Loading...
CR 98-43 Liquor License Violations - MT BearsMarch 11, 1998 Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve Conditional Admission and Waiver of Hearing for Stone Creek Inc.. dba MT Bears. located at 502 North Blake Road. Adoption of this motion will result in the City Council imposing a $500 fine and a two day liquor license suspension effective March 22 and 23, 1998 for violations of state and municipal liquor license laws. Overview LIQUOR LICENSE VIOLATIONS —MT BEARS On October 10, 1997, the Hopkins Police Department found employees of MT Bears consuming alcohol after operating hours. Employees were charged and pled guilty to those charges. During liquor license renewal processes, it was found that corporate ownership of Stone Creek Inc., dba MT Bears, changed hands in an amount which required notification of the city for licensing purposes. Notification was to be made within ten days. That notification was not made. In accordance with Resolution 89 -11, the City Manager has determined that violations did occur, and has negotiated a proposed a Conditional Admission and Waiver of Hearing agreement for Council consideration. While the Resolution is not specific to these violations, it is the City Manager's opinion that the proposed penalties are within the guidelines adopted by the Council as policy in Resolution in 89 -11. Primary Issues to Consider • What guidance is suggested by Resolution 89 -11? • Have there been subsequent violations since the October violations? Supporting Documents • 'Conditional Admission and Waiver of Hearing • Resolution 89 -11 Steven C. Mielke City Manager Council Report 98 -043 Council Report 98 -043 Page 2 Staff Analysis of Issues The following are the primary issues to consider for this item. • What guidance is suggested by Resolution 89 -11? First violations for after hours sale of alcoholic beverages is recommended at zero to two consecutive days suspension. While in this case the violation is consumption after hours, it seems consistent with the proposed presumptive penalty. There is no presumptive penalty for a failure to notify the city of a change in corporate ownership as required by Minnesota statutes, and this seems more a technical violation of law, in previous cases a monetary fine has been considered adequate for these types of violations. Staff is recommending a $500.00 fine. • Have there been any subsequent violations since the October violations? The police have continued to monitor the activities at MT Bears, and have filed no additional charges or allegations against MT Bears since the October violations. Police Department and the owners of MT Bears have held discussions about appropriate procedures and activities within MT Bears. Hopefully there will be no subsequent issues to deal with. North Blake Road, Hopkins, Minnesota. City of Hopkins Conditional Admission and Waiver of Hearing The undersigned is the licensee of record for Stone Creek Inc., dba M.T. Bears, located at 502 The undersigned hereby acknowledges that on October 10, 1997, employees of M.T. Bears were consuming alcohol after hours, in violation of Hopkins City Code Chapter 1200.27. The undersigned additionally acknowledges that notification of a change in corporate ownership was not provided within ten (10) days, in violation of Minnesota Statute 340A.412 subd.9. The undersigned recognizes that under Minnesota Statutes §340A.415, the Hopkins City Council has the authority to suspend or revoke a liquor license or impose a civil fine of up to $2,000 for the violation noted above. Before such sanctions can be imposed, however, the licensee is entitled to notice and a hearing at which the licensee can present evidence and argument and cross - examine witnesses. Following the hearing, a written decision must be rendered on the hearing record alone. The licensee hereby waives the right to such a hearing procedure. This admission and waiver is conditioned upon the Hopkins City Council imposing a fine of $500 and a two day liquor license suspension, effective March 22 and 23, 1998, for the violations noted above. The licensee understands that this agreement will be presented to the Hopkins City Council for approval. If the Council does not agree to impose the stated penalty, this agreement is null and void and the licensee is free to contest the violation at the hearing described above. The licensee has read and understands this agreement and has consulted with counsel or, if not, has been given the opportunity and chose not to do so. Linda Kay Harshe James Robert Harsche President Vice President Date Date Thomas Todd Alexander Treasurer Date This agreement will be presented to the Hopkins City with the recommendation that it be approved. mtbears City Manager Date CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION #89 -11 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION #87 -41 ADOPTING GENERAL POLICIES REGARDING LIQUOR LICENSE ISSUES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hopkins desires to estab- lish certain procedures for dealing with liquor license violations, and WHEREAS, the Council has directed certain general policies be adopted and certain actions be acknowledged, then NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hopkins City Council hereby states the following with regard to liquor license issues, In the event of any reports by the Hopkins Police Department of vio- lations of the laws of the State of Minnesota or the ordinances of the City of Hopkins relating to alcoholic beverages, the administration is directed to take the following action: 1. Notify the Council of the report. 2. Monitor the Criminal case resulting from the report. 3. If the criminal case is dismissed or results in an acquittal or if the administration otherwise finds the evidence of the viola- tion unreliable, the Council shall be so informed. The Council, at that time, shall decide whether to dismiss the matter or proceed. • 4. If the criminal case results in a conviction or payment of the court cost or if the administration otherwise finds the evidence reliable, the City Manager shall meet with the licensee and invite the. licensee to sign a conditional admission and waiver of hearing that includes a proposed sanction. 5. If the conditional admission is signed, it shall be presented to the Council for approval or other action. 6. If the conditional admission is not signed, the licensee shall be provided notice of a suspension /revocation hearing and the matter shall be set down on the Council agenda for hearing. 7. The hearing will be in accord with the Administrative Procedure Act. Minn. Stat. 14.57 to 14.70. The hearing shall be recorded, the the City Manager shall present the evidence establishing lation, and the licensee shall have the right to cross - examine witnesses, present evidence, and make a statement to the Council. The council will issue written findings on whether a violation Be it further included in this resolution that the following list of presumptive penalties be assessed as deemed necessary. Presumptive Penalties for Violations Adverse penalties follows: Type of Violation 1. Commission of a felony related to the licensed activity. 2. Sale of alcoholic beverages while license is under suspension. 3. Sale of alcoholic beverages to under age person. 4. Sale of alcoholic beverage to intox- icated person. 5. After hours sale of alcoholic beverages. 6. Illegal gambling on premises. 7. Permit person to leave premises with alcoholic beverage. 8. Violations of City Ordinances per- taining to fire or building or health codes. for convictions or 1st Violation 10 -25 consec. days of susp. 10 -25 consec. days of susp. 0 -5 Consecutive Days Suspension 0 -5 Consecutive Days Suspension 0 -2 Consecutive Days Suspension 0 -3 Consecutive Days Suspension 0 -2 Consecutive Days Suspension 0 -5 Consecutive Days Suspension violations shall be and Violation Revocation Revocation 6 -15 Consecutive Revocation days Suspension 6 -15 Consecutive Days Suspension 3 -9 Consecutive Days Suspension 4 -9 Consecutive Days Suspension 3 -5 Consecutive Days Suspension 6 -15 Consecutive Days Suspension presumed as 3rd Violation NA NA 16 consec. days of susp.to Revocation 10 consec. days of susp. to Revocation 10 consec. days of susp. to Revocation 6 -10 cons. days of susp. to Revocation 16 consec. days of susp. to Revocation Computation of time. For the purpose of determining the number of occurrences of violations, the council shall consider a violation as a second occurrence if it occurred within 18 calendar months of the second occurrence if it occurred within 18 calendar months of the first violation; and shall consider a violation as a third occurrence if it occurred within 30 calendar months of the second violation. Other penalties. Nothing in this section shall restrict or limit the authority of the council to suspend up to 60 days, revoke the license, assess a civil fine not to exceed $2,000, to impose conditions or take any adverse action in accordance with law, provided that the license holder has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing in the manner provided for in Section 310.05 of this Code. It is the intent of this Resolution to inform the public and business community in the City of Hopkins that henceforth all criminal viola- tions of liquor laws and ordinances will result in automatic admin- istrative action. Nothing in this Resolution concerning the adminis- trative procedures that will be followed in the event of criminal violations of liquor laws and ordinances shall detract from the Council's authority to impose sanctions for violations of other crim- inal laws occurring on the premises of licensees or for complaints of non - criminal conduct. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins on this seventh day of February , 1989. ( Donald J. Hilbert, Mayor ' 81688 Genel ie, City Clerk