Loading...
CR 2000-014 Amendment to PUD Agreement With Hopkins Mainstreet . . e CITY OF January 13, 2000 ~ Council Report 2000-014 HOPKINS AMENDMENT TO PUD AGREEMENT WITH HOPKINS MAINSTREET. INC., DATED 10/6/99. HE: PARKSIDE SECOND ADDITION Proposed Action Staff recommends approval of the following motion: adopt Resolution 2000-06, amending the PUD agreement with Hopkins Mainstreet, Inc.. dated 10/6/99, re: Parkside Second Addition. The City Attorney has stated this is basically a clarification to the approved PUD agreement for the Parkside Second Addition Housing Project. Overview In September 1999 the City Council approved an application by the Beard Group to construct a 58-unit single family housing project on property formerly used by AUiant Tech as a parking lot. As part of the approval process, the property was rezoned to R-1-A PUD and a PUD agreement was prepared and executed. The rezoning was undertaken to allow the developer to construct the project as proposed, which required varying from the strict requirements of the R-I-A zoning ordinance. Within the approved PUD agreement, the setbacks of the various housing units are the foundation pads as shown on the grading plan dated September 14; however, the PUD agreement and the other documents relating to the PUD zoning failed to address the fact that the four housing styles proposed by the developer in the review process have cantilevers. These are extensions of the building wall above the basement level, which extend up to two feet beyond the foundation pad, both in the front and rear of the structure. The City Attorney has recommended that the PUD agreement be clarified to detail that these cantilevers are allowable encroachments into the yard setbacks. Primary Issue To Consider . What is the impact of the proposed action? SUPDortin2 Documents . Grading plan for Parkside Second Addition, dated September 14, 1999 . Resolution 2000-06 . Amendment to PUD Development Agreement . Various housing plans I I ". , I /' .-/ L-........ ,.- ;' , .- ,I Jim K;~rrigan '- / Planning & Economic{pevelopment Director . e e Council Report 2000-014 - Page 2 Primary Issue To Consider . What is the impact ofthe proposed action? This action is basically a clarification to the PUD agreement so that the housing unit styles originally detailed to Council and staff by the developer can be constructed. Inclusion of such language was overlooked when the original agreement was prepared. The developer is not proposing to change any of the elements of this project from what was outlined in the approval process. The number of units, lot size, location of units, size of building foundations, and styles of homes to be constructed all remain the same as approved. Alternatives The City Council has the following alternatives regarding this action: 1) Approve the action as recommended by staff This will allow the developer to proceed with construction of the housing units as previously discussed and approved. 2) Continue the item for additional information. If the Council needs to discuss this action with the developer, it will potentially cause a significant hardship. The lots have been sold and the developer has requested building permits so construction can begin. 3) Deny the action as requested by staff. Under this scenario, the developer would be required to construct housing units which are limited in size to the foundation pads as detailed on the approved grading plan. In essence, this would mean that the developer would be unable construct any of the four units that were shown to the Council as part of the approval process, ..- '::.::'~/ ./ I i~ ~ t~ ili!idi II I H iqq I ~ ~ . ~ e e ~~ ~~ R 0 g d ~ n ~~ ~I d r . 1":1 0 w ~ H I " ! ~ +. 14 L .~ . \ , , f'"t' 'I : ! 1'1" , I I I , oU~ ~ sflal ili p I Ii d In II [1 ~ I : I g I I g I g I g , I "' i!~ il~. ~ Hi ~ 3t! ~~PI ~ h! g I~h ~h ~~I i ~ ~~ z o~ ikl ~6 ~ 6 - ; H j~Hi ~ I ~i ~ ~~~; :i~ ~h ~ ~ ;I~ h~~ ~h ~~~ a ~ -a. ~ "" n .; 11'I III I .. U g ~ 0, ~ v " ~ ~ - II ~I-.S- iili~-: I .. ! a f ~ ! ~" ,,~ ~'i~, 0-;: ~ > il 5 /to d CL ,.., e ~ '" i~ ~ :; I 1;. ~ . "5 . . ~ !? ~ ~~ ~ ~ I g H.l I 1 ! g ~ 'j,5 i i~, r I ~ i d ~ i 9~ ~ ~ ~ ~ idl ~; in ~" i ~~ . ~! ~~ i i~ ooi V'i lD.... " ~ . . ~ a i i , ~ I . i I ~ . ~I i- /~a ~ ~ , , , " : \ /,,1 :") '1" > \ ! " z o E ~. ~ -~ ~ ~"" ~ i~- ~ lid. o .1::1::0 r~" ) 1 \ 1 " ~ e~ ~5 ~~ w" ~" w:!5 ~v. !l \ \ ". 1" -;\ " . ~ :' ; -I !I~ ~~!~ 2~1" ~ ~ ~il~ ~;~: ii~~ ~~~~ "''Y<l15 i.!~ !i!~ in~ ;iF ~ht I -e- I u~~_ ~ ~.!;~~~! O'i'~'J ~Ph. 'l ~~iii j~!ih! :5r~! ? ~c~- ~ ~ ! --- '" t o ~-.Jl~ :' .!ll .. - 4t '" t:. !oJ r '" ,... z "- o Z 0 j:: 011 C '" is ~~ e Q C..I ili ci!~ _ Q .Ct- 0 z~l!izo 'i' Ni2 re ~ ~ C;O ~ s~..zz '" ~- is 2 0 tlCl) ecn z ~ a:o..- ~Uiii c:J &I: :::: ~c 1&1 a uo. g: ~ ~ .. '" ~ " . I . . u a: I- .., Bl.... a:!:!:l g: ...~IO ~ <nj!:z , zj5i1 : 3i:it; -..... G\ <n"~ 0: Zo w ~ ~ ~ .. Go ~ Q 1\ :I: ~ r ~ 6 ~ '" 8 i ~ ~ ;; i . . e CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2000-06 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH HOPKINS MAINSTREET, INC., DATED OCTOBER 6,1999, FOR }) ARKSIllE SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, on October 6, 1999, the City and Hopkins Mainstreet, Inc., ("Hopkins Mainstreet") entered into a Planned Unit Development Agreement (the "PUD Agreement") specifying certain terms and conditions related to the City's approval of the rezoning of certain real property ("Real Property") described in the PUD Agreement to a zoning classification of R-l-A, PUD. The PUD Agreement also stated celtain terms and conditions related to the approval of a plat of the Rcal Property, known as the Plat of Parks ide Scconu Addition (the "Plat"). WHEREAS, pursuant to a Partial Assignment And Assumption Of Planned Unit Development Agreement, dated December , 1 999, Hopkins Mainstrcet has assigned certain of its rights and responsibilities under the PUD Agreement to The Ryland Group, Inc. ("Ryland"). Hopkins Mainstrect and Ryland are herein collectively referred to as the "Developer". WHEREAS, as part of the rczoning of the Real Property to the R-1-A, PUD zoning classification, the City Council approvcd reduced front, side and rear yard setbacks for the single family residences to be constructed on the lots within the Plat by the Developer which setbacks are established as the house pads shown on the Grading Plan prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc., dated September 14, 1999, and referred to as "Plan B" in the PUD Agreement. Said Grading Plan (hereinafter "Plan B") was approved by the City Council as part of its approval of the rezoning of the Real Property and the PUD Agreement. hopciv\rcsoluI4. pud . WHEREAS, certain of the residences to be constructed by the Developer on the Real Property are designed so that the upper levels cantilever two feet beyond the house pads shown on Plan B in the front and rear of the structure. These cantilevers were shown in the proposed plans submitted to the City by the Developer, but the PUD Agreement and Plan B do not document that the applicable front and rear setbacks of the lots within the Plat are to be reduced by two feet to permit the upper levels of structures to be cantilevered two feet beyond the house pads shown on Plan B. WHEREAS, the Hopkins City Council has reviewed and approved a proposed Amendment to the PUD Agreement amending the PUD Agreement to specify that the minimum front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks for the residences to be constructed within the Plat shall be the boundaries of the house pads depicted on Plan B and, further, that the minimum front and rear yard e setbacks may be reduced by two feet to permit the upper levels of the residences to bl: constructed on the lots within the Plat to be cantilevered by no morc than two feet beyond the outer foundation line. . WHEREAS, the Amendment is consistent with the intent of the R-l-^ PUD zoning of the Real Property, the terms and conditions of the PUD Agreement and the approvals previously given by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council ofthe City of Hopkins, Minnesota, hereby adopts the following Resolution: RESOLVED, that the Amendment To Planned Unit Development Agreement prepared by the City Attorney and suhmitted by staff is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to execute the ^mendmcnt upon receipt of counterparts ofthe Amendment hopclv\rcsolut4 [lud 2 . e . executed by the Developer. Adopted this Minnesota. ATTEST: day of January, 2000, by the City Council orthe City ofI-lopkins, Eugene Maxwell, Mayor Terry Obcrmaier, City Clerk hapel v\rcsaluI4. purl 3 . Miller, Steiner & Curtiss, P.A. AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This Amendment Planned Unit Development Agreement (this "Amendment") is made and executed this day of , 2000, by Hopkins Mainstreet, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and The Ryland Group, Inc., a Maryland corporation (collectively . "Developer"), and the City of Hopkins, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota (" City"). RECIT ALS A. Hopkins Mainstrect, Inc. and the City arc the parties to that certain Planned Unit Development Agreement, dated October 6, 1999, (the "PUD Agreement") which specified certain terms and conditions related to the City's approval of the rezoning of certain Real Property (as defined and described in the PUD Agreement) located in the City of Hopkins, to a zoning classification of R-I-A, PUD. The PUD Agreement also specified certain terms and conditions related to the approval of a plat of the Real Property, known as the plat of Parks ide Second Addition (the "Plat"). The PUD Agreement was filed for record October 25, 1999, as Hennepin County Registrar of Titles Document Number . hOpClvil\beard.amd . B. The Ryland Group, Inc., is the assignee certain orthe rights and responsibilities of Hopkins Mainstreet, Inc., under the PUD Agreement, as provided in a Partial Assignment And Assumption Of Planned Unit Development Agreement dated December , 1999, and filed for record , as Hennepin County Registrar of Titles Document Number c. The City and the Developer have agreed to enter into this Amendment for the purpose of expressly stating the minimum front, rear and side yard set back distances for the individual platted lots within the Plat. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration ofthe foregoing Recitals, the City and the Developer agree that the PUD Agreement shall be amended as follows: 1. Recitals And Definitions Incorporated. The foregoing Recital Paragraphs A . through C, are incorporated in and made a part of this PUD Agreement in their entirety. All of the defined terms and phrases in the PUD Agreement are incorporated in and made a part of this Amendment and, when referred to in this Amendment, shall have the same meanings stated in the PUD Agreement. 2. Amendment To Paragraph 12 Of pun Agreement. Paragraph] 2 of the PUD Agreement is amended to add the following subparagraph at the end thereof: . K. The minimum front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks for the residences to be constructed within the Plat shall be the boundaries of the house pads depicted on Plan B, the Grading Plan prepared by Schoell & Madson. Inc. dated September] 4, 1999. In addition, the minimum front and rear yard setbacks are reduced to two feet less than the front and rear boundaries of the house pads shown on Plan 8 in order to permit the front and rcar of the upper Icvels ofthc residences to be constructed on the lots within the Plat to be cantilevered no more than two feet beyond the outer foundation line. The minimum front, side and rear yard setback requirements, and the regulations and definitions applicable thereto, shall otherwise be the same as provided the Hopkins City Zoning Code for R-I-A zoning districts. hopcivll\beard.amd 2 . . . Within ninety (90) days of the date of the Developer's execution of this Agreement, the Developer shall, at Developer's expense, cause Plan B to be revised by Schoell & Madson, Inc., to show the exact distances, in feet and inches, between the closest point ofeach house pad depicted on Plan B and the front, rear and side boundaries of each lot within the Plat. A print of the revised Grading Plan shaU be deli vered to the City, and aU references in the PUD Agreement and this Amendment to Plan B shall thereafter refer to the revised Grading Plan. 3. Ratification OfPUD Agreement. The PUD Agreement shall remain in effect in all of its terms, covenants and conditions, as modified by this Amendment. This Amendment is incorporated in and made a part of the PUD Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer and the City have executed this Amendment as ofthe date and year first above written. HOPKINS MAINSTREET, INC. By_ Its STATE OF ) )SS ) COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _____~ _~______~ __~ 2000, by ____~__~,____________~__ ~ the ~,ofBopkins Mainstreet, Inc., a corporation under the laws of tbe State of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public THE RYLAND GROUP, INC. By Its hope iv i I\bcard. a111d 3 . . . STATE OF ) )SS ) COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ~____~~__~ 2000, by _____~ ___~_~ ~____~ the ~ ' of The Ryland Group, Inc., a corporation under the laws ohhe State of Maryland, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public CITY OF HOPKINS By Its By Its STATE OF ) )SS ) COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ____ ___________ 2000, by _ ____~_~~ ~_________ ~____ the and the ~--------- ----------- -- ------~-- ------~-- ---------- ,ofThc City of Hopkins, a municipal corporation, under the laws ofthe State of Minnesota, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Miller, Steiner & Curtiss, P.A. 400 NOlwest Bank Building 1011 First Street South Hopkins, MilUlesota 55343 hopcivillbcard"amd 4 ~ 13m r.--- ~~ Jll z o i= c > ~ III I- :c " ii: ('l o " .;; ., 1.._____.__.r ti'e i:1'~ HO)......JI.u (NOI.1'V"::xJ''SIHJ,) tpN't"t1~a^O 3)l'V"~ .tll"' . ~ ~w ~i gg 9" "11" ~y ~:!i ~~~ ~ . n II) o .. z S! l- e ~ ... III II: c III II: C? o I '~~ j ~I ~, 2' ~ "~.~ ~ ~, ~ ~ o 0( Z o ;: 0( > IU ..J IU I- Z o a: II. ;)I~1'O!:l O'!..1~ L - € r--- ~~ -~ ~~ '-.J h ..J. .Ja. ~ 9::, gt h~ 3~ ~~~ ~~ lj ~. lit 8~ \ ~ ~; ~~ ~;! J~~ ~~u ~~l! I:lo:~ ::O~.. ~ . S . t ~-i w~ ~~ Iro ~~ ~ 0: t o! ,,~ ~~ I co co . . ...: ... o I- o o tJ) z C ~ 1l/: o ii: m " ~ a~ --I Iii ill ~ !'II ~ !'Ii ~ II,t d >lli ll'1I t I!~ liii :;; 1.1. ;l ~ i i t i ~ f I~I ~ I lRlJJ )- w "- 1: ~ ~ it 10' " w SWPW ~ \II'':J "\I~ \II PC>ld~~ .<<:> P.;>::>"C'Q,*. Pq ~l \C:>UD,. .G"'....~ pup "'i'jd ~~""'1 ~t~~'~\I~:Et:~ ~o;o~":~ -'P.110 PilI' \4B"F.<:1::>:> '11 '."'.59';>..1 f;'''PJ':hP ::ouj 'c:!nOJO PU91~ illo.U .,....w..'lnb.~ fh.4lae...d wnw,,,,.. "'^ ",llm FilI1ll..l0JUO:l' "I e...p ~... .'.....III.."'b... .~:)IP:l'OfIl.. li1'PW'UO.1I'='Ul":lpd, pe'U'I.' ~"II' '",Pld "SUIIIlP..IP 5"110,,4) If''1./1 I)jJ1JO:lO I)qP.lSl4 op I .... ;n.vmrot lHr " N4'1'1I0 J.O:>iiNl'VITI';CIlllfa tl(llldllf)SJOtlOUdO SNOI.L V' /\313 ]UU ONI\\'lIQ V' I1)OlSNlm 1JooI'I y~'~y ~ "lIX 'V'I/.,.'"" ll'l'1H 31U ~ mIl t-- ~/: -~ .J~ z S c > OJ ... OJ !c Cl ii: C'l o . --~-'.::.:: ~I"g -~---. ~ ,;; '" (NOI.1't":)o1 ;II"IJ.} ipN'V't'RlJ!^O iI>tV'bl ."'I~~ ~~ ~l ~a i~ l'J~:ll !1~~ l i n It) o " i! !~ - !!~! , ~,! - -11:1 ~I ,I ~l ~,~, Q' ~, " ~ " "l " ..,,,.. J 1 ..~,,::L .",. i '(-' t\.::... z ~ o ~ i= . c > OJ ... :' ~ I~ (l) o ,... o cC Z o j:: cC > LU ..I LU ... Z o a: II.. o 0> ... . ..: 0. o I- Z o II: U. '" (,) ii: lEI .. .. ::> u. r:- ~~ ~. ~ o . ~<" a~ ~9- 01. ?i ~~;I ~~. ~~ ,Y ~~ g ~H h ~~" ~ a" ~l\I ~~ g~ Ii ! ; ~ I w ~ MI". ~ 0- w ~ ~ ~ ~j it.;, "w Iilc; ~~ ~ Q. /: " il 1 III "l w!ll ....If · 2 ,,!I ~ Ilfl ...J I,j ~ llh 3 Ill' 2 UtI 3 __ ! ~I li ~H ~Iil!~d ~~u ~I~I~:~ ~ I ! [ ! . !H ~ n ),i~ "~ ~~ 11' I ~~ ~! 'J . t NO!.QOW1'iNO:) ~ ;rte:9J ~~.IC.( a-u~I~ l!IIO;l antel ""U"t - - ~lIlIYn311 '9 "OIf~~~ .1P1N5'1lI JO w..oJ fiLl" III J.'lPldo:;:. JO P9':1~o~c:f;r.J pq 0' ~CIv ..~. .eu.m".p t='l.I".Ll",d",.~ .;6utm" Jp pu," .uv,d ~~llll n~u t;l~cb,d , 'So.I\Q~.'l'.i6'"F..:l~ "1 t:SI^JC:>."J r...~".,cl.c:> ='UI'~JC)p.."lr~~ .~ l~UlDJlnb~. R'.JSdo.d 1aII'I1I1"lW V^ "'1111I fi11l'~C>J"'1;I';> "I P.t' pup 'lUP1l1PJ,b.J "~lr.>olnf' '''lu '~nf':l'lJI:t.o:I. pe1l".J pt.'1' tU'ld /.6"'ITII5'~p et""O ,~\ FiJll~ f\qPJaj op 1 Wvbv& "~Jt1t " ONYIAU = ""'"' J.l<'WoI~~liiI I!OU<f1I:OSJOtlOU..:l SN011'\1A313 3'U1I~'(lfO '\1 m01SNlm 'lOOn ~ "', 1;rl1'V(\o't' )rIYtl]lll "& Yl'lY ~ ~?' ~~ -J~ z o i= .. > w ... w I- ~ ii! C\I o . \__________r -,-- ll'C!I ll'C!I '" '" d, ~ ~i ~g h I'l~~ 21~~ l ~ n It) o Wl JiClJ.J.~tM:IO WOIIl iIllttl ""IC.' ~~ ~ Bon_ "oLI.' ;)l!IYroll -,. bY? O~~~~ L ~ r-... ~~ ~! '-J~ " t ) z \ o : i= . c ~ w '" m ~ C') o 0: ~ ~ ! ~c .. I: ~~ 8~ ~~ ~~ ~~g 8 ~~, ~~l ~~ ~~ I I ~i ~i ~' ~, "! .." ,..' - ! " > 0" 11'11 ~r.' gj, i. ~:ni1 ~r' ~~~ I .~, , I ~I ! ~'I ~i ~I " w ~, ~l "[ $t r " ../L ."', .8J11-.9 ,.. o al Z o j: 0( > IU -a IU ... Z o a:: II. '" '" ., . ...: Do o I- o U ., z :c 11: :.: u 1C III ~ ~ ! ~ g - i , Iii , m t 'II J w ~ II I >-,1' !g ~ .,!l I ::; III tij II ::J!"i 2 I ~ !ib ~ II g'l!r ~ n ~I!~!l u. . 9 ~ I ~ I ~ f lUJw ~ o " z ~ )- \2 1: ~, Ir o a: i!! " w Iii . 6 ~ Hi 0/ ~ ~]l.:IX tiIlV("'" )nl'lflllJ ~5'\lUf'lII JO !WQ J "",,, \II pOIC::lo:t .10 r::>=='l'1JX),dIPJ 8~ 01 101.01 PJf' .SuIIl'l5'''P pII"t~PldlP,~l 96Lllm'Jp pup ,,,,,,d GltCll.j1 Ul 'll.46IJ fh~doJd ,- ..lSll.f1o PUf' l46jJf)do:J. '\1 '51"'.'.'" FilftOJdl<1D ~ choJIO) PLl~I~ 1PI,f.l "1."''''1'''''''''' f:.,...d,::o..d_''''III'V^ 4Wn "llWIOJUG':) \If OJf'puCI' '1UClLIJPJlboJ "PO=>I":loOJ liP '..1II 'UOI1Vi:lIJI:t-.d. pID\I',5'''' puf' 9UPlc:l '.SUI.....,. -NI.1\ '1'1./1 FiJll.1S1:t FiqPAlI.f OJ:ll Vi .... .O~ '9f1.&o1TJ9:1/1tV' tWIY~O mOlSNlm U1~ .LO='ilNI\"ITI )c1~1iiI NOIldf!!')C)1)NQ11el) SNOI1'V;\3l3 nlll 1H\'I'1~1 8 8~'~Y ~ lfm ;;;... ~~ ~. z o i= c > III Iil !i: " Ii! C\I o . ---- - -. -~._------.-l____ _____~ .r----- tj.g' ~ <! .; OJ oIi 1 "w ~~ ~g h '\"1 I!lo;:, 21~; ~ . ill Il) o z ~ o ~ i= ! c i: ... III 0: ~ ! C') o ,.. o m z o i= c( > w .... w ~ Z o p: II. o OJ 'Ot . ~ ... o I- Z o a: IL :00: o ii: III ... ... ::> IL ~ ~ f' -~ .J~ z ~ o. i= . c > III ... III I- ~ ! 'It o , IU ~; is w g~~ EL ~~ J~~ ... \1)1: GI- \DU ~~ h ~l? b~ ~~a: ~~ i'~ lo~~ u: ~ ~w '!I" ~I I I , I ~ g I~I ~ I LWJ ~ ti:i ~. i;l~ ~e ;;:cr L t It r m~ w 15 z '" W ..J ..J ii: " 8 Cl ;;:; 3 , III "l !Ii! tift' ,,;1 n,' It-I !Ih 1'1' ~!~l >- \:t /;; ~ ~ it UJ X UJ ~ - r q Ii H ~ d iI~ U~IU) n;ry ~ ~ ; ~ ~!~ i~ -~ 1l~~?! 9 mOlSNlm ~ ...~(".. ::!!!!: aNYIA~ )OO"~~, &IllVnr 3t'I'N3lJ M;lIJ.:'fIl!U9NO::1~8l"Ii91 lj:lN:;I~ WO;/ .ant,. S~"]II '"-1(''' ;'"Lr"( l1V9 .~.IIJOW.lOJfiu,ut plt,c::IO::lO 10 F'f>':)n~oJdSll S'q 01 lOu ~)~ ,6UII'llFJ'" p...~ 'ulild O~OI.U C Sulmv ,p pur .U'lc:I ~"il41 "I H'-l611 f.l..c:bJQ " J8I41~ puv l...p,.Ii.;::jo:>> '11 '~^J5I'~J "lue.ldJlp ~I dno~ PU'Ifl.el S\U t~""'''~lI"lbct.l filJ&ldOJd unulUlW 'V^ 4ltIllFillUII.lOJVO:l UJ .Jl'pIolli'lu""'PJlbIitJ IilPO::l'I,::lOOIIl" 1~'uQI1I'='tJl:l'Pd. pilUle.. ~" 9UVld ,t6ulmC'JP .o9"'-l1 'S'I.l\ Fim~Fiq;l>""cr:'1 ~ tfl.llfll".?:)J.L1'W' AsmvllO ,U~:>Ol~a'''r\:II t. HOUdltlJS)J NOU< SNOll\7'/\:Jl3 I 8~n 3l!U!1NIIlYij()