Loading...
VII.2. Blake Road Station Site Plan Review for Site B; Lindahl April 5, 2022 City Council Report 2022-036 Blake Road Station Site Plan Review for Site B Proposed Action: Staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Commission adopt the following motions: • Move to adopt Resolution 2022-031 approving the site plan for Blake Road Station Site B (PID 19-117-21-42-0046), subject to conditions. Overview The applicant, Bryan Farquhar of TF Hopkins, LLC (Trilogy Real Estate Group), requests an amendment to the Blake Road Station Planned Unit Development (PUD) and site plan review for Blake Road Station Site B. In August 2021, the City approved the Blake Road Station Planned Unit Development and site plan for Site A. The applicant now seeks planned unit development (PUD) amendment and site plan review approvals for the second phase of the Blake Road Station development (Site B). Site B is located at the northwest corner of Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road and its plans are generally consistent with the original PUD Master Plan. As designed, the proposed building will include 250 residential units, approximately 10,000 square feet of commercial space and 339 enclosed parking spaces to serve both the residential and commercial uses. Based on the findings in this report, both the Planning & Zoning Commission and staff recommend approval of the site plan for Site B subject to the conditions detailed in the attached resolution. The PUD amendment portion of this project is in process between the City Attorney and the applicant and is scheduled for review by the City Council on April 19. April 19 corresponds to the end of the 60-day review period for these applications. So staff has sent the applicant a letter extending the review period an additional 30 days to allow time to draft, review and execute the PUD amendment. Primary Issues to Consider • Background • PUD Amendment • Site Plan Review • Engineering Review • Alternatives Supporting Documents • Site Location Map • Applicant’s Narrative • Neighborhood Meeting Comments • Email from Eric Anondson • Plans and Building Elevations • Resolution 2022-031 _________________ Jason Lindahl, City Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N ____ Source: _____________ Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): _________________________________________ Notes: City Council Report 2022-036 Page 2 BACKGROUND This Background section provides a history of existing site, project summary, and a brief summary of the review process for this development to date. More detailed information about the project, it’s phasing, design, streetscape and public realm, and retail components can be found in the applicant’s narrative (see attached). Existing Site. The 6.4-acre subject property was re-platted as Lots 1, 2 & 3, Hopkins Commerce Addition in July of 1992. However, the buildings on each of these lots were built much earlier. Lot 1 (Site C) contains a 44,000 square foot building constructed in 1954 (Goodwill and vacant space). Lot 2 (Site A) contained a 25,000 square multitenant strip commercial building constructed in 1957. The building on Lot 2 has been cleared and construction on Site A began late last year. Lot 3 (Site B) contains a 26,000 square foot multitenant strip commercial building constructed in 1959. In total, the 3 multitenant strip commercial buildings contained approximately 95,000 square feet of neighborhood serving retail and service uses. Project Summary. According to the applicant, the Blake Road Station project will redevelop 6.4 acres of land located at the intersection of Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road into a multi- modal, transit-oriented development adjacent to the future Blake Road Station along the Metro Green Line Extension. Each of the 3 phases of this development are designed to build upon the improvements of the previous phase and are intended to create an increasingly connected, pedestrian friendly, and transit focused neighborhood. As detailed in the table below, overall the site will include 770 residential units and just over 12,000 square feet of retail space. Blake Road Station Development Summary Site Start Commercial Space Residential Units Parcel Size Density A December 2021 2,100 220 1.55 Acres 142 Units/Acre B Summer 2022 10,062 250 2.1 Acres 119 Units/Acre C 2026-2031 0 300 2.76 Acres 109 Units/Acre Total N/A 12,162 770 6.4 Acres 120 Units/Acre Review Process to Date. The review process for this project included both the City’s land use and zoning review and the required State of Minnesota environmental review processes. The City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed the concept plan for this development in June 2020 and were generally supportive of the design. As a concept plan review, no public hearing was required. However, because of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic the City did require the applicant to hold a virtual neighborhood meeting to engage the community about their redevelopment plans. Community comments from the concept plan neighborhood meeting focused on the following topics: • Business displacement and a need to incorporate affordable neighborhood serving commercial uses. • Need for affordable and larger apartment units with 3-4 bedrooms. • The importance of pedestrian scaled architecture. • The importance of pedestrian and bicycle access to and through the site. In response to these comments, the applicant made an effort to improve communication with existing businesses about the timeline for the redevelopment, provide reduced rents and allow City Council Report 2022-036 Page 3 additional time for businesses to relocate. After the concept plan review, the project went through the state required environmental review process in 2020. Based on the size and scope of this redevelopment, the project was required to go through the environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) process. The EAW process included a parking study and a 30-day comment period that resulted in comments from 5 state agencies, Hennepin County, the Hopkins Housing Team and 1 Hopkins resident. The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed the EAW on October 14 and recommended City Council approval. The City Council then reviewed the EAW on October 20 and made a negative declaration of need regarding the EAW clearing the way for the developer to go through the City’s development review process. Following the EAW process, the applicant submitted development applications for the overall Blake Road Station development and the first phase of this project in June of 2021. These applications include rezoning, planned unit development (PUD) and site plan review for the first phase of the development (Site A). The review process for these applications included an in- person neighborhood meeting on July 14, a public hearing before the Planning & Zoning Commission on July 27 and review and action by the City Council during their August 2 and August 17, 2021 meetings. During the development review process, public comment included the need for affordable housing and commercial space, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, displacement of existing businesses, environmental concerns and the need for an equitable development review of the proposal. Neighborhood Meeting. The current PUD amendment and site plan review applications require the applicant to host a neighborhood meeting. That meeting took place on March 2, 2022 from 6:00 – 7:30 PM at 1002 2nd Street Northeast (43 Hoops). Neighborhood meetings must be hosted by the developer and require them to engage with the surrounding neighborhood to explain their project, answer questions and take any comments. In addition to the in-person meeting, the applicant was also required to set up a webpage to allow online comments. According to the applicant, they did not receive any online comments and the overall questions or concerns from the in-person meeting included the items listed below. The applicant’s responses to these items are detailed in their meeting notes (see attached). • Affordable housing • Inquiries from current and prospective tenants about retail space • Project timeline • Pedestrian connections and improvements. Community Comment. Under state law, these applications require a public hearing. Accordingly, the City published notice of this request and public hearing in the Sun Sailor, mailed notices directly to all property owners and existing tenants within 500’ of the subject property, posted a sign on the subject property to inform the general public of the proposed project and added information about the project and staff and developer contact information to the City’s website. The notice directed all interested parties to send questions or comments to City Planner Jason Lindahl by mail, phone or email or to attend the public hearing where they could learn about the request, ask questions and provide feedback. As of the writing of this report, the City had City Council Report 2022-036 Page 4 received one email comment from Eric Anondson of 53 Jackson Road. Mr. Anondson raised concerns about too much landscaping at Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard and its impact on bike maneuverability and the need for additional traffic calming along the new north/south street. After some discussion, both staff and the Planning & Zoning Commission found the landscaping at Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard should not limit bicycle maneuverability and there should be adequate traffic calming along the north/south street. Staff will provide an update on any additional public comments received during the City Council meeting. Planning & Zoning Commission Action. The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this item (Planning Application 2022-06) during the March 22, 2022 regular meeting. During that meeting, the Commission heard a summary presentation from City staff and held a public hearing that produced no comments. Following the hearing, staff noted that the applicant had satisfied several conditions from the Planning & Zoning Commission resolution which could now be deleted. However, there was not agreement between staff and the applicant on the architecture of the building entrance along Excelsior Boulevard or the amount of window transparency along the north and west sides of the building. After some discussion, the Planning & Zoning Commission agreed with the applicant that no changes were needed for the architecture of the building entrance along Excelsior Boulevard. But the Commission was tied 3-3 on the need for additional window transparency along the north and west sides of the building. As a result, they directed the applicant to continue to work with staff to find a solution. Since the meeting, the applicant has agreed to revise the building elevations to include additional storefront design along the north side of the building and matching windows and green wall landscaping materials along the north and west sides of the building. These changes are acceptable to staff under the overall PUD. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT The applicant received approval of the Blake Road Station PUD and associated Master Plan in August of 2021. The PUD establishes the Mixed Use zoning district and its development regulations as the base zone and standards for review. Overall, the PUD entitled lot configuration, access and private road configuration, and building height for all 3 sites as well as the setback standards for Site A. Review of Site B requires separate site plan review approval based on the entitlements established in the PUD Master Plan noted above and the specific zoning standards of the Mixed Use district. Deviations from the Mixed Use standards, other than those noted above require an amendment to the existing Blake Road Station Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement. The PUD amendment portion of this project is in process between the City Attorney and the applicant and is scheduled for review by the City Council on April 19. April 19 corresponds to the end of the 60-day review period for these applications. So staff has sent the applicant a letter extending the review period an additional 30 days to allow time to draft, review and execute the PUD amendment. As you may recall, the purpose of a PUD is to allow flexibility from traditional development standards in return for a higher quality development. Typically, the City looks for a developer to exceed other zoning standards, building code requirements or meet other goals of the Comprehensive Plan. In exchange for the flexibility offered by the planned unit development, the applicant is expected to detail how they intend to provide a higher quality development or City Council Report 2022-036 Page 5 meet other City goals. The requested deviations and items offered by the developer in exchange for the requested deviations for Site B are compared in the table below. Each of the requested deviations is compared with the applicable Mixed Use zoning district standards in the Site Plan review section below. PUD Comparison for Blake Road Station Site B Requested Deviations Items Offered to Support the PUD Building Height Transit Supportive Density Floor to Area Ratio Linear Park Setbacks on all 4 Sides of the Building 20 EV Charging Stations Parking Stall Dimensions Additional Landscaping Exterior Building Materials Transparency & Fenestration Façade Articulation When weighing a PUD request, the City should consider if the proposed deviations and items offered by the developer create a higher quality development, if there is a reasonable trade-off between these items and if the items offered by the developer help to mitigate the requested deviations. Future review of Site C will require separate site plan review approval based on the entitlements established in the PUD Master Plan and the specific zoning standards of the Mixed Use district. Deviations from the Mixed Use standards for Sites C other than those specifically noted in the PUD agreement will require an amendment to the existing Blake Road Station Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement. It should also be noted that the applicant’s narrative for the original PUD states their intent to subdivide these properties as part of future development of Site C. Because this project is along a county road, both the City of Hopkins and Hennepin County will have plat review authority. With any subdivision, the City has the ability to collect park dedication in the form of land or a fee-in-lieu. The original PUD established the park dedication rates in place in 2021 which are $3,000 per unit for multiple family residential and five (5) percent of the fair market value of the commercial land as estimated by the county assessor. SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR SITE B Standards for reviewing site plan applications are detailed in Article IV of the City Code. This section establishes the site plan review procedure and provides regulations pertaining to the enforcement of site design standards. These procedures are established to promote high quality development that ensures the long-term stability of residential neighborhoods and enhances the built and natural environments within the City as new development and redevelopment activities occur. Specifically in this case, site plan review is required for the new mixed-use building. Staff has reviewed the proposed development against the zoning regulations for the Mixed Use district and the standards established in the Blake Road Station PUD. Staff’s review and findings for each of these regulations are detailed below. Land Use & Zoning. The subject property is guided as Activity Center in the 2040 City Council Report 2022-036 Page 6 Comprehensive Plan. The Activity Centers future land use category surrounds and supports the planned Blake Road and Shady Oak light rail stations along the Metro Green Line Extension. These areas are planned to include moderate to high density mixed use development designed to complement and enhance the existing development pattern in these areas and support the public investment in transit. Densities in these areas will typically range from 20-60 units per acre, with 75-150 units per acre within ¼ mile of an LRT station platform. The subject property is within the ¼ mile radius of the future Blake Road Station and has a density of 119 Units/Acre. As noted above, the site is also zoned Mixed Use with a planned unit development which is consistent with the comprehensive plan designation. Height. The applicant’s plans call for the building on Site B to be a total of 7 stories which is consistent with the height standard established for Site A, B and C under the Blake Road Station PUD. In total, the building will have one level of parking below grade, two levels of concrete construction for commercial and amenity spaces and additional parking, and five stories of wood-framed construction for residential apartment units. As a mixed-use building, the base Mixed-Use zoning would allow the building to be up to six stories in height. However, the PUD allowed for one additional story in exchange for the development more closely meeting the 2040 comprehensive plan density goals around light rail stations. Floor to Area Ratio (FAR). As designed, the Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) for Site B fails to meet the standard of the Mixed Use district. FAR is a measurement of density calculated by dividing the floor area of a building by the lot area of the parcel on which the building is located. In the Blake Road Station Area, the FAR standard is a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 3 for residential buildings and a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 5 for mixed use buildings. The building on Site A is considered a mixed-use building because it includes commercial space. With a proposed FAR of 2.8, the building on Site B does not conform to the minimum 3.0 FAR standard. However, given the overall design of the site, the proposed 2.8 FAR is acceptable under the PUD. Setbacks. As designed, the building on Site B does not meet the setback standards for the Mixed Use district. The table below compares the required and proposed setbacks for Site B. Overall, the proposed setbacks are less than required on the north, south and east sides of the building but greater than required on the west side of the building. This design results in additional space for a linear parking along the west side of the site which results in a more pedestrian and transit focused layout and is acceptable under the overall planned unit development. Setback Review for Blake Road Station – Site A Setback Standard Proposed Status Front (South) 15’ – 25’ 10’-8” to 18’-2” Non-Conforming (-4’-4” to -6’-10”) Front (East) 15’ – 25’ 9’-8” to 28’-5” Non-Conforming (-5’-4” to +3’-5”) Front (west) 15’ – 25’ 32’-8’ to 49’-10’ Non-Conforming (+22’-8” to +24’-10”) Rear (North) 10’ 5’-3” to 20’-7” Non-Conforming (-4’-9” to +10’-7”) Note: Setbacks are measured from the foundation; however, it should be noted that stories 3-7 along the south side of the building are recessed which results in great visible setback for these upper floors. Off-Street Parking & Travel Demand Management. The applicant conducted a traffic impact analysis as part of the concept plan and environmental review processes. Overall, the study confirmed the City’s off-street parking requirements of the Mixed Use district and the number City Council Report 2022-036 Page 7 of parking spaces proposed by the developer were adequate for all 3 buildings. A specific review of Site B finds the proposed off-street parking meets the requirements of the Mixed Use district. These standards require residential uses provide a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 1.5 enclosed parking stalls per unit and 1 guest stall per 15 units. Using these standards, the 250 unit building proposed for Site B is required to provide at least 267 off-street parking stalls and a total of 339 are proposed. Of the 339 total proposed stalls, 297 are reserved for residential use while 42 are designated to serve the commercial uses. Under this parking division, the site exceeds the minimum amount of required residential parking by 30 stalls but is 8 stalls under the minimum commercial parking standard of 1 stall per 200 square feet. Therefore, staff recommends a condition of approval require the applicant to allow at least 8 of the stalls reserved for residential use to be available to employees working in the commercial space to meet the 1 stall per 200 square feet parking standard. The recommended allocation of parking results in a parking ratio of 1.15 stalls per unit for residential and 1 stall per 200 square feet for commercial. By comparison, Site A has 256 total stalls with a parking ratio of 1.16 stalls per unit. Bicycle Parking. According to the applicant’s narrative, bicycle parking on Site B exceeds the minimum requirements of the Mixed Use district. For multifamily residential, the Mixed Use district requires 1 long-term space per 2 units and 1 short-term space per 20 units or a total of 138 bicycle parking spaces. According to the applicant, there will be 150 bicycle parking stalls for residential use within the building. However, the location of these stalls is not illustrated on their plans. Staff recommends that a condition of approval require the applicant to revise their plan to show at least 138 long-term bicycle parking stalls within the building and at least 13 short-term stalls outside the building. The Mixed Use district also requires bicycle parking for the commercial space. These standards require at least 0.5 long-term spaces per employee and 0.5 short-term spaces per 1,000 square feet of net building area. According the applicant’s narrative, to meet these requirements Site B will have 20 bicycle racks located within the right-of-way adjacent to the building’s primary entrance. However, the required 5 long-term spaces must be located within the building. Staff recommends that a condition of approval require the applicant to revise their plan to provide at least 5 long-term commercial bicycle parking stalls inside the building in close proximity to the commercial spaces. The balance of the 15 commercial bicycle parking stalls may be located outside the building close to the entrances to the commercial space. Any bicycle parking located within the public right-of-way must be approved by the City and or Hennepin County. Shadow Study. The Mixed Use district requires a shadow study for all buildings four stories or higher and the applicant has included this study with their plans. According to the Mixed Use district standards, the shadow study must indicate the shadows cast at the shortest and longest days of the year. Impacts of a shadow on the surrounding property may be a reason to lower and/or adjust the location or height of buildings. Staff review of the shadow study finds little to no impact on adjacent properties even with the additional height to 7-stories allowed through the PUD. City Council Report 2022-036 Page 8 Exterior. Exterior materials proposed for Site B do not meet the standards of the Mixed Use district. The Mixed Use district requires the primary exterior treatment of walls facing a public right-of–way or parking lot on a structure shall be brick, cast concrete, stone, marble or other material similar in appearance and durability. Regular or decorative concrete block, float finish stucco, EIFS-type stucco, cementitious fiberboard, or wood clapboard may be used on the front façade as a secondary treatment or trim but shall not be a primary exterior treatment of a wall facing a public right-of-way. Staff interprets primary to be at least 65 percent and secondary to not exceed 35 percent of the side of a building. The proposed exterior materials for the building on Site B are summarized in the table below. Exterior Materials for Blake Road Station Site B Material North South East West Brick Veneer 32% 32% 15% 44% Metal Panel 7% 8% 15% 12% Metal Tile 36% 37% 32% 31% Fiber Cement Lap Siding 25% 23% 38% 14% Total 100% 100% 100% 101%??? Of the proposed exterior materials detailed above, only the brick qualifies as a primary material and it covers 32% of the north and south, 15% of the east and 44% of the west sides of the building on Site B. While these are significantly less than the requirement, the applicant notes that the brick material is concentrated on the first two levels of all sides of the building to enhance the ground level pedestrian experience. This design and mix of materials for the building on Site B are acceptable under the overall planned unit development. Building Orientation. The building on Site B conforms to the building orientation standards of the Mixed Use district. Buildings within the Mixed Use district must be oriented toward the pedestrian by providing a direct link between each building and the pedestrian walking system, with emphasis on directing people to a transit station. The applicant’s plans for Site B show the building will have pedestrian connections to the existing sidewalk along both Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard that will eventually connect with the sidewalks and streets planned for overall site and the City’s sidewalk and trail system. Transparency & Fenestration. The building on Site B only meets the transparency & fenestration standards of the Mixed Use district on the south and east sides of the building. The Mixed Use district requires a minimum of 60 percent to a maximum of 75 percent of the front street-facing facade between two feet and eight feet in height must comprise clear windows that allow views of indoor nonresidential space or product display area. And the building must have at least 30 percent fenestration for windows above the first floor for all sides of the building. Since the meeting, the applicant has agreed to revise the building elevations to include additional storefront design along the north side of the building and matching windows and green wall landscaping materials along the north and west sides of the building. These changes are acceptable to staff under the overall PUD. Façade Articulation. The building on Site B does not meet the façade articulation standards of the Mixed Use district. These standards require the primary street side façade of a building shall not consist of unarticulated blank walls, flat front facades or an unbroken series of garage doors. City Council Report 2022-036 Page 9 The front of a building shall be broken up into individual bays of a minimum of 25 feet and maximum of 40 feet wide. The building’s architectural elements (window, balconies and materials) provide some break-up of the elevation, and since the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting the applicant has agreed to add a roof cap architectural feature to the building. Overall, staff finds this design acceptable under the PUD. Sidewalks. Site B meets the minimum sidewalk standards of the Mixed Use district. The Mixed Use district requires a minimum 5-foot wide sidewalk along the frontage of all public streets and within and along the frontage of all new development or redevelopment. The applicant’s plans illustrate sidewalks of at least 5 feet along all four sides of the building. Pedestrian/Streetscapes. The applicant’s plans appear to meet the pedestrian and streetscape standards of the Mixed Use district. The Mixed Use district requires pedestrian streetscape improvements along all sidewalks. Pedestrian improvements of at least 25 percent of the landscaping budget shall be included in the development. These improvements shall create a high quality pedestrian experience through the provision of benches, planters, drinking fountains, waste containers, median landscaping and the like. Pedestrian-scale light fixtures that shine downward on the sidewalks and walkways shall be no greater than 12 feet in height and must be provided along all sidewalks and walkways to provide ample lighting during nighttime hours for employees, residents, and customers. Staff recommends a condition of approval require the applicant to provide more detailed streetscape information for street furniture and light. Landscaping. The applicant’s landscape plan for Site B exceeds the landscaping standards for the Mixed Use district. According to the applicant’s estimates, this project is required to provide $103,000 in landscape improvements with at least 25% allocated to pedestrian/streetscape improvements (see section above). In this case, the applicant’s plans include $286,000 of total landscaping improvements with $188,000 of plantings, fencing and irrigation and $98,000 (or 34%) in pedestrian/streetscape improvements. Staff recommends a condition of approval require the applicant to provide a landscape and landscape/streetscape letter of credit in a form acceptable to the City Attorney for 125% of the value of all improvements. Under the original PUD, the City agreed to accept a landscape escrow instead of a letter of credit. The applicant shall increase this escrow to cover 125% of the landscape/streetscape improvement for Site B. The City shall hold this security until all landscape/streetscape improvements have been installed and all plantings have survived at least one growing season. Signs, Canopies and Awnings. The plans for Site B do not include a specific sign plan. However, the plan renderings do include general information about a monument style sign in the southeast corner of the site adjacent to the Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard intersection. All signs must be approved through a separate administrative permit subject to conformance with the standards of the Mixed Use district and sign regulations contained in Article XXI - Signs. It should be noted that the original PUD allowed for a specific ground sign located at the southwest corner of Site B. This item is addressed in the original PUD and is in addition the future sign proposed for the southwest corner of Site B. Trash Enclosure. The applicant plans to store trash containers within the underground parking garage. The applicant shall designate a specific location within the Level 1 parking garage and an on-site location for trash pickup. Trash pick-up shall not occur within the public right-of-way or City Council Report 2022-036 Page 10 any street surface. Exterior Lighting. The applicant’s plans for Site B include a photometric site plan consistent with the City’s exterior lighting requirements. Stormwater Treatment. The applicant’s narrative includes stormwater treatment information that indicates it exceeds both the City’s and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District’s (MCWD) standards. According to the applicant, runoff from Site B will be conveyed to the future 325 Blake Road regional stormwater treatment facilities via the Powell Road diversion. More detailed information about the applicant’s stormwater treatment plans can be found in the attached project narrative. Staff recommends a condition of approval require the applicant to receive all necessary approvals from the City Engineer and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District prior to issuance of a building permit. ENGINEERING REVIEW The Engineering Department offers the following comments. • Conformance with all applicable conditions of the PUD Master Plan approval. • Conformance with all requirements of the Traffic Impact Study. • Storm Sewer o Watershed review and approval required o All underground detention and newly installed infrastructure will be private, and will be the responsibility of the owner/developer for all future maintenance. • Water/Sewer o All newly installed infrastructure will be private, and will be the responsibility for the owner/developer for all future maintenance. This includes hydrants, valves, and service connections. o ROW permit will be required for any work in the public ROW. This includes Hennepin County and Hopkins. o There are no local SAC or WAC fees. Met Council SAC fees may apply. • The monumentation at Blake and Excelsior may be removed. • The City is only responsible for snow removal for sidewalk and trails within the public ROW. The owner is responsible for all other snow removal. The developer may remove snow from the public ROW. • Lighting with the ROW shall match adjacent corridor lighting. • Irrigation shall be provided in all ROW boulevards. Coordinate location and type with Hopkins Public Works. ALTERNATIVES 1. Vote to approve the site plan for Blake Road Station Site B. By voting to approve, the site plan for Blake Road Station Site B will be approved. 2. Vote to deny the site plan for Blake Road Station Site B. By voting to deny, site plan for Blake Road Station Site B will be denied. Should the City Council consider this option, it must also identify specific findings that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the City Council finds that further information is needed, the items should be continued. Site Location Map for Blake Road Station Subject Property Blake Road Station -- pg 1 Blake Road Station – Phase B Project Narrative – Formal Review 2022-02-18 Submission (03-17-22 Update) PROJECT OVERVIEW The Blake Road Station project is the redevelopment of 7.4 acres of land located at the intersection of Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road South in Hopkins, MN. Trilogy Real Estate Group has been working with the City of Hopkins to develop the site in a three-phase, multi-modal transit-oriented development adjacent to the Blake Road Southwest LRT Station. The project received PUD and Phase A site plan approval in August of 2021, allowing for construction to begin on the first building in December of 2021. The second phase, which is the subject of the current site plan approval request, is situated on the corner of Excelsior and Blake Rd and will serve as a welcoming gateway to the project and City of Hopkins. When the third phase is completed, the development will be an anchor for the new transit station and will advance long-standing City goals outlined in numerous area planning documents, including the East Hopkins Land Use & Market Study (2003), Blake Road Corridor Small Area Plan (2009), Blake Road Corridor Study (2015) and the Blake Road LRT Station Area Development Guidelines (2015), as discussed in more detail in the latter part of this narrative. As early as 2003, the East Hopkins Land Use & Market Study confirmed that redevelopment within the City’s east end along Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road would require a significant catalyst to help overcome certain existing barriers and obstacles to market delivery of such redevelopment. The applicant believes that the high-quality redevelopment of the project site and creation of a new transit- oriented node with significant residential density will provide such a catalyst. Each phase will build upon the improvements of the previous phase and will ultimately result in an increasingly connected, pedestrian friendly, and transit-focused community. The project will add to the mix of housing choices for area residents, providing a new opportunity to live immediately adjacent to the light rail transit station. STREETSCAPE AND PUBLIC REALM The development team has approached this site as a unique opportunity to complement the transformative power of the Southwest LRT line. Each phase of the Blake Road Station project defines and beautifies the streetscape while complementing the crucial transit functions in and around the site. Currently, two of the three parcels on the site are comprised of older, stressed pavement with ill- defined access and a plethora of surface parking stalls. The Planned Unit Development that was previously entitled will transform the site and emphasizes a neighborhood scale of connected streets, with traffic calming measures and pedestrian features that will significantly improve the aesthetic of the gateway to the City of Hopkins. This is the second of three parts of the projects vision that includes extensive pedestrian improvements for the area including sidewalk connections through the site with boulevards and a rhythm of deciduous street trees will provide a human-scale canopy year-round. The trees’ summer shade reduces the heat island effect, creating a comfortable microclimate when needed most. Both the trees and parallel parking zones will help to create visible friction that will successfully reduce driving speeds to provide a safer environment for people, bikers, and drivers. The pedestrian zone along Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road expands to a width suitable for public street amenities including benches, bike racks, street lighting and planting beds. Phase B of the development will begin to define a new north-south street that divides the sites in two Blake Road Station -- pg 2 and will connect to the SWLRT station. This phase creates the spine between the first phase from which stems entries, active uses, and a newly created linear pocket park. Adjacent to the future use parcel that sits immediately to the north of this phase of the project, the pocket park will feature seating, natural play features, landscaping, and a pedestrian walk that offers a connection from Blake Road to the interior of the development. The pedestrian connection will provide flexibility to adapt to opportunities that may develop on the future use parcel that is not currently controlled by the applicant. BUILDING DESIGN Blake Road Station will provide creative, mid-rise residential buildings that maximize density while emphasizing green space and public realm at the street level. The proposed style of construction for Buildings B is five levels of wood framing over two levels of concrete podium and a below-grade level of parking; similar to Building A. Trilogy envisions a community that values leisure and comfort with the ease of urban connection. The exterior building design draws on these qualities of being a transition from an urban to naturalistic landscape. The architecture offers a refined exterior material palette that reinforces this site’s potential as a catalyst for beautiful design and smart growth in the Blake Station area of Hopkins. The palette, forms, colors, textures, and details create a coherent whole that is energizing and enduring. The design of Site B builds on the design language established by Site A. Where Site A has a warm, neutral tones to evoke a feeling of rural comfort, Site B uses similar materials and massing but in a higher contrast color scheme that is dressier and more formal, better suited to its location and role as a gateway building. While the forms of Site B are simple and peacefully resolved they are meant to have more of a “signature” presence both for the development and for the city of Hopkins. At street level, the sidewalk experience at the base of Site B is nearly identical to that of Site A. This is intentional so that the campus will have a sense of place with small differences that can be explored. The articulation in the masonry of Site B is also slightly more animated to enliven the pocket park. Site B has much more commercial square footage. The commercial sidewalk experience is metal clad. It has a clean and modern look, clearly differentiated from the residential and amenity areas at street level, while also maintaining specific historic references to a cornice and traditional façade signage. Blade signs also neatly slot into the elegant panel system used to define the retail facades. Building lighting is utilized to enhance the sidewalk experience throughout. At the upper levels, all facades are clad with durable materials. Masonry and medium gauge metals and composite metal panels along with quality windows comprise more than eighty percent of the façade surfaces on the primary sides of the building along Blake and Excelsior. The primary sides as well as the west side of the building are articulated with separate clearly defined masses, each with its own carefully composed façade whether the function within the building is residential, parking, retail, or private amenity. The projecting masses are wrapped consistently on all three sides, expressing how the building is organized into separate groupings in a beautiful and balanced architecture while also saying something about how each of the individual homes within are configured. Fiber cement lap siding is shown in recesses in order to visually separate these areas from the main facades’ more prominent architectural elements. As with Site A, the metal portions of the cladding on Site B will also have an attractive luster. Metallic luster allows the building to show its personality by dressing itself in the colors of its surroundings, most beautiful at sunrise and sunset but also softly echoing the glow of the carefully designed and manicured pedestrian realm at ground level, reflecting its current lighting configuration and its active uses. Blake Road Station -- pg 3 Amenity courtyards, balconies, and terraces extend living spaces to the outdoors while improved sidewalks and connections encourage active lifestyles for residents. Ground floor retail space will enhance the streetscape experience and provide an opportunity for retailers to have an intimate connection with residents, LRT riders, and the surrounding Hopkins community. With proximity to the Cedar Lake Trail, each building will supply ample storage and access to bicycle repair facilities to encourage bicycle use for recreation as well as daily commuting. Similar to Site A, these state-of-the-art dwelling units will support the residents’ sustainable living experience by providing urban housing that incorporates energy-efficient appliances, low-flow water fixtures, low-VOC paints, building-wide recycling practices and encouraging car-free living. The buildings will be designed to incorporate assemblies that ensure high-quality acoustical performance between units (wall and floor assemblies). DEVELOPMENT PHASING Commencement of construction of the various phases is dependent upon market conditions and existing lease agreements. Subject to those conditions, the development team currently anticipates the following construction start dates for the various phases: Building A: Under Construction Building B: Summer 2022 Building C: Spring 2026 – 2031 (pending existing lease agreements) CITY APPLICATIONS/APPROVALS  Previous Approvals • Zoning Application: Requesting rezoning from B-4 (Neighborhood Commercial) and I-1 (Industrial) to Mixed Use District • Planned Unit Development (PUD) Submittal (for the Overall Site) • Site Plan Approval for Site A (Site Plan Review Application) • Travel Demand Management Study approved by the City of Hopkins and Hennepin County • Execution of a Planned Unit Development Agreement  Site Plan Approval for Site B (Site Plan Review Application)  The development plan may necessitate re-platting of the land in future phase C  Approvals from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District  Amendment to the Planned Unit Development Agreement Blake Road Station -- pg 4 PROPOSED DEVIATIONS FROM MIXED USE DISTRICT STANDARDS Strict adherence to the Mixed-Use District standards and requirements is not required in this case to satisfy the intent of the City’s planned unit development provisions and the proposed deviations from those standards will not prejudice the health, safety or welfare of the residents of the development, the surrounding area or the city as a whole. The proposed deviations from Mixed Use District standards for the Blake Road Station Site B are summarized in the following table: Requested Deviations Category Mixed-Use Standards Proposed for Site B Building Height 6 stories 7 stories granted with previous PUD approval Floor Area Ratio 3.0 2.8 South Setback 15’ – 25’ 10’-8” to 18’-2” on Levels 1 and 2 25’-1” to 30’-8” on Levels 3 thru 7 West Setback 15’ – 25’ 32’-8” to 49’-10” East Setback 15’ – 25’ 9’-8” to 28’-5” North Setback 10’ 5’-3” to 20’-7 on Levels 1 and 2 11’-1” to 20’-4” on Level 3 thru 7 Parking Stall Dimensions 9 ft x 20 ft 9 ft x 18 ft Primary Exterior Building Materials The zoning material guideline does not identify the metal panel tile as a primary or secondary material High-quality, primary materials of brick and glazing are proposed at Levels 1 and 2 of Building B. The applicant proposes the metal tile material as an equally durable and attractive option to other primary materials. Exterior Building Material Percentage 20% maximum for secondary materials such as fiber cement siding East elevation – Fiber cement siding, a secondary material, covers about 24% of the east elevation. Requested deviation to allow up to 30% for secondary materials on the east elevation. Building Transparency 60% transparency between 2 ft and 8 ft West elevation: 30% tinted or opaque glazing and 20% recessed brick is proposed between 2 and 8 ft.* Signage One monument sign permitted for each multi-tenant building provided the surface area of the sign does not exceed 2 sq ft per front foot of lot. No sign shall be over 150 sq ft, 20 feet in height and have a setback in no case less than 20 ft from the property lines. Approved as part of the PUD, a 3 ft x 6 ft monument sign at the southwest corner of Site B is proposed as a marker for Goodwill. Blake Road Station -- pg 5 SUPPORT FOR PROPOSED DEVIATIONS The applicant believes the development, as proposed with deviations from zoning code ordinances, is a high-quality proposal for the City of Hopkins and better aligns with overall Comprehensive Plan goals. To ensure a high-quality development, the applicant is proposing the following site enhancements in support of the proposed deviations: Enhanced Pedestrian Scale Architecture Primary building materials of brick, metal and glass are focused at the first two levels of the street-facing elevations. Other building elements such as canopies, building mounted light sconces, a trellis over the outdoor seating area and recessed balconies enhance the street presence and pedestrian experience at the ground floor. Stepping back the building at the third level along Blake and Excelsior creates a 2-story expression at focused pedestrian areas to further emphasize the human scale. Finally, the selected metal panel tile is both modern and traditional, with a shingle shape that creates a more residential scale at the upper-level elevations. Site signage will be constructed with materials that match the architectural style and materials of the building. The base of the primary monument sign for the development will be surrounded by landscaped planting beds and enhanced with seating opportunities. The development team is open to working out a solution for public art at this intersection. Active Uses and Building Transparency With effectively three front yards on Site B, the pedestrian scale design and site programming ensures articulation and interest on all sides, rounding out the 360-degree architecture of the building design. Active uses line the public street frontages with multiple retail spaces lining Blake Road and anchoring the southeast building corner. Shared building amenity spaces for residents will front Excelsior Boulevard with the primary residential entrance at the intersection of Excelsior and the new north-south internal road. Building accent lighting will enhance the building architecture throughout the site. The elevations along Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard will meet or exceed the city ordinance minimum requirement of 60% transparency for front street-facing façades (between 2 ft and 8 ft). Where 60% transparency is not provided along the western elevation facing the private internal road, windows are provided into the parking garage and the wall is comprised primarily of brick. The wall acts as a backdrop for the public linear park and will be planted with trees and vines that will provide another layer of visual interest for passersby that varies with the seasons. The western façade will incorporate recessed detailing along with the glass, accounting for a total of 50% of the elevation (30% glazing and 20% recessed brick) The western drive is a private road created by the development team, so it is unclear if a deviation should be required for this frontage, as this isn't a city street. The north elevation will receive a similar treatment to the West with the addition of wrapping the retail detailing around the corner. Then elevating the visual interest and aesthetic with a balanced mix of glazing, brick accents and illuminated façade. There is no glazing or transparency requirement as it does not face the street or a public right-of-way, but ±20% tinted/opaque glazing is provided in addition to ±22% façade detailing with a recessed brick accent. Blake Road Station -- pg 6 Site Access Improvements The master plan for the new development aligns directly with goals from Station Area Planning documents. A new network of publicly accessible streets divides the site into pedestrian-scaled, walkable quadrants and connect the surrounding context to the SWLRT station. The new north-south street becomes the crucial spine from which stems primary building entries, active uses, and a public linear park. The east-west street further breaks down an otherwise super block, improving circulation and creating a tree-lined street with parallel parking and walk-up townhome units. As described under the ‘Streetscape and Public Realm’ section, the project vision includes extensive pedestrian improvements for the area, including sidewalk connections through the site that do not exist today. Both the trees and parallel parking zones will help to create visible friction that will successfully reduce driving speeds to provide a safer environment for people, bikers, and drivers. The pedestrian zone along Excelsior Boulevard (ranges from 28’ to 34 ft) and Blake Road (ranges from 17’-6” to 34 ft) expands to a width that supports public street amenities including benches, bike racks, street lighting and planting beds. The deviations for building setbacks are a result of the unique property configurations at this site, and the proposed setbacks provide comfortable buffer zones between street right-of-way and the building edges. The proposed setbacks offer a balance of enough distance to create green zones without compromising the more urban goals of transit-oriented development. This balance of ample though not excessive setbacks prioritizes pedestrians and human activity in and around the site. Along the northern edge of the site, a sidewalk is proposed within the rear yard. While this is not along a frontage road and therefore not required, Trilogy believes this added pedestrian pathway through the site will be a great amenity for the adjacent community. Providing this east-west connection will allow those walking along Blake Road or coming from the LRT station to access the interior of the site and the pocket park without having to walk up to Excelsior Blvd to do so. The sidewalk will be well lit with building mounted and bollard lighting. Native plantings will line the majority of the pathway, and decorative screening and a wood fence will provide visual interest along the way. Exceeding Stormwater Standards The applicant is exceeding the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and City of Hopkins’ minimum standards for stormwater treatment. Runoff from this Site will be conveyed to the future 325 Blake Road regional stormwater treatment facilities via the Powell Road diversion. However, the new landscape areas, underground pipe retention systems and Jellyfish treatment structures proposed on- site will not only provide rate control but will treat the first 2-inches of rainfall from the impervious area. This is a substantial improvement from the site condition today as the site is primarily impervious surface and stormwater runs off without any treatment or attenuation. In summary, the new landscaping will help with stormwater abstraction and the underground treatment system will retain and treat stormwater in excess of MCWD and City standards. The proposed on-site stormwater management system exceeds MCWD/City standards by providing filtration treatment above the required 2” rainfall event. The detention systems (BMP 2A and BMP 2C) have the volume capacity to treat up to a 2.55” rainfall event. The proposed Jellyfish Filter systems (BMP 2B and BMP 2D) have the capacity to treat a flow rate of 1.30 CFS and 0.85 CFS, respectively. The corresponding modelled flow rates are 1.24 CFS and 0.72 CFS, which are within the filtration system treatment capacities. MCWD also requires 70% TSS removal, whereas BMPs 2B and 2D have an 80% removal efficiency. With 88% of Site capture, the filtration system provides 71% TSS removal. Blake Road Station -- pg 7 MCWD requires proposed runoff rates to be equal to or less than the existing condition. Total proposed site runoff rates are reduced by approximately 26-66% from the existing condition, depending on the rainfall event. The majority of the new/reconstructed site area will be dedicated to roof drainage, which is assumed cleaner than pavement runoff. This will further reduce pollutant loadings discharged from the site. The landscaped area within the study area is almost doubled from the existing conditions as well. Due to contaminated groundwater conditions, this additional landscape area has not been included in the model for viable infiltration to be conservative, but the new landscape areas will certainly provide additional volume reduction in reality. Enhanced Landscaping The deviations in setbacks offer yards that are both deep enough for landscaping and green space and reasonable for creating a "street wall" for the pedestrian experience. The deviations also help to implement a comprehensive plan goal of creating a ‘positive relationship to the street’ by proposing appropriate setbacks for the residential density guided by the 2040 Comprehensive Plan (75-150 units per acre within ¼ mile of an LRT station platform). As previously mentioned under ‘Streetscape and Public Realm,’ the master plan includes generous planted zones (6 ft to 12 ft wide) and a rhythm of deciduous street trees that will provide a human-scale canopy year-round. The trees’ summer shade reduces the heat island effect, creating a comfortable microclimate when needed most. A linear public park is proposed on the western edge of Building B. The pocket park offers opportunities for a quick hangout spot or a chance for larger community gatherings to occur. A central plaza space of crushed stone, column lights, artful concrete ‘asterisk’ blocks and moveable café tables/chairs provide flexible seating arrangements. A mini stage for small performances is proposed along with some nature play balance sculptural elements. Additional gabion wall seating is provided along the edges. A spot for a food truck offers potential food options. Native landscape plantings and trees contributes to a more natural backdrop. The streetscape will be greatly improved with new planning beds along Excelsior and Blake Road. Raised curb planting beds will be similar to Phase A and provide a visual continuity along Excelsior. New trees and plantings will help extend the existing Blake Road streetscape. Building edges are enhanced by green and planted yards with an array of site-appropriate species. This variety adds a visually interesting green environment and is a significant improvement from existing conditions today. Calculating the minimum landscape value based on the current project budget for Site B and per the City’s landscape code requirements (section 102-375 Landscaping), the minimum landscape value is approximately$103,000, with at least 25% allocated to pedestrian improvements. The estimated Landscape and Pedestrian/Streetscapes value for Site B will exceed the minimum landscape value requirement. We estimate that Site B will provide the following: - Trees: $33,000 - Shrubs: $25,000 - Grasses: $12,000 Blake Road Station -- pg 8 - Sod: $6,000 - Planting Soil: $25,000 - Edger/Mulch: $22,000 - Irrigation: $40,000 - Fencing/screening: $25,000 Excelsior & Blake Boulevards - Curb islands: $32,000 - Pavers: $26,000 - Site Furniture: $15,000 - Lighting: $25,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED LANDSCAPE VALUE PROVIDED $286,000 Specifics for Site B’s landscaping plan and plant species can be found within the application materials. Proposed Pet Exercise Area (Dog Park) & Relief Areas The importance of providing a formal exercise area for pets, specifically dogs, has been acknowledged by including a dog park along the west side of the future Site C building. The dog park will be fenced and includes small-scale lighting, seating and receptacles for proper disposal of animal waste. A dog relief area will be provided for use by residents along the west side of Building B. Bike Amenities With immediate access to the Cedar Lake Trail, ample bike amenities will promote the use of multiple modes of transportation for residents and patrons to the site. The city standard for bike parking is one long term stall per 2 units and one short term per 20 units (138 total bike racks). Building B will accommodate over 150 bike racks for resident storage within the building. The Mixed Use district bicycle parking requirements are 0.5 long-term spaces per employee and 0.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of net building area or 5 spaces. Public bike racks (20 capacity) are located within the right-of-way adjacent to the primary Building B entrance as well as adjacent to the retail uses along Blake Road. A bike wash area with automatic shut off timer will be available in the P1 parking level. The development team is open to providing space on site to accommodate city micro mobility solutions in the future. Sustainable Design The project is enrolled in the Xcel Energy Design Assist (EDA) program to evaluate and prioritize strategies in order to maximize energy efficiency. See separate attachment for a comprehensive summary of the energy saving and sustainable design features of the project. Support of Comprehensive Plan Goals The project supports and further advances a number of goals outlined in the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan and draft 2040 Cultivate Hopkins Plan. See summary of these goals below within the PUD statement section. Blake Road Station -- pg 9 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STATEMENT Per Hopkins, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances, Part III – Land Development, Chapter 102 – Planning and Zoning, Article XX. – Planned Unit Development, Sec. 102-680, (e), (6), the applicant is responding to the following:  A written statement generally describing the proposed PUD and the market which it is intended to serve and its demand showing its relationship to the city’s comprehensive plan and how the proposed PUD is to be designed, arranged and operated in order to permit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable regulations of the city. Market The proposed Planned Unit Development is intended to serve the growing population of Hopkins and provide dwelling units within one quarter of a mile of the future Blake Road Southwest LRT Station. It is anticipated with the proposed future LRT station that this site will be a regional draw for apartment- dwellers. Trilogy will deliver an incredibly important development node along Blake Road, as envisioned in numerous planning documents, including the East Hopkins Land Use & Market Study, Blake Road Corridor Study and the Blake Road LRT Station Area Development Guidelines. This project will be an anchor for the LRT station and act as a catalyst for future development in the area. Many of the development recommendations outlined in the station area development guidelines are being realized within the proposed project. Here are just a few of the stated goals that will be supported by the project’s site and building design: Site Design:  Create a connected, walkable, mixed-use, sustainable neighborhood, with a pedestrian-oriented and human-scale streetscape  Improve safety and security with strategies such as greater security presence, improved lighting, and other practices such as CPTED (Community Policing Through Environmental Design)  Pursue transit-oriented design that enhances multi-modal access, and provide for bicycle accommodations (racks, lockers, etc.) for businesses and residents.  Add green space to soften the built environment that would allow for outdoor use year-round.  Utilize landscaping and streetscape amenities to create stronger pedestrian district.  Limit surface parking with new development encourage underground or structured parking Neighborhood Diversity:  Provide for a range of housing types and price points to meet the needs of people in all stages of life, with the design flexibility to accommodate changing lifestyle needs  Utilize universal design principles that can respond to changing demographic needs and anticipate in innovative ways to address the dynamic and changing needs of residents  Strengthen the vitality of the area through increased density and mixed commercial and residential uses  Promote high-quality design  Enhance a sustainable neighborhood by promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy  Create opportunities to live, work, learn, play – the spectrum of elements for a healthy community Sustainable Design: Blake Road Station -- pg 10  Improve water and environmental quality  Incorporate sustainable development practices into new construction projects Neighborhood vitality and livability:  Multi-family housing amenities such as guest suites, work-from-home opportunities, and shared space for larger gatherings  Medium to high density residential, to preserve green space and enhance street-level amenities  Locally owned businesses and increased opportunities for residents of all ages to live and work in the area  The potential for commercial uses that enhance rather than compete with downtown Hopkins Mainstreet vitality  Creative ways to support small cultural businesses that serve the community  Convenience services (e.g. pet maintenance areas, bike repair, etc.), especially near the transit station  Flexible space that can adapt as needs change  Welcome developers and businesses that operate with equity principles of hiring and wages Comprehensive Plan The 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update – Cultivate Hopkins – guides this property as Activity Center. Activity Centers surround and support the planned Blake Road and Shady Oak light rail stations along the Southwest LRT Green Line Extension. These areas will include moderate density to high-density mixed-use development designed to complement and enhance the existing development pattern in these areas and support the public investment in transit. The Activity Center areas are expected to experience significant reinvestment and redevelopment to absorb a substantial portion of the city’s anticipated future growth. Development in the Activity Center areas is expected to be medium to larger scale neighborhood and regional uses with an approximate mix of 75% residential and 25% commercial. Densities in these areas will typically range from 20-60 units per acre, with 75-150 units per acre within ¼ mile of an LRT station platform. The proposed project illustrates a residential density that is consistent with the Activity Center guidance, but it falls short of the 2040 guidance for commercial space percentage. Site A will provide 2,000 sq ft of retail space along Excelsior Boulevard and Site B will provide 10,000 sq ft of retail space fronting Blake Road. Trilogy is responding to current market conditions that are more immediate than a comprehensive plan’s land use guidance. The Retail Component Evaluation performed concluded that retail in this development is high-risk. The applicant is attempting to work with the City of Hopkins to address the retail desire, but also needs to be vigilant and not over supply the site. There are negative ramifications to continually vacant retail space. The applicant believes strongly that multi-family residential is highest and best use for this location. The constraints of the site are prohibitive to adding traditional retail space to the development. The Applicant is responding to the 2040 comprehensive plan with an overall development project that supports the following stated goals:  Encourage transit-oriented development (development that emphasizes pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and a broader mix of uses at densities that support transit) in areas with high quality transit service, especially within a quarter mile of light rail stations or high-frequency bus Blake Road Station -- pg 11 routes.  Plan for appropriate amenities, high-quality design, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and open space in high growth areas, particularly in the Neighborhood Center, Activity Center, and Downtown Center future land use categories or other areas in close proximity to transit.  Encourage the transition of selected auto-oriented areas into Activity Centers, as defined and designated in the comprehensive plan.  Improve pedestrian and bicycle access throughout the community, particularly in the Centers future land use categories as defined and designated in the comprehensive plan or other areas in close proximity to transit.  Engage the community to explore how to increase the mix of housing types near transit corridors, parks, and the Centers future land use categories as defined and designated in the comprehensive plan.  Encourage all new projects to have a positive relationship to the street by orienting main entrances to the front of the property, connecting the front door to the sidewalk, and reducing parking between the building and the street as much as possible. Designed, Arranged, Operated This project will not impede improvement of surrounding properties, and the PUD is designed and arranged to permit the orderly development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable regulations of the City. The organization of the parcels within this development is specifically intended to create a walkable, transit-oriented community. The height and associated density of the project will provide housing to help meet City goals for increasing housing options in Hopkins along transit corridors. The proposed residential and retail uses are compatible with and will enhance the existing character of the area. High-density, mixed-use redevelopment of this site is consistent with City goals and, by being responsive to the land use policies for this area, the project will promote the orderly development of the Blake Road Corridor. The contemporary, high-quality building design will be an attractive addition to this important intersection at Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard, and the mix of uses will improve and activate the pedestrian realm. The proposed development will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort or general welfare, and approving the PUD will allow a transit-oriented, mixed-use development that is consistent with the goals of City’s comprehensive plan. Infill development on the underutilized site will have a positive effect on the health, safety and vitality of the area. The new construction will comply with all building and site development codes. Neighborhood Meeting 03/08/22 Minutes – Blake Rd, Page 1 of 2 Project: Blake Road Station Development RE: Neighborhood Meeting (March 8, 2022, 6:00-7:30 pm) Attendees: (see attached Sign-In Sheet for attendees that signed in; approximately 13 people attended) Development Team Attendees: Josh Peters, Tim Biere, Nicole Midtdahl, Chad Olmschenk – Trilogy Real Estate Group Gretchen Camp, Jeff Hemer, Brent Holdman, Logan Brandes – ESG Jesse Symynkywicz – Damon Farber Overall themes/topics from attendees: · Affordable housing · Inquiries from current and prospective tenants about retail space · Project timeline · Pedestrian connections and improvements Questions/comments from discussions: 1. Is there affordable housing within the development? If getting public subsidy, then should really provide affordable housing on the site. Currently, no affordable units are proposed for Site A, B or C. Trilogy will continue to review feasibility for adding affordable units to Site C, but this will require assistance from City/State sources. 2. Will there by minority or women-owned sub-contractors constructing the project? There is currently no requirement for MBE or WBE sub-contractors. Trilogy will inquire with the general contractor, Kraus-Anderson, on tracking MBE/WBE participation on the project. 3. Concerns about height; too many units on the site. Worried about neighborhood turning into a multi-family housing area. 4. Previous rent was much lower than what will be charged for the new spaces. 5. What is the project timeline? Site A has started construction. Site B will break ground in late summer/early fall 2022. Site C is several years out due to existing leases. 6. Add Somali people to the project renderings – make them feel welcome. 7. The Alliance can be a resource – equity scorecard for the project. 8. How wide are sidewalks through the site? See landscape sections for details. Excited about the project and want to make sure internal roads are safe and people aren’t speeding through the site. Can the crosswalks be raised? Looking forward to seeing these improvements for pedestrians. Neighborhood Meeting 03/08/22 Minutes – Blake Rd, Page 2 of 2 9. When did the mailings get sent out? February 22 10. Work to incorporate affordability for Site C. Commit to engaging community for Site C. 11. Request to provide a 5,000 sq ft retail space (make one part of retail larger). 12. Blake Grocery tenants – interested in moving back into one of the retail spaces. 13. Retail tenants – provide right of first refusal to existing tenants. From:Eric Anondson To:Jason Lindahl Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: Comments regarding site B Date:Friday, March 18, 2022 7:12:27 PM Here is the sketch! > On Mar 18, 2022, at 7:11 PM, Eric Anondson <xeoth@icloud.com> wrote: > > Hello Jason and city council, > > I attended the public meeting at 43 Hoops and left comments there regarding thoughts about the sidewalk and public realm surrounding the proposed site B. Having now had a chance to view the landscaping proposals with the advantage of being able to zoom in on my screen, I have a couple more comments to add. > > I believe the landscaping at the corner of Blake and Excelsior is undesirably close. While it may fit within what is allowed, I believe the landscape plantings at the corner are going to crowd the corner, making crossing and mixing of users less pleasant and possibly increase some danger. With the current landscaping, there is a curved space which adds additional room for people on bikes to maneuver to cross and maneuver around other users. > > The proposed geometry will have bikes crossing north across Excelsior or crossing west across Blake to meet at a “T” and clumsily navigate hard angles. I recommend backing off the landscaping from the corner, leaving space for sidewalk users to move around each other. > > Secondly, I strongly advocate extra measures to slow motor vehicle traffic on the new north/south “street”, beyond the minimum bar the city asks for. We can expect drivers to exit off Excelsior to get to the station in a rush. Bumpouts are not going to be enough to make drivers slow down. The street is still designed to signal to drivers that the space is for going fast. > > Two recommendations to help signal to drivers to drive at a safe speed, I would ask for solid bollards that do not detach from drivers crashing placed at the curves of the bumpouts and at each corner of a pedestrian crossing. Also, make the crossings be raised crossings. Raised crossings will also help in winter or rain storms as pedestrians will be less inconvenienced by being forced into puddles. I have attached a sketch marking where I am talking about. > > As an aside, I wish there were awnings over the sidewalk along Excelsior, shade and rain shelter is deeply wished for! > > I’m looking forward to this project, and thank you for your attention! > > > Eric Anondson > 53 Jackson Ave South LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 114' - 4" LEVEL 3 125' - 8" LEVEL 4 137' - 4" LEVEL 5 148' - 0" LEVEL 6 158' - 8" LEVEL 7 169' - 4" LEVEL P1 89' - 6" ROOF LEVEL 180' - 0"83' - 0"15' - 5"4' - 0"24' - 5"10' - 0"10' - 11"10' - 2"9' - 0"16' - 7"9' - 0"15' - 0"8' - 0"6' - 11"16' - 0"4' - 0"24' - 10"10' - 4"10' - 11" NOT INCLUDED IN MATERIAL CALCUATIONS COURTYARD ELEVATION BEYOND 4' - 0"5' - 2"11' - 1"10' - 0"21' - 0"11' - 0"6' - 6"6' - 0"7' - 0"18' - 1"10' - 0"10' - 11"24' - 1"11' - 0"10' - 0"18' - 0"17' - 0"11' - 0"10' - 0"13' - 3"24' - 0"28' - 2"7' - 4"28' - 0"13' - 4" FACE BRICK METAL PANEL METAL TILE COMPOSITE WINDOWS PREFINISHED METAL BALCONIES METAL PANEL FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING ALUMINUM WINDOWS METAL PANEL10' - 8"43' - 8"28' - 8"WALL AREA = 1,565 SF WINDOW AREA = 470 SF TRANSPARENCY = 30% STREETFRONT LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 114' - 4" LEVEL 3 125' - 8" LEVEL 4 137' - 4" LEVEL 5 148' - 0" LEVEL 6 158' - 8" LEVEL 7 169' - 4" LEVEL P1 89' - 6" ROOF LEVEL 180' - 0" 11' - 1"8' - 11"25' - 0"9' - 0"12' - 6"5' - 0"8' - 4"9' - 1"16' - 1"9' - 0"16' - 7"9' - 1"14' - 3"9' - 0"20' - 4"9' - 0"17' - 8"9' - 0"18' - 1"9' - 0"14' - 5" 23' - 1"23' - 11"18' - 1"5' - 7"18' - 1"14' - 0"11' - 8"23' - 4"24' - 1"18' - 0"27' - 0"7' - 4"22' - 0"3' - 0"22' - 3" Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/18/2022 4:00:40 PMA3-3 WEST AND NORTH BUILDING ELEVATIONS 221561.00 LB ESG 02/06/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN Schematic Design 3/17/22 3/32" = 1'-0"A3-3 1 WEST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A3-3 2 NORTH ELEVATION No. Description D ate TRANSFORMER SCREEN METAL PANEL AND WINDOWS EXTENDED TO BLDG EDGE GARAGE WINDOWS MODIFIED TO BE MORE LIKE RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS BY MATCHING HEIGHT, ADDING METAL LINTEL AND HORIZONTAL MULLION HORIZONTAL MULLION ADDED AT FIRST FLOOR GARAGE WINDOWS TO ALIGN WITH RETAIL WINDOW DESIGN LAND USE REVISIONS 3/24/2022 KNOCK-OUT PANEL FOR POTENTIAL NORTHERN GARAGE ENTRANCE DECORATIVE METAL TRELLIS RECESSED FACE BRICK DECORATIVE METAL TRELLIS RECESSED FACE BRICK GARAGE WINDOWS MODIFIED TO BE MORE LIKE RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS BY MATCHING HEIGHT, ADDING METAL LINTEL AND HORIZONTAL MULLION HORIZONTAL MULLION ADDED AT FIRST FLOOR GARAGE WINDOWS Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/17/2022 11:48:24 AMT1-1 TITLE SHEET 221561.00 Author Checker 02/18/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 2/18/2022 PROJECT TEAMPROJECT LOCATION DRAWING INDEX Blake Station Site B Hopkins, MN 8490 Excelsior Boulevard Vicinity Site Location DRAWING INDEX DRAWING NUMBER DRAWING NAME LUA 2/18/2022GENERAL INFORMATION T1-1 TITLE SHEET ● T1-2 CONTEXT MAP & IMAGES ● T1-3 MASTER PLAN ● CIVIL C200 DEMOLITION PLAN ● C300 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN – PHASE 1 ● C301 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN – PHASE 2 ● C401 SITE PLAN – SITE B ● C501 GRADING PLAN – SITE B ● C503 STORM SEWER PLAN – SITE B ● C601 UTILTIY PLAN – SITE B ● V100 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY ● LANDSCAPE L010 GENERAL NOTES ● L011 REFERENCE NOTES & PLANTING SCHEDULES ● L100 OVERALL SITE PLAN ● L111 SITE PLAN BUILDING B ● L140 LANDSCAPE PLAN - BUILDING B ● L400 LANDSCAPE SECTIONS ● L500 LANDSCAPE DETAILS ● ARCHITECTURAL A1-0 LEVEL P1 PLAN ● A1-1 LEVEL 1 PLAN ● A1-2 LEVEL 2 PLAN ● A1-3 LEVEL 3 PLAN ● A1-4 LEVEL 4-6 PLAN ● A1-5 LEVEL 7 PLAN ● A1-6 ROOF PLAN ● A3-1 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS ● A3-2 SOUTH AND EAST BUILDING ELEVATIONS ● A3-3 WEST AND NORTH BUILDING ELEVATIONS ● A3-4 EXTERIOR MATERIALS ● A3-5 SHADOW STUDIES ● ELECTRICAL E0.1P ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC ● E0.2P ELECTRIC SITE PHOTOMETRIC DETAILS ● E0.3P ELECTRIC SITE PHOTOMETRIC DETAILS ● E0.4P ELECTRIC SITE PHOTOMETRIC DETAILS ● UNIT MIX & BUILDING DATA OWNER/DEVELOPER:Trilogy Real Estate Group, LLC 520 West Erie Street Suite 100 Chicago, IL 60654 Ph: (312) 750-0900 Ext. 125 ARCHITECT:Elness Swenson Graham Architects, Inc. 500 Washington Ave. South, Suite 1080 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Ph: 612-339-5508 Fx: 612-339-5382 CIVIL ENGINEER:Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustis Street, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55114 Ph: 651-645-4197 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:Damon Farber Landscape Architects 310 S 4th Ave, Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Ph: 612-332-7522 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Meyer Borgman Johnson 510 S Marquette Ave Unit 900 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Ph: 612-338-0713 MEP ENGINEERING:Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Road Edina, MN 55439 Ph: 952-930-0050 **UNIT MIX SUMMARY - OPTION 1) Name Qty % Area Min - Max SF 1 BED 97 39% 66,839 SF 645 SF ... 720 SF 1 BED + DEN 2 1% 1,572 SF 774 SF ... 797 SF 2 BED 80 32% 81,097 SF 904 SF ... 1,052 SF 3 BED 11 4% 14,087 SF 1,272 SF ... 1,318 SF ALCOVE 40 16% 21,656 SF 495 SF ... 597 SF STUDIO 20 8% 9,650 SF 464 SF ... 521 SF Grand total: 250 250 194,900 SF BUILDING GROSS BUILDING Level Area LEVEL P1 66,337 SF LEVEL 1 64,904 SF LEVEL 2 65,004 SF LEVEL 3 42,027 SF LEVEL 4 41,828 SF LEVEL 5 41,828 SF LEVEL 6 41,828 SF LEVEL 7 40,812 SF 404,569 SF RESIDENTIAL GROSS AREA Level Area LEVEL 2 19,615 SF LEVEL 3 38,269 SF LEVEL 4 40,842 SF LEVEL 5 40,842 SF LEVEL 6 40,842 SF LEVEL 7 38,742 SF 219,153 SF PARKING GROSS AREA Level Area LEVEL P1 62,469 SF LEVEL 1 39,478 SF LEVEL 2 42,751 SF 144,697 SF PARKING SCHEDULE - VEHICLES Description Count LEVEL P1 8 x 18 COMPACT 7 9'-0" x 16' COMPACT 3 ACCESSIBLE STALL 4 COMPACT 8 STANDARD 126 LEVEL 1 8 x 18 COMPACT 3 8'-6" x 18' STANDARD 3 9'-0" x 16' COMPACT 3 9'-0" x 18' STANDARD 1 ACCESSIBLE STALL 4 COMPACT 1 STANDARD 71 LEVEL 2 8 x 18 COMPACT 6 9'-0" x 16' COMPACT 2 ACCESSIBLE STALL 4 COMPACT 5 STANDARD 88 TOTAL STALLS:339 No. Description Date Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/16/2022 5:15:31 PMT1-2 CONTEXT MAP & IMAGES 221561.00 Author Checker 02/11/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 2/18/2022 No. Description Date Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/16/2022 5:15:32 PMT1-3 MASTER PLAN 221561.00 Author Checker 02/11/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 2/18/2022 NORTH PLAN No. Description Date 0 4020 80 MASTER PLAN SITE A SITE B SITE C EXCELSIOR BL V D BLAKE ROAD S(CO. RD. NO. 3 )(CO. RO. NO. 20)(PUBLIC)(PUBLIC)DDDD D D D 8,571 SF AMENITY 2,840 SF RETAIL 3,222 SF RETAIL 832 SF AMENITY 4,000 SF RETAIL 556 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 77 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 152 SF BOH 452 SF MECH / ELEC 304 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 21,298 SF PARKING 18,180 SF PARKING 374 SF STORAGE 143 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 776 SF BOH 370 SF BOH 568 SF BOH 217 SF BOH CIRC PROPOSED BUILDING B FFE: 915.10 TO 920.00 P1 FFE: ±909.091891891891 7 91 8 917 9 1 7 918 919 920919918917916915 91 5 91 6 9 1 7 918919919919 919 918 918 919917917918917916 917DISCHARGE LOCATION #1 EXCELSIOR AVE. STORM SEWER DISCHARGE LOCATION #2 BLAKE ROAD S. STORM SEWER B B C C B D D D D D D DD D C D D B C C A C Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7/17/2020160573033 BPG BLAKE ROAD STATION - SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN 2/18/2022 No. Description Date 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM XX/XX/XXXX WDM LUA SUBMITTAL 12/14/2021 WILLIAM D. MATZEK 42661 NORTH EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES 1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 4. WITHIN TWO WEEKS (14 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS. 5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 8. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS AS NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. 10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER, PARKING, LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL AND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC., IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES IN LOCATION AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DENUDED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE. 2. INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, UNDERGROUND SYSTEM, CURBS AND GUTTERS. 3. INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION AT ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES AS EACH INLET STRUCTURE IS INSTALLED. 4. PERMANENTLY STABILIZE AREAS TO BE VEGETATED AS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE. 5. PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING. 6. PAVE SITE AND INSTALL STRIPING. 7. INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES FOR PAVED AREAS AS WORK PROGRESSES. 8. COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALLATION OF PERMANENT STABILIZATION OVER ALL AREAS. 9. OBTAIN CONCURRENCE WITH THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT THAT THE SITE HAS BEEN FULLY STABILIZED THEN: 1. REMOVE ALL REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION ADN SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES 2. STABILIZE ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL OF BMPS. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: ROCK ENTRANCE INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SAFETY FENCE BIOROLL LEGEND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET KEYNOTE LEGEND CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, OFFSET FOR CLARITY BIROLL INLET PROTECTION BIOLOG A B C D E BMP QUANTITIES BMP UNIT QUANTITY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA.1 BIROLL LF 1,275 INLET PROTECTION EA.12 C301 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2C301 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 EXCELSIOR BL V D BLAKE ROAD S(CO. RD. NO. 3 )(CO. RO. NO. 20)(PUBLIC)(PUBLIC)W C A R PROPOSED BUILDING B FFE: 919.25 TO 920.0 P1 FFE: ±909.0 8,571 SF AMENITY 2,840 SF RETAIL 3,222 SF RETAIL 832 SF AMENITY 4,000 SF RETAIL 556 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 77 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 152 SF BOH 452 SF MECH / ELEC 304 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 21,298 SF PARKING 18,180 SF PARKING 374 SF STORAGE 143 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 776 SF BOH 370 SF BOH 568 SF BOH 217 SF BOH CIRC PROPOSED BUILDING B FFE: 915.10 TO 920.00 P1 FFE: ±909.0 G G A R R C E F H J J J J J J L1 L1 L1 L2 Q T T F T L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 B B B D T AA AA 6.0'6.0'24.0' 16.0' 7.7' 12.3' (TYP.) 6.0'4.0'6.0'10.0' 6.0'6.0' 6.0'6.0'6.4'5.0' 7.5' 5.0'3.5' 10.0'5.0'3.2'15.4'5.0'J J Z 11.4'6.0' 10.1'6.0' 11.0'6.0' L2 J L1 PROPOSED 6' LANDSCAPED BOULEVARD AND 10' MIN. TRAIL/SIDEWALK ALONG BLAKE ROAD S. L1 L2 11.6' 19.0' 6.0' 24.0' BB VARIABLE HEIGHT CURB FROM SIDEWALK TO PROPERTY LINE - SEE SHEET C501 FOR GRADING DETAILS 8.0' 18.0' L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 FUTURE DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO PARKING GARAGE 5.0'10.0'CC DD DD EE EE L1 L2 I S S I I I I BB F F Y Y H D D D D RECESSED RETAIL ENTRY RECESSED AMENITY ENTRY RECESSED PARKING ENTRY RECESSED RETAIL ENTRY RETAIL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY PARKING ENTRY PARKING ENTRY PROPOSED POCKET PARK, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS M N O K K DD W P Y Y Y EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE RETAINING WALL PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT LEGEND PROPOSED LANDSCAPING, SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7/17/2020160573033 BPG BLAKE ROAD STATION - SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN 2/18/2022 No. Description Date 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM XX/XX/XXXX WDM LUA SUBMITTAL 12/14/2021 WILLIAM D. MATZEK 42661 SITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY SAMBATEK, DATED 02/12/2020. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 8. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 9. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 10. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 11. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. NORTH PROPERTY SUMMARY BLAKE & EXCELSIOR - SITE B TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 7.39 AC RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 0.00 AC BUILDING A PARCEL 1.62 AC BUILDING B PARCEL 2.27 AC BUILDING C PARCEL (FUTURE)3.50 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (BUILDING B PARCEL)85,393 SF (1.96 AC) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (BUILDING B PARCEL)8,939 SF (0.21 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA (INCLUDES OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS) 98,331 SF (2.26 AC) ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING B-3 GENERAL BUSINESS PROPOSED ZONING PUD C401SITE PLAN - SITE B PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK KEYNOTE LEGEND B612 CURB AND GUTTER STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROPOSED STOOP/STAIRS/RISERS, REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP PROPOSED GARAGE DOOR, REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS PROPOSED BENCH/SITE FURNITURE, REFERENCE GRADING PLAN FOR ELEVATIONS AND LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR DETAILS PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PAD, UTILITY SCREEN/ENCLOSURES, REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS PROPOSED PLANTER BED, REFERENCE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS PROPOSED STREET LIGHT, REFERENCE LIGHTING PLANS FOR DETAILS PROPOSED SIDEWALK RELOCATED TRAFFIC SIGN, SEE DEMO PLAN FOR EXISTING LOCATIONS PROPOSED LANDCAPE AREA, REFERENCE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS PROPOSED HARDSCAPE AREA, REFERENCE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS PET RELIEF AREA, SEE ARCH PLANS RAISED STAGE FEATURE, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGN TO REMAIN PROPOSED FENCE EXHAUST WELL, SEE ARCH PLANS SAWCUT LINE/MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SALVAGED AND RELOCATED STREET LIGHT - CONTRACTOR TO SALVAGE AND PROVIDE LIGHT POLES TO CITY FOR STORAGE, CONSTRUCT LIGHT POLE BASES AND PROVIDE CONDUIT WIRING, REINSTALL LIGHT POLES PROPOSED RETAINING WALL, REFERENCE GRADING PLAN FOR ELEVATION DETAILS AND LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR WALL TYPE FIRE LANE SIGN, SEE DETAIL NOT USED CONCRETE PAVEMENT DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE SALVAGE AND RELOCATE EXISTING BENCH PROPOSED BIKE RACKS, REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS B624 CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED BOLLARD PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGNAGE, REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SURMOUNTABLE B612 CURB TRANSITION CURB CRUSHED STONE LANDSCAPED AREA, REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR DETAILS A B C D E F G H I J K L1 L2 M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA BB CC DD EE PROPOSED HARDSCAPE, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS PROPOSED CRUSHED STONE LANDSCAPING, SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN EXCELSIOR BL V D BLAKE ROAD S(CO. RD. NO. 3 )(CO. RO. NO. 20)(PUBLIC)(PUBLIC)DDD PROPOSED BUILDING B FFE: 919.25 TO 920.0 P1 FFE: ±909.0 8,571 SF AMENITY 2,840 SF RETAIL 3,222 SF RETAIL 832 SF AMENITY 4,000 SF RETAIL 556 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 77 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 152 SF BOH 452 SF MECH / ELEC 304 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 21,298 SF PARKING 18,180 SF PARKING 374 SF STORAGE 143 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 776 SF BOH 370 SF BOH 568 SF BOH 217 SF BOH CIRC PROPOSED BUILDING B FFE: 915.10 TO 920.00 P1 FFE: ±909.0 917916915 916 917 918 915 91 7 91791891891792092091991 9 919 9199 1 9 91 6 916 9 1 5 915914 920 9199 1 8 91791 6 9 1 5 91 6 917 918918 919916918919917918919917 919 918 918918918 918917 917 918 918918 9199179 1 7918 918 917918917916 916919918917916917 918 919 920 921922 917917 918 919919 918 9 1 9919919918917916 9199 1 8919 916 917 918 919 919 919919920917918919916FFE:917.25 FFE:919.25 FFE:919.25 FFE:919.25 FFE:919.25 FFE:917.90 FFE:916.50 FFE:916.50 FFE:915.50 FFE:920.00 FFE:920.00 T/G:915.85 T/G:915.84 916.30 916.31 T/G:916.09 916.58 916.65 T/G:916.16 T/G:916.81 T:916.72 G:916.27 T/G:917.27 T:917.21 G:916.71 G:916.76 T:917.26 T:916.67 917.52 916.88 916.98 919.00 917.14 916.93 916.77 916.67 916.74 916.40 916.89 916.98 T:916.43 G:915.93 T:916.50 917.00 ME:917.46 ME:917.17 ME/T:917.02 ME/G:916.52 916.63 ME:914.85 ME:915.04 ME:916.26 ME:917.58 ME:917.90 FFE:918.00 ME:916.47 T:916.47 G:915.97 T:917.60 G:917.10 ME:917.70 ME:918.44 ME:919.00 ME:919.02 ME:914.52 ME:914.59 ME/G:918.94 ME:915.40 918.00 916.00 915.00915.00 915.00 919.29 919.19 TW:919.25 BW:918.30 ME:918.24 919.33 918.05 918.52 918.47 917.52 919.25 918.01917.72 917.63 918.23 918.37 918.99 918.93 919.08 916.66 917.88 FFE:916.50 3.84%1.50% 5.74% 5.20% 23.81% 5.37% 7.70%2.23% 1.71% 8.10% 1.57% 1.51% 1.34 %1.94%1.61%1.93%1.50%1.76%1.41%1.95%2.84%4.05%3.89%1.94%4.71%6.51%3.67%1.38%6.97% 3.61% 2. 4 4% 1.96% 1.53% FFE:915.00 917.35917.21 916.94 G:916.17 920.00 919.92 ME:919.38 ME:919.49 4.73%1.81% 3.35% 5.9 6 %7.90%917.03 1.58%1.53%1.65% 917917 919 T:919.83 919.85 T:919.17 ME/G:917.94 T:919.18 T:918.40 ME/G:917.87 ME/T/G:917.61 917.07916.96 917.10 916.85 G:916.34 919.00 919.00 916.93916.70 2.50% 2.53% 918.76 918.82 3.12%3.35% 919.17 919.17 919.25 1.50% THREE - 6" RISERS THREE - 6" RISERS UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER SYSTEM, SEE SHEET C503 FOR DETAILS UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER SYSTEM, SEE SHEET C503 FOR DETAILS 91 5 91 6 9 1 7 918918 91 9 919915 916 917 918919917918919 ME:917.36 ME:917.52 ME:917.62 ME:917.46 917.90 917.90 917.73 917.73 916.50 ME:916.26 916.50 916.50 ME:916.23 ME:916.09916.50 915.50 915.50 ME:915.24 ME:915.39 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% ME:918.03 2.46%2.00% 916.34 916.35 916.35 916.35 2.02% 1.76% 1.50% 3.85% 4.14%3.17%915.43 915.33 0.77%1.32%2.05%2.01 % 914.88 ME:914.75 4.10%914.92 914.92 914.72 914.66 ME T/G:919.13 914.85 915.00 915.00 ME:914.67 ME:918.64 ME:918.85 ME:918.84 ME:918.78 Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7/17/2020160573033 BPG BLAKE ROAD STATION - SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN 2/18/2022 No. Description Date 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM XX/XX/XXXX WDM LUA SUBMITTAL 12/14/2021 WILLIAM D. MATZEK 42661 GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF HOPKINS, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL. 14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D NORTH C501GRADING PLAN - SITE B PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTRUBANCE 8,571 SF AMENITY 2,840 SF RETAIL 3,222 SF RETAIL 832 SF AMENITY 4,000 SF RETAIL 556 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 77 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 152 SF BOH 452 SF MECH / ELEC 304 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 21,298 SF PARKING 18,180 SF PARKING 374 SF STORAGE 143 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 776 SF BOH 370 SF BOH 568 SF BOH 217 SF BOH CIRC PROPOSED BUILDING B FFE: 915.10 TO 920.00 P1 FFE: ±909.0 EXCELSIOR BL V D BLAKE ROAD S(CO. RD. NO. 3 )(CO. RO. NO. 20)(PUBLIC)(PUBLIC)DDDD D D D D D D D BMP 2A ± 400 LF - 60" CMP OR APPROVED EQUAL PIPE STORAGE: ± 10,106 CF PIPE IE: 910.18' T/PIPE: 915.18 2.00" DISCHARGE RATE: 1.24 CFS 100-YR HWL: 914.91' BMP 2C ± 100 LF - 48" CMP OR APPROVED EQUAL PIPE STORAGE: ± 4,574 CF PIPE IE: 912.34' 2.00" DISCHARGE RATE: 0.72 CFS 100-YR HWL: 916.04' BMP 2B 8' DIA. JELLYFISH TREATMENT MH OR APPROVED EQUAL 40" DEPTH CARTRIDGE RE: 915.81 IE (E) 910.18 IE (W): 910.06 TREATMENT CAPACITY: 1.30 CFS TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA: 1.40 AC BMP 2D 6' DIA. JELLYFISH TREATMENT MH OR APPROVED EQUAL 40" DEPTH CARTRIDGE RE: 918.42 IE (E) 912.23 IE (W): 912.34 TREATMENT CAPACITY: 0.85 CFS TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA: 0.80 AC OCS-02 STMH 48" DIA. RE:918.39 IE:912.34 W IE:912.34 S T/WEIR: 915.50 CONNECT TO EX. STMH-105 STMH 48" DIA. RE:915.71 IE:910.02 N IE:910.02 S OCS-01 STMH 48" DIA. RE:915.08 IE:910.18 E IE:910.18 S T/WEIR: 912.50 25 LF - 24" STORM PIPE @ 0.00% 10 LF - 12" STORM PIPE @ 0.00% 8 LF - 12" STORM PIPE @ 0.50% 8 LF - 24" STORM PIPE @ 0.00% 11 LF - 12" STORM PIPE @ 0.00% 7 LF - 12" STORM PIPE @ 0.50% BMP 1A ± 600 LF - 60" CMP OR APPROVED EQUAL PIPE STORAGE: ±11,500 CF PIPE IE: 909.50 2.00" DISCHARGE RATE: 2.79 CFS 100-YR HWL: 915.14 BMP 1B 8 X 8' JELLYFISH TREATMENT VAULT OR APPROVED EQUAL 54" DEPTH CARTRIDGE RE: 917.30 IE (W) 909.46 IE (E): 909.34 TREATMENT CAPACITY: 2.94 CFS TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA: 1.95 AC 13 LF - 10" PVC @ 2.00% RD-3 ROOF DRAIN IE:914.45 W ST-3 CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND SW SYSTEM (INLET) IE:914.18 E RD-2 ROOF DRAIN IE:914.45 W ST-2 CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND SW SYSTEM (INLET) IE:914.18 E 13 LF - 10" PVC @ 2.00% RD-1 ROOF DRAIN IE:914.45 W 13 LF - 10" PVC @ 2.00% ST-1 CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND SW SYSTEM (INLET) IE:914.18 E ST-4 CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND SW SYSTEM (INLET) IE:915.34 N 14 LF - 10" PVC @ 2.00% RD-4 ROOF DRAIN IE:915.63 S 13 LF - 10" PVC @ 2.00% ST-5 CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND SW SYSTEM (INLET) IE:915.34 W RD-5 ROOF DRAIN IE:915.60 E D CONNECT TO EXISTING CURB INLET RE:2.95 IE:912.19 W 919 9199 1 9 9189 1 7 916 91 5 917 916 920918 919918918916918 917918 919 ST-7 UNDERGROUND STORM SYSTEM OUTLET IE:910.18 W ST-9 UNDERGROUND STORM SYSTEM OUTLET IE:912.34 E91891891791791 8 917917919 915 917918919919917918 Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7/17/2020160573033 BPG BLAKE ROAD STATION - SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN 2/18/2022 No. Description Date 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM XX/XX/XXXX WDM LUA SUBMITTAL 12/14/2021 WILLIAM D. MATZEK 42661 NORTH GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF HOPKINS, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL. 14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE LEGEND PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN CO PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION D PROPOSED UNDERGROUND STORMWATER PIPE DETENTION C503 STORM SEWER PLAN - SITE B STORMWATER SUMMARY - BUILDING B PARCEL BLAKE & EXCELSIOR - SITE B PROPERTY AREA (SITE B)94,332 SF (2.17 AC) PROPOSED SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA 86,096 SF (1.98 AC) TRIBUTARY AREA TO BMP 2A/B 61,131 SF (1.40 AC) TRIBUTARY AREA TO BMP 2C/D 23,557 SF (0.54 AC) DISTURBED AREA 95,876 SF (2.20 AC) RATE ATTENUATION SUMMARY 1-YEAR (CFS) 10-YEAR (CFS) 100-YEAR (CFS) BLAKE ROAD S. EXISTING 3.63 6.60 11.77 PROPOSED 1.23 4.40 7.97 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD EXISTING 3.35 5.90 10.37 PROPOSED 1.22 5.61 7.88 TOTAL EXISTING 6.98 12.49 22.15 PROPOSED 2.35 9.27 15.08 RUNOFF VOLUME SUMMARY REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME: MCWD REQUIRES A VOLUME ABSTRACTION OF 1" OVER THE IMPERVIOUS AREA (7,175 CF) OR TREATMENT OF THE FLOW RATE RESULTING FROM THE 2" EVENT OVER THE IMPERVIOUS AREA FOR FILTRATION PRACTICES. 14,350 CF PROVIDED TREATMENT VOLUME: TO DEMONSTRATE THE UNDERGROUND DETENTION AND TREATMENT VAULT HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY, THE 2" EVENT IS MODELED WITH A 2.55" RAINFALL DEPTH THAT RESULTS IN THE PROVIDED TREATMENT VOLUME. 14,680 CF WATER QUALITY SUMMARY REQUIRED TSS REMOVAL 70% SITE CAPTURE 88.33% BMP 2B/2D TSS REMOVAL RATE 80% BMP 2B DISCHARGE RATE/TREATMENT CAPACITY 1.24 CFS/1.30 CFS BMP 2D DISCHARGE RATE/TREATMENT CAPACITY 0.72 CFS/0.85 CFS PROVIDED TSS REMOVAL 70.66% (88.33% SITE CAPTURE * 80% REMOVAL) PROPOSED FINGER DRAIN - INSTALL AROUND CATCH BASINS, 4 DRAINS, SPACED AT 90°, EXTENDING 10' FROM CATCH BASIN EXCELSIOR BL V D BLAKE ROAD S(CO. RD. NO. 3 )(CO. RO. NO. 20)(PUBLIC)(PUBLIC)B DDD 8" X 6" 8" 8" X 8" D D D D D 10.0'11.0'8,571 SF AMENITY 2,840 SF RETAIL 3,222 SF RETAIL 832 SF AMENITY 4,000 SF RETAIL 556 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 77 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 152 SF BOH 452 SF MECH / ELEC 304 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 21,298 SF PARKING 18,180 SF PARKING 374 SF STORAGE 143 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 776 SF BOH 370 SF BOH 568 SF BOH 217 SF BOH CIRC PROPOSED BUILDING B FFE: 915.10 TO 920.00 P1 FFE: ±909.0 EXISTING WATER / SANITARY EASEMENT EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER SERVICE, MAINTAIN SERVICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES EXISTING POWER POLE TO REMAIN PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN C G B E E I F G I F G R150' PROPOSED HYDRANT COVERAGE F J A I I PROPOSED UNDERGROUND GAS LINE, COORD. W / UTILITY PROPOSED UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE, COORD. W / UTILITY EXISTING POWER POLES TO REMAIN CORE DRILL CONNECT TO EXISTING SSWR MH, CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY INVERT ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS REMOVE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER STUB, CONSTRUCT CLEANOUT STRUCTURE AND CONNECT TO EXISTING SERVICE LINE EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO REMAIN EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO BE SALVAGED AND RELOCATED C H H COCOSS-9 48" SSWR MH IE:904.76 SW IE:904.60 E IE:904.60 N IE:904.60 W 102 LF - 8" PVC @ 2.00% SS-8 CLEANOUT IE:906.80 S IE:906.80 NE 5 LF - 8" PVC @ 2.00%SS-7 STUB IE:906.90 N 6 LF - 8" PVC @ 2.00% SS-1 STUB IE:907.86 W SS-2 CLEANOUT IE:907.75 E IE:907.75 SW A A CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE LINE Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7/17/2020160573033 BPG BLAKE ROAD STATION - SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN 2/18/2022 No. Description Date 2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM XX/XX/XXXX WDM LUA SUBMITTAL 12/14/2021 WILLIAM D. MATZEK 42661 CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO EXISTING PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES. 2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP 6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-3034 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 3. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER ANSI 816.22 WATER LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF CEAM SPECIFICATIONS 4. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 5. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 6. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. 8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 9. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING. 10. TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. 11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. 12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES. 13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. 14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS AND/OR STATE OF MINNESOTA WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 19. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20. ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. 21. ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. 22. THE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SHALL BE DISINFECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN PLUMBING CODE RULES PER SECTION 609.9.A 23. THE PLUMBING SYSTEM SHALL BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN PLUMBING CODE RULES PER SECTIONS 609.4 AND 712.0. THIS SHALL INCLUDE THE STORM SEWER LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING AND WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BURIED WATER SUPPLY. 24. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 474, SECTION 1109. 25. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE WATERTIGHT OR BE OF FLEXIBLE COMPRESSION JOINTS LOCATED BETWEEN 12 ANDN 36 INCHES FROM MANHOLE. JOINT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE FLEXIBLE WATER STOPS, RESILIENT CONNECTORS, OR OTHER FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTION TO MANHOLES AND OTHER STRUCTURES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CEMENT MORTAR JOINTS ARE NOT APPROVED NORTH SANITARY SEWER KEYNOTE LEGEND SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. CONNECT TO BUILDING PLUMBING COORDINATE W/ MEP PLANS ADJUST EXISTING CASTING TO NEW RIM ELEVATION CONSTRUCT MANHOLE OVER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. CONNECT TO EXISTING SERVICE PIPE. FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION. CORE DRILL AND CONNECT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE. FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION A B C D SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER LEGEND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND STORMWATER PIPE DETENTION C601UTILITY PLAN - SITE B WATERMAIN KEYNOTE LEGEND PROPOSED 8" FIRE WATER SERVICE, PROVIDE BACKFLOW PREVENTER INSIDE BUILDING CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER STUB CAP EXISTING TEE TO THE EAST AFTER REMOVING EXISTING WATER SERVICE LINE CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER LINE TO MAINTAIN SERVICE EXISTING HYDRANT (SITE A) PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY, PROVIDE 6" LEAD TEE 45-DEGREE BEND GATE VALVE PROPOSED 6" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE A B C D E F G H I J ELECTRIC XCEL ENERGY 5309 W. 70TH STREET EDINA, MN 55439 TELEPHONE: (952) 380-2637 CONTACT: JACOB MOCK COMMUNICATIONS LUMEN 301 65TH STREET W RICHFIELD, MN 55423 TELEPHONE: (612) 431-3529 CONTACT: LUCAS PELUSO GAS CENTERPOINT ENERGY TELEPHONE: (612) 321-5505 CONTACT: ANTHONY LAFFRADO COMMUNICATIONS COMCAST TELEPHONE: (612) 369-1284 CONTACT: RICHARD MISKE FULL DEPTH SAWCUT PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLAN--/--/----26970Jesse SymynkywiczSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE STATIONBLDG BHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL02/18/2022No. Description DateOVERALL SITE PLANL100BIKERACKSDOUBLE-SIDEDBENCHBUS STOP PLAZACURBED PLANTING BEDS(10' - 13' WIDTH / 30"OFFSET FROM CURB)STREET LIGHTINGCONCRETE WALKWAY(10' WIDTH)MONUMENT SIGNBENCHBIKE RACKSRETAIL PATIOCITY STANDARDPAVING / STREETSCAPEBIKE RACKBIKE RACKBIKE RACKBIKE RACKSGOOD WILL SIGNBENCHDOGRELIEFAREAPLAY AREABENCHGABION WALL / BENCHESSTEEL PLANTERSWOOD DECKCRUSHEDSTONESEATINGAREANORTH0SCALE:1" = 30'30 6090STREET LIGHTINGRELOCATED CABINETAND ANTENNACURBED PLANTING BEDS(7' - 11' WIDTH / 30"OFFSET FROM CURB)CONCRETE WALKWAY(9' WIDTH)6' HT. SCREEN FENCEFOUNDATIONPLANTINGSPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEBOULEVARDPLANTINGSFOUNDATIONPLANTINGSBIKERACKSBENCH CONCRETE PAVINGCONCRETE UNIT PAVERSCRUSHED STONEWOOD DECKPLAY SURFACINGPLANTING TYPE 1PLANTING TYPE 2PLANTING TYPE 3OVERALL SITE PLAN LEGENDAREAWELL Xref .\3 Xrefs\Arch\Blake Road Station Site B.dwg 6'-0"SF-01SN-029'-6"1'-4 1/2"SF-02P-0510'-0"P-05P-05P-01P-01P-01P-01P-01EXISTING 'EXCELSIOR'LIGHT POLE(DOES NOT MOVE FROMEXISTING LOCATION)EXISTING 'EXCELSIOR'LIGHT POLE(DOES NOT MOVE FROMEXISTING LOCATION)PLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREABUS STOPSN-01PROPOSEDMONUMENTSIGNPROPOSEDGOODWILLSIGNPLANTINGAREAAREAWELLSF-02P-05P-05CB-01CB-01CB-01CB-01LT-01'BLAKE ROAD'STANDARDLIGHT POLEP-05'BLAKE ROAD'STANDARDLIGHT POLELT-01LT-0110'-0"FE-0210'-0"11'-0"6'-0"6'-0"PLANTINGAREAP-01P-015'-0"TCAREAWELL5'-0"FE-0118'-0"TCP-01P-01P-01SF-01WL-01PE-01PE-03PE-02P-04AM-01WL-01LT-0212' LIGHTS(SIMILAR TOPHASE 'A')P-01P-01P-01P-01P-01P-03DOG RELIEF AREACRUSHED STONELT-02ED-101P-03SF-07SF-04LT-03WL-02SF-05SF-05SF-05SF-07LT-03SF-03WL-01FE-026'-0"6'-0"6'-0"E X C E L S I O R A V E N U E B L A K E R O A D 14' LIGHTCOLUMNSF-06SF-06SF-06SF-06SF-06SF-06PLANTING AREA PLANTING AREA PLANTING AREA PLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAAMENITYSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYWOOD DECK/MINI STAGE126 SF TBDCURBSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELCOLOR/FINISHCONCRETE PLANTER CURB621 LF CUSTOMCONCRETE CURBINGSTANDARD CONCRETEEDGINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELSTEEL EDGING46 LF3/16" GALVANIZED STEELRYERSON3/16" GALVANIZED STEELFENCE & GUARDRAILSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYSCREEN FENCE244 LF 6` HEIGHT WOODEN FENCEUTILITY SCREEN FENCE235 LF MATCH PHASE 1 DESIGNLIGHTINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYEXCELSIOR STREET LIGHT3PEDESTRIAN LIGHT312` HEIGHTPEDESTRIAN COLUMN LIGHT614` HEIGHTPAVINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYCONCRETE PAVING14,738 SF4" CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER 6"COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE, COMPACTEDSUBGRADECONCRETE PAVING - VEHICULAR703 SF6" REINFORCED VEHICULAR RATEDCONCRETE PAVEMENT, OVER COMPACTEDAGGREGATE BASE, COMPACTED SUBGRADESTABILIZED CRUSHED STONE662 SF3" DEPTH 3/8" DECOMPOSED GRANITE,STABILIZED, OVER COMPACTED AGGREGATEBASE OVER COMPACTED SUBGRADEPLAY AREA SURFACE305 SFENGINEERED WOOD FIBER, DEPTH PER ASTMSTND. WITH SUBSURFACE DRAINGE SYSTEMCONCRETE UNIT PAVER2,690 SFTBDPLAY EQUIPMENTSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELPLAY BOULDER5BALANCE BEAM110′ 2″ X 6″ X 1′ 3″KOMPANNRO887-0601STILTS14′ 2″ X 8′ 1″ X 3′ 7″KOMPANNRO806-0601SITE FURNITURESYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELLINEAR BENCH - 8`22` X 8` LINEAR BENCHANOVAINF24L8TLINEAR BENCH - 10`22` X 10` LINEAR BENCHANOVAINF24L10TCAST CONCRETE BENCH4REINFORCED CAST STONE BENCH, 75" X 67" X17"LANDSCAPE FORMSFLOR-SMCURVED BENCH12` CURVED BENCH 16` RADIUSANOVAINF24C1690TGABION BENCH42` X 6` GABION BENCH, FILL W/ DRESSOR TRAPROCKANOVACE1872TBIKE RACK10FORMS + SURFACESTRIO BIKE RACKMOVABLE CHAIR11TBDMOVABLE TABLE6TBDSIGNAGESYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMONUMENT SIGN1TBDGOOD WILL SIGN1RELOCATED GOOD WILL SIGNWALLSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYSTEEL PLANTER WALL120 LF16" HEIGHT WEATHERING STEEL PLANTERWALL WITH BENT TOPWALLSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYAM-01CB-01ED-101FE-01FE-02LT-01LT-02LT-03P-01P-02P-03P-04P-05PE-01PE-02PE-03SF-01SF-02SF-03SF-04SF-05SF-06SF-07SF-08SN-01SN-02WL-01REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULEAMENITYSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYWOOD DECK/MINI STAGE126 SF TBDCURBSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELCOLOR/FINISHCONCRETE PLANTER CURB621 LF CUSTOMCONCRETE CURBINGSTANDARD CONCRETEEDGINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELSTEEL EDGING46 LF3/16" GALVANIZED STEELRYERSON3/16" GALVANIZED STEELFENCE & GUARDRAILSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYSCREEN FENCE244 LF 6` HEIGHT WOODEN FENCEUTILITY SCREEN FENCE235 LF MATCH PHASE 1 DESIGNLIGHTINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYEXCELSIOR STREET LIGHT3PEDESTRIAN LIGHT312` HEIGHTPEDESTRIAN COLUMN LIGHT614` HEIGHTPAVINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYCONCRETE PAVING14,738 SF4" CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER 6"COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE, COMPACTEDSUBGRADECONCRETE PAVING - VEHICULAR703 SF6" REINFORCED VEHICULAR RATEDCONCRETE PAVEMENT, OVER COMPACTEDAGGREGATE BASE, COMPACTED SUBGRADESTABILIZED CRUSHED STONE662 SF3" DEPTH 3/8" DECOMPOSED GRANITE,STABILIZED, OVER COMPACTED AGGREGATEBASE OVER COMPACTED SUBGRADEPLAY AREA SURFACE305 SFENGINEERED WOOD FIBER, DEPTH PER ASTMSTND. WITH SUBSURFACE DRAINGE SYSTEMCONCRETE UNIT PAVER2,690 SFTBDPLAY EQUIPMENTSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELPLAY BOULDER5BALANCE BEAM110′ 2″ X 6″ X 1′ 3″KOMPANNRO887-0601STILTS14′ 2″ X 8′ 1″ X 3′ 7″KOMPANNRO806-0601SITE FURNITURESYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELLINEAR BENCH - 8`22` X 8` LINEAR BENCHANOVAINF24L8TLINEAR BENCH - 10`22` X 10` LINEAR BENCHANOVAINF24L10TCAST CONCRETE BENCH4REINFORCED CAST STONE BENCH, 75" X 67" X17"LANDSCAPE FORMSFLOR-SMCURVED BENCH12` CURVED BENCH 16` RADIUSANOVAINF24C1690TGABION BENCH42` X 6` GABION BENCH, FILL W/ DRESSOR TRAPROCKANOVACE1872TBIKE RACK10FORMS + SURFACESTRIO BIKE RACKMOVABLE CHAIR11TBDMOVABLE TABLE6TBDSIGNAGESYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMONUMENT SIGN1TBDGOOD WILL SIGN1RELOCATED GOOD WILL SIGNWALLSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYSTEEL PLANTER WALL120 LF16" HEIGHT WEATHERING STEEL PLANTERWALL WITH BENT TOPWALLSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYREFERENCEBNOTESBSCHEDULEAM-01CB-01ED-101FE-01FE-02NORTH0SCALE:1"=16'16' 32'48'PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLAN--/--/----26970Jesse SymynkywiczSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE STATIONBLDG BHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL02/18/2022No. Description DateSITE PLAN - BUILDING BL111 EXCELSIOR BLVDBLAKE ROAD S15'-5 1/2"11'-10"6'-0"39 - CA-A7 - GL-I26 - CA-A59 - CA-A64 - CA-A54 - SO-S19 - SP-H21 - AR-A6 - EC-W22 - SS-P26 - NE-F22 - SS-P6 - EC-W26 - NE-F22 - SS-P7 - SP-H10 - AR-A39 - CA-A2 - GL-T10 - PE-A23 - PA-H14 - AR-A11 - SP-H7 - SO-S16 - AR-M11 - LI-K29 - SA-N14 - IR-S24 - SB24 - SB24 - SB24 - SB24 - SB22 - HB21 - HB20 - HB18 - HB21 - HB18 - HB21 - HB15 - HB4 - QB15 - SB15 - SB21 - SB5 - RI-A5 - TN4 - TH-H3 - TN6 - RI-A1 - TH-H41 - TN18 - HY-P2 - AG3 - TH-H36 - CA-A21 - AR-M2 - TH-H10 - HY-P10 - TN3 - AG1 - AG8 - QU-L22 - PH-O22 - AA43 - TH-H28 - PE-A46 - PA-H5 - BF18 - PE-A29 - PA-H35 - PE-A8 - BF61 - PA-H13 - PE-A6 - SO-S5 - AC-M41 - SO-S8 - TI-S7 - CA-V2 - BA-A10 - CA-V12 - TI-S4 - BA-A8 - TI-S9 - CA-V4 - BA-A81 - SB22 - CA-A11 - EP311 - SA-N9 - NE-F13 - AT-S27 - SB14 - HB38 - SP-BDECIDUOUS TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEAC-M 5 ACER MIYABEI `MORTON` TM / STATE STREET MIYABEI MAPLEBF 13 BETULA PLATYPHYLLA 'FARGO' TM / DAKOTA PINNACLE ASIAN WHITE BIRCHGL-T 2 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS DRAVES / HONEY LOCUST STREET KEEPERGL-I 7 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS `SKYCOLE` TM / SKYLINE THORNLESS HONEY LOCUSTQB4QUERCUS BICOLOR / SWAMP WHITE OAKQU-L8QUERCUS X WAREI `LONG` TM / REGAL PRINCE OAKORNAMENTAL TREES CODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEAG 6 AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE` / `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE` SERVICEBERRYSHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEAA422ARONIA MELANOCARPA `AUTUMN MAGIC` / AUTUMN MAGIC BLACK CHOKEBERRYAR-M 37 ARONIA MELANOCARPA `UCONNAM165` / LOW SCAPE MOUND CHOKEBERRYHY-P 28 HYDRANGEA PANICULATA 'JANE' TM / LITTLE LIME PANICLE HYDRANGEAPH-O22PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `DART`S GOLD` / DART`S GOLD NINEBARKRI-A11RIBES ALPINUM / ALPINE CURRANTSO-S 108 SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA `SEM` / SEM ASH LEAF SPIREASP-B 38 SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA 'TOR GOLD' TM / GLOW GIRL BIRCHLEAF SPIREATN 59 TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTON` / TAUNTON YEWEVERGREEN SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMETH-H 13THUJA OCCIDENTALIS `HOLMSTRUP` / HOLMSTRUP ARBORVITAEGRASSESCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECA-A285CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` / FEATHER REED GRASSCA-V26CAREX VULPINOIDEA / FOX SEDGEPA-H159PANICUM VIRGATUM 'HEAVY METAL' / HEAVY METAL SWITCH GRASSSS-P66SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM 'PRAIRIE BLUES' / PRAIRIE BLUES LITTLE BLUESTEMSB279SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM `BLUE HEAVEN` / BLUE HEAVEN LITTLE BLUESTEMSP-H37SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS / PRAIRIE DROPSEEDPERENNIALSCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEAT-S13ALLIUM TANGUTICUM 'SUMMER BEAUTY' / SUMMER BEAUTY GLOBE LILYAR-A45ARUNCUS AETHUSIFOLIUS / DWARF GOATSBEARDBA-A10BAPTISIA AUSTRALIS / BLUE WILD INDIGOEP311 ECHINACEA PALLIDA / PALE PURPLE CONEFLOWEREC-W 12 ECHINACEA PURPUREA 'WHITE SWAN' / WHITE SWAN CONEFLOWERHB170HEMEROCALLIS X 'BAJA' / BAJA DAYLILYIR-S 14 IRIS SIBIRICA 'CAESAR'S BROTHER' / CAESAR'S BROTHER SIBERIAN IRISLI-K 11 LIATRIS SPICATA 'KOBOLD' / KOBOLD BLAZING STARNE-F61NEPETA X FAASSENII 'WALKER'S LOW' / WALKER'S LOW CATMINTPE-A104PEROVSKIA ATRIPLICIFOLIA 'BLUE JEAN BABY' / BLUE JEAN BABY RUSSIAN SAGESA-N40SALVIA NEMOROSA 'CARADONNA' / CARDONNA MEADOW SAGETI-S28TIARELLA X 'SUGAR AND SPICE' / SUGAR AND SPICE FOAMFLOWERPLANT SCHEDULE LANDSCAPENORTH0SCALE:1"=16'16' 32'48'PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLAN--/--/----26970Jesse SymynkywiczSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE STATIONBLDG BHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL02/18/2022No. Description DateLANDSCAPE PLAN -BUILDING BL140 PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLAN--/--/----26970Jesse SymynkywiczSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE STATIONBLDG BHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL02/18/2022No. Description DateLANDSCAPE SECTIONSL40013'-0"10'-0"5'-11"SIDEWALKRAISEDPLANTERBOULEVARDEXCELSIOR BOULEVARDSECTION - STREETSCAPE @ EXCELSIOR1" 1'-0"3'-0"2P-21261-036'-0"10'-0" - 11'-0"13'-2"SIDEWALKPATIOBOULEVARDBLAKE ROADSECTION - STREETSCAPE @ BLAKE ROAD1" 1'-0"1P-21261-0 PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLAN--/--/----26970Jesse SymynkywiczSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE STATIONBLDG BHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL02/18/2022No. Description DateLANDSCAPE DETAILSL500SITE BENCH - INGROUND MOUNT1" = 1'-0"&21&5(7( 6,'(:$/.6(( &,9,/&20P$&7(' $**5(*$7( %$6(.6(( &,9,/P5(P$5(' 68%*5$'(/$1'6&$P( )2506 - %$1&$/ %(1&+.,167$// P(5 0$18)$&785(5'6 ',5(&7,21P-21.261-7513" 7+.. 316" 0,186 75$P52&.6" 7+.. &/$66 5 %$6(-&20P$&7 72 8P52&725 '(16,7<&20P$&7(' 68%%$6(CRUSHED STONE PAVING1" = 1'-0"2P-21.261-67&21&5(7( 6,'(:$/.6(( &,9,/&20P$&7(' $**5(*$7( %$6(6(( &,9,/P5(P$5(' 68%*5$'()2506  685)$&(6 75,2%,.( 5$&. - "6/$7("(0%(''(' 02817 P(5 0$18)$&785(5'6',5(&7,21BIKE RACK, SURFACE MOUNT1" = 1'-0"2'-10"P-21.261-68P-21.261-6831136" 5$',86',* P/$17,1* P,7 4" 72 6" '((P(5 7+$1 5227 %$//81',6785%(' 68%*5$'(NOTE:&2175$&725 6+$// %( 5(6P216,%/( )250$,17$,1,1* 75((6 ,1 $ P/80% P26,7,217+528*+287 7+( :$55$17< P(5,2'. :5$P75(( 7581.6 21/< 8P21 $PP529$/ %</$1'6&$P( $5&+,7(&7. 6(( 6P(&,),&$7,216(&7,21 5(/$7(' 72 P/$176 $1' 62,/P5(P$5$7,21.($&+ 75(( 6+$// %( P/$17(' 68&+ 7+$7 7+(5227 )/$5( ,6 9,6,%/( $7 7+( 72P 2) 7+(5227 %$//. ,) 7+( 5227 )/$5( ,6 127 9,6,%/(7+( 62,/ 6+$// %( 5(029(' ,1 $ /(9(/0$11(5 )520 7+( 5227 %$// 72 :+(5( 7+(),567 0$,1 25'(5 5227 12" ',$. 25 /$5*(5 (0(5*(6 )520 7+( 7581.. 6(7 0$,1 25'(55227 1" +,*+(5 7+$1 $'-$&(17 *5$'(. '2127 &29(5 72P 2) 5227 %$// :,7+ 62,/.P/$&( 5227 %$// 21 81',6785%(' 25&20P$&7(' 62,/7$0P 62,/ $5281' 5227 %$// %$6( ),50/<:,7+ )227 P5(6685( 62 7+$7 5227 %$//'2(6 127 6+,)74" %8,/7-8P ($57+ 6$8&(5 %(<21' ('*( 2)5227 %$//P/$17,1* P,7 72 %( 7:272 ),9( 7,0(6 7+( ',$0(7(52) 7+( 5227 %$// 6/2P('P5(P$5(' P/$17,1* 62,/P(5 6P(&6' ',$0(7(508/&+ 5,1*5(029( %85/$P 7:,1( 52P( $1' :,5( )52072P +$/) 2) 5227 %$//('*( &21',7,21 9$5,(65()(5 72 P/$14" 25*$1,& 08/&+ '2 127 P/$&( 08/&+ ,1&217$&7 :,7+ 75(( 7581.6&$5,)< 6,'(6 2) 75(( P,7:,7+ 6P$'( %< +$1' 72 %,1':,7+ P5(P$5(' P/$17,1* 62,/DETAIL - TREE PLANTING3/4" = 1'-0"P529,'( ,167$// 52'(17 P527(&7,21.12"+$5':,5( &/27+ 0(6+ &</,1'(5 8" ',$. 25*5($7(5 ; 36" +*7 67$.( ,1 P/$&(. P(5 6P(&P-21.261-0144" &21&5(7( 81,7 P$9(56 :/ P2/<0(5,&6$1' 6:(P7 -2,176 6(7 +$1' 7,*+71" :$6+(' 6$1' /(9(/,1* %$6(6" &20P$&7(' $**5(*$7( 68%%$6(&20P$&7(' 68%*5$'(P/$17,1* 9$5,(6- +2/' ),1,6+(' *5$'(1" %(/2: P$9(56 6(( P/$17,1* P/$16"P/$67,& P$9(5 5(675$,17 6<67(0CONCRETE UNIT PAVER1" = 1'-0")/86+$'-$&(17 P$9,1* 6(( P/$16127(&21&5(7( 81,7 P$9(56 6+$// %(,167$//(' ,1 $ 5$1'20 6,=( 5811,1*%21' P$77(51 86,1* 7+( 9$5,286/(1*7+6P-21.261-665+2/' ),1,6+(' *5$'( 12"%(/2: ('*(5- 6(( P/$1 )25('*( &21',7,21316" 0(7$/ ('*(5 :/ 67$.(P/$17,1* $5($- 6(( P/$17,1*P/$1785)- 6(( P/$17,1* P/$1STEEL EDGING1 1/2" = 1'-0"P-21.261-65P-21.261-656P5(P$5( P/$17,1* 62,/ )257+( (17,5( %('$PP/,&$7,21 2) P5(-(0(5*(17+(5%,&,'(3" 08/&+ '2 127 P/$&( ,1&217$&7 :,7+ 6+58% 67(0P5(P$5( %('$ 0,1. 4" '((P(57+$1 5227 %$//12" 0,1.6P$&,1*DETAIL - SHRUB PLANTING1" = 1'-0"('*( &21',7,21 9$5,(65()(5 72 P/$1P/$17,1* 62,/ )25 6+58%66&$5,)< 6,'(6 $1' %27720 2) (17,5(%(' :,7+ 6P$'( %< +$1' 72 %,1':,7+ P/$17,1* 62,/81',6785%(' 68%*5$'(&217$,1(5 *52:1 0$7(5,$/6+$// +$9( 52276 +$1' /226(1('P-21.261-067CONCRETE PLANTER CURB1 1/2" = 1'-0"&20P$&7(' 0Q'27 &/$66 5 $**5(*$7(%$6(&.,.P. &21&5(7( &85% 1/4" &+$0)(5 21('*(6 7<P.(;P$16,21 -2,17 7<P. 2 4 %$5 (P2;< &2$7(' &217,18286./$1'6&$P( %(' 3" 0,1 '(P7++$5':22' 08/&+6(( P/$17,1* P/$1&20P$&7(' 68%*5$'(P$9,1* &21',7,21 9$5,(6 5()(5 72 P/$18"8"10"1'-6"6"8P-21.261-07 62,469 SF PARKING 74 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 464 SF MECH / ELEC 150 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 23' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0" 1 8 ' - 0 " 2 3 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0" 23' - 0"18' - 0" 23' - 4"16' - 0" MECH EXHAUST MECH INTAKE 805 SF MECH / ELEC 444 SF MECH / ELEC UNEXCAVATED 1" = 20'-0"A1-0 1 LEVEL P1 PLAN NORTH Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/16/2022 5:15:11 PMA1-0 LEVEL P1 PLAN 221561.00 Author Checker 01/06/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 2/18/2022 PARKING SCHEDULE - APARTMENT Type Level Count LEVEL P1 8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 7 8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 8 9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL P1 126 9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 3 9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL P1 4 148 LEVEL 1 8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 3 9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 38 9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 2 9'-0' x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 1 44 LEVEL 2 8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 6 8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 5 9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 2 88 9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 2 9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL 2 4 105 TOTAL STALLS:297 PARKING SCHEDULE - RETAIL Type Level Count LEVEL 1 8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 1 8'-6" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 3 9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 33 9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 1 9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL 1 4 TOTAL STALLS:42 No. Description Date 8,571 SF AMENITY 2,840 SF RETAIL 3,222 SF RETAIL 832 SF AMENITY 4,000 SF RETAIL 18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0" 556 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 77 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 152 SF BOH 452 SF MECH / ELEC MECH EXHAUST 18' - 0"23' - 0"4' - 0"304 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 21,298 SF PARKING 18,180 SF PARKING 374 SF STORAGE 143 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 776 SF BOH 370 SF BOH 568 SF BOH 217 SF BOH CIRC LOADING COMMERCIAL TRASH/REC RESIDENTAIL TRASH/REC RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL PARKING ENTRANCE/EXIT MAIN RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE / LOBBY COMMERCIAL / RES GUEST PARKING COMMERCIAL / RES GUEST PARKING RAMP DN TO RES PARKINGRAMP UP TO RES PARKINGSETBACK10' - 8"SETBACK5' - 3"SETBACK 17' - 4" SETBACK 15' - 9" SETBACK 15' - 3" S E T B A C K 9' - 8 " SETBACK 49' - 10" SETBACK 48' - 6" SETBACK 17' - 11" TRANSFORMER AREA WAY FOR GARAGE EXHAUST AREA WAY FOR GARAGE INTAKE AIR SETBACK16' - 3"SETBACK11' - 8"S E T B A C K T O L E V E L 2 -732' - 8 " PROPERTY LINE SETBACK15' - 11"SETBACK 14' - 3" PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE SETBACK 28' - 5"SETBACK18' - 2"SETBACK20' - 7"SETBACK6' - 0"BLAKE ROADE X C E L S IO R B L V D POCKET PARK TRANSFORMER 1" = 20'-0"A1-1 1 LEVEL 1 PLAN NORTH Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/16/2022 5:15:14 PMA1-1 LEVEL 1 PLAN 221561.00 Author Checker 01/05/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 2/18/2022 PARKING SCHEDULE - APARTMENT Type Level Count LEVEL P1 8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 7 8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 8 9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL P1 126 9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 3 9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL P1 4 148 LEVEL 1 8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 3 9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 38 9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 2 9'-0' x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 1 44 LEVEL 2 8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 6 8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 5 9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 2 88 9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 2 9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL 2 4 105 TOTAL STALLS:297 PARKING SCHEDULE - RETAIL Type Level Count LEVEL 1 8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 1 8'-6" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 3 9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 33 9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 1 9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL 1 4 TOTAL STALLS:42 DEPARTMENT GROSS AREAS Area Department Area LEVEL P1 BOH 1,713 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 225 SF PARKING 62,469 SF 64,406 SF LEVEL 1 AMENITY 9,403 SF BOH 2,910 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 1,080 SF PARKING 39,478 SF RETAIL 10,062 SF 62,933 SF LEVEL 2 BOH 1,327 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 2,782 SF PARKING 42,751 SF RESIDENTIAL 16,471 SF 63,332 SF LEVEL 3 AMENITY 2,722 SF BOH 646 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 3,793 SF RESIDENTIAL 33,829 SF 40,991 SF LEVEL 4 BOH 648 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 3,529 SF RESIDENTIAL 36,665 SF 40,842 SF LEVEL 5 BOH 648 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 3,529 SF RESIDENTIAL 36,665 SF 40,842 SF LEVEL 6 BOH 648 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 3,529 SF RESIDENTIAL 36,665 SF 40,842 SF LEVEL 7 AMENITY 745 SF BOH 609 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 3,530 SF RESIDENTIAL 34,603 SF 39,487 SF 393,676 SF No. Description Date 464 SF STUDIO 1,011 SF 2 BED 1,052 SF 2 BED 1,318 SF 3 BED 684 SF 1 BED 1,011 SF 2 BED 1,040 SF 2 BED 1,041 SF 2 BED 506 SF STUDIO 970 SF 2 BED 969 SF 2 BED 797 SF 1 BED + DEN 464 SF STUDIO 774 SF 1 BED + DEN 1 6 ' - 0 "1 5 ' - 6 7 /8 "1 8 ' - 0 "1 4 ' - 0 " 2 8 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 2 8 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 2 8 ' - 0 "34' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"28' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"27' - 1 3/4"684 SF 1 BED 1,011 SF 2 BED 532 SF ALCOVE 684 SF 1 BED 5' - 4"712 SF TERRACE 521 SF STUDIO 18' - 11 1/4"34' - 0" 464 SF STUDIO 474 SF STUDIO 23' - 0"42,751 SF PARKING 337 SF POOL EQUIP 329 SF MECH / ELEC MECH EXHAUST INTAKE MECH EXHAUST 18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"2,782 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION23' - 0"300 SF STORAGE 129 SF BOH SETBACK 48' - 6"SETBACK5' - 3"SETBACK12' - 6"SETBACK 17' - 4"SETBACK10' - 8"SETBACK15' - 6"SETBACK18' - 2"SETBACK9' - 10"S E T B A C K 3 3 ' - 9 " S E T B A C K 3 2 ' - 8 " SETBACK 41' - 5" 91 SF BOH 142 SF BOH 1" = 20'-0"A1-2 1 LEVEL 2 PLAN NORTH Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/16/2022 5:15:15 PMA1-2 LEVEL 2 PLAN 221561.00 Author Checker 01/05/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 2/18/2022 **UNIT MIX SUMMARY - OPTION 1) Name Qty % Area Min - Max SF 1 BED 97 39% 66,839 SF 645 SF ... 720 SF 1 BED + DEN 2 1% 1,572 SF 774 SF ... 797 SF 2 BED 80 32% 81,097 SF 904 SF ... 1,052 SF 3 BED 11 4% 14,087 SF 1,272 SF ... 1,318 SF ALCOVE 40 16% 21,656 SF 495 SF ... 597 SF STUDIO 20 8% 9,650 SF 464 SF ... 521 SF Grand total: 250 250 194,900 SF PARKING SCHEDULE - APARTMENT Type Level Count LEVEL P1 8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 7 8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 8 9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL P1 126 9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 3 9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL P1 4 148 LEVEL 1 8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 3 9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 38 9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 2 9'-0' x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 1 44 LEVEL 2 8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 6 8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 5 9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 2 88 9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 2 9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL 2 4 105 TOTAL STALLS:297 No. Description Date 66' - 0" 30' - 4"5' - 4"30' - 4"66' - 0"30' - 4"5' - 4"30' - 4"66' - 0"30' - 4"5' - 4"30' - 4"645 SF 1 BED 1,031 SF 2 BED 977 SF 2 BED 1,285 SF 3 BED 597 SF ALCOVE 485 SF STUDIO 687 SF 1 BED 687 SF 1 BED 1,016 SF 2 BED 498 SF ALCOVE 698 SF 1 BED 983 SF 2 BED 698 SF 1 BED 546 SF ALCOVE 1,007 SF 2 BED 546 SF ALCOVE 698 SF 1 BED 1,031 SF 2 BED1,031 SF 2 BED 648 SF 1 BED 952 SF 2 BED 720 SF 1 BED 698 SF 1 BED 698 SF 1 BED 904 SF 2 BED 698 SF 1 BED 698 SF 1 BED 698 SF 1 BED 1,031 SF 2 BED 698 SF 1 BED478 SF STUDIO 1,279 SF 3 BED 1,045 SF 2 BED 697 SF 1 BED 1,030 SF 2 BED 697 SF 1 BED 1,031 SF 2 BED 2,081 SF AMENITY 546 SF ALCOVE 698 SF 1 BED 531 SF ALCOVE 1,015 SF 2 BED 648 SF 1 BED 546 SF ALCOVE 641 SF AMENITY 2 0 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 " 2 3 ' - 0 " 1 6 ' - 0 " 2 3 ' - 0 " 3 4 ' - 0 " 2 3 ' - 0 " 3 2 ' - 0 "18' - 0"23' - 0"34' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"30' - 10 1/2"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"32' - 0"SWIMMING POOL 40' - 0"14' - 7 1/8"32' - 0"23' - 0"376 SF MECH / ELEC 139 SF MECH / ELEC 132 SF BOH 3,793 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 13,981 SF TERRACE SPA SETBACK25' - 1"SETBACK30' - 8"SETBACK28' - 7"S E T B A C K 3 2 ' - 8 " SETBACK 48' - 10" S E T B A C K 3 3 ' - 9 " U N I T P A T IO S U N I T P A T IO S U N IT P A T IO S U N IT P A T IO S UNIT PATIOS UNIT PATIOS SETBACK9' - 8"29' - 2" SETBACK 25' - 3" SETBACK 17' - 2" SETBACK 16' - 4" SETBACK 14' - 8"SETBACK16' - 4"SETBACK20' - 4"11' - 8"SETBACK12' - 11"UNIT PATIOSSETBACK 50' - 2" 1" = 20'-0"A1-3 1 LEVEL 3 PLAN NORTH Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/16/2022 5:15:17 PMA1-3 LEVEL 3 PLAN 221561.00 Author Checker 01/05/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 2/18/2022 **UNIT MIX SUMMARY - OPTION 1) Name Qty % Area Min - Max SF 1 BED 97 39% 66,839 SF 645 SF ... 720 SF 1 BED + DEN 2 1% 1,572 SF 774 SF ... 797 SF 2 BED 80 32% 81,097 SF 904 SF ... 1,052 SF 3 BED 11 4% 14,087 SF 1,272 SF ... 1,318 SF ALCOVE 40 16% 21,656 SF 495 SF ... 597 SF STUDIO 20 8% 9,650 SF 464 SF ... 521 SF Grand total: 250 250 194,900 SF No. Description Date 66' - 0" 30' - 4"5' - 4"30' - 4"66' - 0"30' - 4"5' - 4"30' - 4"66' - 0" 30' - 4" 5' - 4" 30' - 4"66' - 0"30' - 4"5' - 4"30' - 4"645 SF 1 BED 1,031 SF 2 BED 980 SF 2 BED 1,272 SF 3 BED 699 SF 1 BED 485 SF STUDIO 687 SF 1 BED 687 SF 1 BED 1,015 SF 2 BED 497 SF ALCOVE 698 SF 1 BED 981 SF 2 BED 698 SF 1 BED 546 SF ALCOVE 1,006 SF 2 BED 545 SF ALCOVE 698 SF 1 BED 1,031 SF 2 BED1,031 SF 2 BED 649 SF 1 BED 951 SF 2 BED 583 SF ALCOVE 698 SF 1 BED 698 SF 1 BED 1,042 SF 2 BED 698 SF 1 BED 698 SF 1 BED 698 SF 1 BED 1,031 SF 2 BED 698 SF 1 BED 478 SF STUDIO 1,279 SF 3 BED 1,045 SF 2 BED 697 SF 1 BED 1,030 SF 2 BED 697 SF 1 BED 1,031 SF 2 BED 697 SF 1 BED 546 SF ALCOVE 698 SF 1 BED 485 SF STUDIO 532 SF ALCOVE 1,020 SF 2 BED 34' - 0"23' - 0"34' - 0"23' - 0"34' - 0" 23' - 0"23' - 0"23' - 0"34' - 0"23' - 0" 1,015 SF 2 BED 110°3 2 ' - 0 " 2 3 ' - 0 " 3 4 ' - 0 " 2 3 ' - 0 "1 6 ' - 0 "2 3 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 "2 0 ' - 0 " 649 SF 1 BED 18' - 0"23' - 0"34' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"32' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"546 SF ALCOVE 3 6 ' - 0 " 2 3 ' - 0 " 2 3 ' - 0 " 2 5 ' - 0 " 3 3 ' - 0 " 4 0 ' - 0 " 40' - 0" 376 SF MECH / ELEC 139 SF MECH / ELEC 132 SF BOH 3,529 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 545 SF ALCOVE 1" = 20'-0"A1-4 1 LEVEL 4-6 PLAN NORTH Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/16/2022 5:15:18 PMA1-4 LEVEL 4-6 PLAN 221561.00 Author Checker 01/05/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 2/18/2022 **UNIT MIX SUMMARY - OPTION 1) Name Qty % Area Min - Max SF 1 BED 97 39% 66,839 SF 645 SF ... 720 SF 1 BED + DEN 2 1% 1,572 SF 774 SF ... 797 SF 2 BED 80 32% 81,097 SF 904 SF ... 1,052 SF 3 BED 11 4% 14,087 SF 1,272 SF ... 1,318 SF ALCOVE 40 16% 21,656 SF 495 SF ... 597 SF STUDIO 20 8% 9,650 SF 464 SF ... 521 SF Grand total: 250 250 194,900 SF No. Description Date 645 SF 1 BED 698 SF 1 BED 979 SF 2 BED 1,272 SF 3 BED 700 SF 1 BED 485 SF STUDIO 687 SF 1 BED 687 SF 1 BED 1,014 SF 2 BED 498 SF ALCOVE 698 SF 1 BED 982 SF 2 BED 698 SF 1 BED 546 SF ALCOVE 1,009 SF 2 BED 544 SF ALCOVE 698 SF 1 BED 745 SF TERRACE745 SF AMENITY 495 SF ALCOVE 951 SF 2 BED 581 SF ALCOVE 698 SF 1 BED 698 SF 1 BED 1,042 SF 2 BED 698 SF 1 BED 698 SF 1 BED 698 SF 1 BED 1,031 SF 2 BED 698 SF 1 BED 478 SF STUDIO 1,279 SF 3 BED 1,046 SF 2 BED 697 SF 1 BED 1,030 SF 2 BED 697 SF 1 BED 1,031 SF 2 BED 697 SF 1 BED 698 SF 1 BED 1,031 SF 2 BED 485 SF STUDIO 533 SF ALCOVE 1,020 SF 2 BED 1,015 SF 2 BED 649 SF 1 BED 546 SF ALCOVE 2 0 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 " 2 3 ' - 0 " 1 6 ' - 0 " 3 4 ' - 0 " 2 3 ' - 0 " 2 3 ' - 0 " 3 2 ' - 0 " 376 SF MECH / ELEC 3,530 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 96 SF BOH137 SF MECH / ELEC 545 SF ALCOVE23' - 4"1" = 20'-0"A1-5 1 LEVEL 7 PLAN NORTH Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/16/2022 5:15:19 PMA1-5 LEVEL 7 PLAN 221561.00 Author Checker 01/05/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 2/18/2022 **UNIT MIX SUMMARY - OPTION 1) Name Qty % Area Min - Max SF 1 BED 97 39% 66,839 SF 645 SF ... 720 SF 1 BED + DEN 2 1% 1,572 SF 774 SF ... 797 SF 2 BED 80 32% 81,097 SF 904 SF ... 1,052 SF 3 BED 11 4% 14,087 SF 1,272 SF ... 1,318 SF ALCOVE 40 16% 21,656 SF 495 SF ... 597 SF STUDIO 20 8% 9,650 SF 464 SF ... 521 SF Grand total: 250 250 194,900 SF No. Description Date ELEVATOR OVERRUN ROOF ACCESS HATCH ELEVATOR OVERRUN COMMERCIAL EXHAUST LEVEL 3 COURTYARD BELOW LEVEL 3 ROOF BELOW LEVEL 7 TERRACE LEVEL 3 UNIT TERRACE BELOW LEVEL 3 UNIT TERRACE BELOW LEVEL 1 COMMERCIAL TRELLIS BELOW AREA AVAILABLE FOR PV SOLAR ARRAY PLAN NORTH Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/16/2022 5:15:20 PMA1-6 ROOF PLAN 221561.00 Author Checker 02/11/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 2/18/2022 1" = 20'-0"A1-6 1 ROOF LEVEL No. Description Dat e Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/16/2022 5:15:20 PMA3-1 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS 221561.00 Author Checker 01/31/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 2/18/2022 COMMERCIAL PATIO ON BLAKE ROAD VIEW WEST ON EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD VIEW EAST ON EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD POCKET PARK No. Description Date LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 114' - 4" LEVEL 3 125' - 8" LEVEL 4 137' - 4" LEVEL 5 148' - 0" LEVEL 6 158' - 8" LEVEL 7 169' - 4" LEVEL P1 89' - 6" ROOF LEVEL 180' - 0" 20' - 2"10' - 1"7' - 9"9' - 0"14' - 2"9' - 0"13' - 2"10' - 0"24' - 9"9' - 0"17' - 6"11' - 3"9' - 0"10' - 0"7' - 6"7' - 10"10' - 1"7' - 10"10' - 1"7' - 10"16' - 3"11' - 0"31' - 4" METAL TILE FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING FACE BRICK METAL PANEL 36' - 1"7' - 4"39' - 5"11' - 6"35' - 2"7' - 4"36' - 7"17' - 10"8' - 10"6' - 7"25' - 2"14' - 1"7' - 4"32' - 6"10' - 8"72' - 4"9' - 4"16' - 4"83' - 0"WALL AREA = 1,715 SF WINDOW AREA = 1,280 SF TRANSPARENCY = 75% STEEL TRELLISALUMINUM STOREFRONT AT LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 114' - 4" LEVEL 3 125' - 8" LEVEL 4 137' - 4" LEVEL 5 148' - 0" LEVEL 6 158' - 8" LEVEL 7 169' - 4" LEVEL P1 89' - 6" ROOF LEVEL 180' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 8"11' - 4"14' - 4"10' - 6"FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING PREFINISHED METAL COPING 16'28'11'13'9'13'9'18'9'15'11'10'9'11'9' 26' FACE BRICK METAL TILE METAL PANEL 19' - 11"23' - 2"13' - 6"9' - 2"19' - 7"18' - 1"21' - 1"7' - 7"10' - 6"9' - 1"16' - 8"32' - 3" ELEVATION BEYOND COMPOSITE WINDOWS AND SLIDING GLASS DOORS ALUMINUM STOREFRONT AT LEVEL 1 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM BALCONY METAL PANEL PREFINISHED METAL RAILING 83' - 0"30' - 4"16' - 0"68' - 8"84' - 8"WALL AREA = 1,260 SF WINDOW AREA = 650 SF TRANSPARENCY = 52% Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/16/2022 5:15:25 PMA3-2 SOUTH AND EAST BUILDING ELEVATIONS 221561.00 Author Checker 01/31/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 2/18/2022 3/32" = 1'-0"A3-2 1 EAST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A3-2 2 SOUTH ELEVATION No. Description Dat e LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 114' - 4" LEVEL 3 125' - 8" LEVEL 4 137' - 4" LEVEL 5 148' - 0" LEVEL 6 158' - 8" LEVEL 7 169' - 4" LEVEL P1 89' - 6" ROOF LEVEL 180' - 0"83' - 0"15' - 5"4' - 0"24' - 5"10' - 0"10' - 11"10' - 2"9' - 0"16' - 7"9' - 0"15' - 0"8' - 0"6' - 11"16' - 0"4' - 0"24' - 10"10' - 4"10' - 11" NOT INCLUDED IN MATERIAL CALCUATIONS COURTYARD ELEVATION BEYOND 4' - 0"5' - 2"11' - 1"10' - 0"21' - 0"11' - 0"6' - 6"6' - 0"7' - 0"18' - 1"10' - 0"10' - 11"24' - 1"11' - 0"10' - 0"18' - 0"17' - 0"11' - 0"10' - 0"13' - 3"24' - 0"28' - 2"7' - 4"28' - 0"13' - 4" FACE BRICK METAL PANEL METAL TILE COMPOSITE WINDOWS PREFINISHED METAL BALCONIES METAL PANEL FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING ALUMINUM WINDOWS METAL PANEL10' - 8"43' - 8"28' - 8"WALL AREA = 1,565 SF WINDOW AREA = 470 SF TRANSPARENCY = 30% STREETFRONT LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 114' - 4" LEVEL 3 125' - 8" LEVEL 4 137' - 4" LEVEL 5 148' - 0" LEVEL 6 158' - 8" LEVEL 7 169' - 4" LEVEL P1 89' - 6" ROOF LEVEL 180' - 0" 11' - 1"8' - 11"25' - 0"9' - 0"12' - 6"5' - 0"8' - 4"9' - 1"16' - 1"9' - 0"16' - 7"9' - 1"14' - 3"9' - 0"20' - 4"9' - 0"17' - 8"9' - 0"18' - 1"9' - 0"14' - 5" 23' - 1"23' - 11"18' - 1"5' - 7"18' - 1"14' - 0"11' - 8"23' - 4"24' - 1"18' - 0"27' - 0"7' - 4"22' - 0"3' - 0"22' - 3" Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 3/18/2022 4:00:40 PMA3-3 WEST AND NORTH BUILDING ELEVATIONS 221561.00 LB ESG 02/06/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN Schematic Design 3/17/22 3/32" = 1'-0"A3-3 1 WEST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A3-3 2 NORTH ELEVATION No. Description D ate TRANSFORMER SCREEN METAL PANEL AND WINDOWS EXTENDED TO BLDG EDGE GARAGE WINDOWS MODIFIED TO BE MORE LIKE RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS BY MATCHING HEIGHT, ADDING METAL LINTEL AND HORIZONTAL MULLION HORIZONTAL MULLION ADDED AT FIRST FLOOR GARAGE WINDOWS TO ALIGN WITH RETAIL WINDOW DESIGN LAND USE REVISIONS 3/24/2022 KNOCK-OUT PANEL FOR POTENTIAL NORTHERN GARAGE ENTRANCE DECORATIVE METAL TRELLIS RECESSED FACE BRICK DECORATIVE METAL TRELLIS RECESSED FACE BRICK GARAGE WINDOWS MODIFIED TO BE MORE LIKE RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS BY MATCHING HEIGHT, ADDING METAL LINTEL AND HORIZONTAL MULLION HORIZONTAL MULLION ADDED AT FIRST FLOOR GARAGE WINDOWS Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/17/2022 8:35:54 AMA3-4 EXTERIOR MATERIALS 221561.00 Author Checker 02/18/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 2/18/2022 No. Description Date FACE BRICK - PRIMARY METAL TILE FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING FACE BRICK - ACCENT METAL PANEL Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/16/2022 5:15:30 PMA3-5 SHADOW STUDIES 221561.00 Author Checker 02/11/22 BLAKE STATION SITE B BLAKE STATION SITE B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 2/18/2022 No. Description Date FUTURE DRIVEWAY T C TC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.9 1.8 1.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.5 5.5 9.8 5.8 1.2 0.2 0.4 1.4 1.6 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 3.3 14.1 1.1 0.2 1.1 5.8 7.2 2.2 0.4 1.0 2.1 1.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 2.4 8.1 11.6 2.7 0.4 3.2 9.3 5.4 0.9 0.2 0.3 1.3 1.8 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 0.7 1.0 7.4 0.7 0.1 0.8 5.3 8.0 2.7 0.4 0.8 2.1 1.7 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.8 0.0 3.6 10.8 3.5 0.4 2.5 9.0 6.5 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.8 3.5 6.3 6.5 9.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 6.8 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 6.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 2.1 5.1 7.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 2.8 6.3 1.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 3.2 0.0 8.1 8.3 3.4 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 3.7 7.4 7.9 4.8 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.3 5.2 8.4 8.0 3.9 2.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.8 6.2 9.3 2.1 2.8 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 2.4 6.1 8.6 10.0 2.6 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.9 5.2 6.5 8.3 2.3 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 2.6 4.8 3.6 1.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.5 4.4 6.2 5.8 11.6 4.9 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.8 5.9 8.5 11.7 4.8 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 2.1 6.9 10.5 9.7 2.2 3.5 2.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 3.2 6.6 8.6 7.9 6.0 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 2.5 9.6 4.1 6.4 5.9 4.0 3.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 2.9 5.0 6.9 1.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.1 2.7 4.2 6.4 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 3.1 7.0 2.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.3 3.6 3.8 4.3 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 3.0 1.7 7.2 9.4 3.3 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 2.2 6.9 8.2 3.3 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 7.1 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 6.9 3.8 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 4.3 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 10.9 2.7 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 6.1 2.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 7.3 2.7 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 12.0 3.6 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.5 4.5 1.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.6 4.1 2.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.7 11.0 4.9 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 9.0 3.5 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.6 1.4 1.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.6 10.4 5.7 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 7.1 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 2.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.2 1.8 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 5.1 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 10.3 4.1 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 1.2 1.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 2.0 1.8 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 11.5 6.7 1.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.0 11.1 6.7 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 1.0 8.7 4.7 0.3 0.8 5.4 1.3 0.8 5.6 1.4 0.7 3.1 9.1 1.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.1 1.2 0.4 0.3 1.1 1.3 0.5 0.3 1.0 1.9 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.3 1.6 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 8.1 2.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 10.8 2.8 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.1 2.7 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.9 3.9 0.1 1.7 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.0 9.0 9.7 3.5 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.1 0.1 4.2 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 2.9 1.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.9 5.8 0.0 3.4 2.4 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 7.7 10.7 6.9 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.0 9.7 5.0 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 1.8 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.0 2.4 6.0 2.7 0.6 0.4 2.3 6.1 2.9 0.6 1.0 4.2 5.2 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 8.0 1.4 3.1 3.2 1.6 0.5 0.4 1.4 1.7 0.6 1.3 3.2 3.2 1.4 0.2 0.7 2.2 3.6 2.6 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 5.8 0.6 1.1 1.2 1.5 8.8 4.5 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.0 6.5 8.0 1.7 1.3 0.4 0.9 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.2 6.3 5.4 0.6 1.4 6.8 4.1 0.5 0.4 0.7 3.6 4.6 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 6.7 2.6 0.6 1.3 2.0 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 8.4 10.1 4.2 0.9 4.8 9.1 3.6 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 4.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 1.5 0.1 0.3 0.8 0.1 0.0 1.0 3.0 2.5 2.6 11.0 8.6 0 40'20' 1"=20'-0" 10' Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min East Property Line Illuminance Fc 0.26 2.0 0.0 N.A. N.A. North Property Line Illuminance Fc 0.54 3.7 0.1 5.40 37.00 Northeast Egress Path Illuminance Fc 2.67 8.9 0.3 8.90 29.67 Northwest Egress Path Illuminance Fc 3.27 10.1 0.3 10.90 33.67 Overall Site Illuminance Fc 0.68 13.4 0.0 N.A. N.A. South Property Line Illuminance Fc 0.34 1.6 0.0 N.A. N.A. West Property Line Illuminance Fc 0.14 0.7 0.0 N.A. N.A. W2 9' 0" W2 9' 0" W1 9' 0" W3 14' 0'' W3 14' 0'' W3 14' 0'' W3 14' 0'' B2 3' 0'' B2 3' 0'' B2 3' 0'' B2 3' 0'' B2 3' 0'' B2 3' 0'' B2 3' 0'' W5 14' 0''W4 14' 0'' W4 8' 6" W4 8' 6" W4 8' 6" W1 8' 6" W4 8' 6" W4 8' 6" W4 8' 6" W4 8' 6" W1 8' 6" W1 8' 6" D2 14' 0'' D2 14' 0'' D2 14' 0'' W4 8' 6" W4 8' 6" W4 8' 6" W4 8' 6" W1 8' 6" W1 8' 6" W1 8' 6" W1 8' 6" W1 8' 6" W1 8' 6" W1 8' 6" W1 8' 6" D1 14' 0'' D1 14' 0'' D1 14' 0'' D1 14' 0'' D1 14' 0'' D1 14' 0'' W1 8' 6" W1 8' 6" B2 3' 0'' B1 14' 0'' B1 14' 0'' B1 14' 0'' B1 14' 0'' B1 14' 0'' B1 14' 0'' W1 14' 0'' W1 14' 0'' B2 3' 0'' A. REFER TO SHEETS E0.2P, E0.3P, AND E0.4P FOR FIXTURE SCHEDULES, DETAILS, AND CUTSHEETS. B. LIGHTING LEVELS SHOWN ARE MAINTAINED. LIGHT LOSS FACTOR OF 0.90 WAS USED TO ACCOUNT FOR DIRT AND LUMEN DEPRECIATION. C. WALL SCONCE AND DOWNLIGHT MOUNTING HEIGHTS SHOWN ARE TO BOTTOM OF FIXTURE. D. BOLLARD MOUNTING HEIGHTS SHOWN ARE TO TOP OF FIXTURE. GENERAL NOTES: PLAN NORTH Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota E0.1P ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC 4452.0002 MBS JJA 02/18/22 Blake Station Site B Blake Station Site B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 02/18/2022 SCALE:1" = 20'-0" ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC1 No. Description Da t e BOLLARD BASE TOP OF GRADE BOND TO GROUND LUG #4 B.C. TYPICAL HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED ANCHOR BOLT PROVIDED BY BOLLARD MANUFACTURER. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR BASE DIMENSIONS AND REBAR SIZE/SPACING BOND TO REBAR 3000K B2 3' TALL, 8'' WIDE NOTCH LED BOLLARD. DIE CAST LOW COPPER ALUMINUM HOUSING. IP65 RATED. UV STABILIZED POLYCARBONATE LENS. ASYMETRICAL THROW. 400 DELIVERED LUMENS. POINT TOWARDS PATHWAY. FINISH TO BE SELECTED BY LANDSCAPE. UNV LED N/A 10 SELUX NT-3-LG4500 3000K D1 RECESSED 2,000 LUMEN 6" ROUND LED DOWNLIGHT. HIGH EFFICIENCY LED LIGHT ENGINE. CLEAR SEMI-DIFFUSE ALZAK REFLECTOR. TRIM TO MATCH CEILING FINISH. FINISH TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT. UNV LED N/A 22 PRESCOLITE LF6SL-6LFSL20L30K8 3000K W4 4 7/8" WIDE, 12 1/2" TALL ROUND LED WALL SCONCE. DIE-CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING. IP65 RATED. WET LOCATION LISTED. DOWN ONLY LIGHT LED MODULE, AWAY FROM WALL DOWN DISTRIBUTION. 2,000 NOMINAL LUMENS. BLACK FINISH. UNV LED N/A 17 WAC LIGHTING DS-WD0534-F930A-BK 3000K D2 7'' TALL LED DOWNLIGHT. ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION. IP66 RATED. CLEAR LENS. 40 DEGREE FLOOD LIGHT DISTRIBUTION. 825 DELIVERED LUMENS, 90 CRI. INSTALL IT IN BETWEEN TRELIS' OVERHEAD BEAMS. FINISH TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT. UNV LED N/A 13 B-K LIGHTING SM-DE-TR-X102-FL 3000K 3000K W3 4' LINEAR WALL MOUNTED LED FIXTURE. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM FIXTURE WITH 6" FIXED BRACKET. SYMMETRIC 30 DEGREE -60 DEGREE BEAM SPREAD. 1,600 DELIVERED LUMENS. WET LOCATION LISTED. TILT FIXTURE 30 DEGREES TOWARDS WALL. BRACKET SHALL BE 1' LONG. BLACK FINISH. UNV LED N/A 16 SPI LIGHTING SEW12145-4FT-L16W-120-277V-3000K-LBK6-SMB 3000K W5 4 7/8" WIDE, 12 1/2" TALL ROUND LED WALL SCONCE. DIE-CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING. IP65 RATED. WET LOCATION LISTED. DOWN ONLY LIGHT LED MODULE, TOWARDS WALL DOWN DISTRIBUTION. 2,000 NOMINAL LUMENS. BLACK FINISH. UNV LED N/A 17 WAC LIGHTING DS-WD0534-F930B-BK 3000K W1 4 7/8" WIDE, 12 1/2" TALL ROUND LED WALL SCONCE. DIE-CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING. IP65 RATED. WET LOCATION LISTED. UP/DOWN LIGHT LED MODULE, AWAY FROM WALL UP/DOWN DISTRIBUTION. 2,000 NOMINAL LUMENS. BLACK FINISH. UNV LED N/A 34 WAC LIGHTING DS-WD0534-F930A-BK 3000K W2 4 7/8" WIDE, 12 1/2" TALL ROUND LED WALL SCONCE. DIE-CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING. IP65 RATED. WET LOCATION LISTED. UP/DOWN LIGHT LED MODULE, TOWARDS WALL UP/DOWN DISTRIBUTION. 2,000 NOMINAL LUMENS. BLACK FINISH. UNV LED N/A 34 WAC LIGHTING DS-WD0534-F930B-BK LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE FIXT. TYPE DESCRIPTION VOLTAGE LAMPS VA/ FIXT.MANUFACTURER CATALOG NUMBER TYPE QTY./ FIXT. B1 14' TALL COLUMN LED BOLLARD. 2' LIT SECTION ON TOP OF FIXTURE WITH UV DIFFUSER. IP66 RATED. ONE LIGHT ENGINE, 1,300 DELIVERED LUMENS. POINT TOWARDS PATHWAY. FINISH TO BE SELECTED BY LANDSCAPE. UNV LED N/A 13 SELUX MTRCL-14-2-1B30-30 Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota E0.2P ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC DETAILS 4452.0002 MBS JJA 02/18/22 Blake Station Site B Blake Station Site B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 02/18/2022 NO SCALE BOLLARD BASE DETAIL1 NO SCALE FIXTURE TYPE B12 NO SCALE FIXTURE TYPE B23 No. Description Da t e Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota E0.3P ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC DETAILS 4452.0002 MBS JJA 02/18/22 Blake Station Site B Blake Station Site B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 02/18/2022 NO SCALE FIXTURE TYPE D11 NO SCALE FIXTURE TYPE D22 NO SCALE FIXTURE TYPE W13 NO SCALE FIXTURE TYPE W24 No. Description Da t e Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota E0.4P ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC DETAILS 4452.0002 MBS JJA 02/18/22 Blake Station Site B Blake Station Site B Hopkins, MN LUA Submittal 02/18/2022 NO SCALE FIXTURE TYPE W31 NO SCALE FIXTURE TYPE W42 NO SCALE FIXTURE TYPE W53 No. Description Da t e Blake Road Station - Site B Hopkins, MN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN — SITE AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN • Transit-oriented development location adjacent to LRT station. Light rail/bus pass discount program offered to encourage use of mass transit. • Native and adaptive plant species selected for their ability to provide enhanced streetscapes, additional habitat and stormwater management strategies • Removal of more than 45,890 sq ft of existing surface parking areas and replaced with new buildings and 38,352 sq ft area of landscape area consisting of native and adaptive tree and plant species • Smart irrigation systems (rain/soil moistures, drip irrigation, highly efficient controllers/sprayheads) • Connecting to existing bike trails and providing internal bike storage rooms • Advocate for mirco-mobility: shared bike or scooter parking stations including maps of local trails • Porous pavement integrated into streetscape improvements • On-site community gardens available for resident use Blake Road Station - Site B Hopkins, MN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN — STORM WATER MANAGEMENT • Dramatic improvements over current site conditions - currently 100% impervious surfaces that sheet drain to streets untreated; future pervious area equal to 12% of the total site area (38,352 sq ft) • Future water run-off collected in catch basins • Sub-surface system in StormTech isolator rows • Treat 2” of run-off from the site’s impervious surfaces via a treatment train of above-ground features, pipe storage system, and JellyFish type treatment structure. • Storage capacity designed to hold back storm events and discharge run-off at rates that are below those of the existing conditions Blake Road Station - Site B Hopkins, MN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN ENERGY EFFICIENCY & SAVINGS • High R-Value building envelope — roof & walls • High solar reflectance index (SRI) for the roof • Low-E insulated glazing • Tightly sealed building envelope to reduce leakage and inefficiencies • High-Efficiency HVAC system with individual controls for residents • Project is enrolled in the Xcel Energy Design Assistnace (EDA) program to evaluate and select efficient mechanical systems and optimize the building enclosure • Water Sense plumbing fixtures and Energy Star rated appliances • Induction cooktops for 20% of units • LED fixtures with occupancy sensors • Programmable or SMART thermostats • Electrical vehicle charging stations (20 in Building B) • Building structure and electrical system are designed to be Solar-Ready for future photovoltaic panels SUSTAINABLE DESIGN — BUILDING DESIGN Blake Road Station - Site B Hopkins, MN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN — OPERATIONS HEALTH & WELLNESS • Designed to encourage physical activity - primary and secondary pedestrian-oriented entrance, each with a convenient stairwell to encourage physical activity; bike racks and storage available with site improvements that include trail along Excelsior Blvd • Clean air with at least MERV 8 air filters. Apartments will be supplied with outside air from individual packaged heatingcooling units dedicated to each space. • Access to daylight in units and amenity spaces - Vertically oriented windows allow daylight to reach deep into dwellings and common areas • Low VOC materials and paints • Convenient common area hand sanitizers and hand washing locations • Green janitorial practices - partnering with companies that share green janitorial initiatives • Operable windows and balcony doors ensure access to natural ventilation and connection to the outdoors • Ceiling Fans in bedrooms = reduced cooling needs • Fitness centers designed with state-of-the-art equipment and input from internal health & wellness director Blake Road Station - Site B Hopkins, MN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN — OPERATIONS EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES • Recycling collection at each trash shoot and separate bins within amenity spaces, making recycling more convenient and including clear instructions for recycling materials • Looking to partner with givebackbox.com onsite • Composting bins provided for resident use • Reusable water bottles provided at move-in and refill stations throughout the property • Virtual flipbook vs. paper brochures for leasing to reduce paper waste • Smart keyless entry (eliminates the need for replacement keys/fobs) • Rent payments encouraged to be electronic by implementing a check processing fee • Healthy building design practices and investigate Healthy Building certification CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2022-031 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SITE PLAN FOR BLAKE ROAD STATION SITE B (PID 19-117-21-42-0046), SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the applicant, Bryan Farquhar of TF Hopkins, LLC (Trilogy Real Estate Group), initiated a site plan review application for Blake Road Station PUD Site B; and WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as Lot 3, Hopkins Commerce Addition with PID 19-117-21-42-0046; and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That the above stated application was initiated by the applicant on February 18, 2022; and, 2. That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on March 22, 2022: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and, 3. That written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and, 4. That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this application during their March 22, 2022 meeting and recommended approval by the City Council, subject to conditions; and 5. That the Hopkins City Council reviewed this application during their April 5, 2022 meeting and agreed with the findings of the Planning & Zoning Commission. WHEREAS, staff recommended approval of the above stated application based on the findings outlined in the staff report dated April 5, 2022. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hopkins hereby approves the site plan application for Blake Road Station Site B (PID 19-117-21-42-0046), subject to the conditions listed below. 1. Execution of an amendment to the Blake Road Station Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 2. Conformance with all applicable standards of the Mixed Use District and terms of the Blake Road Station Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement. 3. The applicant shall allow up to 8 of the stalls reserved for residential use to be available to employees working in the commercial space to meet the 1 stall per 200 square feet parking standard. 4. Plan revisions to the proposed residential bicycle parking to show at least 138 long-term bicycle parking stalls within the building and at least 13 short-term stalls outside the building. Any bicycle parking located within the public right-of-way must be approved by the City and or Hennepin County. 5. Plan revisions to the proposed commercial bicycle parking to provide at least 5 long-term commercial bicycle parking stalls inside the building in close proximity to the commercial spaces. The balance of the 15 commercial bicycle parking stalls may be located outside the building close to the entrances to the commercial space. Any bicycle parking located within the public right-of-way must be approved by the City and or Hennepin County. 6. Provision of a detailed pedestrian and streetscape plan demonstrating consistency with those features used on Site A prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. The applicant shall increase this escrow required under the PUD agreement to cover 125% of the landscape/streetscape improvement for Site B. The City shall hold this security until all landscape/streetscape improvements have been installed and all plantings have survived at least one growing season. 8. The applicant plans to store trash containers within the underground parking garage. The applicant shall designate a specific location within the Level 1 parking garage and an on-site location for trash pickup. Trash pick-up shall not occur within the public right-of-way or any street surface. 9. The applicant shall demonstrate all equipment will be screened in conformance with all zoning requirements. 10. Conformance with all requirements of Hennepin County and the Metropolitan Council. 11. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer. 12. Approval of all necessary permits from the Building, Engineering and Fire Departments. 13. Approval of the development by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and conforms with all related conditions. 14. Payment of all applicable development fees including, but not limited to SAC, park dedication and City Attorney fees. 15. The applicant has indicated their intent to subdivide the properties as part of the future development of Sites C. The applicant has requested and the City has agreed to lock in the 2021 park dedication fees ($3,000/unit and 5% of the fair market value of the commercial land as estimated by the county assessor) and apply them to the development on all 3 sites as part of any future subdivision of any of the 3 parcels. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 5th day of April, 2022. By: ________________________________ Patrick Hanlon, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Amy Domeier, City Clerk