Loading...
VI.8. 325 Blake Road Site Plan Review – Site D; Lindahl December 7, 2021 City Council Report 2021-119 325 Blake Road Site D Site Plan Review Proposed Action: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the following motions: • Move to adopt Resolution 2021-082 approving the site plan for 325 Blake Road Site D, subject to conditions. Overview The applicant, Alatus, LLC on behalf of the property owner the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), requests site plan approval for Site D within the overall 325 Blake Road redevelopment. Site D includes a 5-story, 187-unit mixed income multiple unit building. As a mixed-income building, 80 percent of the units would be market rate while the remaining 20 percent would be designated for tenants at 60 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI). Site D is proposed on Lot 3, Block 1 of the newly create Mile 14 on Minnehaha Creek Addition. This site plan design is subject to the applicant’s associated subdivision and rezoning applications currently before the city. Based on the findings in this report, both the Planning & Zoning Commission and staff recommend approval of the site plan for Site A subject to the conditions detailed in the attached resolutions. Primary Issues to Consider • Background • Site Plan Review • Engineering Review • Alternatives Supporting Documents • Site Location Map • Resolution 2021-082 • Plans and Building Elevations • Applicant’s Narrative • Neighborhood Meeting Comments • Multi-Purpose Parking Solution Summary _____________________ Jason Lindahl, AICP City Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N ____ Source: _____________ Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): _________________________________________ Notes: City Council Report 2021-119 Page 2 BACKGROUND The attached Applicant’s Project Narrative provides a detailed summary of all the various components of the 325 redevelopment project. Generally, Alatus intends to redevelop approximately 12.75 acres of the nearly 17-acre site with the remaining property to be retained by the MCWD for stormwater management and creek restoration. The applicant proposes to redevelop their portion of the property into a mixed use, transit-oriented development near the future Blake Road light rail transit station. The applicant proposes a two-phased redevelopment consisting of approximately 833 housing units targeted to owners, renters (both affordable and market rate) and seniors in both multiple unit buildings and townhome units. Features of the development include an overall design focus to connect both residential and the public with the Minnehaha Creek, a mix of housing types and affordability levels, a mix of residential and commercial uses at transit supportive densities, an enhanced public realm intended to activate public spaces and promote pedestrian and bicycle activity, sustainability components, enhance stormwater management and shared parking. Site D is proposed on Lot 3, Block 1 of the newly create Mile 14 on Minnehaha Creek Addition As proposed, Site D includes a 5-story, 187-unit mixed-income multiple unit building. Of the total units, 20 percent will be designated affordable for those residents at 60 of the area median income (AMI) while 80 percent of the units will be market rate. This site plan design is subject to the applicant’s associated subdivision and rezoning applications currently before the city. Residents of this building will have use of the on-site shared amenities in this building as well as access to the common areas throughout the development and the exercise facility in Site C. Other notable features of Site D include: • Cascade stormwater management features along the north side of the building • A minimum of 10% of the 277 parking spaces will have electric vehicle charging stations • Rooftop solar energy system • High efficiency applicances • Shared parking Review Process to Date. The review process for this project to date included both a concept plan review with a neighborhood meeting and Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The concept plan was reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission in August and the City Council in September. Generally, both bodies and the public expressed support for the concept plan, rezoning to mixed use and use of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The EAW is being reviewed concurrently with the land use approvals for this project. Based on the review of the project, reasonably expected environmental impacts, and the findings of fact and conclusions in the EAW, the City finds that the project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects and that where there may be environmental impacts, they can be addressed through the permitting process. The collection of land use applications (subdivision, rezoning and PUD and individual site plans) are subject to approval of the EAW. Neighborhood Meeting. As part of the associated rezoning application, the applicant was required to hold a neighborhood meeting. This meeting took place on November 15, 2021 at 1002 – 2nd Street Northeast (43 Hoops). Comments from this meeting are attached as a reference and detailed in the associated rezoning staff report. Community Comment. Under state law, site plan review applications require a public hearing. City Council Report 2021-119 Page 3 Accordingly, the City published notice of this request and public hearing in the Sun Sailor and mailed notice directly to all residents and property owners within 500’ of the subject property. That notice directed all interested parties to send questions or comments to City Planner Jason Lindahl by mail, phone or email or to attend the public hearing where they could learn about the request, ask questions and provide feedback. As of the writing of this report, the City had received one email comment from Dale Johnson regarding this request (attached). Mr. Johnson’s questions focused comparison between the Trilogy Blake Road Station and the 325 Blake Road projects, snow removal, and concerns over long term developer accountability. During the public hearing, staff will provide an update on all public comments received prior to the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Planning & Zoning Commission Action. The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this item (Planning Application 2021-24) during the November 23, 2021 regular meeting. During that meeting, the Commission heard a summary presentation from City staff and held a public hearing that produced no comments. After some general discussion, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend the City Council approve the site plan for 325 Blake Road Development Site D. SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR SITE D Standards for reviewing site plan applications are detailed in Article IV of the City Code. This section establishes the site plan review procedure and provides regulations pertaining to the enforcement of site design standards. These procedures are established to promote high quality development that ensures long-term stability of residential neighborhoods and enhance the built and natural environments within the City as new development and redevelopment activities occur. In this case, site plan review is required to review construction of a new building. Staff has reviewed the proposed development against the zoning regulations for the Mixed Use district. Staff’s review and findings for each of these regulations are detailed below. Land Use & Zoning. The subject property is guided as Activity Center in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Activity Centers future land use category surrounds and supports the planned Blake Road and Shady Oak light rail stations along the Southwest LRT Green Line Extension. These areas are planned to include moderate to high density mixed use development designed to complement and enhance the existing development pattern in these areas and support the public investment in transit. Densities in these areas will typically range from 20-60 units per acre, with 75-150 units per acre within ¼ mile of an LRT station platform. The subject property is within the ¼ mile radius of the future Blake Road Station and results in a density of 63 units/acre. To implement the Activity Center future land use classification, Alatus has filed a separate application to rezone the subject property from I-2 General Industrial to Mixed Use. Staff finds this rezoning request consistent with the Activity Center future land use category. A more detailed review of the rezoning proposal can be found in the associated rezoning application. As such, this site plan review for Site D evaluates the property against the zoning standards in the Mixed Use district and any specific deviations granted through the planned unit development. Staff recommends that a condition of site plan approval require the applicant to also receive approval of the separate rezoning application. Height. The applicant’s plans call for the height of the buildings on Site D to exceed the Mixed Use district standard. The Mixed Use district height standard for the Blake Road Station Area City Council Report 2021-119 Page 4 allows 3-4 stories for residential structures and 5-6 stories for mixed use buildings. In this case, Site D will have 5-stories or 1 more story than allowed through the Mixed Use district. From an overall design perspective, the greater height is necessary to achieve the transit supportive densities called for in the Activity Center future land use category of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The increased height of this building is acceptable under the planned unit development as the overall development site will include substantial open space, Outlot C is planned to include 3-story townhouse units and Lot 2, Block 1 is planned to include 1-story commercial buildings. Floor to Area Ratio (FAR). As designed, the Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) for site D does not meet the standard of the Mixed Use district. Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) is a measurement of density calculated by dividing the floor area of a building by the lot area of the parcel on which the building is located. In the Blake Road Station Area, the FAR standard is a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 3 for residential buildings and a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 5 for mixed use buildings. In this case, the FAR for Site D is calculated to be 1.57 and does not conforms to the Mixed Use district FAR standard for residential buildings. This deviation from the FAR standards is most directly related to the additional land on the north side of the building for the cascade stormwater feature is acceptable under the planned unit development. Setbacks. As designed, Site D does not meet the setback standards for the Mixed Use district on any side of the building. The table below compares the required and proposed setbacks for Site D. It shows the largest deviations on the north, east and west sides of the building. The greater setback along the west side of the building provide additional space for the woonerf (or shared pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle space) while the additional space on the north side of the building allows additional area for the cascade stormwater management feature. This design is acceptable under the overall planned unit development. Setback Review for Blake Road Station – Site D Setback Standard Proposed Status Front (North) 15’ – 25’ 76.8’ +51.8 Non-Conforming Side (East) 10’ 14.9’ +4.9’ Non-Conforming Side (West) 10’ 48.4’ +38.4’ Non-Conforming Rear (South) 10’ 11.3’ +1.3’ Non-Conforming Off-Street Parking & Travel Demand Management. Overall, the applicant’s traffic impact analysis study for the entire 325 Blake Road site confirms the City’s off-street parking requirements and the number of parking stalls proposed by the developer are adequate. A specific review of Site D finds the proposed off-street parking exceeds the requirements of the Mixed Use district. The Mixed Use district require residential uses provide a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 1.5 enclosed parking stalls per unit and 1 guest stall per 15 units. Using these standards, the 187-unit building proposed for Site D would be required to provide at least 200 off-street parking stalls. With 277 stalls show on the plans, Site D exceeds the off-street parking maximum standard of the Mixed Use district. The applicant plans to use the access parking to supplement the parking needs for the 2 commercial pods on neighboring Lot 2, Block 1. Further parking analysis of the shared parking will be done under the future site plan review for Lot 2, Block 1. Buildings C & D will include “multi-purpose” parking garages that serve both the residents of City Council Report 2021-119 Page 5 the housing projects and the patrons of the public realms and entertainment node within the Development – these garages will include a combined 797 parking stalls (520 in Site C and 277 in Site D). The applicant has experience curating multi-purpose parking solutions and seeing them through to reality. The key to any successful parking solution is maximizing the utilization rate of the parking such that the supply adequately and precisely meets demand at all hours of the day. The Development will include a variety of uses that have complementary parking needs. For instance, an average resident that does not work from home will primarily use their parking stall from 5pm-9am, while an average employee at one of the various retail outlets would use their parking stall from 9am-5pm (standard workday hours). General guidelines for the multi-purpose garages operated in Buildings C & D are provided below. The City is agreeable to this parking system give the transit-oriented design of the development under the overall planned unit development agreement. • Approximately one-third of the parking stalls (250-300 of the approx. 800) would be dedicated reserved stalls leased to residents of the buildings. • The remaining two-thirds of the parking stalls (500-550 of the approx. 800) would be split between unreserved resident parking and transient parking. • In our recent experience with similar suburban projects, the parking needs of the average rental community is approx. 1.20 parking stalls per unit. • Buildings C & D are currently designed to include approx. 576 rental units, which would equate to 576 total parking stalls (reserved + unreserved) dedicated to the residents based on a 1.20 parking factor. That would leave 105 parking stalls for transient/overflow demand. • The parking garages will be equipped with state-of-the-art parking technology that uses machine learning to make sure there are no inventory problems; this technology would ensure that there is ample parking for residents and track the utilization by the public. Bicycle Parking. Site D does not meet the bicycle parking standards for residential uses in the Mixed Use district. For multifamily residential uses, the Mixed Use district requires 1 long-term space per 2 units and 1 short-term space per 20 units. With this standard, Site D must provide 94 long-term and 10 short-term spaces or a total of 104 bicycle parking spaces. In this case, the plans for Site D show 82 long-term stalls in a bicycle parking rooms on the ground floor levels of the parking structure. The site plan also shows 6 short-term stalls near the entrance to the leasing office/lobby on the north side of the building. Staff recommends a condition of approval require the applicant to revise their plans to show the required amount of bicycle parking stalls prior to execution of the planned unit development agreement. Shadow Study. The Mixed Use district requires a shadow study for all buildings four stories or higher and the applicant has included this study with their plans. According to the Mixed Use district standards, the shadow study must indicate the shadows cast at the shortest and longest days of the year. Impacts of a shadow on the surrounding property may be a reason to lower and/or adjust the location or height of buildings. Review of the shadow study finds little to no impact on adjacent properties even with the additional height to 5-stories allowed through the PUD. Exterior. Exterior materials proposed for Site D do not meet the standards of the Mixed Use City Council Report 2021-119 Page 6 district. The proposed exterior materials for the building on Site D are summarized in the table below. The Mixed Use district requires the primary exterior treatment of walls facing a public right-of– way or parking lot on a structure shall be brick, cast concrete, stone, marble or other material similar in appearance and durability. Regular or decorative concrete block, float finish stucco, EIFS-type stucco, cementitious fiberboard, or wood clapboard may be used on the front façade as a secondary treatment or trim but shall not be a primary exterior treatment of a wall facing a public right-of-way. Staff interprets primary to be at least 65 percent and secondary to not exceed 35 percent of the side of a building. Site D Exterior Materials Material North Pedestrian Way South New Street East Pedestrian Way West Blake Road Brick 14% 16% 14% 15% Cast Stone 0% 0% 0% 0% Metal Panel 58.4% 60.8% 54% 54% Fiber Cement Panel- Reveal System 27.6% 23.2% 32% 31% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Since the Planning & Zoning Commission review the applicant has revised the exterior materials as detailed in the table above. This includes redistributing the materials on north, south and east sides and increasing the amount of brick on the north and east of the building. Overall, these deviations in materials are acceptable on the planned unit development agreement. Building Orientation. The building on Site D exceeds the building orientation standards of the Mixed Use district. Buildings within the Mixed Use district must be oriented toward the pedestrian by providing a direct link between each building and the pedestrian walking system, with emphasis on directing people to a transit station. The applicant’s plans for Site D show an enhanced public realm along the north (cascade stormwater feature), east (connection to the Cedar Lake Regional Trail) and west (Woonerf) sides of the building. Façade. The building on Site D meets the façade articulation standards of the Mixed Use district. These standards require the primary street side façade of a building shall not consist of an unarticulated blank walls, flat front facades or an unbroken series of garage doors. The front of a building shall be broken up into individual bays of a minimum of 25 feet and maximum of 40 feet wide. In this case, the primary street side (south and west) facades of the building are articulated through a combination of architectural features, breaks in materials and balconies. Transparency & Fenestration. The building on Site D meets the transparency & fenestration standards of the Mixed Use district. The Mixed Use district requires at least 30 percent fenestration for windows above the first floor for all sides that abut a public right-of-way. For Site B, that applies to the south and west sides of the building. According to the applicant, the north side of the building has 37 percent fenestration while the west side has 40 percent. Sidewalks. Site D exceeds the sidewalk standards of the Mixed Use district. The Mixed Use City Council Report 2021-119 Page 7 district requires a minimum 5-foot wide sidewalk along the frontage of all public streets and within and along the frontage of all new development or redevelopment. As noted in the Building Orientation section above, the applicant’s plans for Site D show an enhanced pedestrian realm and sidewalks along the north (cascade stormwater feature), east (woonerf) and west (Blake Road Plaza) sides of the building. Landscaping. The applicant’s plans have yet to demonstrate conformance with the Mixed Use district’s landscape standards. This standard requires sites in excess of $4 million to provide landscape improvements equal to 1 percent of the project’s value plus 0.10 of the value over $4 million. The applicant shall provide detailed landscape and planting plans demonstrating compliance with these standards prior to execution of the planned unit development agreement. Staff recommends a condition of approval require the applicant to provide a landscape and pedestrian/streetscape letter of credit in a form acceptable to the City Attorney for 125% of the value of all improvements. The City will hold the letter of credit until the plantings have survived at least one growing season and the applicant has installed the pedestrian/streetscape improvements. Pedestrian/Streetscapes. The Mixed Use district requires pedestrian streetscape improvements along all sidewalks. Pedestrian improvements of at least 25 percent of the landscaping budget shall be included in the development. These improvements shall create a high quality pedestrian experience through the provision of benches, planters, drinking fountains, waste containers, median landscaping and the like. Pedestrian-scale light fixtures that shine downward on the sidewalks and walkways shall be no greater than 12 feet in height and must be provided along all sidewalks and walkways to provide ample lighting during nighttime hours for employees, residents, and customers. The applicant’s plans appear to meet these standards. Staff recommends a condition of approval require the applicant to provide more detailed streetscape information demonstrating compliance with this standard prior to execution of the planned unit development agreement. Signs, Canopies and Awnings. The site plan for Site D does not include a sign plan. All signs must be approved through a separate administrative permit subject to conformance with the standards of the Mixed Use district and sign regulations contained in Article XXI - Signs. Trash Enclosure. The applicant plans to store trash containers within the ground level parking Garage which will be accessed from the driveway along the south side of the building. Trash pick-up shall not occur within the public right-of-way. Exterior Lighting. The applicant’s plans for Site D do not include exterior lighting or photometric plans. Pedestrian-scale light fixtures that shine downward on the sidewalks and walkways shall be no greater than 12 feet in height and must be provided along all sidewalks and walkways to provide ample lighting during nighttime hours for employees, residents, and customers. Staff recommends a condition of approval require the applicant submit and receive approval of a detailed lighting and photometric plan for Site B prior to execution of the planned unit development agreement. This plan shall include both pedestrian-scale street lights (no greater than 12’ in height) as well as all building exterior lighting, light fixture spec sheets and photometric data. City Council Report 2021-119 Page 8 Stormwater Treatment. The applicant’s narrative includes stormwater treatment information that indicates it exceeds both the City’s and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District’s (MCWD) standards. According to the applicant, building D treatment is part of a more comprehensive approach to stormwater developed in the PUD for the entire 325 Blake Road redevelopment. Runoff from this site will be conveyed to the proposed 325 Blake Road regional stormwater treatment facilities via a combination of proposed storm sewer, the Lake Street Diversion and recirculation of pumped stormwater through the Cascade. The previous Cold Storage facility had large impervious area of both rooftop and pavement that flowed untreated to Minnehaha Creek. The proposed project reduces the amount of impervious surface and provides rate control, treatment, and volume control through the use of permeable pavements, filtration, infiltration, underground storage and cycling of pumped stormwater through the Cascade to provide biofiltration, infiltration and storage. The pumped stormwater will flow through Cascade in a series of pools and riffles and end in a waterfall into the upper cell of the MCWD pond, then flow over a weir to the lower cell, where the water will be drawn up at the Pavilion, screened of floatables and pumped through a forcemain to the west end of the Cascade to start the cycle over. A condition of approval shall require the applicant’s stormwater design to comply with all requirements of the City Engineer and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. ENGINEERING REVIEW The Engineering Department has reviewed the applicant’s plans for the overall 325 Blake Road redevelopment and the specific site plan for Site D and offers the following comments listed below. • Addresses will be assigned once PIDs are provided. • MCWD rules are as or more stringent than City of Hopkins. Meeting MCWD stormwater, water quality, and construction permit requirements satisfies City of Hopkins requirements. • All utilities will be private. Provide appropriate watermain valves to isolate private system from public network. • Currently plans show connecting to two 8” existing stubs. A 12” watermain is located in Lake Street NE if water system modeling requires additional flow. • A full engineering review will be completed once construction documents are provided. ALTERNATIVES 1. Vote to approve the site plan application for 325 Blake Road Site D. By voting to approve, the site plan application for Site D will be approved. 2. Vote to deny the site plan application for 325 Blake Road Site D. By voting to deny, the site plan application for Site D will not be approved. Should the City Council consider this option, it must also identify specific findings that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the City Council indicates that further information is needed, the items should be continued. Site Location Map for 325 Blake Road North Subject Property CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2021-082 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SITE PLAN FOR 325 BLAKE ROAD SITE D, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the applicant, Alatus, LLC on behalf of the property owner the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), initiated site plan review application for 325 Blake Road North Site D within PID 19-117-21-14-0002, and WHEREAS, this property is legally described as follows: LOT 74 AND COM AT A PT IN THE E LINE OF MONK AVE DIST 14 48/100 FT S FROM ITS INTERSEC WITH THE NWLY LINE OF LOT 97 TH N 14 48/100 FT TO SAID NWLY LINE THEREOF TH NELY 845 FT ALONG SAID NWLY LINE TH S14 48/100 FT PAR WITH E LINE OF MONK AVE TH SWLY 845 FT TO BEG EXROAD, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 239 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINN WHEREAS, the applicant has also requested to subdivide the property legally described above to facilitate development on Site D and that plat proposes to assign Site D to Lot 3, Block 1, Mile 14 on Minnehaha Creek Addition; and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That the above stated application was initiated by the applicant on October 22, 2021; and, 2. That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on November 23, 2021 and all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and, 3. That written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and, 4. That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this application during their November 23, 2021 meeting and recommended approval by the City Council, subject to conditions; and 5. That the Hopkins City Council reviewed this application during their December 7, 2021 meeting and agreed with the findings of the Planning & Zoning Commission. WHEREAS, staff recommended approval of the above stated application based on the findings outlined in the staff report dated December 7, 2021. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hopkins hereby approves the site plan application for 325 Blake Road North Site D, subject to the conditions listed below. 1. Approval of a negative declaration of need regarding an Environmental Impact Statement for the 325 Blake Road development. 2. Approval of the associated rezoning application and execution of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 3. Conformance with all applicable standards of the Mixed Use district and approved planned unit development agreement. 4. Approval of the associated preliminary and final plat applications for Mile 14 on Minnehaha Creek Addition and conformance with all conditions of approval. 5. Revise the site plan application to show the required amount of bicycle parking stalls prior to execution of the planned unit development agreement. The short-term stalls shall be located near the pedestrian entrance to the leasing office/lobby on the north side of the building. 6. Submission and approval of a detailed landscape and streetscape plan prior to execution of the planned unit development agreement. 7. Provision of a landscape security equal to 1.5 times the cost of all plantings and streetscape improvements in a form acceptable to the City Attorney prior to issuance of a building permit. The City shall hold this security until all streetscape improvements have been installed and all plantings have survived at least one full growing season. 8. The applicant shall designate an on-site location for trash pickup. Trash pick-up shall not occur within the public right-of-way. 9. Submission and approval of exterior lighting and photometric plans prior to issuance of a building permit. These plans shall cover the entire site and demonstrate downward directed light fixtures, poles no higher than twenty (20) feet and light levels equal to or less than 1.0 lumens at any non-residential property line or 0.5 lumens at any residential property line. 10. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer. 11. Approval of all necessary permits from the Building, Engineering and Fire Departments. 12. Approval of the development by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and conforms with all related conditions. 13. Payment of all applicable development fees including, but not limited to SAC, park dedication and City Attorney fees. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 7th day of December, 2021. By: ________________________________ Kristi Halverson, Mayor Pro Tempore ATTEST: _______________________________ Amy Domeier, City Clerk PROJECT TEAM325 BLAKE ROAD - SITE D (BUILDING D)SITE D - TITLE SHEETSHEET CONTENTS:Revisions:License #:Typed or printed name:Signature:Date Plotted: #SHEET NO.DATE COMMENTSThese drawings are forpreliminary coordinationonly and not to be usedfor regulatory approval orconstruction.21180GREGORY FAULKNER40199DALLAS · CHARLOTTE · CHICAGO · DENVER · NEW ORLEANS · NEW YORK · NEWPORT BEACH · ORLANDO · SCOTTSDALE · CHENNAI · HANOI · LONDON · MONTEVIDEO · MEXICO CITY · TORONTOwww.humphreys.com ARCHITECTS, L.P. HUMPHREYS PARTNERS 5339 ALPHA ROAD · SUITE 300 · DALLAS, TEXAS 75240 (972) 701 - 9636 · (972) 701 - 9639 FAX USER: sduran XREF(s): 21180 TBLK-11X17.dwg 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg X-BLDG -V-WRAP-ELE.dwg 21180 TBLK-30X42_2.dwg X-BLDG -WRAP-2.dwgSCALE: 384 DATE/TIME: Oct 28, 2021 - 4:23pmFILE: Z:\1.JOBS\2021\21180 - Hopkins\PROCESS\21180-COVER - SITE D.dwg LAYOUT: 30x42 I hereby certify that thisplan, specification, orreport was prepared byme or under my directsupervision and that I ama duly licensed architectunder the laws of theState of Minnesota.PUD SUBMITTAL310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROADMASTERPLANHOPKINS, MINNESOTAA101DNeighborhood Context MapSite LocationPROJECT TEAMPROJECT LOCATIONBUILDING METRICSDRAWING INDEX325 BLAKE ROAD, HOPKINS, MN +908'CLVT80039898.2336 CULVERT80340896.00EDGE OF WATER80341896.37EDGE OF WATER80342894.22EDGE OF WATER80343896.00EDGE OF WATER80344896.02EDGE OF WATER80345896.16EDGE OF WATER80346896.06EDGE OF WATER80347895.92EDGE OF WATER80348896.16EDGE OF WATER80349896.00EDGE OF WATER80350895.02EDGE OF WATER80393897.32EDGE OF WATER80422911.06HYDRANT80423912.90ELEC METERTRAN80424913.09POWR TRANSTRAN80430913.80POWR TRANS80432914.03ELEC METERTRAN80434914.94POWR TRANSTRAN80458914.78POWR TRANS80461912.95HYDRANT6.5%RAMP U P 6 . 5%RAMP U P 6 . 5%RAMP DOWNEdge of waterPavillionBIKETRAIL5 storyMinnehahaWETLANDCEDAR LAKEREGIONA L TRA I L CreekRESTAURANTS-8,900 s.f.15 story765 s.f.BUILDING B5 story112 units1,246 s.f.SENIOR COOP5 story112 units891 s.f.PARKING - 7 levels-520 spacesPARKING - 5 levels- 277 spacesPODIUM PARKING - 2 levels- 184 spacesCLUBHOUSE &LEASING -2,300 s.f.CLUBHOUSE -3,500 s.f.ACCESSACCESSCLUBHOUSE - 8,000(total area)214 units175 units721 s.f.5 storyBuilding112 units33 units5 story3 story891 s.f1,790 s.f5 story1,246 s.funitsstoriesNET avgBuilding ABuilding C-TowerBuilding C-WrapBuilding DBuilding B112 units15 story5 story721 s.f765 s.f677 s.fRest./boat houseTOTALS1 story214 units175 units833 units5.9% RAMP U P 5.9% RAMP UP2HR2HRVAN 2HR2HRFFE 919 F F E 9 1 6 . 5 BUILDING D187 units677 s.f.BUILDING CBUILDING AB 2A1A1A1 A1 A1 A1 B1 A1 B1 LEAS ING &CLUBHOUSE 2 , 3 0 0 s . f . 5% TRASH STOR.B3B3A1A+den A+den C1 C1B3B1 D1 d n . dn. d n .TOTAL UNITS PER BUILDING33 units 1,790 s.f.Town homes garages- 66 spacestownhomes3 storyPODIUM PARKING - 2 levels- 124 spaces5 story187 unitsTownhomes6 Sh o r t T e rmBik e P a r k 6 S h o r t T e rmBi k e P a r k6 Short TermBike Park11 Short TermBike Park4 S h o r t T e rmBi k e P a r k 5 S h o r t T e rmBi k e P a r k 4 Short TermBike Park27'-4"42'-8"25'-3"13'-3"10'47'-10 "62'-8 "80'-8"17'-10"17'-5"39'-5"17'-6"15'-6"22'7'-4 "32'-11 " 116'- 3 " S O O L I N E R A I L R O A D440'-8 "TRASHSTORAGE/PICK UPTRASHSTORAGE/PICK UPTRASHSTORAGE/PICK UPTRASHSTORAGE/PICK UP26'283'-9 "255'-9"11'-9 "11'-9 "14'-7 "14'-7 "239'-11"406' -10 "43'-10"45'-2"59'-10"182'-3"31'-10 "264'-6 "279'-7"8'-3 "7'-4 "20'-10"18'-6"10'-3"22'-8"8'-1"6'-4 "70'-10"366'-6"630'-2"566'-5 "350'SCALE: 1" = 40' - 0" 0' 40' 80' 160'(24"x36" SHEET)NSHEET CONTENTS:Revisions:License #:Typed or printed name:Signature:Date Plotted: #SHEET NO.DATE COMMENTSThese drawings are forpreliminary coordinationonly and not to be usedfor regulatory approval orconstruction.21180GREGORY FAULKNER4019912/1/2021DALLAS · CHARLOTTE · CHICAGO · DENVER · NEW ORLEANS · NEW YORK · NEWPORT BEACH · ORLANDO · SCOTTSDALE · CHENNAI · HANOI ·LONDON · MONTEVIDEO · MEXICO CITY · TORONTOwww.humphreys.com ARCHITECTS, L.P.HUMPHREYS PARTNERS 5339 ALPHA ROAD · SUITE 300 · DALLAS, TEXAS 75240(972) 701 - 9636 · (972) 701 - 9639 FAX USER: lwei XREF(s): 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg 193805191_BASE_MCWD_012221-new2.dwg TH-1.dwg X-BLDG-Highrise-1.dwg X-S1-alt.dwg X-A1.dwg X-A2.dwg X-A3.dwg X-B1.dwg X-C1.dwg X-B2.DWG 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg 30x42 TBLK-FINAL.dwg X-BLDG-Podium-II.dwg X-B3-P.dwg X-BLDG -WRAP-3.dwg X-BLDG-Podium-I.dwg 21180 TBLK-11X17.dwg 21180 TBLK-30X42_2.dwg S20503A-PPLAT.dwgSCALE: 192 DATE/TIME: Dec 01, 2021 - 2:17pmFILE: M:\2021\21180-Hopkins\01.5 CONCEPT\01.01 DRAWINGS\x-Site-16 - Standard\x-Site-17.dwg LAYOUT: A-201-30x42 I hereby certify that thisplan, specification, orreport was prepared byme or under my directsupervision and that I ama duly licensed architectunder the laws of theState of Minnesota.PUD SUBMITTAL12/1/2021310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROADMASTERPLANHOPKINS, MINNESOTAARQUITECTURAL SITEPLANA201 ADAADAADAADA Parking - Bldg C520 spacesPodium -Bldg A124 spacesTownhomes garages66 spacesSurface parking39 spaces5 levels6 levelsParking -Bldg D277 spacesPodium -Bldg B184 spaces 2 levelsPodium restaurantsB I K E P ARK ING 1 2 4 SP ACE S 8 1 SP AC ES ADAADA6.5%RAMP U P 6 . 5%RAM P U P 9 ' x 1 8 ' TY P 5.9% RAMP U P 5.9% 1 5 SPACES / F L . RAMP UPBIKE RM VAN 5 - LEVE L , TO TA L 2 7 7 SPACES 8 2 B IKE P ARK ING REQU IRED 5 storyLAKE S T NECEDAR LAKE r e g i o n a l t r a i l RESTAURANTS-8,900 s.f.15 story765 s.f.BUILDING B5 story112 units1,246 s.f.5 story112 units891 s.f.PARKING - 7 levels-520 spacesPARKING - 5 levels- 277 spacesPODIUM PARKING - 2 levels- 184 spacesACCESSACCESS214 units175 units721 s.f.5 storyBUILDING D187 units677 s.f.BUILDING CBUILDING ATOTALSBuildingspaces levelsPARKING SPACES1,253 spacesPavillion33 units1,790 s.f.Town homes garages- 66 spacestownhomes3 storyBIKE PARKING64 spaces fi r s t l e ve l - 58 p a r k in g sp a c e s TRASH MECHSPACEBELOW HALL 9´x 18´ typ.StoragePODIUM PARKING - 2 levels- 124 spaces43 spacesSCALE: 1" = 40' - 0" 0' 40' 80' 160'(24"x36" SHEET)SHEET CONTENTS:Revisions:License #:Typed or printed name:Signature:Date Plotted: #SHEET NO.DATE COMMENTSThese drawings are forpreliminary coordinationonly and not to be usedfor regulatory approval orconstruction.21180GREGORY FAULKNER4019912/1/2021DALLAS · CHARLOTTE · CHICAGO · DENVER · NEW ORLEANS · NEW YORK · NEWPORT BEACH · ORLANDO · SCOTTSDALE · CHENNAI · HANOI ·LONDON · MONTEVIDEO · MEXICO CITY · TORONTOwww.humphreys.com ARCHITECTS, L.P.HUMPHREYS PARTNERS 5339 ALPHA ROAD · SUITE 300 · DALLAS, TEXAS 75240(972) 701 - 9636 · (972) 701 - 9639 FAX USER: lwei XREF(s): 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg 193805191_BASE_MCWD_012221-new2.dwg TH-1.dwg X-BLDG-Highrise-1.dwg X-S1-alt.dwg X-A1.dwg X-A2.dwg X-A3.dwg X-B1.dwg X-C1.dwg X-B2.DWG 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg 30x42 TBLK-FINAL.dwg X-BLDG-Podium-II.dwg X-B3-P.dwg X-BLDG -WRAP-3.dwg X-BLDG-Podium-I.dwg 21180 TBLK-11X17.dwg 21180 TBLK-30X42_2.dwg S20503A-PPLAT.dwgSCALE: 192 DATE/TIME: Dec 01, 2021 - 2:20pmFILE: M:\2021\21180-Hopkins\01.5 CONCEPT\01.01 DRAWINGS\x-Site-16 - Standard\x-Site-17.dwg LAYOUT: A-202-30x42 I hereby certify that thisplan, specification, orreport was prepared byme or under my directsupervision and that I ama duly licensed architectunder the laws of theState of Minnesota.PUD SUBMITTAL12/1/2021310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROADMASTERPLANHOPKINS, MINNESOTANARQUITECTURAL SITEPLANA202 +908'CLVT80039898.2336 CULVERT80348896.16EDGE OF WATER80349896.00EDGE OF WATER80350895.02EDGE OF WATER6.5%RAMP UP6.5%RAMP UP BIKETRAIL5 storyWETLANDCEDAR LAKEREGIONA L TRA I L RESTAURANTS-8,900 s.f.PARKING - 5 levels- 277 spacesCLUBHOUSE -3,500 s.f.5.9% RAMP U P 5.9% RAMP UP2HR2HRVAN2HR2HRBUILDING D187 units 677 s.f. 5 S h o r t T e rmBi k e P a r k 4 Short TermBike Park25'-3"13'-3"10'47' -10 "62'-8 " S O O L I N E R A I L R O A D440'-8"TRASHSTORAGE/PICK UP283' -9 "255'-9"11'-9 "11'-9 "14'-7 "14'-7 "239'-11"59'-10"31'-10"70'-10"566'-5"350'SHEET CONTENTS:Revisions:License #:Typed or printed name:Signature:Date Plotted: #SHEET NO.DATE COMMENTSThese drawings are forpreliminary coordinationonly and not to be usedfor regulatory approval orconstruction.21180GREGORY FAULKNER4019912/1/2021DALLAS · CHARLOTTE · CHICAGO · DENVER · NEW ORLEANS · NEW YORK · NEWPORT BEACH · ORLANDO · SCOTTSDALE · CHENNAI · HANOI ·LONDON · MONTEVIDEO · MEXICO CITY · TORONTOwww.humphreys.com ARCHITECTS, L.P.HUMPHREYS PARTNERS 5339 ALPHA ROAD · SUITE 300 · DALLAS, TEXAS 75240(972) 701 - 9636 · (972) 701 - 9639 FAX USER: lwei XREF(s): 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg 193805191_BASE_MCWD_012221-new2.dwg TH-1.dwg X-BLDG-Highrise-1.dwg X-S1-alt.dwg X-A1.dwg X-A2.dwg X-A3.dwg X-B1.dwg X-C1.dwg X-B2.DWG 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg 30x42 TBLK-FINAL.dwg X-BLDG-Podium-II.dwg X-B3-P.dwg X-BLDG -WRAP-3.dwg X-BLDG-Podium-I.dwg 21180 TBLK-11X17.dwg 21180 TBLK-30X42_2.dwg S20503A-PPLAT.dwgSCALE: 192 DATE/TIME: Dec 01, 2021 - 2:29pmFILE: M:\2021\21180-Hopkins\01.5 CONCEPT\01.01 DRAWINGS\x-Site-16 - Standard\x-Site-17.dwg LAYOUT: A-201D-30x42 I hereby certify that thisplan, specification, orreport was prepared byme or under my directsupervision and that I ama duly licensed architectunder the laws of theState of Minnesota.PUD SUBMITTAL12/1/2021310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROADMASTERPLANHOPKINS, MINNESOTANSCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 0' 32' 64' 128'(24"x36" SHEET)ARQUITECTURAL SITEPLANARQUITECTURAL SITEPLANA201DBLDG-DTOTAL BUILDING GROSS AREA: 174,555 S.F.LOT AREA: 2.56 Acres,FAR 1.57 CLUBHOUSELEASING5.9% RAMP UP 5.9%15 SPACES/FL. RAMP UPBIKE RM1,200 S.F.RECYCLEVANTELE.ELEC.3,190S.F.5-LEVEL,TOTAL 277 SPACESMAINTENANCETRASHMETERMAILPACKAGE RMMECHGATE82 BIKE PARKING REQUIREDA1A1A3A3S1A3A3S1A1A1A1B2S1C2S1S1S1S1A4A4A4A2A2A2S0A2A2A2A2A2S0S0S02HR2HR2HR2HR2HR287'-0"250'-5"SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0' 16' 32' 64'(30"x42" SHEET)GROUND FLOOR PLANSHEET CONTENTS:Revisions:License #:Typed or printed name:Signature:Date Plotted: #SHEET NO.DATE COMMENTSThese drawings are forpreliminary coordinationonly and not to be usedfor regulatory approval orconstruction.21180GREGORY FAULKNER4019912/1/2021DALLAS · CHARLOTTE · CHICAGO · DENVER · NEW ORLEANS · NEW YORK · NEWPORT BEACH · ORLANDO · SCOTTSDALE · CHENNAI · HANOI ·LONDON · MONTEVIDEO · MEXICO CITY · TORONTOwww.humphreys.com ARCHITECTS, L.P.HUMPHREYS PARTNERS 5339 ALPHA ROAD · SUITE 300 · DALLAS, TEXAS 75240(972) 701 - 9636 · (972) 701 - 9639 FAX USER: lwei XREF(s): X-S1-alt.dwg X-A3.dwg X-B1.dwg X-B2.DWG X-C1.dwg 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg X-A1.dwg X-BLDG -WRAP-3.dwg 21180 TBLK-11X17.dwg 21180 TBLK-30X42_2.dwgSCALE: 384 DATE/TIME: Dec 01, 2021 - 3:37pmFILE: M:\2021\21180-Hopkins\01.5 CONCEPT\01.01 DRAWINGS\BUILDINGS\Wraps\21180-A450.dwg LAYOUT: 1ST 30x42 I hereby certify that thisplan, specification, orreport was prepared byme or under my directsupervision and that I ama duly licensed architectunder the laws of theState of Minnesota.PUD SUBMITTAL12/1/2021310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROADMASTERPLANHOPKINS, MINNESOTABUILDING D -BUILDING PLANSA450 CLUBHOUSE BELOWA3A3S1B1B2A3A3S15.9%5.9% RAMP UP RAMP DN 5.9%5.9%TrashRm66 SPACES/FL. RAMP UPRAMP DN RAMP UPRAMP DNA1C2A1A1A1B2A1S1S1LEASINGBELOWS1S1S1S1A4A4A4A4A2A2A2S0A2A2A2A2A2S0S0S0287'-0"250'-5"2ND FLOOR PLANSHEET CONTENTS:Revisions:License #:Typed or printed name:Signature:Date Plotted: #SHEET NO.DATE COMMENTSThese drawings are forpreliminary coordinationonly and not to be usedfor regulatory approval orconstruction.21180GREGORY FAULKNER4019912/1/2021DALLAS · CHARLOTTE · CHICAGO · DENVER · NEW ORLEANS · NEW YORK · NEWPORT BEACH · ORLANDO · SCOTTSDALE · CHENNAI · HANOI ·LONDON · MONTEVIDEO · MEXICO CITY · TORONTOwww.humphreys.com ARCHITECTS, L.P.HUMPHREYS PARTNERS 5339 ALPHA ROAD · SUITE 300 · DALLAS, TEXAS 75240(972) 701 - 9636 · (972) 701 - 9639 FAX USER: lwei XREF(s): X-S1-alt.dwg X-A3.dwg X-B1.dwg X-B2.DWG X-C1.dwg 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg X-A1.dwg X-BLDG -WRAP-3.dwg 21180 TBLK-11X17.dwg 21180 TBLK-30X42_2.dwgSCALE: 384 DATE/TIME: Dec 01, 2021 - 3:38pmFILE: M:\2021\21180-Hopkins\01.5 CONCEPT\01.01 DRAWINGS\BUILDINGS\Wraps\21180-A450.dwg LAYOUT: 2ND 30x42 I hereby certify that thisplan, specification, orreport was prepared byme or under my directsupervision and that I ama duly licensed architectunder the laws of theState of Minnesota.PUD SUBMITTAL12/1/2021310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROADMASTERPLANHOPKINS, MINNESOTASCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0' 16' 32' 64'(30"x42" SHEET)BUILDING V - BUILDING PLANSBUILDING D -BUILDING PLANSA451 TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN5.9%5.9% RAMP UP RAMP DN 5.9%5.9%TrashRm66 SPACES/FL. RAMP UPRAMP DN RAMP UPRAMP DNC1B1A1C2A2A2A2A1S0S1S1A3A3S1B2A3A3S1A1A1A1B2S1S1B0S1S1A4A4A4A4A2A2A2A2A2S0S0S0287'-0"250'-1"TYPICAL FLOOR PLANSHEET CONTENTS:Revisions:License #:Typed or printed name:Signature:Date Plotted: #SHEET NO.DATE COMMENTSThese drawings are forpreliminary coordinationonly and not to be usedfor regulatory approval orconstruction.21180GREGORY FAULKNER4019912/1/2021DALLAS · CHARLOTTE · CHICAGO · DENVER · NEW ORLEANS · NEW YORK · NEWPORT BEACH · ORLANDO · SCOTTSDALE · CHENNAI · HANOI ·LONDON · MONTEVIDEO · MEXICO CITY · TORONTOwww.humphreys.com ARCHITECTS, L.P.HUMPHREYS PARTNERS 5339 ALPHA ROAD · SUITE 300 · DALLAS, TEXAS 75240(972) 701 - 9636 · (972) 701 - 9639 FAX USER: lwei XREF(s): X-S1-alt.dwg X-A3.dwg X-B1.dwg X-B2.DWG X-C1.dwg 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg X-A1.dwg X-BLDG -WRAP-3.dwg 21180 TBLK-11X17.dwg 21180 TBLK-30X42_2.dwgSCALE: 384 DATE/TIME: Dec 01, 2021 - 3:38pmFILE: M:\2021\21180-Hopkins\01.5 CONCEPT\01.01 DRAWINGS\BUILDINGS\Wraps\21180-A450.dwg LAYOUT: TYP 30x42 I hereby certify that thisplan, specification, orreport was prepared byme or under my directsupervision and that I ama duly licensed architectunder the laws of theState of Minnesota.PUD SUBMITTAL12/1/2021310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROADMASTERPLANHOPKINS, MINNESOTABUILDING V - BUILDING PLANSSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0' 16' 32' 64'(30"x42" SHEET)BUILDING D -BUILDING PLANSA452 5.9%TrashRm64 SPACES RAMP DNRAMP DN5TH FLOOR PLANA3A3S1C1B1A4B2A3A3S1A1C2A1A1A1B2A1S1S1B0C2S1S1S1S1A4A4A4A2A2A2S0S0A2A2A2A2A2S0S02HR2HR2HR2HR2HR287'-0"250'-1"5TH FLOOR PLANSHEET CONTENTS:Revisions:License #:Typed or printed name:Signature:Date Plotted: #SHEET NO.DATE COMMENTSThese drawings are forpreliminary coordinationonly and not to be usedfor regulatory approval orconstruction.21180GREGORY FAULKNER4019912/1/2021DALLAS · CHARLOTTE · CHICAGO · DENVER · NEW ORLEANS · NEW YORK · NEWPORT BEACH · ORLANDO · SCOTTSDALE · CHENNAI · HANOI ·LONDON · MONTEVIDEO · MEXICO CITY · TORONTOwww.humphreys.com ARCHITECTS, L.P.HUMPHREYS PARTNERS 5339 ALPHA ROAD · SUITE 300 · DALLAS, TEXAS 75240(972) 701 - 9636 · (972) 701 - 9639 FAX USER: lwei XREF(s): X-S1-alt.dwg X-A3.dwg X-B1.dwg X-B2.DWG X-C1.dwg 24x36 TBLK-FINAL.dwg X-A1.dwg X-BLDG -WRAP-3.dwg 21180 TBLK-11X17.dwg 21180 TBLK-30X42_2.dwgSCALE: 384 DATE/TIME: Dec 01, 2021 - 3:38pmFILE: M:\2021\21180-Hopkins\01.5 CONCEPT\01.01 DRAWINGS\BUILDINGS\Wraps\21180-A450.dwg LAYOUT: 5TH 30x42 I hereby certify that thisplan, specification, orreport was prepared byme or under my directsupervision and that I ama duly licensed architectunder the laws of theState of Minnesota.PUD SUBMITTAL12/1/2021310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415 p: 612.332.7522325 BLAKE ROADMASTERPLANHOPKINS, MINNESOTABUILDING V - BUILDING PLANSSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0' 16' 32' 64'(30"x42" SHEET)BUILDING D -BUILDING PLANSA453 1 325 Blake Road Building D Narrative 10-22-2021 PROJECT OVERVIEW Building D is a 5-story, 162-unit multi-family mixed-income development with 277 above-ground parking stalls; some stalls available for flexible commercial space parking for nearby restaurants. 33 of the units we be designated at 60% AMI. The project is located to the east of proposed Building C and just to the north of the Cedar Lake Regional Trail. BUILDING DESIGN Blake Road creates an exciting, high density, mixed-use development oriented towards pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transportation. It offers not only its residents but the neighborhood and the regional network in its entirety, a place to live, work and play. Building D, is to be constructed as a wood frame building, five-story wrapping around a 5 level parking structure. The project seeks to minimize the externalities created by surface level parking and maximize the density and pedestrian configurations for an urban experience in an otherwise suburban location. The site plan has significant design characteristics that will make public transportation, multi-modal sharing, and access to the Green Line Blake Road LRT Station a comfortable and intuitive experience to encourage alternatives to single occupancy vehicles and corresponding trips. This could only be done with the tremendous infrastructure improvements that the City of Hopkins, Three Rivers District, and Met Council have already invested in. Architecturally, the project proposes a contemporary but timeless architecture. Designed for human scale and with the pedestrian at top of mind, the Project offers a distinct base on all buildings including ground floor access to many of its units, and a clear top level with distinct materials and color palette. While all buildings follow this format, each one has its own character and individually unique characteristics. The design looks for individuality without sacrificing being contextual within the overall development project. All dwelling units will support the latest in technology while striving to provide a sustainable living experience. Housing units, common areas, and amenities incorporate high efficiency and WiFi controlled appliances, low-flow water fixtures, low-VOC paints, building-wide recycling practices and solar panels for electricity generation. Acoustical performance between units will exceed Building Code requirements for resident comfort and privacy. Select buildings within the Project will also seek LEED Certification and commissioning. Exterior materials used are a combination of brick, cast stone, metal and glazing to ensure durability and quality for a generational development asset. Conceptually, lower levels use a combination of brick and cast stone as primary materials at the base, corners, building entries and garage entries. Metal, in various forms, is used mostly on upper levels and above the pedestrian scale that will be encountered. Intermediate levels are a combination of these two materials mentioned plus different cementitious panel solutions with multiple façade aesthetic options. An enhanced and energy efficient HVAC variable refrigerant flow (VRF) system ensures that building facades are uninterrupted, rather than the common solution that presents louvers into the façade design for a sometimes-unsightly exterior aesthetic. 2 STREETSCAPE AND PUBLIC REALM The development team has approached this site as a unique opportunity to create a water-centric development that capitalizes on its’ adjacency to Minnehaha Creek, the Blake Road LRT station, and the Cedar Lake Regional Trail. The proposed 325 Blake Road development project will transform the former cold storage site with a rich variety of green open spaces and streetscape design improvements. Proposed open spaces and streetscapes are designed to not only provide safe and convenient connections to the creek, regional trail, and LRT station, but to create a rich outdoor environment for future residents, visitors, and community members. Building D is surrounded by vibrant public open space on all sides. The northern edge fronts onto the Cascade and Central plaza, with the western edge facing the woonerf and pedestrian access to the regional trail, the southern façade looks over the Cedar Lake Regional Trail and the eastern edge looks over the Minnehaha Creek Greenway. Cascade Central to the open space network are a series of plazas, water features, stormwater treatment features, and landscaped gathering areas, reaching from the project entry at Blake Road to the Central Plaza located next to future restaurants and the Minnehaha Creek Greenway. The primary vehicular and pedestrian entry at Blake Road features gateway plazas on either side of the entry road. These will include water features, special paving, lighting, and seating areas. The central water cascade feature, located adjacent to the entry road/parkway, provides a water channel designed to manage stormwater. Stormwater will be pumped from the future MCWD stormwater pond to the west end of the water cascade feature, providing the ability to create a water feature that not only provides an amenity for the development, but also filters and delivers cleaner stormwater back into the pond. It is designed to provide places for people to gather and stroll along the waterway. Native plant materials, special paving and lighting, site furnishings, and native stone elements will be incorporated to create an environment that will reconnect people to local and regional landscape experiences. Central Plaza and Greenway Commons The plazas and restaurant deck spaces, located at the east end of the water cascade, will provide outdoor gathering spaces, and connect people to the future stormwater pond and Minnehaha Creek. The central plaza, located to the west of the future restaurants, will feature a large area for people to gather, a splash pad, outdoor seating, plantings, and a pergola. It is designed to provide places for people to interact with the restaurants and the water cascade. The central plaza will also provide a place for ice skating in the winter. The pocket plaza between the future restaurants and deck spaces outside the restaurants will provide opportunities for outdoor dining, and the ability to engage with and view the pond and creek. The Central Plaza and Greenway Commons will feature special paving, native plantings, native stone elements, and site lighting to create an inviting outdoor environment. Woonerf The drive located between buildings C and D is designed to be pedestrian-oriented (woonerf) while providing important vehicular access to Building D and fire access to both buildings. The driving surface will incorporate decorative permeable pavers. Parallel parking spaces are provided along the west side of the drive. While the entire woonerf is designed to be pedestrian-friendly, sidewalks are provided along the west side of the driving/parking surface and on the east side of the drive at the north end/entry to building D. At the south end of the woonerf pedestrian and bike facilities will connect people to the Cedar Lake Trail. A pergola at this terminus provides a focal element drawing people to the trail. Materials will include permeable paving, native plantings, site lighting, pavement markings, wayfinding, and bollards. 3 Cedar Lake Trail Connections Three opportunities to connect with the Cedar Lake Regional Trail are provided – at the Tower Plaza, the Woonerf, and promenade that connects the Central Plaza and Greenway Commons to the future trailhead designed by MCWD. The goal is to provide safe and convenient connections to the regional trail from the proposed development, encouraging people to walk, bicycle, and utilize public transit, and to invite trail users to visit the amenities provided within the development at 325 Blake Road. Streetscapes The primary roadway through the site is designed as a tree-lined parkway, delivering people from Blake Road through the site to development parcels, parking garages, open spaces, the Minnehaha Creek Greenway, and eventually connecting to Lake Street. The parkway will include turf boulevards, street tree plantings, pedestrian-scaled street lighting, site furnishings, and wayfinding signage. On-street parallel parking and detached sidewalks will provide a safe environment for pedestrians. Raised benches are designed to provide traffic calming measures and safe pedestrian crossings where pedestrian spines cross the parkway. ADA compliant concrete sidewalks will be provided for pedestrian movement throughout the site, providing connections to open spaces and trails for everyone. DEVELOPMENT PHASING Commencement of construction of the various phases is dependent upon market conditions now and into the future as well as other external factors relating to the various entities and stakeholders that will be working through the redevelopment effort for the site located at 325 Blake Road. Subject to those conditions, the development team currently anticipates the following construction start date for Building D: Q2 2023 CITY APPLICATIONS/APPROVALS • Site Plan Approval Building D PROPOSED DEVIATIONS FROM MIXED USE DISTRICT STANDARDS Strict adherence to the Mixed-Use District standards and requirements is not required in this case to satisfy the intent of the City’s planned unit development provisions and the proposed deviations from those standards will not prejudice the health, safety, or welfare of the residents of the development, the surrounding area, or the city as a whole. The proposed deviations from Mixed Use District standards for the Blake Road Station project are as follows: 1. Building D exceeds the parking maximum. It currently has 277 spaces for 162 units. If 35 spaces get allocated to the Restaurants, it will be right at the maximum allowed. 2. Building Articulation: Building D exceeds the 45’ maximum bay width. However, we believe the negative space generated by individual balconies provide more than enough articulation. 3. The proposed development exceeds the maximum block length of 600 feet, however, multiple pedestrian connectors are provided within each block. SUPPORT FOR PROPOSED DEVIATIONS The applicant believes the development, as proposed with deviations from zoning code ordinances, is a high-quality proposal for the City of Hopkins and aligns with overall Comprehensive Plan goals. To 4 ensure a high-quality development, the applicant is proposing the following enhancements in support of the proposed deviations: Site Access Improvements A new network of publicly accessible streets and pedestrian corridors divides the site into pedestrian- scaled, walkable quadrants and connects the surrounding context to the Blake Road LRT station, Minnehaha Creek, and the Cedar Lake Regional Trail. The new tree-lined parkway becomes the crucial spine from which stems primary building entries, active uses, and a series of common open spaces. The East/West and North/South pedestrian spines further break down proposed development sites, improving pedestrian circulation and creating a tree-lined pedestrian ways and walk-up residential units. As described under the ‘Streetscape and Public Realm’ section, the project vision includes extensive pedestrian improvements for the area, including sidewalk connections through the site that do not exist today. Building setbacks provide comfortable buffer zones between street right-of-way and the building edges. The proposed setbacks offer a balance of enough distance to create green zones without compromising the more urban goals of transit-oriented development. This balance of ample though not excessive setbacks prioritizes pedestrians and human activity in and around the site. Exceeding Stormwater Standards The applicant is exceeding the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and City of Hopkins’ minimum standards for stormwater treatment. Building D stormwater is managed by the overall system described in the 325 Blake Road PUD. Runoff from this site will be conveyed to the proposed 325 Blake Road regional stormwater treatment facilities via a combination of proposed storm sewer, the Lake Street Diversion and recirculation of pumped stormwater through the Cascade. The previous Cold Storage facility had large impervious area of both rooftop and pavement that flowed untreated to Minnehaha Creek. The proposed project reduces the amount of impervious surface and provides rate control, treatment, and volume control through the use of permeable pavements, filtration, infiltration, underground storage and cycling of pumped stormwater through the Cascade to provide biofiltration, infiltration and storage. The pumped stormwater will flow through Cascade in a series of pools and riffles and end in a waterfall into the upper cell of the MCWD pond, then flow over a weir to the lower cell, where the water will be drawn up at the Pavilion, screened of floatables and pumped through a forcemain to the west end of the Cascade to start the cycle over. The pump will have a base flow to keep water flowing through the Cascade continuously, then will be throttled up during stormwater events to engage the upper portions of the Cascade storage and overflow into the underground stormwater chambers under the skating plaza. This pumped system allows for water level control and continuous infiltration that is not feasible with a traditional gravity system. This is a substantial improvement from the Cold Storage site condition that was primarily impervious surface with stormwater that ran off without any treatment or attenuation. A total existing (previous) assumed impervious for the site was 10.57 acres, the proposed impervious is 9.75 acres, a reduction of 0.82 acres. The required infiltration of the 1-inch event requires volume control of 0.8125 acre-ft. The infiltration systems as proposed provide 0.689 acre-ft of volume at a conservative 0.45 in/hr infiltration rate. The soil infiltration rates will be confirmed and adjusted to actual rates using Double Ring Infiltrometer testing. The remaining 0.124 acre-ft will come from the Cascade and the pumping system, the proposed design displaces approximately 12,000 cf of treatment volume = 0.275 acre-ft. 5 MCWD requires proposed runoff rates to be equal to or less than the existing condition. Total proposed site runoff rates will be reduced significantly, by approximately 25% in all rainfall events from the existing condition. The system also takes on offsite drainage from the Cedar Lake Trail that would otherwise go untreated. The majority of the new/reconstructed site area will be dedicated to roof drainage, which is assumed cleaner than pavement runoff. This will further reduce pollutant loadings discharged from the site. Enhanced Landscaping The deviations in setbacks offer yards that are both deep enough for landscaping and green space and reasonable for creating a "street wall" for the pedestrian experience. The deviations also help to implement a comprehensive plan goal of creating a ‘positive relationship to the street’ by proposing appropriate setbacks for the residential density guided by the 2040 Comprehensive Plan (75-150 units per acre within ¼ mile of an LRT station platform). High Quality Common Open Spaces As previously mentioned under ‘Streetscape and Public Realm,’ the master plan includes a series of high quality common open spaces for residents, visitors, and community members to gather, recreate, and connect to nature. They also provide important opportunities to reduce urban heat island effect and stormwater runoff, while improving water and air quality. Multi-Modal Opportunities With immediate access to the Minnehaha Creek Greenway, Cedar Lake Trail, and Blake Road LRT station, proposed pedestrian and bike facilities will promote the use of multiple modes of transportation for residents and patrons to and from the project site. The proposed project exceeds the bike parking requirements for Mixed-Use Districts and includes additional bike facilities such as bike pump/repair stations, trail maps, seating for trail users and wayfinding signage. Support of Comprehensive Plan Goals The project supports and further advances a number of goals outlined in the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan and draft 2040 Cultivate Hopkins Plan. See summary of these goals below within the PUD statement section. From:Chris Osmundson To:Jason Lindahl Cc:Robert C. Lux; Chris Osmundson Subject:[EXTERNAL] 325 Blake Road N - Nov 15th Engagement Summary Date:Wednesday, November 17, 2021 2:57:04 PM Attachments:image001.png Importance:High “A neighborhood community engagement session was hosted by Alatus LLC at 6:30pm on Monday, November 15th, 2021 at 43 Hoops, a basketball training facility just across Blake Road N from the proposed redevelopment site at 325 Blake Road. Members of Alatus LLC, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and the City of Hopkins were in attendance. The meeting consisted of a presentation by Bob Lux and Chris Osmundson with Alatus, and Gabe Sherman with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, about the proposed master development plan, focusing on both high level and detailed components of the proposed land use applications and integration with Minnehaha Creek, respectively. Materials presented via a digital Power Point presentation included the latest images and schematic design concepts from Alatus’s land use application, in addition to the most recent engineered drawings from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Further discussion was also had regarding the municipal process that the development is working through, overall site timing, and forthcoming engagement opportunities even after land use approvals have been proposed to be received. After the approximately 40 minute presentation, members of the development team and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District answered specific questions with attendees on a one-on-one basis. Based on the sign-in sheets provided by Alatus at the entry to the facility, 27 people were signed in and were in attendance, in addition to those from the development team, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and the City of Hopkins. Questions asked included: (1) questions related to the multi-family affordable housing rental rent and income limitations in the proposed low-income housing tax credit building and how long those would be in place; (2) questions about how a joint health club / fitness facility would practically work and whether or not certain buildings would have certain amenities while others would not; (3) questions about the how senior co-ops are different and the same from/as a condominium ownership model and what pricing the senior co-op units would range in price from; (4) various questions about bike and pedestrian infrastructure and connections to existing infrastructure and under-construction infrastructure; (5) questions related to parking availability and sufficiency for guests, retail, and parkland/watershed district visitors; (6) questions about the proposed stories and floorplans associated with the for-sale townhomes; (7) questions about integration of trash, recycling, and composting services for all residential units, retail uses, and public parkland and public spaces and how the owner(s) would ensure cleanliness for the whole space; (8) questions about the timing and functionality of the solar arrays on each building and when those would be active and generating electricity for the given residential facilities. While this list is not all inclusive, it is an accurate representation of the questions that the development team members fielded after the presentation. Attendees had the opportunity to pick-up a take-away handout that contained a QR code that could be scanned to link them directly to the 325blakeroadn.com website that is maintained by Alatus LLC. Additionally, the presentation was recorded and the presentation, presentation materials, and other items will be made available on the website for questions and comments and further feedback. Invitations to the meeting were distributed via municipal notice provisions in addition to social media postings and general word of mouth.” Chris Osmundson Alatus, LLC – Director of Development (O): 612.455.0712 | (C): 612.201.8487 cbosmundson@alatusllc.com Stay Connected: Alatus LLC | Facebook | LinkedIn This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) names above. This message may be attorney-client communication and as such privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. Thank you. From:Dale Johnson To:Jason Lindahl; Dale Johnson Subject:[EXTERNAL] Public Hearing Date:Friday, November 12, 2021 5:36:39 PM Dear Mr. Lindahl, I got your letter regarding the meeting on 11/23. I have also received a letter from a developer named Alatus. Is this the same company that is developing or wants to develop the property in the NW corner of Blake and Excelsior by the Goodwill? I was at a council meeting several weeks ago when that project was being presented. They brought in an upper management person from out of town who started out by mentioning he was a minority. That starts the process off on the wrong foot for me. I don't care if he is from Mars but if he and his company feel that is important it tells me they are playing the ethiscity card. Maybe they get better financial deals from the feds, the state or Hopkins or the county. I don't know. A question that I did not ask was where does the snow go when the roads get plowed. If this is a private project, I presume they will incur the cost to plow the streets in their development, not the city! Have they really set aside a realistic sized area for the snow? The same questions need to be asked about this new development. Are there time tables in the agreements? Can the person developing the property just sell out when it is finished and therefore have no concern as to the problems that might come up? Any person who has been educated on city planning must be aware that developers build and split. I hope you can educate me so I can have answers before your meeting and the one next Tuesday put on by Alatus. Sincerely, Lion Dale Johnson 325 Blake Road N. Master Development Multi-Purpose Parking Solution The Master Development (“Development”) created by the Alatus-Hopkins-MCWD partnership located at 325 Blake Road N. was designed as a landmark destination for the residents of Hopkins and beyond. This is evidenced by the variety of housing, entertainment, and public realm features within the Development, all of which are easily accessible by multiple forms of transportation (walk, bike, light rail, vehicle). One of the forms of transportation will be vehicular traffic, and a destination like this requires attention to detail and creativity when designing a parking solution to meet the needs of the residents and public alike, while preserving the aesthetics and value of the landscape and structures. In total, the Development includes 1,239 parking stalls throughout the developable acreage with a high concentration located below ground underneath the various housing projects. “Exhibit A” displays the parking volume at each location. The key to any successful parking solution is maximizing the utilization rate of the parking such that the supply adequately and precisely meets demand at all hours of the day. The Development will include a variety of uses that have complementary parking needs. For instance, an average resident that does not work from home will primarily use their parking stall from 5pm-9am, while an average employee at one of the various retail outlets would use their parking stall from 9am-5pm (standard workday hours). Buildings C & D (pictured in Exhibit A) will include “multi-purpose” parking garages that serve both the residents of the housing projects and the patrons of the public realms and entertainment node within the Development – these garages will include a combined 797 parking stalls (see table below). The Developer (Alatus) has experience curating multi-purpose parking solutions and seeing them through to reality. Below are some general guidelines for the multi-purpose garages operated in Buildings C & D: - Approximately one-third of the parking stalls (250-300 of the approx. 800) would be dedicated RESERVED stalls leased to residents of the buildings. - The remaining two-thirds of the parking stalls (500-550 of the approx. 800) would be split between UNRESERVED resident parking and transient parking. - In our recent experience with similar suburban projects, the parking needs of the average rental community is approx. 1.20 parking stalls per unit. - Buildings C & D are currently designed to include approx. 500 rental units, which would equate to 605 total parking stalls (RESERVED + UNRESERVED) dedicated to the residents based on a 1.20 parking factor. That would leave almost 200 parking stalls for transient/overflow demand. - The parking garages will be equipped with state-of-the-art parking technology that uses machine learning to make sure there are no inventory problems; this technology would ensure that there is ample parking for residents and track the utilization by the public. Exhibit A: 325 Blake Road N. Site Plan