Loading...
CR 98-67 Assessment Hearing - Interlachen ParkMay 1, 1998 Primary Issues to Consider. Appeal procedure Assessment policy Project costs and assessment rates Project timetable Action on appeals Adoption of assessment roll Supporting Information. Hearing notice Affidavit of Mailing and Mailing list Bid tabulation Assessment worksheet Assessment roll Assessment Analysis Appeals Resolution 98 -25 James Gessele Engineering Supt. Assessment Hearing Interlachen Park Street Improvements Project 97 -12 Council Report 98 -67 Proposed Action. Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move that Council adopt Resolution 98-25., Resolution for Adoption of the Assessment Roll, Project 97 -12, Interlachen Park Street Improvements. Overview. Council at its April 7 meeting considered the proposed assessment roll for Interlachen Park street reconstruction: segments of Preston Lane and Holly Road. A public hearing for special assessments was set for May 5. This hearing sets in motion levying of assessments against properties along Preston Lane from Ashley Road to Interlachen Road and along Holly Road from its terminus to Goodrich Street. A public hearing notice has been published and mailed, along with an assessment statement, to every affected property owner. As of Friday, May 1, two appeals were submitted contesting the proposed assessments. Appeals must be submitted no later than the hearing date. Analysis. Appeal procedure Property owners are given the opportunity to approach Council with their appeals during the public hearing. Standard appeal forms have been available at City Hall and need to be submitted no later than the hearing date. Staff will make recommendations on all appeals. Assessment policy Staff has adhered to the City's legislative policy 8 -B concerning special assessment policies and formulas as they pertain to this project. In the case of reconstructed portions of Preston Lane and Holly Road, 70% of street reconstruction cost will be recovered by assessing the benefiting adjacent properties. The bid schedules for each of the streets detail the construction costs that form the basis of calculating the special assessments. It is important to note that sanitary sewer repairs in Preston Lane and water main replacement in Holly Road are at "City expense as part of a reconstruction project." This is to quote,Section 10.11 of the City's legislative policy manual on assessment policies. Some residents have taken issue with the City in claiming that street reconstruction was an excuse used to do utility repairs and replacement and to have street restoration costs passed on to property owners. Staff has ample evidence to prove that the City made several studies of the roadway conditions before even considering utility issues. Council should also note that the bid documents reflect quotes in separate tables for utility service costs on the part of the City and the homeowners. Table Cl reflects costs the City may bear in making new connections or repairs to resident owned water and sanitary services inside the R.O.W. construction zone. Table C2 reflects costs the homeowners may have to bear should upgrades to their sewer and water services be required outside the City's right -of -way. Should homeowners face such costs, staff is prepared to have them sign waiver /petition forms to have the cost placed on the property as a special assessment. Project costs and assessment rates Computations used to derive the proposed assessments are found on the assessment worksheets. A worksheet is provided for each of the two streets where an assessment is proposed: Holly Road and Preston Lane. The worksheets are premised on the low bid contractor quotes in Tables E (Streets and Restoration) of the bid document and on the contracted consultant fee. The assessable construction costs for each of the streets is established, pro -rated engineering costs are added, a 6% admin. /legal, finance fee is applied, and a final 70% share (per current legislative policy) for assessing is calculated. The assessable project costs are divided by the assessable footage to derive the assessment rate. The "Final Assessment Roll" summary sheets reflect the proposed assessment for each lot. Staff prepared the assessable construction costs without benefit of the customary 5 -10% contingency added to either the construction bid or the pro -rated consultant fee. Staff is recommending waiving the contingency in anticipation of renegotiating lower revised costs on some of the bid items. Staff also is concerned about keeping the assessment rate as close as possible to the original estimate. Clearly, the proposed assessment rates are higher than those quoted in original feasibility study estimates. This is a reflection of the higher bids in the total contract. The consultant has provided an assessment analysis to demonstrate how increased unit prices and changes in bid item quantities, subsequent to the feasibility report, have contributed to the assessment rate increase. In the case of Preston Lane, the analysis shows that an increase in quantities from the feasibility phase to the bidding state contributed at least 36% to the increase of the assessment rate. Below is a comparison of the assessment rates: Preston Lane Feasibility rate - $51.03/FF Proposed final rate - $55.90/FF Holly Road Feasibility rate - $53.32/FF Proposed final rate - $55.08/FF Project timetable May 5 Assessment hearing and adopt assessment roll June 16 Award contract July 1 Begin construction October Project complete Action on appeals The following are appeals concerning Project 97 -12: 1. Address: 1318 Preston Lane Assessed Amount: $4,472.00 Appeal for cancellation of assessment by reason of cost to homeowner and no perceived need for a project, and that street repairs and maintenance should be funded out of general revenues. Recommendation: Deny appeal on the basis that City based need for a project on extensive surficial and underground testing, that 100% funding of street reconstruction from general funds would be unfair to residents in at least seven other neighborhoods where the City participated with a 30 % -40% share of the costs. 2. Address: 235 Holly Road Assessed Amount: $5,508.00 Appeal for cancellation of assessment by lengthy list of reasons attached. (See appeal form and notice of objection.) Recommendation: Deny appeal on the basis that benefit is deemed to be derived when a street of substandard condition is replaced and drainage characteristics enhanced, that the City is not obligated to obtain before and after market value appraisals to sustain special assessments, that the City adhered to an established policy concerning reconstruction of streets and the assessing of costs thereof, and that the City is not aware of any violations of Minn. Statutes 429.061 or 429.081 in carrying out its special assessment procedures. Adoption of assessment roll Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 98 -25, adopting the special assessment roll as it pertains to street improvements on Preston Lane and Holly Road. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of Hopkins, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers of the Hopkins City Hall, 1010 1st Street South, Hopkins, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 5, 1998, to hear all persons concerning the adoption of the assessment roll for Public Improvement Project 97 -12 and to adopt the assessment roll as presented or amended. This hearing is scheduled pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. The assessment roll as herein described is on file in the office of the City Clerk. AREA TO BE ASSESSED: CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING Those properties abutting Holly Road from its terminus to Goodrich Street and those properties abutting Preston Lane from Ashley Road to Interlachen Road. TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED IS $180,662.96 All persons who wish to be heard, or to object with reference to this matter may present their cases at this hearing, either orally or in writing. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless a written objection signed by the property owner is filed with the Assessment Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Even though appeals are due by the hearing date on May 5, 1998, the City Clerk strongly recommends that appeals be submitted to the Assessment Clerk's office by April 29, 1998. Appeal forms will be available at the assessment hearing or at the Assessment Clerk's office at the Hopkins City Hall, 1010 1st Street South, Hopkins, Minnesota. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to MSA Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk of the City of Hopkins within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the assessment and by filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor and City Clerk. Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures to apply for such deferment are available from the Assessment Clerk. Deferment applications should be submitted to the Assessment Clerk by April 29, 1998. • The following information shall also apply: 1. The property owner shall have the right to prepay the entire assessment. Your assessment may be paid without interest from May 5, 1998 to June 4, 1998, to the Assessment Clerk at City Hall, 10101st Street South, Hopkins, Minnesota. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the Assessment Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made by November 30, 1998 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 2. Partial prepayment of the assessment in excess of 25 percent of the total assessment has been authorized by ordinance. A partial prepayment can only be made prior to November 30, 1998 with interest accrued to the payment date, except that no interest shall be charged if such partial payment is made by June 4, 1998. 3. In the case where accrued interest applies, the rate of interest to be accrued, if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period, is proposed to be 8 percent commencing on the date of adoption by the City Council. Assessments shall be payable in annual installments over a period of 10 years. 4. The amount to be specially assessed against your property is shown on the statement of assessment sent to you by mail. This is an important hearing because this is your last opportunity to be heard on the matter of this assessment which affects your property. If you have any questions regarding this assessment, please call the Engineering Department or the Assessment Clerk at 935 -8474. Terry O , : rmaier, City Clerk City of Hopkins, Minnesota .. Publish in Hopkins Sailor, Hopkins, Minnesota April 15 and 22, 1998 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA SS. COUNCIL OF HOPKINS Terry Obermaier, being first duly sworn, deposed and says: I am a United States citizen, over 21 years of age, and the City Clerk of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota. On April 15, 1998, acting on behalf of the said city, I deposited in the United States Post Office at the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of hearing on proposed assessments, Public Improvement Project 97 -12, enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses appearing on the attached copy of the mailing list. There is delivery service by United States mail between the place of mailing and the places so addressed. Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this 15th day of April, 1998. (9 214") Notary Public aooa 'it Arit%t4W nano NaSSMW 3 AW r1051 1IW - 311111111 Ai1MMON 313SS30 '1 S3VWf 30- 117 -21 11 0005 Lloyd D Hoff Maxine Hoff 26 Holly Rd • s, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 41 0015 Donald Douglas Anna -Marie Douglas 1311 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 41 0018 Bonita Mae Dargis 1401 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 41 0021 19- 117 -21 41 0022 Sharon L James 1425 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 41 0024 Barbara M Sullivan Thomas J Sullivan 1517 Preston La Hopkins, Mn 55343 141 0027 Joseph W Fish Karen K Fish 1418 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19 -117- 21410030 Anthony Kailas Elaine Kailas 1326 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19 -117- 21410033 Joseph P Pierro Ann H Pierro 29 Ashley Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 19 -117 -21 44 0066 David P Webb 221 Oakwood Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 19 -117 -21 44 0069 O dell R Anderson Amy L Anderson 241 Holly Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 30- 117 -21 11 0007 Archie C Black Patricia Black 262 Holly Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 410016 David J Stark Janet K Stark 1319 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 410019 Glenna R Hovey 1409 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 Paul J Stitzel Judy T Stitzel 1501 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 41 0025 Church of St John The Evangelist 6 Interlachen Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 410028 Clarence E Byram Fern Byram 1410 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 41 0031 Thomas L Lee Joan Lee 1318 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19 -117 -2144 0064 Robert M Dwyer 201 Holly Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 44 0067 Norman P Anderson 225 Holly Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 44 0070 William E Tadewald Karen L Tadewald 255 Holly Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 41 0014 Richard Rinker Caroline Rinker 1301 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 41 0017 Thomas W Nesseth Mary Jane Sahl 1325 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 41 0020 Calixte Robidoux Michele Robidoux 1417 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 41 0023 James Thomas Holzer 1509 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 41 0026 Church of St John The Evangelist 6 Interlachen Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 19 -117 -2141 0029 Carol J Watzke 1402 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 41 0032 Scot E Wilcoxon Antonia M Wilcoxon 1310 Preston La Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 44 0065 Vernon R Riddle Jennifer G Wood 209 Holly Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 44 0068 Stephen Fochler Katherine Fochler 235 Holly Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 44 0085 Richard A Pavelka Rhonda L Pavelka 254 Holly Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 44 0086 Robin C Machen 248 Holly Rd � ins, MN 55343 Charles Siftar Christine Siftar 234 Holly Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 19 -117 -21 44 0089 19 -117 -21 44 0090 Lilyanne Marie Garden 212 Holly Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 19- 117 -21 44 0087 19- 117 -21 44 0088 John Pauly Patricia Nichols 410 Groveland Ave #701 Minneapolis, MN 55403 John T Dorsey W Kelly McKee Dorsey 220 Holly Rd Hopkins, MN 55343 co O in z aZ z a 1 • 61 Q - 1 � z c) F- < u ' o. O 112 pa. E m Q CO 111 49 U U � O U CC 1 00 Z z 1 tt u, �d CO 2 Ira as w < a0 X l4 l- 1 {/J w - L4 CU z O 3 0 EL (0 t0 csi w 0 O 0 w J 0 N o co to N 0f 0 ot N N off co N . N w w 8 ai O M w 0 (o N w 0) 0 In iA 8 0 N 3 8 O to w of co O w 8 ui n w Q W _ a 0 h fM 2 Q1� t0 8 vi w w 8 N O 0) N 8 0) t70 0 co o 0 W z F S- z w H 0) cn co O 0 w so co 0 r 0 O 0) W 2 0) M 0 0 0 co O 01 [8 N I�O as (0 O O 3 w w 0 0 ai v 3 0 n N a M 1(i 2 cn ii co. co M N V O N N I CO N S 0 0 O 0 I() co a N N • ■ CO CO 0 F. ICI 1r co N 0 IOW 0 0 co 00 yy00 v t`d I� of pa pi J H H 00 F - *X CO US w ZZ Wee 113 W .2 .4 W W as t t CO CO ILI ill mi 0 88 $ 88 Iti N N A w w M O O pN O O N N w 888 w W 0 w O O 8 8 88 a ww fA I°� n 88824.3 ww $ 88888888 C 0 0 0 0 H w w N W w w x a It w 1 , 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 CQ C O O O C O O O O O O O O O N O O OI N O O O O O O O �i tt OH0001 H N 00 f0 � ^ W w H 2 8 tp w 'N 'w H K w w N LL Z_ LL H goo .- tD 0 0 0 0 0 c O p C p C p c p N 88 88 °888 a an l l r w 8888 8888 0 a . wwww 4F1 44 888 O p O p O 8 8 8 W H O O O l z 8 O 8 8 a c8i O p O O 8 0 0 , 8 8 8 8 0 0 w 88.V. N � V w 3 0 In CO 8�8 '48 w Ali 0 ti 0 In 88888 w ; p ww p 88488 N l7 ww� 0 I 0 N 0 o .a UI w x 8 8 Q U I Z W =l r W W r r a 0300 0 oN 8 0 8 8 8 O O p O p O OO O www w =ix W x t0OI8 W re, r r. O O 0 co m !L O G ti c.) ` Z >OZU a0N2 ca;df.a. S N 8 8 O O a 8 a 8 8 a 8 8 w 8 1A N V1 8 8 8 tz 2 w a U W y z 0 2 0 8 8 8 a 8 w ( l7 a 8 2 a a to z 3 U z 0 6 2 X 8 m O 8 a 8 8 E 8 N 8 8 y 8 N O 8 8 p O 8 W 8 N U 6 N 0 N U a 8 ui fV N 0 8 8 8 2 O 3 8 0 3 8 88 O O N a 8 N 8 w 8 a 0 6 O 8 G 8 8 8 8 O 1 8 8 8 0 6 W O 0 0 a 0 Q ¢ � w O U g W Z Ug :-U A 0 of 18 0 8 vi O O 2, 8 8 O a 8 8 O 1 8 8 8 8 U 6 0 0 8 O a Y N o O a a 8 O c 2 8 8 8 O p O 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 H o S O G 8 8 8 2 0 a x 6 W 6 8'818 p 0 89 8 fal o,00 00 ipp O ANN O�wVYN 8 O N O S O O 8 8 8 8 z 8 8 a 8 N 8 8 8 y N O O 8 r 2 8 0 8 8 O 8 H 8 0 8 O 8 8 O 8 8 8 8 8 N 0 8 O 8 O 8 8 y Q 8 p U 6 8 8 N o O b 8 csi 8 8 8 a 8 8 8 8 O z N th 0 W 0 a 0 0 8 W N H O 8 ER d*" 0 8 N 8 8 8 N 8 8 8 8 H U N 8 0 00 .a o O r► 8 a 8 8 8 8 8 8 N O N U 6 8 O a 8 8 8 8 O a 8 N N U 6 a O 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 N 8 8 6 OI 0 OO N 0 0 O 8 8 8 � O 0 8 N w 8 8 0 0 r z 8 pf 0 C,S,MCCRQSSAN ' MAPLE GROVE. MN UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 818ESS8 O pN S..12ANO j CONST AMOUNT .NNW ° o, 53,637 50 59,734 70 516,583 60 513,241 40 $480 00 5432.00 55,280 00 $40.70 31,257.00 $12,347.50 31,602.25 33,180.00 3162.00 52,430 00 3813.00 5271.00 5408 00 322,511.451 53,737 50 $570 00 $1,12000 51,650 00 52,100 00 $525 00 5105 00 59,576 00 01'819'6015 O P b N w V 0 0 � M V N NIA Npw.- N O ODh H W N M -O N w w I 514 55 537.6 77 9 $4566 $1.50 00 945 09 65 IC I :STIMATE S88818°0'4 t�00 M Q�oO p NONN f� w p yyNO w W W i, i NORTHOALE CONST ' " " ROGERS MN UNIT PRICE AMOUNT O aSS0000000 oniNNN 0 0 0 0 0 0002 0 0 p 52,250 00 510,37850 518,920.00 514,790 00 5873 60 5343 80 54.856 50 53,700.00 5375 00 5600 00 5270 00 51,907.50 5381 50 $45.00 56,779.20 OL 9V0'44LS O gw pp N O fON pp pp S b NN N f0 to r f001 £L'04 00'165 00 £4S 6065 00 65 91 II'S 09 05 O O O NON niniiia°Dii" M N O O w N N w w O N NN 1 �1 IM1171WE • EDEN PRAIRIE, MN I U • T p N ww p "I O OIA O CN 1, 0000 M 0. § 0 N N N w� $3,562 50 $12,765 00 513,200.00 59,280.00 $928.00 5459 00 $4,999 50 52,900.00 5600.00 51,160.00 5360 00 51,750.00 5290 00 $175 00 512.616 00 I 04'116'8015 S S p O �� w OTN�lIOOA N O NNWNNN 06'05 00'0E5 00 005 09115 60'615 96 91'5 01'65 O0 0 .&x. . p���.}} nN - INI1OWV ,]GWd.UNO NW'3A0b03'5dVW . trW30t3M'S p ho010 as NNwN ONMwO p p w $3,750 00 513,320.00 516,720.00 511,600.00 5960 00 $288 00 54,290 00 5800.00 $300.00 5480 00 5360 00 51,250.00 5220.00 535 00 56.688 00 OL'£L9 801S 0 p E pp E p 2;8/07NMO vi x 00'£5 00 065 0(1905 00 015 00 00'605 00 ES OO O to O p www ( E8N MP ww T,. H. PM wreomoti S3AI51Q8VH O M � mee��ff O tp O � OOS pp O pp HiXNN H N qN 53,250.00 $9,546.00 511,814.00 58,656.50 I r 5640.00 $346.50 $3,960 00 51.000.M) 5600.00 5960.00 51,200 00 51,425.00 $300.00 $60.001 56.384.001 .^ Tel 0 �000. pip ff a p fHV -OWN NNH p own 9s 605 69'905 09 95 00015 00'905 69 05 8'448 ,,ONN I�ww Iw pp EE p Nww p 8 o p O o p tpp ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 1 UNIT PRICE AMOUNT EE p OC700�No§§§ O pp E! N q 8. w 8 8 S O w .} Ww 00 0095 00'016'95 00'099'145 00 900'95 00 00'000'05 00'oLOS o, O as °-aww w O O V 8 ONW °w w . d 09'998 915 p 0S'i$0S'i5'i O W p O N p W p ii W W K oozy 00 605 00'.105 09 .14 00'045 00'0£5 00 £5 0 8 N N 0 gQo O s W = _Joan IIILLLMO �Q }}} J I OA OS 13 OS .UUUWm� 3666V,5B° .LNVfOS f M G N NnsNt0 00£ 060 OPP MIL 020 011. 06 - WN e-r0 Wau I I I MOBILIZATION COMMON EXCAVATION (EVXP) CLEARING AND GRUBBING (1) SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SAWCUT CONCRETE PAVEMENT _ - REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT/ SIDEWALK SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV)(1) STABILIZING AGGREGATE (LV)(1) 1 � I TOPSOIL BORROW (LVH1) AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 (P) BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, TYPE 31 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT r CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6• CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON/ PAVEMENT I � I � TRAFFIC CONTROL ADJUST VALVE BOX ADJUST FRAME RING AND CASTING INLET PROTECTION FURNISH AND PLANT AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE - 2" CAL B &B (1) FURNISH AND PLANT JUNIPER - 2" CAL B &B (1) LANDSCAPE ROCK (1.5" GRAVEL) (LV)(1) SODDING TYPE LAWN (1 TOTAL .-0404.W01 c0 01 O .- N to O N W h W M N N N N N r I N I N C.S. MCCROSSAN MAPLE GROVE, MN .UNIT PRICE AMOUNT,_ 31,150 00 54,140 00 $18.150 00 $4,550 00 $4,160 00 3186.00 52,040 00 52,541 00 $420.00 51,000 00 538,337.00 1 j CONST AMOUNT I $4,500.00 51,563 00 515,097 50 51.900 60 $5,100 00 3200.00 51,906 98 $2,250.00 $350 00 5330 00 s33,198.08 1 NW'a - MK $40.70 31,257.00 $12,347.50 31,602.25 33,180.00 3162.00 52,430 00 3813.00 5271.00 5408 00 322,511.451 - 1N EDIIid Miff NN)'3iIOO1O310IN . ..._ WEIOIOIWS 33,000.00 51,320.00 513,200 00 $1,690 00 52,320 00 39200 32,400.00 31,200 00 3180 00 5300.00 525,702.001 it • V 32,300.00 31,560.00 313,750.00 51,950.00 33,200.00 5140.00 31,800.00 51,230.00 5550.00 5400.00 526,880.001 IC I :STIMATE 1 00 oo6'szS 00'0005 00'095 00 004'05 00'009'15 00 0005 00 006'05 00 009'05 00'050'01.$ 00'000'1.5 00 NTI i 2NVT.tO. 'XObddv 4 l i MOBILIZATION 12" RC PIPE SEWER 15" RC PIPE SEWER 18" RC PIPE SEWER CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, DES S -10 (24'x36") SALVAGE EXISTING CASTING CASTING ASSEMBLY (NEENAH R- 3501- TR/TL) CONNECT TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION AGGREGATE FOUNDATION (1XLV) TOTAL TABLE D • STORM SEWER a h p Q 5 O 8 2 0 g uy w a 2 0 m N ui O h 8 N ro N N a y Ni m ci K a 8 N N M O 3 0 O H 0 2 01 WE 4: lit .7 Zhi 12 8 8 8 x 8 8 N 8 N 8 3 O 8 O 8 8 8 8 8 8 2 2 O 8 8 8 8 8 a 0 W o 3O N 8 h 8 fsi 8 8 z 8 8 8 Y n H 8 8 8 8 N 8 can N O 2 8 8 Q v f9 8 0 0, N 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 8 U Q z 0 0 z 0 1 Q g l 0 0 0 0 , 8 H 8 8 8 N O O 8 8 W 8 8 s y W 8 8 N U 81 O O o a 0 0 8 w 8 3 w 8 8 8 N 8 8 fA 0 0 8 8 U W t0 $ i o N N 8 c 8 8 N 8 8 8 8 8 8 Q U W 2 a z 0 8 a 8 o ° o 8 8 O 8 O 8 w 8 8 ID f- z CD 18 O 3 2 0 0, 8 8 8 O 8 3 8 8 8 O Z 88 0 •m K 8 of a M 8 88. H 8 8 8 3 8 3 0 8 8 z 8 0 0 8 H 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 F LL N 5 W Z W z Y 0. N 8 8 8 8 8 H 8 8 8 N 8 G 8 8 8 0 0, 8 U W 8 8 8 a 8 8 N a 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Q U 8 8 8 N O N 8 8 0 8 8 0 8 8 8 8 2 Z tD 0 e a 0 N w 0 8 8 0 a 8 0 } 0 8 N 3 a O 0 24 �Nyy ! ire 2 V M W 2 2 2 2Q g 0 . W 0 M W X0 W k V 1 4 z 0 8 8 S O O W w w 0 0 0 0 83 N 88 p 8 Q °o o w 88 w N W v 8 8 88 8 w 8 8 8 8 6 m dI W *a tqk 0 0 z � w 211 ~ Z 1� ad 4M H a O E 24 0 w N R g N a 8 N 0 m 8 O 8 8 Vi 8 8 8 t z 8 O m 8 N a p O N 8 H b 8 8 8 z O w as w V V� 2 oi? zz ww WW mx 8 10 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 8 8 8 8 N 8 Q U W 0 0 0 to O p 8 8 m 8 8 8 °o 8 w N 8 8 3 8 C z N 0 0 W 0 a 8 N N O 0 N p ° o fD °o 8 O 8 8 8 8 8 0 $8 W O 01 11 a4 8 8 °o 0 8 t0 82 8 8 N 0 W 8 8 8 O O N 1N 8 fV 8 Y 8 U W 8 N 8 N 8 N 8 8 a O M H 8 8 8 � H 88 O � V O a3 8 {`9 z 0 8 8 y o H 8 8 N m 8 N 8 8 8 w 8 8 8 8 3 8 N 8 §. O O 8 Q U 8 8 6 X Q W g wi to 8 8 w 8 8 8 8 8 f9 N z 8 8 m O H 8 8 8 8 8 8 N n O z 8 w a 0 0 W z 0 y w 0 W a N . 8 W 8 W 8 8 8 8 IA w 8 08 KIN 8 8 U W 8 w 8 3 8 8 8 8 O O 8 N 8 Q U W 8 8 4 a 8 H 8 fV 8 H 8 8 8 N 8 8 8 z N 8 8 8 O 8 8 o 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 W 8 6 P 8 W 8 is O O O v O t0 8 8 3 8 8 °O °o 88 4.444 8 8 8 8 8 6 8 8 8 P 8 W 0 8 N 8 8 H o O 8 a 8 N N 88 ww O N R 8 O 8 o° 8 8 8 3 8 8 a 8 8 xm 0 U w $ z 0 8 O O 8 8 N 8 8 8 8 z 8 8 I C«S.MCCROSSANCQNST, M APLE GRAVE, MN UNIT PRICE AMOUNT N jN N 31.260 00 58,631 00 5152,715.09 _ g � N _ _ _ OO � H W - N rill $381.50 51.144 50 3420 00 S2 23 56,110 20 53 15 I 5127,552.10 ( _ MIDWEST ASPliAI.T NORTHQALE CONST EDEN PRAIRIR,MN ROGERS,MN UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 51,050 00 514.385 00 5163,037.70 I �H,eRCRIVES S. WEI :RMA NGIMEER'S ESTIMATE RQGERS, MO MAPLE GROVE. MN UN(1` PRICE AMOUNT IUNIT PRICE AMOUNT NR PRICE AMOUNT 5750 00 56,028.00 5138,734.50 11111111 5855.00 56.028 00 8119,972.05 � - � � 00 � �� rn N $600 OJ 86.165 00 5101,294.50' NN I SINK , 7 �UR�'.iyO. . .8O8�N � yy z • • ? r1 ltritkidif �- oofo$oo - - Q,0000 -_ - $ W NNN .O1r lN'1N� � [A W r MOBILIZATION COMMON EXCAVATION (EV)(P) CLEARING AND GRUBBING (1) SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SAWCUT CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT/ SIDEWALK SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EVX1) STABILIZING AGGREGATE (LV)(1) TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)(1) AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 (P) BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, TYPE 31 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT _ 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON/ PAVEMENT CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER _ 4" PERFORATED PE PIPE WITH SOCK 4" PERFORATED PE INSPECTION TEE WITH SOCK I i INLt 11'KU I tl: I IUN FURNISH AND PLANT AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE • 2" (1) SODDING TYPE LAWN ( TOTAL - tt © z NCO Y 1D 0n 0001 O -N M Y U)Df`I400) 8 O 8 8 8 O 8 8 8 8 Z 8 8 8 8 N N 8 8 8 8 p 8 8 N 8 Q U W z h U U W w w P') 8 N M N N W N 8 8 0 3 N O N H EL h W a K N O I `w 8 1 0 CA r 8 8 IA 8 8 8 N O N LL LL ZZ o c ° � 88 ?-8 8 8 8 8 8 O 8 a U W rd 8 O 8 8 8 8 8 8 N 8 8 8 N 8 8 a U W N O aa l�1 8 8 a N 8 O x O 8 8 8 N1 8 U 8 8 8 O O1 8. 8 H 8 O a O 8 O e 8 e 8 N w Q O N Y N O 8 8 8 H xc‘ N 8 8 88 8 U O f r CC Cg W e M O 0 6 3 O M x 0 ry N L ce UU 00 00 mm °e K R N l��l N W 3 0 w W 0 O O 3 oho 0 <O O N 0) H 0 00 to W Cl) O S M — W z • w p ` U y- z W Q > W Z Q W S 2 -- yY Q zQ Q W a Lis Z tx F W *. 00H Z K� 0 8 Of 8 O O N 8 8 o l+f S 8 O H 8 8 8 8 8 8 H y 0 2 8 8 (C f0 r N 8 co 8 8 H 8 W 0 Q 0 p 8 8 } co 8 8 a 8 O O 0 8 8 N 8 H 8 N 88 88 N H z w Q a 7 z m 8 H z 8 8 n H 8 8 co 8 8 8 O 3 8 8 8 H 8 O H 8 8 0 88 a 88- H 8 p t V N � 8 6* $8 ?- H 88 N r H N 88 N 88 Ui H Ui 88 ta O N 000 N H 88 4.4. L E° 8 N 8 to N 8 o O N N 8 N Q V 9 - 60 �a O c §g1§ 0 W�W f- w .0.0 z zz »77 OF►_ H Kmmm 8 8 N 8 8 Q1 8 8 8 O 888 X88 H H N CO p 8 7 07 a 8 8 FL 8 8 8 8 O O FP, 8 8 O 8 8 O 8 H 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 XO Pc m 00 U U �. u . p_p F-Q 8 N 8 8 88 N 3 ro O O 8 8 H N 8 O 8 8 8 8 CO H O O 8 888 H H N ai 8 8 11 8 8 z 0 a M 1- O Naigj C < 0z 8 8 N H O 0) 8 G O O O H 8 O 8 H 8 O 8 O O 8 2 0 J z 0 Q 00 O 8 8 O O t[1 O 8 01 8 0 N 8 f0 0 H 9 N 8 8 8 z 8 i0 co 8 fV 8 8 8 co N co O O 0 O f0 H 0 O O a 8 8 8 fV 8 C O 8 8 co O W 0 8 8 H 8 4 O CO 0 8 y 8 t0 0 0 N O N H 8 8 8 8 H O 8 co O O 8 co co 0 J O 0 8 O O 8 8 O 8 O O O 8 8 O O 8 S H co O O m Z > 0 U LL N co O O O p O N O N H O O LL 8 x U 6 01 8 O O 8 N O 8 8 8 8 M O ui x U 6 0 z h 0 0 0 z W W z 8 C.S> MCCROSSAN MAPLE GROVE, MN UNIT ?RICE AMOUNT 1 00 0E95 154 O$ 00'91,6'15 100'91 $5251 $6,98250 526 221 $15,732 00 $1 50 5750 00 $6.10 51,830.00 526 251 51,312.50 51,725 00 51,72500 $190 001 $2,660 00 5280 00 51,960 00 $390 00 $1,170 00 $36,667.00 'NORTHDALE COMM; ( ROGERS,MN UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 53,50000 510,836 00 $7,980 00 519,200 00 $1,365 00 $4,200 00 51,689 50 52,500 00 52,800.00 51,750 00 $1,425 00 557,245.501 b1. LS 00 009'05 5600 $3200 52 73 514.00 533 79 52,500 00 MIDWEST ASPHALT EDEN PRAIRIE, MN UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 00 069'95 00 0065 53,125 50 519,200.00 $1,250.00 53,450 00 52,525.00 $2,900.00 52,800.00 52,030.00 51,200.00 �4 270.50 rt 9 '0065 00'006'ZS 09'045 04115 NZ$ 00 4E'ZS • .LNf1OWV 301Ed 11Nf '' NW '3A0210 31dVW VW2a2M'S1 00'026'01$ 00'000'05 00 004 00 00b'L5 00 009'4$ 00 005'13 00 05 00'099 51,400.00 $840 00 $540 00 '51,260.001 09'1.5 00 000'£5 00 0005 00'905 00'915 00 05 00 Ob$ 00 ZS HARDRIVES ROGERS, PRICE AMOUNT 1 00 00 54,389.00 $17,910.00 $1,000.00 $855.00 $2,200.00 5500.00 52,800.00 51,680.00 51,050.00 535,984.001 00'ZS 00 00'0095 00 1175 99'05 00 05 49'605 OWES .0410W1i 901UctitNEI aLVW1tS3 SA133NIONS 00'001. ZS 00'000'05 00'000' 15 001:601.5 00'OOLS 00 00'OOb'L 1.S 00'000'15 52,100 00 51,050.00 $675.00 531,655.001 04 00'000 00 000'1.5 00 405 09'ZS 00'05 00'605 00'14 LUMP SUM ISO YD LIN FT TON GAL SO FT LIN FT LUMP SUM 7(ONddV 0041 , � 09 000 008 009 000 � w k )US PAVEMENT i i l ! i ROUT AND SEAL .JOINT (1) BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE. TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE PATCH (1) SPOT CURB REPAIR (1) TRAFFIC CONTROL ! BOX E RING AND CASTING TAME RING AND CASTING i Ifill Iiiiiiiiii m a z i z. azt tJt It! a - m. z i �z„a _ O Z tat V Y Z 8888 iri O N N 8 O O 8 8 8 CO 8 8 O 8 3 8 co co a J z 0 m 0 2 N O O r H 8 O r fD 8 8 8 ui 4 8 y 1- w 2 a D 0 GI J 2 8$ N .N O O O O c N 7 O N 4- 88 O CO N N O 28 N m $8 CO d- N H � 88 .=N H H Olu') M oD H cid no Hl 8$ p � N N z O eI z 0 8 Z O 0 M a. ui K 0 2 O 888 8°,0)88 N MI+)h � M N bA N 444 O a H 8 O co p O O H O 8 b O O 0 09 - O O 8 8 O 8 C)') O 8 M H O 8 0 r � 0 a W co U M as mW DM O z U PO 030) co co N 8 CO F.! O 8 8 8 8 N O W p N O 8 8 8 z 8 O N 8 8 CV o° 8 O O at 0 8 8 a H N O 8 a 8 O 8 8 8 2 co co a 0 z U 0 LL O 88 88 NN N N O O a N 8 8 8 o O H O 8 N U W Of 8 co o O N 3 8 0 O 0 O O N a9 8 a O 8 8 U N O 8 M O O V 8 M 8 8 3 8 8 8 O f9 8 O 8 0 z Z o Z O 6 C.S. MCCROSSAN MAPLE GRQVE, MN UNIT PRICE - -- AMOUNT $2,875.00 $157.50 $220.50 $675 00 $607.50 $672.00 $4,104.00 5110.00 $5,070.00 $2,320.00 $1,280.00 $500.00 $3,878 00 $628.80 51,031.60 $10,584.00 51,669.50 51,840 590.00 L $2,016 00 i $347 601 $1,575.00 00091'L$ 00 050 00 090'15 l o9'LLL` LS S l 02OS2S88 O g WVl CD N N M 1+c000000 N V1 M .. dl f9 t 7 V/ H 8 02 f0 '�t r tC 19 U1 2 tO z-NN NMNI9H N M d/ QJ 0 V h0 N V! 2 W $1.58 L $525.001 $525 00' $1,050 00'. $1,150 00. NORTHDALE CONST. ROGERS, MN , UNIT PRICE AMOUNT $4,500 00 5150 00 $210 00 5150 00 $2,835 00 $300 00 $969.00 $1,500.00 $4,126.20 $3,150 00 $1,262.88 5205 00 $3,780.00 $255.00 $900.00 513,147 20 $2,700 00 $2,925 00 $163.80 51,604.40 $1,090.00 $2,700.00 00 0065 00 0L9' 15 00 009'15 00•009'15 00 00£5 memo OSS8SSSOAS31 2h2Mf:000 i9 2 O`od in SISS.$188naNDN Mun/ONM 1000015 0995 00 15 00 009'15 1 1 00 0915 MIDWEST ASPHALT EDEN PRAIRIE'. MN UNIT PRICE AMOUNT $1,800.00 58,700.00 $120.00 $345.00 53,240 00 51,040.00 $2,88990 5380.00 $2,892 50 $2,040 00 51,360.00 53,800.00 54,284.00 $610.50 $1,020.00 513,068.00 52,970.00 52,835.00 5150.00 51,617.00 51,380.00 51,050.00 00'095 00•0565 $470.00 $2,300 00 52,900.00 06'900985 1 S S Ot� S S N 8 O 77 :' O S gR N .. S N (g(�I w. O S O (RpSS W S S PI V O M S S 2 6/1 W S tp t0NM /9NH S 2 S 0015 00'9L1$ 00'9£65 l 009L15 00'006'55 00 00£'55 I - T l 4fm* soma.UNl • NNE `RAM R'idtM VVt2Ut2M'S 88 N N H 88 c 4 H 8 49 5200.00 5969.00 5500.00 54,29000 51,160.00 51,400 00 5170.00 53,640.00 5255.00 5680.00 511,160.00 53,375.00 53,240.00 5180.00 $1,344.00 51,120.00 5480.00 1 00'995 00'LLS 00'0995 00 0065 00'955 00'L89 6£S 888 §"V' W S N � 4a4. 8 2 8 S 6 p W O 8 p O � 8h , b." 0 8 2 Oit 0 S gN S N O C R 0 O O I oo' 19£'05 X00'0995 '00 00£5 100 HARDRIYES ROGERS. • - UNIT PRICE AMOUNT , 51,900.00 5150.00 5300.00 5300.00 5931.50 $400.00 51,236.90 5430.00 53,900.00 52,060.00 51,480.00 $200.00 52,758.00 5360.00 5800.00 514,400.00 513,432.50 $12,082.50 5120,00 $1,617.00 5800.00 51,800.00 00'091 00'0665 00 000'15 00'009' L5 00 095 04'88H� 1•9 S 8 SS8 �� � 000111 a d). :2 s. �eO-tOl+ V/W 2 7M W S4gr4N O �M H V WH/9 NN NN WHR . 00 095 100'15 $30.00 51,600 00 51,000.00 • ENG i«RS ESTIMATE • UNIT PRICE AMOUNT $1.000 00 560 00 575.00 5150 00 51,620.00 5120 00 5741 00 $700 00 52,860.00 51,700.00 $1,200.00 5150 00 52,100.00 5240.00 5300.00 511,520.00 56,898 50 $6,898.50 5120.00 51,260.00 5400 00 $1,200.00 00'095 - 00'055$ $40 00 $300 001 5500 00 00'££9�Z9S 88888188888888188821388S pp SMWNHHNnypSpBV-N N fV tV uiNM/0O 111 N 21�aD H 1�N21V Ng 19 1`M 00 055 LOT L5 00'0095 _ 00'00£5 00 055 2 cn a.LLL ,mmm ° ° ° ..,W• ° ° ° °° tt 5 QQ 1 HOV3 .L3 NIl EACH LUMP SUM 1 LUMP SUM iNV72 'ItOliddit — SS 1h'<'— SN"SSMS8R4wrN fV �- X 1 • 1 1 j : 1 1 MOBILIZATION SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SAWCUT CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE CURB REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMMON EXCAVATION (EV)(P) CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER 12" RC PIPE SEWER CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, DES S•10 (245(36') CASTING ASSEMBLY (NEENAH R- 3360 -A) COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE (LVX1) AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EVX1) STABILIZING AGGREGATE (1Z 6" CONCRETE ALLEY PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, TYPE 31 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE CURB, TYPE V6 FI IRKIISI4 ANf1 INRTAI 1 RALLARA I 4" SOLID WHITE LINE RAIUTGn WA1dnICAP WHEAL I I i • 1 • i P CROSS HATCHING AT HANDICAP STALLS TURF RESTORATION TRACFI(: rf1NTRn1 I lViOl X,. ,,Novowp-moo.-NC9 V ww.com 95 V 'ICS MCCROSSAN MAPLE GROVE, MN UNIT PRICE AMOUNT $2,875.001 Op 00 0L95 00'o0Z$ OS LS LS p p 8 /� Ig00000 0 n W W 494'.4:". O OO g 0 2 0 9_8x 0 0 0 H 0p 8888888 OMNN N.=NMN NHH PNM x0c00072 H 2 H V.M- V '- H $1,227.00 590 00 52,016 00 $1,050 00 $4,725 00 5347 60 51,575 00 $1,05000 $1.050 00 51,150 00 554,517.50 00 9L9'Z5 ( 8g2 tx °O pp °8888OO o °O p 2 w HHNH.�N.- 05'ZZ$ SE'L$ SZ'9$ OSt2g20 H ff/OOO H H 8 MBNNH HHNHH p2 pviln NORTHDAtE CONST. ROGERS, UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 00'00911 8888888248888.8888.7.8888888 .17. 00'051$ 00'0105 §T IgeOORONOf H 1poppp N H lNpx�PEOx�00�0 y .. N N H. S S pppp H H 1 M N oo'oos W HHH roo'sS 00'LS 00'9$ 828874838828,71888W4888888 og N 7; (MO �H H H �xy ��ppp y 9_ y 4/) p 8 8 444 p O -°- N H "'. MIDWEST ASPHALT EDEN PRAIRIE, MN (UNIT PRJCE AMOUNT 1 00'009' 15 I 00'OZLS 00'L9$ 88888.8888.8.888'8 p 0 a cs , N ; H H 80 NHN H Hx9NNO - gggp�p 07W NHN H N IT gc7NN N H N H 0 H 00pp7088 H M 0 88S p E ( 8.qg . WO H . H N ^0 03 H � H c7 50 p I� H 8888.8888 r gppI�ON W 1 H H a H 8p NH H C V H — gg . H�c7 N N H 58 csj H 8 O t0 N N 00'009' 1S 0013 06'Z$ »InOLYV 33Jtlld 11Nn • • ' NVII 'AMMO '1+ W • • ` ... VW3013M'S 00'0095 8�8 8 00'0915 00'0g IS 00 N88y888S8G8S8p88�8p8pO8Q8oIllp8p88p88p8 xO07d1 ,,j 64 N H N ' ' 444 H ,j H 4.411,6 NNN� N H N '< N H N N 8 . 8 i►c�l g 6944 8 OV 1 00. 0 005 t17 00'95 00'95 00 888888888888518888888888 .11') HHH S ggg S p 1ic700h �aO p . N H HMHNNHH I�.1 1 W NHHH CO NM . .M HN HARDRIVES • ROGERS,MN UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 00'000'05 88888'88 §4 ( 00 00E5 00'0005 00'0915 H.NCW p H OV .. H y ,N H I CO N { N H 0r- WWW H N N N .- �00 c .64 a ? p H 00'000'05 000LS 00'015 100'95 :2 8 p �-Ox0 H NH pp 00888 3 . 4► gr . a0800a0 S 8 p N M V NNNH 8 p 2 :7 x08 N 2 x0888888 ySH NN080.N H N 11411011V 33Thfd11NR amnia so/qampNg 1 00 000'15 p Iq 00'0015 00'SLS 00'095 8888888888p888o888� R 8 � H HHnj H - A 8 O OW O 8 § 2 N NHN .4 . 8 8? H § I+ I � � y � H � NN 8 NIN H ( 88 p 88 N H H H g S8 pp § § HH X . N y N 1 00 000'14 8888888888888888888 19_ N 00'95 00•05 00 cV 14gpg(�i H H H n pp b y. N I� N N OOPNI0NNM0 N N MH .. H H p88 H N H W N gg M w LUMP SUM 1 .S- I 14 Nil 14 Nil 1� NIl 22BWW UVQ 5QOz ,28B5IS }YY a[� Mona `XONekilf - O O O Mlc�7 c077 O Q' 'vC 2 8 N N 0 8 N cc�7� 8 Q v� `�� jj O [9311, 1 NOIIVZI1I8O14 i SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SAWCUT CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE CURB REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMMON EXCAVATION (EVXP) CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER 12' RC PIPE SEWER CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, DES S-10 (24 "x361 CASTING ASSEMBLY (NEENAH R- 3360 -A COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE (LVl(1) AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EVx1) STABILIZING AGGREGATE (LVX1) 6' CONCRETE ALLEY PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, TYPE 31 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 4' CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE CURB, TYPE V6 FURNISH AND INSTALL BOLLARD 4" SOLID WHITE LINE PAINTED HANDICAP SYMBOL PAINTED CROSS HATCHING AT HANDICAP STALLS TURF RESTORATION TRAFFIC CONTROL TOTAL aNO V W W NM.NW, ALTERNATE B (CONCRETE PARKING AREA) Assume consultant fee for overall project without contingency Assume total low construction bid without contingency Assume Preston Lane reconstruction bid without contingency Assume Holly Road reconstruction bid without contingency Preston Lane Engineering Const. Bid ($119,972.05) _ total bid ($500,136.90) = 0.24 (24 %) Engineering cost therefore = $84,750 x 24% = $20,340.00 Holly Road Engineering Preston Lane Assessments Assessment Worksheet Interlachen Park Street Improvements Const. Bid (89,935.35) _ total bid ($500,136.90) = 0.18 (18 %) Engineering cost therefore = $84,750 x 18% = $15,255.00 Const. Bid $119,972.05 Engineering 20,340.00 Admin. /legal @ 6% of const. 7,198.32 Total $147,510.37 70% share assessed per City policy = $103,257.92 Assessable footage = 1847.19 feet Assessment rate = 103,257.92 = $55.90/ff 1,847.19 Holly Road Assessments Const. Bid Engineering Admin. /legal @ 6% of const. Total 70% share assessed per City policy Assessable footage = 1405.32 feet Assessment rate = 77,405.03 = $55.08/ff 1,405.32 $ 89,935.35 15,255.00 5,396.65 $110,587.00 $ 77,405.03 $ 84,750.00 $500,136.90 $119,972.05 $ 89,935.35 1 1301 2 1311 3 1319 4 1325 5 1401 6 1409 7 1417 8 1425 9 1501 10 1509 11 1517 12 29 13 1310 14 1318 15 1326 16 1402 17 1410 18 1418 19 1428 20 6 Preston Lane Preston Lane Preston Lane Preston Lane Preston Lane Preston Lane Preston Lane Preston Lane Preston Lane Preston Lane Preston Lane Ashley Road Preston Lane Preston Lane Preston Lane Preston Lane Preston Lane Preston Lane Preston Lane Interlachen Road Project 97 -12 Preliminary Assessment.xls 4/1/98 Final Assessment Roll Project 97 -12: Street Improvements 19- 117 -21 41 19- 117 -21 41 19- 117 -21 41 19- 117 -21 41 19- 117 -2141 19- 117 -21 41 19- 117 -2141 19- 117 -21 41 19- 117 -2141 19- 117 -21 41 19- 117 -21 41 19- 117 -21 41 19 -117 -2141 19- 117 -21 41 19- 117 -21 41 19- 117 -21 41 19- 117 -21 41 19- 117 -21 41 19- 117 -21 41 19- 117 -21 41 0014 0015 0016 0017 0018 0019 0020 0021 0022 0023 0024 0033 0032 0031 0030 0029 0028 0027 0026 0025 90.00 85.00 85.00 80.00 80.20 80.70 80.70 80.70 80.70 80.11 100.34 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.20 80.60 80.70 90.50 271.74 90.00 85.00 85.00 80.00 80.20 80.70 80.70 80.70 80.70 80.11 100.34 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.20 80.60 80.70 90.50 271.74 1,847.19 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $55.90 $5,031.00 $4,751.50 $4,751.50 $4,472.00 $4,483.18 $4,511.13 $4,511.13 $4,511.13 $4,511.13 $4,478.15 $5,609.01 $4,472.00 $4,472.00 $4,472.00 $4,472.00 $4,483.18 $4,505.54 $55.90 $4,511.13 $55.90 $5,058.95 $55.90 $15,190.27 $103,257.93 ddress 1 200 Holly Road 2 212 Holly Road 3 220 Holly Road 4 234 Holly Road 5 248 Holly Road 6 254 Holly Road 7 262 Holly Road 8 201 Holly Road 9 209 Holly Road 10 217 Holly Road 11 225 Holly Road 12 235 Holly Road 13 241 Holly Road 14 255 Holly Road 15 265 Holly Road Project 97 -12 Preliminary Assessment.xls 4/1/98 Project 97 -12: Street Improvements 19 -117 -2144 0090 19- 117 -21 44 0089 19- 117 -2144 0088 19- 117 -21 44 0087 19 -117 -2144 0086 19 -117 -2144 0085 30- 117 -21 11 0007 19- 117 -21 44 0064 19- 117 -21 44 0065 19 -117 -2144 0066 19 -117 -2144 0067 19- 117 -2144 0068 19 -117 -2144 0069 19 -117 -2144 0070 30- 117 -21 11 0005 Frdn - =` = Asab1. F-Otacge`,_:).: 80.00 120.00 80.00 120.00 84.00 113.46 105.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 100.00 90.00 112.86 80.00 80.00 120.00 80.00 120.00 84.00 113.46 105.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 100.00 90.00 112.86 80.00 $55.08 $55.08 $55.08 $55.08 $55.08 $55.08 $55.08 $55.08 $55.08 $55.08 $55.08 $55.08 $55.08 $55.08 $55.08 $4,406.40 $6,609.60 $4,406.40 $6,609.60 $4,626.72 $6,249.38 $5,783.40 $4,406.40 $4,406.40 $4,406.40 $4,406.40 $5,508.00 $4,957.20 $6,216.33 $4,406.40 1,405.32 $77,405.03 eoL IC)NJ & A - NJ K , 1 N c_ Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 1515 East Highway 13 Burnsville, MN 55337 -6857 Phone (612) 890 -0509 • FAX (612) 890 -8065 March 31, 1998 Mr. Jim Gessele Engineering Supervisor 1010 1st Street South Hopkins, MN 55343 RE: 1998 Street and Utility Improvements Assessment Analysis BMI Project Nos. TC97.0168 Dear Mr. Gessele: As you requested, we have done a comparison of the feasibility and low bidder assessment rates m order to determine how increased unit prices and changes in bid item quantities may have contributed to the overall increase between the two assessment rates. The following table is a summary of our findings: The "difference influenced by quantity changes" is calculated as the assessable amount of the Engineer's Final Estimate including contingencies minus the Engineer's Feasibility Estimate including contingencies. The "difference influenced by higher bid prices" is the remainder of the "total difference ". By assuming similar unit prices between the feasibility quantities and the final estimate quantities, we are able to determine which quantity adjustments had the greatest influence on the overall costs of the assessments. Using this approach, we discovered that the higher bid prices are fairly consistent between Preston Lane and Holly Road, adding on average, $3.11 to the feasibility assessment rate. MANKATO, MN FAIRMONT, MN SLEEPY EYE, MN BURNSVILLE, MN AMES, IA LIBERTY, MO An Equal Opportunity Employer Feasibility Low Bidder Total Difference = Difference by Quantities + Difference by Bid Prices Assessment Rate $51.03 $55.90 I $4.87 = $1.75 + $3.12 I . Feasibility I Low Bidder 1 Total Difference = 1 Difference by Quantities + 1 Difference by Bid Prices Assessment I Rate $53.32 $55.08 $1.76 = ($1.34) + $3.10 eoL IC)NJ & A - NJ K , 1 N c_ Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 1515 East Highway 13 Burnsville, MN 55337 -6857 Phone (612) 890 -0509 • FAX (612) 890 -8065 March 31, 1998 Mr. Jim Gessele Engineering Supervisor 1010 1st Street South Hopkins, MN 55343 RE: 1998 Street and Utility Improvements Assessment Analysis BMI Project Nos. TC97.0168 Dear Mr. Gessele: As you requested, we have done a comparison of the feasibility and low bidder assessment rates m order to determine how increased unit prices and changes in bid item quantities may have contributed to the overall increase between the two assessment rates. The following table is a summary of our findings: The "difference influenced by quantity changes" is calculated as the assessable amount of the Engineer's Final Estimate including contingencies minus the Engineer's Feasibility Estimate including contingencies. The "difference influenced by higher bid prices" is the remainder of the "total difference ". By assuming similar unit prices between the feasibility quantities and the final estimate quantities, we are able to determine which quantity adjustments had the greatest influence on the overall costs of the assessments. Using this approach, we discovered that the higher bid prices are fairly consistent between Preston Lane and Holly Road, adding on average, $3.11 to the feasibility assessment rate. MANKATO, MN FAIRMONT, MN SLEEPY EYE, MN BURNSVILLE, MN AMES, IA LIBERTY, MO An Equal Opportunity Employer • • Those bid items whose quantity adjustments have the most influence on the Preston Lane assessment rate include Subgrade Excavation, Stabilizing Aggregate, 6" Concrete Driveway Apron/ Pavement, and Concrete Cross Gutter. Between the feasibility and final design phases of the project, there was much discussion regarding the interpretation of the Braun's soils report. The latest conclusions led us to increase the Subgrade Excavation and associated Stabilizing Aggregate items. The increase in concrete item quantities hinges on the discovery of additional concrete, rather than bituminous, driveways and the necessity of a cross gutter along the church parking lot at the intersection of Preston Lane and Interlachen Road. An analysis of Holly Road actually reveals a reduction in the assessment rate due to changes in the bid item quantities, but unfortunately not enough to offset the higher bid prices. The adjusted bid item which has the most influence on this reduction is Common Excavation. This quantity changed as a result of modifications to the road's proposed profile. If you have any questions regarding this analysis or would require any additional information to include in your council report, don't hesitate to call. Sincerely yours, BOLTON & MENK, INC. 144 cinc..04._ 4 - 7 - 7 , 014444--- Marcus A. Thomas Project Engineer cc: Steve Stadler, City of Hopkins Address of Assessed Parcel ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM What assessment does this concea ci Property Identification Number: c. - - - -- --ate Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one): a .( ) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) b. ( ) *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) Cancellation of assessment d. ( ) Revision of assessment Reason for the- request : Our "Ve5 'Thv /14,(z) * You will need to fill out a special form for deferral of assessment and provide the city verification of your income or disability. PROJECT NO. srfre 10/4-3"/O-4, ,- 1 /44/15= 15 J -Z 1 C3 j2EW b. �.- 4 /14d,1 AVE (print name) (signature) " (date) / 3/' � c cc'c ' C2.. - ) ` ' / l (address of property owner) telephone / Zip S ( ) Yes () No LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, P. A. AT'PORNEYS AT LAW April 29, 1998 Hopkins City Clerk Hopkins City Hall 1010 First Street South Hopkins, MN 55343 RE: Interlachen Park Special Assessments 235 Holly Road Dear City Clerk: Enclosed please find a completed "Assessment Hearing Appeal Form" with an attached Notice of Objection to Proposed Assessment. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 451 -1831. Very truly yours, Stephen II. Fochler SHF:cj Enclosures VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ROGER C. MILLER TIMOTHY J. KUNTZ DANIEL J. BEESON ROLLIN H. CRAWFORD KENNETH J. ROHLF TONETTA T. DOVE STEPHEN H. FOCHLER * JAY P. KARLOVICH ANGELA M. LUTZ AMANN KORINE L. LAND ANN C. O'REILLY * HAROLD LEVANDER 1910 -1992 633 SOUTH CONCORD STREET • SUITE 400 • SOUTH SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55075 • 612- 45 -1 $3 1 FAX: 612- 45 * ARTHUR GILLEN RETIRED * * ALSO ADMITTED IN NORTH DAKOTA c. ( (print name) 13 a' 1No/I ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 77 PO Address of Assessed Parcel 2 / What assessment does this concern ! st-, , tM (7/,,e. 7 5 5, 2 Property Identification Number: D___ t Li 0 0 Cancellation of assessment 51- €pc,tvt 1-1• (address of property owner) k (4; fl q Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? s v Yes ( ) No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one): a .( ) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) b. (___J *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) (signature) (date) ( ) ���- /78C d. ( ) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: .4c,cLeJ telephone Zip 5 • * You will need to fill out a special form for deferral of assessment and provide the city verification of your income or disability. 4'-Z8 -7? STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN In Re: Proposed Levy of Special Assessments Against 235 Holly Road, Hopkins, MN 55343 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS AND HOPKINS CITY CLERK. Notice is hereby given that the undersigned, as fee owners of the real property located at 235 Holly Road, Hopkins, MN 55343, objects to the proposed special assessment of their property for alleged street reconstruction and other improvements to Holly Road upon the following grounds: 1. The subject parcel has not derived any special benefit from the alleged improvements 2. The City has failed to obtain any before and after market value appraisal to sustain any assessment against the subject property. 3. The proposed criteria and method used to determine the assessments upon the subject property are not proper for the imposition of a special assessment, are not in accord with constitutional, statutory or municipal assessment policy requirements, and are, therefore, arbitrary and capricious, and thus, deprive the undersigned of property without due process of law, contrary to the requirements of the United States Constitution. 4. The proposed assessment is contrary to and violates Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. CITY OF HOP KINS FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT . NOTICE OF OBJECTION TO PROPOSED ASSESSMENT 5. The proposed assessment is arbitrary, capricious, 'confiscatory and unreasonable. 6. The proposed assessment does not result in any benefit, special or otherwise, to the subject property. -- 7. The subject property is not specifically benefitted by the improvements. 8. The subject property has not and will not increase in market value as a result of the improvements. 9. The public hearing in said assessment was not properly noticed in conformity with Minnesota Statutes 429.061 and 429.081. Dated: pr, i 2 t ir6 i Au ( 5 a ,141,,,__ Stephen H. Fochler Katherine C. Fochler 235 Holly Road Hopkins, MN. 55343 CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 98-25 ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT 97 -12 INTERLACHEN PARK STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the reconstruction of Preston Lane (Ashley Road to Interlachen Road), and Holly Road (from its terminus to Goodrich St.) as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 97 -12, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as may be amended and a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2 . Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1999, and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from May 5, 1998 until December 31, 1999. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest from one year on all unpaid installments. 3 . It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4 . To the extent that this improvement benefits non - abutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to • Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 5th day of May, 1998. ATTEST: reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5 . The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of the assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Terry Obermaier, City Clerk BY Charles D. Redepenning, Mayor • Appeals concerning Project 97 -12: City of Hopkins Memorandum Date: May 5, 1998 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: James Gessele, Engineering Supt. Subject: Assessment Appeals Interlachen Park Street Improvements In addition to the appeals found in the Council report concerning special assessments for Interlachen Park street improvements, the following appeals need consideration at the assessment hearing. 3. Address: 265 Holly Road Assessed Amount: $4,406.40 Appeal for senior citizen deferment and cancellation of assessment by reason that the project is unnecessary and will increase taxes. Recommendation: Deny appeal on basis that City conducted extensive pavement condition surveys to verify need of doing street reconstruction. Staff has attempted to contact resident concerning qualifications for senior citizen deferment but had no success. 4. Address: 1326 Preston Lane Assessed Amount: $4,472.00 Appeal for cancellation of assessment by reason that streets are in satisfactory condition and assessments are too high. Recommendation: Deny appeal on basis that City conducted extensive pavement condition surveys to verify need of doing street reconstruction and that reconstruction costs are more cost beneficial to the City than the option of maintaining a substandard street. • May 5, 1998 Page 2 5. Address: 1402 Preston Lane Assessed Amount: $4,483.18 Appeal for cancellation of assessment by reason that the project is perceived to be roadway repairs in general and resident does not understand why repairs are assessed in some cases and not in others. Recommendations: Deny appeal on basis that City has a well - established and clearly detailed roadway construction policy that defines overlay projects as repair /maintenance (non - assessed) and pavement removal /regrading /pavement replacement as reconstruction (assessed). Preston Lane at the appellant's address is being reconstructed. 6. Address: 1409 Preston Lane Assessed Amount: $4,511.13 Appeal for cancellation of assessment by reason that project is not needed, that the City did not maintain the street in 1997, and that assessment amounts are excessive. Recommendation: Deny appeal on basis that City conducted extensive pavement condition surveys to verify need of doing street project, that maintenance was not performed in 1997 only after it was determined that repairs or reconstruction were needed, and that reconstruction costs are more cost beneficial to the City than the option of maintaining a substandard street. 7. Address: 201 Holly Road Assessed Amount: $4,406.40 Appeal for cancellation of assessment, no reason given. Recommendation: Deny appeal. 8. Address: 1417 Preston Lane Assessed Amount: $4,511.13 Appeal for cancellation of assessment by reason the resident does not understand why the project is assessed in some cases and not in others and that the City did not maintain the street in 1997. Recommendation: Deny appeal on basis that City has a well- established and clearly detailed roadway construction policy that defines overlay projects as repair /maintenance (non - assessed) and pavement removal /regrading /pavement replacement as reconstruction (assessed), and that maintenance was not performed the previous year only after it was determined that repairs or reconstruction were needed. May 5, 1998 • Page 3 9. Address: 1517 Preston Lane Assessed Amount: $5,609.01 Appeal for cancellation of assessment by reason that assessments are excessively high and no benefits from the project are perceived. Recommendation: Deny appeal on basis that reconstruction costs are more cost beneficial to the City than the option of maintaining a substandard street and that benefit is deemed to be derived when a street of substandard condition is replaced and drainage characteristics enhanced. 10. Address: 1410 Preston Lane Assessed Amount: $4,505.54 Appeal for cancellation of assessment by reason that assessments are excessively high, that the street was not maintained the previous year, and resident perceives no benefit arising from project. Recommendation: Deny appeal on basis that reconstruction costs are more cost beneficial to the City than the option of maintaining a substandard street, that maintenance was not performed the previous year only after it was determined that repairs or reconstruction were needed, and that benefit is deemed to be derived when a street of substandard condition is replaced and drainage characteristics enhanced. 11. Address: 1418 Preston Lane Assessed Amount: $4,511.13 Appeal for cancellation of assessment by reason that no benefit is perceived, that street reconstruction is not necessary, and that street was not adequately maintained in last two years. Recommendation: Deny appeal on basis that benefit is deemed to be derived when a street of substandard condition is replaced and drainage characteristics enhanced, that the City conducted extensive pavement condition surveys to verify need of doing street reconstruction, and that maintenance was not performed the previous year only after it was determined that repairs or reconstruction were needed. May 5, 1998 Page 4 12. Address: 1319 Preston Lane Assessed Amount: $4,751.50 Appeal for cancellation of assessment by reason that sewer repairs are driving the need for rebuilding the street and the utility should fund the costs, that the street project is not necessary, and that there are no current drainage issues on Preston Lane. Recommendation: Deny appeal on the basis that the need for street reconstruction is the driving force behind the project and not the repair of sanitary sewer mains, that the City conducted extensive pavement condition surveys to verify need of doing street reconstruction, and that although there may be no ponded water on Preston Lane, the street's flat grade promotes wet base materials on the road's edge and thus edge cracking. • ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. .9'7- Address of Assessed Parcel ;6r-- What assessment does this concern S R 4'7 Property Identification Number: Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? ( ) Yes () No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one): a .( ) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) b. ( *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. Cancellation of assessment . d. ( ) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: 411, is‘ * You will need to fill out a special form for deferral of assessment and provide the city verification of your income or disability. (print name) API 2/2// (signature) (date) (jrza_) 7 6 to 5 (addresA o f property owner) P Y ) telephone zip f-3 ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 1 1-12- Address of Assessed Parcel 1 3Z. 6 2 t? R E-S ' o t4 C. r M C_ • What assessment does this concern l fvM e,4T c9 r WWCSi aN (flN C- Property Identification Number: 9- [ 1 7 q o 0 3 0 Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one): a .( ) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) b. ( ) *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. () Cancellation of assessment d. ( _._ ) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: 1 PA L 57 i s 012G: rt-' S6 C► O / Loup i Teo h) `c " 4s5 E S5 A't g A i S ,q = . 1-0 o 4-(-G14-1- * You will need to fill out a special form for deferral of assessment and provide the city verification of your income or disability. - -o�c� GLA I N e_ -k -LL45 (print name) (signature) (date) 1324 Pe4sT -0 LA4P - (address of property owner) �-PK t nt 5 t r1 t1 I } Yes ( ) No ( ‘/Z- 93g -'f3 - -- telephone zip 5534-3 ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. Address of Assessed Parcel fijO 7J172/s./ f..Ai What assessment does this concern %/ ‘ f f 4 Property Identification Number: Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? { Yes. () No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the councils to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one): a .( ) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) b. ( ) *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. () Cancellation of assessment d. ( ) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: * Yo will need to aese =sment and pro or disability. AY:121-- oruE (print name) /oo m/7 9/ tf..-- (si (address of property owner) tore fill out a special form for deferral of ide the city verification of your income M (date) ( 61?") /(9 telephone Zip N5 )(- ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 17 - J Address of Assessed Parcel //4 Pr'-yr /- What assessment does this concern ,fr b Vvwa.v ? r - s - h>-. f 1 7 t Property Identification Number: Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? ( )() Yes ( ) No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one): a .( ) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) b. ( - ) *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. () Cancellation of assessment d. ( - ) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: f le - z 4 pt k et * You will need to fill out a special form for deferral of assessment and provide the city verification of your income or disability. /7ve (print name) (signature) 0 Pres- /42.414- (address of property owner) /14 l ( f2) 0 7e , telephone zip 1 27 y nL 9? (date) ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO Address of Assessed Parcel c;? What assessment does this concern Property Identification Number: - / _ � Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? ( } Yes (!) No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one): a .( ) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) b. ( ) *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c Cancellation of assessment d. ( ) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: * You will need to fill out a special form for deferral of assessment and provide the city erification of your income or disability 0-63ar ioribe (print name) ' , 17 22) // (addre s of property ert owner) � F P Y • /71 (signatur date) ( (!z) G � Y/2-7 telephone Zip (5"3 q13 ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. Address of Assessed Parcel / ' /°7 PFi 7e) iv , J What assessment does this concern ' 7 if t E Property Identification Number: - 4-- 6 / 2- Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. i request that the City Council consider (check one): a .. ( ) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) c b. ( ) *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) Cancellation of assessment () Revision of assessment Reason for the request: / �. /V-S545= ,7W=E 9',"- ewe /Pa 7 )4 L( 7"9 71/b *itou will need to fill out a special form for deferral of assessment and provide the city verification of your income or disability. jg%i7' (signature) (date) An/ (A /2) R' addr ss of property owner) //-frK14/ (print name) ( ) Yes No telephone Zip 37 ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO Address of Assessed Parcel What assessment does this concern qtka9f Property Identification Number: - �L'I -�L Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? ( Yes () No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one): a .( ) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) b. () *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. ( - 4, Cancellation of assessment d. () Revision of assessment Reason for the request: .3‘ A-ca( * You will e = ; t' fill out a spe + ial form for deferral of assessment and provide the city verification of your income or disability. 7 ?)0-kr6Iva 11 1.1..Pri _:,<LkatIal,e_ 14)-7,(1/ (signature) (date) ( 5.\ rl?karvi t AhLiq. ( (42_,) 731-gf2A (address of property owner) telephone Zip 5-53' (print name) D4v\Sck.liutik vkJ - (-Op wcd ( be speck..t1er ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. i 1 ---i Address of Assessed Parcel PA,&72X3-7 114. What assessment does this concern Property Identification Number: 1 9 - ___1 1 - .? , .L Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one): a . ( ) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) b. ( ) *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. Cancellation of assessment d. ( ) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: You will need to fill out a special form for deferral of assessment and provide the city verification of your income or disability. t� i^./ /3r ra m C I , h AtCa /3 vea 'r (print name) 1/7 h ���� (address of property owner) 70 0 Yes ( ) No 965 /P," (date) o - el [ i telephone Zip l c 7" ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. - r , Address of Assessed Parcel l `f I What assessment does this concern Property Identification Number: :1_ C I - - i__ s;.>_ c) Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? (c) Yes ( ) No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one): a .( ) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) b. ( ) *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. ( ' Cancellation of assessment d. ( ) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: et✓ �,� erv/V 81.v..tk lyi,44 * You will need to fill out . a special fo for deferral of assessment and provide the city verification of your income or disability. tl 0 3 n4 (print name) (signature) (date) LCH ( q L/ o J (address of property owner) telephone Zip ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 9 - Address of Assessed Parcel Giq What assessment does this concern -(. J - ..— Property Identification Number: 9 LL7 -.2 ._ Do � 6 Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? ( ) Yes (1,2V No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one): a .( ) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) b. ( ) *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. (X) Cancellation of assessment d. ( ) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: * You wi need to fill out a specia form for deferral of assessment and provide the city verification of your income or disability. (signature) (da e) LL) (address of property owner) ,11n5 ( 6_ 12 ) 3S 181 (-1 telephone Zip X3`73