VII.2. Blake Road Station Site Plan Review for Site B; Lindahl
April 5, 2022 City Council Report 2022-036
Blake Road Station Site Plan Review for Site B
Proposed Action: Staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Commission adopt the following
motions:
• Move to adopt Resolution 2022-031 approving the site plan for Blake Road Station Site B
(PID 19-117-21-42-0046), subject to conditions.
Overview
The applicant, Bryan Farquhar of TF Hopkins, LLC (Trilogy Real Estate Group), requests an
amendment to the Blake Road Station Planned Unit Development (PUD) and site plan review
for Blake Road Station Site B. In August 2021, the City approved the Blake Road Station
Planned Unit Development and site plan for Site A. The applicant now seeks planned unit
development (PUD) amendment and site plan review approvals for the second phase of the
Blake Road Station development (Site B).
Site B is located at the northwest corner of Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road and its plans are
generally consistent with the original PUD Master Plan. As designed, the proposed building will
include 250 residential units, approximately 10,000 square feet of commercial space and 339
enclosed parking spaces to serve both the residential and commercial uses.
Based on the findings in this report, both the Planning & Zoning Commission and staff
recommend approval of the site plan for Site B subject to the conditions detailed in the attached
resolution. The PUD amendment portion of this project is in process between the City
Attorney and the applicant and is scheduled for review by the City Council on April 19. April 19
corresponds to the end of the 60-day review period for these applications. So staff has sent the
applicant a letter extending the review period an additional 30 days to allow time to draft, review
and execute the PUD amendment.
Primary Issues to Consider
• Background
• PUD Amendment
• Site Plan Review
• Engineering Review
• Alternatives
Supporting Documents
• Site Location Map
• Applicant’s Narrative
• Neighborhood Meeting Comments
• Email from Eric Anondson
• Plans and Building Elevations
• Resolution 2022-031
_________________
Jason Lindahl, City Planner
Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N ____ Source: _____________
Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): _________________________________________
Notes:
City Council Report 2022-036
Page 2
BACKGROUND
This Background section provides a history of existing site, project summary, and a brief
summary of the review process for this development to date. More detailed information about
the project, it’s phasing, design, streetscape and public realm, and retail components can be
found in the applicant’s narrative (see attached).
Existing Site. The 6.4-acre subject property was re-platted as Lots 1, 2 & 3, Hopkins Commerce
Addition in July of 1992. However, the buildings on each of these lots were built much earlier.
Lot 1 (Site C) contains a 44,000 square foot building constructed in 1954 (Goodwill and vacant
space). Lot 2 (Site A) contained a 25,000 square multitenant strip commercial building
constructed in 1957. The building on Lot 2 has been cleared and construction on Site A began
late last year. Lot 3 (Site B) contains a 26,000 square foot multitenant strip commercial building
constructed in 1959. In total, the 3 multitenant strip commercial buildings contained
approximately 95,000 square feet of neighborhood serving retail and service uses.
Project Summary. According to the applicant, the Blake Road Station project will redevelop 6.4
acres of land located at the intersection of Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road into a multi-
modal, transit-oriented development adjacent to the future Blake Road Station along the Metro
Green Line Extension. Each of the 3 phases of this development are designed to build upon the
improvements of the previous phase and are intended to create an increasingly connected,
pedestrian friendly, and transit focused neighborhood. As detailed in the table below, overall the
site will include 770 residential units and just over 12,000 square feet of retail space.
Blake Road Station Development Summary
Site Start Commercial
Space
Residential
Units
Parcel
Size Density
A December 2021 2,100 220 1.55 Acres 142 Units/Acre
B Summer 2022 10,062 250 2.1 Acres 119 Units/Acre
C 2026-2031 0 300 2.76 Acres 109 Units/Acre
Total N/A 12,162 770 6.4 Acres 120 Units/Acre
Review Process to Date. The review process for this project included both the City’s land use
and zoning review and the required State of Minnesota environmental review processes. The
City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed the concept plan for this
development in June 2020 and were generally supportive of the design. As a concept plan
review, no public hearing was required. However, because of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic
the City did require the applicant to hold a virtual neighborhood meeting to engage the
community about their redevelopment plans. Community comments from the concept plan
neighborhood meeting focused on the following topics:
• Business displacement and a need to incorporate affordable neighborhood serving
commercial uses.
• Need for affordable and larger apartment units with 3-4 bedrooms.
• The importance of pedestrian scaled architecture.
• The importance of pedestrian and bicycle access to and through the site.
In response to these comments, the applicant made an effort to improve communication with
existing businesses about the timeline for the redevelopment, provide reduced rents and allow
City Council Report 2022-036
Page 3
additional time for businesses to relocate.
After the concept plan review, the project went through the state required environmental review
process in 2020. Based on the size and scope of this redevelopment, the project was required to
go through the environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) process. The EAW process
included a parking study and a 30-day comment period that resulted in comments from 5 state
agencies, Hennepin County, the Hopkins Housing Team and 1 Hopkins resident. The Planning
& Zoning Commission reviewed the EAW on October 14 and recommended City Council
approval. The City Council then reviewed the EAW on October 20 and made a negative
declaration of need regarding the EAW clearing the way for the developer to go through the
City’s development review process.
Following the EAW process, the applicant submitted development applications for the overall
Blake Road Station development and the first phase of this project in June of 2021. These
applications include rezoning, planned unit development (PUD) and site plan review for the first
phase of the development (Site A). The review process for these applications included an in-
person neighborhood meeting on July 14, a public hearing before the Planning & Zoning
Commission on July 27 and review and action by the City Council during their August 2 and
August 17, 2021 meetings. During the development review process, public comment included
the need for affordable housing and commercial space, pedestrian and bicycle improvements,
displacement of existing businesses, environmental concerns and the need for an equitable
development review of the proposal.
Neighborhood Meeting. The current PUD amendment and site plan review applications require
the applicant to host a neighborhood meeting. That meeting took place on March 2, 2022 from
6:00 – 7:30 PM at 1002 2nd Street Northeast (43 Hoops). Neighborhood meetings must be
hosted by the developer and require them to engage with the surrounding neighborhood to
explain their project, answer questions and take any comments. In addition to the in-person
meeting, the applicant was also required to set up a webpage to allow online comments.
According to the applicant, they did not receive any online comments and the overall questions
or concerns from the in-person meeting included the items listed below. The applicant’s
responses to these items are detailed in their meeting notes (see attached).
• Affordable housing
• Inquiries from current and prospective tenants about retail space
• Project timeline
• Pedestrian connections and improvements.
Community Comment. Under state law, these applications require a public hearing.
Accordingly, the City published notice of this request and public hearing in the Sun Sailor,
mailed notices directly to all property owners and existing tenants within 500’ of the subject
property, posted a sign on the subject property to inform the general public of the proposed
project and added information about the project and staff and developer contact information to
the City’s website.
The notice directed all interested parties to send questions or comments to City Planner Jason
Lindahl by mail, phone or email or to attend the public hearing where they could learn about the
request, ask questions and provide feedback. As of the writing of this report, the City had
City Council Report 2022-036
Page 4
received one email comment from Eric Anondson of 53 Jackson Road. Mr. Anondson raised
concerns about too much landscaping at Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard and its impact on
bike maneuverability and the need for additional traffic calming along the new north/south
street. After some discussion, both staff and the Planning & Zoning Commission found the
landscaping at Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard should not limit bicycle maneuverability and
there should be adequate traffic calming along the north/south street. Staff will provide an
update on any additional public comments received during the City Council meeting.
Planning & Zoning Commission Action. The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this
item (Planning Application 2022-06) during the March 22, 2022 regular meeting. During that
meeting, the Commission heard a summary presentation from City staff and held a public
hearing that produced no comments.
Following the hearing, staff noted that the applicant had satisfied several conditions from the
Planning & Zoning Commission resolution which could now be deleted. However, there was
not agreement between staff and the applicant on the architecture of the building entrance along
Excelsior Boulevard or the amount of window transparency along the north and west sides of
the building. After some discussion, the Planning & Zoning Commission agreed with the
applicant that no changes were needed for the architecture of the building entrance along
Excelsior Boulevard. But the Commission was tied 3-3 on the need for additional window
transparency along the north and west sides of the building. As a result, they directed the
applicant to continue to work with staff to find a solution. Since the meeting, the applicant has
agreed to revise the building elevations to include additional storefront design along the north
side of the building and matching windows and green wall landscaping materials along the north
and west sides of the building. These changes are acceptable to staff under the overall PUD.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT
The applicant received approval of the Blake Road Station PUD and associated Master Plan in
August of 2021. The PUD establishes the Mixed Use zoning district and its development
regulations as the base zone and standards for review. Overall, the PUD entitled lot
configuration, access and private road configuration, and building height for all 3 sites as well as
the setback standards for Site A.
Review of Site B requires separate site plan review approval based on the entitlements
established in the PUD Master Plan noted above and the specific zoning standards of the Mixed
Use district. Deviations from the Mixed Use standards, other than those noted above require an
amendment to the existing Blake Road Station Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement.
The PUD amendment portion of this project is in process between the City Attorney and the
applicant and is scheduled for review by the City Council on April 19. April 19 corresponds to
the end of the 60-day review period for these applications. So staff has sent the applicant a letter
extending the review period an additional 30 days to allow time to draft, review and execute the
PUD amendment.
As you may recall, the purpose of a PUD is to allow flexibility from traditional development
standards in return for a higher quality development. Typically, the City looks for a developer to
exceed other zoning standards, building code requirements or meet other goals of the
Comprehensive Plan. In exchange for the flexibility offered by the planned unit development,
the applicant is expected to detail how they intend to provide a higher quality development or
City Council Report 2022-036
Page 5
meet other City goals.
The requested deviations and items offered by the developer in exchange for the requested
deviations for Site B are compared in the table below. Each of the requested deviations is
compared with the applicable Mixed Use zoning district standards in the Site Plan review section
below.
PUD Comparison for Blake Road Station Site B
Requested Deviations Items Offered to Support the PUD
Building Height Transit Supportive Density
Floor to Area Ratio Linear Park
Setbacks on all 4 Sides of the Building 20 EV Charging Stations
Parking Stall Dimensions Additional Landscaping
Exterior Building Materials
Transparency & Fenestration
Façade Articulation
When weighing a PUD request, the City should consider if the proposed deviations and items
offered by the developer create a higher quality development, if there is a reasonable trade-off
between these items and if the items offered by the developer help to mitigate the requested
deviations.
Future review of Site C will require separate site plan review approval based on the entitlements
established in the PUD Master Plan and the specific zoning standards of the Mixed Use district.
Deviations from the Mixed Use standards for Sites C other than those specifically noted in the
PUD agreement will require an amendment to the existing Blake Road Station Planned Unit
Development (PUD) agreement.
It should also be noted that the applicant’s narrative for the original PUD states their intent to
subdivide these properties as part of future development of Site C. Because this project is along
a county road, both the City of Hopkins and Hennepin County will have plat review authority.
With any subdivision, the City has the ability to collect park dedication in the form of land or a
fee-in-lieu. The original PUD established the park dedication rates in place in 2021 which are
$3,000 per unit for multiple family residential and five (5) percent of the fair market value of the
commercial land as estimated by the county assessor.
SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR SITE B
Standards for reviewing site plan applications are detailed in Article IV of the City Code. This
section establishes the site plan review procedure and provides regulations pertaining to the
enforcement of site design standards. These procedures are established to promote high quality
development that ensures the long-term stability of residential neighborhoods and enhances the
built and natural environments within the City as new development and redevelopment activities
occur. Specifically in this case, site plan review is required for the new mixed-use building. Staff
has reviewed the proposed development against the zoning regulations for the Mixed Use
district and the standards established in the Blake Road Station PUD. Staff’s review and
findings for each of these regulations are detailed below.
Land Use & Zoning. The subject property is guided as Activity Center in the 2040
City Council Report 2022-036
Page 6
Comprehensive Plan. The Activity Centers future land use category surrounds and supports the
planned Blake Road and Shady Oak light rail stations along the Metro Green Line Extension.
These areas are planned to include moderate to high density mixed use development designed to
complement and enhance the existing development pattern in these areas and support the public
investment in transit. Densities in these areas will typically range from 20-60 units per acre, with
75-150 units per acre within ¼ mile of an LRT station platform. The subject property is within
the ¼ mile radius of the future Blake Road Station and has a density of 119 Units/Acre. As
noted above, the site is also zoned Mixed Use with a planned unit development which is
consistent with the comprehensive plan designation.
Height. The applicant’s plans call for the building on Site B to be a total of 7 stories which is
consistent with the height standard established for Site A, B and C under the Blake Road Station
PUD. In total, the building will have one level of parking below grade, two levels of concrete
construction for commercial and amenity spaces and additional parking, and five stories of
wood-framed construction for residential apartment units. As a mixed-use building, the base
Mixed-Use zoning would allow the building to be up to six stories in height. However, the PUD
allowed for one additional story in exchange for the development more closely meeting the 2040
comprehensive plan density goals around light rail stations.
Floor to Area Ratio (FAR). As designed, the Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) for Site B fails to meet
the standard of the Mixed Use district. FAR is a measurement of density calculated by dividing
the floor area of a building by the lot area of the parcel on which the building is located. In the
Blake Road Station Area, the FAR standard is a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 3 for
residential buildings and a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 5 for mixed use buildings. The
building on Site A is considered a mixed-use building because it includes commercial space.
With a proposed FAR of 2.8, the building on Site B does not conform to the minimum 3.0 FAR
standard. However, given the overall design of the site, the proposed 2.8 FAR is acceptable
under the PUD.
Setbacks. As designed, the building on Site B does not meet the setback standards for the Mixed
Use district. The table below compares the required and proposed setbacks for Site B.
Overall, the proposed setbacks are less than required on the north, south and east sides of the
building but greater than required on the west side of the building. This design results in
additional space for a linear parking along the west side of the site which results in a more
pedestrian and transit focused layout and is acceptable under the overall planned unit
development.
Setback Review for Blake Road Station – Site A
Setback Standard Proposed Status
Front (South) 15’ – 25’ 10’-8” to 18’-2” Non-Conforming (-4’-4” to -6’-10”)
Front (East) 15’ – 25’ 9’-8” to 28’-5” Non-Conforming (-5’-4” to +3’-5”)
Front (west) 15’ – 25’ 32’-8’ to 49’-10’ Non-Conforming (+22’-8” to +24’-10”)
Rear (North) 10’ 5’-3” to 20’-7” Non-Conforming (-4’-9” to +10’-7”)
Note: Setbacks are measured from the foundation; however, it should be noted that stories 3-7 along the south side of the building are
recessed which results in great visible setback for these upper floors.
Off-Street Parking & Travel Demand Management. The applicant conducted a traffic impact
analysis as part of the concept plan and environmental review processes. Overall, the study
confirmed the City’s off-street parking requirements of the Mixed Use district and the number
City Council Report 2022-036
Page 7
of parking spaces proposed by the developer were adequate for all 3 buildings.
A specific review of Site B finds the proposed off-street parking meets the requirements of the
Mixed Use district. These standards require residential uses provide a minimum of 1 and a
maximum of 1.5 enclosed parking stalls per unit and 1 guest stall per 15 units. Using these
standards, the 250 unit building proposed for Site B is required to provide at least 267 off-street
parking stalls and a total of 339 are proposed.
Of the 339 total proposed stalls, 297 are reserved for residential use while 42 are designated to
serve the commercial uses. Under this parking division, the site exceeds the minimum amount
of required residential parking by 30 stalls but is 8 stalls under the minimum commercial parking
standard of 1 stall per 200 square feet. Therefore, staff recommends a condition of approval
require the applicant to allow at least 8 of the stalls reserved for residential use to be available to
employees working in the commercial space to meet the 1 stall per 200 square feet parking
standard.
The recommended allocation of parking results in a parking ratio of 1.15 stalls per unit for
residential and 1 stall per 200 square feet for commercial. By comparison, Site A has 256 total
stalls with a parking ratio of 1.16 stalls per unit.
Bicycle Parking. According to the applicant’s narrative, bicycle parking on Site B exceeds the
minimum requirements of the Mixed Use district. For multifamily residential, the Mixed Use
district requires 1 long-term space per 2 units and 1 short-term space per 20 units or a total of
138 bicycle parking spaces. According to the applicant, there will be 150 bicycle parking stalls
for residential use within the building. However, the location of these stalls is not illustrated on
their plans. Staff recommends that a condition of approval require the applicant to revise their
plan to show at least 138 long-term bicycle parking stalls within the building and at least 13
short-term stalls outside the building.
The Mixed Use district also requires bicycle parking for the commercial space. These standards
require at least 0.5 long-term spaces per employee and 0.5 short-term spaces per 1,000 square
feet of net building area. According the applicant’s narrative, to meet these requirements Site B
will have 20 bicycle racks located within the right-of-way adjacent to the building’s primary
entrance. However, the required 5 long-term spaces must be located within the building. Staff
recommends that a condition of approval require the applicant to revise their plan to provide at
least 5 long-term commercial bicycle parking stalls inside the building in close proximity to the
commercial spaces. The balance of the 15 commercial bicycle parking stalls may be located
outside the building close to the entrances to the commercial space. Any bicycle parking located
within the public right-of-way must be approved by the City and or Hennepin County.
Shadow Study. The Mixed Use district requires a shadow study for all buildings four stories or
higher and the applicant has included this study with their plans. According to the Mixed Use
district standards, the shadow study must indicate the shadows cast at the shortest and longest
days of the year. Impacts of a shadow on the surrounding property may be a reason to lower
and/or adjust the location or height of buildings. Staff review of the shadow study finds little to
no impact on adjacent properties even with the additional height to 7-stories allowed through
the PUD.
City Council Report 2022-036
Page 8
Exterior. Exterior materials proposed for Site B do not meet the standards of the Mixed Use
district. The Mixed Use district requires the primary exterior treatment of walls facing a public
right-of–way or parking lot on a structure shall be brick, cast concrete, stone, marble or other
material similar in appearance and durability. Regular or decorative concrete block, float finish
stucco, EIFS-type stucco, cementitious fiberboard, or wood clapboard may be used on the front
façade as a secondary treatment or trim but shall not be a primary exterior treatment of a wall
facing a public right-of-way. Staff interprets primary to be at least 65 percent and secondary to
not exceed 35 percent of the side of a building. The proposed exterior materials for the building
on Site B are summarized in the table below.
Exterior Materials for Blake Road Station Site B
Material North South East West
Brick Veneer 32% 32% 15% 44%
Metal Panel 7% 8% 15% 12%
Metal Tile 36% 37% 32% 31%
Fiber Cement Lap Siding 25% 23% 38% 14%
Total 100% 100% 100% 101%???
Of the proposed exterior materials detailed above, only the brick qualifies as a primary material
and it covers 32% of the north and south, 15% of the east and 44% of the west sides of the
building on Site B. While these are significantly less than the requirement, the applicant notes
that the brick material is concentrated on the first two levels of all sides of the building to
enhance the ground level pedestrian experience. This design and mix of materials for the
building on Site B are acceptable under the overall planned unit development.
Building Orientation. The building on Site B conforms to the building orientation standards of
the Mixed Use district. Buildings within the Mixed Use district must be oriented toward the
pedestrian by providing a direct link between each building and the pedestrian walking system,
with emphasis on directing people to a transit station. The applicant’s plans for Site B show the
building will have pedestrian connections to the existing sidewalk along both Blake Road and
Excelsior Boulevard that will eventually connect with the sidewalks and streets planned for
overall site and the City’s sidewalk and trail system.
Transparency & Fenestration. The building on Site B only meets the transparency &
fenestration standards of the Mixed Use district on the south and east sides of the building. The
Mixed Use district requires a minimum of 60 percent to a maximum of 75 percent of the front
street-facing facade between two feet and eight feet in height must comprise clear windows that
allow views of indoor nonresidential space or product display area. And the building must have
at least 30 percent fenestration for windows above the first floor for all sides of the building.
Since the meeting, the applicant has agreed to revise the building elevations to include additional
storefront design along the north side of the building and matching windows and green wall
landscaping materials along the north and west sides of the building. These changes are
acceptable to staff under the overall PUD.
Façade Articulation. The building on Site B does not meet the façade articulation standards of
the Mixed Use district. These standards require the primary street side façade of a building shall
not consist of unarticulated blank walls, flat front facades or an unbroken series of garage doors.
City Council Report 2022-036
Page 9
The front of a building shall be broken up into individual bays of a minimum of 25 feet and
maximum of 40 feet wide. The building’s architectural elements (window, balconies and
materials) provide some break-up of the elevation, and since the Planning & Zoning
Commission meeting the applicant has agreed to add a roof cap architectural feature to the
building. Overall, staff finds this design acceptable under the PUD.
Sidewalks. Site B meets the minimum sidewalk standards of the Mixed Use district. The Mixed
Use district requires a minimum 5-foot wide sidewalk along the frontage of all public streets and
within and along the frontage of all new development or redevelopment. The applicant’s plans
illustrate sidewalks of at least 5 feet along all four sides of the building.
Pedestrian/Streetscapes. The applicant’s plans appear to meet the pedestrian and streetscape
standards of the Mixed Use district. The Mixed Use district requires pedestrian streetscape
improvements along all sidewalks. Pedestrian improvements of at least 25 percent of the
landscaping budget shall be included in the development. These improvements shall create a
high quality pedestrian experience through the provision of benches, planters, drinking
fountains, waste containers, median landscaping and the like. Pedestrian-scale light fixtures that
shine downward on the sidewalks and walkways shall be no greater than 12 feet in height and
must be provided along all sidewalks and walkways to provide ample lighting during nighttime
hours for employees, residents, and customers. Staff recommends a condition of approval
require the applicant to provide more detailed streetscape information for street furniture and
light.
Landscaping. The applicant’s landscape plan for Site B exceeds the landscaping standards for
the Mixed Use district. According to the applicant’s estimates, this project is required to provide
$103,000 in landscape improvements with at least 25% allocated to pedestrian/streetscape
improvements (see section above). In this case, the applicant’s plans include $286,000 of total
landscaping improvements with $188,000 of plantings, fencing and irrigation and $98,000 (or
34%) in pedestrian/streetscape improvements. Staff recommends a condition of approval
require the applicant to provide a landscape and landscape/streetscape letter of credit in a form
acceptable to the City Attorney for 125% of the value of all improvements. Under the original
PUD, the City agreed to accept a landscape escrow instead of a letter of credit. The applicant
shall increase this escrow to cover 125% of the landscape/streetscape improvement for Site B.
The City shall hold this security until all landscape/streetscape improvements have been installed
and all plantings have survived at least one growing season.
Signs, Canopies and Awnings. The plans for Site B do not include a specific sign plan.
However, the plan renderings do include general information about a monument style sign in
the southeast corner of the site adjacent to the Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard intersection.
All signs must be approved through a separate administrative permit subject to conformance
with the standards of the Mixed Use district and sign regulations contained in Article XXI -
Signs. It should be noted that the original PUD allowed for a specific ground sign located at the
southwest corner of Site B. This item is addressed in the original PUD and is in addition the
future sign proposed for the southwest corner of Site B.
Trash Enclosure. The applicant plans to store trash containers within the underground parking
garage. The applicant shall designate a specific location within the Level 1 parking garage and an
on-site location for trash pickup. Trash pick-up shall not occur within the public right-of-way or
City Council Report 2022-036
Page 10
any street surface.
Exterior Lighting. The applicant’s plans for Site B include a photometric site plan consistent
with the City’s exterior lighting requirements.
Stormwater Treatment. The applicant’s narrative includes stormwater treatment information that
indicates it exceeds both the City’s and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District’s (MCWD)
standards. According to the applicant, runoff from Site B will be conveyed to the future 325
Blake Road regional stormwater treatment facilities via the Powell Road diversion. More
detailed information about the applicant’s stormwater treatment plans can be found in the
attached project narrative. Staff recommends a condition of approval require the applicant to
receive all necessary approvals from the City Engineer and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District prior to issuance of a building permit.
ENGINEERING REVIEW
The Engineering Department offers the following comments.
• Conformance with all applicable conditions of the PUD Master Plan approval.
• Conformance with all requirements of the Traffic Impact Study.
• Storm Sewer
o Watershed review and approval required
o All underground detention and newly installed infrastructure will be private, and will be
the responsibility of the owner/developer for all future maintenance.
• Water/Sewer
o All newly installed infrastructure will be private, and will be the responsibility for the
owner/developer for all future maintenance. This includes hydrants, valves, and service
connections.
o ROW permit will be required for any work in the public ROW. This includes Hennepin
County and Hopkins.
o There are no local SAC or WAC fees. Met Council SAC fees may apply.
• The monumentation at Blake and Excelsior may be removed.
• The City is only responsible for snow removal for sidewalk and trails within the public
ROW. The owner is responsible for all other snow removal. The developer may remove
snow from the public ROW.
• Lighting with the ROW shall match adjacent corridor lighting.
• Irrigation shall be provided in all ROW boulevards. Coordinate location and type with
Hopkins Public Works.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Vote to approve the site plan for Blake Road Station Site B. By voting to approve, the site
plan for Blake Road Station Site B will be approved.
2. Vote to deny the site plan for Blake Road Station Site B. By voting to deny, site plan for
Blake Road Station Site B will be denied. Should the City Council consider this option, it
must also identify specific findings that support this alternative.
3. Continue for further information. If the City Council finds that further information is
needed, the items should be continued.
Site Location Map for Blake Road Station
Subject Property
Blake Road Station -- pg 1
Blake Road Station – Phase B
Project Narrative – Formal Review
2022-02-18 Submission (03-17-22 Update)
PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Blake Road Station project is the redevelopment of 7.4 acres of land located at the intersection of
Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road South in Hopkins, MN. Trilogy Real Estate Group has been working
with the City of Hopkins to develop the site in a three-phase, multi-modal transit-oriented development
adjacent to the Blake Road Southwest LRT Station. The project received PUD and Phase A site plan
approval in August of 2021, allowing for construction to begin on the first building in December of 2021.
The second phase, which is the subject of the current site plan approval request, is situated on the
corner of Excelsior and Blake Rd and will serve as a welcoming gateway to the project and City of
Hopkins. When the third phase is completed, the development will be an anchor for the new transit
station and will advance long-standing City goals outlined in numerous area planning documents,
including the East Hopkins Land Use & Market Study (2003), Blake Road Corridor Small Area Plan (2009),
Blake Road Corridor Study (2015) and the Blake Road LRT Station Area Development Guidelines (2015),
as discussed in more detail in the latter part of this narrative.
As early as 2003, the East Hopkins Land Use & Market Study confirmed that redevelopment within the
City’s east end along Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road would require a significant catalyst to help
overcome certain existing barriers and obstacles to market delivery of such redevelopment. The
applicant believes that the high-quality redevelopment of the project site and creation of a new transit-
oriented node with significant residential density will provide such a catalyst. Each phase will build upon
the improvements of the previous phase and will ultimately result in an increasingly connected,
pedestrian friendly, and transit-focused community. The project will add to the mix of housing choices
for area residents, providing a new opportunity to live immediately adjacent to the light rail transit
station.
STREETSCAPE AND PUBLIC REALM
The development team has approached this site as a unique opportunity to complement the
transformative power of the Southwest LRT line. Each phase of the Blake Road Station project defines
and beautifies the streetscape while complementing the crucial transit functions in and around the site.
Currently, two of the three parcels on the site are comprised of older, stressed pavement with ill-
defined access and a plethora of surface parking stalls. The Planned Unit Development that was
previously entitled will transform the site and emphasizes a neighborhood scale of connected streets,
with traffic calming measures and pedestrian features that will significantly improve the aesthetic of the
gateway to the City of Hopkins.
This is the second of three parts of the projects vision that includes extensive pedestrian
improvements for the area including sidewalk connections through the site with boulevards and a
rhythm of deciduous street trees will provide a human-scale canopy year-round. The trees’ summer
shade reduces the heat island effect, creating a comfortable microclimate when needed most. Both
the trees and parallel parking zones will help to create visible friction that will successfully reduce
driving speeds to provide a safer environment for people, bikers, and drivers. The pedestrian zone
along Excelsior Boulevard and Blake Road expands to a width suitable for public street amenities
including benches, bike racks, street lighting and planting beds.
Phase B of the development will begin to define a new north-south street that divides the sites in two
Blake Road Station -- pg 2
and will connect to the SWLRT station. This phase creates the spine between the first phase from which
stems entries, active uses, and a newly created linear pocket park. Adjacent to the future use parcel that
sits immediately to the north of this phase of the project, the pocket park will feature seating, natural
play features, landscaping, and a pedestrian walk that offers a connection from Blake Road to the
interior of the development. The pedestrian connection will provide flexibility to adapt to opportunities
that may develop on the future use parcel that is not currently controlled by the applicant.
BUILDING DESIGN
Blake Road Station will provide creative, mid-rise residential buildings that maximize density while
emphasizing green space and public realm at the street level. The proposed style of construction for
Buildings B is five levels of wood framing over two levels of concrete podium and a below-grade level of
parking; similar to Building A. Trilogy envisions a community that values leisure and comfort with the
ease of urban connection. The exterior building design draws on these qualities of being a transition
from an urban to naturalistic landscape. The architecture offers a refined exterior material palette that
reinforces this site’s potential as a catalyst for beautiful design and smart growth in the Blake Station
area of Hopkins. The palette, forms, colors, textures, and details create a coherent whole that is
energizing and enduring.
The design of Site B builds on the design language established by Site A. Where Site A has a warm, neutral
tones to evoke a feeling of rural comfort, Site B uses similar materials and massing but in a higher contrast
color scheme that is dressier and more formal, better suited to its location and role as a gateway building.
While the forms of Site B are simple and peacefully resolved they are meant to have more of a “signature”
presence both for the development and for the city of Hopkins.
At street level, the sidewalk experience at the base of Site B is nearly identical to that of Site A. This is
intentional so that the campus will have a sense of place with small differences that can be explored. The
articulation in the masonry of Site B is also slightly more animated to enliven the pocket park. Site B has
much more commercial square footage. The commercial sidewalk experience is metal clad. It has a clean
and modern look, clearly differentiated from the residential and amenity areas at street level, while also
maintaining specific historic references to a cornice and traditional façade signage. Blade signs also neatly
slot into the elegant panel system used to define the retail facades. Building lighting is utilized to enhance
the sidewalk experience throughout.
At the upper levels, all facades are clad with durable materials. Masonry and medium gauge metals and
composite metal panels along with quality windows comprise more than eighty percent of the façade
surfaces on the primary sides of the building along Blake and Excelsior. The primary sides as well as the
west side of the building are articulated with separate clearly defined masses, each with its own carefully
composed façade whether the function within the building is residential, parking, retail, or private
amenity. The projecting masses are wrapped consistently on all three sides, expressing how the building
is organized into separate groupings in a beautiful and balanced architecture while also saying something
about how each of the individual homes within are configured. Fiber cement lap siding is shown in
recesses in order to visually separate these areas from the main facades’ more prominent architectural
elements. As with Site A, the metal portions of the cladding on Site B will also have an attractive luster.
Metallic luster allows the building to show its personality by dressing itself in the colors of its
surroundings, most beautiful at sunrise and sunset but also softly echoing the glow of the carefully
designed and manicured pedestrian realm at ground level, reflecting its current lighting configuration
and its active uses.
Blake Road Station -- pg 3
Amenity courtyards, balconies, and terraces extend living spaces to the outdoors while improved
sidewalks and connections encourage active lifestyles for residents. Ground floor retail space will
enhance the streetscape experience and provide an opportunity for retailers to have an intimate
connection with residents, LRT riders, and the surrounding Hopkins community. With proximity to the
Cedar Lake Trail, each building will supply ample storage and access to bicycle repair facilities to
encourage bicycle use for recreation as well as daily commuting.
Similar to Site A, these state-of-the-art dwelling units will support the residents’ sustainable living
experience by providing urban housing that incorporates energy-efficient appliances, low-flow water
fixtures, low-VOC paints, building-wide recycling practices and encouraging car-free living. The buildings
will be designed to incorporate assemblies that ensure high-quality acoustical performance between
units (wall and floor assemblies).
DEVELOPMENT PHASING
Commencement of construction of the various phases is dependent upon market conditions and
existing lease agreements. Subject to those conditions, the development team currently anticipates the
following construction start dates for the various phases:
Building A: Under Construction
Building B: Summer 2022
Building C: Spring 2026 – 2031 (pending existing lease agreements)
CITY APPLICATIONS/APPROVALS
Previous Approvals
• Zoning Application: Requesting rezoning from B-4 (Neighborhood
Commercial) and I-1 (Industrial) to Mixed Use District
• Planned Unit Development (PUD) Submittal (for the Overall Site)
• Site Plan Approval for Site A (Site Plan Review Application)
• Travel Demand Management Study approved by the City of Hopkins and Hennepin
County
• Execution of a Planned Unit Development Agreement
Site Plan Approval for Site B (Site Plan Review Application)
The development plan may necessitate re-platting of the land in future phase C
Approvals from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
Amendment to the Planned Unit Development Agreement
Blake Road Station -- pg 4
PROPOSED DEVIATIONS FROM MIXED USE DISTRICT STANDARDS
Strict adherence to the Mixed-Use District standards and requirements is not required in this case to
satisfy the intent of the City’s planned unit development provisions and the proposed deviations from
those standards will not prejudice the health, safety or welfare of the residents of the development, the
surrounding area or the city as a whole. The proposed deviations from Mixed Use District standards for
the Blake Road Station Site B are summarized in the following table:
Requested Deviations
Category Mixed-Use Standards Proposed for Site B
Building Height 6 stories 7 stories granted with previous PUD approval
Floor Area Ratio 3.0 2.8
South Setback 15’ – 25’ 10’-8” to 18’-2” on Levels 1 and 2
25’-1” to 30’-8” on Levels 3 thru 7
West Setback 15’ – 25’ 32’-8” to 49’-10”
East Setback 15’ – 25’ 9’-8” to 28’-5”
North Setback 10’ 5’-3” to 20’-7 on Levels 1 and 2
11’-1” to 20’-4” on Level 3 thru 7
Parking Stall Dimensions 9 ft x 20 ft 9 ft x 18 ft
Primary Exterior Building
Materials
The zoning material
guideline does not
identify the metal
panel tile as a
primary or secondary
material
High-quality, primary materials of brick and
glazing are proposed at Levels 1 and 2 of Building
B. The applicant proposes the metal tile material
as an equally durable and attractive option to
other primary materials.
Exterior Building Material
Percentage
20% maximum for
secondary materials
such as fiber cement
siding
East elevation – Fiber cement siding, a secondary
material, covers about 24% of the east elevation.
Requested deviation to allow up to 30% for
secondary materials on the east elevation.
Building Transparency 60% transparency
between 2 ft and 8 ft
West elevation: 30% tinted or opaque glazing and
20% recessed brick is proposed between 2 and 8
ft.*
Signage One monument sign
permitted for each
multi-tenant building
provided the surface
area of the sign does
not exceed 2 sq ft per
front foot of lot. No
sign shall be over 150
sq ft, 20 feet in height
and have a setback in
no case less than 20 ft
from the property
lines.
Approved as part of the PUD, a 3 ft x 6 ft
monument sign at the southwest corner of Site
B is proposed as a marker for Goodwill.
Blake Road Station -- pg 5
SUPPORT FOR PROPOSED DEVIATIONS
The applicant believes the development, as proposed with deviations from zoning code ordinances, is a
high-quality proposal for the City of Hopkins and better aligns with overall Comprehensive Plan goals.
To ensure a high-quality development, the applicant is proposing the following site enhancements in
support of the proposed deviations:
Enhanced Pedestrian Scale Architecture
Primary building materials of brick, metal and glass are focused at the first two levels of the street-facing
elevations. Other building elements such as canopies, building mounted light sconces, a trellis over the outdoor
seating area and recessed balconies enhance the street presence and pedestrian experience at the ground
floor. Stepping back the building at the third level along Blake and Excelsior creates a 2-story expression at
focused pedestrian areas to further emphasize the human scale. Finally, the selected metal panel tile is both
modern and traditional, with a shingle shape that creates a more residential scale at the upper-level elevations.
Site signage will be constructed with materials that match the architectural style and materials of the building.
The base of the primary monument sign for the development will be surrounded by landscaped planting beds
and enhanced with seating opportunities. The development team is open to working out a solution for public
art at this intersection.
Active Uses and Building Transparency
With effectively three front yards on Site B, the pedestrian scale design and site programming ensures
articulation and interest on all sides, rounding out the 360-degree architecture of the building design. Active
uses line the public street frontages with multiple retail spaces lining Blake Road and anchoring the southeast
building corner. Shared building amenity spaces for residents will front Excelsior Boulevard with the primary
residential entrance at the intersection of Excelsior and the new north-south internal road. Building accent
lighting will enhance the building architecture throughout the site.
The elevations along Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard will meet or exceed the city ordinance minimum
requirement of 60% transparency for front street-facing façades (between 2 ft and 8 ft).
Where 60% transparency is not provided along the western elevation facing the private internal road,
windows are provided into the parking garage and the wall is comprised primarily of brick. The wall acts
as a backdrop for the public linear park and will be planted with trees and vines that will provide another
layer of visual interest for passersby that varies with the seasons. The western façade will incorporate
recessed detailing along with the glass, accounting for a total of 50% of the elevation (30% glazing and
20% recessed brick) The western drive is a private road created by the development team, so it is unclear
if a deviation should be required for this frontage, as this isn't a city street.
The north elevation will receive a similar treatment to the West with the addition of wrapping the retail
detailing around the corner. Then elevating the visual interest and aesthetic with a balanced mix of
glazing, brick accents and illuminated façade. There is no glazing or transparency requirement as it does
not face the street or a public right-of-way, but ±20% tinted/opaque glazing is provided in addition to
±22% façade detailing with a recessed brick accent.
Blake Road Station -- pg 6
Site Access Improvements
The master plan for the new development aligns directly with goals from Station Area Planning documents. A
new network of publicly accessible streets divides the site into pedestrian-scaled, walkable quadrants and
connect the surrounding context to the SWLRT station. The new north-south street becomes the crucial spine
from which stems primary building entries, active uses, and a public linear park. The east-west street further
breaks down an otherwise super block, improving circulation and creating a tree-lined street with parallel
parking and walk-up townhome units.
As described under the ‘Streetscape and Public Realm’ section, the project vision includes extensive
pedestrian improvements for the area, including sidewalk connections through the site that do not exist
today. Both the trees and parallel parking zones will help to create visible friction that will successfully
reduce driving speeds to provide a safer environment for people, bikers, and drivers. The pedestrian
zone along Excelsior Boulevard (ranges from 28’ to 34 ft) and Blake Road (ranges from 17’-6” to 34 ft)
expands to a width that supports public street amenities including benches, bike racks, street lighting
and planting beds.
The deviations for building setbacks are a result of the unique property configurations at this site, and
the proposed setbacks provide comfortable buffer zones between street right-of-way and the building
edges. The proposed setbacks offer a balance of enough distance to create green zones without
compromising the more urban goals of transit-oriented development. This balance of ample though not
excessive setbacks prioritizes pedestrians and human activity in and around the site.
Along the northern edge of the site, a sidewalk is proposed within the rear yard. While this is not along
a frontage road and therefore not required, Trilogy believes this added pedestrian pathway through the
site will be a great amenity for the adjacent community. Providing this east-west connection will allow
those walking along Blake Road or coming from the LRT station to access the interior of the site and the
pocket park without having to walk up to Excelsior Blvd to do so. The sidewalk will be well lit with
building mounted and bollard lighting. Native plantings will line the majority of the pathway, and
decorative screening and a wood fence will provide visual interest along the way.
Exceeding Stormwater Standards
The applicant is exceeding the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and City of Hopkins’ minimum
standards for stormwater treatment. Runoff from this Site will be conveyed to the future 325 Blake
Road regional stormwater treatment facilities via the Powell Road diversion. However, the new
landscape areas, underground pipe retention systems and Jellyfish treatment structures proposed on-
site will not only provide rate control but will treat the first 2-inches of rainfall from the impervious
area. This is a substantial improvement from the site condition today as the site is primarily impervious
surface and stormwater runs off without any treatment or attenuation.
In summary, the new landscaping will help with stormwater abstraction and the underground treatment
system will retain and treat stormwater in excess of MCWD and City standards. The proposed on-site
stormwater management system exceeds MCWD/City standards by providing filtration treatment above
the required 2” rainfall event. The detention systems (BMP 2A and BMP 2C) have the volume capacity to
treat up to a 2.55” rainfall event. The proposed Jellyfish Filter systems (BMP 2B and BMP 2D) have the
capacity to treat a flow rate of 1.30 CFS and 0.85 CFS, respectively. The corresponding modelled flow
rates are 1.24 CFS and 0.72 CFS, which are within the filtration system treatment capacities. MCWD also
requires 70% TSS removal, whereas BMPs 2B and 2D have an 80% removal efficiency. With 88% of Site
capture, the filtration system provides 71% TSS removal.
Blake Road Station -- pg 7
MCWD requires proposed runoff rates to be equal to or less than the existing condition. Total proposed
site runoff rates are reduced by approximately 26-66% from the existing condition, depending on the
rainfall event.
The majority of the new/reconstructed site area will be dedicated to roof drainage, which is assumed
cleaner than pavement runoff. This will further reduce pollutant loadings discharged from the site. The
landscaped area within the study area is almost doubled from the existing conditions as well. Due to
contaminated groundwater conditions, this additional landscape area has not been included in the
model for viable infiltration to be conservative, but the new landscape areas will certainly provide
additional volume reduction in reality.
Enhanced Landscaping
The deviations in setbacks offer yards that are both deep enough for landscaping and green space and
reasonable for creating a "street wall" for the pedestrian experience. The deviations also help to
implement a comprehensive plan goal of creating a ‘positive relationship to the street’ by proposing
appropriate setbacks for the residential density guided by the 2040 Comprehensive Plan (75-150 units
per acre within ¼ mile of an LRT station platform).
As previously mentioned under ‘Streetscape and Public Realm,’ the master plan includes generous
planted zones (6 ft to 12 ft wide) and a rhythm of deciduous street trees that will provide a human-scale
canopy year-round. The trees’ summer shade reduces the heat island effect, creating a comfortable
microclimate when needed most.
A linear public park is proposed on the western edge of Building B. The pocket park offers opportunities
for a quick hangout spot or a chance for larger community gatherings to occur. A central plaza space of
crushed stone, column lights, artful concrete ‘asterisk’ blocks and moveable café tables/chairs provide
flexible seating arrangements. A mini stage for small performances is proposed along with some nature
play balance sculptural elements. Additional gabion wall seating is provided along the edges. A spot
for a food truck offers potential food options. Native landscape plantings and trees contributes to a
more natural backdrop.
The streetscape will be greatly improved with new planning beds along Excelsior and Blake Road.
Raised curb planting beds will be similar to Phase A and provide a visual continuity along Excelsior.
New trees and plantings will help extend the existing Blake Road streetscape. Building edges are
enhanced by green and planted yards with an array of site-appropriate species. This variety adds a
visually interesting green environment and is a significant improvement from existing conditions today.
Calculating the minimum landscape value based on the current project budget for Site B and per the
City’s landscape code requirements (section 102-375 Landscaping), the minimum landscape value is
approximately$103,000, with at least 25% allocated to pedestrian improvements. The estimated
Landscape and Pedestrian/Streetscapes value for Site B will exceed the minimum landscape value
requirement.
We estimate that Site B will provide the following:
- Trees: $33,000
- Shrubs: $25,000
- Grasses: $12,000
Blake Road Station -- pg 8
- Sod: $6,000
- Planting Soil: $25,000
- Edger/Mulch: $22,000
- Irrigation: $40,000
- Fencing/screening: $25,000
Excelsior & Blake Boulevards
- Curb islands: $32,000
- Pavers: $26,000
- Site Furniture: $15,000
- Lighting: $25,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED LANDSCAPE VALUE PROVIDED $286,000
Specifics for Site B’s landscaping plan and plant species can be found within the application materials.
Proposed Pet Exercise Area (Dog Park) & Relief Areas
The importance of providing a formal exercise area for pets, specifically dogs, has been acknowledged
by including a dog park along the west side of the future Site C building. The dog park will be fenced
and includes small-scale lighting, seating and receptacles for proper disposal of animal waste.
A dog relief area will be provided for use by residents along the west side of Building B.
Bike Amenities
With immediate access to the Cedar Lake Trail, ample bike amenities will promote the use of multiple
modes of transportation for residents and patrons to the site. The city standard for bike parking is one
long term stall per 2 units and one short term per 20 units (138 total bike racks). Building B will
accommodate over 150 bike racks for resident storage within the building. The Mixed Use district bicycle
parking requirements are 0.5 long-term spaces per employee and 0.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of
net building area or 5 spaces. Public bike racks (20 capacity) are located within the right-of-way
adjacent to the primary Building B entrance as well as adjacent to the retail uses along Blake Road. A
bike wash area with automatic shut off timer will be available in the P1 parking level. The development
team is open to providing space on site to accommodate city micro mobility solutions in the future.
Sustainable Design
The project is enrolled in the Xcel Energy Design Assist (EDA) program to evaluate and prioritize
strategies in order to maximize energy efficiency. See separate attachment for a comprehensive
summary of the energy saving and sustainable design features of the project.
Support of Comprehensive Plan Goals
The project supports and further advances a number of goals outlined in the City’s 2030 Comprehensive
Plan and draft 2040 Cultivate Hopkins Plan. See summary of these goals below within the PUD
statement section.
Blake Road Station -- pg 9
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STATEMENT
Per Hopkins, Minnesota, Code of Ordinances, Part III – Land Development, Chapter 102 – Planning and
Zoning, Article XX. – Planned Unit Development, Sec. 102-680, (e), (6), the applicant is responding to the
following:
A written statement generally describing the proposed PUD and the market which it is
intended to serve and its demand showing its relationship to the city’s comprehensive plan
and how the proposed PUD is to be designed, arranged and operated in order to permit the
development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable regulations of
the city.
Market
The proposed Planned Unit Development is intended to serve the growing population of Hopkins and
provide dwelling units within one quarter of a mile of the future Blake Road Southwest LRT Station. It is
anticipated with the proposed future LRT station that this site will be a regional draw for apartment-
dwellers.
Trilogy will deliver an incredibly important development node along Blake Road, as envisioned in
numerous planning documents, including the East Hopkins Land Use & Market Study, Blake Road
Corridor Study and the Blake Road LRT Station Area Development Guidelines. This project will be an
anchor for the LRT station and act as a catalyst for future development in the area. Many of the
development recommendations outlined in the station area development guidelines are being realized
within the proposed project. Here are just a few of the stated goals that will be supported by the
project’s site and building design:
Site Design:
Create a connected, walkable, mixed-use, sustainable neighborhood, with a pedestrian-oriented
and human-scale streetscape
Improve safety and security with strategies such as greater security presence, improved lighting,
and other practices such as CPTED (Community Policing Through Environmental Design)
Pursue transit-oriented design that enhances multi-modal access, and provide for bicycle
accommodations (racks, lockers, etc.) for businesses and residents.
Add green space to soften the built environment that would allow for outdoor use year-round.
Utilize landscaping and streetscape amenities to create stronger pedestrian district.
Limit surface parking with new development encourage underground or structured parking
Neighborhood Diversity:
Provide for a range of housing types and price points to meet the needs of people in all stages of
life, with the design flexibility to accommodate changing lifestyle needs
Utilize universal design principles that can respond to changing demographic needs and
anticipate in innovative ways to address the dynamic and changing needs of residents
Strengthen the vitality of the area through increased density and mixed commercial and
residential uses
Promote high-quality design
Enhance a sustainable neighborhood by promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy
Create opportunities to live, work, learn, play – the spectrum of elements for a healthy
community
Sustainable Design:
Blake Road Station -- pg 10
Improve water and environmental quality
Incorporate sustainable development practices into new construction projects
Neighborhood vitality and livability:
Multi-family housing amenities such as guest suites, work-from-home opportunities, and shared
space for larger gatherings
Medium to high density residential, to preserve green space and enhance street-level amenities
Locally owned businesses and increased opportunities for residents of all ages to live and work
in the area
The potential for commercial uses that enhance rather than compete with downtown Hopkins
Mainstreet vitality
Creative ways to support small cultural businesses that serve the community
Convenience services (e.g. pet maintenance areas, bike repair, etc.), especially near the transit
station
Flexible space that can adapt as needs change
Welcome developers and businesses that operate with equity principles of hiring and wages
Comprehensive Plan
The 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update – Cultivate Hopkins – guides this property as Activity Center.
Activity Centers surround and support the planned Blake Road and Shady Oak light rail stations along
the Southwest LRT Green Line Extension. These areas will include moderate density to high-density
mixed-use development designed to complement and enhance the existing development pattern in
these areas and support the public investment in transit. The Activity Center areas are expected to
experience significant reinvestment and redevelopment to absorb a substantial portion of the city’s
anticipated future growth.
Development in the Activity Center areas is expected to be medium to larger scale neighborhood and
regional uses with an approximate mix of 75% residential and 25% commercial. Densities in these areas
will typically range from 20-60 units per acre, with 75-150 units per acre within ¼ mile of an LRT station
platform.
The proposed project illustrates a residential density that is consistent with the Activity Center guidance,
but it falls short of the 2040 guidance for commercial space percentage. Site A will provide 2,000 sq ft of
retail space along Excelsior Boulevard and Site B will provide 10,000 sq ft of retail space fronting Blake
Road. Trilogy is responding to current market conditions that are more immediate than a
comprehensive plan’s land use guidance. The Retail Component Evaluation performed concluded that
retail in this development is high-risk. The applicant is attempting to work with the City of Hopkins to
address the retail desire, but also needs to be vigilant and not over supply the site. There are negative
ramifications to continually vacant retail space. The applicant believes strongly that multi-family
residential is highest and best use for this location. The constraints of the site are prohibitive to adding
traditional retail space to the development.
The Applicant is responding to the 2040 comprehensive plan with an overall development project that
supports the following stated goals:
Encourage transit-oriented development (development that emphasizes pedestrian and bicycle
connectivity and a broader mix of uses at densities that support transit) in areas with high
quality transit service, especially within a quarter mile of light rail stations or high-frequency bus
Blake Road Station -- pg 11
routes.
Plan for appropriate amenities, high-quality design, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and open
space in high growth areas, particularly in the Neighborhood Center, Activity Center, and
Downtown Center future land use categories or other areas in close proximity to transit.
Encourage the transition of selected auto-oriented areas into Activity Centers, as defined and
designated in the comprehensive plan.
Improve pedestrian and bicycle access throughout the community, particularly in the Centers
future land use categories as defined and designated in the comprehensive plan or other areas
in close proximity to transit.
Engage the community to explore how to increase the mix of housing types near transit
corridors, parks, and the Centers future land use categories as defined and designated in the
comprehensive plan.
Encourage all new projects to have a positive relationship to the street by orienting main
entrances to the front of the property, connecting the front door to the sidewalk, and reducing
parking between the building and the street as much as possible.
Designed, Arranged, Operated
This project will not impede improvement of surrounding properties, and the PUD is designed and
arranged to permit the orderly development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the
applicable regulations of the City. The organization of the parcels within this development is specifically
intended to create a walkable, transit-oriented community. The height and associated density of the
project will provide housing to help meet City goals for increasing housing options in Hopkins along
transit corridors. The proposed residential and retail uses are compatible with and will enhance the
existing character of the area. High-density, mixed-use redevelopment of this site is consistent with City
goals and, by being responsive to the land use policies for this area, the project will promote the orderly
development of the Blake Road Corridor.
The contemporary, high-quality building design will be an attractive addition to this important
intersection at Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard, and the mix of uses will improve and activate the
pedestrian realm. The proposed development will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health,
safety, comfort or general welfare, and approving the PUD will allow a transit-oriented, mixed-use
development that is consistent with the goals of City’s comprehensive plan. Infill development on the
underutilized site will have a positive effect on the health, safety and vitality of the area. The new
construction will comply with all building and site development codes.
Neighborhood Meeting 03/08/22 Minutes – Blake Rd, Page 1 of 2
Project: Blake Road Station Development
RE: Neighborhood Meeting (March 8, 2022, 6:00-7:30 pm)
Attendees: (see attached Sign-In Sheet for attendees that signed in; approximately 13 people attended)
Development Team Attendees:
Josh Peters, Tim Biere, Nicole Midtdahl, Chad Olmschenk – Trilogy Real Estate Group
Gretchen Camp, Jeff Hemer, Brent Holdman, Logan Brandes – ESG
Jesse Symynkywicz – Damon Farber
Overall themes/topics from attendees:
· Affordable housing
· Inquiries from current and prospective tenants about retail space
· Project timeline
· Pedestrian connections and improvements
Questions/comments from discussions:
1. Is there affordable housing within the development? If getting public subsidy, then should really
provide affordable housing on the site. Currently, no affordable units are proposed for Site A,
B or C. Trilogy will continue to review feasibility for adding affordable units to Site C, but this
will require assistance from City/State sources.
2. Will there by minority or women-owned sub-contractors constructing the project? There is
currently no requirement for MBE or WBE sub-contractors. Trilogy will inquire with the
general contractor, Kraus-Anderson, on tracking MBE/WBE participation on the project.
3. Concerns about height; too many units on the site. Worried about neighborhood turning into a
multi-family housing area.
4. Previous rent was much lower than what will be charged for the new spaces.
5. What is the project timeline? Site A has started construction. Site B will break ground in late
summer/early fall 2022. Site C is several years out due to existing leases.
6. Add Somali people to the project renderings – make them feel welcome.
7. The Alliance can be a resource – equity scorecard for the project.
8. How wide are sidewalks through the site? See landscape sections for details. Excited about the
project and want to make sure internal roads are safe and people aren’t speeding through the
site. Can the crosswalks be raised? Looking forward to seeing these improvements for
pedestrians.
Neighborhood Meeting 03/08/22 Minutes – Blake Rd, Page 2 of 2
9. When did the mailings get sent out? February 22
10. Work to incorporate affordability for Site C. Commit to engaging community for Site C.
11. Request to provide a 5,000 sq ft retail space (make one part of retail larger).
12. Blake Grocery tenants – interested in moving back into one of the retail spaces.
13. Retail tenants – provide right of first refusal to existing tenants.
From:Eric Anondson
To:Jason Lindahl
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: Comments regarding site B
Date:Friday, March 18, 2022 7:12:27 PM
Here is the sketch!
> On Mar 18, 2022, at 7:11 PM, Eric Anondson <xeoth@icloud.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Jason and city council,
>
> I attended the public meeting at 43 Hoops and left comments there regarding thoughts about the sidewalk and public realm surrounding the proposed site B. Having now had a chance to view the landscaping
proposals with the advantage of being able to zoom in on my screen, I have a couple more comments to add.
>
> I believe the landscaping at the corner of Blake and Excelsior is undesirably close. While it may fit within what is allowed, I believe the landscape plantings at the corner are going to crowd the corner, making
crossing and mixing of users less pleasant and possibly increase some danger. With the current landscaping, there is a curved space which adds additional room for people on bikes to maneuver to cross and
maneuver around other users.
>
> The proposed geometry will have bikes crossing north across Excelsior or crossing west across Blake to meet at a “T” and clumsily navigate hard angles. I recommend backing off the landscaping from the
corner, leaving space for sidewalk users to move around each other.
>
> Secondly, I strongly advocate extra measures to slow motor vehicle traffic on the new north/south “street”, beyond the minimum bar the city asks for. We can expect drivers to exit off Excelsior to get to the
station in a rush. Bumpouts are not going to be enough to make drivers slow down. The street is still designed to signal to drivers that the space is for going fast.
>
> Two recommendations to help signal to drivers to drive at a safe speed, I would ask for solid bollards that do not detach from drivers crashing placed at the curves of the bumpouts and at each corner of a
pedestrian crossing. Also, make the crossings be raised crossings. Raised crossings will also help in winter or rain storms as pedestrians will be less inconvenienced by being forced into puddles. I have attached a
sketch marking where I am talking about.
>
> As an aside, I wish there were awnings over the sidewalk along Excelsior, shade and rain shelter is deeply wished for!
>
> I’m looking forward to this project, and thank you for your attention!
>
>
> Eric Anondson
> 53 Jackson Ave South
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
LEVEL 2
114' - 4"
LEVEL 3
125' - 8"
LEVEL 4
137' - 4"
LEVEL 5
148' - 0"
LEVEL 6
158' - 8"
LEVEL 7
169' - 4"
LEVEL P1
89' - 6"
ROOF LEVEL
180' - 0"83' - 0"15' - 5"4' - 0"24' - 5"10' - 0"10' - 11"10' - 2"9' - 0"16' - 7"9' - 0"15' - 0"8' - 0"6' - 11"16' - 0"4' - 0"24' - 10"10' - 4"10' - 11"
NOT INCLUDED IN MATERIAL CALCUATIONS
COURTYARD ELEVATION BEYOND
4' - 0"5' - 2"11' - 1"10' - 0"21' - 0"11' - 0"6' - 6"6' - 0"7' - 0"18' - 1"10' - 0"10' - 11"24' - 1"11' - 0"10' - 0"18' - 0"17' - 0"11' - 0"10' - 0"13' - 3"24' - 0"28' - 2"7' - 4"28' - 0"13' - 4"
FACE
BRICK
METAL
PANEL
METAL
TILE
COMPOSITE
WINDOWS
PREFINISHED
METAL
BALCONIES
METAL
PANEL
FIBER CEMENT
LAP SIDING
ALUMINUM WINDOWS
METAL PANEL10' - 8"43' - 8"28' - 8"WALL AREA = 1,565 SF
WINDOW AREA = 470 SF
TRANSPARENCY = 30%
STREETFRONT
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
LEVEL 2
114' - 4"
LEVEL 3
125' - 8"
LEVEL 4
137' - 4"
LEVEL 5
148' - 0"
LEVEL 6
158' - 8"
LEVEL 7
169' - 4"
LEVEL P1
89' - 6"
ROOF LEVEL
180' - 0"
11' - 1"8' - 11"25' - 0"9' - 0"12' - 6"5' - 0"8' - 4"9' - 1"16' - 1"9' - 0"16' - 7"9' - 1"14' - 3"9' - 0"20' - 4"9' - 0"17' - 8"9' - 0"18' - 1"9' - 0"14' - 5"
23' - 1"23' - 11"18' - 1"5' - 7"18' - 1"14' - 0"11' - 8"23' - 4"24' - 1"18' - 0"27' - 0"7' - 4"22' - 0"3' - 0"22' - 3"
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
3/18/2022 4:00:40 PMA3-3
WEST AND NORTH
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
221561.00
LB ESG
02/06/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
Schematic Design
3/17/22
3/32" = 1'-0"A3-3
1 WEST ELEVATION
3/32" = 1'-0"A3-3
2 NORTH ELEVATION
No. Description D ate
TRANSFORMER
SCREEN
METAL PANEL AND WINDOWS
EXTENDED TO BLDG EDGE
GARAGE WINDOWS MODIFIED TO BE MORE
LIKE RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS BY MATCHING
HEIGHT, ADDING METAL LINTEL AND
HORIZONTAL MULLION
HORIZONTAL MULLION ADDED AT FIRST FLOOR
GARAGE WINDOWS TO ALIGN WITH RETAIL WINDOW
DESIGN
LAND USE REVISIONS 3/24/2022
KNOCK-OUT PANEL FOR
POTENTIAL NORTHERN
GARAGE ENTRANCE
DECORATIVE METAL
TRELLIS
RECESSED FACE BRICK
DECORATIVE METAL
TRELLIS
RECESSED
FACE BRICK
GARAGE WINDOWS MODIFIED TO BE MORE
LIKE RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS BY MATCHING
HEIGHT, ADDING METAL LINTEL AND
HORIZONTAL MULLION
HORIZONTAL MULLION ADDED AT FIRST FLOOR
GARAGE WINDOWS
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
2/17/2022 11:48:24 AMT1-1
TITLE SHEET
221561.00
Author Checker
02/18/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
2/18/2022
PROJECT TEAMPROJECT LOCATION
DRAWING INDEX
Blake Station Site B
Hopkins, MN
8490 Excelsior Boulevard
Vicinity
Site Location
DRAWING INDEX
DRAWING
NUMBER DRAWING NAME LUA 2/18/2022GENERAL INFORMATION
T1-1 TITLE SHEET ●
T1-2 CONTEXT MAP & IMAGES ●
T1-3 MASTER PLAN ●
CIVIL
C200 DEMOLITION PLAN ●
C300 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN – PHASE 1 ●
C301 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN – PHASE 2 ●
C401 SITE PLAN – SITE B ●
C501 GRADING PLAN – SITE B ●
C503 STORM SEWER PLAN – SITE B ●
C601 UTILTIY PLAN – SITE B ●
V100 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY ●
LANDSCAPE
L010 GENERAL NOTES ●
L011 REFERENCE NOTES & PLANTING SCHEDULES ●
L100 OVERALL SITE PLAN ●
L111 SITE PLAN BUILDING B ●
L140 LANDSCAPE PLAN - BUILDING B ●
L400 LANDSCAPE SECTIONS ●
L500 LANDSCAPE DETAILS ●
ARCHITECTURAL
A1-0 LEVEL P1 PLAN ●
A1-1 LEVEL 1 PLAN ●
A1-2 LEVEL 2 PLAN ●
A1-3 LEVEL 3 PLAN ●
A1-4 LEVEL 4-6 PLAN ●
A1-5 LEVEL 7 PLAN ●
A1-6 ROOF PLAN ●
A3-1 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS ●
A3-2 SOUTH AND EAST BUILDING ELEVATIONS ●
A3-3 WEST AND NORTH BUILDING ELEVATIONS ●
A3-4 EXTERIOR MATERIALS ●
A3-5 SHADOW STUDIES ●
ELECTRICAL
E0.1P ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC ●
E0.2P ELECTRIC SITE PHOTOMETRIC DETAILS ●
E0.3P ELECTRIC SITE PHOTOMETRIC DETAILS ●
E0.4P ELECTRIC SITE PHOTOMETRIC DETAILS ●
UNIT MIX & BUILDING DATA
OWNER/DEVELOPER:Trilogy Real Estate Group, LLC
520 West Erie Street Suite 100
Chicago, IL 60654
Ph: (312) 750-0900 Ext. 125
ARCHITECT:Elness Swenson Graham Architects, Inc.
500 Washington Ave. South, Suite 1080
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Ph: 612-339-5508
Fx: 612-339-5382
CIVIL ENGINEER:Kimley-Horn
767 N Eustis Street, Suite 100
St. Paul, MN 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:Damon Farber Landscape Architects
310 S 4th Ave, Suite 7050
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Ph: 612-332-7522
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Meyer Borgman Johnson
510 S Marquette Ave Unit 900
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Ph: 612-338-0713
MEP ENGINEERING:Emanuelson-Podas, Inc.
7705 Bush Lake Road
Edina, MN 55439
Ph: 952-930-0050
**UNIT MIX SUMMARY - OPTION 1)
Name Qty % Area Min - Max SF
1 BED 97 39% 66,839 SF 645 SF ... 720 SF
1 BED + DEN 2 1% 1,572 SF 774 SF ... 797 SF
2 BED 80 32% 81,097 SF 904 SF ... 1,052 SF
3 BED 11 4% 14,087 SF 1,272 SF ... 1,318 SF
ALCOVE 40 16% 21,656 SF 495 SF ... 597 SF
STUDIO 20 8% 9,650 SF 464 SF ... 521 SF
Grand total: 250 250 194,900 SF
BUILDING GROSS BUILDING
Level Area
LEVEL P1 66,337 SF
LEVEL 1 64,904 SF
LEVEL 2 65,004 SF
LEVEL 3 42,027 SF
LEVEL 4 41,828 SF
LEVEL 5 41,828 SF
LEVEL 6 41,828 SF
LEVEL 7 40,812 SF
404,569 SF
RESIDENTIAL GROSS AREA
Level Area
LEVEL 2 19,615 SF
LEVEL 3 38,269 SF
LEVEL 4 40,842 SF
LEVEL 5 40,842 SF
LEVEL 6 40,842 SF
LEVEL 7 38,742 SF
219,153 SF
PARKING GROSS AREA
Level Area
LEVEL P1 62,469 SF
LEVEL 1 39,478 SF
LEVEL 2 42,751 SF
144,697 SF
PARKING SCHEDULE - VEHICLES
Description Count
LEVEL P1
8 x 18 COMPACT 7
9'-0" x 16' COMPACT 3
ACCESSIBLE STALL 4
COMPACT 8
STANDARD 126
LEVEL 1
8 x 18 COMPACT 3
8'-6" x 18' STANDARD 3
9'-0" x 16' COMPACT 3
9'-0" x 18' STANDARD 1
ACCESSIBLE STALL 4
COMPACT 1
STANDARD 71
LEVEL 2
8 x 18 COMPACT 6
9'-0" x 16' COMPACT 2
ACCESSIBLE STALL 4
COMPACT 5
STANDARD 88
TOTAL STALLS:339
No. Description Date
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
2/16/2022 5:15:31 PMT1-2
CONTEXT MAP & IMAGES
221561.00
Author Checker
02/11/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
2/18/2022
No. Description Date
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
2/16/2022 5:15:32 PMT1-3
MASTER PLAN
221561.00
Author Checker
02/11/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
2/18/2022
NORTH
PLAN
No. Description Date
0 4020 80
MASTER PLAN
SITE A
SITE B
SITE C
EXCELSIOR BL
V
D BLAKE ROAD S(CO. RD. NO.
3
)(CO. RO. NO. 20)(PUBLIC)(PUBLIC)DDDD
D
D
D
8,571 SF
AMENITY
2,840 SF
RETAIL
3,222 SF
RETAIL
832 SF
AMENITY
4,000 SF
RETAIL
556 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
77 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
152 SF
BOH
452 SF
MECH / ELEC
304 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
21,298
SF
PARKING
18,180
SF
PARKING
374 SF
STORAGE
143 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION 776 SF
BOH
370 SF
BOH 568 SF
BOH
217 SF
BOH CIRC
PROPOSED BUILDING B
FFE: 915.10 TO 920.00
P1 FFE: ±909.091891891891
7
91
8
917
9
1
7
918
919
920919918917916915
91
5
91
6
9
1
7
918919919919
919
918
918
919917917918917916
917DISCHARGE LOCATION #1
EXCELSIOR AVE. STORM SEWER
DISCHARGE LOCATION #2
BLAKE ROAD S. STORM SEWER
B
B
C
C
B
D
D
D
D
D
D
DD
D
C
D
D
B C
C
A
C
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/17/2020160573033
BPG
BLAKE ROAD STATION -
SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
2/18/2022
No. Description Date
2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114
PHONE: 651-645-4197
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
XX/XX/XXXX
WDM
LUA SUBMITTAL
12/14/2021
WILLIAM D. MATZEK
42661
NORTH
EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES
1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE
INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
4. WITHIN TWO WEEKS (14 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR
MATERIALS.
5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING
THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE
CONSTRUCTION.
7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE
CONTRACTOR.
8. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.
9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO
EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS AS
NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.
10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER
FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS.
UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER, PARKING,
LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL AND MATERIAL
STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC., IMMEDIATELY DENOTE
THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES IN LOCATION AS THEY OCCUR
THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS.
BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
1. TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DENUDED AREAS THAT WILL
BE INACTIVE FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE.
2. INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, UNDERGROUND SYSTEM,
CURBS AND GUTTERS.
3. INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION AT ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES AS
EACH INLET STRUCTURE IS INSTALLED.
4. PERMANENTLY STABILIZE AREAS TO BE VEGETATED AS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO
FINAL GRADE.
5. PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING.
6. PAVE SITE AND INSTALL STRIPING.
7. INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES FOR PAVED AREAS AS WORK
PROGRESSES.
8. COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALLATION OF PERMANENT STABILIZATION OVER ALL
AREAS.
9. OBTAIN CONCURRENCE WITH THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT THAT THE
SITE HAS BEEN FULLY STABILIZED THEN:
1. REMOVE ALL REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION ADN SEDIMENT CONTROL
DEVICES
2. STABILIZE ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL OF BMPS.
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION:
ROCK ENTRANCE
INLET PROTECTION
SILT FENCE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
SAFETY FENCE
BIOROLL
LEGEND
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
KEYNOTE LEGEND
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, OFFSET FOR CLARITY
BIROLL
INLET PROTECTION
BIOLOG
A
B
C
D
E
BMP QUANTITIES
BMP UNIT QUANTITY
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA.1
BIROLL LF 1,275
INLET PROTECTION EA.12
C301
EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2C301
EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2
EXCELSIOR BL
V
D BLAKE ROAD S(CO. RD. NO.
3
)(CO. RO. NO. 20)(PUBLIC)(PUBLIC)W
C
A
R
PROPOSED BUILDING B
FFE: 919.25 TO 920.0
P1 FFE: ±909.0
8,571 SF
AMENITY
2,840 SF
RETAIL
3,222 SF
RETAIL
832 SF
AMENITY
4,000 SF
RETAIL
556 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
77 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
152 SF
BOH
452 SF
MECH / ELEC
304 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
21,298
SF
PARKING
18,180
SF
PARKING
374 SF
STORAGE
143 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION 776 SF
BOH
370 SF
BOH 568 SF
BOH
217 SF
BOH CIRC
PROPOSED BUILDING B
FFE: 915.10 TO 920.00
P1 FFE: ±909.0
G
G
A
R
R
C
E
F
H
J
J
J
J
J
J
L1
L1
L1
L2
Q
T
T
F
T
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
B
B
B
D
T
AA
AA
6.0'6.0'24.0'
16.0'
7.7'
12.3'
(TYP.)
6.0'4.0'6.0'10.0'
6.0'6.0'
6.0'6.0'6.4'5.0'
7.5'
5.0'3.5'
10.0'5.0'3.2'15.4'5.0'J
J
Z
11.4'6.0'
10.1'6.0'
11.0'6.0'
L2
J
L1
PROPOSED 6' LANDSCAPED BOULEVARD
AND 10' MIN. TRAIL/SIDEWALK ALONG
BLAKE ROAD S.
L1
L2
11.6'
19.0'
6.0'
24.0'
BB
VARIABLE HEIGHT CURB
FROM SIDEWALK TO
PROPERTY LINE - SEE SHEET
C501 FOR GRADING DETAILS
8.0'
18.0'
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
FUTURE DRIVEWAY
ACCESS TO PARKING
GARAGE
5.0'10.0'CC
DD
DD
EE
EE
L1
L2 I
S
S
I
I
I
I
BB
F
F
Y
Y
H
D
D
D
D
RECESSED RETAIL ENTRY
RECESSED AMENITY
ENTRY
RECESSED PARKING
ENTRY
RECESSED RETAIL ENTRY
RETAIL ENTRY
RESIDENTIAL
ENTRY
RESIDENTIAL
ENTRY
PARKING ENTRY
PARKING ENTRY
PROPOSED POCKET PARK,
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
M
N
O
K
K
DD
W
P
Y
Y
Y
EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS
PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER
PROPERTY LINE
RETAINING WALL
PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT
PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT
LEGEND
PROPOSED LANDSCAPING, SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/17/2020160573033
BPG
BLAKE ROAD STATION -
SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
2/18/2022
No. Description Date
2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114
PHONE: 651-645-4197
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
XX/XX/XXXX
WDM
LUA SUBMITTAL
12/14/2021
WILLIAM D. MATZEK
42661
SITE PLAN NOTES
1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS
AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT
LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT
PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING
UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.
3. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
4. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,
REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE
BID.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,
STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL
WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS
AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL
COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.
6. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A
SURVEY BY SAMBATEK, DATED 02/12/2020.
KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR
OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND
ELECTRICAL PLAN.
8. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND
UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS
SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.
9. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY
BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.
10. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.
11. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.
NORTH
PROPERTY SUMMARY
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR - SITE B
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 7.39 AC
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 0.00 AC
BUILDING A PARCEL 1.62 AC
BUILDING B PARCEL 2.27 AC
BUILDING C PARCEL (FUTURE)3.50 AC
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS
AREA (BUILDING B PARCEL)85,393 SF (1.96 AC)
PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA
(BUILDING B PARCEL)8,939 SF (0.21 AC)
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA
(INCLUDES OFFSITE
IMPROVEMENTS)
98,331 SF (2.26 AC)
ZONING SUMMARY
EXISTING ZONING B-3 GENERAL BUSINESS
PROPOSED ZONING PUD
C401SITE PLAN - SITE B
PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK
KEYNOTE LEGEND
B612 CURB AND GUTTER
STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PROPOSED STOOP/STAIRS/RISERS, REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
FOR DETAILS
ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP
PROPOSED GARAGE DOOR, REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR
DETAILS
PROPOSED BENCH/SITE FURNITURE, REFERENCE GRADING PLAN FOR
ELEVATIONS AND LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR DETAILS
PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PAD, UTILITY SCREEN/ENCLOSURES,
REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS
PROPOSED PLANTER BED, REFERENCE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL
PLANS FOR DETAILS
PROPOSED STREET LIGHT, REFERENCE LIGHTING PLANS FOR DETAILS
PROPOSED SIDEWALK
RELOCATED TRAFFIC SIGN, SEE DEMO PLAN FOR EXISTING LOCATIONS
PROPOSED LANDCAPE AREA, REFERENCE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL
PLANS FOR DETAILS
PROPOSED HARDSCAPE AREA, REFERENCE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL
PLANS FOR DETAILS
PET RELIEF AREA, SEE ARCH PLANS
RAISED STAGE FEATURE, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGN TO REMAIN
PROPOSED FENCE
EXHAUST WELL, SEE ARCH PLANS
SAWCUT LINE/MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT
SALVAGED AND RELOCATED STREET LIGHT - CONTRACTOR TO SALVAGE
AND PROVIDE LIGHT POLES TO CITY FOR STORAGE, CONSTRUCT LIGHT
POLE BASES AND PROVIDE CONDUIT WIRING, REINSTALL LIGHT POLES
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL, REFERENCE GRADING PLAN FOR
ELEVATION DETAILS AND LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR WALL TYPE
FIRE LANE SIGN, SEE DETAIL
NOT USED
CONCRETE PAVEMENT DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE
SALVAGE AND RELOCATE EXISTING BENCH
PROPOSED BIKE RACKS, REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR
DETAILS
B624 CURB AND GUTTER
PROPOSED BOLLARD
PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGNAGE, REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
SURMOUNTABLE B612 CURB
TRANSITION CURB
CRUSHED STONE LANDSCAPED AREA, REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PLANS
FOR DETAILS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L1
L2
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
AA
BB
CC
DD
EE
PROPOSED HARDSCAPE, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS
PROPOSED CRUSHED STONE LANDSCAPING, SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN
EXCELSIOR BL
V
D BLAKE ROAD S(CO. RD. NO.
3
)(CO. RO. NO. 20)(PUBLIC)(PUBLIC)DDD PROPOSED BUILDING B
FFE: 919.25 TO 920.0
P1 FFE: ±909.0
8,571 SF
AMENITY
2,840 SF
RETAIL
3,222 SF
RETAIL
832 SF
AMENITY
4,000 SF
RETAIL
556 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
77 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
152 SF
BOH
452 SF
MECH / ELEC
304 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
21,298
SF
PARKING
18,180
SF
PARKING
374 SF
STORAGE
143 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION 776 SF
BOH
370 SF
BOH 568 SF
BOH
217 SF
BOH CIRC
PROPOSED BUILDING B
FFE: 915.10 TO 920.00
P1 FFE: ±909.0
917916915
916
917
918
915
91
7
91791891891792092091991
9
919
9199
1
9
91
6
916
9
1
5
915914
920 9199
1
8 91791
6
9
1
5
91
6
917 918918
919916918919917918919917
919
918
918918918
918917
917
918 918918
9199179
1
7918
918
917918917916 916919918917916917
918
919
920
921922
917917
918
919919 918
9
1
9919919918917916
9199
1
8919 916
917
918
919
919
919919920917918919916FFE:917.25
FFE:919.25
FFE:919.25
FFE:919.25
FFE:919.25
FFE:917.90
FFE:916.50
FFE:916.50
FFE:915.50
FFE:920.00
FFE:920.00
T/G:915.85
T/G:915.84
916.30
916.31
T/G:916.09
916.58
916.65
T/G:916.16
T/G:916.81
T:916.72
G:916.27
T/G:917.27
T:917.21
G:916.71
G:916.76
T:917.26
T:916.67 917.52
916.88
916.98
919.00
917.14
916.93
916.77
916.67
916.74
916.40
916.89
916.98
T:916.43
G:915.93
T:916.50
917.00
ME:917.46
ME:917.17
ME/T:917.02
ME/G:916.52
916.63
ME:914.85
ME:915.04
ME:916.26
ME:917.58
ME:917.90
FFE:918.00
ME:916.47
T:916.47
G:915.97
T:917.60
G:917.10
ME:917.70
ME:918.44
ME:919.00
ME:919.02
ME:914.52
ME:914.59
ME/G:918.94
ME:915.40
918.00
916.00
915.00915.00
915.00
919.29
919.19
TW:919.25
BW:918.30
ME:918.24
919.33
918.05
918.52
918.47
917.52
919.25
918.01917.72
917.63
918.23
918.37 918.99
918.93
919.08
916.66
917.88
FFE:916.50
3.84%1.50%
5.74%
5.20%
23.81%
5.37%
7.70%2.23%
1.71%
8.10%
1.57%
1.51%
1.34
%1.94%1.61%1.93%1.50%1.76%1.41%1.95%2.84%4.05%3.89%1.94%4.71%6.51%3.67%1.38%6.97%
3.61%
2.
4
4%
1.96%
1.53%
FFE:915.00
917.35917.21
916.94
G:916.17
920.00
919.92
ME:919.38
ME:919.49
4.73%1.81%
3.35%
5.9
6
%7.90%917.03
1.58%1.53%1.65%
917917 919
T:919.83
919.85 T:919.17
ME/G:917.94
T:919.18
T:918.40
ME/G:917.87 ME/T/G:917.61
917.07916.96
917.10
916.85
G:916.34
919.00
919.00
916.93916.70
2.50%
2.53%
918.76
918.82 3.12%3.35%
919.17
919.17
919.25
1.50%
THREE - 6" RISERS
THREE - 6" RISERS
UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER SYSTEM,
SEE SHEET C503 FOR DETAILS
UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER SYSTEM,
SEE SHEET C503 FOR DETAILS
91
5
91
6
9
1
7
918918
91
9 919915
916
917
918919917918919
ME:917.36
ME:917.52
ME:917.62
ME:917.46
917.90
917.90 917.73
917.73
916.50
ME:916.26
916.50
916.50
ME:916.23
ME:916.09916.50
915.50
915.50
ME:915.24
ME:915.39
1.50%
1.50%
1.50%
ME:918.03
2.46%2.00%
916.34
916.35
916.35
916.35
2.02%
1.76%
1.50%
3.85%
4.14%3.17%915.43
915.33
0.77%1.32%2.05%2.01
%
914.88
ME:914.75
4.10%914.92 914.92
914.72 914.66
ME T/G:919.13
914.85
915.00
915.00
ME:914.67
ME:918.64
ME:918.85
ME:918.84
ME:918.78
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/17/2020160573033
BPG
BLAKE ROAD STATION -
SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
2/18/2022
No. Description Date
2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114
PHONE: 651-645-4197
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
XX/XX/XXXX
WDM
LUA SUBMITTAL
12/14/2021
WILLIAM D. MATZEK
42661
GRADING PLAN NOTES
1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF HOPKINS,
SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.
3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
RCP PER ASTM C-76
HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252
HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306
PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034
STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443
HDPE PER ASTM 3212
PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212
4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING
UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY
DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.
5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO
HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.
WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE
EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING
PAVEMENT.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM
SEWER ALIGNMENTS.
8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO
SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.
9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED
UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF
THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE
LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.
11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND
GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND
CONCRETE SIDEWALKS.
13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL
STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL.
14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING
DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO
CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO
CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL
SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR
AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL
BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY
ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO
PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE
ISSUES.
16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.
17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF
LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN
LANDSCAPE AREAS.
18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX>
OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN
CONNECTION.
19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING
MANHOLE CONNECTIONS.
20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT
PLUMBING CODE.
21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN
CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.
22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"
WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT
DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR925
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00
LEGEND
PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0
PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION
PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION
PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION
PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION
LP:0.0
G:0.00
T:0.00
PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
T/G:0.0
EOF:0.0
0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION
0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE
ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT
PROPOSED RIPRAP
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION
CO
D
NORTH
C501GRADING PLAN - SITE B
PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTRUBANCE
8,571 SF
AMENITY
2,840 SF
RETAIL
3,222 SF
RETAIL
832 SF
AMENITY
4,000 SF
RETAIL
556 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
77 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
152 SF
BOH
452 SF
MECH / ELEC
304 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
21,298
SF
PARKING
18,180
SF
PARKING
374 SF
STORAGE
143 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION 776 SF
BOH
370 SF
BOH 568 SF
BOH
217 SF
BOH CIRC
PROPOSED BUILDING B
FFE: 915.10 TO 920.00
P1 FFE: ±909.0
EXCELSIOR BL
V
D BLAKE ROAD S(CO. RD. NO.
3
)(CO. RO. NO. 20)(PUBLIC)(PUBLIC)DDDD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
BMP 2A
± 400 LF - 60" CMP OR APPROVED EQUAL
PIPE STORAGE: ± 10,106 CF
PIPE IE: 910.18'
T/PIPE: 915.18
2.00" DISCHARGE RATE: 1.24 CFS
100-YR HWL: 914.91'
BMP 2C
± 100 LF - 48" CMP OR APPROVED EQUAL
PIPE STORAGE: ± 4,574 CF
PIPE IE: 912.34'
2.00" DISCHARGE RATE: 0.72 CFS
100-YR HWL: 916.04'
BMP 2B
8' DIA. JELLYFISH TREATMENT MH
OR APPROVED EQUAL
40" DEPTH CARTRIDGE
RE: 915.81
IE (E) 910.18
IE (W): 910.06
TREATMENT CAPACITY: 1.30 CFS
TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA: 1.40 AC
BMP 2D
6' DIA. JELLYFISH TREATMENT MH
OR APPROVED EQUAL
40" DEPTH CARTRIDGE
RE: 918.42
IE (E) 912.23
IE (W): 912.34
TREATMENT CAPACITY: 0.85 CFS
TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA: 0.80 AC
OCS-02
STMH 48" DIA.
RE:918.39
IE:912.34 W
IE:912.34 S
T/WEIR: 915.50
CONNECT TO EX. STMH-105
STMH 48" DIA.
RE:915.71
IE:910.02 N
IE:910.02 S
OCS-01
STMH 48" DIA.
RE:915.08
IE:910.18 E
IE:910.18 S
T/WEIR: 912.50
25 LF - 24" STORM PIPE
@ 0.00%
10 LF - 12" STORM PIPE
@ 0.00%
8 LF - 12" STORM PIPE
@ 0.50%
8 LF - 24" STORM PIPE
@ 0.00%
11 LF - 12" STORM PIPE
@ 0.00%
7 LF - 12" STORM PIPE
@ 0.50%
BMP 1A
± 600 LF - 60" CMP OR APPROVED EQUAL
PIPE STORAGE: ±11,500 CF
PIPE IE: 909.50
2.00" DISCHARGE RATE: 2.79 CFS
100-YR HWL: 915.14
BMP 1B
8 X 8' JELLYFISH TREATMENT VAULT OR
APPROVED EQUAL
54" DEPTH CARTRIDGE
RE: 917.30
IE (W) 909.46
IE (E): 909.34
TREATMENT CAPACITY: 2.94 CFS
TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA: 1.95 AC
13 LF - 10" PVC
@ 2.00%
RD-3
ROOF DRAIN
IE:914.45 W
ST-3
CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND
SW SYSTEM (INLET)
IE:914.18 E
RD-2
ROOF DRAIN
IE:914.45 W
ST-2
CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND
SW SYSTEM (INLET)
IE:914.18 E
13 LF - 10" PVC
@ 2.00%
RD-1
ROOF DRAIN
IE:914.45 W
13 LF - 10" PVC
@ 2.00%
ST-1
CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND
SW SYSTEM (INLET)
IE:914.18 E
ST-4
CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND
SW SYSTEM (INLET)
IE:915.34 N
14 LF - 10" PVC
@ 2.00%
RD-4
ROOF DRAIN
IE:915.63 S
13 LF - 10" PVC
@ 2.00%
ST-5
CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND
SW SYSTEM (INLET)
IE:915.34 W
RD-5
ROOF DRAIN
IE:915.60 E
D
CONNECT TO EXISTING
CURB INLET
RE:2.95
IE:912.19 W
919 9199
1
9 9189
1
7
916
91
5
917
916
920918
919918918916918
917918
919
ST-7
UNDERGROUND STORM
SYSTEM OUTLET
IE:910.18 W
ST-9
UNDERGROUND STORM
SYSTEM OUTLET
IE:912.34 E91891891791791
8
917917919
915
917918919919917918
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/17/2020160573033
BPG
BLAKE ROAD STATION -
SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
2/18/2022
No. Description Date
2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114
PHONE: 651-645-4197
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
XX/XX/XXXX
WDM
LUA SUBMITTAL
12/14/2021
WILLIAM D. MATZEK
42661
NORTH
GRADING PLAN NOTES
1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF HOPKINS,
SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.
3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
RCP PER ASTM C-76
HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252
HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306
PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034
STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443
HDPE PER ASTM 3212
PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212
4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING
UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY
DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.
5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO
HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.
WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE
EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING
PAVEMENT.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM
SEWER ALIGNMENTS.
8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO
SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.
9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED
UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF
THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE
LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.
11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND
GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND
CONCRETE SIDEWALKS.
13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL
STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL.
14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING
DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO
CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO
CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL
SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR
AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL
BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY
ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO
PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE
ISSUES.
16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.
17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF
LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN
LANDSCAPE AREAS.
18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX>
OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN
CONNECTION.
19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING
MANHOLE CONNECTIONS.
20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT
PLUMBING CODE.
21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN
CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.
22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"
WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT
DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPERTY LINE
LEGEND
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
CO
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)
PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT
PROPOSED RIPRAP
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION
D
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
STORMWATER PIPE DETENTION
C503
STORM SEWER PLAN -
SITE B
STORMWATER SUMMARY - BUILDING B PARCEL
BLAKE & EXCELSIOR - SITE B
PROPERTY AREA (SITE B)94,332 SF (2.17 AC)
PROPOSED SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA 86,096 SF (1.98 AC)
TRIBUTARY AREA TO BMP 2A/B 61,131 SF (1.40 AC)
TRIBUTARY AREA TO BMP 2C/D 23,557 SF (0.54 AC)
DISTURBED AREA 95,876 SF (2.20 AC)
RATE ATTENUATION SUMMARY
1-YEAR
(CFS)
10-YEAR
(CFS)
100-YEAR
(CFS)
BLAKE ROAD S.
EXISTING 3.63 6.60 11.77
PROPOSED 1.23 4.40 7.97
EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD
EXISTING 3.35 5.90 10.37
PROPOSED 1.22 5.61 7.88
TOTAL
EXISTING 6.98 12.49 22.15
PROPOSED 2.35 9.27 15.08
RUNOFF VOLUME SUMMARY
REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME: MCWD REQUIRES A
VOLUME ABSTRACTION OF 1" OVER THE IMPERVIOUS AREA
(7,175 CF) OR TREATMENT OF THE FLOW RATE RESULTING
FROM THE 2" EVENT OVER THE IMPERVIOUS AREA FOR
FILTRATION PRACTICES.
14,350 CF
PROVIDED TREATMENT VOLUME: TO DEMONSTRATE THE
UNDERGROUND DETENTION AND TREATMENT VAULT HAVE
SUFFICIENT CAPACITY, THE 2" EVENT IS MODELED WITH A
2.55" RAINFALL DEPTH THAT RESULTS IN THE PROVIDED
TREATMENT VOLUME.
14,680 CF
WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
REQUIRED TSS REMOVAL 70%
SITE CAPTURE 88.33%
BMP 2B/2D TSS REMOVAL RATE 80%
BMP 2B DISCHARGE RATE/TREATMENT CAPACITY 1.24 CFS/1.30 CFS
BMP 2D DISCHARGE RATE/TREATMENT CAPACITY 0.72 CFS/0.85 CFS
PROVIDED TSS REMOVAL 70.66% (88.33% SITE CAPTURE * 80%
REMOVAL)
PROPOSED FINGER DRAIN - INSTALL AROUND CATCH BASINS, 4 DRAINS,
SPACED AT 90°, EXTENDING 10' FROM CATCH BASIN
EXCELSIOR BL
V
D BLAKE ROAD S(CO. RD. NO.
3
)(CO. RO. NO. 20)(PUBLIC)(PUBLIC)B
DDD 8" X 6"
8"
8" X 8"
D
D
D
D
D
10.0'11.0'8,571 SF
AMENITY
2,840 SF
RETAIL
3,222 SF
RETAIL
832 SF
AMENITY
4,000 SF
RETAIL
556 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
77 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
152 SF
BOH
452 SF
MECH / ELEC
304 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
21,298
SF
PARKING
18,180
SF
PARKING
374 SF
STORAGE
143 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION 776 SF
BOH
370 SF
BOH 568 SF
BOH
217 SF
BOH CIRC
PROPOSED BUILDING B
FFE: 915.10 TO 920.00
P1 FFE: ±909.0
EXISTING WATER /
SANITARY EASEMENT
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER SERVICE,
MAINTAIN SERVICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES
EXISTING POWER POLE TO REMAIN
PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN
C
G
B
E
E
I
F
G
I
F
G
R150'
PROPOSED HYDRANT COVERAGE
F
J
A
I
I
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
GAS LINE, COORD. W / UTILITY
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
TELEPHONE LINE, COORD.
W / UTILITY
EXISTING POWER POLES TO REMAIN
CORE DRILL CONNECT TO
EXISTING SSWR MH, CONTRACTOR
TO FIELD VERIFY INVERT
ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS
REMOVE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER STUB,
CONSTRUCT CLEANOUT STRUCTURE AND
CONNECT TO EXISTING SERVICE LINE
EXISTING LIGHT POLE
TO REMAIN
EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO BE
SALVAGED AND RELOCATED
C
H
H
COCOSS-9
48" SSWR MH
IE:904.76 SW
IE:904.60 E
IE:904.60 N
IE:904.60 W
102 LF - 8" PVC
@ 2.00%
SS-8
CLEANOUT
IE:906.80 S
IE:906.80 NE
5 LF - 8" PVC
@ 2.00%SS-7
STUB
IE:906.90 N
6 LF - 8" PVC
@ 2.00%
SS-1
STUB
IE:907.86 W
SS-2
CLEANOUT
IE:907.75 E
IE:907.75 SW
A
A
CONNECT TO EXISTING
WATER SERVICE LINE
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
7/17/2020160573033
BPG
BLAKE ROAD STATION -
SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
2/18/2022
No. Description Date
2022 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114
PHONE: 651-645-4197
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
XX/XX/XXXX
WDM
LUA SUBMITTAL
12/14/2021
WILLIAM D. MATZEK
42661
CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO
EXISTING PROPOSED
UTILITY PLAN NOTES
1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF
PROPOSED UTILITIES.
2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP
8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP
6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-3034
DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150
3. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241
CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150
4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150
SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER ANSI 816.22
WATER LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST RECENT
EDITION OF CEAM SPECIFICATIONS
4. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET.
5. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST
BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE
CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS.
6. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18"
VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR
STRUCTURE).
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES.
8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES,
STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE
SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET
ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE
MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A
MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR
ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50).
9. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE
BACKFILLING.
10. TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED
PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN
GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS.
11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION
STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I.
12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW
LINES.
13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES.
14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY
OF HOPKINS AND/OR STATE OF MINNESOTA WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND
INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES.
15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION
OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE
VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE
FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE
CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS
BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL
BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES
WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES.
17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION
REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND
ELECTRICAL PLAN.
19. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE
INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS.
20. ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND
MAINTAINED.
21. ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION
BLOCKING.
22. THE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SHALL BE DISINFECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN
PLUMBING CODE RULES PER SECTION 609.9.A
23. THE PLUMBING SYSTEM SHALL BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN PLUMBING CODE
RULES PER SECTIONS 609.4 AND 712.0. THIS SHALL INCLUDE THE STORM SEWER
LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING AND WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BURIED WATER
SUPPLY.
24. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE
BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA
RULES, CHAPTER 474, SECTION 1109.
25. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE WATERTIGHT OR BE OF FLEXIBLE
COMPRESSION JOINTS LOCATED BETWEEN 12 ANDN 36 INCHES FROM MANHOLE. JOINT
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE FLEXIBLE WATER STOPS, RESILIENT CONNECTORS, OR OTHER
FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTION
TO MANHOLES AND OTHER STRUCTURES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND
STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CEMENT MORTAR JOINTS ARE NOT
APPROVED
NORTH
SANITARY SEWER KEYNOTE LEGEND
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. CONNECT TO BUILDING PLUMBING
COORDINATE W/ MEP PLANS
ADJUST EXISTING CASTING TO NEW RIM ELEVATION
CONSTRUCT MANHOLE OVER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER.
CONNECT TO EXISTING SERVICE PIPE. FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND
ELEVATION.
CORE DRILL AND CONNECT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE. FIELD VERIFY
LOCATION AND ELEVATION
A
B
C
D
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
STORM SEWER
SANITARY SEWER
WATERMAIN
GATE VALVE
HYDRANT
TEE
REDUCER
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
TELEPHONE
GAS MAIN
STORM SEWER
LEGEND
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
STORMWATER PIPE DETENTION
C601UTILITY PLAN - SITE B
WATERMAIN KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROPOSED 8" FIRE WATER SERVICE, PROVIDE BACKFLOW
PREVENTER INSIDE BUILDING
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER STUB
CAP EXISTING TEE TO THE EAST AFTER REMOVING EXISTING WATER
SERVICE LINE
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER LINE TO MAINTAIN SERVICE
EXISTING HYDRANT (SITE A)
PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY, PROVIDE 6"
LEAD
TEE
45-DEGREE BEND
GATE VALVE
PROPOSED 6" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
ELECTRIC
XCEL ENERGY
5309 W. 70TH STREET
EDINA, MN 55439
TELEPHONE: (952) 380-2637
CONTACT: JACOB MOCK
COMMUNICATIONS
LUMEN
301 65TH STREET W
RICHFIELD, MN 55423
TELEPHONE: (612) 431-3529
CONTACT: LUCAS PELUSO
GAS
CENTERPOINT ENERGY
TELEPHONE: (612) 321-5505
CONTACT: ANTHONY LAFFRADO
COMMUNICATIONS
COMCAST
TELEPHONE: (612) 369-1284
CONTACT: RICHARD MISKE
FULL DEPTH SAWCUT
PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLAN--/--/----26970Jesse SymynkywiczSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE STATIONBLDG BHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL02/18/2022No. Description DateOVERALL SITE PLANL100BIKERACKSDOUBLE-SIDEDBENCHBUS STOP PLAZACURBED PLANTING BEDS(10' - 13' WIDTH / 30"OFFSET FROM CURB)STREET LIGHTINGCONCRETE WALKWAY(10' WIDTH)MONUMENT SIGNBENCHBIKE RACKSRETAIL PATIOCITY STANDARDPAVING / STREETSCAPEBIKE RACKBIKE RACKBIKE RACKBIKE RACKSGOOD WILL SIGNBENCHDOGRELIEFAREAPLAY AREABENCHGABION WALL / BENCHESSTEEL PLANTERSWOOD DECKCRUSHEDSTONESEATINGAREANORTH0SCALE:1" = 30'30 6090STREET LIGHTINGRELOCATED CABINETAND ANTENNACURBED PLANTING BEDS(7' - 11' WIDTH / 30"OFFSET FROM CURB)CONCRETE WALKWAY(9' WIDTH)6' HT. SCREEN FENCEFOUNDATIONPLANTINGSPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEBOULEVARDPLANTINGSFOUNDATIONPLANTINGSBIKERACKSBENCH
CONCRETE PAVINGCONCRETE UNIT PAVERSCRUSHED STONEWOOD DECKPLAY SURFACINGPLANTING TYPE 1PLANTING TYPE 2PLANTING TYPE 3OVERALL SITE PLAN LEGENDAREAWELL
Xref .\3 Xrefs\Arch\Blake Road Station Site B.dwg
6'-0"SF-01SN-029'-6"1'-4 1/2"SF-02P-0510'-0"P-05P-05P-01P-01P-01P-01P-01EXISTING 'EXCELSIOR'LIGHT POLE(DOES NOT MOVE FROMEXISTING LOCATION)EXISTING 'EXCELSIOR'LIGHT POLE(DOES NOT MOVE FROMEXISTING LOCATION)PLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREABUS STOPSN-01PROPOSEDMONUMENTSIGNPROPOSEDGOODWILLSIGNPLANTINGAREAAREAWELLSF-02P-05P-05CB-01CB-01CB-01CB-01LT-01'BLAKE ROAD'STANDARDLIGHT POLEP-05'BLAKE ROAD'STANDARDLIGHT POLELT-01LT-0110'-0"FE-0210'-0"11'-0"6'-0"6'-0"PLANTINGAREAP-01P-015'-0"TCAREAWELL5'-0"FE-0118'-0"TCP-01P-01P-01SF-01WL-01PE-01PE-03PE-02P-04AM-01WL-01LT-0212' LIGHTS(SIMILAR TOPHASE 'A')P-01P-01P-01P-01P-01P-03DOG RELIEF AREACRUSHED STONELT-02ED-101P-03SF-07SF-04LT-03WL-02SF-05SF-05SF-05SF-07LT-03SF-03WL-01FE-026'-0"6'-0"6'-0"E X
C
E
L
S
I
O
R
A
V
E
N
U
E
B L A K E R O A D 14' LIGHTCOLUMNSF-06SF-06SF-06SF-06SF-06SF-06PLANTING AREA
PLANTING AREA
PLANTING AREA PLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAPLANTINGAREAAMENITYSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYWOOD DECK/MINI STAGE126 SF TBDCURBSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELCOLOR/FINISHCONCRETE PLANTER CURB621 LF CUSTOMCONCRETE CURBINGSTANDARD CONCRETEEDGINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELSTEEL EDGING46 LF3/16" GALVANIZED STEELRYERSON3/16" GALVANIZED STEELFENCE & GUARDRAILSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYSCREEN FENCE244 LF 6` HEIGHT WOODEN FENCEUTILITY SCREEN FENCE235 LF MATCH PHASE 1 DESIGNLIGHTINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYEXCELSIOR STREET LIGHT3PEDESTRIAN LIGHT312` HEIGHTPEDESTRIAN COLUMN LIGHT614` HEIGHTPAVINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYCONCRETE PAVING14,738 SF4" CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER 6"COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE, COMPACTEDSUBGRADECONCRETE PAVING - VEHICULAR703 SF6" REINFORCED VEHICULAR RATEDCONCRETE PAVEMENT, OVER COMPACTEDAGGREGATE BASE, COMPACTED SUBGRADESTABILIZED CRUSHED STONE662 SF3" DEPTH 3/8" DECOMPOSED GRANITE,STABILIZED, OVER COMPACTED AGGREGATEBASE OVER COMPACTED SUBGRADEPLAY AREA SURFACE305 SFENGINEERED WOOD FIBER, DEPTH PER ASTMSTND. WITH SUBSURFACE DRAINGE SYSTEMCONCRETE UNIT PAVER2,690 SFTBDPLAY EQUIPMENTSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELPLAY BOULDER5BALANCE BEAM110′ 2″ X 6″ X 1′ 3″KOMPANNRO887-0601STILTS14′ 2″ X 8′ 1″ X 3′ 7″KOMPANNRO806-0601SITE FURNITURESYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELLINEAR BENCH - 8`22` X 8` LINEAR BENCHANOVAINF24L8TLINEAR BENCH - 10`22` X 10` LINEAR BENCHANOVAINF24L10TCAST CONCRETE BENCH4REINFORCED CAST STONE BENCH, 75" X 67" X17"LANDSCAPE FORMSFLOR-SMCURVED BENCH12` CURVED BENCH 16` RADIUSANOVAINF24C1690TGABION BENCH42` X 6` GABION BENCH, FILL W/ DRESSOR TRAPROCKANOVACE1872TBIKE RACK10FORMS + SURFACESTRIO BIKE RACKMOVABLE CHAIR11TBDMOVABLE TABLE6TBDSIGNAGESYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMONUMENT SIGN1TBDGOOD WILL SIGN1RELOCATED GOOD WILL SIGNWALLSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYSTEEL PLANTER WALL120 LF16" HEIGHT WEATHERING STEEL PLANTERWALL WITH BENT TOPWALLSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYAM-01CB-01ED-101FE-01FE-02LT-01LT-02LT-03P-01P-02P-03P-04P-05PE-01PE-02PE-03SF-01SF-02SF-03SF-04SF-05SF-06SF-07SF-08SN-01SN-02WL-01REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULEAMENITYSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYWOOD DECK/MINI STAGE126 SF TBDCURBSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELCOLOR/FINISHCONCRETE PLANTER CURB621 LF CUSTOMCONCRETE CURBINGSTANDARD CONCRETEEDGINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELSTEEL EDGING46 LF3/16" GALVANIZED STEELRYERSON3/16" GALVANIZED STEELFENCE & GUARDRAILSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYSCREEN FENCE244 LF 6` HEIGHT WOODEN FENCEUTILITY SCREEN FENCE235 LF MATCH PHASE 1 DESIGNLIGHTINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYEXCELSIOR STREET LIGHT3PEDESTRIAN LIGHT312` HEIGHTPEDESTRIAN COLUMN LIGHT614` HEIGHTPAVINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYCONCRETE PAVING14,738 SF4" CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER 6"COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE, COMPACTEDSUBGRADECONCRETE PAVING - VEHICULAR703 SF6" REINFORCED VEHICULAR RATEDCONCRETE PAVEMENT, OVER COMPACTEDAGGREGATE BASE, COMPACTED SUBGRADESTABILIZED CRUSHED STONE662 SF3" DEPTH 3/8" DECOMPOSED GRANITE,STABILIZED, OVER COMPACTED AGGREGATEBASE OVER COMPACTED SUBGRADEPLAY AREA SURFACE305 SFENGINEERED WOOD FIBER, DEPTH PER ASTMSTND. WITH SUBSURFACE DRAINGE SYSTEMCONCRETE UNIT PAVER2,690 SFTBDPLAY EQUIPMENTSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELPLAY BOULDER5BALANCE BEAM110′ 2″ X 6″ X 1′ 3″KOMPANNRO887-0601STILTS14′ 2″ X 8′ 1″ X 3′ 7″KOMPANNRO806-0601SITE FURNITURESYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMANUFACTURERPRODUCT/MODELLINEAR BENCH - 8`22` X 8` LINEAR BENCHANOVAINF24L8TLINEAR BENCH - 10`22` X 10` LINEAR BENCHANOVAINF24L10TCAST CONCRETE BENCH4REINFORCED CAST STONE BENCH, 75" X 67" X17"LANDSCAPE FORMSFLOR-SMCURVED BENCH12` CURVED BENCH 16` RADIUSANOVAINF24C1690TGABION BENCH42` X 6` GABION BENCH, FILL W/ DRESSOR TRAPROCKANOVACE1872TBIKE RACK10FORMS + SURFACESTRIO BIKE RACKMOVABLE CHAIR11TBDMOVABLE TABLE6TBDSIGNAGESYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYMONUMENT SIGN1TBDGOOD WILL SIGN1RELOCATED GOOD WILL SIGNWALLSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYSTEEL PLANTER WALL120 LF16" HEIGHT WEATHERING STEEL PLANTERWALL WITH BENT TOPWALLSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONQTYMATERIAL PROFILE/ASSEMBLYREFERENCEBNOTESBSCHEDULEAM-01CB-01ED-101FE-01FE-02NORTH0SCALE:1"=16'16' 32'48'PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLAN--/--/----26970Jesse SymynkywiczSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE STATIONBLDG BHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL02/18/2022No. Description DateSITE PLAN - BUILDING BL111
EXCELSIOR BLVDBLAKE ROAD S15'-5 1/2"11'-10"6'-0"39 - CA-A7 - GL-I26 - CA-A59 - CA-A64 - CA-A54 - SO-S19 - SP-H21 - AR-A6 - EC-W22 - SS-P26 - NE-F22 - SS-P6 - EC-W26 - NE-F22 - SS-P7 - SP-H10 - AR-A39 - CA-A2 - GL-T10 - PE-A23 - PA-H14 - AR-A11 - SP-H7 - SO-S16 - AR-M11 - LI-K29 - SA-N14 - IR-S24 - SB24 - SB24 - SB24 - SB24 - SB22 - HB21 - HB20 - HB18 - HB21 - HB18 - HB21 - HB15 - HB4 - QB15 - SB15 - SB21 - SB5 - RI-A5 - TN4 - TH-H3 - TN6 - RI-A1 - TH-H41 - TN18 - HY-P2 - AG3 - TH-H36 - CA-A21 - AR-M2 - TH-H10 - HY-P10 - TN3 - AG1 - AG8 - QU-L22 - PH-O22 - AA43 - TH-H28 - PE-A46 - PA-H5 - BF18 - PE-A29 - PA-H35 - PE-A8 - BF61 - PA-H13 - PE-A6 - SO-S5 - AC-M41 - SO-S8 - TI-S7 - CA-V2 - BA-A10 - CA-V12 - TI-S4 - BA-A8 - TI-S9 - CA-V4 - BA-A81 - SB22 - CA-A11 - EP311 - SA-N9 - NE-F13 - AT-S27 - SB14 - HB38 - SP-BDECIDUOUS TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEAC-M 5 ACER MIYABEI `MORTON` TM / STATE STREET MIYABEI MAPLEBF 13 BETULA PLATYPHYLLA 'FARGO' TM / DAKOTA PINNACLE ASIAN WHITE BIRCHGL-T 2 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS DRAVES / HONEY LOCUST STREET KEEPERGL-I 7 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS `SKYCOLE` TM / SKYLINE THORNLESS HONEY LOCUSTQB4QUERCUS BICOLOR / SWAMP WHITE OAKQU-L8QUERCUS X WAREI `LONG` TM / REGAL PRINCE OAKORNAMENTAL TREES CODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEAG 6 AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE` / `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE` SERVICEBERRYSHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEAA422ARONIA MELANOCARPA `AUTUMN MAGIC` / AUTUMN MAGIC BLACK CHOKEBERRYAR-M 37 ARONIA MELANOCARPA `UCONNAM165` / LOW SCAPE MOUND CHOKEBERRYHY-P 28 HYDRANGEA PANICULATA 'JANE' TM / LITTLE LIME PANICLE HYDRANGEAPH-O22PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `DART`S GOLD` / DART`S GOLD NINEBARKRI-A11RIBES ALPINUM / ALPINE CURRANTSO-S 108 SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA `SEM` / SEM ASH LEAF SPIREASP-B 38 SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA 'TOR GOLD' TM / GLOW GIRL BIRCHLEAF SPIREATN 59 TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTON` / TAUNTON YEWEVERGREEN SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMETH-H 13THUJA OCCIDENTALIS `HOLMSTRUP` / HOLMSTRUP ARBORVITAEGRASSESCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMECA-A285CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` / FEATHER REED GRASSCA-V26CAREX VULPINOIDEA / FOX SEDGEPA-H159PANICUM VIRGATUM 'HEAVY METAL' / HEAVY METAL SWITCH GRASSSS-P66SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM 'PRAIRIE BLUES' / PRAIRIE BLUES LITTLE BLUESTEMSB279SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM `BLUE HEAVEN` / BLUE HEAVEN LITTLE BLUESTEMSP-H37SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS / PRAIRIE DROPSEEDPERENNIALSCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMEAT-S13ALLIUM TANGUTICUM 'SUMMER BEAUTY' / SUMMER BEAUTY GLOBE LILYAR-A45ARUNCUS AETHUSIFOLIUS / DWARF GOATSBEARDBA-A10BAPTISIA AUSTRALIS / BLUE WILD INDIGOEP311 ECHINACEA PALLIDA / PALE PURPLE CONEFLOWEREC-W 12 ECHINACEA PURPUREA 'WHITE SWAN' / WHITE SWAN CONEFLOWERHB170HEMEROCALLIS X 'BAJA' / BAJA DAYLILYIR-S 14 IRIS SIBIRICA 'CAESAR'S BROTHER' / CAESAR'S BROTHER SIBERIAN IRISLI-K 11 LIATRIS SPICATA 'KOBOLD' / KOBOLD BLAZING STARNE-F61NEPETA X FAASSENII 'WALKER'S LOW' / WALKER'S LOW CATMINTPE-A104PEROVSKIA ATRIPLICIFOLIA 'BLUE JEAN BABY' / BLUE JEAN BABY RUSSIAN SAGESA-N40SALVIA NEMOROSA 'CARADONNA' / CARDONNA MEADOW SAGETI-S28TIARELLA X 'SUGAR AND SPICE' / SUGAR AND SPICE FOAMFLOWERPLANT SCHEDULE LANDSCAPENORTH0SCALE:1"=16'16' 32'48'PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLAN--/--/----26970Jesse SymynkywiczSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE STATIONBLDG BHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL02/18/2022No. Description DateLANDSCAPE PLAN -BUILDING BL140
PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLAN--/--/----26970Jesse SymynkywiczSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE STATIONBLDG BHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL02/18/2022No. Description DateLANDSCAPE SECTIONSL40013'-0"10'-0"5'-11"SIDEWALKRAISEDPLANTERBOULEVARDEXCELSIOR BOULEVARDSECTION - STREETSCAPE @ EXCELSIOR1" 1'-0"3'-0"2P-21261-036'-0"10'-0" - 11'-0"13'-2"SIDEWALKPATIOBOULEVARDBLAKE ROADSECTION - STREETSCAPE @ BLAKE ROAD1" 1'-0"1P-21261-0
PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BY20-172BD JSORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateKEY PLAN--/--/----26970Jesse SymynkywiczSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota310 South 4th Avenue, Suite 7050Minneapolis, MN 55415p: 612.332.752220-172BLAKE ROAD STATIONBLAKE STATIONBLDG BHOPKINS, MN 55343LUA SUBMITTAL02/18/2022No. Description DateLANDSCAPE DETAILSL500SITE BENCH - INGROUND MOUNT1" = 1'-0"&21&5(7( 6,'(:$/.6(( &,9,/&20P$&7(' $**5(*$7( %$6(.6(( &,9,/P5(P$5(' 68%*5$'(/$1'6&$P( )2506 - %$1&$/ %(1&+.,167$// P(5 0$18)$&785(5'6 ',5(&7,21P-21.261-7513" 7+.. 316" 0,186 75$P52&.6" 7+.. &/$66 5 %$6(-&20P$&7 72 8P52&725 '(16,7<&20P$&7(' 68%%$6(CRUSHED STONE PAVING1" = 1'-0"2P-21.261-67&21&5(7( 6,'(:$/.6(( &,9,/&20P$&7(' $**5(*$7( %$6(6(( &,9,/P5(P$5(' 68%*5$'()2506 685)$&(6 75,2%,.( 5$&. - "6/$7("(0%(''(' 02817 P(5 0$18)$&785(5'6',5(&7,21BIKE RACK, SURFACE MOUNT1" = 1'-0"2'-10"P-21.261-68P-21.261-6831136" 5$',86',* P/$17,1* P,7
4" 72 6" '((P(5
7+$1 5227 %$//81',6785%(' 68%*5$'(NOTE:&2175$&725 6+$// %( 5(6P216,%/( )250$,17$,1,1* 75((6 ,1 $ P/80% P26,7,217+528*+287 7+( :$55$17< P(5,2'. :5$P75(( 7581.6 21/< 8P21 $PP529$/ %</$1'6&$P( $5&+,7(&7. 6(( 6P(&,),&$7,216(&7,21 5(/$7(' 72 P/$176 $1' 62,/P5(P$5$7,21.($&+ 75(( 6+$// %( P/$17(' 68&+ 7+$7 7+(5227 )/$5( ,6 9,6,%/( $7 7+( 72P 2) 7+(5227 %$//. ,) 7+( 5227 )/$5( ,6 127 9,6,%/(7+( 62,/ 6+$// %( 5(029(' ,1 $ /(9(/0$11(5 )520 7+( 5227 %$// 72 :+(5( 7+(),567 0$,1 25'(5 5227 12" ',$. 25 /$5*(5(0(5*(6 )520 7+( 7581.. 6(7 0$,1 25'(55227 1" +,*+(5 7+$1 $'-$&(17 *5$'(. '2127 &29(5 72P 2) 5227 %$// :,7+ 62,/.P/$&( 5227 %$// 21 81',6785%(' 25&20P$&7(' 62,/7$0P 62,/ $5281' 5227 %$// %$6( ),50/<:,7+ )227 P5(6685( 62 7+$7 5227 %$//'2(6 127 6+,)74" %8,/7-8P ($57+ 6$8&(5 %(<21' ('*( 2)5227 %$//P/$17,1* P,7 72 %( 7:272 ),9( 7,0(6 7+( ',$0(7(52) 7+( 5227 %$// 6/2P('P5(P$5(' P/$17,1* 62,/P(5 6P(&6' ',$0(7(508/&+ 5,1*5(029( %85/$P 7:,1( 52P( $1' :,5( )52072P +$/) 2) 5227 %$//('*( &21',7,21 9$5,(65()(5 72 P/$14" 25*$1,& 08/&+ '2 127 P/$&( 08/&+ ,1&217$&7 :,7+ 75(( 7581.6&$5,)< 6,'(6 2) 75(( P,7:,7+ 6P$'( %< +$1' 72 %,1':,7+ P5(P$5(' P/$17,1* 62,/DETAIL - TREE PLANTING3/4" = 1'-0"P529,'( ,167$// 52'(17 P527(&7,21.12"+$5':,5( &/27+ 0(6+ &</,1'(5 8" ',$. 25*5($7(5 ; 36" +*7 67$.( ,1 P/$&(. P(5 6P(&P-21.261-0144" &21&5(7( 81,7 P$9(56 :/ P2/<0(5,&6$1' 6:(P7 -2,176 6(7 +$1' 7,*+71" :$6+(' 6$1' /(9(/,1* %$6(6" &20P$&7(' $**5(*$7( 68%%$6(&20P$&7(' 68%*5$'(P/$17,1* 9$5,(6- +2/' ),1,6+(' *5$'(1" %(/2: P$9(56 6(( P/$17,1* P/$16"P/$67,& P$9(5 5(675$,17 6<67(0CONCRETE UNIT PAVER1" = 1'-0")/86+$'-$&(17 P$9,1* 6(( P/$16127(&21&5(7( 81,7 P$9(56 6+$// %(,167$//(' ,1 $ 5$1'20 6,=( 5811,1*%21' P$77(51 86,1* 7+( 9$5,286/(1*7+6P-21.261-665+2/' ),1,6+(' *5$'( 12"%(/2: ('*(5- 6(( P/$1 )25('*( &21',7,21316" 0(7$/ ('*(5 :/ 67$.(P/$17,1* $5($- 6(( P/$17,1*P/$1785)- 6(( P/$17,1* P/$1STEEL EDGING1 1/2" = 1'-0"P-21.261-65P-21.261-656P5(P$5( P/$17,1* 62,/ )257+( (17,5( %('$PP/,&$7,21 2) P5(-(0(5*(17+(5%,&,'(3" 08/&+ '2 127 P/$&( ,1&217$&7 :,7+ 6+58% 67(0P5(P$5( %('$ 0,1. 4" '((P(57+$1 5227 %$//12" 0,1.6P$&,1*DETAIL - SHRUB PLANTING1" = 1'-0"('*( &21',7,21 9$5,(65()(5 72 P/$1P/$17,1* 62,/ )25 6+58%66&$5,)< 6,'(6 $1' %27720 2) (17,5(%(' :,7+ 6P$'( %< +$1' 72 %,1':,7+ P/$17,1* 62,/81',6785%(' 68%*5$'(&217$,1(5 *52:1 0$7(5,$/6+$// +$9( 52276 +$1' /226(1('P-21.261-067CONCRETE PLANTER CURB1 1/2" = 1'-0"&20P$&7(' 0Q'27 &/$66 5 $**5(*$7(%$6(&.,.P. &21&5(7( &85% 1/4" &+$0)(5 21('*(6 7<P.(;P$16,21 -2,17 7<P.2 4 %$5 (P2;< &2$7(' &217,18286./$1'6&$P( %(' 3" 0,1 '(P7++$5':22' 08/&+6(( P/$17,1* P/$1&20P$&7(' 68%*5$'(P$9,1* &21',7,21 9$5,(6 5()(5 72 P/$18"8"10"1'-6"6"8P-21.261-07
62,469 SF
PARKING
74 SF
COMMON / CIRCULATION
464 SF
MECH / ELEC
150 SF
COMMON / CIRCULATION
23' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"
1 8 ' - 0 "
2 3 ' - 0 "
1 8 ' - 0 "
18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"
23' - 0"18' - 0"
23' - 4"16' - 0"
MECH
EXHAUST
MECH
INTAKE
805 SF
MECH / ELEC
444 SF
MECH / ELEC
UNEXCAVATED
1" = 20'-0"A1-0
1 LEVEL P1
PLAN
NORTH
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
2/16/2022 5:15:11 PMA1-0
LEVEL P1 PLAN
221561.00
Author Checker
01/06/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
2/18/2022
PARKING SCHEDULE - APARTMENT
Type Level Count
LEVEL P1
8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 7
8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 8
9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL P1 126
9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 3
9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL P1 4
148
LEVEL 1
8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 3
9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 38
9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 2
9'-0' x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 1
44
LEVEL 2
8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 6
8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 5
9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 2 88
9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 2
9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL 2 4
105
TOTAL STALLS:297
PARKING SCHEDULE - RETAIL
Type Level Count
LEVEL 1
8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 1
8'-6" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 3
9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 33
9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 1
9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL 1 4
TOTAL STALLS:42
No. Description Date
8,571 SF
AMENITY
2,840 SF
RETAIL
3,222 SF
RETAIL
832 SF
AMENITY
4,000 SF
RETAIL
18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"
556 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
77 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
152 SF
BOH
452 SF
MECH / ELEC
MECH
EXHAUST
18' - 0"23' - 0"4' - 0"304 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
21,298
SF
PARKING
18,180
SF
PARKING
374 SF
STORAGE
143 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION 776 SF
BOH
370 SF
BOH 568 SF
BOH
217 SF
BOH CIRC
LOADING
COMMERCIAL
TRASH/REC
RESIDENTAIL
TRASH/REC
RESIDENTIAL AND
COMMERCIAL
PARKING
ENTRANCE/EXIT
MAIN RESIDENTIAL
ENTRANCE / LOBBY
COMMERCIAL / RES
GUEST PARKING
COMMERCIAL
/ RES GUEST
PARKING
RAMP DN TO RES PARKINGRAMP UP TO RES PARKINGSETBACK10' - 8"SETBACK5' - 3"SETBACK
17' - 4"
SETBACK
15' - 9"
SETBACK
15' - 3"
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
9'
-
8
"
SETBACK
49' - 10"
SETBACK
48' - 6"
SETBACK
17' - 11"
TRANSFORMER
AREA WAY FOR
GARAGE EXHAUST
AREA WAY
FOR GARAGE
INTAKE AIR
SETBACK16' - 3"SETBACK11' - 8"S E T B A C K T O L E V E L 2 -732' - 8 "
PROPERTY LINE SETBACK15' - 11"SETBACK
14' - 3"
PROPERTY
LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY
LINE
SETBACK
28' - 5"SETBACK18' - 2"SETBACK20' - 7"SETBACK6' - 0"BLAKE ROADE X C E L S IO R B L V D
POCKET
PARK
TRANSFORMER
1" = 20'-0"A1-1
1 LEVEL 1
PLAN
NORTH
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
2/16/2022 5:15:14 PMA1-1
LEVEL 1 PLAN
221561.00
Author Checker
01/05/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
2/18/2022
PARKING SCHEDULE - APARTMENT
Type Level Count
LEVEL P1
8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 7
8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 8
9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL P1 126
9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 3
9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL P1 4
148
LEVEL 1
8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 3
9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 38
9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 2
9'-0' x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 1
44
LEVEL 2
8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 6
8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 5
9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 2 88
9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 2
9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL 2 4
105
TOTAL STALLS:297
PARKING SCHEDULE - RETAIL
Type Level Count
LEVEL 1
8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 1
8'-6" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 3
9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 33
9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 1
9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL 1 4
TOTAL STALLS:42
DEPARTMENT GROSS AREAS
Area Department Area
LEVEL P1
BOH 1,713 SF
COMMON / CIRCULATION 225 SF
PARKING 62,469 SF
64,406 SF
LEVEL 1
AMENITY 9,403 SF
BOH 2,910 SF
COMMON / CIRCULATION 1,080 SF
PARKING 39,478 SF
RETAIL 10,062 SF
62,933 SF
LEVEL 2
BOH 1,327 SF
COMMON / CIRCULATION 2,782 SF
PARKING 42,751 SF
RESIDENTIAL 16,471 SF
63,332 SF
LEVEL 3
AMENITY 2,722 SF
BOH 646 SF
COMMON / CIRCULATION 3,793 SF
RESIDENTIAL 33,829 SF
40,991 SF
LEVEL 4
BOH 648 SF
COMMON / CIRCULATION 3,529 SF
RESIDENTIAL 36,665 SF
40,842 SF
LEVEL 5
BOH 648 SF
COMMON / CIRCULATION 3,529 SF
RESIDENTIAL 36,665 SF
40,842 SF
LEVEL 6
BOH 648 SF
COMMON / CIRCULATION 3,529 SF
RESIDENTIAL 36,665 SF
40,842 SF
LEVEL 7
AMENITY 745 SF
BOH 609 SF
COMMON / CIRCULATION 3,530 SF
RESIDENTIAL 34,603 SF
39,487 SF
393,676 SF No. Description Date
464 SF
STUDIO
1,011 SF
2 BED
1,052 SF
2 BED
1,318 SF
3 BED 684 SF
1 BED 1,011 SF
2 BED
1,040 SF
2 BED
1,041 SF
2 BED
506 SF
STUDIO
970 SF
2 BED
969 SF
2 BED
797 SF
1 BED + DEN
464 SF
STUDIO
774 SF
1 BED + DEN
1 6 ' - 0 "1 5 ' - 6 7 /8 "1 8 ' - 0 "1 4 ' - 0 "
2 8 ' - 0 "
1 8 ' - 0 "
2 8 ' - 0 "
1 8 ' - 0 "
2 8 ' - 0 "34' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"28' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"27' - 1 3/4"684 SF
1 BED
1,011 SF
2 BED
532 SF
ALCOVE
684 SF
1 BED 5' - 4"712 SF
TERRACE
521 SF
STUDIO
18' - 11 1/4"34' - 0"
464 SF
STUDIO
474 SF
STUDIO
23' - 0"42,751
SF
PARKING
337 SF
POOL EQUIP
329 SF
MECH / ELEC
MECH
EXHAUST
INTAKE
MECH
EXHAUST
18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"2,782 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION23' - 0"300 SF
STORAGE
129 SF
BOH
SETBACK
48' - 6"SETBACK5' - 3"SETBACK12' - 6"SETBACK
17' - 4"SETBACK10' - 8"SETBACK15' - 6"SETBACK18' - 2"SETBACK9' - 10"S E T B A C K
3 3 ' - 9 "
S E T B A C K
3 2 ' - 8 "
SETBACK
41' - 5"
91 SF
BOH
142 SF
BOH
1" = 20'-0"A1-2
1 LEVEL 2
PLAN
NORTH
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
2/16/2022 5:15:15 PMA1-2
LEVEL 2 PLAN
221561.00
Author Checker
01/05/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
2/18/2022
**UNIT MIX SUMMARY - OPTION 1)
Name Qty % Area Min - Max SF
1 BED 97 39% 66,839 SF 645 SF ... 720 SF
1 BED + DEN 2 1% 1,572 SF 774 SF ... 797 SF
2 BED 80 32% 81,097 SF 904 SF ... 1,052 SF
3 BED 11 4% 14,087 SF 1,272 SF ... 1,318 SF
ALCOVE 40 16% 21,656 SF 495 SF ... 597 SF
STUDIO 20 8% 9,650 SF 464 SF ... 521 SF
Grand total: 250 250 194,900 SF
PARKING SCHEDULE - APARTMENT
Type Level Count
LEVEL P1
8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 7
8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 8
9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL P1 126
9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL P1 3
9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL P1 4
148
LEVEL 1
8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 3
9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 38
9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 1 2
9'-0' x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 1 1
44
LEVEL 2
8'-0" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 6
8'-6" x 18' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 5
9'-0" x 18' - STANDARD LEVEL 2 88
9'-0' x 16' - COMPACT LEVEL 2 2
9'-0' x 18' - ADA LEVEL 2 4
105
TOTAL STALLS:297
No. Description Date
66' - 0"
30' - 4"5' - 4"30' - 4"66' - 0"30' - 4"5' - 4"30' - 4"66' - 0"30' - 4"5' - 4"30' - 4"645 SF
1 BED 1,031 SF
2 BED
977 SF
2 BED
1,285 SF
3 BED 597 SF
ALCOVE
485 SF
STUDIO 687 SF
1 BED 687 SF
1 BED 1,016 SF
2 BED
498 SF
ALCOVE
698 SF
1 BED
983 SF
2 BED
698 SF
1 BED
546 SF
ALCOVE
1,007 SF
2 BED
546 SF
ALCOVE
698 SF
1 BED
1,031 SF
2 BED1,031 SF
2 BED
648 SF
1 BED
952 SF
2 BED
720 SF
1 BED
698 SF
1 BED 698 SF
1 BED 904 SF
2 BED
698 SF
1 BED
698 SF
1 BED
698 SF
1 BED 1,031 SF
2 BED
698 SF
1 BED478 SF
STUDIO
1,279 SF
3 BED
1,045 SF
2 BED
697 SF
1 BED
1,030 SF
2 BED
697 SF
1 BED
1,031 SF
2 BED
2,081 SF
AMENITY
546 SF
ALCOVE
698 SF
1 BED
531 SF
ALCOVE
1,015 SF
2 BED
648 SF
1 BED
546 SF
ALCOVE
641 SF
AMENITY
2 0 ' - 0 "
2 0 ' - 0 "
2 3 ' - 0 "
1 6 ' - 0 "
2 3 ' - 0 "
3 4 ' - 0 "
2 3 ' - 0 "
3 2 ' - 0 "18' - 0"23' - 0"34' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"30' - 10 1/2"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"23' - 0"32' - 0"SWIMMING
POOL
40' - 0"14' - 7 1/8"32' - 0"23' - 0"376 SF
MECH / ELEC
139 SF
MECH / ELEC
132 SF
BOH
3,793 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
13,981
SF
TERRACE
SPA
SETBACK25' - 1"SETBACK30' - 8"SETBACK28' - 7"S E T B A C K
3 2 ' - 8 "
SETBACK
48' - 10"
S E T B A C K
3 3 ' - 9 "
U N I T
P A T IO S
U N I T
P A T IO S
U N IT P A T IO S
U N IT P A T IO S
UNIT PATIOS
UNIT PATIOS
SETBACK9' - 8"29' - 2"
SETBACK
25' - 3"
SETBACK
17' - 2"
SETBACK
16' - 4"
SETBACK
14' - 8"SETBACK16' - 4"SETBACK20' - 4"11' - 8"SETBACK12' - 11"UNIT PATIOSSETBACK
50' - 2"
1" = 20'-0"A1-3
1 LEVEL 3
PLAN
NORTH
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
2/16/2022 5:15:17 PMA1-3
LEVEL 3 PLAN
221561.00
Author Checker
01/05/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
2/18/2022
**UNIT MIX SUMMARY - OPTION 1)
Name Qty % Area Min - Max SF
1 BED 97 39% 66,839 SF 645 SF ... 720 SF
1 BED + DEN 2 1% 1,572 SF 774 SF ... 797 SF
2 BED 80 32% 81,097 SF 904 SF ... 1,052 SF
3 BED 11 4% 14,087 SF 1,272 SF ... 1,318 SF
ALCOVE 40 16% 21,656 SF 495 SF ... 597 SF
STUDIO 20 8% 9,650 SF 464 SF ... 521 SF
Grand total: 250 250 194,900 SF
No. Description Date
66' - 0"
30' - 4"5' - 4"30' - 4"66' - 0"30' - 4"5' - 4"30' - 4"66' - 0"
30' - 4"
5' - 4"
30' - 4"66' - 0"30' - 4"5' - 4"30' - 4"645 SF
1 BED 1,031 SF
2 BED
980 SF
2 BED
1,272 SF
3 BED 699 SF
1 BED
485 SF
STUDIO 687 SF
1 BED 687 SF
1 BED 1,015 SF
2 BED
497 SF
ALCOVE
698 SF
1 BED
981 SF
2 BED
698 SF
1 BED
546 SF
ALCOVE
1,006 SF
2 BED
545 SF
ALCOVE
698 SF
1 BED
1,031 SF
2 BED1,031 SF
2 BED
649 SF
1 BED
951 SF
2 BED
583 SF
ALCOVE 698 SF
1 BED 698 SF
1 BED 1,042 SF
2 BED
698 SF
1 BED
698 SF
1 BED
698 SF
1 BED
1,031 SF
2 BED
698 SF
1 BED
478 SF
STUDIO
1,279 SF
3 BED
1,045 SF
2 BED
697 SF
1 BED
1,030 SF
2 BED
697 SF
1 BED
1,031 SF
2 BED
697 SF
1 BED
546 SF
ALCOVE
698 SF
1 BED
485 SF
STUDIO
532 SF
ALCOVE
1,020 SF
2 BED
34' - 0"23' - 0"34' - 0"23' - 0"34' - 0"
23' - 0"23' - 0"23' - 0"34' - 0"23' - 0"
1,015 SF
2 BED
110°3 2 ' - 0 "
2 3 ' - 0 "
3 4 ' - 0 "
2 3 ' - 0 "1 6 ' - 0 "2 3 ' - 0 "
2 0 ' - 0 "2 0 ' - 0 "
649 SF
1 BED 18' - 0"23' - 0"34' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"32' - 0"23' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"546 SF
ALCOVE
3 6 ' - 0 "
2 3 ' - 0 "
2 3 ' - 0 "
2 5 ' - 0 "
3 3 ' - 0 "
4 0 ' - 0 "
40' - 0"
376 SF
MECH / ELEC
139 SF
MECH / ELEC
132 SF
BOH
3,529 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
545 SF
ALCOVE
1" = 20'-0"A1-4
1 LEVEL 4-6
PLAN
NORTH
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
2/16/2022 5:15:18 PMA1-4
LEVEL 4-6 PLAN
221561.00
Author Checker
01/05/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
2/18/2022
**UNIT MIX SUMMARY - OPTION 1)
Name Qty % Area Min - Max SF
1 BED 97 39% 66,839 SF 645 SF ... 720 SF
1 BED + DEN 2 1% 1,572 SF 774 SF ... 797 SF
2 BED 80 32% 81,097 SF 904 SF ... 1,052 SF
3 BED 11 4% 14,087 SF 1,272 SF ... 1,318 SF
ALCOVE 40 16% 21,656 SF 495 SF ... 597 SF
STUDIO 20 8% 9,650 SF 464 SF ... 521 SF
Grand total: 250 250 194,900 SF
No. Description Date
645 SF
1 BED 698 SF
1 BED
979 SF
2 BED
1,272 SF
3 BED 700 SF
1 BED
485 SF
STUDIO 687 SF
1 BED 687 SF
1 BED 1,014 SF
2 BED
498 SF
ALCOVE
698 SF
1 BED
982 SF
2 BED
698 SF
1 BED
546 SF
ALCOVE
1,009 SF
2 BED
544 SF
ALCOVE
698 SF
1 BED
745 SF
TERRACE745 SF
AMENITY
495 SF
ALCOVE
951 SF
2 BED
581 SF
ALCOVE
698 SF
1 BED 698 SF
1 BED 1,042 SF
2 BED
698 SF
1 BED
698 SF
1 BED
698 SF
1 BED 1,031 SF
2 BED
698 SF
1 BED
478 SF
STUDIO
1,279 SF
3 BED
1,046 SF
2 BED
697 SF
1 BED
1,030 SF
2 BED
697 SF
1 BED
1,031 SF
2 BED
697 SF
1 BED
698 SF
1 BED
1,031 SF
2 BED
485 SF
STUDIO
533 SF
ALCOVE
1,020 SF
2 BED
1,015 SF
2 BED
649 SF
1 BED
546 SF
ALCOVE
2 0 ' - 0 "
2 0 ' - 0 "
2 3 ' - 0 "
1 6 ' - 0 "
3 4 ' - 0 "
2 3 ' - 0 "
2 3 ' - 0 "
3 2 ' - 0 "
376 SF
MECH / ELEC
3,530 SF
COMMON /
CIRCULATION
96 SF
BOH137 SF
MECH / ELEC
545 SF
ALCOVE23' - 4"1" = 20'-0"A1-5
1 LEVEL 7
PLAN
NORTH
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
2/16/2022 5:15:19 PMA1-5
LEVEL 7 PLAN
221561.00
Author Checker
01/05/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
2/18/2022
**UNIT MIX SUMMARY - OPTION 1)
Name Qty % Area Min - Max SF
1 BED 97 39% 66,839 SF 645 SF ... 720 SF
1 BED + DEN 2 1% 1,572 SF 774 SF ... 797 SF
2 BED 80 32% 81,097 SF 904 SF ... 1,052 SF
3 BED 11 4% 14,087 SF 1,272 SF ... 1,318 SF
ALCOVE 40 16% 21,656 SF 495 SF ... 597 SF
STUDIO 20 8% 9,650 SF 464 SF ... 521 SF
Grand total: 250 250 194,900 SF
No. Description Date
ELEVATOR
OVERRUN
ROOF
ACCESS
HATCH
ELEVATOR
OVERRUN
COMMERCIAL
EXHAUST
LEVEL 3
COURTYARD
BELOW
LEVEL 3
ROOF
BELOW
LEVEL 7
TERRACE
LEVEL 3 UNIT
TERRACE BELOW
LEVEL 3 UNIT
TERRACE BELOW
LEVEL 1
COMMERCIAL
TRELLIS BELOW
AREA AVAILABLE
FOR PV SOLAR
ARRAY
PLAN
NORTH
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
2/16/2022 5:15:20 PMA1-6
ROOF PLAN
221561.00
Author Checker
02/11/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
2/18/2022
1" = 20'-0"A1-6
1 ROOF LEVEL
No. Description Dat e
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
2/16/2022 5:15:20 PMA3-1
PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
221561.00
Author Checker
01/31/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
2/18/2022
COMMERCIAL PATIO ON BLAKE ROAD VIEW WEST ON EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD
VIEW EAST ON EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD POCKET PARK
No. Description Date
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
LEVEL 2
114' - 4"
LEVEL 3
125' - 8"
LEVEL 4
137' - 4"
LEVEL 5
148' - 0"
LEVEL 6
158' - 8"
LEVEL 7
169' - 4"
LEVEL P1
89' - 6"
ROOF LEVEL
180' - 0"
20' - 2"10' - 1"7' - 9"9' - 0"14' - 2"9' - 0"13' - 2"10' - 0"24' - 9"9' - 0"17' - 6"11' - 3"9' - 0"10' - 0"7' - 6"7' - 10"10' - 1"7' - 10"10' - 1"7' - 10"16' - 3"11' - 0"31' - 4"
METAL TILE FIBER CEMENT
LAP SIDING
FACE BRICK
METAL PANEL
36' - 1"7' - 4"39' - 5"11' - 6"35' - 2"7' - 4"36' - 7"17' - 10"8' - 10"6' - 7"25' - 2"14' - 1"7' - 4"32' - 6"10' - 8"72' - 4"9' - 4"16' - 4"83' - 0"WALL AREA = 1,715 SF
WINDOW AREA = 1,280 SF
TRANSPARENCY = 75%
STEEL TRELLISALUMINUM STOREFRONT AT LEVEL 1
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
LEVEL 2
114' - 4"
LEVEL 3
125' - 8"
LEVEL 4
137' - 4"
LEVEL 5
148' - 0"
LEVEL 6
158' - 8"
LEVEL 7
169' - 4"
LEVEL P1
89' - 6"
ROOF LEVEL
180' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 8"11' - 4"14' - 4"10' - 6"FIBER CEMENT
LAP SIDING
PREFINISHED METAL
COPING
16'28'11'13'9'13'9'18'9'15'11'10'9'11'9'
26'
FACE BRICK
METAL TILE
METAL PANEL
19' - 11"23' - 2"13' - 6"9' - 2"19' - 7"18' - 1"21' - 1"7' - 7"10' - 6"9' - 1"16' - 8"32' - 3"
ELEVATION BEYOND
COMPOSITE
WINDOWS AND
SLIDING
GLASS DOORS
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
AT LEVEL 1
PREFINISHED
ALUMINUM BALCONY
METAL PANEL
PREFINISHED METAL RAILING 83' - 0"30' - 4"16' - 0"68' - 8"84' - 8"WALL AREA = 1,260 SF
WINDOW AREA = 650 SF
TRANSPARENCY = 52%
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
2/16/2022 5:15:25 PMA3-2
SOUTH AND EAST BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
221561.00
Author Checker
01/31/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
2/18/2022
3/32" = 1'-0"A3-2
1 EAST ELEVATION
3/32" = 1'-0"A3-2
2 SOUTH ELEVATION
No. Description Dat e
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
LEVEL 2
114' - 4"
LEVEL 3
125' - 8"
LEVEL 4
137' - 4"
LEVEL 5
148' - 0"
LEVEL 6
158' - 8"
LEVEL 7
169' - 4"
LEVEL P1
89' - 6"
ROOF LEVEL
180' - 0"83' - 0"15' - 5"4' - 0"24' - 5"10' - 0"10' - 11"10' - 2"9' - 0"16' - 7"9' - 0"15' - 0"8' - 0"6' - 11"16' - 0"4' - 0"24' - 10"10' - 4"10' - 11"
NOT INCLUDED IN MATERIAL CALCUATIONS
COURTYARD ELEVATION BEYOND
4' - 0"5' - 2"11' - 1"10' - 0"21' - 0"11' - 0"6' - 6"6' - 0"7' - 0"18' - 1"10' - 0"10' - 11"24' - 1"11' - 0"10' - 0"18' - 0"17' - 0"11' - 0"10' - 0"13' - 3"24' - 0"28' - 2"7' - 4"28' - 0"13' - 4"
FACE
BRICK
METAL
PANEL
METAL
TILE
COMPOSITE
WINDOWS
PREFINISHED
METAL
BALCONIES
METAL
PANEL
FIBER CEMENT
LAP SIDING
ALUMINUM WINDOWS
METAL PANEL10' - 8"43' - 8"28' - 8"WALL AREA = 1,565 SF
WINDOW AREA = 470 SF
TRANSPARENCY = 30%
STREETFRONT
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
LEVEL 2
114' - 4"
LEVEL 3
125' - 8"
LEVEL 4
137' - 4"
LEVEL 5
148' - 0"
LEVEL 6
158' - 8"
LEVEL 7
169' - 4"
LEVEL P1
89' - 6"
ROOF LEVEL
180' - 0"
11' - 1"8' - 11"25' - 0"9' - 0"12' - 6"5' - 0"8' - 4"9' - 1"16' - 1"9' - 0"16' - 7"9' - 1"14' - 3"9' - 0"20' - 4"9' - 0"17' - 8"9' - 0"18' - 1"9' - 0"14' - 5"
23' - 1"23' - 11"18' - 1"5' - 7"18' - 1"14' - 0"11' - 8"23' - 4"24' - 1"18' - 0"27' - 0"7' - 4"22' - 0"3' - 0"22' - 3"
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
3/18/2022 4:00:40 PMA3-3
WEST AND NORTH
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
221561.00
LB ESG
02/06/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
Schematic Design
3/17/22
3/32" = 1'-0"A3-3
1 WEST ELEVATION
3/32" = 1'-0"A3-3
2 NORTH ELEVATION
No. Description D ate
TRANSFORMER
SCREEN
METAL PANEL AND WINDOWS
EXTENDED TO BLDG EDGE
GARAGE WINDOWS MODIFIED TO BE MORE
LIKE RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS BY MATCHING
HEIGHT, ADDING METAL LINTEL AND
HORIZONTAL MULLION
HORIZONTAL MULLION ADDED AT FIRST FLOOR
GARAGE WINDOWS TO ALIGN WITH RETAIL WINDOW
DESIGN
LAND USE REVISIONS 3/24/2022
KNOCK-OUT PANEL FOR
POTENTIAL NORTHERN
GARAGE ENTRANCE
DECORATIVE METAL
TRELLIS
RECESSED FACE BRICK
DECORATIVE METAL
TRELLIS
RECESSED
FACE BRICK
GARAGE WINDOWS MODIFIED TO BE MORE
LIKE RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS BY MATCHING
HEIGHT, ADDING METAL LINTEL AND
HORIZONTAL MULLION
HORIZONTAL MULLION ADDED AT FIRST FLOOR
GARAGE WINDOWS
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
2/17/2022 8:35:54 AMA3-4
EXTERIOR MATERIALS
221561.00
Author Checker
02/18/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
2/18/2022
No. Description Date
FACE BRICK - PRIMARY
METAL TILE
FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING
FACE BRICK - ACCENT
METAL PANEL
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of Minnesota
2/16/2022 5:15:30 PMA3-5
SHADOW STUDIES
221561.00
Author Checker
02/11/22
BLAKE STATION SITE B
BLAKE STATION
SITE B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
2/18/2022
No. Description Date
FUTURE DRIVEWAY
T
C
TC
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.9 1.8 1.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.5 5.5 9.8 5.8 1.2 0.2 0.4 1.4 1.6 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 3.3 14.1 1.1 0.2 1.1 5.8 7.2 2.2 0.4 1.0 2.1 1.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 2.4 8.1 11.6 2.7 0.4 3.2 9.3 5.4 0.9 0.2 0.3 1.3 1.8 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 0.7 1.0 7.4 0.7 0.1 0.8 5.3 8.0 2.7 0.4 0.8 2.1 1.7 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.8 0.0 3.6 10.8 3.5 0.4 2.5 9.0 6.5 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.8 3.5 6.3 6.5 9.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 6.8 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 6.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 2.1 5.1 7.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 2.8 6.3 1.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 3.2 0.0 8.1 8.3 3.4 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 3.7 7.4 7.9 4.8 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.3 5.2 8.4 8.0 3.9 2.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.8 6.2 9.3 2.1 2.8 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 2.4
6.1
8.6 10.0 2.6 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.9 5.2 6.5 8.3 2.3 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 2.6 4.8 3.6 1.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.5 4.4 6.2 5.8 11.6 4.9 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.8 5.9 8.5 11.7 4.8 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 2.1 6.9 10.5 9.7
2.2
3.5 2.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 3.2 6.6 8.6 7.9 6.0 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 2.5 9.6 4.1 6.4
5.9
4.0 3.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 2.9 5.0 6.9 1.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.1 2.7 4.2 6.4 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 3.1 7.0 2.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.3 3.6 3.8 4.3 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 3.0 1.7 7.2 9.4 3.3 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 2.2 6.9 8.2 3.3 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 7.1 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 6.9 3.8 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 4.3 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 10.9 2.7 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 6.1 2.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 7.3 2.7 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 12.0 3.6 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.5 4.5 1.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.6 4.1 2.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.7 11.0 4.9 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 9.0 3.5 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.6 1.4 1.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.6 10.4 5.7 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 7.1 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 2.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.2 1.8 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 5.1 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 10.3 4.1 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 1.2 1.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 2.0 1.8 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 11.5 6.7 1.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.0 11.1 6.7 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 1.0 8.7 4.7 0.3 0.8 5.4 1.3 0.8 5.6 1.4 0.7 3.1 9.1 1.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.1 1.2 0.4 0.3 1.1 1.3 0.5 0.3 1.0 1.9 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.3 1.6 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 8.1 2.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 10.8 2.8 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.1 2.7 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.1 0.2 0.2 0.9 3.9 0.1 1.7 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.2 1.0 9.0 9.7 3.5 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.1 0.1 4.2 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 2.9 1.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.1 0.9 5.8 0.0 3.4 2.4 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 7.7 10.7 6.9 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.0 9.7 5.0 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 1.8 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.0 2.4 6.0 2.7 0.6 0.4 2.3 6.1 2.9 0.6 1.0 4.2 5.2 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 8.0 1.4 3.1 3.2 1.6 0.5 0.4 1.4 1.7 0.6 1.3 3.2 3.2 1.4 0.2 0.7 2.2 3.6 2.6 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 5.8 0.6 1.1 1.2 1.5 8.8 4.5 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.0 6.5 8.0 1.7 1.3 0.4 0.9 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.2 6.3 5.4 0.6 1.4 6.8 4.1 0.5 0.4 0.7 3.6 4.6 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.9 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4.2 6.7 2.6 0.6 1.3 2.0 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
8.4 10.1 4.2 0.9 4.8 9.1 3.6 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0
4.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1
0.7 0.2 0.1
1.5 0.1 0.3
0.8 0.1 0.0
1.0 3.0 2.5
2.6
11.0
8.6
0 40'20'
1"=20'-0"
10'
Calculation Summary
Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min
East Property Line Illuminance Fc 0.26 2.0 0.0 N.A. N.A.
North Property Line Illuminance Fc 0.54 3.7 0.1 5.40 37.00
Northeast Egress Path Illuminance Fc 2.67 8.9 0.3 8.90 29.67
Northwest Egress Path Illuminance Fc 3.27 10.1 0.3 10.90 33.67
Overall Site Illuminance Fc 0.68 13.4 0.0 N.A. N.A.
South Property Line Illuminance Fc 0.34 1.6 0.0 N.A. N.A.
West Property Line Illuminance Fc 0.14 0.7 0.0 N.A. N.A.
W2
9' 0"
W2
9' 0"
W1
9' 0"
W3
14' 0''
W3
14' 0''
W3
14' 0''
W3
14' 0''
B2
3' 0''
B2
3' 0''
B2
3' 0''
B2
3' 0''
B2
3' 0''
B2
3' 0''
B2
3' 0''
W5
14' 0''W4
14' 0''
W4
8' 6"
W4
8' 6"
W4
8' 6"
W1
8' 6"
W4
8' 6"
W4
8' 6"
W4
8' 6"
W4
8' 6"
W1
8' 6"
W1
8' 6"
D2
14' 0''
D2
14' 0''
D2
14' 0''
W4
8' 6"
W4
8' 6"
W4
8' 6"
W4
8' 6"
W1
8' 6"
W1
8' 6"
W1
8' 6"
W1
8' 6"
W1
8' 6"
W1
8' 6"
W1
8' 6"
W1
8' 6"
D1
14' 0''
D1
14' 0''
D1
14' 0''
D1
14' 0''
D1
14' 0''
D1
14' 0''
W1
8' 6"
W1
8' 6"
B2
3' 0''
B1
14' 0''
B1
14' 0''
B1
14' 0''
B1
14' 0''
B1
14' 0''
B1
14' 0''
W1
14' 0''
W1
14' 0''
B2
3' 0''
A. REFER TO SHEETS E0.2P, E0.3P, AND E0.4P FOR FIXTURE SCHEDULES,
DETAILS, AND CUTSHEETS.
B. LIGHTING LEVELS SHOWN ARE MAINTAINED. LIGHT LOSS FACTOR OF 0.90
WAS USED TO ACCOUNT FOR DIRT AND LUMEN DEPRECIATION.
C. WALL SCONCE AND DOWNLIGHT MOUNTING HEIGHTS SHOWN ARE TO
BOTTOM OF FIXTURE.
D. BOLLARD MOUNTING HEIGHTS SHOWN ARE TO TOP OF FIXTURE.
GENERAL NOTES:
PLAN
NORTH
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License #Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional engineer under the laws of the State
of Minnesota
E0.1P
ELECTRICAL SITE
PHOTOMETRIC
4452.0002
MBS JJA
02/18/22
Blake Station Site B
Blake Station Site
B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
02/18/2022
SCALE:1" = 20'-0"
ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC1
No. Description Da t e
BOLLARD BASE
TOP OF GRADE
BOND TO GROUND LUG
#4 B.C. TYPICAL
HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED
ANCHOR BOLT PROVIDED BY
BOLLARD MANUFACTURER.
REFER TO STRUCTURAL DETAILS
FOR BASE DIMENSIONS AND
REBAR SIZE/SPACING
BOND TO REBAR
3000K
B2
3' TALL, 8'' WIDE NOTCH LED BOLLARD. DIE CAST LOW COPPER ALUMINUM HOUSING. IP65 RATED. UV STABILIZED POLYCARBONATE LENS. ASYMETRICAL THROW. 400 DELIVERED LUMENS.
POINT TOWARDS PATHWAY. FINISH TO BE SELECTED BY LANDSCAPE.
UNV LED N/A 10 SELUX NT-3-LG4500
3000K
D1
RECESSED 2,000 LUMEN 6" ROUND LED DOWNLIGHT. HIGH EFFICIENCY LED LIGHT ENGINE. CLEAR SEMI-DIFFUSE ALZAK REFLECTOR. TRIM TO MATCH CEILING FINISH. FINISH TO BE
SELECTED BY ARCHITECT.
UNV LED N/A 22 PRESCOLITE LF6SL-6LFSL20L30K8
3000K
W4
4 7/8" WIDE, 12 1/2" TALL ROUND LED WALL SCONCE. DIE-CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING. IP65 RATED. WET LOCATION LISTED. DOWN ONLY LIGHT LED MODULE, AWAY FROM WALL DOWN
DISTRIBUTION. 2,000 NOMINAL LUMENS. BLACK FINISH.
UNV LED N/A 17 WAC LIGHTING DS-WD0534-F930A-BK
3000K
D2
7'' TALL LED DOWNLIGHT. ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION. IP66 RATED. CLEAR LENS. 40 DEGREE FLOOD LIGHT DISTRIBUTION. 825 DELIVERED LUMENS, 90 CRI. INSTALL IT IN BETWEEN TRELIS'
OVERHEAD BEAMS. FINISH TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT.
UNV LED N/A 13 B-K LIGHTING SM-DE-TR-X102-FL
3000K
3000K
W3
4' LINEAR WALL MOUNTED LED FIXTURE. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM FIXTURE WITH 6" FIXED BRACKET. SYMMETRIC 30 DEGREE -60 DEGREE BEAM SPREAD. 1,600 DELIVERED LUMENS. WET
LOCATION LISTED. TILT FIXTURE 30 DEGREES TOWARDS WALL. BRACKET SHALL BE 1' LONG. BLACK FINISH.
UNV LED N/A 16 SPI LIGHTING SEW12145-4FT-L16W-120-277V-3000K-LBK6-SMB
3000K
W5
4 7/8" WIDE, 12 1/2" TALL ROUND LED WALL SCONCE. DIE-CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING. IP65 RATED. WET LOCATION LISTED. DOWN ONLY LIGHT LED MODULE, TOWARDS WALL DOWN
DISTRIBUTION. 2,000 NOMINAL LUMENS. BLACK FINISH.
UNV LED N/A 17 WAC LIGHTING DS-WD0534-F930B-BK
3000K
W1
4 7/8" WIDE, 12 1/2" TALL ROUND LED WALL SCONCE. DIE-CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING. IP65 RATED. WET LOCATION LISTED. UP/DOWN LIGHT LED MODULE, AWAY FROM WALL UP/DOWN
DISTRIBUTION. 2,000 NOMINAL LUMENS. BLACK FINISH.
UNV LED N/A 34 WAC LIGHTING DS-WD0534-F930A-BK
3000K
W2
4 7/8" WIDE, 12 1/2" TALL ROUND LED WALL SCONCE. DIE-CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING. IP65 RATED. WET LOCATION LISTED. UP/DOWN LIGHT LED MODULE, TOWARDS WALL UP/DOWN
DISTRIBUTION. 2,000 NOMINAL LUMENS. BLACK FINISH.
UNV LED N/A 34 WAC LIGHTING DS-WD0534-F930B-BK
LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE
FIXT.
TYPE DESCRIPTION VOLTAGE
LAMPS
VA/
FIXT.MANUFACTURER CATALOG NUMBER
TYPE QTY./
FIXT.
B1
14' TALL COLUMN LED BOLLARD. 2' LIT SECTION ON TOP OF FIXTURE WITH UV DIFFUSER. IP66 RATED. ONE LIGHT ENGINE, 1,300 DELIVERED LUMENS. POINT TOWARDS PATHWAY. FINISH TO
BE SELECTED BY LANDSCAPE.
UNV LED N/A 13 SELUX MTRCL-14-2-1B30-30
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional engineer under the laws of the State
of Minnesota
E0.2P
ELECTRICAL SITE
PHOTOMETRIC DETAILS
4452.0002
MBS JJA
02/18/22
Blake Station Site B
Blake Station Site
B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
02/18/2022
NO SCALE
BOLLARD BASE DETAIL1 NO SCALE
FIXTURE TYPE B12 NO SCALE
FIXTURE TYPE B23
No. Description Da t e
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional engineer under the laws of the State
of Minnesota
E0.3P
ELECTRICAL SITE
PHOTOMETRIC DETAILS
4452.0002
MBS JJA
02/18/22
Blake Station Site B
Blake Station Site
B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
02/18/2022
NO SCALE
FIXTURE TYPE D11 NO SCALE
FIXTURE TYPE D22
NO SCALE
FIXTURE TYPE W13 NO SCALE
FIXTURE TYPE W24
No. Description Da t e
Signature
Typed or Printed Name
License # Date
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS:
KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional engineer under the laws of the State
of Minnesota
E0.4P
ELECTRICAL SITE
PHOTOMETRIC DETAILS
4452.0002
MBS JJA
02/18/22
Blake Station Site B
Blake Station Site
B
Hopkins, MN
LUA Submittal
02/18/2022
NO SCALE
FIXTURE TYPE W31
NO SCALE
FIXTURE TYPE W42 NO SCALE
FIXTURE TYPE W53
No. Description Da t e
Blake Road Station - Site B
Hopkins, MN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN — SITE AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN
• Transit-oriented development location adjacent to
LRT station. Light rail/bus pass discount program
offered to encourage use of mass transit.
• Native and adaptive plant species selected for their
ability to provide enhanced streetscapes, additional
habitat and stormwater management strategies
• Removal of more than 45,890 sq ft of existing surface
parking areas and replaced with new buildings and
38,352 sq ft area of landscape area consisting of
native and adaptive tree and plant species
• Smart irrigation systems (rain/soil moistures, drip
irrigation, highly efficient controllers/sprayheads)
• Connecting to existing bike trails and providing
internal bike storage rooms
• Advocate for mirco-mobility: shared bike or scooter
parking stations including maps of local trails
• Porous pavement integrated into streetscape
improvements
• On-site community gardens available for resident use
Blake Road Station - Site B
Hopkins, MN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN — STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
• Dramatic improvements over current site
conditions - currently 100% impervious surfaces
that sheet drain to streets untreated; future
pervious area equal to 12% of the total site area
(38,352 sq ft)
• Future water run-off collected in catch basins
• Sub-surface system in StormTech isolator rows
• Treat 2” of run-off from the site’s impervious
surfaces via a treatment train of above-ground
features, pipe storage system, and JellyFish type
treatment structure.
• Storage capacity designed to hold back storm
events and discharge run-off at rates that are below
those of the existing conditions
Blake Road Station - Site B
Hopkins, MN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
ENERGY EFFICIENCY & SAVINGS
• High R-Value building envelope — roof & walls
• High solar reflectance index (SRI) for the roof
• Low-E insulated glazing
• Tightly sealed building envelope to reduce leakage
and inefficiencies
• High-Efficiency HVAC system with individual controls
for residents
• Project is enrolled in the Xcel Energy Design
Assistnace (EDA) program to evaluate and select
efficient mechanical systems and optimize the
building enclosure
• Water Sense plumbing fixtures and Energy Star rated
appliances
• Induction cooktops for 20% of units
• LED fixtures with occupancy sensors
• Programmable or SMART thermostats
• Electrical vehicle charging stations (20 in Building B)
• Building structure and electrical system are designed
to be Solar-Ready for future photovoltaic panels
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN — BUILDING DESIGN
Blake Road Station - Site B
Hopkins, MN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN — OPERATIONS
HEALTH & WELLNESS
• Designed to encourage physical activity - primary and
secondary pedestrian-oriented entrance, each with a
convenient stairwell to encourage physical activity; bike
racks and storage available with site improvements that
include trail along Excelsior Blvd
• Clean air with at least MERV 8 air filters. Apartments
will be supplied with outside air from individual
packaged heatingcooling units dedicated to each space.
• Access to daylight in units and amenity spaces -
Vertically oriented windows allow daylight to reach
deep into dwellings and common areas
• Low VOC materials and paints
• Convenient common area hand sanitizers and hand
washing locations
• Green janitorial practices - partnering with companies
that share green janitorial initiatives
• Operable windows and balcony doors ensure access to
natural ventilation and connection to the outdoors
• Ceiling Fans in bedrooms = reduced cooling needs
• Fitness centers designed with state-of-the-art
equipment and input from internal health & wellness
director
Blake Road Station - Site B
Hopkins, MN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN — OPERATIONS
EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
• Recycling collection at each trash shoot and separate
bins within amenity spaces, making recycling more
convenient and including clear instructions for
recycling materials
• Looking to partner with givebackbox.com onsite
• Composting bins provided for resident use
• Reusable water bottles provided at move-in and refill
stations throughout the property
• Virtual flipbook vs. paper brochures for leasing to
reduce paper waste
• Smart keyless entry (eliminates the need for
replacement keys/fobs)
• Rent payments encouraged to be electronic by
implementing a check processing fee
• Healthy building design practices and investigate
Healthy Building certification
CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION 2022-031
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SITE PLAN FOR BLAKE ROAD STATION SITE B
(PID 19-117-21-42-0046), SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the applicant, Bryan Farquhar of TF Hopkins, LLC (Trilogy Real Estate Group),
initiated a site plan review application for Blake Road Station PUD Site B; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as Lot 3, Hopkins Commerce Addition
with PID 19-117-21-42-0046; and
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows:
1. That the above stated application was initiated by the applicant on February 18, 2022; and,
2. That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notice,
held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on March 22, 2022:
all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and,
3. That written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and,
4. That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this application during their
March 22, 2022 meeting and recommended approval by the City Council, subject to
conditions; and
5. That the Hopkins City Council reviewed this application during their April 5, 2022 meeting
and agreed with the findings of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
WHEREAS, staff recommended approval of the above stated application based on the findings
outlined in the staff report dated April 5, 2022.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hopkins
hereby approves the site plan application for Blake Road Station Site B (PID 19-117-21-42-0046),
subject to the conditions listed below.
1. Execution of an amendment to the Blake Road Station Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
2. Conformance with all applicable standards of the Mixed Use District and terms of the Blake
Road Station Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement.
3. The applicant shall allow up to 8 of the stalls reserved for residential use to be available to
employees working in the commercial space to meet the 1 stall per 200 square feet parking
standard.
4. Plan revisions to the proposed residential bicycle parking to show at least 138 long-term
bicycle parking stalls within the building and at least 13 short-term stalls outside the
building. Any bicycle parking located within the public right-of-way must be approved by
the City and or Hennepin County.
5. Plan revisions to the proposed commercial bicycle parking to provide at least 5 long-term
commercial bicycle parking stalls inside the building in close proximity to the commercial
spaces. The balance of the 15 commercial bicycle parking stalls may be located outside the
building close to the entrances to the commercial space. Any bicycle parking located within
the public right-of-way must be approved by the City and or Hennepin County.
6. Provision of a detailed pedestrian and streetscape plan demonstrating consistency with those
features used on Site A prior to issuance of a building permit.
7. The applicant shall increase this escrow required under the PUD agreement to cover 125% of
the landscape/streetscape improvement for Site B. The City shall hold this security until all
landscape/streetscape improvements have been installed and all plantings have survived at
least one growing season.
8. The applicant plans to store trash containers within the underground parking garage. The
applicant shall designate a specific location within the Level 1 parking garage and an on-site
location for trash pickup. Trash pick-up shall not occur within the public right-of-way or any
street surface.
9. The applicant shall demonstrate all equipment will be screened in conformance with all
zoning requirements.
10. Conformance with all requirements of Hennepin County and the Metropolitan Council.
11. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer.
12. Approval of all necessary permits from the Building, Engineering and Fire Departments.
13. Approval of the development by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and conforms with
all related conditions.
14. Payment of all applicable development fees including, but not limited to SAC, park
dedication and City Attorney fees.
15. The applicant has indicated their intent to subdivide the properties as part of the future
development of Sites C. The applicant has requested and the City has agreed to lock in the
2021 park dedication fees ($3,000/unit and 5% of the fair market value of the commercial
land as estimated by the county assessor) and apply them to the development on all 3 sites as
part of any future subdivision of any of the 3 parcels.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 5th day of April, 2022.
By: ________________________________
Patrick Hanlon, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Amy Domeier, City Clerk