Loading...
V. 2. 2023-07 314 Mainstreet (Walser Chrysler) Planned Unit Development and Amended Conditional Use Permit CITY OF HOPKINS Planning Application 2023-07 To: Planning and Zoning Commission Chair and Members of the Commission From: Ryan Krzos, City Planner Date: July 25, 2023 Subject: 314 Mainstreet (Walser Chrysler) Planned Unit Development and Amended Conditional Use Permit _____________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDED ACTION MOTIONS TO: Adopt Planning & Zoning Resolution 2023-09, recommending the Hopkins City Council approve the PUD Overlay Rezoning Ordinance and granting PUD Site Plan approval for 314 Mainstreet (Walser Chrysler). Adopt Planning & Zoning Resolution 2023-10, recommending the Hopkins City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit Amendment allowing an expansion to the vehicle sales and service use at 314 Mainstreet (Walser Chrysler). OVERVIEW Walser Real Estate Inc. requests land use approvals to allow an expansion of the Walser Chrysler vehicle sales lot at 314 Mainstreet onto property acquired from the Hennepin County Railroad Authority located to the south of the facility. The project would consist of expansion to the paved area for the storage of inventory vehicles and employee parking. No new buildings or building additions are proposed with this application. The plans for the proposed expansion would conflict with multiple provisions of the development code in part due to the existing legal nonconforming nature of the facility and operational needs. As such, the applicant is seeking the planned unit development form of approval to facilitate the expansion. Expansion of the facility also requires an amendment to an existing conditional use permit for the facility. The Planning and Zoning Commission is to conduct a public hearing on this item and provide a recommendation on the requests to the City Council. PRIMARY ISSUES TO CONSIDER •Background •Legal Authority •Zoning Review •Alternatives SUPPORTING INFORMATION •Planning and Zoning Commission Resolutions 2023-09 & 2023-10 •Owner’s Application and Exhibits Planning & Development BACKGROUND The subject property is zoned MX-S, Mixed-Use Suburban Center and is guided as Downtown Center in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The parcels comprising the site total 6.16 acres in size. City records indicate that automobile related uses have been operating on this block of Mainstreet since at least the 1960s. Beginning in the 2000s Walser expanded the facility through acquisition of properties to the west of the current building, eventually owning the entire block. With each expansion, the City reviewed and approved amendments to the conditional use permit that was granted to construct the original building, as vehicle sales uses have been classified as a conditional use in the property’s zone since that time. Vehicle sales and service uses remain a conditional use in the MX-S zone. Walser Real Estate Inc. recently acquired a 0.71-acre parcel from the Hennepin County Rail Road Association (HCRRA) south of the sales lot. This parcel was part of an abandoned railroad corridor from Hopkins to Victoria that HCRRA purchased from the Chicago North Western Transportation Company in 1981. The Lake Minnetonka Regional Trail is located within this corridor; however, the construction of the 8th Avenue Artery eliminated the need to retain the parcel abutting Walser Chrysler in public ownership for future transit or transportation purposes. Walser had previously leased a large portion of the area in question for use as recently as 2009. However much of the area was converted to greenspace, save for a strip of pavement that was to be part of the regional trail. Walser Real Estate Inc. has now come forward with plans to expand the sales and parking lot onto the property it now owns. PUBLIC COMMENT These planned unit development and conditional use applications require a public hearing. The City published notice of this public hearing in the local paper and mailed notices directly to those properties within 500 feet of the subject property. Signage informing the community of a pending development proposal was also displayed on the site. As of the writing of this report, the City has not received any comments on this item. Staff will provide an update to the Planning and Zoning Commission on all public comments received during the public hearing. LEGAL AUTHORITY This proposal includes two different types of land use applications. The planned unit development application is considered a legislative action. When considering a legislative action, the City is assigning zoning classifications or creating development standards to regulate the types of uses and/or structures. Under the law, the City has wide flexibility to create standards that will ensure the type of development it desires; however, these regulations must be reasonable and supported by a rational basis relating to promoting the public health, safety and welfare. Conversely, a conditional use permit request is considered a quasi-judicial action. For this type of application, the City is judging whether the applicable Zoning regulations and approval criteria are or will be followed. Generally, if the application meets these requirements they should be approved. The City may impose conditions as long as said conditions are reasonably related to the impacts of the use or structures in question. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW The MX-S zone allows for vehicle sales and service uses upon approval of a conditional use permit. New or amended conditional use permits may only be granted if the City determines that: (1)The proposed conditional use is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the purposes of the development code; (2)The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable provisions of the development code; and (3) The proposed conditional use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan The 2040 Comprehensive Plan has sections related to land use generally in the City and related to guidance specifically for the downtown. Within the Plan’s land use chapter a goal relevant to this proposal is to maintain and diversify the city’s strong employment base. Policies to achieve this goal include: •Encourage development of living wage jobs, especially in the Center and District future land use categories that parallel the railroad corridor or other areas in close proximity to transit. •Encourage businesses and office uses with a considerable daytime population to locate in Downtown, to support retail and services businesses on Mainstreet. •Encourage larger employers that draw employees from across the region to be in the most regionally accessible locations. In general approval of the proposal would not jeopardize the achievement of this goal nor run directly counter to any of the relevant policies. This expansion project is a relatively minor expansion to the facility and makes reasonable use of the oddly-shape remnant parcel. Any future efforts to redevelop the site are not encumbered by the proposed improvements. A goal for the Downtown within the Comprehensive Plan relevant to this proposal is to continue to grow the Downtown’s population and jobs base. The most direct policy of this goal is to encourage an anchor development at the east end of Mainstreet that supports transit and complements Downtown Hopkins. Staff finds that the proposal would not conflict with this policy in that the minor expansion continues a long-standing use and does so in a manner that would not preclude redevelopment in the future. Consistency with the Development Code A detailed assessment of the proposed facility against the standards of the zoning code, including the specific vehicle sales and service standards, is included as an attachment to this report. As noted, multiple aspects of the projects conflict with code requirements, so as a result the planned unit development process is being pursued – as further analyzed below. Should the City decide against granting the planned unit development form of approval then any conflicts with the code should be resolved to grant approval. Impact on the Surroundings No material negative impacts on the immediate area are expected because of the proposed expansion. Furthermore, the expansion is not likely to impede the logical and orderly development (or redevelopment) of the subject property and adjoining properties. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW The purpose of a planned unit development is to allow flexibility from traditional development standards in return for a higher quality development. Typically, the City looks for an applicant to exceed other zoning standards, building code requirements or meet other goals of the Comprehensive Plan. In exchange for the flexibility offered by the planned unit development, the applicant is expected to detail how they intend to provide a higher quality development or meet other City goals. The Zoning Code establishes two types of Planned Unit Developments (PUDs): small- scale PUD and large-scale PUD. Small-scale PUDs are optional for projects 3 acres in area or more, and mandatory for projects above that threshold. Since the affected area of this request is 0.71 acres in size, staff interprets that the small-scale PUD may apply. The PUD process includes approval of a PUD overlay rezoning, and a PUD site plan approval. The rezoning aspect of the process adopts an overlay zone that supplements the underlying base zone (in this case the MX-S zone). The detailed plans for building and site design for the subject property comprise the PUD site plan. The requested Planned Unit Development would authorize the applicant to deviate from some of the zoning regulations as described in the table below. The applicant is seeking this flexibility in exchange for providing perimeter landscaping exceeding the ordinance minimums and putting an odd-shaped remnant parcel into productive use. Staff recommends a condition of approval requiring that the parcels comprising the entire site be combined into one single parcel as the use encompasses. The lot combination is a type of request that can be administratively reviewed and approved. Requested Planned Unit Development Deviations Zoning Category Zoning Requirement Requested Deviation Building Siting 120-360(d) Impervious Site Coverage 75% Maximum (of entire site) 89.7% Supplemental Use Regulations 102-580(k)(1)(a.) Building to Parking/Display Area Ratio. The parking or display area may not be larger in area than the floor area of the building devoted to the related business. The parking/Display area would exceed the building area by 39,900 square feet. Landscape & Site Design 102-8130(d) Required Landscape Islands required within each row of parking an island is required every 9th stall. One island is proposed within the new rows of parking. Landscape & Site Design 102-8130(d)(6)(a.) 50-foot Rule. Each parking space must be located within 50 feet of a tree planted within the parking lot interior. Only 15 of the 82 new stalls are within 50 feet of an interior tree. In making recommendations and decisions regarding approval of PUDs, the City must consider at least the following factors: a.Whether the proposed PUD development plan and zoning map amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other adopted plans for the subject area; b.Whether PUD development plan complies with the PUD overlay zone provisions of Section 102-440 of the Development Code; c.Whether the proposed development will result in public benefits that are greater than or at least equal to those that would have resulted from development under conventional zoning regulations; and d. Whether appropriate terms and conditions have been imposed on the approval to protect the interests of surrounding property owners and residents, existing and future residents of the PUD and the general public. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan A finding of that the project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan is required for approval of the Planned Unit Development. As noted in the Conditional Use Permit review section above the proposal would not directly conflict with the goals or policies of the Comprehensive Plan from staff’s perspective. Consistency with the PUD Section of the Code This application is being pursued as a small-scale PUD. The provisions of Section 102- 440 related to small-scale PUDs primarily include that the development would not be accommodated under the otherwise applicable standards and that the public benefits are at least commensurate with the degree of development flexibility granted and are addressed. As previously noted, staff finds that the proposal generally strikes the right balance in providing flexibility in exchange for a better overall project. The other provisions of this section pertain to the size and design of large-scale PUDs, which is not applicable. Balance of Benefits and Flexibility The applicant is seeking relief from the Zoning provisions specified above. In general, staff finds that the requested deviations are minor in nature and appropriately compensated for in the overall proposal. Protect Surroundings As noted in the conditional use permit review section, no material negative impacts on the immediate area are expected because of the proposed expansion. ALTERNATIVES 1.Recommend approval of the proposed land use requests. By recommending approval, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval which may include suggested conditions. Should the Planning & Zoning Commission consider this option, it must also identify specific findings that support this alternative. 2.Recommend denial of the proposed land use requests. By recommending denial, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. Should the Planning & Zoning Commission consider this option, it must also identify specific findings that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. ZONING REVIEW: WALSER CHRYSLER EXPANSION – 314 Mainstreet Review Date: July 25, 2023 PROJECT DECRIPTION: Expansion of sales, parking, and inventory lot to the south. BASE ZONE: MX-S PROPOSED USE: Vehicle Sales BUILDING TYPES ALLOWED: Storefront Building COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Center BUILDING TYPE SELECTED: Storefront Building EXISTING USE: Vehicle Sales & Service LARGE PUD REQUIRED? No DEADLINE FOR ACTION August 22, 2023 (60 days) ZONING MAP Review Key Meets or exceeds regulation N/A Regulation does not apply Does not meet regulation Cond. Met per conditions LNC. Legally Non- conforming ?More Information Needed PUD PUD Deviation 102-360 STOREFRONT BUILDING TYPE REGULATIONS (MX-S Zone) Section of Code Regulation REVIEW NOTES 102-360(d) BUILDING LOCATION 120-360(d)FRONT STREETWALL 75% min.; Existing Condition 120-360(d)FRONT STREET SETBACK 7.5 ft. min, 25 ft. max. along Mainstreet; Existing Condition 120-360(d)NON-FRONT STREET SETBACK 5 ft. min., 20 ft. max along the 5th Ave S side. Existing Condition 120-360(d)SIDE SETBACK 5 ft. min along east property line 120-360(d)REAR SETBACK 20 ft. min along south property line PUD 120-360(d)IMPERVIOUS SITE COVERAGE 75% max. ?120-360(d)ADDITIONAL SEMI-PERVIOUS COVERAGE +20% - In addition to the 75% hardcover, 15% of the site may be semi-pervious, i.e. green roof, porous pavement, etc. No semi-pervious surfaces depicted. 102-360(e) PARKING & ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 120-360(e)PARKING & DRIVEWAY ACCESS LOCATION Required off alley or non-front street; No new driveways shown 120-360(e)DRIVEWAY SIZE & NUMBER 22 ft max driveway width. No new driveways shown.  Max. 1 access per development per street. No new street access shown. 120-360(e)SURFACE PARKING Only allowed in rear or side yard; all new proposed parking is in rear yard 120-360(e)ACCESSORY STRUCTURES No Accessory Structures proposed ARTICLE 5 PRINCIPAL USES Section of Code Regulation REVIEW NOTES 102-580 (k) SUPPLEMENTAL USE REGULATIONS: VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE USES PUD 102-580(k) (1)(a.) BUILDING TO PARKING/DISPLAY AREA RATIO The parking or display area may not be larger in area than the floor area of the building devoted to the related business. As proposed, there would be approximately 84,125 square feet of parking and/or display area. The one-story building has a footprint of 44,225 square feet. The applicant is seeking a deviation from this requirement as the new display area would add further conflict with this requirement. LNC 102-580(k) (1)(b.) SETBACK A minimum 20-foot front yard setback is required, in which there may be no auto parking. Landscaping must be provided within this required setback area. The site contains an existing structure in non-compliance with this requirement, no structural expansions are proposed. The site improvements pre-date this requirement, and as such it is considered a legal nonconformity. 102-580(k) (1)(c.) EXTERIOR LIGHTING Lighting of the sales lot must be from indirect lighting. Proposed new lighting consists of pole-mounted downcast light fixtures. Light must be directed toward the ground. Externally lit signs, display, building and aesthetic lighting must be lit from the top and shine downward. Lighting must be shielded to prevent direct glare. Light levels may not exceed 0.5 lumens at any residential property line or 1.0 lumens at any nonresidential property line. Lighting would not exceed .1 footcandles (approximately, 1 lumen). Exterior lighting may not exceed 30 feet in height. The height of any exterior lighting within 100 feet of a residential use or N zone may not exceed 20 feet. Proposed lights would be mounted on 26-foot poles. All nonessential lighting must be turned off after business hours, leaving only the lighting necessary for site security. Compliance with this requirement would be ongoing following approval. N/A 102-580(k) (1)(d.) SCREENING Lots that abut an N zone, must provide complete visual screening at least 6 feet in height along the lot line of abutting N-zoned lot. The lot does not abut an N Zone 102-580(k) (1)(e.) VEHICLE SIZE The vehicle sales/leasing lot may not include vehicles over a 9,000 pounds rated weight. 102-580(k) (1)(f.) JUNK VEHICLES Junk vehicles awaiting repair or pick up are subject to the regulations of 102-9100. 102-580(k) (1)(g.) OUTDOOR STORAGE Outdoor storage of parts, materials, or equipment is prohibited except vehicles for sale or lease with a valid license or dealer inventory control number. 102-580(k) (1)(h.)PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS Public address systems are prohibited. 102-580(k) (1)(i.) TEST DRIVING Test driving of vehicles on local residential streets is prohibited. 102-580(k) (1)(j.) SALE ACTIVITY Used car sales are permitted only when an integral part of a new car dealership. The subject facility is a new car dealership. 102-580(k) (1)(k.) VEHICLE PARKING OR DISPLAY Vehicle sales and rental uses must designate on a site plan areas for required off-street parking including customer parking and areas for inventory vehicle display. Such required off-street parking areas must comply with 102-960. Sites may not contain more vehicles than can be placed in accordance with these standards. Vehicles may not be positioned in any way to interfere with access to any parking, loading, maneuvering or pedestrian area. 102-580(k) (1)(l.) ACCESSORY FUELING An accessory fueling facility is allowed if it is not visible from a public right-of-way and it is secured so as to ensure its exclusive use by subject business for the fueling its inventory. Retail sale of gasoline to the general public is prohibited. 102-580(k) (1)(m.) ANCILLARY AUTOMOBILE REPAIR Vehicle sales and rental uses require a separate conditional use permit for ancillary vehicle repair and maintenance. Ancillary automobile repair associated with a vehicle sales and rental use may include minor or major vehicle repair/maintenance uses. Vehicle sales and rental uses that include ancillary vehicle repair and maintenance may not be located on property that abuts a residential use or N zone. ARTICLE 8 LANDSCAPE & SITE DESIGN Section of Code Regulation REVIEW NOTES 102-810(b)VISIBILITY AT INTERSECTIONS At intersecting streets, a 30 ft by 30 ft vision triangle, free from walls, fences, plants, or trees >30 inches above the abutting curb line shall be provided. No changes proposed at street intersections. Cond. 102-820 LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION Notes to follow the specified landscape installation regulations are required on submittal drawings. 102-830 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE The owner is responsible for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of all landscaping required by code. 102-840 EXISTING TREES A survey of existing trees on the site is required, which is to include identification of significant and contributing trees. Tree protection is required. No significant or contributing trees are present on the site. 102-850 GROUND VEGETATION All unpaved areas of any lot in any other zone must be covered by planting bed per 102-850 (b) or grass per 102- 850 (c) or a combination of planting bed and grass. Unpaved project area proposed as sod and/or planting beds. 102-860 SITE TREES One medium or large tree is required per 3000 square feet of yard area. The project area associated with this request is 9,785 sf feet –requiring at least three (3) trees. 9 honey locusts, 2 birch, and two evergreen trees are proposed. N/A 102-870 STREETSCAPE DESIGN The requirements of this section apply to development of new streets and development on all lots with 200 feet or more of street frontage on existing streets. 102-880 STREET SIDEWALKS Sidewalks or multi-use paths must be provided along all street frontages, located within the public right-of-way. Existing sidewalks exist along all streets adjoining the site. LNC 102-890 INTERNAL SITE SIDEWALKS Sidewalks must connect between all building entrances to all public sidewalks, including at least one connection to each street-frontage sidewalk abutting the site. The site does not conform to this requirement, however, the proposal does not increase the extent of said non-conformity. 102-8100 STREET TREES Each lot is required to have one tree for every 40 feet of street frontage with a minimum of one street tree per street frontage, and must be located between the curb and sidewalk, a minimum of 2 feet and a maximum of 10 feet off the back of curb. The project area consists of approximately 37 feet of newly impacted street frontage. The existing median is paved, however one tree is proposed just inside of the sidewalk. Cond. 102-8110 FRONTAGE BUFFERS A frontage buffer is required when on-site vehicular parking, loading, outdoor storage, and/or other activities abut the street. Additional landscaping must be added along the expanded area adjoining 5th Avenue. N/A 102-8120 SIDE & REAR BUFFERS A side and rear buffer is required along the side and rear lot lines where transitions between certain zones occur. The subject zone and abutting zones do not require buffers. PUD 102-8130(d) REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ISLANDS Landscape islands are required at the terminal ends of rows of parking; and within each row of parking an island is required every 9th stall. Islands must be at least 5 feet in width and contain one medium or large shade tree. The applicant is seeking a deviation from this standard of the code as said islands would interfere with snow clearance operations. PUD PUD N/A  102-8130(d) REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ISLANDS: TREE REQUIREMENTS 50-foot Rule. Each parking space must be located within 50 feet of a tree planted within the parking lot interior. All new trees are on the perimeter of the parking lot, as such this requirement is not meet, and the applicant is seeking a deviation from this standard. 5-Space Rule. For parking lots with more than 40 spaces, a minimum of 1 shade tree for every 5 parking spaces must be planted within the parking lot interior or within 4 feet of the parking lot’s edge. One tree per 5 space is provided except for the out row of tandem inventory stalls. Buffer Trees. Trees within any required buffer area may not be utilized to meet these requirements. Only a frontage buffer is required, no side or rear buffers apply. Shading Requirement. At maturity, tree canopies must shade a minimum of 30 percent of the interior of the parking lot. The proposal include N/A 102-8140 SCREENING OF REFUSE & UTILITY AREAS All dumpsters, loading areas, open storage, refuse areas, mechanical equipment, and utility appurtenances must be screened. 102-8150 OUTDOOR LIGHTING Lighting is to meet the general standards, which in general as less restrictive than the outdoor lighting standards applicable to vehicle sales uses in 102-580(k)(1)(c.) ARTICLE 9 PARKING & MOBILITY Section of Code Regulation REVIEW NOTES 102-920 OFF-STREET PARKING – MOTOR VEHICULAR MINIMUMS & MAXIMUMS Minimum for Vehicle Sales and Service: four (4) plus, one per service bay No Maximum. The project does not involve increasing the intensity of the site from a parking standpoint; therefore, no additional stalls are required so Cond. 102-920 OFF-STREET PARKING – BICYCLE MINIMUMS Minimum for Vehicle Sales & Service: four (4) stalls. With 50% minimum as short-term. Recommend condition of approval requiring installation of bike parking facilities. 102-950 LOCATION OF OFF-STREET PARKING Except as otherwise expressly stated in this article, required off-street parking areas must be located on the same lot as the building or use they are required to serve.   102-960 PARKING AREA LAYOUT & DESIGN Parking areas must be designed to allow vehicles to enter and exit a street and cross public sidewalks in a forward motion Parking stalls may be standard or compact N/A 102-970 ELECTRIC VEHCILE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT The proposal includes new parking areas with 36 employee Parking Spaces, which would not general be used by the public. Accordingly, no electric vehicle charging stations are required as this requirement applies to spaces/lot available used by the general public. Should the customer parking be expanded in the future, a commensurate number of electric vehicle charging facilities would be needed. Cond. 102-990 BICYCLE PARKING Short-term bicycle parking must be located on the subject lot, unless the city approves a proposal to allow private bicycle parking facilities to be located in the right-of-way. Said spaces must be located within 50 feet of a building entrance CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-09 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE PROPERTY AT 314 MAINSTREET FROM MX-S MIXED-USE SUBURBAN CENTER ZONE TO MX-S MIXED-USE SUBURBAN CENTER WITH A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND APPROVE A RESOLUTION GRANTING PUD SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the applicant, Walser Real Estate Inc., initiated an application requesting to rezone the property at 314 Mainstreet (PIDs 24-117-22-44-0003, 24-117-22-44-0056, 24-117- 22-44-0057, 24-117-22-44-0029, 24-117-22-44-0006, 24-117-22-44-0008, 24-117-22-44-0007, 24-117-22-44-0009, 24-117-22-44-0043, 24-117-22-44-0072) from MX-S, Mixed-Use Suburban Center to MX-S, Mixed-Use Suburban Center with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and requesting approval of a PUD site plan, and WHEREAS, this property is legally described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That the above stated application was initiated by the applicant on June 23, 2023; and, 2.That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on July 25, 2023; all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and, 3.That written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and, WHEREAS, staff recommended approval of the above stated application based on the findings outlined in the staff report dated July 25, 2023. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Hopkins hereby recommends the City Council approve an ordinance rezoning the property at 314 Mainstreet from MX-S, Mixed-Use Suburban Center to MX-S, Mixed-Use Suburban Center with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and approve a resolution granting PUD site plan approval, subject to the conditions listed below. 1.Execution of a Planned Unit Development Agreement. 2.Approval of the associated conditional use permit amendment to allow an expansion to the vehicle sales and service use in the MX-S, Mixed-Use Suburban Center zone and conformance with all related conditions. 3.Submission of an administrative subdivision to combine all the parcels described in Exhibit A into one lot. 4.Modifications to the landscaping plan at the southeast corner of the site near Excelsior Boulevard. 5.Addition of the shrub hedge element required by the frontage buffer section of the development code for the new frontage along 5th Avenue South. 6.Addition of notes to the landscaping plan to follow the specified landscape installation regulations of Section 102-820 of the development code is to be added to the drawings. 7.Installation of bicycle parking facilities to accommodate four bicycle parking spaces. 8.Approval of the development by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and conformance with all related conditions. Adopted this 25th day of July, 2023. _______________________ Ben Goodlund, Acting Chair EXHIBIT A Legal Description of subject property The North 19 feet of the East 50 feet of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 823, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND The North 122 feet of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision Number 242, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of the West 33 feet thereof. AND The North 122 feet of the West 34 feet of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision Number 242, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND Lot 12 and Lot 13, Auditor's Subdivision Number 242, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND That part of Lot 14, Auditor's Subdivision Number 242, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying North of a line parallel with and distant 145 feet Southerly from the Southerly line of Excelsior Avenue. AND Those parts of Lots 14, 20, and 23 Auditor's Subdivision Number 242, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast Corner of Section 24, Township 117, Range 22; thence North, along the East line of said Section 24, a distance of 953.32 feet; thence Westerly, deflecting to the left 112 degrees 38 minutes 17 seconds, a distance of 538.92 feet; thence Northerly, at a right angle, a distance af 275.83 feet; thence Westerly, at a right angle, a distance of 33.00 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence Southerly at a right angle, along a line hereinafter referred to as "Line A", a distance of 8.27 feet; thence Southerly a distance of 126.88 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 167.00 feet to the intersection with the Northwesterly right-of-way line of Hennepin County State Aid Highway No. 3, Plat 16, as recorded in Book 4 of Highway Plats, Page 4, in the office of the County Recorder, County of Hennepin; thence Southwesterly along said right-of-way line to the Northeasterly right-of-way tine of the Chicago and North Western Railway Company (formerly The Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company); thence Northwesterly along the last described right-of-way line to the West line of said Lot 14; thence North along said West line to a point 240.00 feet South from the Northwest Corner of said Lot 14; thence East, parallel with the North line of said Lot 14 and its extension, a distance of 275.00 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said Lot 14, a distance of 94.53 feet to the South line of Lot 17 in said Auditor's Subdivision; thence East, along said South line, a distance of 3.50 feet to the intersection with a curve concave to the East which has a radius of 473.00 feet and is tangential with the aforementioned "Line A"; thence Southerly along the last described curve to the actual point of beginning. AND That part of Lots 14 and 20, Auditor's Subdivision Number 242, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Lot 14, distant 145 feet South of the Southerly line of Excelsior Avenue; thence South along said West line of distance of 95 feet; thence East a distance of 275 feet along a line run parallel with the Southerly line of Excelsior Avenue; thence North along a line run parallel with the West line of said Lot 14 to the South line of Lot 17, said addition; thence West, along the Southerly line of Lot 17, 16, and 15, said addition and along said Southerly line extended to the point of beginning. AND All of Lots 15 and 16 and that part of Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision Number 242, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies West of a line drawn parallel with and distance 30 feet West of the following described line: Beginning at the East Quarter corner of Section 24, Township 117, Range 22; thence South along the East line of said Section a distance of 364.37 feet; thence deflect at an angle of 25 degrees 59 minutes 28 seconds for a distance of 462.86 feet; thence deflect right at an angle of 19 degrees 50 minutes 43 seconds for a distance of 209.19 feet; thence deflect left at an angle of 84 degrees 27 minutes 29 seconds for a distance of 76.15 feet; thence deflect 90 degrees right for a distance of 216.88 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflect left along a tangential curve having a radius of 440.0 feet (delta angle 83 degrees 47 minutes 14 seconds) for a distance of 649.29 feet and there terminating. AND Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1 LUTHER WALSER HOPKINS ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND Outlet O, HCRRA DOWNTOWN HOPKINS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-10 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW AN EXPANSION TO THE VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE USE IN THE MX-S MIXED-USE SUBURBAN CENTER ZONE ON THE PROPERTY AT 314 MAINSTREET, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the applicant, Walser Real Estate Inc., initiated an application for a conditional use permit amendment to allow an expansion to the vehicle sales and service use of property in the MX-S, Mixed-Use Suburban Center zone at 314 Mainstreet, and; WHEREAS, this property is legally described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1.That the above stated application was initiated by the applicant on June 23, 2023; and, 2.That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on July 25, 2023: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and, 3.That written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and, WHEREAS, staff recommended approval of the above stated application based on the findings outlined in the staff report dated July 25, 2023. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Hopkins hereby recommends the City Council approve a conditional use permit amendment to allow an expansion to the vehicle sales and service use of property in the MX- S, Mixed-Use Suburban Center zone at 314 Mainstreet, subject to the conditions listed below. 1.Conformance with all the general performance standards in Section 102-590 of the Hopkins Development Code and the specific standards for vehicle sales and service uses detailed Section 102-580(k). 2.Approval of the associated rezoning application and execution of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement. 3.Approval of the associated PUD site plan and conformance with all related conditions. 4.Approval of all necessary permits from the Building, Engineering and Fire Departments. 5.Approval of the development by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and conforms with all related conditions. 6. Payment of all applicable development fees including, but not limited to SAC, park dedication and City Attorney fees. Adopted this 25th Day of July, 2023. _______________________ Ben Goodlund, Acting Chair EXHIBIT A Legal Description of subject property The North 19 feet of the East 50 feet of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 823, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND The North 122 feet of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision Number 242, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of the West 33 feet thereof. AND The North 122 feet of the West 34 feet of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision Number 242, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND Lot 12 and Lot 13, Auditor's Subdivision Number 242, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND That part of Lot 14, Auditor's Subdivision Number 242, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying North of a line parallel with and distant 145 feet Southerly from the Southerly line of Excelsior Avenue. AND Those parts of Lots 14, 20, and 23 Auditor's Subdivision Number 242, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast Corner of Section 24, Township 117, Range 22; thence North, along the East line of said Section 24, a distance of 953.32 feet; thence Westerly, deflecting to the left 112 degrees 38 minutes 17 seconds, a distance of 538.92 feet; thence Northerly, at a right angle, a distance af 275.83 feet; thence Westerly, at a right angle, a distance of 33.00 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence Southerly at a right angle, along a line hereinafter referred to as "Line A", a distance of 8.27 feet; thence Southerly a distance of 126.88 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 167.00 feet to the intersection with the Northwesterly right-of-way line of Hennepin County State Aid Highway No. 3, Plat 16, as recorded in Book 4 of Highway Plats, Page 4, in the office of the County Recorder, County of Hennepin; thence Southwesterly along said right-of-way line to the Northeasterly right-of-way tine of the Chicago and North Western Railway Company (formerly The Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company); thence Northwesterly along the last described right-of-way line to the West line of said Lot 14; thence North along said West line to a point 240.00 feet South from the Northwest Corner of said Lot 14; thence East, parallel with the North line of said Lot 14 and its extension, a distance of 275.00 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said Lot 14, a distance of 94.53 feet to the South line of Lot 17 in said Auditor's Subdivision; thence East, along said South line, a distance of 3.50 feet to the intersection with a curve concave to the East which has a radius of 473.00 feet and is tangential with the aforementioned "Line A"; thence Southerly along the last described curve to the actual point of beginning. AND That part of Lots 14 and 20, Auditor's Subdivision Number 242, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Lot 14, distant 145 feet South of the Southerly line of Excelsior Avenue; thence South along said West line of distance of 95 feet; thence East a distance of 275 feet along a line run parallel with the Southerly line of Excelsior Avenue; thence North along a line run parallel with the West line of said Lot 14 to the South line of Lot 17, said addition; thence West, along the Southerly line of Lot 17, 16, and 15, said addition and along said Southerly line extended to the point of beginning. AND All of Lots 15 and 16 and that part of Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision Number 242, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies West of a line drawn parallel with and distance 30 feet West of the following described line: Beginning at the East Quarter corner of Section 24, Township 117, Range 22; thence South along the East line of said Section a distance of 364.37 feet; thence deflect at an angle of 25 degrees 59 minutes 28 seconds for a distance of 462.86 feet; thence deflect right at an angle of 19 degrees 50 minutes 43 seconds for a distance of 209.19 feet; thence deflect left at an angle of 84 degrees 27 minutes 29 seconds for a distance of 76.15 feet; thence deflect 90 degrees right for a distance of 216.88 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflect left along a tangential curve having a radius of 440.0 feet (delta angle 83 degrees 47 minutes 14 seconds) for a distance of 649.29 feet and there terminating. AND Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1 LUTHER WALSER HOPKINS ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND Outlet O, HCRRA DOWNTOWN HOPKINS, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 32 20 6 25 20 17 16 12 13 16 17 21 22 14 WASHINGTON AVENUE NORTH (MAIN STREET)HIGHWAY 1691 NUMBERED NOTES EXISTING CURB TO BE REMOVED 2 EXISTING PAINTED MARKINGS TO REMAIN 3 NEW PAINTED MARKINGS4 5 NEW BITUMINOUS NEW CONCRETE CURB- B412 DESIGN - TYP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF FORMER RAILROAD PROPERTY6 6 6 6 6 PICNIC TABLE / (2)- THUS7 28'-0"18'-0"10'24'-0"18'-0"10'7 PARKING STALL 9' X 18'- TYPICAL KEY RR EXISTING LIGHT POLE AND FIXTURES- TO BE REMOVED & RELOCATED AS SHOWN B NEW LIGHT POLE AND FIXTURES- TYPE - B C NEW LIGHT POLE AND FIXTURES- TYPE - C MRM- LED- 48L- SIL- AM- 50- 70CRI- D180- 26' MH MRM- LED- 48L- SIL- FT- 50- 70CRI- SINGLE- 26' MH C C C C C C C C C B NEW LIGHT POLE EXIST LIGHT POLE (TYP) RR RR RR B NEW LIGHT POLE LIGHT POLE RELOCATED FROM WEST LOT- NEW CONC BASE 18'-0"4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 5 ' - 5 " 5 30'-0"3 6 E M P L O Y E E IN V E N T O R Y DESIGN DATA FORMER RAILROAD PROPERTY SITE AREA 31,350 SF (100 %) GREEN SPACE / LANDSCAPE AREA 9,785 SF (31 %) 7 10 INVENTORYINVENTORYINVENTORYINVENTORYINVENTORYINVENTORYINVENTORY6INVENTORY SERVICE CUSTOMEREMPLOYEE9 9 EMPLOYEEEMPLOYEESERVICE CUSTOMERSERVICE CUSTOMER20 20 INVENTORY INVENTORY E M P L O Y E E INVENTORY CUSTOME R 4 CUSTOMER DISPLAYCUSTOMERCUSTOMER12 CUSTOMER16 DISPLAY10CUSTOMER INVEN T O R Y INVEN T O R Y INVEN T O R Y INVEN T O R Y INVEN T O R Y 131519 21 4 6 SITE PLAN A1.0 5/24/2023 BIDS & PERMIT 1 A1.0 SITE PLAN 1"= 30'-0" NORTH PHILLIPS ARCHITECTS & CONTRACTORS, LTD. COPYRIGHT 2023 PHILLIPS Architects & Contractors, Ltd.C 401 North Third Steet, Suite 450 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph. (612) 868-1261 www.phillipsarchitects.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. David A. Phillips DATE LICENSE #17387 ISSUE/REVISION: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO. : DAP2023 SITE ALTERATIONS FOR:HOPKINS, MINNESOTA314 MAIN STREETWALSER CHRYSLER - Hopkins5/24/2023 33 24 6 3 10 10 10 10 4 21 19 16 12 13 10 10 10 10 10 14 WASHINGTON AVENUE NORTH (MAIN STREET)HIGHWAY 169C B RR DESIGN DATA FORMER RAILROAD PROPERTY SITE AREA 31,350 SF (100 %) GREEN SPACE / LANDSCAPE AREA 9,785 SF (31 %) NEW SOD- TYPICAL NEW SOD- TYPICAL NEW SOD- TYPICAL NEW SOD- TYPICAL NEW SOD- TYPICAL NEW SOD- TYPICAL 1.ALL DISTURBED LANDSCAPED LAWN AREAS TO BE SODDED 2.LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM 3.PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE EDGED WITH HEAVY DUTY VINYL BORDER 4.PROVIDE 3" DEEP MULCH AT PLANTING BEDS LANDSCAPE NOTES COMMON NAME BALSAM FIR QUAN. B SYM.BOTANICAL NAME ABIES BALSEMEA 6' HT. SIZE - NEW AS SHOWN SPACING REMARKS D FEATHER REED GRASS CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER'3' - 5'AS SHOWN 8H AS SHOWNHONEYLOCUSTGLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS 2 1/2" CAL. 46' - 66' HT. SIZE - FULL 3' - 5' 35' -40' HT. K N DAKOTA PINICAL BIRCH 1 1/2" CAL.25' - 30' HT. AS SHOWNWHITE SPRUCE PICEA GLAUCA 40' -60' HT. PLANTING SCHEDULE (PROPOSED NEW PLANTINGS) AS SHOWN 6' HT. H H H H H H H H N N B K 1 2 1 8D 8D 8D 8D 8D 8D 8D 8D 8D 8D 8D 8D 8D 8D 112 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.0 5/24/2023 BIDS & PERMIT 1 L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 1"= 30'-0" NORTH PHILLIPS ARCHITECTS & CONTRACTORS, LTD. COPYRIGHT 2023 PHILLIPS Architects & Contractors, Ltd.C 401 North Third Steet, Suite 450 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph. (612) 868-1261 www.phillipsarchitects.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. David A. Phillips DATE LICENSE #17387 ISSUE/REVISION: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO. : DAP2023 SITE ALTERATIONS FOR:HOPKINS, MINNESOTA314 MAIN STREETWALSER CHRYSLER - Hopkins5/24/2023 LEGEND925.8925.52924.50923.00923.50925.00923.20NEW BITUMINOUSNEW CURBNEW CURBREMOVE EXISTING CURBNEW CURB TIE INNEW CURBTIE INEXISTING CURBINLET CATCH BASINSEXISTING CURBINLET CATCH BASINCORE DRILL ATELEVATION=921.20NEW CURB INLET CATCHBASIN AND 32 L.F. OF 12"STORM PIPE.TC=924.50INV=921.50REMOVE EXISTING CURB314 MAIN STREET 1-STORY BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AREA = 44,225 SQ. FT.925.80923.35 28.028.0 30.0 24 . 0 NEW STRIPING (TYP)Phillips Architects & Contractors, Inc.401 North Third StreetSuite 450Minneapolis, MN 55401SITE LAYOUT ANDGRADING PLANWALSER CHRYSLER -PARKINGHOPKINS, MNPROPOSED LEGENDWATER MAINSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER SERVICESANITARY SERVICECHAIN LINK FENCEVINYL/WOOD FENCELIGHT POLEHYDRANTWATER VALVESANITARY MANHOLESTORM MANHOLECATCH BASINSILT FENCEGRADING LIMITS999CONTOUR LINESPOT ELEVATIONDRAINAGE ARROWDETAILNOTESSSSWWWWSSSSNOTES1)UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATION, CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 811FOR ALL UTILITY, GAS LINE, AND ELECTRICAL LINE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION.2)BENCHMARK - VARIOUS CONTROL POINTS AS SHOWN3)NO WETLANDS EXIST ON SITE.4)ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL HAVE SEED MIXTURE NO. 250 PLACED AT THE RATE OF 75POUNDS PER ACRE. MULCH SHALL BE PLACED AT A TARGET RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE.SOD SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 3' BEHIND ALL CURBED AREAS, UNLESS STATEDOTHERWISE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.5)RE-VEGETATE SITE WITHIN 48 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING.6)CONSTRUCT SILT FENCE AS NEEDED.7)PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION (WIMCO ROAD DRAIN OR EQUIVALENT) AT ALL AREA CATCHBASINS. USE TEMPORARY SILT CURTAIN AT PERIMETER OF THE STRUCTURE.8)CONSTRUCT ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT ACCESS LOCATION.9)SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ALL PROPOSED PLANTINGS.10)SLOPES AS SHOWN ARE 3:1 OR LESS.11)LESS THAN 1 ACRE OF DISTURBING, THEREFORE NO NPDES PERMIT REQUIRED.12)STREET SWEEPING IS REQUIRED AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK, AND MORE OFTEN ASNEEDED DUE TO TRACKING FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.