Loading...
CR 08-102 Order Feasibility Report 5th Street South Reconstruction City Project 08-11HOPKIN November 3, 2008 Council Report 2008 -102 Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move that Council adopt Resolution 2008 -062, Resolution Ordering the Preparation of a Feasibility Report For the 5 Street South Reconstruction and authorize Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. to prepare the report. This action is the first step in the process of improving 5 Street South and assessing abutting properties per City assessment policy. A petition to improve any of the proposed streets has not been submitted to the City. Overview The 2009 - 2013 CIP identified street and utility improvements of 5 Street South for the year 2009. The street involved in this project is 5 Street South from 11 Avenue South to the western corporate limit. The first step in proceeding with this project is ordering a feasibility report. Staff has selected a qualified consultant to undertake topographic survey work, geotechnical evaluation and the preliminary engineering report. The cost of these services is $16,174. Final design and construction observation services will be negotiated separately after the feasibility report phase and the Council's ordering of the improvement project. Primary Issues to Consider • Project background • Selection of consultant/proposed fees • Project schedule Supporting Information • Resolution 2008 -062 • Project location map • Portions of SRF Proposal hn R. Bradford, P.E., City Engineer G ' . Y O F Order Feasibility Report 5 Street South Reconstruction City Project 08 -11 Financial Impact: $ 16,174 Budgeted: Y/N Y Source: Utility Funds, PIR Funds, Special Assessments, MSA Funds Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): 2009 -2013 CIP Notes: Council Report 2008 -102 Page 2 Analysis of Issues • Project background 5 Street South was selected for the 2009 improvements in light of its current pavement condition. The pavement condition indices for the reconstruction area range from 15 to 42. The project will be assessed to adjacent property owners. Total project budget is $720 Thousand. • Selection of consultant /proposed fees Staff solicited proposal from SRF Consulting Group, Inc, WSB & Associates, Inc, and Bolton & Menk, Inc. SRF submitted the best proposal based on qualifications, project approach, identified project challenges and cost of service. The proposed fee of $16,174 includes $2,100 for geotechnical investigations. The cost compares favorably with comparable projects in other communities and fees charged by other consultants. • Project schedule The Feasibility Report will be presented to Council at their January 6, 2009 meeting. This puts us on a schedule to bid the improvements in mid April which could help secure competitive bids for the project. Construction is anticipated to begin in May and will continue through October. 10 The RFP outlines the work tasks for each of three separate phases of the project: develop- ing a Feasibility Report, completing Final Plans and providing In- Construction Services. We have reviewed these tasks and have used them to develop our detailed cost proposal included at the end of this document. The following sections describe our philosophy in doing the various tasks as well as areas where we feel our team can provide extra value and /or processes that have shown to be effective. Feasibility Report SRF staff (and /or our sub -con- sultant) will complete the following tasks as part of this phase of the project: Topographic Survey SRF will complete a topo- graphic survey of the corridor to include all existing elements within the project limits as well as ten feet beyond the existing 66' wide right of way on either side of the street. Topographic survey includes (but is not lim- ited to) pavement, curb and gutter, driveways, utility cast- ings, hydrants, catchbasins and utility poles /cabinets. Property corners will also be located to assist in the right of way loca- tion. A project basemap will be SCOPE OF SERVICES prepared as part of this service that includes existing topogra- phy, computed right of way and existing utility information based on information provided by the City of Hopkins (as -built or record drawings) and private utilities. Subsurface utility information will be Quality Level D according to CI -ASCE 38 -02 (Standard Guidelines for the collection and depiction of existing subsurface utility data). Soil Borings Borings will be completed by STS /AECOM to determine existing pavement thickness as well as possible unsuitable soils. A report will be prepared that describes the conditions encountered, and R -value determination will be com- pleted to allow the pavement thicknesses to be developed. If additional treatment methods are necessary for stormwater runoff, as an additional service to the contract, the soil could be analyzed for potential treat- ment methods prior to discharge to Nine Mile Creek. Feasibility Study SRF will complee a feasibility study including: preliminary design for the project improve- ments, a preliminary cost estimate, preliminary assess- ment rates based on the expected construction costs, and a preliminary assessment roll. This information will be bound in a report to the City including appropriate text, charts, data and graphics. Project Meetings We have assumed one project kick -off meeting with City staff, two project status meetings with City staff, one neighbor- hood meeting with business owners /area residents, and one City Council meeting to pres- ent the findings of the report. Presentation to the City Council will be in PowerPoint including hard copy versions for the Council and members of the public in attendance. Final Plans SRF staff will complete the fol- lowing tasks if directed by the of • * : 4ns to prepare final proposed struction Plans SRF will prepare final plans in a format suitable for a State Aid funded project. This includes cover sheet with all appropriate information, statement of esti- mated quantities, typical sections and details, removal plans, construction plans, storm sewer plans (MSA design), erosion control and turf establishment plans, traffic control plans, signing and strip- ing plans, and cross sections. We have assumed that signal revisions will consist of loop replacement only, and that utility improvements (besides storm sewer) will be limited to casting adjustments and hydrant relocations. Additional design services can be added if it is deemed necessary to replace /repair sanitary sewer or watermain. We have also assumed that the Nine Mile Creek culvert cross- ing design will be completed by others under a separate contract and that only coordi- nation services will be provided by SRF. Cross sections w i l l be prepared at 50 foot intervals and /or at centerline of existing driveways. Draft plans will be submitted to City staff at 60% and 95% (along with State Aid at .95 %) for review. City and State Aid comments will be incorporated into the final plans to be issued for construc- tion. A cost estimate will be completed at 95% and 100% based on the computed quanti- ties. All the appropriate documentation necessary for State Aid approval will be com- pleted by SRF and submitted to Mn /DOT on behalf the City of Hopkins. This documentation includes: State Aid Plan Review Checklist, Parking Resolutions, R -Value docu- mentation, Sigma N -18 calculations, Drainage Area Map, Hydraulic Computations, Engineer's Estimate and Laboratory Services Request Form. Specifications Specifications and Special Provisions will be completed based on Mn /DOT Standard Specifications for construction. SRF will prepare and submit draft specifications to the City of Hopkins at the 95% submit- tal for comment. Comments w i l l be incorporated into the final specifications to be issued for construction. Bidding The ad for bid will be prepared by SRF staff and submitted in electronic format to the City of Hopkins for publication. SRF will prepare and distribute plans /specifications /proposal form to contractors. These plans will be available to con- tractors in electronic format on the SRF website, and will be available for purchase /review at SRF offices. SRF staff will answer contractor questions as necessary, provide clarification of questions through adden- dum to the contract (if required), and attend the bid opening at City Hall. Bids will be tabulated and a recommen- dation of award (along with complete bid tabulation) will be completed and submitted to the City of Hopkins. At this time, a final assessment roll will be prepared and submitted based on the selected low bid. Meetings SRF staff will attend up to two (2) project meetings with City staff, one City Council meeting to present final plans, and will attend the assessment hearing prior to award of the contract to the selected contractor. SRF staff will prepare and distribute meeting mi nutes for each meeting with staff. It is assumed that City staff will present the assessment hearing information to the City Council and that SRF staff w i l l be there to answer questions of a tech- nical nature. HOPKINS .5TH STREET SOUTH — 1 I TH AVENUE TO CORPORATE LlMrrs 11 12 SCOPE OF SERVICES Construction Services If the City elects to move for- ward with construction of this project, SRF is prepared to pro- vide full construction services for the 5th Street Reconstruc- tion Project: Preconstruction Conference SRF staff will prepare for and run the preconstruction confer- ence for this project. Invitees will include City staff, selected contractor, private utility repre- sentatives, Mn /DOT State Aid staff, and other agency repre- sentatives. Additional copies of plans and specifications will be made available to interested parties at this meeting. Construction Staking Full construction staking will be provided by SRF survey crews for the necessary ele- ments — removals, proposed line and grade of roadway /side- walks, driveway locations, and storm sewer elements. Construction Observation Construction observation will be provided on a full time basis with oversight by Mn /DOT - certified inspectors for the duration of construction. Construction administration services will also be provided at this time, including preparation of neces- sary pay request forms and other documentation necessary for a State Aid project. Construction testing will be coordinated based on the appropriate testing intervals. STS /AECOM w i l l provide the appropriate construction test- ing, including soil compaction density, concrete cylinder analysis, and pavement density. Construction Coordination SRF staff will assist the contrac- tor i n coordinating construction with the private utility owners, though this is ultimately the responsibility of the contractor. Our on -site con- struction staff will also relay contractor schedules to the City and the surrounding busi- nesses. This information will be sent via e -mail on a weekly basis as well as through the operation of a 24 -hour hotline for the project that businesses can call with project concerns. Response time on this hotline will be within one business day. Weekly construction meet- ings will be held to assist in the coordination of the project, as well as to allow business own- ers to voice concerns. Project Close -out All paperwork necessary to finalize the project will be completed by SRF. Final pay estimates w i l l be presented to the Contractor and any discrep- ancies rectified through negotiation. Record drawings will be prepared and delivered to the City of Hopkins in hard copy (mylar) and electronic (PDF) format. It is our intent to prepare a turn -key project for the City of Hopkins to allow City staff as much or as little involvement in the day -to -day operations of the project as they desire. 11 at or at It Mt Nt PC SRF is known for our ability to provide a multi - disciplinary approach, including engineer- ing, conceptual planning, public participation, and con- struction. This approach has produced a staff of individuals that excels at communication, attention to detail and meeting deadlines. Experienced Project Team We believe that the foundation for a successful project is the establishment of strong per- sonal and professional relationships with our clients. Our project team includes indi- viduals that have significant PROJECT TEAM experience and knowledge of street reconstruction projects, traffic control and staging plans, innovative stormwater treatment methods, and public involvement. Our team mem- bers are recognized leaders in their service areas, take great pride in providing the best service to our clients, and have worked together for many years. Qualified Professionals The SRF team includes some of the industry's most experienc- ed engineers, surveyors and construction administrators who are committed to develop- ing a plan that meets the current and future needs of the City. Key members of our team have served county, city, and metropolitan planning organi- zations and have direct experience with this type of project. In this section, we present our team members and their respective roles and responsi- bilities. We have provided overviews for each, describing their relevant experience. It is SRF's intent to have these indi- viduals on the project throughout the duration of the project. Specific project exam- ples follow in the next section. Principal -in- Charge/ Project Manager David Juliff, PE Principal David has more than 18 years of experience i n municipal and transportation engineering, including the design and construction man- agement of residential streets, minor collector and major arte- rial roadways and trunk highways. He is well -known for his ability to effectively manage multi- agency projects and his creativity in developing unique solutions for difficult and complex projects. David has recently served as the Project Manager for the Lake Street Reconstruction and Streetscape in Minneapolis and the Excelsior Boulevard Reconstruction and Streetscape in St. Louis Park. As the Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager, David will ensure project coordination and suc- cess, delivering a complete project to the City of Hopkins. H0PKINS ® 5TH STREET SOUTH - 1 1 TH AVENUE TO CORPORATE LIMITS 1 3 14 PROJECT TEAM Roadway Design Jim Gersema, PE Associate Jim has eight years of experience working on a wide variety of munici- pal engineering projects. He has served as the lead civil engineer on State and Federal Aid projects such as the Lake Street Reconstruc -tion and Streetscape. Jim's work on this signature Minneapolis roadway included traffic PROJECT TEAM SURVEYS & RIGHT OF WAY DEAN DUSHECK, PLS SENIOR ASSOCIATE CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION/ ADMINISTRATION GREG EcKBLAD SENIOR TECHNICIAN SUPERVISOR control /construction staging, alignments, profiles, cross -sec- tions, right of way plans, intersection details, signing/ striping plans, statement of esti- mated quantities, and supplemental specifications. He has also served as a con- struction engineer responsible for contract administration and plan revisions for the Fernbrook Lane Widening proj- ect in Plymouth and Excelsior Boulevard Reconstruction and Streetscape for Hennepin County. CITY OF HOPKINS PROJECT MANAGER JOHN BRADFORD, PE CITY ENGINEER PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE/ PROJECT MANAGER DAVID JULIFF, PE PRINCIPAL ROADWAY DESIGN JIM GERSEMA, PE ASSOCIATE ZACHARY KARTAK, PE SENIOR ENGINEER GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION & ANALYSIS PUBLIC & AGENCY INVOLVEMENT • BLLSINESS/ PROPERTY OWNERS • CITY OF HOPKINS - CITY COUNCIL EMERGENCY SERVICES • MPCA • NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT • MN /DOT STATE AID • METRO TRAN°" • 11TTUr' COMPANIES WATER RESOURCES WALTER ESHENAUR, PE SENIOR ASSOCIATE JAMES OVERTOOM, PE STS/ AECOM rA.9,grolv4;F• 744. Zachary Kartak, PE Senior Engineer Zack has four years of experi- ence designing municipal street and utility improvements. His project work includes construction observation, preparing construction plans, coordination with private util- ity companies and preparing cost estimates. Zack also has experience using MicroStation and GEOPAK. His experience includes Anoka County's CSAH 14 Preliminary Design, for which Zack developed align- ments, profiles, cross - sections and cost estimates. 1 Surveys /Right of Way Dean Dusheck, PLS Senior Associate Dean has more than 25 years of experience in all aspects of design surveys and and surveys, including determination of right of way for highways, road- ways and railroads in both rural and urban areas. He oversees SRF's survey department and has regularly coordinated design surveys with subconsul- tants. He is respected as a detdrl- oriented land surveyor and efficient supervisor. Dean will supervise the completion of all boundary and legal sur- veys, plats, legal descriptions and topographic surveys as needed. Water Resources Walter Eshenauer, PE Senior Associate Walter has 21 years of experi- ence i n water resources, includ- ing hydrology, hydraulics and the design of stormwater management sys- tems and energy dissipators; flood routing; river channel realignment; highway and watershed erosion control methods and distribution and pumping systems. He also has experience assessing and treat- ing water quality and applying innovative Best Management Practices and bioengineering solutions to the treatment of surface water runoff and stream channel stabilization. Walter also has in -depth knowledge of major hydrologic and hydraulic computer applications and models. His recent project experience includes the CSAH 14 Reconstruction from I -35W to I -35E in Anoka County. Construction Observation/ Administration Greg Eckblad Senior Technician Supervisior Greg has more than 30 years of experience in project inspection and supervising - construction inspection per- sonnel. During his career, he has gained a great deal of expe- rience with municipal streets and utilities, municipal county roads, site work, bicycle /pedes- trian trails, traffic signals and highway improvements. Greg visits various projects that are under construction to over- see inspection of work completed to date. A project visit includes addressing construction concerns and questions, and making field decisions dealing with changed conditions. Greg provides solutions for construction problems, correcting issues in construction plans before they are built. He also instructs the inspection staff on documentation and inspection procedures. Geotech n i cal Investigation and Analysis STS Consultants, Ltd. Jim Overtoom, PE Principal Engineer Jim has more than 40 years of experience with STS, as a Project Engineer and a Principal Engineer. His duties have included preparing numerous engineering reports, supervising quality assurance and laboratory testing activi- ties. His geotechnical skills include construction observa- tion and testing management, foundation design, earth reten- tion system review, petroleum spill remedial investigation, remedial design and turnkey construction. Jim's project experience ranges from commercial and industrial buildings to flood protection and large government projects. H0PKINS ® 55TH STREET SOUTH - 1 1 TH AVENUE TO CORPORATE LIMITS 15 1 6 Excelsior Boulevard Streetscapes - Phase III -V St. Louis Park, Minnesota SRF worked with the City of St. Louis Park to provide a full range of planning, design and in- construction services for Phase 111 streetscape improve- ments for the segment of Excelsior Boulevard between Quentin Avenue and Monterey Avenue. This was a State Aid project that included: • Roadway narrowing and bump -outs at intersections to slow traffic and improve pedestrian safety • Transit plazas with land- scaping, identifying monuments and custom shelters • Expanded medians with landscaping, banner poles and bollards RELATED EXPERIENCE OF PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS • Concrete sidewalks with a decorative scoring patterns and concrete paver bantling • New boulevard trees and ornamental street lighting • Imprinted bituminous cross- walks • New traffic signals The project required extensive coordination with the City of St. Louis Park, Hennepin County, Metro Transit and the developer of an adjacent prop- erty. Significant public involvement included open "� IM.°a1= ■ll��1IL houses and individual meetings with each property owner along the corridor during the planning and design phases to seek input. SRF has subsequently been hired by the City to design Phases IV and V of the Excelsior Boulevard streetscape in coordination with county roadway improvements v 'est of TH 100. Reference: Michael Rardin Director of Public Works City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Ph: (952) 924 -2551 Fernbrook Lane Reconstruction (27th Avenue to 34th Avenue) Plymouth, Minnesota Growing traffic volumes along Fernbrook Lane, Trunk Highway 55 and 1 -494 has resulted in increased conges- tion and traffic delays for area motorists. To address these concerns and eliminate unde- sirable access and turning movements, the City of Plymouth evaluated the recon- struction of Fernbrook Lane between 27th Avenue and 34th Avenue in the vicinity of Trunk Highway 55. As part of this evaluation, SRF was contracted by the City to perform a prelim- inary traffic study and analysis of the project area. Using the principles of "Context Sensitive Design," SRF completed the preliminary design of the proposed recon- struction project and prepared right of way plans for acquisi- tion easements from adjacent property owners with access to Fernbrook Lane. SRF agents worked closely with property owners throughout the process resulting in successful negotia- tions. In addition, SRF assisted the City with acquisition of Federal Hazard Elimination (HES) Program Funding. As the project used Federal HES and High Priority Project (HPP) Program funding, SRF also prepared a Project Memorandum to satisfy the required documentation of social, economic and environ- mental (SEE) impacts of the proposed construction project and right of way and easement purchase. The Project Memorandum documented the proposed project improve- ments, project need, project alternatives, public agency involvement and non- signifi- cant SEE impacts, qualifying it as a Categorical Exclusion (CE) under 23CFR771.117(c )3. In addition to the Project Memorandum SRF provided the following final design and construction support services. Reference: Robert Moberg, PE City Engineer City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Ph: (763) 509 -5525 HOPKINS 5TH STREET SOUTH — 1 1 TH AVENUE TO CORPORATE LIMITS 1 7 RELATED EXPERIENCE OF PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS Dominick Drive (Pioneer Road to Shady Oak Road) Minnetonka, Minnesota Dominick Drive, a 1.3 mile length of two -lane segment of roadway between Pioneer Road and Shady Oak Road in the City of Minnetonka, func- tions as a major collector. Concerns over safety, sight line restrictions and poor roadway conditions prompted the City to consider reconoon of the road to meet design stan- dards and accommodate bicycle and pedestrian travel. The roadway's proximity to many man made and natural resources, including homes, stands of significant trees, wet- lands, and Shady Oak Lake, enhanced the need for SRF to provide a design that is sensi- tive to the environment while effectively addressing the needs of the City, residents and other project stakeholders. Preconstruction photos The City contracted with SRF to provide preliminary design and public involvement assistance, and also prepare a feasibility study for the proposed improvements. In addition, SRF evaluated innovative stormwater treat- ment methods for use in treating water before discharge to the adjacent wetlands and Shady Oak Lake SRF has since been contracted to provide final design services, including: : _.s • Roadway reconstruction to an urban section • Sidewalks / trails • Sanitary sewer and water - main adjustment and reconstruction • Storm sewer • Retaining walls (CIP and Modular) • Landscaping • Wetland delineation and permitting SRF will also prepare easement and right of way legal descrip- tions and will assist the City in acquisition of the necessary easements. Reference: Lee Gustafson, PE Director of Engineering City of Minnetonka 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345 Ph: (952) 939 -8239 W 0 z • V w 0 I) • • • 0 O4 U TO 0 m e. v c 0 v 0 Aanis JW1t ISH3 j t: o Z O 0 (' a c o. O _ u= Q E.61 }- o c O z o Z Z N c v) v) U 0 o O 2 4. c cr ,z G 2 0 .. NOLLDfl LLSNO' ■ FEES AND REIMBURSABLES Feasibility Report Phase Our estimated fee to provide civil engineering services for the Feasibility Report Phase of this project is based on the scope of work described herein, and the estimated con- struction cost of $720,000 indicated in the Request for Proposals. Our fees for the individual services as part of this phase of the project are as listed in the table below. 1 DAVID JULIFF, PE DEAN DUSHECK, PLS JIM GERSEMA, PE ZACHARY KARTAK, PE WALTER ESHENAUR, PE OTHER TECHNICAL /CLERICAL STAFF STS/ AECOM REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES SUBTOTAL: BY TASK rbA MEV Feasibility and Final Design Phase As requested in the Request for Proposals, we have estimated the combined fees for the Feasibility Study and Final Design phase for the proposed project. Based on the scope of work and the estimated con- struction cost of $720,000 for approximately 1/3 mile of MSA roadway, our maximum not to exceed percentage of construc- tion cost for Feasibility and Final Design Phases is 7.1%. COST Should the project construction cost be significantly higher or lower than the anticipated $720,000 due to unforeseen circumstances, SRF reserves the right to renegotiate this per- centage. It is our under- standing that the fees for final design will be negotiated at a later time with either an hourly not to exceed fee or lump sum fee. In addition, we also understand that a separate con- tract will be negotiated for construction services on an hourly basis. 1) Soil Borings will be completed by STS /AECOM. Fees for STS /AECOM will be billed to the City of Hopkins at cost with no additional mark -up. (Z) Project Meetings include one project kick -off meeting, two project status meetings with City staff, one neighborhood meeting, and one City Council meeting. Additional meetings beyond those mentioned above can be added as necessary on an hourly basis. (3) Reimbursable expenses include travel expenses (mileage at the [RS approved rate), reproduction, deliveries, and other miscellaneous supplies. HoPK1NS ■ 5TH STREET SOUTH — 1 1TH AVENUE TO CORPORATE LIMITS 20 $ 780 $1,280 $2,028 tl :t $ 318 - - - $ 318 - - $1,166 $1,484 $2,650 sJ:. - - $1,512 - $1,512 p ' - - $ 424 - $ 424: $2,240 - $4,652 - $6,892 - $2,100 - - $2,100 s $ 50 - $ 150 $ 50 $ 250 $2,608 $2,100 $8,684 $2,782 $16,174 TOTAL FEES AND REIMBURSABLES Feasibility Report Phase Our estimated fee to provide civil engineering services for the Feasibility Report Phase of this project is based on the scope of work described herein, and the estimated con- struction cost of $720,000 indicated in the Request for Proposals. Our fees for the individual services as part of this phase of the project are as listed in the table below. 1 DAVID JULIFF, PE DEAN DUSHECK, PLS JIM GERSEMA, PE ZACHARY KARTAK, PE WALTER ESHENAUR, PE OTHER TECHNICAL /CLERICAL STAFF STS/ AECOM REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES SUBTOTAL: BY TASK rbA MEV Feasibility and Final Design Phase As requested in the Request for Proposals, we have estimated the combined fees for the Feasibility Study and Final Design phase for the proposed project. Based on the scope of work and the estimated con- struction cost of $720,000 for approximately 1/3 mile of MSA roadway, our maximum not to exceed percentage of construc- tion cost for Feasibility and Final Design Phases is 7.1%. COST Should the project construction cost be significantly higher or lower than the anticipated $720,000 due to unforeseen circumstances, SRF reserves the right to renegotiate this per- centage. It is our under- standing that the fees for final design will be negotiated at a later time with either an hourly not to exceed fee or lump sum fee. In addition, we also understand that a separate con- tract will be negotiated for construction services on an hourly basis. 1) Soil Borings will be completed by STS /AECOM. Fees for STS /AECOM will be billed to the City of Hopkins at cost with no additional mark -up. (Z) Project Meetings include one project kick -off meeting, two project status meetings with City staff, one neighborhood meeting, and one City Council meeting. Additional meetings beyond those mentioned above can be added as necessary on an hourly basis. (3) Reimbursable expenses include travel expenses (mileage at the [RS approved rate), reproduction, deliveries, and other miscellaneous supplies. HoPK1NS ■ 5TH STREET SOUTH — 1 1TH AVENUE TO CORPORATE LIMITS 20 B. N, S, z w z z MINNETONKA M INNEHAHA BRADFORD RO ® EXCELSIOR 4) � a P 0-egee'r cy If SERVICE � E LMO SMETANA i R0. MINNETONKA -- (CREEK DRIL LANE ( CIR. B. N L _QR ILLANE C .- � � R0. COTT p CAP z '' 0 w z 69 z 36TH T. ( 1 ) REGENCY (21 REGENCY (3) CASSIE CT (41 CAMERON C (5) PARKSIOE ( 6 ) ABBIE LA. (7) LINOSEY LA (8) RENAISSANCE (q) VAN BUREN WA ( 10 ) VAN BUREN (1 I ) VAN BUREN (12) VAN BUREN (13) MONROE (14) SHADYSI (15) SUNNY SI � Y U W J 2 J � a r d S. WHEREAS, City staff is requesting that these streets be upgraded under the City's assessment policy even though no petition for the upgrade has been submitted; and report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, that the proposed improvements be referred to the firm SRF Consulting Group, Inc. for study and that they be instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, this 3rd day of Novemeber, 2008. ATTEST: CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2008 -062 RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE 5 STREET SOUTH RECONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, the following street is in need of reconstruction: 5 Street South; and WHEREAS, the first step in the assessment procedure is the ordering of a feasibility Terry Obermaier, City Clerk Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor