CR 2003-040 General Storm water Permit Application For Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems Project
.
.
.
w.
March 4, 2003
Council Report 2003-040
APPROVE GENERAL STORM WATER PERMIT APPLICATION
FOR SMALL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS
PROJECT 02-05
Proposed Action
Approve attached General Storm Water Permit Application to be submitted to the Mim1esota
Pollution Control agency by March 10, 2003. Direct staff to complete the req uired Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan for submittal to the Minnesota Pollution Control agency by May 9,
2003.
Overview
The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) phase II permit program is part
of the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Water Act. The Milmesota PolIution Control
Agency (MPCA) is responsible for implementing and enforcing this legislation locally. On
February 14, 2003 the MPC A made available the General Storm Water Permit Application. Due
to the short time frame between when the permit was available and the deadline for submittal the
MPCA has modified the schedule. The new schedule requires the permit application to be
submitted by March 10, 2003 and the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be
submitted by May 9, 2003.City staff has completed the required application and is in the process
of completing the SWPPP.
Primarv Issues To Consider
. Permit application deadline
. SWPPP submittal deadline
Supportine Information
. General Storm Water Permit ^pplication for Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer
Systems
~~~J~~
Assistant City Engineer
Financial Impact: N/A Budgeted YIN
Related Documents (eIP. ERP. etc.):
Notes:
Source:
.. . MS Word Tern late
Notice of intent to obtain coverage
General Storm Water Permit Application (MN R 040000)
for Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
(Noticed as MN R 580000)
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
520 Lafayette Road North, st. Paul, MN 55155-4194
Application deadline: March 10,2003
e
~~~
Minnesota
Pollution
Control
Agency
Please read the instructions carefully and use the "tab" key to move through the fields of this form. Enter
responses using drop dovvn menus, check boxes and text as indicated. Use the "save as" featme in MS Word to
save this template as a document.
I. MS4 Information
A. Application Type
Application type: Single site or administrative area If multiple sites, number of attached application forms:
MS4s with multiple sites such as campuses. dispersedfadlities, or state agency regions/districts, must attach a completed application for each site or
administrative area. An authorized person with overall responsibility or an officially delegated representative must sign each application form.
B. M$4 Owner
City of Hopkins
Community, municipality, agency or olher party having ownership or operational control oflhc MS4.
1 nl n "pi rcd- Srn::::,q::::.r Snllrn
Mailing Address
.
City
Hnpkin<=:
MN
55343
Zip Code
State
Hennepin
Mississippi River Twin Cities, Minnesota River Shakopee
Major Watershed (see enclosed map)
County
41-6005-247
Federal Tax ID
8022882
State Tax ill
c. General Contact
Anderson John
Lasl Name First Name
General conlact (official, slaffmember, consultant or other) for permit compliance issues.
Assistant City Engin~pr
Title
1010 First Street South
Mailing Address
Hopkins
.MN
City
Slate
c;l')~4~
Zip Code
(952) 939-1356
Telephone (include area code)
landerson@Hopkinsmn.com
E-Mail Address
II. Certification of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP)
A.
Have you developed a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program for your MS4? DYes IXJNo
Municipalities must demonstrate how their Storm Water Pollutioll Prevention Program will be implemented and
enforced over the term of the jive-year permit. SWPPPs must incorporate appropriate educational components,
BMPs and measurable goals.
.
Provide a brief description of the plan to complete the SWPPP if "No" is marked above.
MPCA MS4 Storm Waler Pemlil Application 1 of 1
02/06/03
swppp will be submitted on or before May 9, 2003 deadline
.
Summary of the six minimum control measures. Complete items B. 1. through B. 6.
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Programs must address the specific requirements contained in Part V. G. of the permit. SWPPPs must
outline how the siY: minimum control measures will be addressed. the contact person, department in charge. lime frame and measures that
will be implemented to meet the schedules required by the permit.
B.
1. Public education and outreach measures
Anderson
Contact Last Name
John
First Name
Engineering
Departmellt
1010 Fir~~ ~~rpp~ ~outh
Mailing Address
City
Hopkins
MN
(952) 939-1356
Telephone (include area code)
55343
State Zip Code
janderson@Hopkinsmn.com
E-Mail Address
a) Have Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented for this minimum
control measure been planned or developed?
b) Have measurable goals for each BMP for this minimum control measure been planned or
developed?
c) Has an estimated timeline for implementing each BMP for this minimum control
measure been planned or developed? Timelines should include, in parrative Of numerical
form, the months and years required actions will occur, interim milestones, and
frequency of action, as appropriate.
. d) Have the educational components for this minimum control measure been planned or
developed?
e) Provide a brief description of the plan to complete any requirements marked "No" above.
2. Public participation and involvement measures
Anderson
Contact Last Name
John
First Name
Engineering
Department
1010 First Street South
Mailing Address
Hopkins
MN
55343
Zip Code
City
State
(952) 939-1356
Telephone (include area code)
janderson@Hopkinsmn.com
E-Mail Address
IXJYes ONo
IilYes DNo
Gf]Yes ONe
IilYes DNo
a) Have Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented for this minlinwu [X]Yes DNo
control measure been planned or developed?
b) Have measurable goals for each BMP for this minimum control measure been planned or IRlYes DNo
developed?
c) Has an estimated timeline for implementing each BMP for this minimum control ~Yes DNo
measure been planned or developed? Timelines should include, in narrative Of numerical
form, the months and years required actions will occur, interim milestones, and
frequency of action, as appropriate.
. d) Have the educational components for this minimum control measure been planned or ~Yes DNo
developed?
e) Provide a brief description of the plan to complete any requirements marked "No" above.
MPCA MS4 Storm Water Pemlit Application
20f2
02106103
3. Illicit discharge detection and elimination
.
Anderson
Contact Last Name
John
First Name
Engineering
Department
10]0 First Street South
Mailing Address
Hnpkinc::
City
MN
State
55343
Zip Code
(9')2) 939-1356
Telephone (include area code)
landerson@Hopkinsmn.com
E-Mail Address
a) Have Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented for this minimum ~Yes DNe
control measure been planned or developed?
b) Have measurable goals for each BMP for this minimum control measure been planned or ~Yes DNo
developed?
c) Has an estimated timeline for implementing each BMP for this minimum control lRIYes DNo
measure been planned or developed? Timelines should include, in narrative or numerical
form, the months and years required actions will occur, interim milestones, and
frequency of action, as appropriate.
d) Have the educational components for this minimum control measure been planned or ~Yes DNa
developed?
e) Provide a brief description of the plan to complete any requirements marked "No" above.
4. Construction site storm water runoff control measures
.
Anderson
Contact Last Name
John
First Name
Enqineering
Department
1010 FirST Street SOUTh
Mailing Address
Hopkins
MN 55343
City
State Zip Code
(952) 939-1356
Telephone (include area code)
landerson@Hopkinsmn.com
E-Mail Address
a) Have Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented for this minimum !RIYes ONo
control measure been planned or developed?
b) Have measurable goals for each BMP for this minimum control measure been planned or ~Yes DNa
developed?
c) Has an estimated timeline for implementing each BMP for this minimum control ImYes ONe
measure been planned or developed? Timelines should include, in narrative or numerical
form, the months and years required actions will occur, interim milestones, and
frequency of action, as appropriate.
d) Have the educational components for this minimum control measure been planned or 5i]Yes DNo
developed?
e) Provide a brief description ofthe plan to complete any requirements marked "No" above.
5. Post-construction storm water management measures
.
Anderson
Contact Last Name
John
First Namc
Engineering
Department
MPCA MS4 Storm Water Permit Application
30f3
02/06/03
1010 Fir~t Street South
Mailing Address
City
(952) 939-1356
. Telephone (include area code)
Hopkins
MN
State
':1':1141
Zip Code
janderson@Hopkinsmn.com
E-Mail Address
a) Have Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented for this minimum lli]Ves DNo
control measure been planned or developed?
b) I-lave measurable goals for each BMP for this minimum control measure been planned or IZ]Ves DNo
developed?
c) Has an estimated timeline for implementing each BMP for this minimum control lli]Yes DNo
measure been planned or developed? Timelines should include, in narrative or numerical
form, the months and years required actions will occur, interim milestones, and
frequency of action, as appropriate.
d) Have the educational components for this minimum control measure been planned or ~Ves DNo
developed?
e) Provide a brief description of the plan to complete any requirements marked "No" above.
6. Pollution prevention and good housekeeping measures
Anderson
Contact Last Name
John
First Name
RnlJineE'rin'J
Department
1010 First Street South
Mailing Address
Hopkins
55343
Slate Zip Code
janderson@Hopkinsmn.com
MN
City
. (952) 939-1356
Telephone (include area code)
E-Mail Address
a) Have Best Management Practices (BMFs) that will be implemented for this minimum iXlVes DNo
control measure been planned or developed?
b) Have measurable goals for each BMF for this minimum control measure been planned or lK!Yes DNo
developed?
c) Has an estimated timeline for implementing each BMP for this minimum control lli]Yes DNo
measure been planned or developed? Timelines should include, in narrative or numerical
form, the months and years required actions will occur, interim milestones, and
frequency of action, as appropriate.
d) Have the educational components for this minimum control measure been planned or ~Yes DNo
developed?
e) Provide a brief description of the plan to complete any requirements marked "No" above.
c. Reporting and record keeping requirements.
Have reporting and record keeping requirements for implementation of the Storm Water IKlYes DNo
Pollution Prevention Program been planned or developed?
Provide a brief description of the plan to complete the reporting and record keeping requirements if"No" is
marked above.
.
MPCA MS4 Storm Water Penn it Application
40f4
02106/03
> .
III. Summar of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP)
Required Application Attachments
Complete a one page SWPPP Summary Sheet and a BMP Description Sheet for each type of BMP that will
. be implemented. (See last two pages of the application form.)
A. Is the SWPPP Summary Sheet attached?
B. Is one BMP Description Sheet attached for each BMP7
C. How many BMP Description Sheets are attached 7
DYes IXINo
DYes !ZJNo
IV. Limitations of Coverage
A. Part II Limitations on Coverage and Appendix C
I have read Part II Limitations on Coverage and Appendix C ofthe MS4 general permit and
certify that we intend to comply with the applicable requirements of those sections.
IRIYes
B. Special Waters
Please refer to the Guidance Manual for Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) and the
enclosed map to complete this section.
1. Does the MS4 discharge into Prohibited Waters as defined in Minn. R. 7050.0180,
subp. 3,4, and 57 See Attachment Four of the Guidance Manualfor Small Municipal
Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) for further information. If yes, please list below
and contact Lou Flynn at (651) 296-6575 or louis.f1ynn@state.mn.us. Be advised that
you will be required to obtain an individual permit versus a general permit.
.2.
Does the MS4 discharge into waters with a Restricted Discharge as defined in Minn. R.
7050.0180, subp. 6, 6a, and 6b? If yes, please list below and comply with Part IX,
Appendix C, Item B. See Attaclunent Four of the Guidance Manualfor Small A1unicipal
Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) for further information.
DYes IZJNo
DYes !ZJNo
3. Does the MS4 discharge into Trout Waters as defined in Minn. R. 6264.0050 subp. 2 & DYes IZ]No
4? rfyes, please list below and comply with Part IX, Appendix C, Item C. See
Attaclunents Two and Three of the Guidance Manual for Small Municipal Separate
Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) for further information.
4. Does the MS4 discharge into Wetlands as defined in Minn. R. 7050.0130, subp. F? See DYes [K]No
Attachment Four of the Guidance Manualfor Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer
Systems (MS4s) for further infoIDlation.
5. Does the MS4 have a process to evaluate discharges that require applicable [K]Yes DNo
Environmental Review as required by State or federal laws? See Part IX of the
Guidance Manual for Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) for further
infonnation.
.6.
Does the MS4 have a process to evaluate discharges whose direct, indirect, interrelated,
interconnected, or independent impacts may jeopardize a listed Endangered or
Threatened Species or adversely modifY a designated critical habitat? See Part IX of the
Guidance Manual for Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) for further
MPCA MS4 Stann Water Permit Application
5of5
IKJYes DNo
02/06/03
. information.
.
7. Does the MS4 have a process to evaluate discharges which may adversely affect
properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or
affecting known or discovered archeological sites? See Part IX of the Guidance Manual
for Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) for further information.
~Yes DNa
If you answered "No" to Item 5, 6, or 7, briefly explain how the MS4 will come into compliance with the
requirements of Appendix C.
V. Owner or Operator Certification
The person with overall, site or administrative area SWPPP implementation responsibility must sign the
application. This person must be duly authorized to sign the application (mayor, designated public works
director, president of the university, ete.).
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and
evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons, who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete (Minn. R. 7001.0070).
I also certifY under penalty of law that I have read, understood, and accepted all terms and conditions of the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Storm Water Permit for MS4s that
. authorizes storm water discharges identified in this application form.
I understand that as a permittee, I am legally accountable under the Clean Water Act to ensure compliance with
the terms and conditions of the NPDES General Storm Water Permit for MS4s.
I also understand that MPCA enforcement actions (pursuant to Minn. Stat. SI15.07, 116.072, and Section 309
of the Clean Water Act) may be taken against me or the MS4 if the terms and conditions ofthe NPDES General
Storm Water Penllit for MS4s are not met.
Authorized Signature
Date
Stadler
Steve
Public Works Director
Title
Last Name First Name
Official notices will be scnt tn person indicated here.
1010 First Street South
Mailing Address
Hnpkinc:
City
MN
State
S'i14'=l
Zip Code
Telephone (include area code)
.
E-Mail Address
MPCA MS4 Storm Water Pennit Application
6of6
02/06/03
Attachment 1 SWPPP Summary Sheet
. Develop a unique identification number for each BMP Description Sheet (Attachment 2) completed. List the
unique identification number for each BMP under the following seven areas.
A. Public Education and Outreach Measures
BMP unique identification numbers:
B. Public Participation and Involvement Measures
BMP unique identification numbers:
C. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Measures
BMP unique identification numbers:
D. Construction Site Storm Water Runoff Control Measures
BMP unique identification numbers:
E. Post-Construction Storm Water Management Measures
BMP unique identification numbers:
F. Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping Measures
BMP llilique identification numbers:
G. Other portion of the permit (such as Record Keeping or Appendix C).
. Portion of the permit that the BMPs addresses. BMP unique identification numbers.
.
MPCA MS4 Slorm Water Permit Application
70f7
02/06/03
Use the BMP Description template and "save as" feature in MSWord to complete this page for each BMP.
Alternate fonnats are acceptable as long as all the requested infonnation is rovided.
.A.
Unique Identification Number:
, (Assign a number.)
B. Name or type ofBMP:
C. BMP description:
D. Minimum control measure addressed: Public Education and Outreach
E. Describe the measurable goals that will be used to determine success or benefits of this BMP:
F. Describe the timeline or implementation schedule for this BMP:
G. Person or department in charge of implementing this BMP:
Last Name
First Name
Department
H. If this BMP is an educational component of your SWPPP, briefly describe the audience and educational
. goals for this minimum control measure:
.
MPCA MS4 Storm Water Permit Application
80[8
02/06/03
.
Phase II
Storm Water
Program
League of Mj""esota Cities
CUju promoti"g ....""/10"""
Phase II Bulletin - February 17, 2003
Issue # 7
If you are with a "Designated MS4", a city outside any of the Urbanized Areas, please see the message
at the end of this newsletter for a program schedule.
Countdown to Completion - 4th Edition - Deadline Extension
This is the fourth in a series of newsletters prepared at the direction of the LMC Guide Plan Steering
Committee. These newsletters are intended to guide you through the specific and detailed steps to get
your Permit application prepared. We are depmiing from this to convey and discuss a major piece of
news in the Minnesota NPDES Phase II world.
1iIiII'Ifoo1e. \ "'''r~~ ~ 'Ifoo1~lSI e: \-......~Q\.I..o:'lI"2l..o:'l1 ...~'Ifoo\@\ AI~,gIAII'lI_I~ *~~'-'!I
-.!!.~"!!;I!!.!3' ~~~g-~~ "!!;I!!.~~ ~~~~!!.!.~~~ I!:!,.,!!;I!!.~ ~91~~~';;',!l;!.91 .!!.v.r!!a-
S_l'll'll hl:mr.l! ii"'~"'~"I.I_~ "'~'Ifool ~\ ~'I''{'''''Ji'~~~''f1
~~.g,=:.l==a~-~~~!;~ -la~~~ @. YJllI ~~g;;.!D~
.
On Wednesday, 2/12/03, we received an E-mail from the MPCA with the following message and
instructions to distribute it:
While the MS4 application is due to the MPCA on March 10, 2003, the MPCA also
recognizes that, in some communities, it will be difficult or impossible in the time that
remains to complete (1) the MPCA's application and SWPPP summary, and then (2)
the community's own established internal procedures for review, approval and sign-
off. The MPCA will allow communities who find themselves in this situation to
submit a near-final application by March 10, but to take up to an additional 60 days
(until May 9, 2003) to provide the final, fully signed application containing the final
SWPPP summary, Under this procedure, the application provided by March 10
should be complete with the exception of those portions of the SWPPP summary
that require further approval by the City Councilor manager, the County Board or
administrator, etc. The application must be accompanied by a letter to the MPCA
confirming that you intend to provide the final application, including the final SWPPP
summary, by the 60-day deadline,
What does this mean?
Your NPDES Phase II Permit Application will have two parts:
. the Application Form, and
. the SWPPP and/or S WPPP summary.
.
The MPCA is authorizing separate deadlines for these documents. I f you decide not to submit your
SWPPP on March 10, you would submit only a filled-in Application Form on that date. You would have
an additional 60 days (May 9) to complete your SWPPP.
League of Minnesota Cities. 145 University Avenue West. St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 . (651) 281-1200 . (800) 925-1122 . www.lmnc,org
Copyright (iJ 2002 2003 League of Minnesota Cities. All rights reserved. Not for reproduction or distribution.
.
.
.
2
When your SWPPP is finalized, you would submit a revised Application Form and your SWPPP and/or
SWPPP summary.
The statement instructs MS4s to submit "a near-final application by March 10". Please note that we
strongly recommend against submitting draft or incomplete materials to the MPCA. If your City Council
is going to review and approve your SWPP and Permit Application, we strongly recommend against
submitting these draft materials before the Council has reviewed and acted on them. We believe that
MS4 can meet the conditions of this statement by submitting only the Application Form filled out to
indicate that the SWPPP is not complete.
What should the incomplete submittal on March 10 look like?
We are working on this question. The legal staff at the LMC will consider some of legal questions
related to this. We will provide recommendations about how the Application Form should be filled out.
We will also provide a sample letter that will be appropriate.
The Application Form recently distributed by the MPCA includes the following section:
A. Have you developed a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program for DVesDNo
your MS4?
Municipalities must demonstrate how their Storm Water Pot/lltioll PrevellUoll Program wil! be implemented and
enforced OWl' the term of the jive-year permit. SWPPPs mllst incorpurate appropriate educatiolw/ components,
BMPs amI measurable goafs.
Provide a brief description of the plan to complete the SWPPP if "No" is marked above.
We expect that you would simply mark the check box labeled "No" and include a brief letter describing
your plan to complete and submit your SWPPP before the extended deadline of May 9, 2003.
What do you recommend that we do now?
We recommend that you not rush to complete your Permit Application. If you were on schedule to be
done by March 10 and are comfortable with your process, you may want to continue ahead as planned.
If you were rushing to get it done and approved by March 10, you may want to slow down a bit and
move ahead with more deliberation. Now you have the time to take it to your Council and make any
appropriate revisions. Now you have the time to compare your BMPs and final SWPPP with SWPPPs
from other cities. Consider the pros and cons listed below.
Pros & Cons
Submitting a complcte Permit Application on March 10, 2003 - Application Form & SWPPP
and/or SWPPP summary
Pros
. You will be done with it!
. You will meet the letter of the Federal rule
League of Minnesota Cities. 145 University Avenue West. 51. Paul, MN 55103-2044. (651) 281-1200 · (800) 925-1122 · www.lmnc.org
Copyright If) 2002-2003 League of Minnesota Cities. All rights reserved. Not for reproduction or distribution.
3
.
Cons
. You will not have a chance to see many other S WPPPs before you submit yours
. Your Application will have a greater chance of being read by the MPCA and other groups.
When you submit your Application, there may not be a great many other submittals and the
agency and groups will have additional time. Being "on the point" is not always a good idea
with this sort of regulation.
. We still have not seen the final version of the Guidance Manual for this Permit. You will
have less time to make any adjustments that may be appropriate after you have read through
the Guidance Manual.
Submitting only the Application Form on March 10 and submitting the complete Permit
Application later, but before May 9, 2003
.
Pros
. You will not have to rush the preparation of your SWPPP. You will have the time to:
o have meaningful review and comment from your Council and/or other review bodies
o . review and compare other cities' SWPPP to get a bettcr "feel" for where your SWPPP
stands - discuss it with your peers
o proceed in a deliberativc manner that allows for appropriate involvement and review by
various departments within your city
o make any adjustments that may be appropriate after you read through the Guidance
Manual.
. Your Permit Application would not "stand auf' because of being submitted early.
. This Permit process has been quite fluid. By submitting your Permit Application later, you
will have a chance to see how things "settle auf' before finalizing your submittal.
. You would not have to complete your Permit Application under pressure. A more
deliberative process could result in a better Application.
Cons
. There is a very small chance that some party could step forward and file a lawsuit claiming
that you had not met the requirements of the Federal rule.
. This would hang over your head for a bit longer. There would be less pressure, but it would
still be there.
Do you have any other pros and cons to suggest? Please send them to us at phaseii({l)lmnc.org and we
will include them in the next newsletter.
The story behind this extension
The story behind this extension is instructive. Without the Guide Plan project, it is possible that this
extension would not have happened.
The LMC Guide Plan project organized a demonstration of a software program on January 23rd. The
presenter from the software company has been marketing his product in many states throughout the
country. [n the course of his presentation, he mentioned that some states have set different submittal
dates for their Application Forms and their SWPPPs. Barb Huberty (City of Rochester) picked up on this
comment and raised it in discussion immediately after the presentation.
.
League of Minnesota Cities. 145 University Avenue West. St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 . (651) 281.1200 · (800) 925-1122 · www,lmnc.org
Copyright iD 2002-2003 League of Minnesota Cities. All rights reserved. Not for reproduction or distribution.
.
4
Based on Barb's comments, I contacted the MPC ^ staff to ask them to consider this idea. Within a
couple days, I received an E-mail from the MPCA indicating that the idea had received a positive
response in preliminary discussions. To support the idea, I contacted the Permit writer for the State of
Connecticut and got some of the details 011 how they had set up their submittal schedule. I passed that
information and the contact details to the MPCA staff.
On 2/11, the MPCA distributed a draft of this message. I commented on this draft immediately. The
revised language you see above was distributed on 2/12.
News & Other Items
Documents From the MPCA
The MPCA distributed documents, including the Application Form for the MS4 Permit, late last week.
Here are hyperlinks to the Application Form in Word temple (.dac file) and Adobe Acrobat (.pdf file)
formats:
MS4application.doc
MS4Application. pdf
We still await the Guidance Manual.
Next Week's Newsletter
Measurable Goals
.
Please post your questions to the Web site
Please E-mail your questions to phascii({v.lmnc.org and we will post the questions and answers as soon
as we can.
Designated MS4s
We have been hearing from several cities that are outside of any of the Urbanized Areas recently. These
cities may fall into the category of Designated MS4s. Here is what the MPC A has to say about these
cities on their Web site:
Designated MS4s
Designated MS4s include any small MS4 that is physically interconnected to a
regulated MS4 and substantially contributes pollutant loadings to the system, The
designation criteria apply to any MS4 with a population density of at least 1,000
people per square mile and a population of at least 10,000. Additional designation
criteria will be based on potential significant water quality impacts of storm water
discharges.
.
The most recent list of cities to be evaluated under this program includes:
Albert Lea
Austin
Bemidji
Big Lake
Big Lake Township
Brainerd
Buffalo
Cloquet
Faribault
League of Minnesota Cities. 145 University Avenue West. St. Paul, MN 55103-2044. (651) 281-1200 . (800) 925-1122 . www.lmnc.org
Copyright @ 2002-2003 League of Minnesota Cities. All rights reserved. Not for reproduction or distribution.
.
.
.
5
Fairmont
Fergus Falls
Forest Lake
Hastings
Hibbing
Huthcinson
Mankato
Marshall
Monticello
New VIm
North Mankato
N orthfield
Owatonna
Red Wing
St. Michael
Stillwater
Willmar
Winona
Worthington
The list of cities regulated under this program may include other municipalities. The list above is not
intended to be complete at this time.
The schedule for the Designated Cities was discussed with representatives from the MPCA at the
last LMC Guide Plan Steering Committee meeting. Here is what we were told.
The MPCA is obliged, under the Federal rule, to develop and apply selection criteria to determine
which cities that are outside the Urbanized Areas will be regulated under the NPDES Phase II MS4
General Permit during this pennit cycle. The MPCA told us that they hope to have the criteria
developed and the selection determined by May 2003. They said that the summer may be more
realistic.
We were fmiher told that, after the Designated MS4s are informed that they are to be regulated, they
will have from 12 to 18 months to complete and submit their Permit Applications, including their
SWPPPs. According to this proposed schedule, the earliest that a Designated City would need
to complete and submit their Permit Application would be May 2004. A later date may be
more realistic.
Please breathe easier. You have some time.
League of Minnesota Cities. 145 University Avenue West. St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 . (651) 281-1200 . (800) 925-1122 . www.lmnc.org
Copyright (0 2002-2003 League of Minnesota Cities. All rights reserved. Not for reproduction or distribution.