Loading...
CR 2004-020 Approve 2004/05 Local 49 Contract March 3, 2004 .~ Council Report 2004-020 . APPROVE 2004/05 LOCAL 49 CONTRACT Proposed Action Staff recommends that the Council approve the following motion: Move approval of the 2004-2005 Contract for Local 49 retroactive to January L 2004. This action will ratify the 2004/05 contract for the Public Works' employees. Overview, The contract calls for a 1.5% wage increase effective January 1, 2004, a 1.5% wage increase effective June 27, 2004, and a 2% increase effective January 1, 2005. The contract also provides for an increase in,the City's contribution for insurance of $55.00/month for 2004. The increase will apply for employees with family, Single +1, or Single + Children group health insurance. There is no increase for employees with single coverage. Employees hired after January 1, 2004, who have. single insUrance, will receive single health, dental; and life insurance at a cost not to exceed $450.00. For 2005 the increase in the City's contribution for health insurance will equal 1/2 of the average increase in family insurance. Again, there will be no increase for employees with single coverage. . Primary Issues to Consider . What other economic issues are included in the new contract? . How does this agreement fit in with the 2004/05 budget? . How does this 'agreement compare to other contract settlements .for 2004/05 in terms' of wage and benefit increases? Supportint! Information . A copy of the contract is available from the Assistant City Manager. 1 es A. Genellie ssistant City Manager Financial hnpact: $ $24,700 in 2004 Budgeted: Y IN Yes Source: General & Utility Funds . Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: Council Report 2004-020 . ,Page2 Analvsis of the Issues What other economic issues are included in the new contract? . Call Back - the. minimum amount of time for which an employee,will be paid for being called back to work for an emergency has been changed from 2 hours to 2 1/2 hours . Employees will receive one additional vacation day per year. How does this agreement fit in the budget? The City budgeted 2.5% for wage and benefit increases in 2004. The total cost of. the proposed settlement is within the budget. The City Council has not approved a budget for 2005. The 2% increase in wages, however, is less than what the finance department has been using for planning purposes. How does this agreement compare to other contract settlements' for 2004/05 in terms of wage and benefit increases? 2004 settlements for other cities have generally been in the r1IDge of 3%. There are not enough 2005 settlements to determine.a trend. . ) .