue
Side
Street
Stop
EB 17.6 C 8.9 A 8.1 A
100+ F WB 29.7 D 0.8 A 0.6 A
NB 100+ F - - 85.8 F
SB 100+ F - - 23.1 C
Excelsior Boulevard
& RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - 6.2 A - -
9.5 A WB - - 2.2 A 1.7 A
NB - - - - - -
SB - - - - 9.5 A
Excelsior Boulevard
& Blake Road Signal
EB 57.1 E 26.7 C 10.2 B
32.4 C WB 55.4 E 21.7 C 9.2 A
NB 51.8 D 47.0 D 29.3 C
SB 62.3 E 53.3 D 46.0 D
Blake Road & Full
Site Access
Side
Street
Stop
EB 18.8 C - - 8.6 A
29.5 D WB 29.5 D - - 11.4 B
NB 5.8 A 1.5 A 1.4 A
SB 6.4 A 0.9 A 0.3 A
Blake Road & RIRO
Side
Street
Stop
EB - - - - 5.2 A
5.2 A WB - - - - - -
NB - - 0.4 A - -
SB - - 2.0 A 1.7 A
Blake Road & 2nd
Street Signal
EB 25.9 C 26.4 C 20.5 C
20.3 C WB 25.4 C 28.8 C 8.1 A
NB 39.8 D 17.2 B 16.3 B
SB 47.4 D 19.3 B 11.3 B
Note: delays in excess of 100 seconds per vehicle are reported as "100+"
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
26
MITIGATION ANALYSIS
Based on the capacity analysis results, the side street stop-controlled movements at Excelsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue are expected to operate at LOS F in every PM analysis scenario. While queuing is not an
issue for the side street movements, vehicles may choose to accept smaller gaps due to the increased
delay. This could potentially become a safety concern. In order to mitigate the side street delays, this
intersection was also analyzed as a signal for the Horizon Year (2030) Build conditions. While the
intersection may or may not meet warrants by 2030, the intersection should be monitored and reevaluated
as the development occurs and background traffic increases in the area.
The intersection geometry would include dedicated southbound left turn lane, and a dedicated westbound
right turn lane. It was assumed that the eastbound and westbound left turns would operate as protected in
the peak hours but would be flashing yellow arrows off peak , and the northbound and southbound
movements would be permissive.
Table 19 shows the SimTraffic results for the mitigated Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue intersection
in the AM & PM peak hours. Based on the capacity analysis results, the mitigated intersection is anticipated
to operate at LOS C in both the AM & PM peak hours. All turn lane queues are anticipated to be within their
storage capacity at the intersection. In the PM peak hour, eastbound queues on Excelsior Boulevard may
extend from Blake Road to Pierce Avenue. With proper signal coordination this is not anticipated to be a
major issue. Installing a signal could provide benefits to the development traffic as well as the transit lines
that will use Pierce Avenue to access the bus stops near the Blake LRT station.
Table 19 – Horizon Year Build (2030) Signal Mitigation Analysis
Intersection Control Approach
Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
AM Peak Hour
Excelsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue Signal
EB 60.1 E 25.8 C 20.6 C
25.8 C WB 48.4 D 25.8 C 16.1 B
NB 10.9 B 17.5 B 8.3 A
SB 16.5 B - - 8.9 A
PM Peak Hour
Excelsior Boulevard
& Pierce Avenue Signal
EB 72.4 E 37.0 D 41.9 D
31.3 C WB 51.9 D 19.8 B 12.8 B
NB 34.8 C - - 29.5 C
SB 30.1 C - - 9.9 A
27 Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
ESG Architecture & Design and Trilogy Real Estate Group are proposing a multiphase development that
includes, a 215-unit multifamily housing building, a 250-unit multifamily housing building, a 298-unit
multifamily housing building, and the potential for an additional outlot development. It is anticipated that
there will be a total of 19,000 sq. ft. of retail between the three buildings, however, the exact amount in each
building is not known at this time and will be evaluated as each building is developed. The total development
will include around 763 units of multifamily and 19,000 square feet of retail on the northwest corner of
Excelsior Boulevard (CSAH 3) & Blake Road (CSAH 20) in Hopkins, MN. The exact unit count may vary
slightly since the 250-unit apartment building and the 298-unit apartment building would not be built until
2026 and 2030, respectively.
In the Opening Year, Site A is anticipated to generate an additional 73 new trips during the AM peak hour
(19 entering, 54 exiting) and 90 new trips during the PM peak hour (55 entering, 35 exiting). In the Horizon
Year, Sites A, B, and C are anticipated to generate an additional 256 new trips during the AM peak hour
(68 entering, 188 exiting) and 311 new trips during the PM peak hour (198 entering, 113 exiting). The
existing site generates 85 AM peak hour trips and 316 PM peak hour trips. The proposed development will
generate significantly more trips in the AM peak hour than the existing site, but the PM peak hour trips will
be approximately the same.
There are currently five site accesses, and the proposed development would close the Hill Street RIRO
access on Blake Road. The northern RIRO on Blake Road will be relocated approximately 175 feet north
of the existing access as part of the SWLRT station and Park & Ride construction. The other site access
will remain the same as the existing site. The existing site accesses on Excelsior Boulevard are pivotal to
the site. The RIRO on Excelsior Boulevard provides connectivity, it helps maintain a grid like roadway
network on site, and increases the viability of retail on the corner of Excelsior Boulevard & Blake Road.
With the redevelopment of the site, the remaining site accesses will no longer feed directly into parking lots,
they will be urban roadways connecting throughout the site. This change will improve the flow of vehicles
entering and exiting the site accesses.
A capacity analysis was performed for Existing (2020), Opening Year No -Build (2022), Opening Year Build
(2022), Horizon Year (2030) No -Build, Horizon Year (2030) Build, and the Horizon Year (2030) Build +
Outlot .
The operations at the study intersections in the Existing (2020) and Opening Year No-Build (2022) operate
at LOS D or better in both the AM and PM peak hours except for Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue,
which has significant delays on the side streets during the PM peak hour scenarios. However, there are not
excessive side street queues .
In the Opening Year Build (2022) scenarios, the study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS C or
better in the AM & PM peak hours except for Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue which is anticipated to
operate at LOS E in the AM peak hour and LOS F in the PM peak hour. With the excessive southbound
delays at Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue, vehicles exiting the site may utilize different site accesses
during the peak hours to minimize delay. The intersection should continue to be monitored as it may require
mitigation. All other site accesses, including the RIRO site access on Excelsior Boulevard are anticipated
to operate acceptably in the Opening Year Build (2022) scenarios. It is assumed that a westbound right
turn lane at Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue will be installed as part of Site As development.
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
28
In the Horizon Year No -Build (2030) scenarios, the study intersections operate at LOS D or better in both
the AM and PM peak hours except for Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue, which has significant delays
on the side streets during the PM peak hour scenarios. Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue will require
mitigation as the delays are unacceptable without the proposed redevelopment.
In the Horizon Year Build (2030) scenarios, the study intersections were analyzed without any mitigation
as the projected trip generation for the site is similar to the existing site trip generation but with a different
distribution pattern. The study intersections operate at LOS D or better in both the AM and PM peak hours
except for Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue, which is projected to have significant delays on the side
streets during the PM peak hour scenarios similar to the Horizon Year No -Build (2030) scenarios. All other
site accesses, including the RIRO on Excelsior Boulevard are anticipated to operate acceptably in the
Horizon Year Build (2030) scenarios. No change in access is required as a result of the full development
build out.
Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue was then analyzed as a signalized intersection in the Horizon Year
Build (2030) scenarios. The mitigated intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS C in both the AM & PM
peak hours. All turn lane queues are anticipated to be within their storage capacity at the intersection. It is
recommended that a signal be installed at Excelsior Boulevard & Pierce Avenue by 2030. Installing
a signal could provide benefits to the development traffic as well as the transit lines that will use Pierce
Avenue to access the bus stops near the Blake LRT station. However, the intersection should be monitored
to determine if/when a signal is warranted.
The development of the outlot on the site is not anticipated to have a significant impact on traffic operations
in the study area.
29 Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment
Traffic Impact Analysis │ August 2020
APPENDIX
A. Exhibits
B. Site Plan
C. Raw Turning Movement Counts
D. SimTraffic Analysis Results
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT 1
PROJECT SITE LOCATION AND STUDY AREA
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR REDEVELOPMENT
LEGEND
Proposed Site Location
Study Intersections
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT 2
EXISTING (2020) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR REDEVELOPMENT
LEGEND
Proposed Site Location
AM (PM) Weekday Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X)
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT 3
OPENING YEAR NO-BUILD (2022) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR REDEVELOPMENT
LEGEND
Proposed Site Location
AM (PM) Weekday Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X)
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT 4
HORIZON YEAR NO-BUILD (2030) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR REDEVELOPMENT
LEGEND
Proposed Site Location
AM (PM) Weekday Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X)
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT 5
OPENING YEAR (2022) SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR REDEVELOPMENT
LEGEND
Proposed Site Location
Study Intersection
Site Traffic Distribution
Inbound Site Traffic
Outbound Site Traffic
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT 6
HORIZON YEAR (2030) SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR REDEVELOPMENT
LEGEND
Proposed Site Location
Study Intersection
Site Traffic Distribution
Inbound Site Traffic
Outbound Site Traffic
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT 7
OPENING YEAR (2022) TRIP ASSIGNMENT
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR REDEVELOPMENT
LEGEND
Proposed Site Location
AM (PM) Weekday Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X)
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT 8
HORIZON YEAR BUILD (2030) TRIP ASSIGNMENT
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR REDEVELOPMENT
LEGEND
Proposed Site Location
AM (PM) Weekday Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X)
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT 9
HORIZON YEAR BUILD + OUTLOT (2030) TRIP ASSIGNMENT
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR REDEVELOPMENT
LEGEND
Proposed Site Location
AM (PM) Weekday Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X)
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT 10
OPENING YEAR BUILD (2022) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR REDEVELOPMENT
LEGEND
Proposed Site Location
AM (PM) Weekday Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X)
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT 11
HORIZON YEAR BUILD (2030) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR REDEVELOPMENT
LEGEND
Proposed Site Location
AM (PM) Weekday Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X)
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT 12
HORIZON YEAR BUILD + OUTLOT (2030) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR REDEVELOPMENT
LEGEND
Proposed Site Location
AM (PM) Weekday Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X)
PARK
AND RIDE
DESIGNATED
ACCESSBLAKE RD NB LA K E R D SW LR T ST A T IO N
B U S STO P
D R O P O FFB U S STO P
E X C E L SI O R B L V DPIERCE AVEGARAGE
ENTRY
SITE A
SITE C
SITE BLINEAR PARKFUTURE USE
SIDEWALK BOULEVARD
REALIGNED DRIVE
BLAKE STATION, MASTER PLAN MASTER PLAN
March 27, 2020
Hopkins, Minnesota
N
March 27, 2020
BLAKE ROAD STATION
Hopkins, MN Master Plan
Scale 1 : 1400
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 1_Excelsior Boulevard & PierceAvenueSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardPierce AvenueThe Blake School DrivewayWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:00 AM0 65 0065 4 108 40116 2011320103 1877:15 AM2 108 00110 3 131 30137 0030310011 2517:30 AM6 144 00150 3 152 50160 1022300000 3137:45 AM10 185 20197 5 159 30167 1000100101 366Hourly Total18 502 20522 15 550 150580 406310 30215 11178:00 AM8 163 01171 7 171 90187 10304218011 3738:15 AM5 164 20171 7 172 80187 30205505010 3738:30 AM0 125 10126 8 148 40160 1030420204 2948:45 AM0 116 00116 10 114 10125 0030330003 247Hourly Total13 568 31584 32 605 220659 50 11016 12 1 15028 1287*** BREAK ***---------------------4:00 PM4 173 30180 8 192 20202 407011 20204 3974:15 PM2 167 10170 13 196 30212 409113 10102 3974:30 PM4 158 20164 15 257 10273 507012 30003 4524:45 PM3 150 20155 11 237 40252 50 14019 20103 429Hourly Total13 648 80669 47 882 100939 18 0 37155 804012 16755:00 PM3 143 00146 20 272 30295 20 16018 20103 4625:15 PM6 178 21186 12 235 30250 0080890019 4535:30 PM3 131 10135 8 236 00244 418013 10001 3935:45 PM4 118 10123 10 169 10180 0031300303 309Hourly Total16 570 41590 50 912 70969 61 35142 12 04116 1617Grand Total60 2288 1722365 144 2949 5403147 33 1 895123 35 1 25261 5696Approach % 2.5 96.7 0.7-- 4.6 93.7 1.7-- 26.8 0.8 72.4-- 57.4 1.6 41.0---Total %1.1 40.2 0.3-41.5 2.5 51.8 0.9-55.2 0.6 0.0 1.6-2.2 0.6 0.0 0.4-1.1 -Lights54 2209 16-2279 140 2881 38-3059 32 1 83-116 34 1 25-60 5514% Lights90.0 96.5 94.1-96.4 97.2 97.7 70.4-97.2 97.0 100.0 93.3-94.3 97.1 100.0 100.0-98.4 96.8Mediums6 66 1-73 1 55 16-72 003-3100-1 149% Mediums 10.0 2.9 5.9-3.1 0.7 1.9 29.6-2.3 0.0 0.0 3.4-2.4 2.9 0.0 0.0-1.6 2.6Articulated Trucks 0 13 0-13 3 13 0-16 103-4000-0 33% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.6 0.0-0.5 2.1 0.4 0.0-0.5 3.0 0.0 3.4-3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.6Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----1----1--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---0.0---------20.0----50.0--Pedestrians---2----0----4----1--% Pedestrians ---100.0---------80.0----50.0--
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 1_Excelsior Boulevard & PierceAvenueSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 202/26/2020 7:00 AMEnding At02/26/2020 6:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansPierce Avenue [N]Out In Total157 116 2732 3 53 4 70 0 00 0 0162 123 28583 1 32 03 0 0 03 0 1 00 0 0 10 0 0 489 1 33 5R T L P
3007
0
0
14
55
2938
Out
2365
0
0
13
73
2279
In
5372
0
0
27
128
5217
Total
Excelsior Boulevard [E]
R
17
0
0
0
1
16
T
2288
0
0
13
66
2209
L
60
0
0
0
6
54
P
2
2
0
0
0
0
93 60 15322 1 230 0 00 0 00 0 0115 61 176Out In TotalThe Blake SchoolL T R P34 1 25 01 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 10 0 0 135 1 25 2Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total538514232005559In30597216003147Out232670160024121401300144L28815513002949T381600054R000000PTurning Movement Data Plot
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 1_Excelsior Boulevard & PierceAvenueSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM)Start TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardPierce AvenueThe Blake School DrivewayWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:30 AM6 144 00150 3 152 50160 1022300000 3137:45 AM10 185 20197 5 159 30167 1000100101 3668:00 AM8 163 01171 7 171 90187 10304218011 3738:15 AM5 164 20171 7 172 80187 30205505010 373Total29 656 41689 22 654 250701 607213 71 14022 1425Approach % 4.2 95.2 0.6-- 3.1 93.3 3.6-- 46.2 0.0 53.8-- 31.8 4.5 63.6---Total %2.0 46.0 0.3-48.4 1.5 45.9 1.8-49.2 0.4 0.0 0.5-0.9 0.5 0.1 1.0-1.5 -PHF0.725 0.886 0.500-0.874 0.786 0.951 0.694-0.937 0.500 0.000 0.583-0.650 0.350 0.250 0.438-0.500 0.955Lights28 628 3-659 20 631 21-672 605-11 71 14-22 1364% Lights96.6 95.7 75.0-95.6 90.9 96.5 84.0-95.9 100.0 - 71.4-84.6 100.0 100.0 100.0-100.0 95.7Mediums1 23 1-25 0 20 4-24 000-0000-0 49% Mediums3.4 3.5 25.0-3.6 0.0 3.1 16.0-3.4 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 3.4Articulated Trucks 050-5230-5002-2000-0 12% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.8 0.0-0.7 9.1 0.5 0.0-0.7 0.0 - 28.6-15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.8Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---0.0---------0.0-------Pedestrians---1----0----2----0--% Pedestrians ---100.0---------100.0-------
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 1_Excelsior Boulevard & PierceAvenueSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 4Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 7:30 AMEnding At02/26/2020 8:30 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansPierce Avenue [N]Out In Total24 11 351 0 12 2 40 0 00 0 027 13 405 0 6 00 0 0 02 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 27 0 6 2R T L P
674
0
0
3
20
651
Out
689
0
0
5
25
659
In
1363
0
0
8
45
1310
Total
Excelsior Boulevard [E]
R
4
0
0
0
1
3
T
656
0
0
5
23
628
L
29
0
0
0
1
28
P
1
1
0
0
0
0
49 22 715 0 50 0 00 0 00 0 054 22 76Out In TotalThe Blake SchoolL T R P7 1 14 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 07 1 14 0Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total13124712001371In67224500701Out6402370067020020022L63120300654T21400025R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 1_Excelsior Boulevard & PierceAvenueSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM)Start TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardPierce AvenueThe Blake School DrivewayWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total4:30 PM4 158 20164 15 257 10273 507012 30003 4524:45 PM3 150 20155 11 237 40252 50 14019 20103 4295:00 PM3 143 00146 20 272 30295 20 16018 20103 4625:15 PM6 178 21186 12 235 30250 0080890019 453Total16 629 61651 58 1001 1101070 12 0 45057 16 02118 1796Approach % 2.5 96.6 0.9-- 5.4 93.6 1.0-- 21.1 0.0 78.9-- 88.9 0.0 11.1---Total %0.9 35.0 0.3-36.2 3.2 55.7 0.6-59.6 0.7 0.0 2.5-3.2 0.9 0.0 0.1-1.0 -PHF0.667 0.883 0.750-0.875 0.725 0.920 0.688-0.907 0.600 0.000 0.703-0.750 0.444 0.000 0.500-0.500 0.972Lights13 620 6-639 57 986 1-1044 11 0 44-55 16 02-18 1756% Lights81.3 98.6 100.0-98.2 98.3 98.5 9.1-97.6 91.7 - 97.8-96.5 100.0 - 100.0-100.0 97.8Mediums380-11 1 12 10-23 001-1000-0 35% Mediums 18.8 1.3 0.0-1.7 1.7 1.2 90.9-2.1 0.0 - 2.2-1.8 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 1.9Articulated Trucks 010-1030-3100-1000-05% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.2 0.0-0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0-0.3 8.3 - 0.0-1.8 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 0.3Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---0.0--------------0.0--Pedestrians---1----0----0----1--% Pedestrians ---100.0--------------100.0--
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 1_Excelsior Boulevard & PierceAvenueSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 6Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 4:30 PMEnding At02/26/2020 5:30 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansPierce Avenue [N]Out In Total63 55 1181 1 20 1 10 0 00 0 064 57 12144 0 11 01 0 0 00 0 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 045 0 12 0R T L P
1015
0
0
4
12
999
Out
651
0
0
1
11
639
In
1666
0
0
5
23
1638
Total
Excelsior Boulevard [E]
R
6
0
0
0
0
6
T
629
0
0
1
8
620
L
16
0
0
0
3
13
P
1
1
0
0
0
0
14 18 3213 0 130 0 00 0 00 0 027 18 45Out In TotalThe Blake SchoolL T R P16 0 2 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 116 0 2 1Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total1724324001760In1044233001070Out680910069057100058L986123001001T11000011R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 2_Excelsior Boulevard & RIROSite DrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardRIRO Site DrivewayWestboundEastboundSouthboundThruRightPedsApp. TotalLeftThruPedsApp. TotalLeftRightPedsApp. Total Int. Total7:00 AM3920410420420212857:15 AM43204507807801011247:30 AM43104408318302121297:45 AM8000800890890111170Hourly Total205502100292129206365088:00 AM6922710108210800101798:15 AM108201100134013401012458:30 AM154211560146114600103028:45 AM19500195016301630101359Hourly Total526635320551355102221085*** BREAK ***-------------4:00 PM186511910124412409093244:15 PM208121220013831380100103684:30 PM183511880270127009094674:45 PM16050165019101910808364Hourly Total7372737640723872303603615235:00 PM1791001890198019808083955:15 PM158611640213021306063835:30 PM160161176026612660120124545:45 PM15690165026102610525431Hourly Total653412694093819380312311663Grand Total21217982200025041325040757754779Approach %96.43.6--0.0100.0--0.0100.0---Total %44.41.7-46.00.052.4-52.40.01.6-1.6-Lights204278-212002420-2420074-744614% Lights96.398.7-96.4-96.6-96.6-98.7-98.796.5Mediums651-66072-7201-1139% Mediums3.11.3-3.0-2.9-2.9-1.3-1.32.9Articulated Trucks140-14012-1200-026% Articulated Trucks0.70.0-0.6-0.5-0.5-0.0-0.00.5Bicycles on Crosswalk--0---0---0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk--0.0---0.0---0.0--Pedestrians--8---13---7--% Pedestrians--100.0---100.0---100.0--
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 2_Excelsior Boulevard & RIROSite DrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 202/26/2020 7:00 AMEnding At02/26/2020 6:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansRIRO Site Driveway [N]Out In Total78 74 1521 1 20 0 00 0 00 0 079 75 15474 0 01 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 775 0 7R L P
2504
0
0
12
72
2420
Out
2200
0
0
14
66
2120
In
4704
0
0
26
138
4540
Total
Excelsior Boulevard [E]
R
79
0
0
0
1
78
T
2121
0
0
14
65
2042
P
8
8
0
0
0
0
0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0Out In TotalFake Approach [S]Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total453613826004700In24207212002504Out21166614002196000000L24207212002504T00001313PTurning Movement Data Plot
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 2_Excelsior Boulevard & RIROSite DrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (8:00 AM)Start TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardRIRO Site DrivewayWestboundEastboundSouthboundThruRightPedsApp. TotalLeftThruPedsApp. TotalLeftRightPedsApp. Total Int. Total8:00 AM6922710108210800101798:15 AM108201100134013401012458:30 AM154211560146114600103028:45 AM19500195016301630101359Total526635320551355102221085Approach %98.91.1--0.0100.0--0.0100.0---Total %48.50.6-49.00.050.8-50.80.00.2-0.2-PHF0.6740.750-0.6820.0000.845-0.8450.0000.500-0.5000.756Lights5036-5090537-53702-21048% Lights95.6100.0-95.7-97.5-97.5-100.0-100.096.6Mediums170-17013-1300-030% Mediums3.20.0-3.2-2.4-2.4-0.0-0.02.8Articulated Trucks60-601-100-07% Articulated Trucks1.10.0-1.1-0.2-0.2-0.0-0.00.6Bicycles on Crosswalk--0---0---0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk--0.0---0.0---0.0--Pedestrians--3---3---2--% Pedestrians--100.0---100.0---100.0--
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 2_Excelsior Boulevard & RIROSite DrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 4Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 8:00 AMEnding At02/26/2020 9:00 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansRIRO Site Driveway [N]Out In Total6 2 80 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 06 2 82 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 22 0 2R L P
551
0
0
1
13
537
Out
532
0
0
6
17
509
In
1083
0
0
7
30
1046
Total
Excelsior Boulevard [E]
R
6
0
0
0
0
6
T
526
0
0
6
17
503
P
3
3
0
0
0
0
0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0Out In TotalFake Approach [S]Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total1042307001079In53713100551Out50517600528000000L53713100551T000033PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (8:00 AM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 2_Excelsior Boulevard & RIROSite DrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (5:00 PM)Start TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardRIRO Site DrivewayWestboundEastboundSouthboundThruRightPedsApp. TotalLeftThruPedsApp. TotalLeftRightPedsApp. Total Int. Total5:00 PM1791001890198019808083955:15 PM158611640213021306063835:30 PM160161176026612660120124545:45 PM15690165026102610525431Total653412694093819380312311663Approach %94.15.9--0.0100.0--0.0100.0---Total %39.32.5-41.70.056.4-56.40.01.9-1.9-PHF0.9120.641-0.9180.0000.882-0.8820.0000.646-0.6460.916Lights63141-6720922-922031-311625% Lights96.6100.0-96.8-98.3-98.3-100.0-100.097.7Mediums190-1909-900-028% Mediums2.90.0-2.7-1.0-1.0-0.0-0.01.7Articulated Trucks30-307-700-010% Articulated Trucks0.50.0-0.4-0.7-0.7-0.0-0.00.6Bicycles on Crosswalk--0---0---0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk--0.0---0.0---0.0--Pedestrians--2---1---2--% Pedestrians--100.0---100.0---100.0--
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 2_Excelsior Boulevard & RIROSite DrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 6Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 5:00 PMEnding At02/26/2020 6:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansRIRO Site Driveway [N]Out In Total41 31 720 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 041 31 7231 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 231 0 2R L P
938
0
0
7
9
922
Out
694
0
0
3
19
672
In
1632
0
0
10
28
1594
Total
Excelsior Boulevard [E]
R
41
0
0
0
0
41
T
653
0
0
3
19
631
P
2
2
0
0
0
0
0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0Out In TotalFake Approach [S]Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total15842810001622In9229700938Out66219300684000000L9229700938T000011PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (5:00 PM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 3_Blake Road & ExcelsiorBoulevardSite Code:Start Date: 03/10/2020Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:00 AM4 44 11059 12 67 8087 14 10 7031 13 11 13037 2147:15 AM7 66 14087 15 95 120122 22 22 12056 8 11 14033 2987:30 AM11 98 200129 15 104 151134 29 13 17059 14 24 18156 3787:45 AM21 134 230178 10 143 182171 35 21 20176 28 21 16065 490Hourly Total43 342 680453 52 409 533514 100 66 561222 63 67 611191 13808:00 AM17 131 380186 20 147 240191 24 17 29070 40 28 21089 5368:15 AM12 127 110150 26 134 330193 23 13 19055 24 34 16074 4728:30 AM12 67 280107 12 113 240149 24 12 11047 17 30 15062 3658:45 AM9 96 230128 8 97 60111 22 20 19061 20 9 11040 340Hourly Total50 421 1000571 66 491 870644 93 62 780233 101 101 630265 1713*** BREAK ***---------------------4:00 PM12 141 390192 25 130 241179 33 23 17073 16 19 6041 4854:15 PM18 132 443194 21 149 380208 39 23 18180 29 28 5462 5444:30 PM31 150 501231 26 149 342209 29 31 15675 18 38 9065 5804:45 PM22 121 540197 22 158 315211 32 17 21070 21 35 10066 544Hourly Total83 544 1874814 94 586 1278807 133 94 717298 84 120 304234 21535:00 PM14 138 513203 23 167 371227 25 42 20087 20 38 16074 5915:15 PM17 99 400156 26 164 360226 38 34 23095 28 43 14085 5625:30 PM16 111 360163 29 122 220173 34 32 21087 16 24 10050 4735:45 PM14 69 360119 24 83 213128 30 25 19074 26 30 13069 390Hourly Total61 417 1633641 102 536 1164754 127 133 830343 90 135 530278 2016Grand Total 237 1724 51872479 314 2022 383152719 453 355 28881096 338 423 2075968 7262Approach % 9.6 69.5 20.9-- 11.5 74.4 14.1-- 41.3 32.4 26.3-- 34.9 43.7 21.4---Total %3.3 23.7 7.1-34.1 4.3 27.8 5.3-37.4 6.2 4.9 4.0-15.1 4.7 5.8 2.9-13.3 -Lights223 1674 498-2395 310 1971 380-2661 439 343 284-1066 334 412 201-947 7069% Lights94.1 97.1 96.1-96.6 98.7 97.5 99.2-97.9 96.9 96.6 98.6-97.3 98.8 97.4 97.1-97.8 97.3Mediums14 40 17-71 4 40 2-46 9 11 4-24 4 11 5-20 161% Mediums5.9 2.3 3.3-2.9 1.3 2.0 0.5-1.7 2.0 3.1 1.4-2.2 1.2 2.6 2.4-2.1 2.2Articulated Trucks 0 10 3-13 0 11 1-12 510-6001-1 32% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.6 0.6-0.5 0.0 0.5 0.3-0.4 1.1 0.3 0.0-0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5-0.1 0.4Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---0.0----0.0----0.0----0.0--Pedestrians---7----15----8----5--% Pedestrians ---100.0----100.0----100.0----100.0--
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 3_Blake Road & ExcelsiorBoulevardSite Code:Start Date: 03/10/2020Page No: 203/10/2020 7:00 AMEnding At03/10/2020 6:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total1220 1066 228632 24 563 6 90 0 00 0 01255 1096 2351284 343 439 04 11 9 00 1 5 00 0 0 00 0 0 8288 355 453 8R T L P
2682
0
0
17
54
2611
Out
2479
0
0
13
71
2395
In
5161
0
0
30
125
5006
Total
Excelsior Boulevard [E]
R
518
0
0
3
17
498
T
1724
0
0
10
40
1674
L
237
0
0
0
14
223
P
7
7
0
0
0
0
946 947 189327 20 472 1 30 0 00 0 0975 968 1943Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P334 412 201 04 11 5 00 0 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 5338 423 207 5Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total49539422005069In26614612002719Out229248100023503104000314L19714011002022T3802100383R00001515PTurning Movement Data Plot
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 3_Blake Road & ExcelsiorBoulevardSite Code:Start Date: 03/10/2020Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM)Start TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:30 AM11 98 200129 15 104 151134 29 13 17059 14 24 18156 3787:45 AM21 134 230178 10 143 182171 35 21 20176 28 21 16065 4908:00 AM17 131 380186 20 147 240191 24 17 29070 40 28 21089 5368:15 AM12 127 110150 26 134 330193 23 13 19055 24 34 16074 472Total61 490 920643 71 528 903689 111 64 851260 106 107 711284 1876Approach % 9.5 76.2 14.3-- 10.3 76.6 13.1-- 42.7 24.6 32.7-- 37.3 37.7 25.0---Total %3.3 26.1 4.9-34.3 3.8 28.1 4.8-36.7 5.9 3.4 4.5-13.9 5.7 5.7 3.8-15.1 -PHF0.726 0.914 0.605-0.864 0.683 0.898 0.682-0.892 0.793 0.762 0.733-0.855 0.663 0.787 0.845-0.798 0.875Lights57 475 83-615 70 516 90-676 104 58 83-245 103 105 70-278 1814% Lights93.4 96.9 90.2-95.6 98.6 97.7 100.0-98.1 93.7 90.6 97.6-94.2 97.2 98.1 98.6-97.9 96.7Mediums4 12 8-24 1 10 0-11 562-13 321-6 54% Mediums6.6 2.4 8.7-3.7 1.4 1.9 0.0-1.6 4.5 9.4 2.4-5.0 2.8 1.9 1.4-2.1 2.9Articulated Trucks 031-4020-2200-2000-08% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.6 1.1-0.6 0.0 0.4 0.0-0.3 1.8 0.0 0.0-0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.4Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk--------0.0----0.0----0.0--Pedestrians---0----3----1----1--% Pedestrians --------100.0----100.0----100.0--
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 3_Blake Road & ExcelsiorBoulevardSite Code:Start Date: 03/10/2020Page No: 4Peak Hour Data03/10/2020 7:30 AMEnding At03/10/2020 8:30 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total258 245 50311 13 241 2 30 0 00 0 0270 260 53083 58 104 02 6 5 00 0 2 00 0 0 00 0 0 185 64 111 1R T L P
710
0
0
4
16
690
Out
643
0
0
4
24
615
In
1353
0
0
8
40
1305
Total
Excelsior Boulevard [E]
R
92
0
0
1
8
83
T
490
0
0
3
12
475
L
61
0
0
0
4
57
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
205 278 48310 6 160 0 00 0 00 0 0215 284 499Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P103 105 70 03 2 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 1106 107 71 1Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total1337285001370In67611200689Out6611730068170100071L51610200528T90000090R000033PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 3_Blake Road & ExcelsiorBoulevardSite Code:Start Date: 03/10/2020Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM)Start TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total4:30 PM31 150 501231 26 149 342209 29 31 15675 18 38 9065 5804:45 PM22 121 540197 22 158 315211 32 17 21070 21 35 10066 5445:00 PM14 138 513203 23 167 371227 25 42 20087 20 38 16074 5915:15 PM17 99 400156 26 164 360226 38 34 23095 28 43 14085 562Total84 508 1954787 97 638 1388873 124 124 796327 87 154 490290 2277Approach % 10.7 64.5 24.8-- 11.1 73.1 15.8-- 37.9 37.9 24.2-- 30.0 53.1 16.9---Total %3.7 22.3 8.6-34.6 4.3 28.0 6.1-38.3 5.4 5.4 3.5-14.4 3.8 6.8 2.2-12.7 -PHF0.677 0.847 0.903-0.852 0.933 0.955 0.932-0.961 0.816 0.738 0.859-0.861 0.777 0.895 0.766-0.853 0.963Lights80 495 192-767 96 625 137-858 121 121 78-320 87 152 48-287 2232% Lights95.2 97.4 98.5-97.5 99.0 98.0 99.3-98.3 97.6 97.6 98.7-97.9 100.0 98.7 98.0-99.0 98.0Mediums4 11 2-17 191-11 131-5021-3 36% Mediums4.8 2.2 1.0-2.2 1.0 1.4 0.7-1.3 0.8 2.4 1.3-1.5 0.0 1.3 2.0-1.0 1.6Articulated Trucks 021-3040-4200-2000-09% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.4 0.5-0.4 0.0 0.6 0.0-0.5 1.6 0.0 0.0-0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.4Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---0.0----0.0----0.0-------Pedestrians---4----8----6----0--% Pedestrians ---100.0----100.0----100.0-------
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 3_Blake Road & ExcelsiorBoulevardSite Code:Start Date: 03/10/2020Page No: 6Peak Hour Data03/10/2020 4:30 PMEnding At03/10/2020 5:30 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total440 320 7605 5 101 2 30 0 00 0 0446 327 77378 121 121 01 3 1 00 0 2 00 0 0 00 0 0 679 124 124 6R T L P
811
0
0
6
11
794
Out
787
0
0
3
17
767
In
1598
0
0
9
28
1561
Total
Excelsior Boulevard [E]
R
195
0
0
1
2
192
T
508
0
0
2
11
495
L
84
0
0
0
4
80
P
4
4
0
0
0
0
338 287 6258 3 110 0 00 0 00 0 0346 290 636Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P87 152 48 00 2 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 087 154 49 0Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total1518236001547In85811400873Out6601220067496100097L6259400638T1371000138R000088PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 4_Blake Road & Hill StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeHill StreetBlake RoadBlake RoadEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeftRightPedsApp. TotalThruRightPedsApp. TotalLeftThruPedsApp. Total Int. Total7:00 AM0040322034027027617:15 AM00106420660450451117:30 AM00007610770450451227:45 AM0010660066080080146Hourly Total006023850243019701974408:00 AM01018620881630641538:15 AM01016930720640641378:30 AM02026150660560561248:45 AM0202484052055055109Hourly Total060626414027812380239523*** BREAK ***-------------4:00 PM0616733076011501151974:15 PM04148611097011801182194:30 PM07579370100012001202274:45 PM0343964110001200120223Hourly Total0201120348251373047304738665:00 PM06369370100012301232295:15 PM0929844088012501252225:30 PM0606855090010701072035:45 PM0505844088074074167Hourly Total02652634620036604290429821Grand Total05222521196641126011337013382650Approach %0.0100.0--94.95.1--0.199.9---Total %0.02.0-2.045.12.4-47.50.050.5-50.5-Lights052-52116563-122811298-12992579% Lights-100.0-100.097.498.4-97.5100.097.1-97.197.3Mediums00-0251-26032-3258% Mediums-0.0-0.02.11.6-2.10.02.4-2.42.2Articulated Trucks00-060-607-713% Articulated Trucks-0.0-0.00.50.0-0.50.00.5-0.50.5Bicycles on Crosswalk--0---0---0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk--0.0---0.0------Pedestrians--22---1---0--% Pedestrians--100.0---100.0------
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 4_Blake Road & Hill StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 202/26/2020 7:00 AMEnding At02/26/2020 6:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total1298 1228 252632 26 587 6 130 0 00 0 01337 1260 259763 1165 01 25 00 6 00 0 00 0 164 1196 1R T P
0
0
0
0
0
0
Out
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Fake Approach [E]1217 1299 251625 32 576 7 130 0 00 0 01248 1338 2586Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T P1 1298 00 32 00 7 00 0 00 0 01 1337 0Hill Street [W]Total1161000117In52000052Out64100065000000L52000052R00002222PTurning Movement Data Plot
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 4_Blake Road & Hill StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM)Start TimeHill StreetBlake RoadBlake RoadEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeftRightPedsApp. TotalThruRightPedsApp. TotalLeftThruPedsApp. Total Int. Total7:45 AM00106600660800801468:00 AM01018620881630641538:15 AM01016930720640641378:30 AM0202615066056056124Total041428210029212630264560Approach %0.0100.0--96.63.4--0.499.6---Total %0.00.7-0.750.41.8-52.10.247.0-47.1-PHF0.0000.500-0.5000.8200.500-0.8300.2500.822-0.8250.915Lights04-426710-2771252-253534% Lights-100.0-100.094.7100.0-94.9100.095.8-95.895.4Mediums00-0130-13011-1124% Mediums-0.0-0.04.60.0-4.50.04.2-4.24.3Articulated Trucks00-020-200-02% Articulated Trucks-0.0-0.00.70.0-0.70.00.0-0.00.4Bicycles on Crosswalk--0---0---0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk--0.0----------Pedestrians--1---0---0--% Pedestrians--100.0----------
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 4_Blake Road & Hill StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 4Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 7:45 AMEnding At02/26/2020 8:45 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total252 277 52911 13 240 2 20 0 00 0 0263 292 55510 267 00 13 00 2 00 0 00 0 010 282 0R T P
0
0
0
0
0
0
Out
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Fake Approach [E]271 253 52413 11 242 0 20 0 00 0 0286 264 550Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T P1 252 00 11 00 0 00 0 00 0 01 263 0Hill Street [W]Total15000015In400004Out11000011000000L400004R000011PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:45 AM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 4_Blake Road & Hill StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM)Start TimeHill StreetBlake RoadBlake RoadEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeftRightPedsApp. TotalThruRightPedsApp. TotalLeftThruPedsApp. Total Int. Total4:30 PM07579370100012001202274:45 PM03439641100012001202235:00 PM06369370100012301232295:15 PM092984408801250125222Total025142536622138804880488901Approach %0.0100.0--94.35.7--0.0100.0---Total %0.02.8-2.840.62.4-43.10.054.2-54.2-PHF0.0000.694-0.6940.9530.786-0.9700.0000.976-0.9760.984Lights025-2536322-3850480-480890% Lights-100.0-100.099.2100.0-99.2-98.4-98.498.8Mediums00-030-306-69% Mediums-0.0-0.00.80.0-0.8-1.2-1.21.0Articulated Trucks00-000-002-22% Articulated Trucks-0.0-0.00.00.0-0.0-0.4-0.40.2Bicycles on Crosswalk--0---0---0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk--0.0---0.0------Pedestrians--14---1---0--% Pedestrians--100.0---100.0------
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 4_Blake Road & Hill StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 6Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 4:30 PMEnding At02/26/2020 5:30 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total480 385 8656 3 92 0 20 0 00 0 0488 388 87622 363 00 3 00 0 00 0 00 0 122 366 1R T P
0
0
0
0
0
0
Out
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Fake Approach [E]388 480 8683 6 90 2 20 0 00 0 0391 488 879Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T P0 480 00 6 00 2 00 0 00 0 00 488 0Hill Street [W]Total47000047In25000025Out22000022000000L25000025R00001414PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 5_Blake Road & Full Access SiteDrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeWestside Village Apartments DrivewayArby's DrivewayBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:00 AM80 13021 000206 25 2033 0 22 5427 817:15 AM808216 00000 10 59 0069 0 36 9145 1307:30 AM806014 001016 67 0073 1 39 5045 1337:45 AM606012 000002 60 0062 1 74 1176 150Hourly Total30 0 33263 00121 24 211 20237 2 171 206193 4948:00 AM515011 400044 82 0086 1 67 0068 1698:15 AM418013 404086 66 3175 2 59 3064 1608:30 AM803211 111039 60 0069 1 50 5056 1398:45 AM608214 100214 48 1253 1 50 3154 122Hourly Total23 2 24449 10 15216 23 256 43283 5 226 111242 590*** BREAK ***---------------------4:00 PM41 13018 768121 8 65 4177 3 100 71110 2264:15 PM60 22128 23308 11 87 1299 2 102 132117 2524:30 PM53 10218 923014 9 85 0294 2 119 50126 2524:45 PM10 2 11123 615012 18 86 22106 4 105 80117 258Hourly Total25 6 56487 24 12 19155 46 323 77376 11 426 333470 9885:00 PM40 15119 14 22118 4 90 0294 4 112 91125 2565:15 PM70 10317 424210 7 75 2184 2 119 31124 2355:30 PM32 18123 52209 15 85 22102 1 97 70105 2395:45 PM42 12018 506111 13 76 0189 4 67 5176 194Hourly Total18 4 55577 28 6 14448 39 326 46369 11 395 243430 924Grand Total96 12 16815276 62 19 399120 132 1116 17161265 29 1218 88131335 2996Approach % 34.8 4.3 60.9-- 51.7 15.8 32.5-- 10.4 88.2 1.3-- 2.2 91.2 6.6---Total %3.2 0.4 5.6-9.2 2.1 0.6 1.3-4.0 4.4 37.2 0.6-42.2 1.0 40.7 2.9-44.6 -Lights93 12 163-268 61 19 38-118 120 1090 16-1226 29 1183 83-1295 2907% Lights96.9 100.0 97.0-97.1 98.4 100.0 97.4-98.3 90.9 97.7 94.1-96.9 100.0 97.1 94.3-97.0 97.0Mediums305-8101-2 12 22 0-34 0 28 5-33 77% Mediums3.1 0.0 3.0-2.9 1.6 0.0 2.6-1.7 9.1 2.0 0.0-2.7 0.0 2.3 5.7-2.5 2.6Articulated Trucks 000-0000-0041-5070-7 12% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.4 5.9-0.4 0.0 0.6 0.0-0.5 0.4Bicycles on Crosswalk ---4----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---26.7----0.0----0.0----0.0--Pedestrians---11----9----16----13--% Pedestrians ---73.3----100.0----100.0----100.0--
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 5_Blake Road & Full Access SiteDrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 202/26/2020 7:00 AMEnding At02/26/2020 6:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total1407 1226 263334 34 687 5 120 0 00 0 01448 1265 271316 1090 120 00 22 12 01 4 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 1617 1116 132 16R T L P
239
0
0
0
17
222
Out
276
0
0
0
8
268
In
515
0
0
0
25
490
Total
Westside Village Apartment
R
168
0
0
0
5
163
T
12
0
0
0
0
12
L
96
0
0
0
3
93
P
15
11
4
0
0
0
1221 1295 251626 33 594 7 110 0 00 0 01251 1335 2586Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P29 1183 83 00 28 5 00 7 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 1329 1218 88 13Arby's Driveway [W]Total1752100178In1182000120Out5701005861100062L19000019T38100039R000099PTurning Movement Data Plot
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 5_Blake Road & Full Access SiteDrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM)Start TimeWestside Village Apartments DrivewayArby's DrivewayBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:45 AM606012 000002 60 0062 1 74 1176 1508:00 AM515011 400044 82 0086 1 67 0068 1698:15 AM418013 404086 66 3175 2 59 3064 1608:30 AM803211 111039 60 0069 1 50 5056 139Total23 2 22247 915015 21 268 31292 5 250 91264 618Approach % 48.9 4.3 46.8-- 60.0 6.7 33.3-- 7.2 91.8 1.0-- 1.9 94.7 3.4---Total %3.7 0.3 3.6-7.6 1.5 0.2 0.8-2.4 3.4 43.4 0.5-47.2 0.8 40.5 1.5-42.7 -PHF0.719 0.500 0.688-0.904 0.563 0.250 0.313-0.469 0.583 0.817 0.250-0.849 0.625 0.845 0.450-0.868 0.914Lights21 2 22-45 915-15 16 256 2-274 5 239 8-252 586% Lights91.3 100.0 100.0-95.7 100.0 100.0 100.0-100.0 76.2 95.5 66.7-93.8 100.0 95.6 88.9-95.5 94.8Mediums200-2000-05 10 0-15 0 10 1-11 28% Mediums8.7 0.0 0.0-4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 23.8 3.7 0.0-5.1 0.0 4.0 11.1-4.2 4.5Articulated Trucks 000-0000-0021-3010-14% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.7 33.3-1.0 0.0 0.4 0.0-0.4 0.6Bicycles on Crosswalk ---1----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---50.0---------0.0----0.0--Pedestrians---1----0----1----1--% Pedestrians ---50.0---------100.0----100.0--
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 5_Blake Road & Full Access SiteDrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 4Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 7:45 AMEnding At02/26/2020 8:45 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total270 274 54410 15 251 3 40 0 00 0 0281 292 5732 256 16 00 10 5 01 2 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 13 268 21 1R T L P
31
0
0
0
6
25
Out
47
0
0
0
2
45
In
78
0
0
0
8
70
Total
Westside Village Apartment
R
22
0
0
0
0
22
T
2
0
0
0
0
2
L
23
0
0
0
2
21
P
2
1
1
0
0
0
282 252 53412 11 232 1 30 0 00 0 0296 264 560Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P5 239 8 00 10 1 00 1 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 15 250 9 1Arby's Driveway [W]Total24010025In15000015Out9010010900009L100001T500005R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:45 AM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 5_Blake Road & Full Access SiteDrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:15 PM)Start TimeWestside Village Apartments DrivewayArby's DrivewayBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total4:15 PM60 22128 23308 11 87 1299 2 102 132117 2524:30 PM53 10218 923014 9 85 0294 2 119 50126 2524:45 PM10 2 11123 615012 18 86 22106 4 105 80117 2585:00 PM40 15119 14 22118 4 90 0294 4 112 91125 256Total25 5 58588 31 8 13152 42 348 38393 12 438 353485 1018Approach % 28.4 5.7 65.9-- 59.6 15.4 25.0-- 10.7 88.5 0.8-- 2.5 90.3 7.2---Total %2.5 0.5 5.7-8.6 3.0 0.8 1.3-5.1 4.1 34.2 0.3-38.6 1.2 43.0 3.4-47.6 -PHF0.625 0.417 0.659-0.786 0.554 0.667 0.650-0.722 0.583 0.967 0.375-0.927 0.750 0.920 0.673-0.962 0.986Lights25 5 57-87 30 8 13-51 40 341 3-384 12 429 35-476 998% Lights100.0 100.0 98.3-98.9 96.8 100.0 100.0-98.1 95.2 98.0 100.0-97.7 100.0 97.9 100.0-98.1 98.0Mediums001-1100-1260-8070-7 17% Mediums0.0 0.0 1.7-1.1 3.2 0.0 0.0-1.9 4.8 1.7 0.0-2.0 0.0 1.6 0.0-1.4 1.7Articulated Trucks 000-0000-0010-1020-23% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0-0.3 0.0 0.5 0.0-0.4 0.3Bicycles on Crosswalk ---1----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---20.0----0.0----0.0----0.0--Pedestrians---4----1----8----3--% Pedestrians ---80.0----100.0----100.0----100.0--
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 5_Blake Road & Full Access SiteDrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 6Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 4:15 PMEnding At02/26/2020 5:15 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total516 384 9009 8 172 1 30 0 00 0 0527 393 9203 341 40 00 6 2 00 1 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 83 348 42 8R T L P
85
0
0
0
2
83
Out
88
0
0
0
1
87
In
173
0
0
0
3
170
Total
Westside Village Apartment
R
58
0
0
0
1
57
T
5
0
0
0
0
5
L
25
0
0
0
0
25
P
5
4
1
0
0
0
379 476 8556 7 131 2 30 0 00 0 0386 485 871Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P12 429 35 00 7 0 00 2 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 312 438 35 3Arby's Driveway [W]Total71100072In51100052Out2000002030100031L800008T13000013R000011PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:15 PM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 6_Blake Road & RIRO SiteDrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeRIRO Site DrivewayBlake RoadBlake RoadEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeftRightPedsApp. TotalThruRightPedsApp. TotalLeftThruPedsApp. Total Int. Total7:00 AM0020351036036036727:15 AM00007000700430431137:30 AM00007600760450451217:45 AM0000631064082082146Hourly Total002024420246020602064528:00 AM00008730900740741648:15 AM00107010710720721438:30 AM02026410650550551228:45 AM0000520052059059111Hourly Total02122735027802600260540*** BREAK ***-------------4:00 PM0202751076012501252034:15 PM002010140105012501252304:30 PM0202934097013501352344:45 PM01011015010601250125232Hourly Total0525370140384051005108995:00 PM00009730100014001402405:15 PM0101840084013301332185:30 PM000010120103012301232265:45 PM0101882090083083174Hourly Total02023707037704790479858Grand Total09591257280128501455014552749Approach %0.0100.0--97.82.2--0.0100.0---Total %0.00.3-0.345.71.0-46.70.052.9-52.9-Lights09-9121127-123801413-14132660% Lights-100.0-100.096.396.4-96.3-97.1-97.196.8Mediums00-0401-41034-3475% Mediums-0.0-0.03.23.6-3.2-2.3-2.32.7Articulated Trucks00-060-608-814% Articulated Trucks-0.0-0.00.50.0-0.5-0.5-0.50.5Bicycles on Crosswalk--2---0---0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk--40.0----------Pedestrians--3---0---0--% Pedestrians--60.0----------
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 6_Blake Road & RIRO SiteDrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 202/26/2020 7:00 AMEnding At02/26/2020 6:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total1413 1238 265134 41 758 6 140 0 00 0 01455 1285 274027 1211 01 40 00 6 00 0 00 0 028 1257 0R T P
0
0
0
0
0
0
Out
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Fake Approach [E]1220 1413 263340 34 746 8 140 0 00 0 01266 1455 2721Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T P0 1413 00 34 00 8 00 0 00 0 00 1455 0RIRO Site Driveway [W]Total36100037In900009Out27100028000000L900009R000235PTurning Movement Data Plot
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 6_Blake Road & RIRO SiteDrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:45 AM)Start TimeRIRO Site DrivewayBlake RoadBlake RoadEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeftRightPedsApp. TotalThruRightPedsApp. TotalLeftThruPedsApp. Total Int. Total7:45 AM00006310640820821468:00 AM00008730900740741648:15 AM00107010710720721438:30 AM0202641065055055122Total02122846029002830283575Approach %0.0100.0--97.92.1--0.0100.0---Total %0.00.3-0.349.41.0-50.40.049.2-49.2-PHF0.0000.250-0.2500.8160.500-0.8060.0000.863-0.8630.877Lights02-22636-2690272-272543% Lights-100.0-100.092.6100.0-92.8-96.1-96.194.4Mediums00-0180-18010-1028% Mediums-0.0-0.06.30.0-6.2-3.5-3.54.9Articulated Trucks00-030-301-14% Articulated Trucks-0.0-0.01.10.0-1.0-0.4-0.40.7Bicycles on Crosswalk--0---0---0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk--0.0----------Pedestrians--1---0---0--% Pedestrians--100.0----------
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 6_Blake Road & RIRO SiteDrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 4Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 7:45 AMEnding At02/26/2020 8:45 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total272 269 54110 18 281 3 40 0 00 0 0283 290 5736 263 00 18 00 3 00 0 00 0 06 284 0R T P
0
0
0
0
0
0
Out
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Fake Approach [E]265 272 53718 10 283 1 40 0 00 0 0286 283 569Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T P0 272 00 10 00 1 00 0 00 0 00 283 0RIRO Site Driveway [W]Total800008In200002Out600006000000L200002R000011PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:45 AM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 6_Blake Road & RIRO SiteDrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:15 PM)Start TimeRIRO Site DrivewayBlake RoadBlake RoadEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeftRightPedsApp. TotalThruRightPedsApp. TotalLeftThruPedsApp. Total Int. Total4:15 PM002010140105012501252304:30 PM0202934097013501352344:45 PM010110150106012501252325:00 PM0000973010001400140240Total032339216040805250525936Approach %0.0100.0--96.13.9--0.0100.0---Total %0.00.3-0.341.91.7-43.60.056.1-56.1-PHF0.0000.375-0.3750.9700.800-0.9620.0000.938-0.9380.975Lights03-338015-3950514-514912% Lights-100.0-100.096.993.8-96.8-97.9-97.997.4Mediums00-0101-1109-920% Mediums-0.0-0.02.66.3-2.7-1.7-1.72.1Articulated Trucks00-020-202-24% Articulated Trucks-0.0-0.00.50.0-0.5-0.4-0.40.4Bicycles on Crosswalk--2---0---0--% Bicycles on Crosswalk--100.0----------Pedestrians--0---0---0--% Pedestrians--0.0----------
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 6_Blake Road & RIRO SiteDrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 6Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 4:15 PMEnding At02/26/2020 5:15 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total514 395 9099 11 202 2 40 0 00 0 0525 408 93315 380 01 10 00 2 00 0 00 0 016 392 0R T P
0
0
0
0
0
0
Out
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Fake Approach [E]383 514 89710 9 192 2 40 0 00 0 0395 525 920Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T P0 514 00 9 00 2 00 0 00 0 00 525 0RIRO Site Driveway [W]Total18100019In300003Out15100016000000L300003R000202PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:15 PM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 7_Blake Road & 2nd StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart Time2nd Street2nd StreetBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:00 AM00010 12 0 13025 0 20 31051 7 28 0035 1117:15 AM00010 23 0 26049 0 42 37079 14 31 0045 1737:30 AM00000 28 0 21049 0 53 550108 15 31 0046 2037:45 AM00000 35 0 13048 0 46 640110 23 58 0081 239Hourly Total00020 98 0 730171 0 161 1870348 59 148 00207 7268:00 AM00000 24 0 20044 0 67 400107 21 54 0075 2268:15 AM00000 19 0 11030 0 61 410102 8 65 0173 2058:30 AM00000 11 0 18029 0 48 34082 11 41 0052 1638:45 AM00000 10 0 14024 0 41 36077 20 41 0161 162Hourly Total00000 64 0 630127 0 217 1510368 60 201 02261 756*** BREAK ***---------------------4:00 PM00000 38 0 25263 2 56 24082 20 103 01123 2684:15 PM00030 44 0 32076 0 62 28190 17 108 00125 2914:30 PM00010 61 0 28089 0 72 342106 18 120 00138 3334:45 PM00010 50 0 30180 0 73 291102 24 99 00123 305Hourly Total00050 193 0 1153308 2 263 1154380 79 430 01509 11975:00 PM00010 61 0 29090 0 76 280104 24 119 00143 3375:15 PM00030 58 0 32090 0 49 40289 20 103 00123 3025:30 PM00020 36 0 27063 0 73 26099 19 110 01129 2915:45 PM00000 38 0 21059 0 68 31099 14 70 0084 242Hourly Total00060 193 0 1090302 0 266 1252391 77 402 01479 1172Grand Total000130 548 0 3603908 2 907 57861487 275 1181 041456 3851Approach % 0.0 0.0 0.0-- 60.4 0.0 39.6-- 0.1 61.0 38.9-- 18.9 81.1 0.0---Total %0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 14.2 0.0 9.3-23.6 0.1 23.6 15.0-38.6 7.1 30.7 0.0-37.8 -Lights000-0 532 0 345-877 2 882 557-1441 265 1146 0-1411 3729% Lights----- 97.1 - 95.8-96.6 100.0 97.2 96.4-96.9 96.4 97.0 --96.9 96.8Mediums000-0 15 0 12-27 0 22 20-42 8 29 0-37 106% Mediums----- 2.7 - 3.3-3.0 0.0 2.4 3.5-2.8 2.9 2.5 --2.5 2.8Articulated Trucks 000-0103-4031-4260-8 16% Articulated Trucks ----- 0.2 - 0.8-0.4 0.0 0.3 0.2-0.3 0.7 0.5 --0.5 0.4Bicycles on Crosswalk ---4----0----1----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---30.8----0.0----16.7----0.0--Pedestrians---9----3----5----4--% Pedestrians ---69.2----100.0----83.3----100.0--
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 7_Blake Road & 2nd StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 202/26/2020 7:00 AMEnding At02/26/2020 6:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total1678 1441 311944 42 867 4 110 0 00 0 01729 1487 3216557 882 2 020 22 0 01 3 0 00 0 0 10 0 0 5578 907 2 6R T L P
2
0
0
0
0
2
Out
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
2
0
0
0
0
2
Total
2nd Street [E]
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
0
0
0
P
13
9
4
0
0
0
1227 1411 263834 37 716 8 140 0 00 0 01267 1456 2723Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P265 1146 0 08 29 0 02 6 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 4275 1181 0 42nd Street [W]Total1699557001761In87727400908Out8222830085353215100548L000000T34512300360R000033PTurning Movement Data Plot
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 7_Blake Road & 2nd StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM)Start Time2nd Street2nd StreetBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:30 AM00000 28 0 21049 0 53 550108 15 31 0046 2037:45 AM00000 35 0 13048 0 46 640110 23 58 0081 2398:00 AM00000 24 0 20044 0 67 400107 21 54 0075 2268:15 AM00000 19 0 11030 0 61 410102 8 65 0173 205Total00000 106 0 650171 0 227 2000427 67 208 01275 873Approach % 0.0 0.0 0.0-- 62.0 0.0 38.0-- 0.0 53.2 46.8-- 24.4 75.6 0.0---Total %0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 12.1 0.0 7.4-19.6 0.0 26.0 22.9-48.9 7.7 23.8 0.0-31.5 -PHF0.000 0.000 0.000-0.000 0.757 0.000 0.774-0.872 0.000 0.847 0.781-0.970 0.728 0.800 0.000-0.849 0.913Lights000-0 101 0 62-163 0 218 196-414 66 199 0-265 842% Lights----- 95.3 - 95.4-95.3 - 96.0 98.0-97.0 98.5 95.7 --96.4 96.4Mediums000-0403-7074-11 170-8 26% Mediums----- 3.8 - 4.6-4.1 - 3.1 2.0-2.6 1.5 3.4 --2.9 3.0Articulated Trucks 000-0100-1020-2020-25% Articulated Trucks ----- 0.9 - 0.0-0.6 - 0.9 0.0-0.5 0.0 1.0 --0.7 0.6Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk------------------0.0--Pedestrians---0----0----0----1--% Pedestrians ------------------100.0--
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 7_Blake Road & 2nd StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 4Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 7:30 AMEnding At02/26/2020 8:30 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total300 414 71411 11 223 2 50 0 00 0 0314 427 741196 218 0 04 7 0 00 2 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0200 227 0 0R T L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
Out
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
2nd Street [E]
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
0
0
0
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
280 265 54510 8 182 2 40 0 00 0 0292 275 567Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P66 199 0 01 7 0 00 2 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 167 208 0 12nd Street [W]Total42512100438In1637100171Out26250002671014100106L000000T62300065R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 7_Blake Road & 2nd StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM)Start Time2nd Street2nd StreetBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total4:30 PM00010 61 0 28089 0 72 342106 18 120 00138 3334:45 PM00010 50 0 30180 0 73 291102 24 99 00123 3055:00 PM00010 61 0 29090 0 76 280104 24 119 00143 3375:15 PM00030 58 0 32090 0 49 40289 20 103 00123 302Total00060 230 0 1191349 0 270 1315401 86 441 00527 1277Approach % 0.0 0.0 0.0-- 65.9 0.0 34.1-- 0.0 67.3 32.7-- 16.3 83.7 0.0---Total %0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 18.0 0.0 9.3-27.3 0.0 21.1 10.3-31.4 6.7 34.5 0.0-41.3 -PHF0.000 0.000 0.000-0.000 0.943 0.000 0.930-0.969 0.000 0.888 0.819-0.946 0.896 0.919 0.000-0.921 0.947Lights000-0 224 0 119-343 0 267 127-394 83 434 0-517 1254% Lights----- 97.4 - 100.0-98.3 - 98.9 96.9-98.3 96.5 98.4 --98.1 98.2Mediums000-0600-6033-6360-9 21% Mediums----- 2.6 - 0.0-1.7 - 1.1 2.3-1.5 3.5 1.4 --1.7 1.6Articulated Trucks 000-0000-0001-1010-12% Articulated Trucks ----- 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.8-0.2 0.0 0.2 --0.2 0.2Bicycles on Crosswalk ---1----0----1----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---16.7----0.0----20.0-------Pedestrians---5----1----4----0--% Pedestrians ---83.3----100.0----80.0-------
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 7_Blake Road & 2nd StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 6Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 4:30 PMEnding At02/26/2020 5:30 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total658 394 105212 6 181 1 20 0 00 0 0671 401 1072127 267 0 03 3 0 01 0 0 00 0 0 10 0 0 4131 270 0 5R T L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
Out
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
2nd Street [E]
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
0
0
0
P
6
5
1
0
0
0
386 517 9033 9 120 1 10 0 00 0 0389 527 916Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P83 434 0 03 6 0 00 1 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 086 441 0 02nd Street [W]Total55312100566In3436000349Out21061002172246000230L000000T1190000119R000011PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 8_Excelsior Boulevard &Milwaukee Street/Jackson AvenueSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardJackson AvenueMilwaukee StreetWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:00 AM3 58 8069 87 113 170217 14 33038 20507 3317:15 AM10 93 91112 80 124 30207 21 29032 119011 3627:30 AM5 115 80128 94 144 110249 31 43047 83 11022 4467:45 AM17 140 210178 82 140 50227 33 46052 54 23032 489Hourly Total35 406 461487 343 521 360900 99 1510169 16 8 48072 16288:00 AM10 115 70132 97 163 50265 51 35141 77 12026 4648:15 AM8 110 80126 66 153 90228 10 40341 83 10021 4168:30 AM4 121 80133 87 135 30225 11 31033 73 18028 4198:45 AM9 95 90113 73 123 20198 32 22227 72 10019 357Hourly Total31 441 320504 323 574 190916 10 4 1286142 29 15 50094 1656*** BREAK ***---------------------4:00 PM2 157 61165 18 158 10177 21 1 810103 17 2 22141 4864:15 PM3 154 41161 35 178 10214 15 2 910108 76 27140 5234:30 PM8 139 32150 20 204 10225 34 1 931128 10 8 34052 5554:45 PM8 159 30170 26 211 10238 13 3 980114 12 6 40058 580Hourly Total21 609 164646 99 751 40854 83 7 3631453 46 22 1232191 21445:00 PM2 135 83145 37 219 10257 24 4 1061134 64 28038 5745:15 PM5 188 60199 36 206 10243 14 5 80099 10 7 22139 5805:30 PM10 107 71124 33 185 10219 13 2 63078 63 21030 4515:45 PM6 116 81130 20 148 10169 92 50161 70 15022 382Hourly Total23 546 295598 126 758 40888 60 13 2992372 29 14 861129 1987Grand Total 110 2002 123102235 891 2604 6303558 162 33 94191136 120 59 3073486 7415Approach % 4.9 89.6 5.5-- 25.0 73.2 1.8-- 14.3 2.9 82.8-- 24.7 12.1 63.2---Total %1.5 27.0 1.7-30.1 12.0 35.1 0.8-48.0 2.2 0.4 12.7-15.3 1.6 0.8 4.1-6.6 -Lights105 1923 119-2147 877 2524 62-3463 161 32 922-1115 114 57 304-475 7200% Lights95.5 96.1 96.7-96.1 98.4 96.9 98.4-97.3 99.4 97.0 98.0-98.2 95.0 96.6 99.0-97.7 97.1Mediums2 64 4-70 12 63 0-75 01 17-18 213-6 169% Mediums1.8 3.2 3.3-3.1 1.3 2.4 0.0-2.1 0.0 3.0 1.8-1.6 1.7 1.7 1.0-1.2 2.3Articulated Trucks 3 15 0-18 2 17 1-20 102-3410-5 46% Articulated Trucks 2.7 0.7 0.0-0.8 0.2 0.7 1.6-0.6 0.6 0.0 0.2-0.3 3.3 1.7 0.0-1.0 0.6Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----2--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---0.0---------0.0----66.7--Pedestrians---10----0----9----1--% Pedestrians ---100.0---------100.0----33.3--
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 8_Excelsior Boulevard &Milwaukee Street/Jackson AvenueSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 202/26/2020 7:00 AMEnding At02/26/2020 6:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansJackson Avenue [N]Out In Total1053 1115 216817 18 353 3 60 0 00 0 01073 1136 2209922 32 161 017 1 0 02 0 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 9941 33 162 9R T L P
3073
0
0
18
66
2989
Out
2235
0
0
18
70
2147
In
5308
0
0
36
136
5136
Total
Excelsior Boulevard [E]
R
123
0
0
0
4
119
T
2002
0
0
15
64
1923
L
110
0
0
3
2
105
P
10
10
0
0
0
0
199 475 6743 6 94 5 90 0 00 0 0206 486 692Out In TotalMilwaukee Street [S]L T R P114 57 304 02 1 3 04 1 0 00 0 0 20 0 0 1120 59 307 3Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total642215841006621In34637520003558Out2959832100306387712200891L25246317002604T62010063R000000PTurning Movement Data Plot
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 8_Excelsior Boulevard &Milwaukee Street/Jackson AvenueSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM)Start TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardJackson AvenueMilwaukee StreetWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:30 AM5 115 80128 94 144 110249 31 43047 83 11022 4467:45 AM17 140 210178 82 140 50227 33 46052 54 23032 4898:00 AM10 115 70132 97 163 50265 51 35141 77 12026 4648:15 AM8 110 80126 66 153 90228 10 40341 83 10021 416Total40 480 440564 339 600 300969 12 5 1644181 28 17 560101 1815Approach % 7.1 85.1 7.8-- 35.0 61.9 3.1-- 6.6 2.8 90.6-- 27.7 16.8 55.4---Total %2.2 26.4 2.4-31.1 18.7 33.1 1.7-53.4 0.7 0.3 9.0-10.0 1.5 0.9 3.1-5.6 -PHF0.588 0.857 0.524-0.792 0.874 0.920 0.682-0.914 0.600 0.417 0.891-0.870 0.875 0.607 0.609-0.789 0.928Lights36 457 43-536 332 573 30-935 11 5 154-170 25 16 56-97 1738% Lights90.0 95.2 97.7-95.0 97.9 95.5 100.0-96.5 91.7 100.0 93.9-93.9 89.3 94.1 100.0-96.0 95.8Mediums2 17 1-20 5 22 0-27 00 10-10 010-1 58% Mediums5.0 3.5 2.3-3.5 1.5 3.7 0.0-2.8 0.0 0.0 6.1-5.5 0.0 5.9 0.0-1.0 3.2Articulated Trucks 260-8250-7100-1300-3 19% Articulated Trucks 5.0 1.3 0.0-1.4 0.6 0.8 0.0-0.7 8.3 0.0 0.0-0.6 10.7 0.0 0.0-3.0 1.0Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk-------------0.0-------Pedestrians---0----0----4----0--% Pedestrians -------------100.0-------
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 8_Excelsior Boulevard &Milwaukee Street/Jackson AvenueSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 4Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 7:30 AMEnding At02/26/2020 8:30 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansJackson Avenue [N]Out In Total391 170 5617 10 172 1 30 0 00 0 0400 181 581154 5 11 010 0 0 00 0 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 4164 5 12 4R T L P
668
0
0
6
22
640
Out
564
0
0
8
20
536
In
1232
0
0
14
42
1176
Total
Excelsior Boulevard [E]
R
44
0
0
0
1
43
T
480
0
0
6
17
457
L
40
0
0
2
2
36
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
71 97 1682 1 32 3 50 0 00 0 075 101 176Out In TotalMilwaukee Street [S]L T R P25 16 56 00 1 0 03 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 028 17 56 0Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total15715416001641In93527700969Out636279006723325200339L57322500600T30000030R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM)
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 8_Excelsior Boulevard &Milwaukee Street/Jackson AvenueSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM)Start TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardJackson AvenueMilwaukee StreetWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total4:30 PM8 139 32150 20 204 10225 34 1 931128 10 8 34052 5554:45 PM8 159 30170 26 211 10238 13 3 980114 12 6 40058 5805:00 PM2 135 83145 37 219 10257 24 4 1061134 64 28038 5745:15 PM5 188 60199 36 206 10243 14 5 80099 10 7 22139 580Total23 621 205664 119 840 40963 85 13 3772475 38 25 1241187 2289Approach % 3.5 93.5 3.0-- 12.4 87.2 0.4-- 17.9 2.7 79.4-- 20.3 13.4 66.3---Total %1.0 27.1 0.9-29.0 5.2 36.7 0.2-42.1 3.7 0.6 16.5-20.8 1.7 1.1 5.4-8.2 -PHF0.719 0.826 0.625-0.834 0.804 0.959 1.000-0.937 0.625 0.650 0.889-0.886 0.792 0.781 0.775-0.806 0.987Lights23 607 20-650 119 820 4-943 85 13 376-474 38 24 122-184 2251% Lights100.0 97.7 100.0-97.9 100.0 97.6 100.0-97.9 100.0 100.0 99.7-99.8 100.0 96.0 98.4-98.4 98.3Mediums0 11 0-11 0 16 0-16 000-0002-2 29% Mediums0.0 1.8 0.0-1.7 0.0 1.9 0.0-1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6-1.1 1.3Articulated Trucks 030-3040-4001-1010-19% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.5 0.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0-0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3-0.2 0.0 4.0 0.0-0.5 0.4Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----1--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---0.0---------0.0----100.0--Pedestrians---5----0----2----0--% Pedestrians ---100.0---------100.0----0.0--
Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 8_Excelsior Boulevard &Milwaukee Street/Jackson AvenueSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 6Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 4:30 PMEnding At02/26/2020 5:30 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansJackson Avenue [N]Out In Total163 474 6370 0 01 1 20 0 00 0 0164 475 639376 13 85 00 0 0 01 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 2377 13 85 2R T L P
1049
0
0
4
18
1027
Out
664
0
0
3
11
650
In
1713
0
0
7
29
1677
Total
Excelsior Boulevard [E]
R
20
0
0
0
0
20
T
621
0
0
3
11
607
L
23
0
0
0
0
23
P
5
5
0
0
0
0
40 184 2240 2 20 1 10 0 00 0 040 187 227Out In TotalMilwaukee Street [S]L T R P38 24 122 00 0 2 00 1 0 00 0 0 10 0 0 038 25 124 1Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total1964278001999In94316400963Out10211140010361190000119L82016400840T400004R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM)
SimTraffic Performance Report
Existing AM Peak Hour 03/31/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.3 4.0 0.1 0.3 3.9
Total Del/Veh (s)38.9 7.7 5.1 53.8 18.0 15.6 48.8 53.6 2.2 51.5 63.9 1.9
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)19.3
2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)9.0 3.7 3.4 8.1 0.4 0.2 20.1 29.7 4.8 13.7 6.6 2.5
3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)1.0 1.8 1.4 9.3 1.4
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.2 2.7 3.6 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)38.7 13.3 3.2 46.2 20.0 3.7 41.6 33.7 12.5 40.4 34.5 23.6
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)23.1
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)7.4 3.1 7.7 5.3 3.6 3.9 1.2 1.1 2.7 0.4 0.2 1.2
6: Blake Road & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)0.2 1.6 1.4 1.0
SimTraffic Performance Report
Existing AM Peak Hour 03/31/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 2
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)18.0 10.7 23.1 6.8 13.4 5.1 12.5
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8
Total Del/Veh (s)35.5
Queuing and Blocking Report
Existing AM Peak Hour 03/31/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 3
Intersection: 1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L T TR L T L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 301 362 228 187 156 252 242 65 56 61 31
Average Queue (ft)185 230 102 70 37 107 118 21 12 15 5
95th Queue (ft)280 319 208 166 101 212 218 53 37 45 21
Link Distance (ft)717 717 717 1943 1943 317 537 537
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 500 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)0 4
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 2
Intersection: 2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB WB WB NB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft)34 4 40 4 29 31
Average Queue (ft)6 0 10 0 11 8
95th Queue (ft)22 3 29 3 29 25
Link Distance (ft)1943 303 111 208
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
Movement SB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft)23
Average Queue (ft)3
95th Queue (ft)15
Link Distance (ft)116
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report
Existing AM Peak Hour 03/31/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 4
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft)42 63 180 206 117 105 224 197 62 194 224 93
Average Queue (ft)11 27 86 96 25 45 129 98 27 97 42 26
95th Queue (ft)32 57 162 178 71 88 203 185 55 175 112 66
Link Distance (ft)204 204 204 204 1139 1139 608 608
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 1
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 122 132 170 206
Average Queue (ft)48 67 68 100
95th Queue (ft)96 112 128 174
Link Distance (ft)275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 165 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L L
Maximum Queue (ft)39 65 23 30
Average Queue (ft)13 28 2 4
95th Queue (ft)38 55 12 20
Link Distance (ft)99 110
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Queuing and Blocking Report
Existing AM Peak Hour 03/31/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 5
Intersection: 6: Blake Road & RIRO
Movement
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft)
Average Queue (ft)
95th Queue (ft)
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Blake Road & 2nd Street
Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR L T TR T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 152 206 89 76 93 161 144
Average Queue (ft)17 104 41 28 32 76 48
95th Queue (ft)72 168 78 63 73 132 107
Link Distance (ft)551 561 561 615 615
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 200
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 4
SimTraffic Performance Report
Existing PM Peak Hour 03/27/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.5 3.9 0.3 1.0 3.5
Total Del/Veh (s)58.8 12.2 9.7 69.0 27.2 26.1 49.4 58.4 2.5 51.1 56.7 2.8
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.7
Total Del/Veh (s)19.6
2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)14.7 7.0 7.2 29.1 0.7 0.6 69.9 28.6 54.3 14.4 5.8
3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)3.5 2.1 1.6 6.8 3.0
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.3 2.5 3.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)53.3 24.3 8.6 53.1 20.2 6.8 54.7 46.6 24.5 56.6 48.1 35.7
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)29.1
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)11.6 16.2 6.1 18.0 18.8 8.1 5.1 1.4 1.0 5.6 0.6 0.2
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)2.3
SimTraffic Performance Report
Existing PM Peak Hour 03/27/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 2
6: Blake Road & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)4.2 0.3 1.7 1.4 0.9
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)21.8 15.5 28.3 9.5 16.6 8.2 14.4
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9
Total Del/Veh (s)46.5
Queuing and Blocking Report
Existing PM Peak Hour 03/27/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 3
Intersection: 1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L T TR L T L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 128 168 389 355 174 379 383 81 66 130 48
Average Queue (ft)26 94 205 176 24 249 264 29 20 72 13
95th Queue (ft)96 156 345 313 88 363 369 68 53 119 42
Link Distance (ft)717 717 717 1943 1943 317 537 537
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 500 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)20
Queuing Penalty (veh)5
Intersection: 2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB SB
Directions Served L T TR L TR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft)68 21 3 41 7 63 93
Average Queue (ft)16 1 0 10 0 14 30
95th Queue (ft)44 11 2 31 4 42 69
Link Distance (ft)1943 1943 303 111 208
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
Movement EB EB EB SB
Directions Served T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft)60 211 215 54
Average Queue (ft)5 30 42 18
95th Queue (ft)35 122 142 43
Link Distance (ft)303 303 116
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50
Storage Blk Time (%)4
Queuing Penalty (veh)33
Queuing and Blocking Report
Existing PM Peak Hour 03/27/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 4
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 134 149 302 299 204 135 268 236 142 165 195 153
Average Queue (ft)47 64 235 247 140 63 172 143 65 86 94 62
95th Queue (ft)100 118 323 330 263 113 245 220 115 149 163 130
Link Distance (ft)204 204 204 204 1139 1139 608 608
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 16 18 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 64 72 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175
Storage Blk Time (%)21 1 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)51 3 0 0 1
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 162 183 192 245
Average Queue (ft)79 92 78 119
95th Queue (ft)142 153 147 196
Link Distance (ft)275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 165 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1
Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway
Movement EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L
Maximum Queue (ft)69 98 29 15 52
Average Queue (ft)33 40 3 0 16
95th Queue (ft)60 74 17 5 44
Link Distance (ft)99 110 275
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1
Queuing and Blocking Report
Existing PM Peak Hour 03/27/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 5
Intersection: 6: Blake Road & RIRO
Movement EB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft)29
Average Queue (ft)4
95th Queue (ft)20
Link Distance (ft)87
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Blake Road & 2nd Street
Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR L T TR T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 176 262 150 207 194 198 181
Average Queue (ft)35 130 53 81 88 95 75
95th Queue (ft)125 216 106 159 164 168 155
Link Distance (ft)551 561 561 615 615
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 200
Storage Blk Time (%)0 4 0 0 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 4 0 0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 238
SimTraffic Performance Report
2022 No Build AM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.3 4.0 0.2 0.7 3.8
Total Del/Veh (s)39.0 7.3 4.2 56.1 19.2 19.1 43.9 59.4 2.1 40.9 65.6 2.0
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.6
Total Del/Veh (s)19.6
2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 4.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)10.9 3.5 4.0 7.9 0.4 0.2 18.5 23.0 6.3 19.2 6.4 2.5
3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)0.9 1.8 1.5 3.5 1.4
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.2 2.7 3.5 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)41.8 14.0 3.2 49.9 21.0 4.2 40.8 33.3 11.5 41.5 35.7 24.0
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)23.8
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)9.2 4.0 9.5 7.9 3.8 3.6 1.3 1.2 3.4 0.4 0.2 1.3
6: Blake Road & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)3.5 0.2 1.6 1.5 1.0
SimTraffic Performance Report
2022 No Build AM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 2
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)18.4 11.7 24.7 6.9 14.5 6.2 13.2
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8
Total Del/Veh (s)36.1
Queuing and Blocking Report
2022 No Build AM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 3
Intersection: 1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L T TR L T L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 344 377 219 194 160 229 238 71 49 52 31
Average Queue (ft)183 234 99 67 39 121 138 27 13 14 7
95th Queue (ft)303 339 196 157 99 210 223 63 41 44 27
Link Distance (ft)717 717 717 1944 1944 317 537 537
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 500 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 5
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 2
Intersection: 2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)48 42 42 23 21
Average Queue (ft)10 11 14 4 7
95th Queue (ft)32 32 34 19 21
Link Distance (ft)111 209
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200 100
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
Movement SB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft)23
Average Queue (ft)4
95th Queue (ft)17
Link Distance (ft)116
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report
2022 No Build AM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 4
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft)61 69 186 216 182 110 239 197 69 194 171 100
Average Queue (ft)10 24 86 100 32 48 139 109 31 111 44 27
95th Queue (ft)33 52 169 186 97 94 205 186 61 188 116 73
Link Distance (ft)204 204 204 204 1139 1139 608 608
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 1 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175
Storage Blk Time (%)1 0 0 2
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 0 0 1
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 114 119 133 181
Average Queue (ft)49 68 63 98
95th Queue (ft)95 111 114 168
Link Distance (ft)275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 165 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway
Movement EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L
Maximum Queue (ft)52 65 22 4 35
Average Queue (ft)14 28 1 0 7
95th Queue (ft)41 55 9 3 27
Link Distance (ft)99 110 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Queuing and Blocking Report
2022 No Build AM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 5
Intersection: 6: Blake Road & RIRO
Movement EB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft)29
Average Queue (ft)4
95th Queue (ft)22
Link Distance (ft)87
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Blake Road & 2nd Street
Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR L T TR T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 165 203 98 78 88 159 144
Average Queue (ft)25 108 41 30 33 77 53
95th Queue (ft)98 176 75 65 70 138 114
Link Distance (ft)551 561 561 615 615
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 200
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 7
SimTraffic Performance Report
2022 No Build PM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.6 3.8 0.3 0.9 3.4
Total Del/Veh (s)53.2 14.9 8.3 64.2 27.5 27.3 48.2 56.6 2.7 53.3 59.1 2.9
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8
Total Del/Veh (s)20.5
2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 4.1 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s)16.4 8.3 11.1 31.3 0.7 0.5 121.1 49.4 91.5 8.9 7.0
3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)4.8 2.1 1.4 7.0 3.8
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.4 2.6 3.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)54.8 25.7 9.4 57.0 21.4 6.9 56.6 42.8 26.1 57.8 48.1 35.5
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)30.1
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)14.3 22.7 6.4 18.2 18.1 7.4 4.1 1.4 1.2 5.8 0.6 0.3
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)2.5
SimTraffic Performance Report
2022 No Build PM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 2
6: Blake Road & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)3.7 0.3 1.7 1.4 0.9
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s)19.5 13.5 31.3 10.6 16.7 9.0 14.6
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9
Total Del/Veh (s)48.6
Queuing and Blocking Report
2022 No Build PM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 3
Intersection: 1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L T TR L T R L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 144 166 457 416 174 390 401 100 87 24 153 49
Average Queue (ft)22 85 238 202 36 257 273 34 23 1 69 15
95th Queue (ft)80 142 380 358 117 369 385 73 58 18 125 43
Link Distance (ft)717 717 717 1944 1944 317 537 537
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 500 150 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)21
Queuing Penalty (veh)5
Intersection: 2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L TR LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)52 49 4 74 41 44
Average Queue (ft)21 9 0 20 10 19
95th Queue (ft)47 32 3 58 32 38
Link Distance (ft)303 111 209
Upstream Blk Time (%)1
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200 100
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
Movement EB EB EB WB SB
Directions Served T T T R R
Maximum Queue (ft)74 263 271 13 48
Average Queue (ft)12 57 75 0 18
95th Queue (ft)57 181 209 10 42
Link Distance (ft)303 303 116
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 65
Storage Blk Time (%)7 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)60 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
2022 No Build PM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 4
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 114 134 308 302 204 174 272 230 123 180 218 162
Average Queue (ft)48 64 251 261 152 69 179 153 56 94 93 61
95th Queue (ft)96 113 334 337 270 133 257 223 98 163 165 134
Link Distance (ft)204 204 204 204 1139 1139 608 608
Upstream Blk Time (%)20 22 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)79 86 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175
Storage Blk Time (%)24 1 0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)61 4 0 2 1
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 149 178 224 223
Average Queue (ft)79 97 93 124
95th Queue (ft)142 156 177 199
Link Distance (ft)275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 165 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1
Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway
Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft)93 85 29 19 45 23
Average Queue (ft)36 43 3 1 15 1
95th Queue (ft)68 77 18 9 42 17
Link Distance (ft)99 110 275 310
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1
Queuing and Blocking Report
2022 No Build PM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 5
Intersection: 6: Blake Road & RIRO
Movement EB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft)43
Average Queue (ft)14
95th Queue (ft)40
Link Distance (ft)87
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Blake Road & 2nd Street
Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR L T TR T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 171 226 125 186 206 183 215
Average Queue (ft)26 124 52 86 97 94 76
95th Queue (ft)101 203 99 156 171 164 154
Link Distance (ft)551 561 561 615 615
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 200
Storage Blk Time (%)0 3 0 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 4 0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 305
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 No Build AM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.3 4.0 0.2 0.6 3.8
Total Del/Veh (s)41.7 8.4 4.6 55.7 20.3 19.5 49.1 50.5 2.2 48.3 45.8 2.1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.6
Total Del/Veh (s)20.8
2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 4.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)13.7 4.1 4.2 8.0 0.5 0.3 22.5 31.7 6.0 20.1 5.5 2.8
3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)1.1 1.9 1.5 5.3 1.5
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.2 2.6 3.5 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)35.8 15.3 3.6 46.6 22.7 4.3 40.9 36.2 16.7 38.8 37.8 25.3
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)25.2
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)9.4 4.5 10.2 10.6 4.2 5.1 1.4 1.1 3.1 0.4 0.3 1.4
6: Blake Road & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)3.7 0.2 1.6 1.3 1.1
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 No Build AM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 2
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.2 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)20.7 20.4 14.7 20.4 22.3 5.1 30.3 11.4 6.1 37.4 17.1 8.5
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3
Total Del/Veh (s)16.4
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8
Total Del/Veh (s)38.8
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 No Build AM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 3
Intersection: 1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L T TR L T L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 332 366 260 208 138 241 250 82 53 44 39
Average Queue (ft)198 248 110 76 35 130 143 25 17 13 6
95th Queue (ft)303 348 216 168 88 219 229 62 46 40 26
Link Distance (ft)717 717 717 1944 1944 317 537 537
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 500 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)0 6
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 2
Intersection: 2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T L TR LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)52 15 45 4 33 31 21
Average Queue (ft)14 1 8 0 13 6 6
95th Queue (ft)39 8 27 3 32 23 19
Link Distance (ft)1944 303 111 209
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200 100
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
Movement EB SB
Directions Served T R
Maximum Queue (ft)10 23
Average Queue (ft)1 4
95th Queue (ft)7 17
Link Distance (ft)303 116
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 No Build AM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 4
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft)63 76 225 242 199 112 248 215 65 187 150 152
Average Queue (ft)13 29 99 113 39 49 143 110 32 104 51 48
95th Queue (ft)38 62 192 215 122 96 210 188 57 176 121 111
Link Distance (ft)204 204 204 204 1139 1139 608 608
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 2 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175
Storage Blk Time (%)1 0 0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 0 0 1 0
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 128 133 164 203
Average Queue (ft)62 80 90 118
95th Queue (ft)114 124 144 180
Link Distance (ft)275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 165 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway
Movement EB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L L TR
Maximum Queue (ft)44 66 29 31 4
Average Queue (ft)13 30 3 5 0
95th Queue (ft)38 54 18 23 3
Link Distance (ft)99 110 310
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 No Build AM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 5
Intersection: 6: Blake Road & RIRO
Movement EB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft)29
Average Queue (ft)4
95th Queue (ft)20
Link Distance (ft)87
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Blake Road & 2nd Street
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR LT R L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 173 227 162 67 92 132 144 65 187 160
Average Queue (ft)34 122 63 13 45 45 55 11 93 66
95th Queue (ft)122 199 117 45 81 97 109 41 157 129
Link Distance (ft)551 185 561 561 615 615
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 100 200 140
Storage Blk Time (%)0 3 3 0 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 3 0 0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 12
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 No Build PM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.7 3.9 0.4 0.9 3.4
Total Del/Veh (s)59.7 15.8 16.0 70.1 29.6 30.9 52.4 61.6 2.9 51.6 61.3 3.1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8
Total Del/Veh (s)22.1
2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.3 4.1 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s)18.3 8.7 9.0 34.9 0.8 0.3 139.5 105.8 78.9 9.0 7.6
3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)5.8 2.1 1.5 7.4 4.4
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.4 2.5 3.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)59.2 27.0 10.4 56.0 20.8 8.7 56.9 46.2 29.3 59.2 51.0 40.8
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)31.7
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)17.2 22.2 8.5 26.8 23.9 12.5 4.9 1.6 1.4 6.9 0.7 0.2
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)2.9
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 No Build PM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 2
6: Blake Road & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)4.0 0.4 1.6 1.4 0.9
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.3 0.3
Total Del/Veh (s)24.3 25.1 20.4 26.3 28.1 7.5 41.4 17.7 14.4 42.1 19.8 10.7
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)20.4
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s)1.0
Total Del/Veh (s)53.2
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 No Build PM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 3
Intersection: 1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L T TR L T R L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 151 283 508 481 174 412 422 100 90 58 174 58
Average Queue (ft)37 114 259 219 37 287 298 34 25 3 77 16
95th Queue (ft)118 246 440 397 125 401 407 73 64 34 140 46
Link Distance (ft)717 717 717 1944 1944 317 537 537
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 500 150 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)24 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)6 0
Intersection: 2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T TR L LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)75 17 40 37 96 53 51
Average Queue (ft)24 1 1 9 27 11 19
95th Queue (ft)54 12 18 29 74 36 39
Link Distance (ft)1944 1944 111 209
Upstream Blk Time (%)2
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200 100
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Intersection: 3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
Movement EB EB EB WB SB
Directions Served T T T R R
Maximum Queue (ft)74 274 299 28 51
Average Queue (ft)15 73 91 0 18
95th Queue (ft)65 210 233 10 41
Link Distance (ft)303 303 116
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 65
Storage Blk Time (%)0 10 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 84 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 No Build PM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 4
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 150 144 297 320 204 170 258 270 166 186 207 168
Average Queue (ft)62 77 262 272 158 76 179 153 77 92 103 82
95th Queue (ft)120 125 326 327 271 140 254 234 136 164 179 153
Link Distance (ft)204 204 204 204 1139 1139 608 608
Upstream Blk Time (%)24 25 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)102 108 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175
Storage Blk Time (%)28 1 0 2 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)73 5 0 2 0
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 165 189 242 268
Average Queue (ft)91 108 101 141
95th Queue (ft)149 167 187 231
Link Distance (ft)275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 165 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 2
Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway
Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft)74 121 33 19 63 41 23
Average Queue (ft)37 46 6 2 18 1 1
95th Queue (ft)65 93 25 12 48 22 10
Link Distance (ft)99 110 275 310 310
Upstream Blk Time (%)1
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 2 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 No Build PM Peak Hour 03/29/2020
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 5
Intersection: 6: Blake Road & RIRO
Movement EB SB
Directions Served R T
Maximum Queue (ft)34 11
Average Queue (ft)14 0
95th Queue (ft)38 8
Link Distance (ft)87 561
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Blake Road & 2nd Street
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR LT R L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 185 290 144 35 177 278 290 98 205 197
Average Queue (ft)55 162 57 10 66 129 147 23 111 84
95th Queue (ft)169 256 106 34 138 229 246 62 186 163
Link Distance (ft)551 185 561 561 615 615
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 100 200 140
Storage Blk Time (%)0 9 4 2 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 11 1 2 1
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 404
SimTraffic Performance Report
2022 Build AM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.4 3.9 0.1 0.1 3.8
Total Del/Veh (s)40.7 7.7 4.5 50.9 19.3 16.4 47.3 55.5 2.3 44.2 54.7 1.9
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.6
Total Del/Veh (s)20.1
2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 3.9 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s)13.7 3.7 4.4 10.1 0.5 0.3 32.1 41.3 9.6 30.3 6.4 3.5
3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)1.0 1.8 1.4 4.8 1.4
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.2 2.7 3.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)37.9 15.0 3.6 43.9 20.9 4.3 39.8 33.9 13.4 39.6 35.8 22.2
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)23.8
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)8.1 4.4 10.4 12.6 4.1 4.4 1.3 1.1 3.2 0.4 0.3 1.4
6: Blake Road & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)3.5 0.2 1.6 1.3 1.1
SimTraffic Performance Report
2022 Build AM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 2
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)17.8 11.5 24.9 6.8 13.2 5.7 12.5
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8
Total Del/Veh (s)36.6
Queuing and Blocking Report
2022 Build AM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 3
Intersection: 1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L T TR L T L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 344 370 227 192 126 244 260 75 62 53 35
Average Queue (ft)188 238 105 70 30 114 133 27 18 12 6
95th Queue (ft)296 332 201 155 78 202 223 64 49 41 26
Link Distance (ft)717 717 717 1944 1944 317 537 537
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 500 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)4
Queuing Penalty (veh)2
Intersection: 2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L R LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)52 4 45 4 57 79 35
Average Queue (ft)15 0 9 0 14 28 10
95th Queue (ft)38 3 28 3 38 63 27
Link Distance (ft)1944 111 196
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200 60 100
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Intersection: 3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
Movement EB SB
Directions Served T R
Maximum Queue (ft)13 23
Average Queue (ft)0 4
95th Queue (ft)9 17
Link Distance (ft)299 116
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report
2022 Build AM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 4
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft)53 76 211 251 171 124 216 198 62 193 158 132
Average Queue (ft)12 30 100 115 32 50 133 106 30 107 42 31
95th Queue (ft)38 64 180 204 95 103 206 183 58 182 112 85
Link Distance (ft)204 204 204 204 1139 1139 608 608
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 1 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175
Storage Blk Time (%)1 0 2
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 0 1
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 120 157 171 193
Average Queue (ft)53 72 70 99
95th Queue (ft)102 124 135 170
Link Distance (ft)275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 165 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L L
Maximum Queue (ft)54 75 28 39
Average Queue (ft)18 28 2 4
95th Queue (ft)45 58 14 24
Link Distance (ft)99 110
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Queuing and Blocking Report
2022 Build AM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 5
Intersection: 6: Blake Road & RIRO
Movement EB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft)29
Average Queue (ft)3
95th Queue (ft)18
Link Distance (ft)87
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Blake Road & 2nd Street
Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR L T TR T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 101 204 98 78 91 158 144
Average Queue (ft)12 101 41 32 37 77 55
95th Queue (ft)65 169 79 66 76 132 114
Link Distance (ft)551 561 561 615 615
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 200
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 8
SimTraffic Performance Report
2022 Build PM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.7 3.8 0.3 0.9 3.4
Total Del/Veh (s)55.3 15.3 10.5 62.6 27.9 26.7 50.1 61.0 2.8 49.6 65.9 2.9
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.7
Total Del/Veh (s)20.9
2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 51.1 72.8 2.5
Total Del/Veh (s)18.3 8.1 7.0 32.9 0.8 0.7 118.1 105.6 248.7 46.0 11.1
3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)5.1 2.1 1.4 6.3 4.0
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.4 2.5 3.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)54.9 26.3 9.5 56.4 21.1 7.5 56.3 45.8 25.9 55.3 47.2 35.7
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)30.2
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)16.3 22.6 7.1 21.5 21.9 7.6 4.6 1.5 1.3 5.2 0.6 0.3
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)2.7
SimTraffic Performance Report
2022 Build PM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 2
6: Blake Road & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)3.0 0.3 1.8 1.8 1.0
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s)20.1 15.2 31.3 9.5 16.9 8.8 14.3
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s)2.3
Total Del/Veh (s)50.9
Queuing and Blocking Report
2022 Build PM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 3
Intersection: 1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L T TR L T R L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 132 276 536 471 174 381 390 104 83 53 153 70
Average Queue (ft)17 91 249 210 36 257 274 38 23 2 74 19
95th Queue (ft)71 197 443 404 123 373 384 79 63 28 134 54
Link Distance (ft)717 717 717 1944 1944 317 537 537
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 500 150 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)21 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)5 0
Intersection: 2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T R LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)87 18 26 41 4 4 74 228 125
Average Queue (ft)28 1 1 7 0 0 23 90 36
95th Queue (ft)63 13 12 26 3 5 60 215 109
Link Distance (ft)1944 1944 299 111 196
Upstream Blk Time (%)20
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200 60 100
Storage Blk Time (%)30 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)20 0
Intersection: 3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
Movement EB EB EB SB
Directions Served T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft)75 278 309 50
Average Queue (ft)10 55 73 17
95th Queue (ft)52 190 214 39
Link Distance (ft)299 299 116
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 4
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50
Storage Blk Time (%)7
Queuing Penalty (veh)60
Queuing and Blocking Report
2022 Build PM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 4
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 119 131 307 307 204 197 267 240 128 178 218 189
Average Queue (ft)48 69 255 266 159 80 177 152 63 92 100 71
95th Queue (ft)98 117 321 327 271 150 255 232 113 159 178 157
Link Distance (ft)204 204 204 204 1139 1139 608 608
Upstream Blk Time (%)21 23 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)84 92 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175
Storage Blk Time (%)26 1 0 1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)66 5 0 1 1
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 160 169 158 209
Average Queue (ft)77 91 81 118
95th Queue (ft)138 146 145 191
Link Distance (ft)275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 165 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1
Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway
Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 101 95 37 16 60 6 4
Average Queue (ft)40 43 6 1 15 0 0
95th Queue (ft)76 77 26 8 44 5 3
Link Distance (ft)99 110 275 310 310
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 1
Queuing and Blocking Report
2022 Build PM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 5
Intersection: 6: Blake Road & RIRO
Movement EB SB
Directions Served R T
Maximum Queue (ft)29 6
Average Queue (ft)12 0
95th Queue (ft)36 5
Link Distance (ft)87 561
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Blake Road & 2nd Street
Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR L T TR T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 184 245 144 194 194 230 201
Average Queue (ft)41 126 59 82 93 98 85
95th Queue (ft)142 209 115 154 165 175 165
Link Distance (ft)551 561 561 615 615
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 200
Storage Blk Time (%)0 3 0 0 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 4 0 0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 345
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build AM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.4 4.0 0.1 0.5 3.8
Total Del/Veh (s)40.6 8.6 4.6 55.2 22.7 23.1 42.5 50.2 2.3 42.9 57.0 2.1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.6
Total Del/Veh (s)21.1
2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 4.1 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s)12.2 4.1 3.6 8.8 0.5 0.3 23.4 21.0 7.2 31.5 7.6 3.5
3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)1.2 1.9 1.4 5.6 1.6
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.2 2.6 3.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s)35.6 15.4 3.9 46.0 23.2 4.6 40.4 32.2 14.6 38.2 34.5 27.3
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)24.7
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)12.3 6.2 11.1 4.0 5.2 1.3 0.8 4.0 0.5 0.3 1.8
6: Blake Road & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)4.5 0.3 1.8 1.4 1.2
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build AM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 2
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.2 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)20.4 20.3 15.1 19.8 18.6 4.9 28.4 11.0 5.9 32.2 17.1 8.7
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3
Total Del/Veh (s)16.0
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8
Total Del/Veh (s)38.5
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build AM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 3
Intersection: 1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L T TR L T L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 318 356 240 223 152 275 304 62 71 53 36
Average Queue (ft)195 241 121 87 38 143 162 25 18 15 8
95th Queue (ft)291 326 220 189 100 243 265 57 52 44 31
Link Distance (ft)717 717 717 1944 1944 317 537 537
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 500 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)9
Queuing Penalty (veh)4
Intersection: 2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)48 12 56 37 78 53
Average Queue (ft)12 0 9 13 28 14
95th Queue (ft)37 5 31 31 58 38
Link Distance (ft)1944 111 196
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200 100
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Intersection: 3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
Movement EB SB
Directions Served T R
Maximum Queue (ft)12 32
Average Queue (ft)0 11
95th Queue (ft)4 31
Link Distance (ft)299 116
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build AM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 4
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft)66 79 223 245 167 135 220 204 76 197 223 110
Average Queue (ft)15 31 107 117 39 46 148 117 33 110 50 41
95th Queue (ft)43 64 193 206 112 96 216 198 64 185 135 95
Link Distance (ft)204 204 204 204 1139 1139 608 608
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 1 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175
Storage Blk Time (%)1 0 2
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 0 1
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 171 181 190 220
Average Queue (ft)73 90 91 120
95th Queue (ft)134 146 159 189
Link Distance (ft)275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 165 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1
Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway
Movement EB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L T TR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft)98 66 33 4 4 39 4
Average Queue (ft)37 31 3 0 0 7 0
95th Queue (ft)74 53 18 4 3 29 3
Link Distance (ft)99 110 275 275 310
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build AM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 5
Intersection: 6: Blake Road & RIRO
Movement EB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft)46
Average Queue (ft)15
95th Queue (ft)41
Link Distance (ft)87
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Blake Road & 2nd Street
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR LT R L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 184 244 142 35 117 111 134 46 195 182
Average Queue (ft)29 125 59 12 48 50 62 11 98 74
95th Queue (ft)114 207 112 37 95 89 108 34 166 146
Link Distance (ft)551 185 561 561 615 615
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 100 200 140
Storage Blk Time (%)0 4 2 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 4 0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 16
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build PM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.5 3.9 0.3 1.1 3.4
Total Del/Veh (s)56.6 16.3 12.0 59.6 28.4 26.4 52.8 56.1 2.5 53.0 66.1 3.0
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8
Total Del/Veh (s)21.6
2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 44.7 36.9 0.7
Total Del/Veh (s)19.7 8.7 10.3 28.5 0.8 0.7 144.5 73.6 257.0 45.2 10.1
3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)6.0 2.1 1.8 6.8 4.5
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.4 2.5 3.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)58.8 26.7 10.8 56.7 21.5 9.4 56.4 46.0 27.5 57.5 53.5 42.5
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)31.8
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)22.7 9.8 30.6 11.1 6.4 1.5 1.3 6.9 0.7 0.4 2.6
6: Blake Road & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)4.3 0.4 1.8 1.7 1.0
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build PM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 2
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.2 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.3 0.3
Total Del/Veh (s)26.3 25.0 20.6 26.7 25.1 6.9 42.0 16.9 12.2 48.3 20.9 12.8
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)20.7
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s)1.3
Total Del/Veh (s)53.1
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build PM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 3
Intersection: 1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L T TR L T L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 174 190 536 490 174 412 423 101 77 142 57
Average Queue (ft)39 104 265 231 35 279 296 39 23 68 15
95th Queue (ft)120 165 462 428 124 402 417 79 58 127 43
Link Distance (ft)717 717 717 1944 1944 317 537 537
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 500 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)22
Queuing Penalty (veh)6
Intersection: 2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T R LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)77 5 32 37 3 35 88 140 95
Average Queue (ft)22 0 1 6 0 2 29 62 16
95th Queue (ft)58 5 14 22 2 19 68 178 63
Link Distance (ft)1944 1944 299 111 196
Upstream Blk Time (%)1 15
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200 60 100
Storage Blk Time (%)0 19 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 5 0
Intersection: 3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
Movement EB EB EB SB
Directions Served T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft)75 295 316 23
Average Queue (ft)19 75 94 9
95th Queue (ft)73 223 245 27
Link Distance (ft)299 299 116
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)2 6
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50
Storage Blk Time (%)0 9
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 80
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build PM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 4
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 142 170 299 305 204 144 294 262 162 190 218 181
Average Queue (ft)60 81 259 267 154 71 189 165 81 107 103 82
95th Queue (ft)119 141 334 334 269 129 272 244 137 184 182 157
Link Distance (ft)204 204 204 204 1139 1139 608 608
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 23 24 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 101 104 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175
Storage Blk Time (%)26 1 0 2 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)70 5 0 3 1
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 171 189 236 267
Average Queue (ft)96 117 114 152
95th Queue (ft)160 178 197 238
Link Distance (ft)275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 165 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 5
Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway
Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 106 107 40 12 54 23
Average Queue (ft)32 41 7 0 19 1
95th Queue (ft)71 78 29 5 47 16
Link Distance (ft)99 110 275 310
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 2 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build PM Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 5
Intersection: 6: Blake Road & RIRO
Movement EB SB
Directions Served R TR
Maximum Queue (ft)67 4
Average Queue (ft)19 0
95th Queue (ft)48 3
Link Distance (ft)87 561
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Blake Road & 2nd Street
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR LT R L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 185 304 124 66 173 284 302 126 253 250
Average Queue (ft)63 160 58 10 66 132 154 26 120 115
95th Queue (ft)183 265 106 37 128 230 259 74 209 214
Link Distance (ft)551 185 561 561 615 615
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 100 200 140
Storage Blk Time (%)0 10 3 0 2 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 12 0 0 2 1
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 410
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build AM with Outlot Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.3 4.0 0.2 0.5 3.8
Total Del/Veh (s)40.4 8.1 4.4 56.7 22.8 23.3 43.8 52.4 2.3 48.3 49.3 2.1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.6
Total Del/Veh (s)21.0
2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 4.0 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s)14.9 4.0 3.3 7.3 0.5 0.4 25.5 43.3 8.1 30.1 8.4 3.5
3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)1.3 2.0 1.3 6.2 1.7
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.2 2.7 3.5 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)36.2 15.8 4.0 47.8 24.6 4.7 40.7 34.5 14.5 39.2 37.0 29.0
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)25.7
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)13.4 6.6 10.1 4.2 6.9 1.3 1.4 3.6 0.6 0.2 1.9
6: Blake Road & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)4.9 0.3 1.7 1.5 1.2
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build AM with Outlot Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 2
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.2 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)20.6 19.9 15.5 22.0 22.4 4.8 30.2 11.5 5.8 40.5 17.0 8.1
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3
Total Del/Veh (s)16.5
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8
Total Del/Veh (s)39.2
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build AM with Outlot Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 3
Intersection: 1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L T TR L T L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 337 397 266 210 174 279 305 73 49 44 36
Average Queue (ft)203 252 112 83 40 149 165 23 14 10 8
95th Queue (ft)300 349 213 176 108 248 260 61 40 36 29
Link Distance (ft)717 717 717 1944 1944 317 537 537
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 500 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)0 10
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 4
Intersection: 2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)35 4 54 46 89 38
Average Queue (ft)8 0 9 14 30 13
95th Queue (ft)26 3 30 35 64 30
Link Distance (ft)1944 111 196
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200 100
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Intersection: 3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
Movement EB WB SB
Directions Served T R R
Maximum Queue (ft)11 13 28
Average Queue (ft)0 0 12
95th Queue (ft)8 9 32
Link Distance (ft)299 116
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)65
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build AM with Outlot Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 4
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft)74 80 224 254 203 122 243 208 73 197 235 153
Average Queue (ft)16 31 104 120 48 48 148 125 36 114 54 40
95th Queue (ft)48 63 189 211 143 97 215 198 64 189 142 106
Link Distance (ft)204 204 204 204 1139 1139 608 608
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 2 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175
Storage Blk Time (%)1 0 0 3
Queuing Penalty (veh)2 0 0 2
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 161 163 191 218
Average Queue (ft)77 93 93 129
95th Queue (ft)136 142 164 204
Link Distance (ft)275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 165 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1
Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway
Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft)86 53 29 4 37 6
Average Queue (ft)38 27 4 0 5 0
95th Queue (ft)66 53 21 3 23 5
Link Distance (ft)99 110 275 310
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build AM with Outlot Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 5
Intersection: 6: Blake Road & RIRO
Movement EB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft)53
Average Queue (ft)18
95th Queue (ft)45
Link Distance (ft)87
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Blake Road & 2nd Street
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR LT R L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 180 249 143 48 111 109 132 46 205 192
Average Queue (ft)37 128 66 11 48 46 59 12 104 74
95th Queue (ft)136 214 118 38 93 90 111 34 177 147
Link Distance (ft)551 185 561 561 615 615
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 100 200 140
Storage Blk Time (%)0 3 3 0 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 4 0 0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 18
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build PM with Outlot Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.5 3.8 0.3 1.2 3.4
Total Del/Veh (s)59.5 17.5 10.3 71.9 29.5 29.4 53.7 53.1 2.7 51.1 56.0 3.0
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.7
Total Del/Veh (s)22.9
2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 10.5 3.6 55.8 76.0 1.4
Total Del/Veh (s)17.6 8.9 8.1 29.7 0.8 0.6 224.5 85.8 269.1 23.1 10.3
3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)6.2 2.2 1.7 9.5 4.6
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.4 2.5 3.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s)57.1 26.7 10.2 55.4 21.7 9.2 51.8 47.0 29.3 62.3 53.3 46.0
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)32.4
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)18.8 8.6 29.5 11.4 5.8 1.5 1.4 6.4 0.9 0.3 2.6
6: Blake Road & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)5.2 0.4 2.0 1.7 1.1
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build PM with Outlot Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 2
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.3 0.3
Total Del/Veh (s)25.9 26.4 20.5 25.4 28.8 8.1 39.8 17.2 16.3 47.4 19.3 11.3
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)20.3
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s)1.6
Total Del/Veh (s)54.4
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build PM with Outlot Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 3
Intersection: 1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L T TR L T R L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 184 207 554 506 174 446 443 92 79 33 159 56
Average Queue (ft)44 107 282 243 38 294 306 34 28 1 67 15
95th Queue (ft)134 176 486 444 123 413 418 74 66 24 128 47
Link Distance (ft)717 717 717 1944 1944 317 537 537
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 500 150 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)23 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)6 0
Intersection: 2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L R LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft)58 4 42 25 104 141 92
Average Queue (ft)20 0 7 1 35 60 18
95th Queue (ft)45 3 25 13 97 152 68
Link Distance (ft)1944 111 196
Upstream Blk Time (%)11 8
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200 60 100
Storage Blk Time (%)0 19 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 5 0
Intersection: 3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
Movement EB EB EB EB SB
Directions Served T T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft)8 75 304 313 37
Average Queue (ft)0 19 82 97 9
95th Queue (ft)6 73 239 256 28
Link Distance (ft)299 299 116
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)4 5
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 10
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 89
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build PM with Outlot Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 4
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 128 146 309 318 204 197 292 294 202 190 197 199
Average Queue (ft)60 78 259 267 152 76 189 173 83 103 103 92
95th Queue (ft)110 129 334 334 269 148 270 265 156 173 176 170
Link Distance (ft)204 204 204 204 1139 1139 608 608
Upstream Blk Time (%)23 25 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)99 110 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175
Storage Blk Time (%)28 1 0 0 0 1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)74 5 0 0 0 2 1
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 175 189 268 271
Average Queue (ft)109 125 124 153
95th Queue (ft)177 191 219 244
Link Distance (ft)275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)3 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 165 165
Storage Blk Time (%)1 3 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 4 6
Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway
Movement EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft)92 113 36 8 15 58 40 6
Average Queue (ft)34 44 8 0 1 17 2 0
95th Queue (ft)71 83 29 6 7 47 19 6
Link Distance (ft)99 110 275 275 310 310
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 2 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build PM with Outlot Peak Hour
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 5
Intersection: 6: Blake Road & RIRO
Movement EB SB
Directions Served R TR
Maximum Queue (ft)64 4
Average Queue (ft)18 0
95th Queue (ft)49 3
Link Distance (ft)87 561
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Blake Road & 2nd Street
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR LT R L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 182 304 140 76 167 270 287 139 235 220
Average Queue (ft)58 158 60 13 67 138 159 25 123 102
95th Queue (ft)175 266 118 50 134 251 266 76 200 183
Link Distance (ft)551 185 561 561 615 615
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 100 200 140
Storage Blk Time (%)0 9 3 0 0 2 0 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 11 0 0 0 2 0 1
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 432
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build AM Peak Hour with Mitigation
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.4 4.0 0.1 0.6 3.8
Total Del/Veh (s)41.6 7.9 4.4 66.5 18.5 19.1 45.9 55.3 2.3 49.1 52.6 2.0
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.6
Total Del/Veh (s)20.1
2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 4.1 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s)60.1 25.8 20.6 48.4 25.8 16.1 10.9 17.5 8.3 16.5 8.9 25.8
3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)3.7 2.3 1.5 6.8 3.0
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.2 2.7 3.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)28.1 11.9 3.8 47.3 24.1 4.7 41.8 33.7 15.7 39.5 36.1 25.3
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)24.1
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)12.9 6.0 12.6 4.1 5.3 1.3 1.4 3.6 0.5 0.2 1.9
6: Blake Road & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)3.9 0.3 1.7 1.4 1.2
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build AM Peak Hour with Mitigation
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 2
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.2 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)21.0 19.1 15.0 22.4 22.0 4.5 32.8 11.0 5.8 30.6 16.5 8.5
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3
Total Del/Veh (s)16.3
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8
Total Del/Veh (s)48.0
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build AM Peak Hour with Mitigation
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 3
Intersection: 1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L T TR L T L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 348 410 259 235 94 348 362 84 68 60 36
Average Queue (ft)204 258 106 83 33 103 113 26 19 15 5
95th Queue (ft)317 363 220 187 79 262 270 65 52 45 24
Link Distance (ft)717 717 717 1944 1944 317 537 537
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 500 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)0 6
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 3
Intersection: 2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T T R LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 169 389 411 222 345 361 51 28 63 48
Average Queue (ft)24 164 186 31 185 197 3 9 16 11
95th Queue (ft)84 317 337 124 326 340 22 26 46 33
Link Distance (ft)1944 1944 299 299 111 196
Upstream Blk Time (%)2 2
Queuing Penalty (veh)9 11
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200 60 100
Storage Blk Time (%)6 10 36 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)2 3 4 0
Intersection: 3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
Movement EB WB WB SB
Directions Served T T R R
Maximum Queue (ft)23 17 15 32
Average Queue (ft)1 1 1 11
95th Queue (ft)14 8 11 31
Link Distance (ft)299 204 116
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)65
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build AM Peak Hour with Mitigation
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 4
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft)72 96 237 253 203 117 240 229 78 190 222 128
Average Queue (ft)15 35 96 109 42 49 151 122 34 115 54 47
95th Queue (ft)47 78 199 227 138 96 229 207 61 191 146 101
Link Distance (ft)204 204 204 204 1139 1139 608 608
Upstream Blk Time (%)1 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 2 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175
Storage Blk Time (%)1 0 0 2
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 0 0 1
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 148 168 208 225
Average Queue (ft)71 92 88 124
95th Queue (ft)132 146 157 193
Link Distance (ft)275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 165 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1
Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway
Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft)93 69 29 4 30 8
Average Queue (ft)37 31 4 0 6 0
95th Queue (ft)67 57 21 3 25 4
Link Distance (ft)99 110 275 310
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build AM Peak Hour with Mitigation
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 5
Intersection: 6: Blake Road & RIRO
Movement EB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft)40
Average Queue (ft)15
95th Queue (ft)40
Link Distance (ft)87
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Blake Road & 2nd Street
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR LT R L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 178 225 154 68 107 115 121 42 179 163
Average Queue (ft)33 123 62 12 47 47 59 9 92 72
95th Queue (ft)121 201 120 48 90 94 108 33 157 142
Link Distance (ft)551 185 561 561 615 615
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 100 200 140
Storage Blk Time (%)0 4 3 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 4 1 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 44
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build PM Peak Hour with Mitigation
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 1
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.6 3.9 0.3 1.0 3.4
Total Del/Veh (s)56.5 15.9 11.5 74.7 17.9 17.6 57.8 58.1 3.7 52.9 64.2 3.0
1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8
Total Del/Veh (s)18.6
2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 4.2 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)72.4 37.0 41.9 51.9 19.8 12.8 34.8 29.5 30.1 9.9 31.3
3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)8.0 3.1 2.0 12.0 6.1
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.5 2.5 3.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)40.6 18.4 7.5 56.8 24.6 10.0 53.4 45.2 35.4 52.6 48.0 36.5
4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5
Total Del/Veh (s)28.2
5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)19.1 8.0 25.7 9.9 5.8 1.5 1.5 6.3 0.7 0.3 2.3
6: Blake Road & RIRO Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Del/Veh (s)4.7 0.4 1.8 1.9 1.1
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build PM Peak Hour with Mitigation
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 2
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.3 0.3
Total Del/Veh (s)27.6 32.6 19.4 27.2 30.5 7.4 42.3 18.4 15.1 43.5 20.2 12.8
7: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2
Total Del/Veh (s)21.4
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s)1.0
Total Del/Veh (s)60.4
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build PM Peak Hour with Mitigation
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 3
Intersection: 1: Milwaukee Street/Jackson Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L T TR L T R L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 158 202 546 461 153 448 808 94 79 98 150 52
Average Queue (ft)42 111 270 228 27 148 180 35 26 4 76 15
95th Queue (ft)123 178 434 390 81 344 511 75 61 44 132 44
Link Distance (ft)717 717 717 1944 1944 317 537 537
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 500 150 150 150
Storage Blk Time (%)5 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)1 0
Intersection: 2: Pierce Avenue & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T T R LTR LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 239 954 954 143 386 396 82 41 72 60
Average Queue (ft)56 325 358 16 152 154 9 11 20 11
95th Queue (ft)151 795 830 79 363 367 43 32 55 35
Link Distance (ft)1944 1944 299 299 111 196
Upstream Blk Time (%)7 7
Queuing Penalty (veh)37 38
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200 60 100
Storage Blk Time (%)17 12 25 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)9 2 8 0 0
Intersection: 3: Excelsior Boulevard & RIRO
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB SB
Directions Served T T T T T R R
Maximum Queue (ft)74 322 336 105 136 36 23
Average Queue (ft)12 52 64 8 9 2 7
95th Queue (ft)57 218 244 53 63 21 25
Link Distance (ft)299 299 204 204 116
Upstream Blk Time (%)1 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)6 9 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 65
Storage Blk Time (%)3 2 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)28 1 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build PM Peak Hour with Mitigation
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 4
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB
Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 143 157 294 289 204 164 341 315 230 192 203 181
Average Queue (ft)63 80 204 216 118 72 198 181 84 101 96 81
95th Queue (ft)124 141 335 341 253 139 293 277 163 178 166 153
Link Distance (ft)204 204 204 204 1139 1139 608 608
Upstream Blk Time (%)9 10 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)38 42 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175
Storage Blk Time (%)11 1 1 0 1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh)31 3 1 0 2 1
Intersection: 4: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard
Movement SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 165 186 222 234
Average Queue (ft)95 114 108 145
95th Queue (ft)160 176 179 214
Link Distance (ft)275 275
Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 165 165
Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1
Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Full Access Driveway
Movement EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft)73 97 38 4 18 58 12 4
Average Queue (ft)30 42 8 0 1 18 0 0
95th Queue (ft)60 79 31 3 7 47 6 3
Link Distance (ft)99 110 275 275 310 310
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)50 50
Storage Blk Time (%)0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0 1
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build PM Peak Hour with Mitigation
Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment SimTraffic Report
Kimley Horn Page 5
Intersection: 6: Blake Road & RIRO
Movement EB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft)47
Average Queue (ft)19
95th Queue (ft)45
Link Distance (ft)87
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Blake Road & 2nd Street
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR LT R L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 184 313 159 54 197 282 318 120 238 225
Average Queue (ft)70 170 61 11 67 144 161 29 124 113
95th Queue (ft)195 272 119 39 142 248 271 80 212 204
Link Distance (ft)551 185 561 561 615 615
Upstream Blk Time (%)0
Queuing Penalty (veh)0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 100 200 140
Storage Blk Time (%)0 10 4 3 0 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 13 1 3 0 2
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 280