Loading...
V. 2. 2021-19 325 Blake Road PUD & Rezoning November 23, 2021 Planning Application 2021-19 325 Blake Road Rezoning and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposed Action: Staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Commission adopt the following motion: • Move to adopt Planning & Zoning Commission Resolution 2021-24 recommending the City Council approve an ordinance rezoning the property at 325 Blake Road North (PID 19-117-21-14-0002) from I-2, General Industrial to Mixed Use with a Planned Unit Development (PUD), subject to conditions. Overview The applicant, Alatus, LLC on behalf of the property owner the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), requests rezoning and planned unit development (PUD) approvals for the property located at 325 Blake Road. This 16.87-acre property is located on the west side of Blake Road between Lake Street Northeast and the Southwest Light Rail Transit/Cedar Lake Regional Trail corridor. The rezoning and PUD requests are necessary to facilitate the applicant’s plans to subdivide and redevelop the subject property into a mixed use, commercial and residential transit-oriented development across Blake Road from the future Blake Road light rail transit station. The request would rezone the property from I-1, General Industrial to Mixed Use with a planned unit development. The planned unit development approval is necessary to allow for several deviations from the development standards of the Mixed Uses district which are detailed below. Based on the findings in this report, staff recommends approval of these requests subject to the conditions detailed in the attached resolution. Primary Issues to Consider • Background • Rezoning & PUD Review • Engineering Review • Alternatives Supporting Documents • Site Location Map • Resolution 2021-24 • Plans and Elevations • Concept Plan • Applicant’s Narrative • Neighborhood Meeting Comments • Multi-Purpose Parking Solution • Traffic Impact Analysis _____________________ Jason Lindahl, AICP City Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N ____ Source: _____________ Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): _________________________________________ Notes: Planning Application 2021-19 Page 2 BACKGROUND The 16.87 subject property was originally platted as Lot 74, of Auditor’s Subdivision Number 239 in 1929 (see attached plat). In the early 1950’s Merchant Refrigerating Company constructed a cold storage warehouse on the site that operated until December 2017. In 2018, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the City worked together to demolish the cold storage warehouse building and prepare the site for redevelopment. In 2011, the MCWD acquired the site as a key element in the restoration of the Minnehaha Creek Greenway. MCWD’s goal was to implement a regional stormwater improvement project on a portion of the site and restore more than 1,000 feet of creek frontage. MCWD identified that the stormwater improvement project could treat polluted stormwater from approximately 270 acres of surrounding area that flows into the creek. Early in this process, MCWD and the City of Hopkins identified the potential to integrate a restored Minnehaha Creek with a transit-oriented, mixed-use development near the future Blake Road LRT Station of the METRO Green Line Extension (Southwest LRT). In January of 2021, MCWD and the City solicited interest in redeveloping the property through a request for letters of interest. After a thorough review process, MCWD and the City selected Alatus, LLC as the master developer in June of 2021. In the summer of 2021, Alatus submitted a concept plan review application for the subject property. That concept plan was reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission in August and the City Council in September. Generally, both bodies and the public expressed support for the concept plan, rezoning to mixed use and use of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). Alatus offers this subdivision application to facilitate the redevelopment envisioned in the concept plan. Project Summary. The attached Applicant’s Project Narrative provides a detailed summary of all the various components of the 325 redevelopment project. Generally, Alatus intends to redevelop approximately 12.75 acres of the nearly 17-acre site with the remaining property to be retained by the MCWD for stormwater management and creek restoration. The applicant proposes to redevelop their portion of the property into a mixed use, transit-oriented development near the future Blake Road light rail transit station. The applicant proposes a two- phased redevelopment consisting of approximately 761 housing units targeted to owners, renters (both affordable and market rate) and seniors in both multiple unit buildings and townhome units. Features of the development include an overall design focus to connect both residents and the public with the Minnehaha Creek, a mix of housing types and affordability levels, a mix of residential and commercial uses at transit supportive densities, an enhanced public realm intended to activate public spaces and promote pedestrian and bicycle activity, sustainability components, enhance stormwater management and shared parking. The nature of the proposed development is concentrated on creating a spectrum of opportunities for community members of all different backgrounds. The proposed housing mix will include the creation of a 14-story mid-rise multiple unit building that will have views unlike any seen in the west-suburban market, interspersed with low-rise market-rate developments, an affordable housing tax credit property with 50% to 60% AMI rental and income restrictions, and for-sale townhome/condominium offerings with affordable ownership opportunities as well. The Site Plan estimates the following unit types and counts for housing options on the development site: Planning Application 2021-19 Page 3 Blake Road Station Development Summary Site Phase Use Parcel Size (Acres) Density (Units/Acre) A 1 112 Unit Affordable Rental at 50%-60% AMI 1.34 94.8 B 1 112 Unit For-Sale Senior Cooperative 1.45 77.2 C 1 342 Market Rate Rental 15% Hotel 9,000 sq. ft. Commercial 3.45 99.1 D 1 162 Unit Mixed Income Rental 33 Units at 60% AMI 129 Units Market Rate 2.56 63.2 Outlot C 2 33 For-Sale Townhomes 1.59 20.75 Lot 1, Block 1 2 Boat House 0.94 N/A Lot 2, Block 1 2 Central Plaza & 2 Commercial Pads 0.12 N/A Total 10.39 73.2 Review Process to Date. The review process for this project to date included both a concept plan review with a neighborhood meeting and Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The concept plan was reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission in August and the City Council in September. Generally, both bodies and the public expressed support for the concept plan, rezoning to mixed use and use of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The EAW is being reviewed concurrently with the land use approvals for this project. Based on the review of the project, reasonably expected environmental impacts, and the findings of fact and conclusions in the EAW, the City finds that the project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects and that where there may be environmental impacts, they can be addressed through the permitting process. The collection of land use applications (subdivision, rezoning and PUD and individual site plans) are subject to approval of the EAW. Neighborhood Meeting. As part of the associated rezoning application, the applicant was required to hold a neighborhood meeting. This meeting took place on November 15, 2021 at 1002 – 2nd Street Northeast (43 Hoops). Comments from this meeting are attached as a reference. Community Comment. Under state law, rezoning applications require a public hearing. Accordingly, the City published notice of this request and public hearing in the Sun Sailor and mailed notice directly to all residents and property owners within 500’ of the subject property. That notice directed all interested parties to send questions or comments to City Planner Jason Lindahl by mail, phone or email or to attend the public hearing where they could learn about the request, ask questions and provide feedback. As of the writing of this report, the City had received one email comment from Dale Johnson regarding this request (attached). Mr. Johnson’s questions focused comparisons between the Trilogy Blake Road Station and the 325 Blake Road projects, snow removal, and concerns over long term developer accountability. Planning Application 2021-19 Page 4 During the public hearing, staff will provide an update on all public comments received prior to the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. REZONING & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW The applicant requests rezoning of the subject property from I-2 General Industrial to Mixed Use with a planned unit development (PUD) consistent with the Activity Center Future Land Use guiding in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Rezoning applications are considered a legislative action. When considering legislative actions, the City is advancing health, safety, and welfare by making rules that apply throughout the entire community. By including the PUD in this case, the zoning standards are only specific to the subject properties. The PUD establishes the Mixed Use district and its development regulations as the base zone and standards for review. Overall, the PUD entitles lot configuration, access and private road configuration, setbacks and building height for sites A – D and will be used to evaluate each of the separate associated site plan review applications. The boat house, central plaza and commercial pads site and Outlot C will require separate approval. Deviations from the Mixed Use standards other than those noted for each site below will require either a minor or major amendment to the planned unit development. The specifics of each deviation are detailed in the site plan review staff report for each site. 325 Blake Road Redevelopment Deviations from the Mixed Use District Zoning Standards Category Site A Site B Site C Site D Building Height     Floor to Area Ratio   Setbacks     Parking     Exterior Materials     In exchange for the deviations noted above, the applicant pledges the items listed below. Staff finds that these additions create a higher quality development than could have otherwise occured under the straight Mixed Use district zoning regulations. • An overall design focus to connect both residents and the public with the Minnehaha Creek. • A mix of housing types and affordability levels. • A mix of residential and commercial uses at transit supportive densities. • An enhanced public realm intended to activate public spaces and promote pedestrian and bicycle activity. • Sustainability components including rooftop solar on Sites A, B, & D and LEED certification for Site C. • Enhance stormwater management. • Shared parking. • Privately owned and maintained open space that will be open to the general public. • Public Art. There are three key criteria for the City to weigh when considering a rezoning request – consistency with the comprehensive plan, compatibility with present and future land uses and how the proposed development conforms with the new zoning standards. These criteria and Planning Application 2021-19 Page 5 staff's findings for each are detailed below. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Rezoning the subject properties from I-2, General Industrial to Mixed Use with a planned unit development (PUD) is consistent with the Activity Center Future Land Use guiding in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Activity Centers surrounds and supports the planned Blake Road and Shady Oak light rail stations along the Southwest LRT Green Line Extension. These areas are planned to include moderate to high density mixed use development designed to complement and enhance the existing development pattern in these areas and support the public investment in transit. The Activity Center areas are expected to experience significant reinvestment and redevelopment to absorb a substantial portion of the city’s anticipated future growth. Development in the Activity Center areas is expected to be medium to larger scale neighborhood and regional uses with an approximate mix of 75% residential and 25% commercial. Densities in these areas will typically range from 20-60 units per acre, with 75-150 units per acre within ¼ mile of an LRT station platform. The applicant’s plan illustrates an overall residential density of 73.2 units per acre, which is slightly under the Activity Center category standards for areas close to an LRT station; however, it falls short of the commercial space percentage guideline. The following goals from the comprehensive plan support the proposed development: • Encourage transit-oriented development (development that emphasizes pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and a broader mix of uses at densities that support transit) in areas with high quality transit service, especially within a quarter mile of light rail stations or high- frequency bus routes. • Plan for appropriate amenities, high-quality design, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and open space in high growth areas, particularly in the Neighborhood Center, Activity Center, and Downtown Center future land use categories or other areas in close proximity to transit. • Encourage the transition of selected auto-oriented areas into Activity Centers, as defined and designated in the comprehensive plan. • Improve pedestrian and bicycle access throughout the community, particularly in the Centers future land use categories as defined and designated in the comprehensive plan or other areas in close proximity to transit. • Engage the community to explore how to increase the mix of housing types near transit corridors, parks, and the Centers future land use categories as defined and designated in the comprehensive plan. • Encourage all new projects to have a positive relationship to the street by orienting main entrances to the front of the property, connecting the front door to the sidewalk, and reducing parking between the building and the street as much as possible. Compatibility with Present and Future Land Uses. Rezoning the subject properties from I- 2, General Industrial to Mixed Use with a planned unit development (PUD) is consistent with surrounding present and future land uses. These uses are detailed in the table below. Planning Application 2021-19 Page 6 Surrounding Existing and Future Land Uses Analysis Direction Existing 2040 Future Land Use North Park, Minnehaha Creek & Multiple Unit Residential Activity Center & Open and Social Space South Southwest LRT & Cedar Lake Regional Trail Corridor, Multiple Unit Residential & Industrial Activity Center East Minnehaha Creek & Multiple Unit Residential Activity Center West Multiple Unit Residential & Commercial Activity Center Conformance with New Zoning Standards. Generally, the overall development site meets or exceeds many of the development standards for the Mixed Uses district with the exception of the items summarized above and detailed in the individual site plan review applications for sites A-D. These deviations are acceptable based on the overall planned unit development proposal from the applicant which includes the items listed above. Future development of Lot 2, Block 1 or Outlot C will require separate approvals. ENGINEERING REVIEW The Engineering Department has reviewed the applicant’s plans for the overall 325 Blake Road redevelopment and the specific site plan for Sites A - D and offers the following comments listed below. • Addresses will be assigned once PIDs are provided. • MCWD rules are as or more stringent than City of Hopkins. Meeting MCWD stormwater, water quality, and construction permit requirements satisfies City of Hopkins requirements. • All utilities will be private. Provide appropriate watermain valves to isolate private system from public network. • Currently plans show connecting to two 8” existing stubs. A 12” watermain is located in Lake Street NE if water system modeling requires additional flow. • A full engineering review will be completed once construction documents are provided. ALTERNATIVES 1. Recommend approval of the rezoning and planned unit development for the 325 Blake Road Development. By recommending approval of these application, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the rezoning and planned unit development for the 325 Blake Road Development. By recommending denial of this application, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. Should the Planning & Zoning Commission consider this option, it must also identify specific findings that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the items should be continued. Site Location Map for 325 Blake Road North Subject Property CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2021-24 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE PROPERTY AT 325 BLAKE ROAD NORTH WITH PID 19-117-21-14-0002 FROM 1-2, GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO MIXED USE WITH A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the applicant, Alatus, LLC on behalf of the property owner the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), initiated site plan review application for 325 Blake Road North Site A within PID 19-117-21-14-0002, and WHEREAS, this property is legally described as follows: LOT 74 AND COM AT A PT IN THE E LINE OF MONK AVE DIST 14 48/100 FT S FROM ITS INTERSEC WITH THE NWLY LINE OF LOT 97 TH N 14 48/100 FT TO SAID NWLY LINE THEREOF TH NELY 845 FT ALONG SAID NWLY LINE TH S14 48/100 FT PAR WITH E LINE OF MONK AVE TH SWLY 845 FT TO BEG EXROAD, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 239 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINN WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That the above stated application was initiated by the applicant on October 22, 2021; and, 2. That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on November 23, 2021 and all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and, 3. That written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and, WHEREAS, staff recommended approval of the above stated application based on the findings outlined in the staff report dated November 23, 2021. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Hopkins hereby recommends the City Council of the City of Hopkins approve an ordinance rezoning the property at 325 Blake Road North with PID 19-117-21-14-0002 from I-2, General Industrial to Mixed Use with a Planned Unit Development (PUD), subject to the conditions listed below. 1. Approval of a negative declaration of need regarding an Environmental Impact Statement for the 325 Blake Road development. 2. Execution of a Planned Unit Development Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 3. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer. 4. Approval of the development by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and conformance with all related conditions. 5. Payment of all applicable development fees including, but not limited to SAC, park dedication and City Attorney fees. Adopted this 23rd day of November 2021. ______________________________ Samuel Stiele, Chair +908'CLVT80039898.2336 CULVERT80340896.00EDGE OF WATER80341896.37EDGE OF WATER80342894.22EDGE OF WATER80343896.00EDGE OF WATER80344896.02EDGE OF WATER80345896.16EDGE OF WATER80346896.06EDGE OF WATER80347895.92EDGE OF WATER80348896.16EDGE OF WATER80349896.00EDGE OF WATER80350895.02EDGE OF WATER80393897.32EDGE OF WATER80422911.06HYDRANT80423912.90ELEC METERTRAN80424913.09POWR TRANSTRAN80430913.80POWR TRANS80432914.03ELEC METERTRAN80434914.94POWR TRANSTRAN80458914.78POWR TRANS80461912.95HYDRANTFM FM FM FMFMFMFMFM6.5%RAMP U P 6 . 5%RAMP U P 6 . 5%RAMP DOWNEdge of waterPavillionBIKETRAIL5 storyLAKE S T NEMinnehahaWETLANDCEDAR LAKE r e g i o n a l t r a i l CreekRESTAURANTS-8,900 s.f.15 story854 s.f.BUILDING B5 story112 units1,246 s.f.SENIOR COOP5 story127 units793 s.f.PARKING - 7 levels-520 spacesPARKING - 5 levels- 277 spacesPODIUM PARKING - 2 levels- 184 spacesCLUBHOUSE -2,300 s.f.CLUBHOUSE -3,500 s.f.ACCESSACCESSLEASING 2,000 s.f.CLUBHOUSE - 8,000(total area)RED line-Extent of area to be retained forregional stormwater management by MCWD,based on building edge as proposed duringdesign charrette187 units155 units794 s.f.5 storyGARAGE LINEBuilding127 units33 units5 story3 story793 s.f1,790 s.f5 story1,246 s.funitsstoriesNET avgBuilding ABuilding C-TowerBuilding C-WrapBuilding DBuilding B112 units15 story5 story794 s.f854 s.f841 s.fRest./boat houseTOTALS1 story187 units155 units776 units5.9% RAMP U P 5.9% RAMP UP2HR2HRVAN 2HR2HRB31,140 s.f.B51,280 s.f.B2 1 1 2 0 s . f .B4 1 1 8 0 s . f .B1 1 1 6 0 0 s . f .B1 1 1 6 0 0 s . f .B7 1 4 0 0 s . f . A21060 s.f.B1 1 0 7 0 s . f .A21060 s.f.Co u r t y a r d A1 8 4 0 s . f .B2 1 1 2 0 s . f .ramp dn-12%B1 0 1 5 1 5 s . f .B91,500 s.f.B61300 s.f. TR ASH B 1 1 0 7 0 s . f .B6 1 3 0 0 s . f .MECH.T E L .MECH. LOUNG EMAI L /PACK AG E AMENITIES5,400 S.F.(PARTIALLY DOU B LE VO LUME )DROP O F F F FE 9 1 9 F F E 9 1 6 . 5 BUILDING D162 units 841 s.f.BUILDING CBUILDING AB2A1A1A1 A1 A1 A1 B1 A1A1A1A1A1 B1 LEAS ING&CLUBHOUS E 2 , 3 0 0 s . f .RAMP DN5%MAIL ROOMCOURTY ARD TRASH STOR.A1 B1 COURTYARD B3B3B3A1 B2 A+den A+den TOTAL UNITS PER BUILDING33 units 1,790 s.f.Town homes garages- 66 spacestownhomes3 storyPODIUM PARKING - 2 levels- 110 spaces5 story162 unitsTownhomesSCALE: 1" = 40' - 0" 0' 40' 80' 160'(24"x36" SHEET)NSHEET CONTENTS:Revisions:License #:Typed or printed name:Signature:Date Plotted: #SHEET NO.DATE COMMENTSThese drawings are forpreliminary coordinationonly and not to be usedfor regulatory approval orconstruction.21180GREGORY FAULKNER4019910/22/2021DALLAS · CHARLOTTE · CHICAGO · DENVER · NEW ORLEANS · NEW YORK · NEWPORT BEACH · ORLANDO · SCOTTSDALE · CHENNAI · HANOI ·LONDON · MONTEVIDEO · MEXICO CITY · TORONTOwww.humphreys.com ARCHITECTS, L.P. HUMPHREYS PARTNERS 5339 ALPHA ROAD · SUITE 300 · DALLAS, TEXAS 75240 (972) 701 - 9636 · (972) 701 - 9639 FAX USER: sduran XREF(s): 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg 193805191_BASE_MCWD_012221-new.dwg TH-1.dwg X-BLDG-Highrise.dwg X-S1-alt.dwg X-A1.dwg X-A2.dwg X-A3.dwg X-B1.dwg X-C1.dwg X-B2.DWG 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg 30x42 TBLK-FINAL.dwg X-BLDG-Podium-II.dwg X-B3-P.dwg X-BLDG -WRAP-2.dwg X-BLDG-Podium-I.dwg 21180 TBLK-11X17.dwg 21180 TBLK-30X42_2.dwgSCALE: 768 DATE/TIME: Oct 22, 2021 - 4:22pmFILE: Z:\1.JOBS\2021\21180 - Hopkins\PROCESS\x-Site-16.dwg LAYOUT: A-201-30x42 I hereby certify that thisplan, specification, orreport was prepared byme or under my directsupervision and that I ama duly licensed architectunder the laws of theState of Minnesota.PUD SUBMITTAL10/22/2021310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROADMASTERPLANHOPKINS, MINNESOTAARQUITECTURAL SITEPLANA201 ADAADAADAADA Parking - Bldg C520 spacesPodium -Bldg A110 spacesTownhomes garages66 spacesSurface parking39 spaces5 levels6 levelsParking -Bldg D277 spacesPodium -Bldg B184 spaces 2 levelsPodium restaurantsB I K E P ARK ING 1 2 4 SP ACE S 8 1 SP AC ES ADAADA6.5%RAMP U P 6 . 5%RAM P U P 9 ' x 1 8 ' TY P 5.9% RAMP U P 5.9% 1 5 SPACES / F L . RAMP UPBIKE RM VAN 5 - LEVE L , TO TA L 2 7 7 SPACES 8 2 B IKE P ARK ING REQU IRED 5 storyLAKE S T NECEDAR LAKE r e g i o n a l t r a i l RESTAURANTS-8,900 s.f.15 story854 s.f.BUILDING B5 story112 units1,246 s.f.5 story127 units793 s.f.PARKING - 7 levels-520 spacesPARKING - 5 levels- 277 spacesPODIUM PARKING - 2 levels- 184 spacesACCESSACCESS187 units155 units794 s.f.5 storyBUILDING D162 units841 s.f.BUILDING CBUILDING ATOTALSBuildingspaces levelsPARKING SPACES1,239 spacesPavillion33 units1,790 s.f.Town homes garages- 66 spacestownhomes3 story6% R AMP DNBIKE PARK ING 2 0 S P AC ES RAMP U P 12% 6% RAM P D N STANDARD 9´x 18´BIKE PARK ING 2 1 SPACE S BIKE PARKING17 SPACES 5% RAMP UP 12% RAMP DN BIKE PARKING64 spaces fi r s t l e ve l - 50 p a r k in g sp a c e s TRASH MECHSPACEBELOW HALL 9´x 18´ typ.PODIUM PARKING - 2 levels- 110 spaces43 spacesSCALE: 1" = 40' - 0" 0' 40' 80' 160'(24"x36" SHEET)SHEET CONTENTS:Revisions:License #:Typed or printed name:Signature:Date Plotted: #SHEET NO.DATE COMMENTSThese drawings are forpreliminary coordinationonly and not to be usedfor regulatory approval orconstruction.21180GREGORY FAULKNER4019910/22/2021DALLAS · CHARLOTTE · CHICAGO · DENVER · NEW ORLEANS · NEW YORK · NEWPORT BEACH · ORLANDO · SCOTTSDALE · CHENNAI · HANOI ·LONDON · MONTEVIDEO · MEXICO CITY · TORONTOwww.humphreys.com ARCHITECTS, L.P. HUMPHREYS PARTNERS 5339 ALPHA ROAD · SUITE 300 · DALLAS, TEXAS 75240 (972) 701 - 9636 · (972) 701 - 9639 FAX USER: sduran XREF(s): 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg 193805191_BASE_MCWD_012221-new.dwg TH-1.dwg X-BLDG-Highrise.dwg X-S1-alt.dwg X-A1.dwg X-A2.dwg X-A3.dwg X-B1.dwg X-C1.dwg X-B2.DWG 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg 30x42 TBLK-FINAL.dwg X-BLDG-Podium-II.dwg X-B3-P.dwg X-BLDG -WRAP-2.dwg X-BLDG-Podium-I.dwg 21180 TBLK-11X17.dwg 21180 TBLK-30X42_2.dwgSCALE: 768 DATE/TIME: Oct 22, 2021 - 4:24pmFILE: Z:\1.JOBS\2021\21180 - Hopkins\PROCESS\x-Site-16.dwg LAYOUT: A-202-30x42 I hereby certify that thisplan, specification, orreport was prepared byme or under my directsupervision and that I ama duly licensed architectunder the laws of theState of Minnesota.PUD SUBMITTAL10/22/2021310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROADMASTERPLANHOPKINS, MINNESOTANARQUITECTURAL SITEPLANA202 APPROXIMATE WESTERN LIMITS OF MCWD REGIONAL STORMWATER PROJECT LOUCKS W:\2020\20503A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\Full Site\C1-1 Existing Conditions-Full SitePlotted: 10 /21 / 2021 10:14 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION 325 BLAKE ROAD N HOPKINS, MN ALATUS LLC 80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Michael J. St. Martin - PE Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 24440 20503A MJS TRG MKK 10-22-21 10-22-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1A-D SITE PLAN C3-1A-D GRADING PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES C4-1A-D SANI. AND WATERMAIN C4-2A-D STORM SEWER C8-1, 2 DETAIL SHEET 10/22/21 PUD SUBMITTAL 310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522 N SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-1TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT-TYP REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE-TYP REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER-TYP REMOVE SIDWALK-TYP REMOVE CRUSHED CONCRETE STOCKPILE OF APPROXIMATELY 13,000 C.Y. TO BE USED FOR THE PROJECT EXISTING CRUSHED BITUMINOUS STOCKPILE OF APPROXIMATELY 2,000 C.Y. TO BE USED FOR THE PROJECT REMOVE WATER SERVICE TO VALVE REMOVE GAS SERVICE REMOVE BRICK PAVERS TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND PUSHBUTTON CROSSWALKS TO BE SALVAGED AND REINSTALLED REMOVE 36" RCP AND APRON REMOVE SIGN REMOVE FENCE REMOVE 18" STORM SEWER AND APRON VERIFY EXISTING WATERMAIN AND STUB, REMOVE PER CITY STANDARD REMOVE EXISTING ABANDON GAS PIPE REMOVE HYDRANT & VALVE AND SALVAGE REMOVE LIMITS OF SIDEWALK FOR BUILDING FOUNDATION EXCAVATION TO BE DETERMINED APPROXIMATE WESTERN LIMITS OF MCWD REGIONAL STORMWATER PROJECT REMOVE FENCE REMOVE FENCE REMOVE POWER POLE REMOVE POWER POLE REMOVE POWER POLE REMOVE POWER POLE REMOVE POWER POLE REMOVE POWER POLE REMOVE OVERHEAD POWER TREES TO BE REMOVED AS PART OF MWCD STORMWATER PROJECT, VERIFY LIMITED TREES TO BE SAVE LOUCKS W:\2020\20503A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\Full Site\C1-2 Demo Plan-Full SitePlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 3:33 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION 325 BLAKE ROAD N HOPKINS, MN ALATUS LLC 80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Michael J. St. Martin - PE Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 24440 20503A MJS TRG MKK 10-22-21 10-22-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1A-D SITE PLAN C3-1A-D GRADING PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES C4-1A-D SANI. AND WATERMAIN C4-2A-D STORM SEWER C8-1, 2 DETAIL SHEET 10/22/21 PUD SUBMITTAL 310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522 N SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 DEMOLITION PLAN C1-2TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER, RETAINING WALLS, FENCE, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING MANHOLES, POWER POLES, LIGHT POLES, BOLLARDS, PARKING METERS, SIGNS, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING TREES REMOVE EXISTING UTILITIES REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVING DEMOLITION LEGEND: EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND 58.0 8.0 24.0 24.0 12 22.0 9.0 24.0 22.0 6 24.0 24.0 BUILDING I BUILDING A BUILDING B BUILDING II BUILDING C BUILDING D APPROXIMATE WESTERN LIMITS OF MCWD REGIONAL STORMWATER PROJECT APPROXIMATE WESTERN LIMITS OF MCWD REGIONAL STORMWATER PROJECT COURTYARD COURTYARD BUILDING ABOVE 22.0 20.3 18.5 17.1 38.0 27.9 15.8 11.3 14.9 15.1 17.4 19.3 46.5 31.6 53.3 42.0 5.0 8.0 35.3 21.7 13.4 19.0 30.8 RESTAURANT 1 RESTAURANT 2 25.5 49.6 PAVILION 5.0 35.3 22.0 9.0 18.6 17.7 43.4 59.0 24.6 25.0 1.3 9.4 7.6 22.3 21.8 19.3 16.3 POND 76.8 11.7 48.4 13.5 LOUCKS W:\2020\20503A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\Full Site\C2-1 Site Plan-Full SitePlotted: 11 /16 / 2021 4:55 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION 325 BLAKE ROAD N HOPKINS, MN ALATUS LLC 80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Michael J. St. Martin - PE Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 24440 20503A MJS TRG MKK 10-29-21 10-29-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1A-D SITE PLAN C3-1A-D GRADING PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES C4-1A-D SANI. AND WATERMAIN C4-2A-D STORM SEWER C8-1, 2 DETAIL SHEET 10/22/21 PUD SUBMITTAL 10/29/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL 11/08/21 CITY COMMENTS 11/15/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL 310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522 N SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 SITE PLAN OVERALL C2-1 PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND CURRENT ZONING:I-2 (INDUSTRIAL) PROPOSED ZONING:PUD SETBACKS SHOWN BELOW ARE CITY CODE MINIMUMS, SEE PLAN FOR PROPOSED SETBACKS THAT DEVIATE FROM CODE MINIMUMS. (1) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: 15 FEET TO 25 FEET. (2) OFFICE BUILDING: 25 FEET TO 40 FEET. (3) FRONT YARD SETBACKS ALONG 2ND STREET. (4) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: FIVE FEET TO 15 FEET. (5) STRUCTURED PARKING: FIVE FEET TO 15 FEET. (6) OFFICE BUILDING: FIVE FEET TO 15 FEET. (7) SIDE YARD: TEN FEET. (8) REAR YARD: TEN FEET. PROPERTY AREA:16.87 AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.00 AC (0.00%) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 9.58 AC (56.7%) SITE DATA SITE NOTES 1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. 3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. BITUMINOUS IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD TO BE PLACED AT FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE ADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND BEHIND CURB ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS. 6. BITUMINOUS PARKING STALLS AND DRIVE ISLES TO BE HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS 7. SEE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING 8. SEE ARCHITECTURE FOR SITE USE TABULATION. PARKING CALCULATIONS PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING PROVIDED: 39 STALLS PROPOSED GARAGE PARKING PROVIDED: 1,134 STALLS PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 1,173 STALLS Areas: Lot 1, Block 1 = 5,144 +/- square feet or 0.12 +/- acres Lot 2, Block 1 = 40,920 +/- square feet or 0.94 +/- acres Lot 3, Block 1 = 111,532 +/- square feet or 2.56 +/- acres Lot 4, Block 1 = 150,397 +/- square feet or 3.45 +/- acres Lot 1, Block 2 = 63,359 +/- square feet or 1.45 +/- acres Lot 2, Block 2 = 58,306 +/- square feet or 1.34 +/- acres Outlot A = 112,896 +/- square feet or 2.59 +/- acres Outlot B = 66,695 +/- square feet or 1.53 +/- acres Outlot C = 69,070 +/- square feet or 1.59 +/- acres Right of Way Dedication Area = 56,736 +/- square feet or 1.30 +/- acres Creek Area = 23,305 +/- square feet or 0.53 +/- acres Net Property Area = 655,014 +/- square feet or 15.04 +/- acres Total Property Area = 735,055 +/- square feet or 16.87 +/- acres. SITE DATA            STA. 191+00 ELEV=910.0 STA. 195+00 ELEV=907.3 STA. 191+50 ELEV=909.6 STA. 192+00 ELEV=908.7 STA. 193+00 ELEV=907.9 STA. 194+00 ELEV=907.6 STA. 196+00 ELEV=907.2 STA. 197+00 ELEV=909.6 STA. 190+00 ELEV=909.4 STA. 189+00 ELEV=906.9 STA. 188+00 ELEV=903.4 STA. 187+00 ELEV=899.9 STA. 197+50 ELEV=910.6 STA. 196+50 ELEV=908.3 STA. 195+50 ELEV=907.1 STA.194+50 ELEV=907.4 STA. 193+50 ELEV=907.7 STA. 192+50 ELEV=908.1 STA. 190+50 ELEV=910.0 STA. 189+50 ELEV=908.4 STA. 188+50 ELEV=905.1 STA. 187+50 ELEV=901.6 919.0 STA. 5+00 ELEV=909.6 STA. 4+00 ELEV=913.1 STA. 2+03.06 ELEV=919.5 STA. 3+00 ELEV=916.6 STA. 2+50 ELEV=918.3 STA. 3+50 ELEV=914.8 STA. 4+50 ELEV=911.3 STA. 186+50 917 914 912 914 908 9 1 09089 0 9 908 914918914919 914913892894896898890 892 894 896 898 900                   908 906910 895900905891892893894 896897898899901902903904906907895894896897890889 891 892 893 894910909909 911 912905910 904906907908909 15.60 15.60 16.00 16.00 16.00 8.50 13.00 16.00 14.77 16.00 14.00 13.50 12.00 10.70 11.19 9.88 14.89 15.00 15.20 14.80 15.00 14.80 15.00 14.80 15.10 14.90 15.60 14.30 15.30 16.0016.00 16.00 17.00 16.00 15.50 16.00 16.00 15.95 16.30 16.00 15.50 15.50 15.49 13.30 13.00 15.50 13.30 13.40 16.00 15.30 15.50 14.40 14.80 910911912913914 915 911912913 914 916 915911911912 912913913914916910915911911911912912 912912 912913914 9 1 5 9 1 4 914 913914917918919 915914916910 909 911 912 913 91 0 90990990 9 911 912 913 9059069079089099109069079089099119129139149.05 7.00 7.50 7.47 8.62 13.50 13.54 7.00 15.70 12.60 9.50 14.39 16.71 16.8919.00 13.00 13.38 16.00 15.16 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 13.00 19.00 11.00 19.00 10.00 19.00 7.50 19.00 19.0018.50 15.67 FFE=916.0 FFE=916.0 P1=905.0 FFE=919.0 P1=909.0 P2=899.0 RETAINING WALL FFE=914.5 GFE=903.5 FFE=919.0 P1=909.0 P2=899.0 914.5 915.5 915.5 915.5 915.5 915.5 915.5 914.5 913.5 913.5 914.5 914.5 914.5 914.5 912.5 912.5 912.5 912.5 912.5 911.5 910.5 909.5 908.5 913.5913.5 914.5 912.5 911.5 910.5 909.5 909.5 909.3 909.0 FFE=916 NORTH POND NWL=896.0 HWL=901.0 SOUTH POND NWL=897.0 HWL=901.0 LOUCKS W:\2020\20503A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\Full Site\C3-1 Grading Plan-Full SitePlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 11:48 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION 325 BLAKE ROAD N HOPKINS, MN ALATUS LLC 80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Michael J. St. Martin - PE Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 24440 20503A MJS TRG MKK 10-22-21 10-22-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1A-D SITE PLAN C3-1A-D GRADING PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES C4-1A-D SANI. AND WATERMAIN C4-2A-D STORM SEWER C8-1, 2 DETAIL SHEET 10/22/21 PUD SUBMITTAL 310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522 N SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 GRADING PLAN C3-1 PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 4. FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT WALL GRADE TRANSITION, AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 5. STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 6. DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 7. SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. 8. SEE UTILITY PLANS FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION. 9. SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. 10. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR FINAL SITE STABILIZATION.            STA. 191+00 ELEV=910.0 STA. 195+00 ELEV=907.3 STA. 191+50 ELEV=909.6 STA. 192+00 ELEV=908.7 STA. 193+00 ELEV=907.9 STA. 194+00 ELEV=907.6 STA. 196+00 ELEV=907.2 STA. 197+00 ELEV=909.6 STA. 190+00 ELEV=909.4 STA. 189+00 ELEV=906.9 STA. 188+00 ELEV=903.4 STA. 187+00 ELEV=899.9 STA. 197+50 ELEV=910.6 STA. 196+50 ELEV=908.3 STA. 195+50 ELEV=907.1 STA.194+50 ELEV=907.4 STA. 193+50 ELEV=907.7 STA. 192+50 ELEV=908.1 STA. 190+50 ELEV=910.0 STA. 189+50 ELEV=908.4 STA. 188+50 ELEV=905.1 STA. 187+50 ELEV=901.6 919.0 STA. 5+00 ELEV=909.6 STA. 4+00 ELEV=913.1 STA. 2+03.06 ELEV=919.5 STA. 3+00 ELEV=916.6 STA. 2+50 ELEV=918.3 STA. 3+50 ELEV=914.8 STA. 4+50 ELEV=911.3 STA. 186+50             FFE=916.0 FFE=916.0 P1=905.0 FFE=919.0 P1=909.0 P2=899.0 FFE=914.5 GFE=903.5 FFE=919.0 P1=909.0 P2=899.0 914.5 915.5 915.5 915.5 915.5 915.5 915.5 914.5 913.5 913.5 914.5 914.5 914.5 914.5 912.5 912.5 912.5 912.5 912.5 911.5 910.5 909.5 908.5 913.5913.5 914.5 912.5 911.5 910.5 909.5 909.5 909.3 909.0 FFE=916 NORTH POND NWL=896.0 HWL=901.0 SOUTH POND NWL=897.0 HWL=901.0 INLET PROTECTION TYP-SEE DETAIL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SEE DETAIL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SEE DETAIL SILT FENCE TYP-SEE DETAIL SILT FENCE TYP-SEE DETAIL SILT FENCE TYP-SEE DETAIL INLET PROTECTION TYP-SEE DETAIL SILT FENCE TYP-SEE DETAIL LOUCKS W:\2020\20503A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\Full Site\C3-2 SWPPP-Full SitePlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 10:13 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION 325 BLAKE ROAD N HOPKINS, MN ALATUS LLC 80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Michael J. St. Martin - PE Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 24440 20503A MJS TRG MKK 10-22-21 10-22-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1A-D SITE PLAN C3-1A-D GRADING PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES C4-1A-D SANI. AND WATERMAIN C4-2A-D STORM SEWER C8-1, 2 DETAIL SHEET 10/22/21 PUD SUBMITTAL 310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522 N SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 SWPPP PLAN C3-2 PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! SWPPP LEGEND INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE BIO ROLLS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND LOUCKS W:\2020\20503A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\Full Site\C3-3 SWPPP NotesPlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 11:12 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION 325 BLAKE ROAD N HOPKINS, MN ALATUS LLC 80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Michael J. St. Martin - PE Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 24440 20503A MJS TRG MKK 10-22-21 10-22-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1A-D SITE PLAN C3-1A-D GRADING PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES C4-1A-D SANI. AND WATERMAIN C4-2A-D STORM SEWER C8-1, 2 DETAIL SHEET 10/22/21 PUD SUBMITTAL 310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522 SWPPP NOTES C3-3 1.THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF CONSTRUCTING FIVE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS,THIRTY THREE CONDOS, AND A RESTAURANT. ASSOCIATED SURFACE PAVEMENTS, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND UTILITIES. 2. THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL VEHICLE TRACKING BMP 2. INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND SITE 3. CLEAR AND GRUB SITE 4. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 5. REMOVE PAVEMENTS AND UTILITIES 6. CONSTRUCT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY 7. ROUGH GRADE SITE 8. IMPORT CLEAN FILL FOR REPLACEMENT AND BALANCE 9. INSTALL UTILITIES 10. INSTALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS 11. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER 12. INSTALL PAVEMENTS AND WALKS 13. FINAL GRADE SITE 14. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM STORMWATER SYSTEMS 15. SEED AND MULCH 16. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. 3. SITE DATA: AREA OF DISTURBANCE:16.87 AC PRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.00 AC POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 9.58 AC GENERAL SOIL TYPE: SEE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT 4. THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 5. ALL DISTURBED GROUND LEFT INACTIVE FOR SEVEN (7) OR MORE DAYS SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SEEDING OR SODDING (ONLY AVAILABLE PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15) OR BY MULCHING OR COVERING OR OTHER EQUIVALENT CONTROL MEASURE. 6. ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES, SLOPE LENGTHS CAN NOT BE GREATER THAN 75 FEET. 7. ALL STORM DRAINS AND INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES OF POTENTIAL DISCHARGE ARE STABILIZED. 8. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL AND CAN NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ARE EXEPMT EX: CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCK PILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES. 9. SEDIMENT LADEN WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF NOT POSSIBLE, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S. 10. SOLID WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. 11. EXTERNAL WASHING OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE PROPERLY CONTAINED. 12. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. 13. THE OWNER WHO SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION IS A PERMITTEE AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. THE OPERATOR (CONTRACTOR) WHO SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION IS A PERMITTEE FOR PARTS II.B., PART II.C, PART II.B-F, PART V, PART IV AND APPLICABLE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN APPENDIX A, PART C. OF THE NPDES PERMIT AND IS JOINTLY RESPONSIBLE WITH THE OWNER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PERMIT. 14.TERMINATION OF COVERAGE-PERMITTEE(S) WISHING TO TERMINATE COVERAGE MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) TO THE MPCA. ALL PERMITTEE(S) MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: A. FINAL STABILIZATION, PER NPDES PERMIT PART IV.G. HAS BEEN ACHIEVED ON ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE FOR WHICH THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE. B. TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP AS DESCRIBED IN THE PERMIT. 15. INSPECTIONS A. INITIAL INSPECTION FOLLOWING SILT FENCE INSTALLATION BY CITY REPRESENTATIVE IS REQUIRED. B. EXPOSED SOIL AREAS: ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A 0.5" OVER 24 HOUR RAIN EVENT. C. STABILIZED AREAS: ONCE EVERY 30 DAYS D. FROZEN GROUND: AS SOON AS RUNOFF OCCURS OR PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION. E. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR 3 YEARS AFTER FILING OF THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION AND MUST INCLUDE: DATE AND TIME OF ACTION, NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING WORK, FINDING OF INSPECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION, DATE AND AMOUNT OF RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN A 24 HOUR PERIOD. 16. MINIMUM MAINTENANCE A. SILT FENCE TO BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, SUPPLEMENTED WHEN NONFUNCTIONAL, OR 1/3 FULL; WITHIN 24 HOURS B. SEDIMENT BASINS DRAINED AND SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN REACHES 1/2 STORAGE VOLUME. REMOVAL MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. C. SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM SURFACE WATERS WITHIN (7)SEVEN DAYS D. CONSTRUCTION SITE EXITS INSPECTED, TRACKED SEDIMENT REMOVED WITH 24 HOURS. E. PROVIDE COPIES OF EROSION INSPECTION RESULTS TO CITY ENGINEER FOR ALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 12" IN 24 HOURS 17. THE SWPPP, INCLUDING ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BY THE PERMITTEE(S) WHO HAVE OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THE SITE. 18. OWNER MUST KEEP RECORDS OF ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT, THE SWPPP, ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE, PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS, AND REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR THREE YEARS AFTER FILING NPDES NOTICE OF TERMINATION. 19. SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED WHEN: A. THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON DISCHARGE B. INSPECTIONS INDICATE THAT THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE AND DISCHARGE IS EXCEEDING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. C. THE BMP'S IN THE SWPPP ARE NOT CONTROLLING POLLUTANTS IN DISCHARGES OR IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. 19. CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA A. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PREFABRICATED CONCRETE WASH-OUT CONTAINER WITH RAIN PROTECTION PER PLAN. B. CONCRETE WASH-OUT TO BE IDENTIFIED WITH SIGNAGE STATING "CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA DO NOT OVERFILL". C. CONCRETE WASHOUT WATER NEEDS TO BE PUMPED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF STANDING WATER IN WASHOUT AREA. 20. IN THE EVENT OF ENCOUNTERING A WELL OR SPRING DURING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR TO CEASE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND NOTIFY ENGINEER. 21. PIPE OULTETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. 22. FINAL STABILIZATION FINAL STABILIZATION REQUIRES THAT ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACVTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND THAT DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH 70% OF THE EXPECTED FINAL DENSITY, AND THAT ALL PERMANENT PAVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. ALL TEMPORARY BMP'S SHALL BE REMOVED, DITCHES STABILIZED, AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PERMANENT CONVEYANCES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS IN ORDER TO RETURN THE POND TO DESIGN CAPACITY. 23. RESPONSIBILITIES A. THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY A PERSON WHO WILL OVERSEE THE SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION AND THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE: CONTACT: __________________________________ COMPANY: __________________________________ PHONE: __________________________________ B. THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY THE A PERSON WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: CONTACT: __________________________________ COMPANY: __________________________________ PHONE: __________________________________ 24. THE WATERSHED DISTRICT OR THE CITY MAY HAVE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSPECTIONS OR AS-BUILT DRAWINGS VERIFYING PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF THE BMPS. SWPPP NOTES ESTIMATED QUANTITIES DESCRIPTION UNIT TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA SILT FENCE (STANDARD)LF INLET PROTECTION EA QUANTITY 2 3,759 36 SITE VICINITY MAP CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER SPECIAL WATERS SEARCH MAP N N SILT FENCE PRE-ASSEMBLED OR MACHINE SLICED FLOW 6" 6" NOTES: 1. PLACE BOTTOM EDGE OF FENCE INTO 6 IN DEEP TRENCH AND BACKFILL IMMEDIATELY. 2. POSTS SHALL BE: ·6 FT MAX. SPACING. ·2 IN X 2IN HARDWOOD, OR STANDARD STEEL T-TYPE FENCE POSTS. ·5' MIN. LENGTH POSTS, DRIVEN 2 FT INTO THE GROUND. 3. ATTACH FABRIC TO WOOD POST WITH A MIN. OF 5, 1 INCH LONG STAPLES. 4. ATTACH FABRIC TO STEEL POST WITH A MIN. OF 3 ZIP TIES IN TOP 8 INCHES OF FABRIC. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PER MNDOT 3886 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PER MNDOT 3886 DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3000 HARD SURFACE PUBLIC ROAD 2' MINIMUM 1" TO 2" WASHED ROCK 50 ' M I N I M U M AS R E Q UI R E D4:1 4:1 6" MINIMUM ROCK ENTRANCE TO CONSTRUCTION SITE NOTES: 1. ROCK SIZE SHOULD BE 1" TO 2" IN SIZE SUCH AS MN/DOT CA-1 OR CA-2 COURSE AGGREGATE. (WASHED) 2. A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE USED UNDER THE ROCK TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF THE UNDERLYING SOIL INTO THE STONE. DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3004 INLET PROTECTION - EXISTING STORM STRUCTURES HIGH-FLOW FABRIC CURB DEFLECTOR PLATE OVERFLOW 1-CENTER OF FILTER ASSEMBLY OVERFLOW 2 - TOP OF CURB BOX POLYESTER SLEEVE MANHOLE COVER ASSEMBLY FILTER ASSEMBLY 27" 27" SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER 2'X3' SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER ROAD DRAIN HIGH-FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN, OR APPROVED EQUAL DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3011 ASI-01 ASI-01                            CONNECT TO EXISTING MH EXISTING SMH 6119 RIM=911.98 INV=892.32 CONNECT TO EXISTING WITH 8"X8" TEE MAIN VALVES (TYP) SERVICE VALVES (TYP) EXISTING HYDRANT SANMH 1 RIM=908.30 INV=893.67 SANMH 2 RIM=907.72 INV=894.25 SANMH 3 RIM=907.08 INV(W)=897.00 INV(N/S)=895.00 SANMH 4 RIM=907.70 INV=895.75 SANMH 5 RIM=908.32 INV=896.49 SANMH 6 RIM=909.50 INV=897.32 SANMH 7 RIM=909.32 INV=897.90 SANMH 8 RIM=910.28 INV=898.48 SANMH 9 RIM=911.86 INV=899.36 SANMH10 RIM=913.50 INV=900.26 SANMH 11 RIM=914.45 INV=901.63 SANMH 12 RIM=914.86 INV=902.22SANMH 12 RIM=913.74 INV=904.12 SANMH 40 RIM=916.94 INV=899.35 SANMH 41 RIM=913.96 INV=899.96 SANMH 42 RIM=913.93 INV(NW)=900.40 SANMH 51 RIM=912.07 INV=902.37 SANMH 50 RIM=914.30 INV=900.83 SANMH 20 RIM=907.95 INV=895.51 SANMH60 RIM=914.70 INV=903.51 SANMH 30 RIM=908.77 INV=897.52 SANMH 31 RIM=909.73 INV=898.01 SANMH 32 RIM=912.75 INV=901.15 SANMH 33 RIM=913.46 INV=902.46 SANMH 34 RIM=914.94 INV=903.09 SANMH 35 RIM=914.28 INV=903.72 128 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0 58 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 75 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 75 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 74 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 83 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 58 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 58 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 88 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 90 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 137 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 59 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 190 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 79 LF-8" PVC @ 1.X% 129 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 154 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 57 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 87 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 61 LF-6" PVC @ 1.0% 44 LF-6" PVC @ 1.0% 63 LF-8" PVC @ 1.X% 63 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 131 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 79 LF-8" PVC @ 3.97% 49 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 52 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% 126 LF-8" PVC @ 1.X% 10 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% SANITARY STUB INV=904.91 SANITARY STUB INV=902.55 18 LF-6" PVC @ 1.0% FIRE HYDRANT 6 LF-6" PVC @ 1.0% SANITARY STUB INV=900.46 SANITARY STUB INV=899.45 10 LF-6" PVC @ 1.0% CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" SANITARY STUB INV=901.96 33 LF-6" PVC @ 1.0% SANITARY STUB INV=895.61 23 LF-8" PVC @ 1.0% SANITARY STUB INV=895.74 LOUCKS W:\2020\20503A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\Full Site\C4-1 Utilities (Sanitary And Water)-Full SitePlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 11:7 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION 325 BLAKE ROAD N HOPKINS, MN ALATUS LLC 80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Michael J. St. Martin - PE Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 24440 20503A MJS TRG MKK 10-22-21 10-22-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1A-D SITE PLAN C3-1A-D GRADING PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES C4-1A-D SANI. AND WATERMAIN C4-2A-D STORM SEWER C8-1, 2 DETAIL SHEET 10/22/21 PUD SUBMITTAL 310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522 N SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 UTILITY PLAN SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN OVERALL C4-1 PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS,THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, THE LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT , AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 2013 EDITION. 2. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION AND THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 3. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 4. ALL STORM SEWER , SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE 5' FROM THE BUILDING FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL NEW WATERMAIN AND SERVICES MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 7. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN CL 52 DIP 6" TO 8" DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 & SCH 40 6" TO 8" DIAMETER STORM SEWER DUAL WALL HDPE 12" TO 15" DIAMETER 9. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATCH BASINS, LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.2820 10.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0700). APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. 11.HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINS MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0540: a. PIPES 4-INCH TO 10-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH AASHTO M252. b. PIPES 12-INCH TO 60-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM F2306. c. ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D3212. d. WATER-TIGHT JOINTS MUST BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES. 12. CONTRACTOR AND MANHOLE FABRICATOR SHALL SUMP (LOWER) ALL STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN CASTINGS WITHIN PAVED AREAS 0.16 FEET OR 2-INCHES BELOW THE RIM ELEVATION DEPICTED ON THE UTILITY PLAN. 13.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. 14.THE CITY SHALL OPERATE ALL GATE VALVES. 15.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MANHOLES SHALL BE MADE BY CORE DRILLING THE MANHOLE AT THE PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATIONS AND INSTALLING A RUBBER BOOT. GROUT IN THE BOOT AND AN INVERT FOR THE NEW SEWER LINE. 16.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ON THE PLAN INCLUDE THE APRON SECTION. 17.WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CLASS 52, INSTALLED WITH 7.5 FEET OF COVER TO TOP PIPE. FITTINGS SHALL BE COMPACT TYPE. PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL HAVE A CEMENT MORTAR LINING. CONDUCTIVITY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY WELDED STRAPS ACROSS EACH JOIN.T 18.TRENCH COMPACTION SHALL BE 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY IN THE AREA FROM THE PIPE ZONE TO WITHIN 3 FEET OF FINISHED GRADE AND 100% IN FINAL 3 FEET OF THE BACKFILL TO FINISH GRADE. UTILITY NOTES EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND                            30" CBMH 34 RIM=915.31 INV=904.38 CBMH 33 RIM=918.55 INV=905.51 CBMH 32 RIM=911.48 INV(NW)=903.07 INV(SW)=903.17 CBMH 31 RIM=907.90 INV(NE)=901.91 INV(SE)=902.01 INV(W)=903.0 CBMH 30 RIM=907.35 INV(NE)=900.0 INV(SW)=901.0 INV(E)=900.1 CBMH 35 RIM=906.65 INV(W)=900.53 INV(SW)=900.63 CBMH 36 RIM=907.07 INV(NE)=901.01 INV(SE)=901.11 CBMH 37 RIM=907.51 INV(NW)=901.45 INV(SW)=901.55 CBMH 38 RIM=908.5 INV=901.82 STMH F RIM=909.18 INV=897.35 STMH E RIM=899.89 INV=897.15 CBMH 10 RIM=908.75 INV(N)=898.07 INV(SW)=901.48 INV(SE)=898.17 CBMH 11 RIM=908.40 INV(NW)=898.41 INV(SW)=898.51 CBMH 21 RIM=908.58 INV(E)=903.5 INV(S)=903.6 CBMH 12 RIM=910.18 INV(NW)=899.07 INV(S)=899.17 INV(SE)=902.37 CBMH 13 RIM=911.48 INV(NE)=899.58 INV(SW)=899.68 CBMH 14 RIM=913.06 INV(NE)=900.07 INV(SW)=900.17 CBMH 15 RIM=914.28 INV(NE)=900.41 INV(N)=909.75 INV(W)=900.51 CBMH 23 RIM=914.28 INV=910.0 CBMH 16 RIM=913.16 INV(NE)=901.08 INV(W)=901.18 INV(SE)=906.60 CBMH 17 RIM=913.68 INV(NE)=901.82 INV(SW)=901.92 CBMH 18 RIM=912.77 INV(NE)=902.46 INV(SW)=902.56 CBMH 19 RIM=917.49 INV(NE)=902.98 INV(S)=903.08 OCS 20 RIM=917.43 INV(N)=903.38 INV(S)=903.5 120 LF-12" HDPE @ X.X% 78 LF-12" HDPE @ 3.0% 170 LF-4" HDPE DRAINTILE @ 0.5% 91 LF-15" HDPE @ 1.0% 30 LF-21" HDPE @ 1.0% 27 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% 34 LF-15" HDPE @ 1.0% 38 LF-15" HDPE @ 1.0% 43 LF-15" HDPE @ 1.0% 246 LF-42" RCP @ 0.10% 125 LF-42" RCP @ 0.16% 62 LF-36" HDPE @ 1.0% 27 LF-21" HDPE @ 1.0% 47 LF-30" HDPE @ 0.5% 112 LF-30" HDPE @ 0.5% 38 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% 82 LF-27" HDPE @ 0.5% 78 LF-27" HDPE @ 0.5% 25 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% 48 LF-27" HDPE @ 0.5% 114 LF-27" HDPE @ 0.5% 145 LF-18" HDPE @ 2.0% 128 LF-24" HDPE @ 0.5% 108 LF-21" HDPE @ 0.5% 84 LF-21" HDPE @ 0.5% 61 LF-21" HDPE @ 0.5% 11 LF-21" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 25 RIM=912.48 INV=906.47 CBMH 24 RIM=912.42 INV(N)=905.87 INV(S)=905.77 127 LF-21" HDPE @ 1.0% 60 LF-21" HDPE @ 1.0% STMH 42 RIM=912.28 INV(N/S)=909.1 +/- INV(E)=909.2 CBMH 41 RIM=912.31 INV=909.26 STMH 40 RIM=912.23 INV(N/S)=908.06 +/- INV(E)=908.25 CBMH 41 RIM=912.42 INV=908.4 15 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% 12 LF-12" HDPE @ 0.5% 74 LF-21" HDPE @ 2.0% 154 LF-6" HDPE DRAINTILE@ 1.0% 33 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% 106 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% 170 LF-4" HDPE DRAINTILE @ 0% 34 LF-15" HDPE @ 1.0% 46 LF-12" HDPE @ 3.0% GRIT CHAMBER G INV: 897.60 PAVILION AND PUMPHOUSE FES D INV: 897.0 FES C INV: 896.0 FES A INV: 895.80 POND OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE B RIM: 901.10 GRIT CHAMBER I INV: 898.16 FES H INV: 898.0 OCS 42 RIM=908.90 INV(NE)=901.75 INV(SW)=901.5 340' - 60" CMP INFILTRATION PIPE SYSTEM INV PIPE: 903.5 INV ROCK: 903.0 OCS 41 RIM=911.90 INV(NE)=905.25 INV(SW)=905.0 7 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% 19 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% MH 40 RIM=915.60 INV(NE)=909.0 INV(DT)=912.0 24 LF-24" HDPE @ 4.0% MH 44 RIM=913.95 INV(NE)=908.0 INV(DT)=911.0 OCS 45 RIM=912.40 INV(NE)=902.75 INV(SW)=902.5 31 LF-12" HDPE @ 0.5% 29 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% OCS 46 RIM=915.00 INV(NE)=909.5 INV(SW)=909.0 72 LF-18" HDPE @ 1.0% 7 LF-18" HDPE @ 1.0% 550' - 60" CMP INFILTRATION PIPE SYSTEM INV PIPE: 907.5 INV ROCK: 907.0 281' - 48" CMP INFILTRATION PIPE SYSTEM INV PIPE: 900.0 INV ROCK: 899.5 12 LF-18" HDPE @ 1.1% ROOF LEADER INV: 911.0 395' - 60" CMP INFILTRATION PIPE SYSTEM INV PIPE: 907.5 INV ROCK: 907.0 10 LF-18" HDPE @ 1.1% ROOF LEADER INV: 911.0 OCS 47 RIM=915.25 INV(NE)=909.5 INV(SW)=909.0 6 LF-18" HDPE @ 1.0% 810' - 60" CMP INFILTRATION PIPE SYSTEM INV PIPE: 902.5 INV ROCK: 902.0 65 LF-18" HDPE @ 2.0% ROOF LEADER INV: 907.77 26 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% 265' - 60" CMP INFILTRATION PIPE SYSTEM INV PIPE: 900.0 INV ROCK: 899.5 CBMH 22 RIM=908.63 INV=903.86 21 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 51 RIM=912.05 INV=903.79 CBMH 50 RIM=912.25 INV=904.0 10 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 52 RIM=915.25 INV=909.64 69 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 58 RIM=916.20 INV=905.0 81 LF-18" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 57 RIM=916.10 INV=905.81 CBMH 56 RIM=916.20 INV=906.65 CBMH 54 RIM=916.20 INV=908.0 CBMH 53 RIM=915.55 INV=908.95 CBMH 55 RIM=916.20 INV=907.33 84 LF-18" HDPE @ 1.0% 68 LF-18" HDPE @ 1.0% 67 LF-18" HDPE @ 1.0% 95 LF-18" HDPE @ 1.0% 38 LF-18" HDPE @ 2.0% ROOF LEADER INV: 910.0 26 LF-18" HDPE @ 2.0% ROOF LEADER INV: 910.0 15 LF-18" HDPE @ 1.1% ROOF LEADER INV: 911.0 15 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.1% ROOF LEADER INV: 911.0 MH 52 RIM=916.0 INV=910.83 86 LF-24" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH 53 RIM=907.0 INV=902.5 86 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% 72 LF-36" RCP @ 0.33% 45 LF-36" RCP @ 0.35% TRENCH DRAIN RIM=915.6 INV=913.0 CBMH 54 RIM=910.50 INV=906.0 27 LF-15" HDPE @ 1.0% 10 LF-12" HDPE @ 1.0% LOUCKS W:\2020\20503A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\Full Site\C4-2 Utilities (Stormwater)-Full SitePlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 11:53 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION 325 BLAKE ROAD N HOPKINS, MN ALATUS LLC 80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Michael J. St. Martin - PE Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 24440 20503A MJS TRG MKK 10-22-21 10-22-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1A-D SITE PLAN C3-1A-D GRADING PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES C4-1A-D SANI. AND WATERMAIN C4-2A-D STORM SEWER C8-1, 2 DETAIL SHEET 10/22/21 PUD SUBMITTAL 310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522 N SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 UTILITY PLAN STORM SEWER OVERALL C4-2 PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS,THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, THE LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT , AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 2013 EDITION. 2. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION AND THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 3. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 4. ALL STORM SEWER , SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE 5' FROM THE BUILDING FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL NEW WATERMAIN AND SERVICES MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 7. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN CL 52 DIP 6" TO 8" DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 & SCH 40 6" TO 8" DIAMETER STORM SEWER DUAL WALL HDPE 12" TO 15" DIAMETER 9. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATCH BASINS, LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.2820 10.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0700). APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. 11.HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINS MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0540: a. PIPES 4-INCH TO 10-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH AASHTO M252. b. PIPES 12-INCH TO 60-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM F2306. c. ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D3212. d. WATER-TIGHT JOINTS MUST BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES. 12. CONTRACTOR AND MANHOLE FABRICATOR SHALL SUMP (LOWER) ALL STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN CASTINGS WITHIN PAVED AREAS 0.16 FEET OR 2-INCHES BELOW THE RIM ELEVATION DEPICTED ON THE UTILITY PLAN. 13.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. 14.THE CITY SHALL OPERATE ALL GATE VALVES. 15.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MANHOLES SHALL BE MADE BY CORE DRILLING THE MANHOLE AT THE PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATIONS AND INSTALLING A RUBBER BOOT. GROUT IN THE BOOT AND AN INVERT FOR THE NEW SEWER LINE. 16.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ON THE PLAN INCLUDE THE APRON SECTION. 17.WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CLASS 52, INSTALLED WITH 7.5 FEET OF COVER TO TOP PIPE. FITTINGS SHALL BE COMPACT TYPE. PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL HAVE A CEMENT MORTAR LINING. CONDUCTIVITY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY WELDED STRAPS ACROSS EACH JOIN.T 18.TRENCH COMPACTION SHALL BE 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY IN THE AREA FROM THE PIPE ZONE TO WITHIN 3 FEET OF FINISHED GRADE AND 100% IN FINAL 3 FEET OF THE BACKFILL TO FINISH GRADE. UTILITY NOTES EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND LOUCKS W:\2020\20503A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\Full Site\C8-1 Detail SheetPlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 10:15 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION 325 BLAKE ROAD N HOPKINS, MN ALATUS LLC 80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Michael J. St. Martin - PE Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 24440 20503A MJS TRG MKK 10-22-21 10-22-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1A-D SITE PLAN C3-1A-D GRADING PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES C4-1A-D SANI. AND WATERMAIN C4-2A-D STORM SEWER C8-1, 2 DETAIL SHEET 10/22/21 PUD SUBMITTAL 310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522 DETAIL SHEET C8-125' MIN.CONCRETE SIDEWALKS SHALL BE AMINIMUM OF 6 INCHES (6") THICK AT ALLDRIVEWAYS.4" OR 6"CONCRETESIDEWALKNO SMALL UTILITIES OR IRRIGATIONPIPES SHALL BE PLACED IN THEROADWAY STRUCTURAL SECTION.R/WR/WRESIDENTIAL STREET SECTIONGRADES ON MINOR STREETS SHOULD PROVIDE AN AREA OFNOT MORE THAN A 3% GRADE AT INTERSECTIONS WITHSTREETS OF A HIGHER TRAFFIC PRIORITY.2% CROSS SLOPE TYP.VARIABLEVARIABLE3%3%6"5'1'1/2:112"(TYP.)DETAIL APAVEMENT SECTION BASED ONGEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY _____, DATED_____,20__MINIMUM SECTIONDETAIL A4" OR 6" PERFORATEDDRAINTILE (TYP.)3" (PLUS) CUSHIONUNDER CURB (TYP.)1/2:1 1-1/2" BIT. WEAR COURSEMN/DOT 2360 TYPESPWEA240B OR SPWEB240B2357 TACK COAT2-1/2" BIT. NON-WEAR COURSEMN/DOT 2360 TYPE SPNWB230B8" AGG. BASE CLASS 5 OR 2 MN/DOT 313812" SELECT GRANULAR MN/DOT 3149.DGEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC TYPE V MN/DOT3733.2 (IF REQUIRED)APPROVED SUBGRADEDRAWN 12/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2004 STANDARD GUTTER 8"12" 6" 13.5" 1 2" RAD. MIN. OF 4" AGG. BASE UNDER CURB (IF TOTAL THICKNESS OF SECTION ALLOWS) 3/8 " LIP 3" RAD. 1 3 3" RAD. AGG. BASE VARIES SLOPE GUTTER TO MATCH PARKING LOT DRAINAGE (3/4" PER FT. TYP.) TIP GUTTER OUT AS REQ'D B6-12 STYLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER MINIMUM 1' BEHIND BACK OF CURB 7" SPECIFICATION NOTES: 1. UPON COMPLETION, CURBING SHOULD BE SPRAYED WITH A MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND PER MNDOT 3754. 2. EXPANSION JOINTS AT MAX. SPACING OF 200'. 3. CONSTRUCT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2531. DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2009 8"12" 6" 48" 1 2" RAD. MIN. OF 4" AGG. BASE UNDER CURB (IF TOTAL THICKNESS OF SECTION ALLOWS) 3/8 " LIP 3" RAD. 1 3 3" RAD. AGG. BASE VARIES PAVEMENT SECTION VARIES SEE PAVEMENT SECTION DETAIL SLOPE GUTTER TO MATCH PARKING LOT DRAINAGE (3/4" PER FT. TYP.) TIP GUTTER OUT AS REQ'D B6 STYLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER / WALL MINIMUM 1' BEHIND BACK OF CURB 7" SPECIFICATION NOTES: 1. UPON COMPLETION, CURBING SHOULD BE SPRAYED WITH A MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND PER MNDOT 3754. 2. EXPANSION JOINTS AT MAX. SPACING OF 200'. 3. CONSTRUCT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2531. DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2009A GRADE AT BASE OF CURB FLAT CURB AND GUTTER (12") DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2012 SLOPE GUTTER TO MATCH PARKING LOT DRAINAGE TIP GUTTER OUT AS REQ'D PAVEMENT SECTION VARIES MIN. OF 4" 3/8 " LIP AGG. BASE UNDER CURB (IF TOTAL THICKNESS OF SECTION ALLOWS) 7" 12"8" AGG. BASE VARIES 1/2" RAD. 20" SPECIFICATION NOTES: 1. UPON COMPLETION, CURBING SHOULD BE SPRAYED WITH A MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND PER MNDOT 3754. 2. EXPANSION JOINTS AT MAX. SPACING OF 200'. 3. CONSTRUCT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2531. CONCRETE SIDEWALK- WIDTH & SECTION VARY REFER TO SITE PLAN NO PARKING FIRE LANE 5' 0"12"18"FIRE LANE SIGN NOTES: 1. "NO PARKING FIRE LANE", R7-22 OR APPROVED EQUAL. SIGN MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 12" X 18", ALUMINUM PLATE, .063 MIN. THICKNESS, HIGH INTENSITY SHEETING, INSTALLED AT A HEIGHT 5' ABOVE GROUND, WITH RED LETTERING ON WHITE BACKGROUND (STANDARD). 2. THE SIGN SUPPORTS WILL BE A U POST. 3. THE SUPPORTING POSTS SHALL BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF 12" BUT NOT MORE THAN 36" FROM THE CURB ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FIRE LANE. 4. ALL SIGNS SHALL FACE THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED BY THE CITY ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2026 BOLLARD 1/2" CROWN 1" CROWN 3'-6"3'-0"6"24" DIA. 4,000 PSI CONCRETE 6" DIP, CONC. FILLED, PAINTED OSHA YELLOW DRAWN 12/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2039 2" BIT. WEAR COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPWEA240B TACK COAT, MN/DOT 2357 2" BIT. NON-WEAR COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPNWB230B 6" AGG. BASE, CLASS 5 OR 2 MN/DOT 3138 APPROVED SUBGRADE FINISHED GRADE 24" SELECT GRANULAR, MN/DOT 3149.D HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC TYPE V, MN/DOT 3733.2 DRAWN 12/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2032 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION 4" CONCRETE WALK MN/DOT 2521 4" GRANULAR MATERIAL MN/DOT 3149 DRAWN 12/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2034 FLOW SECTION A-A SECTION B-B NOTES: VARIABLE THICKNESS HDPE ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED. MIN. OF 4" ADJUSTMENT AND MAX. OF 12" ADJUSTMENT. USE LARGER ADJUSTMENT RINGS TO MINIMIZE THE NUMBER OF JOINTS. INCLUDE ONE 2" RING IMMEDIATELY UNDER THE CASTING. USE TAPERED RINGS TO MATCH CASTING TO STREET GRADE. APPLY BUTYL SEALANT BETWEEN ALL THE JOINTS. CONCRETE RINGS SET IN A MORTAR BED ARE ACCEPTABLE. ADJUST CASTING TO 14" - 12" BELOW FINISHED GRADE, TYPICAL FOR ALL CASTINGS IN PAVEMENT NOTE: ALL CONNECTIONS THROUGH MH SHALL HAVE A RUBBER BOOT. ANY FIELD ADDED OPENING FOR PIPE SHALL BE CORE DRILLED AND AN ELASTOMERIC RUBBER BOOT INSTALLED.OFF ROAD MARKERM H INSTALL WHEN M.H. IS PLACED OUTSIDE OF THE ROADWAY. BENCH SLOPE STANDARD SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE MANHOLE CASTING AND COVER, NEENAH R-1642 OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH TWO (2) CONCEALED PICK HOLES. 1. WHERE WATER MAY STAND, TOP OF MH SHALL BE 2 FEET ABOVE GROUND, AND/OR 2 FEET ABOVE THE 100 YEAR STORM WATER LEVEL. 2. ON MANHOLES 8' DEEP AND GREATER A ONE FOOT FOUR INCH (1'-4") PRECAST SECTION SHALL BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY BELOW CONE SECTION. 3. WHEN MANHOLE DEPTH IS LESS THAN 8', A TOP SLAB SHALL BE USED IN PLACE OF THE CONE. TOP SLAB SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR AASHTO HS20 HIGHWAY LOADINGS. THE SLAB SHALL BE SET ON A MORTAR BED. 4. ALL JOINTS BETWEEN SECTIONS SHALL HAVE RUBBER O-RING GASKETS. 5. MINIMUM BASE SLAB THICKNESS, 6" TO 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14'. STEPS 16" O.C. ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM OR STEEL REINFORCED COPOLYMER PLASTIC. 20" TO SPRING LINE (MAX.) SLOPE 2"/FOOT 7" 27" 48"4'1'-4"A B B A AS NEEDEDDRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4000 NOTE: GRANULAR MATERIALS FURNISHED FOR USE IN FOUNDATION, BEDDING, ENCASEMENT, OR BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: ·FOUNDATION MATERIALS SHALL HAVE 100% PASSING THE 1 1/2" SIEVE AND A MAXIMUM OF 10% PASSING THE No. 4 SIEVE. NOT LESS THAN 50% OF THE MATERIAL RETAINED BY THE No. 4 SIEVE SHALL HAVE ONE (1) OR MORE CRUSHED FACES. HARD, DURABLE CRUSHED CARBONATE QUARRY ROCK MAY BE USED FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS. ·BEDDING AND ENCASEMENT MATERIALS FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3149.2B1, GRANULAR BORROW, EXCEPT THAT 100% SHALL PASS THE ONE INCH (1") SIEVE. ·BACKFILL MATERIALS SHALL CONSIST OF SUITABLE EXISTING TRENCH MATERIALS, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE DEFINED AS A MINERAL SOIL FREE OF FOREIGN MATERIALS (RUBBISH, ORGANICS & DEBRIS), FROZEN CLUMPS, OVERSIZE STONE, ROCK, CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS CHUNKS, AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIALS THAT MAY DAMAGE PIPE, PREVENT THOROUGH COMPACTION, OR INCREASE THE RISKS OF SETTLEMENT. PLASTIC PIPE BEDDING PLASTIC PIPE 18"18"PIPE WIDTH ENCASEMENT BEDDING FOUNDATION (MAY NOT BE REQUIRED) 12" 6" BACKFILL COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4008 ADJUST CASTING TO 14" - 12" BELOW FINISHED GRADE, TYPICAL FOR ALL CASTINGS IN PAVEMENT OFF ROAD MARKERM H INSTALL WHEN M.H. IS PLACED OUTSIDE OF THE ROADWAY. STANDARD STORM SEWER MANHOLE WITH CONE SECTION FLOWAS REQUIRED1'-4"2" 0"-8" 2" 27" 48"4'CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS, MIN. 4" - MAX. 10" MANHOLE CASTING FRAME AND COVER-NEENAH R-1733 OR APPROVED EQUAL. INCLUDES SOLID LID & "STORM SEWER" LETTERING. RUBBER GASKETS BETWEEN EACH JOINT IN MANHOLE SECTIONS. 1. WHERE WATER MAY STAND, TOP OF MH SHALL BE 2 FEET ABOVE GROUND, AND/OR 2 FEET ABOVE THE 100 YEAR STORM WATER LEVEL. 2. ON MANHOLES 8' DEEP AND GREATER A ONE FOOT FOUR INCH (1'-4") PRECAST SECTION SHALL BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY BELOW CONE SECTION. 3. WHEN MANHOLE DEPTH IS LESS THAN 8', A TOP SLAB SHALL BE USED IN PLACE OF THE CONE. TOP SLAB SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR AASHTO HS20 HIGHWAY LOADINGS. THE SLAB SHALL BE SET ON A MORTAR BED. 4. ALL JOINTS BETWEEN SECTIONS SHALL HAVE RUBBER O-RING GASKETS. 5. MINIMUM BASE SLAB THICKNESS, 6" TO 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14'. 6. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLE SHALL BE WATERTIGHT. NOTES: STEPS 16" O.C. ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM OR STEEL REINFORCED COPOLYMER PLASTIC. DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4300 KOR-N-SEAL OR APPROVED FLEXIBLE CONNECTION PREFORMED OR CORE DRILLED HOLES REQUIRED FOR SUBDRAIN CONNECTIONS. GROUT INSIDE AND OUT AROUND SUBDRAIN. TRIM DRAIN TILE BACK TO WALL. DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED ON BOTH THE OUTSIDE AND INSIDE. CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS, MIN. 4" - MAX. 10" 2'x3' CATCH BASIN (MAX. DEPTH 4.0') (NEENAH CASTING NO. R-3067 WITH TYPE DR, DL, OR TYPE V GRATE OR APPROVED EQUAL)DIRECTION OF MAJOR FLOW (TYPE DL GRATE) NOTES: 1. EXPANSION MATERIAL TO BE PLACED IN FIRST CURB JOINT, BOTH SIDES OF CATCH BASIN. 2. RECESS CATCH BASINS 2" BELOW GUTTER GRADE LINE. 3. FOR SURMOUNTABLE CURB, PROVIDE FACE OF CURB TRANSITION EXTENDING 10' ON EACH SIDE OF CATCH BASIN TO MATCH CASTING. 5" PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE IF STRUCTURE BASE IS LESS THAN 48" BELOW FINISHED GRADE, PLACE GRANULAR MATERIAL UNDER STRUCTURE, FOR A MINIMUM OF 48" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. NOTE: USE 4 FOOT DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE WHEN DEPTH EXCEEDS 4.0 FEET. 3" 36" 6" 24 "36"4" 31 "43"6" 17 - 1 / 2 " 35-1/ 2" DRAWN 12/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4302 CONCRETE PIPE BEDDING RCP PIPE 18"18"PIPE WIDTH COMPACTED SAND OR 3 4" TO 1-1 2" CLEAR ROCK (AS DIRECTED) COMPACTED SUBGRADE 6" COMPACTED BACKFILL EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH RCP PIPE 18"18"PIPE WIDTH SHAPE BOTTOM OF EXISTING TRENCH MATERIAL TO FIT PIPE BARREL. COMPACTED BACKFILL EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH CLASS C BEDDING CLASS B BEDDING DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4310 2.0'2" MAX. 2.0' 1.0' PERFORATED DRAIN TILE PIPE FINE FILTER AGGREGATE MN/DOT 3149.2J PERFORATED PIPE (PVC OR CORRUGATED PE) WITH PROTECTIVE WRAP, MEETING MN/DOT 3245 AND 3278 SPECS. DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4314 NOTES: 6" HUB WITH THREADED PVC PLUG - DO NOT GLUE CASTING MAY BE REQUIRED SEE SPECIFICATIONS END OF LINE CLEANOUT IN LINE CLEANOUT PVC LONG SWEEP BEND SCH. 40 2.5' VARIES 2.5' VARIES ONE PIECE 6" PVC SCH. 40 CLEANOUT RISER DRAINTILE CLEAN-OUT STRUCTURE 6.0' 4.0' 6.0' 4.0' DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4315 LOUCKS W:\2020\20503A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\Full Site\C8-1 Detail SheetPlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 10:16 AM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION 325 BLAKE ROAD N HOPKINS, MN ALATUS LLC 80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Michael J. St. Martin - PE Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. 24440 20503A MJS TRG MKK 10-22-21 10-22-21 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1A-D SITE PLAN C3-1A-D GRADING PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES C4-1A-D SANI. AND WATERMAIN C4-2A-D STORM SEWER C8-1, 2 DETAIL SHEET 10/22/21 PUD SUBMITTAL 310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522 DETAIL SHEET C8-2 "HYDRANTFINDER" SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE TOP OF THE UPPER FLANGE ON THE REAR BOLTS. INSTALL PLASTIC COMPOSITE HYDRANTFINDERS ONLY. EXPOSED FIBERGLASS AND METAL HYDRANTFINDERS SHALL NOT BE USED. INSTALL ADAPTOR INC.'S VALVE BOX ADAPTOR #6 BASE OR APPROVED EQUAL 6" AMERICAN FLOW CONTROL 2500 SERIES RESILIENT WEDGE TYPE GATE VALVE OR APPROVED EQUAL. HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE INSTALLATION NOTES: 1. GATE VALVES ARE REQUIRED WITH ALL HYDRANTS. 2. THRUST BLOCKING REQUIRED BEHIND ALL HYDRANTS. 3. ALL BOLTS, T-BOLTS, NUTS AND RODDING INSTALLED BELOW GRADE SHALL BE ASTM F593 TYPE 316 STAINLESS STEEL. THIS INCLUDES HYDRANTS AND VALVES. CONCRETE BLOCKCONCRETEBLOCK MEGALUG UNDISTURBED SOIL CONCRETE BLOCK 7.5' MIN. COVER ON WATERMAIN MEGALUG 1 CUBIC YARD GRAVEL OR CRUSHED ROCK WITH 2 LAYERS OF 4 MIL POLY. (2/3 OF MATERIAL BELOW HYDRANT)2.5'16"TRAFFICFLANGE2-1/2" HOSE CONNECTION (NATIONAL STANDARD THREAD) CAPS TO BE CHAINED (PENTAGON NUT ON CAPS) 4-1/2" PUMPER CONNECTION (NATIONAL STANDARD THREAD) NATIONAL STANDARD OPERATING NUT 3'-0"2'-0" FINISHED BOULEVARD GRADE SEE STANDARD PLATE 4601 FOR APPROVED TYPES OF GATE VALVE BOXES DRAWN 12/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4600 GATE VALVES FINISHED GRADE 7.5' MINIMUM COVERVARIABLEVAR.MIDDLE SECTION EXTENSIONS TOP SECTION VARIABLE14-3/4 17-1/412-9/167 8-1/4 9-7/16 7-3/4 78-1/8 2-3/8 7 8-1/8 61-1/2 5-3/4 5-1/4 6-5/8 7-1/8 7-5/8 8-7/8 2" 6-1/4 WATER 7-3/8 2" 4" 5-3/4 7-1/8 NOTE: ALL BOLTS, T-BOLTS, NUTS AND RODDING INSTALLED BELOW GRADE SHALL BE ASTM F593 TYPE 316 STAINLESS STEEL. AMERICAN FLOW CONTROL 2500 SERIES RESILIENT WEDGE TYPE OR APPROVED EQUAL. VALVE BODY BOLTS SHALL BE ASTM F593 TYPE 316 STAINLESS STEEL. INSTALL ADAPTOR INC.'S VALVE BOX ADAPTOR #6 BASE OR APPROVED EQUAL ADJUST V.B. TOP TO 14" TO 12" BELOW STREET GRADE OR 12" TO 1" BELOW FINISHED BLVD. GRADE AND SHALL BE SET SO AS TO PROVIDE 12" OF UPWARD ADJUSTMENT. GATE VALVE BOXES: TYLER PIPE - SERIES 6860 SCREW TYPE WITH A #6 BASE AND DROP LIDS WITH "WATER" LABELED ON COVER OR APPROVED EQUAL OFF ROAD MARKERG V GATE VALVE AND BOX INSTALLATION NO. 6 ROUND BASE CONCRETE BLOCK GATE VALVE BOXES ARE 3 PIECE, 5-1/4" SHAFT 14" MIN. FROM TOP OF BOTTOM SECTION TO TOP OF VALVE BOX DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4601 24"MAX.6"MAX. "L" SIZE OF PIPE "L" 21" TO 42" 6" 48" TO 72" 12" MIN. TIE THE LAST 3 JOINTS ON INLET AND OUTLET PIPES. TRASH GUARD RCP APRON RIPRAP REQUIRED: SEE STD. PLATE 4308 OR 4309 USE 2 TIE BOLT FASTENERS PER JOINT INSTALLED AT 60 DEG FROM TOP OR BOTTOM OF PIPE. USE 5/8" TIE FOR PIPE SIZES 12" TO 27". USE 3/4" TIE FOR PIPE SIZES 30" TO 66". USE 1" TIE FOR PIPE SIZES OVER 72". TRASH GUARDS WILL BE REQUIRED ON 24" OR LARGER PIPE. SEE 4308-4309 FOR RIPRAP DETAIL PROVIDE 3 CLIPS TO FASTEN TRASH GUARD TO F.E.S. GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION. DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4306 LARGE WATER SERVICE CONNECTION CL PIPE PL VALVE BOX 3' TEE WATERMAIN SERVICE VALVE PLUG EXISTING GROUND STREET 5' HEAVY METAL FENCE POST WIRED TO MARKER.3'WIRE TOGETHER 2"X4" MARKER7.5' MIN.NOTE: VALVES SHALL BE TIED TO TEE AT MAIN WITH 2 3/4"ROUND TIE RODS. ALL BOLTS, T-BOLTS, NUTS AND RODDING INSTALLED BELOW GRADE SHALL BE ASTM F593 TYPE 316 STAINLESS STEEL. DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4604 5' MED. DUTY, (1.25 #/FT) STEEL FENCE POST EXPOXY- RESIN COATED, PAINTED OR GALVANIZED INSTALLED TO 6" BELOW FINISHED GRADE SECURE TRACER WIRE BY WRAPPING AROUND POST CONTINUOUS #10 SOLID COPPER, INSULATED TRACER WIRE FROM CORP TO C.S. BOX CAP CONTINUOUS #10 GA. SOLID COPPER OR STAINLESS STEEL, INSULATED TRACE WIRE ATTACHED TO HYDT FLANGE AND MAIN LINE WIRE THE TRACER WIRE LOOPS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO ALL FIRE HYDRANTS AT A REAR FLANGE BOLT USING A ALUMINUM ANGLE IRON HYDRANT TRACER WIRE BRACKET PART # HTWB-7000 MADE BY “VAIT PRODUCTS” OR APPROVED EQUAL.1" O.D. HDPE WMSVC PIPE 3' LONGTRACER WIRE FOR WATER SERVICE / HYDRANT LEAD DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4605 CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING 1'-10" 2'-0" D 22 1/2° BEND 1'-5" 1'-10" 3'-0" B 6" 8" 12" 16" 20" 24" 1'-6" 2'-0" 2'-6" 3'-6" 2'-1" 2'-8" 4'-9" 6'-2" 1'-6" 2'-0" 3'-0" BUTTRESS DIMENSIONS 2'-1" 3'-4" 3'-10" 6'-10" 1'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6" 3'-6" 2'-0" 1'-10" 3'-3" 4'-8" 45° BEND 90° BEND TEE/PLUGPIPE SIZE DB DB DB 1'-5" 1'-5" 1'-5" 1'-5" 1'-5" 2'-8" 3'-0" 3'-6" 4'-4" 4'-0" 5'-0" 8'-4" 9'-8" 3'-4" 3'-10" 5'-6"4'-0" 5'-0" 5'-10" 6'-9" NOTES: 1. SHAPE OF BACK OF BUTTRESS MAY VARY AS LONG AS POURED AGAINST FIRM UNDISTURBED EARTH. 2. DIMENSION "A" SHOULD BE AS LARGE AS POSSIBLE. 3. Δ= 45° MINIMUM. 4. PLACE POLY SHEETING BETWEEN CONCRETE & PIPE. 5. ALL BENDS AND FITTINGS SHALL BE RESTRAINED WITH MEGALUGS THRUST RESTRAINTS OR EQUAL. Δ - SEE NOTE 3 A A A A A A DBBBAAA90° VAR. (3' MIN.) 6" Δ - SEE NOTE 3 Δ - SEE NOTE 3 Δ - SEE NOTE 3 SECTION A-A PLAN 0° TO 22 1/2° BENDS TEES/PLUGSPLAN 22 1/2° TO 90° BENDS CONCRETE SHALL BE IN CONTACT WITH THIS QUADRANT OF PIPE. BEDDING MATERIAL UNDISTURBED EARTH CONCRETE DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4606 3' TR A N SI TI O N 3' TA P E R 1" E X P A N S I O N J O I N T 2 NO. 4, 3' LONG, EPOXY COATED REBARS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON EACH SIDE OF THE CASTING. REBARS AND EPOXY COATING PER MN/DOT SPEC. 3301. TYPICAL NEENAH R-3067 CASTING. 6"± CATCH BASIN CASTING INSTALLATION B612 TO CASTING DESIGN GUTTER LINE GRADE EXPANSION JOINTEXPANSION JOINT 3' MIN. TRANSITION B612 CURB & GUTTER TOP CURB NOTE: B612 CURB AND GUTTER TO BE FORMED INTO A B618 TYPE CURB AT CATCH BASIN CASTING. B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 3' MIN. TRANSITION B612 CURB & GUTTER 2 NO. 4, 3' LONG, EPOXY COATED REBARS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON EACH SIDE OF THE CASTING. REBARS AND EPOXY COATING PER MN/DOT SPEC. 3301. DRAWN 12/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4312 TYPICAL WATERMAIN INSULATION W.M. WATERMAIN PIPE STORM SEWER PIPE STORM SEWER VARIES VARIES 6" MIN. 12" MAX. 6" MIN. 12" MAX. 4" 4" 4" FLAT SHEET EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE FOAM INSULATION, DOW HIGHLOAD 40 RIGID BOARD, OR APPROVED EQUAL. OVERLAP INSULATION AT JOINTS. 16' 8' DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4608 WATERMAIN UNDER SEWER DEFLECTION 12"O.D.12" TRANSITION TO SPECIFIED DEPTH (TYPICAL). INSTALL 45° VERTICAL BENDS WITH MEGA LUGS AS REQUIRED. MINIMUM 6" OF COMPACTED SAND ABOVE & BELOW INSULATION ONE PIPE LENGTH 4" FLAT SHEET EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE FOAM INSULATION, DOW HIGHLOAD 40 RIGID BOARD, OR APPROVED EQUAL. OVERLAP INSULATION AT JOINTS. 18" MIN SEPARATION PROPOSED SEWER DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4611 NOTE: GRANULAR MATERIALS FURNISHED FOR USE IN FOUNDATION, BEDDING, ENCASEMENT, OR BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: ·FOUNDATION MATERIALS SHALL HAVE 100% PASSING THE 1 1/2" SIEVE AND A MAXIMUM OF 10% PASSING THE No. 4 SIEVE. NOT LESS THAN 50% OF THE MATERIAL RETAINED BY THE No. 4 SIEVE SHALL HAVE ONE (1) OR MORE CRUSHED FACES. HARD, DURABLE CRUSHED CARBONATE QUARRY ROCK MAY BE USED FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS. ROCK BEDDING MATERIALS SHALL BE 3/4" TO 1-1/2" CLEAR ROCK. IF IN-SITU MATERIAL UNDER ROCK BEDDING IS UNSTABLE, USE AS MUCH ROCK AS NECESSARY TO STABILIZE. DUCTILE IRON PIPE BEDDING D.I.P. PIPE 18"18"PIPE WIDTH 12" 4" EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH D.I.P. PIPE 18"18"PIPE WIDTH 12" 4" EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH SAND BEDDING ROCK BEDDING DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4615 OUTLET 48" TO 72" DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED BOTH ON THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS C PIPE SIZE WILL VARY INLET PRECAST BASE SLAB INLET ELEVATION A RIM - (EMERGENCY OVERFLOW) D B 6" E TOP OF WEIR ELEVATION WEIR TO BE REINFORCED WITH AT LEAST #4 REBAR, 12" ON CENTER. H 2" 0"-8" 2" 2 - 8" DRAIN-TILE DOWN-STREAM OF WEIR OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE - MH DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4316 WEIR/ORIFICE E TOP OF WEIR ELEVATION ORIFICE OPENING SIZE - F INVERT ELEVATION - G 41 20 903.43 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE ELEVATION TABLE 904.93 903.50 905.0 903.38 905.25 917.43 911.90 OCS NO. A B C D 907.5 906.0 E 15"Hx18"W 6"Hx6"W F 904.50 905.50 G 48" 48" H 45 902.37 902.5 902.75 912.40 904.0 2"Hx6"W 903.0 48" 46 908.93 909.0 909.50 915.0 --- 48" 47 908.94 909.0 909.5 915.25 --- 48" 42 901.39 901.50 901.75 908.90 903.75 6"Hx6"W 902.0 48" LOUCKS\\dfa-app-01\job_files\2020 Projects\20-199B 325 Blake Road - Alatus\0 CAD\20-199B_PUDPlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 1:10 PM 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300Maple Grove, MN 55369763.424.5505www.loucksinc.comPLANNINGCIVIL ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREENVIRONMENTALSUBMITTAL/REVISIONSPROFESSIONAL SIGNATUREQUALITY CONTROLCADD QUALIFICATIONReview DateI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly Licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.Project LeadDrawn ByChecked ByDF/ Project No.310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROAD NHOPKINS, MNALATUS LLC80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155MINNEAPOLIS, MN 5540210/22/21 CITY SUBMITTAL19-199BJMAM/JHJM/TWL1-1OVERALLSITE PLANBUILDING CBUILDING DBUILDING BBUILDING ABLAKE ROAD LAKE STREETCEDAR LAKE TRAILPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE AMENITYCODE DESCRIPTIONQTYAM-01PERGOLAAM-02BRIDGE247 LFAM-03GAS FIRE FEATURE2BOLLARDCODE DESCRIPTIONQTYBO-01 BOLLARD (NON-LIT)40DECKINGCODE DESCRIPTIONQTYDK-01WOOD DECKING6,728 SFDK-02BRIDGE SURFACE1,583 SFFENCE & GUARDRAILCODE DESCRIPTIONQTYFE-01SCREEN FENCE132 LFHANDRAILCODE DESCRIPTIONQTYHR-03BRIDGE GUARDRAIL1,351 LFLIGHTINGCODE DESCRIPTIONQTYLT-01LT-01 ROAD SCALED POLE MOUNTED LIGHTS56LT-02LT-02 - PEDESTRIAN SCALE POLE LIGHT32LT-03LT-03 - LIGHT COLUMN39LT-04LT-04 - PATHWAY/GARDEN LIGHT BOLLARD45LT-05LT-05 - CATENARY LIGHT662 LFLT-06LT-06 - LED STRIP LIGHT617 LFLT-07LT-07 - DOWN LIGHTS18LT-08LT-08 - POP JET LIGHTS21LT-09LT-09 - UP/FLOOD LIGHT6LT-10LT-10 - WOOD POST RECESS LIGHT20LT-11LT-11 - BRIDGE RECESSED WALL LIGHT48LT-12LT-12 - FOUNTAIN IN GROUND LIGHT8MISCELLANEOUSCODE DESCRIPTIONQTYM-01PUBLIC ART - LARGE1M-02PUBLIC ART - SMALL1M-03PUBLIC ART - PEDESTAL274 SFMINERAL MULCHCODE DESCRIPTIONQTYMM-01CRUSHED AGGREGATE45.5 CYPAVINGCODE DESCRIPTIONQTYP-01APAVING TYPE 01A -CONCRETE PAVING58,485 SFP-01BPAVING TYPE 01B -CONCRETE PAVING - VEHICULAR2,306 SFP-02APAVING TYPE 02A -DECORATIVE CONCRETE PAVING1,733 SFP-02BPAVING TYPE 02B -DECORATIVE CONCRETE PAVING - VEHICULAR4,493 SFP-03APAVING TYPE 03A -CONCRETE UNIT PAVERS8,587 SFP-03BPAVING TYPE 03B -CONCRETE UNIT PAVERS13,440 SFP-04APAVING TYPE 04A - PERMEABLE CONCRETE UNIT PAVERS9,866 SFP-04BPAVING TYPE 04B -PERMEABLE CONCRETE UNIT PAVERS - VEHICULAR9,577 SFP-05APAVING TYPE 05A -LIMESTONE UNIT PAVERS5,013 SFP-05BPAVING TYPE 05B -LIMESTONE UNIT PAVERS1,733 SFP-06APAVING TYPE 06A -LIMESTONE FLAGGING4,665 SFP-06BPAVING TYPE 06B -LIMESTONE FLAGGING1,733 SFROCKCODE DESCRIPTIONQTYRO-01 CASCADE BOULDERSITE FURNITURECODE DESCRIPTIONQTYSF-01 BENCH TYPE 01 - MONOLITHIC LIMESTONE BENCH3SF-02 BENCH TYPE 02 - SURFACE MOUNTED BENCH6SF-03 BENCH TYPE 03 - SURFACE MOUNTED BENCH3SF-04 BENCH TYPE 04 - PRECAST BENCH5SF-05 MOVABLE TABLE (1) / CHAIRS (4)24SF-06 ADIRONDACK CHAIR6SF-07 TREE GRATE6SF-08 BIKE RACK41SF-09 SURFACE MOUNTED TABLE3SIGNAGECODE DESCRIPTIONQTYSN-01 ENTRY SIGNSTAIRSCODE DESCRIPTIONQTYST-02 STAIR TYPE 02 - PRECAST CONCRETE STAIRSWATER FEATURECODE DESCRIPTIONQTYWF-01WATER FEATURE TYPE 1 - FOUNTAINWF-03WATER FEATURE TYPE 3 - CASCADE WATERFALLWALLCODE DESCRIPTIONQTYWL-01BWALL TYPE 01B - CIP CONCRETE WALL237 LFWL-02WALL TYPE 02 - PRECAST CONCRETE SEAT WALL275 LFWL-04WALL TYPE 04 - CUT LIMESTONE TIERED BLOCKS5,438 SFDECIDUOUS TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONT.AR6ACER RUBRUM 'AUTUMN RADIANCE' / AUTUMN RADIANCE RED MAPLE2.5" CAL.B&BAN2ACER RUBRUM 'NEW WORLD' / NEW WORLD RED MAPLE2.5" CAL.B&BAB31ACER SACCHARUM 'BARRETT COLE' TM / APOLLO SUGAR MAPLE2.5" CAL.B&BBH36BETULA NIGRA 'HERITAGE' / HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH8` HT. MULTI-STEM B&BBW28BETULA POPULIFOLIA 'WHITESPIRE' / WHITESPIRE GRAY BIRCH2" CAL.B&BGI24GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS 'SKYCOLE' TM / SKYLINE HONEY LOCUST2.5" CAL.B&BGK2GYMNOCLADUS DIOICA / KENTUCKY COFFEETREE2.5" CAL.B&BPP26POPULUS TREMULOIDES 'NE ARB' TM / PRAIRIE GOLD QUAKING ASPEN2" CAL.B&BQB19QUERCUS BICOLOR / SWAMP WHITE OAK2.5" CAL.B&BQE9QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS / NORTHERN PIN OAK2.5" CAL.B&BQW8QUERCUS X WAREI 'LONG' TM / REGAL PRINCE OAK2.5" CAL.B&BTA17TILIA AMERICANA `BOULEVARD` / BOULEVARD LINDEN2.5" CAL.B&BEVERGREEN TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONT.LL2LARIX LARICINA / TAMARACK6` HT.B&BPB2PICEA GLAUCA 'DENSATA' / BLACK HILLS SPRUCE6` HT.B&BPR3PINUS RESINOSA / RED PINE6` HT.B&BPS6PINUS STROBUS / WHITE PINE6` HT.B&BORNAMENTAL TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONT.AG36AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA 'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' / AUTUMN BRILLIANCE APPLE SERVICEBERRY2" CAL.B&BCE14CERCIS CANADENSIS / EASTERN REDBUD MULTI-TRUNK8` HT. MULTI-STEM B&BCA6CORNUS ALTERNIFOLIA / PAGODA DOGWOOD8` HT. CLUMP B&BMD22MALUS X 'DONALD WYMAN' / DONALD WYMAN CRABAPPLE2" CAL.B&BMP17MALUS X 'PRAIRIFIRE' / PRAIRIFIRE CRABAPPLE2" CAL.B&BDECIDUOUS SHRUBS QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONT.AI354ARONIA MELANOCARPA `IROQUOIS BEAUTY` TM / BLACK CHOKEBERRY#5CONT.AU235ARONIA MELANOCARPA `UCONNAM165` / LOW SCAPE MOUND CHOKEBERRY#5CONT.BA81BAPTISIA AUSTRALIS / BLUE WILD INDIGO#2CONT.CR23CORNUS SERICEA / RED TWIG DOGWOOD#5CONT.DL318DIERVILLA LONICERA / DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE#5CONT.IA81ILEX VERTICILLATA `AFTERGLOW` / AFTERGLOW WINTERBERRY#5CONT.PO150PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `DART`S GOLD` / DART`S GOLD NINEBARK#5CONT.PS5105PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `SEWARD` / SEWARD NINEBARK#5CONT.PF14PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `UMNHARPELL` TM / FIRESIDE NINEBARK#5CONT.RH-G624RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW` / GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC#5CONT.SN423SPIRAEA NIPPONICA `SNOWMOUND` / SNOWMOUND SPIREA#5CONT.SA136SPIRAEA X BUMALDA `ANTHONY WATERER` / ANTHONY WATERER BUMALD SPIRAEA#5CONT.SP-G192SPIRAEA X BUMALDA `GOLDFLAME` / GOLDFLAME SPIREA#3CONT.EVERGREEN SHRUBS QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZECONT.JU-H220JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS `BLUE PRINCE` / BLUE PRINCE JUNIPER#5CONT.JH28JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS `HUGHES` / HUGHES JUNIPER#5CONT.TE22TAXUS X MEDIA `EVERLOW` / EVERLOW YEW#5CONT.TN60TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTON` / TAUNTON YEW#5CONT.LOUCKSS:\2020 Projects\20-199B 325 Blake Road - Alatus\0 CAD\20-199B_PUDPlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 1:54 PM 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300Maple Grove, MN 55369763.424.5505www.loucksinc.comPLANNINGCIVIL ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREENVIRONMENTALSUBMITTAL/REVISIONSPROFESSIONAL SIGNATUREQUALITY CONTROLCADD QUALIFICATIONReview DateI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly Licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.Project LeadDrawn ByChecked ByDF/ Project No.310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROAD NHOPKINS, MNALATUS LLC80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155MINNEAPOLIS, MN 5540210/22/21 CITY SUBMITTAL19-199BJMAM/JHJM/TWL3-1PLANTING &MATERIALSSCHEDULESMATERIALS SCHEDULEPLANT SCHEDULE OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C.DuctRiser DuctRiserTrashRmMain TelCable RmCLUBHOUSELEASING5.9% RAMP UP 5.9%15 SPACES/FL. RAMP UPBIKE RM1,200 S.F.RECYCLEVANTELE.ELEC.3,190S.F.5-LEVEL,TOTAL 277 SPACESMAINTENANCETRASHMETERMAIL PACKAGE RMMECHGATE82 BIKE PARKING REQUIREDB1A1C2A1B1A3A3S1A3A3S1A1A1A1B2A1A1A1S1B2B0B0A1A1B2A1A1A1A1EAST WEST SPINE1L4-1A2L4-1A1L4-1BBUILDING ABUILDING BBUILDING CBUILDING DBLA K E R O A D SPINE ROADWOONERFFIRE/SERVICE ACCESS DRIVEPAVILIONRESTAURANT1RESTAURANT2GREENWAYCOMMONS2L4-1B2L4-1C1L4-1D2L4-1D1L4-1C3L4-1ALOUCKSS:\2020 Projects\20-199B 325 Blake Road - Alatus\0 CAD\20-199B_SectionsPlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 1:55 PM 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300Maple Grove, MN 55369763.424.5505www.loucksinc.comPLANNINGCIVIL ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREENVIRONMENTALSUBMITTAL/REVISIONSPROFESSIONAL SIGNATUREQUALITY CONTROLCADD QUALIFICATIONReview DateI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly Licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.Project LeadDrawn ByChecked ByDF/ Project No.310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROAD NHOPKINS, MNALATUS LLC80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155MINNEAPOLIS, MN 5540210/22/21 CITY SUBMITTAL19-199BJMAM/JHJM/TWL4-1ASITESECTIONS -BUILDING A11'-0"9'-0"5'-0"RoadwayBoulevardSidewalkplanting4'-7"SECTION J - BLAKE ROAD AT BLDG A1/4" = 1'-0"plantingBUILDING A1P-20 199B-103'-0"6'-0"14'-0"2'-6"8'-6"WalkwayBenchesBenches5'-0"StormwaterBUILDING APlantingSECTION H - EAST WEST SPINE1/4" = 1'-0"P-04AP-20 199B-312KEY PLAN4'-0"9'-0"22'-0"9'-0"4'-0"13'-0"5'-0"ParkingRoadwaySidewalkSidewalkParkingSECTION B - SPINE ACCESS ROAD1/4" = 1'-0"TOWNHOMES6'-6"Front LawnLT-01LT-013P-20 199B-02 OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC.DuctRiser DuctRiserTrashRmMain TelCable RmCLUBHOUSELEASING5.9% RAMP UP 5.9%15 SPACES/FL. RAMP UPBIKE RM1,200 S.F.RECYCLEVANTELE.ELEC.3,190S.F.5-LEVEL,TOTAL 277 SPACESMAINTENANCETRASHMETERMAILPACKAGE RMMECHGATE82 BIKE PARKING REQUIREDB1A1C2A1B1A3A3S1A3A3S1A1A1A1B2A1A1A1S1B2B0B0A1A1B2A1A1A1A1EAST WEST SPINE1L4-1A2L4-1A1L4-1BBUILDING ABUILDING BBUILDING CBUILDING DBLA K E R O A D SPINE ROADWOONERFFIRE/SERVICE ACCESS DRIVEPAVILIONRESTAURANT1RESTAURANT2GREENWAYCOMMONS2L4-1B2L4-1C1L4-1D2L4-1D1L4-1C3L4-1ALOUCKSS:\2020 Projects\20-199B 325 Blake Road - Alatus\0 CAD\20-199B_SectionsPlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 2:19 PM 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300Maple Grove, MN 55369763.424.5505www.loucksinc.comPLANNINGCIVIL ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREENVIRONMENTALSUBMITTAL/REVISIONSPROFESSIONAL SIGNATUREQUALITY CONTROLCADD QUALIFICATIONReview DateI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly Licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.Project LeadDrawn ByChecked ByDF/ Project No.310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROAD NHOPKINS, MNALATUS LLC80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155MINNEAPOLIS, MN 5540210/22/21 CITY SUBMITTAL19-199BJMAM/JHJM/TWL4-1BSITESECTIONS -BUILDING B3'-0"12'-0"26'-0"8'-6"26'-0"8'-0"RoadwayWalkwayRoadwayPlanted MedianSidewalkSECTION C - ENTRY DRIVE1/4" = 1'-0"PlantingBUILDING BLT-01TREE GRATEP-01LT-01LT-01TREE GRATE1P-20 199B-0310'-0"8'-0"Stormwater treatementPedestrian WalkSECTION I - NORTH SOUTH SPINE 1/4" = 1'-0"7'-6"PlantingLT-0210'-0"Stormwater treatement7'-6"P-04A2P-20 199B-09KEY PLAN OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC.DuctRiser DuctRiserTrashRmMain TelCable RmCLUBHOUSELEASING5.9% RAMP UP 5.9%15 SPACES/FL. RAMP UPBIKE RM1,200 S.F.RECYCLEVANTELE.ELEC.3,190S.F.5-LEVEL,TOTAL 277 SPACESMAINTENANCETRASHMETERMAILPACKAGE RMMECHGATE82 BIKE PARKING REQUIREDB1A1C2A1B1A3A3S1A3A3S1A1A1A1B2A1A1A1S1B2B0B0A1A1B2A1A1A1A1EAST WEST SPINE1L4-1A2L4-1A1L4-1BBUILDING ABUILDING BBUILDING CBUILDING DBLA K E R O A D SPINE ROADWOONERFFIRE/SERVICE ACCESS DRIVEPAVILIONRESTAURANT1RESTAURANT2GREENWAYCOMMONS2L4-1B2L4-1C1L4-1D2L4-1D1L4-1C3L4-1ALOUCKSS:\2020 Projects\20-199B 325 Blake Road - Alatus\0 CAD\20-199B_SectionsPlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 2:19 PM 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300Maple Grove, MN 55369763.424.5505www.loucksinc.comPLANNINGCIVIL ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREENVIRONMENTALSUBMITTAL/REVISIONSPROFESSIONAL SIGNATUREQUALITY CONTROLCADD QUALIFICATIONReview DateI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly Licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.Project LeadDrawn ByChecked ByDF/ Project No.310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROAD NHOPKINS, MNALATUS LLC80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155MINNEAPOLIS, MN 5540210/22/21 CITY SUBMITTAL19-199BJMAM/JHJM/TWL4-1CSITESECTIONS -BUILDING C10'-0"6'-0"8'-0"24'-0"8'-0"8'-0"RoadwayBoulevardBoulevardSidewalkLawnSECTION D - ENTRY DRIVE AT CASCADE1/4" = 1'-0"BUILDING BWalkwayWaterTerraced CascadeSteps/Seats11'-0 1/2"LT-01LT-013P-20 199B-049'-6"12'-0"12'-0"StormwaterSidewalkRoadwaySECTION E - URBAN CASCADE1/4" = 1'-0"2'-6"LargeStoneBlocks2'-6"LargeStoneBlocksLT-01Cascade PavingTREE GRATE2P-20 199B-0520'-0"2'-0"8'-0"PlantingFire Access RouteCedar Lake Trailx 906.98'-0"Clear30'-0"20'-0"Clear Fire AccessSECTION K - FIRE ACCESS AT BUILDING C1/4" = 1'-0"2'-0"1P-20 199B-11KEY PLAN OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3''19'-1" X 20'GARAGEBATHC.OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATH C. OFFICE11'-11" X 9'-3'' 19'-1" X 20'GARAGE BATHC.DuctRiser DuctRiserTrashRmMain TelCable RmCLUBHOUSELEASING5.9% RAMP UP 5.9%15 SPACES/FL. RAMP UPBIKE RM1,200 S.F.RECYCLEVANTELE.ELEC.3,190S.F.5-LEVEL,TOTAL 277 SPACESMAINTENANCETRASHMETERMAILPACKAGE RMMECHGATE82 BIKE PARKING REQUIREDB1A1C2A1B1A3A3S1A3A3S1A1A1A1B2A1A1A1S1B2B0B0A1A1B2A1A1A1A1EAST WEST SPINE1L4-1A2L4-1A1L4-1BBUILDING ABUILDING BBUILDING CBUILDING DBLA K E R O A D SPINE ROADWOONERFFIRE/SERVICE ACCESS DRIVEPAVILIONRESTAURANT1RESTAURANT2GREENWAYCOMMONS2L4-1B2L4-1C1L4-1D2L4-1D1L4-1C3L4-1ALOUCKSS:\2020 Projects\20-199B 325 Blake Road - Alatus\0 CAD\20-199B_SectionsPlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 2:18 PM 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300Maple Grove, MN 55369763.424.5505www.loucksinc.comPLANNINGCIVIL ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREENVIRONMENTALSUBMITTAL/REVISIONSPROFESSIONAL SIGNATUREQUALITY CONTROLCADD QUALIFICATIONReview DateI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly Licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.Project LeadDrawn ByChecked ByDF/ Project No.310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROAD NHOPKINS, MNALATUS LLC80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155MINNEAPOLIS, MN 5540210/22/21 CITY SUBMITTAL19-199BJMAM/JHJM/TWL4-1DSITESECTIONS -BUILDING D9'-0"Stormwater ChannelStone Paving Sitting AreaStone Paving Sitting Area5'-6"10'-0"10'-0"18'-6"17'-6"15'-0"10'-3"6'-0"BoulevardStreet Parking15'-0"Planting BedSECTION F - CASCADE AT RESTAURANT1/4" = 1'-0"Stone Slab TerracingStone Slab TerracingLT-01LT-03Sidewalk1P-20 199B-067'-0"5'-0"2'-0"9'-0"22'-0"2'-0"5'-0"ParkingRoadwaySidewalkPlantingPlantingBUILDING CSECTION A - WOONERF1/4" = 1'-0"BUILDING DLT-01LT-01P-04B2P-20 199B-01KEY PLAN LOUCKSS:\2020 Projects\20-199B 325 Blake Road - Alatus\0 CAD\20-199B_SectionsPlotted: 10 /22 / 2021 1:59 PM 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300Maple Grove, MN 55369763.424.5505www.loucksinc.comPLANNINGCIVIL ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREENVIRONMENTALSUBMITTAL/REVISIONSPROFESSIONAL SIGNATUREQUALITY CONTROLCADD QUALIFICATIONReview DateI hereby certify that this plan,specification or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly Licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.Project LeadDrawn ByChecked ByDF/ Project No.310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROAD NHOPKINS, MNALATUS LLC80 S 8th ST. STE. 4155MINNEAPOLIS, MN 5540210/22/21 CITY SUBMITTAL19-199BJMAM/JHJM/TWL5-1PLANTINGANDSCREENINGDETAILS1136" RADIUSDIG PLANTING PIT 4" TO 6" DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADENOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORMAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITIONTHROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. WRAPTREE TRUNKS ONLY UPON APPROVAL BYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SEE SPECIFICATIONSECTION RELATED TO PLANTS AND SOILPREPARATION.EACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THEROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THEROOT BALL. IF THE ROOT FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE,THE SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED IN A LEVELMANNER FROM THE ROOT BALL TO WHERE THEFIRST MAIN ORDER ROOT (12" DIA. OR LARGER)EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. SET MAIN ORDERROOT 1" HIGHER THAN ADJACENT GRADE. DONOT COVER TOP OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL.PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED ORCOMPACTED SOILTAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLYWITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALLDOES NOT SHIFT4" BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OFROOT BALLPLANTING PIT TO BE TWOTO FIVE TIMES THE DIAMETEROF THE ROOT BALL, SLOPEDPREPARED PLANTING SOILPER SPEC6' DIAMETERMULCH RINGREMOVE BURLAP, TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE FROMTOP HALF OF ROOT BALLEDGE CONDITION VARIES;REFER TO PLAN4" ORGANIC MULCH; DO NOT PLACE MULCH INCONTACT WITH TREE TRUNKSCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PITWITH SPADE BY HAND TO BINDWITH PREPARED PLANTING SOILDETAIL - TREE PLANTING3/4" = 1'-0"PROVIDE & INSTALL RODENT PROTECTION.12"HARDWIRE CLOTH MESH CYLINDER, 8" DIA. ORGREATER X 36" HGT; STAKE IN PLACE. PER SPECP-20 199B-15111DIG PLANTING PIT 4" TO 6" DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL NOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORMAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITIONTHROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. WRAPTREE TRUNKS ONLY UPON APPROVAL BYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SEE SPECIFICATIONSECTION RELATED TO PLANTS AND SOILPREPARATION.EACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THEROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THEROOT BALL. IF THE ROOT FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE,THE SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED IN A LEVELMANNER FROM THE ROOT BALL TO WHERE THEFIRST MAIN ORDER ROOT (12" DIA. OR LARGER)EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. SET MAIN ORDERROOT 1" HIGHER THAN ADJACENT GRADE. DONOT COVER TOP OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL.PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED ORCOMPACTED SOILTAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASEFIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THATROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFTREFER TO PLAN FOR WIDTH OFPLANTING PIT5'-0" MIN. WIDTHREMOVE BURLAP, TWINE, ROPE AND WIREFROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALLCONCRETE OR WALKABLESURFACE4" ORGANIC MULCH; DO NOT PLACE MULCHIN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK24" MIN. DEPTH MNDOT 3877-2SOIL OR MPRB FORESTRYAPPROVED EQUIVALENTUNDISTURBED SUBGRADEDETAIL - TREE PLANTING IN STREETSCAPE3/4" = 1'-0"P-20 199B-302PREPARE PLANTING SOIL FORTHE ENTIRE BEDAPPLICATION OF PRE-EMERGENTHERBICIDE3" MULCH; DO NOT PLACE INCONTACT WITH SHRUB STEMPREPARE BED A MIN. 4" DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL 12" MIN.SPACINGDETAIL - SHRUB PLANTING1" = 1'-0"EDGE CONDITION VARIES;REFER TO PLANPLANTING SOIL FOR SHRUBSSCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIREBED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BINDWITH PLANTING SOILUNDISTURBED SUBGRADECONTAINER GROWN MATERIALSHALL HAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENEDP-20 199B-143PREPARE PLANTING SOIL FORTHE ENTIRE BED1'-6"6"MIN.SPACINGUNDISTURBED SUBGRADESCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIREBED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITHPLANTING SOILPLANTING SOIL FOR PERENNIALSCONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALLHAVE ROOTSH AND LOOSENEDEDGE CONDITION VARIES; REFER TO PLAN3" MULCH; DO NOT PLACE IN CONTACTWITH PLANT STEMDETAIL - PERENNIAL PLANTING1 1/2" = 1'-0"4P-20 199B-16DETAIL - LOUVERED SCREEN FENCE3/8" = 1'-0"24'-0"7'-8"7'-8"7'-8"6" TYP.4" SQ GALV STEEL TUBINGGALV STEEL LOUVER2"X4" GALV STEEL TUBING14" DIA? SONOTUBEFOOTING6'-0"GRADEELEVATIONAXON5P-20 199B-17 1 325 Blake Road Project Narrative 10-22-2021 PROJECT OVERVIEW The 325 Blake Road project (the “Project”) is the redevelopment of [16.84] acres if infill suburban land located at the intersection of the Cedar Creek Regional Trail, as maintained by Three Rivers District, and Blake Road N, a recently enhanced major north-south arterial roadway in Hopkins, MN. Alatus LLC and its assigns (“Alatus”) are proposing a two-phased development proposal consisting of approximately 800 housing units of different designations, 17,000 total sq ft of retail and commercial use pads, and public and private realm infrastructure tied into the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District revitalization of the Minnehaha Creek, just to the northeast of what will be the parcels ultimately owned by Alatus. The project will serve as a tremendous complement to the Trilogy Real Estate Group project located at the intersection of Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard and will also seek to enhance the existing and pending infrastructure improvements already made by the City of Hopkins, Three Rivers District, and the Met Council and the pending infrastructure improvements that Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has committed to making in the regional stormwater facilities. Furthermore, the project has been designed in close compliance with numerous planning efforts made to date including: East Hopkins Land Use & Market Study (2003), Blake Road Corridor Small Area Plan (2009), Blake Road Corridor Study (2015) and the Blake Road LRT Station Area Development Guidelines (2015). STREETSCAPE AND PUBLIC REALM The development team has approached this site as a unique opportunity to create a water-centric development that capitalizes on its’ adjacency to Minnehaha Creek, the Blake Road LRT station, and the Cedar Lake Regional Trail. The proposed 325 Blake Road development project will transform the former cold storage site with a rich variety of green open spaces and streetscape design improvements. Proposed open spaces and streetscapes are designed to not only provide safe and convenient connections to the creek, regional trail, and LRT station, but to create a rich outdoor environment for future residents, visitors, and community members. Gateway Plaza and Cascade Central to the open space network are a series of plazas, water features, stormwater treatment features, and landscaped gathering areas, reaching from the project entry at Blake Road to the Central Plaza located next to future restaurants and the Minnehaha Creek Greenway. The primary vehicular and pedestrian entry at Blake Road features gateway plazas on either side of the entry road. These will include water features, special paving, lighting, and seating areas. The central water cascade feature, located adjacent to the entry road/parkway, provides a water channel designed to manage stormwater. Stormwater will be pumped from the future MCWD stormwater pond to the west end of the water cascade feature, providing the ability to create a water feature that not only provides an amenity for the development, but also filters and delivers cleaner stormwater back into the pond. It is designed to provide places for people to gather and stroll along the waterway. Native plant materials, special paving and lighting, site furnishings, and native stone elements will be incorporated to create an environment that will reconnect people to local and regional landscape experiences. Central Plaza and Greenway Commons The plazas and restaurant deck spaces, located at the east end of the water cascade, will provide outdoor gathering spaces, and connect people to the future stormwater pond and Minnehaha Creek. 2 The central plaza, located to the west of the future restaurants, will feature a large area for people to gather, a splash pad, outdoor seating, plantings, and a pergola. It is designed to provide places for people to interact with the restaurants and the water cascade. The central plaza will also provide a place for ice skating in the winter. The pocket plaza between the future restaurants and deck spaces outside the restaurants will provide opportunities for outdoor dining, and the ability to engage with and view the pond and creek. The Central Plaza and Greenway Commons will feature special paving, native plantings, native stone elements, and site lighting to create an inviting outdoor environment. Blake Road Plaza The plaza area located to the west of Building C provides ideal opportunities to connect the proposed development to the Cedar Lake Regional Trail and the future Blake Road LRT station while also providing an outdoor gathering area and dining spaces adjacent to the ground level restaurant in the building. The plaza design incorporates a significant public art opportunity at the corner of Blake Road and the Cedar Lake Trail, a designated plaza space for bike parking adjacent to the regional trail, special paving, native plantings, seat walls, site lighting, and site furnishings. Building loading and utility areas are screened from the plaza with decorative fencing. Woonerf The drive located between buildings C and D is designed to be pedestrian-oriented (woonerf) while providing important vehicular access to Building D and fire access to both buildings. The driving surface will incorporate decorative permeable pavers. Parallel parking spaces are provided along the west side of the drive. While the entire woonerf is designed to be pedestrian-friendly, sidewalks are provided along the west side of the driving/parking surface and on the east side of the drive at the north end/entry to building D. At the south end of the woonerf pedestrian and bike facilities will connect people to the Cedar Lake Trail. A pergola at this terminus provides a focal element drawing people to the trail. Materials will include permeable paving, native plantings, site lighting, pavement markings, wayfinding, and bollards. North/South Pedestrian Spine The site is designed to provide a pedestrian walkway between Buildings A and B, and the townhomes. Building B and the townhomes will connect to a central walkway with front stoops/walks from individual residential units. The central walkway, running north/south, is designed to include permeable pavers and stormwater treatment planting areas to provide this area with stormwater infiltration. Native plantings include shade and ornamental trees, shrubs, and groundcovers. Pedestrian-scaled site lighting and wayfinding will provide a safe and convenient pedestrian environment. East/West Pedestrian Spine and Courtyard An east/west pedestrian walkway is located between Buildings A and B and the townhomes, connecting people from Blake Road to the Minnehaha Creek Greenway. The corridor is anchored at the west end with a small plaza and public art to invite people off Blake Road. At the center of the corridor a courtyard is provided, featuring a small gathering area with a lawn area and patio with pergola. Buildings A and B, as well as the townhomes will connect to the central walkway with front stoops/walks from individual residential units. The walkway, running east/west, is designed to include permeable pavers and stormwater treatment planting areas to provide stormwater infiltration. Cutouts for site furnishings/seating are provided along the central walkway. Native plantings include shade and ornamental trees, shrubs, and groundcovers. Pedestrian-scaled site lighting and wayfinding will provide a safe and convenient pedestrian environment. 3 Cedar Lake Trail Connections Three opportunities to connect with the Cedar Lake Regional Trail are provided – at the Tower Plaza, the Woonerf, and promenade that connects the Central Plaza and Greenway Commons to the future trailhead designed by MCWD. The goal is to provide safe and convenient connections to the regional trail from the proposed development, encouraging people to walk, bicycle, and utilize public transit, and to invite trail users to visit the amenities provided within the development at 325 Blake Road. Streetscapes The primary roadway through the site is designed as a tree-lined parkway, delivering people from Blake Road through the site to development parcels, parking garages, open spaces, the Minnehaha Creek Greenway, and eventually connecting to Lake Street. The parkway will include turf boulevards, street tree plantings, pedestrian-scaled street lighting, site furnishings, and wayfinding signage. On-street parallel parking and detached sidewalks will provide a safe environment for pedestrians. Raised benches are designed to provide traffic calming measures and safe pedestrian crossings where pedestrian spines cross the parkway. ADA compliant concrete sidewalks will be provided for pedestrian movement throughout the site, providing connections to open spaces and trails for everyone. BUILDING DESIGN Blake Road creates an exciting, high density, mixed-use development oriented towards pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transportation. It offers not only its residents but the neighborhood and the regional network in its entirety, a place to live, work and play. Buildings A and B, both offer two levels of mostly below grade podium parking and five stories of wood frame residential construction above those. Building C, comprises both a concrete 15-story residential structure and a 5 story wood frame residential building wrapping around a six-level concrete parking structure. Of note, the concrete mid-rise will offer amenities for the whole development such as a 5,000 s.f. gym, lounge, and remote work facilities on top of a publicly accessed roof deck bar with outstanding citywide views in three directions. Building D, is to be constructed as a wood frame building, five-story wrapping around a 5 level parking structure. The project seeks to minimize the externalities created by surface level parking and maximize the density and pedestrian configurations for an urban experience in an otherwise suburban location. The site plan has significant design characteristics that will make public transportation, multi-modal sharing, and access to the Green Line Blake Road LRT Station a comfortable and intuitive experience to encourage alternatives to single occupancy vehicles and corresponding trips. This could only be done with the tremendous infrastructure improvements that the City of Hopkins, Three Rivers District, and Met Council have already invested in. For-sale townhomes along the main boulevard, are all three stories, with rooftop access and double car garages. The project also proposes another set of amenities open to the public. Restaurants retail pads open to the creek and to a newly developed skating rink, pond, and water cascade area via generous outdoor cantilevered decks and a boat house where items such as kayaks and canoes can be stored and rented out with ease and direct access to the adjacent waterflows. Architecturally, the project proposes a contemporary but timeless architecture. Designed for human scale and with the pedestrian at top of mind, the Project offers a distinct base on all buildings including ground floor access to many of its units, and a clear top level with distinct materials and color palette. 4 While all buildings follow this format, each one has its own character and individually unique characteristics. The design looks for individuality without sacrificing being contextual within the overall development project. All dwelling units will support the latest in technology while striving to provide a sustainable living experience. Housing units, common areas, and amenities incorporate high efficiency and WiFi controlled appliances, low-flow water fixtures, low-VOC paints, building-wide recycling practices and solar panels for electricity generation. Acoustical performance between units will exceed Building Code requirements for resident comfort and privacy. Select buildings within the Project will also seek LEED Certification and commissioning. Exterior materials used are a combination of brick, cast stone, metal and glazing to ensure durability and quality for a generational development asset. Conceptually, lower levels use a combination of brick and cast stone as primary materials at the base, corners, building entries and garage entries. Metal, in various forms, is used mostly on upper levels and above the pedestrian scale that will be encountered. Intermediate levels are a combination of these two materials mentioned plus different cementitious panel solutions with multiple façade aesthetic options. An enhanced and energy efficient HVAC variable refrigerant flow (VRF) system ensures that building facades are uninterrupted, rather than the common solution that presents louvers into the façade design for a sometimes unsightly exterior aesthetic. DEVELOPMENT PHASING Commencement of construction of the various phases is dependent upon market conditions now and into the future as well as other external factors relating to the various entities and stakeholders that will be working through the redevelopment effort for the site located at 325 Blake Road. Subject to those conditions, the development team currently anticipates the following construction start dates for the various phases: Phase I: Q2 2022 – Spine Road, Buildings B & C Phase II: Q2 2023 – Buildings A (pending Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Allocation), Building D, Restaurants, Boat House & Townhomes CITY APPLICATIONS/APPROVALS • Zoning Application: Requesting rezoning from I-1 (Industrial) to Mixed Use District • Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) Submittal (for the Project) • Site Plan Approval(s) for Building A, Building B, Building C, and Building D Site Plan Review Application(s) • Preliminary & Final Subdivision and proposed Re-Plat of the single parcel located at 325 Blake Road N. • Travel Demand Management Study approval by the City of Hopkins and Hennepin County – via Environmental Assessment Worksheet and attached exhibits and addendums • Approvals from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District • Execution of a Development Agreement (to be finalized with the City of Hopkins and submitted at a later date) PROPOSED DEVIATIONS FROM MIXED USE DISTRICT STANDARDS 5 Strict adherence to the Mixed-Use District standards and requirements is not required in this case to satisfy the intent of the City’s planned unit development provisions and the proposed deviations from those standards will not prejudice the health, safety, or welfare of the residents of the development, the surrounding area, or the city as a whole. The proposed deviations from Mixed Use District standards for the Blake Road Station project are as follows: 1. Building A is below the parking minimum of 1 space per unit. It provides 110 spaces for 127 units. 2. Building B exceeds the parking maximum. It currently has 184 spaces for 113 units. 3. Building D exceeds the parking maximum. It currently has 277 spaces for 162 units. If 35 spaces get allocated to the Restaurants, it will be right at the maximum allowed. 4. Transparency requirements. Building C will exceed the percentage of glass allowed by providing a 90% transparency at the ground floor. 5. Building Articulation: Building C and D exceed the 45’ maximum bay width. However, we believe the negative space generated by individual balconies provide more than enough articulation. 6. The proposed development exceeds the maximum block length of 600 feet, however, multiple pedestrian connectors are provided within each block. 7. Front yard setback requirements along Blake Road in the Mixed-Use zone are 15-25 feet for a residential building. Building C as proposed is located 45 feet from Blake Road. The added space provides the opportunity to create a plaza for gathering spaces between Blake Road and the ground level retail/restaurant in Building C, public art opportunities, and the ability to infiltrate stormwater. SUPPORT FOR PROPOSED DEVIATIONS The applicant believes the development, as proposed with deviations from zoning code ordinances, is a high-quality proposal for the City of Hopkins and aligns with overall Comprehensive Plan goals. To ensure a high-quality development, the applicant is proposing the following enhancements in support of the proposed deviations: Site Access Improvements A new network of publicly accessible streets and pedestrian corridors divides the site into pedestrian- scaled, walkable quadrants and connects the surrounding context to the Blake Road LRT station, Minnehaha Creek, and the Cedar Lake Regional Trail. The new tree-lined parkway becomes the crucial spine from which stems primary building entries, active uses, and a series of common open spaces. The East/West and North/South pedestrian spines further break down proposed development sites, improving pedestrian circulation and creating a tree-lined pedestrian ways and walk-up residential units. As described under the ‘Streetscape and Public Realm’ section, the project vision includes extensive pedestrian improvements for the area, including sidewalk connections through the site that do not exist today. The street trees, parallel parking zones, and raised pedestrian crossings provided along the parkway will help to calm traffic and provide a safer environment for people, bikers, and drivers. The pedestrian zone along the proposed parkway supports public street amenities including benches, bike racks, street lighting and planting beds. Building setbacks provide comfortable buffer zones between street right-of-way and the building edges. The proposed setbacks offer a balance of enough distance to create green zones without compromising the more urban goals of transit-oriented development. This balance of ample though not excessive setbacks prioritizes pedestrians and human activity in and around the site. 6 Exceeding Stormwater Standards The applicant is exceeding the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and City of Hopkins’ minimum standards for stormwater treatment. Runoff from this site will be conveyed to the proposed 325 Blake Road regional stormwater treatment facilities via a combination of proposed storm sewer, the Lake Street Diversion and recirculation of pumped stormwater through the Cascade. The previous Cold Storage facility had large impervious area of both rooftop and pavement that flowed untreated to Minnehaha Creek. The proposed project reduces the amount of impervious surface and provides rate control, treatment, and volume control through the use of permeable pavements, filtration, infiltration, underground storage and cycling of pumped stormwater through the Cascade to provide biofiltration, infiltration and storage. The pumped stormwater will flow through Cascade in a series of pools and riffles and end in a waterfall into the upper cell of the MCWD pond, then flow over a weir to the lower cell, where the water will be drawn up at the Pavilion, screened of floatables and pumped through a forcemain to the west end of the Cascade to start the cycle over. The pump will have a base flow to keep water flowing through the Cascade continuously, then will be throttled up during stormwater events to engage the upper portions of the Cascade storage and overflow into the underground stormwater chambers under the skating plaza. This pumped system allows for water level control and continuous infiltration that is not feasible with a traditional gravity system. This is a substantial improvement from the Cold Storage site condition that was primarily impervious surface with stormwater that ran off without any treatment or attenuation. A total existing (previous) assumed impervious for the site was 10.57 acres, the proposed impervious is 9.75 acres, a reduction of 0.82 acres. The required infiltration of the 1-inch event requires volume control of 0.8125 acre-ft. The infiltration systems as proposed provide 0.689 acre-ft of volume at a conservative 0.45 in/hr infiltration rate. The soil infiltration rates will be confirmed and adjusted to actual rates using Double Ring Infiltrometer testing. The remaining 0.124 acre-ft will come from the Cascade and the pumping system, the proposed design displaces approximately 12,000 cf of treatment volume = 0.275 acre-ft. MCWD requires proposed runoff rates to be equal to or less than the existing condition. Total proposed site runoff rates will be reduced significantly, by approximately 25% in all rainfall events from the existing condition. The system also takes on offsite drainage from the Cedar Lake Trail that would otherwise go untreated. The majority of the new/reconstructed site area will be dedicated to roof drainage, which is assumed cleaner than pavement runoff. This will further reduce pollutant loadings discharged from the site. Enhanced Landscaping The deviations in setbacks offer yards that are both deep enough for landscaping and green space and reasonable for creating a "street wall" for the pedestrian experience. The deviations also help to implement a comprehensive plan goal of creating a ‘positive relationship to the street’ by proposing appropriate setbacks for the residential density guided by the 2040 Comprehensive Plan (75-150 units per acre within ¼ mile of an LRT station platform). High Quality Common Open Spaces As previously mentioned under ‘Streetscape and Public Realm,’ the master plan includes a series of high quality common open spaces for residents, visitors, and community members to gather, recreate, and 7 connect to nature. They also provide important opportunities to reduce urban heat island effect and stormwater runoff, while improving water and air quality. Multi-Modal Opportunities With immediate access to the Minnehaha Creek Greenway, Cedar Lake Trail, and Blake Road LRT station, proposed pedestrian and bike facilities will promote the use of multiple modes of transportation for residents and patrons to and from the project site. The proposed project exceeds the bike parking requirements for Mixed-Use Districts and includes additional bike facilities such as bike pump/repair stations, trail maps, seating for trail users and wayfinding signage. Support of Comprehensive Plan Goals The project supports and further advances a number of goals outlined in the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan and draft 2040 Cultivate Hopkins Plan. See summary of these goals below within the PUD statement section. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STATEMENT Per Hopkins, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances, Part III – Land Development, Chapter 102 – Planning and Zoning, Article XX. – Planned Unit Development, Sec. 102-680, (e), (6), the applicant is responding to the following: • A written statement generally describing the proposed PUD and the market which it is intended to serve and its demand showing its relationship to the city’s comprehensive plan and how the proposed PUD is to be designed, arranged, and operated in order to permit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable regulations of the city. Market Project goals and public benefits envisioned for the development site at 325 Blake Road N are as follows: • Environmentally and Fiscally Sustainable – the project will not create negative environmental externalities while also fiscally supporting itself due to dense, usable infrastructure with a significant tax base to benefit projects outside of the MCWD development project for years to come. The process of ensuring that the project makes the space better than it was before is underway in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet and will culminate with a state-of-the-art regional stormwater infrastructure installment in and around a dense, vibrant housing development, that will add vitality to the already vulnerable Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. • Spectrums of Housing & Affordability – Market-rate, mixed-income, and low-income rental opportunities partnered with townhome living arrangements in for-sale product mean that a diverse demographic and socioeconomic population can live here and enjoy the same quality of life. The concept of the “15 Minute City” will further enhance affordability for residents, nearby residents, and the public alike by reducing dependency via the tax that is vehicular ownership, maintenance, etc. thanks in no small part to multi-modal connections with the Green Line LRT and Cedar Lake Regional Trail bike and pedestrian corridor. The Development Team has also included a large fitness, wellness, and remote work facility to be shared by all residents of the community to facilitate the creation of a true neighborhood center. 8 • Progressive Sub-Urban Design Concepts – High quality housing, retail, and infrastructure improvements, along with a pedestrian and bicycle first infrastructure scope, that will be a baseline benchmark for future development projects in the city of Hopkins and in the larger Twin Cities region, at a minimum. • Inclusivity of Natural and Man-Made Resources for All – Too often natural resources in urban corridors are only eligible to the privileged able to afford a “lake” or “waterfront” private parcel. By inviting residents of Hopkins to enjoy the substantial investment from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District into this regional corridor, this natural resource will remain a public attraction and amenity for all to enjoy for years to come in a multitude of ways. The nature of the proposed development is concentrated on creating a spectrum of opportunities for community members of all different backgrounds. The proposed housing mix will include the creation of a 15-story mid-rise for views unlike any seen in the west-suburban market, interspersed with low-rise market-rate developments, a low-income housing tax credit property with 50% to 60% AMI rental and income restrictions, and for-sale townhome / condominium offerings with affordable ownership opportunities as well. The Site Plan estimates the following unit types and counts for housing options on the development site: • Building A: 5-story, 127-unit low-income housing tax credit development (50% to 60% AMI rental and income restricted units) with 110 underground parking stalls • Building B: 5-story, 112-unit for-sale senior co-op development with 184 underground parking stalls • Building C: 15-story, 187-unit multi-family market-rate Type I development; 5-story, 155- unit multi-family market-rate development; 17,000 SF of retail; 520 above-ground parking stalls; 43 parking spaces below restaurants and 39 surface stalls • Building D: 5-story, 162-unit multi-family mixed-income development (33 of the units we be designated at 60% AMI) with 277 above-ground parking stalls; some stalls available for flexible commercial space parking • Townhomes: 3-story, 33 townhome units with variable pricing; 66 attached garage parking stalls The commercial space envisioned for the property, currently at approximately [17,000 sq ft], is envisioned to be community oriented with an eye toward attracting the existing residents of Hopkins that enjoy the density of their Downtown Hopkins and also for the bike or pedestrian commuter stopping through on the public infrastructure tied into the backbone of the project. The impact of the Green Line Southwest LRT will be compounded with the proposed development improvements. We expect to have a mixture of locally sourced restaurateurs, brewery, and distillery opportunities with indoor and outdoor experiences for optimization of space in both the summer and winter, as well as more affordable commercial space leasing options for the relocation of existing Hopkins community retail locations that are having to make decisions about their upcoming leasehold interests. Alatus will deliver an incredibly important development node along Blake Road, as envisioned in numerous planning documents, including the East Hopkins Land Use & Market Study, Blake Road Corridor Study and the Blake Road LRT Station Area Development Guidelines. This project will be an 9 important link between the LRT station and the Minnehaha Creek Greenway and continued momentum for development in the area. Many of the development recommendations outlined in the station area development guidelines are being realized within the proposed project. Here are just a few of the stated goals that will be supported by the project’s site and building design: Site Design: • Create a connected, walkable, mixed-use, sustainable neighborhood, with a pedestrian-oriented and human-scaled streetscape, and a vibrant public realm. • Improve safety and security with strategies such as “eyes on the street”, improved lighting, and other practices such as CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design). • Support transit-oriented development by providing site design features that enhance multi- modal access, provide bicycle accommodations (racks, lockers, trail maps, signage, etc.) for businesses and residents, and improve pedestrian and bicycle connections to the future Blake Road LRT Station and the Cedar Lake Regional Trail. • Provide high quality common open spaces that offer places for residents, visitors, and community members to gather, recreate, and connect with nature. • Utilize landscaping and streetscape amenities to create a pedestrian-friendly environment. • Limit surface parking with new development by incorporating underground or structured parking. Neighborhood Diversity: • Provide for a range of housing types and price points to meet the needs of people in all stages of life, with the design flexibility to accommodate changing lifestyle needs. • Utilize universal design principles that can respond to changing demographic needs and anticipate in innovative ways to address the dynamic and changing needs of residents. • Strengthen the vitality of the area through increased density and a mix of retail/restaurant and residential uses. • Promote high-quality design. • Enhance a sustainable neighborhood by promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy. • Create opportunities to live, work, learn, play – the spectrum of elements for a healthy community. • Engage with diverse communities to develop opportunities for public art, interpretation, and wayfinding. Sustainable Design: • Improve water and environmental quality. • Incorporate sustainable development practices into new construction projects. • Utilize native plantings to conserve water use and reduce maintenance needs. • Incorporate best practices for stormwater management. Neighborhood vitality and livability: • Multi-family housing amenities that provide work-from-home opportunities and shared spaces for larger gatherings. • Medium to high density residential that preserve green space and enhance street-level amenities. • Ground level uses that enhance the public realm. • Enhanced connections to Minnehaha Creek. 10 • High quality open spaces that provide places for outdoor gathering, recreation, and healthy living. • Increased opportunities for residents of all ages to live and work in the area. • The potential for commercial uses that enhance rather than compete with downtown Hopkins Mainstreet vitality. • Potential to support small cultural businesses that serve the community. • Convenience services (e.g. pet maintenance areas, bike repair, etc.). • Welcome developers and businesses that operate with equity principles of hiring and wages. Comprehensive Plan The 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update – Cultivate Hopkins – guides this property as Activity Center. Activity Centers surround and support the planned Blake Road and Shady Oak light rail stations along the Southwest LRT Green Line Extension. These areas will include moderate density to high-density mixed-use development designed to complement and enhance the existing development pattern in these areas and support the public investment in transit. The Activity Center areas are expected to experience significant reinvestment and redevelopment to absorb a substantial portion of the city’s anticipated future growth. Development in the Activity Center areas is expected to be medium to larger scale neighborhood and regional uses with an approximate mix of 75% residential and 25% commercial. Densities in these areas will typically range from 20-60 units per acre, with 75-150 units per acre within ¼ mile of an LRT station platform. The proposed project illustrates a residential density that is consistent with the Activity Center guidance, but it falls short of the 2040 guidance for commercial space percentage. Building C will provide 8,000 sq ft of retail/restaurant space fronting Blake Road, 5,000 sq ft of health club space shared by the residents, 2800 sq ft of co-working space shared by the residents, and 1,000 sq ft of roof top bar with public access. The free-standing restaurants located near the MCWD stormwater pond will provide 6,800 sq ft of retail/restaurant space open to the public. The applicant believes strongly that multi- family residential is highest and best use for this location. The constraints of the site are prohibitive to adding traditional retail space to the development. The Applicant is responding to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan with an overall development project that supports the following stated goals: • Encourage transit-oriented development (development that emphasizes pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and a broader mix of uses at densities that support transit) in areas with high quality transit service, especially within a quarter mile of light rail stations or high-frequency bus routes. • Plan for appropriate amenities, high-quality design, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and open space in high growth areas, particularly in the Neighborhood Center, Activity Center, and Downtown Center future land use categories or other areas in close proximity to transit. • Improve pedestrian and bicycle access throughout the community, particularly in the Centers future land use categories as defined and designated in the comprehensive plan or other areas in close proximity to transit. • Engage the community to explore how to increase the mix of housing types near transit corridors, parks, and the Centers future land use categories as defined and designated in the comprehensive plan. 11 • Encourage all new projects to have a positive relationship to the street by orienting main entrances to the front of the property, connecting the front door to the sidewalk, and reducing parking between the building and the street as much as possible. • Promote the development of high-density transit oriented mixed-use development around planned Green Line Extension light rail stations. • Establish strong identities for emerging Centers and Districts as defined and designated in the comprehensive plan. Their identities should evolve from unique features of the area. • Design streets, parks, and open spaces to encourage pedestrian activity, public gathering, and art in its various forms. • Encourage creative placemaking throughout the city, particularly in the Neighborhood Center, Activity Center, and Downtown Center future land use categories as defined and designated in the comprehensive plan. • Support community events hosted in public parks and facilities to help foster a sense of community and celebrate Hopkins’ distinct character and diversity. • Use urban design elements, building massing, land use strategies, and public realm improvements to provide appropriate transitions between developments – particularly those of different scale and intensity. • Encourage pedestrian and bicycle continuity and connection between established and developing areas of the city. • Carefully manage vehicular access and parking to minimize its impact on individual developments, the public realm, and the overall fabric of the community. • Encourage all development projects to be durable and environmentally responsible. • Encourage all developments to incorporate common spaces (interior or exterior) that help enhance the public realm and sense of community. • Assist adults and kids in maintaining healthy, active lifestyles by providing a range of recreational facilities and programming that are accessible and convenient. • Support development in areas that are or will be served by transit, bicycle, and pedestrian infrastructure to reduce dependency on automobiles for travel. • Support greener development patterns through stormwater management and landscaping of sites. • Encourage the use of drought-tolerant plantings, promote irrigation systems that utilize reclaimed water, and incentivize systems that collect rainwater for reuse. • Implement and encourage the use of stormwater Best Management Practices to reduce the speed and impact of stormwater runoff. • Incorporate permeable paving, bioretention cells, buffer strips, swales, and other strategies that address stormwater runoff, where applicable. • Support a reduction in vehicle emissions by improving travel efficiency and promoting non-auto modes of transportation, including walking, biking, and public transportation alternatives. Designed, Arranged, Operated This project will not impede improvement of surrounding properties, and the PUD is designed and arranged to permit the orderly development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable regulations of the City. The organization of the parcels within this development is specifically intended to create a walkable, bikeable, transit-oriented urban community in a suburban location. The height and associated density of the project will provide housing to help meet City goals for increasing housing options in Hopkins along transit corridors. The Project has intentionally focused density on the southwest portion of 325 Blake Road closest to the Southwest Green Line station at Blake Road. The 12 proposed housing density as one travels to the northeast tapers to better align with surrounding densities in existing neighborhoods and to minimize the visual impacts on the Minnehaha Creek Greenway. The proposed residential and retail uses are compatible with and will enhance the existing character of the Blake Road Station area. High-density, mixed-use redevelopment of this site is consistent with City goals and, by being responsive to the land use policies for this area, the project will promote the orderly development of the Blake Road Corridor. The contemporary, high-quality building design will be an attractive addition to the built environment along Blake Road and the Cedar Lake Regional Trail and the mix of uses will improve and activate the pedestrian realm along Blake Road but also provide an improved experience for pedestrians wishing to access the Minnehaha Creek Greenway. The proposed development will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort or general welfare, and approving the PUD will allow a transit-oriented, mixed-use development that is consistent with the goals of City’s comprehensive plan. Redevelopment of this once industrial site will have a positive effect on the health, safety and vitality of the area. The new construction will comply with all building, health, and site development codes. From:Chris Osmundson To:Jason Lindahl Cc:Robert C. Lux; Chris Osmundson Subject:[EXTERNAL] 325 Blake Road N - Nov 15th Engagement Summary Date:Wednesday, November 17, 2021 2:57:04 PM Attachments:image001.png Importance:High “A neighborhood community engagement session was hosted by Alatus LLC at 6:30pm on Monday, November 15th, 2021 at 43 Hoops, a basketball training facility just across Blake Road N from the proposed redevelopment site at 325 Blake Road. Members of Alatus LLC, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and the City of Hopkins were in attendance. The meeting consisted of a presentation by Bob Lux and Chris Osmundson with Alatus, and Gabe Sherman with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, about the proposed master development plan, focusing on both high level and detailed components of the proposed land use applications and integration with Minnehaha Creek, respectively. Materials presented via a digital Power Point presentation included the latest images and schematic design concepts from Alatus’s land use application, in addition to the most recent engineered drawings from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Further discussion was also had regarding the municipal process that the development is working through, overall site timing, and forthcoming engagement opportunities even after land use approvals have been proposed to be received. After the approximately 40 minute presentation, members of the development team and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District answered specific questions with attendees on a one-on-one basis. Based on the sign-in sheets provided by Alatus at the entry to the facility, 27 people were signed in and were in attendance, in addition to those from the development team, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and the City of Hopkins. Questions asked included: (1) questions related to the multi-family affordable housing rental rent and income limitations in the proposed low-income housing tax credit building and how long those would be in place; (2) questions about how a joint health club / fitness facility would practically work and whether or not certain buildings would have certain amenities while others would not; (3) questions about the how senior co-ops are different and the same from/as a condominium ownership model and what pricing the senior co-op units would range in price from; (4) various questions about bike and pedestrian infrastructure and connections to existing infrastructure and under-construction infrastructure; (5) questions related to parking availability and sufficiency for guests, retail, and parkland/watershed district visitors; (6) questions about the proposed stories and floorplans associated with the for-sale townhomes; (7) questions about integration of trash, recycling, and composting services for all residential units, retail uses, and public parkland and public spaces and how the owner(s) would ensure cleanliness for the whole space; (8) questions about the timing and functionality of the solar arrays on each building and when those would be active and generating electricity for the given residential facilities. While this list is not all inclusive, it is an accurate representation of the questions that the development team members fielded after the presentation. Attendees had the opportunity to pick-up a take-away handout that contained a QR code that could be scanned to link them directly to the 325blakeroadn.com website that is maintained by Alatus LLC. Additionally, the presentation was recorded and the presentation, presentation materials, and other items will be made available on the website for questions and comments and further feedback. Invitations to the meeting were distributed via municipal notice provisions in addition to social media postings and general word of mouth.” Chris Osmundson Alatus, LLC – Director of Development (O): 612.455.0712 | (C): 612.201.8487 cbosmundson@alatusllc.com Stay Connected: Alatus LLC | Facebook | LinkedIn This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) names above. This message may be attorney-client communication and as such privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. Thank you. From:Dale Johnson To:Jason Lindahl; Dale Johnson Subject:[EXTERNAL] Public Hearing Date:Friday, November 12, 2021 5:36:39 PM Dear Mr. Lindahl, I got your letter regarding the meeting on 11/23. I have also received a letter from a developer named Alatus. Is this the same company that is developing or wants to develop the property in the NW corner of Blake and Excelsior by the Goodwill? I was at a council meeting several weeks ago when that project was being presented. They brought in an upper management person from out of town who started out by mentioning he was a minority. That starts the process off on the wrong foot for me. I don't care if he is from Mars but if he and his company feel that is important it tells me they are playing the ethiscity card. Maybe they get better financial deals from the feds, the state or Hopkins or the county. I don't know. A question that I did not ask was where does the snow go when the roads get plowed. If this is a private project, I presume they will incur the cost to plow the streets in their development, not the city! Have they really set aside a realistic sized area for the snow? The same questions need to be asked about this new development. Are there time tables in the agreements? Can the person developing the property just sell out when it is finished and therefore have no concern as to the problems that might come up? Any person who has been educated on city planning must be aware that developers build and split. I hope you can educate me so I can have answers before your meeting and the one next Tuesday put on by Alatus. Sincerely, Lion Dale Johnson 325 Blake Road N. Master Development Multi-Purpose Parking Solution The Master Development (“Development”) created by the Alatus-Hopkins-MCWD partnership located at 325 Blake Road N. was designed as a landmark destination for the residents of Hopkins and beyond. This is evidenced by the variety of housing, entertainment, and public realm features within the Development, all of which are easily accessible by multiple forms of transportation (walk, bike, light rail, vehicle). One of the forms of transportation will be vehicular traffic, and a destination like this requires attention to detail and creativity when designing a parking solution to meet the needs of the residents and public alike, while preserving the aesthetics and value of the landscape and structures. In total, the Development includes 1,239 parking stalls throughout the developable acreage with a high concentration located below ground underneath the various housing projects. “Exhibit A” displays the parking volume at each location. The key to any successful parking solution is maximizing the utilization rate of the parking such that the supply adequately and precisely meets demand at all hours of the day. The Development will include a variety of uses that have complementary parking needs. For instance, an average resident that does not work from home will primarily use their parking stall from 5pm-9am, while an average employee at one of the various retail outlets would use their parking stall from 9am-5pm (standard workday hours). Buildings C & D (pictured in Exhibit A) will include “multi-purpose” parking garages that serve both the residents of the housing projects and the patrons of the public realms and entertainment node within the Development – these garages will include a combined 797 parking stalls (see table below). The Developer (Alatus) has experience curating multi-purpose parking solutions and seeing them through to reality. Below are some general guidelines for the multi-purpose garages operated in Buildings C & D: - Approximately one-third of the parking stalls (250-300 of the approx. 800) would be dedicated RESERVED stalls leased to residents of the buildings. - The remaining two-thirds of the parking stalls (500-550 of the approx. 800) would be split between UNRESERVED resident parking and transient parking. - In our recent experience with similar suburban projects, the parking needs of the average rental community is approx. 1.20 parking stalls per unit. - Buildings C & D are currently designed to include approx. 500 rental units, which would equate to 605 total parking stalls (RESERVED + UNRESERVED) dedicated to the residents based on a 1.20 parking factor. That would leave almost 200 parking stalls for transient/overflow demand. - The parking garages will be equipped with state-of-the-art parking technology that uses machine learning to make sure there are no inventory problems; this technology would ensure that there is ample parking for residents and track the utilization by the public. Exhibit A: 325 Blake Road N. Site Plan TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 325 BLAKE ROAD DEVELOPMENT HOPKINS, MINNESOTA Prepared for: ALATUS, LLC 80 S 8th Street, Suite 4155 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 767 N Eustis Street, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55114 SEPTEMBER 2021 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 325 BLAKE ROAD DEVELOPMENT HOPKINS, MINNESOTA REPORT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________ Date: 9/27/2021 Jacob A. Rojer, P.E. License No. 56767 3 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 4 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 4 Existing Roadways ................................................................................................................................. 4 Existing Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................................................ 5 Roadway Improvements ........................................................................................................................ 5 Background Growth ............................................................................................................................... 6 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................................... 8 Site Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................... 8 Site Trip Distribution and Access ........................................................................................................... 9 Parking ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Infrastructure .................................................................................... 11 CAPACITY ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................. 12 Existing Year (2021) Conditions .......................................................................................................... 13 Opening Year (2025) No-Build Conditions .......................................................................................... 15 Horizon Year (2040) No-Build Conditions............................................................................................ 18 Opening Year (2025) Build Conditions ................................................................................................ 20 Horizon Year (2040) Build Conditions ................................................................................................. 24 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................... 29 APPENDIX .................................................................................................................................................. 30 APPENDIX A. Exhibits B. Site Plan C. Raw Turning Movement Counts D. SimTraffic Analysis Results 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 4 INTRODUCTION Alatus, LLC is proposing a mixed-use development that includes townhomes and five multifamily housing buildings varying in height from 3 stories to 14 stories, with up to 875 dwelling units on site. There will also be a 9,000 square feet of standalone restaurant space and 8,000 square feet of retail on site. The development is located on the southeast corner of Blake Road (CSAH 20) and Lake Street in Hopkins, MN. The site was previously occupied by a cold storage facility. Exhibit 1 shows the proposed project location. All exhibits referenced in this report are provided in Appendix A. The proposed site plan is included in Appendix B. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS The proposed development is in the southeast corner of Blake Road & Lake Street in Hopkins, MN. The following study intersections are included in the traffic analysis.  Blake Road (CSAH 20) & Excelsior Boulevard (CSAH 3)  Blake Road (CSAH 20) & 2nd Street  Blake Road (CSAH 20) & Lake Street  Blake Road (CSAH 20) & Cambridge Street  Blake Road (CSAH 20) & Trunk Highway 7 (TH 7) The study intersections listed above are shown in Exhibit 1. EXISTING ROADWAYS The key surrounding roadway network consists of Blake Road, Lake Street, Excelsior Boulevard, and TH 7. The redevelopment will have site accesses on Blake Road and Lake Street. The following provides a detailed description of roads in the study network. Blake Road (CSAH 20) is a four lane north-south roadway with left turn lanes at accesses. Blake Road was reconstructed in 2018 and 2019 and there is ongoing construction at the Cedar Lake Trail crossing, freight rail crossing, and future Southwest Light Rail (SWLRT) crossing. Blake Road is classified as a Major Collector according to the Hennepin County 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application reports the 2016 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) on Blake Road as 12,200 vehicles per day (vpd) north of Excelsior Boulevard. South of TH 7 the 2014 AADT is reported as 16,200 vpd. The current posted speed limit on Blake Road is 30 miles per hour (mph). Lake Street is a two-lane east-west roadway with a westbound left turn lane at Blake Road. Lake Street is classified as a Local Road according to the City of Hopkins 2040 Comprehensive Plan. There is no reported AADT for Lake Street on the MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application. The current posted speed limit on Lake Street is 30 mph. Excelsior Boulevard (CSAH 3) is a four-lane divided east-west roadway with left turn lanes at intersecting streets. Excelsior Boulevard is classified as an A-Minor Reliever according to the Hennepin County 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application reports the 2016 AADT of Excelsior Boulevard as 19,100 vpd west of Blake Road and 20,300 vpd east of Blake 5 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 Road. The current posted speed limit on Excelsior Boulevard is 35 miles per hour west of Blake Road and 40 miles per hour east of Blake Road. TH 7 is a four-lane divided east-west highway with turn lanes at roadway intersections. TH 7 is classified as an A-Principal Arterial according to the MnDOT functional classification map. The MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application reports the AADT Excelsior Boulevard as 37,500 vpd west of Blake Road and 36,000 vpd east of Blake Road. The current posted speed limit on Excelsior Boulevard is 50 mph in the study area. Exhibit 2 provides the lane geometry and intersection control for the study intersections. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES To analyze the traffic operations at the study intersections, weekday peak period turning movement counts were compiled from various sources. The following list provides the date of data collection and agency that provided the data:  Blake Road & TH 7 – Wednesday, March 7, 2018; MnDOT  Blake Road & Cambridge Street – Wednesday, March 7, 2018; MnDOT  Blake Road & 2nd Street – Wednesday, February 26, 2020; Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment, Traffic Impact Analysis  Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard – Tuesday, March 10, 2020; Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment, Traffic Impact Analysis The final intersection, Blake Road & Lake Street, did not have any recent Turning Movement Counts (TMCs) so new count data was collected on Thursday, August 12, 2021. During the 2021 data collection, southbound Blake Road was closed at the Cedar Lake Regional Trail. Due to the road closure, volumes on Blake Road were balanced with the previous counts taken at Blake Road & 2nd Street to account for traffic that rerouted to avoid construction. All TMCs collected prior to 2021 were grown to Existing Year (2021) conditions using the same factors that were used to grow existing volumes to future volumes; these factors are outlined in the background growth section. The COVID-19 pandemic was not believed to have any effects on the traffic volumes based on the dates of the previous counts, so no adjustments were made. Exhibit 3 provides a summary of the adjusted existing weekday AM and PM peak hour turning traffic volumes used in the analysis. The raw turning movement count data is provided in Appendix C. The network AM peak hour was determined to be 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM and the network PM peak hour was determined to be 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The Cedar Lake Trail crossing at Blake Road is being reconstructed as an underpass with ramps from the trail providing access to Blake Road. Blake Station will be constructed as part of the Southwest LRT project, southwest of the proposed development site. Additionally, the Access Road will be reconstructed and connect to Blake road just south of Blake Station. The geometric changes to Pierce Avenue and the Access Road will not impact this study. Figure 1 below shows the Metro Transit plan for the improvements to be completed in conjunction with the Southwest light rail project (SWLRT). These improvements were included in the opening year and horizon year analysis. 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 6 Figure 1 – Metro Transit Blake Station SWLRT Improvements BACKGROUND GROWTH The first phase of the proposed development is anticipated to be completed and open by 2025 with the complete buildout of the site completed by 2040. The City of Hopkins Comprehensive Plan was reviewed to identify a background growth rate for Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard. The Blake Road Corridor Study was reviewed to determine a background growth rate for TH 7, the study projected AADTs for TH 7 to 2035. These rates were used to develop forecast peak hour volumes at the study intersections for Opening Year (2025) and Horizon Year (2040). Table 1 provides a summary of the AADT and the proposed annual growth rates. These growth rates were applied to the adjusted Existing (2021) TMCs to develop the Opening Year No-Build (2025) and Horizon Year No-Build (2040) turning movement volumes. Table 1 – Annual Growth Rate Calculation Street Segment Most Recent AADT Projected AADT Calculated Background Annual Growth Rate Year Volume Year Volume Excelsior Boulevard 2018 19,100 2040 22,000 0.6% Blake Road 2018 12,200 2040 13,400 0.4% TH 7, West of Blake Road 2019 37,500 2035 39,000 0.2% TH 7, East of Blake Road 2019 36,000 2035 38,900 0.5% 7 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 In addition to the background growth rate, the Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment phase 1 traffic was added to the 2025 background growth and the Full Buildout traffic was added to the 2040 background growth. The Blake & Excelsior Redevelopment is located in the northwest quadrant of the Blake Rd & Excelsior Blvd intersection. Additionally, the future LRT Park N Ride trips were added to the background growth, separate from the growth rates. The trip generation was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Tenth Edition. Standard ITE trip rates were used to develop the total trips generated. A 0.6% annual growth rate was applied to Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard. The growth rate on Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road was used to be consistent with previous studies and be conservative based on calculations in Table 1. A 0.4% annual growth rate was applied to TH 7. The growth rate along TH 7 was averaged based on the two calculated growth rates. Growth Rates used are consistent with previous the Blake Road Corridor Study and the Hennepin County Comprehensive Plan. Exhibits 4 and 5 shows the Opening Year No-Build (2025) & Horizon Year No-Build (2040) turning movement volumes, respectively. 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 8 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE TRIP GENERATION The trip-generating potential of the proposed 325 Blake Road development was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Tenth Edition. ITE average trip rates for each land use were used to develop the total trips generated by the site. Table 2 provides the proposed new land uses for each building on the site. The site plan is currently fluctuating between 801 and 875 units; therefore 875 dwelling units were analyzed to account for the highest trip generation, the actual unit count in each building may vary as the site plan continues to evolve. The proposed retail in building III does not have a known tenant, so for the purposes of the analysis it was assumed that the space would be a restaurant because that is a more conservative trip generator. Table 2 – Proposed Site Development Building Height Intensity/Units Parking (Stalls) Building I 3 Story 126 Dwelling Units 114 Building II (Senior Living) 5 Story 115 Dwelling Units 183 Building III 14 Story 173 Dwelling Units/ 8,000 SF Retail 482 Building IV 5 Story 191 Dwelling Units Building V 5 Story 163 Dwelling Units 276 Townhomes - 33 Dwelling Units 66 Standalone Restaurant - 9,000 SF 48 Surface Parking - - 22 The studies completed by the Metropolitan Council for the SWLRT project forecasts that Blake Station, adjacent to the proposed site, will serve 1,300 riders per day in 2040 and that most riders are expected to walk to the station. Based on its proximity and density, this development will likely have a significant portion of trips via transit. This analysis assumed a transit mode share of 10% due to the proximity of Blake Station to the proposed site. Construction is expected to happen in two phases. For the purposes of this traffic study, Phase 1 will include Building II, Building III, Building IV, the townhomes, and restaurant and is expected to be completed prior to 2025. Phase 2 will include the entire buildout of the site (adding Building I and Building V) and is expected to be complete prior to 2040. All on-site infrastructure will be built as part of Phase 1. From the data in Table 3, the Opening Year (2025) site is anticipated to generate 3,505 daily vehicle trips, 225 vehicle trips in the AM Peak Hour (85 entering and 140 exiting), and 285 vehicle trips in the PM Peak Hour (180 entering and 105 exiting). The additional units not shown on the site plan were assumed to be constructed in Phase 2. The Horizon Year (2040) site is anticipated to generate 4,870 daily vehicle trips, 320 vehicle trips in the AM Peak Hour (110 entering and 210 exiting), and 385 vehicle trips in PM Peak Hour (245 entering and 140 exiting). 9 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 Table 3 – Proposed Site Trip Generation Land Use Description ITE Land Use Code (LUC) Intensity/ Units Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Opening Year (2025) Development (Partial Build Out) Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (Townhomes) 220 33 Dwelling Units 220 5 10 15 10 5 15 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) (Building IV) 221 191 Dwelling Units 1,370 25 65 90 70 45 115 Multifamily Housing (High-Rise) (Building III) 222 173 Dwelling Units 700 15 35 50 35 20 55 Senior Adult Housing-Attached (Building II) 252 115 Dwelling Units 390 10 15 25 15 10 25 Quality Restaurant 931 8 KSF 575 5 0 5 35 15 50 High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 932 9 KSF 860 40 40 80 45 25 70 Total Trips After Internal Capture 3,895 95 155 250 200 115 315 Total Trips with Internal Capture and 10% Transit Mode Share 3,505 85 140 225 180 105 285 Horizon Year (2040) Development (Full Build Out) Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (Townhomes) 220 33 Dwelling Units 230 5 10 15 10 5 15 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) (Building I, IV, V, & 74 additional units) 221 554 Dwelling Units 2,845 50 140 190 140 85 225 Multifamily Housing (High-Rise) (Building III) 222 173 Dwelling Units 725 15 40 55 35 20 55 Senior Adult Housing-Attached (Building II) 252 115 Dwelling Units 405 10 15 25 15 10 25 Quality Restaurant 931 8 KSF 575 5 0 5 35 15 50 High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 932 9 KSF 860 40 40 80 45 25 70 Total Trips After Internal Capture 5,410 120 235 355 270 155 425 Total Trips with Internal Capture and 10% Transit Mode Share 4,870 110 210 320 245 140 385 SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ACCESS The site trips were distributed to adjacent roadways based on the current traffic patterns in the area and a general assessment of the major regional roadways surrounding the study area. In general, the following global trip distribution was assumed for the development:  20% west on TH 7  35% east on TH 7 (20% utilize Texas Avenue/Lake Street to access the site)  20% east on Excelsior Boulevard  5% south on Blake Road  15% west on Excelsior Boulevard 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 10  5% west on 2nd Street Based on discussions with the City of Hopkins and Hennepin County, it was determined that while some traffic would likely use the Texas Avenue & TH 7 to get to the site, the intersection does not require analysis due to the amount of trips anticipated to use the intersection. The trip distribution for the site-generated traffic used the same overall distribution pattern for the Opening Year (2025) and the Horizon Year (2040) conditions. Exhibit 6 shows the distributions for both Build conditions and Exhibits 7 & 8 show the Opening Year (2025) trip assignment and Horizon Year (2040) trip assignment, respectively. The site will have two site accesses, which are listed below:  Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1  Lake Street & Site Access 2 Site Access 1 will be at Blake Road at 2nd Street, this access is signalized. Site Access 2 is proposed to be on Lake Street, approximately 90 feet east of Blake Road, this site access cannot be moved further to the east due to the Minnehaha Creek. The proposed site plan is included in Appendix B. PARKING Per the City of Hopkins code of Ordinances sec. 102-365 on mixed-use development parking, “A minimum of one and maximum of 1.5 parking spaces per multifamily unit is permitted; one guest space per 15 units is permitted. All uses other than residential shall require a parking study to determine the necessary parking required.” The parking needs for the restaurant space could vary greatly based on the tenant. Because the site is a mixed-use development, a parking study should be completed to determine if the 48 provided stalls will be adequate for the stand-alone restaurant space. It is assumed that adequate parking will be provided for the retail space located in Building III. The proposed parking ratios for the five multifamily buildings are shown in Table 4. Overall, the entire development has a ratio of 1.40 parking spaces per multifamily unit and meets City of Hopkins requirements. The townhomes are proposed to have a higher parking ratio because they are considered to be more similar with parking needs for one and two family homes. It was also noted that Buildings III & IV will use the same parking structure, so the two buildings have a combined parking ratio. 11 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 Table 4 – Residential Parking Ratios PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, AND TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE The site is in a predominately industrial and residential area in the east part of Hopkins. The site is surrounded by mainly residential with some industrial developments southeast of the site. The site is bordered by the Cedar Lake Trail and Canadian Pacific (CP) Railroad on the south side of the site. Blake Road provides trails on both sides of the roadway and provides access to the Cedar Lake Trail which will have a grade separated crossing under Blake Road. Blake Road & 2nd Street NE also has a pedestrian crossing at the signal. Excelsior Boulevard provides sidewalks on both sides of the roadway west of Blake Road and has pedestrian crossings at the signals. The proposed development site will have sidewalks along interior roadways, which connect to Blake Road and the Cedar Lake Regional Trial. The site is well connected to promote bicycling as a viable mode of transportation as there is access to the regional trail system along the south side of the site, there are on-street bike lanes on Blake Road south of Excelsior Boulevard, and there are existing trails on Blake Road north of Excelsior Boulevard. This is a transit-oriented development as it will be located adjacent to a SWLRT station. As previously stated, the adjacent Blake Station is projected to serve 1,300 riders per day in 2040 and a significant portion of development trips are expected to use transit. The addition of a bus stop near the SWLRT station will provide more options to utilize transit. Building Dwelling Units Parking Stalls Parking Ratio Building I 126 114 0.90 Building II 115 183 1.59 Building III 173 482 1.32 Building IV 191 Building V 163 276 1.69 Townhomes 33 66 2.00 Total 801 1,121 1.40 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 12 CAPACITY ANALYSIS A capacity analysis was performed to quantify the vehicle delay and level of service at the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The capacity analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic. The capacity of an intersection quantifies its ability to accommodate traffic volumes and is measured in average delay per vehicle. It is expressed in terms of level of service (LOS) which ranges from A to F, with LOS A as the highest (best traffic flow and least delay), LOS E as saturated or at-capacity conditions, and LOS F as the lowest (oversaturated conditions). The LOS grades shown below, which are provided in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), quantify and categorize the driver’s discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and travel times experienced as a result of intersection control and the resulting traffic queuing. A detailed description of each LOS rating and the range of control delays for each rating can be found in Table 5. Because signalized intersections are expected to carry a larger volume of vehicles and stopping is required during red time, higher delays are tolerated for the corresponding LOS ratings. For side street stop intersections, the intersection LOS is reported as the worst individual movement. Table 5 – Level of Service Information Level of Service Average Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) Description A 0-10 (Unsignalized); 0-10 (Signalized) Minimal control delay; traffic operates at primarily free-flow conditions; unimpeded movement within traffic stream. B >10-15 (Unsignalized); >10-20 (Signalized) Minor control delay at signalized intersections; traffic operates at a fairly unimpeded level with slightly restricted movement within traffic stream. C >15-25 (Unsignalized); >20-35 (Signalized) Moderate control delay; movement within traffic stream more restricted than at LOS B; formation of queues contributes to lower average travel speeds. D >25-35 (Unsignalized); >35-55 (Signalized) Considerable control delay that may be substantially increased by small increases in flow; average travel speeds continue to decrease. E >35-50 (Unsignalized); >55-80 (Signalized) High control delay; average travel speed no more than 33 percent of free flow speed. F >50 (Unsignalized); >80 (Signalized) Extremely high control delay; extensive queuing and high volumes create exceedingly restricted traffic flow. Traffic models for each scenario were developed using Synchro/SimTraffic, and the delay and queueing were evaluated for each scenario. The scenarios that were analyzed are as follows:  Existing Year (2021)  Opening Year (2025) No-Build  Horizon Year (2040) No-Build  Opening Year (2025) Build  Horizon Year (2040) Build 13 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 EXISTING YEAR (2021) CONDITIONS The Existing Year (2021) Condition analysis was completed to develop an understanding of the baseline operating conditions for the study area and calibrate the model compared to observed conditions. The traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 3 were used in the Existing Year (2021) analysis. As previously discussed, the raw traffic counts were adjusted to all be based on year 2021. The existing signal timings supplied by MnDOT and Hennepin County were used for analysis. Tables 6 and 7 provide a summary of the average delay (seconds per vehicle) and LOS under Existing Year (2021) Conditions for each movement at the study intersections during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour, respectively. The movements that are anticipated to operate at LOS E are shown in yellow and the movements that are anticipated to operate at LOS F are shown in red. The full SimTraffic reports are included in Appendix D. Table 6 – Existing Year (2021) AM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Blake Road & TH 7 Signal EB 83.5 F 48.2 D 16.1 B 44.8 D WB 74.0 E 28.7 C 6.7 A NB 71.4 E 68.7 E 40.2 D SB 97.4 F 91.2 F 2.9 A Blake Road & Cambridge Street Signal EB 36.2 D 38.4 D 6.7 A 13.7 B WB 36.1 D 27.8 C 5.0 A NB 42.5 D 6.0 A 4.1 A SB 63.8 E 6.0 A 4.2 A Blake Road & Lake Street Side Street Stop EB 11.8 B 11.7 B 5.3 A 12.0 B WB 12.0 B 11.5 B 4.4 A NB 6.5 A 1.1 A 0.8 A SB 4.1 A 0.4 A 0.2 A Blake Road & 2nd Street Signal EB 18.5 B - - 10.2 B 12.2 B WB - - - - - - NB 25.1 C 7.9 A - - SB - - 11.0 B 8.2 A Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Signal EB 44.3 D 18.9 B 4.0 A 26.1 C WB 47.3 D 22.0 C 4.1 A NB 40.8 D 35.1 D 12.0 B SB 40.6 D 38.0 D 28.8 C 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 14 Table 7 – Existing Year (2021) PM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Blake Road & TH 7 Signal EB 82.0 F 51.4 D 17.4 B 62.1 E WB 95.5 F 43.8 D 11.9 B NB 68.9 E 83.7 F 65.3 E SB 100+ F 100+ F 14.3 B Blake Road & Cambridge Street Signal EB 36.8 D 38.8 D 6.9 A 16.8 B WB 29.9 C 29.3 C 6.2 A NB 47.7 D 11.1 B 11.3 B SB 54.4 D 11.3 B 8.8 A Blake Road & Lake Street Side Street Stop EB 19.4 C 19.1 C 8.8 A 20.1 C WB 20.1 C 26.3 D 7.7 A NB 5.9 A 2.1 A 2.1 A SB 8.5 A 0.7 A 0.6 A Blake Road & 2nd Street Signal EB 20.6 C - - 12.9 B 14.1 B WB - - - - - - NB 29.3 C 10.5 B - - SB - - 14.8 B 9.8 A Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Signal EB 49.2 D 19.3 B 5.8 A 26.8 C WB 57.7 E 20.4 C 7.1 A NB 53.6 D 44.5 D 25.9 C SB 56.9 E 45.0 D 35.2 D Note: delays in excess of 100 seconds per vehicle are reported as "100+" Based on the analysis, the study intersections are currently operating at LOS D or better during the AM peak hour. In the PM peak hour, Blake Road & TH 7 operates at LOS E. Under Existing Year (2021) Conditions, all intersection movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better except for the following:  AM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – the eastbound left, southbound left, and southbound through movements are expected to operate at LOS F. Additionally, the westbound left, northbound left, and northbound through are expected to operate at LOS E. The projected delays are not unexpected, considering the high volumes and long cycle length (190 s).  Blake Road & Cambridge Street – the southbound left movement operates at LOS E; this is due to the movement being low volume and the coordination of the signals.  PM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – the eastbound left, westbound left, southbound left, northbound through, and southbound through movements are expected to operate at LOS F. Additionally, the northbound left and northbound right are expected to operate at LOS E. The projected delays are not unexpected, considering the high volumes and long cycle length (200 s).  Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard – the westbound left and southbound left movements are expected to operate at LOS E, this is due to priority being given to the high east-west volumes on Excelsior Boulevard. The 95th percentile queues were reviewed at the study intersections. The 95th percentile queues for the movements that have extended queues or have high levels of delay are listed below. 15 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021  PM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – The southbound left 95th percentile queue is expected to extend approximately 130 feet outside the storage bay. The southbound through queues may impact the upstream intersection of Aquilas Avenue & West 37th Street, these queues are the result of heavy traffic volumes through the intersection and are a known issue. It should be noted that SimTraffic reports longer queues than the actual 95th percentile queues for turn lanes if the through lane queues on that approach extend beyond the provided turn lane storage bay. The traffic models were observed to determine which queues were actually extending out of storages bays. Only the actual queuing issues are documented above. The capacity analysis results for Existing Year (2021) Conditions are consistent with the findings in the Blake Road Corridor Study conducted in 2015, with undesirable delays at the intersection of Blake Road & TH 7. OPENING YEAR (2025) NO-BUILD CONDITIONS The Opening Year (2025) No-Build Condition analysis was completed to develop an understanding of the baseline operating conditions for the study area without the addition of the development traffic. The traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 4 were used in the Opening Year (2025) No-Build analysis. As previously discussed, these volumes were developed based on traffic projections from the City of Hopkins Comprehensive Plan and the Blake Road Corridor Study, which are consistent with Hennepin County growth rates. The signal timings used in Existing (2021) were used for Opening Year (2025) No-Build conditions. Signal timings were not adjusted for background growth. Tables 8 and 9 provide a summary of the average delay (seconds per vehicle) and LOS under Opening Year (2025) No-Build Conditions for each movement at the study intersections during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour, respectively. The movements that are anticipated to operate at LOS E are shown in yellow and the movements that are anticipated to operate at LOS F are shown in red. The full SimTraffic reports are included in Appendix D. 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 16 Table 8 – Opening Year (2025) No-Build AM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Blake Road & TH 7 Signal EB 83.0 F 53.0 D 19.1 B 46.5 D WB 71.3 E 27.9 C 7.6 A NB 72.7 E 70.6 E 39.7 D SB 100+ F 88.6 F 3.2 A Blake Road & Cambridge Street Signal EB 37.3 D 37.8 D 6.6 A 14.2 B WB 30.2 C 30.7 C 5.3 A NB 44.4 D 6.9 A 4.2 A SB 64.4 E 6.3 A 4.8 A Blake Road & Lake Street Side Street Stop EB 14.6 B 16.1 C 6.7 A 16.1 C WB 11.2 B 11.7 B 4.6 A NB 5.1 A 1.2 A 1.1 A SB 4.4 A 0.5 A 0.4 A Blake Road & 2nd Street Signal EB 18.5 B - - 10.9 B 13.1 B WB - - - - - - NB 27.9 C 8.3 A - - SB - - 12.5 B 8.7 A Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Signal EB 42.7 D 20.2 C 4.0 A 26.5 C WB 47.3 D 22.3 C 4.3 A NB 39.0 D 33.4 C 12.3 B SB 45.1 D 37.0 D 30.2 C Note: delays in excess of 100 seconds per vehicle are reported as "100+" Table 9 – Opening Year (2025) No-Build PM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Blake Road & TH 7 Signal EB 88.9 F 65.4 E 25.8 C 67.5 E WB 97.0 F 45.2 D 12.7 B NB 74.3 E 87.4 F 70.5 E SB 100+ F 100+ F 10.4 B Blake Road & Cambridge Street Signal EB 37.0 D 39.2 D 6.9 A 18.1 B WB 30.6 C 33.6 C 7.7 A NB 46.0 D 12.7 B 14.2 B SB 58.2 E 12.5 B 10.5 B Blake Road & Lake Street Side Street Stop EB 22.2 C 25.4 D 10.8 B 25.4 D WB 21.4 C 24.3 C 8.9 A NB 6.7 A 2.1 A 2.0 A SB 5.9 A 0.8 A 0.6 A Blake Road & 2nd Street Signal EB 21.9 C - - 14.4 B 14.2 B WB - - - - - - NB 29.9 C 10.4 B - - SB - - 13.8 B 9.6 A Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Signal EB 52.4 D 20.1 C 6.5 A 27.7 C WB 57.4 E 20.3 C 7.7 A NB 56.6 E 43.8 D 29.0 C SB 56.1 E 45.9 D 40.6 D Note: delays in excess of 100 seconds per vehicle are reported as "100+" 17 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 Based on the analysis, the study intersections are expected to operate at LOS D or better during the AM peak hour. In the PM peak hour, Blake Road & TH 7 operates at LOS E. Under Opening Year (2025) No- Build Conditions, all intersection movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better except for the following:  AM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – the eastbound left, southbound left, and southbound through movements are expected to operate at LOS F. Additionally, the westbound left, northbound left, and northbound through are expected to operate at LOS E. The projected delays are not unexpected, considering the high volumes and long cycle length (190 seconds).  Blake Road & Cambridge Street – the southbound left movement is expected to operate at LOS E; this is due to the movement being low volume and the coordination of the signals.  PM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – the eastbound left, westbound left, southbound left, northbound through, and southbound through movements are expected to operate at LOS F. Additionally, the northbound left, eastbound through, and northbound right are expected to operate at LOS E. The projected delays are not unexpected, considering the high volumes and long cycle length (200 seconds).  Blake Road & Cambridge Street – the southbound left movement is expected to operate at LOS E; this is due to the movement being low volume and the coordination of the signals.  Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard – the westbound left, northbound left, and southbound left movements are expected to operate at LOS E, this is due to priority being given to the high east- west volumes on Excelsior Boulevard. The 95th percentile queues were reviewed at the study intersections. The 95th percentile queues for the movements that have extended queues or have high levels of delay are listed below.  AM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – the southbound left 95th percentile queue is expected to fill the storage bay, but queues will be accommodated in the taper of the turn lane.  Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard – the northbound left 95th percentile queue is anticipated to extend past the storage bay by 17 feet, this will be accommodated within the taper of the turn lane.  PM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – the westbound left and northbound left 95th percentile queues are expected to fill their respective storage bays, but queues will be accommodated in the taper of the turn lanes. The southbound left 95th percentile queue is expected to extend approximately 130 feet outside the storage bay. The southbound through queues may impact the upstream intersection of Aquilas Avenue & West 37th Street, these queues are the result of heavy traffic volumes through the intersection and are a known issue. It should be noted that SimTraffic reports longer queues than the actual 95th percentile queues for turn lanes if the through lane queues on that approach extend beyond the provided turn lane storage bay. The traffic models were observed to determine which queues were actually extending out of storages bays. Only the actual queuing issues are documented above. The capacity analysis results for Opening Year (2025) No-Build Conditions are consistent with the findings in the Blake Road Corridor Study conducted in 2015 and the Existing Year (2021) analysis. 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 18 HORIZON YEAR (2040) NO-BUILD CONDITIONS The Horizon Year (2040) No-Build Condition analysis was completed to develop an understanding of the baseline horizon year operating conditions for the study area without the addition of the development traffic. The traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 5 were used in the Horizon Year (2040) No-Build analysis. As previously discussed, these volumes were developed based on traffic projections from the City of Hopkins Comprehensive Plan and the Blake Road Corridor Study. The signal timings used in Existing (2021) and Opening Year (2025) No-Build conditions were optimized for Horizon Year analysis because it is anticipated signal timings at all intersections will be modified prior to 2040. Tables 10 and 11 provide a summary of the average delay (seconds per vehicle) and LOS under Horizon Year (2040) Conditions for each movement at the study intersections during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour, respectively. The movements that are anticipated to operate at LOS E are shown in yellow and the movements that are anticipated to operate at LOS F are shown in red. The full SimTraffic reports are included in Appendix D. Table 10 – Horizon Year (2040) No Build AM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Blake Road & TH 7 Signal EB 87.9 F 49.9 D 19.3 B 47.7 D WB 97.2 F 30.1 C 8.1 A NB 71.0 E 65.2 E 45.7 D SB 96.1 F 85.9 F 2.6 A Blake Road & Cambridge Street Signal EB 35.7 D 34.3 C 7.5 A 14.7 B WB 28.0 C 30.3 C 5.0 A NB 40.8 D 7.6 A 6.3 A SB 66.3 E 8.0 A 6.4 A Blake Road & Lake Street Side Street Stop EB 16.9 C 17.6 C 6.5 A 18.6 C WB 13.1 B 18.6 C 6.1 A NB 3.9 A 1.2 A 0.7 A SB 4.8 A 0.6 A 0.4 A Blake Road & 2nd Street Signal EB 20.1 C - - 12.7 B 14.8 B WB - - - - - - NB 30.7 C 8.9 A - - SB - - 15.0 B 11.2 B Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Signal EB 41.4 D 21.5 C 4.3 A 28.2 C WB 45.5 D 23.0 C 4.5 A NB 40.1 D 34.7 C 14.7 B SB 47.8 D 43.4 D 37.3 D 19 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 Table 11 – Horizon Year (2040) No Build PM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Blake Road & TH 7 Signal EB 100+ F 99.6 F 57.1 E 84.6 F WB 100+ F 53.7 D 16.9 B NB 76.2 E 86.1 F 82.6 F SB 100+ F 85.3 F 3.4 A Blake Road & Cambridge Street Signal EB 61.5 E 56.3 E 10.2 B 28.6 C WB 27.3 C 32.1 C 15.7 B NB 45.8 D 30.5 C 45.0 D SB 58.9 E 14.2 B 12.3 B Blake Road & Lake Street Side Street Stop EB 28.1 D 34.2 D 17.5 C 41.7 E WB 23.0 C 41.7 E 9.9 A NB 8.6 A 2.2 A 2.2 A SB 11.2 B 0.9 A 0.7 A Blake Road & 2nd Street Signal EB 24.1 C - - 16.5 B 16.2 B WB - - - - - - NB 34.5 C 12.0 B - - SB - - 15.6 B 11.8 B Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Signal EB 48.2 D 21.7 C 7.7 A 29.8 C WB 62.2 E 23.3 C 8.6 A NB 63.6 E 45.4 D 30.0 C SB 55.2 E 48.3 D 47.2 D Note: delays in excess of 100 seconds per vehicle are reported as "100+" Based on the analysis, all study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better except for the intersection of Blake Road & TH 7, which operates at LOS F in the PM Peak Hour and the intersection of Blake Road & Lake Street, which operates at LOS E in the PM Peak. Under Horizon Year (2040) No-Build Conditions, all intersection movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better except for the following:  AM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – the eastbound left, westbound left, southbound left, and southbound through movements are expected to operate at LOS F. Additionally, northbound left, and northbound through are expected to operate at LOS E. The projected delays are not unexpected, considering the high volumes and long cycle length (190 seconds).  Blake Road & Cambridge Street – the southbound left movement is expected to operate at LOS E; this is due to the movement being low volume and the coordination of the signals.  PM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – the eastbound left, westbound left, southbound left, eastbound through, northbound through, southbound through, and northbound right movements are all expected to operate at LOS F. Additionally, the northbound left and eastbound right are expected to operate at LOS E. The projected delays are not unexpected, considering the high volumes and long cycle length (200 seconds). Delays should be monitored in the future to determine the feasibility of mitigation options.  Blake Road & Cambridge Street – the eastbound left, southbound left, and eastbound through movements are expected to operate at LOS E; this is due to the signal prioritizing the higher volume Blake Road movements. The northbound right, eastbound left, and eastbound through turn 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 20 movements operates at LOS E due to northbound right movement from Blake Road & TH 7 queueing into the intersection and blocking the right turn movement at Blake Road & Cambridge Street.  Blake Road & Lake Street – the westbound left movement is anticipated to operate at LOS E; this is not uncommon for a side street stop-controlled intersection with a high-volume main street such as Blake Road.  Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard – the westbound left, northbound left, and southbound left movements are expected to operate at LOS E, this is due to priority being given to the high east- west volumes on Excelsior Boulevard. The 95th percentile queues were reviewed at the study intersections. The 95th percentile queues for the movements that have extended queues or have high levels of delay are listed below.  AM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – The westbound left 95th percentile queue is anticipated to fill the provided storage bays, again this can be accommodated within the taper of the dual left turn lanes.  Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard – The northbound left 95th percentile queue is anticipated to extend past the storage bay by approximately 20 feet, this queue is not expected to affect the upstream intersection.  PM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 –The northbound left 95th percentile queue is expected to extend approximately 40 feet past the provided storage bay, this queue will be accommodated in the taper of the dual left-turn lanes. The southbound left 95 th percentile queue is expected to extend approximately 125 feet outside the storage bay. The southbound queues are expected to impact the upstream intersection of Aquilas Avenue & West 37th Street. Queues should be monitored in the future to determine the feasibility of mitigation options. It should be noted that SimTraffic reports longer queues than the actual 95th percentile queues for turn lanes if the through lane queues on that approach extend beyond the provided turn lane storage bay. The traffic models were observed to determine which queues were actually extending out of storages bays. Only the actual queuing issues are documented above. The capacity analysis results for Horizon Year (2040) No-Build Conditions are consistent with the findings in the Blake Road Corridor Study future year (2035) analysis. OPENING YEAR (2025) BUILD CONDITIONS The Opening Year (2025) Build Condition analysis was completed to develop an understanding of the impact of site traffic to operating conditions for the study area. The traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 9 were used in the Opening Year (2025) Build analysis. As previously discussed, these volumes were calculated by adding the Opening Year (2025) trips generated by the site to the Opening Year (2025) No-Build volumes. Site access 1 ties into the signalized intersection of Blake Road & 2nd Street and was assumed to have a dedicated left-turn lane and a shared through/right lane on the site. Site Access 2, on Lake Street, was assumed to be side street stop controlled and have a single shared left/right lane on the site. Both accesses were assumed to have a single inbound lane. 21 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 The signal timings used in Existing (2021) and Opening Year (2025) No-Build conditions were used for Opening Year (2025) Build conditions. Signal timings were not adjusted for the Opening Year (2025) Build condition except the addition of a couple of seconds of green time to the westbound approach at Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1. Tables 12 and 13 provide a summary of the average delay (seconds per vehicle) and LOS under Opening Year (2025) Build Conditions for each movement at the study intersections during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour, respectively. The movements that are anticipated to operate at LOS E are shown in yellow and the movements that are anticipated to operate at LOS F are shown in red. The full SimTraffic reports are included in Appendix D. Table 12 – Opening Year (2025) Build AM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Blake Road & TH 7 Signal EB 87.0 F 57.6 E 21.5 C 48.4 D WB 73.8 E 29.1 C 7.1 A NB 71.8 E 67.3 E 39.2 D SB 89.6 F 88.1 F 2.5 A Blake Road & Cambridge Street Signal EB 37.8 D 34.2 C 7.0 A 14.0 B WB 33.1 C 29.3 C 5.9 A NB 41.7 D 6.7 A 4.6 A SB 68.1 E 6.9 A 5.2 A Blake Road & Lake Street Side Street Stop EB 14.0 B 16.8 C 5.9 A 16.8 C WB 11.5 B 10.3 B 5.5 A NB 6.3 A 1.3 A 0.9 A SB 3.3 A 0.5 A 0.3 A Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Signal EB 19.2 B 22.5 C 12.5 B 14.5 B WB 26.0 C 25.5 C 5.3 A NB 30.1 C 10.7 B 7.6 A SB 35.7 D 12.8 B 8.9 A Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Signal EB 41.0 D 22.6 C 4.6 A 27.1 C WB 48.5 D 23.5 C 4.5 A NB 41.4 D 32.8 C 14.0 B SB 41.4 D 35.9 D 27.9 C Lake Street & Site Access 2 Side Street Stop EB - - 0.6 A 0.7 A 4.5 A WB 2.1 A 0.3 A - - NB 4.5 A - - 2.9 A SB - - - - - - 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 22 Table 13 – Opening Year (2025) Build PM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Blake Road & TH 7 Signal EB 88.7 F 62.1 E 23.9 C 66.8 E WB 100+ F 46.0 D 13.2 B NB 73.8 E 87.1 F 76.8 E SB 99.2 F 100+ F 4.2 A Blake Road & Cambridge Street Signal EB 42.6 D 44.0 D 8.0 A 20.4 C WB 33.5 C 28.3 C 9.9 A NB 45.7 D 16.4 B 20.1 C SB 57.4 E 13.2 B 10.0 A Blake Road & Lake Street Side Street Stop EB 26.5 D 27.7 D 12.9 B 27.7 D WB 26.7 D 22.7 C 10.1 B NB 7.5 A 2.3 A 2.3 A SB 7.6 A 0.8 A 0.7 A Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Signal EB 23.8 C 24.8 C 16.5 B 18.3 B WB 30.5 C 27.8 C 6.5 A NB 37.8 D 16.1 B 13.6 B SB 45.1 D 15.5 B 11.2 B Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Signal EB 52.4 D 20.3 C 6.7 A 28.2 C WB 54.0 D 21.2 C 8.0 A NB 53.8 D 45.2 D 29.7 C SB 56.3 E 44.9 D 43.6 D Lake Street & Site Access 2 Side Street Stop EB - - 0.6 A 0.5 A 6.5 A WB 3.5 A 0.4 A - - NB 6.5 A - - 5.9 A SB - - - - - - Note: delays in excess of 100 seconds per vehicle are reported as "100+" Based on the analysis, the study intersections are expected to operate at LOS D or better during the AM peak hour. In the PM peak hour, Blake Road & TH 7 is expected to operate at LOS E under Opening Year (2025) Build Conditions. Additionally, both site accesses are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better in the AM & PM Peak Hours. All intersection movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better except for the following:  AM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – the eastbound left, southbound left, and southbound through movements are expected to operate at LOS F. Additionally, the westbound left, northbound left, eastbound through, and northbound through are expected to operate at LOS E. The projected delays are not unexpected, considering the high volumes and long cycle length (190 s). These are the same movements that were shown to operate at LOS E or F in the Opening Year (2025) No-Build analysis, with the exception of the eastbound through which operated at LOS D in the Opening Year (2025) No-Build Analysis.  Blake Road & Cambridge Street – the southbound left movement operates at LOS E; this is due to the movement being low volume and the coordination of the signals. The same movement operated at LOS E the Opening Year (2025) No-Build analysis.  PM Peak Hour 23 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021  Blake Road & TH 7 – the eastbound left, westbound left, southbound left, northbound through, and southbound through movements are expected to operate at LOS F. Additionally, the northbound left, eastbound through, and northbound right are expected to operate at LOS E. The projected delays are not unexpected, considering the high volumes and long cycle length (200 s). These are the same movements that were shown to operate at LOS E or F in the Opening Year (2025) No- Build analysis.  Blake Road & Cambridge Street – the southbound left movement is expected to operate at LOS E; this is due to the movement being low volume and the coordination of the signals. The same movement operated at LOS E the Opening Year (2025) No-Build analysis.  Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard – the southbound left movement is expected to operate at LOS E, this is due to priority being given to the high east-west volumes on Excelsior Boulevard. In the Opening Year (2025) No-Build Analysis the westbound left and northbound left, as well as the southbound left, operated at LOS E. The westbound left and northbound left movements improve due to the random seeding in the SimTraffic model. The 95th percentile queues were reviewed at the study intersections. The 95th percentile queues for the movements that have extended queues or have high levels of delay are listed below.  AM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – the southbound left 95th percentile queue is expected to remain within the storage bay.  Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 – All 95th percentile queues are within their respective storage bays. The westbound left and westbound through/right 95th percentile queues are approximately 65 feet and 55 feet, respectively.  Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard – the northbound left 95th percentile queue is anticipated to extend past the storage bay by approximately 20 feet, this will be accommodated within the taper of the turn lane.  PM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – the westbound left 95th percentile queue is expected to extend past the storage bay by approximately 43 feet, this queue will be accommodated in the taper of the turn lane. The northbound left 95th percentile queue is expected to extend approximately 20 feet past the provided storage bay, this queue will be accommodated in the taper of the turn lane. The southbound left 95th percentile queue is expected to extend approximately 130 feet outside the storage bay. The southbound through queues are expected to impact the upstream intersection of Aquilas Avenue & West 37th Street, this is consistent with Opening Year (2025) No-Build Conditions.  Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 – All 95th percentile queues are within their respective storage bays. The westbound left and westbound through/right 95th percentile queues are 50 feet and 40 feet, respectively. It should be noted that SimTraffic reports longer queues than the actual 95th percentile queues for turn lanes if the through lane queues on that approach extend beyond the provided turn lane storage bay. The traffic models were observed to determine which queues were actually extending out of storages bays. Only the actual queuing issues are documented above. The capacity analysis results for Opening Year (2025) Build Conditions are consistent with the results of the Opening Year (2025) No-Build analysis. The site traffic did not have a significant impact on operations at the study area intersections. 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 24 With the recent reconstruction of Blake Road, a northbound right turn lane was not constructed at 2 nd Street/Site Access 1, this is consistent along the Blake Road corridor. By not including right turn lanes, it allows for a more pedestrian/bicycle friendly corridor. At the time, there was not a known 325 Blake road redevelopment, therefore a right turn lane has also been analyzed to determine the operational impacts with the proposed development. Table 14 shows both the AM and PM Peak hour results at the site access. Table 14 – Opening Year (2025) Build Peak Hour Intersection Analysis with NBR Turn Lane Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS AM Peak Hour Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Signal EB 20.1 C 21.5 C 13.6 B 15.1 B WB 26.1 C 19.5 B 4.9 A NB 30.4 C 10.4 B 4.0 A SB 37.5 D 13.9 B 9.9 A AM Peak Hour Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Signal EB 23.0 C 23.2 C 16.6 B 17.5 B WB 32.1 C 25.1 C 7.0 A NB 36.2 D 15.7 B 4.9 A SB 40.3 D 14.9 B 10.4 B The northbound right turn does not have a significant impact on delay or LOS. In both peak hours, the northbound right turn movement improves by a few seconds. In the AM Peak Hour, the overall intersection delay increases by less than a second. In the PM Peak Hour, the overall intersection delay decreases by less than a second. While the turn lane doesn’t have a significant impact on operations Hennepin County has expressed their desire for the install of a northbound right turn lane as they have proven safety benefits for vehicles. HORIZON YEAR (2040) BUILD CONDITIONS The Horizon Year (2040) Build Condition analysis was completed to develop an understanding of the impact of site traffic to operating conditions for the study area. The traffic volumes shown in Exhibit 10 were used in the Horizon Year (2040) Build analysis. As previously discussed, these volumes were calculated by adding the Horizon Year (2040) No-Build volumes to the Horizon Year (2040) trips generated by the site. The same geometry and intersection control devices were assumed for the accesses as in the Opening Year (2025) Build analysis. As previously discussed, site access 1 was assumed to be signalized and have a dedicated left-turn lane and a shared through/right lane on the site. Site Access 2 was assumed to be side street stop controlled and have a single shared left/right lane on the site. The signal timings used in Existing (2021) and Opening Year (2025) Build conditions were optimized for Horizon Year analysis because it is anticipated signal timings at all intersections will be modified prior to 2040. Tables 15 and 16 provide a summary of the average delay (seconds per vehicle) and LOS under Horizon Year (2040) Build Conditions for each movement at the study intersections during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour, respectively. The movements that are anticipated to operate at LOS E are shown in yellow and the movements that are anticipated to operate at LOS F are shown in red. The full SimTraffic reports are included in Appendix D. 25 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 Table 15 – Horizon Year (2040) Build AM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Blake Road & TH 7 Signal EB 92.6 F 85.2 F 47.7 D 60.6 E WB 77.2 E 30.9 C 9.1 A NB 72.6 E 61.8 E 40.9 D SB 98.2 F 92.0 F 3.3 A Blake Road & Cambridge Street Signal EB 36.6 D 33.3 C 7.2 A 15.0 B WB 29.2 C 34.2 C 5.2 A NB 44.8 D 8.6 A 6.6 A SB 64.8 E 8.4 A 7.3 A Blake Road & Lake Street Side Street Stop EB 17.3 C 21.2 C 9.6 A 21.2 C WB 16.0 C 12.6 B 6.3 A NB 6.8 A 1.5 A 1.2 A SB 5.1 A 0.7 A 0.5 A Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Signal EB 21.7 C 22.2 C 14.0 B 16.8 B WB 25.1 C 24.5 C 5.8 A NB 33.3 C 12.9 B 6.4 A SB 41.4 D 15.3 B 12.4 B Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Signal EB 41.9 D 22.1 C 5.1 A 28.3 C WB 47.6 D 24.7 C 4.9 A NB 40.6 D 31.4 C 14.6 B SB 43.1 D 39.5 D 32.7 C Lake Street & Site Access 2 Side Street Stop EB - - 0.8 A 0.5 A 4.6 A WB 2.1 A 0.3 A - - NB 4.6 A - - 3.1 A SB - - - - - - 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 26 Table 16 – Horizon Year (2040) Build PM Peak Hour Intersection Analysis Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Blake Road & TH 7 Signal EB 100+ F 100+ F 63.5 E 100+ F WB 100+ F 51.1 D 16.6 B NB 76.6 E 99.0 F 86.9 F SB 100+ F 100+ F 20.8 C Blake Road & Cambridge Street Signal EB 51.4 D 54.9 D 10.9 B 24.2 C WB 28.0 C 25.8 C 14.8 B NB 48.3 D 22.5 C 35.3 D SB 53.3 D 15.2 B 12.6 B Blake Road & Lake Street Side Street Stop EB 31.1 D 38.9 E 18.1 C 38.9 E WB 28.9 D 26.2 D 10.1 B NB 9.9 A 2.5 A 2.4 A SB 9.1 A 0.9 A 0.8 A Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Signal EB 28.2 C 27.4 C 19.9 B 21.8 C WB 31.1 C 25.0 C 8.6 A NB 42.8 D 18.7 B 16.0 B SB 47.0 D 18.4 B 14.6 B Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Signal EB 55.2 E 22.2 C 8.1 A 30.8 C WB 58.5 E 22.6 C 10.0 A NB 55.4 E 45.7 D 32.6 C SB 61.9 E 49.6 D 51.2 D Lake Street & Site Access 2 Side Street Stop EB - - 0.6 A 0.5 A 7.2 A WB 3.5 A 0.5 A - - NB 7.2 A - - 6.1 A SB - - - - - - Note: delays in excess of 100 seconds per vehicle are reported as "100+" Based on the analysis, all study intersections are anticipated to operate LOS C or better except for the intersection of Blake Road & TH 7, which operates at an LOS E in the AM Peak Hour and LOS F in the PM Peak Hour and the intersection of Blake Road & Lake Street, which operates at LOS E in the PM Peak. Additionally, both site accesses are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better in the AM & PM Peak Hours. Under Horizon Year (2040) Build Conditions, all intersection movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better except for the following:  AM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – the eastbound left, westbound left, southbound left, and southbound through movements are expected to operate at LOS F. Additionally, the northbound left, eastbound through, and northbound through are expected to operate at LOS E. The projected delays are not unexpected, considering the high volumes and long cycle length (190 s). These results are similar to the Horizon Year (2040) No-Build analysis.  Blake Road & Cambridge Street – the southbound left movement is expected to operate at LOS E; this is due to the movement being low volume and the coordination of the signals. The same movement operated at LOS E the Horizon Year (2040) No-Build analysis.  PM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – the eastbound left, westbound left, southbound left, eastbound through, northbound through, southbound through, eastbound right, and northbound right movements are all expected to operate at LOS F. Additionally, the northbound left is expected to operate at LOS 27 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 E. The projected delays are not unexpected, considering the high volumes and long cycle length (200 s). These are the same movements that were shown to operate at LOS E or F in the Horizon Year (2040) No-Build analysis. Delays should be monitored in the future to determine the feasibility of mitigation options.  Blake Road & Lake Street – the eastbound through movement is anticipated to operate at LOS E; this is not uncommon for a side street stop-controlled intersection with a high-volume main street such as Blake Road. In the Horizon Year (2040) No-Build model, the westbound left movement also operated at LOS E and not the eastbound left.  Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard – the eastbound left, westbound left, northbound left and southbound left movements are expected to operate at LOS E, this is due to priority being given to the high east-west volumes on Excelsior Boulevard. In the Horizon Year (2040) No-Build model the westbound left, northbound left, and southbound left also operated at LOS E, but the eastbound left operated at LOS D and degraded to LOS E with the addition of site traffic. The 95th percentile queues were reviewed at the study intersections. The 95th percentile queues for the movements that have extended queues or have high levels of delay are listed below.  AM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – The westbound left is anticipated to extend beyond the provided storage bay by approximately 40 feet, the queue can be accommodated within the taper of the dual left turn lanes. The northbound left 95th percentile queue is expected to extend past the storage bay by approximately 30 feet, the queue can be accommodated within the taper of the dual left-turn lanes. The southbound left turn 95th percentile queue extends past the provided storage bay by 15 feet, this can be accommodated within the taper of the turn lane.  Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 – All 95th percentile queues are within their respective storage bays. The westbound left and westbound through/right 95th percentile queues are 85 feet and 65 feet, respectively.  Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard – the northbound left 95th percentile queue is anticipated to extend past the storage bay by approximately 23 feet, this queue is not expected to affect the upstream intersection. The southbound left 95th percentile queue is anticipated to extend past the storage bay by approximately 3 feet; this queue can be accommodated within the taper of the turn lane.  PM Peak Hour  Blake Road & TH 7 – The northbound left 95th percentile queue is expected to extend 70 feet past the provided storage bay, this queue will be accommodated in the taper of the dual left-turn lanes. The southbound left 95th percentile queue is expected to extend approximately 110 feet outside the storage bay. The southbound queues are expected to impact operations at the upstream intersection of Aquilas Avenue & West 37th Street. Queues should be monitored in the future to determine the feasibility of mitigation options.  Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 – All 95th percentile queues are within their respective storage bays. The westbound left and westbound through/right 95th percentile queues are 75 feet and 60 feet, respectively.  Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard – The northbound left 95th percentile queue is anticipated to extend approximately 20 feet beyond the storage bay; this can be accommodated within the taper of the turn lane. The southbound left 95th percentile queue is expected to fill the storage bay. It should be noted that SimTraffic reports longer queues than the actual 95th percentile queues for turn lanes if the through lane queues on that approach extend beyond the provided turn lane storage bay. The 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 28 traffic models were observed to determine which queues were actually extending out of storages bays. Only the actual queuing issues are documented above. The capacity analysis results for Horizon Year (2040) Build Conditions are consistent with the results from the Horizon Year (2040) No-Build conditions. The site traffic did not have a significant impact on operations at any intersections within the study network. As previously discussed, a northbound right turn lane was not constructed at 2nd Street/Site Access 1 with the reconstruction of Blake Road. this is consistent with other roadway connections along the Blake Road corridor. By not including right turn lanes, it allows for a more pedestrian/bicycle friendly corridor. At the time, there was not a known 325 Blake road redevelopment, therefore a right turn lane has also been analyzed to determine the operational impacts with the proposed development. Table 14 shows both the AM and PM Peak hour results at the site access Table 17 – Horizon Year (2040) Build Peak Hour Intersection Analysis with NBR Turn Lane Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS AM Peak Hour Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Signal EB 21.7 C 19.3 B 14.6 B 17.4 B WB 26.9 C 21.0 C 4.8 A NB 33.7 C 13.7 B 3.8 A SB 43.4 D 16.1 B 13.1 B PM Peak Hour Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Signal EB 26.5 C 27.1 C 18.5 B 20.8 C WB 28.5 C 24.1 C 8.8 A NB 38.0 D 19.7 B 6.3 A SB 45.4 D 17.9 B 13.6 B The northbound right turn does not have a big impact on Delay or LOS. In both peak hours, the northbound right turn movement improves by a few seconds. In the AM Peak Hour, the overall intersection delay increases by a second. In the PM Peak Hour, the overall intersection delay decreases by a second. A northbound turn lane doesn’t have a significant impact on operations and maintaining the existing geometry is in line with the vision for the Blake Road corridor. 29 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Alatus, LLC is proposing a mixed-use development that includes townhomes and five multifamily housing buildings varying in height from 3 stories to 14 stories, with up to 875 dwelling units on site. There will also be a 9,000 square feet of standalone restaurant space and 8,000 square feet of retail on site. The development is located on the southeast corner of Blake Road (CSAH 20) and Lake Street in Hopkins, MN. The site was previously occupied by a cold storage facility. In the Opening Year, Buildings II, III, IV, the townhomes, and the restaurant space is expected to be constructed and open. With that assumed development, the Site is anticipated to generate 225 new trips during the AM peak hour (85 entering, 140 exiting) and 285 new trips during the PM peak hour (180 entering, 105 exiting). In the Horizon Year, full buildout of the site was assumed (Opening Year development plus the construction of Buildings I & V). In the Horizon Year, the site is anticipated to generate 320 new trips during the AM peak hour (110 entering, 210 exiting) and 385 new trips during the PM peak hour (245 entering, 140 exiting). The site will have two accesses. Site Access 1 will be at Blake Road at 2nd Street, which is signalized. Site Access 2 is proposed to be on Lake Street approximately 90 feet east of Blake Road. Access 1 is anticipated to have two outbound lanes, a dedicated left-turn lane, and a shared through/right lane on the site. Access 2 is anticipated to have 1 outbound lane that is a shared left/right lane on the site. Existing year (2021), Opening Year (2025) No-Build, and Horizon Year (2040) No-Build are anticipated to have similar operations, with slight increases in vehicle delays due to background growth. The intersection of Blake Road & TH 7 consistently has movements with LOS E or F operations and the other study intersections generally operate acceptably. The movements that get significantly worse with the addition of background growth are the left-turning and through movements at the intersection of Blake Road & TH 7 and the eastbound leg at the intersection of Blake Road & Lake Street. Opening Year (2025) Build and Horizon Year (2040) Build operations are very similar to their No-Build counterparts. The Opening Year No-Build & Build models generally have the same results with LOS E/F operations for the same movements. The Horizon Year models showed that the eastbound through movement at the intersection of Blake Road & TH 7 changed from LOS D in No-Build AM Peak Hour model to LOS E in the Build AM Peak Hour model. Additionally, four movements changed from LOS D in the No- Build PM Peak Hour to LOS E in the Build PM Peak Hour. Overall, the No-Build models were consistent with their respective Build models. It should be noted that delays and queues at Blake Road & TH 7 will be extensive in all Horizon Year (2040) analysis conditions. These should be monitored in the future to determine the feasibility of mitigation options. As seen across the five analysis conditions, the background growth caused overall vehicle delays to increase. In comparison to the background growth, site traffic didn’t have a significant impact on the intersection LOS. Based on the analysis results, the following mitigation is recommended: Site access 1 should have a dedicated left turn lane and a shared through/right lane. The left-turn lane should have a storage bay length of at least 100 feet based on the 95th percentile queue of 85 feet. The signal at Blake Road & 2nd Street/Access 1 should be optimized for the additional approach. Cycle Length at Blake Road & 2nd Street/Access 1 should be kept consistent with the corridor but provide adequate time for development and 2nd street traffic to operate acceptably. Site access 2 should have a shared left/right turn lane and be side street stop controlled. The eastbound queue at the intersection of Blake Road and Lake Street should be monitored to ensure it does not affect operations at site access 2. 325 Blake Road Development Traffic Impact Analysis │ September 2021 30 APPENDIX A. Exhibits B. Site Plan C. Raw Turning Movement Counts D. SimTraffic Analysis Results NOT TO SCALE 20 COUNTY 3COUNTY 7 Ca EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT SITE LOCATION AND STUDY AREA LEGEND Proposed Site Location Study Intersection Proposed Site Driveway Site Access 1 Site Access 2 NOT TO SCALE 20 COUNTY 3COUNTY 7 Ca * EXHIBIT 2 EXISTING GEOMETRY AND INTERSECTION CONTROL LEGEND Project Site Location Study Intersection Existing Signal Control Existing Stop Control Channelized Right *Leg is not fully constructed NOT TO SCALE 20 COUNTY 3COUNTY 7 Ca EXHIBIT 3 EXISTING YEAR (2021) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEGEND Proposed Site Location AM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X) NOT TO SCALE 20 COUNTY 3COUNTY 7 Ca EXHIBIT 4 OPENING YEAR (2025) NO-BUILD PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEGEND Proposed Site Location AM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X) NOT TO SCALE 20 COUNTY 3COUNTY 7 Ca EXHIBIT 5 HORIZON YEAR (2040) NO-BUILD PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEGEND Proposed Site Location AM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X) NOT TO SCALE 20 COUNTY 3COUNTY 7 Ca EXHIBIT 6 SITE DISTRIBUTION LEGEND Proposed Site Location Site Traffic Distribution Inbound Site Traffic Outbound Site Traffic NOT TO SCALE 20 COUNTY 3COUNTY 7 Ca EXHIBIT 7 OPENING YEAR (2025) TRIP ASSIGNMENT LEGEND Proposed Site Location AM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X) NOT TO SCALE 20 COUNTY 3COUNTY 7 Ca EXHIBIT 8 HORIZON YEAR (2040) TRIP ASSIGNMENT LEGEND Proposed Site Location AM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X) NOT TO SCALE 20 COUNTY 3COUNTY 7 Ca EXHIBIT 9 OPENING YEAR (2025) BUILD PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEGEND Proposed Site Location AM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X) NOT TO SCALE 20 COUNTY 3COUNTY 7 Ca EXHIBIT 10 HORIZON YEAR (2040) BUILD PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEGEND Proposed Site Location AM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X) Edge of waterBoat house+909'+910'+916'+908'BIKETRAIL+905'+908'CLVT80039898.2336 CULVERT80327903.55HYDRANT80340896.00EDGE OF WATER80341896.37EDGE OF WATER80342894.22EDGE OF WATER80343896.00EDGE OF WATER80344896.02EDGE OF WATER80345896.16EDGE OF WATER80346896.06EDGE OF WATER80347895.92EDGE OF WATER80348896.16EDGE OF WATER80349896.00EDGE OF WATER80350895.02EDGE OF WATER80357897.67EDGE OF WATER80359897.13EDGE OF WATERCLVT80360899.0330 CULVERT80375897.22EDGE OF WATER80376897.15EDGE OF WATER80389898.17EDGE OF WATER80393897.32EDGE OF WATER80422911.06HYDRANT80423912.90ELEC METERTRAN80424913.09POWR TRANSTRAN80430913.80POWR TRANS80432914.03ELEC METERTRAN80434914.94POWR TRANSTRAN80458914.78POWR TRANS80461912.95HYDRANTFM FM FMFMFMFM FM FM FM FM FMFMFMPier+899'+897'+897'+906'+899'+904'+905'BUILDING V5 story5% ramp12%BLAKE ROAD N LAKE ST NEMinnehahaWETLANDCEDAR LAKE r e g i o n a l t r a i l CreekRESTAURANTS-8,900 s.f.163 units881 s.f.BUILDING IV5 story181 units860 s.f.BUILDING III14 story173 units854 s.f.BUILDING II5 story115 units1188 s.f.SENIOR COOP33 units1,670 s.f.BUILDING I-option C5 story126 units 800 s.f.PARKING - 6 levels- 482 spacesPARKING - 5 levels- 276 spacesPODIUM PARKING - 1 level- 114 spacesTown homes garages- 66 spacesPODIUM PARKING - 2 levels- 183 spacesaccess ramp 90'-0"90'-0"161010169Total regular P on floor= 619 RAMP UP RAMP DNNET - 582 SQ. F T.UNIT S1 LIVING 15'-0" x 11'- 0" KITCHEN 7' WALL BEDROOM 11'-0" x 10'- 2" BATH W.H./HVAC W./D. C. W.I.C. L. P.NET - 582 SQ. FT.UNIT S1LIVING15'-0" x 11'-0"KITCHEN7' WALLBEDROOM11'-0" x 10'-2"BATHW.H./HVACW./D.C.W.I.C.L.P.NET - 582 SQ. FT.UNIT S1LIVING15'-0" x 11'-0"KITCHEN7' WALLBEDROOM11'-0" x 10'-2"BATHW.H./HVACW./D.C.W.I.C.L.P.NET - 582 SQ. FT.UNIT S1LIVING15'-0" x 11'-0"KITCHEN7' WALLBEDROOM11'-0" x 10'-2"BATHW.H./HVACW./D.C.W.I.C.L.P.access rampRETAIL -8,000 s.f.CLUBHOUSE -3,400 s.f.CLUBHOUSE -3,500 s.f.townhomes3 storyelec meterPWR transPWR transPWR transACCESSACCESS13'-0"20´20´10´PWR trans31'-1"LEASING 2,000 s.f.Clubhouse-5,500 s.f.CLUBHOUSE - 8,000 (total area)RED line-Extent of area to be retainedfor regional stormwater managementby MCWD , based on building edge asproposed during design charrette50' -0 " 20'-0"+906'skating rink+914'+910'71'45'49'9035' NET - 582 SQ. F T.UNIT S1 LIVING 15'-0" x 11'- 0" KITCHEN 7' WALL BEDROOM 11'-0" x 1 0'- 2" BATH W.H./ HVAC W./D. C. W.I.C. L. P.NET - 582 SQ. FT.UNIT S1LIVING15'-0" x 11'-0"KITCHEN7' WALLBEDROOM11'-0" x 10'-2"BATHW.H./HVACW./D.C.W.I.C.L.P.20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0 " 20'-0 "20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"22'-0"25'-0"24'Building144 units33 units5 story3 story712 s.f1,670 s.f5 story1,050 s.funits stories NET avgTownhomesBuilding IBuilding IIIBuilding IVBuilding VBuilding II-SC-207 units130 units173 units188 units5 story14 story5 story766 s.f854 s.f765 s.fRest./boat house875 unitsTOTALS1 storySCALE: 1" = 40' - 0" 0' 40' 80' 160'(24"x36" SHEET)N© 2016 by HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, LP The arrangements depicted herein are the sole property of Humphreys & Partners Architects, LP and may not be reproduced in any form without its written permission. Architectural conceptual site plans are for feasibility purpose only. Revisions may occur due to further investigation from regulatory authorities and building code analysis. Dimensions shown are of a strategic intent only. Refer to surveys and civil drawings for technical information and measurements.HUMPHREYSPARTNERSHopkins, MinnesotaHPA# 21180325 BLAKE ROAD5339 Alpha Rd., Suite 300, Dallas, TX 75240 | 972.701.9636 | www.humphreys.comALATUS,LLC September 25, 2021ARCHITECTURAL SITEPLAN Intersection Traffic Counts Intersection: #21 MN7 & Aquila Ave Count Date(s): Wed, Mar 7, 2018 Peaks: 6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM Prepared by: Associated Consulting Services LLC www.acsteam.com (612) 568-3227 U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped* 6:00 -7 6 2 15 --23 49 8 80 --22 6 21 49 --9 115 4 128 -272 - 6:15 1 3 --4 --25 98 12 135 --22 6 29 57 --8 179 14 201 1 397 1 6:30 -9 12 2 23 --22 147 13 182 -1 34 6 19 60 --19 229 16 264 -529 - 6:45 -11 12 -23 --43 174 18 235 --28 19 40 87 -1 11 220 15 247 -592 - 7:00 -10 18 3 31 --31 258 15 304 --38 12 52 102 -1 14 286 18 319 1 756 1 7:15 -14 15 2 31 --55 297 19 371 --30 22 50 102 1 -23 424 25 472 1 976 2 7:30 -19 15 1 35 --48 378 25 451 1 -42 14 64 120 -1 15 421 21 458 -1064 1 7:45 -16 25 5 46 --54 444 21 519 --40 30 47 117 --37 462 38 537 1 1219 1 8:00 -22 23 2 47 --59 363 27 449 -1 33 21 68 123 --33 445 32 510 -1129 - 8:15 -17 22 2 41 --83 321 30 434 --42 32 82 156 --42 354 34 430 -1061 - 8:30 -25 22 1 48 --47 338 31 416 --39 22 62 123 1 -40 336 31 407 2 994 3 8:45 -19 29 4 52 --36 247 26 309 --46 31 48 125 --61 283 31 375 -861 - 9:00 -26 23 2 51 1 -39 165 33 237 1 -37 24 49 110 --48 274 32 354 2 752 4 9:15 -15 27 4 46 --29 154 27 210 --26 34 39 99 -2 62 242 24 330 -685 - 9:30 -------------------------- 9:45 -------------------------- 10:00 -------------------------- 10:15 -------------------------- 10:30 -------------------------- 10:45 -------------------------- 11:00 -49 40 14 103 --36 128 45 209 1 -36 44 44 124 --79 125 24 228 1 664 2 11:15 -35 43 12 90 --38 151 39 228 --23 62 49 134 --68 150 43 261 2 713 2 11:30 -33 59 10 102 2 -59 144 53 256 --40 43 35 118 --80 149 31 260 3 736 5 11:45 -47 48 10 105 -3 40 149 39 231 5 -42 47 46 135 --81 165 41 287 1 758 6 12:00 -34 52 7 93 2 1 50 152 52 255 1 -48 55 54 157 -1 95 154 36 286 -791 3 12:15 -46 65 10 121 2 -56 160 48 264 --40 44 46 130 -2 93 161 36 292 4 807 6 12:30 -53 67 6 126 --60 161 41 262 1 -37 51 70 158 --83 164 34 281 -827 1 12:45 -43 43 12 98 1 -58 143 38 239 2 -45 57 59 161 2 -84 152 38 274 2 772 7 13:00 -------------------------- 13:15 -------------------------- 13:30 -------------------------- 13:45 -------------------------- 14:00 -------------------------- 14:15 -------------------------- 14:30 -57 61 12 130 --55 192 44 291 1 -35 46 35 116 --83 174 20 277 -814 1 14:45 -40 58 11 109 --58 199 37 294 -2 37 52 47 138 -2 72 177 44 295 -836 - 15:00 -45 62 6 113 --50 240 31 321 2 1 38 49 58 146 --70 221 27 318 2 898 4 15:15 -45 54 9 108 --56 256 52 364 1 -38 62 54 154 -2 78 252 35 367 3 993 4 15:30 -33 54 14 101 --63 277 37 377 3 -45 63 72 180 --101 284 43 428 -1086 3 15:45 -48 53 8 109 --66 236 42 344 1 -49 54 59 162 2 -70 317 44 431 1 1046 4 16:00 -66 44 11 121 1 -49 267 46 362 3 -38 48 60 146 2 -104 372 31 507 5 1136 11 16:15 -51 74 10 135 --55 275 35 365 2 -43 56 74 173 -1 113 400 36 550 1 1223 3 16:30 1 56 76 8 141 --50 321 35 406 2 -44 75 87 206 --81 417 35 533 4 1286 6 16:45 -47 44 10 101 1 -78 300 44 422 4 -33 57 87 177 --102 419 46 567 1 1267 6 17:00 -66 72 14 152 1 -51 294 43 388 2 1 41 66 79 187 -1 92 411 39 543 -1270 3 17:15 -56 71 7 134 -2 79 290 51 422 1 -40 82 90 212 --104 395 43 542 1 1310 2 17:30 -42 67 4 113 --57 278 44 379 --49 80 89 218 --85 382 45 512 5 1222 5 17:45 -46 59 3 108 1 -69 257 41 367 5 -35 63 74 172 --92 342 48 482 2 1129 8 Total 2 1251 1515 238 3006 12 6 1827 8303 1242 11378 39 6 1355 1535 2038 4934 8 14 2332 10053 1154 13553 46 32871 105 % App 0%42%50%8%100%-0%16%73%11%100%-0%27%31%41%100%-0%17%74%9%100%--- % Total 0%4%5%1%9%11%0%6%25%4%35%37%0%4%5%6%15%8%0%7%31%4%41%44%100%100% Passenger Vehicles 1 1244 1480 236 2961 -5 1773 8114 1219 11111 -6 1298 1504 2004 4812 -14 2311 9885 1092 13302 -32186 - Passenger Vehicles %50%99%98%99%99%-83%97%98%98%98%-100%96%98%98%98%-100%99%98%95%98%-98%- HC Vehicles 1 7 35 2 45 -1 54 189 23 267 --57 31 34 122 --21 168 62 251 -685 - HC Vehicles %50%1%2%1%1%-17%3%2%2%2%--4%2%2%2%--1%2%5%2%-2%- U = U-Turn, L = Left, T = Thru, R = Right, App = Approach Total asterisk (*) indicates pedestrians and bicyclists on crosswalk dash (-) in the table indicates zero or not applicable % App = percentage of specific movement total in relation to its approach total % Total = percentage of specific movement total in relation to its intersection total Passenger Vehicles % = percentage of passenger vehicle total in a specific movement HC Vehicles % = percentage of heavy commercial vehicle total in a specific movement 15-min Ped Total All Vehicles_Entire Duration (6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM) at #21 MN7 & Aquila Ave 15-min Veh Total Start Time From North (Southbound)From East (Westbound)From South (Northbound)From West (Eastbound) Page 1 of 5 Intersection Traffic Counts Intersection: #21 MN7 & Aquila Ave Count Date(s): Wed, Mar 7, 2018 Peaks: 6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM Prepared by: Associated Consulting Services LLC www.acsteam.com (612) 568-3227 U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped* 7:30 -19 15 1 35 --48 378 25 451 1 -42 14 64 120 -1 15 421 21 458 -1064 1 7:45 -16 25 5 46 --54 444 21 519 --40 30 47 117 --37 462 38 537 1 1219 1 8:00 -22 23 2 47 --59 363 27 449 -1 33 21 68 123 --33 445 32 510 -1129 - 8:15 -17 22 2 41 --83 321 30 434 --42 32 82 156 --42 354 34 430 -1061 - Total -74 85 10 169 --244 1506 103 1853 1 1 157 97 261 516 -1 127 1682 125 1935 1 4473 2 % App -44%50%6%100%--13%81%6%100%-0%30%19%51%100%-0%7%87%6%100%--- % Total -2%2%0%4%--5%34%2%41%50%0%4%2%6%12%-0%3%38%3%43%50%100%100% PHF -0.841 0.850 0.500 0.899 --0.735 0.848 0.858 0.893 -0.250 0.935 0.758 0.796 0.827 -0.250 0.756 0.910 0.822 0.901 -0.917 - Passenger Vehicles -73 82 10 165 --239 1478 99 1816 -1 150 96 258 505 -1 123 1662 115 1901 -4387 - Passenger Vehicles %-99%96%100%98%--98%98%96%98%-100%96%99%99%98%-100%97%99%92%98%-98%- HC Vehicles -1 3 -4 --5 28 4 37 --7 1 3 11 --4 20 10 34 -86 - HC Vehicles %-1%4%-2%--2%2%4%2%--4%1%1%2%--3%1%8%2%-2%- U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped* 12:00 -34 52 7 93 2 1 50 152 52 255 1 -48 55 54 157 -1 95 154 36 286 -791 3 12:15 -46 65 10 121 2 -56 160 48 264 --40 44 46 130 -2 93 161 36 292 4 807 6 12:30 -53 67 6 126 --60 161 41 262 1 -37 51 70 158 --83 164 34 281 -827 1 12:45 -43 43 12 98 1 -58 143 38 239 2 -45 57 59 161 2 -84 152 38 274 2 772 7 Total -176 227 35 438 5 1 224 616 179 1020 4 -170 207 229 606 2 3 355 631 144 1133 6 3197 17 % App -40%52%8%100%-0%22%60%18%100%--28%34%38%100%-0%31%56%13%100%--- % Total -6%7%1%14%29%0%7%19%6%32%24%-5%6%7%19%12%0%11%20%5%35%35%100%100% PHF -0.830 0.847 0.729 0.869 -0.250 0.933 0.957 0.861 0.966 --0.885 0.908 0.818 0.941 -0.375 0.934 0.962 0.947 0.970 -0.966 - Passenger Vehicles -176 219 35 430 -1 213 597 177 988 --164 204 222 590 -3 354 610 139 1106 -3114 - Passenger Vehicles %-100%96%100%98%-100%95%97%99%97%--96%99%97%97%-100%100%97%97%98%-97%- HC Vehicles --8 -8 --11 19 2 32 --6 3 7 16 --1 21 5 27 -83 - HC Vehicles %--4%-2%--5%3%1%3%--4%1%3%3%--0%3%3%2%-3%- U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped* 16:30 1 56 76 8 141 --50 321 35 406 2 -44 75 87 206 --81 417 35 533 4 1286 6 16:45 -47 44 10 101 1 -78 300 44 422 4 -33 57 87 177 --102 419 46 567 1 1267 6 17:00 -66 72 14 152 1 -51 294 43 388 2 1 41 66 79 187 -1 92 411 39 543 -1270 3 17:15 -56 71 7 134 -2 79 290 51 422 1 -40 82 90 212 --104 395 43 542 1 1310 2 Total 1 225 263 39 528 2 2 258 1205 173 1638 9 1 158 280 343 782 -1 379 1642 163 2185 6 5133 17 % App 0%43%50%7%100%-0%16%74%11%100%-0%20%36%44%100%-0%17%75%7%100%--- % Total 0%4%5%1%10%12%0%5%23%3%32%53%0%3%5%7%15%-0%7%32%3%43%35%100%100% PHF 0.250 0.852 0.865 0.696 0.868 -0.250 0.816 0.938 0.848 0.970 -0.250 0.898 0.854 0.953 0.922 -0.250 0.911 0.980 0.886 0.963 -0.980 - Passenger Vehicles 1 224 260 39 524 -2 254 1194 170 1620 -1 152 276 341 770 -1 379 1626 160 2166 -5080 - Passenger Vehicles %100%100%99%100%99%-100%98%99%98%99%-100%96%99%99%98%-100%100%99%98%99%-99%- HC Vehicles -1 3 -4 --4 11 3 18 --6 4 2 12 ---16 3 19 -53 - HC Vehicles %-0%1%-1%--2%1%2%1%--4%1%1%2%---1%2%1%-1%- U = U-Turn, L = Left, T = Thru, R = Right, App = Approach Total asterisk (*) indicates pedestrians and bicyclists on crosswalk dash (-) in the table indicates zero or not applicable % App = percentage of specific movement total in relation to its approach total % Total = percentage of specific movement total in relation to its intersection total Passenger Vehicles % = percentage of passenger vehicle total in a specific movement HC Vehicles % = percentage of heavy commercial vehicle total in a specific movement From South (Northbound)From West (Eastbound) Start Time 15-min Veh Total From North (Southbound)From East (Westbound)From South (Northbound)From West (Eastbound)15-min Ped Total 15-min Ped Total 15-min Ped Total All Vehicles_AM Peak (7:30AM-8:30AM) at #21 MN7 & Aquila Ave All Vehicles_Midday Peak (12:00PM-1:00PM) at #21 MN7 & Aquila Ave All Vehicles_PM Peak (4:30PM-5:30PM) at #21 MN7 & Aquila Ave Start Time 15-min Veh Total From North (Southbound)From East (Westbound)From South (Northbound)From West (Eastbound) Start Time 15-min Veh Total From North (Southbound)From East (Westbound) Page 2 of 5 Intersection Traffic Counts Intersection: #21 MN7 & Aquila Ave Count Date(s): Wed, Mar 7, 2018 Peaks: 6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM Prepared by: Associated Consulting Services LLC www.acsteam.com (612) 568-3227 169 (438)527 10 85 74 (35)(227)(176) 39 263 225 103 (179)173 1853 1506 (616)1205 (1019) 244 (224)258 1,636 1934 127 (355)379 (1130)1682 (631)1642 2184 125 (144)163 157 97 261 (170)(207)(229) 158 280 343 515 (606)781 XXX AM Peak (7:30AM-8:30AM)AM 0.917 (XXX)Midday Peak (12:00PM-1:00PM)Midday 0.966 XXX PM Peak (4:30PM-5:30PM)PM 0.980 Vehicle Volume Diagrams at #21 MN7 & Aquila Ave PHF All Vehicles_Peak Hours Aquila Ave #21 MN7 #21 MN7 Aquila Ave 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 6:007:008:009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0015-Minute Vehicle VolumeTime of Day Vehicle Turning Movements (6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM) SB WB NB EB Total Page 3 of 5 Intersection Traffic Counts Intersection: #21 MN7 & Aquila Ave Count Date(s): Wed, Mar 7, 2018 Peaks: 6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM Prepared by: Associated Consulting Services LLC www.acsteam.com (612) 568-3227 U L T R Ped*U L T R Ped*U L T R Ped*U L T R Ped* 6:00 -7 6 1 --22 44 8 --22 6 20 --9 115 3 - 6:15 -3 ----24 94 12 --21 5 29 --8 176 12 1 6:30 -9 12 2 --22 144 13 -1 34 6 19 --17 225 12 - 6:45 -11 12 ---42 165 17 --27 18 39 -1 10 216 13 - 7:00 -10 18 2 --30 255 14 --36 12 51 -1 14 281 14 1 7:15 -14 15 2 --52 289 18 --27 20 50 1 -23 419 25 1 7:30 -19 15 1 --47 375 24 1 -41 14 63 -1 13 416 17 - 7:45 -16 24 5 --53 438 21 --39 30 47 --35 457 35 1 8:00 -22 21 2 --58 353 25 -1 30 21 66 --33 442 31 - 8:15 -16 22 2 --81 312 29 --40 31 82 --42 347 32 - 8:30 -25 19 1 --44 324 30 --38 22 61 1 -38 329 29 2 8:45 -19 29 4 --35 242 26 --42 30 47 --59 279 27 - 9:00 -25 21 2 1 -34 158 32 1 -37 24 48 --47 267 29 2 9:15 -14 26 4 --29 147 27 --24 31 39 -2 61 234 24 - 9:30 -------------------- 9:45 -------------------- 10:00 -------------------- 10:15 -------------------- 10:30 -------------------- 10:45 -------------------- 11:00 -49 37 14 --35 124 45 1 -32 43 43 --79 123 23 1 11:15 -35 41 12 --38 144 38 --22 59 48 --68 142 43 2 11:30 -32 58 10 2 -58 141 52 --38 43 35 --79 143 29 3 11:45 -47 47 10 -2 40 143 38 5 -42 47 45 --80 162 40 1 12:00 -34 50 7 2 1 49 149 51 1 -46 54 51 -1 95 146 35 - 12:15 -46 62 10 2 -54 156 48 --38 42 44 -2 93 161 36 4 12:30 -53 65 6 --54 151 41 1 -35 51 69 --82 158 32 - 12:45 -43 42 12 1 -56 141 37 2 -45 57 58 2 -84 145 36 2 13:00 -------------------- 13:15 -------------------- 13:30 -------------------- 13:45 -------------------- 14:00 -------------------- 14:15 -------------------- 14:30 -57 59 12 --54 184 44 1 -34 46 34 --82 167 20 - 14:45 -40 58 11 --55 193 36 -2 37 51 45 -2 72 170 36 - 15:00 -45 60 6 --49 234 29 2 1 38 47 57 --69 219 26 2 15:15 -45 54 9 --53 249 52 1 -37 59 53 -2 77 245 35 3 15:30 -33 53 14 --59 271 36 3 -44 62 71 --100 279 37 - 15:45 -48 52 8 --66 232 42 1 -44 54 57 2 -70 316 43 1 16:00 -66 42 11 1 -48 264 44 3 -35 46 58 2 -103 368 29 5 16:15 -50 74 10 --55 273 35 2 -39 55 73 -1 113 393 36 1 16:30 1 56 75 8 --49 319 34 2 -41 74 86 --81 411 35 4 16:45 -47 44 10 1 -77 298 43 4 -32 56 87 --102 415 45 1 17:00 -65 70 14 1 -49 289 43 2 1 40 66 79 -1 92 407 38 - 17:15 -56 71 7 -2 79 288 50 1 -39 80 89 --104 393 42 1 17:30 -41 67 4 --57 276 44 --47 79 88 --85 379 45 5 17:45 -46 59 3 1 -66 255 41 5 -35 63 73 --92 340 48 2 U = U-Turn, L = Left, T = Thru, R = Right asterisk (*) indicates pedestrians and bicyclists on crosswalk dash (-) in the table indicates zero or not applicable Passenger Vehicles_Entire Duration (6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM) at #21 MN7 & Aquila Ave Start Time From North (Southbound)From East (Westbound)From South (Northbound)From West (Eastbound) Page 4 of 5 Intersection Traffic Counts Intersection: #21 MN7 & Aquila Ave Count Date(s): Wed, Mar 7, 2018 Peaks: 6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM Prepared by: Associated Consulting Services LLC www.acsteam.com (612) 568-3227 U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R 6:00 ---1 -1 5 ----1 ---1 6:15 1 ----1 4 --1 1 ---3 2 6:30 ------3 ------2 4 4 6:45 -----1 9 1 -1 1 1 -1 4 2 7:00 ---1 -1 3 1 -2 -1 --5 4 7:15 -----3 8 1 -3 2 ---5 - 7:30 -----1 3 1 -1 -1 -2 5 4 7:45 --1 --1 6 --1 ---2 5 3 8:00 --2 --1 10 2 -3 -2 --3 1 8:15 -1 ---2 9 1 -2 1 ---7 2 8:30 --3 --3 14 1 -1 -1 -2 7 2 8:45 -----1 5 --4 1 1 -2 4 4 9:00 -1 2 --5 7 1 ---1 -1 7 3 9:15 -1 1 ---7 --2 3 --1 8 - 9:30 ---------------- 9:45 ---------------- 10:00 ---------------- 10:15 ---------------- 10:30 ---------------- 10:45 ---------------- 11:00 --3 --1 4 --4 1 1 --2 1 11:15 --2 ---7 1 -1 3 1 --8 - 11:30 -1 1 --1 3 1 -2 ---1 6 2 11:45 --1 -1 -6 1 ---1 -1 3 1 12:00 --2 --1 3 1 -2 1 3 --8 1 12:15 --3 --2 4 --2 2 2 ---- 12:30 --2 --6 10 --2 -1 -1 6 2 12:45 --1 --2 2 1 ---1 --7 2 13:00 ---------------- 13:15 ---------------- 13:30 ---------------- 13:45 ---------------- 14:00 ---------------- 14:15 ---------------- 14:30 --2 --1 8 --1 -1 -1 7 - 14:45 -----3 6 1 --1 2 --7 8 15:00 --2 --1 6 2 --2 1 -1 2 1 15:15 -----3 7 --1 3 1 -1 7 - 15:30 --1 --4 6 1 -1 1 1 -1 5 6 15:45 --1 ---4 --5 -2 --1 1 16:00 --2 --1 3 2 -3 2 2 -1 4 2 16:15 -1 ----2 --4 1 1 --7 - 16:30 --1 --1 2 1 -3 1 1 --6 - 16:45 -----1 2 1 -1 1 ---4 1 17:00 -1 2 --2 5 --1 ----4 1 17:15 ------2 1 -1 2 1 --2 1 17:30 -1 ----2 --2 1 1 --3 - 17:45 -----3 2 ----1 --2 - U = U-Turn, L = Left, T = Thru, R = Right dash (-) in the table indicates zero or not applicable HC Vehicles_Entire Duration (6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM) at #21 MN7 & Aquila Ave From West (Eastbound)Start Time From North (Southbound)From East (Westbound)From South (Northbound) Page 5 of 5 Intersection Traffic Counts Intersection: #23 Blake Rd & Cambridge Count Date(s): Wed, Mar 7, 2018 Peaks: 6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM Prepared by: Associated Consulting Services LLC www.acsteam.com (612) 568-3227 U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped* 6:00 1 -29 2 32 ---1 4 5 --6 27 1 34 1 -25 -4 29 1 100 2 6:15 2 2 33 6 43 1 -2 1 5 8 1 -3 28 2 33 1 -23 -9 32 -116 3 6:30 1 -59 4 64 1 -3 -3 6 1 -3 61 2 66 1 -22 7 12 41 -177 3 6:45 -3 55 9 67 3 -7 3 6 16 --3 68 2 73 1 -38 2 10 50 -206 4 7:00 -2 67 9 78 --4 4 6 14 1 -6 70 -76 --30 2 16 48 -216 1 7:15 3 -75 3 81 2 -8 1 10 19 2 -9 72 3 84 --38 4 20 62 -246 4 7:30 1 6 91 10 108 1 -7 6 9 22 --9 74 4 87 2 -30 8 17 55 1 272 4 7:45 -2 93 7 102 --1 3 2 6 --16 81 7 104 2 -44 2 16 62 1 274 3 8:00 2 4 117 8 131 --2 1 7 10 --11 75 2 88 --48 1 15 64 -293 - 8:15 1 4 81 7 93 2 -3 2 7 12 2 -14 90 2 106 --44 4 14 62 1 273 5 8:30 -3 75 9 87 2 -2 3 5 10 --5 75 5 85 2 -44 2 16 62 -244 4 8:45 -5 74 9 88 1 -2 4 4 10 2 1 10 71 2 84 2 -36 3 8 47 2 229 7 9:00 1 4 64 3 72 1 -3 2 5 10 2 1 10 49 2 62 --40 3 8 51 -195 3 9:15 1 2 56 5 64 1 --3 2 5 1 -11 63 2 76 2 -28 5 7 40 -185 4 9:30 -------------------------- 9:45 -------------------------- 10:00 -------------------------- 10:15 -------------------------- 10:30 -------------------------- 10:45 -------------------------- 11:00 1 20 75 15 111 1 -4 5 6 15 1 -12 86 10 108 2 -35 3 14 52 -286 4 11:15 3 15 94 21 133 2 -4 5 16 25 3 1 20 67 6 94 6 -41 3 20 64 1 316 12 11:30 1 21 93 7 122 --5 3 14 22 2 -13 88 9 110 3 -33 6 25 64 3 318 8 11:45 -17 88 14 119 1 -8 4 19 31 2 -20 97 10 127 3 -43 4 20 67 -344 6 12:00 1 9 104 27 141 2 -8 4 14 26 3 -17 70 13 100 2 -44 4 16 64 2 331 9 12:15 4 15 112 23 154 1 -12 3 22 37 --21 81 9 111 --48 3 22 73 -375 1 12:30 1 14 87 18 120 --8 5 8 21 1 -11 84 11 106 --63 7 11 81 2 328 3 12:45 1 13 101 27 142 1 -9 3 10 22 --21 97 9 127 2 -54 5 16 75 1 366 4 13:00 -------------------------- 13:15 -------------------------- 13:30 -------------------------- 13:45 -------------------------- 14:00 -------------------------- 14:15 -------------------------- 14:30 2 9 119 20 150 --4 3 7 14 1 -14 76 4 94 1 -50 1 18 69 -327 2 14:45 2 8 106 15 131 1 -6 7 12 25 2 1 13 87 2 103 2 -41 5 15 61 2 320 7 15:00 1 14 103 9 127 --5 2 6 13 1 -11 106 6 123 2 -46 6 11 63 1 326 4 15:15 3 15 119 16 153 1 -8 3 5 16 --13 129 6 148 1 -41 4 15 60 -377 2 15:30 2 9 128 18 157 2 -4 3 15 22 3 -16 106 12 134 4 -40 5 27 72 1 385 10 15:45 1 9 102 16 128 3 -8 3 8 19 4 -16 123 16 155 6 -33 2 21 56 2 358 15 16:00 -11 93 21 125 --8 2 6 16 3 1 18 110 10 139 5 -48 5 23 76 1 356 9 16:15 2 8 114 13 137 1 -9 4 12 25 --19 133 12 164 2 -45 7 30 82 3 408 6 16:30 3 8 129 26 166 --7 6 8 21 4 -21 139 20 180 1 -40 5 17 62 1 429 6 16:45 1 20 118 22 161 3 -9 3 9 21 -1 12 133 8 154 6 -52 5 18 75 4 411 13 17:00 2 7 130 27 166 2 -5 8 7 20 3 1 19 148 11 179 4 -47 5 18 70 1 435 10 17:15 5 14 130 13 162 1 -10 -10 20 4 -17 134 9 160 1 -54 1 25 80 4 422 10 17:30 2 15 111 23 151 --5 5 10 20 4 2 15 142 11 170 1 -38 4 17 59 2 400 7 17:45 2 20 110 24 156 --9 4 10 23 3 1 23 124 9 157 --56 8 28 92 -428 3 Total 53 328 3335 506 4222 37 -199 119 309 627 56 10 478 3264 249 4001 68 -1482 141 599 2222 37 11072 198 % App 1%8%79%12%100%--32%19%49%100%-0%12%82%6%100%--67%6%27%100%--- % Total 0%3%30%5%38%19%-2%1%3%6%28%0%4%29%2%36%34%-13%1%5%20%19%100%100% Passenger Vehicles 53 318 3207 480 4058 --195 115 302 612 -10 471 3191 241 3913 --1433 138 573 2144 -10727 - Passenger Vehicles %100%97%96%95%96%--98%97%98%98%-100%99%98%97%98%--97%98%96%96%-97%- HC Vehicles -10 128 26 164 --4 4 7 15 --7 73 8 88 --49 3 26 78 -345 - HC Vehicles %-3%4%5%4%--2%3%2%2%--1%2%3%2%--3%2%4%4%-3%- U = U-Turn, L = Left, T = Thru, R = Right, App = Approach Total asterisk (*) indicates pedestrians and bicyclists on crosswalk dash (-) in the table indicates zero or not applicable % App = percentage of specific movement total in relation to its approach total % Total = percentage of specific movement total in relation to its intersection total Passenger Vehicles % = percentage of passenger vehicle total in a specific movement HC Vehicles % = percentage of heavy commercial vehicle total in a specific movement 15-min Ped Total All Vehicles_Entire Duration (6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM) at #23 Blake Rd & Cambridge 15-min Veh Total Start Time From North (Southbound)From East (Westbound)From South (Northbound)From West (Eastbound) Page 1 of 5 Intersection Traffic Counts Intersection: #23 Blake Rd & Cambridge Count Date(s): Wed, Mar 7, 2018 Peaks: 6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM Prepared by: Associated Consulting Services LLC www.acsteam.com (612) 568-3227 U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped* 7:30 1 6 91 10 108 1 -7 6 9 22 --9 74 4 87 2 -30 8 17 55 1 272 4 7:45 -2 93 7 102 --1 3 2 6 --16 81 7 104 2 -44 2 16 62 1 274 3 8:00 2 4 117 8 131 --2 1 7 10 --11 75 2 88 --48 1 15 64 -293 - 8:15 1 4 81 7 93 2 -3 2 7 12 2 -14 90 2 106 --44 4 14 62 1 273 5 Total 4 16 382 32 434 3 -13 12 25 50 2 -50 320 15 385 4 -166 15 62 243 3 1112 12 % App 1%4%88%7%100%--26%24%50%100%--13%83%4%100%--68%6%26%100%--- % Total 0%1%34%3%39%25%-1%1%2%4%17%-4%29%1%35%33%-15%1%6%22%25%100%100% PHF 0.500 0.667 0.816 0.800 0.828 --0.464 0.500 0.694 0.568 --0.781 0.889 0.536 0.908 --0.865 0.469 0.912 0.949 -0.949 - Passenger Vehicles 4 15 362 29 410 --13 11 25 49 --49 313 14 376 --159 15 56 230 -1065 - Passenger Vehicles %100%94%95%91%94%--100%92%100%98%--98%98%93%98%--96%100%90%95%-96%- HC Vehicles -1 20 3 24 ---1 -1 --1 7 1 9 --7 -6 13 -47 - HC Vehicles %-6%5%9%6%---8%-2%--2%2%7%2%--4%-10%5%-4%- U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped* 12:00 1 9 104 27 141 2 -8 4 14 26 3 -17 70 13 100 2 -44 4 16 64 2 331 9 12:15 4 15 112 23 154 1 -12 3 22 37 --21 81 9 111 --48 3 22 73 -375 1 12:30 1 14 87 18 120 --8 5 8 21 1 -11 84 11 106 --63 7 11 81 2 328 3 12:45 1 13 101 27 142 1 -9 3 10 22 --21 97 9 127 2 -54 5 16 75 1 366 4 Total 7 51 404 95 557 4 -37 15 54 106 4 -70 332 42 444 4 -209 19 65 293 5 1400 17 % App 1%9%73%17%100%--35%14%51%100%--16%75%9%100%--71%6%22%100%--- % Total 1%4%29%7%40%24%-3%1%4%8%24%-5%24%3%32%24%-15%1%5%21%29%100%100% PHF 0.438 0.850 0.902 0.880 0.904 --0.771 0.750 0.614 0.716 --0.833 0.856 0.808 0.874 --0.829 0.679 0.739 0.904 -0.933 - Passenger Vehicles 7 50 383 93 533 --36 13 54 103 --67 324 40 431 --201 18 63 282 -1349 - Passenger Vehicles %100%98%95%98%96%--97%87%100%97%--96%98%95%97%--96%95%97%96%-96%- HC Vehicles -1 21 2 24 --1 2 -3 --3 8 2 13 --8 1 2 11 -51 - HC Vehicles %-2%5%2%4%--3%13%-3%--4%2%5%3%--4%5%3%4%-4%- U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped*U L T R App Ped* 16:30 3 8 129 26 166 --7 6 8 21 4 -21 139 20 180 1 -40 5 17 62 1 429 6 16:45 1 20 118 22 161 3 -9 3 9 21 -1 12 133 8 154 6 -52 5 18 75 4 411 13 17:00 2 7 130 27 166 2 -5 8 7 20 3 1 19 148 11 179 4 -47 5 18 70 1 435 10 17:15 5 14 130 13 162 1 -10 -10 20 4 -17 134 9 160 1 -54 1 25 80 4 422 10 Total 11 49 507 88 655 6 -31 17 34 82 11 2 69 554 48 673 12 -193 16 78 287 10 1697 39 % App 2%7%77%13%100%--38%21%41%100%-0%10%82%7%100%--67%6%27%100%--- % Total 1%3%30%5%39%15%-2%1%2%5%28%0%4%33%3%40%31%-11%1%5%17%26%100%100% PHF 0.550 0.613 0.975 0.815 0.986 --0.775 0.531 0.850 0.976 -0.500 0.821 0.936 0.600 0.935 --0.894 0.800 0.780 0.897 -0.975 - Passenger Vehicles 11 48 500 87 646 --31 17 34 82 -2 69 549 48 668 --186 16 77 279 -1675 - Passenger Vehicles %100%98%99%99%99%--100%100%100%100%-100%100%99%100%99%--96%100%99%97%-99%- HC Vehicles -1 7 1 9 ---------5 -5 --7 -1 8 -22 - HC Vehicles %-2%1%1%1%---------1%-1%--4%-1%3%-1%- U = U-Turn, L = Left, T = Thru, R = Right, App = Approach Total asterisk (*) indicates pedestrians and bicyclists on crosswalk dash (-) in the table indicates zero or not applicable % App = percentage of specific movement total in relation to its approach total % Total = percentage of specific movement total in relation to its intersection total Passenger Vehicles % = percentage of passenger vehicle total in a specific movement HC Vehicles % = percentage of heavy commercial vehicle total in a specific movement From South (Northbound)From West (Eastbound) Start Time 15-min Veh Total From North (Southbound)From East (Westbound)From South (Northbound)From West (Eastbound)15-min Ped Total 15-min Ped Total 15-min Ped Total All Vehicles_AM Peak (7:30AM-8:30AM) at #23 Blake Rd & Cambridge All Vehicles_Midday Peak (12:00PM-1:00PM) at #23 Blake Rd & Cambridge All Vehicles_PM Peak (4:30PM-5:30PM) at #23 Blake Rd & Cambridge Start Time 15-min Veh Total From North (Southbound)From East (Westbound)From South (Northbound)From West (Eastbound) Start Time 15-min Veh Total From North (Southbound)From East (Westbound) Page 2 of 5 Intersection Traffic Counts Intersection: #23 Blake Rd & Cambridge Count Date(s): Wed, Mar 7, 2018 Peaks: 6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM Prepared by: Associated Consulting Services LLC www.acsteam.com (612) 568-3227 430 (550)644 32 382 16 (95)(404)(51) 88 507 49 25 (54)34 50 12 (15)17 (106) 13 (37)31 82 243 166 (209)193 (293)15 (19)16 287 62 (65)78 50 320 15 (70)(332)(42) 69 554 48 385 (444)671 XXX AM Peak (7:30AM-8:30AM)AM 0.949 (XXX)Midday Peak (12:00PM-1:00PM)Midday 0.933 XXX PM Peak (4:30PM-5:30PM)PM 0.975 Vehicle Volume Diagrams at #23 Blake Rd & Cambridge PHF All Vehicles_Peak Hours #23 Blake Rd Cambridge Cambridge #23 Blake Rd 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 6:007:008:009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0015-Minute Vehicle VolumeTime of Day Vehicle Turning Movements (6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM) SB WB NB EB Total Page 3 of 5 Intersection Traffic Counts Intersection: #23 Blake Rd & Cambridge Count Date(s): Wed, Mar 7, 2018 Peaks: 6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM Prepared by: Associated Consulting Services LLC www.acsteam.com (612) 568-3227 U L T R Ped*U L T R Ped*U L T R Ped*U L T R Ped* 6:00 1 -28 1 ---1 3 --6 27 -1 -24 -3 1 6:15 2 2 31 5 1 -1 1 5 1 -3 28 2 1 -23 -9 - 6:30 1 -56 2 1 -3 -3 1 -3 58 2 1 -22 7 12 - 6:45 -2 50 8 3 -7 3 5 --3 67 2 1 -37 2 8 - 7:00 -2 65 8 --4 4 5 1 -6 66 ---29 2 14 - 7:15 3 -72 1 2 -8 1 10 2 -9 71 3 --36 4 18 - 7:30 1 5 86 9 1 -7 6 9 --9 74 4 2 -29 8 15 1 7:45 -2 91 5 --1 3 2 --15 78 7 2 -42 2 15 1 8:00 2 4 112 8 --2 1 7 --11 74 1 --46 1 12 - 8:15 1 4 73 7 2 -3 1 7 2 -14 87 2 --42 4 14 1 8:30 -3 70 9 2 -2 3 5 --5 74 4 2 -42 2 15 - 8:45 -5 65 8 1 -2 4 3 2 1 9 71 2 2 -36 3 6 2 9:00 1 4 64 3 1 -2 2 5 2 1 10 47 2 --37 2 6 - 9:15 1 2 51 4 1 --3 2 1 -11 61 2 2 -28 5 7 - 9:30 -------------------- 9:45 -------------------- 10:00 -------------------- 10:15 -------------------- 10:30 -------------------- 10:45 -------------------- 11:00 1 18 73 14 1 -4 5 6 1 -11 85 9 2 -32 3 14 - 11:15 3 15 92 21 2 -4 5 16 3 1 20 66 6 6 -39 3 18 1 11:30 1 21 88 7 --5 3 14 2 -13 87 7 3 -33 6 25 3 11:45 -16 86 11 1 -8 4 17 2 -20 94 10 3 -42 4 20 - 12:00 1 9 101 27 2 -8 3 14 3 -17 68 12 2 -40 4 16 2 12:15 4 14 104 23 1 -12 3 22 --19 79 8 --46 2 20 - 12:30 1 14 83 18 --7 4 8 1 -11 83 11 --63 7 11 2 12:45 1 13 95 25 1 -9 3 10 --20 94 9 2 -52 5 16 1 13:00 -------------------- 13:15 -------------------- 13:30 -------------------- 13:45 -------------------- 14:00 -------------------- 14:15 -------------------- 14:30 2 8 111 17 --4 3 7 1 -14 73 4 1 -49 1 18 - 14:45 2 7 103 14 1 -6 7 12 2 1 13 86 2 2 -39 5 15 2 15:00 1 14 99 9 --5 2 6 1 -11 102 6 2 -44 6 11 1 15:15 3 15 111 16 1 -8 3 5 --13 124 6 1 -40 4 15 - 15:30 2 8 125 18 2 -4 3 14 3 -16 100 12 4 -40 4 26 1 15:45 1 9 98 15 3 -7 3 8 4 -16 116 16 6 -32 2 20 2 16:00 -11 93 21 --8 2 6 3 1 18 107 10 5 -46 5 22 1 16:15 2 8 113 13 1 -9 3 12 --18 130 12 2 -44 7 30 3 16:30 3 8 128 26 --7 6 8 4 -21 138 20 1 -38 5 17 1 16:45 1 20 113 21 3 -9 3 9 -1 12 133 8 6 -51 5 18 4 17:00 2 7 129 27 2 -5 8 7 3 1 19 147 11 4 -44 5 18 1 17:15 5 13 130 13 1 -10 -10 4 -17 131 9 1 -53 1 24 4 17:30 2 15 109 23 --5 5 10 4 2 15 141 11 1 -38 4 17 2 17:45 2 20 109 23 --9 4 10 3 1 23 124 9 --55 8 28 - U = U-Turn, L = Left, T = Thru, R = Right asterisk (*) indicates pedestrians and bicyclists on crosswalk dash (-) in the table indicates zero or not applicable Passenger Vehicles_Entire Duration (6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM) at #23 Blake Rd & Cambridge Start Time From North (Southbound)From East (Westbound)From South (Northbound)From West (Eastbound) Page 4 of 5 Intersection Traffic Counts Intersection: #23 Blake Rd & Cambridge Count Date(s): Wed, Mar 7, 2018 Peaks: 6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM Prepared by: Associated Consulting Services LLC www.acsteam.com (612) 568-3227 U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R 6:00 --1 1 ---1 ---1 -1 -1 6:15 --2 1 -1 ---------- 6:30 --3 2 ------3 ----- 6:45 -1 5 1 ---1 --1 --1 -2 7:00 --2 1 ---1 --4 --1 -2 7:15 --3 2 ------1 --2 -2 7:30 -1 5 1 ---------1 -2 7:45 --2 2 -----1 3 --2 -1 8:00 --5 -------1 1 -2 -3 8:15 --8 ---1 ---3 --2 -- 8:30 --5 -------1 1 -2 -1 8:45 --9 1 ---1 -1 -----2 9:00 -----1 ----2 --3 1 2 9:15 --5 1 ------2 ----- 9:30 ---------------- 9:45 ---------------- 10:00 ---------------- 10:15 ---------------- 10:30 ---------------- 10:45 ---------------- 11:00 -2 2 1 -----1 1 1 -3 -- 11:15 --2 -------1 --2 -2 11:30 --5 -------1 2 ---- 11:45 -1 2 3 ---2 --3 --1 -- 12:00 --3 ---1 ---2 1 -4 -- 12:15 -1 8 ------2 2 1 -2 1 2 12:30 --4 --1 1 ---1 ----- 12:45 --6 2 -----1 3 --2 -- 13:00 ---------------- 13:15 ---------------- 13:30 ---------------- 13:45 ---------------- 14:00 ---------------- 14:15 ---------------- 14:30 -1 8 3 ------3 --1 -- 14:45 -1 3 1 ------1 --2 -- 15:00 --4 -------4 --2 -- 15:15 --8 -------5 --1 -- 15:30 -1 3 ----1 --6 ---1 1 15:45 --4 1 -1 ----7 --1 -1 16:00 ----------3 --2 -1 16:15 --1 ---1 --1 3 --1 -- 16:30 --1 -------1 --2 -- 16:45 --5 1 ---------1 -- 17:00 --1 -------1 --3 -- 17:15 -1 --------3 --1 -1 17:30 --2 -------1 ----- 17:45 --1 1 ---------1 -- U = U-Turn, L = Left, T = Thru, R = Right dash (-) in the table indicates zero or not applicable HC Vehicles_Entire Duration (6-9:30AM, 11AM-1PM, 2:30-6PM) at #23 Blake Rd & Cambridge From West (Eastbound)Start Time From North (Southbound)From East (Westbound)From South (Northbound) Page 5 of 5 Kimley - Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 riley.mitts@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Blake Road North & Lake StreetNortheastSite Code:Start Date: 08/12/2021Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeEastbound Lake Street NEWestbound Lake Street NENorthbound Blake Road NSouthbound Blake Road NEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeft Thru Right U-Turn PedsApp.TotalLeft Thru Right U-Turn PedsApp.TotalLeft Thru Right U-Turn PedsApp.TotalLeft Thru Right U-Turn PedsApp.TotalInt. Total7:00 AM 8 1 1 0110 1 1 2 004 0 44 3 0047 0 22 0 0022 837:15 AM 10 1 0 0211 1 3 2 006 1 40 1 0042 2 26 1 0129 887:30 AM 13 0 1 0014 3 1 2 016 0 57 1 0058 0 30 3 0033 1117:45 AM 4 1 1 006 2 1 1 024 1 63 0 1065 1 44 3 0048 123Hourly Total 35 3 3 0341 7 6 7 0320 2 204 5 10212 3 122 7 01132 4058:00 AM 10 1 2 0113 3 0 2 005 1 76 0 0077 4 23 5 0032 1278:15 AM 5 1 1 007 3 0 6 019 2 83 2 2089 5 22 4 1032 1378:30 AM 5 1 1 027 0 0 6 016 2 67 3 0172 1 34 5 0040 1258:45 AM 11 0 0 0311 2 0 3 005 0 73 0 0073 4 34 4 0042 131Hourly Total 31 3 4 0638 8 0 17 0225 5 299 5 21311 14 113 18 10146 520*** BREAK *** - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- -4:00 PM 7 1 4 0412 4 3 5 0112 2 140 4 02146 7 52 13 0172 2424:15 PM 10 2 2 0014 5 4 7 0416 3 138 3 00144 2 45 11 0058 2324:30 PM 17 2 2 0221 8 2 3 0213 6 144 2 00152 4 54 14 0072 2584:45 PM 12 3 2 0317 6 0 4 0210 7 135 8 00150 4 65 17 1087 264Hourly Total 46 8 10 0964 23 9 19 0951 18 557 17 02592 17 216 55 11289 9965:00 PM 13 2 3 0118 5 2 3 0010 6 150 5 00161 1 61 11 1074 2635:15 PM 9 1 3 0213 5 0 8 0113 4 132 4 00140 4 53 14 1072 2385:30 PM 14 3 3 0620 1 2 4 057 3 133 3 00139 5 68 10 0083 2495:45 PM 7 3 3 0413 7 1 7 0015 6 141 3 01150 3 43 14 0160 238Hourly Total 43 9 12 01364 18 5 22 0645 19 556 15 01590 13 225 49 21289 988Grand Total 155 23 29 031207 56 20 65 020141 44 1616 42 341705 47 676 129 43856 2909Approach % 74.9 11.1 14.0 0.0-- 39.7 14.2 46.1 0.0-- 2.6 94.8 2.5 0.2-- 5.5 79.0 15.1 0.5-- -Total % 5.3 0.8 1.0 0.0-7.1 1.9 0.7 2.2 0.0-4.8 1.5 55.6 1.4 0.1-58.6 1.6 23.2 4.4 0.1-29.4 -Lights 153 19 29 0-201 54 16 62 0-132 43 1571 39 3-1656 44 657 124 4-829 2818% Lights 98.7 82.6 100.0 --97.1 96.4 80.0 95.4 --93.6 97.7 97.2 92.9 100.0-97.1 93.6 97.2 96.1 100.0-96.8 96.9Mediums 1 0 0 0-1 0 0 1 0-1 0 36 2 0-38 1 14 5 0-20 60% Mediums 0.6 0.0 0.0 --0.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 --0.7 0.0 2.2 4.8 0.0-2.2 2.1 2.1 3.9 0.0-2.3 2.1Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 1 0-1 0 9 0 0-9 0 3 0 0-3 13% ArticulatedTrucks0.0 0.0 0.0 --0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 --0.7 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0-0.5 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0-0.4 0.4Bicycles on Road 1 4 0 0-5 2 4 1 0-7 1 0 1 0-2 2 2 0 0-4 18% Bicycles onRoad0.6 17.4 0.0 --2.4 3.6 20.0 1.5 --5.0 2.3 0.0 2.4 0.0-0.1 4.3 0.3 0.0 0.0-0.5 0.6Bicycles onCrosswalk- - - -5- - - - -1- - - - -1- - - - -1- -% Bicycles onCrosswalk- - - -16.1- - - - -5.0- - - - -25.0- - - - -33.3- -Pedestrians - - - -26- - - - -19- - - - -3- - - - -2- -% Pedestrians - - - -83.9- - - - -95.0- - - - -75.0- - - - -66.7- - Kimley - Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 riley.mitts@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Blake Road North & Lake StreetNortheastSite Code:Start Date: 08/12/2021Page No: 208/12/2021 7:00 AMEnding At08/12/2021 6:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherSouthbound Blake RoadOut In Total1790 829 261938 20 5810 3 132 4 60 0 01840 856 2696124 657 44 4 05 14 1 0 00 3 0 0 00 2 2 0 00 0 0 0 3129 676 47 4 3R T L U P 112 0 7 0 3 102 Out 141 0 7 1 1 132 In 253 0 14 1 4 234 Total Westbound Lake Street NE R 65 0 1 1 1 62 T 20 0 4 0 0 16 L 56 0 2 0 0 54 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 20 20 0 0 0 0 743 1656 239914 38 523 9 124 2 60 0 0764 1705 2469Out In TotalNorthbound Blake Road NU L T R P3 43 1571 39 00 0 36 2 00 0 9 0 00 1 0 1 00 0 0 0 43 44 1616 42 4Eastbound Lake Street NE [Total38460100400In2011050207Out1835050193000000U1531010155L19004023T29000029R00003131PTurning Movement Data Plot Kimley - Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 riley.mitts@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Blake Road North & Lake StreetNortheastSite Code:Start Date: 08/12/2021Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (8:00 AM)Start TimeEastbound Lake Street NEWestbound Lake Street NENorthbound Blake Road NSouthbound Blake Road NEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeft Thru Right U-Turn PedsApp.TotalLeft Thru Right U-Turn PedsApp.TotalLeft Thru Right U-Turn PedsApp.TotalLeft Thru Right U-Turn PedsApp.TotalInt. Total8:00 AM 10 1 2 0113 3 0 2 005 1 76 0 0077 4 23 5 0032 1278:15 AM 5 1 1 007 3 0 6 019 2 83 2 2089 5 22 4 1032 1378:30 AM 5 1 1 027 0 0 6 016 2 67 3 0172 1 34 5 0040 1258:45 AM 11 0 0 0311 2 0 3 005 0 73 0 0073 4 34 4 0042 131Total31 3 4 0638 8 0 17 0225 5 299 5 21311 14 113 18 10146 520Approach % 81.6 7.9 10.5 0.0-- 32.0 0.0 68.0 0.0-- 1.6 96.1 1.6 0.6-- 9.6 77.4 12.3 0.7-- -Total % 6.0 0.6 0.8 0.0-7.3 1.5 0.0 3.3 0.0-4.8 1.0 57.5 1.0 0.4-59.8 2.7 21.7 3.5 0.2-28.1 -PHF 0.705 0.750 0.500 0.000-0.731 0.667 0.000 0.708 0.000-0.694 0.625 0.901 0.417 0.250-0.874 0.700 0.831 0.900 0.250-0.869 0.949Lights30 2 4 0-36 8 0 17 0-25 4 282 5 2-293 12 111 17 1-141 495% Lights 96.8 66.7 100.0 --94.7 100.0 - 100.0 --100.0 80.0 94.3 100.0 100.0-94.2 85.7 98.2 94.4 100.0-96.6 95.2Mediums 1 0 0 0-1 0 0 0 0-0 0 14 0 0-14 1 2 1 0-4 19% Mediums 3.2 0.0 0.0 --2.6 0.0 - 0.0 --0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0-4.5 7.1 1.8 5.6 0.0-2.7 3.7Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 3 0 0-3 0 0 0 0-0 3% ArticulatedTrucks0.0 0.0 0.0 --0.0 0.0 - 0.0 --0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0-1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.6Bicycles on Road 0 1 0 0-1 0 0 0 0-0 1 0 0 0-1 1 0 0 0-1 3% Bicycles onRoad0.0 33.3 0.0 --2.6 0.0 - 0.0 --0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.3 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.7 0.6Bicycles onCrosswalk- - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -1- - - - -0- -% Bicycles onCrosswalk- - - -0.0- - - - -0.0- - - - -100.0- - - - --- -Pedestrians - - - -6- - - - -2- - - - -0- - - - -0- -% Pedestrians - - - -100.0- - - - -100.0- - - - -0.0- - - - --- - Kimley - Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 riley.mitts@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Blake Road North & Lake StreetNortheastSite Code:Start Date: 08/12/2021Page No: 4Peak Hour Data08/12/2021 8:00 AMEnding At08/12/2021 9:00 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherSouthbound Blake RoadOut In Total330 141 47115 4 193 0 30 1 10 0 0348 146 49417 111 12 1 01 2 1 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 00 0 0 0 018 113 14 1 0R T L U P 22 0 2 0 1 19 Out 25 0 0 0 0 25 In 47 0 2 0 1 44 Total Westbound Lake Street NE R 17 0 0 0 0 17 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 8 0 0 0 0 8 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 2 2 0 0 0 0 125 293 4182 14 160 3 30 1 10 0 0127 311 438Out In TotalNorthbound Blake Road NU L T R P2 4 282 5 00 0 14 0 00 0 3 0 00 1 0 0 00 0 0 0 12 5 299 5 1Eastbound Lake Street NE [Total57202061In36101038Out21101023000000U30100031L200103T400004R000066PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (8:00 AM) Kimley - Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 riley.mitts@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Blake Road North & Lake StreetNortheastSite Code:Start Date: 08/12/2021Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM)Start TimeEastbound Lake Street NEWestbound Lake Street NENorthbound Blake Road NSouthbound Blake Road NEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeft Thru Right U-Turn PedsApp.TotalLeft Thru Right U-Turn PedsApp.TotalLeft Thru Right U-Turn PedsApp.TotalLeft Thru Right U-Turn PedsApp.TotalInt. Total4:30 PM 17 2 2 0221 8 2 3 0213 6 144 2 00152 4 54 14 0072 2584:45 PM 12 3 2 0317 6 0 4 0210 7 135 8 00150 4 65 17 1087 2645:00 PM 13 2 3 0118 5 2 3 0010 6 150 5 00161 1 61 11 1074 2635:15 PM 9 1 3 0213 5 0 8 0113 4 132 4 00140 4 53 14 1072 238Total51 8 10 0869 24 4 18 0546 23 561 19 00603 13 233 56 30305 1023Approach % 73.9 11.6 14.5 0.0-- 52.2 8.7 39.1 0.0-- 3.8 93.0 3.2 0.0-- 4.3 76.4 18.4 1.0-- -Total % 5.0 0.8 1.0 0.0-6.7 2.3 0.4 1.8 0.0-4.5 2.2 54.8 1.9 0.0-58.9 1.3 22.8 5.5 0.3-29.8 -PHF 0.750 0.667 0.833 0.000-0.821 0.750 0.500 0.563 0.000-0.885 0.821 0.935 0.594 0.000-0.936 0.813 0.896 0.824 0.750-0.876 0.969Lights51 7 10 0-68 22 3 17 0-42 23 556 19 0-598 13 231 53 3-300 1008% Lights 100.0 87.5 100.0 --98.6 91.7 75.0 94.4 --91.3 100.0 99.1 100.0 --99.2 100.0 99.1 94.6 100.0-98.4 98.5Mediums 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 4 0 0-4 0 1 3 0-4 8% Mediums 0.0 0.0 0.0 --0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 --0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 --0.7 0.0 0.4 5.4 0.0-1.3 0.8Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 1 0 0-1 0 0 0 0-0 1% ArticulatedTrucks0.0 0.0 0.0 --0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 --0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 --0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.1Bicycles on Road 0 1 0 0-1 2 1 1 0-4 0 0 0 0-0 0 1 0 0-1 6% Bicycles onRoad0.0 12.5 0.0 --1.4 8.3 25.0 5.6 --8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 --0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0-0.3 0.6Bicycles onCrosswalk- - - -2- - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- -% Bicycles onCrosswalk- - - -25.0- - - - -0.0- - - - --- - - - --- -Pedestrians - - - -6- - - - -5- - - - -0- - - - -0- -% Pedestrians - - - -75.0- - - - -100.0- - - - --- - - - --- - Kimley - Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 riley.mitts@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Blake Road North & Lake StreetNortheastSite Code:Start Date: 08/12/2021Page No: 6Peak Hour Data08/12/2021 4:30 PMEnding At08/12/2021 5:30 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on RoadOtherSouthbound Blake RoadOut In Total627 300 9274 4 81 0 11 1 20 0 0633 305 93853 231 13 3 03 1 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 1 0 0 00 0 0 0 056 233 13 3 0R T L U P 40 0 1 0 0 39 Out 46 0 4 0 0 42 In 86 0 5 0 0 81 Total Westbound Lake Street NE R 18 0 1 0 0 17 T 4 0 1 0 0 3 L 24 0 2 0 0 22 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 5 5 0 0 0 0 263 598 8611 4 50 1 13 0 30 0 0267 603 870Out In TotalNorthbound Blake Road NU L T R P0 23 556 19 00 0 4 0 00 0 1 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 23 561 19 0Eastbound Lake Street NE [Total1473020152In68001069Out79301083000000U51000051L700108T10000010R000088PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM) Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 7_Blake Road & 2nd StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart Time2nd Street2nd StreetBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:00 AM00010 12 0 13025 0 20 31051 7 28 0035 1117:15 AM00010 23 0 26049 0 42 37079 14 31 0045 1737:30 AM00000 28 0 21049 0 53 550108 15 31 0046 2037:45 AM00000 35 0 13048 0 46 640110 23 58 0081 239Hourly Total00020 98 0 730171 0 161 1870348 59 148 00207 7268:00 AM00000 24 0 20044 0 67 400107 21 54 0075 2268:15 AM00000 19 0 11030 0 61 410102 8 65 0173 2058:30 AM00000 11 0 18029 0 48 34082 11 41 0052 1638:45 AM00000 10 0 14024 0 41 36077 20 41 0161 162Hourly Total00000 64 0 630127 0 217 1510368 60 201 02261 756*** BREAK ***---------------------4:00 PM00000 38 0 25263 2 56 24082 20 103 01123 2684:15 PM00030 44 0 32076 0 62 28190 17 108 00125 2914:30 PM00010 61 0 28089 0 72 342106 18 120 00138 3334:45 PM00010 50 0 30180 0 73 291102 24 99 00123 305Hourly Total00050 193 0 1153308 2 263 1154380 79 430 01509 11975:00 PM00010 61 0 29090 0 76 280104 24 119 00143 3375:15 PM00030 58 0 32090 0 49 40289 20 103 00123 3025:30 PM00020 36 0 27063 0 73 26099 19 110 01129 2915:45 PM00000 38 0 21059 0 68 31099 14 70 0084 242Hourly Total00060 193 0 1090302 0 266 1252391 77 402 01479 1172Grand Total000130 548 0 3603908 2 907 57861487 275 1181 041456 3851Approach % 0.0 0.0 0.0-- 60.4 0.0 39.6-- 0.1 61.0 38.9-- 18.9 81.1 0.0---Total %0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 14.2 0.0 9.3-23.6 0.1 23.6 15.0-38.6 7.1 30.7 0.0-37.8 -Lights000-0 532 0 345-877 2 882 557-1441 265 1146 0-1411 3729% Lights----- 97.1 - 95.8-96.6 100.0 97.2 96.4-96.9 96.4 97.0 --96.9 96.8Mediums000-0 15 0 12-27 0 22 20-42 8 29 0-37 106% Mediums----- 2.7 - 3.3-3.0 0.0 2.4 3.5-2.8 2.9 2.5 --2.5 2.8Articulated Trucks 000-0103-4031-4260-8 16% Articulated Trucks ----- 0.2 - 0.8-0.4 0.0 0.3 0.2-0.3 0.7 0.5 --0.5 0.4Bicycles on Crosswalk ---4----0----1----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---30.8----0.0----16.7----0.0--Pedestrians---9----3----5----4--% Pedestrians ---69.2----100.0----83.3----100.0-- Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 7_Blake Road & 2nd StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 202/26/2020 7:00 AMEnding At02/26/2020 6:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total1678 1441 311944 42 867 4 110 0 00 0 01729 1487 3216557 882 2 020 22 0 01 3 0 00 0 0 10 0 0 5578 907 2 6R T L P 2 0 0 0 0 2 Out 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 2 0 0 0 0 2 Total 2nd Street [E] R 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 13 9 4 0 0 0 1227 1411 263834 37 716 8 140 0 00 0 01267 1456 2723Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P265 1146 0 08 29 0 02 6 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 4275 1181 0 42nd Street [W]Total1699557001761In87727400908Out8222830085353215100548L000000T34512300360R000033PTurning Movement Data Plot Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 7_Blake Road & 2nd StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM)Start Time2nd Street2nd StreetBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:30 AM00000 28 0 21049 0 53 550108 15 31 0046 2037:45 AM00000 35 0 13048 0 46 640110 23 58 0081 2398:00 AM00000 24 0 20044 0 67 400107 21 54 0075 2268:15 AM00000 19 0 11030 0 61 410102 8 65 0173 205Total00000 106 0 650171 0 227 2000427 67 208 01275 873Approach % 0.0 0.0 0.0-- 62.0 0.0 38.0-- 0.0 53.2 46.8-- 24.4 75.6 0.0---Total %0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 12.1 0.0 7.4-19.6 0.0 26.0 22.9-48.9 7.7 23.8 0.0-31.5 -PHF0.000 0.000 0.000-0.000 0.757 0.000 0.774-0.872 0.000 0.847 0.781-0.970 0.728 0.800 0.000-0.849 0.913Lights000-0 101 0 62-163 0 218 196-414 66 199 0-265 842% Lights----- 95.3 - 95.4-95.3 - 96.0 98.0-97.0 98.5 95.7 --96.4 96.4Mediums000-0403-7074-11 170-8 26% Mediums----- 3.8 - 4.6-4.1 - 3.1 2.0-2.6 1.5 3.4 --2.9 3.0Articulated Trucks 000-0100-1020-2020-25% Articulated Trucks ----- 0.9 - 0.0-0.6 - 0.9 0.0-0.5 0.0 1.0 --0.7 0.6Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk------------------0.0--Pedestrians---0----0----0----1--% Pedestrians ------------------100.0-- Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 7_Blake Road & 2nd StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 4Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 7:30 AMEnding At02/26/2020 8:30 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total300 414 71411 11 223 2 50 0 00 0 0314 427 741196 218 0 04 7 0 00 2 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0200 227 0 0R T L P 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2nd Street [E] R 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 280 265 54510 8 182 2 40 0 00 0 0292 275 567Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P66 199 0 01 7 0 00 2 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 167 208 0 12nd Street [W]Total42512100438In1637100171Out26250002671014100106L000000T62300065R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM) Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 7_Blake Road & 2nd StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM)Start Time2nd Street2nd StreetBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total4:30 PM00010 61 0 28089 0 72 342106 18 120 00138 3334:45 PM00010 50 0 30180 0 73 291102 24 99 00123 3055:00 PM00010 61 0 29090 0 76 280104 24 119 00143 3375:15 PM00030 58 0 32090 0 49 40289 20 103 00123 302Total00060 230 0 1191349 0 270 1315401 86 441 00527 1277Approach % 0.0 0.0 0.0-- 65.9 0.0 34.1-- 0.0 67.3 32.7-- 16.3 83.7 0.0---Total %0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 18.0 0.0 9.3-27.3 0.0 21.1 10.3-31.4 6.7 34.5 0.0-41.3 -PHF0.000 0.000 0.000-0.000 0.943 0.000 0.930-0.969 0.000 0.888 0.819-0.946 0.896 0.919 0.000-0.921 0.947Lights000-0 224 0 119-343 0 267 127-394 83 434 0-517 1254% Lights----- 97.4 - 100.0-98.3 - 98.9 96.9-98.3 96.5 98.4 --98.1 98.2Mediums000-0600-6033-6360-9 21% Mediums----- 2.6 - 0.0-1.7 - 1.1 2.3-1.5 3.5 1.4 --1.7 1.6Articulated Trucks 000-0000-0001-1010-12% Articulated Trucks ----- 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.8-0.2 0.0 0.2 --0.2 0.2Bicycles on Crosswalk ---1----0----1----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---16.7----0.0----20.0-------Pedestrians---5----1----4----0--% Pedestrians ---83.3----100.0----80.0------- Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 7_Blake Road & 2nd StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 6Peak Hour Data02/26/2020 4:30 PMEnding At02/26/2020 5:30 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total658 394 105212 6 181 1 20 0 00 0 0671 401 1072127 267 0 03 3 0 01 0 0 00 0 0 10 0 0 4131 270 0 5R T L P 0 0 0 0 0 0 Out 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2nd Street [E] R 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 6 5 1 0 0 0 386 517 9033 9 120 1 10 0 00 0 0389 527 916Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P83 434 0 03 6 0 00 1 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 086 441 0 02nd Street [W]Total55312100566In3436000349Out21061002172246000230L000000T1190000119R000011PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM) Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 7_Blake Road & 2nd StreetSite Code:Start Date: 02/26/2020Page No: 7 Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 3_Blake Road & ExcelsiorBoulevardSite Code:Start Date: 03/10/2020Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:00 AM4 44 11059 12 67 8087 14 10 7031 13 11 13037 2147:15 AM7 66 14087 15 95 120122 22 22 12056 8 11 14033 2987:30 AM11 98 200129 15 104 151134 29 13 17059 14 24 18156 3787:45 AM21 134 230178 10 143 182171 35 21 20176 28 21 16065 490Hourly Total43 342 680453 52 409 533514 100 66 561222 63 67 611191 13808:00 AM17 131 380186 20 147 240191 24 17 29070 40 28 21089 5368:15 AM12 127 110150 26 134 330193 23 13 19055 24 34 16074 4728:30 AM12 67 280107 12 113 240149 24 12 11047 17 30 15062 3658:45 AM9 96 230128 8 97 60111 22 20 19061 20 9 11040 340Hourly Total50 421 1000571 66 491 870644 93 62 780233 101 101 630265 1713*** BREAK ***---------------------4:00 PM12 141 390192 25 130 241179 33 23 17073 16 19 6041 4854:15 PM18 132 443194 21 149 380208 39 23 18180 29 28 5462 5444:30 PM31 150 501231 26 149 342209 29 31 15675 18 38 9065 5804:45 PM22 121 540197 22 158 315211 32 17 21070 21 35 10066 544Hourly Total83 544 1874814 94 586 1278807 133 94 717298 84 120 304234 21535:00 PM14 138 513203 23 167 371227 25 42 20087 20 38 16074 5915:15 PM17 99 400156 26 164 360226 38 34 23095 28 43 14085 5625:30 PM16 111 360163 29 122 220173 34 32 21087 16 24 10050 4735:45 PM14 69 360119 24 83 213128 30 25 19074 26 30 13069 390Hourly Total61 417 1633641 102 536 1164754 127 133 830343 90 135 530278 2016Grand Total 237 1724 51872479 314 2022 383152719 453 355 28881096 338 423 2075968 7262Approach % 9.6 69.5 20.9-- 11.5 74.4 14.1-- 41.3 32.4 26.3-- 34.9 43.7 21.4---Total %3.3 23.7 7.1-34.1 4.3 27.8 5.3-37.4 6.2 4.9 4.0-15.1 4.7 5.8 2.9-13.3 -Lights223 1674 498-2395 310 1971 380-2661 439 343 284-1066 334 412 201-947 7069% Lights94.1 97.1 96.1-96.6 98.7 97.5 99.2-97.9 96.9 96.6 98.6-97.3 98.8 97.4 97.1-97.8 97.3Mediums14 40 17-71 4 40 2-46 9 11 4-24 4 11 5-20 161% Mediums5.9 2.3 3.3-2.9 1.3 2.0 0.5-1.7 2.0 3.1 1.4-2.2 1.2 2.6 2.4-2.1 2.2Articulated Trucks 0 10 3-13 0 11 1-12 510-6001-1 32% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.6 0.6-0.5 0.0 0.5 0.3-0.4 1.1 0.3 0.0-0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5-0.1 0.4Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---0.0----0.0----0.0----0.0--Pedestrians---7----15----8----5--% Pedestrians ---100.0----100.0----100.0----100.0-- Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 3_Blake Road & ExcelsiorBoulevardSite Code:Start Date: 03/10/2020Page No: 203/10/2020 7:00 AMEnding At03/10/2020 6:00 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total1220 1066 228632 24 563 6 90 0 00 0 01255 1096 2351284 343 439 04 11 9 00 1 5 00 0 0 00 0 0 8288 355 453 8R T L P 2682 0 0 17 54 2611 Out 2479 0 0 13 71 2395 In 5161 0 0 30 125 5006 Total Excelsior Boulevard [E] R 518 0 0 3 17 498 T 1724 0 0 10 40 1674 L 237 0 0 0 14 223 P 7 7 0 0 0 0 946 947 189327 20 472 1 30 0 00 0 0975 968 1943Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P334 412 201 04 11 5 00 0 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 5338 423 207 5Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total49539422005069In26614612002719Out229248100023503104000314L19714011002022T3802100383R00001515PTurning Movement Data Plot Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 3_Blake Road & ExcelsiorBoulevardSite Code:Start Date: 03/10/2020Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM)Start TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total7:30 AM11 98 200129 15 104 151134 29 13 17059 14 24 18156 3787:45 AM21 134 230178 10 143 182171 35 21 20176 28 21 16065 4908:00 AM17 131 380186 20 147 240191 24 17 29070 40 28 21089 5368:15 AM12 127 110150 26 134 330193 23 13 19055 24 34 16074 472Total61 490 920643 71 528 903689 111 64 851260 106 107 711284 1876Approach % 9.5 76.2 14.3-- 10.3 76.6 13.1-- 42.7 24.6 32.7-- 37.3 37.7 25.0---Total %3.3 26.1 4.9-34.3 3.8 28.1 4.8-36.7 5.9 3.4 4.5-13.9 5.7 5.7 3.8-15.1 -PHF0.726 0.914 0.605-0.864 0.683 0.898 0.682-0.892 0.793 0.762 0.733-0.855 0.663 0.787 0.845-0.798 0.875Lights57 475 83-615 70 516 90-676 104 58 83-245 103 105 70-278 1814% Lights93.4 96.9 90.2-95.6 98.6 97.7 100.0-98.1 93.7 90.6 97.6-94.2 97.2 98.1 98.6-97.9 96.7Mediums4 12 8-24 1 10 0-11 562-13 321-6 54% Mediums6.6 2.4 8.7-3.7 1.4 1.9 0.0-1.6 4.5 9.4 2.4-5.0 2.8 1.9 1.4-2.1 2.9Articulated Trucks 031-4020-2200-2000-08% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.6 1.1-0.6 0.0 0.4 0.0-0.3 1.8 0.0 0.0-0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.4Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk--------0.0----0.0----0.0--Pedestrians---0----3----1----1--% Pedestrians --------100.0----100.0----100.0-- Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 3_Blake Road & ExcelsiorBoulevardSite Code:Start Date: 03/10/2020Page No: 4Peak Hour Data03/10/2020 7:30 AMEnding At03/10/2020 8:30 AMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total258 245 50311 13 241 2 30 0 00 0 0270 260 53083 58 104 02 6 5 00 0 2 00 0 0 00 0 0 185 64 111 1R T L P 710 0 0 4 16 690 Out 643 0 0 4 24 615 In 1353 0 0 8 40 1305 Total Excelsior Boulevard [E] R 92 0 0 1 8 83 T 490 0 0 3 12 475 L 61 0 0 0 4 57 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 205 278 48310 6 160 0 00 0 00 0 0215 284 499Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P103 105 70 03 2 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 1106 107 71 1Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total1337285001370In67611200689Out6611730068170100071L51610200528T90000090R000033PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM) Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 3_Blake Road & ExcelsiorBoulevardSite Code:Start Date: 03/10/2020Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:30 PM)Start TimeExcelsior BoulevardExcelsior BoulevardBlake RoadBlake RoadWestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundLeft Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total4:30 PM31 150 501231 26 149 342209 29 31 15675 18 38 9065 5804:45 PM22 121 540197 22 158 315211 32 17 21070 21 35 10066 5445:00 PM14 138 513203 23 167 371227 25 42 20087 20 38 16074 5915:15 PM17 99 400156 26 164 360226 38 34 23095 28 43 14085 562Total84 508 1954787 97 638 1388873 124 124 796327 87 154 490290 2277Approach % 10.7 64.5 24.8-- 11.1 73.1 15.8-- 37.9 37.9 24.2-- 30.0 53.1 16.9---Total %3.7 22.3 8.6-34.6 4.3 28.0 6.1-38.3 5.4 5.4 3.5-14.4 3.8 6.8 2.2-12.7 -PHF0.677 0.847 0.903-0.852 0.933 0.955 0.932-0.961 0.816 0.738 0.859-0.861 0.777 0.895 0.766-0.853 0.963Lights80 495 192-767 96 625 137-858 121 121 78-320 87 152 48-287 2232% Lights95.2 97.4 98.5-97.5 99.0 98.0 99.3-98.3 97.6 97.6 98.7-97.9 100.0 98.7 98.0-99.0 98.0Mediums4 11 2-17 191-11 131-5021-3 36% Mediums4.8 2.2 1.0-2.2 1.0 1.4 0.7-1.3 0.8 2.4 1.3-1.5 0.0 1.3 2.0-1.0 1.6Articulated Trucks 021-3040-4200-2000-09% Articulated Trucks 0.0 0.4 0.5-0.4 0.0 0.6 0.0-0.5 1.6 0.0 0.0-0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.4Bicycles on Crosswalk ---0----0----0----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk---0.0----0.0----0.0-------Pedestrians---4----8----6----0--% Pedestrians ---100.0----100.0----100.0------- Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 3_Blake Road & ExcelsiorBoulevardSite Code:Start Date: 03/10/2020Page No: 6Peak Hour Data03/10/2020 4:30 PMEnding At03/10/2020 5:30 PMLightsMediumsArticulated TrucksBicycles on CrosswalkPedestriansBlake Road [N]Out In Total440 320 7605 5 101 2 30 0 00 0 0446 327 77378 121 121 01 3 1 00 0 2 00 0 0 00 0 0 679 124 124 6R T L P 811 0 0 6 11 794 Out 787 0 0 3 17 767 In 1598 0 0 9 28 1561 Total Excelsior Boulevard [E] R 195 0 0 1 2 192 T 508 0 0 2 11 495 L 84 0 0 0 4 80 P 4 4 0 0 0 0 338 287 6258 3 110 0 00 0 00 0 0346 290 636Out In TotalBlake Road [S]L T R P87 152 48 00 2 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 087 154 49 0Excelsior Boulevard [W]Total1518236001547In85811400873Out6601220067496100097L6259400638T1371000138R000088PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:30 PM) Kimley-Horn : Lisle (IL)1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350Lisle, Illinois, United States 60532331.481.7332 jack.olsson@kimley-horn.comCount Name: 3_Blake Road & ExcelsiorBoulevardSite Code:Start Date: 03/10/2020Page No: 7 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing (2021) Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)2.0 0.5 2.0 2.1 0.5 2.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.9 1.0 3.8 Total Del/Veh (s)83.5 48.2 16.1 74.0 28.7 6.7 71.4 68.7 40.2 97.4 91.2 2.9 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8 Total Del/Veh (s)44.8 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.4 3.7 0.2 0.2 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)36.2 38.4 6.7 36.1 27.8 5.0 42.5 6.0 4.1 63.8 6.0 4.2 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)13.7 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 4.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)11.8 11.7 5.3 12.0 11.5 4.4 6.5 1.1 0.8 4.1 0.4 0.2 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)1.6 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)1.3 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)18.5 10.2 25.1 7.9 11.0 8.2 12.2 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing (2021) Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.2 2.6 3.6 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)44.3 18.9 4.0 47.3 22.0 4.1 40.8 35.1 12.0 40.6 38.0 28.8 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)26.1 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)1099.8 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing (2021) Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 152 328 840 848 420 189 369 538 557 190 178 183 Average Queue (ft)47 96 521 516 112 104 137 315 295 15 77 97 95th Queue (ft)119 234 786 794 416 177 253 511 511 129 144 155 Link Distance (ft)1614 1614 1315 1315 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)675 675 300 300 300 300 190 190 Storage Blk Time (%)3 24 11 9 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)5 32 28 9 0 0 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 98 123 321 186 202 146 Average Queue (ft)43 61 176 86 78 35 95th Queue (ft)84 108 285 156 150 101 Link Distance (ft)410 410 410 525 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 250 Storage Blk Time (%)2 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)2 2 Intersection: 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 234 82 72 61 99 77 125 54 123 147 Average Queue (ft)116 33 20 20 41 26 44 18 19 31 95th Queue (ft)189 66 52 49 85 64 98 47 75 92 Link Distance (ft)738 1036 652 652 410 410 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)200 100 200 140 Storage Blk Time (%)1 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing (2021) Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection: 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Movement EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 58 37 59 21 44 Average Queue (ft)26 11 14 2 4 95th Queue (ft)49 35 41 12 24 Link Distance (ft)794 874 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 85 100 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L LTR L T TR T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 111 171 101 84 90 184 226 Average Queue (ft)42 85 40 27 35 67 74 95th Queue (ft)87 144 79 67 79 153 172 Link Distance (ft)544 1263 1263 619 619 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 200 Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing (2021) Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 65 66 246 194 132 129 226 215 68 190 98 112 Average Queue (ft)16 23 135 106 34 52 140 109 32 100 35 31 95th Queue (ft)43 54 210 178 93 108 208 188 62 174 80 81 Link Distance (ft)184 184 184 184 1140 1140 607 607 Upstream Blk Time (%)2 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)5 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175 Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 1 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement SB SB SB SB Directions Served L L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 138 147 163 202 Average Queue (ft)49 65 68 98 95th Queue (ft)106 124 142 179 Link Distance (ft)1263 1263 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)165 165 Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 86 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing (2021) Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)2.1 0.8 2.0 2.2 0.5 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 7.6 9.1 Total Del/Veh (s)82.0 51.4 17.4 95.5 43.8 11.9 68.9 83.7 65.3 116.8 131.4 14.3 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)1.7 Total Del/Veh (s)62.1 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 0.5 3.5 0.2 0.2 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)36.8 38.8 6.9 29.9 29.3 6.2 47.7 11.1 11.3 54.4 11.3 8.8 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)16.8 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.2 0.1 4.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)19.4 19.1 8.8 20.1 26.3 7.7 5.9 2.1 2.1 8.5 0.7 0.6 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)2.8 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)1.1 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)20.6 12.9 29.3 10.5 14.8 9.8 14.1 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing (2021) Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.1 0.0 2.7 0.3 2.6 3.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)49.2 19.3 5.8 57.7 20.4 7.1 53.6 44.5 25.9 56.9 45.0 35.2 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)26.8 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)1.7 Total Del/Veh (s)953.1 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing (2021) Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 289 312 794 834 420 224 501 566 571 420 154 206 Average Queue (ft)173 199 519 520 197 129 169 344 328 55 72 103 95th Queue (ft)267 293 791 810 539 218 302 527 523 250 139 167 Link Distance (ft)1614 1614 1315 1315 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)675 675 300 300 300 300 190 190 Storage Blk Time (%)3 26 0 0 18 15 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)11 45 0 2 49 27 0 0 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 258 266 420 250 541 340 118 Average Queue (ft)152 158 293 225 347 235 6 95th Queue (ft)230 238 438 292 587 384 76 Link Distance (ft)410 410 410 525 Upstream Blk Time (%)3 12 Queuing Penalty (veh)7 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%)6 47 33 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 144 134 7 Intersection: 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 261 113 77 64 125 172 277 94 190 240 Average Queue (ft)136 36 30 20 55 62 115 37 47 71 95th Queue (ft)225 81 66 49 98 132 224 76 129 166 Link Distance (ft)738 1036 652 652 410 410 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)200 100 200 140 Storage Blk Time (%)2 0 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0 0 0 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing (2021) Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection: 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Movement EB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 81 66 53 47 26 48 9 Average Queue (ft)37 18 17 12 1 10 1 95th Queue (ft)71 49 42 37 14 35 6 Link Distance (ft)794 874 619 251 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 85 100 Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Intersection: 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L LTR L T TR T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 146 202 111 197 211 182 217 Average Queue (ft)44 103 51 79 89 77 91 95th Queue (ft)107 168 95 153 163 150 177 Link Distance (ft)544 1263 1263 619 619 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 200 Storage Blk Time (%)0 2 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 0 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing (2021) Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 113 135 268 270 184 144 278 246 164 174 149 166 Average Queue (ft)44 64 226 206 125 71 169 147 61 80 79 66 95th Queue (ft)90 113 295 281 238 131 245 223 117 146 136 136 Link Distance (ft)184 184 184 184 1140 1140 607 607 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 15 9 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 60 37 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175 Storage Blk Time (%)9 1 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)24 5 0 1 0 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement SB SB SB SB Directions Served L L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 141 159 163 221 Average Queue (ft)60 80 57 97 95th Queue (ft)115 133 128 182 Link Distance (ft)1263 1263 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)165 165 Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 568 SimTraffic Performance Report Opening Year (2025) No-Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)2.0 0.5 1.9 2.1 0.6 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.8 3.9 Total Del/Veh (s)83.0 53.0 19.1 71.3 27.9 7.6 72.7 70.6 39.7 102.8 88.6 3.2 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8 Total Del/Veh (s)46.5 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.5 3.6 0.2 0.2 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)37.3 37.8 6.6 30.2 30.7 5.3 44.4 6.9 4.2 64.4 6.3 4.8 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)14.2 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.1 0.1 4.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)14.6 16.1 6.7 11.2 11.7 4.6 5.1 1.2 1.1 4.4 0.5 0.4 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)1.9 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)1.3 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)18.5 10.9 27.9 8.3 12.5 8.7 13.1 SimTraffic Performance Report Opening Year (2025) No-Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.2 2.5 3.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)42.7 20.2 4.0 47.3 22.3 4.3 39.0 33.4 12.3 45.1 37.0 30.2 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)26.5 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)1018.2 Queuing and Blocking Report Opening Year (2025) No-Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 141 648 1033 1017 420 226 250 528 500 344 187 196 Average Queue (ft)47 104 552 535 107 112 135 313 293 27 86 105 95th Queue (ft)115 325 887 872 405 202 218 498 483 177 157 169 Link Distance (ft)1614 1614 1315 1315 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)675 675 300 300 300 300 190 190 Storage Blk Time (%)6 27 0 0 10 8 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)9 38 0 0 28 9 0 0 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 151 119 324 196 185 135 Average Queue (ft)57 68 184 92 84 36 95th Queue (ft)112 114 307 166 157 98 Link Distance (ft)410 410 410 525 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 250 Storage Blk Time (%)0 3 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 3 1 Intersection: 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 240 79 83 50 101 92 134 88 106 141 Average Queue (ft)128 31 25 18 38 34 53 24 21 34 95th Queue (ft)207 67 63 45 79 77 112 65 72 91 Link Distance (ft)738 1036 652 652 410 410 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)200 100 200 140 Storage Blk Time (%)2 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Opening Year (2025) No-Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection: 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Movement EB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 83 33 64 26 8 40 4 Average Queue (ft)32 14 22 3 0 4 0 95th Queue (ft)62 38 50 18 4 26 3 Link Distance (ft)794 874 619 251 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 85 100 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L LTR L T TR T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 122 219 105 92 91 202 231 Average Queue (ft)38 97 40 32 38 71 83 95th Queue (ft)86 173 80 75 78 154 182 Link Distance (ft)544 1263 1263 619 619 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 200 Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Opening Year (2025) No-Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 72 88 255 222 162 124 240 208 91 192 91 97 Average Queue (ft)20 28 146 117 41 49 146 113 36 109 31 35 95th Queue (ft)51 67 228 193 112 97 215 189 73 181 72 84 Link Distance (ft)184 184 184 184 1140 1140 607 607 Upstream Blk Time (%)3 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)8 2 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175 Storage Blk Time (%)1 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)1 0 0 0 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement SB SB SB SB Directions Served L L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 160 166 176 211 Average Queue (ft)52 74 72 104 95th Queue (ft)120 138 148 186 Link Distance (ft)1263 1263 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)165 165 Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 104 SimTraffic Performance Report Opening Year (2025) No-Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)2.3 0.9 2.0 2.2 0.5 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.7 3.1 5.3 Total Del/Veh (s)88.9 65.4 25.8 97.0 45.2 12.7 74.3 87.4 70.5 107.1 124.5 10.4 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)1.3 Total Del/Veh (s)67.5 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 0.4 3.6 0.3 0.2 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)37.0 39.2 6.9 30.6 33.6 7.7 46.0 12.7 14.2 58.2 12.5 10.5 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)18.1 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.1 0.1 4.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)22.2 25.4 10.8 21.4 24.3 8.9 6.7 2.1 2.0 5.9 0.8 0.6 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)3.1 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)1.2 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)21.9 14.4 29.9 10.4 13.8 9.6 14.2 SimTraffic Performance Report Opening Year (2025) No-Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.1 0.0 2.5 0.4 2.5 3.5 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)52.4 20.1 6.5 57.4 20.3 7.7 56.6 43.8 29.0 56.1 45.9 40.6 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)27.7 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)1.4 Total Del/Veh (s)1026.4 Queuing and Blocking Report Opening Year (2025) No-Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 304 597 1072 1092 420 275 465 558 584 420 189 236 Average Queue (ft)182 283 660 665 192 142 184 358 340 81 89 116 95th Queue (ft)272 657 1129 1125 528 231 321 554 550 319 161 196 Link Distance (ft)1614 1614 1315 1315 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)675 675 300 300 300 300 190 190 Storage Blk Time (%)9 31 0 0 19 16 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)36 58 0 2 54 29 0 1 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 260 261 422 250 547 340 60 Average Queue (ft)159 166 309 222 333 227 3 95th Queue (ft)247 253 454 288 582 381 34 Link Distance (ft)410 410 410 525 Upstream Blk Time (%)4 5 Queuing Penalty (veh)11 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%)7 47 35 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 12 151 151 7 Intersection: 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 295 108 94 61 123 188 280 131 202 218 Average Queue (ft)141 34 37 22 56 68 126 41 55 76 95th Queue (ft)231 78 75 50 106 147 236 91 142 158 Link Distance (ft)738 1036 652 652 410 410 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)200 100 200 140 Storage Blk Time (%)3 0 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0 0 0 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Opening Year (2025) No-Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection: 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR L TR L T TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 93 64 80 52 7 20 47 9 Average Queue (ft)43 18 23 17 0 1 12 1 95th Queue (ft)77 47 54 44 5 8 37 7 Link Distance (ft)794 874 619 619 251 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 85 100 Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 0 Intersection: 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L LTR L T TR T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 168 228 144 194 175 185 219 Average Queue (ft)49 113 53 79 92 79 95 95th Queue (ft)117 192 102 156 164 162 186 Link Distance (ft)544 1263 1263 619 619 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 200 Storage Blk Time (%)0 2 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 3 0 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Opening Year (2025) No-Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 08/18/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 115 132 285 276 184 178 291 276 138 184 214 179 Average Queue (ft)55 70 237 220 128 73 182 160 67 99 90 71 95th Queue (ft)107 121 301 295 239 140 265 240 116 172 175 148 Link Distance (ft)184 184 184 184 1140 1140 607 607 Upstream Blk Time (%)19 12 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)77 51 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175 Storage Blk Time (%)12 1 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)33 4 0 1 0 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement SB SB SB SB Directions Served L L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 146 157 229 228 Average Queue (ft)62 79 80 108 95th Queue (ft)120 139 176 198 Link Distance (ft)1263 1263 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)165 165 Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 687 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year (2040) No-Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/16/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)1.9 0.5 1.9 2.1 0.6 2.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 3.7 0.2 3.7 Total Del/Veh (s)87.9 49.9 19.3 97.2 30.1 8.1 71.0 65.2 45.7 96.1 85.9 2.6 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8 Total Del/Veh (s)47.7 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 0.4 3.6 0.2 0.2 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)35.7 34.3 7.5 28.0 30.3 5.0 40.8 7.6 6.3 66.3 8.0 6.4 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)14.7 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 4.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)16.9 17.6 6.5 13.1 18.6 6.1 3.9 1.2 0.7 4.8 0.6 0.4 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)2.1 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)1.4 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)20.1 12.7 30.7 8.9 15.0 11.2 14.8 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year (2040) No-Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/16/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.1 0.0 2.5 0.2 2.6 3.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)41.4 21.5 4.3 45.5 23.0 4.5 40.1 34.7 14.7 47.8 43.4 37.3 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)28.2 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)1.0 Total Del/Veh (s)1112.3 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year (2040) No-Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/16/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 136 493 1031 986 420 272 359 570 542 420 189 202 Average Queue (ft)58 128 557 550 118 143 169 345 321 37 96 115 95th Queue (ft)131 403 934 931 422 246 305 528 519 222 168 186 Link Distance (ft)1614 1614 1315 1315 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)675 675 300 300 300 300 190 190 Storage Blk Time (%)6 24 0 1 13 11 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)9 39 2 5 41 13 0 0 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 135 138 412 207 169 140 Average Queue (ft)56 68 228 83 77 47 95th Queue (ft)110 117 375 156 147 110 Link Distance (ft)410 410 410 634 634 Upstream Blk Time (%)1 Queuing Penalty (veh)1 Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 Storage Blk Time (%)0 3 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1 Intersection: 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 257 123 78 45 114 104 187 74 117 115 Average Queue (ft)129 33 24 17 52 37 69 24 27 39 95th Queue (ft)213 64 59 41 96 83 144 59 80 87 Link Distance (ft)738 1036 652 652 410 410 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)200 100 200 140 Storage Blk Time (%)2 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year (2040) No-Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/16/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection: 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Movement EB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR L TR L TR L T Maximum Queue (ft) 77 45 65 29 6 42 11 Average Queue (ft)34 12 21 2 0 7 0 95th Queue (ft)63 38 52 16 4 31 8 Link Distance (ft)794 874 631 251 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 85 100 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L LTR L T TR T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 182 250 117 123 117 298 309 Average Queue (ft)57 113 50 37 46 104 106 95th Queue (ft)127 198 94 88 99 234 237 Link Distance (ft)544 1263 1263 631 631 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 200 Storage Blk Time (%)0 2 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year (2040) No-Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/16/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 73 84 266 228 182 135 267 229 85 198 234 111 Average Queue (ft)22 28 163 137 46 55 151 122 38 122 52 43 95th Queue (ft)55 64 244 213 116 107 234 203 68 196 146 92 Link Distance (ft)184 184 184 184 1140 1140 607 607 Upstream Blk Time (%)5 2 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)13 4 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175 Storage Blk Time (%)2 0 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh)2 0 0 2 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement SB SB SB SB Directions Served L L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 170 184 233 238 Average Queue (ft)75 92 85 118 95th Queue (ft)152 164 182 210 Link Distance (ft)1263 1263 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)165 165 Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 3 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 142 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year (2040)No-Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/16/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)7.2 5.9 7.7 2.2 0.6 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.3 0.5 3.1 Total Del/Veh (s)105.8 99.6 57.1 156.5 53.7 16.9 76.2 86.1 82.6 109.9 85.3 3.4 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)3.2 Total Del/Veh (s)84.6 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 0.4 3.6 0.2 0.2 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)61.5 56.3 10.2 27.3 32.1 15.7 45.8 30.5 45.0 58.9 14.2 12.3 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)28.6 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.2 0.2 4.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)28.1 34.2 17.5 23.0 41.7 9.9 8.6 2.2 2.2 11.2 0.9 0.7 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)3.8 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)1.2 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)24.1 16.5 34.5 12.0 15.6 11.8 16.2 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year (2040)No-Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/16/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.1 0.0 2.4 0.4 2.5 3.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)48.2 21.7 7.7 62.2 23.3 8.6 63.6 45.4 30.0 55.2 48.3 47.2 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)29.8 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)2.8 Total Del/Veh (s)1138.8 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year (2040)No-Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/16/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 338 974 1533 1528 420 373 552 757 717 420 207 266 Average Queue (ft)199 449 1003 1010 226 228 275 432 428 166 96 135 95th Queue (ft)311 1032 1608 1595 557 360 459 680 676 483 172 227 Link Distance (ft)1614 1614 1315 1315 Upstream Blk Time (%)6 5 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)675 675 300 300 300 300 190 190 Storage Blk Time (%)27 43 7 10 26 24 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh)119 95 46 67 90 49 0 3 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 320 281 426 250 561 519 Average Queue (ft)185 179 382 227 318 236 95th Queue (ft)276 260 482 283 560 457 Link Distance (ft)410 410 410 634 634 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 20 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 64 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 Storage Blk Time (%)9 50 12 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 18 75 31 0 Intersection: 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB B8 SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR T L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 408 213 106 72 170 420 543 33 186 294 303 Average Queue (ft)192 52 39 23 59 123 272 3 48 94 113 95th Queue (ft)379 163 78 57 114 282 577 28 105 227 253 Link Distance (ft)738 1036 652 652 251 410 410 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 5 Storage Bay Dist (ft)200 100 200 140 Storage Blk Time (%) 14 1 0 1 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 12 0 0 1 0 1 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year (2040)No-Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/16/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection: 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Movement EB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 112 62 67 61 10 47 22 Average Queue (ft)50 22 26 15 0 11 1 95th Queue (ft)92 52 56 45 6 36 10 Link Distance (ft)794 874 631 251 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 85 100 Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Intersection: 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L LTR L T TR T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 184 282 165 200 223 239 278 Average Queue (ft)65 134 66 93 107 107 122 95th Queue (ft)149 228 124 171 193 205 233 Link Distance (ft)544 1263 1263 631 631 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 200 Storage Blk Time (%)0 5 0 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 7 0 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year (2040)No-Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/16/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 129 141 288 292 184 254 342 297 173 195 285 233 Average Queue (ft)57 75 253 242 142 92 221 191 75 117 108 79 95th Queue (ft)110 124 299 303 242 184 315 277 135 194 225 171 Link Distance (ft)184 184 184 184 1140 1140 607 607 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 24 18 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 110 80 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175 Storage Blk Time (%)18 1 2 6 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)52 6 2 7 1 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement SB SB SB SB Directions Served L L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 160 176 244 254 Average Queue (ft)86 102 98 133 95th Queue (ft)151 168 188 220 Link Distance (ft)1263 1263 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)165 165 Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 3 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 948 SimTraffic Performance Report Opening Year (2025) Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)2.0 0.5 1.9 2.1 0.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.2 3.6 Total Del/Veh (s)87.0 57.6 21.5 73.8 29.1 7.1 71.8 67.3 39.2 89.6 88.1 2.5 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.7 Total Del/Veh (s)48.4 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 0.3 3.8 0.1 0.3 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)37.8 34.2 7.0 33.1 29.3 5.9 41.7 6.7 4.6 68.1 6.9 5.2 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)14.0 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)14.0 16.8 5.9 11.5 10.3 5.5 6.3 1.3 0.9 3.3 0.5 0.3 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)2.1 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)1.4 0.3 0.5 4.1 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)19.2 22.5 12.5 26.0 25.5 5.3 30.1 10.7 7.6 35.7 12.8 8.9 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)14.5 SimTraffic Performance Report Opening Year (2025) Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.2 2.7 3.5 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)41.0 22.6 4.6 48.5 23.5 4.5 41.4 32.8 14.0 41.4 35.9 27.9 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)27.1 6: Site Access 2 & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)0.6 0.7 2.1 0.3 4.5 2.9 1.5 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)1055.6 Queuing and Blocking Report Opening Year (2025) Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 152 495 1044 1013 420 236 367 614 554 420 182 194 Average Queue (ft)55 145 588 585 144 111 137 332 309 19 95 112 95th Queue (ft)133 488 987 993 468 201 250 534 509 147 165 173 Link Distance (ft)1614 1614 1315 1315 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)675 675 300 300 300 300 190 190 Storage Blk Time (%)8 28 0 12 9 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)11 44 0 33 10 0 0 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 112 119 351 158 172 145 Average Queue (ft)45 63 189 86 72 39 95th Queue (ft)96 110 305 149 137 97 Link Distance (ft)410 410 410 525 525 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 Storage Blk Time (%)1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Intersection: 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 207 77 85 55 108 96 146 67 132 151 Average Queue (ft)120 33 26 19 41 30 59 24 24 38 95th Queue (ft)197 65 65 45 87 72 124 57 78 102 Link Distance (ft)738 1036 652 652 410 410 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)200 100 200 140 Storage Blk Time (%)1 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Opening Year (2025) Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection: 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR L TR L T TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 74 56 67 32 4 8 40 Average Queue (ft)31 23 25 3 0 0 7 95th Queue (ft)59 51 54 17 3 4 28 Link Distance (ft)794 136 136 634 634 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)85 100 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L LTR L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 141 197 69 65 98 113 118 109 200 221 Average Queue (ft)43 96 33 24 42 37 50 20 81 92 95th Queue (ft)100 172 63 52 80 81 96 64 173 182 Link Distance (ft)544 464 1263 1263 634 634 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 100 200 140 Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 0 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 0 0 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Opening Year (2025) Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 67 86 277 244 182 124 252 225 82 197 184 112 Average Queue (ft)16 31 157 131 48 53 148 118 36 115 36 38 95th Queue (ft)46 67 239 211 127 107 226 206 68 192 101 87 Link Distance (ft)184 184 184 184 1140 1140 607 607 Upstream Blk Time (%)4 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)10 3 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175 Storage Blk Time (%)1 0 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh)1 0 0 1 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement SB SB SB SB Directions Served L L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 154 156 198 200 Average Queue (ft)56 76 75 103 95th Queue (ft)122 135 165 181 Link Distance (ft)1263 1263 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)165 165 Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1 Intersection: 6: Site Access 2 & Lake Street Movement WB NB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 45 Average Queue (ft)2 26 95th Queue (ft)18 47 Link Distance (ft)1022 340 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 119 SimTraffic Performance Report Opening Year (2025) Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)2.1 0.8 2.1 2.2 0.5 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.9 4.1 Total Del/Veh (s)88.7 62.1 23.9 108.3 46.0 13.2 73.8 87.1 76.8 99.2 117.0 4.2 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)1.1 Total Del/Veh (s)66.8 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 0.6 3.6 0.2 0.2 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)42.6 44.0 8.0 33.5 28.3 9.9 45.7 16.4 20.1 57.4 13.2 10.0 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)20.4 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)26.5 27.7 12.9 26.7 22.7 10.1 7.5 2.3 2.3 7.6 0.8 0.7 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)3.8 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)1.2 0.4 0.5 4.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)23.8 24.8 16.5 30.5 27.8 6.5 37.8 16.1 13.6 45.1 15.5 11.2 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)18.3 SimTraffic Performance Report Opening Year (2025) Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.1 0.0 2.5 0.4 2.6 3.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)52.4 20.3 6.7 54.0 21.2 8.0 53.8 45.2 29.7 56.3 44.9 43.6 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)28.2 6: Site Access 2 & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)0.6 0.5 3.5 0.4 6.5 5.9 1.8 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)1.2 Total Del/Veh (s)1032.0 Queuing and Blocking Report Opening Year (2025) Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 301 457 994 996 420 289 572 650 607 420 195 246 Average Queue (ft)178 253 632 637 186 168 203 373 351 81 93 119 95th Queue (ft)277 578 1039 1046 525 265 343 575 555 318 171 207 Link Distance (ft)1614 1614 1315 1315 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)675 675 300 300 300 300 190 190 Storage Blk Time (%)8 30 0 0 19 17 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh)31 66 2 2 60 32 1 2 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 291 282 423 250 486 419 68 Average Queue (ft)159 160 345 223 296 207 7 95th Queue (ft)244 241 486 288 504 376 88 Link Distance (ft)410 410 410 525 525 Upstream Blk Time (%)9 3 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)28 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 250 Storage Blk Time (%)5 43 28 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 61 66 2 Intersection: 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 305 165 97 68 135 206 291 175 249 290 Average Queue (ft)161 42 42 24 58 80 150 49 72 88 95th Queue (ft)275 119 86 56 110 165 272 119 183 204 Link Distance (ft)738 1036 652 652 410 410 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)200 100 200 140 Storage Blk Time (%)5 1 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 0 0 0 1 Queuing and Blocking Report Opening Year (2025) Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection: 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Movement EB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 111 83 91 50 21 62 18 Average Queue (ft)46 28 30 14 1 18 1 95th Queue (ft)89 63 65 40 8 48 8 Link Distance (ft)794 136 136 634 251 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)85 100 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L LTR L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 180 267 62 44 150 241 263 124 204 247 Average Queue (ft)55 126 22 14 58 102 130 36 88 109 95th Queue (ft)132 219 50 40 116 195 229 83 181 211 Link Distance (ft)544 464 1263 1263 634 634 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 100 200 140 Storage Blk Time (%)0 4 0 1 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 5 0 1 1 Queuing and Blocking Report Opening Year (2025) Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 137 155 287 276 184 216 330 295 160 173 182 170 Average Queue (ft)60 83 236 219 133 78 179 157 67 91 79 73 95th Queue (ft)114 140 295 295 241 150 267 247 124 155 148 146 Link Distance (ft)184 184 184 184 1140 1140 607 607 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 18 11 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 75 48 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175 Storage Blk Time (%)11 1 1 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)30 5 1 0 0 0 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement SB SB SB SB Directions Served L L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 149 150 172 262 Average Queue (ft)74 89 80 121 95th Queue (ft)128 143 156 213 Link Distance (ft)1263 1263 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)165 165 Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1 Intersection: 6: Site Access 2 & Lake Street Movement WB NB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 35 Average Queue (ft)4 22 95th Queue (ft)23 45 Link Distance (ft)1022 340 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 536 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year (2040) Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)2.0 0.6 2.0 2.1 0.7 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.7 0.2 3.9 Total Del/Veh (s)84.5 59.7 26.8 107.3 33.8 9.8 70.5 62.5 45.1 106.8 84.7 2.5 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8 Total Del/Veh (s)53.7 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 0.6 3.6 0.2 0.2 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)36.8 33.8 7.0 33.0 26.8 6.9 45.3 8.8 6.1 63.0 8.0 5.9 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)14.7 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)18.5 19.9 13.1 14.8 10.2 5.7 4.7 1.4 1.2 5.6 0.7 0.5 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)2.4 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)1.4 0.5 0.6 3.9 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)21.6 22.4 14.2 25.6 19.7 5.9 30.9 12.6 8.5 39.5 14.3 11.2 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)16.4 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year (2040) Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.1 0.0 2.4 0.2 2.5 3.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)42.7 22.8 5.0 48.9 25.0 5.1 41.8 32.4 14.4 42.6 39.2 30.9 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.6 Total Del/Veh (s)28.4 6: Site Access 2 & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)1.0 0.8 2.2 0.4 4.6 2.9 2.0 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)1.0 Total Del/Veh (s)1109.5 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year (2040) Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 150 814 1147 1184 420 276 504 707 686 420 216 232 Average Queue (ft)58 139 656 661 182 173 197 378 362 82 124 142 95th Queue (ft)130 460 1059 1074 517 269 338 603 596 348 204 219 Link Distance (ft)1614 1614 1315 1315 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)675 675 300 300 300 300 190 190 Storage Blk Time (%)10 30 0 1 16 15 1 3 Queuing Penalty (veh)15 55 4 5 52 18 0 2 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 143 129 419 203 183 147 Average Queue (ft)51 64 248 100 84 48 95th Queue (ft)107 112 387 175 157 111 Link Distance (ft)410 410 410 525 525 Upstream Blk Time (%)1 Queuing Penalty (veh)2 Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 Storage Blk Time (%)4 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)2 1 Intersection: 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 258 122 83 55 120 137 178 82 150 148 Average Queue (ft)132 31 26 18 49 50 82 21 30 41 95th Queue (ft)220 62 63 47 98 111 160 57 90 101 Link Distance (ft)738 1036 652 652 410 410 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)200 100 200 140 Storage Blk Time (%)2 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0 0 1 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year (2040) Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection: 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Movement EB WB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR L TR L L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 102 56 76 28 59 4 Average Queue (ft)36 21 34 3 12 0 95th Queue (ft)73 50 63 18 43 3 Link Distance (ft)794 136 136 251 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)85 100 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L LTR L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 166 241 105 85 117 126 153 145 266 283 Average Queue (ft)50 115 44 32 51 51 64 35 95 105 95th Queue (ft)111 195 85 65 99 107 122 89 201 219 Link Distance (ft)544 464 1263 1263 634 634 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 100 200 140 Storage Blk Time (%)0 2 1 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 1 0 1 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year (2040) Build Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 80 99 268 252 183 179 263 243 92 192 161 112 Average Queue (ft)23 36 178 151 61 59 165 138 41 126 40 41 95th Queue (ft)59 74 266 230 159 125 243 222 78 198 109 90 Link Distance (ft)184 184 184 184 1140 1140 607 607 Upstream Blk Time (%)7 2 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)17 6 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175 Storage Blk Time (%)2 0 0 4 Queuing Penalty (veh)3 1 0 3 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement SB SB SB SB Directions Served L L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 166 174 191 209 Average Queue (ft)89 103 83 120 95th Queue (ft)161 168 162 199 Link Distance (ft)1263 1263 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)165 165 Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1 Intersection: 6: Site Access 2 & Lake Street Movement WB NB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 29 63 Average Queue (ft)1 34 95th Queue (ft)13 53 Link Distance (ft)1022 340 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 194 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year (2040) Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 13.0 11.5 12.4 2.3 0.8 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.3 66.4 59.6 Total Del/Veh (s)117.2 106.3 63.5 252.7 51.1 16.6 76.6 99.0 86.9 194.9 178.3 20.8 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s) 12.5 Total Del/Veh (s)104.2 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 0.6 3.6 0.2 0.2 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)51.4 54.9 10.9 28.0 25.8 14.8 48.3 22.5 35.3 53.3 15.2 12.6 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)24.2 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)31.1 38.9 18.1 28.9 26.2 10.1 9.9 2.5 2.4 9.1 0.9 0.8 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)4.1 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)1.3 0.6 0.5 4.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)28.2 27.4 19.9 31.1 25.0 8.6 42.8 18.7 16.0 47.0 18.4 14.6 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)21.8 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year (2040) Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.1 0.0 2.4 0.4 2.4 3.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)55.2 22.2 8.1 58.5 22.6 10.0 55.4 45.7 32.6 61.9 49.6 51.2 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)30.8 6: Site Access 2 & Lake Street Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)0.6 0.5 3.5 0.5 7.2 6.1 2.1 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)9.6 Total Del/Veh (s)1261.7 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year (2040) Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L L T T R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 350 975 1583 1574 420 427 598 1003 925 420 233 279 Average Queue (ft)206 517 1102 1099 268 358 431 538 487 129 114 151 95th Queue (ft)306 1128 1842 1828 589 516 659 992 918 418 195 257 Link Distance (ft)1614 1614 1315 1315 Upstream Blk Time (%)11 8 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)675 675 300 300 300 300 190 190 Storage Blk Time (%)28 42 46 54 20 20 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh)123 114 304 358 77 41 0 4 Intersection: 1: Blake Rd/Aquila Ave & TH 7 Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 374 349 425 250 552 526 204 Average Queue (ft)195 193 393 243 496 386 34 95th Queue (ft)327 310 479 269 648 613 198 Link Distance (ft)410 410 410 525 525 Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0 19 48 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0 64 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 250 Storage Blk Time (%) 13 75 44 23 Queuing Penalty (veh) 30 113 115 10 Intersection: 2: Blake Rd & Cambridge St Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 365 168 109 67 150 307 493 179 314 324 Average Queue (ft)178 49 36 22 59 110 211 41 104 125 95th Queue (ft)329 147 79 53 120 235 414 104 247 277 Link Distance (ft)738 1036 652 652 410 410 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)1 Storage Bay Dist (ft)200 100 200 140 Storage Blk Time (%) 10 0 0 0 1 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year (2040) Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection: 3: Blake Road & Lake Street Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR L TR L T TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 101 82 65 62 8 39 69 17 Average Queue (ft)50 26 30 15 0 2 21 1 95th Queue (ft)89 61 57 44 6 15 53 11 Link Distance (ft)794 136 136 634 634 251 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)85 100 Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Intersection: 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L LTR L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 185 331 85 66 181 281 281 151 254 281 Average Queue (ft)70 149 36 26 77 127 152 54 118 130 95th Queue (ft)159 252 73 59 149 223 248 116 226 250 Link Distance (ft)544 464 1263 1263 634 634 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 100 200 140 Storage Blk Time (%)0 6 0 0 1 0 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 8 0 0 1 1 5 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year (2040) Build Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 5 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served L L T T R L T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 154 162 284 292 184 207 303 287 184 198 240 196 Average Queue (ft)73 88 252 244 145 87 207 188 90 116 97 86 95th Queue (ft)133 143 301 308 242 158 295 278 151 191 187 160 Link Distance (ft)184 184 184 184 1140 1140 607 607 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 25 19 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 114 87 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)185 280 350 175 Storage Blk Time (%)19 1 1 3 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)54 7 1 4 0 Intersection: 5: Blake Road & Excelsior Boulevard Movement SB SB SB SB Directions Served L L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 174 188 236 260 Average Queue (ft)99 112 100 144 95th Queue (ft)169 176 188 233 Link Distance (ft)1263 1263 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)165 165 Storage Blk Time (%)0 2 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 3 5 Intersection: 6: Site Access 2 & Lake Street Movement WB NB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 55 Average Queue (ft)4 27 95th Queue (ft)23 49 Link Distance (ft)1022 340 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 1660 SimTraffic Performance Report Opening Year (2025) Build Traffic Volumes with NBR AM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)1.5 0.5 0.5 4.0 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)20.1 21.5 13.6 26.1 19.5 4.9 30.4 10.4 4.0 37.5 13.9 9.9 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)15.1 Queuing and Blocking Report Opening Year (2025) Build Traffic Volumes with NBR AM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 Intersection: 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L LTR L TR L T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 168 216 77 44 105 109 134 38 119 233 235 Average Queue (ft)48 99 27 15 43 36 43 9 18 89 96 95th Queue (ft)110 172 61 35 83 84 91 29 55 180 196 Link Distance (ft)544 452 1263 1263 634 634 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 100 200 100 140 Storage Blk Time (%)0 2 0 1 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 0 0 0 SimTraffic Performance Report Opening Year (2025) Build Traffic Volumes with NBR PM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)1.1 0.4 0.5 4.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)23.0 23.2 16.6 32.1 25.1 7.0 36.2 15.7 4.9 40.3 14.9 10.4 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)17.5 Queuing and Blocking Report Opening Year (2025) Build Traffic Volumes with NBR PM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 Intersection: 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L LTR L TR L T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 180 257 76 41 132 189 225 118 123 193 214 Average Queue (ft)54 128 22 14 59 107 121 17 34 93 105 95th Queue (ft)134 215 57 34 107 172 198 64 83 166 188 Link Distance (ft)544 452 1263 1263 634 634 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 100 200 100 140 Storage Blk Time (%)0 5 0 0 10 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 6 0 0 6 1 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year (2040) Build Traffic Volumes with NBR AM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)1.4 0.5 0.5 3.9 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)21.7 19.3 14.6 26.9 21.0 4.8 33.7 13.7 3.8 43.4 16.1 13.1 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)17.4 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)1.3 Total Del/Veh (s)814.8 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year (2040) Build Traffic Volumes with NBR AM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 Intersection: 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L LTR L TR L T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 164 229 100 80 121 132 129 47 124 281 269 Average Queue (ft)51 115 42 22 47 54 62 12 35 102 120 95th Queue (ft)117 190 83 51 98 109 110 35 95 218 245 Link Distance (ft)544 452 1263 1263 634 634 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 100 200 100 140 Storage Blk Time (%)0 2 1 0 1 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 3 0 0 1 1 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 5 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year (2040) Build Traffic Volumes with NBR PM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)1.3 0.7 0.6 4.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)26.5 27.1 18.5 28.5 24.1 8.8 38.0 19.7 6.3 45.4 17.9 13.6 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)20.8 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)1.3 Total Del/Veh (s)1257.4 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year (2040) Build Traffic Volumes with NBR PM Peak Hour 09/15/2021 SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 Intersection: 4: Blake Road & 2nd Street/Site Access 1 Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served L LTR L TR L T T R L T TR Maximum Queue (ft) 185 277 76 82 209 253 258 220 146 248 268 Average Queue (ft)70 146 28 18 75 131 147 37 51 119 133 95th Queue (ft)159 242 63 54 146 225 241 127 112 221 244 Link Distance (ft)544 452 1263 1263 634 634 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 100 200 100 140 Storage Blk Time (%)0 6 0 0 0 1 16 0 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 8 0 0 0 2 15 0 4 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 29