Memo- CSAH 3/ C.P. 9227
- - ---'-~- -
.'!:>
,~ Memo
A~~ 3 /'122 7
tc: Utt-r ~Jt:.N
',~rEWb' ~. .
'0. (C-/~ eF ~~)
&:yeWP.
DATE:
August 17, 1999
TO:
Craig Twinem
Don Lundstr~
FROM:
SUBJECT: CSAH 3/C.P. 9227
7lA/lv Jt)#IJ~
. CEP/l~SVal)
, I
As per your request, attached are copies of traffic studies recently conducted by our division as
follows: ~
· CSAH 3 @ Jackson Ave.
· 16 Hr. Traffic Movement Study No. 2424
· Signal Warrant Review
· CSAH 3 @ Harrison Ave.
· 24 Hr. Hose Count
· Pedestrian Count
· CSAH 3@ Van Buren Ave.
· 24 Hr. Hose Count
· Pedestrian Count
.
~()
I
/
SIGNAL "V ARRANT REVIEW
HENNEPIN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTl\1ENT
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DIVISION
WARRANT #1 16.0 HRS. , 0.0 HRS. -, - 0.0 HRS. No
(MIN. VEH.)
WARRANT #2 14.25 HRS. 0.0 HRS. 0.0 HRS. No
{INT. OF TRAF.)
tkrARRANT#8 16.0 HRS. 0.0 HRS. 0.0 HRS. No
(COMBINATION) - ----~-
MULTIWAYSTOP 16.0 HRS. 0.0 HRS. 0.0 HRS. No
(VEH. VOL.UME)
TTh1E
WARRANT #9 No hours meet minimum VPH threshold on minor street approach .No
(FOUR HR. VOL.)
WARRANT #11
(pEAK HR.)
No hours meet minimum VPH threshold on minor street approach
No
WARRANT #3
(MIN. PED. VOL.)
36 PEDS 6:00AM - 10:00 PM
No
10 PEDS
WARRANTS MET None
~(
RUG-06-1333 10:23 FROM HENNEPIN CO PUBLIC WORKS
TO
HOPKINS PW P.02
DESCRIPTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
.
Traffic control signals should not be installed unless one or more of the signal warrants in the
Minnesota ,Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices are met. The satisfaction of a warrant or
warrants is not in itself justification for a signal. Information should be obtained by means of
engineering studies and compared with the requirements set forth in the warrants. The
engineering study should indicate the installation of a traffic signal will improve the overall
safety and/or operation of the intersection. If these requirements are not met, a traffic signal
should neither be put into operation nor continued in op~ation (if already installed).
~:
Warrant 1 - Minimum vehicular volume
Combined volume of mainline and cross-street must exceed a certain volume
Warrant 2 - Interruption of continuous traffic
Mainline volume must be high enough that insufficient gaps exist for cross-street
traffic to enter
Warrant 3 - Minimum pedestrian volume
Applies primarily to central business districts, rarely if ever attained elsewhere
Warrant 4 - School crossings
Number of safe crossing gaps must be insufficient
Warrant 5 - Progressive movement
Applicable to ari integrated system of closely spaced signals operating in
coordinated mode
-.'
Warrant 6 - ,Accident experience <-
Number of accidents correctable by traffic signal control must exceed acceptable
threshold
Warrant 7 - Systems
Applicable to the concentration and organization of traffic at adjacent intersections
Warrant 8 - Combination of warrants
Must meet 80% of values for both Warrants 1 and 2
\
Warrant 9 - Four hour volumes
Combined volumes over four hour period must exceed acceptable threshold
Warrant 10 -Peak hour delay
Average cross street delay during peak hour must exceed aCGeptable threshold
Warrant 11 -Peak hour volume
Combined volumes over peak daily one hour period must exceed acceptable
threshold
];?,
RUG-06-1ggg 10:30
FROM HENNEPIN CO PUBLIC WORKS TO
NON-SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
HOPKINS PW P.03
/ t:7 r' 2.
Traffic Sional RankinJZ System
In order to be listed in the traffic signal ranking system, the traffic or accident characteristics of an
intersection or location must meet the requirements of at least one of the eleven traffic signal warrants.
The traffic signal warrants are outlined in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform T raffle Control Devices.
The traffic signal ranking system is based on three factors. These are a traffic volume factor~ an accident
susceptibility factor and an accident severity factor.
1) Traffic Volume Factor: The traffic vohune factor is based on the total number of hours that
vehicular and pedestrian volume at a particular intersection or location meets or exceeds the
wammting criteria of select traffic signal warrants. Listed below are the traffic warrants and the
maximum hours that are assigned to each for the purposes of developing a traffic volume factor.
Maximum
Hours
Warrant No. 1, Minimum Vehicular Volume
Warrant No.2, Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Warrant No.3, Minimum Pedestrian Volume
Warrant No.4. School Crossing
Warrant No. S, Progressive Movement
Warrant No.6, Accident Experience
Warrant No. 7~ Systems Warrant
Warrant No. 8, Combination of Warrants
Warrant No.9, Four Hour Volumes
Warrant No. 10, Peak Hour Delay
Warrant No. 11. Peak Hour Volume
8
8
4
- (a)
- (b)
- (c)
- (b)
8
4
- (b)
2 (max. 4 pts.) (d)
Total
Total Maximum Points
34 Hours
36 Points
As an example, an intersection may be warranted under Warrant Number 2~ Interroption of
Continuous Traffi~' by meeting at least eight hours of that warrant. However, if only three hoW's of
Warrant Number 1 are met plus two hours ofWamnt 3, six hours of Warrant 8, no hours ofWammt
9, and one hour of Warrant 11 adjusted to 1.5 points, the traffic volume factor for this intersection
would be 3 + 8 + 2 + 6 + 0 + 1.5 = 20.5 hours.
2) Accident SusceJ)tibilitv Factor: This factor is based on the total nmnber of accidents that have
occurred at an intersection or location within the most recent three year period that are susceptible to
correction by a traffic signal. Susceptible accidents include all right ~g1e crashes. Although some
types of left turn accidents may be susceptible to correction' by a tra.ffic signal, they are not included
since signal phasing and possible changes to intersection geometrics have not been determined at the
prioritization stage. The accidents included in this factor may be property damage only, personal
injury or fatal accidents but must be those that have been reported to the Minnesota Department of
Public Safety.
3) Accident Severity Factor: The basis for this factor is the total cost in dollars of all reportable
accidents that have occurred at an intersection or location in the most recent three year period. The
FHW A currently has assigned $2,700 to a property damage only accident and $30,500 to a personal
injury accident. Because fatal accidents are a rare occurrence, they are included in the personal
, --z, ~
RUG-06-1999 10:30 FROM HENNEPIN CO PUBLIC WORK5
injuxy category.
TO
HOPKIN5 PW P.04
z. ClP z..
The three factors are weighted to be equivalent. The weighting is based on the maximum nwnber of
Susceptible Accidents over the three year period and the Accident Severity dollar value being adjusted to
equal the maximum value oithe Traffic Volume Factor (TVF). For example, if the maximum TVF
equals 32 while the maximum dollar value equals $320,400 and the maximum number of susceptible
accidents equals 20, then the number of accidents would be multiplied by the number below to get the
Accident Susceptibility Factor (SuF).
TVF max.
Max. No. of Susceptible Acc.
or
32 or
20
1.600000
The Accident Severity dollar value would be multiplied by the number below to get the Accident
Severity Factor (SeF).
TVF max.
Max. Acc. Severity Dollar Value
or
32 or
$320,400
0.000Q999
This results in the highest value in each category being equal.
The three factors are snry1mSlted to produce a traffic signal priority factor. '
Traffic SiQlla1 Priority Factor CPF) = Traffic Volume Factor (TVF) +
Accident Susceptibility Factor (SuF) + Accident Severity Factor (SeF)
U=TVF+ SuF+ SeF
Footnotes
a) School crossing signals are not included in the traffic signal priority rating system. No common
criteria is available to compare the priority of school crossing locations to other intersections or
locations. In addition, requests for school crossing signals occur infrequently and are best addressed
on an individual basis.
b) Warrant Numbers 5, 7 and 10 cannot be quantified in hours of warrant and therefore are not being
considered in the priority ranking system. Hennepin County has not used these warrants as traffic
signal justification.
c) Intersection or location accident statistics are being used as two of the prioritizing factors.
d) The P.M. peak and the A.M. peak are the first two hours examined. If tp.ese do not meet the
warranting values, other hours during the day are then reviewed. When a warrant for an hour is
reached, a multiplier is applied based on the High Volume approach on the minor street. This
multiplier bas a limit of2 and is based on the actual volume divided by the warranting volume.
DAL:jh
7/16/92
9/19/96
2/27/98
1/20/99
vA-
TOTAL P.04
Staff Analvsis of 2000 Budl!et
. 2000 Budget Analysis
Attached to this report is a summary of2000 estimated budget revenues the general fund. Also included
is a summary of the estimated 2000 budget requests for the general fund budget. Finance was unable to
complete the project budgeting worksheets in time for the departments to have them returned at this
point in the process. Prior to the September 7th meeting, at which time the Council will set the
preliminary levy, most departments' will have their requested budgets back to Finance and we will have
a more accurate estimate.
The summary also shows historical revenues and expenditures, which allows us to analyze current and
future requests.
. 1999 Legislative Actions
The action of the 1999 State Legislature will impact local tax structure in two ways. Levy limits are
imposed and there are small tax rate changes.
For the third year, levy limits will be imposed on all counties and on cities with populations over 2,500.
These limits are imposed to help control property tax increases. Increases are allowed for factors such as
inflation, household growth, and increases in market value due to the construction of new commercial
and industrial properties. The City's budget is designed to fit within the established levy limits. The
City of Hopkins current levy limit went up by 8.38% or $342,928 from our actual levy for the general
fund in 1999. The current levy limit is set at $4,434,834.
Property class rate changes have been enacted. In Minnesota property is taxed at different rates based
upon its type. In 2000, commercial, industrial, residential, utility and apartment property all will have a
compression of their respective tax capacity rates. This causes a small loss in the City's'potential tax
capacity value of about 3 %. Our tax capacity value increased in 1999.
2000 Budl!et ODtions
As part of the preparation for the preliminary budget, departments are instructed to keep personnel
increases at agreed amounts per our labor agreements and to keep all other expenses at or below 2.5%.
Presently labor negotiations are still in process and as mentioned earlier departments have not had an
opportunity to return their requested budgets to Finance.
The Finance Department has prepared some estimated budget amounts based on proposed labor contracts
and historical materials, supplies and services. None of the proposed options will cover the projected
increase in salaries and benefits for 2000. Salaries and benefits compose 74% of general fund
expenditures. With a projected increase of salaries of 2.5%, a $5 per month benefit increase, and
scheduled step increases, salaries and benefits are anticipated to increase by $340,000. This is an overall
increase in salaries and benefits from last year of 6.5%.
Bud!!et Option No.1
Budget option No.1 would increase operating expenditures by $143,173 or 2%, which would not cover
increases in salary per our proposed labor union contracts. In order to accomplish this budget increase a
program or service would need to be eliminated, or the Shady Oak Beach development payment could be
paid from the park development fund and $22,000 in projects or expenditures would need to be
eliminated. The same general city services mayor may not be maintained at this level. At a 2% increase
in spending our levy will go up by $133,964 or 3.03%.
Budf!et Option No.2
This option would increase spending in the general fund by $211,467, an increase of2.95% over 1999.
With this option we could maintain city services but need to decrease the estimated budget by $3,700.
The Shady Oak Beach development payment would come from the general fund as initially intended and
current capital items requested such as the fire station repeater, the fire station roof repair and exhaust
system would be accomplished. For this option the tax levy would increase by $202,260 or 4.57%.
Budl!et Option No.3
This option would provide an increase in spending in the general fund of$257,712, or an increase of
3.6%. Departments will still be required to keep spending down to a level comparable to 1999 except for
salaries, which will be negotiated union contract amounts. The capital expenditures and special projects
will all come from the general fund. The tax levy increase for this option is $248,260 or 4.6%. This
option is still approximately $95,000 under the maximum tax levy limit set by the State of Minnesota.
. Tax Impacts of Budget Options
The general fund is the largest portion of the city's tax levy. In addition to the general fund, there is also
the levy for debt service. The debt service levy is staying constant at $330,000. The debt service levy is
excluded from the levy limit.
Attached you'll find three different scenarios for residential and commercial/industrial tax impacts.
You'll notice that no matter which scenario is used, Hopkins residents will have a small increase in taxes
along with almost all the commercial/industrial classes.
In the past the Council has set the preliminary levy amount at the State's recommended levy limit. This
year Finance is recommending that the Council consider setting the preliminary levy amount at the
Budget Option No.3 amount, which is a $248,260 increase in the levy, but still $95,000 under the levy
limit. The reason for setting the preliminary levy underneath the State's recommended levy limit is that
the anticipated needs of the city will fall within this amount.
· 1999 Public Hearings for the 2000 Budget and 1999/2000 Tax Levy
This year, cities with populations above 500 will be required to hold an additional public hearing prior to
October 19th to give notification of the proposed "levy certification tax rate" increase and adopt a
resolution approving a "levy certification tax rate" increase. This hearing can be an item on the agenda
of a regular scheduled meeting and does not need to be published. Finance recommends this hearing
take place at the October 5th Council meeting.
Last year the legislature set aside the first two Mondays in December for the use of cities to hold their
Initial Public Hearing and the Continuation Hearing. The dates are December 6, 1999 for the Initial
Hearing and December 13th for the Continuation Hearing. The City of Hopkins can choose other dates if
it would like to but it must not overlap the county or school districts date and must be in between
November 30, 1999 and December 20, 1999. There are other restrictions that must be adhered to also.
Staff is recommending the City Council adopt the first two Mondays in December as the Initial Public
Hearing and the Continuation Hearing and then we will be able to adopt the final budget and tax levy on
Tuesday, December 14, 1999, which is a regular council meeting date.
Attached is a letter from Hennepin County detailing some of the restrictions.
GENERAL FUND FUND 101
REVENUES
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BY SOURCE
2% 2.95% 3.60%
1999 2000 2000 2000
SOURCE BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION PROJECTIO
l.:urrent Kevenues
CURRENT PROPERTY TAX $ 4,113,906 $ 4,247,870 $ 4,316,166 $ 4,362,166
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,077,254 2,106,288 2,106,288 2,106,288
LICENSE, PERMITS & FINES 418,400 430,952 430,952 430,952
INTEREST EARNINGS 347,089 297,089 297,089 297,089
CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES 79,415 95,248 95,248 95,248
OTHER REVENUES 55,600 56,434 56,434 56,434
NON REVENUE RECEIPTS 37,000 37,370 37,370 37,370
NET TOTAL REVENUES 7,128,664 7,271,251 7,339,547 7,385,547
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 30,000 30,586 30,586 30,586
TOTAL REVENUES :I) 1,1)~,664 :I) I,JU1,~J 1 :I) I,J IU,lJJ :I) 1,416, lJJ
EXPENDITURES
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BY OBJECTIVE
2% 2.95% 3.60%
1999 2000 2000 2000
OBJECTIVE BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION PROJECTIO
l.:urrent Expenses
SALARIES AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $ 5,292,119 $ 5,635,716 $ 5,635,716 $ 5,635,716
MA TERIALS, SUPPLIES AND SERVICES 2,091,596 2,058,744 2,058,744 2,058,744
CAPITAL OUTLAY 520,282 521,718 521,718 521,718
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 100,000 50,000 50,000
TOTAL $ 8,003,997 $ 8,216,178 $ 8,266,178 $ 8,266,178
LESS EXPENDITURES CHARGED TO
OTHER ACTIVITIES (854,378) (901,364) (901,364) (901,364)
NET TOTAL 7,149,619 7,314,814 7,364,814 7,364,814
Other Financing Uses 9,045 9,045 9,045 9,045
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 7,158,664 $ 7,323,859 $ 7,373,859 $ 7,373,859
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (22,022) (3,726) 42,274
~ ~
IV -" ~ ~ <~-"
- ..j::... \0 -....1
~o-. W VI - ~ e; \0
~ ~ '0 C~\O
0 -"
0 0 0 0 (I) (I) 0-.
0 0 0 0 .....
"'0
~ -" ~ ~ n
- ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.
~
0 0'\ W IV -....10"'(1)'-<:
0 0 w 0 ........ tIl
..j::... - -....1 IV (I)
~ ~
IV - ~ ~ <~-
IV ..j::... \0 -....1
VI \0 ~\O ..j::... ~ e; \0
\0 0\ -....1 Iv C~\O
w 00 00 0-. (I) (I) -....1
0-. w 00 0-. .....
"'0 ~g5
~ - ~ ~ n
- ~ ~ ~ \0 ~ ~ ..... CZl...,
'0 \OO"'(I)q I--< I--<
0\ w IV ~~
-....1 ..j::... 0-. IV OO........tIl
\0 \0 00 ..j::... (I) IV
'$, Z...,
Z ~trl
~ ~ ~ ~~
IV -" -" ~ <~- n
w VI 0 -....1 ~ ~~
\0 00 VI 00 PJ e; \0
~ ~ ~ ~ C~\O >
0 W VI VI 0"'0
..j::... 0'\ -....1 -....1 (I) (I) 00 CZl ~trl
.....
0 ..j::... 0-. W trl
"'0 Z CZl~
@~
~ - ~ ~ n t:l::l ~~
-" ~ ~ ~ \0 ~ ~ ~. 8
~
-" .......:J ..j::... IV \00"'(1)'-<: "'0><
VI 0 - 0-. \0 (D tIl 0
- VI W ..j::... trl :::01--<
~ o~
~ ~ ~ ~>
IV - - ~ <~-" :::on
VI 0'\ - 00 ~~
w 00 IV w ~ e; \0 ~CZl
~ ~ ~ ~ C~\O
00 - -
0-. 00 IV ..j::... (I) (I) \0
- w IV VI .....
"'0
~ IV ~ ~ n
-" ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~.
~
-" .......:J ..j::... IV 00"'(1)'-<:
VI - IV -....1 O........tIl
IV - w VI (I)
n
::r
~ ~ I~ ~
~ ~ -" -
- 0'\ 0 -
n
0 0 IV ..j::... ::r '$,
-" \0 ~ ~ ~
'$, '$, '$, '$, cro
(I)
>>>
CZl CZl CZl
iii
CZl CZl CZl
>>>
o-.VI..j::...
. . .
IV 00 0'\
'$,~~
ZZZ
nnn
~~~
>>>
CZl CZl CZl
trltrltrl
ZZZ
~~~
...,~~
<<<
~~~
fBfBfB
~~""rj
:::0:::0:::0
000
~~~
-"--
\0 \0 \0
\0 \0 \0
00 -....1 0'\
~...,...,
000
-"--
\0\0\0
\0 \0 \0
\0 00 -....1
&9- &9- >-
N - &9- &9- < tIJ _
- +::0- \0 ......:J p) tIJ \0
0'\ Vol Vl - - ~ \0
~ ~ ... "
0 - +::0- 0 ~ ~ 0'\
0 0 0 0 (l) ~
0 0 0 0 0-
""C
&9- - p) ~ n
- &9- &9- &9- \0 'p3 ~ ::+.
~ \Ocr'~~
0 0'\ Vol N
0 0 Vol 0 ......:J_tIJ
+::0- - ......:J N (l)
>->->-
C/1 CZl CZl
C/1C/1CZl &9- &9- >-
~~~ N - &9- &9- < tIJ _
N +::0- \0 ......:J
Vl ~ \0 +::0- p) tIJ \0
- ~ \0
C/1C/1CZl \0 0'\ ':...:J N ~ ~ ......:J
>->->- Vol 00 00 0'\ (l) ~
0"1 Vol 00 0"1 0-
O"IVl+::o-
NOoO\ ""C ~~
~~'t( &9- ...... p) ~ n
ZZZ - &9- &9- &9- \0 'p3 ~ ::+" C/1~
~ \Ocr'(l)~ - -
0 0"1 Vol N ~~
(j(jn ......:J +::0- 0'\ N 00 ........ tIJ N
~~~ \0 \0 00 +::0- ~ \0
Vl
't( ~~
>->->- _tr1
CZlC'-lC'-l &9- -E;;; -E;;; >- Z ~~
trltr1tr1 N - - -E;;;
ZZZ Vol Vl 0 ......:J < tIJ _ (j :::C::::O
\0 00 Vl 00 p:l tIJ \0 ~
~ ~ ... " - ~ \0 00
~~~ 0 Vol Vl Vl ~ ~ 00 ~~
+::0- 0'\ ......:J ......:J (l) ~ >-
0 +::0- 0"1 Vol 0- C'-l
tr1 C'-l~
""C Z tri~
~~~ &9- - p) ~ n t;C 6S2
<<< - &9- &9- &9- \0 'p3 ~ ::+"
~ \Ocr'(l)~ 8
- ......:J +::0- N ""C><
~~~ Vl 0 - 0"1 \O_tIJ
- Vl Vol +::0- ~ ~ :::0-
~~~ O~
..., ~>-
~~~ &9- &9- &9- >- ~~
~~:::o N - - &9- < tIJ _
000 Vl 0"1 - 00
Vol 00 ...N w p) tIJ \0 ~I/l
~ ~~. ~ ~ ... - ~ \0
00 - - +::0- ~ ~ \0
...... ...... ...... 0"1 00 N +::0- (l) (l)
\0 \0 \0 - Vol N Vl 0-
\0 \0 \0
00 ......:J 0"1
~~..., ""C
000 -E;;; N p:l ..., n
- -E;;; &9- &9- o 'p3 ~ ::+.
-...... ...... ~ Ocr'~~
\0 \0 \0 - ......:J +::0- N
\0\0\0 ......:J N w 00 O_tIJ
\0 00 ......:J N +::0- 0 0 (l)
n
::r
-E;;; -E;;; -E;;; -E;;; ~ -E;;;
N ...... - - UCI
- \0 ......:J 0"1 (l)
(j
- N +::0- 0"1 ::r '::R
00 ......:J N N ~ <:)
't( ~ 't( 't( UC1
(l)
V7 V7 <~--
tv -- V7 V7
-- .,J::.. \0 .....:)
0'\ VJ Vl -- ~ ~ \0
" " " " 8"~\O
0 -- .,J::.. 0 (I) (I) 0\
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 .-t-
'i:i
V7 -- ~ --3 n
-- V7 V7 V7 \0 ~ ~ ~.
'0 0\ VJ tv \00"'(1)'-<
0 0 VJ 0 .....:)'-V:!
.,J::.. -- .....:) tv ('I)
>>>
CZl CZl CZl
CZl CZl CZl V7 V7
~~~ tv -- V7 V7 <~--
tv .,J::.. \0 .....:)
Vl \0 \0 .,J::.. ~ ~ \0
\0 ~ "....J tv 8"~\O
CZl CZl CZl w 00 00 0\ ('I) (I) .....:)
>>> .-t-
0'\ VJ 00 0\
9"Y'~
tv 00 0'\ 'i:i r:g~
~~~ V7 -- ~ --3 n
ZZZ -- V7 V7 V7 \0 ~ ~ ~. CZl--3
'0 \00"'(1)'-< ~ ~
0'\ VJ tv ~~
nnn .....:) .,J::.. 0\ tv oo'-V:! w
~~~ \0 \0 00 .,J::.. ('I)
0\ Z--3
>>> ~ --3trj
CZl CZl CZl Z ~Cl
tT:ltT:ltT:l V7 V7 V7 <~-- ~'i:i
N -- -- V7 n
ZZZ w VI 0 .....:) ~ ~~
\0 00 Vl 00 PJ ~ \0
'0 "w " " 8"~\O O'i:i
~~~ Vl VI ('I) ('I) 00 >
.,J::.. 0\ .....:) .....:) ~tT:l
0 .,J::.. 0'\ VJ .-t- CZl
tT:l CZl~
'i:i Z @~
--3--3--3 V7 -- ~ --3 n to ~~
<<< -- V7 V7 V7 \0 ~ ~ ~. @
" \00"'('1)'-<
-- .....:) .,J::.. tv 'i:i~
~~~ VI 0 -- 0'\ \O.-tf.l
-- VI W .,J::.. (I) ~ :;:o~
~~~ O~
--3 ~>
~"'rj"'rj V7 V7 V7 > :;:on
:;:o~:;:o N -- -- V7 < V:! __ --3--3
000 VI 0\ -- 00
w 00 N W ~ V:! \0 ~CZl
~~~ " " y ~ .- (I) \0
00 -- -- s:: ~ \0
-- ---- 0\ 00 N .,J::.. ('I) (I)
\0 \0 \0 -- W N VI 0..
\0 \0 \0
00 .....:) 0'\
--3--3--3 'i:i
000 V7 N ~ --3 n
-- V7 V7 V7 o~ ~ ~.
-- ---- y 00"'('1)'-<
\0 \0 \0 -- .....:) .,J::.. N O'-V:!
\0 \0 \0 00 VJ W 00 (I)
\0 00 .....:) 0'\ N Vl VJ
n
:::r'
V7 V7 V7 V7 ~ V7
VJ N N -- (JQ
VI .....:) N \0 ('I)
n
w w VI .....:) :::r' ~
~ . ~
0 \0 Vl
~ ~ ~ ~ {JQ
(I)
{;17
,...... {;17 {;17 <~,......
a VI N
0 0 0 p:l e; \0
0 0 0 2"'~\O
a a a (1) (1) 0\
0 0 0 .-+
0 0 0
{;17 ~
,...... {;17 {;17 ,......p:l~(1
N VI N \0 ~ ~ ::+.
N \0 ~
,...... \00"'(1)'-<:
-.J ,...... 0 -.J........{Il
-.J -.J ,...... (1)
{;17
,...... {;17 {;17 <~,......
"
0 VI N
,...... 0 0 p:l e; \0
,,0\ 00 w Z"~\O
~ N (1) (1) -.J
0 0
0 0 0 .-+
0 0 0
{;17 ~ (1tTj
,...... {;17 {;17 ......p:l~(1 ~d
,...... VI ,...... \0 ~ ~ ::+.
" " ~
-.J VI 00 \00"'(1)'-<:
00 \0 00 OO........{Il N ~~
,...... ..j::::.. ...... (1) .
~ O~
{;17 Z ~~
,...... {;17 {;17 <s::,...... (1
0 VI N ~ I ~
00 ..j::::.. ,...... p:l e; \0 ~~
,...... ~o 0\ 2"'~\O >
" ~ (1) (1) 00
0 Vl N (I':l
N ,...... 0 .-+ tr:l c::tTj
..j::::.. N VI Z (I':l~
~~
{;17 ~ to
,...... {;17 {;17 ,......p:l ~(18 ~~
,...... U'l ,...... ~ ~ ~ ::+.
" " "
-.J 0\ \0 \Og:~,-<: 0 ~~
\0 ..j::::.. ..j::::..
N 0 \0 (1) tTj ~~
~
~>
{;17 tTj(1
,...... {;17 {;17 <~,...... ~~
"
,...... U'l N
..j::::.. -.J N p:l e; \0 ~(I':l
"..j::::.. N 00 2"'~\O
00 ~ \0 (1) (1) \0
0 0 0\ .-+
..j::::.. N ,......
{;17 ~
,...... {;17 {;17 Np:l ~(1
,...... U'l ...... o ~ ~ ::+.
b, " \0
0\ 00"'(1)'-<:
0\ 0 0\ O........{Il
\0 0 0 (1)
(1
I :::r'
{;17 I ~ {;17
,...... {;17 {;17
N ..j::::.. ,...... C/'Cl
w 0 ,...... (1)
(1
I I ~
,...... 0 0 ~ ~
0 -.J 0\
~ ~ ~ C/'Cl
(1)
>>>
(I':l (I':l (I':l
EEE
(I':l (I':l (I':l
>>>
U'l 0\ ......
. . .
\o..j::::..o\
~~~
zzz
(1(1(1
~~~
>>>
(I':l (I':l (I':l
tTjtTjtTj
zzz
~~~
~~~
<<<
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
000
~~~
,...... ,...... ,......
\0 \0 \0
\0 \0 \0
00 -.J 0\
~~~
000
,...... ,...... ,......
\0 \0 \0
\0 \0 \0
\0 00 -.J
~
- ~ ~ <~-
~
0 VI tv
0 0 0 $l:l ~ \0
~o 0 0 2'~\O
0 '0 '0 ('l) ('l) 0\
0 0 0 -
0 0 0
~ ""'d
- ~ ~ -$l:llo-ojn
tv VI tv ~~ ~ ::;1.'
N \0 ~
- .......)0"'(1)'-<
.......) - 0 ....... tn
.......) .......) - (1)
~
- ~ ~ <~-
'"
0 VI tv
- 0 0 $l:l ~ \0
",0\ 00 w 2'~\O
0 '0 N (1) (1) .......)
0 0 0 -
0 0 0
~ ""'d nm
- ~ ~ -$l:llo-ojn ~~
- VI - ~~ ~ ::;1.'
~ ~ ~
.......) VI 00 oocr'{'l)'-< tv
00 \0 00 ....... tn . ?O~
- .J::.. - ('l) \0
VI
~ Q@
~ z F:~
- ~ ~ <~-
~ n I?O
0 Vl tv ~
00 .J::.. - $l:l ~ \0 ~~
- 0 0\ 2'~\O
'" ~ "'tv ('l) ('l) 00 >
0 VI em
tv - 0 - r./:J
.J::.. tv VI m r./:J~
Z Io-oj-<
~ ""'d ~Io-oj
- ~ ~ -$l:llo-ojn to F:>
- VI - \0 ~ ~ ::+. 8
~ ~ \0
.......) \OO"'{'l)'-< ""'d~
\0 .,J:::.. .,J:::.. \0 ....... tn
tv 0 \0 ('l) 0 ~~
m
Io-oj ""'d>
~ mn
- ~ ~ <~- ~Io-oj
~
- VI tv
.J::.. .......) tv $l:l ~ \0 -<r./:J
~.J::.. tv 00 2'~\O
00 ~ \0 ('l) ('l) \0
0 0 0\ -
.J::.. tv -
~ ""'d
- ~ ~ tv$l:llo-ojn
- VI - o ~ ~ ::+.
~ ~ ~
00 0\ \0 Ocr'{'l)'-<
.......) \0 \0 O.......tn
- .......) w ('l)
n
P'"
~ ~ ~ I~ ~
......:J VI .J::..
\0 ......:J .,J:::..
n
~ - tv P'"
......:J 0 W ~ ~
~ ~ ~ OCI
('l)
>>>
r./:J r./:J r./:J
EEE
r./:J r./:J r./:J
>>>
VI 0\-
. . .
\0 .J::.. 0\
~~~
ZZZ
nnn
~~~
>>>
r./:J r./:J r./:J
mmm
ZZZ
~~~
Io-ojlo-ojlo-oj
<<<
F:F:F:
fBfBfB
"Tj"Tj"Tj
?o?o?o
000
~~~
- --
\0 \0 \0
\0 \0 \0
00 .......) 0\
Io-ojlo-ojlo-oj
000
- --
\0 \0 \0
\0 \0 \0
\0 00 .......)
Q"7
....... Q"7 Q"7 <~.......
...
0 VI N
0 0 0 ~ ~ \0
...0 0 0 C~\O
... ... (1) (1) 0\
0 0 0
0 0 0 .-+-
0 0 0
Q"7 '"0
....... Q"7 Q"7 ....... ~ ~ n
N VI N ~~ ~ ~.
N \0 ...
....... -.)cr(1)'-<
-.) ....... 0 - 00
-.) -.) ....... (1)
Q"7
....... Q"7 Q"7 <~.......
...
0 VI N
....... 0 0 ~ ~ \0
...0\ 00 w - ""'t \0
'0 N ~ ~-.)
0 (1) (1)
0 0 0 .-+-
0 0 0
Q"7 '"0 ntn
Or./J
....... Q"7 Q"7 ....... ~ ~ n ~d
....... VI ....... ~~ ~~.
... ... ...
-.) VI 00 oocr(1)'-<
00 \0 00 (D"tIl W ~~
....... ..j:::... ....... .
0\
~ n~
~tn
Q"7 Z ~~
....... ~ ~ <~....... n
0 VI N ~ 1:;:0
00 ..j:::.. ....... ~ ~ \0 ~~
....... 0 0\ - ""'t \0
... ... N ~ ~ 00 >
0 VI (1) (1)
N ....... 0 .-+- r./J c::tn
..j:::.. N VI tn r./J~
Z ~~
Q"7 ""0 OJ
....... Q"7 Q"7 ....... ~ ~ n ~~
....... VI ....... ~ ~ ~ ~. 8
... ... \0
-.) 0\ \Ocr(1)'-< ""O~
\0 ..j:::.. ..j:::... - 00 ~
N 0 \0 (1) ~~
...., 0'"0
""0>
Q"7 tI1n
....... Q"7 Q"7 <~....... ~....,
...
....... VI N
..j:::... -.) N ~ ~ \0 ~r./J
..j:::.. N 00 C~\O
... ... \0
00 ..j:::.. (1) (1) \0
0 0 0\ .-+-
..j:::.. N -
Q"7 '"0
....... Q"7 Q"7 N ~ ~ n
...N VI ...N o~ ~ ~.
...
0 -.) 0 Ocr(1)'-<
0 0\ ....... 0_00
\0 ..j:::... -.) (1)
n
Q"7 Q"7 :::r'
N ....... Q"7 ~ Q"7
....... N 0\ (JQ
-.) ..j:::.. 00 (1)
n
....... N w :::r'
. ~ ~
00 N VI
~ ~ ~ (JQ
(1)
>>>
r./J r./J r./J
~~~
r./J r./J r./J
>>>
VI 0\........
. . .
\0 ..j:::.. 0\
~~~
ZZZ
nnn
~~~
>>>
r./J r./J r./J
tntntr:1
ZZZ
~~~
~~~
<<<
~~~
fBfBfB
~~~
~:;:o~
000
~~~
....... ....... .......
\0 \0 \0
\0 \0 \0
00 -.) 0\
~~~
000
....... ....... .......
\0 \0 \0
\0 \0 \0
\0 00 -.)
,>~!:.,Hennepin County
?", ,:'Y~' ,~~?:;.~~:~~~
<',:/
An Equal Opportunity Employer
August 12, 1999
Terry Obermaier, City Clerk
City Hall
1010 First Street S
Hopkins MN 55343
Dear Ms. Obermaier:
As required by th~Truth in Taxation legislation, we are notifying you of the public
hearing dates set fur the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners, Metropolitan
Special Taxing Districts and the school districts to discuss their proposed budget and
property tax levy for 2000:
.
Taxing District
Hennepin County
Metro Sp~cial Taxing Districts
School District 270
School District 273
School District 283
Initial Hearing
December 2, 1999
December 1, 1999
November 29, 1999
December 7, 1999
November 30, 1999
Continuation Hearing
December 20, 1999
December 8, 1999
December 9, 1999
December 15, 1999
December 7, 1999
The 1998 Legislature set aside the first two Mondays in December for the use of the
cities. Those dates are December 6,1999 for the Initial Hearing and December 13th
for the Continuation Hearing. You can use those dates or select dates other than those
shown above. Although we will only be printing the initial hearing date on the notice, the
continuation date should also be set at this time. The earliest hearing date is November
29, 1999 and the last date is December 20, 1999. Flo'wever. the dates shown abo'Ve
CANNOT be used for vour initial hearin~. Also, please remember that the continuation
date must be at least five (5) business days but no more than fourteen (14) business days
after the initial public hearing.
.
Taxpayer Services Department
A-600 Hennepin County Government Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0060
Recycled Paper