Loading...
CR 2003-072 Zoning Ordinance Amendments " .: J, , ;' '\ CITY Of: April 30, 2003 - HOPKINS Council Report 03-72 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS Proposed Action. Sta~f recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution 03-41, approvmg Ordinance 03-898, making amendments to the zoning ordinance for first reading. At the Zoning and Planning meeting, Ms. Hatcher moved and Ms, Halverson seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ03-5, recommending approval of Ordinance 03-898, making amendments to the zoning ordinance. The motion was approved unanimously. Overview. At various times the staff assembles sections of the zoning ordinance that need to be updated. These amendments are to correct inconsistencies or problems the staff has identified or just to update the ordinance. Several of the proposed amendments are basically housekeeping- . type amendments. Primary Issues to Consider. . What are the proposed amendments? . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Supportine Documents. . Analysis of Issues . Letter from Cetom . Resolution 03-41 . Ordinance 03-898 ~ r1ldo!\OlJY1 Nan S. Anderson, AICP Planner Financial Impact: $ N/ A Budgeted: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: Y/N Source: . . . CR03-72 Page 2 Primary Issues to Consider. . What are the proposed amendme~ts? 515.00. Manufacturing - light. A use engaged in the manufacture. predominantly from previously prepared materials of finished products or parts. including processing. fabrication. assembly. treatment. and packaging. which activities are conducted wholly within an enclosed building. New definition 515.00. Portable storage unit. A self-contained unit that is used for temporary storage. New definition 520.03 Subd. 5. Discontinuance. When a lawful non-conforming use of a structure or land is discontinued for a period of six months one year, any future use of the structure or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this code. State Statute changed for non-conforming uses. 541.02 b. Manufacturing, produotion, prooessing, servICIng, repair or testing or materials, goods or produots that is wholly oontained 'within a building and whioh betY/een Office, showroom and tech uses, amllight manufacturing that occupyies at least 60 percent of the gross floor area of the building and a warehouse, 'llSe and light manufacturing use~ that occupyies a maximum of 40 percent. Eliminating light manufacturing as a part of the 60 percent and adding light manufacturing to the 40 percent. 560.12 Portable storage unites) are allowed in all districts for temporary storage during construction and/or remodeling with a building permit or for not longer than 30 consecutive days for the purpose of moving. Portable storage units shall not be placed in the public right- of-way. Defining where and when there can be portable storage units. · What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Ms. Anderson reviewed the proposed amendments. It was noted that Cetom, the owner of the Knox property, has submitted a letter objecting to the change in the uses within the Business Park zoning district. No one appeared at the public hearing regarding the proposed amendments. CR03-72 Page 3 Alternatives. 1. Approve the amendments to the zoning ordinance. By approving the amendments to the zoning ordinance, the zoning ordinance will be amended. 2. Deny the amendments to the zoning ordinance. By denying the amendments to the zoning ordinance, the zoning ordinance will not be amended. If the City Council considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the City Council indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. APR 29 21211213 13:47 FR FABYANSKE LAW FIRM 512 338 3857 TO 99529351834 P.12l2 "'" . C.HART T, I'"AIlY ANSl<!! MARK W. WESTRA Je:Re:M1AI-1 J, KEARNEY DEI'INIS J. TROOIEN SCOTT LLOYO ANDERSON PAUL L, RATE1.LE GREGORY T. SPALJ DEAN II 1HO,..SON GARY C, 1010501'1 l(yl.E E, HART JUDITH E. KAOW STEPHEN A MELCHER RICHARD G. JENI5EN THOMAS J. TUCCI CHARLES G. CARPENTER. III FABY ANSKE, WESTRA & HART A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION SUITE: 1100 920 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 TEI.E"HONE 612.338.0115 FAX 812-338-3S57 WWW.FWHLAW.COM CHRISTQPHIOFI p, CHILaTRDI'oI JOCELYN l.. l<NOLL STEVEN C. COX JU~IE A, DOHERTY AARON A. CEAN SCOTT A. JOHNSON ~"'ANNA L STREET PATRICK J. LEE'O'HALLORAN F1'IEI;IEFlICK H. I.AI;INEFI TOWLE M, rlEU PATRICi( R, ROHlJIND NATHAN E. flAY TI-1ERESA A. PETERSON THEODORE V. ROElERTS MICHAIO~ 1\. ROeOW April 28, 2003 OF COUNSE~: GORDON P,I'1EIN$ON JAYNE E. GARONER RENEE K, ZIRBES EMI\I~ O'TROOISNOFWHI.IIW,COM DIRECT (S12) :IIlS.9SOS VIA FACSIMILE: (952) 935-1834 Ms. Nancy S. Anderson Planner, City of Hopkins 1010 First Street South Hopkins. MN 55343-7573 Re: Knox Property I Cetom Associates, L.P. Our File No.: 81376-002 " Dear Ms. Anderson: Please be advised that we are local legal counsel for Cetom Associates, L.P., the owner of the "Knox property" at 250 Fifth Avenue South in Hopkins, Minnesota. This letter is in response to the proposed text amendments of your zoning ordinance as set forth in the notification from you, dated April 18, 2003. Please be advised that my client objects to the proposed change of "light manufacturing" being disqualified from the 60% use requirement and the placing of "light manufacturing" into the 40% use requirement. Your Business Park ordinance is already overly restrictive and discourages reasonable uses in a business park. Your restrictive zoning has been the cause of the Knox property not being put back into productive use, It is also unreasonable to apply these restrictions to the Knox property, as it is surrounded by distribution centers and outside storage facilities_ Very{j7llTS' Dennis 1. Trooien --- . DITlkjm cc: Client N:\PLIJ.)JT\244710.doc ** TOTAL PAGE.12I2 ** CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: 03-41 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING VARIOUS ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS WHEREAS, an application for zoning amendments, ZN03-3, has been made by the City of Hopkins; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for zoning amendments was made by the City of Hopkins; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on April 29, 2003: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for zoning amendments, ZN03-3, is hereby approved based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the proposed amendments protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Adopted this 6th day of May 2003. Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk . , , . CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2003-898 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: That the Hopkins Zoning Ordinance No. 515-570 be, and the same and is hereby amended by amending and adding the following sections: 515.07. Subd 112. Manufacturing - light. A use engaged in the manufacture, predominantly from previously prepared materials, of finished products or parts, including processing, fabrication, assembly, treatment. packaging, which activities are conducted wholly within an enclosed building. 515.07. Subd. 140. Portable storage unit. A self-contained unit that is used for temporary storage. 520.03 Subd. 5. Discontinuance. When a lawful non-conforming use of a structure or land is discontinued for a period of six months one year, any future use of the structure or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this code 541.02 b. Manufacturing, production, processing, servioing, repair or testing or materials, goods or produots that is wholly contained within a building and whioh bet\veen Office, showroom and tech uses, and light manufaoturing that occupyies at least 60 percent of the gross floor area of the building and a warehouse, 'l:lSe and light manufacturing use~ that occupyies a maximum of 40 percent. 560.12 Portable storage unites) are allowed in all districts for temporary storage during construction and/or remodeling. Such units shall be removed immediately upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy or final building permit inspection, whichever applies. Public storage units may also be used for not longer than 30 consecutive days in coni unction with moving and relocation activities. Portable storage units shall not be placed in the public right-of-way. Other uses listed in Sections 515, 520, 541, and 560 are to be renumbered accordingly. First Reading: May 6, 2003 Second Reading: May 20, 2003 Date of Publication: May 29, 2003 , . . . Date Ordinance Takes Effect: May 29, 2003 Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Signature Date I